PodSearch

ATP

660: It’s All Chicken Salad

 

00:00:00   Um, so I took a vacation to visit Casey. If I'm honest, it was not entirely to visit Casey.

00:00:06   No, that was, that was a happy coincidence if we're honest with each other, but it worked

00:00:11   out well. Casey's there all the time, but there was something else that was there that made

00:00:14   you go now. Uh, yes. Uh, one of my, one of my new favorite bands, Goose was there playing

00:00:21   a couple of shows in Richmond. You know, it's one of the things where like I looked, I'm

00:00:24   like, I kind of want to see Goose's Falls looking at like where they're playing. And you know,

00:00:27   I like a good venue. I also like good seats. And I looked, I'm like, oh, they're playing

00:00:31   in Richmond. That's interesting. Uh, maybe I could fly down there and see Casey and see

00:00:35   Goose. And maybe I could even bring Casey to Goose. And then I looked, I'm like, I go, I

00:00:40   went on like, you know, one of the ticket resale sites and I'm like, let me see if I can get

00:00:43   tickets. And there were three tickets, basically like the best seats you could possibly have

00:00:49   in this venue. The first row of seats behind the general admission pit, but it's also like

00:00:56   elevated three feet above the pit. So you're just looking across the top of everybody.

00:01:01   You can be seated and be looking above the entire pit and you're perfectly centered, the

00:01:07   perfect distance from the stage to get all the light effects and everything. And I was

00:01:10   like, oh, I can't let these go. And like, and you know, they were like, maybe they were

00:01:14   pricey for Richmond, but they were not pricey for New York, if you know what I mean? So I

00:01:18   was like, oh yeah, this, this is a no brainer. I'm getting these tickets. So I've actually,

00:01:22   I asked Casey real quickly. I'm like, hey, by the way, are you free this night by any

00:01:25   chance? Yeah. Okay.

00:01:27   So I, we booked everything and, and Casey was first of all, an amazing host. Like, so I flew

00:01:36   in, flew in the day of the concert, like that morning, flew out the next day. Casey was basically

00:01:41   like my private driver. Like he drove me, he picked me up at the airport, dropped me off

00:01:45   the next day at the airport, drove everywhere. And he even brought me to get the, this is

00:01:51   how good of a friend Casey is. He brought me to a chicken salad place for lunch. Now, let

00:01:56   me be clear. This is not a place that serves chicken salad. This is a place that serves

00:02:01   only chicken salad, 12 different flavors of chicken salad. And you can pick and you can get

00:02:07   like, you know, one scoop of each one. And what a good friend Casey is. Like, that's amazing.

00:02:13   What kind of chicken salad did you get? I'm dying to know now.

00:02:16   So they, they had a bunch of different options. Casey got like a barbecue one that I sampled

00:02:20   and then I got like their classic. I want to know like, you know, what's the, what's the

00:02:23   their regular one. And I also got one that had like pineapple and stuff in it. It was fun.

00:02:27   You know, it's funny you say about the barbecue because I understand where you're coming from.

00:02:32   This is a chain called chicken salad chick. I think it's only in the Southeast US. Um, and

00:02:37   they do a couple of other things besides, besides chicken salad, but for all intents and purposes,

00:02:41   it's all chicken salad and they have something like 12 of them. I forget exactly how many we'll

00:02:45   put a link in the show notes, but, um, the, all of the it's chicken salad chick, right? So all of

00:02:49   the names are silly, like takes on girls' names, the Barbie think the doll with the letter Q

00:02:54   barbecue, get it? Barbie Q barbecue. Uh, I love that one. It is a very subtle barbecue flavor,

00:03:00   but anyone I know that has tried it has at the very least said, Oh, that's pretty good. I get why you

00:03:05   would go John, but truly it's, it's quite tasty. It doesn't look as barbecue as I thought. It's just

00:03:10   like barely pink. Yeah. You get, you get like a hint of the barbecue flavor, but it's not like

00:03:14   overwhelming. It's not just like a chicken salad doused in barbecue sauce. No, no, no, no, no. Then

00:03:19   Marco got the classic Carol and I forget what the other one was. Uh, fruity Fran. No, you didn't

00:03:24   have the only one that has pineapple. Yeah. It doesn't matter. But my perception of Marco is that

00:03:30   generally speaking, Marco would like something a little fancier than, than an equivalent to like

00:03:34   a Panera bread. But I was casting about thinking, where could I take Marco Arment for a, a meal that

00:03:41   would be quick and easy after he's traveled. And even though the travel I believe was relatively easy,

00:03:47   it's still travel. It's still tiring and whatnot. And I thought, Oh, this is a man who used to go for

00:03:52   chicken salad. What every other day, every day for lunch. Why are you avoiding saying that you're

00:03:56   trying to take him to a place that is, uh, like, uh, you know, uniquely Southern? Cause that seems

00:04:01   like what you did. I mean, that wasn't the, but that wasn't the, the, the impetus for it. The impetus

00:04:06   was this is a man who appreciates a chicken salad and let's get some chicken salad. I mean, your other,

00:04:10   your other choice, I guess would have been barbecue. Like you want to take him something,

00:04:12   something he can't get. Well, hold on. Just you wait. Funny you might. We did barbecue the next day

00:04:17   for lunch. Exactly. It sounded like a very healthy trip. It was amazing. The chicken salad wasn't

00:04:21   terrible. I'm sure it wasn't great, but it wasn't terrible. And barbecue is mostly protein.

00:04:25   They have red velvet cake too. He didn't, we didn't have red velvet cake though.

00:04:29   No, I wanted to fill up entirely on chicken salad. I'm like, I'm not going to have anything else

00:04:33   here. I'm not going to like, you know, I'm not going to waste a stomach space on like potato

00:04:36   salad or whatever. No, I'm going to have more chicken salad. Oh, they have egg salad too. Very

00:04:40   nice. Yeah. But like, that's, that's like going to a steakhouse and ordering the fish. It's

00:04:44   like, you can do it, but like, that's not really what it's for. I mean, the distance between

00:04:47   egg salad and chicken salad is not as far as the distance between a fish and steak. I think

00:04:51   maybe you're mostly eating mayonnaise in both cases. True. Anyway, regardless, even though

00:04:59   we had this amazing chicken salad place and the following day, amazing barbecue, that was

00:05:05   actually not the highlight of this trip. The highlight of this trip was the goose show.

00:05:11   It was incredible. It was so good. It was so good. On multiple levels. Like number one,

00:05:18   you know, I've only, there's only the second time I've seen them. It was, I would say the

00:05:22   second best concert I have ever seen. Like the number one best was fish at the sphere night

00:05:27   three that I went to. Um, that was, that was number one for me. This is number two. It was

00:05:32   that good of a show. Like goose puts on, and this is again, I've seen, I've seen them. I saw

00:05:37   them a year ago and that was also a great show, but they're even better now. Like they're,

00:05:41   they're getting refined and they're getting more time together and more, you know, a bigger

00:05:46   catalog. It was an amazing performance. It was an amazing show. They played so many of

00:05:51   my favorite songs, including some that they hardly ever play. So that was very, uh, very

00:05:56   rewarding. And all of that was topped off by the topper that Casey seemed to really enjoy

00:06:04   it. Now some backstory here, you know, the listeners might recall Casey and I often have

00:06:10   some debates about whether his band, uh, Mr. Dave Matthews, uh, is considered a jam band

00:06:17   or not. And so I thought, well, goose is unquestionably a jam band. So let me, let me

00:06:23   bring, I knew Casey probably couldn't handle fish on his first try. Um, unless maybe I slipped

00:06:30   him some gummies and, you know, then anybody could enjoy it, but like, you know, but I

00:06:37   figured like, you know, an, an unadorned Casey, uh, probably would not go right from Dave to

00:06:43   fish. Like that's a big jump. Goose has a lot closer to mainstream appeal compared to fish.

00:06:49   Um, and so I thought this is a good like step into my musical world. Maybe, I thought maybe

00:06:55   Casey would enjoy it and it would at least show him like, when I say that Dave Matthews is,

00:07:00   is kind of a jam band, but not really like this is kind of what I'm comparing to is like, this

00:07:06   is definitely a jam band. And maybe, maybe I thought maybe this would allow him to just

00:07:11   like mildly appreciate the difference, but instead like days before the trip, Casey was

00:07:17   like listening to a bunch of goose, like in preparation for the show and getting really

00:07:23   into it. And I'm like, Oh boy, this, this could really become like an actual fan here. Uh, and

00:07:30   not only was Casey visibly happy during the show, he was moving more than I was now granted,

00:07:39   you know, this is still like me doing my like, you know, white guy at a jam band dancing, you

00:07:44   know, it's like, let's not get carried away with what I mean by moving here. It's pretty

00:07:50   limited. No hard. Same on that. But yes, I'm, I'm with you. I'm with you to, to, to have,

00:07:55   to have brought you to this, to have forced you to go listen to this, this band that you

00:08:00   probably didn't think you would enjoy. Uh, I mean, that's not entirely true, but finish it off.

00:08:05   And then, and then to see you get super into it and seem to really enjoy it, uh, was incredibly

00:08:12   heartening. And it was, it was a wonderful trip for lots of reasons. You know, that Casey was amazing

00:08:18   as a friend and as a chauffeur. And I got to spend a lot of time with his family and that was really

00:08:22   nice. Uh, and of course the music was really nice, but to also, you know, expand the fandom of one of

00:08:29   my favorite bands into somebody who I would describe as maybe a light skeptic of the genre

00:08:34   was really quite special. No, I appreciate it. I was very glad you came down. Um, it was a semi

00:08:41   last second thing. And the funny thing about it is it was whatever the recording we did right before I

00:08:46   left for Memphis, you had kind of, what is the term or phrase like floated the trial balloon or

00:08:51   whatever. And said, Hey, you know, goose is a thing. It's coming to Richmond. Maybe we should

00:08:54   do it. And I'll say, okay, yeah, sure. I'm sure it would be fine. And then as I'm trying to get to

00:08:58   the airport, you're like, Hey, let's do it. Let's buy tickets. Let's go. And you weren't doing

00:09:02   anything wrong, but I'm in, I'm like trying to get to the airport. And I'm like, okay, fine. Sure.

00:09:05   Great. Whatever. Okay. Yeah. Yeah. And, uh, and I'm sure it was at the time I'm like, I'm sure

00:09:09   it'll all work out. It'll be great. Uh, and so I go to Memphis, I do my thing. I come back from

00:09:12   Memphis. I'm like, all right, now I got to do my deep dive on goose. And I had heard a little bit

00:09:16   of their stuff in the past. Like, you know, the algorithm had pushed a song or two here and there

00:09:20   and I, I liked it. It was fine. It was good. Uh, I liked it. And, uh, I generally just really love

00:09:27   live music. I don't have the occasion to go see live music very often, but it, I, as I said to you

00:09:32   probably 15 times over the couple of, or the really 24 hours you were here, you know, if you put me at a

00:09:37   fish show, as much as I joke, as much as I give you a hard time about it, I bet you, I would enjoy it.

00:09:41   I might leave it and say, that was fun. I don't need to do it again. But at the time I think I

00:09:46   would enjoy a fish concert. And I figured it would be like that with goose, maybe a little bit better,

00:09:50   but as it turns out, these four dudes are unbelievably freaking good. And now I've basically

00:09:57   listened to nothing but goose ever since, uh, I'm ruined. I'm ruined forever. Um, it is, it is really

00:10:03   quite incredible. And the show was phenomenal. And we went with a friend of mine and it was great to

00:10:07   have two fans literally on either side of me. And I cannot thank Marco enough, not only for

00:10:13   buying these tickets in, in annoyingly, but also courteously refusing pay a payment for them,

00:10:17   but truly granted, this is a very small amphitheater in Richmond, Virginia. This may not be helpful to

00:10:22   anyone else, but I tell you what the seats Marco chose as they were perfect. They were absolutely

00:10:28   perfect. And it was such an unbelievable privilege and treat not only to be, to be there with Marco and

00:10:33   my new friend Tyler, but also they, these seats were just incredible and the concert was incredible.

00:10:37   And what's great about these kinds of bands, jam bands or what have you, is that the next day,

00:10:42   their, their entire concert from the soundboard was available on band camp. We'll link the show.

00:10:47   Uh, you can download it for, you know, 10 plus dollars if you want, which is what we did.

00:10:51   And it's incredible. And then, uh, they also simulcast video. So, uh, if you happen to know a guy who's

00:10:58   good with command line tools as maybe Marco does, um, you can get a one month subscription to nugs.net

00:11:06   and you G S I think it is about net. Um, and you might be able to, I don't know, archive something

00:11:13   on nugs.net if you, uh, try hard enough. So, uh, that means, uh, hypothetically one could have an

00:11:19   entire video recording of this incredible concert. So it was a really great 24 hours. It was too quick.

00:11:25   I don't fault you for the time you spent here. I don't fault you for not making like a week long

00:11:30   trip out of it, but it was great because at the end of the trip, I thought, damn, that was great.

00:11:34   I hope we get to do that again soon. And that's the right way to leave a vacation or trip or whatever

00:11:38   you want to call it. But, uh, but thank you again, Marco, for being such a wonderful person to hang

00:11:43   out with for 24 straight hours. It was really great. And you had, and you had my favorite barbecue

00:11:47   joint in town, ZZQ. And I like to think that went pretty well.

00:11:51   Oh, it was amazing. And I think the best part of it all is that because I know Minecraft,

00:11:55   I was able to talk Minecraft to Casey's son and that, and because Casey does not play Minecraft,

00:12:04   that made me the coolest person in the world. And that, in that moment, I, I, I know enough

00:12:10   Minecraft to have a conversation with him and I, I understand the general gist of it, but I certainly

00:12:15   do not have anywhere near the experience that Marco does. And so again, speaking of trial balloons,

00:12:20   I think Declan kind of threw up a trial balloon to see kind of whether or not Marco would bite.

00:12:25   And because Marco's a good person, he did the kindness of biting. And then it was basically like,

00:12:30   okay, let's talk Minecraft. So it was one of those situations where like Declan, come on,

00:12:36   I need you to go do this or we need to go do that. I forget exactly what the situation was, but

00:12:40   we got to go to the concert. I need you to wrap it up big guy. Cause he was overjoyed to talk your

00:12:46   ear off, which was both adorable and also kind of funny. At least they didn't ask you to install

00:12:49   any mods. That'll come in the next visit. I don't know how you two have managed to avoid that.

00:12:53   I'm sure. Just give us time. It'll happen. It's too late for Marco probably.

00:12:57   Very true. But no, it was, it was really great. And you know what? I was starting to go down this

00:13:02   path. I got myself sidetracked, but again, I love live music, even shows that I don't think I would

00:13:07   enjoy. I ended up typically enjoying because I just love watching live music. And it,

00:13:10   in, I don't believe in reincarnation, but if reincarnation were a thing, I want to come

00:13:14   back as a musician, not even a good one, not even a popular one, just someone that could actually play

00:13:18   music. And I, I just am, I am in awe at the amount of sound. I said noise, I think on Friday nights,

00:13:26   because I couldn't find a better word for it, but, and I didn't mean it in a pejorative way,

00:13:29   but the amount of sound that came from four guys, it was just unreal. And I don't know if Goose is,

00:13:35   and you're, you know, anyone's particular cup of tea, if you're listening to this. Um, but

00:13:40   if you are willing to just let a song really and truly air out in a way that even a Dave Matthews

00:13:46   fan would be like, Whoa, they really aired that one out. Um, it, it really is incredible. And I,

00:13:52   I really do recommend their stuff. They have plenty of stuff on Apple music and I presume on Spotify as

00:13:56   well. Uh, but I ended up leaving that show very, very much a fan. And I was getting to the point that

00:14:01   I was a fan by the time I walked in, but I was very much a fan leaving that show and they really are

00:14:07   incredible. And I think Marco had said to me during, during the show, which was to, I know

00:14:12   we're going on long. I apologize, but I can't help myself. Uh, there was a set break in the middle of

00:14:16   the, of the, of the show. So they played like hour, hour and a half. And then I had a set break for all

00:14:20   the old dudes to go pee, which the three old dudes went and did. And it was incredible, but we're

00:14:24   talking to 6,000 other old. Right. Exactly. We're talking during the set break. And I, and I think

00:14:29   Marco had said to me, uh, you know, what's incredible about Goose is it's clear that they are on the

00:14:33   rise and we are catching them on the early end of that. And I think from what I can tell, that's very

00:14:38   much true. So if you want to get on the ground floor or nearly the ground floor, now's the time.

00:14:42   Yeah. Go, go see them while they're still playing medium sized venues sometimes. Cause like, you know,

00:14:47   they, they've already sold out Madison Square Garden. Like they're, they're on their way up.

00:14:51   It's going to, it's going to become the, the venues are going to get larger over time and the tickets

00:14:56   will become more scarce and more expensive. And yeah, this is, it's very special to be able to see them

00:15:01   like in a small venue or small, medium sized venue like this. And, uh, and to be able to get those

00:15:05   seats was incredible. Um, and it's funny, like, and there was, there was a point like in the second

00:15:10   set, they went, I would say in jam band terms, um, a little more atmospheric, maybe like the second set

00:15:18   was a little more exploratory and there was some like, you know, kind of, you know, discordant sections

00:15:23   that they were playing around with. And I, I kind of look at Casey, I'm like, okay, this is,

00:15:27   this was a bit challenging for a non jam band person. Like I'm like kind of gauging, like what's,

00:15:32   how is he taking this part? And like, and he got through it and I'm like, okay. I'm like,

00:15:37   if he can get through that, I think he's ready for fish next.

00:15:42   All right. Pump the brakes there. Big shoots. We'll see. We'll see. I don't know. It's probably

00:15:46   only a matter of time, but no goose from, to my ears, goose is like, and you said this starting

00:15:51   the segment goose is considerably more approachable and less esoteric. Now maybe fast forward

00:15:55   for two years, maybe I'll have a totally different opinion, but sitting here now, that's how I would

00:15:59   describe it. But again, thank you for facilitating, for making it happen, for, uh, dealing with me

00:16:04   kind of like half paying attention to you as you're trying to book tickets as I'm on the way to the

00:16:08   airport. Um, and again, for purchasing the tickets because they truly hand, hand on heart. I cannot

00:16:14   think of a better place to stand in that venue than where we were standing. We were incredibly lucky.

00:16:18   So thank you much, Lee. Let's do it again. Absolutely.

00:16:21   All right. Uh, let's do some fun stories, uh, in recognition corner. Uh, Richard Ernie was,

00:16:28   uh, recognized in an ATP pixel shirt upon arriving in a place in Scotland. We'll get to that in a second.

00:16:33   We talked about this last week. Uh, Matt Smith wrote in and said, I was that person that records

00:16:38   recognized the guy in Scotland. And apparently I just absolutely murdered the pronunciation of this

00:16:44   city. I am happy to make an attempt, but John, would you like to instruct me on the correct

00:16:48   pronunciation options, please? This shades a little bit into, you did pronounce it weirdly.

00:16:52   And this, this shades a little bit into the discussion I had in rec tips about like,

00:16:55   do you pronounce, uh, the name of a place in the native language of the place? But here's the thing.

00:17:01   The native language of Scotland is ostensibly English or the most common language in Scotland.

00:17:06   Right. For a loose definition. It's very much English different.

00:17:11   Right. Okay. But so that's, that's like, all right. So yeah, the example is a rectif is like

00:17:15   Paris. We say Paris, but French people don't say Paris. They say Perry or whatever. Right. Uh,

00:17:20   and are we pronouncing it wrong when we say Paris? No. Cause that's how you say the capital city of

00:17:25   France in English. So how do you say this city in Scotland? Should we say it in a Scottish accent or

00:17:34   should we not? And what is the, what is the quote unquote, like American English way to say

00:17:38   this city? So you didn't say you, you just pronounce it phonetically, right?

00:17:42   What I've heard in the United States is one of the pronunciations that a Scottish person will tell

00:17:48   you was just wrong. They'll say it's not Edinburgh, like a borough of New York city. There are five

00:17:53   boroughs, right? Edinburgh. That's the Scottish person will say, nope, wrong. You don't have it.

00:17:58   I'm like, well, that's not how you pronounce it, but I do hear that a lot in the U S. But anyway,

00:18:03   going by what Scottish people say, and I looked this up and tried to find some reasonable

00:18:06   pronunciations, I found a funny one from someone saying here's three valid pronunciations, uh, which

00:18:12   like based on how much of a hurry you're in, how much of you just swallow up the word. So one is

00:18:18   Edinburgh where it's B U H R U H borough Edinburgh. If you're even more in more of a hurry, you can say

00:18:25   Edinburgh. Now the borough becomes bruh Edinburgh. Bruh. And if you're really in a hurry and you're

00:18:31   native scholars, you can say Embra. Yeah. And now I'm not saying these with a Scottish accent,

00:18:36   so maybe they sound weird, but anyway, Edinburgh, they definitely sound weird. And borough sounds to

00:18:40   me like a Scottish way of saying borough, but I guess not. I can't, we can't say Edinburgh. So we'll

00:18:45   say Edinburgh and there you have it. So we'll just kind of make sure we say Melbourne and Edinburgh or

00:18:51   Embra. Anyway, it's definitely not Edinburgh. And Casey, you said Edinburgh, which is definitely wrong.

00:18:56   Yeah. I don't know where that came from. That, that, that is lunacy. I will be the first to fall on my

00:19:00   sword about that one. That was lunacy, but you're just pronouncing it fanatically, which is fine,

00:19:04   but that's, you know, yeah. I, I, after college, I moved to Pittsburgh and then continuing in

00:19:11   recognition corner, uh, Santiago Hervella writes long time listener, first time caller in day one

00:19:16   overcast user writing in on episode 659. You told the story about how Mark Christian was wearing an ATP

00:19:20   shirt in Manhattan when they were tapped by some nerd who showed them their overcast app currently

00:19:24   listening to ATP. That was me. I'm that nerd. Mark was very gracious when he thought I was just

00:19:28   grabbing his attention for something. And even more so when I showed him my phone screen,

00:19:31   it was hilarious to hear you describe that interaction while I was walking to the office,

00:19:34   not two blocks from that same spot.

00:19:35   I got this. ATP is becoming a misconnection for nerds.

00:19:39   Yeah. I saw you on the, the, the subway and you were listening to a nerdy podcast and I said,

00:19:44   hi, but then I didn't get your number.

00:19:46   That's great. Love it.

00:19:47   Make some love connections here.

00:19:48   All right. Let's talk AirPods three and, uh, particularly the ear lottery.

00:19:54   Michael writes, I had the same AirPods pro three experiences, Marco. And I also ordered

00:19:58   the AirPods pro two again. I can keep them in my ear all day for getting the there. I spent two

00:20:02   weeks trying to get the AirPods pro three working for me. It was okay initially, but it started to

00:20:06   hurt quickly. Uh, Franklin Delno Stallone writes, I had the same issues market with new AirPods,

00:20:11   but it went away in just about over a week. Uh, so I've either stretched out my ears or a level

00:20:17   of earwax on the AirPods has helped. AirPods would always be a bit of a pain for me when I clean

00:20:21   them fully. So there's possibly something there, but while the noise canceling is better, I kind

00:20:25   of wish they'd go back to the old style. Matthew Schaefer writes, my wife has had airpod pro two

00:20:30   since around the time they were released. She said they don't cancel noise very well.

00:20:34   It's made my ears perk up because pretty much everyone agrees that the ANC is very good.

00:20:38   So I had her stand next to a running fan and switch the ANC off and on. And she said there was

00:20:42   really wasn't much of a difference. She could hear the fan just fine. This was shocking to me.

00:20:45   Apparently she just thought her experience was normal this whole time.

00:20:48   I had her put in my brand new AirPods pro threes and her words exactly were that's approximately

00:20:53   5,000 times better. AirPods pro two didn't fit in her ears, regardless of which tips she used.

00:20:59   I had no clue this whole time that they're, they've been working about as good as cheap

00:21:03   non ANC earbuds. Obviously I went out and bought her some AirPods pro threes right then and there.

00:21:08   Finally, Michael Gock writes for me, the AirPods pro three were slightly uncomfortable. I ended up

00:21:12   going up in tip size. They didn't go in as far, excuse me, they don't go in as far and they're

00:21:16   great. Now you mentioned trying smaller sizes, but did you try the larger ones?

00:21:19   So interestingly, so this, when Michael said this, I kind of stuck in my brain. I had literally shipped

00:21:26   them off to be returned that morning.

00:21:29   Oh no.

00:21:29   You're so hasty to throw out your non-working keyboards and return your AirPods.

00:21:33   You gotta chill a little. At least wait one week for follow-up.

00:21:35   Well, I was, I didn't want to like hit the two week deadline.

00:21:39   Um, so I'm like that, that's annoying. And then there were like, there were these YouTubers

00:21:44   who were like, well, if you, if you angle them differently, like, you know, cause what direction

00:21:49   are the stems pointing? Most people it's somewhere between straight down and straight, like, you

00:21:56   know, 40 or 90 degrees forward. And it turns out a lot of people were saying like, if you

00:22:01   angle them too far down, they fit wrong basically, or they fit less comfortably for a lot of people.

00:22:06   What you're supposed to do apparently with the threes is angle them. So the stems basically

00:22:11   form a line towards your mouth.

00:22:13   So, so, so on that theory, we've all, I think we've all seen people with AirPods of many different

00:22:18   generations with those stems pointing in every direction imaginable.

00:22:22   Yeah.

00:22:22   Sometimes in just ridiculous directions, you're like, there's no way those are in right. Like,

00:22:27   but hearing all the things about how, from like the doctors about how the inside of our ear

00:22:31   canals go off in all sorts of weird directions. I do wonder if it's just like, I mean, the whole

00:22:36   reason there's the ear lotteries, like everyone's ears are a little bit different. And so for

00:22:39   some people, maybe, maybe the, when we see them with like the, the stems pointing like

00:22:44   up at an angle and out away from their head, like antennas or something, maybe that's how

00:22:48   their ear is shaped and that's the best position for them. Or maybe they just don't know how

00:22:51   to use ear pods. I, I don't know, but like, I, I do feel like that there is a huge amount

00:22:56   of variability in what the correct angle is for you. I know which video you're talking about.

00:22:59   Oh, point it towards your mouth. If that works for you, great. But I feel like the lesson

00:23:02   is try that thing pointing in different directions because who knows which direction will work

00:23:07   for your weird ears.

00:23:09   Yeah. So between those videos and between Michael, Michael's, um, post here, like kind of infecting

00:23:16   my brain, like I didn't, I tried to ever, I tried the default medium and everything smaller.

00:23:21   I didn't actually try the large tips. So I'm like, you know what? Fine. Amazon could deliver

00:23:26   me a pair the next morning. Oh, here we go. I've been testing them out with the large tips

00:23:31   and with them pointing towards my mouth instead of a little bit further down.

00:23:35   They are a lot more comfortable that way. Oh, look at that. That's awesome. Comfortable enough

00:23:41   for you to keep them though? I think so. In reality, they are better in a few ways I do care

00:23:47   about. Like they do sound better. They don't sound massively better, but they do sound better.

00:23:53   You know, as, as mentioned, you know, in the past, like, you know, the bass is a little

00:23:55   bit better. The treble is a decent amount better. Um, the soundstage is a bit wider. Like, you

00:24:00   know, they do sound better and they do isolate better during noise canceling mode. Um, almost

00:24:05   too well for like walking around actually. But you know, there's lots of other times when

00:24:08   you want to use them. So like, I think overall they are better. Um, the water resistance is

00:24:16   better. You know, like there's lots of things about them that are better. Um, so I want them

00:24:19   to work for me ultimately with the largest ear tips and with the mangled towards my mouth,

00:24:25   they fit comfortably enough that so far, I mean, I haven't tried them for more than like

00:24:30   two hours straight. Um, but for two hours straight, I was able to wear them and it was fine. And

00:24:34   that was not the case with the smaller ear tips ever, um, at all. So I've now gotten to

00:24:40   the point where they are fine. Um, the twos are still more comfortable, uh, but the threes

00:24:46   are now good enough with these modifications. So I can keep them. I'm still not sure that

00:24:52   I will keep them because the twos are easier and better for me. Um, but I probably will keep

00:24:58   them now. We'll see.

00:24:58   So wait till you build up some of your wax.

00:25:00   Yeah.

00:25:01   All right. And then with regard, uh, further regard to active noise cancellation, don't Tony

00:25:07   Denki writes, I use the AirPods pro three on a recent long haul seven 87 flight and compared

00:25:11   them to the Bose quiet comfort ultra over ear headphones. The AirPods pro three were massively

00:25:16   better than the ultras. I was amazed. Combine that with the lighter, less vibration noise

00:25:20   risk from contact with a hard surface in the seat. The AirPods pro three, one battery life

00:25:24   was seriously impressive too.

00:25:26   That is a very real thing. If you've ever been on a plane, especially if you have the window

00:25:29   seat, like I always try to have. And if you were wearing over your headphones and

00:25:33   you touch the outside of the case of those headphones to the wall of the plane, Oh yeah.

00:25:37   It's a bad news. And that's a much less likely to happen. You've got a tiny earbud in.

00:25:41   Yeah. I mean the, the noise cancellation is so much better on the threes. Um, and it was

00:25:46   all like the twos were already good enough that I would use them on planes because again, like

00:25:50   the, the bag space savings are just so big that it was always worth it to me. Um, and then

00:25:56   the threes take it even further. And so I think like, as long as the threes can be comfortable

00:26:02   for you, I don't see much reason for, for most people to get the giant headphones anymore. Like

00:26:09   if you are getting them for noise cancellation on planes or during work or during walking around

00:26:13   or whatever, again, if the, if the pros threes are comfortable enough for you, I think they're

00:26:18   better than the over your headphones for most people, most of the time.

00:26:21   And then apparently Marco, you've done a little bit of an experiment. Yes, I did too.

00:26:25   Oh, cool. I'd love to. So, uh, I, a bunch of people keep kept asking me like, Hey, have

00:26:31   you seen the, have you done the live translation with the new AirPods? Like regular people in

00:26:34   my life, like people like in stores and stuff, friends, like people who don't follow the tech

00:26:38   that closely, but they've heard about that. And they don't know they can probably do them

00:26:41   with their own AirPods. Yeah, exactly. So yeah. Number one thing to know again, if people

00:26:45   in your life are asking you about the live translation feature, keep in mind that it's, it doesn't

00:26:49   require the pro threes. It also works on the pro twos and the AirPods four with noise cancellation.

00:26:54   So if you have either of those models, you already have access to live translation, download

00:26:59   Apple's translation app. If you don't already have it. And there's a whole tab, you know,

00:27:02   a live conversation tab. So I've actually tried this now. Um, we had a, uh, a staff party for

00:27:07   the restaurant and we had some chefs who speak Spanish. And so we tried it out like Spanish to

00:27:12   English. I downloaded the model. So it should be like maximum speed. Uh, we had our server,

00:27:17   you know, speaking, uh, in English and we had a chef speaking in Spanish and we had them

00:27:21   kind of gauge like, you know, how accurate it was. It was okay. Like, so number one thing

00:27:27   is like, it is a little bit awkward when no one's done it before or seen it before. Like

00:27:31   you got to be like, Oh wait, who, who holds the phone? Where do I face it? Who's looking

00:27:34   at what do I speak? Does it speak to me? Like, so getting all that worked out is, is, you know,

00:27:39   it takes some doing. Um, and then the, the, the Spanish option, it's like, it's Spanish

00:27:45   parentheses, Spain. So this is like Spanish as speaking as spoken in Spain. It varies

00:27:51   a lot, you know, as from like Spanish in other regions and languages and cultures and everything

00:27:55   like that. And so, and I, I didn't say anything about that, but like within the first two sentences,

00:28:01   our chef who was looking at the transition, he's like, this is Spain Spanish. Like he knew

00:28:06   instantly. It was like, this is not what we speak in the kitchen. This is, this is a Spain

00:28:11   thing. This is very different. Um, so he instantly called it out. Um, but overall, like it was good

00:28:17   enough to get the gist of what people are saying. It's not perfect by any means. It missed a lot

00:28:23   of things. It missed a lot of, you know, nuance. It missed a lot of like, you know, idioms, slang,

00:28:27   like it missed a lot of that stuff, but it did communicate the gist of what was being said.

00:28:33   It was not super reliable. It was not super graceful and it was not super fast,

00:28:38   but it did work. And so it, and I tested it a second time when I brought it, uh, earlier today,

00:28:46   I brought it to another place where some friends work and they tried it with one of their people

00:28:50   who speak Spanish and one of their people who speaks English into the same thing and basically

00:28:55   had exactly the same result. Like it's a little awkward. No one knows what to do quite, you know,

00:29:00   at first, but then you try it and it's like, okay, that's kind of the gist of what I said.

00:29:04   And, you know, and it's slow. Um, so I think it is going to be the kind of thing that like it,

00:29:10   it will be useful in a pinch, certainly while traveling. If you've got to work something out

00:29:14   with somebody, um, it's not like nat very natural and conversational. Like you have to speak pretty

00:29:20   slowly. You have to speak pretty loudly for it to hear you or hear the other person correctly.

00:29:24   Again, like it is slow and awkward when people are not used to it. Um, so it's the kind of thing that

00:29:29   I can see being about as useful as like Google translate has always been. And it's the kind of

00:29:34   thing that I can definitely see Apple's version being fine, but Google and maybe open AI probably do a

00:29:43   much better job of this. Um, and certainly as we go into the future, I can see Apple's version staying

00:29:48   exactly the way it is now and Google and open AI's versions being a lot better overall. So I'm glad

00:29:55   this tech exists. It's very impressive. Um, but it's not quite as natural as what everybody might assume

00:30:00   or want it to be. And I don't expect Apple's going to be the best company to do this long-term.

00:30:05   Now, very quick question. Were you basically a passive, uh, viewer for like, or, or listener in

00:30:11   this? Like you weren't doing any of the talking. Yes. Oh, and that was still supported. It's just

00:30:16   whatever it hears it's bringing in and doing its thing. Well, I was like, you know, the, the listener

00:30:21   was wearing my AirPods and holding my phone. Oh, okay. I gotcha. Okay. I was watching and like,

00:30:26   and kind of telling people cause they would ask, wait, do I talk? I say, no, you talk, you listen.

00:30:30   Like I was, I was kind of telling them what to do. I see. Okay. You know, cause they didn't really

00:30:33   know. Um, but so it's, it's, it's a cool feature. Um, it's not going to revolutionize communication

00:30:42   any more than Google translate does, but that's not nothing. Like that's pretty useful in a lot

00:30:47   of cases. So I think it'll be, it'll be a great like casual travel aid. Um, but you know, not going

00:30:54   to, it's not going to be as seamless as it was in the commercial. Gotcha. All right, John, you said

00:30:59   you also tested it. Yeah. I wish I had saved some of these things. Uh, first of all, I, I don't

00:31:03   don't even remember if we, if this follow-up ever made it into one of the episodes, but

00:31:06   someone had sent this thing that saying that Apple's live translation, despite the translate

00:31:11   app, having like the option of like, Oh, we'll go to the server for this, but we'll download

00:31:14   these models while blah, supposedly the AirPods live translation only ever uses local models

00:31:19   for some privacy reason. That's if true. And it seems like it was based on that link that

00:31:23   I can no longer find that we may or may not have talked about in the past episode. Uh, that

00:31:27   is going to hold Apple back because obviously the models that run on the server can be way

00:31:30   better than anything very locally. Now, obviously you have more latency when you go to the server,

00:31:33   but if you have a really good network connection that can be alleviated, especially since it

00:31:37   seems like most of the time you're waiting for the model to compute the result. And maybe

00:31:40   a server could actually even be faster there. If you can get the audio up to it or the whatever

00:31:45   text up to it as fast as possible, depending on what it's doing. Um, anyway, when this came

00:31:50   out, like when, when it was first available, I tried it, but I didn't have anyone to speak

00:31:55   another language with. So I tried to give it like what I felt like was a really challenging

00:31:58   scenario where I'm going to sit in front of my computer screen and I'm going to pull

00:32:04   up a Spanish speaking YouTube channel. And that, that YouTube channel is not doing like

00:32:09   what you're being coached by a Marco and trying to speak in non idiomatic, uh, very simple sentences

00:32:15   to get your point across slowly and clearly. Right. This was just, you know, rapid fire real,

00:32:21   like a YouTuber, but in Spanish. Um, and I was amazed that as far as I could tell it again,

00:32:29   it got the gist of it. I can't judge the translation cause I don't speak Spanish, but looking at,

00:32:34   because it shows you both of them looking at like what it thinks the Spanish is and then

00:32:37   what the English is. I can't tell you whether the English is a correct reflection of the Spanish,

00:32:40   but I can tell you the Spanish was looking kind of like what they were saying. I was amazed

00:32:44   that it worked at all, honestly, because this is not a real person. It's a computer screen

00:32:48   playing out of the computer speakers. I'm wearing AirPods. Uh, and yeah, there is a delay, but

00:32:53   I was impressed that it did anything. I've heard people report. We had some feedback. Some people

00:32:57   said I tried it, uh, had these two people tried, somebody spoke and the thing just didn't do

00:33:02   anything. Like it didn't, it didn't, it didn't start translating at all. Like as with any of the

00:33:06   stuff in iOS 26 or any of this new stuff, there are definitely bugs. And I can imagine scenarios where

00:33:12   it just falls on its face and doesn't think there's anything that's supposed to translate

00:33:15   or can't understand it at all. Again, Marco mentioned the various different dialects of

00:33:19   Spanish. There are enough of them and they're different enough from each other, including

00:33:22   not just the pronunciation, but the actual words and everything about them can change in ways that

00:33:26   can thwart the model. So, uh, Apple has added more languages and hopefully they'll add more like,

00:33:31   uh, localizations of different kinds of Spanish. Um, even within Spain, there's, there's just plenty

00:33:36   of different kinds of Spanish within the regions, but it is impressive that it works at all.

00:33:40   It's again, it's not really an AirPods feature. It's really just a feature of your phone that

00:33:43   it's connecting to the AirPods, which is fine. Uh, but I was impressed that it was able to do a

00:33:47   YouTube video. Like I could, I could probably watch the YouTube video and honestly, it would be better

00:33:51   if I just turned on the auto generated English subtitles to the YouTube video, because I can

00:33:55   imagine Google doing a server side is still better, but, um, it was neat.

00:33:58   We are sponsored this episode by open case, a patented iPhone case with a literal open space

00:34:05   in the back of the case to make MagSafe accessories work a lot better. So here's how this works.

00:34:10   The open case, it has like a big oval hole in the back where the MagSafe accessories go,

00:34:16   things like wallets and whatever else. And the great thing about this is like, you know,

00:34:19   when we, you know, with magnets, we talked about like the sandwich squishing force. I forget how

00:34:23   I put it, like the sliding force. If you try to pull a magnet off the back of the case, like straight

00:34:28   off, it's hard to pull it off. But if you slide it, it's a lot easier. So what the open case does

00:34:33   is it gives a space for the like wallet or whatever back there to stay in the middle and

00:34:38   it blocks it from sliding easily, which means a couple of things. Number one, it's just thinner

00:34:44   overall. Cause you, you know, you're not, you're not putting your wallet or whatever on top of the

00:34:48   case. It's just going directly against the phone. But the main thing is it makes it really hard for

00:34:53   it to fall off in everyday use. So it's much more secure. You don't have like your wallet constantly

00:34:58   popping off the back of your phone. It also, you know, because it has this big cutout,

00:35:02   it's also just a nice minimal, you know, case. Like you still get the protection around the edges,

00:35:06   where it really matters around the corners and everything around the camera. But overall you

00:35:11   save bulk, you save weight and you have, you know, a big window. But if you're not using a MagSafe

00:35:17   accessory to see like the color of your phone, you get the nice new orange phone. You want to see that

00:35:21   color, right? You can see the beauty of the phone. You can see the Apple logo, all that stuff. So

00:35:24   it's nice. So open case, it's a great option for cases. There's no like vendor lock in or anything.

00:35:30   You know, you don't have to buy their accessories. Everything fits in there that reasonably can,

00:35:34   but it's a great option. I really think honestly, I'm going to order one and try it because it looks

00:35:39   pretty cool. And I'm always looking for a good case and this was a great one. So you can see for

00:35:43   yourself by going to the open case.com. It's the open case, the open case.com use promo code ATP

00:35:51   for 10% off. That's the open case.com promo code ATP for 10% off. Thanks to open case for sponsoring our

00:35:59   show.

00:35:59   All right. With regard to last week's ask ATP question about filling SSD and particularly iPhone

00:36:09   storage, David Schaub writes, my iPhone 8 got full once resulting in a reboot loop whenever springboard

00:36:14   loaded. Yikes. The solution, accept a call from the lock screen, add a person, type in the passcode,

00:36:21   control center, try and change the wifi, go into wifi settings. And then once in your, once you're in

00:36:26   settings, delete all the things, uh, never let the David continues, never let an iPhone have less

00:36:31   than about five gigs of free space. Why does iOS let you fly so close to the sun recovery should have a

00:36:37   boot directly to settings option. Don't make the phones angry. They don't like it. Nope. Uh,

00:36:43   additionally, with regard to phones, uh, Mike Taffet did some science, which was very kind of him.

00:36:47   Mike writes, I just transferred from an iPhone 17 pro max to an iPhone 17 pro both wired via two

00:36:53   and a half gigabit ethernet, uh, adapters that also take in power through a 10 gigabyte or 10

00:37:00   gigabit, excuse me, uh, ubiquity switch. Neither device ran out of power, but also the unify interface

00:37:05   interface allowed me to see the bandwidth being used by each port. It seems this transfer was running on

00:37:10   average about 500 to 600 megabits per second. So for simplicity, I don't see any reason why wifi

00:37:15   isn't the best option. Again, the USB port is 10 gigabits. This was running at five to 600 megabits,

00:37:21   probably because it was transferring lots of small files. Yeah. Uh, then we have some feedback

00:37:25   with regard to Marco's USB odyssey. This was Marco figuring out that or just discovering that you

00:37:31   couldn't plug in a USB two device to your thunderbolt hub, right? Is that a fair summary? Yeah. If any

00:37:37   USB two device that was plugged in through any thunderbolt hub in any method, except through the pro

00:37:43   display XDRs, back ports would not work anymore. And I had traced the problem to a bad cable,

00:37:49   um, that once I changed out the cable that ran from the thunderbolt hub to the laptop,

00:37:54   the problem was fixed. Jack Wolborn writes, I had a thunderbolt cable fail on me a little over a year

00:37:59   ago. And while it wasn't the same symptoms that Marco had, it did involve only some devices working.

00:38:04   In my case, it was the USB devices that worked and the thunderbolt ones that didn't.

00:38:08   Sid Polk writes, uh, I'm starting to think that Tahoe and the latest version of Sequoia made a change in

00:38:13   the thunderbolt or USB that breaks older USB or thunderbolt hubs. My OWC thunderbolt four hub stopped serving

00:38:19   USB. My Caldigit three at work. Now Colonel panics, my Mac, unless I unplug all of my USB devices.

00:38:24   I bought a Caldigit TS five for my M one Mac max Mac book pro and it works flawlessly.

00:38:29   Fabian writes, uh, in this, Fabian was arguably the best person to describe what they were talking

00:38:36   about, but we heard this from a lot of people and I should have thought of this as well. Uh,

00:38:40   but anyway, Fabian writes my USB extension cable came with a sticker that reads quote USB 2.0 low

00:38:45   speed devices, such as a mouse keyboard, USB 2.0 flash drive, USB 2.0 of hub, et cetera.

00:38:50   This is not Fabian's fault. This is the sticker, uh, can only work with one side of the ultra high

00:38:55   rate extension cables interface. If USB 2.0 devices do not work as you expected, please flip the type

00:38:59   C connector over and connect again. So Fabian writes, maybe that's why you had inconsistent results with

00:39:04   the same hardware in inadvertently flipped connector. Additionally, Keith Heaton, uh, provided a pin out

00:39:11   or whatever you would like to call it, a pin diagram of the USB C connector. And we will put a link to

00:39:16   that in the show notes. And it says that you, or Keith writes, USB 2.0 data runs on the A6 and A7 or

00:39:22   B6 and B7 pins of a type C connector. If only the A bank or B bank has an issue, you might be able to

00:39:27   keep using that expensive cable by rotating the connector 180 degrees. So the hub and the computer

00:39:32   are both using the functional bank, even without a cable tester, there are only four possible

00:39:36   combinations. This is worth noting as well. So in my tailgate tub that we've talked about in the past,

00:39:42   I have a, uh, GLI net router that has, that can take in tethering, including via phone via a USB,

00:39:49   uh, a connector, but on the front of the tailgate tub, I put in USB C connectors. And so internal to

00:39:57   the tailgate tub, I have a C to a, uh, line cable, whatever. And I've noticed that I need to make sure

00:40:03   that I connected the exact same way. So I drew on the connector, you know, with like a silvery Sharpie

00:40:08   that shows up in the black connector, which side needs to be on which side of the input on the

00:40:13   tailgate tub. So basically I'm connecting the two sides correctly because I found, wait, why is this

00:40:18   not working? Why is this not working? Why is this? Oh, flip. There it goes. Works perfectly now. And I

00:40:23   didn't think of this when we were recording, but I should have some, my apologies to you, Marco.

00:40:27   Well, I mean, if it makes you feel any better, I would not accept that solution.

00:40:32   Like, cause yeah, what it basically says is like, if one side's pins go bad or whatever part of that

00:40:38   controller, like if one side of pins goes bad, the other side might still work. So flip it over and

00:40:43   try it. That to me is not a solution. The solution is replace the thing that is bad because I'm not

00:40:51   going to like it because it'd be one thing. Like if this is the kind of thing, like it's, if it's part of

00:40:55   my setup that I just plug it in once and it stays there for years, maybe I tolerate that. But this is

00:41:01   like when I take my laptop to go somewhere, I unplug this cable and bring it somewhere. And then when

00:41:06   I get back, I plug this cable back into the laptop and I would not tolerate it working half the time

00:41:12   and having to flip it over for that situation. But to be clear, that's not really the cable's fault.

00:41:16   As far as I understand, it's just circumstantially there's USB two pins on both sides and perhaps

00:41:23   but they're duplicated. So theoretically, it should be able to like, you should be able to plug in a USB-C

00:41:33   or Thunderbolt cable in either direction on either end of the cable and everything should work. If

00:41:37   everything is working properly, it does not matter which direction you plug it in. What they're saying

00:41:41   basically is like, sometimes things don't work properly and it can start to matter. But in that

00:41:46   case, like something is broken. And so, you know, consider replacing it.

00:41:49   Or that thing with the sticker that Fabian sent is probably they left out two conductors to save

00:41:53   money. Right.

00:41:54   Right.

00:41:55   They're trying to say don't bother with that.

00:41:56   Which to me is broken.

00:41:58   Yeah. And there was someone else wrote in. I don't have the details of it. It was just like

00:42:02   wrote in just a couple of hours ago about the idea of a dedicated like the USB to alternate mode where

00:42:08   you have dedicated pins on the Thunderbolt cable just for USB. But the other version is where you

00:42:14   don't use that alternate mode and you tunnel everything through Thunderbolt. The theory is that the XDR is

00:42:18   tunnel everything through PCIe and Thunderbolt, whereas the cheaper hubs and other things are

00:42:22   using the USB alternate mode and having the dedicated wires, which is why if those if one

00:42:28   set of those four wires, one pair of those four wires went bad on your cable. Yeah, maybe it would

00:42:33   work flipped, but I would definitely get a new cable.

00:42:34   Then with regard to active versus passive Thunderbolt cables.

00:42:39   This was such a nightmare. There's like three things in here, but it's because I thought I will get

00:42:44   one thing in here. Someone said a thing. I'm like, let me try to get an authoritative source. And then

00:42:47   you'll see it just goes down this terrible rabbit hole where there's no straightforward answer. But

00:42:51   we'll try to give you three buckets of information, see if you can reconcile them without reading the

00:42:57   freaking Thunderbolt spec. So on OWC's website, they write that Thunderbolt three cables longer than

00:43:04   seven tenths of a meter are active cables which do not support DisplayPort. Thunderbolt three cables that

00:43:11   are one meter or longer. There are passive cables which are 20 gigabit

00:43:15   Thunderbolt three. They support 10 gigabit USB display port and works with the USB-C display

00:43:20   directly. Active cables are up to 40 gigabit

00:43:24   Thunderbolt three up to 480 megabit USB.

00:43:28   It does support DisplayPort, but it does not work with the USB-C

00:43:31   display directly.

00:43:32   So even that, this is OWC, like they're a big hardware manufacturer for Mac stuff. You

00:43:36   figure they're web. They know what they're talking about. They're pretty authoritative source, right?

00:43:39   It already from these two bullet points, they're contradictory. Thunderbolt cables longer than 0.7

00:43:44   meters are active, but then it tells me about a passive cable that's that's one meter or longer,

00:43:48   but it's 20 gigabits. Like their two bullet points contradict each other. If I have one meter cable,

00:43:53   well, I'm sure that it has to be active because it says that if they're longer than 0.7 meters,

00:43:57   they're active, except when they're passive. But then they're 20 gigabits, but then they have 10 gigabit USB.

00:44:01   But if you have a 40 gigabit one that's active, then you only have 480 megabits USB.

00:44:05   Sure. That's just OWC. Then, then I'm like, because originally I came up with a Reddit result,

00:44:10   but like, no, let me find something more authoritative. Let me go to OWC. But nope,

00:44:13   now I'm going back to Reddit. All right. So there's a Reddit, Reddit,

00:44:16   Reddit, R-E-B-B-I-T. There's a Reddit comment from LaughingMan11 on active versus passive Thunderbolt

00:44:22   cables, which reads cables rated at 40 gigabits per second with a length of 0.8 meters of all kinds,

00:44:29   Thunderbolt 3, Thunderbolt 4, USB 4, are 100% guaranteed to be passive. If you see 40 gigabit

00:44:34   certified cable at 0.8 meters or shorter, it is a passive cable. For distances between 0.8 and two

00:44:40   meters, some cables are actually certified passive cables. I've seen cable manufacturers stretch and

00:44:44   make one meter 40 gigabit per second passive cables with no problems. They managed to squeeze

00:44:50   the extra two-tenths of a meter and keep up the signal integrity just fine.

00:44:54   So again, there's more info in that post. I just pulled this out, but at least it sounds very

00:44:57   authoritative and, you know, LaughingMan is a reference from an anime series that I like.

00:45:00   So I'm on board with LaughingMan11 from Reddit versus OWC, the company.

00:45:04   But at least, at least it's not self-contradictory, these two points,

00:45:08   you know, and it does really outline that it is possible to have passive cables. In fact,

00:45:12   passive cables that are longer than you would expect.

00:45:13   Then, as with all things, we turned to Wikipedia and Wikipedia writes, "Copper Thunderbolt 4 cables

00:45:18   of up to one meter are passive cables, while longer cables must integrate active signal conditioning

00:45:23   circuitry. Two meters maximum is the length of active cables available for most brands,

00:45:27   including CalDigit, Cable Matters, etc., while Apple is currently the only company that offers a

00:45:32   three-meter active copper cable." It's madness. I dare you to Google this. Notice how all the numbers

00:45:40   change, one meter, 0.8, 0.7, some companies have been extended to this thing, active,

00:45:45   passive, how fast things go. The only thing I took from this stupid adventure that I spent so

00:45:49   long wandering through, and I found way more than just OWC Reddit and Wikipedia, but this is a sampling,

00:45:55   is that passive Thunderbolt cables exist. That's it. That's all I can come away with. And they're probably short.

00:46:01   We were sponsored this episode by Squarespace, the on-one website platform for entrepreneurs to stand out

00:46:09   out and succeed online. Whether you're just starting out or managing a growing brand,

00:46:13   Squarespace makes it easy to create a beautiful website, engage with your audience and sell anything,

00:46:17   from your products to your content to your time, all in one place and all on your terms. They just

00:46:23   make it super easy to make a great site for you and your business. So one of the ways to do this is their

00:46:27   new design intelligence system. This combines their decades of industry-leading design expertise with

00:46:33   cutting-edge AI so that you can unlock your creative potential. Anybody can be empowered to build a

00:46:39   beautiful, more personalized website tailored to your unique needs. So it's not just like picking

00:46:43   clip art. It's not going to look like anybody else's website out there. It'll look like your website.

00:46:48   And you can even use the identity you create across all other platforms. You can use it across your

00:46:53   social media and stuff because you're creating your identity on Squarespace with their design intelligence

00:46:57   system. It's a great setup. And for your business, they support all of the different payment methods

00:47:02   that you might want. Obviously, credit cards, even things like Klarna, direct debit, Apple Pay,

00:47:07   after pay, clear pay, all sorts of methods are always being added with Squarespace. So you never

00:47:11   fall behind. You're never like, oh, my customers want this new thing, but my platform doesn't support

00:47:15   it. Nope, nothing like that. It's all super easy to install and configure and use. Anybody can do it.

00:47:21   There's no coding or technical stuff required. You don't deal with updates and patches and everything

00:47:25   like that. They do it all for you. It's a great system. See for yourself by starting a free trial

00:47:31   at Squarespace.com. And again, this is great. If you're like, if you're not technical, or if you're

00:47:35   making a website or telling somebody to make a website who is not technical, they don't have to go through

00:47:39   you, the nerd, like they can just do it themselves. It's a great system, you know, empower people to just

00:47:44   not be coding and everything and do everything themselves. It's awesome. So Squarespace.com,

00:47:48   see for yourself how to use it. When you decide to sign up, go to Squarespace.com slash ATP for 10%

00:47:54   off your first purchase of a website or domain. Thank you so much to Squarespace for sponsoring

00:47:59   our show.

00:47:59   We spoke about some alternatives to Synology, I don't know, a week or two ago. I forget exactly

00:48:09   when it was, but Colin McKellar writes, have you ever considered QNAP, NASAs, Q-N-A-P? They're

00:48:16   fairly equivalent to Synology in terms of hardware and capabilities, but they have not followed Synology

00:48:20   in limiting the drives that can be used.

00:48:22   So I've looked at QNAP back in the day, and I looked again when Colin mentioned it. And they've

00:48:27   come pretty far since I last checked them out. Their software stack looks very Synology-ish,

00:48:31   sometimes down to the exact same like name brand apps or similar looking apps. And the other thing

00:48:37   QNAP has going for them is that they support ZFS, which I like. It is, the thing about ZFS,

00:48:43   and I looked at this when I was looking at the QNAP stuff, is like, it's got way more features than,

00:48:49   it's got lots of cool features, like the automatic self-healing replication. It's got tons and tons

00:48:54   of options. But it is very enterprise-y in that it is farther from the Drobo dream than the Synology

00:49:02   setup. The Drobo dream, for people who don't remember Drobo, was you buy this big box full of drives,

00:49:07   and whenever you need more storage, you add another drive of any size you feel like, and it just adds

00:49:10   to the space, and it maintains whatever level of data protection that you had.

00:49:15   And it dies disastrously.

00:49:17   Right. Well, that was the pitch, right? Because that appeals to consumers. Consumers aren't going

00:49:22   to buy fleets of things with giant hard drives that are like, I'm just going to buy as many drives as I

00:49:26   can afford, and later when I want more space, I'll buy another drive or whatever I can afford and stick

00:49:31   it in. And I don't have to have all the drives be the same size, or make subgroups, or make separate

00:49:36   VDEVs and add them to the ZFS RAID-Z pool and all that. Like, I don't want to think about that.

00:49:41   I just want to buy a drive for whatever amount of money I have and stick it in. Three years later,

00:49:45   do the same thing and stick it in. And I want data protection, whatever data protection I picked when

00:49:49   I set up this array, I want that data protection to be maintained as I add drives, and I don't care

00:49:53   what size they are. And that is not what ZFS delivers. ZFS wants you to add things in a more

00:50:00   regimented manner. It's not as flexible. When you add things, you can't always add any drive of any

00:50:06   size. Sometimes it does want you. You can't add, like, drives in pairs and add new things to your

00:50:12   pool. Like, there are ways to get some more flexibility than just, like, you have to replace

00:50:16   every drive like in traditional RAID. But it's more fidgety. But anyway, I do like ZFS. But then I

00:50:21   looked at the prices in QNAP stuff. It's just as expensive as Synology. So it's like, I mean,

00:50:25   maybe not as expensive. I think they have, like, better CPUs and more RAM for the same as Synology's

00:50:30   prices. But anyway, QNAP, if you're looking for alternative Synology, just looking at their product

00:50:34   offerings, they seem to be the closest thing to Synology that I've seen. Their software stack

00:50:40   really does look like they're copying everything that Synology has in a good way. And they have the

00:50:46   option of using ZFS. You don't have to use ZFS. You can use plain old RAID. You can use ZFS. Anyway,

00:50:51   I was impressed with how far QNAP has come. Also, some of the recommendations people had for us were

00:50:55   Ugreen, which is the company that I just think of as making, like, USB hubs and Ethernet hubs and stuff

00:51:00   like that. But apparently they make NAS hardware now, too. Unraid is a software solution. Then

00:51:04   there's FreeNAS, TrueNAS. There's tons of options for you out there, depending on how much stuff you

00:51:08   want to do. But QNAP looked like the same type of solution as Synology in that, like, you give us

00:51:13   money, we take care of everything. Like, it's not DIY. It's not, like, you can get down nitty gritty and

00:51:17   do, like, fancy stuff with ZFS. But if you just want to buy, like, an appliance and use an interface to

00:51:22   set it up, QNAP will do that for you. And it does have features that Synology doesn't because it has

00:51:27   ZFS.

00:51:27   Cool. That's all very useful. And I appreciate all the feedback from everyone. But I have news. As of

00:51:36   about 24 hours from now, or thereabouts, Synology has mostly backtracked on their complete refusal to

00:51:44   work with third party drives. So that Synology Europe thing we had last episode was right.

00:51:48   Yeah, but YouTube put a stray YouTube comment from the official Synology at Europe account.

00:51:53   Who'd thunk it? So Synology released DiskStation Manager 7.3 DSM as their, you know, like, operating

00:51:59   system, if you will. And their press release reads, Synology is currently collaborating closely with

00:52:04   third party drive manufacturers to accelerate the testing and verification of additional storage drives

00:52:08   and will announce more updates as soon as possible. In the meantime, 25 model year DiskStation Plus

00:52:12   value in J-Series running DSM 7.3 will support the installation and storage pool creation of non

00:52:18   validated third party drives. This provides greater flexibility while Synology continues to expand the

00:52:23   lineup of officially verified drives that meet long term reliability standards. However, the creation

00:52:28   of M.2 based storage pool and cache still requires drives from the HCL. I have no idea what that means,

00:52:33   but on the hardware compatibility list. So basically the asterisk, it was like what it was a footnote

00:52:39   one saying, you know, we'll support the creation of non validated third party drives footnote. And the footnote

00:52:44   was, yeah, except for M.21. So there's more detail from this SpaceRex YouTube channel here.

00:52:49   All right. So from SpaceRex YouTube, uh, the M.2 NVMe restrictions are still in place due to the highly

00:52:55   diverse M.2 NVMe market in wide variation. We've seen many instances where consumer grade M.2 SSDs with

00:53:01   low endurance performance and quality combined with poor firmware implementations have directly

00:53:04   contributed to system instability and data loss. And that's directly from Synology. This was the SpaceRex,

00:53:09   uh, YouTuber asking Synology, hey, what's the deal? Why can't we do NVM? Why can't we use, uh,

00:53:13   arbitrary third party NVMe flash drives? And that's Synology explanation. Still only the approved list

00:53:20   for those. And then Lee Hutchinson at ArtsTechnica writes, we asked Synology whether the requirements

00:53:25   will also be lifted from previous generation Synology products. And the answer to that question

00:53:28   appears to be a no. Quote, this change only affects the 25 series models, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

00:53:33   Models in the XS Plus line are considered a business or enterprise model and will remain under

00:53:38   the current HCL policy for our business lines. Synology explained. Yeah. HCL is not hydrochloric

00:53:43   acid, but, uh, hardware compatibility list. So this is, this is why I said they mostly backtracked.

00:53:47   They're, they're trying to have their cake and eat it too. They're like their enterprise product

00:53:51   lines as XS Plus line, still only Synology validated drives old pre 2025 products. And that is

00:53:58   Synology products that don't end in 25 because all their remarks like DS725, DS225. Those are all 2025

00:54:05   products. Uh, if you have a product that's not a 2025 product, you're not included in this either.

00:54:10   Uh, it's only exactly what the press release says, which is the, um, only running DSM 7.3 and it's the

00:54:17   plus value in J series, which I imagine are what consumers buy. Right. So they're trying to say

00:54:22   enterprises with lots of money. We still want to sell you overpriced storage because that's what

00:54:27   every storage company enterprise does. Like it's how, you know, these big companies make a lot of their

00:54:31   money, but for consumers, cause you all got mad at us, we will let you do this, but only if you buy

00:54:36   a new 2025 thing, or you have one of the really older ones, if you got caught in that middle thing,

00:54:41   too bad for you, which is still kind of crappy. Like I'm saying, like, if you're gonna, if you're

00:54:45   gonna walk this back, walk it back all the way, they want, they're walking it back halfway, which

00:54:48   is better than nothing, but still not great. Yeah. I I'm not sure what to make of this. That

00:54:54   is probably enough to make me consider going. I'm saying going back as though I've left, but

00:55:00   you know, whenever the time comes that I replaced my like two year old model, uh, this, if this

00:55:04   continues for the home market, I'd probably stick with astrology. Uh, but, uh, it's certainly

00:55:11   kind of put a gross taste in my mouth and we'll see how long that lasts.

00:55:15   Yeah. A lot of the YouTubers, a lot of the various people reporting on this news are like,

00:55:18   uh, in typically, typically YouTube fashion would come right out and say, this is because their sales

00:55:25   got destroyed when they did this. And it's like, do you have their sales numbers? Like citation needed

00:55:30   as they say in Wikipedia, like probably their sales went down. We know that there was lots of people

00:55:35   complaining about it, but like, they just definitively say it's because their sales were, you know, in

00:55:40   the toilet. It's like, well, you know, like I would like to see something. Anyway, uh, they, the bottom line

00:55:46   is they want to sell to enterprises. Everyone who sells to enterprises makes you buy their storage.

00:55:51   Like you buy like EMC or like Dell owns them now, or all the other big, like I had to deal with all

00:55:56   these vendors and doing like a, uh, uh, what do you call it? Vendor, uh, evaluation for lots of big

00:56:02   storage vendors for a big storage project back when I had a jobby job. So I got to hear all their sales

00:56:06   pitches and they all want to sell you just the most expensive hard drives you've ever seen in your

00:56:11   entire life. Like it's like Apple with RAM and storage, like storage. That's where all their

00:56:16   margins come from. And you can see why Synology wants to do that too. Their mistake was thinking

00:56:20   they could also apply that to that, to people who want to have like a two drive NAS in their

00:56:24   basement or something. And that has not worked out. So I think QNAP is probably reaching,

00:56:28   reaping the benefits. Um, I would definitely, uh, consider trying them, but now that Synology is

00:56:33   backtracking mostly on this. And if I ever buy no one, it will be a 2025 model or later. I'm like,

00:56:37   yeah, I'll probably just stick with Synology.

00:56:40   All right. Uh, let's do some more first impressions, but I actually have a very

00:56:44   quick bit of, I guess it's sort of kind of follow-up. Sorry, John, uh, about the AirPods

00:56:48   Pro 3. After hearing the discussion about, oh, you should try the bigger tips. I thought to myself,

00:56:53   you know what? I should try the bigger tips. What's it going to hurt? And even though I didn't feel

00:56:57   like the tips were not snug in my ears, I thought, let me give it a whirl. And I've tried the bigger

00:57:02   tips, which I think there's only one step larger, if I'm not mistaken, in the box from what they have

00:57:08   mounted on the, on the, on the device. And you can option into one size larger, if I'm not mistaken.

00:57:13   And I tried that and I got to tell you, they fit, they fit just fine. And who'd have thunk it? The

00:57:20   ANC got just a touch better. I wouldn't say it was bad before. I wouldn't say it's night and day better

00:57:24   than the AirPods Pro 2, but it's definitely a touch better. So even if you don't think you need the

00:57:28   bigger tips, give it a shot. Can't hurt. Just like Marco was saying earlier. Uh, Marco, you have some

00:57:34   case updates for us. I do. Yeah. Um, so in the intervening time, last episode of this one,

00:57:39   um, I have tried three new iPhone 17 pro cases. Um, as I wait for my Suti leather back to be

00:57:47   delivered ever. I don't, I don't even think it has shipped yet. I think I need to email them.

00:57:50   Oh, speaking of your leather back, by the way, did you see that person who had your leather back and

00:57:53   just cut the top off of it? I meant to say that when you were talking about cutting the,

00:57:56   cutting the top off of one of your older cases, but did you see that person's post?

00:57:59   Yeah. I mean, certainly that person did a much better job than I did. Uh, but, uh,

00:58:04   but you were, you were using a, a, a leather back for an earlier phone. Oh, right. Sticking it on

00:58:09   your 17. This person took the, the leather back for the 17 pro that you returned and just cut the top

00:58:15   off of that one. I'm done rebuying things. I've returned. I don't want to, I just, I just wanted to

00:58:20   know if you saw it cause it like it looked pretty good. Again, I don't know how well, if maybe those

00:58:24   little things lifted up, I'm trying to find, I mean, they seem to have a lot better Dremel skills than

00:58:28   I have. Um, so there, there's looked a lot better than I think mine would, but there it is. Oh,

00:58:32   Omar Shaheen. Um, yeah, it's looking pretty good. I mean, I, again, I don't know if those little

00:58:37   pointy bits, I'll send you the link to it. I don't know if those little pointy bits might catch under

00:58:40   your finger or whatever, but it just, that's, I immediately thought of that when you're talking

00:58:43   about chopping up your things last time. And I forgot to mention it. Yeah. I'm hoping the

00:58:46   Sudi leather case comes also like what I'm, what I'm also hoping to see. I don't know if this

00:58:50   will exist cause it seems like the, the market for like leather magnetically attached phone

00:58:57   backs that don't have any side protection seems like a pretty small market. I mean, it is kind

00:59:01   of a weird thing. Like people usually buy cases for protection, not back grip, but true. And

00:59:05   I, I also, I did try, um, I found some Amazon seller for like $7. They were selling this, some

00:59:11   kind of like gel, uh, back, like, Oh my, like a, like a stick on decal that you'd stick on

00:59:18   the back. Jelly shoes for your, uh, phone. It was horrific. Um, I did have from, from my,

00:59:26   uh, Casey goose trip, I did have just a, a cheap clear case, um, from Torras, T O R R A S

00:59:32   from Amazon. It was, it was relatively inexpensive. I think like under $20. Um, and it's like a,

00:59:38   a basic clear TPU case, no MagSafe support. Um, so it does, you know, it did kind of ruin

00:59:45   MagSafe strength. Um, but it was cheap and it would, it was, it would come the next morning.

00:59:49   So I tried it. It was fine. Um, the only, the only thing I don't like about the, about the

00:59:54   Torras clear case is that the lip around the camera plateau is very tall. And so it, which

01:00:01   makes sense. Like it, it helps it stand off the table better, but it kind of protrudes and

01:00:07   makes like an outline on your pocket and your jeans. Like you can see the rim around the camera

01:00:12   mesa as its own outline. And I didn't, I didn't love that, but it can't beat the value. Yeah.

01:00:17   On that topic of the, of the having tall rings around the mesa, I've seen a lot of people complaining

01:00:21   about this and I don't think people have, have thought it through. They're like, uh, they made

01:00:25   this big full width camera mesa plateau thing, but the cameras still stick out from it. So when I put

01:00:30   it on the table, it still rocks because the cameras stick out, uh, you know, more on the side

01:00:34   where the three lenses are than the side that doesn't have any lenses. They're like,

01:00:38   why didn't they just make it flat all the way across? If there was, first of all, the cameras

01:00:42   are not sticking out just for the hell of it. That's how deep they are. That's what they can

01:00:46   fit. There's the screen on the other side of them. Those are the cameras. Believe me, there

01:00:49   is no empty space that they're wasting inside there. And given that, if you made the iconic

01:00:55   plateau, even with the tops of the camera lenses all the way across, that would look like this

01:01:02   case that you're describing, it would be huge. Like you don't realize how prominent that sort

01:01:07   of five head would be to borrow a phrase from, uh, the flop house. It's just, it would just be

01:01:12   gigantic and granted they could probably put more stuff in there or whatever, but like,

01:01:15   I don't think you want that. Like, it's a shame that the camera lenses stick out as far as they do,

01:01:20   but you don't want the whole plateau to be even with the tips of the cameras. Cause that would just

01:01:24   be very top heavy and weird and leave weird prints in your jeans.

01:01:28   Well, interesting that you mentioned that though. Um, there actually is a slightly better solution,

01:01:32   but I'll get to that in a second. So I also tried, um, John's favorite, the bull strap case with the

01:01:38   open bottom. Um, this is a nice leather case. Um, I got the black one. It looks very nice on the phone

01:01:45   and with the open bottom, you still get to see the nice orange strip of your phone on the bottom,

01:01:49   which I found to be a nice feature. Um, I don't like the way bull strap partially covers up the camera

01:01:56   mesa. Um, I like when cases leave the mesa itself, like the full round rect shape and don't try to

01:02:02   like just leave the cameras open in a square and then have like, you know, the two holes for the

01:02:05   two things on the, on the right. Although, uh, in this particular phone, because as we noted on an

01:02:10   earlier episode, that sharp edge around the camera plateau is the place where the anodization will

01:02:15   come off. And the bull strap case does protect that whole sharp edge with leather.

01:02:19   does. And the bull strap, the way the case like rises up around that, it doesn't create any sharp

01:02:26   or like, you know, blunt edges. Everything is rounded. Yeah. That's one of the things I like

01:02:31   about my 16 pro bull strap cases that the thing around the camera is kind of smooth and slanted

01:02:37   and leather. It's not a plastic frame, a metal flame, a champ chamfered metal frame, you know,

01:02:42   like lots of cases do that. And I don't like feeling that on the back of the phone. I like it to be smooth

01:02:47   up there. My wife's got the bull strap case too. And I don't like how it looks when it covers that

01:02:50   the fold with plateau, but I do like the protection it provides and the fact that it's leather like in

01:02:55   more places. Yeah. Honestly, the look, it looks like a car bra. It really does. Like going back

01:02:59   to our very first podcast together, like it looks exactly like a car bra, but it has the opposite

01:03:04   because it will protect the thing under it instead of getting grit under there and causing abrasions and

01:03:08   having it all. Yeah, but it's, I, I, I wish it was more open, but anyway, otherwise the bull strap case

01:03:14   is pretty nice. The leather feels fantastic. It's a great quality leather. Um, even like after only a

01:03:20   couple of days of use, it, it already feels amazing. Um, the black I think is a really nice color combo

01:03:25   with the orange. Uh, and overall I'm very happy with the bull strap except that the sleep wake button

01:03:32   is not a good button feel. Yeah. The buttons aren't great this year on the whole strap case.

01:03:37   Yeah. That, and that really hurts it. Like it's, it's the kind of thing like, you know, you push

01:03:41   sleep wake and like you think it pushed, but you don't really, you don't really feel that click the

01:03:45   way you do with a good button. So like double clicking it to like for Apple pay or something

01:03:48   like it feels awful. You also might have a, you might have a bad one. Like there, I think the

01:03:53   quality control of the buttons is variable because again, the buttons on my bull strap case

01:03:56   from the 16 pro they're okay. My wife's buttons I think are worse than mine, but they're still

01:04:01   clicky. So, I mean, I don't think you want to return it or whatever, but like, no, I don't want

01:04:05   to go through that, but their buttons, like something I've heard about the Apple case. Was it the Apple

01:04:09   cases? They said like the buttons are much improved this year or whatever, like the tech woven

01:04:13   good buttons versus bad buttons is there's a wide gap with cases and it's very difficult to tell what

01:04:18   you're getting by looking at the pictures on the website. Yeah. Apple tends to have the best

01:04:21   buttons. Um, like that that's just the reality of their cases. Like if you want all the clear cases,

01:04:26   like the buttons on a clear case, Apple clear case compared to the buttons on an Apple, like,

01:04:30   like the tech woven or fine woven, huge difference because the clear case kind of has to be like all

01:04:35   one thing and they're not great. That's true. Yeah. Yeah. The clear case, it's not nearly as good as

01:04:39   the others, but, um, yeah, overall bull strap best looking case I've seen, uh, best feeling leather I

01:04:46   have found in a long time in a case. Uh, but the buttons are not amazing. Open bottom is great. Uh,

01:04:51   covered up plateau is less great. So it's kind of a mixed bag, but overall a very strong,

01:04:55   showing. Uh, and then finally I have for the last few days been using the peak design case.

01:05:01   I got that in a couple of days ago. So I've been trying that out. I've had great success with these

01:05:05   in previous phones and the peak design. If you've ever used the peak design phone case,

01:05:10   it's the same case. It's like, they just keep making the same thing over and over again,

01:05:15   but that's a good thing. It's a good case. Um, I really like the peak design case. There's a couple

01:05:21   things about that I don't, but mostly it's a very positive. Uh, so first of all, I think it looks

01:05:26   fantastic. Like this is, this is the material that tech woven wishes it was, but it's not,

01:05:31   I don't know why. Um, but peak design material, um, they do have a couple of material choices.

01:05:35   I still get like the gray one that has like the original, like nice gray weave. Um, the other

01:05:41   choices are getting poor reviews. Um, so I would say be careful with those, but if you get like the,

01:05:45   like the woven texture ones, it's the same old texture they've always had. And it's great.

01:05:49   Um, the rim around the camera plateau is a little bit, uh, pokey, but not nearly as bad as the cheap

01:05:57   case. Um, and it doesn't stick up quite as far overall. So it's, it's overall like a nicer ratio

01:06:03   for that. Um, you, you do slightly see the outline in a pocket, but it's very, it's much more subtle.

01:06:09   Um, I love having the little square indentation on the back to kind of put your finger in as you're like

01:06:14   resting the phone in your, in your grip. It kind of serves as like an inverse pop socket in that way.

01:06:19   Um, it does have a covered up bottom, but it does not obstruct like the speakers in any meaningful way,

01:06:25   you know, charging cables, even like the thick anchor cables go in it just fine. Um, the buttons

01:06:30   feel great. Peak design buttons are almost as good, maybe even as good as Apple's buttons. They're very,

01:06:37   very good. They have a camera control button this year, um, which is also sort of the bull strap,

01:06:42   by the way, both of those camera control buttons are very, very good. Um, the Torres cheap clear

01:06:47   case does not have a camera control button. It just has a cutout. Um, but yeah, bull strap and peak

01:06:51   design, great camera control buttons. They feel good. They're easy to push. They click in nicely.

01:06:56   Um, so overall peak design is good. The only, the main downside of the peak design case, uh,

01:07:01   is that it's just bulky. Uh, and that's just, their cases have always been this way. It's, it's a trade

01:07:06   off. It is not super slim. It is not super lightweight. It does cover up most of the orange of the phone,

01:07:12   although you do see the entire camera plateau, which is nice. Um, so it's a mixed bag. The peak design

01:07:17   case, it's, it's like the, you know, the, the mid-sized SUV of phone cases. Like it will,

01:07:24   it will take you anywhere you need to go. It is overall, if you're going to have one case on your

01:07:29   phone all year round and you want it to be, you know, relatively protective, you want it to be able

01:07:35   to get wet unlike leather and still be okay. Like the peak design case is a great choice.

01:07:40   Does it not have, does it not have a lip, uh, around the screen that sticks out farther than

01:07:44   the screen? It does. It just, it's not very tall. I mean, it's a pretty shallow. I was just looking at

01:07:49   some of the reviews and some for the older cases and they're complaining that there's the lip isn't

01:07:52   enough to essentially, like if you put your phone face down, that your screen will actually be

01:07:55   touching it versus like, no, the bull strap case, for instance, a grain of salt could very easily

01:08:00   be on the table and not touch your screen. If you put a screen face down on the bull strap case.

01:08:04   No, the peak design case, actually, I'll compare them for you. The peak design case,

01:08:07   it, it does have a raised lip. It's not a very tall raised lip. Um, but it, it definitely does

01:08:12   have it here. I'll pop it into the bull strap now. Let's see. Stop taking your phone and out of cases.

01:08:15   You're upsetting me. I, I get my phone to be used. I don't care if it gets like minor little dust here

01:08:21   and there. No, it's every time you put it in and out of the case, you're risking, you're stretching

01:08:25   out the case, you're making the fit worse and you're risking, probably not risking bending your

01:08:29   phone, but I would say the bull strap is about the same depth. Maybe the bull strap might be a

01:08:33   a little bit taller ridge around it, but not, it's not a meaningful difference. Um, but yeah,

01:08:38   overall I would say bull strap for formal occasions, peak design for general utility and, uh, and you

01:08:45   know, a cheap, clear case if you want, you know, clear view of the phone. Um, but ultimately I'm still

01:08:50   waiting for a good leather back and I still like, you know, kind of more like minimal cases than these.

01:08:55   Um, but for now this is good. Um, the peak design also for whatever it's worth, if you have any needs

01:09:00   for a strong mount on something, like, um, if you have like a bike, you want to mount your phone on

01:09:06   your bike. Um, peak design makes mounts like that for the, and they, they latch in way stronger than

01:09:11   magnets. They latch into like the, the hole in the back of the case, the square hole. And it's like a

01:09:16   physical latching mechanism. So it's, it's much stronger than anything magnetic. That being said,

01:09:20   for whatever it's worth, the peak design case also has by far the strongest mag safe strength I've

01:09:28   ever seen in a case. Like when you put this on the mag safe pocket, when you want to take it off the

01:09:34   puck, you got to pull hard, which is actually really nice in a lot of cases. Like I tried earlier in my

01:09:41   car mount, I tried to like jiggle it off the car mount to see like, will it fall off amount? And the

01:09:47   entire mount moved before the phone did. Like it, it's a very strong magnetic connection on the back

01:09:53   of the peak design case, way more than the bull strap and any other case I've ever had way more

01:09:57   than the, than the naked phone even. Uh, and so if that's, if that's a relevant thing to you, again,

01:10:02   the peak design will probably win that comparison as well. So overall, it's a great overall case.

01:10:07   It's just a bit bulky, but that's kind of the nature of it. And otherwise it's very, very good.

01:10:13   Cool. So you've seemed like you found at least a couple of winners.

01:10:16   Yeah. I mean, like, like last year, I'm probably going to change it up throughout the year as,

01:10:21   as you know, seasons and needs change. Uh, but overall I'm, I'm happy with what I have found,

01:10:26   but I, I do wish that my sooty leatherback would ever ship.

01:10:30   I'm so sorry. Uh, for what it's worth, I got a considerable amount of amusement, uh, with Aaron and

01:10:39   Marco tag teaming me on making fun of my blue phone and saying how much I should return it and

01:10:44   get an orange phone. Oh my God. I stand by, I stand by my blue phone. That's sometimes purple,

01:10:49   but occasionally blue. I don't think I want an orange phone.

01:10:51   Every time Casey referred to the color of his phone on the trip, it was resignation and slight

01:10:58   displeasure. And we're like, you're within the return window. You obviously don't like the color

01:11:03   you picked. Just return it while you still can and get the one that you actually want.

01:11:08   Well, but I don't think I want, I genuinely don't think I want the orange phone. I just

01:11:11   doesn't want to go through the phone transfer process. Also that very much that. And I mean,

01:11:16   there are definitely times where I really, really do like the look of this and the color of this,

01:11:20   but I, I want, I wish for a stronger, bolder blue. That's all.

01:11:24   We are sponsored this episode by delete me. Delete me makes it easy, quick, and safe to remove your

01:11:31   personal data from hundreds of data brokers online at a time when surveillance and data breaches are

01:11:36   common enough to make everyone vulnerable. So delete me does all the hard work of wiping you

01:11:41   and your family's personal data from data broker websites. This is how this works. This whole industry

01:11:45   of data brokers, they go and, you know, they buy and sell and try to accumulate as much data on you

01:11:49   as possible. And this can be, it's creepy stuff. It's like, you know, your home address, your phone

01:11:53   number, like your, your siblings and your kids' names and like all this stuff. It's, it's creepy.

01:11:58   And they will of course sell this to anybody who wants it. And it's super easy to find people's

01:12:02   personal info. Thanks to this disgusting industry. Well, they usually have some kind of opt out or

01:12:07   required to have some kind of opt out or takedown, but they're all different. So what delete me does

01:12:12   is they automate the removal and takedowns of your information from every data broker that they can

01:12:18   figure out, they can find. There's hundreds of them out there. And if you can, you know, you could do it

01:12:22   yourself. You could go file hundreds of takedowns, figure out everyone's processes and everything,

01:12:27   but no one's going to do that. They do it for you in mass. And when new data brokers come up,

01:12:32   they get out of there too. So it's a service that's constantly working for you. They'll send

01:12:37   you reports on, you know, what they found, where they were able to remove it. So it's a, it's a

01:12:41   subscription and they're constantly working for you to remove your data from all these data broker

01:12:46   websites. It's a great service. I tried it myself and I actually really liked it. And this was before

01:12:50   they were a sponsor. I went looking for a service like this. I found them. They were well recommended.

01:12:54   So I tried it out. Worked great. So take control of your data and keep your private life private

01:12:58   by signing up for delete me. Now at a special discount for our listeners, get 20% off your

01:13:03   delete me plan. When you go to join delete me.com slash ATP and use promo code ATP at checkout. The only

01:13:10   way to get 20% off is to go to join delete me.com slash ATP and enter code ATP at checkout. That's

01:13:17   join delete me.com slash ATP code ATP. Thanks to delete me for sponsoring our show.

01:13:23   Let's talk iOS 26 first impressions. And John, it seems like you would like to start. So please do.

01:13:32   Cause I didn't, I didn't run iOS 26. You two have had it obviously for your betas of your apps and

01:13:38   everything like that, but I was avoiding it because I had heard terrible things about it. And you know,

01:13:42   I'm like, I'll wait till the release version comes out. Oh, quick update. By the way, the 26.1 beta two

01:13:48   and Tahoe beta two have made tethering less broken. All right. It will. Once you connect now,

01:13:56   it will stay connected. But the, the initial process of connecting now takes like three times longer

01:14:02   because it can get into a state where the little circle next to the, you know, Marco's iPhone 17,

01:14:07   like the tethering circle in the menu is lit up, but then the menu bar item still shows like no wifi

01:14:14   and you have to like deselect it and then reselect it for it to actually connect and make you connected to

01:14:20   the tethering. So it's still a mess, but at least like once you are connected, at least it stays

01:14:25   connected. So it's less broken, but still broken. Cool. Yeah. So I installed, I installed iOS 26 when the

01:14:32   release one came out. I don't have the beta that Marco was just referring to it. And I'm not on the beta

01:14:36   train. I'm just on the release train. So I'm running 26.0. Uh, and again, I've, I've been

01:14:42   using Tahoe since it was released in all the betas. So I'm familiar with how that looks and I don't like

01:14:46   it and how it works and I don't like it, but whatever, got to deal with it with my apps.

01:14:50   But I was 26. Like I'd, I'd seen all the screenshots. I'd heard YouTube talk about it. I heard Marco talk

01:14:55   about it at length and his experience with his apps and everything, but I didn't really quite know what

01:14:59   to expect other than I would, I knew that I wasn't going to like how it looked cause I'd seen how it

01:15:04   looked. Um, so now having used it, I don't know, for a couple of weeks now, uh, here's the few additional

01:15:12   things I have to say about it on top of what you two have already said about it during the betas, uh, to find

01:15:18   at least two nice things to say about iOS 26. Wow. Okay. Um, first, um, in previous versions of iOS,

01:15:33   various, uh, various things, especially in like top navigation and stuff like that, like the back

01:15:40   button or like, um, you know, I don't know the, the, the thing that you hit to close a sheet or

01:15:46   whatever, the touch areas may have been the same size as they are in 26, but 26 due to its different

01:15:54   style where it draws, like if you have like an X button, it draws a circle around it. Or if you have

01:15:58   like a toolbar, it draws like an outline around it, the touch areas in iOS 26 look bigger. I don't know

01:16:05   if they are bigger, but they look bigger because visually used to have like the word back and a little

01:16:09   left-facing chevron. And I'm sure the touch area for that was probably huge, but you didn't see that

01:16:13   because you just saw like the background that it's on and you saw the text and you felt like you had

01:16:17   to tap the text and the text can be small. Like the capital B is big, but the ACK is small and you're

01:16:21   like, do I have to hit that? No, like the touch area was probably huge, huge, but it felt smaller

01:16:26   with the big actual outlines around buttons, like the big circle around the X or the big circle around a

01:16:32   chevron or the big circle or a capsule shape around like a toolbar at the top or a checkbox or whatever

01:16:38   or a checkmark or whatever. Those touch targets feel bigger to me. And I like that. Number two,

01:16:45   second nice thing. In earlier versions of iOS in the post iOS 7 era, when there was any kind of state

01:16:54   change on touch, like you touch that back button, you touch the little X thing or whatever, it was

01:17:00   pretty subtle. Maybe the word back would change from light blue to dark blue or some other kind

01:17:05   of highlighting type thing. iOS 26, usually the entire background of the thing that you hit does

01:17:13   some stupid glowy effect, right? But it's not, you won't miss it. Like it's sitting there and when you

01:17:19   touch it, it like, I don't know if HDR lights up, but it like lights up and like this little transition

01:17:24   and glow goes through it and there's an animation or whatever, but that happens as soon as you touch it.

01:17:29   And imagine having things react to you, activating them is a good thing in UI design. One of the

01:17:36   things that we kind of sort of lost in the iOS 7 transition because that became so much more

01:17:41   subtle. So those are my two nice things to say on iOS 26. Oh no. The touch targets feel like they're

01:17:48   bigger even if they're not and more things that are buttons like that are button-like in the UI,

01:17:54   make it clear when you hit them immediately. As soon as your finger hits them, they do their highlight

01:18:00   thing. Everything else is about it as what we've said before. And in particular, like I felt like

01:18:05   doing a blog post about this because I feel like the, like the three, like the three main sins of the

01:18:10   26 redesign, not just iOS, but across all the platforms are like, uh, how it looks like subjective stuff, which is like

01:18:17   you might like it, you might not, but I don't. So that's just the subjective thing. Um, moving everything away from the

01:18:23   edges, like, and you know, the, the whole, like not having things go edge to edge and having them be inset in capsules and

01:18:30   whatever the third one is that I put in my notes documented. They can't remember now, but like, um,

01:18:34   like those are like, there, there are a few fundamental, Oh, and the third one, I remember

01:18:39   it immediately. Uh, just showing stuff through behind, you know, like I can, you know, why do I need

01:18:44   to see through this control to the content that's behind it or whatever? Right. Those are the three

01:18:47   main sins as far as I'm concerned of the entire OS redesign. And we keep thinking like when they come

01:18:52   up with the 20th anniversary phone or the folding phone with a wraparound edge to edge screen, this,

01:18:56   this redesign will quote unquote make sense. And I don't think that's true because all

01:19:00   you'd have to do is change a safe area insets with the old design and it would make just as much

01:19:04   sense. Like it's no, you don't need them to be floating lozenges. You don't need to see the

01:19:07   content through them. You don't need to see the content behind them. But yeah, those are the three

01:19:11   main things that I object to this entire OS design. I think it's ugly. Your mileage will vary,

01:19:16   but just subjectively, I think it's not attractive. I think in, you know, in setting everything off of

01:19:21   the margins and making them floating and having to have margins around all the buttons,

01:19:24   waste space and is bad. Uh, and the content that, and it makes problems with the content being able to be

01:19:30   seen, not underneath the controls, but around where there are no controls. And then finally

01:19:34   having the controls show content that's literally underneath them is a terrible mistake. And

01:19:37   those are the three big ones. There's, there's a lot of smaller nitpicks to pick, but, uh, nothing

01:19:42   about using the iOS 26 has changed my mind about any of that. It's just as bad as I thought it would

01:19:47   be much like Tahoe. Like I said about Tahoe, you get used to it. It's fine. Like it's not a big deal.

01:19:53   I said this from like day one on Tahoe. Like I hate how it looks. I think it's incredibly stupid,

01:19:57   but, but it's, it's fine. You survive. It's not the end of the world. It, it, it could be worse.

01:20:02   Right. Um, and, and this is coming from someone who doesn't even like how it looks. And I feel that

01:20:06   way about iOS 26. Now in iOS 26, I have been, I'm still am and have been trying to like, just leave it

01:20:11   on the defaults. Cause I didn't want to be like, Oh, day one, I'm putting them reduced transparency.

01:20:15   I'm putting on like, I just want to use it like, like it shipped just so I have a legit

01:20:19   experience from it. And so far I'm mostly sticking with that. There are all sorts of situations where

01:20:24   things are legible on the screen. And like, I, I basically got burned out on those before the

01:20:29   thing actually shipped because we've seen so many of them, but they're real. They come up like in

01:20:33   particular when the bloomy way on day one was like, if you take a screenshot on iOS 26 and then you look

01:20:39   at that screenshot and the stupid photos app with the stupid iOS 26 design, guess what?

01:20:44   The screenshot, which is a picture of your phone screen that has like the time at the top on your

01:20:48   battery shows right underneath the actual time on your screen and the battery when the screenshot is

01:20:53   shown full screen. And why? Because the photos app has a completely transparent status bar that shows

01:21:00   the photo underneath it. So you get to see the time you get to see what the time was in the screenshot

01:21:04   exactly superimposed on top of the actual time. And it just scrambles that whole top of the screen

01:21:08   looks, it looks ridiculous. Like I just, I can't even believe that they shipped something. This was

01:21:13   so dumb, but in, in the grand scheme of things, when that happens, I, you pinch and you can see

01:21:18   what time it really is. And you know, like there are always ways around it. It's not the end of the

01:21:22   world. It's fine. Your phone will be fine. And practically speaking, I still haven't turned on

01:21:26   reduced transparency. I just deal with, cause I think it looks even uglier with reduced transparency.

01:21:30   Honestly, I just deal with the way it looks.

01:21:32   Well, also 26.0 has some pretty bad bugs with reduced transparency, especially in dark mode,

01:21:38   which I still continue to hear from customers every single day about. I cannot wait for 26.1 to be

01:21:47   lured to the public as long as they fix tethering first. But yeah, I cannot wait.

01:21:51   Yeah. I wish they would fix these other obvious things that are just like fundamental to design,

01:21:55   but it's like, I don't know what they can do about it. But anyway, and then finally on the sort of

01:21:58   keeping the default front, there was lots of discussion on earlier episodes of YouTube going

01:22:02   back and forth about, uh, the whatever compact, uh, toolbar and safari at the bottom, right?

01:22:07   You can have it be two stack and you get the immediate one tap access back to your tabs and

01:22:11   stuff like that. I've left it on the default just to see if I could tolerate it. And the answer is,

01:22:16   yeah, I mostly can. I find myself using most often the double tap on the three dots button,

01:22:22   which is a nice gesture. I think they, uh, it seems like it might just be a consequence of like,

01:22:27   oh, actually you're just catching the animation in the process, but I think they programmed that in.

01:22:30   I think they made sure that a double tap, like, I don't think you're catching the in transition

01:22:34   animation of the pop-up menu. I think they're just registering a two tap gesture and doing it. So I

01:22:39   use double tap. Occasionally you swipe up from the little bar thingy. Um, and the reason I haven't

01:22:44   gone to the two, two stack is because I don't want more. I don't want it eating into even more of my

01:22:48   space. It's bad enough that I have that stupid, useless area on the bottom where there's nothing.

01:22:52   Then I have the floating toolbar. Uh, I don't want to waste more space with the second row. So

01:22:57   yeah, I've been using stock iOS 26. I've been surviving. It's fine except for all the parts

01:23:03   where it's ridiculous and stupid. And I hope that someone comes in and changes this in the next five

01:23:08   to 10 years. Wow. Cool. Uh, all right. So I was in Memphis when iOS 26 dropped and I was around a

01:23:20   bunch of all sack employees again, all sack, uh, what is it? American Lebanese, Syrian, uh, something,

01:23:26   something, I forget what it means. Uh, but anyways, it's a fundraising arm for, um, for St. Jude

01:23:30   and an associated charities. There you go. Uh, anyway, so I would ask these like regular people,

01:23:36   what do you think of iOS 26? And did they have it on their phone or you asked them to be your phone?

01:23:40   No, no, no. Their own phones. And I think, in fact, I think a lot of them had it pushed to their

01:23:45   work devices, which they were not happy about. Um, but anyways, for the most part, the reaction was

01:23:51   not great. And the only consistent feedback I got that was, that was specific was a lot of people really

01:24:00   hated the way messages looked, particularly the lack of like a opaque bar at the top. And at least one or

01:24:08   two people commented. And I have the same issue. A lot of times when I want to send a screenshot of

01:24:13   a messages conversation, I want to send like a comment or two, like, I don't need the whole damn

01:24:18   conversation. And what I would do in iOS 18 is if you're quick about it, you can scroll, scroll,

01:24:23   scroll so that the, there's a big gap between the last message in the keyboard. And that would

01:24:28   shove the last couple of messages all the way up to the top of the screen. Right. And then you can

01:24:33   take a screenshot and then crop that screenshot. So you've got the top of the screen, you've got the,

01:24:37   the header and the navigation bar with who you're talking to. And the last couple of text messages

01:24:42   sent. And I do that oftentimes to call attention to the specific context I want, or maybe it's,

01:24:47   you know, private information that I'm not trying to share above that, but I do this not

01:24:51   infrequently. And that is effectively impossible now because there is no top navigation bar in the

01:24:57   same sense that there wasn't 18. And what's there is translucent. And there were a handful of people

01:25:02   that really didn't like that. So then I get home, uh, I transfer Aaron's old phone to her new one, which

01:25:08   means she's getting iOS 26. And the first thing she said to me is how in the name of Zeus's butthole do I

01:25:14   close a tab in Safari? Not her words, but you get the idea. Um, how do I close a tab in Safari?

01:25:18   And I explained, well, you know, they really rejiggered everything and I tried it for a few

01:25:21   days. I couldn't handle it. I really did give it an honest thought, but I couldn't handle it.

01:25:25   And so, um, I, I went back to the best of my knowledge. She hasn't yet, which probably relates

01:25:31   to the fact that she has about 11 D billion tabs on her phone. It drives me bananas, but it works for her.

01:25:36   Um, but the one positive feedback that she gave me, most of it, she was like, meh, whatever. Uh,

01:25:42   but the positive bit of feedback she gave me, which I am also enjoying, but I think she's

01:25:45   gotten genuinely quite a lot of love out of is being able to see typing indicators in a group

01:25:52   text because it used to be, you could see, see a typing indicator when one-to-one chats, including

01:25:56   an RCS, but you can now get that in group chats on iMessage. And she was really, really into

01:26:01   that. And I thought that was interesting. So that's my feedback. Has Tiff had anything interesting

01:26:06   or worthwhile to note about it? No, she's basically been like, it's fine. Whatever.

01:26:11   Fair enough. Yeah. My kids haven't gotten it yet, but they're going to get it with their

01:26:13   new phone. So it'll be interesting to see what they think. Because again, like I said, my daughter,

01:26:17   when I put Tahoe on quote unquote her laptop, which is not really hers. Um, wow. She did not

01:26:23   like it. She was like, no, no, don't want, don't want. I'm like, all right, well, you know,

01:26:27   then she's got a new laptop now that doesn't have Tahoe on it. And I had both my kids turn off

01:26:32   auto updates before Tahoe came out because they both expressed that they did not want it. So now

01:26:36   they don't have to get it. Uh, eventually they probably will. But anyway, uh, I bet they'll

01:26:41   probably be fine with it on their phone, but my, my daughter has complaints about a lot of things,

01:26:44   but eventually she gets over it. It's just like I said, I, this is a blog post that I almost made

01:26:49   like three times. So just those, those three things that apparently I need to write better in my notes

01:26:54   document of just like how it looks. I think it's ugly, uh, moving things in from the edges and the fact

01:26:59   that you can see through stuff. And those are the three like top level, top three sins of this

01:27:05   design. And they spread to all the OSs and they're just, they're bad ideas. They're just bad ideas.

01:27:11   And so, and we get to deal with them everywhere. And I mean, obviously the look, if you like the look,

01:27:15   it's too bad ideas. Right. But for me, it's three because I don't like how it looks.

01:27:18   All right. Tell me about iOS or excuse me, iPad OS 26.1, John.

01:27:23   I'm even more wary about the other OSs. Obviously, uh, like with the iPad, I mentioned,

01:27:27   we were talking about the beta is like, Oh, slide over is gone. That's like my main use

01:27:31   case for using my iPad as I watch full screen video. Cause it's like my little, my little

01:27:35   bedtime TV. I watch full screen video. And then I have social media apps and slide over. I'm

01:27:40   watching like some, you know, thing that I don't need to pay tons of attention to like some crappy

01:27:44   reality TV. And I have stuff in slide over slide over. Like my normal slide over apps I have

01:27:49   these days are, uh, Slack, Ivory and Tapestry. Tapestry is the thing I used to read Blue Sky most of the

01:27:56   time. Um, and it's nice. I got full screen video when I want to see something that slide over. I

01:28:02   slide it over. Uh, and if you swipe at the bottom of a slide over thing, you can cycle through which

01:28:07   thing you're seeing in slide over. So I can rotate through those, those things that I just said with

01:28:11   the slide over staying there, it just goes like a little bunch of cards. One, two, three, just goes

01:28:15   around in a cycle. Swipe, swipe, swipe, swipe, swipe. And when you're done with the slide over,

01:28:17   you just chuck it. You can flick the slide over to the other side of the screen. If you want on the left

01:28:20   and the right, you can hide it. That's slide over. And I heard that iPad OS 26 doesn't have it.

01:28:25   I'm like, I'm all, you know, I don't, the winning features are not for me. Like I don't, I don't use

01:28:30   my iPad in that way, but I'm like, I don't mind them. It should all be fine, but I want my slide over.

01:28:34   So everyone was all excited when iPad OS 26.1 beta came out and said, slide over's back, slide over's

01:28:39   back and iPad OS 26.1. Everyone's so excited about it. And so I foolishly updated from 18 to 26.1 beta

01:28:47   just to get slide over. And I think that they did a bad job.

01:28:53   Oh no. What happened?

01:28:55   Well, so first of all, the thing that everybody knows is now you can only have one app in slide

01:28:59   over, which doesn't make any sense to me. Because like I said, when we talked about iPad OS 26,

01:29:03   slide over fits perfectly with the windowing system of iPad 26. It's just another way of dealing with

01:29:11   windows. It makes your windows tall and skinny, and it puts them off to the side where you can't

01:29:15   see them. And when you swipe in from the edge, they come. And when you cycle through it, like

01:29:18   it, it fits perfectly. There's tons of other things you do with windows and windowing mode

01:29:22   and iPad that are just like that. This is just another one. It's just another place where you

01:29:25   can make windows. You know, you got stage manager, you have the windowing thing, you got all sorts

01:29:28   of ways to deal with windows and iPad. And this fits the paradigm perfectly. It doesn't require

01:29:33   the windows to be anything but what they are. It's just an automated way to have them off

01:29:37   screen and then on screen and cycle through them. But they said, no, you can only have one of

01:29:40   these in 26.1 beta. I don't know why, but that's what they did. Second, they put a translucent sort

01:29:47   of liquid glass, whatever, outline around the thing, pretty big, like half a centimeter outline

01:29:53   around the thing to indicate that it's not like other windows, like it's going to behave differently,

01:29:57   you know. At least I'm guessing that's what it's for. So you don't think it's just a regular window

01:30:01   because it behaves like a slide over window. You can gesture to chuck it off the screen. You can gesture

01:30:05   to pull it on. That's not true. Other windows, it's true slider. Fine. It's an affordance. Didn't

01:30:10   need to be there before, but I don't object to it at all. The real thing they screwed up. Well, a couple

01:30:15   of things. One, if you remember the original iPhone, one of the cool features they had, and it's still

01:30:22   there to this day, is if you're doing something like, say, scrolling a web page, if especially back in

01:30:28   the olden days of the original iPhone, not a lot of websites were updated for mobile, as they say.

01:30:34   They were just regular websites that would render on your iPhone, and sometimes the text would be real

01:30:37   small, and you'd pinch a zoom, blah, blah, blah, but they weren't like sort of mobile savvy.

01:30:41   So you mean like Daring Fireball?

01:30:43   Yeah, exactly. I said I needed a website to test this on, and I immediately went to Daring Fireball.

01:30:47   Sorry, George.

01:30:47   There it is.

01:30:48   Because he hasn't updated his website. And here's the key thing. When you have a sort of a

01:30:52   non-mobile savvy website, or any kind of content, any kind of content on your phone screen

01:30:56   that you can scroll up and down and left and right. There's more to the left, there's more to the right,

01:31:01   there's more up, there's more down. This can be an image, this can be whatever, but very often non-mobile

01:31:04   savvy web pages are like this, right? But what the iPhone would do from day one is if it sensed that

01:31:10   you were trying to scroll vertically, it would lock you into like a rail vertically. And even if as you

01:31:16   started scrolling vertically, your finger went off to the left, or your finger drifted right a little bit,

01:31:22   the content wouldn't go off to the left or drift right. It would be like it was stuck on a rail,

01:31:26   like, ah, you're vertically scrolling. I'm not going to make you carefully, perfectly move your

01:31:32   finger in a straight line down the screen. I'm going to let you once I realize you're vertically

01:31:35   scrolling, I'm going to lock it in there. And just makes it much we take it for granted. But this is

01:31:40   a thing about the iPhone. If you've ever noticed this before, go load Darren Friable and try it out.

01:31:44   As soon as it figures out you're going up and down, it locks you into that. And so even if you move

01:31:47   your thumb side to side, it won't do that. Slide over 26.1 beta miraculously undoes this.

01:31:54   Because when you try to chuck the slide over thing back off the screen, you're like,

01:31:59   why is the thing moving up and down? It exactly tracks my finger. I'm trying to, like, alt slide

01:32:05   over. And when you chucked it, it would be like, oh, I see you're trying to dismiss that. And it would

01:32:09   move it exactly to the right, exactly east, right? Or exactly west. And the current one tracks your

01:32:15   finger. So it looks like it's like, it's all loosey goosey. And it's like, it's going up and down.

01:32:19   It's like, that's stupid. Like, why would that? How could they screw that up? And then on top of

01:32:24   that, in my context where I'm watching full screen video and sliding a thing over and back, first of

01:32:29   all, when I swipe it in from the edge of the screen, it doesn't slide in from the edge. It like fades

01:32:34   into its final position. Like, what the hell? It's called slide over. Slide it over, people.

01:32:39   Like, just slide it from the side. It like cross fades into its final position. And then it makes

01:32:46   the full screen, like it has a full screen flash of both windows, like a flicker, like a one frame

01:32:53   flicker flash when the thing comes in. I brought my iPad to just try this out because like, it's so,

01:32:58   it's so maddening to me that like, that they managed to screw this. Like, I should slow-mo it because I

01:33:04   think it like, it half animates, but then fades into the final position. And if you're playing

01:33:09   video, it makes the whole screen flicker every time it comes in and out. Now, granted, this is a beta.

01:33:13   Maybe they'll fix this stuff. I'm like, how do you screw up slide over so bad? It's a feature you

01:33:17   already had that you could have taken exactly as is and put it into the OS. And somehow they found a way

01:33:25   to make it less useful and screw it up in every possible detail. Oh, and then the final thing is,

01:33:31   and this is not the fault of iPadOS 26, I guess. But lots of the apps I use don't understand iOS 26

01:33:40   windowing system. So for example, in ivory, if you swipe left and right and like the toolbar on the top

01:33:47   of the thing, you can change accounts. But when you're an iPadOS, the windowing system grabs that swipe

01:33:54   and thinks you're chucking the window to the left. That's not what you're trying to do. In tapestry,

01:34:00   when you tap a link in the thing and it brings up like an in in in app browser sheet type thing.

01:34:07   And you dismiss that sheet by hitting the big X in the upper or whatever to dismiss like the web view

01:34:12   sheet thing. It dismisses the web view, but it also registers it as a tap on top of the timeline and

01:34:17   scrolls you immediately to the top. Because of the confusion about who is controlling what safe area

01:34:22   inset or whatever, these are a combination of like apps not being updated for iOS 26 and beta bugs and

01:34:27   stuff like that. But the overall experience is that the thing I was trying to avoid, I did to

01:34:32   myself, I feel like Casey, I was trying to avoid messing with trying to avoid messing with my

01:34:37   workflow of like watching full screen video and having apps and slide over. And I messed with it in every

01:34:41   possible way. Because now I'm constantly accidentally scrolling tapestry all the way to the top and have

01:34:45   to use to use the jump back button. I'm sliding things in and out and having a screen flicker every

01:34:51   time it happens. I'm being distracted by the fact that the thing is wobbling up and down as I move it in and

01:34:55   out. I'm being annoyed every time the fade animation comes in and I'm being annoyed about that big

01:34:59   outline. I don't know how they managed this. It was an existing feature, but they re-implanted it

01:35:04   poorly with fewer features. So it's better than not having it. Like I'm sorry, it's better than not

01:35:09   having it, but I kind of regret upgrading. Wow. So other than that, did you like the play?

01:35:14   I mean, if you think how I use my iPad, what else am I getting out of iPad OS 26? Like I'm not a power

01:35:20   user of iPad. It's I'm using, I got this thing for the freaking OLED screen so I could watch TV on it

01:35:24   and also have slack and ivory and tapestry. And it's just, it's kind of sad, but you know, I will

01:35:31   endure. I'm glad. All right. So we have more first impressions to talk about. We're going to have to

01:35:39   shelve that because there's been some news this week. Apple has pulled ice block from the app store.

01:35:44   Richard Lawler at the Verge writes, Apple has removed the ice block app from its app store.

01:35:48   The ice block app is intended to use, to be used anonymously to report sightings of U.S.

01:35:52   Immigration Customs Enforcement or ICE officials and see sightings reported within a five mile radius.

01:35:58   Ice block rose to the top of the app store's charts this summer after being targeted by Trump

01:36:02   administration officials with U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem calling it an obstruction

01:36:07   of justice and Attorney General Pam Bondi claiming it was not a protected speech. On October 2nd,

01:36:13   Bondi took credit for the app's removal saying to Fox News Digital, we reached out to Apple today

01:36:17   demanding they remove the ice block app from their app store. And Apple did so. Ice block is designed

01:36:22   to put ice agents at risk just for doing their jobs. And violence against law enforcement is an

01:36:26   intolerable red line that cannot be crossed. Excuse me while I pick up my eyes, which has just rolled

01:36:31   out of my head. Oh, I'm going to have a lot to say about this. No, we have to be quick. It'll be fine.

01:36:36   Don't worry. Ice block developer Joshua Aaron is quoted in the same report as saying it counts over 1.1

01:36:41   million users. And that Apple has claimed they received information from law enforcement that

01:36:46   ice blocks serve to harm law enforcement or officers. This is patently false.

01:36:49   Apple made similar claims in 2019 when it removed HK Map, an app that allowed Hong Kong protesters to

01:36:55   trace the movements of law enforcement with CEO Tim Cook telling employees that over the past several

01:37:00   days, we received credible information from the Hong Kong Cybersecurity and Technology Crime Bureau,

01:37:03   as well as from users in Hong Kong, that the app was being used maliciously to target individual

01:37:07   officers for violence and to victimize individuals and property where no police are present. At the time,

01:37:12   lawmakers from both sides of the aisle spoke out against Apple's censorship of apps. A letter signed by

01:37:16   four Republican and three Democratic members of Congress, including Cruz and AOC, if I'm not mistaken,

01:37:22   said cases like these raise real concern about whether Apple and other U.S.

01:37:26   large U.S. corporate entities will bow to growing Chinese demands rather than lose access to a

01:37:31   billion Chinese customers or consumers. Excuse me. Hmm. You know, it would be great. It would be

01:37:36   really great if we had an alternative way of getting apps on our phones. But let's just get through this

01:37:41   before we do the commentary. But yes, it's true. Reuters says Apple removed more than 1,700 apps from its

01:37:46   app store in 2024 in response to government of demands. But the vast majority, more than 1,300, came from China,

01:37:51   followed by Russia with 171, South Korea with 79. Over the last three years, the United States has not

01:37:56   appeared as one of the countries where apps were removed due to government demands, according to the

01:37:59   company Application Transparency Reports. MJ Tsai writes, back in 2011, a group of Democratic senators

01:38:06   asked Apple to remove DUI checkpoint apps from the app store. Apple's position at the time was that these

01:38:09   apps were a net positive in terms of public safety. Then the government brought the Apple VP of

01:38:14   software technology, Bud Tribble, before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee, where Senator Schumer

01:38:18   demanded, and Senator Udall lambasted, and Apple changed its mind and banned the apps.

01:38:24   Cool.

01:38:25   So this last bit of context here. So the Verge story is like, here's the deal, here's what people said

01:38:29   about it with the Iceblock app. I think the Reuters and MJ Tsai story provided some important context,

01:38:33   in particular that 1,700 apps were banned in 2024 due to government responses. Like, government asked

01:38:41   Apple to pull an app, and they said yes, 1,700 times. Again, most of them from China, followed by Russia,

01:38:46   and that the U.S. was not on that list. But then MJ Tsai points out, actually, the U.S. has made Apple pull

01:38:51   down an app, and it was kind of similar, like law enforcement related, to remove DUI checkpoint apps.

01:38:56   You remember where that happened back in 2011? These were apps that would tell you, like, here's a place where

01:39:00   police are checking for drunk drivers, and you could note them. And, you know, again, Democrats and Republicans

01:39:07   asked Apple, you need to pull these apps. Apple hadn't pulled them, even though people had asked them to, and then they

01:39:13   brought them in front of the Congress, and they said, you've got to do this, and eventually

01:39:16   Apple pulled the apps, right? And obviously, the HK map one is very similar, like tracking protests or

01:39:22   whatever, again, law enforcement related. So I feel like the story here is that Apple has always been

01:39:28   pulling apps when governments asked them to, but usually those governments are China and Russia,

01:39:33   and it has happened once or twice with the U.S. when it's related to law enforcement,

01:39:37   government. But now it's happening again with an app that very much looks like a law enforcement

01:39:42   type app, you know, knowing where ICE is or whatever. And before we go wandering off into

01:39:47   ICE, ICE block, and the current context, which is much more dire for us than the DUI checkpoint time

01:39:54   was in 2011, let's say, but actually is very similar. I do want to say that this whole,

01:40:00   this whole thing is a good example of the limits of Apple's strategy, because Apple's strategy with

01:40:08   the Trump administration both times has been essentially appeasement. Try to make nice with

01:40:13   them. Try to make them not mad at you, because when they're mad at you, they are, you know, it's a

01:40:17   corrupt administration, and they will do things to harm your company individually in a vindictive way

01:40:22   because they, because they're just, you know, mobsters and bullies, right? Um, they'll, they'll

01:40:27   specifically hurt your company and we want them specifically not hurt our company. So we're working

01:40:31   within a corrupt system to try to get favors, blah, blah, blah. The problem with that strategy

01:40:36   is the strategy is not to make them mad. And you can blow that whole strategy. Appeasement stops working

01:40:44   and becomes pointless. The second you push back at all and make them mad at you, because then it's

01:40:51   like, well, what did you do all that appeasement for? So it leads to like the sunk cost fallacy of

01:40:56   saying, well, we already made nice with all these things. We already did all this stuff. When they

01:41:00   ask us to pull the ice block out, if we say no, they'll be mad at us. And it's like, well, then what

01:41:05   did we do all that appeasement for? What, what did we sell our souls for before? And so you're inclined to

01:41:09   say yes and say yes to the next thing and say yes to the next thing. And it's a slippery slope of

01:41:13   appeasement. The word comes up in the context of World War II all the time.

01:41:16   Appeasement looks great right up until you have the rise of Hitler and then doesn't look so good

01:41:22   anymore, does it? Because you're like anyone who was on board with that appeasement thing tends to

01:41:27   look bad in the eye of history of saying you were appeasing this monster. And you're like, well,

01:41:31   when I was appeasing them, they weren't really that monstrous. They were just on their way to

01:41:34   monsters. And I kept appeasing them. And, but eventually I found my limit and Apple apparently has not

01:41:38   found its limit. And, um, and it's not just the, you know, the fact that we have a terrible corrupt

01:41:42   administration now, again, in 2011 situation was different. It was still, Apple was still making

01:41:47   the same calculus. Oh, the government wants us to do this thing. We don't really care one way or the

01:41:52   other. We'll probably get bad press from this if we say it's helping people to drunk drive. So we'll do

01:41:57   this, but we'll still leave the speed, uh, you know, the speed radar checkpoint things in the Apple

01:42:02   maps app. Like they didn't get rid of that, but DUI is over the line. Like they're always doing this

01:42:06   very cynical corporate calculus of if there's too much public or government pressure to get rid of

01:42:11   an app in the app store, we'll do it. In the end, we controlled it and it's our decision, but we will

01:42:15   do it. And devoid of any context, I feel like the ice block app feels exactly like that. It's like,

01:42:22   Oh, some government thing doesn't want us to have a thing. And Oh, this is harming law enforcement.

01:42:27   Or so they say, or they lie about everything, but half the country believes them anyway. So whatever,

01:42:30   we'll just get rid of it. It'll be fine. But that's missing the wider context,

01:42:33   which I'm sure Marco will get to in a second, which is, uh, 2025 is not 2011. Uh, the current

01:42:39   administration is not what it used to be. And appeasement in this scenario, even though it has

01:42:44   been Apple strategy from day one, uh, it has its limits and Apple so far has not found that limit

01:42:50   for them. But I think a lot of their observers have said, you need to like, you need to just get over

01:42:56   the sunk cost fallacy and give up on the appeasement strategy and throw away all the stuff that you've

01:43:02   done and screw your whole company over. Because if you keep down this path of just always saying

01:43:07   yes and always agreeing, that's not going to lead anywhere good. Like we all hope that they're going

01:43:12   to find a line somewhere. But every time something like this happens, people like Marco flip out

01:43:16   justifiably and say, I guess there is no line. I guess there's literally nothing that they can ask

01:43:20   for that. They won't do. It's not that again, not removing ice block is not the biggest thing in the

01:43:24   world, but it's like, you just start extrapolating. Well, what if they ask for this? What if they ask for

01:43:27   that? Because again, the appeasement strategy requires you to not make them mad and saying

01:43:32   no to them will make them mad, which means you will say yes to anything. Marco, please go.

01:43:37   Okay.

01:43:39   Understanding. I would like to go to bed at some point tonight.

01:43:41   I'm going to go and you're going to have to bear with me here.

01:43:47   So this entire premise is predicated on a lie. It's predicated on the idea that they had to remove

01:43:56   this app because it was dangerous to law enforcement. That is a straight up lie. If you think about,

01:44:03   okay, what unreasonable danger is posed to ISIS? They use the term officials. I would use the term

01:44:11   kidnappers and murderers. What unreasonable danger is posed to ISIS kidnappers and murderers by people

01:44:18   telling other people where they are. They're the ones that have the guns, zero accountability,

01:44:25   and the complete support of a fascist federal government behind them. They are kidnapping and

01:44:31   murdering US citizens. And we are supposed to believe that they are the ones that need protection

01:44:36   from people knowing where they are. ICE agents, just like Donald Trump himself, are pathetic,

01:44:45   weak, thin-skinned racists who only know how to demonstrate strength with cruelty, violence,

01:44:52   and punching down. They are cowards and they hide their cowardly faces behind masks because the only

01:44:58   real danger they face is cameras. And they're such cowards they can't even handle that.

01:45:06   Now, just like when racists twisted Black Lives Matter into Blue Lives Matter and All Lives Matter,

01:45:13   the idea that the ICE agents are the victims in need of protection from the people they're

01:45:18   assaulting and killing is a dangerous lie. And that lie will be used to justify using more deadly

01:45:25   force in retaliation. And Apple is now complicit in that lie. And the context of this is very

01:45:34   important. The Trump administration is literally waging war on America on Americans. This is not

01:45:41   a metaphor. They are waging war against US law, the US Constitution, and US citizens in the US.

01:45:47   They're deploying military troops intentionally into liberal cities that will probably result in them

01:45:55   shooting liberals. And now, this might sound like an exaggeration, but if this does, ask, say, your parents,

01:46:02   if you're maybe under age, you know, 50 or so, or ask Neil Young, what happens when a thin-skinned

01:46:09   Republican president does deplorable things, and then when people start protesting, they deploy National

01:46:15   Guard soldiers against them? This is going to escalate. People have already died. A lot more people will

01:46:24   probably die as this escalates. And Apple, in this war against Americans on American soil,

01:46:31   has chosen not only to not fight against it, but to explicitly and repeatedly support the aggressors

01:46:39   of this war. Tim Cook's legacy will forever be tarnished by his Trump support. And not only is he

01:46:47   destroying Apple's brand and reputation by doing this, he's supporting the destruction of our democracy

01:46:55   and our home country. Tim Cook has shown us exactly who and what he is. He is cowardly, spineless,

01:47:02   and I would say at this point, irredeemable. But there are other people, powerful people at Apple

01:47:09   who can still make a difference. So Tim Cook is a lost cause. He has shown us who he is. Believe him.

01:47:17   I urge the rest of Apple's senior leadership to do some serious soul-searching right now and consider

01:47:25   what they're willing to support, what they want their careers and legacies to mean, and what they

01:47:33   would like to tell their grandchildren in the future about how they handled what's going on in America

01:47:37   right now with the power they had. Please, Apple leadership, really do some soul-searching and

01:47:42   consider how you want this to end. It's pretty concise. I disagree with a lot of your more extreme

01:47:49   statements there, but the gist is that I think we're all more or less on board with. The lie that

01:47:55   they're perpetrating does have a foundation in plausibility, which is like, in theory, knowing

01:48:01   where law enforcement are located could cause them to come to harm because now people who are trying to

01:48:06   harm them know where they are and can ambush them and so on and so forth. In practice, has that happened?

01:48:09   No, not to my knowledge. So it's just a theoretical thing that could happen. It's the same thing with

01:48:13   the Hong Kong protesters, like trying to avoid the armed forces or whatever. It's like, yeah,

01:48:18   you're picking a side. You're picking the side of law enforcement saying, we don't want people to

01:48:22   know where we are through eight of this app, despite the fact that in our country anyway, it's perfectly

01:48:26   legal to take pictures of police in public and so on and so forth. Still, the story that our government

01:48:32   says to Apple is like, you know, Apple even says they told us that law enforcement officers are

01:48:37   coming to harm because of this. Could it have happened? Maybe. But our government lies so much

01:48:41   about everything routinely all the time. Like, look at all the court cases. They just straight up lie.

01:48:45   ICE in particular lies like crazy. Again, as proven in court multiple times, it's hard to take anything

01:48:51   they say as truth. But in theory, it could happen. So like the issue is actually somewhat nuanced,

01:48:57   kind of like the DUI checkpoint things. Like, do you want people evading DUI checkpoints when they're

01:49:01   drunk? Probably not. Um, as Casey pointed out earlier, this whole thing is a problem caused by

01:49:07   Apple being the only way you can get apps because if Apple wasn't the only way, fine, let them ban

01:49:11   whatever they want. We'll just get it from an alternative app store. But that's not the world

01:49:16   we live in, at least in this country. Um, so yeah, it's problems on top of problems on top of problems.

01:49:21   And like the, the, the appeasement strategy, like it's just, it's a, it's essentially a trap. Like it's,

01:49:27   it works fine right up until it doesn't, but when it doesn't, it negates everything you've done.

01:49:32   It's like, well, what was the point in all of that? What was the point in all the harm that we caused?

01:49:37   If it turns out that the strategy is not sustainable. And I really feel like the strategy is not

01:49:42   sustainable at this point. Like it's just, it's not the fact that they pulled an app. It's, that's not

01:49:47   the thing. It's what everything that Marco said that what's happening with ice in this country is

01:49:50   just very, very bad. It's very bad. It's not like the DUI checkpoints, nothing like this was happening

01:49:59   in that context. So it's like, Oh, Apple pulls an app. It's kind of crappy, but whatever. And now it's

01:50:03   like, okay, well, Apple's Apple pulling the app is part of what part of a thing that is happening

01:50:07   that is terrible and is just getting worse by the day. I I'm a little bit more optimistic than you are

01:50:13   Marco that I'm hoping that the people wearing, uh, uh, dinosaur suits in Portland will actually not,

01:50:18   uh, get themselves shot and killed by ice, but you never know what's going to happen. So

01:50:23   I'm, you know, I'm, I'm hoping that, uh, ridicule and peaceful protest and, uh, you know, we'll,

01:50:28   we'll keep this from escalating because I'm hoping that our side is not going to escalate this

01:50:34   because honestly, like the premise of all this, of sending, you know, sending the national guard

01:50:37   into cities, like the cities are war zones. Everyone's dying, which is not, which is obviously

01:50:41   not true, but part of the whole fascist thing is you just make up lies, get enough people to believe

01:50:44   it. And then you send in troops and then the troops, you know, cause violence to happen. And

01:50:49   they say, see, look, we told you there was violence and it's just, it's a terrible thing,

01:50:52   but hopefully people know that that's what's happening and can do things like dressing up

01:50:57   in silly outfits to, uh, combat it. Uh, but anyway, it's, yeah, it's grim and Apple is not helping.

01:51:03   I hope you are more right than I am. I don't think you will be, but I hope you are.

01:51:09   Yeah. We'll see. Like it's, you really can't tell how these things are going to go, but like

01:51:13   for people who are in positions to, to influence it, like, you know, obviously individual citizens

01:51:19   protesting and voting and so on and so forth, but like in positions of power, like Apple or any of

01:51:23   the other companies that are, or universities or any of any other of the large institutions in our

01:51:28   country that are being, that the government has essentially captured with this, with this, uh,

01:51:33   appeasement is the path of least resistance strategy. They can actually make an even bigger

01:51:37   difference. And it's, uh, it's sometimes heartening to see like a couple of universities

01:51:41   actually standing up for themselves, but it's incredibly disheartening to see Apple and all

01:51:45   the tech companies and Columbia university and all the other things that just have folded like a house

01:51:49   of cards and they're not pushing back. And like I said, it's because the second they push back,

01:51:53   they, it, they are self negating their entire, you know, nine month long appeasement strategy.

01:52:00   And that's going to feel bad for them. It's a sunk cost fallacy, but they, they probably need to just

01:52:04   get over it. Yeah. And also I think at this point, it is very clear that, uh, Apple needs to, at this

01:52:10   point, recognize what they are and stop quoting Martin Luther King on their homepage. Yeah. And also I would

01:52:18   say other, other people who would have pretty strong opinions about what they're doing right

01:52:22   now, stop quoting them too, including Steve jobs. They should never quote Steve jobs again on their

01:52:29   homepage. If they're going to act like this, because a lot of people say, what would Steve do? And a lot

01:52:33   of times wish wishful thinking Steve would not do this. He, he was a hippie. He was there. He would do a

01:52:43   lot of things for the shameless seeking of money and success. He would not do this.

01:52:48   I don't know. People get old. He did do that thing with like, uh, uh, colluding to, uh, not let people

01:52:53   change jobs for more money with like Pixar and everything. That's pretty close to this again.

01:52:58   Not great. Like he's, he did a lot of not great things and had a lot of not great opinions. And he

01:53:03   was a master BS artist to try to rationalize what he was doing, but he would not do this.

01:53:08   Well, anyway, what we really got to be hoping for is what the next CEO will do. And Steve's not going to

01:53:13   be the next CEO and neither is Tim. So fingers crossed that, that transition cannot happen soon

01:53:20   enough. Hi. Did you see the recent story there talking about all the, like that Jeff Williams

01:53:24   leaving and stuff like that. A German had a bunch on it. And it was mentioning like, if Tim leaves,

01:53:28   he might still be chairman of the board. I'm like, no, Tim, just go to an Island. Do not stay on as

01:53:33   chairman of the board, please. I mean, at least it would be, at least it would be step one. Like step

01:53:36   one is get out of the CEO role. I know, but like, I know obviously he's going to be around

01:53:40   for a while. Not to turn this to a succession topic, but like part of the, one of the things

01:53:45   that Tim had a problem, quote unquote problem that Tim had is just the long shadow of Steve

01:53:49   Jobs. So for like his first few years, it was like he was steering the Steve Jobs ship and

01:53:53   that didn't let him become his own CEO, which for better or for worse. And we would say for

01:53:58   worse at this point. Right. Yeah. But like, I'm so afraid that like the next CEO will feel

01:54:03   like they have to like be steering the Tim Cook ship for the first two years. Like, no,

01:54:06   like that's why I want him to get it out on him. I don't want him to be on the board. I don't want

01:54:10   him to be there looking over anyone's shoulder. I want the new CEO to say, I'm the new CEO. I have

01:54:14   different ideas, clean break from the past, but I'm not sure that that's going to happen.

01:54:18   I mean, we'll see like, you know, the, you know, the, the, uh, recent reigniting of the rumors

01:54:23   that John Ternus might be the one kind of, you know, slated up in line next. You know, we,

01:54:27   we don't know that much about John Ternus and in ways like this, like we don't know

01:54:32   like what kind of CEO he would be, but so far, like, honestly, if you look at, you know,

01:54:37   look at what, what at Apple is working really well and what could use some help hardware is

01:54:43   going really well, but the hardware is not, there's nothing, not much political in the

01:54:47   hardware. So it's hard to tell where he stands on that stuff, you know, like that, like we

01:54:51   don't really, we, we won't know that unless we actually, you know, have that situation and

01:54:55   see how it goes. And that's the worst, that's the worst thing about like the, like the second

01:54:58   and third level of the org chart on Apple. You almost have no idea what the hell they're

01:55:01   thinking because everyone speaks with one voice and is so aligned on the message. You

01:55:05   know what I mean? Yeah. And it's like, it's kind of like when you're electing politicians,

01:55:08   you just hope that like this politician did what it took to get elected. But once they get

01:55:12   in there, they're going to do all this great stuff. Almost never happens. Like, because

01:55:16   to get that far, to become the senior vice president at Apple, you have to be so willing

01:55:22   to, you know, be on message and be aligned with the leadership that are you ever going to get

01:55:29   somebody who spends all those years working all the way up, but in their secret heart is

01:55:32   like, what's what I get in charge? I'm going to change everything. No, I'd feel like you

01:55:35   don't like the breed, you breed like the only way you get that close. The only way you get

01:55:39   to be second in line or whatever is to be like, to essentially just drink the Kool-Aid and be

01:55:43   like, yep, no, I agree with all these Apple things. And just that's, and like Ternus is just a

01:55:50   cipher in this because, you know, again, in hardware, you don't spend a lot of time having to

01:55:53   make any kind of decisions that touch this at all. Cause it's like, it's microchips. And like,

01:55:57   I mean, I guess maybe like sourcing parts and like sweatshops and stuff like that, but

01:56:01   even, even that is more of like a Jack Williams type thing. And anyway, uh, it's, I'm, I'm ready

01:56:06   for it to be an uncertain future. I'm kind of the, over the present.

01:56:10   I mean, it's an, I think it's uncertain future now. Like we, you know, we don't know.

01:56:14   I'm ready to be in the uncertain future. Like I'm ready to be like in, in like, Oh, there's

01:56:18   someone new and I don't know what they're going to do. Cause I know what the current people are

01:56:22   going to do and it's not good. Yeah. I mean like, yeah, we need, we need a lot of turnover

01:56:27   right now in a lot of different ways and a lot of different places.

01:56:29   Yeah. And that's what the German story is about that we're referring to that like all those,

01:56:32   all the, you know, Jeff Williams, I think we mentioned this in the show ages ago when it

01:56:35   happened, like bringing a second command up and he's on his way out the door. And a lot,

01:56:39   lots of people are kind of of that age in senior leadership where they're going to retire

01:56:43   within the next few years, including Tim Cook, we all hope. Um, and so there could actually

01:56:46   start to be some turnover at the top level of the company, which is an incredibly

01:56:49   dangerous situation. Things could go terribly wrong, but it's also your only possible hope

01:56:54   for, you know, positive change. Yeah. It just sucks. It all sucks. Everything sucks from top

01:56:59   to bottom. And I feel like it is, I'm casting about trying to find something to be excited about

01:57:09   something to feel like, yes, yes, this group or this person or these people, they get it and

01:57:16   they're fighting for the same thing that I am to whatever degree I'm fighting, fighting

01:57:20   for. And I feel like I am, I've yet to find that person, that group, et cetera.

01:57:26   No, they're out there. They're just losing all the time.

01:57:29   I guess. Yeah.

01:57:30   That's why you can, if you like follow all the court cases, you can enjoy all the lower court

01:57:33   decisions before the Supreme court overrules them all and says Trump can do whatever he

01:57:36   wants. So if you can just enjoy the in-between period after they win decisively in the lower

01:57:41   courts and you get to read those court decisions where they just take the government to task

01:57:44   for being terrible, you know, just bad all over. And then just don't pay attention as

01:57:50   it wanders up to the Supreme court. And they say, no, actually it's fine.

01:57:52   Well, let me tell you, I'm sure the Democrats are fighting tooth and now, nevermind. No, they're

01:57:57   not.

01:57:57   Some of them are, but most of them.

01:57:59   Like I, at this point, it's like, I love that everybody has the quaint idea that the courts

01:58:03   are going to save us. Look, look at how much they have saved us so far. That's not going

01:58:08   to happen. They're not going to save us. The courts won't save us and the Democrats

01:58:12   won't save us. So, you know, keep looking.

01:58:14   Well, the court, the Supreme court won't save us. The lower courts, the government's losing

01:58:19   all the time because they're wrong and breaking the law.

01:58:21   Yes. But then when it gets to the Supreme court, they're going to win again.

01:58:24   Like, yes, that's right. So just enjoy, just enjoy that brief period between those two

01:58:28   things.

01:58:28   You know, look, we've, the entire first Trump era was defined by, you know, like, you know,

01:58:34   Max's old joke, like this time we got him this time. And like, we never, we never

01:58:38   are going to get him. That's it. You want to get him this time. You've got to be rooting

01:58:41   for heart disease.

01:58:41   Yeah. Like nothing else, nothing will ever get him. Like that's for heart disease. We

01:58:48   can, we can all pray for that, but nothing else will get him and nothing else will stop

01:58:54   him. And, you know, if you think this is all going to be over in three years, I got news

01:58:58   for you about that too. Like I wouldn't necessarily count on that either. Until, until time saves

01:59:04   us all, uh, that's, you know, don't count on anything coming to save us. Anyway, what a

01:59:10   great show. Thanks for listening.

01:59:12   So this would have been fine as an after show.

01:59:15   No, you, you can't end on that. It's terrible. We'll have the after show to pick us back up.

01:59:20   Thank you to our sponsors this week, Squarespace, delete me and open case. And thanks to our members

01:59:25   who support us directly. You can join us at atp.fm slash join. One of the perks of membership

01:59:29   is ATP overtime, our weekly bonus topic. This week on overtime, we're going to be talking about

01:59:34   the new meta Ray-Ban display glasses and Apple's changing plans in response to that. You can join

01:59:42   to listen atp.fm slash join. Thank you very much, everybody. And we'll talk to you next week.

01:59:50   Now the show is over. They didn't even mean to begin. Cause it was accidental. Oh, it was accidental.

01:59:59   John didn't do any research. Marco and Casey wouldn't let him. Cause it was accidental. Oh, it was accidental.

02:00:10   And you can find the show notes at atp.fm. And if you're into Mastodon, you can follow them

02:00:21   at C-A-S-E-Y-L-I-S-S. So that's Casey Liss. M-A-R-C-O-A-R-M-N-G. Marco Arman. S-I-R-A-C-U-S-A-C-R-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A. It's accidental.

02:00:39   Accidental. They didn't mean to. Accidental. Accidental. Tech podcast. So long.

02:00:49   So this after show is going to be potentially fun for Marco and I, and real sad for one of us.

02:00:57   Oh no. There's only one left. Uh, John news broke over the last, I don't know, 24, 48 hours as we

02:01:03   record this, that TiVo is exiting its legacy DVR business. Oh, you're going to have to wake up and

02:01:10   join the 2020s. What are you going to do? No, this is not really sad for me because it's like, uh, TiVo,

02:01:16   I'm proud of TiVo for living as long as it has. Yeah. Cause it's, it's been a while. Like TiVo kind of

02:01:23   like, uh, a couple other companies that, uh, I've previously enjoyed, like they lost the ability

02:01:28   to make good products several years ago. Uh, it's the reason I'm still running older TiVos because

02:01:35   they're, they're literally better spec wise than the stuff they were selling. Like they stopped selling,

02:01:40   uh, DVRs that had the hard drive capacity of the one that I bought ages ago. They just like made

02:01:46   them smaller and worse and put smaller diameter, noisier fans in them and crappier hard drives and

02:01:51   just their products got worse. Right. Even as technology marched on and they never really made

02:01:55   the treasures into the 4k era, mostly because cable card didn't make a transition to the 4k era.

02:01:59   Like they're, that's not true. Time has passed them by, but we have 4k cable cards. That's the

02:02:05   thing. Yeah. I'm almost sure of it because I get 4k from my cable card powered HD home run. I'm,

02:02:10   I might be wrong, but I'm almost certain. No, I think we went through this when we did like the HD

02:02:15   home run thing. Like it's not the, it's not the cable card. It's the problem. Remember I was saying

02:02:18   like the only channels I get in 4k are like when they have those Red Sox games locally every once in a

02:02:22   while, but everything else is 1080. Oh, that is 100% true. Yeah. That's basically what I mean.

02:02:26   They're like, their idea was they would take quote unquote cable television and record it to a hard

02:02:30   drive. And if the cable television is 1080, uh, but you can get 4k on Netflix, you know, but anyway,

02:02:35   the streaming area obviously came and passed them by like, you know, and I, even though I still have

02:02:39   TiVos connected to both of my televisions, I have a good one on my downstairs TV and a not so good one

02:02:46   on my upstairs TV. Uh, you know, my, our viewing is just basically transitioned away from them almost

02:02:51   entirely, almost, but not quite entirely to streaming services. So I got, I mentioned this on

02:02:56   ages ago that I got rid of HBO and my cable plan and just subscribed to it in the streaming app

02:03:00   because the streaming app had higher resolution, right? Uh, you know, streaming is, has come and

02:03:05   displaced TiVo. Um, and so it is kind of amazing that they've lasted as long as they can. It is also

02:03:10   a shame that as this transition happened, they lost the ability to make good products. They could have

02:03:15   done more of like a transition into like a more niche consumer product type thing. But like, again,

02:03:20   they're, they're constrained by the fact that the television coming to the house, either over the

02:03:24   air or through cable, uh, lost the spec race to the television coming into your house through streaming

02:03:29   services. We have streaming services just went to 4k faster and higher bit rates and HDR and, uh,

02:03:34   cable was still jamming lots of channels over a single wire and blah, blah, blah. So, you know,

02:03:39   time marches on. Uh, I still have my TiVos. I'm still running them. I still will continue to run them.

02:03:43   I still pay for quote unquote cable television and I get stuff on there. Um, but these days,

02:03:48   for example, and I'm watching the Superbowl or something when that's on rather than just going

02:03:52   directly to TiVo and watching the Superbowl, I'll check if it is in higher resolution on a

02:03:57   streaming service somewhere just to try to get a better version of the Superbowl. The answer is

02:04:01   usually it's not. It's usually basically the same because sports is still kind of behind the times

02:04:04   for a variety of reasons. But anyway, so yeah, TiVo is, uh, no longer making a thing with hard drives

02:04:10   and computers that will record cable television to the hard drive and let you play it back later.

02:04:13   But I do want to say pouring one out for TiVo and even though I don't drink, um, is that the

02:04:19   original TiVo back before high definition television was just, you know, standard definition cable

02:04:25   television, analog cable television coming over a cable, going into a cable card that was stuck into

02:04:31   one of these things that had a computer and a hard drive in it was one of the best consumer

02:04:35   electronic products ever made. Both in terms of how good it was at doing its job, but also in terms of

02:04:42   how it changed the lives of people who had it. It's not iPhone caliber. Obviously it didn't take

02:04:47   the world by storm because it was kind of geeky, but like the way, I mean, if you talk to anybody

02:04:51   who was around back then and got one of the early TiVos, the way it changed your relationship with

02:04:55   television is actually analogous to the way streaming services have changed the way that everybody deals

02:04:59   with television. Uh, because it lets you, you know, let you pause live TV, let you record multiple

02:05:04   shows without using VC, you know, VHS tapes, let you fast forward and rewind and skip commercials,

02:05:09   which is the big thing that changed everyone's lives. Right. And eventually it's recording

02:05:12   six shows at once, which is the thing you only the people with like 17 stacked VCRs used to do.

02:05:16   And then you had to rewind all the tapes and blah, blah, blah. But the real thing, this thing was so

02:05:20   great at was, you know, that little peanut shape remote. And the fact that that thing was so responsive

02:05:24   back in the analog cable days, I don't even know what resolution it was. It was like 480 I,

02:05:29   480 P with like MPEG one code or whatever garbage, like low resolution, primitive algorithms we had.

02:05:36   That was the signal it was recording anyway. So responsive. Pause, immediately pause,

02:05:40   played, immediately played. You could fast forward and rewind in increments of X number of seconds as

02:05:44   fast as you could hit that button. Just incredibly responsive, incredibly easy to navigate. Apple TV

02:05:50   cannot touch the TiVo up, down, left, right, select button. Like every menu was like the old iPhone.

02:05:56   You go right to go into something, you go left to go out, up and down to scroll up and down. The whole

02:06:00   interface was that. So fast, so simple, so readable from the couch. Everything was instant. Play the show.

02:06:08   It's playing. Pause the show. It's paused. Skip commercial. It's like, and as time went on and as

02:06:13   HD came out and so on and so forth, the TiVos got worse. They became less responsive. The interface

02:06:17   went through a terrible transition where it got way, way worse. And some of the interface was in

02:06:22   non-HD and some of it was at HD or whatever. And they, you know, they, they declined. They diminished.

02:06:27   They got worse at what they were doing. Streaming came and wiped them off the face of the earth. But

02:06:31   today with TiVo stopping the production, you can't even buy these anymore, although you shouldn't buy

02:06:36   them because they're worse than the old ones. But stopping production of their hard drive based

02:06:39   DVRs, it's worth remembering just how good the TiVo was in its heyday and how it totally transformed my

02:06:48   relationship with television. It stopped being a thing that I had to sit down at a certain time and

02:06:52   watch or whatever. I stopped seeing commercials entirely, which kind of disconnected, disconnected me

02:06:57   from popular culture for a while because people would talk about commercials that were on TV and

02:07:00   I'd never seen them. That's still kind of true this day because I think a lot of people add support

02:07:04   to streaming services and I don't. But what a piece of hardware. That remote, still amazing. By the way,

02:07:10   if you have old TiVo remotes, you can teach the Apple TV to use them as long as you have IR line of

02:07:14   sight to the thing. I don't necessarily recommend that because in some situations, the Swavy pad is faster

02:07:19   than the five-way button. But in every other respect, using a TiVo remote with your Apple TV is a much

02:07:24   more pleasant experience. If only the Apple TV with eight bajillion times the computing power was as

02:07:29   responsive as like a Series 2 TiVo was back in the day. I'm sorry for young people who didn't

02:07:33   experience this, but believe me, like the same way you don't believe that changing channels used to be as

02:07:38   fast as it was back when we were little kids because you've only ever seen a modern TV where

02:07:42   changing channels takes for freaking ever, whereas the channels used to change as fast as you could turn that

02:07:46   dial. Like, yeah, analog. It had its downsides, but it also had its upsides. Anyway, with TiVo going

02:07:53   away, I just want to remember TiVo for the great, I will always have great memories of it. It made my

02:07:58   life better. It continues to make my life better, even as the company not goes out of business, but

02:08:03   stops making those products. It still has a place in my entertainment center until the thing finally

02:08:09   dies. And then I guess maybe someday I'll eventually be a quote unquote cord cutter because one thing I'm

02:08:15   not doing is ever having a cable company box in my house. And that's the thing that I never did

02:08:19   because TiVo, this is another thing TiVo did, TiVo saved me from ever having a cable box. Every time I

02:08:24   went over to someone's house and they had cable and had to use the cable company cable box, man, it was

02:08:29   grim. TiVo was just living in the future for at least a decade. And it also happened to coincide the

02:08:35   time when both my kids were born, or at least my first kid and a little shading to the second.

02:08:38   I do not know what I would have done without TiVo giving me all that stuff to watch at 3am as I

02:08:44   bounced my children on a bouncy ball trying to get them to sleep.

02:08:47   You know, I, again, in the same way that I give Marco a lot of stick about fish, even though I bet

02:08:52   you I would enjoy it a lot more than I admit, I give John a lot of stick about TiVo, particularly

02:08:57   running it in the year of our Lord 2025. But with that said, what John described, I cannot

02:09:04   begin to tell you how revolutionary it was. I mean, my children don't understand what

02:09:09   commercials are. And that's not because of TiVo. That's because of the things that TiVo

02:09:13   brought to us. And, you know, there was no cable company DVR that I was aware of until TiVo

02:09:20   existed. I mean, it really was revolutionary. And if you're born in the year, you know, in the

02:09:26   new millennium, if your birth date is, it begins with a two, I don't think you understand how

02:09:31   incredibly revolutionary a DVR was because, you know, my kids don't understand that there

02:09:37   are things that you can only watch when they're airing. Yeah. Like, you know, as an

02:09:41   example, there's a brief window of time over the summer where the family really got into

02:09:44   Jeopardy and then school happened. We've mostly fizzled about that, but they didn't understand

02:09:49   that you couldn't just watch Jeopardy whenever the hell you want. Like, what do you mean it's

02:09:53   not on? Yeah. What do you mean? What does that even mean? What is a channel? I don't even

02:09:57   like, I hear you say those words, but I don't know. What is a channel? What does that mean?

02:10:01   Like a YouTube channel? Right. Exactly. Exactly. And so all of that, to me, Genesis was the TiVo. And

02:10:09   even though I think it's ridiculous to continue to use a TiVo in 2025.

02:10:13   It's not ridiculous, though. Like, if it keeps working, like, the ridiculous thing is paying

02:10:16   for cable. That's the ridiculous thing. But having a TiVo in the house, if you are paying

02:10:19   for cable, it's just great. It just makes cable better.

02:10:21   Well, but so does channels. Like, there are much more modern versions of this.

02:10:25   Yeah. Well, I mean, remember, I did try channels. I do believe my current TiVo is still nicer

02:10:29   than channels, because I tried it. I tried channels. I did it. Channels is really good. If TiVo

02:10:33   didn't exist, maybe I would do it. But my TiVo is better than channels.

02:10:36   I'm not sure I agree, but you might be right.

02:10:39   If the content was 4K, channels would be better. But it's not.

02:10:42   I mean, the channels will slurp up whatever you give it.

02:10:46   I know. I just, but I'm saying, like, I don't, Fios doesn't deliver 4K except for, and remember

02:10:50   we went through this, like, the Red Sox games every once in a while and a few really high

02:10:53   number channels, but almost everything else is not 4K.

02:10:55   Yeah. Well, on the exact same day that TiVo stopped making DVRs, we also lost another revolution.

02:11:03   AOL dial-up service ended. Literally the same day, September 30th, both of these things died.

02:11:11   It is kind of remarkable to think that those both had the same lifespan.

02:11:16   Although I would say that AOL dial-up service was revolutionary for a lot of people, but its

02:11:20   useful lifespan was way shorter.

02:11:22   Yes, agreed. But also probably 10 years earlier. But yeah, the remarkable thing, in both cases,

02:11:28   in the case of AOL dial-up and of TiVo DVRs, in both cases, most people hearing the news today,

02:11:34   the reaction is, you could still get those.

02:11:37   Yeah. Didn't they say, like, how many people were actually using dial-up when they stopped it?

02:11:42   It was some number that's way bigger than you would think.

02:11:44   It was a couple hundred thousand, I think, or something like that.

02:11:46   I just wonder if those are, like, accounts where there's no, it's just, like, some auto-pay

02:11:49   thing going on. And there's, like, I have a hard time believing that there's a hundred

02:11:52   thousand actual humans dialing up to AOL. But maybe, you know, like, really old people?

02:11:57   I don't know. It's just...

02:11:58   Yeah, I mean, figure, like, maybe if you live somewhere rural where, like, you haven't had

02:12:00   good internet service options for most of the time, you might still not. And you have really

02:12:05   simple needs and you've been doing the same thing for 40 years, like, maybe, yeah, okay.

02:12:10   I would think the capacitors would blow on their PCs. You know what I mean? Like, how is the

02:12:15   modem still working?

02:12:16   Yeah. Well, I guess, like, you know, people still make, like, all-in-one printer scanner fax

02:12:20   things. So, like, the components must still be made for the fax modems in those. So, I guess,

02:12:25   like, you can still make a modem. But, I mean, how would you, like, how would you get the

02:12:32   computer version? Like, who even still makes... Like, I'm sure somebody makes, like, a USB

02:12:35   one.

02:12:36   Yeah. I mean, you know, it can happen. Like, hey, I've got my Synology down in the basement.

02:12:39   I was at 13 years old of continuous running and I've used my Mac Pro for 10 years. So, like,

02:12:44   I don't know, 30, 40, you could get lucky.

02:12:45   Yeah. But I bet, though, I bet Casey's right. I bet it's, like, mostly probably, like, subscriptions

02:12:50   that were just never canceled at this point.

02:12:52   That was John that said that. But either way, I was looking for a link to put in the show notes

02:12:56   and I stumbled on a Tom's Hardware link. In the U.S., there are still some ISPs which can

02:13:00   make good use of your old U.S. Robotic Sportster 56K or Diamond Super Express modem.

02:13:05   Diamond. No, the Sportster was the best one. Come on. We all know that.

02:13:09   We all know that. We've been through this many times. The biggest name alternative is MSN Dial-Up,

02:13:13   which is $22 a month. There are also dial-up services offered by NetZero and Juno. Remember

02:13:19   that name?

02:13:20   Juno still exists?

02:13:20   That's a name I haven't heard in many.

02:13:22   I wonder how many companies that's been passed around through.

02:13:23   Right?

02:13:24   That was my first, you know, quote, internet. I mean, that was when it was back when it

02:13:27   was just email. Like, that was my first internet.

02:13:29   I miss netcom. Netcom.com. What a domain name.

02:13:32   That's incredible. Finishing up from Tom's Hardware, we recently also had the pleasure of

02:13:35   seeing a pair of network enthusiasts bond 12 56K modems together to set dial-up broadband

02:13:41   records. They managed to achieve a record 668 kilobits per second using multi-link PPP technology.

02:13:51   This is like the floppy disk raids. Right? Exactly.

02:13:54   One of those. Oh, gosh. Incredible.

02:13:56   The term broadband is being used pretty generously here.

02:13:59   I mean, maybe they need broad, like physical width.

02:14:01   Yeah, right. All those modems lined up.

02:14:03   You line up those modems. It's pretty broad.