PodSearch

ATP

630: Time to Spiral

 

00:00:00   So I mentioned last week that I had to go to the bank to get cash for the restaurant because I had never had to deal with cash before. Turns out I did, in fact, do that wrong.

00:00:12   Did you get Monopoly money?

00:00:14   I would like to state for the record that Marco put into our internal show notes, pre-show, Marco went to the bank wrong. How did you go to the bank wrong?

00:00:25   What do you think I might have forgotten exists?

00:00:28   You did not pass go and did not collect $200?

00:00:30   Withdrawal slips or something equivalent?

00:00:33   Coins.

00:00:34   Oh.

00:00:36   I got no change.

00:00:39   So I had to go back today a second time like, oh, I also need coins to fill the drawers.

00:00:46   Did you get pennies?

00:00:47   I thought about it, but like, you know, to get pennies, what that means, like a roll of pennies is 50 cents.

00:00:53   So what that means is I spent $2. I got four rolls of pennies. Like, we'll see if I ever actually use them.

00:00:57   So we'll see.

00:00:59   But, you know, maybe they'll be illegal or banned by the time I actually, you know, open for full service.

00:01:04   Who knows? We'll find out.

00:01:06   But yes, I did indeed get pennies because it turns out because coins are generally worth so little, getting anything but quarters costs basically nothing.

00:01:14   And even the quarters aren't that expensive, especially once you get down to like, you know, dimes, nickels, pennies.

00:01:19   These are very inexpensive.

00:01:22   Like, I spent less than $100 to fill all the change that we are probably going to need for a long time.

00:01:27   Can you clarify your, your, uh, the semantics of that statement?

00:01:30   Don't the coins cost the amount indicated by their denomination?

00:01:35   Yes, but it turns out since coins are worth so little relative to rectangles of paper and cotton and stuff, it turns out like you can, you can get, you can have a lot of change for like $70.

00:01:46   Right, so you can get like four quarters by just paying a dollar, right?

00:01:49   Yeah, it's amazing how that works.

00:01:51   I think we're following your math here.

00:01:52   What did you end up carrying the cash and coinage in?

00:01:56   Did you just put it in like a Peak Design, well, maybe not a Peak Design backpack, that's a little canceled right now.

00:02:00   But did you put it in some sort of backpack or did you take a duffel or what?

00:02:04   Here's the funny thing.

00:02:04   So when I went to get cash, I had brought my, yes, Peak Design everyday backpack.

00:02:09   You know what?

00:02:09   I'm not going to let one murderer ruin my backpack.

00:02:13   It's a great backpack, okay?

00:02:16   They're all good dogs, Brian.

00:02:17   It wasn't really a backpack-centric murder either, so I feel like the backpack is fine.

00:02:21   No, and like, you know, what kind of shoes was the guy wearing?

00:02:24   Are those ruined too?

00:02:25   Like, no, it doesn't matter, right?

00:02:26   Was he wearing Hanes underwear?

00:02:27   Now you can't wear Hanes underwear anymore?

00:02:28   Right, he was wearing a cotton t-shirt.

00:02:30   You can't wear cotton.

00:02:31   Anyway, so no, I'm not going to let that ruin my backpack.

00:02:34   It's a great backpack.

00:02:35   So I went in there with a giant backpack to get what was not a giant amount of cash, as it turns out, volume one.

00:02:42   Today, I went in there to get change and I had nothing.

00:02:45   I'm like, I'm just getting changed.

00:02:46   Coins are heavy.

00:02:48   It turns out.

00:02:49   Yes.

00:02:49   So I walked out.

00:02:50   It's like they're made of metal.

00:02:51   I walked out with like, I just put them in like, you know, I was wearing like a light jacket.

00:02:55   I just put them in my jacket pockets and I'm like, you know, lumbering out the door.

00:03:01   Like, I'm doing every part of this wrong.

00:03:02   Oh my gosh.

00:03:04   You're jingling like a school janitor with a too big key chain.

00:03:07   Yeah.

00:03:08   Like I had my kid with me and as we're walking out, he's like, it looks like we're robbing

00:03:11   the bank.

00:03:12   I'm like, don't joke about that.

00:03:13   You're the world's worst bank robbers.

00:03:15   Don't ask for change.

00:03:16   Yeah.

00:03:16   We rob the bank for 70 bucks worth of coins.

00:03:19   You can't escape quickly because you're too weighed down.

00:03:22   That's gracious.

00:03:25   All right.

00:03:26   So you've made, you've, you've had some learnings as, as the business people say, you've learned

00:03:30   some lessons, uh, and hopefully you won't need to get cash at least for a little while.

00:03:34   I presume.

00:03:34   I have no idea.

00:03:36   We'll find out.

00:03:37   We'll find out.

00:03:37   Yeah.

00:03:38   Take a penny, leave a penny.

00:03:39   All right.

00:03:41   Let's do some follow-up.

00:03:42   We have a lot of follow-up to get through.

00:03:44   In fact, I, uh, asked John to cut some of the follow-up and he was very gracious about

00:03:48   it.

00:03:48   Um, so we'll see, maybe if we can plow through it, we'll, we'll make John's night by, by getting

00:03:52   through all of it, but we'll see what happens.

00:03:53   Uh, and I'm going to start by ruining.

00:03:55   John's night by doing vision pro corner.

00:03:57   Uh, we have a few quick pieces of, uh, information to talk about.

00:04:01   First of all, there's a new adventure episode.

00:04:02   Adventure is one of the series, like it's kind of sort of TV series that, uh, Apple has put

00:04:08   together for vision pro and there's a new adventure episode called deep water solo.

00:04:12   This is about a, uh, rock climber, mountain climber fellow who is climbing up the side of

00:04:18   a cliff in somewhere in Spain.

00:04:21   I forgot already.

00:04:21   Um, but it is very well done.

00:04:23   And it's again, like eight to 10 minutes, something in that neck of the woods.

00:04:26   And I really enjoyed it.

00:04:27   I like these ones that have a bit more of a story to them.

00:04:30   Uh, the rodeo one from a few weeks back, I don't remember if that was an adventure episode

00:04:34   or something else, but, um, that one, I feel like they tried to put a story on it, but it

00:04:38   didn't really land.

00:04:39   Uh, this one, they, they did a pretty good job of the story.

00:04:41   And one of the things I really liked about it.

00:04:42   So, I mean, that's not really much of a spoiler.

00:04:44   This guy's trying to scale a cliff.

00:04:46   And one of the fun things about the vision pro is what with it being 3d, they're, they're

00:04:51   doing like an animation or like a, an overlay on, uh, it might've been a rendering.

00:04:56   Maybe it was a photo of the rock cliff and showing where he's going to scale the rock cliff.

00:05:01   And you can see that these renderings, like it's very obvious they're three, they're in

00:05:05   3d space, right?

00:05:06   Like there's a path, a line going up the rock cliff that's jiggy, jaggy and a dashed line

00:05:10   where he needs to jump somewhere.

00:05:12   And, uh, in, in, you can see that that's floating above the rock face.

00:05:15   And is that a big deal?

00:05:16   No, absolutely not.

00:05:17   But is it neat?

00:05:18   Yeah.

00:05:18   It's kind of neat.

00:05:19   Uh, so you can check that out if you're interested, uh, Marco, I know you're going to be pausing

00:05:22   the show in order to put on your vision pro that you probably haven't touched in

00:05:25   three months in order to try it.

00:05:26   Well, I might touch it for the next item.

00:05:29   Uh, well, the, uh, maybe not the next item, but the one after.

00:05:31   So, uh, spatial gallery is our next item.

00:05:33   That is the vision OS exclusive app that is, uh, only in the beta for now.

00:05:39   It was not in the first beta.

00:05:40   It is in the second.

00:05:41   And I think we're on the third beta now.

00:05:42   Um, I wanted to very briefly talk about it.

00:05:44   This is, it was billed as Apple giving us more spatial content.

00:05:49   Now I know I do this every time, but it's important to understand the difference.

00:05:52   Immersive is what we were just talking about where you look around and the perspective of

00:05:56   the camera is changing.

00:05:57   You're kind of controlling the camera, if you will, because you're looking around a

00:06:01   180 degree scene, right?

00:06:03   Spatial is when you have a rectangle with depth and it's honest to goodness depth as far as

00:06:09   you can tell, but it's just a rectangle with depth.

00:06:11   If you look around, you're looking away from that rectangle that with depth.

00:06:15   And so anyway, the spatial gallery app, my two second review, it really is just a gallery.

00:06:21   There's almost no Chrome to the app whatsoever.

00:06:23   It's just a series of videos and images, all of which have at least some amounts of spatial

00:06:27   content.

00:06:28   Some of the individual, so there's these pains that you swoop through the air, right?

00:06:33   There are individual pains for each of the different gallery items, pictures, videos,

00:06:38   whatever, but some of these pains are actually kind of like Instagram stories where they'll

00:06:44   show one photo for a little bit and then another photo for a little bit, and then it'll automatically

00:06:47   advance to the next photo for a little bit.

00:06:48   So as an example of that, they had some behind the scenes stills from Severance, which by the

00:06:55   way, I am now caught up on and is real good.

00:06:57   No spoilers, no spoilers.

00:06:58   No spoilers, no spoilers.

00:06:59   It's real good though.

00:07:00   So they had some behind the scenes stills from Severance.

00:07:05   They were neat, like nothing dramatic, but it was still neat to see.

00:07:10   There's no playback controls that I could tell.

00:07:13   Like even when you're watching a short video, it's just, that's it.

00:07:15   That's the whole thing.

00:07:17   It's also kind of funny because the audio changes if you're looking at it full screen versus in

00:07:22   like a pane, you can blow these up to be more full screen and the audio sounds different.

00:07:27   This is similar to being on like a FaceTime call when you're in an environment or rather

00:07:30   than just, you know, looking at floating heads.

00:07:32   I loved that there were some basically advertisements, like one of the first things in the list is

00:07:39   a video for Red Bull.

00:07:40   And at the top, there's a little pill that says, you know, open the Red Bull app or download

00:07:44   and open the Red Bull app or whatever the case may be.

00:07:46   And I just think it's kind of funny.

00:07:47   It's like, it's like Price is Right all over again.

00:07:49   Like the, you know, the greatest trick the devil ever played was convincing, convincing

00:07:52   us that Price is Right wasn't an hour long commercial.

00:07:54   Well, it's a similar thing, right?

00:07:56   Where this is, it's, it is cool, new, interesting content.

00:08:00   And yet it's still also advertisements in part.

00:08:04   Uh, there was a really good one on Porsche where they had, I forget the model, but like

00:08:08   a particular, uh, early, early, early race car.

00:08:11   And they showed a couple of videos of that, which was really neat.

00:08:14   All of this was dated the 3rd of March, if I'm not mistaken.

00:08:17   And the impression that Apple gave was that they would be doing regular content updates,

00:08:23   just like they gave in February of 2024.

00:08:26   When we got our vision pros, it is now the 12th of March and there's nothing new.

00:08:31   I mean, I respect that they're trying in theory, but come on, you got a new app for it.

00:08:36   Let's do it.

00:08:36   Let's move more stuff, more stuff.

00:08:38   We'll see.

00:08:39   That being said, and now I have Marco's attention.

00:08:41   Uh, they have just announced either earlier today or yesterday, I forget as we record,

00:08:45   but it doesn't matter.

00:08:46   Uh, there's going to be a roughly 30 minute Metallica immersive special, uh, reading from,

00:08:53   I believe their press release, this project marks a new foray into immersive technology

00:08:57   using ultra high resolution, 180 degree video in spatial audio to give fans unprecedented access

00:09:02   from vantage points as close up as the snake pit to wide angle views.

00:09:05   It brings the live show to a whole new level.

00:09:08   And to achieve this Apple built a custom stage plot featuring 14 immersive video cameras using

00:09:14   a mix of stabilized cameras, cable suspended cameras, and a remote controlled camera dolly

00:09:19   system that moved around the stage.

00:09:22   Hello, sign me up.

00:09:24   It continues filmed during our final M 72 stop.

00:09:27   Oh, I'm sorry.

00:09:27   This is from Metallica's website, isn't it?

00:09:29   Uh, filmed during our final M 72 stop of 2024 Mexico city.

00:09:32   It features, uh, full performances, whiplash one and hello, Hokies enter Sandman all captured

00:09:38   exclusively in Apple immersive video.

00:09:41   Holy pants.

00:09:42   I want this in my life.

00:09:44   I want it now.

00:09:45   And as it turns out, it will be here this coming Friday as we record this.

00:09:47   I am excited.

00:09:48   Can we pirate it?

00:09:49   Deep cut.

00:09:50   I know.

00:09:51   Yeah, I, I, this is great.

00:09:54   I think like, you know, we'll see what it, what I have some reservations.

00:09:57   I mean, first of all, like, you know, okay, I'm not a huge Metallica fan, but like, fine.

00:10:01   I actually want to see this because what I've been saying for months is concerts and events

00:10:06   and theater and stuff like that in vision pro would be great.

00:10:09   My, so on one hand, I'm very happy to see this.

00:10:13   I am a little concerned about like, what choices did they make for production?

00:10:18   Like how much jumping between cameras are we going to get?

00:10:21   How much movement of the camera are we going to get?

00:10:23   What I think I want is basically a fixed camera.

00:10:28   Like from the perspective of being a little bit above a really good seat in the audience,

00:10:33   like a, like a, you know, near the front of the stage, a little bit higher than the audience.

00:10:37   So no one's heads in your way, but like, basically I want the experience of being there.

00:10:43   And I think what they will probably end up doing for the most part is overproducing everything.

00:10:49   Cause that's Apple style.

00:10:50   Apple's very overproduced.

00:10:51   Um, and I don't know, you know, how much creative control Metallica had versus Apple's usual

00:10:56   production team.

00:10:57   Who knows?

00:10:57   You know, we don't know the details, but I think this is a good step.

00:11:01   It is, I laughed when I read that it was just three songs.

00:11:05   Yeah.

00:11:05   I'm like, Oh, you're like another content snack, another demo, another trial.

00:11:10   Like, come on, like do the whole concert.

00:11:14   You set all that up for three songs.

00:11:17   Yeah.

00:11:17   I could not agree more.

00:11:18   That's a content snack is such a great turn of phrase for it.

00:11:21   It's so incredibly true.

00:11:22   After three songs, the audience actually wanted to see the show.

00:11:25   They said, get these cameras out of here.

00:11:26   It could be, but I just want to reiterate what Marco said though.

00:11:30   Like some of my favorite stuff that I've seen in the vision pro is the, um, the, uh,

00:11:37   concert for one, like the Alicia keys thing.

00:11:39   And, uh, I think it was Raya Reva.

00:11:41   Forgive me.

00:11:41   I forget the, the artist's name, but, um, there was to, to Marco's point earlier, there

00:11:46   was a little bit of hopping around with different camera angles and whatnot.

00:11:50   However, what I really like about being immersive where you can pitch the camera for all intents

00:11:55   and purposes is that if they're focusing on the drummer, but the bassist is just

00:12:00   barely outside where you're looking right now, you know what you can do?

00:12:03   You can turn your head.

00:12:04   And as you turn your head, you can now look at the basis.

00:12:07   You know what I mean?

00:12:07   And so this is, as someone who is a concert film aficionado, one of the things that drives

00:12:13   me bananas about concert films is that a lot of times either somebody's soloing or maybe

00:12:18   some, and you want to focus on them or maybe, you know, the guitarist is soloing, but actually

00:12:23   quietly in the background, that bassist is killing it.

00:12:26   And I'd rather look at the bassist for a minute.

00:12:27   You know what I mean?

00:12:28   And this is where like the old DVD technology with like different camera angles.

00:12:31   Do you remember that way back in the day?

00:12:33   Did anybody ever actually use that besides the adult film industry?

00:12:36   Uh, yeah.

00:12:37   Phil Collins had, or I think it was Phil Collins.

00:12:39   I want to say it was Phil Collins.

00:12:40   People used it by accident probably by hitting a button on the remote.

00:12:42   They didn't know what it did.

00:12:43   Exactly.

00:12:44   That's so true.

00:12:44   Uh, but anyways, but DVDs way back in the day, kids ask your parents, uh, DVDs way back in

00:12:48   the day, a handful of them allowed for you to actually change the camera angle.

00:12:52   And it was really neat.

00:12:53   And so you kind of sort of get this, that same sort of thing here.

00:12:56   And again, like Marco said a few moments ago, a live performance, be that music or stage or

00:13:03   what have you, that is just screaming.

00:13:06   May we please see this immersive video.

00:13:09   And I don't know if I would go so far as to say, I agree with Marco on just give me a stationary

00:13:13   camera and never move it.

00:13:14   I think it's neat to be able to move or see different perspectives from time to time.

00:13:18   But I wholeheartedly agree with Marco's implied point, or maybe you said it explicitly that

00:13:21   I don't want to cut every three seconds.

00:13:23   And some of the early Apple stuff, that's what it was, was a cut, cut, cut, cut.

00:13:28   And by the time you get your bearings as to where your body feels like it is in 3D space,

00:13:32   then suddenly you're on something else.

00:13:33   You have to reorient yourself in a way that is kind of true in 2D, but much more dramatic

00:13:39   in 3D.

00:13:39   And so all of that to say, I'm super duper excited.

00:13:42   One of the first things I plan on doing Friday morning as someone who enjoys, I'm not a humongous

00:13:47   Metallica fan, but I like Metallica a fair bit.

00:13:49   And as a graduate of Virginia Tech, I need to love Enter Sandman.

00:13:53   And if you're not familiar, don't worry about it.

00:13:55   But suffice to say, I am real excited to try this on Friday.

00:13:58   And I'm excited that, Marco, you might actually dust off your Vision Pro and try it too.

00:14:02   I also, like I watch a lot of concert broadcasts, usually Fish, occasionally Goose,

00:14:06   occasionally somebody else, but usually those two.

00:14:08   And by the way, Goose is on fire on this tour.

00:14:14   They've had some staffing changes in their percussion section over the last year, and I

00:14:19   think they have ended up in a very good spot where not only, like, so the new drummer just

00:14:25   is working his, but he never stops moving.

00:14:29   You look at this guy in the video and you're like, how is he doing that for three hours?

00:14:34   It's amazing.

00:14:36   So, you know, this is like Taylor Swift level of athleticism required, like, you know, for

00:14:41   this drummer to be doing what he's doing for as long as he's doing it.

00:14:43   It's really impressive.

00:14:45   So Goose, oh my God, they're on fire right now.

00:14:47   Anyway, so when I watch a concert broadcast or a concert video, they do like switch around.

00:14:53   You know, they'll usually be like, you know, live switching, like somebody will be directing

00:14:58   the live broadcast, just like, you know, like a sports broadcast would be.

00:15:00   There's like a director saying, all right, take camera three, take camera two.

00:15:04   I don't think they ever go back and like really edit, you know, what switches they made for

00:15:09   like the published video.

00:15:09   So, you know, they're just kind of guessing, hey, right now the bass player is doing something

00:15:13   fun.

00:15:13   We'll switch to him for a few, you know, a few seconds here and there.

00:15:15   And now we'll go back to the guitar.

00:15:17   Okay, let's take a wide shot to show the lights, whatever.

00:15:19   So what you see is a bunch of like really close ups of the musicians that even if you

00:15:24   were there in a front row seat, you wouldn't have that good of a view.

00:15:27   And especially you'll see things like right behind the drummer or you'll see like a shot

00:15:33   down to see like into the keyboard player where normally the keyboard player's keyboards are

00:15:37   usually blocking the view from the audience of really seeing what the keyboard is doing.

00:15:41   That kind of concert, that kind of concert filming technique with multiple cameras and

00:15:46   switching between is actually very different and in some ways better than a view in person

00:15:52   when you're actually there in a great seat for the concert.

00:15:54   It's a really interesting thing and it's almost a different thing than being there in person.

00:15:59   But when you are there in person, you are getting the experience that the band is actually

00:16:05   creating and that their artistic team around them is creating like the lighting, the staging

00:16:09   and if there's any background decoration or movement or screens or animations, you're

00:16:15   getting that.

00:16:15   Like in the sphere, you're getting that whole thing.

00:16:18   That's a whole different thing.

00:16:19   When you have a multi-cam live directed switched between kind of format that's being broadcast,

00:16:26   that is a good thing in certain ways, but it is a different thing than attending the concert.

00:16:31   And when you are just looking at your fixed view from the audience, you are getting the entire

00:16:37   experience that they were trying to create at that time.

00:16:40   You're getting the cool light show.

00:16:42   You're getting like a little bit, you know, trippiness if you're in a jam band situation.

00:16:47   Like you're getting, if there's, you know, if you're watching some kind of over-the-top

00:16:51   rock band, there's like fire on the background.

00:16:52   You're seeing that like as it's full-scale spectacle that it was meant to be seen at.

00:16:58   I think if I'm watching something in an immersive video like this, I would rather have the audience

00:17:05   experience because that's something that, you know, the multi-cam situation where you're

00:17:10   seeing a quick close-up of the guitar, then quick close-up of the keyboard, then quick

00:17:13   close-up of the drums.

00:17:14   That, I think, is optimizing for what TV screens and computer screens are good at.

00:17:20   Yeah.

00:17:20   Small, high-resolution screens that are not super immersive, that are not taking up your

00:17:25   whole field of view, but they can display really, really great content at a smaller size.

00:17:29   So you can zoom in.

00:17:30   You can see, oh, look at that, like the way the light's reflecting off those strings.

00:17:33   That's pretty cool or whatever.

00:17:34   Oh, wow.

00:17:34   I didn't realize those fingers were moving that fast or, you know, whatever it is.

00:17:37   In the Vision Pro, the immersive format, what it can offer, is the full experience of being

00:17:45   there, and that's something that other screens can't do, and the Vision Pro can.

00:17:51   Like, if you wanted to simulate what it's like to actually be in the sphere watching those

00:17:55   cool animations at the ridiculous scale that they're at, you can largely do that with the

00:18:00   Vision Pro.

00:18:00   You can't even come close.

00:18:01   Like, I watched the videos later of some of the Phish shows that I saw at the sphere,

00:18:07   and the videos were great, but it was nothing like being there, not even close, because they're

00:18:12   trying to show what was an immersive performance in a rectangle in front of me, and it's just

00:18:18   not possible.

00:18:18   Like, it doesn't communicate it well.

00:18:20   I hope that Apple will take advantage of what the Vision Pro can uniquely do here, which is

00:18:26   show an immersive experience.

00:18:29   Whatever, you know, Metallica snack they've made here, it sounds like it's probably going

00:18:33   to be closer to, you know, the multicam kind of style.

00:18:37   We'll see how it goes.

00:18:39   I do think there's a place for that, but I hope that's not all they ever do.

00:18:43   I hope what they really offer also is the audience perspective.

00:18:48   Just give me a fixed perspective.

00:18:50   There's so much potential there, because people go to live events because they're going to get

00:18:56   that perspective when they go, and there's so many people who would love to enjoy live

00:19:00   events who can't go, or the events already happened in the past, or whatever.

00:19:04   Like, there's a huge market there.

00:19:07   And so, again, I will again urge Apple, this is good.

00:19:11   This is a start.

00:19:13   There is so much more here to be taken advantage of, and I hope they do.

00:19:19   We are sponsored this episode by Terminal.

00:19:21   This is the wonderful e-ink display that I was talking about back in December that I bought

00:19:25   myself before they were a sponsor.

00:19:27   Now they're sponsoring our show.

00:19:29   So this is what Terminal is.

00:19:30   This is basically a small e-ink display with a nice white case or a black case that you can

00:19:36   just stick on your desk or on your wall or in your kitchen or whatever, and it just displays

00:19:41   ambient information.

00:19:42   Now, because it's e-ink, it's not a glowing screen, so it looks great anywhere.

00:19:46   It's very, you know, kind of, you know, non-intrusive visually, and it can display whatever you want.

00:19:52   They have an entire gallery of what they call recipes for displaying stuff from different

00:19:56   services.

00:19:56   So, of course, you can have the basics, clocks, weather, calendars.

00:20:00   I have a countdown to the day the restaurant's opening, plus weather, and plus quotes from the

00:20:04   office online.

00:20:05   All of those were already in their recipe gallery for that, like, there's thousands of

00:20:09   things people have made for this.

00:20:10   So you probably don't even have to make your own.

00:20:12   But if you want to make your own, you can.

00:20:14   There's a whole open, easy API for this, and it's super easy to use.

00:20:19   I personally haven't, but I know Casey was looking at that.

00:20:21   And it's just, there's so much going on here.

00:20:23   They have an unbrickable pledge, which means if they ever go out of business, they open source

00:20:27   all their code.

00:20:28   You don't even have to use their infrastructure if you don't want to.

00:20:30   Like, they have a really great setup there.

00:20:32   And I love that it looks nice enough to pass the historical commission restrictions in most

00:20:39   households, I would say, at least according to data from the ATP hosts here.

00:20:43   So I love the Terminal.

00:20:45   It's a great looking product.

00:20:46   It works well.

00:20:47   You can hack it a bunch, or if you don't want to, or you don't have time, you can just use

00:20:51   what they have built in, and it's fantastic.

00:20:53   So check it out today.

00:20:54   It's $129.

00:20:56   And with this promo code, use code ATPFM for $15 off.

00:21:02   Terminal, it's T-R-M-N-L.

00:21:04   So basically, Terminal with no vowels in it.

00:21:06   Delete all the vowels.

00:21:06   So the domain name is useterminal.com and use code ATPFM for $15 off.

00:21:13   Thank you so much to Terminal for just being awesome and for sponsoring our show.

00:21:21   All right, let's talk iPad Air.

00:21:22   Apparently, the 2x base thing was a false alarm.

00:21:27   Tell me about this, John.

00:21:27   Yeah, that was something I mentioned.

00:21:29   The Mac rumors had said that the iPad Air 13-inch is missing the 2x base feature that the previous

00:21:34   version had.

00:21:34   But apparently, that story has been pulled.

00:21:36   I don't know why they didn't just update it and put a retraction on it on Mac rumors or

00:21:40   something.

00:21:40   But it seems like it was just a false alarm.

00:21:42   So in case anyone was worried that the 13-inch Air has a regression in this way, it seems like

00:21:46   no.

00:21:46   Additionally, we had some feedback with regard to the appeal of the iPad Air because, you

00:21:50   know, the three of us were kind of scratching our heads saying, why?

00:21:53   And John Spurlock wrote in and said, one reason I'm glad the iPad Air exists and just ordered

00:21:59   one is the larger screen size.

00:22:00   I use mine mostly for music, like sheet music, and the 13-inch makes a huge difference, as does

00:22:05   the $550 savings versus a similar iPad Pro.

00:22:09   It's because there is no 13-inch regular iPad.

00:22:11   That's the point there.

00:22:12   If you want a 13-inch, it's great that the Air exists because otherwise you'd have to buy

00:22:16   a Pro and they're really expensive at any size, and the 13-inch one even more so.

00:22:20   Ryan Manley writes, I was a big iPad Pro guy.

00:22:23   I've had three big ones and one small one.

00:22:25   I went to the M2 iPad Air last year mostly because I wanted the blue one.

00:22:28   I'm literal proof that colors drive buying decisions.

00:22:32   And yes, Face ID is the biggest thing I miss.

00:22:34   Are you listening, lack of colors are, at Apple?

00:22:37   Can we please, please have colors, please, pretty please?

00:22:41   Yeah, especially, man, like now that we're seeing all the iPad or the MacBook Air reviews

00:22:45   of Sky Blue, which is just bluish silver.

00:22:48   Like, oh man, what a missed opportunity.

00:22:52   Oh, like an actual Sky Blue one?

00:22:54   That would be amazing.

00:22:55   I currently drive a Sky Blue car.

00:22:57   Like, that would be great.

00:22:58   That would look awesome.

00:22:59   And it seems like they just didn't do it.

00:23:03   I don't know why.

00:23:04   I wish, oh, please, Apple, sometime soon, maybe the M5 generation, give me cellular nanotexture

00:23:12   and a color that's actually a color.

00:23:15   That would be amazing.

00:23:16   And again, and I think this is an important feedback from Ryan here.

00:23:19   Like, people often make buying decisions based solely or significantly on visual appeal, colors,

00:23:28   styles.

00:23:30   I, we know, we know people, sometimes we have been people who have bought a new Apple

00:23:35   thing, mostly because, you know, we wanted it.

00:23:39   And why do we want it?

00:23:39   Sometimes we wanted it because it was a cool color or a new color.

00:23:43   Like, you know, something cool, like anything, just give us anything.

00:23:47   A, it doesn't, I'm not saying every color has to be bold.

00:23:51   I'm saying make any color bold.

00:23:53   Give us one.

00:23:54   Seriously.

00:23:56   You know, I, I, you know, we bought Aaron's car like nine months ago or something like that.

00:24:01   And we were trying to find a car that we wanted.

00:24:03   And I will give you one guess.

00:24:05   And we worked with several different dealers during the time.

00:24:07   And I'll give you one guess what each dealer's first question was, you know, at, well, after,

00:24:11   you know, what are you looking for in terms of like what model, what color do you want?

00:24:15   Which shade of silver do you want?

00:24:17   Pretty much.

00:24:18   But that is almost always the first question.

00:24:20   And then a friend of mine was looking for an F-150 Lightning, actually, and he ended up just

00:24:25   getting one.

00:24:25   It's a really nice truck, although I'm not a truck person.

00:24:27   But anyways, you know, as I was kind of living vicariously through him and because I enjoy buying

00:24:32   cars with other people's money.

00:24:33   And, you know, oftentimes the question was, what color do you want?

00:24:36   And I feel like it's not an apples to apples comparison between a car and a computer.

00:24:42   Well, unless you're John buying a $15,000 computer.

00:24:44   But nevertheless, you know, it's still important to your point, Marco, that it makes a big difference.

00:24:51   And, you know, my M3 Max MacBook Pro that I'm talking to you through right now, I feel like

00:24:57   it was time for me to upgrade and update anyway last year, two years ago, whatever it was.

00:25:01   But I definitely insta-bought when I saw that there was that, you know, deep, deep black, which

00:25:06   granted is not a bold, vibrant color, but it just had such nostalgia for that black book that I wanted

00:25:11   so badly back in 2008 or thereabouts that I had to have it.

00:25:15   And granted, I'm kind of, you know, taking the wind out of my own sails when I'm talking about black.

00:25:18   But the same thing would be true.

00:25:20   If there was like a vibrant blue, I'd probably rock one.

00:25:23   And certainly, if not in the Mac, which maybe I'd be a little more conservative with the

00:25:27   computer, you bet your bottom that I would 100% rock a very bold blue iPhone.

00:25:33   And a few years ago, I think it was 13 or thereabouts, we had a reasonably decent blue iPhone Pro.

00:25:40   And I recently gave that to Declan as a, you know, phone without service to use as like

00:25:45   a noisemaker at night and whatnot.

00:25:46   And man, everything, every time I look at that thing, I'm just, oh man, I miss that blue.

00:25:50   I miss that blue so much.

00:25:51   Yeah.

00:25:52   And in defense of the, you know, the current black color on the MacBook Pros, the reason

00:25:58   why people went nuts for that is because it was new and it was, and it was extreme or it

00:26:06   was more extreme than like before that we had silver.

00:26:10   And silver is, you know, aluminum, great.

00:26:15   That's the color I usually get.

00:26:16   Space gray was just darker.

00:26:18   It was just like, do you want light gray or medium gray?

00:26:23   The new, you know, whatever they're calling this gray is a much darker gray.

00:26:28   It's not black, but it's very, it's much closer to black.

00:26:31   And so it was, for the first time, it was like, oh, finally, like a, a bold, a more bold

00:26:36   choice exists besides these two kind of just lukewarm, do you want this kind of lukewarm

00:26:43   thing or that kind of lukewarm thing?

00:26:45   The MacBook Air is now available in one bold color, which is that the super dark navy blue,

00:26:51   almost black.

00:26:53   And then three just total bland, milquetoast, Tim Cook roommates chat kind of colors, like

00:27:01   just the most boring, bland, like we are afraid to express anything whatsoever with our color

00:27:07   schemes.

00:27:07   Like just, and there's three of them.

00:27:09   Like I understand as, as I think we'll get to many people want to and choose to buy the

00:27:15   boring colors.

00:27:16   That's why the iMac is offered in silver, even though it's also offered in all those

00:27:20   other colors, but they offer it in other colors too, for people who want color in their life.

00:27:27   Why would a company whose logo was a rainbow for so long, why would they want to offer color

00:27:35   in their products?

00:27:35   Because it's nice and people buy them and people love it.

00:27:40   And it makes people happy and it adds some emotional appeal to what is otherwise your work

00:27:45   computer or whatever.

00:27:46   Like it gives people some fun in these tools that are just machines.

00:27:50   Otherwise, Apple has not shied away from colors across their product lines forever.

00:27:56   They're actually really good at colors.

00:27:58   When they choose to do real colors, they do a great job.

00:28:03   And doing colored aluminum, they've been doing it since the iPod mini.

00:28:10   Like it's been a long time.

00:28:12   They've, they know how to make good colored aluminum in all sorts of different colors, saturated

00:28:18   colors, pastels.

00:28:19   I think they can, they do a really good job when they do it.

00:28:22   So they have the resources, they have the ability, they have the talent to pick good colors.

00:28:29   Use it, give us something, some option, because we keep hearing from people who could buy the

00:28:38   more expensive pro version of an iPhone or a Mac and they don't, they get the smaller,

00:28:43   you know, more consumer branded one or whatever because it's available in more colors than gray,

00:28:48   gray and gray.

00:28:49   Use that enthusiasm and you can actually upsell people.

00:28:53   You could even like Apple and they actually have done this in the past.

00:28:57   They could even have like, you know, the cheapest configuration only available in silver, gray,

00:29:03   gray and gray.

00:29:04   And then they can have like the next step up.

00:29:06   That's, I think the iMac used to be this way.

00:29:08   I think it, I'm not sure if the current generation is, but the M1 generation was like this.

00:29:11   Then the step up, like the mid, the mid tier specs, that one's available in three more colors

00:29:16   or whatever.

00:29:17   Like they can do stuff like that.

00:29:18   There's so many ways to do this that would work out better for everybody.

00:29:22   So just come on, color, bring color back to the world.

00:29:25   We, trust me, we need it right now.

00:29:27   Like the world could use some, please, for the love of God, bring color back.

00:29:32   Matt Ripito writes with regard to your question, Marco, about portrait only iPad apps.

00:29:38   Would you actually, would you mind just recapping what the query was from, from you last week?

00:29:43   Yeah, so basically I'd said last week, one of the things I'd gone through with the restaurant

00:29:45   was I had an iPad set up to play music and, and run the app for the mixer to control volume

00:29:50   and stuff.

00:29:51   And the mixers app would only run in portrait on iOS.

00:29:56   It's, it's not an iPhone only app.

00:29:57   It was an iPad native build, but it would only run in portrait.

00:30:00   And the problem was, I'm like, I, I couldn't find any way for iPad OS on any sized iPad, even

00:30:07   on a big one to run two portrait only apps side by side with the iPad physically in landscape.

00:30:13   But I figured by this point, like the screens are so big now, maybe they can do that.

00:30:16   And it turns out I could not find a way.

00:30:18   Well, Matt Ripito and many other people have actually written in to point out that it turns

00:30:24   out you can actually run two portrait only iPad apps in landscape side by side using stage

00:30:32   manager, which is something I didn't even think of.

00:30:35   I figured stage manager would have the same restrictions, but it turns out it doesn't.

00:30:39   So this is both helpful in the sense that great, I can actually do this.

00:30:43   I think I haven't actually tried it, but I can do it.

00:30:46   Apparently a lot of people are going to say this, but I don't think I will do it because

00:30:51   this is an iPad that's that again, this is being used by all the bartenders, all the staff

00:30:56   who are working back there.

00:30:57   They're not all going to be iPad experts.

00:30:59   I think the stage manager environment and the little like, what if it gets swapped or

00:31:06   what if it gets disabled or what if, you know, a different app gets pulled up and then that

00:31:11   scene is messed up?

00:31:12   Like, can I trust people who are not iPad power users to be able to use stage manager and like

00:31:19   put it back?

00:31:20   I don't know.

00:31:21   I don't know if I want to take that risk.

00:31:23   I wonder if you could automate this with shortcuts.

00:31:25   I genuinely don't know.

00:31:27   Let's make it even more complicated.

00:31:29   Well, didn't you already buy the iPad mini though?

00:31:32   Like, isn't this kind of the ship is going to sail there?

00:31:33   Yes.

00:31:34   So you'd have to like return the iPad mini or find another use for it to buy a bigger

00:31:37   one.

00:31:37   But like, yeah, this is, you know, this is the problem with iPad OS.

00:31:40   We've talked about it many times.

00:31:41   You really want to build something complicated out of a set of understandable building blocks.

00:31:47   Like if I asked you on your Mac, can you put two windows side by side?

00:31:50   You'd say, yeah, because you learned long ago how to move windows around on your Mac and

00:31:54   how to resize them.

00:31:54   And using those basic tools of like window controls and resizing and moving and dragging,

00:31:59   despite the fact that Mac apps continue to try to make the title bar disappear or make

00:32:04   it difficult, like try grabbing the top of your Chrome window.

00:32:06   But anyway, because the fundamental building blocks of manipulating windows on the Mac are

00:32:13   simple to understand and learn and are incredibly flexible.

00:32:16   Almost anybody can take two windows and put the side by side.

00:32:19   Maybe they don't know about the cool shortcuts with like where you can tile them and blah,

00:32:22   blah, blah.

00:32:22   But they don't need to know those shortcuts.

00:32:24   They know what windows are.

00:32:25   They can see them.

00:32:26   They can move them.

00:32:27   Chances are good to be able to recover.

00:32:29   But the instructions for doing it in stage manager highlight how that is not the case

00:32:34   on the iPad.

00:32:34   First of all, Marco couldn't discover it, which I mean, granted, he didn't even think of stage

00:32:37   manager, which is itself its own problem of this weird mode.

00:32:40   Yeah.

00:32:40   But second, even if you had said, let me try stage manager, would you have tried this?

00:32:44   Fabian wrote in with an example video.

00:32:46   He says, here's an example with Monument Valley 3, which is an iPad native portrait only app

00:32:51   and Nintendo music and iPhone app running in iPad compatibility mode.

00:32:54   After activating stage manager, launch app A, locate app B via the dock app library or spotlight,

00:33:00   hold down the shift key and tap on app B.

00:33:02   If you don't have a keyboard, hold down the icon of app B and drag it onto the quote stage.

00:33:07   Like, no one's going to figure this out.

00:33:08   It's way too complicated.

00:33:09   And for what?

00:33:10   To what end?

00:33:11   What does this complexity give you the ability to do?

00:33:14   It gives you the ability to do a very finite, limited subset of what you can do by simply

00:33:19   moving windows around.

00:33:21   Like, it's just, it's madness.

00:33:22   So, we don't want to rehash everything about iPad or us being a problem, but it's a problem.

00:33:26   All right.

00:33:27   Going back to colors for a minute, Yossi Kanner writes,

00:33:30   tech pundits love to complain that Apple doesn't make devices with real colors, yet it seems

00:33:34   people actually buy the plain black or silver option.

00:33:37   I had an iPhone 12 mini and a 13 pro in blue colors.

00:33:40   They came in and hated them.

00:33:42   Since then, I've gone back to the more neutral colors and much happier.

00:33:44   Now, granted, there isn't much color in Apple's current lineup, but choosing to get a

00:33:47   colorful iPhone or iPad is a much bigger decision than, say, getting a colorful case.

00:33:51   I think Apple's making the right choice here.

00:33:53   Yossi, I appreciate you, your feedback, but you are wrong.

00:33:56   I want a colorful phone.

00:33:58   Well, no.

00:33:58   So, this is, this is a, it's not a, this is not a either or situation.

00:34:02   No, you're right.

00:34:02   You're right.

00:34:03   In every case, everyone out of Kanner for Color says, of course, they should continue

00:34:07   to make a neutral color or maybe multiple neutral colors because that is probably,

00:34:11   he's right.

00:34:11   That's what most people will buy, right?

00:34:13   But that's like, again, not, not every product will be your best selling product.

00:34:17   Not every color will be your best selling color, right?

00:34:19   You put the color in for excitement, right?

00:34:21   A lot of, you know, cars are the best example.

00:34:23   I mean, you guys were talking about a bunch of things, but like cars are like the second

00:34:26   most expensive things most people will ever buy next to their house if they ever own a

00:34:29   house, right?

00:34:29   And cars are purchased massively based on their appearance, which doesn't make sense.

00:34:35   You're like, oh, with something so as expensive as a computer, do I care how it looks?

00:34:37   Are you kidding?

00:34:38   The two most expensive things people buy, cars and homes, are purchased so much based on their

00:34:44   appearance.

00:34:45   It's ridiculous.

00:34:45   It's almost as if the more expensive things get, the more we buy based on how it looks,

00:34:50   not less, right?

00:34:51   So there's no argument to be made that you shouldn't, you know, make these fancy colors

00:34:55   because people will just pick the neutral ones.

00:34:56   Fine.

00:34:57   It gets them in the showroom, right?

00:34:59   Like they're not even going to buy that car, but they want to come and see it because it's

00:35:02   shiny and red or the car they're going to get is silver, but they want to look at the

00:35:04   cool red one, right?

00:35:05   Or you want to go into the neighborhood with the fancy houses, even though you're not going

00:35:08   to buy one of those, but you want to buy one next to it so you can look at the

00:35:10   fancy house.

00:35:11   Yeah.

00:35:12   Most people are going to buy the neutral colors.

00:35:13   They should always offer the neutral colors.

00:35:15   Look at the iMac.

00:35:16   It comes in a huge range of really nice colors and there's just one neutral color and that

00:35:20   one neutral color is enough because that neutral color is fine.

00:35:23   And if you want an iMac that is neutral and won't clash with your decor, there's one for

00:35:28   you to buy.

00:35:29   Like it's, this is not, this is not a problem that needs to be solved.

00:35:32   It's not like they shouldn't offer colors because most people will not buy them.

00:35:35   Yeah.

00:35:35   That's why they should offer them.

00:35:36   Most people won't buy them, offer them anyway to get people in the door and to get people

00:35:40   excited.

00:35:40   Well, and also like I, I, we hear this argument a lot whenever, whenever we are basically advocating

00:35:46   for something that is not going to be Apple's largest seller of its category or whatever.

00:35:51   And we always hear people trying to excuse Apple's logistics and be like, well, look, they

00:35:56   don't want to keep that many SKUs or like, well, no, not, not, not a lot of people buy

00:36:00   that one.

00:36:01   You know, there, there's a lot of degrees of, of precision or ratios here that matter.

00:36:06   Like, okay, not a lot of people.

00:36:08   What does that mean?

00:36:08   Like, do more people buy a theoretical, you know, orange MacBook air than would buy the

00:36:14   Mac pro probably, but they still have the Mac pro.

00:36:19   I was going to say, well, you were talking about like, Oh, bring us color in your life.

00:36:22   I'm thinking, well, you know, the next product due to be updated is ever ready for a, you know,

00:36:26   a lime green gigantic cheese grater.

00:36:29   I mean, but, but seriously, like if you look at, if you use that logic of like, well,

00:36:34   they shouldn't, they shouldn't make things that most people won't buy or that most people

00:36:39   don't need, you know, quote need.

00:36:41   Well then they should only make the silver MacBook air and no other max.

00:36:45   Like by that logic, why do any of these other models exist?

00:36:49   Most people use the silver MacBook air.

00:36:51   Okay.

00:36:52   Then just make that by these, like that, of course the logic makes no sense.

00:36:56   You, you have more options for lots of reasons and enough people buy them to make them worth

00:37:02   making.

00:37:02   Like it doesn't take that many people to buy something at Apple scale for it to be worth

00:37:07   making in a certain configuration.

00:37:08   And even if it isn't worth making on its own, you still have to make it the same reason they

00:37:12   make all those other computers and stuff, because you need to have a diversified product line

00:37:16   that people feel confident in.

00:37:17   So even if they're going to buy the silver MacBook air, they feel more comfortable buying that

00:37:21   knowing that there's an entire line of Mac laptops that covers all their needs, as opposed

00:37:26   to like, Oh, I was going to buy a laptop, but that company only makes one.

00:37:29   And I'm worried about getting entrenched in the Apple ecosystem considering they only make

00:37:32   one laptop.

00:37:33   And what if my needs ever don't fit within that one laptop doesn't make you confident.

00:37:36   Like you have to diversify your product lines.

00:37:38   We've talked about how diversified should they be, you know, with respect to the iPhone, how

00:37:42   many iPhones is enough iPhones to cover the market and the same thing with Macs or whatever.

00:37:46   But the answer is never just make the one or two that are the most popular.

00:37:50   That's even, even if every single one, except for the one or two most popular loses money,

00:37:54   you should still do it because overall you will make more money by having a full featured product

00:37:58   line that gives people confidence.

00:37:59   Speaking of the MacBook air, the M4 MacBook air has a new mute button icon.

00:38:04   The F10 key, instead of being the outline of a speaker, it's now the outline of a speaker

00:38:10   with a slash through it.

00:38:11   And I may sound like I'm snarking, but actually I do think this is an improvement.

00:38:15   This is definitely an improvement.

00:38:16   I very frequently find myself like having to double take to make a second glance because

00:38:20   I have the same key caps on my keyboard.

00:38:22   I think all the Apple ones do to make a second glance to see like the F11 has got the little

00:38:27   the little sound wave coming out, distinguish it from, you know.

00:38:30   So anyway, hopefully this is a trend that will ripple across all their keyboards.

00:38:33   But yeah, good improvement.

00:38:35   Yep.

00:38:36   It gets my stamp of approval.

00:38:38   All right.

00:38:39   With regard to the quote unquote Hydra chip in ATP 562.

00:38:43   Do you have a dragon?

00:38:44   Apparently we discussed and linked to, I do remember actually this interview, a Johnny

00:38:48   Surugi interview from July, 2023, in which he was asked in so many words, what are the

00:38:53   next challenges and processors that Apple should tackle to get to the real next generation of

00:38:58   processors?

00:38:58   His answer after disclaiming about future products and blah, blah, blah, was basically one of the

00:39:03   things that is going to be important is packaging.

00:39:06   So this relates to the Hydra H-I-D-R-A chip because some people think that it should be pronounced

00:39:12   Hydra.

00:39:13   And then people like to remind you that the mythical beast, the Hydra from mythology is a

00:39:17   multi-headed creature.

00:39:18   I think if you caught off one of the heads to grow back or whatever.

00:39:21   Oh, doesn't this sound like packaging is interesting, multi-headed beast, M4 Extreme chip, it's not

00:39:27   going to be an M4 Ultra for the Mac Pro, could use one of TSMC's various new technologies for

00:39:32   doing what AMD calls chiplets or whatever, various like multiple independently manufactured chips

00:39:39   combining into a larger thing for a super mega chip for the Mac Pro.

00:39:44   That all sounds well and good and I'm certainly rooting for the M4 Extreme type thing to come

00:39:50   in the Mac Pro, but I don't actually know if H-I-D-R-A is an alternate spelling of the mythical

00:39:57   Hydra because that Hydra is with an H-Y every place that I've seen it.

00:40:00   And also there is at least one thing called H-I-D-R-A, which is an island in Norway or something.

00:40:06   So codenames are weird.

00:40:08   This codename could be about the island in Norway.

00:40:13   It could be about the multi-headed beast.

00:40:14   It could be an intentionally misspelled version of the multi-headed beast or it could be something

00:40:17   else entirely.

00:40:18   But I just want to throw that out there because so many people said, you dummy, Hydra, it's

00:40:23   a multi-headed beast, M4 Extreme confirmed.

00:40:25   I hope you're right, but I don't know if the codename has anything to do with that.

00:40:28   Yep.

00:40:29   All right.

00:40:31   Mark Gurman writes with regard to the M4 Ultra and Hydra, Apple's Ultra processors have always

00:40:38   been developed by fusing two Macs chips together to double the performance across the

00:40:42   system that requires a so-called Ultra fusion interconnect system.

00:40:46   The M3 Max has that feature while the M4 Max does not.

00:40:49   Let's pause a second here.

00:40:51   This is the second thing that I've read, one translated for French that is flat out stated

00:40:56   that the M4 Max does not have an interposer on it.

00:40:59   What are they basing this on?

00:41:01   Does Gurman have a D-lidded M4 Max that he's looking at?

00:41:05   Does someone have die shots of the M4 Max that shows it's not there?

00:41:08   I don't know.

00:41:10   It's frustrating me that this has just been, and now it's just like asserted as truth.

00:41:13   And second, the M4 Max has it?

00:41:16   Last time I saw any die shots of the M3 Max, sorry, the M3 Max, any die shots of the M3 Max,

00:41:21   it was in the context of a story of someone saying, hey, look, no interposer on the M3 Max.

00:41:25   And again, I said, did they just crop the picture and it's there or is it not there?

00:41:30   No answer, please.

00:41:31   I wish I could fix this myself.

00:41:32   I can't.

00:41:32   I don't have these chips.

00:41:33   I don't have the equipment.

00:41:34   I can't do it.

00:41:34   Somebody out there, like, and I Google search for it so much, but just try Google searching

00:41:40   for M3 space M-A-X, die shot, like, but just, it's impossible.

00:41:45   Like, I can't, it's all just so much garbage in the search results.

00:41:48   I can't find it anywhere.

00:41:49   So please, I would love for someone to actually determine if any of this is true.

00:41:53   Gurman, you can't just say the M4 Max doesn't have an interposer.

00:41:55   Did Apple confirm that?

00:41:57   Then tell me that Apple confirmed it to you.

00:41:59   And, and again, I will reiterate, even if the M4 Max doesn't have an interposer, maybe

00:42:03   the M3 Max didn't either.

00:42:04   But when they manufactured the ones that are going to do for the Ultra, they put it on there

00:42:08   because it's a different chip because it's got Thunderbolt 5 and all sorts of other stuff.

00:42:11   Anyway, this just annoys me.

00:42:13   So, sorry.

00:42:14   Continue.

00:42:14   Gurman continues, though I previously speculated that Apple might have used the M3 Ultra to differentiate

00:42:20   from a future M4 Ultra Mac Pro.

00:42:23   That now seems less likely given the lack of Ultra Fusion development.

00:42:27   An M3 Ultra refresh for the Mac Pro or a future M5 Ultra, if that generation gets this interconnect

00:42:32   capability, is more plausible.

00:42:34   The main benefits of the Mac Pro are PCIe expandability and extra ports, hardly enough to be a true

00:42:39   differentiator for 99.99% of people.

00:42:42   Apple knows this and its marketing team was dismayed when a higher end extreme chip with double the

00:42:47   performance of the Ultra processors was nixed years ago.

00:42:49   That would have given the premium price more of a justification.

00:42:52   I put this part in here because I like the idea of the marketing team at Apple having so much

00:43:00   influence over the company and sway over the products that it's a disappointment that there

00:43:05   was no good chip in the Mac Pro could actually influence product design.

00:43:08   And that may sound ridiculous if you're from a company where you're like, well, we make the

00:43:11   product and the marketing team sells it.

00:43:13   But my vague impression with the little knowledge I have about inside of Apple is that actually

00:43:18   the marketing team or the product marketing team is surprisingly powerful within the company.

00:43:23   So I really hope this is true.

00:43:25   I really hope the marketing team was dismayed.

00:43:28   I was dismayed.

00:43:29   A lot of people were dismayed.

00:43:30   I hope the marketing team is like, how are we going to sell this?

00:43:32   It's a Mac mini in a giant case.

00:43:34   And, you know, everyone just shrugs.

00:43:36   So, again, fingers crossed M4 Extreme WWDC 2025.

00:43:40   What did you call it last week, Marco?

00:43:42   A breakout box for the studio?

00:43:44   It's not even a breakout box.

00:43:45   It's in the same box.

00:43:46   Yeah, it's a PCI Express enclosure for the Mac Studio.

00:43:50   I mean, it's a PCI Express hotel.

00:43:52   Yeah.

00:43:53   And certainly, you know, if the plan is indeed for the Mac Pro to get some kind of extreme chip

00:43:59   that the studio doesn't get or can't fit or whatever, that would kind of explain.

00:44:05   Because, like, when you look at the Mac Pro now, it does kind of look like a seat filler.

00:44:10   It's like this is a role that Apple wants to, ostensibly wants to keep serving.

00:44:16   And here is a computer that sort of serves it.

00:44:19   That exists and is not Intel.

00:44:21   Right.

00:44:22   Which is an important feature.

00:44:23   It sort of serves this role.

00:44:24   But, like, it does kind of, like, the current Mac Pro does not differentiate itself enough

00:44:30   from Mac Studio except for a very, very, very small market of people who happen to use PCI

00:44:36   slots but not GPUs in those PCI slots.

00:44:39   Like, so, like, that is a market, but it's not a very big market.

00:44:42   And so, if they also are able to, you know, have a bigger extreme chip that could then presumably

00:44:51   also not only have better performance and maybe, you know, better GPU grunt, but also presumably

00:44:56   could address more RAM and have, you know, higher resource ceilings, more Thunderbolt bandwidth

00:45:00   and, you know, all the other things that you get from having more of these chips, that would

00:45:05   help differentiate it.

00:45:06   Because then people like John, who just need a bunch of processor or GPU grunt, who won't

00:45:13   fill the PCI slots, you know, that becomes served.

00:45:16   And now there's only one John, and even he wouldn't buy this because it'll probably be

00:45:19   $25,000.

00:45:20   But there's, like, scientific computing.

00:45:22   There's AI research and training and stuff like that where, like, anything where you're

00:45:27   working with huge amounts of memory, huge data sets, big throughput.

00:45:30   Like, there are industries and uses for what would be a theoretical, like, extreme quad chip

00:45:38   and the resources that would presumably go along with it.

00:45:40   Again, these are not massive markets, but they're profitable, and certainly Apple itself would

00:45:47   probably use them.

00:45:49   So, you know, there's lots of reasons for them to make a computer like that.

00:45:52   And again, it does seem like the current Mac Pro is basically a benchwarmer waiting for

00:45:56   a better one to come out that is more differentiated above the studio.

00:46:00   If that is the case, granted, this is wishful thinking.

00:46:03   You know, this is wishful rumor casting, like, we, or wish casting, I guess people call it.

00:46:08   Like, we want this to be true.

00:46:10   So it kind of makes us believe the rumors more.

00:46:12   But I do hope that the Mac Pro isn't just what we see today.

00:46:17   I hope that they do actually make the extreme version at some point.

00:46:21   And maybe not every CPU generation, you know, we'll see about that.

00:46:24   I will say, though, when it comes to that performance, when we get into the next item

00:46:30   about the M3 Ultra benchmarks, I'm a little concerned.

00:46:35   No, actually, before we go on to that, I just want to say that it's not just wish casting.

00:46:39   It is the thing that often gets us into trouble when it comes to the Mac Pro, because it is

00:46:43   like, yes, people want this and it's, you know, desirability or whatever.

00:46:47   And but the real downfall is like, well, how would what Apple is doing make any sense if

00:46:53   not for X?

00:46:54   And that leads you to things like this kind of hope, because, for example, why in the world

00:47:00   would they not revise the Mac Pro with the M3 Ultra at the same time as the studio?

00:47:06   It only makes sense.

00:47:07   The only reason they wouldn't do that is because, you know, based on what they said, there might

00:47:12   not be an Ultra in every generation.

00:47:13   There's not going to be an M4 Ultra.

00:47:15   They're not revising the Mac Pro at the same time as the studio.

00:47:18   Therefore, it only makes sense that the Mac Pro is not getting the M3 Ultra and it's not

00:47:23   getting the M4 Ultra because Apple has hinted that doesn't exist.

00:47:26   M4 Extreme WWC confirmed, right?

00:47:28   And yet when we do that and try to try to make sense of what Apple has said and what they

00:47:32   have done, very often we find ourselves foiled by like, oh, here we are, WWC 25.

00:47:37   And guess what?

00:47:37   They just announced the new Mac Pro with the M3 Ultra.

00:47:40   And then we all just smack ourselves in the forehead and say, but that doesn't make any

00:47:44   sense.

00:47:44   And Apple will be like, we know, like the things they've been doing with the Mac Pro have not

00:47:51   made a lot of sense recently.

00:47:52   And so we have to be careful not to fall into that trap.

00:47:56   But of, because that's just, that's, you know, I'll be there in my belief cert.

00:48:01   If they put a Mac Pro with M3 Ultra months after the studio got the M3 Ultra, like what in the

00:48:06   world is the point?

00:48:07   What are they even doing?

00:48:08   But anyway, yes, M3 Ultra benchmarks.

00:48:10   Next item.

00:48:10   Right.

00:48:11   So this is from Geekbench 6.

00:48:13   I mean, I'm happy to read off all these numbers and whatnot.

00:48:16   What's the best way to...

00:48:18   I can characterize it for you, right?

00:48:20   So here's the deal.

00:48:21   So I've looked these things up.

00:48:22   Now, some caveats to start.

00:48:23   This is super early.

00:48:25   I don't know if people even have the M3 Ultra studio now.

00:48:28   I think the embargo's lifted, but I think a few people have them.

00:48:30   But anyway, the thing about Geekbench, it's just a benchmark.

00:48:33   Anyone can submit scores to it.

00:48:35   Very early in the life of any model of computer, there are few reported scores.

00:48:40   At the time I gathered these numbers, there was only a handful of purported M3 Ultra scores

00:48:46   being reported.

00:48:47   You know, you get the app and you just, it reports your scores over the network to their

00:48:50   server, right?

00:48:52   When they show the scores for computers they've been out for a while, they're showing an average,

00:48:56   which I would argue is also maybe not the best because people could like super cool and overclock

00:49:00   them and throw off the average and do all sorts of weird stuff.

00:49:02   But anyway, that's why in some cases we have multiple scores here for like, here's the best

00:49:08   or here's the best score I could find for this.

00:49:11   And here is the average score of the few ones they have attached there.

00:49:14   So, and then the final caveat is, of course, how exactly representative is Geekbench of

00:49:19   anything that you care about?

00:49:20   And we'll link it in the show notes to an artist technical article where they try to do a few

00:49:23   more different benchmarks, try to be more representative.

00:49:25   But here's the upshot.

00:49:27   In GPU, which honestly is the main thing I was looking at the M3 Ultra for because the number

00:49:33   of CPU cores isn't that different.

00:49:34   The cores themselves are M2 versus M3.

00:49:37   It's not that big of a deal.

00:49:38   But in GPU, maybe they've done something big here.

00:49:41   And based on the Metal scores, and Metal is the API you care about if you're in the Apple world,

00:49:45   it is 10% faster than the M2 Ultra, than the M2 Ultra's Mac Studio's best score.

00:49:53   And it's 20% faster than the M2 Ultra's average score.

00:49:57   So, you know, the M2 Ultra's Mac Studio's been out for ages, so the average is probably accurate.

00:50:01   But I wanted to give it the best chance here.

00:50:03   Like, the M2 Ultra's best score is within 10% of the M3 Ultra.

00:50:07   The M2 Ultra, the M2 Ultra, Mac Studio, was released in June 2023.

00:50:12   So here we are in 2025, and Apple's releasing a computer that is 10% to 20% faster in GPU.

00:50:19   That's not a big boost in that many years, right?

00:50:24   It's not encouraging, especially since you can get more Metal score, at the very least,

00:50:32   by just putting in more GPU.

00:50:34   Maybe it was a cooling issue.

00:50:36   Maybe it's literally a die size issue, because they really are running up against the reticle limit,

00:50:40   even when doing the two maxes stuck together type of thing.

00:50:44   But it seems like only a month or two ago, when we were talking on the show about all these people

00:50:49   who have these grand fantasies of Apple putting out a GPU that's going to rival a 4090 and stuff.

00:50:55   And instead, they put out a GPU that is a low double-digit percentage faster than the one they put out in 2023.

00:51:02   Still, people will say, and they're right in that regard, well, it's actually extremely expensive to try to get something with this much GPU power with fast access to 512 gigs of RAM, right?

00:51:15   But it's just further narrowing the use case and making, you know, as if I wasn't attracted to the M3 Ultra anyway.

00:51:23   But certainly, if you're buying this thinking, well, I just want to get the best GPU Apple sells, this is it.

00:51:28   But it's not the best by much.

00:51:29   Extremely disappointing.

00:51:30   And then the single-core score, of course, is not great.

00:51:33   10% faster than the M2 Ultra.

00:51:35   Again, the 2023 computer.

00:51:36   20% slower than the M4 Max.

00:51:39   That's not a small number.

00:51:41   Single-core is, I mean, we know that.

00:51:43   Like, we know the M4 is amazing in single-core.

00:51:45   We know this uses M3 cores.

00:51:47   It is what it is.

00:51:49   And then the multi-core, 24% faster than the M2 Ultra.

00:51:52   24% since 2023 in multi-core?

00:51:57   Meh.

00:51:57   9% faster in multi-core than the M4 Max.

00:52:00   9% faster than, like, the Max of the current generation, right?

00:52:06   That's supposed to be half the chip.

00:52:08   It's not half the chip because it's two M3 Maxes for the M3 Ultra.

00:52:11   It's not great in multi-core.

00:52:15   Like, if he's like, well, if you want the fastest multi-core, you got to get the M3 Ultra.

00:52:18   Yeah, by 9%.

00:52:19   Now, one, I will say one more time, Geekbench is not reality.

00:52:23   Geekbench is a benchmark.

00:52:24   Benchmarks are not particularly representative.

00:52:27   If you look at the Ars Technic article, you will find some real-world things that it can

00:52:30   do much better than that.

00:52:31   You'll find some real-world things that can do much worse.

00:52:33   So, as always, if you care about how long it takes to do a thing, export a Final Cut

00:52:38   project, you know, do text-to-speech, run an AI model, do those things, measure those

00:52:43   things, and say, how much faster is it and how much am I getting?

00:52:46   But M3 Ultra does not look like a particularly compelling upgrade from the M2 Ultra.

00:52:53   And the M4 Max, Max Studio, looks really attractive unless you really need that extra 10% to 20%

00:53:00   GPU and an extra 9% of multi-core.

00:53:03   And if you don't need that, you get 20% faster single-core.

00:53:06   So, yeah, M4 forever.

00:53:08   Yeah, it seems like the Ultra here, again, what I was saying earlier, like, the Ultra is

00:53:14   really about the other, like, higher RAM limits, more Thunderbolt bandwidth.

00:53:19   Like, if those kinds of things are what's holding your work back, then maybe this is for you.

00:53:24   Otherwise, like, look, you know, if there's a way for me to spend money to get more performance,

00:53:30   I will often be prone to that, I would not in a million years choose the Ultra for my

00:53:35   needs because the Max is actually doing a better job, you know, for it would be better for my

00:53:42   needs by a mile.

00:53:43   And it would cost half as much on the processor.

00:53:46   But, you know, so, but, you know, it's, again, it's not to say there's nobody who this is

00:53:48   for, but this is not probably for people for whom CPU performance is critical.

00:53:56   Like, this is probably mostly for people who need more RAM or maybe who need that extra

00:54:02   GPU.

00:54:03   But, again, like, the GPU does not compare that well because, you know, also what we're

00:54:08   seeing, and this is kind of what worries me about the rumors about the Mac Pro getting

00:54:11   getting an extreme, you know, quote, extreme chip with, you know, double the Ultra or whatever.

00:54:16   These chips don't seem to be scaling that well past the max core counts.

00:54:23   Like, we've seen this from all the generations so far that have gotten the Ultra chip.

00:54:27   Or was there an M1 Ultra?

00:54:29   Yeah, yeah, there was.

00:54:30   And I was going to say that when you were talking about the other thing that, like, even though

00:54:35   you said quad and we keep talking about it in that context, I continue to think and hope,

00:54:39   I thought this was what the M3 Ultra was going to be, but anyway, I continue to think that

00:54:43   they're better off making a chip that is bigger and badder than the Macs and putting two of

00:54:48   those together rather than trying to put four of anything together because they've never

00:54:52   been able to do it.

00:54:53   And you're right.

00:54:53   Like, just if their overhead's killing them on the two-chip ones, and it was killing them

00:54:57   on some of the earlier two-chip ones, don't try to go.

00:55:00   There's a reason they didn't do the four, right?

00:55:01   So I'm just hoping they make two really big chips and stick them together rather than trying

00:55:07   to take four of any of the existing chips and stick them together.

00:55:09   Yeah, because as we're seeing, we saw this with all the Ultra so far, the Ultra being

00:55:14   two Macs stuck together does not give you twice the performance.

00:55:18   On the GPU, it sometimes can come close.

00:55:21   On the CPU, it's way off.

00:55:23   And because, again, there's different bottlenecks, there's different trade-offs, there's different,

00:55:27   you know, things don't scale perfectly because they're complicated and that's not how things

00:55:32   work.

00:55:32   And they screwed up the GPU.

00:55:33   So the GPU gets close.

00:55:34   I forget which generation.

00:55:36   One of the generations, they actually screwed up the GPU part real bad and it was way worse

00:55:39   than it needed to be.

00:55:40   I think that was the M1 where they messed it up and they fixed it in the M2.

00:55:42   Yeah.

00:55:43   There's all these different, you know, bandwidths and caches and things that just make it more

00:55:46   complicated than just doubling everything.

00:55:48   So what you're getting is, you know, you get twice the cost, at least on the manufacturing

00:55:54   side.

00:55:54   You know, certainly the retail price reflects, you know, definitely twice the cost, but you're

00:55:59   not getting twice the performance.

00:56:00   And in many cases, you're getting a lot less than twice the performance.

00:56:04   So it does seem like, again, you will know if you need this and odds are if you don't know

00:56:13   that you need this, you don't need this.

00:56:14   Like if you don't, if you're not hitting the RAM limits on your maxed out max chip computer,

00:56:22   you probably don't need this.

00:56:24   If you're not like absolutely maxing out the GPU total speed all the time, you probably don't

00:56:31   need this.

00:56:31   Like this is, this is for certain people, not for us.

00:56:35   And if you just want a really fast general purpose computer, an M4 max based computer is

00:56:41   most likely going to give you a better and possibly even faster overall performance, whether that's

00:56:48   the MacBook pro or the Mac studio, you can have it in both.

00:56:51   And it seems to be the same chip in both.

00:56:52   And that's great.

00:56:53   So you want a laptop that's the fastest computer for you.

00:56:55   Great.

00:56:56   You want a desktop version.

00:56:57   You have that option too.

00:56:58   You want one with slots too bad, but.

00:57:01   But right now, like the M4 max is the place to be and the M4 ultra or the M3 ultra is

00:57:07   for almost no one.

00:57:10   We are sponsored this episode by BetterHelp.

00:57:13   With over 30,000 therapists, BetterHelp is the world's largest online therapy platform, having

00:57:19   served over 5 million people globally.

00:57:22   And it's super convenient.

00:57:23   You can just join a session with a click of a button, which helps you fit therapy into your

00:57:28   busy life.

00:57:29   And if your therapist is not working out, you can switch therapists easily at any time.

00:57:33   Now, let's talk numbers.

00:57:35   Traditional in-person therapy can cost $100 or $200 per session.

00:57:39   This really adds up fast.

00:57:40   But with BetterHelp online therapy, you can save on average up to 50% per session.

00:57:46   With BetterHelp, you pay a flat fee for weekly sessions, saving you big on both cost and on

00:57:52   time.

00:57:52   Because they believe therapy should feel accessible, not like a luxury that's out of reach or that

00:57:58   you'll get to someday later.

00:57:59   Believe me, I'm guilty of that.

00:58:00   With online therapy, you get quality care at a price that makes sense and can help you

00:58:05   with anything from anxiety to everyday stress.

00:58:08   Your mental health is worth it.

00:58:10   And now it is within reach with BetterHelp.

00:58:13   Your well-being is important.

00:58:15   You know, therapy is, I have gone to therapy myself in the past, and it is very beneficial.

00:58:20   You'd be surprised.

00:58:21   You know, give it a shot.

00:58:22   Like it's, even a small number of sessions, it'll kind of blow your mind as to like what a

00:58:27   good therapist can uncover.

00:58:28   So, BetterHelp is making this accessible and affordable to more people.

00:58:32   Your well-being is worth it.

00:58:34   Visit BetterHelp.com slash A-TechPod, that's A-T-E-C-H pod, today to get 10% off your first

00:58:43   month.

00:58:43   That's BetterHelp, H-E-L-P.com slash A-TechPod.

00:58:48   We will put that code in the show notes as well.

00:58:50   So, once again, BetterHelp.com slash A-TechPod for 10% off your first month of BetterHelp.

00:58:56   Thank you so much to BetterHelp for sponsoring our show.

00:58:59   So, a few years ago now, on March 10th of 2022, there was an exchange that was had on this

00:59:10   very program, on episode 473, Fan Boats and Coattails.

00:59:15   And I believe Marco is going to play that exchange right now.

00:59:21   Eventually, the iMac screen is going to be larger than 24 inches.

00:59:24   And when it does, the 27-inch iMac will come back.

00:59:26   That's all I'm saying.

00:59:27   I'm not saying like that tomorrow there's going to be a 27-inch iMac despite this hole in the

00:59:31   lineup or whatever.

00:59:31   It's just the 24, like it went up from 21.

00:59:34   The low-end iMac used to be 21.

00:59:35   So, they made 24, which is a nice in-between size.

00:59:37   But eventually, two or three years from now, they're going to be like, 24, really?

00:59:41   Everyone else is so much bigger and they'll work their way back up to 27 and 5K.

00:59:47   You really just infinite timescaled us on this?

00:59:49   It's not infinite.

00:59:50   Totally infinite timescaled us.

00:59:51   I'm going to say within three years, there'll be a 27-inch iMac.

00:59:54   You really just finite timescaled us on this?

00:59:56   All right.

00:59:57   That's the bet.

00:59:57   Three years from now, I'll bet you a dollar.

01:00:00   My $1 bet.

01:00:01   Yeah.

01:00:01   All right.

01:00:04   So, it's been three years.

01:00:05   Yeah.

01:00:05   For all the people who sent this in by Mastodon and other means, don't you all know I had this

01:00:11   on my calendar?

01:00:11   Like, I think I put it on the calendar on that show.

01:00:15   I always put these things on my calendar because I would never remember them otherwise.

01:00:17   Yeah, I should have gone with five years.

01:00:19   I should have stuck to my instincts, but...

01:00:22   Double or nothing?

01:00:22   Double or nothing?

01:00:22   Yeah, I was going to ask.

01:00:23   So, well, so here's the thing.

01:00:26   Here's the other thing that I didn't think about when we were making that.

01:00:28   So, first of all, I still say that they're going to make a larger iMac for the reason

01:00:33   that I was trying to articulate in that clip, which is like, look, even if they never add

01:00:38   a larger iMac to the line, the one and only iMac that exists, assuming the iMac continues

01:00:44   to exist at all as a product, which is not guaranteed, but continue to exist at all, that

01:00:48   one and only iMac will itself get bigger just as it got bigger from 21-inch to 24.

01:00:52   But my three-year timeline was not asking for that.

01:00:54   My three-year timeline is saying they're going to add a bigger iMac.

01:00:57   Here's what I didn't anticipate.

01:00:58   The iMac is close enough to being a monitor that you got to add the gigantic Apple monitor

01:01:05   timescale modifier to all of your calculations, which means Apple producing a new screen?

01:01:11   That only happens once every 15 years or whatever.

01:01:15   So, yeah, I blew it.

01:01:17   It's three years have gone by.

01:01:19   There's no bigger iMac.

01:01:20   Honestly, I would not double or nothing for an additional two years because that's how...

01:01:26   I mean, since then, what has happened with the Mac Studio display?

01:01:30   Not anything.

01:01:32   What has happened with the XDR?

01:01:35   Nothing.

01:01:36   What has happened with the iMac?

01:01:38   Very little.

01:01:39   So, I still think there will be one, but I don't think it will be in two years.

01:01:44   And so, just...

01:01:46   I mean, I hope we don't have to wait until the 24-inch just to become, you know, inconvenient

01:01:52   and inexpensive.

01:01:52   And they kind of like a 25 or a 26-inch just like kind of like bumped up from...

01:01:56   So, I hope we don't have to wait that long.

01:01:58   But related to that, ever since Apple came out with the 24-inch and then said to everybody

01:02:02   who would listen, we're totally not making 27-inch, so buy this 24.

01:02:06   No sense waiting for 27.

01:02:07   We're not going to make it.

01:02:08   We're not doing it.

01:02:09   Buy the 24, right?

01:02:10   Which is true.

01:02:11   They didn't make a 27.

01:02:12   You should have bought the 24, right?

01:02:13   But ever since then, shortly after that, there have been persistent rumors about a larger iMac,

01:02:18   which has been frustrating to me in this bet.

01:02:20   So, German in August 2024 says, a larger iMac remains something Apple is exploring as well,

01:02:27   but it's unclear if that will be an M4 product or something that comes the following year

01:02:30   or later.

01:02:31   Yeah.

01:02:31   February 2025, from German again, Apple will also probably eventually get around to offering

01:02:38   a larger iMac.

01:02:39   I just want to reread that beautiful piece of German pros again.

01:02:42   Apple will also...

01:02:44   No, sorry.

01:02:44   I screwed it up.

01:02:45   I'm adding my own thing to it.

01:02:46   Let me try again.

01:02:46   Apple also will probably eventually get around to offering a larger screen iMac.

01:02:52   At least he hyphenated its larger screen, although that's debatable.

01:02:56   Golly, that's good.

01:02:57   Like, the rumors of larger iMacs have never gone away, and not just like vague, wishful

01:03:03   thinking, but like from people like German who usually have sources, and yet one has not

01:03:07   shipped, so Marco gets $1.

01:03:08   Yep.

01:03:09   Correct.

01:03:10   Which I can apply towards the price of the iMac that I bought a month ago for the restaurant.

01:03:14   What color was that one?

01:03:16   Green.

01:03:16   There you go.

01:03:17   See?

01:03:18   There you go.

01:03:18   I would just like to point out that the Pro Display XDR, which, while from what I gather

01:03:24   from you two, still a very good monitor, release date as per Wikipedia, 10th of December 2019,

01:03:30   which was almost 2,000 days ago.

01:03:34   Woof.

01:03:36   And if you made $1 a day since then, you could buy less than half of one.

01:03:39   You could buy two stands.

01:03:42   John, I think our long national nightmare may be over with regard to threads and your timeline

01:03:49   setting.

01:03:49   Can you tell me more about this?

01:03:50   More digging back from the archives.

01:03:52   As discussed on ATP 616, I Have No Grippers, which was actually a reference to this very

01:03:57   thing, The Verge reported on November 25th, 2024, that, quote, threads will now let users

01:04:03   decide what feed they want to be their default when opening the app.

01:04:05   And I was complaining on that show that they announced this as if it's like a feature.

01:04:09   They're like, here you go.

01:04:10   You asked for it, and you got it.

01:04:12   And I didn't get it.

01:04:14   It's like, oh, we're rolling this out to people.

01:04:15   You'll probably get it eventually.

01:04:16   And I've been patiently waiting and launching the Threads app and looking for my little grippers,

01:04:20   which are the little three lines that let you know that you can drag reorder the order

01:04:24   of the feeds.

01:04:25   And you just put the one you want, the following feed on the top, and it becomes your default

01:04:29   feed so that every single time you launch the Threads app, it doesn't revert you back to

01:04:34   the feed you don't want to see.

01:04:35   You can change the default.

01:04:36   They announced that in November, 2024, as if it's just a thing, but it wasn't a thing.

01:04:40   It was a thing in an article.

01:04:41   It was a thing that some people have, but it was not a thing that I had.

01:04:45   So exactly 100 days later, on March 5th, 2025, I got the feature, the gripper.

01:04:51   I've been checking.

01:04:53   The grippers were there.

01:04:53   I'm like, yay, I can rotate it up.

01:04:55   I don't use Threads as much as the other services, so it's not that big of a deal.

01:05:00   But I was just annoyed that they announced this feature as if it was a thing they did,

01:05:04   and it just totally wasn't.

01:05:05   And that was going to be the story, except for that was on March 5th.

01:05:10   Today is March 12th, and I just looked at my Threads app, and the grippers are gone.

01:05:13   Oh, no.

01:05:14   Other people are texting me and sending me images and saying, hey, look, I got it, too.

01:05:18   It's rolling out for everybody.

01:05:19   It did roll out to me for seven days, and now it's gone.

01:05:23   That's so cruel.

01:05:25   That is cruel.

01:05:26   So stupid.

01:05:26   Like, look, are you going to honor my preferences or not?

01:05:30   Are you going to always put me on the thing I don't want to see because you think that's

01:05:33   better for engagement or whatever the hell?

01:05:34   Or are you just going to let me put it the way I want?

01:05:37   And they just can't decide, how much study does this feature need?

01:05:40   Either let me pick what my default feed is or don't.

01:05:43   But don't pretend like you're letting people pick and then just, like, randomly, haphazardly

01:05:46   roll it out.

01:05:47   Like, are they just making sure it's not going to destroy their business to allow people to

01:05:51   have a preference setting?

01:05:52   So annoying.

01:05:53   Finally, for follow-up this week, we got some feedback with regard to mostly me popping off

01:05:59   about feedback in the Apple world.

01:06:02   This is, you know, formerly known as Radar.

01:06:05   We got a fairly long piece of feedback from an anonymous person, but I'd like to read

01:06:09   it because I think there's a lot of good stuff here.

01:06:11   This person writes, I was an Apple engineer for almost two decades and a third-party Apple

01:06:16   developer for more than a decade.

01:06:17   I heard Casey's rant against Apple's feedback assistant, and I can sympathize.

01:06:20   As a third-party developer, I also got the impression that my bug reports were ignored.

01:06:24   Let me tell you what it's like to be an Apple engineer.

01:06:27   So, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

01:06:28   Then come third-party bugs.

01:06:30   During beta season, I may be assigned hundreds of bugs each week.

01:06:33   Obviously, I can't possibly fix that many, so I triage.

01:06:36   Well-written bug reports with clear instructions to reproduce the problem are first.

01:06:40   If you've attached a small Xcode project that demonstrates the bug, even better.

01:06:43   Unfortunately, there are lots of bugs without a clear problem description or instructions on

01:06:47   how to reproduce it.

01:06:48   Even worse are bugs so poorly written I can't even understand what's wrong.

01:06:51   Unfortunately, these bugs will probably be ignored.

01:06:53   All right.

01:06:54   So, so far, I think this makes sense.

01:06:56   I mean, it's not what I want to hear, but there's only so much time in a day and in a week,

01:07:00   and you do the things that you think are the easiest to accomplish.

01:07:03   Fair enough.

01:07:04   All right.

01:07:05   So, back to the anonymous person.

01:07:06   If I have a question for the developer, I'm prohibited from just contacting them.

01:07:11   I have to send the question to Apple Developer Support.

01:07:13   They contact the developer and eventually send me the reply.

01:07:16   But I have occasionally contacted developers directly for people I know.

01:07:22   Multiple reports of the same bug are grouped together.

01:07:24   The clearest is tagged as the original bug.

01:07:26   The rest are listed as duplicates.

01:07:28   Okay.

01:07:29   This is fine.

01:07:29   Duplicates are like votes.

01:07:31   Oh, God.

01:07:31   Duplicates are like votes that this is an important bug.

01:07:34   A bug with hundreds of duplicates is important since lots of people are hitting it.

01:07:37   I'm supposed to fix high-priority bugs first.

01:07:40   Crashes and data loss are the highest priority, then features that don't work,

01:07:43   eventually working your way down to annoying malfunctions and UI glitches.

01:07:45   The problem is many annoying but non-serious bugs don't get fixed this way.

01:07:50   So experienced engineers also work on the most annoying non-serious bugs.

01:07:53   We also use Apple products and we want them to work well.

01:07:56   Bugs reported during the official beta period have the highest chance of being fixed,

01:08:00   since I'm supposed to be fixing third-party bug reports.

01:08:02   The rest of the year, I'm assigned to work on new features in next year's release,

01:08:06   not old bugs in last year's release.

01:08:07   I mean, this stands to reason given Apple's behavior, but oof.

01:08:11   One thing that drives me crazy is Apple ignoring old bugs.

01:08:15   New features get lots of attention and their bugs are fixed.

01:08:17   New bugs that appear in old features, regressions, are also fixed.

01:08:20   But bugs that have existed for years are ignored.

01:08:22   If a bug somehow slips through QA and ships, the system ignores it.

01:08:26   There's no incentive for engineers or teams to go back and fix old bugs.

01:08:31   None of this is surprising.

01:08:33   And some of it I genuinely do get, especially working at the vast volume that Apple works at.

01:08:40   But, oof, having basically zero incentive to go back and fix things that are broken,

01:08:45   that's not a great look.

01:08:48   It stands to reason given behavior, but it's not a great look.

01:08:51   When people do stuff like this, it's like they're explaining, like, you don't understand.

01:08:55   This is the situation.

01:08:56   It's like, all you're doing is explaining from a different side the exact same problem.

01:09:00   We're both saying it's bad, but you're trying to say, like, on the outside, we think it's terrible.

01:09:05   On the inside, it's like, well, here's all the reasons.

01:09:07   Like, yeah, those are the reasons it's terrible.

01:09:09   Those are not justifications for it being terrible.

01:09:13   And nor are they unmovable, intractable things that can never change, and therefore it must be terrible.

01:09:18   And the reason we know that it doesn't have to be terrible is because other companies do similar things at, yes, similar volumes,

01:09:26   and they do it better.

01:09:27   There are companies that get more customer support feedback than Apple does, you know,

01:09:31   in industries where that is more common, right?

01:09:34   There are companies that also have technical platforms.

01:09:37   Just it is possible to do this better,

01:09:40   as evidenced by this big explanation of all of the dysfunction that's going on inside the company.

01:09:45   If you fix some of that dysfunction, then it won't be as terrible.

01:09:48   That's what we're saying.

01:09:50   So I think, and I'm not saying that this anonymous feedback is trying to justify it or whatever,

01:09:55   just like, because sometimes two people do get indignant and say, you don't understand.

01:09:58   It has to be that way because reasons X, Y, and Z.

01:10:01   I don't think that's what the person is saying.

01:10:02   I think they actually are just giving a different perspective of like,

01:10:04   here's how terrible it looks on the inside of the company as well.

01:10:08   But yeah, like this, the only thing that needs to change about making this better is someone

01:10:13   inside Apple in a position of power needs to decide that is something they want to improve

01:10:18   and actually put resources towards it.

01:10:20   And thus far, that has not happened to a large enough degree to really make a big impact.

01:10:24   All right.

01:10:25   I think we only have time for one topic today because this is likely to be a doozy.

01:10:29   And this is a report from Bloomberg from the 10th, as we're sitting here now.

01:10:33   It is the 12th.

01:10:34   This is a report from Bloomberg.

01:10:36   Like I said, I believe this was German.

01:10:37   And they write,

01:10:39   Apple Inc is preparing one of the most dramatic software overhauls in the company's history,

01:10:43   aiming to transform the interface of the iPhone, iPad, and Mac for a new generation of users.

01:10:47   The revamp will fundamentally change the look of the operating systems and make Apple's various

01:10:53   software platforms more consistent.

01:10:55   That includes updating the style of icons, menus, apps, windows, and system buttons.

01:10:59   As part of the push, the company is working to simplify the way users navigate and control

01:11:03   their devices.

01:11:04   The design is loosely based on the Vision Pro software.

01:11:07   The changes are coming as part of iOS 19 and iPadOS 19, codenamed Luck, and macOS 16,

01:11:13   which is dubbed Cheer.

01:11:16   They go well beyond a new design language and aesthetic tweaks.

01:11:20   The software will mark the most significant upgrade to the Mac.

01:11:23   Upgrade is doing a lot of work there.

01:11:24   To the Mac since the Big Sur operating system in 2020.

01:11:27   For the iPhone, it will be the biggest revamp since iOS 7 in 2013.

01:11:31   A key goal of the overhaul is to make Apple's different operating systems look similar and

01:11:35   more consistent.

01:11:36   Still, Apple is stopping short of merging its operating systems, a step other tech giants

01:11:40   have taken.

01:11:40   The company believes it can make better Macs and iPads by keeping their operating systems

01:11:44   separate.

01:11:45   So there's a little bit of editorializing in there.

01:11:48   And I know on a recent episode, we talked about the potential for an iOS 19 overhaul to

01:11:54   look like Vision OS.

01:11:55   But at the time we were discussing that, it was purely in the context of, does iOS need an

01:12:00   overhaul?

01:12:00   Is it going to look like Vision Pro?

01:12:01   Is it going to look like the imitation app or whatever?

01:12:04   This new story this week is something so much more than that.

01:12:09   Because making a change to the visual look of iOS 19 would be significant, especially if

01:12:14   it's like, you know, looking like the Vision Pro or Glass or Crew or whatever.

01:12:17   But this, this, and this story is not just government.

01:12:19   Other people have had this story as well.

01:12:21   I don't know if they're just parroting him or have their own sources, but this is like

01:12:25   a overhaul of the look and feel of all of Apple's major platforms.

01:12:32   The iOS, the Mac and the iPad to, and again, I don't know how much of this is government editorializing

01:12:40   with the goal of making them more consistent with each other or having more of a family

01:12:45   resemblance.

01:12:47   Let's do a little, you know, germinology here and say, what do we think about this

01:12:53   sentence?

01:12:53   Uh, the, uh, what is it?

01:12:56   The update includes updating the style of icons, menus, apps, windows, and system buttons.

01:13:03   And with the fundamental change, the look of operating systems to make the software platforms

01:13:06   more consistent, right?

01:13:07   Icons, menus, apps, windows.

01:13:09   How, how in the world could you make the look of icons, menus, apps, and windows consistent

01:13:19   across the phone, the iPad, and the Mac?

01:13:23   Let's talk about icons.

01:13:25   Icons on the Mac and on the iPad and on the phone are already.

01:13:33   I mean, am I wrong?

01:13:34   They're already consistent.

01:13:35   They're squircles.

01:13:36   We talked about, we talked about the squircle.

01:13:38   They're, they're squares with rounded corners.

01:13:40   Oh, no, no, no.

01:13:41   Not on vision pro.

01:13:42   Vision OS, they're all circles.

01:13:43   Right.

01:13:43   I didn't say vision pro.

01:13:44   I just listed the ones German listed iOS, iPad OS, and Mac OS, right?

01:13:48   Well, and, and icons also includes like the design of the symbols within the icons, which

01:13:54   they've already made consistent.

01:13:55   SF symbols.

01:13:56   Right.

01:13:56   Yeah.

01:13:57   They do a really good, there's a huge library of consistently styled icons that they expand

01:14:01   all the time.

01:14:02   When Apple designs their own icons that are not NSF symbols, they also match that style.

01:14:07   So already icons are pretty consistent.

01:14:11   And, you know, what you're talking about is the app launch icons, but like even those,

01:14:15   you're right, are already mostly the same across most platforms.

01:14:19   Yeah.

01:14:19   I mean, are they saying that like the, the, the, the male icon on the Mac has to be literally

01:14:24   pixel or pickles, the same as the male icon on the phone and the iPad?

01:14:27   I, I mean, maybe it already is pretty close, but like, so there's that windows, the phone

01:14:32   doesn't even really have windows.

01:14:34   It's got sheets and cards and whatever, but it really doesn't have windows.

01:14:37   The iPad kind of sort of has windows, but not really.

01:14:42   So, and you know, I'm not quite sure what they're aiming at there.

01:14:45   Menus again, the Mac has a menu bar.

01:14:48   The other jobbering systems do not, but they both have kind of pop-up menu things.

01:14:52   And those things do look a little bit different.

01:14:53   I can't, I can't tell.

01:14:56   This story is so insistent that the goal of this is to sort of unify and make them more

01:15:01   consistent with each other.

01:15:02   I can't tell if that is a real thing or not, right?

01:15:06   It's not like sources.

01:15:08   I think, I think I cut out most of the people said or whatever.

01:15:10   I can see them in any kind of redesign, any kind of like cross OS redesign.

01:15:16   I can see someone looking at it and saying, oh, it looks like one of the goals of this redesign

01:15:21   was to make the platforms look more similar to each other.

01:15:24   But I feel like if you do any redesign, of course, there's going to be a, like the redesign

01:15:31   will span multiple operating systems.

01:15:33   It will, the same ideas will be appear in all of them.

01:15:36   I don't think that means they're trying to make them look more like each other.

01:15:39   I just think it means when, if you do all three at once, of course, there's going to be a family

01:15:43   resemblance.

01:15:43   Like, so anyway, I'm, I can't tell what, how big the consistency angle is.

01:15:48   And that is one of the things that I'm going to be looking at.

01:15:50   If this story turns out to be true, was the consistency angle, just someone looking at

01:15:54   it and saying, oh, they all look similar because they were all redesigned at the same time.

01:15:59   Or is Apple going to get up on stage and say, we really felt it was very confusing that pop-up

01:16:04   menus on your phone look different than pull-down menus on the Mac menu bar and users were really

01:16:09   tripping up on that.

01:16:10   And it was really impairing the usability and functionality of our software.

01:16:13   So now a pop-up menu on your phone looks exactly the same as a pull-down menu on your Mac.

01:16:19   And we feel like that, that makes our platforms better.

01:16:21   Or we just want there to be a family resemblance.

01:16:24   So the icons already looked almost exactly the same, but now they literally are exactly

01:16:28   the same.

01:16:28   And you can tint icons on your phone and you can tint icons on your Mac.

01:16:31   I don't know what to make of that.

01:16:34   And then as for the circular icons, which Casey just brought up, let's just, let's just throw

01:16:38   that out there as like a part of the doomsday scenario that we'll, we'll surely spiral into

01:16:41   briefly icons on vision power circles, not squircles, literal circles.

01:16:47   How, you know, how can you decide with an iOS 19 release that now iOS icons on your phone

01:16:57   are also circles.

01:16:57   Apple can do that because they have noticed and they can redraw all their icons.

01:17:01   So they fit in a circle, but you can't just take a third party icons and, and put them in

01:17:06   a circle shape, you'll cut off half of people's icons because they don't expect that to happen.

01:17:10   So I don't see any way where you can have a transition to circular icons on the phone

01:17:18   without just massive upheaval and some kind of transition period where some of them are squircles

01:17:24   and some of them are circles.

01:17:26   Again, to what end people were real confused that the icons on vision power circles, but

01:17:31   they're squircles on their phone.

01:17:32   They had no idea what to do.

01:17:33   No, everyone's fine.

01:17:34   They know what I got.

01:17:36   There's nothing.

01:17:37   This reminds me of that, uh, Bruce Tognizini, uh, thing that I put it in my Mac was tender

01:17:41   use a few times from the original, like Apple human interface guidelines.

01:17:44   There was a, a section of that book, uh, that emphasized an important idea and interface

01:17:50   design using the example of extension icons for classic Mac OS extensions were things that

01:17:55   could like modify the system because they had no memory protections.

01:17:58   You could just do whatever the hell you wanted.

01:17:59   Anyway, um, those were extensions.

01:18:01   And, uh, in, and the later versions of classic Mac OS, you would see the icons of the extensions

01:18:06   that loaded during the, the, the startup process.

01:18:08   You'd see them march across to the bottom of your screen from left to right.

01:18:11   And the extension icon that Apple defined when they rolled out system seven with extensions

01:18:16   and stuff was a puzzle piece.

01:18:18   So it was, you know, just picture like a rectangle, but it's like a puzzle piece, kind of a squashed

01:18:21   puzzle piece because you don't have that much room for the little, I don't know

01:18:24   what you call them, the little things that stick out.

01:18:25   The little notches, but it was a puzzle piece.

01:18:27   But the thing is there was like four different puzzle piece icons that were possible with

01:18:32   different arrangements of the little bulges and holes.

01:18:35   No one was ever confused by that because a puzzle piece is a puzzle piece is a puzzle piece.

01:18:41   If I throw four puzzle pieces in front of you, you're like, well, one of those is a puzzle

01:18:43   piece, but I have no idea what the other ones are.

01:18:45   Like it's, they showed, the other thing that they showed was the home icon for hypercard.

01:18:51   You go to the home button to go back to the home of your hypercard stack for old people.

01:18:54   There was seven different versions of that.

01:18:56   They all look like little houses, little, little square houses with a little triangular

01:18:59   roof.

01:19:00   Again, anyone said, oh, click on the home icon, click on the little picture of the house.

01:19:05   No one said, well, I see one picture of a house, but that other one looks different.

01:19:07   Is that also a house?

01:19:10   You can trust people to recognize a bunch of different puzzle pieces, a bunch of different

01:19:15   house icons.

01:19:16   And yes, you can trust people to recognize this is an icon on your phone, and this is an icon

01:19:22   in Vision Pro, and this is an icon on your iPad, and this is an icon on your Mac.

01:19:25   Even if they're not all squircles, it'll be fine.

01:19:28   So I really hope that part of it is just family resemblance and not, you know, everybody.

01:19:35   I mean, we're already at everybody squircle.

01:19:37   Maybe they should make Vision Pro squircle.

01:19:38   Again, this rumor doesn't mention Vision Pro at all.

01:19:40   So I don't know what the hell, or at least not the part that I snipped out of it.

01:19:43   But setting that aside, how do you feel about this OS-spanning rumor as compared to how you

01:19:52   felt about the iOS 19 rumor?

01:19:53   I mean, this is a much larger, like, so what we heard of with iOS 19 earlier, and we did

01:19:59   that after show, or the overtime about it, it sounded like, you know, there was that mock-up

01:20:05   of the camera app that somebody, was it Jon Prosser who did the mock-up?

01:20:08   Somebody.

01:20:09   That's right.

01:20:10   And it sounded like, okay, well, maybe this is something that they're doing, like, for

01:20:15   certain apps.

01:20:15   Like, you know, the point I made was that Apple has always had multiple design languages depending

01:20:20   on the app type, and there were different styles your app could be, whether it was, like, a

01:20:25   content viewing app, or, like, a single view app, versus a document app, versus a productivity

01:20:30   app, and they've always kind of had, they've been juggling multiple styles.

01:20:33   And so my thought at that time was, maybe this is just a new style they're going to, you

01:20:38   know, add and make easy in the APIs and everything, and maybe adopt for some of their apps.

01:20:42   This is a pretty bold claim that it's much bigger than that, that this is more about, like, the

01:20:49   default look of the UI widgets, and the styles and everything.

01:20:53   And that's a bigger thing.

01:20:55   Now, it sounds like echoes of iOS 7, but I think we're in a very different world now than

01:21:03   we were back then.

01:21:04   First of all, this is a much larger and more established and more entrenched world of apps

01:21:13   now, and all the stuff that runs in Apple's ecosystems is much bigger now, much more entrenched,

01:21:18   and it's much bigger companies now having a lot of influence and a lot of usage in their

01:21:23   apps.

01:21:23   So, for Apple to do something like iOS 7 today, I don't even think they're in a position to

01:21:32   really do it very strongly, for lots of reasons.

01:21:35   Like, number one, I don't think they have the support from developers to, on a large scale,

01:21:44   adopt a new design language, because, like, the small developers like us, they have, you

01:21:49   know, done a pretty good job of straining that relationship, first of all.

01:21:54   Like, that's, number one is, like, we, you know, we are largely, we've been strained, let's

01:22:00   say, and that's, you know, they keep doing that, and that's going to keep being a thing

01:22:03   with their, you know, policy decisions and behavior and everything like that.

01:22:08   So, there's already, like, that relationship with small developers is strained.

01:22:12   That relationship with big company developers is not only differently and maybe more strained,

01:22:18   but big company developers have largely not stuck with Apple's stock look for anything.

01:22:25   Big companies develop their own styles and their own looks for their apps, and they use

01:22:30   them across platforms.

01:22:32   They want their style of their app to look the same on Android and on iOS and maybe on PCs

01:22:39   or the web or whatever the other platforms might be, but especially Android and iOS.

01:22:42   So, they are already saying, like, you know what?

01:22:45   That's nice, Apple.

01:22:47   You have your default, you know, widget looks and whatever else.

01:22:50   We're not going to use them, or we're going to override them to look like us.

01:22:52   So, the big companies, when you think about, like, what, how would this actually play out?

01:22:58   The big companies are going to be hostile or neglectful.

01:23:03   Like, they're going to actively fight against it, or they're going to, they're going to just, like,

01:23:08   never update to the new styles or whatever.

01:23:10   So, all the apps that you use on your phone for big companies, like, they're out.

01:23:15   They're not going to do any of this stuff.

01:23:16   They're going to do their, they're going to keep doing their own stuff.

01:23:18   Small developers like us, this kind of thing is usually a pretty huge workload on us.

01:23:27   It's a huge request and a huge burden to put on third-party developers when the system theme significantly changes.

01:23:36   Because huge amounts of, huge, like, you know, UI chunks of our app will not work right, will not look right.

01:23:44   They'll have visual glitches, or it won't work in the new format.

01:23:48   And so, for us to adopt it, it's a huge amount of work.

01:23:52   Oftentimes needing a pretty significant redesign of the app to adopt it.

01:23:57   And on that front, by the way, I've seen a lot of people reacting to this story by saying,

01:24:01   well, SwiftUI to the rescue, because SwiftUI is declarative,

01:24:05   and you can be less precise about exactly how things look.

01:24:08   Therefore, it'll be much easier for people who have fully adopted a SwiftUI to accommodate the new look.

01:24:13   There is a tiny, very, very small amount of truth to that.

01:24:18   But mostly, what I think Marco's getting at from someone who has experience with doing this is,

01:24:25   it's not like your app won't work when they change the default look of everything, no matter what API you use.

01:24:31   Like, unless you're really unlocking, you're doing custom controls and stuff like that.

01:24:34   But if you're along the straight and narrow, it's like, your app will work.

01:24:36   But when they change the default look, you have to go through every single screen,

01:24:41   every single button, every single widget, because anybody who actually pays attention to their app,

01:24:45   like in any developer who doesn't budget their time the same way a big company would,

01:24:50   has tweaked everything within an inch of its life.

01:24:52   Even if it's just micro-adjusting padding, or using a particular thing because of the way it happens to look

01:24:59   in the default widget set, and it looks nicer that way,

01:25:01   when they change all the default widgets,

01:25:03   you've got to go through every single thing that appears in your app,

01:25:07   and make sure it still looks okay and good.

01:25:11   Because it will, like, the choices you made to use this style of picker versus that style of toggle,

01:25:16   and you're using overlay here, and ZStack there, and background here,

01:25:21   and why did you make those choices?

01:25:22   Because they make the best appearance and behavior with the widget set that you developed it with.

01:25:27   And if they change all the default widgets,

01:25:29   you are going to have to go back and revisit all that stuff,

01:25:32   even if you use SwiftUI from top to bottom.

01:25:34   So that's the burden we're talking about here.

01:25:36   Not that, like, all of a sudden my app crashes, or it doesn't load,

01:25:38   or you can't hit a button anymore, it just starts to look like

01:25:41   this was clearly developed with a different widget set, because it was.

01:25:45   What this does to the developer community is it just drops a huge bomb.

01:25:51   This will be all we can do this year with our apps.

01:25:54   Because, like, what happens is when Apple does a new theme,

01:25:58   usually what happens is if you don't build with a new SDK,

01:26:02   so your app that's not updated yet in the store will continue running on the old theme.

01:26:07   So people will launch your app, and if you haven't built it with a new SDK,

01:26:11   which you can't do usually until, you know, the week before release for public,

01:26:14   and maybe for TestFlight you can do it a little bit earlier,

01:26:16   but anything built with the old SDK will still look old.

01:26:20   Did that happen with iOS 7, by the way? I don't remember.

01:26:22   I think so, yeah.

01:26:24   What will then happen is all of your users, when they update their phones,

01:26:31   which might be day one with the beta, or at least it'll be, like, you know,

01:26:36   certainly in the fall when the OS releases,

01:26:37   your app will look very, very old to them.

01:26:41   And they will complain.

01:26:43   They will, first of all, they'll accuse you of being abandoned.

01:26:46   And they, you'll start getting one-star reviews.

01:26:48   And as I learned last summer, one-star reviews in small numbers,

01:26:53   okay, that's life.

01:26:55   In big numbers, that can destroy your business.

01:26:57   Like, that can be a pretty substantial, like, your business is on fire problem.

01:27:01   So, what developers have to do when the system theme changes like this?

01:27:05   See also when Dark Mode was added.

01:27:07   That was a smaller version, but of a similar thing.

01:27:09   We have to address that with our app.

01:27:12   We have to adopt it, because the reviews will kill us if we don't.

01:27:16   And they'll kill us starting on day one at large scale.

01:27:21   And even before that, we'll start getting killed in the summer during the betas.

01:27:24   But we will get killed if we aren't there with the new redesign.

01:27:28   So, it's imperative.

01:27:30   This is not, like, some optional thing we can adopt at our leisure or if we like it or not.

01:27:34   We have to do it.

01:27:36   And what that means, that's such a huge thing.

01:27:38   As John was just saying, it's so big, because it touches, like,

01:27:40   potentially every screen, every control.

01:27:43   That means that we really can't do any other features this fall.

01:27:47   Like, that's why it's such a huge burden.

01:27:51   It's an incredibly expensive lever for Apple to pull.

01:27:54   Keep in mind, also, it is similarly expensive for Apple,

01:27:58   for all of their apps, all of their software, all of their UI.

01:28:02   So, if this is true, this is a huge deal for the software community,

01:28:09   both inside Apple and for all of us outside of Apple.

01:28:12   And it has to really be worth it.

01:28:15   Like, because it's so, again, it puts such a burden.

01:28:18   It's so expensive.

01:28:20   And that will mean that all of the other features that we might want to add this fall

01:28:25   are not going to happen.

01:28:26   Like, that's how, like, that's how, I can't possibly express enough

01:28:31   how much of a burden this places on the community.

01:28:33   You see this, because if you recall, with the previous big redesign with iOS 7,

01:28:38   it took a long time before a lot of the apps on your phone,

01:28:42   or before most of the apps on your phone, were translated over.

01:28:45   And in fact, apps that are not made by enthusiasts,

01:28:49   and that don't care how many one-star reviews they have,

01:28:52   often never get updated.

01:28:54   Like, you know, the app for my mixer at the restaurant,

01:28:56   that doesn't even work in landscape mode,

01:28:57   that's never going to get updated for it.

01:28:59   Never.

01:28:59   Like, there's not a chance.

01:29:00   You know, how many apps on your phone are there from, you know,

01:29:03   like, that are just part of some hardware that you bought,

01:29:05   or that, you know, for, like, your dentist's booking software or whatever.

01:29:09   Like, none of that stuff's ever going to get updated.

01:29:11   So you enter this era of just, like, transitional, crappy user experiences

01:29:16   that are kind of blended old world, new world,

01:29:18   or they can force the new theme on all the old apps that aren't updated,

01:29:23   which will break them all.

01:29:24   So there's no...

01:29:26   I don't know if it'll break them all,

01:29:27   but visually they might look unexpected, let's say.

01:29:30   Because, like, again, I don't think it will literally break most things.

01:29:33   A new look will just cause things to look extremely awkward.

01:29:36   Maybe some text will be truncated where you didn't think...

01:29:38   Especially if they try to keep the metrics the same.

01:29:40   But I want to recall back to something that you said, Marco,

01:29:43   and I think a show or two ago,

01:29:45   which I think people might be remembering

01:29:47   and thinking it conflicts with what you're saying,

01:29:48   but it actually doesn't.

01:29:49   You had mentioned how iOS 7 was a gift to you

01:29:52   when you were developing Overcast

01:29:54   because it was so much simpler and required

01:29:56   with less, like, pixel-perfect, you know,

01:29:58   photorealistic artistic skills

01:30:00   and more just to be able to lurk with, like, text and white space

01:30:03   and solid colors and stuff.

01:30:05   That was a gift to you

01:30:06   because you were in the midst of developing an application

01:30:09   that was not out yet.

01:30:10   Yes.

01:30:11   It's a different situation when you already have an app

01:30:13   and they change...

01:30:14   They pull the rug out from under you

01:30:15   and change the look of every single thing.

01:30:16   So you built your app based on the widget set

01:30:18   from, you know, iOS, whatever you were doing

01:30:21   when you developed it,

01:30:21   and now here comes iOS 19

01:30:22   and everything looks different.

01:30:23   That's going to be true of this redesign as well.

01:30:26   It will actually be an advantage

01:30:28   for people who are just starting their app

01:30:30   at the right moment

01:30:31   because they will be the first

01:30:32   to be able to adopt this look and feel

01:30:34   because they don't...

01:30:35   They're not converting a legacy app.

01:30:37   They're, like, they're there from day one.

01:30:38   They hop right on board.

01:30:39   Their app is designed with this look in mind

01:30:41   from the start.

01:30:42   It is optimized and tweaked

01:30:44   and made to look correct

01:30:46   with the iOS 19 widget set, right?

01:30:49   And everybody who has an older app

01:30:51   has to go and convert theirs

01:30:53   and decide,

01:30:54   oh, what do I do with this screen?

01:30:55   I picked this because in the old look,

01:30:57   this looked best,

01:30:57   but the new one,

01:30:58   it doesn't look good at all.

01:30:59   Do I have to use...

01:31:00   Do I have to add another screen?

01:31:01   Can I use a different widget here?

01:31:04   Can I use a sheet instead of this thing?

01:31:06   So that's true of any of these changes

01:31:09   and what you said before, Marco, is so true.

01:31:11   And what I keep saying with...

01:31:13   To what end?

01:31:13   Like, if you're going to make a big change like this,

01:31:16   why?

01:31:16   What's...

01:31:17   What is the benefit

01:31:18   on the other side of this pain, right?

01:31:20   You know, what is it that is about your systems

01:31:24   that needs to be...

01:31:24   That demands this kind of overhaul?

01:31:26   And this is where we kind of

01:31:29   get a little bit into the spiraling,

01:31:31   but, like, before we get to that,

01:31:32   which I will soon,

01:31:34   I first want to say

01:31:36   the tiny optimistic part of this story

01:31:39   for me, personally.

01:31:40   And that is

01:31:41   that I have been

01:31:43   unhappy

01:31:45   with the direction

01:31:46   that the macOS UI

01:31:47   has been going in

01:31:48   for many years now.

01:31:49   We've talked about system settings

01:31:51   many times.

01:31:51   I'm currently making an app

01:31:53   using a bunch of the new

01:31:54   SwiftUI and macOS widgets

01:31:56   and buttons

01:31:57   and controls

01:31:58   and forms

01:31:59   and labels

01:31:59   and text fields

01:32:01   and all the things, right?

01:32:02   And I don't think

01:32:04   they're an improvement

01:32:05   over what AppKit

01:32:06   looked like a decade ago.

01:32:08   I think they're worse.

01:32:08   I think they're uglier.

01:32:09   I think they don't work as well.

01:32:10   So, on the Mac,

01:32:12   the answer to the question

01:32:14   to what end

01:32:15   could be,

01:32:17   in best case scenario,

01:32:18   hey, all those things

01:32:19   you don't like

01:32:20   about how the Mac

01:32:20   is looking and working,

01:32:21   now is an opportunity

01:32:23   to fix that,

01:32:25   to say,

01:32:26   we're going in the wrong direction.

01:32:27   We shouldn't have text fields

01:32:28   with no borders

01:32:29   with right-aligned text

01:32:30   in the passwords, right?

01:32:31   Like,

01:32:32   the toggle switches

01:32:34   and settings

01:32:34   and labels

01:32:35   20 yards away

01:32:36   from the things

01:32:37   that they're labeling,

01:32:38   that's not good.

01:32:39   Let's come up

01:32:42   with a better look for that.

01:32:43   Let's just make

01:32:44   some more contrast

01:32:45   and more visual hierarchy

01:32:46   and not just have everything

01:32:47   to be dark gray everywhere.

01:32:48   On the Mac,

01:32:50   there is,

01:32:51   I think,

01:32:51   a need,

01:32:53   a problem

01:32:53   that needs to be solved.

01:32:55   that the current notion

01:32:57   of modern Mac OS UI

01:32:59   is ugly

01:33:00   and works worse

01:33:00   than it used to.

01:33:01   That's my optimistic take

01:33:04   is like,

01:33:05   you know,

01:33:05   I don't think

01:33:07   iOS and iPad OS

01:33:08   are dying

01:33:09   for a UI overhaul

01:33:11   and obviously

01:33:12   it's so much more important

01:33:12   than the phone

01:33:13   because it's such

01:33:13   a more popular platform.

01:33:14   But the Mac

01:33:15   kind of has felt at sea

01:33:17   for a while now

01:33:18   with any new UI

01:33:20   they were allowed

01:33:20   basically being met

01:33:22   by the Mac's biggest fans

01:33:23   with either a shrug

01:33:24   or a frown.

01:33:26   Whereas in the early days

01:33:27   of,

01:33:27   especially the early days

01:33:28   of Mac OS X,

01:33:29   Aqua had everybody jazzed

01:33:31   even though it had tons

01:33:32   of detractors as well

01:33:32   but it was certainly exciting

01:33:34   and over the years

01:33:35   they have refined

01:33:36   the Mac interface

01:33:36   and there were good years

01:33:37   and bad years.

01:33:38   Sometimes the dock

01:33:38   was really shiny,

01:33:39   sometimes it wasn't.

01:33:40   Sometimes they added

01:33:42   stitched leather

01:33:43   to the calendar app,

01:33:44   you know,

01:33:45   but like there's been

01:33:46   ups and downs

01:33:46   but always I feel like

01:33:47   we're sort of,

01:33:48   you know,

01:33:48   driving an unwinding road

01:33:51   towards improvement

01:33:51   except for in the last,

01:33:53   let's say,

01:33:54   five to ten years

01:33:54   where a bunch of,

01:33:56   even just forgetting

01:33:57   the widgets,

01:33:57   a bunch of things

01:33:58   that happened

01:33:58   like do you remember,

01:33:59   I don't even remember

01:33:59   which OS update this was,

01:34:00   we've already established

01:34:01   that we can't remember

01:34:01   the names of the OS S's

01:34:02   but I think long time

01:34:05   Mac users will have this feeling

01:34:07   that it used to be easier

01:34:09   to tell which window

01:34:11   was active,

01:34:12   which window was in front.

01:34:13   Like they made an OS change

01:34:15   where like the front window

01:34:17   was not as much more prominent

01:34:19   than the windows behind it.

01:34:21   like they used to,

01:34:22   you know,

01:34:22   in the old days

01:34:23   they'd have like,

01:34:24   the windows would be,

01:34:25   the background windows

01:34:26   would be lighter

01:34:27   and the front window

01:34:27   would be darker.

01:34:28   Sometimes the foreground window

01:34:29   would have more detail

01:34:30   than the background windows.

01:34:31   The foreground window

01:34:31   has always had a bigger shadow

01:34:33   and still does

01:34:33   but they made some changes

01:34:34   in recent years

01:34:35   that really just kind of

01:34:37   flattens out the UI

01:34:38   a little bit

01:34:38   and makes foreground

01:34:39   and background windows

01:34:40   look much more like each other.

01:34:42   They have taken away borders

01:34:44   on things,

01:34:44   things like text fields.

01:34:46   There are things

01:34:47   in the Mac OS UI

01:34:48   that you can't tell

01:34:49   our controls

01:34:49   in sort of an iOS 7 style.

01:34:51   There are problems,

01:34:53   UI problems

01:34:54   to be solved on the Mac

01:34:55   and in theory

01:34:57   this could be

01:34:58   a way to fix them.

01:34:59   Now,

01:35:00   now it's time to spiral.

01:35:01   How much confidence

01:35:03   do we have

01:35:03   that literally

01:35:05   anything they do

01:35:06   to any of these

01:35:07   operating systems

01:35:07   will be an improvement?

01:35:08   Yeah,

01:35:09   that,

01:35:09   so,

01:35:09   that's the bigger concern

01:35:12   for me

01:35:12   is like what they have

01:35:13   demonstrated

01:35:14   on the Mac

01:35:15   for the last,

01:35:16   you know,

01:35:16   decade or whatever.

01:35:17   pick any platform really.

01:35:18   No,

01:35:19   but especially,

01:35:19   see,

01:35:20   the Mac I think

01:35:21   is the most in danger

01:35:23   with this

01:35:24   because

01:35:24   I'm in danger.

01:35:25   What they have shown

01:35:26   with the Mac

01:35:27   is that

01:35:28   they currently

01:35:29   do not have

01:35:31   enough resources

01:35:32   devoted to the Mac

01:35:33   or possibly enough talent

01:35:35   left in the company.

01:35:36   Enough expertise.

01:35:37   They don't,

01:35:38   they don't know

01:35:39   what to do.

01:35:39   Yeah,

01:35:40   like what we've seen

01:35:41   is that

01:35:41   whenever they

01:35:42   change the Mac UI

01:35:44   recently,

01:35:45   it's usually worse.

01:35:47   and when you see

01:35:48   something like

01:35:48   the new settings app,

01:35:49   you're like,

01:35:50   okay,

01:35:50   this was a dramatic redesign

01:35:51   that happened recently

01:35:53   and it's awful.

01:35:55   Like,

01:35:55   there's so many things

01:35:56   about it

01:35:56   that are

01:35:57   unintuitive,

01:35:58   ugly,

01:35:58   broken,

01:35:59   like,

01:36:00   just like,

01:36:00   outright,

01:36:01   just awful.

01:36:02   especially since it did

01:36:04   achieve some of its

01:36:05   design goals,

01:36:05   which is to make

01:36:06   an interface that

01:36:07   scales better

01:36:08   with more settings.

01:36:08   Like,

01:36:09   I think they have

01:36:10   achieved that,

01:36:10   but every other

01:36:11   aspect of the redesign

01:36:13   is bad.

01:36:13   Like,

01:36:13   congratulations,

01:36:14   you made a scalable

01:36:15   system for adding

01:36:16   more settings

01:36:17   that is more scalable

01:36:18   than hand tweaking

01:36:18   every single screen,

01:36:19   but literally everything

01:36:20   else about it is worse

01:36:21   than it was before.

01:36:22   Right,

01:36:22   so like,

01:36:22   when you think of

01:36:23   a redesign happening,

01:36:25   it's not,

01:36:26   you know,

01:36:27   the people who made

01:36:28   the Mac what we love,

01:36:29   it's the people who

01:36:30   made the settings app.

01:36:31   It's those people

01:36:33   redesigning.

01:36:33   The entire OS,

01:36:35   like,

01:36:36   that's what we are

01:36:37   going for here?

01:36:37   Yeah,

01:36:38   so now think about,

01:36:39   I'm picturing in my

01:36:40   mind's eye,

01:36:40   a new,

01:36:42   consistent,

01:36:42   forget about it,

01:36:43   whether it looks like

01:36:43   Vision OS with,

01:36:44   like,

01:36:44   glassy things on iOS,

01:36:45   but like,

01:36:45   a new,

01:36:45   consistent thing,

01:36:46   and all I picture in my

01:36:47   mind,

01:36:47   looking at my Mac screen,

01:36:49   is title bars that have

01:36:51   even fewer features

01:36:52   and less contrast,

01:36:54   title bars that are

01:36:55   bigger,

01:36:55   menu bars and title bars

01:36:57   that are just bigger

01:36:58   and featureless expanses

01:36:59   of white and light gray,

01:37:01   like,

01:37:01   you know what a pop-up

01:37:02   menu looks like on the

01:37:03   phone,

01:37:03   whatever that thing is

01:37:04   where it shows like a

01:37:05   rounded rectangle with

01:37:06   the lines through it,

01:37:06   my pull-down menus from

01:37:08   the menu bar look like

01:37:08   that,

01:37:09   huge amounts of white

01:37:09   space around each

01:37:11   thing,

01:37:11   like,

01:37:11   check boxes and radio

01:37:13   buttons are gone,

01:37:14   everything is a toggle

01:37:15   switch,

01:37:15   like,

01:37:16   for consistency,

01:37:17   because people are

01:37:18   confused,

01:37:18   they're not confused,

01:37:19   like,

01:37:20   that's what,

01:37:21   I see,

01:37:21   like,

01:37:22   if you take the,

01:37:23   take iOS or iPad OS

01:37:25   and make the Mac look

01:37:27   like that,

01:37:27   it is not an improvement,

01:37:29   it is worse,

01:37:30   and that's what I fear,

01:37:31   I fear so badly.

01:37:32   Well,

01:37:32   and in fact,

01:37:33   Apple's own,

01:37:34   Apple's own marketing

01:37:36   department and statements

01:37:37   have been,

01:37:38   Craig Federighi,

01:37:39   like,

01:37:39   outright stating things

01:37:40   like,

01:37:41   we're not going to merge

01:37:42   these OSs,

01:37:42   and in fact,

01:37:43   there's a rumor,

01:37:43   government still says

01:37:44   exactly that,

01:37:45   but if you,

01:37:46   if you make the designs

01:37:47   too,

01:37:48   quote,

01:37:48   consistent,

01:37:50   you are adopting

01:37:51   design patterns

01:37:52   for a platform

01:37:53   that are not right

01:37:54   for it,

01:37:55   and that's the same

01:37:57   reasons that we all

01:37:58   know these platforms

01:37:59   are not really meant

01:38:00   to be merged,

01:38:01   allegedly,

01:38:01   or shouldn't be merged,

01:38:02   but they're doing

01:38:05   all this allegedly,

01:38:06   and,

01:38:06   you know,

01:38:06   again,

01:38:07   this is all through

01:38:08   the German filter,

01:38:09   so,

01:38:09   you know,

01:38:09   some of the details

01:38:11   or justifications

01:38:12   or reasons might be

01:38:13   wrong,

01:38:13   but the information

01:38:15   about them

01:38:16   having a big redesign

01:38:18   of this is probably

01:38:19   right,

01:38:19   that's,

01:38:20   you know,

01:38:20   based on German's

01:38:21   track record.

01:38:21   Yeah,

01:38:21   and OS-spanning

01:38:23   redesign,

01:38:23   not just within

01:38:24   one island,

01:38:25   right?

01:38:25   Yeah,

01:38:25   but,

01:38:26   you know,

01:38:26   what we've seen

01:38:28   from Apple

01:38:28   over the years

01:38:29   with a lot of the

01:38:31   stuff they've done

01:38:31   to the Mac

01:38:32   especially,

01:38:32   that,

01:38:33   like,

01:38:33   they use that term

01:38:34   consistency,

01:38:35   that it is a goal

01:38:36   of theirs

01:38:37   to make the Mac

01:38:38   more like iOS,

01:38:39   but not only

01:38:40   does that not

01:38:41   make sense

01:38:41   because the design,

01:38:43   like,

01:38:43   they're such

01:38:45   different systems

01:38:45   with such

01:38:46   different hardware

01:38:47   and input

01:38:48   and output methods

01:38:49   and,

01:38:50   you know,

01:38:50   just information

01:38:51   density and control

01:38:52   designs and everything,

01:38:53   like,

01:38:53   they're so different,

01:38:54   it makes no sense

01:38:55   to have them be the same,

01:38:56   but also,

01:38:57   I don't,

01:38:58   I think they are

01:39:00   being very condescending

01:39:02   to users

01:39:02   to suggest that

01:39:04   we need things

01:39:05   to be more similar

01:39:05   otherwise we just

01:39:06   don't understand

01:39:07   our computers,

01:39:08   like,

01:39:09   they're selling

01:39:09   Macs in record

01:39:10   numbers,

01:39:11   people aren't

01:39:12   confused,

01:39:13   like,

01:39:13   people who buy

01:39:14   the Mac

01:39:14   know the Mac,

01:39:15   not every single

01:39:17   person in the world

01:39:18   understands the Mac,

01:39:18   but not every single

01:39:20   person in the world

01:39:20   understands any

01:39:21   computing platform

01:39:21   including iPads

01:39:22   and iPhones,

01:39:23   like,

01:39:23   computers,

01:39:25   when people are

01:39:26   motivated to have

01:39:27   to use them for work

01:39:27   or people like them,

01:39:28   they figure them out,

01:39:30   that's what we've done

01:39:30   over the decades

01:39:32   of computers existing,

01:39:32   like,

01:39:32   people figure them out,

01:39:33   not everything is perfect,

01:39:35   not everything needs

01:39:36   to stay the same way

01:39:37   it is forever,

01:39:37   but,

01:39:38   people are able

01:39:40   to learn

01:39:41   two different

01:39:42   interfaces on two

01:39:43   different devices

01:39:43   and it's fine

01:39:45   to have the Mac

01:39:46   look and work

01:39:48   differently than

01:39:49   the iPhone,

01:39:50   that's why it's

01:39:51   a different platform,

01:39:52   if you wanted

01:39:53   everything to just

01:39:54   look like iPhones,

01:39:54   we'd all just use

01:39:55   iPhones and nobody

01:39:56   would even need

01:39:56   the Mac.

01:39:56   So,

01:39:57   I don't want people

01:39:58   hearing this and

01:39:58   thinking you're saying,

01:39:59   oh,

01:39:59   people can just

01:40:00   figure out the Mac,

01:40:00   it doesn't matter

01:40:01   that it's harder,

01:40:01   no,

01:40:02   as we said before

01:40:03   on the iPad,

01:40:03   talking about iPad

01:40:04   and stage management

01:40:06   and stuff,

01:40:06   the Mac paradigm

01:40:08   for doing what

01:40:08   it needs to do

01:40:09   is better and easier

01:40:11   than,

01:40:12   for example,

01:40:13   the iPad paradigm

01:40:14   or the iPhone paradigm.

01:40:15   It is better and easier

01:40:17   to manipulate

01:40:18   multiple things,

01:40:19   multiple windows

01:40:20   on the Mac

01:40:21   than it is

01:40:21   on the phone

01:40:22   or the iPad.

01:40:23   Obviously,

01:40:23   it's easier

01:40:23   than on the phone

01:40:24   because the screen

01:40:25   is tiny,

01:40:25   but even on the iPad

01:40:26   where you have

01:40:27   a 13-inch iPad

01:40:28   and a 13-inch MacBook Pro,

01:40:29   dealing with Windows

01:40:30   and iPad OS

01:40:31   uses an interface

01:40:33   appearance

01:40:33   and vocabulary

01:40:34   and set of actions

01:40:35   that is Byzantine

01:40:37   and hard to understand.

01:40:38   So,

01:40:39   having to learn

01:40:40   something new

01:40:41   on the Mac

01:40:41   pays dividends

01:40:42   because that new

01:40:43   thing you're learning

01:40:44   is better

01:40:45   than what you knew

01:40:46   on the phone

01:40:46   for dealing

01:40:48   with multiple windows

01:40:49   and a keyboard

01:40:50   and trackpad

01:40:51   and, you know,

01:40:51   all the Mac stuff.

01:40:53   Like,

01:40:53   it's not the case

01:40:54   that the Mac

01:40:55   is difficult

01:40:56   and worse,

01:40:57   but you should

01:40:57   just suck it up.

01:40:58   It's the case

01:40:59   that the Mac

01:40:59   is better

01:41:00   than the other choices

01:41:02   because it lets you

01:41:04   do more powerful things

01:41:06   with a simple,

01:41:07   easy-to-understand,

01:41:08   consistent interface

01:41:09   that, by the way,

01:41:10   has been around

01:41:10   for decades

01:41:11   and is basically

01:41:12   a lot of the skills

01:41:13   that you know

01:41:13   from Windows,

01:41:14   Microsoft Windows,

01:41:15   transfer over

01:41:16   for various reasons

01:41:17   that are very similar

01:41:17   to each other.

01:41:18   Like,

01:41:19   we have not come up

01:41:20   with a better way

01:41:21   to do many things

01:41:24   with a powerful

01:41:25   personal computer

01:41:26   than Windows menus,

01:41:27   pointer,

01:41:28   blah, blah, blah.

01:41:28   Arguably,

01:41:29   touchscreen Macs

01:41:30   would help

01:41:30   with this a lot,

01:41:30   but Apple's

01:41:31   being stubborn there,

01:41:31   but setting that aside

01:41:32   and setting aside

01:41:33   any redesign

01:41:34   that may,

01:41:34   you know,

01:41:35   one of the rumors

01:41:35   is they'll redesign

01:41:36   macOS to be

01:41:36   more friendly to touch.

01:41:37   By all means,

01:41:38   go for it,

01:41:39   but that is a

01:41:40   separate issue

01:41:41   entirely from things

01:41:42   like,

01:41:42   I just mentioned

01:41:43   the toggle switches.

01:41:44   Was macOS

01:41:45   crying out

01:41:46   for iOS-style

01:41:47   slidey sideways

01:41:48   toggle switches?

01:41:49   I've seen

01:41:50   more people

01:41:51   confused by

01:41:52   the iOS

01:41:52   toggle switch control

01:41:53   than I've ever

01:41:54   seen people

01:41:55   confused by

01:41:56   a checkbox.

01:41:56   Is it because

01:41:57   people are old

01:41:58   and checkboxes

01:41:58   existed on paper

01:41:59   forms,

01:42:00   whereas most

01:42:00   people didn't

01:42:00   interact with

01:42:01   little toggle switches

01:42:02   unless they were

01:42:02   dealing with like

01:42:03   audio equipment

01:42:03   or something?

01:42:04   People don't always

01:42:05   know which is the

01:42:06   on and which is

01:42:06   the off,

01:42:07   which is why

01:42:07   they have the

01:42:08   little one that

01:42:08   says O-N

01:42:09   where you can

01:42:09   see the letters

01:42:10   on when it's

01:42:10   on.

01:42:11   like, is blue

01:42:12   on or is gray

01:42:14   off or is gray

01:42:15   like, nothing

01:42:17   macOS was saying,

01:42:18   you know what

01:42:18   the problem with

01:42:18   macOS is?

01:42:19   People can't

01:42:20   figure out

01:42:20   checkboxes.

01:42:21   They have no

01:42:21   idea what a

01:42:22   checkbox means.

01:42:22   They can't tell

01:42:23   when it's on.

01:42:24   They can't tell

01:42:24   when it's off.

01:42:24   We need

01:42:25   consistency.

01:42:26   People in the

01:42:27   iOS settings app

01:42:28   use those little

01:42:29   toggle switches.

01:42:29   How about we put

01:42:30   them on the

01:42:30   Mac?

01:42:30   And so here I am

01:42:32   making a Mac

01:42:32   app in 2025

01:42:33   and the settings

01:42:34   screen in my

01:42:34   app is filled

01:42:35   with iOS-style

01:42:36   toggles because

01:42:37   that's the way

01:42:38   Apple wants you to

01:42:38   do things and

01:42:39   they herd you

01:42:39   in that

01:42:40   direction with

01:42:40   SwiftUI and

01:42:41   macOS.

01:42:41   And it's not

01:42:43   the end of the

01:42:43   world and again

01:42:44   there are some

01:42:45   advantages to it

01:42:45   for scalability

01:42:46   but it is not

01:42:47   a thing that

01:42:48   macOS needed.

01:42:49   It was not

01:42:49   crying out for it.

01:42:50   Users were not

01:42:51   baffled by

01:42:52   checkboxes and

01:42:53   radio buttons

01:42:54   because they've

01:42:54   been seeing them

01:42:55   their whole life,

01:42:55   right?

01:42:56   And they're

01:42:57   understandable and

01:42:58   tractable.

01:42:59   Ditto for buttons

01:43:00   and for, you

01:43:01   know, windows and

01:43:02   title bars and

01:43:02   pull-down menus.

01:43:03   These are flexible

01:43:06   components that could

01:43:07   be improved upon

01:43:08   and you can come

01:43:08   up with maybe

01:43:09   enhancements are

01:43:10   ways to make

01:43:11   them better or

01:43:11   better window

01:43:12   management systems

01:43:12   and so on and

01:43:13   so forth.

01:43:13   But the solution

01:43:15   is not we should

01:43:16   get rid of all

01:43:17   that and just use

01:43:17   stage manager

01:43:18   everywhere because

01:43:18   stage manager is

01:43:19   not burning up

01:43:20   the world and

01:43:21   these toggle

01:43:21   switches are not

01:43:22   appreciably making

01:43:23   anything better.

01:43:24   At best, they're

01:43:24   neutral.

01:43:25   Like, oh, I

01:43:26   recognize these

01:43:27   from my phone,

01:43:27   therefore I know

01:43:28   how to use them.

01:43:29   But like, it's

01:43:31   not making the

01:43:32   Mac better and

01:43:33   more powerful.

01:43:33   It is just sort

01:43:34   of like visual

01:43:35   consistency for the

01:43:36   sake of visual

01:43:37   consistency.

01:43:38   Yeah, and I

01:43:39   don't think that's

01:43:40   a thing that

01:43:40   people need as

01:43:42   much as Apple

01:43:42   designers seem to

01:43:43   think they do.

01:43:43   These are very

01:43:45   different platforms.

01:43:45   They behave very

01:43:47   differently in lots

01:43:48   of ways.

01:43:49   And I'm not saying

01:43:51   that the Mac has

01:43:52   no room for

01:43:53   improvement for

01:43:53   things that are

01:43:54   confusing to a lot

01:43:54   of people.

01:43:55   That's not what I'm

01:43:56   saying at all.

01:43:56   There's lots of room

01:43:57   for improvement for

01:43:58   that.

01:43:58   But I don't think

01:44:00   people need a

01:44:01   different skin on

01:44:02   the UI.

01:44:03   That's not what's

01:44:04   confusing them.

01:44:04   What's confusing

01:44:05   them is things like

01:44:06   where do files go?

01:44:07   How do I get

01:44:07   to things?

01:44:08   What the hell is

01:44:09   a disk image?

01:44:09   There's all sorts

01:44:10   of other things.

01:44:11   How do I find

01:44:11   things in settings?

01:44:12   Yeah, right.

01:44:13   And why does half

01:44:14   the settings app not

01:44:15   work?

01:44:15   Literally, it doesn't

01:44:17   work.

01:44:17   So again, this is

01:44:19   what we're talking

01:44:19   about.

01:44:19   We're going to have

01:44:20   those people redesign

01:44:21   the whole thing.

01:44:22   We're not having

01:44:23   like Bruce talking

01:44:24   to Zini here.

01:44:25   We're having those

01:44:26   people redesign it.

01:44:26   Not only do I not

01:44:28   trust them to do a

01:44:30   good job.

01:44:31   I literally, again,

01:44:32   because the settings

01:44:33   app is literally

01:44:35   broken.

01:44:35   many features of

01:44:36   it do not work.

01:44:37   It does not work.

01:44:39   So do we want

01:44:40   those people

01:44:41   redesigning the

01:44:43   whole OS?

01:44:43   Even if we liked

01:44:45   their visual

01:44:46   concepts, which I

01:44:47   don't think we

01:44:48   will, but even if

01:44:49   we like their

01:44:49   visual concepts,

01:44:50   they have not

01:44:52   been trustworthy

01:44:53   to execute

01:44:55   correctly, to make

01:44:56   something that

01:44:56   works.

01:44:57   So that's a huge

01:44:59   worry for me.

01:45:00   And I think when

01:45:01   you look at

01:45:01   how people have

01:45:03   reacted to this

01:45:05   rumor, it has

01:45:06   gone over like a

01:45:07   lead balloon.

01:45:07   Yeah, people are

01:45:08   not excited about

01:45:09   it.

01:45:09   Not at all.

01:45:10   And I think that

01:45:11   shows where Apple's

01:45:14   reputation is in this

01:45:15   department.

01:45:15   I mentioned earlier

01:45:17   the developer issues

01:45:18   of if they're going

01:45:19   to drop a bomb on

01:45:20   the developer

01:45:20   community and put a

01:45:21   massive burden on

01:45:23   every iOS app

01:45:24   developer in the

01:45:24   world, I think they

01:45:26   might be kind of

01:45:28   overrating their

01:45:29   position here and

01:45:30   maybe overestimating

01:45:32   how much political

01:45:33   capital they have in

01:45:35   this environment.

01:45:35   But then on the

01:45:36   technical side too,

01:45:38   do they even have

01:45:40   the talent on

01:45:41   macOS to implement

01:45:43   a new design?

01:45:44   Or on iOS, because

01:45:46   for all of iOS 7's

01:45:48   faults, it was a

01:45:49   very clear vision of

01:45:51   what they wanted and

01:45:52   they overshot it by a

01:45:53   little bit, which

01:45:54   arguably is what you

01:45:54   want to do.

01:45:55   You don't want to

01:45:56   undershoot it, you

01:45:57   want to overshoot it

01:45:57   so the fonts are a

01:45:58   little bit too thin,

01:45:59   maybe the thing is a

01:46:00   little bit too simple,

01:46:01   maybe the buttons have

01:46:02   too few borders, and

01:46:03   you just back it off

01:46:04   six notches and you

01:46:05   have an OS that you

01:46:06   can use for a decade,

01:46:07   right?

01:46:07   I think the iOS 7

01:46:09   transition, and by

01:46:09   the way, it's cheaper

01:46:10   to make apps with it,

01:46:10   I think the iOS 7

01:46:11   transition, despite all

01:46:13   the fuss about it, was

01:46:14   largely successful.

01:46:15   And I do agree that

01:46:17   occasionally, you know,

01:46:18   every decade or two,

01:46:19   it's good to refresh

01:46:20   everything and come up

01:46:21   with a new look,

01:46:22   right?

01:46:22   We're just all scared

01:46:23   now because we're like,

01:46:24   okay, but what new

01:46:26   look?

01:46:26   Like, what are you

01:46:27   going to do specifically?

01:46:28   Because just saying we're

01:46:29   going to do a big

01:46:29   redesign, like, if, and

01:46:31   to be clear and to be

01:46:32   optimistic, if, if they

01:46:34   make something that looks

01:46:37   cool and attractive and

01:46:38   new, we will be excited

01:46:40   about it.

01:46:41   Customers will be excited

01:46:42   about it, even though

01:46:43   people will grumble that

01:46:43   they change the way stuff

01:46:44   looks or whatever, but

01:46:45   like, that is a source of

01:46:46   excitement.

01:46:46   It is, there is upside to

01:46:48   this, like a setting aside,

01:46:49   like, to what end, what

01:46:50   benefit are people getting

01:46:52   or whatever.

01:46:53   Merely changing the way

01:46:55   things look and a few

01:46:56   minor behaviors, if you do

01:46:58   it well, it's important to

01:47:00   do that every once in a

01:47:01   while and can get people

01:47:03   jazzed and excited.

01:47:04   It can be a differentiator.

01:47:06   It could be, like, what

01:47:07   Apple wants a story to be

01:47:08   when the new iPhone comes

01:47:09   out with iOS 19 is, like,

01:47:11   and it's got an all-new

01:47:12   interface that looks really

01:47:13   cool.

01:47:13   That's what they want the

01:47:14   story to be, and that is

01:47:16   a plausible story.

01:47:17   It absolutely can happen,

01:47:18   even if functionally they

01:47:20   don't actually improve

01:47:21   anything on the phone, but

01:47:22   it just looks a little

01:47:22   cooler, and most people

01:47:24   think it looks cooler.

01:47:24   Thumbs up.

01:47:26   Same thing with the Mac.

01:47:27   Oh, the Mac has been kind

01:47:28   of the same for a long

01:47:29   time.

01:47:29   Like I just said, there's

01:47:31   things about the current

01:47:32   interface that bother me.

01:47:33   Guess what?

01:47:34   They have an all-new look

01:47:35   and redesigned for the Mac,

01:47:36   and actually a lot of those

01:47:37   problem areas have improved,

01:47:38   and the whole OS looks new

01:47:40   and different, and we're

01:47:41   excited about it.

01:47:42   And I remember the times

01:47:44   when Mac OS X versions

01:47:45   would come out, and we

01:47:46   would be excited about how

01:47:48   it looked.

01:47:48   That started to, you

01:47:49   know, again, that started

01:47:50   to veer off a little bit

01:47:51   around the stitch leather

01:47:51   thing, but in general, for

01:47:53   many of the early years of

01:47:55   Mac OS X, each new OS

01:47:56   would come out, and we

01:47:57   were excited to see how it

01:47:59   looked, and if you had

01:48:00   opinions, I like it, I

01:48:01   don't like it, but in

01:48:02   general, it was like, oh,

01:48:02   this is the Mac looks all,

01:48:04   it was part of things that

01:48:04   drove upgrades back when

01:48:05   Apple sold the OS for

01:48:06   $130.

01:48:07   Kids, if you remember back

01:48:09   in those days, they used

01:48:10   to sell the upgrades to

01:48:10   Mac OS.

01:48:12   it would make you buy it, it

01:48:12   would make you buy it, because

01:48:13   you want the cool new look.

01:48:15   And even if you didn't think

01:48:18   you liked the cool new look,

01:48:19   and when you first saw it, it

01:48:20   would grow on you, and

01:48:21   eventually the old look would

01:48:22   look old, and you'd feel like

01:48:23   you needed the new look, and

01:48:24   like that, I think that's a

01:48:25   healthy phenomenon, but there

01:48:28   was a lot of getting lost in

01:48:29   the wilderness there, and then

01:48:31   iOS 7 happened, and then the

01:48:33   OS has started to diverge.

01:48:34   I do agree there's less sort of

01:48:36   design unity between Mac OS, iOS,

01:48:39   and iPad OS than there has

01:48:40   been, mostly between the Mac

01:48:41   and the other things, but I

01:48:44   fear, I fear what they will

01:48:46   do, and that's what I'm

01:48:46   hearing from everybody who's

01:48:47   sort of in the know.

01:48:48   Regular people don't even

01:48:48   know this is happening.

01:48:49   They won't know until they

01:48:50   see the first ad for the

01:48:51   phone, or they go to the

01:48:51   store and see the first

01:48:52   phone with it, right, which

01:48:53   is the way it should be,

01:48:54   right?

01:48:54   But people who are tech

01:48:55   enthusiasts, I have not

01:48:56   heard a single person say,

01:48:58   I'm so jazzed about that.

01:48:59   I haven't even heard a

01:48:59   single person say what I

01:49:00   just said, which is, there

01:49:01   are parts of the current

01:49:02   Mac OS that I don't like, and

01:49:03   I hope this fixes them.

01:49:04   Everybody is saying, oh my

01:49:06   God, I'm so afraid of what

01:49:08   they're going to do.

01:49:09   I'm so afraid that they're

01:49:10   just going to make

01:49:10   everything worse, and Apple

01:49:13   should really reflect on

01:49:14   that, and I mean, hopefully

01:49:15   they'll use it to motivate

01:49:16   them.

01:49:16   No one believes in us.

01:49:18   Everyone thinks we don't

01:49:19   know how to make things

01:49:20   better.

01:49:20   Everyone is out there just

01:49:22   crossing their fingers that

01:49:23   we won't break the crap

01:49:24   that they like now.

01:49:25   Like, a lot of people are

01:49:26   feeling that way.

01:49:27   Just fix the existing bugs

01:49:28   and don't break the things

01:49:29   that I like, right?

01:49:30   That is a very pessimistic

01:49:33   position for customers to

01:49:34   be in, and Apple, I don't

01:49:36   know if they do surveys of

01:49:38   like their most enthusiastic

01:49:39   customers, Apple should not

01:49:40   have, it should not like to

01:49:42   see that in the server

01:49:42   responses, the sentiment that

01:49:44   their most enthusiastic

01:49:46   customers are saying, please

01:49:47   just don't make anything

01:49:48   worse.

01:49:48   Please just don't break the

01:49:50   thing that I like.

01:49:50   You know, please just fix

01:49:52   the bugs that have been

01:49:52   there for five years.

01:49:53   I don't want any new

01:49:54   features.

01:49:54   Do a Snow Leopard release,

01:49:55   blah, blah, blah.

01:49:56   Like, the occurrence of

01:50:01   that sentiment has only been

01:50:02   increasing in recent years

01:50:03   among the enthusiast

01:50:04   community, and the non

01:50:06   enthusiast community, the

01:50:07   regular people who buy most

01:50:08   of their products, they are

01:50:10   going to be upset by any

01:50:12   kind of change, but also if

01:50:14   you do a change that they

01:50:15   think looks cool, they will

01:50:16   be motivated to get the new

01:50:17   phone in cool colors with

01:50:19   the new interface and so on

01:50:20   and so forth.

01:50:20   Now, that didn't work out

01:50:21   for them with iOS 18 and

01:50:22   photos, which was in the

01:50:24   grand scheme of things, a

01:50:24   very small change that

01:50:26   didn't change the look

01:50:26   and feel of the widgets

01:50:27   everywhere, just changed

01:50:28   one commonly used app in a

01:50:30   way that I don't think was

01:50:31   terrible, but certainly

01:50:32   wasn't a clear win over the

01:50:33   existing app.

01:50:33   Multiply iOS 18 photos by

01:50:38   every single app and every

01:50:39   single iPhone, iPad, and

01:50:43   Mac, and 2025 is looking

01:50:45   like a pretty scary year.

01:50:45   Yeah, because, and keep in

01:50:47   mind, too, like, the, like,

01:50:49   iOS 7 did not go over well

01:50:51   with regular people.

01:50:52   People hated it.

01:50:54   Like, when, when, when,

01:50:55   like, your parents' phones

01:50:57   would update, you'd get

01:50:57   those calls.

01:50:58   Like, you, like, you...

01:50:59   Yeah, what happened?

01:51:00   Why does everything look

01:51:00   like this now?

01:51:01   Yeah, can I go back?

01:51:02   Nope.

01:51:02   Like, and, and, but also,

01:51:05   you know, when you look at,

01:51:05   like, iOS 7, you can say,

01:51:08   like, oh, well, they haven't

01:51:09   done a redesign in how many

01:51:10   years ago that way.

01:51:11   It's been, it's been a long

01:51:12   time.

01:51:12   But they've done a ton of

01:51:15   incremental changes.

01:51:16   If you look at, like, go,

01:51:17   if, listeners, go do, right

01:51:20   now, go do a Google image

01:51:21   search for something like

01:51:22   iOS 7 UI, and take a look

01:51:25   around at screenshots of

01:51:26   actually what iOS 7 looked

01:51:28   like.

01:51:28   It looks ancient by

01:51:30   comparison to what we have

01:51:31   today.

01:51:31   It's not that we've kept

01:51:33   the same design all this

01:51:34   time.

01:51:35   Apple has iterated over time,

01:51:37   and we've iterated over time.

01:51:38   And so, it's not like we are

01:51:40   in desperate need for a huge

01:51:42   reset.

01:51:42   We have been changing and

01:51:46   evolving designs over the

01:51:48   last decade or whatever it's

01:51:49   been.

01:51:50   We are nothing like iOS 7

01:51:52   today.

01:51:52   I wouldn't say nothing.

01:51:53   We're clearly a derivative of

01:51:55   iOS 7.

01:51:56   But yes, the details, the

01:51:57   small details have changed

01:51:58   literally everywhere.

01:51:59   But I think if you looked at

01:52:00   this and said, is this more

01:52:01   like from the iOS 7 lineage

01:52:03   or from the iOS 1 through 6

01:52:05   lineage?

01:52:05   I know there wasn't an iOS 1.

01:52:06   I would say we're clearly

01:52:08   derived from iOS 7.

01:52:09   I mean, yes, but like, it's

01:52:12   like in only very broad

01:52:13   strokes.

01:52:14   If you look, and because

01:52:15   every stroke is broader than

01:52:16   every stroke in iOS 7.

01:52:17   But like, if you look at

01:52:19   like what iOS 7 actually

01:52:20   looked like and shipped

01:52:22   like, it's, you know, we

01:52:24   have gone so far since

01:52:25   then.

01:52:25   So, there is not this big

01:52:27   need for this.

01:52:28   And again, like, the

01:52:30   expense, the burden that it

01:52:32   puts on the entire

01:52:33   ecosystem, including users,

01:52:35   because I cannot, if

01:52:37   listeners, if you didn't

01:52:38   have like parents in your

01:52:39   life or older people in

01:52:40   your life during the iOS 7

01:52:42   transition, consider

01:52:43   yourself like you missed

01:52:44   it.

01:52:45   Why does my phone's

01:52:46   home screen look like a

01:52:47   clown now?

01:52:47   Right.

01:52:48   Or like, I don't, I can't,

01:52:49   everything is lost.

01:52:50   I can't find anything.

01:52:51   Just please, how do I go

01:52:52   back?

01:52:52   People hated it.

01:52:54   Like, regular people hated

01:52:55   it.

01:52:56   Yeah.

01:52:56   And people are always

01:52:57   going to hate that.

01:52:57   It's not the reason not to

01:52:58   do it.

01:52:58   And I do think people

01:52:59   eventually got on board

01:53:00   with it and got used to it

01:53:01   pretty quickly because I

01:53:02   think the iOS 7 design was

01:53:04   fundamentally a good idea if

01:53:06   even if they overshot it a

01:53:07   little bit.

01:53:08   But that's going to happen.

01:53:09   And like, it's, I think it's

01:53:11   fine for that to happen, but

01:53:12   you don't want to burn, you

01:53:13   don't want to do that if

01:53:15   there's not, if you're not

01:53:16   going to make some people

01:53:17   excited about it and if

01:53:18   there's not going to be

01:53:20   benefits on the other side

01:53:22   of it.

01:53:22   So the benefits of iOS 17

01:53:23   are, you know, lower

01:53:24   application development

01:53:26   costs, a fresh new look

01:53:27   that makes you stand out in

01:53:28   the market, a

01:53:29   differentiator between last

01:53:30   year's phone and this

01:53:31   year's phone.

01:53:31   Like there's, there were

01:53:33   upsides to it that made the

01:53:34   pain worth it.

01:53:36   I think there's a couple of

01:53:38   things that we need to

01:53:40   explore.

01:53:40   First of all, while I agree

01:53:42   with everything that you guys

01:53:43   are saying broadly, I think

01:53:45   I can't help but wonder

01:53:47   hearing John particularly

01:53:48   espouse like, oh, the Mac is

01:53:49   so much simpler and better

01:53:50   than iPadOS to do things like

01:53:52   window management.

01:53:53   And on the surface, I think

01:53:54   that's true.

01:53:54   But I think we're all three of

01:53:57   us showing our age because I

01:54:00   would say for people who grow

01:54:03   up on touchscreen devices

01:54:05   first, the indirection that

01:54:07   comes from a mouse, from a

01:54:10   keyboard in some cases, but

01:54:11   certainly by not touching the

01:54:13   thing that they're interacting

01:54:14   with, that has a burden that

01:54:17   the three of us don't have to

01:54:19   deal with because we were

01:54:20   brought up on that

01:54:21   indirection.

01:54:21   But for things like my kids,

01:54:23   like they're using Chromebooks

01:54:25   now and they seem fine with

01:54:26   that, but they're not really

01:54:27   doing window management on

01:54:28   their Chromebooks.

01:54:29   Like everything's full

01:54:30   screen, right?

01:54:30   And I think that they would

01:54:31   find, and they're

01:54:33   smart kids, but I think they

01:54:34   would find the window

01:54:35   management that I consider

01:54:36   second nature to be

01:54:37   burdensome and frustrating

01:54:39   and old-timey.

01:54:41   And even though I personally

01:54:43   agree wholeheartedly with what

01:54:44   you're saying, John, I don't

01:54:45   know that that's a fair

01:54:48   representation of everyone.

01:54:49   And I don't know that we

01:54:52   should assume that we are

01:54:54   completely right about that.

01:54:55   Well, I mean, like I said,

01:54:56   it's in the context of doing

01:54:58   what you do on a Mac.

01:54:59   If you need to see multiple

01:55:01   things at the same time, it

01:55:03   is easier to accomplish

01:55:03   that on the Mac.

01:55:04   If you don't need to see

01:55:05   multiple things at the same

01:55:06   time, it is easier to

01:55:07   accomplish that on an iPad.

01:55:07   So I think it's really just a

01:55:09   question of like, eventually

01:55:10   your kids, if they get, you

01:55:12   know, get older and get a

01:55:13   job, they're going to have to

01:55:15   do more than have a single

01:55:16   thing full screen all the

01:55:17   time.

01:55:17   Like just inevitably your work

01:55:19   will become more complicated

01:55:20   than that.

01:55:20   So when you're faced with

01:55:21   that challenge, how do you

01:55:23   want to tackle it?

01:55:24   How do you want to

01:55:24   accomplish that goal?

01:55:26   And the answer is not

01:55:27   stage manager.

01:55:27   The answer is some kind of

01:55:29   normal windowing system.

01:55:30   And as for the touchscreen

01:55:31   thing, like we're all for

01:55:32   touchscreen Macs.

01:55:32   Like, again, if they have to

01:55:33   change a Mac OS to make it

01:55:34   accommodate touchscreens, fine,

01:55:35   but then actually ship some

01:55:36   touch Macs, right?

01:55:37   Like this, it is frustrating

01:55:39   that Apple has been stubbornly

01:55:41   refusing to do touch Macs for

01:55:44   reasons that don't make sense

01:55:45   anymore.

01:55:45   And if they, if the redesign

01:55:47   accommodates that, that's all

01:55:49   the better.

01:55:50   But like, like here's the

01:55:52   thing.

01:55:52   When faced with a complex

01:55:54   task, a simple set of tools

01:55:58   is the best way to tackle

01:55:59   it, allowing you to use

01:56:00   those tools to solve your

01:56:01   problem rather than taking a

01:56:04   complex task and making a

01:56:05   complex system that fits that

01:56:07   complex task, like a key

01:56:09   fits a lock, but in only one

01:56:11   particular way, does it fit?

01:56:12   That's, that's not a good way

01:56:14   to solve that.

01:56:15   So if I said you have to

01:56:17   develop an app in Xcode, well,

01:56:18   there's a big learning curve

01:56:19   there.

01:56:20   Now I said, now you have to do

01:56:21   it on an iPad versus doing it

01:56:23   on a Mac.

01:56:24   It doesn't matter if you

01:56:25   were born yesterday or born

01:56:26   50 years ago, you will be more

01:56:29   frustrated by trying to deal

01:56:30   with all the different things

01:56:31   that you have to deal with to

01:56:32   develop an app in an Xcode or

01:56:35   any kind of ID like interface.

01:56:36   You'll be very frustrated

01:56:37   trying to do that on an iPad

01:56:38   versus trying to do it on the

01:56:40   Mac.

01:56:40   Once you learn all the things

01:56:42   that you have to do.

01:56:42   I don't know that that's true.

01:56:43   I really don't.

01:56:44   And I, and I mean that

01:56:45   genuinely because I, again, I

01:56:47   came from the same lineage that

01:56:49   you did, even though I'm not

01:56:50   sure you agree on that, but I

01:56:52   came from the same lineage that

01:56:53   you did.

01:56:53   And so I, one trillion

01:56:55   percent would be, I would

01:56:57   nope out of it instantly

01:56:58   because it's, it's impossible,

01:57:00   but I'm not so sure that

01:57:02   someone from a diff cut from a

01:57:04   different cloth would feel the

01:57:05   same way.

01:57:05   But I mean, there's no way to

01:57:06   answer this.

01:57:07   I mean, it's a question of the

01:57:09   complexity of the problem.

01:57:09   How many things do you need to

01:57:11   be doing and seeing at the same

01:57:12   time?

01:57:13   As that number decreases, you

01:57:14   can get simpler interfaces.

01:57:16   And by the way, I think the Mac

01:57:17   does a pretty good job of

01:57:18   accomplishing that.

01:57:18   If I watch how my son uses his

01:57:21   Mac to do things, he just

01:57:22   full screens, everything three

01:57:23   from his swipes between them.

01:57:24   Like it's not as, as

01:57:25   straightforward as, as an iPad

01:57:27   perhaps, but it is a way of

01:57:29   using a Mac that is foreign to

01:57:31   me, but Mac OS does accommodate

01:57:33   it and allows him to work more

01:57:34   like he's used to.

01:57:35   But there does come a point where

01:57:37   he needs to see more than one

01:57:38   window at the same time.

01:57:39   And as soon as you need to do

01:57:40   that, you need to come up with

01:57:42   some kind of solution.

01:57:42   And like, I, I've literally never

01:57:45   met anybody who finds the way

01:57:48   iPad handles multiple windows to

01:57:50   be simpler, more understandable,

01:57:52   and more flexible than the way

01:57:53   Mac does.

01:57:53   It's not saying the Mac is

01:57:54   easier because people can get

01:57:55   frustrated by the Mac too.

01:57:56   Oh, I lose track of windows.

01:57:58   I can't tell when they're

01:57:58   visible, so on and so forth.

01:57:59   But if you're, if your thing you're

01:58:01   trying to do is complicated, the

01:58:03   iPad is so limiting.

01:58:05   You can do certain things.

01:58:06   I can do two.

01:58:07   I can do two with the slide

01:58:08   over four, five mil strange

01:58:11   manager kind of, but it gets real

01:58:14   hard, real fast.

01:58:15   Like the curve, you hit a wall,

01:58:16   right?

01:58:16   So again, it depends on the

01:58:19   context for simple things.

01:58:20   You know, iPad OS makes simple

01:58:22   things easy, but it makes many

01:58:23   hard things literally impossible.

01:58:24   Yeah.

01:58:25   And I, and I get you in, in I'm

01:58:27   not, again, I'm not saying you're

01:58:28   wrong, but I wonder if any one

01:58:30   of the three of us would have a

01:58:31   very different opinion about

01:58:32   this if we were growing up now

01:58:34   rather than 500 years ago.

01:58:35   Uh, the other point I wanted to

01:58:37   make is to be angels advocate

01:58:40   rather than devil's advocate, I

01:58:41   guess.

01:58:41   I don't know.

01:58:41   Um, so I put the vision pro on a

01:58:47   few hours ago in order to rewatch

01:58:49   the aforementioned, um, freeze,

01:58:52   not free solo, whatever I called

01:58:53   it.

01:58:54   Um, the, the adventure episode.

01:58:56   And I briefly use the vision pro

01:58:58   to do not entertainment things.

01:59:01   I answered an email, which I think

01:59:03   I answered with four words because

01:59:05   it's the world's worst keyboard.

01:59:06   But, um, but I did a handful of,

01:59:10   of quote unquote productivity

01:59:12   things.

01:59:12   It was very little, but it was

01:59:13   some.

01:59:14   And every time I put the vision

01:59:15   pro on, I've said this many

01:59:16   times, every one put the, I put

01:59:17   the vision pro on, I feel like

01:59:19   I'm strapping the future to my

01:59:20   face.

01:59:21   And that's both in the obvious

01:59:22   ways.

01:59:23   Like, oh, there's windows floating

01:59:24   in freaking space.

01:59:26   And the fact that when I look

01:59:28   around, those windows are pretty

01:59:30   solidly staying perfectly

01:59:33   stationary, you know, they're

01:59:35   not hovering and, and, and, and

01:59:37   bouncing around like my drone

01:59:38   does when I put it in the air,

01:59:39   like they are solid.

01:59:41   And I still am stupefied that that

01:59:43   is something that we can

01:59:44   accomplish in 2024, really, because

01:59:46   this was a year ago now.

01:59:47   Um, but the other thing that makes

01:59:49   it feel like the future is the,

01:59:51   just the whole vibe of the

01:59:53   interface.

01:59:53   And I, I don't think I have the

01:59:54   vocabulary to do much better than

01:59:56   that, but the way that

01:59:58   transparency is used and depth

02:00:00   is used and granted those things

02:00:02   are used because the vision pro

02:00:04   lends itself to transparency and

02:00:07   depth, especially, but the whole

02:00:10   just vibe of the OS leaving aside

02:00:14   the fact that I've got the future

02:00:15   on my face, the vibe of the OS

02:00:17   just feels kind of futuristic.

02:00:19   And then I look at things like the

02:00:20   invites app and granted the

02:00:22   invites app was kind of not

02:00:23   great, but visually it's a lot

02:00:27   of transparency and, uh, in

02:00:29   depth in a much smaller degree, but

02:00:31   depth nevertheless.

02:00:32   And it does, as we've talked about

02:00:34   before, does give a kind of

02:00:36   vision OSE vibe.

02:00:37   And I feel like bringing that

02:00:40   whole vibe to the OS broadly.

02:00:42   And I'm not disagreeing, especially

02:00:44   Marco with what you were saying

02:00:45   earlier, it's a big lift for

02:00:47   individual developers like us.

02:00:48   It's asking a lot at a time where

02:00:50   we're all feeling pretty

02:00:51   disgruntled about Apple again.

02:00:53   It's all of those things you

02:00:54   said, I completely agree with, but

02:00:55   if you take it just at the

02:00:56   surface, I think having that

02:00:59   vibe, the, the, the, uh, was

02:01:02   it John Prosser?

02:01:02   I think you said a mock-up of

02:01:04   photos app, like visually, I

02:01:07   think that looked pretty cool and

02:01:09   it looked kind of like the

02:01:10   future.

02:01:11   And I would not at all be

02:01:13   surprised if Apple tries to get

02:01:15   if not literally that same

02:01:17   approach, that whole vibe onto

02:01:21   iPadOS, onto MacOS, onto iOS.

02:01:24   And perhaps that's why it wasn't

02:01:26   mentioned in, in German's report

02:01:27   is because we're already there in

02:01:29   vision OSE and we're bringing that

02:01:31   same.

02:01:31   And I know I've said the word 17

02:01:33   times.

02:01:33   I'll say it again.

02:01:34   We're bringing that same vibe to

02:01:35   these other platforms.

02:01:37   And honestly, putting, taking off my

02:01:40   developer hat and putting on my

02:01:41   consumer hat, that actually sounds

02:01:43   kind of good to me, to be

02:01:44   completely honest with you.

02:01:45   I think I might be here for that.

02:01:47   Now, as soon as I take my, you

02:01:48   know, user hat off and put the

02:01:49   developer hat on, I want to crawl

02:01:51   into a hole and die.

02:01:52   Like I'm already too tired to deal

02:01:55   with any of that, but it's from a

02:01:57   user's perspective.

02:01:58   I think that might be pretty cool.

02:01:59   It's actually some parallels with the

02:02:01   early days of Mac OS X here.

02:02:02   Like one of the things that, uh, was

02:02:04   said frequently about Aqua, probably

02:02:05   by me, but all I don't remember,

02:02:06   um, was that Aqua looks like the

02:02:10   interface that people would make up

02:02:12   for sci-fi movies back in the day.

02:02:14   Like they make like a fake computer

02:02:16   interface of some future computer and

02:02:17   a sci-fi thing.

02:02:18   And they'd make it, it would look

02:02:20   nothing like, you know, at the time,

02:02:22   like, you know, Windows or classic

02:02:23   Mac OS and it would behave nothing

02:02:24   like it.

02:02:25   It would have these gratuitous visual

02:02:26   effects that people would look at

02:02:27   and say, that's not what computers

02:02:29   look like.

02:02:30   This is all, you know, fantasy sci-fi

02:02:32   stuff or whatever.

02:02:33   Uh, and Apple essentially said,

02:02:35   we're going to make a movie

02:02:36   computer interface.

02:02:37   Like the genie effect was totally

02:02:40   like a special effect movie thing.

02:02:41   Everything being transparent and

02:02:43   shiny candy colored, round 3D

02:02:46   looking photorealistic buttons and

02:02:47   photorealistic icons.

02:02:48   Like that's not what computers are.

02:02:50   Like that's some ridiculous movie

02:02:51   person's idea, but they literally

02:02:53   made it.

02:02:53   They made, they made a movie

02:02:54   computer, right?

02:02:55   And what you're saying about

02:02:57   vision OS is basically the same

02:02:59   thing.

02:02:59   Oh, it looks like the future

02:03:01   because you've seen a lot of

02:03:03   things in popular media, sci-fi

02:03:05   stuff that looks kind of like big

02:03:08   translucent panes.

02:03:09   And I remember a minority report

02:03:11   had such an effect on this that in

02:03:12   pop culture, even non tech

02:03:14   enthusiasts were saying it's like a

02:03:16   minority report interface where Tom

02:03:17   Cruz is swiping away clear panes of

02:03:20   glass, you know, floating in front of

02:03:21   him and like an air interface or

02:03:23   whatever things in popular mood media

02:03:26   influence what we think, quote unquote,

02:03:28   looks like the future.

02:03:29   So vision OS looks like the future

02:03:31   because it looks like things that

02:03:33   we've seen in sci-fi movies.

02:03:34   And as we've all said, transparency

02:03:37   and vision OS makes tons of sense

02:03:38   because it's overlaying the interface

02:03:39   on top of the world around you in a

02:03:41   way that other things do not things

02:03:43   with screens that are not strapped

02:03:44   your eyeballs don't do that.

02:03:45   And arguably early versions of Mac

02:03:49   OS 10 and later versions of Windows

02:03:51   thoroughly explored exactly how

02:03:53   translucent you can make things before

02:03:55   it becomes visually confusing.

02:03:56   And we've learned lessons there.

02:03:58   And we may suddenly unlearn those.

02:03:59   But you're totally right that if

02:04:01   they can successfully make

02:04:03   essentially the movie interface,

02:04:04   just like Aqua did, it will be

02:04:07   exciting enough and cool enough

02:04:09   that it will be a net benefit

02:04:12   despite all the people who are

02:04:14   going to flip out about how

02:04:15   things look terrible, despite all

02:04:16   the reviews that I wrote saying how

02:04:18   this thing shouldn't be translucent

02:04:19   and this is hard to see and the

02:04:21   information density has gone down

02:04:22   and yada, yada, yada.

02:04:23   Like they refined, they tweaked,

02:04:25   they backed off, they figured it out.

02:04:26   But that burst of excitement is

02:04:28   something you can't replace.

02:04:28   And despite the fact, as Marco said,

02:04:30   that, you know, iOS is not crying out

02:04:32   for a massive redesign.

02:04:33   Every n number of years, you should do

02:04:38   this just to sort of clear the decks

02:04:40   and freshen things up, even though

02:04:42   it's painful.

02:04:42   It's why you don't do it every year.

02:04:43   It's why you don't do it every five

02:04:45   years.

02:04:45   But when was iOS 7?

02:04:46   I can't do math in my head.

02:04:47   But like I think every 10 or 15 years

02:04:50   is a reasonable time scale to think

02:04:53   about a rig redesign.

02:04:54   The reason I'm spiraling about this

02:04:57   is because I don't have faith

02:04:59   that the redesign will be an improvement.

02:05:01   Oh, it kills me to say that,

02:05:02   but I just don't.

02:05:03   And honestly, I've still not met a single,

02:05:06   not met, not seen a single response

02:05:08   from somebody granted in my little

02:05:10   circles of people who are similar

02:05:12   ages and have similar experiences

02:05:13   with Apple who are like,

02:05:15   I'm excited about this.

02:05:16   I think they're going to do a great

02:05:17   job because we're not excited.

02:05:20   And I hope Apple, you know,

02:05:23   takes that as a challenge and defies

02:05:25   expectations and make something that

02:05:26   we were like, oh, thank God,

02:05:27   it's actually really cool.

02:05:28   All right.

02:05:29   Thanks to our sponsors this week,

02:05:31   Terminal and BetterHelp.

02:05:33   And thanks to our members who

02:05:34   support us directly.

02:05:35   You can join us at atp.fm slash join.

02:05:37   One of the perks of membership is

02:05:39   ATP Overtime, our weekly bonus topic.

02:05:42   This week on Overtime, we're going to

02:05:43   be looking at affordable EVs and

02:05:46   physical controls, which is an

02:05:47   interesting combination.

02:05:48   We're seeing there's this new

02:05:50   Volkswagen ID everyone concept

02:05:53   we're going to be talking about

02:05:53   and some physical button news.

02:05:56   So that's in this week's Overtime.

02:05:58   If you want to hear us talk about

02:05:58   that, you can join atp.fm slash join.

02:06:01   Thanks, everyone.

02:06:02   And we'll talk to you next week.

02:06:04   Now the show is over.

02:06:09   They didn't even mean to begin

02:06:11   Cause it was accidental

02:06:13   Oh, it was accidental

02:06:16   John didn't do any research

02:06:19   Margo and Casey wouldn't let him

02:06:22   Cause it was accidental

02:06:24   Oh, it was accidental

02:06:26   And you can find the show notes

02:06:30   at atp.fm

02:06:32   And if you're into Mastodon

02:06:36   You can follow them at C-A-S-E-Y-L-I-S-S

02:06:42   So that's Casey Liss, M-A-R-C-O-A-R-M-E-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-E-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-E-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-E-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-E-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-E-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-E-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-E-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-E-N-T-M-A-R-

02:06:42   That's Casey Liss, M-A-R-C-O-A-R-M-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-N-S-I-R-A-C-U-S-A-C-R-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U

02:07:12   were dying they fully died eventually like just would not make any more noise which was bad um and

02:07:18   so i was looking at new speakers i had some speakers in mind that i was going to get i asked

02:07:22   the audience if anyone has these speakers how do they like them and people did write in can i jump

02:07:28   in it just occurred i don't know why it just occurred to me what if you're only using these

02:07:33   speakers for games why does fidelity really matter that much i mean so as i said last time i've had

02:07:40   these speakers for like over 16 years and when i'm buying anything new electronics wise like oh

02:07:45   can i do better than the speakers i got 16 years ago it's not that i'm against fidelity it's just

02:07:50   that i'm not listening to them all day long so i'm not going to spend a huge amount of money on them

02:07:53   they're not that important to me especially given my criteria which i will re-emphasize when i start

02:07:58   talking about these new speakers this is a lot of money to spend on speakers that you're using for

02:08:02   video games if you ask me it's not just video like anytime i need to hear audio if i'm watching a

02:08:06   youtube video i need to hear the audio so maybe that's not a high fidelity type experience but you

02:08:10   know and i do occasionally listen to my music collection on my mac while i'm doing stuff you

02:08:15   know it's just i'm not i'm not i don't have music playing all the time like you do but the bottom

02:08:18   line is i wanted to upgrade i had old speakers i wanted new speakers i wanted the new speakers to

02:08:23   be better than the old speakers not better in a thousands of dollars way but better i mean that's

02:08:28   all the reason you ultimately need i was just curious all right so i apologize for interrupting

02:08:32   yeah and it's not it's not like i again i wasn't looking for like these have to be super high

02:08:36   fidelity i just wanted them to be better right you know you buy a new thing you want to be better than

02:08:40   the old thing especially if the old thing you have is really old so i asked for people to give me

02:08:45   feedback on the ones i was thinking of buying and they did but also people uh suggested many

02:08:50   alternatives to the ones that i was looking at most of the alternatives they suggested i had seen and

02:08:54   explored and chosen the ones that i was looking at because i didn't like them but two uh suggestions

02:09:00   stand out i want to talk about them uh one of them is the vanatoo v-a-n-a-t-o-o transparent zero plus i

02:09:07   had actually looked at the speaker i had mostly dismissed it based on looks which was a big criteria for me

02:09:14   uh but so many people wrote in to say they either had these or had heard these and they were impressed by

02:09:23   the fidelity uh compared to the price and size despite the fact that they are a little weird

02:09:29   looking uh these links to all these in the show all of these are not great looking to be honest with

02:09:35   you i don't think any of these are good looking these speakers are wedge shaped so they're angled

02:09:40   they're angled they're more like a trap is a trap yeah they're more like a trapezoid than a rectangle

02:09:45   but they have this interesting feature where if you can see on the back looks like there's like a handle

02:09:49   back there right if you turn these over if you flip them like 180 degrees

02:09:54   then then the surface of the speakers is um perpendicular to the table right so they it's like

02:10:03   they're trying to have it both ways these can be tilted back or these can be just straight up and down

02:10:07   and it makes very strange arrangement uh if you have them in your desk you should probably have

02:10:11   them tilted up towards you i don't really like the handle but i just wanted to point this out that

02:10:15   people give lots of good reports on these speakers in particular they have good fidelity a lot of

02:10:20   people who are looking for speakers on their desks are measuring them as what they call studio monitors

02:10:25   or things that will try to give you an exactly accurate neutral near field listening experience for

02:10:31   doing audio editing so you know what it really sounds like as opposed to trying to change the audio

02:10:37   to make it pleasing to your ears like no just show me the audio that's there because i'm the one

02:10:41   changing the audio i'm mixing the track i'm adjusting the thing or whatever so i need to hear

02:10:45   what it really sounds like so i want you to just be completely neutral have a frequency response that

02:10:51   doesn't change it's just totally flat uh because that is accurate uh i wasn't looking for that and so

02:10:58   the fact that these uh vanitude transparent zero pluses have that and are fairly inexpensive and small

02:11:03   wasn't that attractive to me but i did take a second look at them even though i had dismissed

02:11:08   them earlier for being ugly wait before so first of all before we lose before we leave this

02:11:13   this is actually like to have the speakers natively angled diagonally upward towards you

02:11:19   is a great feature for desktop speakers because that is the better angle normally you have to achieve

02:11:24   it with some kind of you know stand or like a wedge kind of mount or something like but so to have

02:11:29   them actually just natively angled up like that is a great feature these may be tilted a little bit

02:11:34   too much though i feel like depending on the height of your desk in their position they look a little

02:11:38   slanty to me a little but i i think it actually that's pretty close to what you want like my i have my i

02:11:43   have the the the kef or kef i still don't know how to pronounce it i always just like kef yeah i have

02:11:48   the uh i think it's the lsx2 i think those have stands that like just stand them up and it's it's at

02:11:57   almost that angle it isn't quite that angle but it's it's close um that being said i do love the

02:12:04   name you know transparent that's what you mean like when transparent in audio terms means the speakers

02:12:10   are not quote coloring the sound they're not like boosting the bass or boosting the treble like they're

02:12:15   they're just giving you like the a reasonably flat frequency frequency response and that is you are

02:12:22   correct uh what people in studios want when they have you know studio monitors uh it's almost never

02:12:30   what you want for your own personal listening people usually would go for speakers that are quote more

02:12:34   musical when the books usually means like a little more pleasant to listen to but you know the name

02:12:40   transparent that means there's nothing there they add to that zero so transparent also zero still

02:12:48   nothing there and then they say plus plus what like what that's not transparent anymore well they're

02:12:54   better than the old transparent zero i think is actually the second version of this and by the way

02:12:57   the other alternative that you will see and the reason some of these go in different arrangements is

02:13:01   rather than tilting them up they you physically raise them so they're at the height of your ears and

02:13:04   then you make them you know just 90 degrees to the the table uh that's another alternative uh you

02:13:10   often see that's why you often see studio monitors like up on a shelf in studios so that the

02:13:14   speakers are at the level of the ears of the person who is working on the thing um the other set of

02:13:20   speakers that was recommended uh that i had also looked at a little bit before but again hearing lots

02:13:25   of people who have these in real life and like them a lot were the atom audio d3v uh they look like

02:13:33   little computer speakers they're very compact they're fairly inexpensive and again one of the things that

02:13:38   uh people say about these is they are very neutral good for being studio monitor things these ones have

02:13:45   going for them is they have ribbon tweeters which are uh very uh it's a different way of making the

02:13:51   speaker mechanism that makes the highest frequencies and it uses lighter weight materials

02:13:55   that can start and stop moving more quickly uh sometimes people don't like ribbon tweeters because

02:14:00   they find them too shrill or too harsh but it may be they're just accurately portraying uh frequencies

02:14:06   and transitions that they're not able to hear on other speakers that are more musical and less

02:14:11   transparent yeah well that's on on that response by the way like people who there is nothing more

02:14:18   divisive and harder to like nail down consensus on in the audio world than treble like treble response

02:14:27   like this because and there's lots of good reasons for this like the amount of treble and how people

02:14:32   people perceive it varies wildly across different speakers and headphones and like it's it's so

02:14:40   different and there's a good reason why some people will say oh i want like i i'm i like a lot of treble

02:14:46   i want a lot of that detail otherwise things sound muffled or dull or boring because you're missing a lot

02:14:51   of that high-end frequency response oh to other people a lot of that high-end frequency response that kind

02:14:57   of you know sharp trebly sound that can sound harsh or grating it can make it fatiguing to listen for

02:15:03   long periods too bright they say yes and there's a reason the reason we have such massively different

02:15:10   opinions across you know people in for treble response is that people have massively different

02:15:16   hearing response to treble not only as we age we lose treble uh you know pickup response but also

02:15:24   just different people have different like peaks and sensitivities to how how we are sensitive to

02:15:30   different frequencies even when you're young so nothing like anything people say about treble response or

02:15:36   harshness or sharpness or fatigue when listening to speakers or headphones you basically have to discount

02:15:42   all of that and just kind of judge for yourself because whatever you prefer and perceive and even

02:15:48   hear in treble is probably different from whatever that reviewer that you're reading it perceives or

02:15:54   prefers themselves although one thing you can look at from the physical instruction is again ribbon

02:15:58   tweeters tend to be better at the highs and and the uh the subtle transitions between the different

02:16:03   frequencies because they can they essentially the moving parts have less momentum and mass and so

02:16:09   than a traditional tweeter uh those those canto tucks that you got i think they had a ribbon tweeter as

02:16:14   well like ribbon tweeters are very common like so if you like if you like the highest of high frequencies

02:16:19   you may be drawn to a speaker that has a ribbon tweeter uh as a way to get that the other aspect of these

02:16:26   speakers that is different than most of the other ones that i've been looking at is they're not ported

02:16:29   which means they don't have a big hole in the back of the speaker to allow air to go in and out

02:16:33   to make sort of a bassier noise from a smaller speaker uh instead they have a passive radiator

02:16:39   which is like a diaphragm that the diaphragm goes in and out it's like a usually like a you know a

02:16:45   circular region or whatever that's like a loose drum head and as the air pressure changes inside the

02:16:50   speaker from it playing that little thing will move in and out uh it is a different it's a different

02:16:55   sound porting can be like boomier and make sort of some sorts of uh strange noises when the volume is

02:17:01   very high uh but it also can give a very small speaker a lot more bass and there's

02:17:06   factors about how close you put it to the wall that affect that and so on and so forth but anyway

02:17:10   the atom audio d3v a non-ported ribbon tweeter small form factor studio monitor type of thing with

02:17:19   the volume control on the front not the best looking yeah i gotta say this definitely looks like someone

02:17:26   who designed speakers in 95 was dragged to 2025 and said use modern style to do the crap you're used to

02:17:35   doing because that's what this is it looks straight out of 95 with like the just a sprinkle of modern

02:17:39   stuff on it i don't mind it that much i don't really like the shape i don't like like i in general i feel

02:17:46   like i don't like speakers that that taper like footballs so many of them are like that the whole uh

02:17:53   there's a whole bunch of very popular studio monitors that their their look of their whole

02:17:56   product line is kind of like oblong rounded tapered type of things this at least has a little bit of

02:18:03   sharper edges but yeah i'm not a big fan i don't really like the uh the the passive radiator on the

02:18:07   side i do kind of like that they have an integrated tilted stand looks like a foot as opposed to you

02:18:13   having to buy one that's the way they accomplish this i think you can use it with or without the stand

02:18:17   i don't know if it actually tilts but they got a lot of good reviews and here's the thing there

02:18:20   for their size and performance it is it's a good ratio if you care about transparent ish studio monitors

02:18:27   that are small and sound really good but don't cost that much these atom audio d3vs are a good deal

02:18:33   i would actually have probably considered them if i could have tolerated to look a little bit better

02:18:38   which leads me to the speakers that i was actually looking at and again one of the main reasons i was

02:18:44   looking at these speakers was because i like the way they looked and we just got done saying how

02:18:47   silly it is what you're picking speakers based on how the speaker looks that makes no sense that makes

02:18:53   total sense by the way i bought my car based a lot on how it looks i bought my house based a lot on how

02:18:58   oh that's not true you bought your car because you don't know how to buy anything but a honda

02:19:01   specifically you know no i skipped over the ugly honda core generations if you notice i'm calling i'm

02:19:07   throwing a yellow flag on this one but we don't have time to deal with i like the way my car looks you

02:19:11   don't have to like it i like it so anyway um the two i were looking at were the canto k-n-t-o canto

02:19:17   aura all caps o-r-a and the canto aura four and i said please give feedback if you have these speakers

02:19:22   tell me what you think of them tons of people wrote in pretty much no one had anything bad to say about

02:19:27   these speakers other than the things that i already knew about them and actually just to interject again

02:19:33   the canto aura the one that we're going to link in the show notes if you open that page on amazon do you

02:19:39   notice that there are one two three four five six seven eight nine variations of the speaker you know

02:19:43   why because it has in colors imagine that it has colors you can buy speakers in colors you can do

02:19:52   black gray indigo which is i guess bluish to my eyes but that's right uh moon moss pink purple red

02:20:00   and white imagine being able to buy colors and you can distinguish all these colors believe me yes

02:20:06   you will not be confused about which one is the blue one it's blue and by the way they also sell

02:20:12   it in black which is the one i got i was not offended by the existence of those colors at all

02:20:17   i bet most people do buy i bet most people do buy the black or white ones but it's still cool that the

02:20:22   colors exist and they can change those colors every year if they want to mix it up a little bit anyway

02:20:25   i like how these speakers looked i also like that they got good reviews i also like the size of them i was

02:20:30   trying to decide between the aura and the aura four they're basically the same exact speaker except for the

02:20:34   aura four is larger because the non-tweeter driver in it is four inches instead of 2.5 inches

02:20:40   and also there was the mostly ridiculous but still weird thing that was driving me towards the aura fours

02:20:49   is that the auras in theory only had 16 uh 16 bit 48 kilohertz and the aura four support 24 bit 96

02:20:56   kilohertz which makes no difference because these speakers cannot resolve anything that would let you

02:21:02   distinguish that and i don't even have music in that resolution anyway ears but still it was driving

02:21:05   me towards it and on that front by the way someone who has the the auras not the auras fours wrote in

02:21:10   to say maybe they did a stealth upgrade of the guts of the auras because here is the audio midi setup in

02:21:15   mac os with my auras attached and it lets me pick 24 bit 96 kilohertz i don't know if that is evidence

02:21:20   that that speaker supports 24 bit 96 kilohertz or merely evidence that mac os will let you set that as the

02:21:27   output and then when it gets to the speaker the speaker just down samples it to 1640 uh 1648 i don't

02:21:33   know the answer to that question but just setting that aside that was one of the things driving towards

02:21:37   it and what finally one of the final things that would drive me towards the four versus the aura

02:21:41   was that the the mid-range driver looks nicer on the on the aura four than the aura look at the aura

02:21:51   next to the aura four the the aura four has like i think it's metal whereas the aura has like a paper

02:21:56   one and it just looks a little bit smoother and cleaner on the aura four i know this sounds ridiculous

02:22:01   to you again you're you're picking one speaker over the other because the speaker cone looks nicer

02:22:07   believe me especially if people have those keff speakers whatever speaker manufacturers spend a lot

02:22:12   of time designing the look of the speaker drivers in their speaker even if they have great so that's why a lot

02:22:19   of them come with magnetic like you know you know uh grills you call them grates or grills yeah they

02:22:24   come with magnetic ones so if you don't want them on you can just take them off and there's no holes

02:22:28   and usually it sounds better without them yeah these are visual items and i mean keff doesn't even

02:22:33   include them but they're like look at our beautiful speakers they're so beautiful and so concentric keff

02:22:37   speakers are okay keff speakers are awesome like i as i have tried other brands here and there

02:22:43   including i have um uh genelec uh desktop speaker they had those briefly that's another one of those

02:22:50   stupid uh oblong like lozenge shaped thing yeah i mean it's yeah they're fine um the the keff speakers

02:22:58   they just sound so good and not all of them like i actually don't like the um the ls50 uh line very

02:23:06   much like they they have a bit of a different sound profile that i don't care for um but the q line

02:23:12   and the the lsx2 i really enjoy and they you know they have a totally different design where they they

02:23:20   have um concentric drivers where the tweeter is on the inside of the woofer so they it's just two

02:23:27   concentric circles it looks like one driver but you know the but the tweeter is like the middle part

02:23:32   then that vibrates separately from the outer part which is the wolf like it's it's a crazy design but

02:23:37   there's a bunch of benefits to that um in terms of like there it kind of widens the sweet spot of the

02:23:44   sound and it avoids certain interference patterns like it ends up sounding really good um but what keff

02:23:49   is really good at to my ears uh is that musicality like these are not flat frequency responses they just

02:23:57   sound really pleasant and really really good in a way that like especially in in mid-range and in vocals

02:24:03   i haven't found anything that sounds this good in speakers i have one pair of headphones that i like

02:24:09   more than this that's the hi-fi man hg6 that i have from forever ago um i've never found anything else

02:24:14   besides those headphones and keff speakers and only a few models of keff speakers uh that sound that good

02:24:21   in the mid-range but fortunately i don't have to deal with like these being ugly because they're not

02:24:26   ugly they're great looking in to my opinion and you know what they're offered in colors multiple colors

02:24:33   every keff speaker is offered in multiple colors even the boring like wood finish ones are offered in like

02:24:38   four different woods and these are like you know these have like carpet on the outside of them and like

02:24:44   these have like four different colors too like there's they they have lots of different styles

02:24:48   because when people use things and you know they buy them for their homes they want them to look

02:24:53   like you know their personality it's a permanent fixture in your house it's going to be a thing that

02:24:58   you see all the time yes you do want it to to look nice and match you want it to look good and to have

02:25:02   some options and by the way i think the keffs if you look at them now and you're like marco thinks

02:25:06   he looks good they're a little bit puffy looking if you're not used to what they look like and the keff

02:25:11   does make other much much larger tower speakers that are much more complicated and have lots more

02:25:16   large drivers that don't look like the little concentric things and yes other companies also

02:25:20   have concentric drivers and they're great everyone should make center channel speakers with concentric

02:25:23   drivers you hear me uh but they don't uh but still some some other companies do have in fact i believe

02:25:28   there are a couple i was looking at some when i was looking at other like desk computer mon uh computer

02:25:33   speakers they have computer speakers with concentric drivers too not from keff but like from other

02:25:37   much less expensive brands uh it's a good idea because it aligns the you know the high frequencies

02:25:43   low frequencies and it's it's very beneficial um oh my god there's a bright yellow version of the lsx2

02:25:48   now this was not available when i purchased you should look at the really big keff tower speakers i think

02:25:53   you might like them oh they're they look nuts so anyway the thing the downsides of these auras um

02:25:58   what i had heard is obviously when these are all small speakers they're kind of expensive uh the

02:26:05   they don't have a bass or treble adjustment on the speakers which everyone complained about and i knew

02:26:10   i wouldn't like because i do like to have that basic adjustability on the speaker itself

02:26:14   these don't have it i knew that going in everyone who owned them was happy with them

02:26:19   some people did say that they heard the aura 4 versus the aura and they picked the aura because

02:26:24   they felt the aura 4 had a little bit too much bass i mean it makes sense they're basically exactly the

02:26:29   same speaker except for the uh mid-range slash quote-unquote woofer is just so much bigger on the aura 4

02:26:35   so it can't help but sound bassier because that's the whole deal some people like the aura 4 it's better

02:26:40   because it was bassier and could go louder because it has a more powerful amplifier and a bigger driver

02:26:45   and all that other stuff in the end like i said i decided to get the aura 4 because i did like the way

02:26:50   look no negative reviews from anybody really i figured i could live with the lack of bass and

02:26:55   treble controls and i like the way i like the 24 bit 96 kilohertz even though it's pointless

02:27:00   and i like the way the the speaker cone look the metal speaker cone versus the paper one or whatever

02:27:05   so i did indeed get the canto aura 4s uh these are just a flat rectangle and of course i needed them to

02:27:12   be tilted up if you are using computer speakers and you do not have them pointed at your ears you are

02:27:17   missing out on a lot because most computer speakers if they're designed at all are designed for

02:27:22   near quote-unquote near field listening which is your head is pretty close to the speakers like you

02:27:28   can reach them with your hands that is not the case with you know stereo speakers or whatever uh even

02:27:33   home theater speakers that are filling your room with sound these are going to be close to you

02:27:36   they're often very directional which means that if you don't point in particular the tweeters

02:27:42   at your ears you are losing a lot of the frequencies that they're putting out and it's not

02:27:48   subtle you can just take them and twist them so they're pointed directly at the back of the room

02:27:52   and you hear the treble disappear and then point them back at your ear so you need them to point at

02:27:56   you and you can just twist them on your desk but you also need to point up at your ears so you have

02:28:00   a choice of either getting some speaker stands that elevates the speaker so they are at ear level

02:28:04   which i don't want to do because i don't like how it looks or you get something that tilts them up

02:28:09   luckily kanto the the my first interaction with kanto as a brand was i bought their speaker stands for

02:28:15   my home theater speakers they make lots of speaker stands surprise surprise they make tiny little

02:28:21   angled speaker stands for their tiny speakers and so if you get the kanto aura you can get the kanto s2

02:28:28   speaker stands which is a bent piece of metal that costs less than the one inside my mac pro

02:28:32   and if you buy the aura 4 you should get the kanto s4 speaker stand a pro tip for kanto on your website

02:28:39   clearly indicate which speakers the stand works with they try to do that but they don't mention

02:28:46   the auras anywhere so i can just tell you from experimentally determining the kanto s4 speaker

02:28:50   stands fit the kanto aura 4 perfectly they the kanto aura 4s have a little screw hole in the bottom

02:28:57   the stands have a little screw hole and they come with a screw and it fits directly in there and they

02:29:01   exactly fit uh and so i hooked up my speakers with a big long usb c cable to my mac plugged everything

02:29:08   in turn everything on tried it out here's what i think of these things i wish they had a bass and

02:29:13   treble knob i knew i would i knew it would be a problem uh part of that like marco basically covered

02:29:22   this all this exact stuff before i'm old and i can't hear treble as well as i used to i'm 50 right that's

02:29:28   just a fact of life uh i also happen to like treble the kanto aura 4 in their default mode

02:29:36   sound too bassy to me they sound bassy they sound muddled they sound muffled to a young person maybe

02:29:42   they don't but to me they do which is fine very often if you have a computer speaker that has a bass

02:29:48   and a treble knob just turn the knobs until it sounds the way you want it to no knobs so you can't do

02:29:53   that so i am left with uh software solutions which is fine there's lots of good software solutions this

02:29:59   in particular sound source from rogamiba a piece of software i already own can do this for you it can

02:30:04   provide a system-wide equalizer that applies to all audio across the entire system with customizable

02:30:11   equalizer curves and yada yada yada if you don't want to do it system-wide itunes itself which is where i

02:30:16   listen to my music or whatever the hell it's called now music also has its own equalizer inside the music

02:30:21   app if you just want to equalize the music and not every system sound there are many other apps that do

02:30:27   this that you can find i like sound source because it does 5 000 other things i've already put in like

02:30:30   five feature requests for for a sound source um my main activity while setting these things up has been

02:30:37   trying to figure out what equalizer curve do i want i've been trying to sort of manually reproduce the

02:30:44   harman curve because i actually do kind of like that uh was it harman kardon the stereo manufacturer

02:30:50   came up with a curve that they claim is what most people they just a lot of people listen to things

02:30:56   and said do you like this better worse or the same and they came up with a curve that they thought

02:30:59   if you apply this curve most people think it sounds better this is what marker was getting at with like

02:31:03   it's not neutral and it sounds exactly like what you'd expect from a design by committee to average

02:31:09   these everything designed with the harman curve because like when they released that like

02:31:14   everything was then judged against that and so for a long time and i think even still today

02:31:20   people imitate it yeah yeah and every like headphone and speaker is is tuned to try to match the harman

02:31:27   curve exactly because they know they're going to be reviewed against it and as a result a lot of

02:31:30   things end up sounding exactly the same and and for me it's a little bit less treble than i would like

02:31:35   and so most headphones and speakers sound very boring to me as a result and so yeah there's nothing wrong

02:31:41   with using eq to tweak the sound the way you want it i have an eq in my system it's fine

02:31:45   yeah so i was basically trying to reproduce the harman curve with my equalizer because i found

02:31:50   that that is actually kind of what i want and i'll try to i was trying to find a good link you would

02:31:54   think there'd be like a good wikipedia page in the harman curve and there are a bunch of wikipedia pages

02:31:58   about target curves and the harman itself has some pages about this but there's no like

02:32:02   here is the one definitive url for the harman target curve i was very disappointed in not being

02:32:07   able to find it because i wanted to find like the literal values like because i'm moving sliders i'm

02:32:10   like i need to know where to move these sliders i don't want to just match the shape on this you

02:32:14   know logarithmic graph where they have to carefully count the little lines to figure out what value that

02:32:18   is i figured someone's got to have it like a excel spreadsheet with the values for like 10 band dq or

02:32:24   something but i couldn't find it but anyway basically what it looks like is like a kind of an s

02:32:28   shape curve where like it's high at the base then dips down low and then goes up high at the treble

02:32:32   but then dips down at the very end of the treble anyway point is i was playing with equalizers to

02:32:38   make these sound good and the the upshot is that when i equal these these things take very well to

02:32:44   equalization because they have more than enough of everything if i want tons of bass they have it this

02:32:48   is even without a subwoofer attached if they want tons of bass and that's what i want they can do it

02:32:52   and they also have pretty good treble so it's just a question of how much of each thing do you want how

02:32:56   do you want to dial it and i came up with a curve in sound source that i think i mostly like i'm still

02:33:02   tweaking it a little bit uh and they just sound way better than my 16 year old speakers surprise

02:33:06   they cost way more and they sound way better i think they look really nice too i love the stands

02:33:12   one of the other complaints about the the canto auras in particular not the aura forest is they're so

02:33:17   small and light and that the knob on them is so stiff and you have to press the knob in to turn

02:33:21   them on and off that you end up moving the speaker on your desk that does not happen with the aura 4s

02:33:27   especially on the stands because all of canto stands are very heavy metal stands and the speakers are

02:33:32   screwed to them and they have like grippy stuff on the bottom so i can press the power button and that

02:33:37   doesn't happen the one downside to the power button is i have to press it twice because when you first

02:33:41   press it it always defaults to like the 3.5 inch jack and the second presses do usb which leads me to

02:33:47   the final thing about this which is as i said before most of the time i spent with my old speakers

02:33:52   during that 16 years the speakers were turned off like physically turned off with an off switch so

02:33:57   every time my computer went to make a sound no sound would come out because they were sending sound to

02:34:01   speakers that were turned off that's the way i like it right and when i want to hear music i turn my

02:34:07   speakers on now whenever i turn my speakers on i have to press the power button twice which is a little bit

02:34:13   annoying but the other thing that i discovered about this that i hadn't thought about at all is

02:34:17   after i was you know i got them all set up okay let me just do some stuff turn my speakers off start

02:34:22   working i think i clicked on something and it beeped i'm like how are they beeping i turned the speakers

02:34:26   off and i said oh that wasn't the speakers beeping that was my mac beeping sometimes i forget that my mac

02:34:33   has a speaker inside it but it does the mac pro does in fact have a speaker and i'm like mac why are you

02:34:38   making noise you've never done that before you know the answer it's because these speakers are

02:34:44   connected with a usb cable and when i turn these speakers off mac os goes well wherever the hell

02:34:49   that usb audio interface was it's gone now so anyway falling back to the internal speaker yeah so to solve

02:34:55   that problem i did the uh the analog the analog hole solution which is plug a stub headphone jack

02:35:02   adapter into the headphone jack on the back of my mac and now it thinks it's connected to some

02:35:07   analog speakers to the 3.5 millimeter jack but it's not so now my mac is blessedly silent i have

02:35:14   system-wide eq through sound source i have speakers on my desk that i find very attractive i hope they

02:35:20   don't collect too much dust i'll keep you updated on this situation they sound so much better than my

02:35:25   old speakers and i actually have been to casey's delight listening to way more music at my desk although

02:35:30   yes i absolutely i was trying to develop my app this week and at various points i said wait a second i need

02:35:36   to turn this music off what do you think i'm not casey list i can't like my brain i can't i'm an

02:35:41   active listener and my brain latches on to the music and stops doing the programming and so there are only

02:35:47   limited circumstances in which i can i think we've talked to this before i can do css when i'm listening

02:35:52   to music i can't really code and i definitely can't write so but i have listened to a lot of music when

02:35:57   i've been working this week and i'm really happy with the the new speakers like i said there is

02:36:02   improvement uh oh and size wise i'm glad i got the bigger ones i was afraid they would be too big

02:36:08   they're not i think these small ones are a little bit too small and i think these big ones are a little

02:36:13   bit too big but they're not so big that they dominate the desk in a problematic way so if you're looking for

02:36:19   a speaker and have simpler requirements to my ridiculous requirements that you just heard

02:36:25   and you like how these look i think they sound pretty good and i like almost everything about

02:36:30   them and i hope they will last another 16 years uh and if you're not as picky as me definitely look at

02:36:35   those atom audio things because they're a little bit ugly but they are uh what are they like a hundred

02:36:40   dollars less 150 dollars less hundred dollars less uh than the ones i got and they supposedly sound

02:36:46   better so if you don't want to be foolish like me and buy speakers based on how they look but rather

02:36:50   how they sound go check out the atom audio d3v and if you like the way they sound they are a bargain