630: Time to Spiral
00:00:00
◼
►
So I mentioned last week that I had to go to the bank to get cash for the restaurant because I had never had to deal with cash before. Turns out I did, in fact, do that wrong.
00:00:12
◼
►
Did you get Monopoly money?
00:00:14
◼
►
I would like to state for the record that Marco put into our internal show notes, pre-show, Marco went to the bank wrong. How did you go to the bank wrong?
00:00:25
◼
►
What do you think I might have forgotten exists?
00:00:28
◼
►
You did not pass go and did not collect $200?
00:00:30
◼
►
Withdrawal slips or something equivalent?
00:00:36
◼
►
I got no change.
00:00:39
◼
►
So I had to go back today a second time like, oh, I also need coins to fill the drawers.
00:00:46
◼
►
Did you get pennies?
00:00:47
◼
►
I thought about it, but like, you know, to get pennies, what that means, like a roll of pennies is 50 cents.
00:00:53
◼
►
So what that means is I spent $2. I got four rolls of pennies. Like, we'll see if I ever actually use them.
00:00:57
◼
►
So we'll see.
00:00:59
◼
►
But, you know, maybe they'll be illegal or banned by the time I actually, you know, open for full service.
00:01:04
◼
►
Who knows? We'll find out.
00:01:06
◼
►
But yes, I did indeed get pennies because it turns out because coins are generally worth so little, getting anything but quarters costs basically nothing.
00:01:14
◼
►
And even the quarters aren't that expensive, especially once you get down to like, you know, dimes, nickels, pennies.
00:01:19
◼
►
These are very inexpensive.
00:01:22
◼
►
Like, I spent less than $100 to fill all the change that we are probably going to need for a long time.
00:01:27
◼
►
Can you clarify your, your, uh, the semantics of that statement?
00:01:30
◼
►
Don't the coins cost the amount indicated by their denomination?
00:01:35
◼
►
Yes, but it turns out since coins are worth so little relative to rectangles of paper and cotton and stuff, it turns out like you can, you can get, you can have a lot of change for like $70.
00:01:46
◼
►
Right, so you can get like four quarters by just paying a dollar, right?
00:01:49
◼
►
Yeah, it's amazing how that works.
00:01:51
◼
►
I think we're following your math here.
00:01:52
◼
►
What did you end up carrying the cash and coinage in?
00:01:56
◼
►
Did you just put it in like a Peak Design, well, maybe not a Peak Design backpack, that's a little canceled right now.
00:02:00
◼
►
But did you put it in some sort of backpack or did you take a duffel or what?
00:02:04
◼
►
Here's the funny thing.
00:02:04
◼
►
So when I went to get cash, I had brought my, yes, Peak Design everyday backpack.
00:02:09
◼
►
You know what?
00:02:09
◼
►
I'm not going to let one murderer ruin my backpack.
00:02:13
◼
►
It's a great backpack, okay?
00:02:16
◼
►
They're all good dogs, Brian.
00:02:17
◼
►
It wasn't really a backpack-centric murder either, so I feel like the backpack is fine.
00:02:21
◼
►
No, and like, you know, what kind of shoes was the guy wearing?
00:02:24
◼
►
Are those ruined too?
00:02:25
◼
►
Like, no, it doesn't matter, right?
00:02:26
◼
►
Was he wearing Hanes underwear?
00:02:27
◼
►
Now you can't wear Hanes underwear anymore?
00:02:28
◼
►
Right, he was wearing a cotton t-shirt.
00:02:30
◼
►
You can't wear cotton.
00:02:31
◼
►
Anyway, so no, I'm not going to let that ruin my backpack.
00:02:34
◼
►
It's a great backpack.
00:02:35
◼
►
So I went in there with a giant backpack to get what was not a giant amount of cash, as it turns out, volume one.
00:02:42
◼
►
Today, I went in there to get change and I had nothing.
00:02:45
◼
►
I'm like, I'm just getting changed.
00:02:46
◼
►
Coins are heavy.
00:02:48
◼
►
It turns out.
00:02:49
◼
►
So I walked out.
00:02:50
◼
►
It's like they're made of metal.
00:02:51
◼
►
I walked out with like, I just put them in like, you know, I was wearing like a light jacket.
00:02:55
◼
►
I just put them in my jacket pockets and I'm like, you know, lumbering out the door.
00:03:01
◼
►
Like, I'm doing every part of this wrong.
00:03:04
◼
►
You're jingling like a school janitor with a too big key chain.
00:03:08
◼
►
Like I had my kid with me and as we're walking out, he's like, it looks like we're robbing
00:03:12
◼
►
I'm like, don't joke about that.
00:03:13
◼
►
You're the world's worst bank robbers.
00:03:15
◼
►
Don't ask for change.
00:03:16
◼
►
We rob the bank for 70 bucks worth of coins.
00:03:19
◼
►
You can't escape quickly because you're too weighed down.
00:03:22
◼
►
That's gracious.
00:03:26
◼
►
So you've made, you've, you've had some learnings as, as the business people say, you've learned
00:03:30
◼
►
some lessons, uh, and hopefully you won't need to get cash at least for a little while.
00:03:34
◼
►
I have no idea.
00:03:36
◼
►
We'll find out.
00:03:37
◼
►
We'll find out.
00:03:38
◼
►
Take a penny, leave a penny.
00:03:41
◼
►
Let's do some follow-up.
00:03:42
◼
►
We have a lot of follow-up to get through.
00:03:44
◼
►
In fact, I, uh, asked John to cut some of the follow-up and he was very gracious about
00:03:48
◼
►
Um, so we'll see, maybe if we can plow through it, we'll, we'll make John's night by, by getting
00:03:52
◼
►
through all of it, but we'll see what happens.
00:03:53
◼
►
Uh, and I'm going to start by ruining.
00:03:55
◼
►
John's night by doing vision pro corner.
00:03:57
◼
►
Uh, we have a few quick pieces of, uh, information to talk about.
00:04:01
◼
►
First of all, there's a new adventure episode.
00:04:02
◼
►
Adventure is one of the series, like it's kind of sort of TV series that, uh, Apple has put
00:04:08
◼
►
together for vision pro and there's a new adventure episode called deep water solo.
00:04:12
◼
►
This is about a, uh, rock climber, mountain climber fellow who is climbing up the side of
00:04:18
◼
►
a cliff in somewhere in Spain.
00:04:21
◼
►
I forgot already.
00:04:21
◼
►
Um, but it is very well done.
00:04:23
◼
►
And it's again, like eight to 10 minutes, something in that neck of the woods.
00:04:26
◼
►
And I really enjoyed it.
00:04:27
◼
►
I like these ones that have a bit more of a story to them.
00:04:30
◼
►
Uh, the rodeo one from a few weeks back, I don't remember if that was an adventure episode
00:04:34
◼
►
or something else, but, um, that one, I feel like they tried to put a story on it, but it
00:04:38
◼
►
didn't really land.
00:04:39
◼
►
Uh, this one, they, they did a pretty good job of the story.
00:04:41
◼
►
And one of the things I really liked about it.
00:04:42
◼
►
So, I mean, that's not really much of a spoiler.
00:04:44
◼
►
This guy's trying to scale a cliff.
00:04:46
◼
►
And one of the fun things about the vision pro is what with it being 3d, they're, they're
00:04:51
◼
►
doing like an animation or like a, an overlay on, uh, it might've been a rendering.
00:04:56
◼
►
Maybe it was a photo of the rock cliff and showing where he's going to scale the rock cliff.
00:05:01
◼
►
And you can see that these renderings, like it's very obvious they're three, they're in
00:05:05
◼
►
3d space, right?
00:05:06
◼
►
Like there's a path, a line going up the rock cliff that's jiggy, jaggy and a dashed line
00:05:10
◼
►
where he needs to jump somewhere.
00:05:12
◼
►
And, uh, in, in, you can see that that's floating above the rock face.
00:05:15
◼
►
And is that a big deal?
00:05:16
◼
►
No, absolutely not.
00:05:17
◼
►
But is it neat?
00:05:18
◼
►
It's kind of neat.
00:05:19
◼
►
Uh, so you can check that out if you're interested, uh, Marco, I know you're going to be pausing
00:05:22
◼
►
the show in order to put on your vision pro that you probably haven't touched in
00:05:25
◼
►
three months in order to try it.
00:05:26
◼
►
Well, I might touch it for the next item.
00:05:29
◼
►
Uh, well, the, uh, maybe not the next item, but the one after.
00:05:31
◼
►
So, uh, spatial gallery is our next item.
00:05:33
◼
►
That is the vision OS exclusive app that is, uh, only in the beta for now.
00:05:39
◼
►
It was not in the first beta.
00:05:40
◼
►
It is in the second.
00:05:41
◼
►
And I think we're on the third beta now.
00:05:42
◼
►
Um, I wanted to very briefly talk about it.
00:05:44
◼
►
This is, it was billed as Apple giving us more spatial content.
00:05:49
◼
►
Now I know I do this every time, but it's important to understand the difference.
00:05:52
◼
►
Immersive is what we were just talking about where you look around and the perspective of
00:05:56
◼
►
the camera is changing.
00:05:57
◼
►
You're kind of controlling the camera, if you will, because you're looking around a
00:06:01
◼
►
180 degree scene, right?
00:06:03
◼
►
Spatial is when you have a rectangle with depth and it's honest to goodness depth as far as
00:06:09
◼
►
you can tell, but it's just a rectangle with depth.
00:06:11
◼
►
If you look around, you're looking away from that rectangle that with depth.
00:06:15
◼
►
And so anyway, the spatial gallery app, my two second review, it really is just a gallery.
00:06:21
◼
►
There's almost no Chrome to the app whatsoever.
00:06:23
◼
►
It's just a series of videos and images, all of which have at least some amounts of spatial
00:06:28
◼
►
Some of the individual, so there's these pains that you swoop through the air, right?
00:06:33
◼
►
There are individual pains for each of the different gallery items, pictures, videos,
00:06:38
◼
►
whatever, but some of these pains are actually kind of like Instagram stories where they'll
00:06:44
◼
►
show one photo for a little bit and then another photo for a little bit, and then it'll automatically
00:06:47
◼
►
advance to the next photo for a little bit.
00:06:48
◼
►
So as an example of that, they had some behind the scenes stills from Severance, which by the
00:06:55
◼
►
way, I am now caught up on and is real good.
00:06:57
◼
►
No spoilers, no spoilers.
00:06:58
◼
►
No spoilers, no spoilers.
00:06:59
◼
►
It's real good though.
00:07:00
◼
►
So they had some behind the scenes stills from Severance.
00:07:05
◼
►
They were neat, like nothing dramatic, but it was still neat to see.
00:07:10
◼
►
There's no playback controls that I could tell.
00:07:13
◼
►
Like even when you're watching a short video, it's just, that's it.
00:07:15
◼
►
That's the whole thing.
00:07:17
◼
►
It's also kind of funny because the audio changes if you're looking at it full screen versus in
00:07:22
◼
►
like a pane, you can blow these up to be more full screen and the audio sounds different.
00:07:27
◼
►
This is similar to being on like a FaceTime call when you're in an environment or rather
00:07:30
◼
►
than just, you know, looking at floating heads.
00:07:32
◼
►
I loved that there were some basically advertisements, like one of the first things in the list is
00:07:39
◼
►
a video for Red Bull.
00:07:40
◼
►
And at the top, there's a little pill that says, you know, open the Red Bull app or download
00:07:44
◼
►
and open the Red Bull app or whatever the case may be.
00:07:46
◼
►
And I just think it's kind of funny.
00:07:47
◼
►
It's like, it's like Price is Right all over again.
00:07:49
◼
►
Like the, you know, the greatest trick the devil ever played was convincing, convincing
00:07:52
◼
►
us that Price is Right wasn't an hour long commercial.
00:07:54
◼
►
Well, it's a similar thing, right?
00:07:56
◼
►
Where this is, it's, it is cool, new, interesting content.
00:08:00
◼
►
And yet it's still also advertisements in part.
00:08:04
◼
►
Uh, there was a really good one on Porsche where they had, I forget the model, but like
00:08:08
◼
►
a particular, uh, early, early, early race car.
00:08:11
◼
►
And they showed a couple of videos of that, which was really neat.
00:08:14
◼
►
All of this was dated the 3rd of March, if I'm not mistaken.
00:08:17
◼
►
And the impression that Apple gave was that they would be doing regular content updates,
00:08:23
◼
►
just like they gave in February of 2024.
00:08:26
◼
►
When we got our vision pros, it is now the 12th of March and there's nothing new.
00:08:31
◼
►
I mean, I respect that they're trying in theory, but come on, you got a new app for it.
00:08:36
◼
►
Let's do it.
00:08:36
◼
►
Let's move more stuff, more stuff.
00:08:39
◼
►
That being said, and now I have Marco's attention.
00:08:41
◼
►
Uh, they have just announced either earlier today or yesterday, I forget as we record,
00:08:45
◼
►
but it doesn't matter.
00:08:46
◼
►
Uh, there's going to be a roughly 30 minute Metallica immersive special, uh, reading from,
00:08:53
◼
►
I believe their press release, this project marks a new foray into immersive technology
00:08:57
◼
►
using ultra high resolution, 180 degree video in spatial audio to give fans unprecedented access
00:09:02
◼
►
from vantage points as close up as the snake pit to wide angle views.
00:09:05
◼
►
It brings the live show to a whole new level.
00:09:08
◼
►
And to achieve this Apple built a custom stage plot featuring 14 immersive video cameras using
00:09:14
◼
►
a mix of stabilized cameras, cable suspended cameras, and a remote controlled camera dolly
00:09:19
◼
►
system that moved around the stage.
00:09:22
◼
►
Hello, sign me up.
00:09:24
◼
►
It continues filmed during our final M 72 stop.
00:09:27
◼
►
Oh, I'm sorry.
00:09:27
◼
►
This is from Metallica's website, isn't it?
00:09:29
◼
►
Uh, filmed during our final M 72 stop of 2024 Mexico city.
00:09:32
◼
►
It features, uh, full performances, whiplash one and hello, Hokies enter Sandman all captured
00:09:38
◼
►
exclusively in Apple immersive video.
00:09:42
◼
►
I want this in my life.
00:09:44
◼
►
I want it now.
00:09:45
◼
►
And as it turns out, it will be here this coming Friday as we record this.
00:09:47
◼
►
I am excited.
00:09:48
◼
►
Can we pirate it?
00:09:51
◼
►
Yeah, I, I, this is great.
00:09:54
◼
►
I think like, you know, we'll see what it, what I have some reservations.
00:09:57
◼
►
I mean, first of all, like, you know, okay, I'm not a huge Metallica fan, but like, fine.
00:10:01
◼
►
I actually want to see this because what I've been saying for months is concerts and events
00:10:06
◼
►
and theater and stuff like that in vision pro would be great.
00:10:09
◼
►
My, so on one hand, I'm very happy to see this.
00:10:13
◼
►
I am a little concerned about like, what choices did they make for production?
00:10:18
◼
►
Like how much jumping between cameras are we going to get?
00:10:21
◼
►
How much movement of the camera are we going to get?
00:10:23
◼
►
What I think I want is basically a fixed camera.
00:10:28
◼
►
Like from the perspective of being a little bit above a really good seat in the audience,
00:10:33
◼
►
like a, like a, you know, near the front of the stage, a little bit higher than the audience.
00:10:37
◼
►
So no one's heads in your way, but like, basically I want the experience of being there.
00:10:43
◼
►
And I think what they will probably end up doing for the most part is overproducing everything.
00:10:49
◼
►
Cause that's Apple style.
00:10:50
◼
►
Apple's very overproduced.
00:10:51
◼
►
Um, and I don't know, you know, how much creative control Metallica had versus Apple's usual
00:10:56
◼
►
production team.
00:10:57
◼
►
You know, we don't know the details, but I think this is a good step.
00:11:01
◼
►
It is, I laughed when I read that it was just three songs.
00:11:05
◼
►
I'm like, Oh, you're like another content snack, another demo, another trial.
00:11:10
◼
►
Like, come on, like do the whole concert.
00:11:14
◼
►
You set all that up for three songs.
00:11:17
◼
►
I could not agree more.
00:11:18
◼
►
That's a content snack is such a great turn of phrase for it.
00:11:21
◼
►
It's so incredibly true.
00:11:22
◼
►
After three songs, the audience actually wanted to see the show.
00:11:25
◼
►
They said, get these cameras out of here.
00:11:26
◼
►
It could be, but I just want to reiterate what Marco said though.
00:11:30
◼
►
Like some of my favorite stuff that I've seen in the vision pro is the, um, the, uh,
00:11:37
◼
►
concert for one, like the Alicia keys thing.
00:11:39
◼
►
And, uh, I think it was Raya Reva.
00:11:41
◼
►
I forget the, the artist's name, but, um, there was to, to Marco's point earlier, there
00:11:46
◼
►
was a little bit of hopping around with different camera angles and whatnot.
00:11:50
◼
►
However, what I really like about being immersive where you can pitch the camera for all intents
00:11:55
◼
►
and purposes is that if they're focusing on the drummer, but the bassist is just
00:12:00
◼
►
barely outside where you're looking right now, you know what you can do?
00:12:03
◼
►
You can turn your head.
00:12:04
◼
►
And as you turn your head, you can now look at the basis.
00:12:07
◼
►
You know what I mean?
00:12:07
◼
►
And so this is, as someone who is a concert film aficionado, one of the things that drives
00:12:13
◼
►
me bananas about concert films is that a lot of times either somebody's soloing or maybe
00:12:18
◼
►
some, and you want to focus on them or maybe, you know, the guitarist is soloing, but actually
00:12:23
◼
►
quietly in the background, that bassist is killing it.
00:12:26
◼
►
And I'd rather look at the bassist for a minute.
00:12:27
◼
►
You know what I mean?
00:12:28
◼
►
And this is where like the old DVD technology with like different camera angles.
00:12:31
◼
►
Do you remember that way back in the day?
00:12:33
◼
►
Did anybody ever actually use that besides the adult film industry?
00:12:37
◼
►
Phil Collins had, or I think it was Phil Collins.
00:12:39
◼
►
I want to say it was Phil Collins.
00:12:40
◼
►
People used it by accident probably by hitting a button on the remote.
00:12:42
◼
►
They didn't know what it did.
00:12:44
◼
►
That's so true.
00:12:44
◼
►
Uh, but anyways, but DVDs way back in the day, kids ask your parents, uh, DVDs way back in
00:12:48
◼
►
the day, a handful of them allowed for you to actually change the camera angle.
00:12:52
◼
►
And it was really neat.
00:12:53
◼
►
And so you kind of sort of get this, that same sort of thing here.
00:12:56
◼
►
And again, like Marco said a few moments ago, a live performance, be that music or stage or
00:13:03
◼
►
what have you, that is just screaming.
00:13:06
◼
►
May we please see this immersive video.
00:13:09
◼
►
And I don't know if I would go so far as to say, I agree with Marco on just give me a stationary
00:13:13
◼
►
camera and never move it.
00:13:14
◼
►
I think it's neat to be able to move or see different perspectives from time to time.
00:13:18
◼
►
But I wholeheartedly agree with Marco's implied point, or maybe you said it explicitly that
00:13:21
◼
►
I don't want to cut every three seconds.
00:13:23
◼
►
And some of the early Apple stuff, that's what it was, was a cut, cut, cut, cut.
00:13:28
◼
►
And by the time you get your bearings as to where your body feels like it is in 3D space,
00:13:32
◼
►
then suddenly you're on something else.
00:13:33
◼
►
You have to reorient yourself in a way that is kind of true in 2D, but much more dramatic
00:13:39
◼
►
And so all of that to say, I'm super duper excited.
00:13:42
◼
►
One of the first things I plan on doing Friday morning as someone who enjoys, I'm not a humongous
00:13:47
◼
►
Metallica fan, but I like Metallica a fair bit.
00:13:49
◼
►
And as a graduate of Virginia Tech, I need to love Enter Sandman.
00:13:53
◼
►
And if you're not familiar, don't worry about it.
00:13:55
◼
►
But suffice to say, I am real excited to try this on Friday.
00:13:58
◼
►
And I'm excited that, Marco, you might actually dust off your Vision Pro and try it too.
00:14:02
◼
►
I also, like I watch a lot of concert broadcasts, usually Fish, occasionally Goose,
00:14:06
◼
►
occasionally somebody else, but usually those two.
00:14:08
◼
►
And by the way, Goose is on fire on this tour.
00:14:14
◼
►
They've had some staffing changes in their percussion section over the last year, and I
00:14:19
◼
►
think they have ended up in a very good spot where not only, like, so the new drummer just
00:14:25
◼
►
is working his, but he never stops moving.
00:14:29
◼
►
You look at this guy in the video and you're like, how is he doing that for three hours?
00:14:34
◼
►
It's amazing.
00:14:36
◼
►
So, you know, this is like Taylor Swift level of athleticism required, like, you know, for
00:14:41
◼
►
this drummer to be doing what he's doing for as long as he's doing it.
00:14:43
◼
►
It's really impressive.
00:14:45
◼
►
So Goose, oh my God, they're on fire right now.
00:14:47
◼
►
Anyway, so when I watch a concert broadcast or a concert video, they do like switch around.
00:14:53
◼
►
You know, they'll usually be like, you know, live switching, like somebody will be directing
00:14:58
◼
►
the live broadcast, just like, you know, like a sports broadcast would be.
00:15:00
◼
►
There's like a director saying, all right, take camera three, take camera two.
00:15:04
◼
►
I don't think they ever go back and like really edit, you know, what switches they made for
00:15:09
◼
►
like the published video.
00:15:09
◼
►
So, you know, they're just kind of guessing, hey, right now the bass player is doing something
00:15:13
◼
►
We'll switch to him for a few, you know, a few seconds here and there.
00:15:15
◼
►
And now we'll go back to the guitar.
00:15:17
◼
►
Okay, let's take a wide shot to show the lights, whatever.
00:15:19
◼
►
So what you see is a bunch of like really close ups of the musicians that even if you
00:15:24
◼
►
were there in a front row seat, you wouldn't have that good of a view.
00:15:27
◼
►
And especially you'll see things like right behind the drummer or you'll see like a shot
00:15:33
◼
►
down to see like into the keyboard player where normally the keyboard player's keyboards are
00:15:37
◼
►
usually blocking the view from the audience of really seeing what the keyboard is doing.
00:15:41
◼
►
That kind of concert, that kind of concert filming technique with multiple cameras and
00:15:46
◼
►
switching between is actually very different and in some ways better than a view in person
00:15:52
◼
►
when you're actually there in a great seat for the concert.
00:15:54
◼
►
It's a really interesting thing and it's almost a different thing than being there in person.
00:15:59
◼
►
But when you are there in person, you are getting the experience that the band is actually
00:16:05
◼
►
creating and that their artistic team around them is creating like the lighting, the staging
00:16:09
◼
►
and if there's any background decoration or movement or screens or animations, you're
00:16:15
◼
►
getting that.
00:16:15
◼
►
Like in the sphere, you're getting that whole thing.
00:16:18
◼
►
That's a whole different thing.
00:16:19
◼
►
When you have a multi-cam live directed switched between kind of format that's being broadcast,
00:16:26
◼
►
that is a good thing in certain ways, but it is a different thing than attending the concert.
00:16:31
◼
►
And when you are just looking at your fixed view from the audience, you are getting the entire
00:16:37
◼
►
experience that they were trying to create at that time.
00:16:40
◼
►
You're getting the cool light show.
00:16:42
◼
►
You're getting like a little bit, you know, trippiness if you're in a jam band situation.
00:16:47
◼
►
Like you're getting, if there's, you know, if you're watching some kind of over-the-top
00:16:51
◼
►
rock band, there's like fire on the background.
00:16:52
◼
►
You're seeing that like as it's full-scale spectacle that it was meant to be seen at.
00:16:58
◼
►
I think if I'm watching something in an immersive video like this, I would rather have the audience
00:17:05
◼
►
experience because that's something that, you know, the multi-cam situation where you're
00:17:10
◼
►
seeing a quick close-up of the guitar, then quick close-up of the keyboard, then quick
00:17:13
◼
►
close-up of the drums.
00:17:14
◼
►
That, I think, is optimizing for what TV screens and computer screens are good at.
00:17:20
◼
►
Small, high-resolution screens that are not super immersive, that are not taking up your
00:17:25
◼
►
whole field of view, but they can display really, really great content at a smaller size.
00:17:29
◼
►
So you can zoom in.
00:17:30
◼
►
You can see, oh, look at that, like the way the light's reflecting off those strings.
00:17:33
◼
►
That's pretty cool or whatever.
00:17:34
◼
►
I didn't realize those fingers were moving that fast or, you know, whatever it is.
00:17:37
◼
►
In the Vision Pro, the immersive format, what it can offer, is the full experience of being
00:17:45
◼
►
there, and that's something that other screens can't do, and the Vision Pro can.
00:17:51
◼
►
Like, if you wanted to simulate what it's like to actually be in the sphere watching those
00:17:55
◼
►
cool animations at the ridiculous scale that they're at, you can largely do that with the
00:18:00
◼
►
You can't even come close.
00:18:01
◼
►
Like, I watched the videos later of some of the Phish shows that I saw at the sphere,
00:18:07
◼
►
and the videos were great, but it was nothing like being there, not even close, because they're
00:18:12
◼
►
trying to show what was an immersive performance in a rectangle in front of me, and it's just
00:18:18
◼
►
not possible.
00:18:18
◼
►
Like, it doesn't communicate it well.
00:18:20
◼
►
I hope that Apple will take advantage of what the Vision Pro can uniquely do here, which is
00:18:26
◼
►
show an immersive experience.
00:18:29
◼
►
Whatever, you know, Metallica snack they've made here, it sounds like it's probably going
00:18:33
◼
►
to be closer to, you know, the multicam kind of style.
00:18:37
◼
►
We'll see how it goes.
00:18:39
◼
►
I do think there's a place for that, but I hope that's not all they ever do.
00:18:43
◼
►
I hope what they really offer also is the audience perspective.
00:18:48
◼
►
Just give me a fixed perspective.
00:18:50
◼
►
There's so much potential there, because people go to live events because they're going to get
00:18:56
◼
►
that perspective when they go, and there's so many people who would love to enjoy live
00:19:00
◼
►
events who can't go, or the events already happened in the past, or whatever.
00:19:04
◼
►
Like, there's a huge market there.
00:19:07
◼
►
And so, again, I will again urge Apple, this is good.
00:19:11
◼
►
This is a start.
00:19:13
◼
►
There is so much more here to be taken advantage of, and I hope they do.
00:19:19
◼
►
We are sponsored this episode by Terminal.
00:19:21
◼
►
This is the wonderful e-ink display that I was talking about back in December that I bought
00:19:25
◼
►
myself before they were a sponsor.
00:19:27
◼
►
Now they're sponsoring our show.
00:19:29
◼
►
So this is what Terminal is.
00:19:30
◼
►
This is basically a small e-ink display with a nice white case or a black case that you can
00:19:36
◼
►
just stick on your desk or on your wall or in your kitchen or whatever, and it just displays
00:19:41
◼
►
ambient information.
00:19:42
◼
►
Now, because it's e-ink, it's not a glowing screen, so it looks great anywhere.
00:19:46
◼
►
It's very, you know, kind of, you know, non-intrusive visually, and it can display whatever you want.
00:19:52
◼
►
They have an entire gallery of what they call recipes for displaying stuff from different
00:19:56
◼
►
So, of course, you can have the basics, clocks, weather, calendars.
00:20:00
◼
►
I have a countdown to the day the restaurant's opening, plus weather, and plus quotes from the
00:20:04
◼
►
office online.
00:20:05
◼
►
All of those were already in their recipe gallery for that, like, there's thousands of
00:20:09
◼
►
things people have made for this.
00:20:10
◼
►
So you probably don't even have to make your own.
00:20:12
◼
►
But if you want to make your own, you can.
00:20:14
◼
►
There's a whole open, easy API for this, and it's super easy to use.
00:20:19
◼
►
I personally haven't, but I know Casey was looking at that.
00:20:21
◼
►
And it's just, there's so much going on here.
00:20:23
◼
►
They have an unbrickable pledge, which means if they ever go out of business, they open source
00:20:27
◼
►
all their code.
00:20:28
◼
►
You don't even have to use their infrastructure if you don't want to.
00:20:30
◼
►
Like, they have a really great setup there.
00:20:32
◼
►
And I love that it looks nice enough to pass the historical commission restrictions in most
00:20:39
◼
►
households, I would say, at least according to data from the ATP hosts here.
00:20:43
◼
►
So I love the Terminal.
00:20:45
◼
►
It's a great looking product.
00:20:46
◼
►
It works well.
00:20:47
◼
►
You can hack it a bunch, or if you don't want to, or you don't have time, you can just use
00:20:51
◼
►
what they have built in, and it's fantastic.
00:20:53
◼
►
So check it out today.
00:20:56
◼
►
And with this promo code, use code ATPFM for $15 off.
00:21:02
◼
►
Terminal, it's T-R-M-N-L.
00:21:04
◼
►
So basically, Terminal with no vowels in it.
00:21:06
◼
►
Delete all the vowels.
00:21:06
◼
►
So the domain name is useterminal.com and use code ATPFM for $15 off.
00:21:13
◼
►
Thank you so much to Terminal for just being awesome and for sponsoring our show.
00:21:21
◼
►
All right, let's talk iPad Air.
00:21:22
◼
►
Apparently, the 2x base thing was a false alarm.
00:21:27
◼
►
Tell me about this, John.
00:21:27
◼
►
Yeah, that was something I mentioned.
00:21:29
◼
►
The Mac rumors had said that the iPad Air 13-inch is missing the 2x base feature that the previous
00:21:34
◼
►
version had.
00:21:34
◼
►
But apparently, that story has been pulled.
00:21:36
◼
►
I don't know why they didn't just update it and put a retraction on it on Mac rumors or
00:21:40
◼
►
But it seems like it was just a false alarm.
00:21:42
◼
►
So in case anyone was worried that the 13-inch Air has a regression in this way, it seems like
00:21:46
◼
►
Additionally, we had some feedback with regard to the appeal of the iPad Air because, you
00:21:50
◼
►
know, the three of us were kind of scratching our heads saying, why?
00:21:53
◼
►
And John Spurlock wrote in and said, one reason I'm glad the iPad Air exists and just ordered
00:21:59
◼
►
one is the larger screen size.
00:22:00
◼
►
I use mine mostly for music, like sheet music, and the 13-inch makes a huge difference, as does
00:22:05
◼
►
the $550 savings versus a similar iPad Pro.
00:22:09
◼
►
It's because there is no 13-inch regular iPad.
00:22:11
◼
►
That's the point there.
00:22:12
◼
►
If you want a 13-inch, it's great that the Air exists because otherwise you'd have to buy
00:22:16
◼
►
a Pro and they're really expensive at any size, and the 13-inch one even more so.
00:22:20
◼
►
Ryan Manley writes, I was a big iPad Pro guy.
00:22:23
◼
►
I've had three big ones and one small one.
00:22:25
◼
►
I went to the M2 iPad Air last year mostly because I wanted the blue one.
00:22:28
◼
►
I'm literal proof that colors drive buying decisions.
00:22:32
◼
►
And yes, Face ID is the biggest thing I miss.
00:22:34
◼
►
Are you listening, lack of colors are, at Apple?
00:22:37
◼
►
Can we please, please have colors, please, pretty please?
00:22:41
◼
►
Yeah, especially, man, like now that we're seeing all the iPad or the MacBook Air reviews
00:22:45
◼
►
of Sky Blue, which is just bluish silver.
00:22:48
◼
►
Like, oh man, what a missed opportunity.
00:22:52
◼
►
Oh, like an actual Sky Blue one?
00:22:54
◼
►
That would be amazing.
00:22:55
◼
►
I currently drive a Sky Blue car.
00:22:57
◼
►
Like, that would be great.
00:22:58
◼
►
That would look awesome.
00:22:59
◼
►
And it seems like they just didn't do it.
00:23:03
◼
►
I don't know why.
00:23:04
◼
►
I wish, oh, please, Apple, sometime soon, maybe the M5 generation, give me cellular nanotexture
00:23:12
◼
►
and a color that's actually a color.
00:23:15
◼
►
That would be amazing.
00:23:16
◼
►
And again, and I think this is an important feedback from Ryan here.
00:23:19
◼
►
Like, people often make buying decisions based solely or significantly on visual appeal, colors,
00:23:30
◼
►
I, we know, we know people, sometimes we have been people who have bought a new Apple
00:23:35
◼
►
thing, mostly because, you know, we wanted it.
00:23:39
◼
►
And why do we want it?
00:23:39
◼
►
Sometimes we wanted it because it was a cool color or a new color.
00:23:43
◼
►
Like, you know, something cool, like anything, just give us anything.
00:23:47
◼
►
A, it doesn't, I'm not saying every color has to be bold.
00:23:51
◼
►
I'm saying make any color bold.
00:23:53
◼
►
Give us one.
00:23:56
◼
►
You know, I, I, you know, we bought Aaron's car like nine months ago or something like that.
00:24:01
◼
►
And we were trying to find a car that we wanted.
00:24:03
◼
►
And I will give you one guess.
00:24:05
◼
►
And we worked with several different dealers during the time.
00:24:07
◼
►
And I'll give you one guess what each dealer's first question was, you know, at, well, after,
00:24:11
◼
►
you know, what are you looking for in terms of like what model, what color do you want?
00:24:15
◼
►
Which shade of silver do you want?
00:24:17
◼
►
Pretty much.
00:24:18
◼
►
But that is almost always the first question.
00:24:20
◼
►
And then a friend of mine was looking for an F-150 Lightning, actually, and he ended up just
00:24:25
◼
►
getting one.
00:24:25
◼
►
It's a really nice truck, although I'm not a truck person.
00:24:27
◼
►
But anyways, you know, as I was kind of living vicariously through him and because I enjoy buying
00:24:32
◼
►
cars with other people's money.
00:24:33
◼
►
And, you know, oftentimes the question was, what color do you want?
00:24:36
◼
►
And I feel like it's not an apples to apples comparison between a car and a computer.
00:24:42
◼
►
Well, unless you're John buying a $15,000 computer.
00:24:44
◼
►
But nevertheless, you know, it's still important to your point, Marco, that it makes a big difference.
00:24:51
◼
►
And, you know, my M3 Max MacBook Pro that I'm talking to you through right now, I feel like
00:24:57
◼
►
it was time for me to upgrade and update anyway last year, two years ago, whatever it was.
00:25:01
◼
►
But I definitely insta-bought when I saw that there was that, you know, deep, deep black, which
00:25:06
◼
►
granted is not a bold, vibrant color, but it just had such nostalgia for that black book that I wanted
00:25:11
◼
►
so badly back in 2008 or thereabouts that I had to have it.
00:25:15
◼
►
And granted, I'm kind of, you know, taking the wind out of my own sails when I'm talking about black.
00:25:18
◼
►
But the same thing would be true.
00:25:20
◼
►
If there was like a vibrant blue, I'd probably rock one.
00:25:23
◼
►
And certainly, if not in the Mac, which maybe I'd be a little more conservative with the
00:25:27
◼
►
computer, you bet your bottom that I would 100% rock a very bold blue iPhone.
00:25:33
◼
►
And a few years ago, I think it was 13 or thereabouts, we had a reasonably decent blue iPhone Pro.
00:25:40
◼
►
And I recently gave that to Declan as a, you know, phone without service to use as like
00:25:45
◼
►
a noisemaker at night and whatnot.
00:25:46
◼
►
And man, everything, every time I look at that thing, I'm just, oh man, I miss that blue.
00:25:50
◼
►
I miss that blue so much.
00:25:52
◼
►
And in defense of the, you know, the current black color on the MacBook Pros, the reason
00:25:58
◼
►
why people went nuts for that is because it was new and it was, and it was extreme or it
00:26:06
◼
►
was more extreme than like before that we had silver.
00:26:10
◼
►
And silver is, you know, aluminum, great.
00:26:15
◼
►
That's the color I usually get.
00:26:16
◼
►
Space gray was just darker.
00:26:18
◼
►
It was just like, do you want light gray or medium gray?
00:26:23
◼
►
The new, you know, whatever they're calling this gray is a much darker gray.
00:26:28
◼
►
It's not black, but it's very, it's much closer to black.
00:26:31
◼
►
And so it was, for the first time, it was like, oh, finally, like a, a bold, a more bold
00:26:36
◼
►
choice exists besides these two kind of just lukewarm, do you want this kind of lukewarm
00:26:43
◼
►
thing or that kind of lukewarm thing?
00:26:45
◼
►
The MacBook Air is now available in one bold color, which is that the super dark navy blue,
00:26:51
◼
►
almost black.
00:26:53
◼
►
And then three just total bland, milquetoast, Tim Cook roommates chat kind of colors, like
00:27:01
◼
►
just the most boring, bland, like we are afraid to express anything whatsoever with our color
00:27:07
◼
►
Like just, and there's three of them.
00:27:09
◼
►
Like I understand as, as I think we'll get to many people want to and choose to buy the
00:27:15
◼
►
boring colors.
00:27:16
◼
►
That's why the iMac is offered in silver, even though it's also offered in all those
00:27:20
◼
►
other colors, but they offer it in other colors too, for people who want color in their life.
00:27:27
◼
►
Why would a company whose logo was a rainbow for so long, why would they want to offer color
00:27:35
◼
►
in their products?
00:27:35
◼
►
Because it's nice and people buy them and people love it.
00:27:40
◼
►
And it makes people happy and it adds some emotional appeal to what is otherwise your work
00:27:45
◼
►
computer or whatever.
00:27:46
◼
►
Like it gives people some fun in these tools that are just machines.
00:27:50
◼
►
Otherwise, Apple has not shied away from colors across their product lines forever.
00:27:56
◼
►
They're actually really good at colors.
00:27:58
◼
►
When they choose to do real colors, they do a great job.
00:28:03
◼
►
And doing colored aluminum, they've been doing it since the iPod mini.
00:28:10
◼
►
Like it's been a long time.
00:28:12
◼
►
They've, they know how to make good colored aluminum in all sorts of different colors, saturated
00:28:18
◼
►
colors, pastels.
00:28:19
◼
►
I think they can, they do a really good job when they do it.
00:28:22
◼
►
So they have the resources, they have the ability, they have the talent to pick good colors.
00:28:29
◼
►
Use it, give us something, some option, because we keep hearing from people who could buy the
00:28:38
◼
►
more expensive pro version of an iPhone or a Mac and they don't, they get the smaller,
00:28:43
◼
►
you know, more consumer branded one or whatever because it's available in more colors than gray,
00:28:48
◼
►
gray and gray.
00:28:49
◼
►
Use that enthusiasm and you can actually upsell people.
00:28:53
◼
►
You could even like Apple and they actually have done this in the past.
00:28:57
◼
►
They could even have like, you know, the cheapest configuration only available in silver, gray,
00:29:03
◼
►
gray and gray.
00:29:04
◼
►
And then they can have like the next step up.
00:29:06
◼
►
That's, I think the iMac used to be this way.
00:29:08
◼
►
I think it, I'm not sure if the current generation is, but the M1 generation was like this.
00:29:11
◼
►
Then the step up, like the mid, the mid tier specs, that one's available in three more colors
00:29:16
◼
►
or whatever.
00:29:17
◼
►
Like they can do stuff like that.
00:29:18
◼
►
There's so many ways to do this that would work out better for everybody.
00:29:22
◼
►
So just come on, color, bring color back to the world.
00:29:25
◼
►
We, trust me, we need it right now.
00:29:27
◼
►
Like the world could use some, please, for the love of God, bring color back.
00:29:32
◼
►
Matt Ripito writes with regard to your question, Marco, about portrait only iPad apps.
00:29:38
◼
►
Would you actually, would you mind just recapping what the query was from, from you last week?
00:29:43
◼
►
Yeah, so basically I'd said last week, one of the things I'd gone through with the restaurant
00:29:45
◼
►
was I had an iPad set up to play music and, and run the app for the mixer to control volume
00:29:51
◼
►
And the mixers app would only run in portrait on iOS.
00:29:56
◼
►
It's, it's not an iPhone only app.
00:29:57
◼
►
It was an iPad native build, but it would only run in portrait.
00:30:00
◼
►
And the problem was, I'm like, I, I couldn't find any way for iPad OS on any sized iPad, even
00:30:07
◼
►
on a big one to run two portrait only apps side by side with the iPad physically in landscape.
00:30:13
◼
►
But I figured by this point, like the screens are so big now, maybe they can do that.
00:30:16
◼
►
And it turns out I could not find a way.
00:30:18
◼
►
Well, Matt Ripito and many other people have actually written in to point out that it turns
00:30:24
◼
►
out you can actually run two portrait only iPad apps in landscape side by side using stage
00:30:32
◼
►
manager, which is something I didn't even think of.
00:30:35
◼
►
I figured stage manager would have the same restrictions, but it turns out it doesn't.
00:30:39
◼
►
So this is both helpful in the sense that great, I can actually do this.
00:30:43
◼
►
I think I haven't actually tried it, but I can do it.
00:30:46
◼
►
Apparently a lot of people are going to say this, but I don't think I will do it because
00:30:51
◼
►
this is an iPad that's that again, this is being used by all the bartenders, all the staff
00:30:56
◼
►
who are working back there.
00:30:57
◼
►
They're not all going to be iPad experts.
00:30:59
◼
►
I think the stage manager environment and the little like, what if it gets swapped or
00:31:06
◼
►
what if it gets disabled or what if, you know, a different app gets pulled up and then that
00:31:11
◼
►
scene is messed up?
00:31:12
◼
►
Like, can I trust people who are not iPad power users to be able to use stage manager and like
00:31:19
◼
►
put it back?
00:31:20
◼
►
I don't know.
00:31:21
◼
►
I don't know if I want to take that risk.
00:31:23
◼
►
I wonder if you could automate this with shortcuts.
00:31:25
◼
►
I genuinely don't know.
00:31:27
◼
►
Let's make it even more complicated.
00:31:29
◼
►
Well, didn't you already buy the iPad mini though?
00:31:32
◼
►
Like, isn't this kind of the ship is going to sail there?
00:31:34
◼
►
So you'd have to like return the iPad mini or find another use for it to buy a bigger
00:31:37
◼
►
But like, yeah, this is, you know, this is the problem with iPad OS.
00:31:40
◼
►
We've talked about it many times.
00:31:41
◼
►
You really want to build something complicated out of a set of understandable building blocks.
00:31:47
◼
►
Like if I asked you on your Mac, can you put two windows side by side?
00:31:50
◼
►
You'd say, yeah, because you learned long ago how to move windows around on your Mac and
00:31:54
◼
►
how to resize them.
00:31:54
◼
►
And using those basic tools of like window controls and resizing and moving and dragging,
00:31:59
◼
►
despite the fact that Mac apps continue to try to make the title bar disappear or make
00:32:04
◼
►
it difficult, like try grabbing the top of your Chrome window.
00:32:06
◼
►
But anyway, because the fundamental building blocks of manipulating windows on the Mac are
00:32:13
◼
►
simple to understand and learn and are incredibly flexible.
00:32:16
◼
►
Almost anybody can take two windows and put the side by side.
00:32:19
◼
►
Maybe they don't know about the cool shortcuts with like where you can tile them and blah,
00:32:22
◼
►
But they don't need to know those shortcuts.
00:32:24
◼
►
They know what windows are.
00:32:25
◼
►
They can see them.
00:32:26
◼
►
They can move them.
00:32:27
◼
►
Chances are good to be able to recover.
00:32:29
◼
►
But the instructions for doing it in stage manager highlight how that is not the case
00:32:34
◼
►
on the iPad.
00:32:34
◼
►
First of all, Marco couldn't discover it, which I mean, granted, he didn't even think of stage
00:32:37
◼
►
manager, which is itself its own problem of this weird mode.
00:32:40
◼
►
But second, even if you had said, let me try stage manager, would you have tried this?
00:32:44
◼
►
Fabian wrote in with an example video.
00:32:46
◼
►
He says, here's an example with Monument Valley 3, which is an iPad native portrait only app
00:32:51
◼
►
and Nintendo music and iPhone app running in iPad compatibility mode.
00:32:54
◼
►
After activating stage manager, launch app A, locate app B via the dock app library or spotlight,
00:33:00
◼
►
hold down the shift key and tap on app B.
00:33:02
◼
►
If you don't have a keyboard, hold down the icon of app B and drag it onto the quote stage.
00:33:07
◼
►
Like, no one's going to figure this out.
00:33:08
◼
►
It's way too complicated.
00:33:09
◼
►
And for what?
00:33:10
◼
►
To what end?
00:33:11
◼
►
What does this complexity give you the ability to do?
00:33:14
◼
►
It gives you the ability to do a very finite, limited subset of what you can do by simply
00:33:19
◼
►
moving windows around.
00:33:21
◼
►
Like, it's just, it's madness.
00:33:22
◼
►
So, we don't want to rehash everything about iPad or us being a problem, but it's a problem.
00:33:27
◼
►
Going back to colors for a minute, Yossi Kanner writes,
00:33:30
◼
►
tech pundits love to complain that Apple doesn't make devices with real colors, yet it seems
00:33:34
◼
►
people actually buy the plain black or silver option.
00:33:37
◼
►
I had an iPhone 12 mini and a 13 pro in blue colors.
00:33:40
◼
►
They came in and hated them.
00:33:42
◼
►
Since then, I've gone back to the more neutral colors and much happier.
00:33:44
◼
►
Now, granted, there isn't much color in Apple's current lineup, but choosing to get a
00:33:47
◼
►
colorful iPhone or iPad is a much bigger decision than, say, getting a colorful case.
00:33:51
◼
►
I think Apple's making the right choice here.
00:33:53
◼
►
Yossi, I appreciate you, your feedback, but you are wrong.
00:33:56
◼
►
I want a colorful phone.
00:33:58
◼
►
So, this is, this is a, it's not a, this is not a either or situation.
00:34:02
◼
►
No, you're right.
00:34:02
◼
►
You're right.
00:34:03
◼
►
In every case, everyone out of Kanner for Color says, of course, they should continue
00:34:07
◼
►
to make a neutral color or maybe multiple neutral colors because that is probably,
00:34:11
◼
►
That's what most people will buy, right?
00:34:13
◼
►
But that's like, again, not, not every product will be your best selling product.
00:34:17
◼
►
Not every color will be your best selling color, right?
00:34:19
◼
►
You put the color in for excitement, right?
00:34:21
◼
►
A lot of, you know, cars are the best example.
00:34:23
◼
►
I mean, you guys were talking about a bunch of things, but like cars are like the second
00:34:26
◼
►
most expensive things most people will ever buy next to their house if they ever own a
00:34:29
◼
►
house, right?
00:34:29
◼
►
And cars are purchased massively based on their appearance, which doesn't make sense.
00:34:35
◼
►
You're like, oh, with something so as expensive as a computer, do I care how it looks?
00:34:37
◼
►
Are you kidding?
00:34:38
◼
►
The two most expensive things people buy, cars and homes, are purchased so much based on their
00:34:45
◼
►
It's ridiculous.
00:34:45
◼
►
It's almost as if the more expensive things get, the more we buy based on how it looks,
00:34:50
◼
►
not less, right?
00:34:51
◼
►
So there's no argument to be made that you shouldn't, you know, make these fancy colors
00:34:55
◼
►
because people will just pick the neutral ones.
00:34:57
◼
►
It gets them in the showroom, right?
00:34:59
◼
►
Like they're not even going to buy that car, but they want to come and see it because it's
00:35:02
◼
►
shiny and red or the car they're going to get is silver, but they want to look at the
00:35:04
◼
►
cool red one, right?
00:35:05
◼
►
Or you want to go into the neighborhood with the fancy houses, even though you're not going
00:35:08
◼
►
to buy one of those, but you want to buy one next to it so you can look at the
00:35:10
◼
►
fancy house.
00:35:12
◼
►
Most people are going to buy the neutral colors.
00:35:13
◼
►
They should always offer the neutral colors.
00:35:15
◼
►
Look at the iMac.
00:35:16
◼
►
It comes in a huge range of really nice colors and there's just one neutral color and that
00:35:20
◼
►
one neutral color is enough because that neutral color is fine.
00:35:23
◼
►
And if you want an iMac that is neutral and won't clash with your decor, there's one for
00:35:29
◼
►
Like it's, this is not, this is not a problem that needs to be solved.
00:35:32
◼
►
It's not like they shouldn't offer colors because most people will not buy them.
00:35:35
◼
►
That's why they should offer them.
00:35:36
◼
►
Most people won't buy them, offer them anyway to get people in the door and to get people
00:35:40
◼
►
Well, and also like I, I, we hear this argument a lot whenever, whenever we are basically advocating
00:35:46
◼
►
for something that is not going to be Apple's largest seller of its category or whatever.
00:35:51
◼
►
And we always hear people trying to excuse Apple's logistics and be like, well, look, they
00:35:56
◼
►
don't want to keep that many SKUs or like, well, no, not, not, not a lot of people buy
00:36:01
◼
►
You know, there, there's a lot of degrees of, of precision or ratios here that matter.
00:36:06
◼
►
Like, okay, not a lot of people.
00:36:08
◼
►
What does that mean?
00:36:08
◼
►
Like, do more people buy a theoretical, you know, orange MacBook air than would buy the
00:36:14
◼
►
Mac pro probably, but they still have the Mac pro.
00:36:19
◼
►
I was going to say, well, you were talking about like, Oh, bring us color in your life.
00:36:22
◼
►
I'm thinking, well, you know, the next product due to be updated is ever ready for a, you know,
00:36:26
◼
►
a lime green gigantic cheese grater.
00:36:29
◼
►
I mean, but, but seriously, like if you look at, if you use that logic of like, well,
00:36:34
◼
►
they shouldn't, they shouldn't make things that most people won't buy or that most people
00:36:39
◼
►
don't need, you know, quote need.
00:36:41
◼
►
Well then they should only make the silver MacBook air and no other max.
00:36:45
◼
►
Like by that logic, why do any of these other models exist?
00:36:49
◼
►
Most people use the silver MacBook air.
00:36:52
◼
►
Then just make that by these, like that, of course the logic makes no sense.
00:36:56
◼
►
You, you have more options for lots of reasons and enough people buy them to make them worth
00:37:02
◼
►
Like it doesn't take that many people to buy something at Apple scale for it to be worth
00:37:07
◼
►
making in a certain configuration.
00:37:08
◼
►
And even if it isn't worth making on its own, you still have to make it the same reason they
00:37:12
◼
►
make all those other computers and stuff, because you need to have a diversified product line
00:37:16
◼
►
that people feel confident in.
00:37:17
◼
►
So even if they're going to buy the silver MacBook air, they feel more comfortable buying that
00:37:21
◼
►
knowing that there's an entire line of Mac laptops that covers all their needs, as opposed
00:37:26
◼
►
to like, Oh, I was going to buy a laptop, but that company only makes one.
00:37:29
◼
►
And I'm worried about getting entrenched in the Apple ecosystem considering they only make
00:37:33
◼
►
And what if my needs ever don't fit within that one laptop doesn't make you confident.
00:37:36
◼
►
Like you have to diversify your product lines.
00:37:38
◼
►
We've talked about how diversified should they be, you know, with respect to the iPhone, how
00:37:42
◼
►
many iPhones is enough iPhones to cover the market and the same thing with Macs or whatever.
00:37:46
◼
►
But the answer is never just make the one or two that are the most popular.
00:37:50
◼
►
That's even, even if every single one, except for the one or two most popular loses money,
00:37:54
◼
►
you should still do it because overall you will make more money by having a full featured product
00:37:58
◼
►
line that gives people confidence.
00:37:59
◼
►
Speaking of the MacBook air, the M4 MacBook air has a new mute button icon.
00:38:04
◼
►
The F10 key, instead of being the outline of a speaker, it's now the outline of a speaker
00:38:10
◼
►
with a slash through it.
00:38:11
◼
►
And I may sound like I'm snarking, but actually I do think this is an improvement.
00:38:15
◼
►
This is definitely an improvement.
00:38:16
◼
►
I very frequently find myself like having to double take to make a second glance because
00:38:20
◼
►
I have the same key caps on my keyboard.
00:38:22
◼
►
I think all the Apple ones do to make a second glance to see like the F11 has got the little
00:38:27
◼
►
the little sound wave coming out, distinguish it from, you know.
00:38:30
◼
►
So anyway, hopefully this is a trend that will ripple across all their keyboards.
00:38:33
◼
►
But yeah, good improvement.
00:38:36
◼
►
It gets my stamp of approval.
00:38:39
◼
►
With regard to the quote unquote Hydra chip in ATP 562.
00:38:43
◼
►
Do you have a dragon?
00:38:44
◼
►
Apparently we discussed and linked to, I do remember actually this interview, a Johnny
00:38:48
◼
►
Surugi interview from July, 2023, in which he was asked in so many words, what are the
00:38:53
◼
►
next challenges and processors that Apple should tackle to get to the real next generation of
00:38:58
◼
►
His answer after disclaiming about future products and blah, blah, blah, was basically one of the
00:39:03
◼
►
things that is going to be important is packaging.
00:39:06
◼
►
So this relates to the Hydra H-I-D-R-A chip because some people think that it should be pronounced
00:39:13
◼
►
And then people like to remind you that the mythical beast, the Hydra from mythology is a
00:39:17
◼
►
multi-headed creature.
00:39:18
◼
►
I think if you caught off one of the heads to grow back or whatever.
00:39:21
◼
►
Oh, doesn't this sound like packaging is interesting, multi-headed beast, M4 Extreme chip, it's not
00:39:27
◼
►
going to be an M4 Ultra for the Mac Pro, could use one of TSMC's various new technologies for
00:39:32
◼
►
doing what AMD calls chiplets or whatever, various like multiple independently manufactured chips
00:39:39
◼
►
combining into a larger thing for a super mega chip for the Mac Pro.
00:39:44
◼
►
That all sounds well and good and I'm certainly rooting for the M4 Extreme type thing to come
00:39:50
◼
►
in the Mac Pro, but I don't actually know if H-I-D-R-A is an alternate spelling of the mythical
00:39:57
◼
►
Hydra because that Hydra is with an H-Y every place that I've seen it.
00:40:00
◼
►
And also there is at least one thing called H-I-D-R-A, which is an island in Norway or something.
00:40:06
◼
►
So codenames are weird.
00:40:08
◼
►
This codename could be about the island in Norway.
00:40:13
◼
►
It could be about the multi-headed beast.
00:40:14
◼
►
It could be an intentionally misspelled version of the multi-headed beast or it could be something
00:40:17
◼
►
else entirely.
00:40:18
◼
►
But I just want to throw that out there because so many people said, you dummy, Hydra, it's
00:40:23
◼
►
a multi-headed beast, M4 Extreme confirmed.
00:40:25
◼
►
I hope you're right, but I don't know if the codename has anything to do with that.
00:40:31
◼
►
Mark Gurman writes with regard to the M4 Ultra and Hydra, Apple's Ultra processors have always
00:40:38
◼
►
been developed by fusing two Macs chips together to double the performance across the
00:40:42
◼
►
system that requires a so-called Ultra fusion interconnect system.
00:40:46
◼
►
The M3 Max has that feature while the M4 Max does not.
00:40:49
◼
►
Let's pause a second here.
00:40:51
◼
►
This is the second thing that I've read, one translated for French that is flat out stated
00:40:56
◼
►
that the M4 Max does not have an interposer on it.
00:40:59
◼
►
What are they basing this on?
00:41:01
◼
►
Does Gurman have a D-lidded M4 Max that he's looking at?
00:41:05
◼
►
Does someone have die shots of the M4 Max that shows it's not there?
00:41:08
◼
►
I don't know.
00:41:10
◼
►
It's frustrating me that this has just been, and now it's just like asserted as truth.
00:41:13
◼
►
And second, the M4 Max has it?
00:41:16
◼
►
Last time I saw any die shots of the M3 Max, sorry, the M3 Max, any die shots of the M3 Max,
00:41:21
◼
►
it was in the context of a story of someone saying, hey, look, no interposer on the M3 Max.
00:41:25
◼
►
And again, I said, did they just crop the picture and it's there or is it not there?
00:41:30
◼
►
No answer, please.
00:41:31
◼
►
I wish I could fix this myself.
00:41:32
◼
►
I don't have these chips.
00:41:33
◼
►
I don't have the equipment.
00:41:34
◼
►
I can't do it.
00:41:34
◼
►
Somebody out there, like, and I Google search for it so much, but just try Google searching
00:41:40
◼
►
for M3 space M-A-X, die shot, like, but just, it's impossible.
00:41:45
◼
►
Like, I can't, it's all just so much garbage in the search results.
00:41:48
◼
►
I can't find it anywhere.
00:41:49
◼
►
So please, I would love for someone to actually determine if any of this is true.
00:41:53
◼
►
Gurman, you can't just say the M4 Max doesn't have an interposer.
00:41:55
◼
►
Did Apple confirm that?
00:41:57
◼
►
Then tell me that Apple confirmed it to you.
00:41:59
◼
►
And, and again, I will reiterate, even if the M4 Max doesn't have an interposer, maybe
00:42:03
◼
►
the M3 Max didn't either.
00:42:04
◼
►
But when they manufactured the ones that are going to do for the Ultra, they put it on there
00:42:08
◼
►
because it's a different chip because it's got Thunderbolt 5 and all sorts of other stuff.
00:42:11
◼
►
Anyway, this just annoys me.
00:42:14
◼
►
Gurman continues, though I previously speculated that Apple might have used the M3 Ultra to differentiate
00:42:20
◼
►
from a future M4 Ultra Mac Pro.
00:42:23
◼
►
That now seems less likely given the lack of Ultra Fusion development.
00:42:27
◼
►
An M3 Ultra refresh for the Mac Pro or a future M5 Ultra, if that generation gets this interconnect
00:42:32
◼
►
capability, is more plausible.
00:42:34
◼
►
The main benefits of the Mac Pro are PCIe expandability and extra ports, hardly enough to be a true
00:42:39
◼
►
differentiator for 99.99% of people.
00:42:42
◼
►
Apple knows this and its marketing team was dismayed when a higher end extreme chip with double the
00:42:47
◼
►
performance of the Ultra processors was nixed years ago.
00:42:49
◼
►
That would have given the premium price more of a justification.
00:42:52
◼
►
I put this part in here because I like the idea of the marketing team at Apple having so much
00:43:00
◼
►
influence over the company and sway over the products that it's a disappointment that there
00:43:05
◼
►
was no good chip in the Mac Pro could actually influence product design.
00:43:08
◼
►
And that may sound ridiculous if you're from a company where you're like, well, we make the
00:43:11
◼
►
product and the marketing team sells it.
00:43:13
◼
►
But my vague impression with the little knowledge I have about inside of Apple is that actually
00:43:18
◼
►
the marketing team or the product marketing team is surprisingly powerful within the company.
00:43:23
◼
►
So I really hope this is true.
00:43:25
◼
►
I really hope the marketing team was dismayed.
00:43:28
◼
►
I was dismayed.
00:43:29
◼
►
A lot of people were dismayed.
00:43:30
◼
►
I hope the marketing team is like, how are we going to sell this?
00:43:32
◼
►
It's a Mac mini in a giant case.
00:43:34
◼
►
And, you know, everyone just shrugs.
00:43:36
◼
►
So, again, fingers crossed M4 Extreme WWDC 2025.
00:43:40
◼
►
What did you call it last week, Marco?
00:43:42
◼
►
A breakout box for the studio?
00:43:44
◼
►
It's not even a breakout box.
00:43:45
◼
►
It's in the same box.
00:43:46
◼
►
Yeah, it's a PCI Express enclosure for the Mac Studio.
00:43:50
◼
►
I mean, it's a PCI Express hotel.
00:43:53
◼
►
And certainly, you know, if the plan is indeed for the Mac Pro to get some kind of extreme chip
00:43:59
◼
►
that the studio doesn't get or can't fit or whatever, that would kind of explain.
00:44:05
◼
►
Because, like, when you look at the Mac Pro now, it does kind of look like a seat filler.
00:44:10
◼
►
It's like this is a role that Apple wants to, ostensibly wants to keep serving.
00:44:16
◼
►
And here is a computer that sort of serves it.
00:44:19
◼
►
That exists and is not Intel.
00:44:22
◼
►
Which is an important feature.
00:44:23
◼
►
It sort of serves this role.
00:44:24
◼
►
But, like, it does kind of, like, the current Mac Pro does not differentiate itself enough
00:44:30
◼
►
from Mac Studio except for a very, very, very small market of people who happen to use PCI
00:44:36
◼
►
slots but not GPUs in those PCI slots.
00:44:39
◼
►
Like, so, like, that is a market, but it's not a very big market.
00:44:42
◼
►
And so, if they also are able to, you know, have a bigger extreme chip that could then presumably
00:44:51
◼
►
also not only have better performance and maybe, you know, better GPU grunt, but also presumably
00:44:56
◼
►
could address more RAM and have, you know, higher resource ceilings, more Thunderbolt bandwidth
00:45:00
◼
►
and, you know, all the other things that you get from having more of these chips, that would
00:45:05
◼
►
help differentiate it.
00:45:06
◼
►
Because then people like John, who just need a bunch of processor or GPU grunt, who won't
00:45:13
◼
►
fill the PCI slots, you know, that becomes served.
00:45:16
◼
►
And now there's only one John, and even he wouldn't buy this because it'll probably be
00:45:20
◼
►
But there's, like, scientific computing.
00:45:22
◼
►
There's AI research and training and stuff like that where, like, anything where you're
00:45:27
◼
►
working with huge amounts of memory, huge data sets, big throughput.
00:45:30
◼
►
Like, there are industries and uses for what would be a theoretical, like, extreme quad chip
00:45:38
◼
►
and the resources that would presumably go along with it.
00:45:40
◼
►
Again, these are not massive markets, but they're profitable, and certainly Apple itself would
00:45:47
◼
►
probably use them.
00:45:49
◼
►
So, you know, there's lots of reasons for them to make a computer like that.
00:45:52
◼
►
And again, it does seem like the current Mac Pro is basically a benchwarmer waiting for
00:45:56
◼
►
a better one to come out that is more differentiated above the studio.
00:46:00
◼
►
If that is the case, granted, this is wishful thinking.
00:46:03
◼
►
You know, this is wishful rumor casting, like, we, or wish casting, I guess people call it.
00:46:08
◼
►
Like, we want this to be true.
00:46:10
◼
►
So it kind of makes us believe the rumors more.
00:46:12
◼
►
But I do hope that the Mac Pro isn't just what we see today.
00:46:17
◼
►
I hope that they do actually make the extreme version at some point.
00:46:21
◼
►
And maybe not every CPU generation, you know, we'll see about that.
00:46:24
◼
►
I will say, though, when it comes to that performance, when we get into the next item
00:46:30
◼
►
about the M3 Ultra benchmarks, I'm a little concerned.
00:46:35
◼
►
No, actually, before we go on to that, I just want to say that it's not just wish casting.
00:46:39
◼
►
It is the thing that often gets us into trouble when it comes to the Mac Pro, because it is
00:46:43
◼
►
like, yes, people want this and it's, you know, desirability or whatever.
00:46:47
◼
►
And but the real downfall is like, well, how would what Apple is doing make any sense if
00:46:54
◼
►
And that leads you to things like this kind of hope, because, for example, why in the world
00:47:00
◼
►
would they not revise the Mac Pro with the M3 Ultra at the same time as the studio?
00:47:06
◼
►
It only makes sense.
00:47:07
◼
►
The only reason they wouldn't do that is because, you know, based on what they said, there might
00:47:12
◼
►
not be an Ultra in every generation.
00:47:13
◼
►
There's not going to be an M4 Ultra.
00:47:15
◼
►
They're not revising the Mac Pro at the same time as the studio.
00:47:18
◼
►
Therefore, it only makes sense that the Mac Pro is not getting the M3 Ultra and it's not
00:47:23
◼
►
getting the M4 Ultra because Apple has hinted that doesn't exist.
00:47:26
◼
►
M4 Extreme WWC confirmed, right?
00:47:28
◼
►
And yet when we do that and try to try to make sense of what Apple has said and what they
00:47:32
◼
►
have done, very often we find ourselves foiled by like, oh, here we are, WWC 25.
00:47:37
◼
►
And guess what?
00:47:37
◼
►
They just announced the new Mac Pro with the M3 Ultra.
00:47:40
◼
►
And then we all just smack ourselves in the forehead and say, but that doesn't make any
00:47:44
◼
►
And Apple will be like, we know, like the things they've been doing with the Mac Pro have not
00:47:51
◼
►
made a lot of sense recently.
00:47:52
◼
►
And so we have to be careful not to fall into that trap.
00:47:56
◼
►
But of, because that's just, that's, you know, I'll be there in my belief cert.
00:48:01
◼
►
If they put a Mac Pro with M3 Ultra months after the studio got the M3 Ultra, like what in the
00:48:06
◼
►
world is the point?
00:48:07
◼
►
What are they even doing?
00:48:08
◼
►
But anyway, yes, M3 Ultra benchmarks.
00:48:11
◼
►
So this is from Geekbench 6.
00:48:13
◼
►
I mean, I'm happy to read off all these numbers and whatnot.
00:48:16
◼
►
What's the best way to...
00:48:18
◼
►
I can characterize it for you, right?
00:48:20
◼
►
So here's the deal.
00:48:21
◼
►
So I've looked these things up.
00:48:22
◼
►
Now, some caveats to start.
00:48:23
◼
►
This is super early.
00:48:25
◼
►
I don't know if people even have the M3 Ultra studio now.
00:48:28
◼
►
I think the embargo's lifted, but I think a few people have them.
00:48:30
◼
►
But anyway, the thing about Geekbench, it's just a benchmark.
00:48:33
◼
►
Anyone can submit scores to it.
00:48:35
◼
►
Very early in the life of any model of computer, there are few reported scores.
00:48:40
◼
►
At the time I gathered these numbers, there was only a handful of purported M3 Ultra scores
00:48:46
◼
►
being reported.
00:48:47
◼
►
You know, you get the app and you just, it reports your scores over the network to their
00:48:50
◼
►
server, right?
00:48:52
◼
►
When they show the scores for computers they've been out for a while, they're showing an average,
00:48:56
◼
►
which I would argue is also maybe not the best because people could like super cool and overclock
00:49:00
◼
►
them and throw off the average and do all sorts of weird stuff.
00:49:02
◼
►
But anyway, that's why in some cases we have multiple scores here for like, here's the best
00:49:08
◼
►
or here's the best score I could find for this.
00:49:11
◼
►
And here is the average score of the few ones they have attached there.
00:49:14
◼
►
So, and then the final caveat is, of course, how exactly representative is Geekbench of
00:49:19
◼
►
anything that you care about?
00:49:20
◼
►
And we'll link it in the show notes to an artist technical article where they try to do a few
00:49:23
◼
►
more different benchmarks, try to be more representative.
00:49:25
◼
►
But here's the upshot.
00:49:27
◼
►
In GPU, which honestly is the main thing I was looking at the M3 Ultra for because the number
00:49:33
◼
►
of CPU cores isn't that different.
00:49:34
◼
►
The cores themselves are M2 versus M3.
00:49:37
◼
►
It's not that big of a deal.
00:49:38
◼
►
But in GPU, maybe they've done something big here.
00:49:41
◼
►
And based on the Metal scores, and Metal is the API you care about if you're in the Apple world,
00:49:45
◼
►
it is 10% faster than the M2 Ultra, than the M2 Ultra's Mac Studio's best score.
00:49:53
◼
►
And it's 20% faster than the M2 Ultra's average score.
00:49:57
◼
►
So, you know, the M2 Ultra's Mac Studio's been out for ages, so the average is probably accurate.
00:50:01
◼
►
But I wanted to give it the best chance here.
00:50:03
◼
►
Like, the M2 Ultra's best score is within 10% of the M3 Ultra.
00:50:07
◼
►
The M2 Ultra, the M2 Ultra, Mac Studio, was released in June 2023.
00:50:12
◼
►
So here we are in 2025, and Apple's releasing a computer that is 10% to 20% faster in GPU.
00:50:19
◼
►
That's not a big boost in that many years, right?
00:50:24
◼
►
It's not encouraging, especially since you can get more Metal score, at the very least,
00:50:32
◼
►
by just putting in more GPU.
00:50:34
◼
►
Maybe it was a cooling issue.
00:50:36
◼
►
Maybe it's literally a die size issue, because they really are running up against the reticle limit,
00:50:40
◼
►
even when doing the two maxes stuck together type of thing.
00:50:44
◼
►
But it seems like only a month or two ago, when we were talking on the show about all these people
00:50:49
◼
►
who have these grand fantasies of Apple putting out a GPU that's going to rival a 4090 and stuff.
00:50:55
◼
►
And instead, they put out a GPU that is a low double-digit percentage faster than the one they put out in 2023.
00:51:02
◼
►
Still, people will say, and they're right in that regard, well, it's actually extremely expensive to try to get something with this much GPU power with fast access to 512 gigs of RAM, right?
00:51:15
◼
►
But it's just further narrowing the use case and making, you know, as if I wasn't attracted to the M3 Ultra anyway.
00:51:23
◼
►
But certainly, if you're buying this thinking, well, I just want to get the best GPU Apple sells, this is it.
00:51:28
◼
►
But it's not the best by much.
00:51:29
◼
►
Extremely disappointing.
00:51:30
◼
►
And then the single-core score, of course, is not great.
00:51:33
◼
►
10% faster than the M2 Ultra.
00:51:35
◼
►
Again, the 2023 computer.
00:51:36
◼
►
20% slower than the M4 Max.
00:51:39
◼
►
That's not a small number.
00:51:41
◼
►
Single-core is, I mean, we know that.
00:51:43
◼
►
Like, we know the M4 is amazing in single-core.
00:51:45
◼
►
We know this uses M3 cores.
00:51:47
◼
►
It is what it is.
00:51:49
◼
►
And then the multi-core, 24% faster than the M2 Ultra.
00:51:52
◼
►
24% since 2023 in multi-core?
00:51:57
◼
►
9% faster in multi-core than the M4 Max.
00:52:00
◼
►
9% faster than, like, the Max of the current generation, right?
00:52:06
◼
►
That's supposed to be half the chip.
00:52:08
◼
►
It's not half the chip because it's two M3 Maxes for the M3 Ultra.
00:52:11
◼
►
It's not great in multi-core.
00:52:15
◼
►
Like, if he's like, well, if you want the fastest multi-core, you got to get the M3 Ultra.
00:52:18
◼
►
Yeah, by 9%.
00:52:19
◼
►
Now, one, I will say one more time, Geekbench is not reality.
00:52:23
◼
►
Geekbench is a benchmark.
00:52:24
◼
►
Benchmarks are not particularly representative.
00:52:27
◼
►
If you look at the Ars Technic article, you will find some real-world things that it can
00:52:30
◼
►
do much better than that.
00:52:31
◼
►
You'll find some real-world things that can do much worse.
00:52:33
◼
►
So, as always, if you care about how long it takes to do a thing, export a Final Cut
00:52:38
◼
►
project, you know, do text-to-speech, run an AI model, do those things, measure those
00:52:43
◼
►
things, and say, how much faster is it and how much am I getting?
00:52:46
◼
►
But M3 Ultra does not look like a particularly compelling upgrade from the M2 Ultra.
00:52:53
◼
►
And the M4 Max, Max Studio, looks really attractive unless you really need that extra 10% to 20%
00:53:00
◼
►
GPU and an extra 9% of multi-core.
00:53:03
◼
►
And if you don't need that, you get 20% faster single-core.
00:53:06
◼
►
So, yeah, M4 forever.
00:53:08
◼
►
Yeah, it seems like the Ultra here, again, what I was saying earlier, like, the Ultra is
00:53:14
◼
►
really about the other, like, higher RAM limits, more Thunderbolt bandwidth.
00:53:19
◼
►
Like, if those kinds of things are what's holding your work back, then maybe this is for you.
00:53:24
◼
►
Otherwise, like, look, you know, if there's a way for me to spend money to get more performance,
00:53:30
◼
►
I will often be prone to that, I would not in a million years choose the Ultra for my
00:53:35
◼
►
needs because the Max is actually doing a better job, you know, for it would be better for my
00:53:42
◼
►
needs by a mile.
00:53:43
◼
►
And it would cost half as much on the processor.
00:53:46
◼
►
But, you know, so, but, you know, it's, again, it's not to say there's nobody who this is
00:53:48
◼
►
for, but this is not probably for people for whom CPU performance is critical.
00:53:56
◼
►
Like, this is probably mostly for people who need more RAM or maybe who need that extra
00:54:03
◼
►
But, again, like, the GPU does not compare that well because, you know, also what we're
00:54:08
◼
►
seeing, and this is kind of what worries me about the rumors about the Mac Pro getting
00:54:11
◼
►
getting an extreme, you know, quote, extreme chip with, you know, double the Ultra or whatever.
00:54:16
◼
►
These chips don't seem to be scaling that well past the max core counts.
00:54:23
◼
►
Like, we've seen this from all the generations so far that have gotten the Ultra chip.
00:54:27
◼
►
Or was there an M1 Ultra?
00:54:29
◼
►
Yeah, yeah, there was.
00:54:30
◼
►
And I was going to say that when you were talking about the other thing that, like, even though
00:54:35
◼
►
you said quad and we keep talking about it in that context, I continue to think and hope,
00:54:39
◼
►
I thought this was what the M3 Ultra was going to be, but anyway, I continue to think that
00:54:43
◼
►
they're better off making a chip that is bigger and badder than the Macs and putting two of
00:54:48
◼
►
those together rather than trying to put four of anything together because they've never
00:54:52
◼
►
been able to do it.
00:54:53
◼
►
And you're right.
00:54:53
◼
►
Like, just if their overhead's killing them on the two-chip ones, and it was killing them
00:54:57
◼
►
on some of the earlier two-chip ones, don't try to go.
00:55:00
◼
►
There's a reason they didn't do the four, right?
00:55:01
◼
►
So I'm just hoping they make two really big chips and stick them together rather than trying
00:55:07
◼
►
to take four of any of the existing chips and stick them together.
00:55:09
◼
►
Yeah, because as we're seeing, we saw this with all the Ultra so far, the Ultra being
00:55:14
◼
►
two Macs stuck together does not give you twice the performance.
00:55:18
◼
►
On the GPU, it sometimes can come close.
00:55:21
◼
►
On the CPU, it's way off.
00:55:23
◼
►
And because, again, there's different bottlenecks, there's different trade-offs, there's different,
00:55:27
◼
►
you know, things don't scale perfectly because they're complicated and that's not how things
00:55:32
◼
►
And they screwed up the GPU.
00:55:33
◼
►
So the GPU gets close.
00:55:34
◼
►
I forget which generation.
00:55:36
◼
►
One of the generations, they actually screwed up the GPU part real bad and it was way worse
00:55:39
◼
►
than it needed to be.
00:55:40
◼
►
I think that was the M1 where they messed it up and they fixed it in the M2.
00:55:43
◼
►
There's all these different, you know, bandwidths and caches and things that just make it more
00:55:46
◼
►
complicated than just doubling everything.
00:55:48
◼
►
So what you're getting is, you know, you get twice the cost, at least on the manufacturing
00:55:54
◼
►
You know, certainly the retail price reflects, you know, definitely twice the cost, but you're
00:55:59
◼
►
not getting twice the performance.
00:56:00
◼
►
And in many cases, you're getting a lot less than twice the performance.
00:56:04
◼
►
So it does seem like, again, you will know if you need this and odds are if you don't know
00:56:13
◼
►
that you need this, you don't need this.
00:56:14
◼
►
Like if you don't, if you're not hitting the RAM limits on your maxed out max chip computer,
00:56:22
◼
►
you probably don't need this.
00:56:24
◼
►
If you're not like absolutely maxing out the GPU total speed all the time, you probably don't
00:56:31
◼
►
Like this is, this is for certain people, not for us.
00:56:35
◼
►
And if you just want a really fast general purpose computer, an M4 max based computer is
00:56:41
◼
►
most likely going to give you a better and possibly even faster overall performance, whether that's
00:56:48
◼
►
the MacBook pro or the Mac studio, you can have it in both.
00:56:51
◼
►
And it seems to be the same chip in both.
00:56:52
◼
►
And that's great.
00:56:53
◼
►
So you want a laptop that's the fastest computer for you.
00:56:56
◼
►
You want a desktop version.
00:56:57
◼
►
You have that option too.
00:56:58
◼
►
You want one with slots too bad, but.
00:57:01
◼
►
But right now, like the M4 max is the place to be and the M4 ultra or the M3 ultra is
00:57:07
◼
►
for almost no one.
00:57:10
◼
►
We are sponsored this episode by BetterHelp.
00:57:13
◼
►
With over 30,000 therapists, BetterHelp is the world's largest online therapy platform, having
00:57:19
◼
►
served over 5 million people globally.
00:57:22
◼
►
And it's super convenient.
00:57:23
◼
►
You can just join a session with a click of a button, which helps you fit therapy into your
00:57:29
◼
►
And if your therapist is not working out, you can switch therapists easily at any time.
00:57:33
◼
►
Now, let's talk numbers.
00:57:35
◼
►
Traditional in-person therapy can cost $100 or $200 per session.
00:57:39
◼
►
This really adds up fast.
00:57:40
◼
►
But with BetterHelp online therapy, you can save on average up to 50% per session.
00:57:46
◼
►
With BetterHelp, you pay a flat fee for weekly sessions, saving you big on both cost and on
00:57:52
◼
►
Because they believe therapy should feel accessible, not like a luxury that's out of reach or that
00:57:58
◼
►
you'll get to someday later.
00:57:59
◼
►
Believe me, I'm guilty of that.
00:58:00
◼
►
With online therapy, you get quality care at a price that makes sense and can help you
00:58:05
◼
►
with anything from anxiety to everyday stress.
00:58:08
◼
►
Your mental health is worth it.
00:58:10
◼
►
And now it is within reach with BetterHelp.
00:58:13
◼
►
Your well-being is important.
00:58:15
◼
►
You know, therapy is, I have gone to therapy myself in the past, and it is very beneficial.
00:58:20
◼
►
You'd be surprised.
00:58:21
◼
►
You know, give it a shot.
00:58:22
◼
►
Like it's, even a small number of sessions, it'll kind of blow your mind as to like what a
00:58:27
◼
►
good therapist can uncover.
00:58:28
◼
►
So, BetterHelp is making this accessible and affordable to more people.
00:58:32
◼
►
Your well-being is worth it.
00:58:34
◼
►
Visit BetterHelp.com slash A-TechPod, that's A-T-E-C-H pod, today to get 10% off your first
00:58:43
◼
►
That's BetterHelp, H-E-L-P.com slash A-TechPod.
00:58:48
◼
►
We will put that code in the show notes as well.
00:58:50
◼
►
So, once again, BetterHelp.com slash A-TechPod for 10% off your first month of BetterHelp.
00:58:56
◼
►
Thank you so much to BetterHelp for sponsoring our show.
00:58:59
◼
►
So, a few years ago now, on March 10th of 2022, there was an exchange that was had on this
00:59:10
◼
►
very program, on episode 473, Fan Boats and Coattails.
00:59:15
◼
►
And I believe Marco is going to play that exchange right now.
00:59:21
◼
►
Eventually, the iMac screen is going to be larger than 24 inches.
00:59:24
◼
►
And when it does, the 27-inch iMac will come back.
00:59:26
◼
►
That's all I'm saying.
00:59:27
◼
►
I'm not saying like that tomorrow there's going to be a 27-inch iMac despite this hole in the
00:59:31
◼
►
lineup or whatever.
00:59:31
◼
►
It's just the 24, like it went up from 21.
00:59:34
◼
►
The low-end iMac used to be 21.
00:59:35
◼
►
So, they made 24, which is a nice in-between size.
00:59:37
◼
►
But eventually, two or three years from now, they're going to be like, 24, really?
00:59:41
◼
►
Everyone else is so much bigger and they'll work their way back up to 27 and 5K.
00:59:47
◼
►
You really just infinite timescaled us on this?
00:59:49
◼
►
It's not infinite.
00:59:50
◼
►
Totally infinite timescaled us.
00:59:51
◼
►
I'm going to say within three years, there'll be a 27-inch iMac.
00:59:54
◼
►
You really just finite timescaled us on this?
00:59:57
◼
►
That's the bet.
00:59:57
◼
►
Three years from now, I'll bet you a dollar.
01:00:04
◼
►
So, it's been three years.
01:00:05
◼
►
For all the people who sent this in by Mastodon and other means, don't you all know I had this
01:00:11
◼
►
on my calendar?
01:00:11
◼
►
Like, I think I put it on the calendar on that show.
01:00:15
◼
►
I always put these things on my calendar because I would never remember them otherwise.
01:00:17
◼
►
Yeah, I should have gone with five years.
01:00:19
◼
►
I should have stuck to my instincts, but...
01:00:22
◼
►
Double or nothing?
01:00:22
◼
►
Double or nothing?
01:00:22
◼
►
Yeah, I was going to ask.
01:00:23
◼
►
So, well, so here's the thing.
01:00:26
◼
►
Here's the other thing that I didn't think about when we were making that.
01:00:28
◼
►
So, first of all, I still say that they're going to make a larger iMac for the reason
01:00:33
◼
►
that I was trying to articulate in that clip, which is like, look, even if they never add
01:00:38
◼
►
a larger iMac to the line, the one and only iMac that exists, assuming the iMac continues
01:00:44
◼
►
to exist at all as a product, which is not guaranteed, but continue to exist at all, that
01:00:48
◼
►
one and only iMac will itself get bigger just as it got bigger from 21-inch to 24.
01:00:52
◼
►
But my three-year timeline was not asking for that.
01:00:54
◼
►
My three-year timeline is saying they're going to add a bigger iMac.
01:00:57
◼
►
Here's what I didn't anticipate.
01:00:58
◼
►
The iMac is close enough to being a monitor that you got to add the gigantic Apple monitor
01:01:05
◼
►
timescale modifier to all of your calculations, which means Apple producing a new screen?
01:01:11
◼
►
That only happens once every 15 years or whatever.
01:01:15
◼
►
So, yeah, I blew it.
01:01:17
◼
►
It's three years have gone by.
01:01:19
◼
►
There's no bigger iMac.
01:01:20
◼
►
Honestly, I would not double or nothing for an additional two years because that's how...
01:01:26
◼
►
I mean, since then, what has happened with the Mac Studio display?
01:01:30
◼
►
Not anything.
01:01:32
◼
►
What has happened with the XDR?
01:01:36
◼
►
What has happened with the iMac?
01:01:38
◼
►
Very little.
01:01:39
◼
►
So, I still think there will be one, but I don't think it will be in two years.
01:01:44
◼
►
And so, just...
01:01:46
◼
►
I mean, I hope we don't have to wait until the 24-inch just to become, you know, inconvenient
01:01:52
◼
►
and inexpensive.
01:01:52
◼
►
And they kind of like a 25 or a 26-inch just like kind of like bumped up from...
01:01:56
◼
►
So, I hope we don't have to wait that long.
01:01:58
◼
►
But related to that, ever since Apple came out with the 24-inch and then said to everybody
01:02:02
◼
►
who would listen, we're totally not making 27-inch, so buy this 24.
01:02:06
◼
►
No sense waiting for 27.
01:02:07
◼
►
We're not going to make it.
01:02:08
◼
►
We're not doing it.
01:02:09
◼
►
Buy the 24, right?
01:02:10
◼
►
Which is true.
01:02:11
◼
►
They didn't make a 27.
01:02:12
◼
►
You should have bought the 24, right?
01:02:13
◼
►
But ever since then, shortly after that, there have been persistent rumors about a larger iMac,
01:02:18
◼
►
which has been frustrating to me in this bet.
01:02:20
◼
►
So, German in August 2024 says, a larger iMac remains something Apple is exploring as well,
01:02:27
◼
►
but it's unclear if that will be an M4 product or something that comes the following year
01:02:31
◼
►
February 2025, from German again, Apple will also probably eventually get around to offering
01:02:38
◼
►
a larger iMac.
01:02:39
◼
►
I just want to reread that beautiful piece of German pros again.
01:02:42
◼
►
Apple will also...
01:02:44
◼
►
I screwed it up.
01:02:45
◼
►
I'm adding my own thing to it.
01:02:46
◼
►
Let me try again.
01:02:46
◼
►
Apple also will probably eventually get around to offering a larger screen iMac.
01:02:52
◼
►
At least he hyphenated its larger screen, although that's debatable.
01:02:56
◼
►
Golly, that's good.
01:02:57
◼
►
Like, the rumors of larger iMacs have never gone away, and not just like vague, wishful
01:03:03
◼
►
thinking, but like from people like German who usually have sources, and yet one has not
01:03:07
◼
►
shipped, so Marco gets $1.
01:03:10
◼
►
Which I can apply towards the price of the iMac that I bought a month ago for the restaurant.
01:03:14
◼
►
What color was that one?
01:03:16
◼
►
There you go.
01:03:18
◼
►
There you go.
01:03:18
◼
►
I would just like to point out that the Pro Display XDR, which, while from what I gather
01:03:24
◼
►
from you two, still a very good monitor, release date as per Wikipedia, 10th of December 2019,
01:03:30
◼
►
which was almost 2,000 days ago.
01:03:36
◼
►
And if you made $1 a day since then, you could buy less than half of one.
01:03:39
◼
►
You could buy two stands.
01:03:42
◼
►
John, I think our long national nightmare may be over with regard to threads and your timeline
01:03:49
◼
►
Can you tell me more about this?
01:03:50
◼
►
More digging back from the archives.
01:03:52
◼
►
As discussed on ATP 616, I Have No Grippers, which was actually a reference to this very
01:03:57
◼
►
thing, The Verge reported on November 25th, 2024, that, quote, threads will now let users
01:04:03
◼
►
decide what feed they want to be their default when opening the app.
01:04:05
◼
►
And I was complaining on that show that they announced this as if it's like a feature.
01:04:09
◼
►
They're like, here you go.
01:04:10
◼
►
You asked for it, and you got it.
01:04:12
◼
►
And I didn't get it.
01:04:14
◼
►
It's like, oh, we're rolling this out to people.
01:04:15
◼
►
You'll probably get it eventually.
01:04:16
◼
►
And I've been patiently waiting and launching the Threads app and looking for my little grippers,
01:04:20
◼
►
which are the little three lines that let you know that you can drag reorder the order
01:04:24
◼
►
of the feeds.
01:04:25
◼
►
And you just put the one you want, the following feed on the top, and it becomes your default
01:04:29
◼
►
feed so that every single time you launch the Threads app, it doesn't revert you back to
01:04:34
◼
►
the feed you don't want to see.
01:04:35
◼
►
You can change the default.
01:04:36
◼
►
They announced that in November, 2024, as if it's just a thing, but it wasn't a thing.
01:04:40
◼
►
It was a thing in an article.
01:04:41
◼
►
It was a thing that some people have, but it was not a thing that I had.
01:04:45
◼
►
So exactly 100 days later, on March 5th, 2025, I got the feature, the gripper.
01:04:51
◼
►
I've been checking.
01:04:53
◼
►
The grippers were there.
01:04:53
◼
►
I'm like, yay, I can rotate it up.
01:04:55
◼
►
I don't use Threads as much as the other services, so it's not that big of a deal.
01:05:00
◼
►
But I was just annoyed that they announced this feature as if it was a thing they did,
01:05:04
◼
►
and it just totally wasn't.
01:05:05
◼
►
And that was going to be the story, except for that was on March 5th.
01:05:10
◼
►
Today is March 12th, and I just looked at my Threads app, and the grippers are gone.
01:05:14
◼
►
Other people are texting me and sending me images and saying, hey, look, I got it, too.
01:05:18
◼
►
It's rolling out for everybody.
01:05:19
◼
►
It did roll out to me for seven days, and now it's gone.
01:05:23
◼
►
That's so cruel.
01:05:25
◼
►
That is cruel.
01:05:26
◼
►
Like, look, are you going to honor my preferences or not?
01:05:30
◼
►
Are you going to always put me on the thing I don't want to see because you think that's
01:05:33
◼
►
better for engagement or whatever the hell?
01:05:34
◼
►
Or are you just going to let me put it the way I want?
01:05:37
◼
►
And they just can't decide, how much study does this feature need?
01:05:40
◼
►
Either let me pick what my default feed is or don't.
01:05:43
◼
►
But don't pretend like you're letting people pick and then just, like, randomly, haphazardly
01:05:46
◼
►
roll it out.
01:05:47
◼
►
Like, are they just making sure it's not going to destroy their business to allow people to
01:05:51
◼
►
have a preference setting?
01:05:52
◼
►
So annoying.
01:05:53
◼
►
Finally, for follow-up this week, we got some feedback with regard to mostly me popping off
01:05:59
◼
►
about feedback in the Apple world.
01:06:02
◼
►
This is, you know, formerly known as Radar.
01:06:05
◼
►
We got a fairly long piece of feedback from an anonymous person, but I'd like to read
01:06:09
◼
►
it because I think there's a lot of good stuff here.
01:06:11
◼
►
This person writes, I was an Apple engineer for almost two decades and a third-party Apple
01:06:16
◼
►
developer for more than a decade.
01:06:17
◼
►
I heard Casey's rant against Apple's feedback assistant, and I can sympathize.
01:06:20
◼
►
As a third-party developer, I also got the impression that my bug reports were ignored.
01:06:24
◼
►
Let me tell you what it's like to be an Apple engineer.
01:06:27
◼
►
So, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
01:06:28
◼
►
Then come third-party bugs.
01:06:30
◼
►
During beta season, I may be assigned hundreds of bugs each week.
01:06:33
◼
►
Obviously, I can't possibly fix that many, so I triage.
01:06:36
◼
►
Well-written bug reports with clear instructions to reproduce the problem are first.
01:06:40
◼
►
If you've attached a small Xcode project that demonstrates the bug, even better.
01:06:43
◼
►
Unfortunately, there are lots of bugs without a clear problem description or instructions on
01:06:47
◼
►
how to reproduce it.
01:06:48
◼
►
Even worse are bugs so poorly written I can't even understand what's wrong.
01:06:51
◼
►
Unfortunately, these bugs will probably be ignored.
01:06:54
◼
►
So, so far, I think this makes sense.
01:06:56
◼
►
I mean, it's not what I want to hear, but there's only so much time in a day and in a week,
01:07:00
◼
►
and you do the things that you think are the easiest to accomplish.
01:07:03
◼
►
Fair enough.
01:07:05
◼
►
So, back to the anonymous person.
01:07:06
◼
►
If I have a question for the developer, I'm prohibited from just contacting them.
01:07:11
◼
►
I have to send the question to Apple Developer Support.
01:07:13
◼
►
They contact the developer and eventually send me the reply.
01:07:16
◼
►
But I have occasionally contacted developers directly for people I know.
01:07:22
◼
►
Multiple reports of the same bug are grouped together.
01:07:24
◼
►
The clearest is tagged as the original bug.
01:07:26
◼
►
The rest are listed as duplicates.
01:07:29
◼
►
This is fine.
01:07:29
◼
►
Duplicates are like votes.
01:07:31
◼
►
Duplicates are like votes that this is an important bug.
01:07:34
◼
►
A bug with hundreds of duplicates is important since lots of people are hitting it.
01:07:37
◼
►
I'm supposed to fix high-priority bugs first.
01:07:40
◼
►
Crashes and data loss are the highest priority, then features that don't work,
01:07:43
◼
►
eventually working your way down to annoying malfunctions and UI glitches.
01:07:45
◼
►
The problem is many annoying but non-serious bugs don't get fixed this way.
01:07:50
◼
►
So experienced engineers also work on the most annoying non-serious bugs.
01:07:53
◼
►
We also use Apple products and we want them to work well.
01:07:56
◼
►
Bugs reported during the official beta period have the highest chance of being fixed,
01:08:00
◼
►
since I'm supposed to be fixing third-party bug reports.
01:08:02
◼
►
The rest of the year, I'm assigned to work on new features in next year's release,
01:08:06
◼
►
not old bugs in last year's release.
01:08:07
◼
►
I mean, this stands to reason given Apple's behavior, but oof.
01:08:11
◼
►
One thing that drives me crazy is Apple ignoring old bugs.
01:08:15
◼
►
New features get lots of attention and their bugs are fixed.
01:08:17
◼
►
New bugs that appear in old features, regressions, are also fixed.
01:08:20
◼
►
But bugs that have existed for years are ignored.
01:08:22
◼
►
If a bug somehow slips through QA and ships, the system ignores it.
01:08:26
◼
►
There's no incentive for engineers or teams to go back and fix old bugs.
01:08:31
◼
►
None of this is surprising.
01:08:33
◼
►
And some of it I genuinely do get, especially working at the vast volume that Apple works at.
01:08:40
◼
►
But, oof, having basically zero incentive to go back and fix things that are broken,
01:08:45
◼
►
that's not a great look.
01:08:48
◼
►
It stands to reason given behavior, but it's not a great look.
01:08:51
◼
►
When people do stuff like this, it's like they're explaining, like, you don't understand.
01:08:55
◼
►
This is the situation.
01:08:56
◼
►
It's like, all you're doing is explaining from a different side the exact same problem.
01:09:00
◼
►
We're both saying it's bad, but you're trying to say, like, on the outside, we think it's terrible.
01:09:05
◼
►
On the inside, it's like, well, here's all the reasons.
01:09:07
◼
►
Like, yeah, those are the reasons it's terrible.
01:09:09
◼
►
Those are not justifications for it being terrible.
01:09:13
◼
►
And nor are they unmovable, intractable things that can never change, and therefore it must be terrible.
01:09:18
◼
►
And the reason we know that it doesn't have to be terrible is because other companies do similar things at, yes, similar volumes,
01:09:26
◼
►
and they do it better.
01:09:27
◼
►
There are companies that get more customer support feedback than Apple does, you know,
01:09:31
◼
►
in industries where that is more common, right?
01:09:34
◼
►
There are companies that also have technical platforms.
01:09:37
◼
►
Just it is possible to do this better,
01:09:40
◼
►
as evidenced by this big explanation of all of the dysfunction that's going on inside the company.
01:09:45
◼
►
If you fix some of that dysfunction, then it won't be as terrible.
01:09:48
◼
►
That's what we're saying.
01:09:50
◼
►
So I think, and I'm not saying that this anonymous feedback is trying to justify it or whatever,
01:09:55
◼
►
just like, because sometimes two people do get indignant and say, you don't understand.
01:09:58
◼
►
It has to be that way because reasons X, Y, and Z.
01:10:01
◼
►
I don't think that's what the person is saying.
01:10:02
◼
►
I think they actually are just giving a different perspective of like,
01:10:04
◼
►
here's how terrible it looks on the inside of the company as well.
01:10:08
◼
►
But yeah, like this, the only thing that needs to change about making this better is someone
01:10:13
◼
►
inside Apple in a position of power needs to decide that is something they want to improve
01:10:18
◼
►
and actually put resources towards it.
01:10:20
◼
►
And thus far, that has not happened to a large enough degree to really make a big impact.
01:10:25
◼
►
I think we only have time for one topic today because this is likely to be a doozy.
01:10:29
◼
►
And this is a report from Bloomberg from the 10th, as we're sitting here now.
01:10:33
◼
►
It is the 12th.
01:10:34
◼
►
This is a report from Bloomberg.
01:10:36
◼
►
Like I said, I believe this was German.
01:10:37
◼
►
And they write,
01:10:39
◼
►
Apple Inc is preparing one of the most dramatic software overhauls in the company's history,
01:10:43
◼
►
aiming to transform the interface of the iPhone, iPad, and Mac for a new generation of users.
01:10:47
◼
►
The revamp will fundamentally change the look of the operating systems and make Apple's various
01:10:53
◼
►
software platforms more consistent.
01:10:55
◼
►
That includes updating the style of icons, menus, apps, windows, and system buttons.
01:10:59
◼
►
As part of the push, the company is working to simplify the way users navigate and control
01:11:03
◼
►
their devices.
01:11:04
◼
►
The design is loosely based on the Vision Pro software.
01:11:07
◼
►
The changes are coming as part of iOS 19 and iPadOS 19, codenamed Luck, and macOS 16,
01:11:13
◼
►
which is dubbed Cheer.
01:11:16
◼
►
They go well beyond a new design language and aesthetic tweaks.
01:11:20
◼
►
The software will mark the most significant upgrade to the Mac.
01:11:23
◼
►
Upgrade is doing a lot of work there.
01:11:24
◼
►
To the Mac since the Big Sur operating system in 2020.
01:11:27
◼
►
For the iPhone, it will be the biggest revamp since iOS 7 in 2013.
01:11:31
◼
►
A key goal of the overhaul is to make Apple's different operating systems look similar and
01:11:35
◼
►
more consistent.
01:11:36
◼
►
Still, Apple is stopping short of merging its operating systems, a step other tech giants
01:11:40
◼
►
The company believes it can make better Macs and iPads by keeping their operating systems
01:11:45
◼
►
So there's a little bit of editorializing in there.
01:11:48
◼
►
And I know on a recent episode, we talked about the potential for an iOS 19 overhaul to
01:11:54
◼
►
look like Vision OS.
01:11:55
◼
►
But at the time we were discussing that, it was purely in the context of, does iOS need an
01:12:00
◼
►
Is it going to look like Vision Pro?
01:12:01
◼
►
Is it going to look like the imitation app or whatever?
01:12:04
◼
►
This new story this week is something so much more than that.
01:12:09
◼
►
Because making a change to the visual look of iOS 19 would be significant, especially if
01:12:14
◼
►
it's like, you know, looking like the Vision Pro or Glass or Crew or whatever.
01:12:17
◼
►
But this, this, and this story is not just government.
01:12:19
◼
►
Other people have had this story as well.
01:12:21
◼
►
I don't know if they're just parroting him or have their own sources, but this is like
01:12:25
◼
►
a overhaul of the look and feel of all of Apple's major platforms.
01:12:32
◼
►
The iOS, the Mac and the iPad to, and again, I don't know how much of this is government editorializing
01:12:40
◼
►
with the goal of making them more consistent with each other or having more of a family
01:12:45
◼
►
resemblance.
01:12:47
◼
►
Let's do a little, you know, germinology here and say, what do we think about this
01:12:53
◼
►
Uh, the, uh, what is it?
01:12:56
◼
►
The update includes updating the style of icons, menus, apps, windows, and system buttons.
01:13:03
◼
►
And with the fundamental change, the look of operating systems to make the software platforms
01:13:06
◼
►
more consistent, right?
01:13:07
◼
►
Icons, menus, apps, windows.
01:13:09
◼
►
How, how in the world could you make the look of icons, menus, apps, and windows consistent
01:13:19
◼
►
across the phone, the iPad, and the Mac?
01:13:23
◼
►
Let's talk about icons.
01:13:25
◼
►
Icons on the Mac and on the iPad and on the phone are already.
01:13:33
◼
►
I mean, am I wrong?
01:13:34
◼
►
They're already consistent.
01:13:35
◼
►
They're squircles.
01:13:36
◼
►
We talked about, we talked about the squircle.
01:13:38
◼
►
They're, they're squares with rounded corners.
01:13:40
◼
►
Oh, no, no, no.
01:13:41
◼
►
Not on vision pro.
01:13:42
◼
►
Vision OS, they're all circles.
01:13:43
◼
►
I didn't say vision pro.
01:13:44
◼
►
I just listed the ones German listed iOS, iPad OS, and Mac OS, right?
01:13:48
◼
►
Well, and, and icons also includes like the design of the symbols within the icons, which
01:13:54
◼
►
they've already made consistent.
01:13:57
◼
►
They do a really good, there's a huge library of consistently styled icons that they expand
01:14:01
◼
►
all the time.
01:14:02
◼
►
When Apple designs their own icons that are not NSF symbols, they also match that style.
01:14:07
◼
►
So already icons are pretty consistent.
01:14:11
◼
►
And, you know, what you're talking about is the app launch icons, but like even those,
01:14:15
◼
►
you're right, are already mostly the same across most platforms.
01:14:19
◼
►
I mean, are they saying that like the, the, the, the male icon on the Mac has to be literally
01:14:24
◼
►
pixel or pickles, the same as the male icon on the phone and the iPad?
01:14:27
◼
►
I, I mean, maybe it already is pretty close, but like, so there's that windows, the phone
01:14:32
◼
►
doesn't even really have windows.
01:14:34
◼
►
It's got sheets and cards and whatever, but it really doesn't have windows.
01:14:37
◼
►
The iPad kind of sort of has windows, but not really.
01:14:42
◼
►
So, and you know, I'm not quite sure what they're aiming at there.
01:14:45
◼
►
Menus again, the Mac has a menu bar.
01:14:48
◼
►
The other jobbering systems do not, but they both have kind of pop-up menu things.
01:14:52
◼
►
And those things do look a little bit different.
01:14:53
◼
►
I can't, I can't tell.
01:14:56
◼
►
This story is so insistent that the goal of this is to sort of unify and make them more
01:15:01
◼
►
consistent with each other.
01:15:02
◼
►
I can't tell if that is a real thing or not, right?
01:15:06
◼
►
It's not like sources.
01:15:08
◼
►
I think, I think I cut out most of the people said or whatever.
01:15:10
◼
►
I can see them in any kind of redesign, any kind of like cross OS redesign.
01:15:16
◼
►
I can see someone looking at it and saying, oh, it looks like one of the goals of this redesign
01:15:21
◼
►
was to make the platforms look more similar to each other.
01:15:24
◼
►
But I feel like if you do any redesign, of course, there's going to be a, like the redesign
01:15:31
◼
►
will span multiple operating systems.
01:15:33
◼
►
It will, the same ideas will be appear in all of them.
01:15:36
◼
►
I don't think that means they're trying to make them look more like each other.
01:15:39
◼
►
I just think it means when, if you do all three at once, of course, there's going to be a family
01:15:43
◼
►
resemblance.
01:15:43
◼
►
Like, so anyway, I'm, I can't tell what, how big the consistency angle is.
01:15:48
◼
►
And that is one of the things that I'm going to be looking at.
01:15:50
◼
►
If this story turns out to be true, was the consistency angle, just someone looking at
01:15:54
◼
►
it and saying, oh, they all look similar because they were all redesigned at the same time.
01:15:59
◼
►
Or is Apple going to get up on stage and say, we really felt it was very confusing that pop-up
01:16:04
◼
►
menus on your phone look different than pull-down menus on the Mac menu bar and users were really
01:16:09
◼
►
tripping up on that.
01:16:10
◼
►
And it was really impairing the usability and functionality of our software.
01:16:13
◼
►
So now a pop-up menu on your phone looks exactly the same as a pull-down menu on your Mac.
01:16:19
◼
►
And we feel like that, that makes our platforms better.
01:16:21
◼
►
Or we just want there to be a family resemblance.
01:16:24
◼
►
So the icons already looked almost exactly the same, but now they literally are exactly
01:16:28
◼
►
And you can tint icons on your phone and you can tint icons on your Mac.
01:16:31
◼
►
I don't know what to make of that.
01:16:34
◼
►
And then as for the circular icons, which Casey just brought up, let's just, let's just throw
01:16:38
◼
►
that out there as like a part of the doomsday scenario that we'll, we'll surely spiral into
01:16:41
◼
►
briefly icons on vision power circles, not squircles, literal circles.
01:16:47
◼
►
How, you know, how can you decide with an iOS 19 release that now iOS icons on your phone
01:16:57
◼
►
are also circles.
01:16:57
◼
►
Apple can do that because they have noticed and they can redraw all their icons.
01:17:01
◼
►
So they fit in a circle, but you can't just take a third party icons and, and put them in
01:17:06
◼
►
a circle shape, you'll cut off half of people's icons because they don't expect that to happen.
01:17:10
◼
►
So I don't see any way where you can have a transition to circular icons on the phone
01:17:18
◼
►
without just massive upheaval and some kind of transition period where some of them are squircles
01:17:24
◼
►
and some of them are circles.
01:17:26
◼
►
Again, to what end people were real confused that the icons on vision power circles, but
01:17:31
◼
►
they're squircles on their phone.
01:17:32
◼
►
They had no idea what to do.
01:17:33
◼
►
No, everyone's fine.
01:17:34
◼
►
They know what I got.
01:17:36
◼
►
There's nothing.
01:17:37
◼
►
This reminds me of that, uh, Bruce Tognizini, uh, thing that I put it in my Mac was tender
01:17:41
◼
►
use a few times from the original, like Apple human interface guidelines.
01:17:44
◼
►
There was a, a section of that book, uh, that emphasized an important idea and interface
01:17:50
◼
►
design using the example of extension icons for classic Mac OS extensions were things that
01:17:55
◼
►
could like modify the system because they had no memory protections.
01:17:58
◼
►
You could just do whatever the hell you wanted.
01:17:59
◼
►
Anyway, um, those were extensions.
01:18:01
◼
►
And, uh, in, and the later versions of classic Mac OS, you would see the icons of the extensions
01:18:06
◼
►
that loaded during the, the, the startup process.
01:18:08
◼
►
You'd see them march across to the bottom of your screen from left to right.
01:18:11
◼
►
And the extension icon that Apple defined when they rolled out system seven with extensions
01:18:16
◼
►
and stuff was a puzzle piece.
01:18:18
◼
►
So it was, you know, just picture like a rectangle, but it's like a puzzle piece, kind of a squashed
01:18:21
◼
►
puzzle piece because you don't have that much room for the little, I don't know
01:18:24
◼
►
what you call them, the little things that stick out.
01:18:25
◼
►
The little notches, but it was a puzzle piece.
01:18:27
◼
►
But the thing is there was like four different puzzle piece icons that were possible with
01:18:32
◼
►
different arrangements of the little bulges and holes.
01:18:35
◼
►
No one was ever confused by that because a puzzle piece is a puzzle piece is a puzzle piece.
01:18:41
◼
►
If I throw four puzzle pieces in front of you, you're like, well, one of those is a puzzle
01:18:43
◼
►
piece, but I have no idea what the other ones are.
01:18:45
◼
►
Like it's, they showed, the other thing that they showed was the home icon for hypercard.
01:18:51
◼
►
You go to the home button to go back to the home of your hypercard stack for old people.
01:18:54
◼
►
There was seven different versions of that.
01:18:56
◼
►
They all look like little houses, little, little square houses with a little triangular
01:19:00
◼
►
Again, anyone said, oh, click on the home icon, click on the little picture of the house.
01:19:05
◼
►
No one said, well, I see one picture of a house, but that other one looks different.
01:19:07
◼
►
Is that also a house?
01:19:10
◼
►
You can trust people to recognize a bunch of different puzzle pieces, a bunch of different
01:19:15
◼
►
house icons.
01:19:16
◼
►
And yes, you can trust people to recognize this is an icon on your phone, and this is an icon
01:19:22
◼
►
in Vision Pro, and this is an icon on your iPad, and this is an icon on your Mac.
01:19:25
◼
►
Even if they're not all squircles, it'll be fine.
01:19:28
◼
►
So I really hope that part of it is just family resemblance and not, you know, everybody.
01:19:35
◼
►
I mean, we're already at everybody squircle.
01:19:37
◼
►
Maybe they should make Vision Pro squircle.
01:19:38
◼
►
Again, this rumor doesn't mention Vision Pro at all.
01:19:40
◼
►
So I don't know what the hell, or at least not the part that I snipped out of it.
01:19:43
◼
►
But setting that aside, how do you feel about this OS-spanning rumor as compared to how you
01:19:52
◼
►
felt about the iOS 19 rumor?
01:19:53
◼
►
I mean, this is a much larger, like, so what we heard of with iOS 19 earlier, and we did
01:19:59
◼
►
that after show, or the overtime about it, it sounded like, you know, there was that mock-up
01:20:05
◼
►
of the camera app that somebody, was it Jon Prosser who did the mock-up?
01:20:09
◼
►
That's right.
01:20:10
◼
►
And it sounded like, okay, well, maybe this is something that they're doing, like, for
01:20:15
◼
►
certain apps.
01:20:15
◼
►
Like, you know, the point I made was that Apple has always had multiple design languages depending
01:20:20
◼
►
on the app type, and there were different styles your app could be, whether it was, like, a
01:20:25
◼
►
content viewing app, or, like, a single view app, versus a document app, versus a productivity
01:20:30
◼
►
app, and they've always kind of had, they've been juggling multiple styles.
01:20:33
◼
►
And so my thought at that time was, maybe this is just a new style they're going to, you
01:20:38
◼
►
know, add and make easy in the APIs and everything, and maybe adopt for some of their apps.
01:20:42
◼
►
This is a pretty bold claim that it's much bigger than that, that this is more about, like, the
01:20:49
◼
►
default look of the UI widgets, and the styles and everything.
01:20:53
◼
►
And that's a bigger thing.
01:20:55
◼
►
Now, it sounds like echoes of iOS 7, but I think we're in a very different world now than
01:21:03
◼
►
we were back then.
01:21:04
◼
►
First of all, this is a much larger and more established and more entrenched world of apps
01:21:13
◼
►
now, and all the stuff that runs in Apple's ecosystems is much bigger now, much more entrenched,
01:21:18
◼
►
and it's much bigger companies now having a lot of influence and a lot of usage in their
01:21:23
◼
►
So, for Apple to do something like iOS 7 today, I don't even think they're in a position to
01:21:32
◼
►
really do it very strongly, for lots of reasons.
01:21:35
◼
►
Like, number one, I don't think they have the support from developers to, on a large scale,
01:21:44
◼
►
adopt a new design language, because, like, the small developers like us, they have, you
01:21:49
◼
►
know, done a pretty good job of straining that relationship, first of all.
01:21:54
◼
►
Like, that's, number one is, like, we, you know, we are largely, we've been strained, let's
01:22:00
◼
►
say, and that's, you know, they keep doing that, and that's going to keep being a thing
01:22:03
◼
►
with their, you know, policy decisions and behavior and everything like that.
01:22:08
◼
►
So, there's already, like, that relationship with small developers is strained.
01:22:12
◼
►
That relationship with big company developers is not only differently and maybe more strained,
01:22:18
◼
►
but big company developers have largely not stuck with Apple's stock look for anything.
01:22:25
◼
►
Big companies develop their own styles and their own looks for their apps, and they use
01:22:30
◼
►
them across platforms.
01:22:32
◼
►
They want their style of their app to look the same on Android and on iOS and maybe on PCs
01:22:39
◼
►
or the web or whatever the other platforms might be, but especially Android and iOS.
01:22:42
◼
►
So, they are already saying, like, you know what?
01:22:45
◼
►
That's nice, Apple.
01:22:47
◼
►
You have your default, you know, widget looks and whatever else.
01:22:50
◼
►
We're not going to use them, or we're going to override them to look like us.
01:22:52
◼
►
So, the big companies, when you think about, like, what, how would this actually play out?
01:22:58
◼
►
The big companies are going to be hostile or neglectful.
01:23:03
◼
►
Like, they're going to actively fight against it, or they're going to, they're going to just, like,
01:23:08
◼
►
never update to the new styles or whatever.
01:23:10
◼
►
So, all the apps that you use on your phone for big companies, like, they're out.
01:23:15
◼
►
They're not going to do any of this stuff.
01:23:16
◼
►
They're going to do their, they're going to keep doing their own stuff.
01:23:18
◼
►
Small developers like us, this kind of thing is usually a pretty huge workload on us.
01:23:27
◼
►
It's a huge request and a huge burden to put on third-party developers when the system theme significantly changes.
01:23:36
◼
►
Because huge amounts of, huge, like, you know, UI chunks of our app will not work right, will not look right.
01:23:44
◼
►
They'll have visual glitches, or it won't work in the new format.
01:23:48
◼
►
And so, for us to adopt it, it's a huge amount of work.
01:23:52
◼
►
Oftentimes needing a pretty significant redesign of the app to adopt it.
01:23:57
◼
►
And on that front, by the way, I've seen a lot of people reacting to this story by saying,
01:24:01
◼
►
well, SwiftUI to the rescue, because SwiftUI is declarative,
01:24:05
◼
►
and you can be less precise about exactly how things look.
01:24:08
◼
►
Therefore, it'll be much easier for people who have fully adopted a SwiftUI to accommodate the new look.
01:24:13
◼
►
There is a tiny, very, very small amount of truth to that.
01:24:18
◼
►
But mostly, what I think Marco's getting at from someone who has experience with doing this is,
01:24:25
◼
►
it's not like your app won't work when they change the default look of everything, no matter what API you use.
01:24:31
◼
►
Like, unless you're really unlocking, you're doing custom controls and stuff like that.
01:24:34
◼
►
But if you're along the straight and narrow, it's like, your app will work.
01:24:36
◼
►
But when they change the default look, you have to go through every single screen,
01:24:41
◼
►
every single button, every single widget, because anybody who actually pays attention to their app,
01:24:45
◼
►
like in any developer who doesn't budget their time the same way a big company would,
01:24:50
◼
►
has tweaked everything within an inch of its life.
01:24:52
◼
►
Even if it's just micro-adjusting padding, or using a particular thing because of the way it happens to look
01:24:59
◼
►
in the default widget set, and it looks nicer that way,
01:25:01
◼
►
when they change all the default widgets,
01:25:03
◼
►
you've got to go through every single thing that appears in your app,
01:25:07
◼
►
and make sure it still looks okay and good.
01:25:11
◼
►
Because it will, like, the choices you made to use this style of picker versus that style of toggle,
01:25:16
◼
►
and you're using overlay here, and ZStack there, and background here,
01:25:21
◼
►
and why did you make those choices?
01:25:22
◼
►
Because they make the best appearance and behavior with the widget set that you developed it with.
01:25:27
◼
►
And if they change all the default widgets,
01:25:29
◼
►
you are going to have to go back and revisit all that stuff,
01:25:32
◼
►
even if you use SwiftUI from top to bottom.
01:25:34
◼
►
So that's the burden we're talking about here.
01:25:36
◼
►
Not that, like, all of a sudden my app crashes, or it doesn't load,
01:25:38
◼
►
or you can't hit a button anymore, it just starts to look like
01:25:41
◼
►
this was clearly developed with a different widget set, because it was.
01:25:45
◼
►
What this does to the developer community is it just drops a huge bomb.
01:25:51
◼
►
This will be all we can do this year with our apps.
01:25:54
◼
►
Because, like, what happens is when Apple does a new theme,
01:25:58
◼
►
usually what happens is if you don't build with a new SDK,
01:26:02
◼
►
so your app that's not updated yet in the store will continue running on the old theme.
01:26:07
◼
►
So people will launch your app, and if you haven't built it with a new SDK,
01:26:11
◼
►
which you can't do usually until, you know, the week before release for public,
01:26:14
◼
►
and maybe for TestFlight you can do it a little bit earlier,
01:26:16
◼
►
but anything built with the old SDK will still look old.
01:26:20
◼
►
Did that happen with iOS 7, by the way? I don't remember.
01:26:22
◼
►
I think so, yeah.
01:26:24
◼
►
What will then happen is all of your users, when they update their phones,
01:26:31
◼
►
which might be day one with the beta, or at least it'll be, like, you know,
01:26:36
◼
►
certainly in the fall when the OS releases,
01:26:37
◼
►
your app will look very, very old to them.
01:26:41
◼
►
And they will complain.
01:26:43
◼
►
They will, first of all, they'll accuse you of being abandoned.
01:26:46
◼
►
And they, you'll start getting one-star reviews.
01:26:48
◼
►
And as I learned last summer, one-star reviews in small numbers,
01:26:53
◼
►
okay, that's life.
01:26:55
◼
►
In big numbers, that can destroy your business.
01:26:57
◼
►
Like, that can be a pretty substantial, like, your business is on fire problem.
01:27:01
◼
►
So, what developers have to do when the system theme changes like this?
01:27:05
◼
►
See also when Dark Mode was added.
01:27:07
◼
►
That was a smaller version, but of a similar thing.
01:27:09
◼
►
We have to address that with our app.
01:27:12
◼
►
We have to adopt it, because the reviews will kill us if we don't.
01:27:16
◼
►
And they'll kill us starting on day one at large scale.
01:27:21
◼
►
And even before that, we'll start getting killed in the summer during the betas.
01:27:24
◼
►
But we will get killed if we aren't there with the new redesign.
01:27:28
◼
►
So, it's imperative.
01:27:30
◼
►
This is not, like, some optional thing we can adopt at our leisure or if we like it or not.
01:27:34
◼
►
We have to do it.
01:27:36
◼
►
And what that means, that's such a huge thing.
01:27:38
◼
►
As John was just saying, it's so big, because it touches, like,
01:27:40
◼
►
potentially every screen, every control.
01:27:43
◼
►
That means that we really can't do any other features this fall.
01:27:47
◼
►
Like, that's why it's such a huge burden.
01:27:51
◼
►
It's an incredibly expensive lever for Apple to pull.
01:27:54
◼
►
Keep in mind, also, it is similarly expensive for Apple,
01:27:58
◼
►
for all of their apps, all of their software, all of their UI.
01:28:02
◼
►
So, if this is true, this is a huge deal for the software community,
01:28:09
◼
►
both inside Apple and for all of us outside of Apple.
01:28:12
◼
►
And it has to really be worth it.
01:28:15
◼
►
Like, because it's so, again, it puts such a burden.
01:28:18
◼
►
It's so expensive.
01:28:20
◼
►
And that will mean that all of the other features that we might want to add this fall
01:28:25
◼
►
are not going to happen.
01:28:26
◼
►
Like, that's how, like, that's how, I can't possibly express enough
01:28:31
◼
►
how much of a burden this places on the community.
01:28:33
◼
►
You see this, because if you recall, with the previous big redesign with iOS 7,
01:28:38
◼
►
it took a long time before a lot of the apps on your phone,
01:28:42
◼
►
or before most of the apps on your phone, were translated over.
01:28:45
◼
►
And in fact, apps that are not made by enthusiasts,
01:28:49
◼
►
and that don't care how many one-star reviews they have,
01:28:52
◼
►
often never get updated.
01:28:54
◼
►
Like, you know, the app for my mixer at the restaurant,
01:28:56
◼
►
that doesn't even work in landscape mode,
01:28:57
◼
►
that's never going to get updated for it.
01:28:59
◼
►
Like, there's not a chance.
01:29:00
◼
►
You know, how many apps on your phone are there from, you know,
01:29:03
◼
►
like, that are just part of some hardware that you bought,
01:29:05
◼
►
or that, you know, for, like, your dentist's booking software or whatever.
01:29:09
◼
►
Like, none of that stuff's ever going to get updated.
01:29:11
◼
►
So you enter this era of just, like, transitional, crappy user experiences
01:29:16
◼
►
that are kind of blended old world, new world,
01:29:18
◼
►
or they can force the new theme on all the old apps that aren't updated,
01:29:23
◼
►
which will break them all.
01:29:24
◼
►
So there's no...
01:29:26
◼
►
I don't know if it'll break them all,
01:29:27
◼
►
but visually they might look unexpected, let's say.
01:29:30
◼
►
Because, like, again, I don't think it will literally break most things.
01:29:33
◼
►
A new look will just cause things to look extremely awkward.
01:29:36
◼
►
Maybe some text will be truncated where you didn't think...
01:29:38
◼
►
Especially if they try to keep the metrics the same.
01:29:40
◼
►
But I want to recall back to something that you said, Marco,
01:29:43
◼
►
and I think a show or two ago,
01:29:45
◼
►
which I think people might be remembering
01:29:47
◼
►
and thinking it conflicts with what you're saying,
01:29:48
◼
►
but it actually doesn't.
01:29:49
◼
►
You had mentioned how iOS 7 was a gift to you
01:29:52
◼
►
when you were developing Overcast
01:29:54
◼
►
because it was so much simpler and required
01:29:56
◼
►
with less, like, pixel-perfect, you know,
01:29:58
◼
►
photorealistic artistic skills
01:30:00
◼
►
and more just to be able to lurk with, like, text and white space
01:30:03
◼
►
and solid colors and stuff.
01:30:05
◼
►
That was a gift to you
01:30:06
◼
►
because you were in the midst of developing an application
01:30:09
◼
►
that was not out yet.
01:30:11
◼
►
It's a different situation when you already have an app
01:30:13
◼
►
and they change...
01:30:14
◼
►
They pull the rug out from under you
01:30:15
◼
►
and change the look of every single thing.
01:30:16
◼
►
So you built your app based on the widget set
01:30:18
◼
►
from, you know, iOS, whatever you were doing
01:30:21
◼
►
when you developed it,
01:30:21
◼
►
and now here comes iOS 19
01:30:22
◼
►
and everything looks different.
01:30:23
◼
►
That's going to be true of this redesign as well.
01:30:26
◼
►
It will actually be an advantage
01:30:28
◼
►
for people who are just starting their app
01:30:30
◼
►
at the right moment
01:30:31
◼
►
because they will be the first
01:30:32
◼
►
to be able to adopt this look and feel
01:30:34
◼
►
because they don't...
01:30:35
◼
►
They're not converting a legacy app.
01:30:37
◼
►
They're, like, they're there from day one.
01:30:38
◼
►
They hop right on board.
01:30:39
◼
►
Their app is designed with this look in mind
01:30:41
◼
►
from the start.
01:30:42
◼
►
It is optimized and tweaked
01:30:44
◼
►
and made to look correct
01:30:46
◼
►
with the iOS 19 widget set, right?
01:30:49
◼
►
And everybody who has an older app
01:30:51
◼
►
has to go and convert theirs
01:30:54
◼
►
oh, what do I do with this screen?
01:30:55
◼
►
I picked this because in the old look,
01:30:57
◼
►
this looked best,
01:30:57
◼
►
but the new one,
01:30:58
◼
►
it doesn't look good at all.
01:30:59
◼
►
Do I have to use...
01:31:00
◼
►
Do I have to add another screen?
01:31:01
◼
►
Can I use a different widget here?
01:31:04
◼
►
Can I use a sheet instead of this thing?
01:31:06
◼
►
So that's true of any of these changes
01:31:09
◼
►
and what you said before, Marco, is so true.
01:31:11
◼
►
And what I keep saying with...
01:31:13
◼
►
To what end?
01:31:13
◼
►
Like, if you're going to make a big change like this,
01:31:17
◼
►
What is the benefit
01:31:18
◼
►
on the other side of this pain, right?
01:31:20
◼
►
You know, what is it that is about your systems
01:31:24
◼
►
that needs to be...
01:31:24
◼
►
That demands this kind of overhaul?
01:31:26
◼
►
And this is where we kind of
01:31:29
◼
►
get a little bit into the spiraling,
01:31:31
◼
►
but, like, before we get to that,
01:31:32
◼
►
which I will soon,
01:31:34
◼
►
I first want to say
01:31:36
◼
►
the tiny optimistic part of this story
01:31:39
◼
►
for me, personally.
01:31:41
◼
►
that I have been
01:31:45
◼
►
with the direction
01:31:46
◼
►
that the macOS UI
01:31:47
◼
►
has been going in
01:31:48
◼
►
for many years now.
01:31:49
◼
►
We've talked about system settings
01:31:51
◼
►
I'm currently making an app
01:31:53
◼
►
using a bunch of the new
01:31:54
◼
►
SwiftUI and macOS widgets
01:31:57
◼
►
and controls
01:31:59
◼
►
and text fields
01:32:01
◼
►
and all the things, right?
01:32:02
◼
►
And I don't think
01:32:04
◼
►
they're an improvement
01:32:05
◼
►
over what AppKit
01:32:06
◼
►
looked like a decade ago.
01:32:08
◼
►
I think they're worse.
01:32:08
◼
►
I think they're uglier.
01:32:09
◼
►
I think they don't work as well.
01:32:10
◼
►
So, on the Mac,
01:32:12
◼
►
the answer to the question
01:32:17
◼
►
in best case scenario,
01:32:18
◼
►
hey, all those things
01:32:19
◼
►
you don't like
01:32:20
◼
►
about how the Mac
01:32:20
◼
►
is looking and working,
01:32:21
◼
►
now is an opportunity
01:32:23
◼
►
to fix that,
01:32:26
◼
►
we're going in the wrong direction.
01:32:27
◼
►
We shouldn't have text fields
01:32:28
◼
►
with no borders
01:32:29
◼
►
with right-aligned text
01:32:30
◼
►
in the passwords, right?
01:32:32
◼
►
the toggle switches
01:32:34
◼
►
and settings
01:32:35
◼
►
20 yards away
01:32:36
◼
►
from the things
01:32:37
◼
►
that they're labeling,
01:32:38
◼
►
that's not good.
01:32:39
◼
►
Let's come up
01:32:42
◼
►
with a better look for that.
01:32:43
◼
►
Let's just make
01:32:44
◼
►
some more contrast
01:32:45
◼
►
and more visual hierarchy
01:32:46
◼
►
and not just have everything
01:32:47
◼
►
to be dark gray everywhere.
01:32:53
◼
►
that needs to be solved.
01:32:55
◼
►
that the current notion
01:32:57
◼
►
of modern Mac OS UI
01:33:00
◼
►
and works worse
01:33:00
◼
►
than it used to.
01:33:01
◼
►
That's my optimistic take
01:33:05
◼
►
I don't think
01:33:07
◼
►
iOS and iPad OS
01:33:09
◼
►
for a UI overhaul
01:33:11
◼
►
and obviously
01:33:12
◼
►
it's so much more important
01:33:12
◼
►
than the phone
01:33:13
◼
►
because it's such
01:33:13
◼
►
a more popular platform.
01:33:15
◼
►
kind of has felt at sea
01:33:17
◼
►
for a while now
01:33:18
◼
►
with any new UI
01:33:20
◼
►
they were allowed
01:33:20
◼
►
basically being met
01:33:22
◼
►
by the Mac's biggest fans
01:33:23
◼
►
with either a shrug
01:33:26
◼
►
Whereas in the early days
01:33:27
◼
►
especially the early days
01:33:28
◼
►
of Mac OS X,
01:33:29
◼
►
Aqua had everybody jazzed
01:33:31
◼
►
even though it had tons
01:33:32
◼
►
of detractors as well
01:33:32
◼
►
but it was certainly exciting
01:33:34
◼
►
and over the years
01:33:35
◼
►
they have refined
01:33:36
◼
►
the Mac interface
01:33:36
◼
►
and there were good years
01:33:37
◼
►
and bad years.
01:33:38
◼
►
Sometimes the dock
01:33:38
◼
►
was really shiny,
01:33:39
◼
►
sometimes it wasn't.
01:33:40
◼
►
Sometimes they added
01:33:42
◼
►
stitched leather
01:33:43
◼
►
to the calendar app,
01:33:45
◼
►
but like there's been
01:33:46
◼
►
ups and downs
01:33:46
◼
►
but always I feel like
01:33:47
◼
►
we're sort of,
01:33:48
◼
►
driving an unwinding road
01:33:51
◼
►
towards improvement
01:33:51
◼
►
except for in the last,
01:33:54
◼
►
five to ten years
01:33:54
◼
►
where a bunch of,
01:33:56
◼
►
even just forgetting
01:33:57
◼
►
the widgets,
01:33:57
◼
►
a bunch of things
01:33:58
◼
►
that happened
01:33:58
◼
►
like do you remember,
01:33:59
◼
►
I don't even remember
01:33:59
◼
►
which OS update this was,
01:34:00
◼
►
we've already established
01:34:01
◼
►
that we can't remember
01:34:01
◼
►
the names of the OS S's
01:34:02
◼
►
but I think long time
01:34:05
◼
►
Mac users will have this feeling
01:34:07
◼
►
that it used to be easier
01:34:09
◼
►
to tell which window
01:34:12
◼
►
which window was in front.
01:34:13
◼
►
Like they made an OS change
01:34:15
◼
►
where like the front window
01:34:17
◼
►
was not as much more prominent
01:34:19
◼
►
than the windows behind it.
01:34:21
◼
►
like they used to,
01:34:22
◼
►
in the old days
01:34:23
◼
►
they'd have like,
01:34:24
◼
►
the windows would be,
01:34:25
◼
►
the background windows
01:34:26
◼
►
would be lighter
01:34:27
◼
►
and the front window
01:34:27
◼
►
would be darker.
01:34:28
◼
►
Sometimes the foreground window
01:34:29
◼
►
would have more detail
01:34:30
◼
►
than the background windows.
01:34:31
◼
►
The foreground window
01:34:31
◼
►
has always had a bigger shadow
01:34:33
◼
►
and still does
01:34:33
◼
►
but they made some changes
01:34:34
◼
►
in recent years
01:34:35
◼
►
that really just kind of
01:34:37
◼
►
flattens out the UI
01:34:38
◼
►
a little bit
01:34:38
◼
►
and makes foreground
01:34:39
◼
►
and background windows
01:34:40
◼
►
look much more like each other.
01:34:42
◼
►
They have taken away borders
01:34:44
◼
►
things like text fields.
01:34:46
◼
►
There are things
01:34:47
◼
►
in the Mac OS UI
01:34:48
◼
►
that you can't tell
01:34:49
◼
►
our controls
01:34:49
◼
►
in sort of an iOS 7 style.
01:34:51
◼
►
There are problems,
01:34:54
◼
►
to be solved on the Mac
01:34:55
◼
►
and in theory
01:34:57
◼
►
this could be
01:34:58
◼
►
a way to fix them.
01:35:00
◼
►
now it's time to spiral.
01:35:01
◼
►
How much confidence
01:35:03
◼
►
that literally
01:35:05
◼
►
anything they do
01:35:06
◼
►
to any of these
01:35:07
◼
►
operating systems
01:35:07
◼
►
will be an improvement?
01:35:09
◼
►
that's the bigger concern
01:35:12
◼
►
is like what they have
01:35:13
◼
►
demonstrated
01:35:15
◼
►
for the last,
01:35:16
◼
►
decade or whatever.
01:35:17
◼
►
pick any platform really.
01:35:19
◼
►
but especially,
01:35:20
◼
►
the Mac I think
01:35:21
◼
►
is the most in danger
01:35:24
◼
►
I'm in danger.
01:35:25
◼
►
What they have shown
01:35:26
◼
►
with the Mac
01:35:28
◼
►
they currently
01:35:31
◼
►
enough resources
01:35:32
◼
►
devoted to the Mac
01:35:33
◼
►
or possibly enough talent
01:35:35
◼
►
left in the company.
01:35:36
◼
►
Enough expertise.
01:35:38
◼
►
they don't know
01:35:40
◼
►
like what we've seen
01:35:41
◼
►
whenever they
01:35:42
◼
►
change the Mac UI
01:35:45
◼
►
it's usually worse.
01:35:47
◼
►
and when you see
01:35:48
◼
►
something like
01:35:48
◼
►
the new settings app,
01:35:49
◼
►
you're like,
01:35:50
◼
►
this was a dramatic redesign
01:35:51
◼
►
that happened recently
01:35:53
◼
►
and it's awful.
01:35:55
◼
►
there's so many things
01:35:57
◼
►
unintuitive,
01:36:02
◼
►
especially since it did
01:36:04
◼
►
achieve some of its
01:36:05
◼
►
design goals,
01:36:05
◼
►
which is to make
01:36:06
◼
►
an interface that
01:36:07
◼
►
scales better
01:36:08
◼
►
with more settings.
01:36:09
◼
►
I think they have
01:36:10
◼
►
achieved that,
01:36:10
◼
►
but every other
01:36:11
◼
►
aspect of the redesign
01:36:13
◼
►
congratulations,
01:36:14
◼
►
you made a scalable
01:36:15
◼
►
system for adding
01:36:16
◼
►
more settings
01:36:17
◼
►
that is more scalable
01:36:18
◼
►
than hand tweaking
01:36:18
◼
►
every single screen,
01:36:19
◼
►
but literally everything
01:36:20
◼
►
else about it is worse
01:36:21
◼
►
than it was before.
01:36:22
◼
►
when you think of
01:36:23
◼
►
a redesign happening,
01:36:27
◼
►
the people who made
01:36:28
◼
►
the Mac what we love,
01:36:29
◼
►
it's the people who
01:36:30
◼
►
made the settings app.
01:36:31
◼
►
It's those people
01:36:33
◼
►
redesigning.
01:36:33
◼
►
The entire OS,
01:36:36
◼
►
that's what we are
01:36:37
◼
►
going for here?
01:36:38
◼
►
so now think about,
01:36:39
◼
►
I'm picturing in my
01:36:42
◼
►
forget about it,
01:36:43
◼
►
whether it looks like
01:36:43
◼
►
Vision OS with,
01:36:44
◼
►
glassy things on iOS,
01:36:45
◼
►
consistent thing,
01:36:46
◼
►
and all I picture in my
01:36:47
◼
►
looking at my Mac screen,
01:36:49
◼
►
is title bars that have
01:36:51
◼
►
even fewer features
01:36:52
◼
►
and less contrast,
01:36:54
◼
►
title bars that are
01:36:55
◼
►
menu bars and title bars
01:36:57
◼
►
that are just bigger
01:36:58
◼
►
and featureless expanses
01:36:59
◼
►
of white and light gray,
01:37:01
◼
►
you know what a pop-up
01:37:02
◼
►
menu looks like on the
01:37:03
◼
►
whatever that thing is
01:37:04
◼
►
where it shows like a
01:37:05
◼
►
rounded rectangle with
01:37:06
◼
►
the lines through it,
01:37:06
◼
►
my pull-down menus from
01:37:08
◼
►
the menu bar look like
01:37:09
◼
►
huge amounts of white
01:37:09
◼
►
space around each
01:37:11
◼
►
check boxes and radio
01:37:13
◼
►
buttons are gone,
01:37:14
◼
►
everything is a toggle
01:37:16
◼
►
for consistency,
01:37:17
◼
►
because people are
01:37:18
◼
►
they're not confused,
01:37:20
◼
►
that's what,
01:37:22
◼
►
if you take the,
01:37:23
◼
►
take iOS or iPad OS
01:37:25
◼
►
and make the Mac look
01:37:27
◼
►
it is not an improvement,
01:37:29
◼
►
it is worse,
01:37:30
◼
►
and that's what I fear,
01:37:31
◼
►
I fear so badly.
01:37:32
◼
►
and in fact,
01:37:33
◼
►
Apple's own,
01:37:34
◼
►
Apple's own marketing
01:37:36
◼
►
department and statements
01:37:38
◼
►
Craig Federighi,
01:37:39
◼
►
outright stating things
01:37:41
◼
►
we're not going to merge
01:37:42
◼
►
and in fact,
01:37:43
◼
►
there's a rumor,
01:37:43
◼
►
government still says
01:37:44
◼
►
exactly that,
01:37:46
◼
►
if you make the designs
01:37:50
◼
►
you are adopting
01:37:51
◼
►
design patterns
01:37:52
◼
►
for a platform
01:37:53
◼
►
that are not right
01:37:55
◼
►
and that's the same
01:37:57
◼
►
reasons that we all
01:37:58
◼
►
know these platforms
01:37:59
◼
►
are not really meant
01:38:00
◼
►
to be merged,
01:38:01
◼
►
or shouldn't be merged,
01:38:02
◼
►
but they're doing
01:38:05
◼
►
all this allegedly,
01:38:07
◼
►
this is all through
01:38:08
◼
►
the German filter,
01:38:09
◼
►
some of the details
01:38:11
◼
►
or justifications
01:38:12
◼
►
or reasons might be
01:38:13
◼
►
but the information
01:38:16
◼
►
having a big redesign
01:38:18
◼
►
of this is probably
01:38:20
◼
►
based on German's
01:38:21
◼
►
track record.
01:38:21
◼
►
and OS-spanning
01:38:23
◼
►
not just within
01:38:26
◼
►
what we've seen
01:38:28
◼
►
over the years
01:38:29
◼
►
with a lot of the
01:38:31
◼
►
stuff they've done
01:38:33
◼
►
they use that term
01:38:34
◼
►
consistency,
01:38:35
◼
►
that it is a goal
01:38:37
◼
►
to make the Mac
01:38:38
◼
►
more like iOS,
01:38:39
◼
►
but not only
01:38:40
◼
►
does that not
01:38:41
◼
►
because the design,
01:38:43
◼
►
they're such
01:38:45
◼
►
different systems
01:38:46
◼
►
different hardware
01:38:48
◼
►
and output methods
01:38:50
◼
►
just information
01:38:51
◼
►
density and control
01:38:52
◼
►
designs and everything,
01:38:53
◼
►
they're so different,
01:38:54
◼
►
it makes no sense
01:38:55
◼
►
to have them be the same,
01:38:58
◼
►
I think they are
01:39:00
◼
►
being very condescending
01:39:02
◼
►
to suggest that
01:39:04
◼
►
we need things
01:39:05
◼
►
to be more similar
01:39:05
◼
►
otherwise we just
01:39:06
◼
►
don't understand
01:39:07
◼
►
our computers,
01:39:09
◼
►
they're selling
01:39:09
◼
►
Macs in record
01:39:11
◼
►
people aren't
01:39:13
◼
►
people who buy
01:39:14
◼
►
know the Mac,
01:39:15
◼
►
not every single
01:39:17
◼
►
person in the world
01:39:18
◼
►
understands the Mac,
01:39:18
◼
►
but not every single
01:39:20
◼
►
person in the world
01:39:20
◼
►
understands any
01:39:21
◼
►
computing platform
01:39:21
◼
►
including iPads
01:39:22
◼
►
and iPhones,
01:39:25
◼
►
when people are
01:39:26
◼
►
motivated to have
01:39:27
◼
►
to use them for work
01:39:27
◼
►
or people like them,
01:39:28
◼
►
they figure them out,
01:39:30
◼
►
that's what we've done
01:39:30
◼
►
over the decades
01:39:32
◼
►
of computers existing,
01:39:32
◼
►
people figure them out,
01:39:33
◼
►
not everything is perfect,
01:39:35
◼
►
not everything needs
01:39:36
◼
►
to stay the same way
01:39:37
◼
►
it is forever,
01:39:38
◼
►
people are able
01:39:41
◼
►
two different
01:39:42
◼
►
interfaces on two
01:39:43
◼
►
different devices
01:39:43
◼
►
and it's fine
01:39:45
◼
►
to have the Mac
01:39:46
◼
►
look and work
01:39:48
◼
►
differently than
01:39:50
◼
►
that's why it's
01:39:51
◼
►
a different platform,
01:39:52
◼
►
if you wanted
01:39:53
◼
►
everything to just
01:39:54
◼
►
look like iPhones,
01:39:54
◼
►
we'd all just use
01:39:55
◼
►
iPhones and nobody
01:39:56
◼
►
would even need
01:39:57
◼
►
I don't want people
01:39:58
◼
►
hearing this and
01:39:58
◼
►
thinking you're saying,
01:39:59
◼
►
people can just
01:40:00
◼
►
figure out the Mac,
01:40:00
◼
►
it doesn't matter
01:40:01
◼
►
that it's harder,
01:40:02
◼
►
as we said before
01:40:03
◼
►
on the iPad,
01:40:03
◼
►
talking about iPad
01:40:04
◼
►
and stage management
01:40:06
◼
►
the Mac paradigm
01:40:08
◼
►
for doing what
01:40:08
◼
►
it needs to do
01:40:09
◼
►
is better and easier
01:40:12
◼
►
for example,
01:40:13
◼
►
the iPad paradigm
01:40:14
◼
►
or the iPhone paradigm.
01:40:15
◼
►
It is better and easier
01:40:17
◼
►
to manipulate
01:40:18
◼
►
multiple things,
01:40:19
◼
►
multiple windows
01:40:21
◼
►
on the phone
01:40:22
◼
►
or the iPad.
01:40:23
◼
►
than on the phone
01:40:24
◼
►
because the screen
01:40:25
◼
►
but even on the iPad
01:40:26
◼
►
where you have
01:40:27
◼
►
a 13-inch iPad
01:40:28
◼
►
and a 13-inch MacBook Pro,
01:40:29
◼
►
dealing with Windows
01:40:31
◼
►
uses an interface
01:40:33
◼
►
and vocabulary
01:40:34
◼
►
and set of actions
01:40:35
◼
►
that is Byzantine
01:40:37
◼
►
and hard to understand.
01:40:39
◼
►
having to learn
01:40:40
◼
►
something new
01:40:41
◼
►
pays dividends
01:40:42
◼
►
because that new
01:40:43
◼
►
thing you're learning
01:40:45
◼
►
than what you knew
01:40:46
◼
►
on the phone
01:40:48
◼
►
with multiple windows
01:40:49
◼
►
and a keyboard
01:40:50
◼
►
and trackpad
01:40:51
◼
►
and, you know,
01:40:51
◼
►
all the Mac stuff.
01:40:53
◼
►
it's not the case
01:40:54
◼
►
that the Mac
01:40:55
◼
►
is difficult
01:40:57
◼
►
but you should
01:40:57
◼
►
just suck it up.
01:40:58
◼
►
It's the case
01:40:59
◼
►
that the Mac
01:41:00
◼
►
than the other choices
01:41:02
◼
►
because it lets you
01:41:04
◼
►
do more powerful things
01:41:06
◼
►
with a simple,
01:41:07
◼
►
easy-to-understand,
01:41:08
◼
►
consistent interface
01:41:09
◼
►
that, by the way,
01:41:10
◼
►
has been around
01:41:11
◼
►
and is basically
01:41:12
◼
►
a lot of the skills
01:41:13
◼
►
that you know
01:41:13
◼
►
from Windows,
01:41:14
◼
►
Microsoft Windows,
01:41:15
◼
►
transfer over
01:41:16
◼
►
for various reasons
01:41:17
◼
►
that are very similar
01:41:17
◼
►
to each other.
01:41:19
◼
►
we have not come up
01:41:20
◼
►
with a better way
01:41:21
◼
►
to do many things
01:41:24
◼
►
with a powerful
01:41:25
◼
►
personal computer
01:41:26
◼
►
than Windows menus,
01:41:28
◼
►
blah, blah, blah.
01:41:29
◼
►
touchscreen Macs
01:41:30
◼
►
with this a lot,
01:41:31
◼
►
being stubborn there,
01:41:31
◼
►
but setting that aside
01:41:32
◼
►
and setting aside
01:41:33
◼
►
any redesign
01:41:35
◼
►
one of the rumors
01:41:35
◼
►
is they'll redesign
01:41:36
◼
►
more friendly to touch.
01:41:37
◼
►
By all means,
01:41:39
◼
►
but that is a
01:41:40
◼
►
separate issue
01:41:41
◼
►
entirely from things
01:41:42
◼
►
I just mentioned
01:41:43
◼
►
the toggle switches.
01:41:46
◼
►
for iOS-style
01:41:47
◼
►
slidey sideways
01:41:48
◼
►
toggle switches?
01:41:52
◼
►
toggle switch control
01:41:53
◼
►
than I've ever
01:41:56
◼
►
Is it because
01:41:57
◼
►
people are old
01:41:58
◼
►
and checkboxes
01:41:58
◼
►
existed on paper
01:42:00
◼
►
whereas most
01:42:00
◼
►
people didn't
01:42:00
◼
►
interact with
01:42:01
◼
►
little toggle switches
01:42:02
◼
►
unless they were
01:42:02
◼
►
dealing with like
01:42:03
◼
►
audio equipment
01:42:03
◼
►
or something?
01:42:04
◼
►
People don't always
01:42:05
◼
►
know which is the
01:42:06
◼
►
on and which is
01:42:07
◼
►
which is why
01:42:07
◼
►
they have the
01:42:08
◼
►
little one that
01:42:09
◼
►
where you can
01:42:09
◼
►
see the letters
01:42:10
◼
►
on when it's
01:42:11
◼
►
like, is blue
01:42:12
◼
►
on or is gray
01:42:14
◼
►
off or is gray
01:42:15
◼
►
like, nothing
01:42:17
◼
►
macOS was saying,
01:42:18
◼
►
you know what
01:42:18
◼
►
the problem with
01:42:19
◼
►
People can't
01:42:21
◼
►
They have no
01:42:22
◼
►
checkbox means.
01:42:22
◼
►
They can't tell
01:42:23
◼
►
when it's on.
01:42:24
◼
►
They can't tell
01:42:24
◼
►
when it's off.
01:42:25
◼
►
consistency.
01:42:26
◼
►
People in the
01:42:27
◼
►
iOS settings app
01:42:28
◼
►
use those little
01:42:29
◼
►
toggle switches.
01:42:29
◼
►
How about we put
01:42:30
◼
►
And so here I am
01:42:32
◼
►
making a Mac
01:42:33
◼
►
and the settings
01:42:34
◼
►
screen in my
01:42:34
◼
►
app is filled
01:42:35
◼
►
with iOS-style
01:42:36
◼
►
toggles because
01:42:37
◼
►
that's the way
01:42:38
◼
►
Apple wants you to
01:42:38
◼
►
do things and
01:42:39
◼
►
they herd you
01:42:40
◼
►
direction with
01:42:41
◼
►
And it's not
01:42:43
◼
►
the end of the
01:42:43
◼
►
world and again
01:42:44
◼
►
there are some
01:42:45
◼
►
advantages to it
01:42:45
◼
►
for scalability
01:42:46
◼
►
but it is not
01:42:47
◼
►
a thing that
01:42:48
◼
►
macOS needed.
01:42:49
◼
►
crying out for it.
01:42:50
◼
►
Users were not
01:42:52
◼
►
checkboxes and
01:42:53
◼
►
radio buttons
01:42:54
◼
►
because they've
01:42:54
◼
►
been seeing them
01:42:55
◼
►
their whole life,
01:42:57
◼
►
understandable and
01:42:59
◼
►
Ditto for buttons
01:43:00
◼
►
and for, you
01:43:01
◼
►
know, windows and
01:43:02
◼
►
title bars and
01:43:02
◼
►
pull-down menus.
01:43:03
◼
►
These are flexible
01:43:06
◼
►
components that could
01:43:07
◼
►
be improved upon
01:43:08
◼
►
and you can come
01:43:08
◼
►
up with maybe
01:43:09
◼
►
enhancements are
01:43:10
◼
►
ways to make
01:43:11
◼
►
them better or
01:43:11
◼
►
better window
01:43:12
◼
►
management systems
01:43:12
◼
►
and so on and
01:43:13
◼
►
But the solution
01:43:15
◼
►
is not we should
01:43:16
◼
►
get rid of all
01:43:17
◼
►
that and just use
01:43:17
◼
►
stage manager
01:43:18
◼
►
everywhere because
01:43:18
◼
►
stage manager is
01:43:19
◼
►
not burning up
01:43:20
◼
►
the world and
01:43:21
◼
►
these toggle
01:43:21
◼
►
switches are not
01:43:22
◼
►
appreciably making
01:43:23
◼
►
anything better.
01:43:24
◼
►
At best, they're
01:43:26
◼
►
recognize these
01:43:27
◼
►
from my phone,
01:43:27
◼
►
therefore I know
01:43:28
◼
►
how to use them.
01:43:29
◼
►
But like, it's
01:43:31
◼
►
not making the
01:43:32
◼
►
Mac better and
01:43:33
◼
►
more powerful.
01:43:33
◼
►
It is just sort
01:43:34
◼
►
of like visual
01:43:35
◼
►
consistency for the
01:43:36
◼
►
sake of visual
01:43:37
◼
►
consistency.
01:43:39
◼
►
don't think that's
01:43:40
◼
►
a thing that
01:43:40
◼
►
people need as
01:43:42
◼
►
much as Apple
01:43:42
◼
►
designers seem to
01:43:43
◼
►
think they do.
01:43:43
◼
►
These are very
01:43:45
◼
►
different platforms.
01:43:45
◼
►
They behave very
01:43:47
◼
►
differently in lots
01:43:49
◼
►
And I'm not saying
01:43:51
◼
►
that the Mac has
01:43:53
◼
►
improvement for
01:43:53
◼
►
things that are
01:43:54
◼
►
confusing to a lot
01:43:55
◼
►
That's not what I'm
01:43:56
◼
►
saying at all.
01:43:56
◼
►
There's lots of room
01:43:57
◼
►
for improvement for
01:43:58
◼
►
But I don't think
01:44:00
◼
►
people need a
01:44:01
◼
►
different skin on
01:44:03
◼
►
That's not what's
01:44:04
◼
►
confusing them.
01:44:04
◼
►
What's confusing
01:44:05
◼
►
them is things like
01:44:06
◼
►
where do files go?
01:44:07
◼
►
How do I get
01:44:08
◼
►
What the hell is
01:44:09
◼
►
a disk image?
01:44:09
◼
►
There's all sorts
01:44:10
◼
►
of other things.
01:44:11
◼
►
How do I find
01:44:11
◼
►
things in settings?
01:44:12
◼
►
Yeah, right.
01:44:13
◼
►
And why does half
01:44:14
◼
►
the settings app not
01:44:15
◼
►
Literally, it doesn't
01:44:17
◼
►
So again, this is
01:44:19
◼
►
what we're talking
01:44:19
◼
►
We're going to have
01:44:20
◼
►
those people redesign
01:44:21
◼
►
the whole thing.
01:44:22
◼
►
We're not having
01:44:23
◼
►
like Bruce talking
01:44:24
◼
►
to Zini here.
01:44:25
◼
►
We're having those
01:44:26
◼
►
people redesign it.
01:44:26
◼
►
Not only do I not
01:44:28
◼
►
trust them to do a
01:44:31
◼
►
I literally, again,
01:44:32
◼
►
because the settings
01:44:33
◼
►
app is literally
01:44:35
◼
►
many features of
01:44:36
◼
►
it do not work.
01:44:37
◼
►
It does not work.
01:44:39
◼
►
So do we want
01:44:40
◼
►
those people
01:44:41
◼
►
redesigning the
01:44:43
◼
►
Even if we liked
01:44:45
◼
►
their visual
01:44:46
◼
►
concepts, which I
01:44:47
◼
►
don't think we
01:44:48
◼
►
will, but even if
01:44:49
◼
►
we like their
01:44:49
◼
►
visual concepts,
01:44:50
◼
►
they have not
01:44:52
◼
►
been trustworthy
01:44:55
◼
►
correctly, to make
01:44:56
◼
►
something that
01:44:57
◼
►
So that's a huge
01:44:59
◼
►
worry for me.
01:45:00
◼
►
And I think when
01:45:01
◼
►
how people have
01:45:03
◼
►
reacted to this
01:45:05
◼
►
rumor, it has
01:45:06
◼
►
gone over like a
01:45:07
◼
►
lead balloon.
01:45:07
◼
►
Yeah, people are
01:45:08
◼
►
not excited about
01:45:10
◼
►
And I think that
01:45:11
◼
►
shows where Apple's
01:45:14
◼
►
reputation is in this
01:45:15
◼
►
I mentioned earlier
01:45:17
◼
►
the developer issues
01:45:18
◼
►
of if they're going
01:45:19
◼
►
to drop a bomb on
01:45:20
◼
►
the developer
01:45:20
◼
►
community and put a
01:45:21
◼
►
massive burden on
01:45:23
◼
►
every iOS app
01:45:24
◼
►
developer in the
01:45:24
◼
►
world, I think they
01:45:26
◼
►
might be kind of
01:45:28
◼
►
overrating their
01:45:29
◼
►
position here and
01:45:30
◼
►
maybe overestimating
01:45:32
◼
►
how much political
01:45:33
◼
►
capital they have in
01:45:35
◼
►
this environment.
01:45:35
◼
►
But then on the
01:45:36
◼
►
technical side too,
01:45:38
◼
►
do they even have
01:45:40
◼
►
the talent on
01:45:41
◼
►
macOS to implement
01:45:43
◼
►
a new design?
01:45:44
◼
►
Or on iOS, because
01:45:46
◼
►
for all of iOS 7's
01:45:48
◼
►
faults, it was a
01:45:49
◼
►
very clear vision of
01:45:51
◼
►
what they wanted and
01:45:52
◼
►
they overshot it by a
01:45:53
◼
►
little bit, which
01:45:54
◼
►
arguably is what you
01:45:55
◼
►
You don't want to
01:45:56
◼
►
undershoot it, you
01:45:57
◼
►
want to overshoot it
01:45:57
◼
►
so the fonts are a
01:45:58
◼
►
little bit too thin,
01:45:59
◼
►
maybe the thing is a
01:46:00
◼
►
little bit too simple,
01:46:01
◼
►
maybe the buttons have
01:46:02
◼
►
too few borders, and
01:46:03
◼
►
you just back it off
01:46:04
◼
►
six notches and you
01:46:05
◼
►
have an OS that you
01:46:06
◼
►
can use for a decade,
01:46:07
◼
►
I think the iOS 7
01:46:09
◼
►
transition, and by
01:46:09
◼
►
the way, it's cheaper
01:46:10
◼
►
to make apps with it,
01:46:10
◼
►
I think the iOS 7
01:46:11
◼
►
transition, despite all
01:46:13
◼
►
the fuss about it, was
01:46:14
◼
►
largely successful.
01:46:15
◼
►
And I do agree that
01:46:17
◼
►
occasionally, you know,
01:46:18
◼
►
every decade or two,
01:46:19
◼
►
it's good to refresh
01:46:20
◼
►
everything and come up
01:46:21
◼
►
with a new look,
01:46:22
◼
►
We're just all scared
01:46:23
◼
►
now because we're like,
01:46:24
◼
►
okay, but what new
01:46:26
◼
►
Like, what are you
01:46:27
◼
►
going to do specifically?
01:46:28
◼
►
Because just saying we're
01:46:29
◼
►
going to do a big
01:46:29
◼
►
redesign, like, if, and
01:46:31
◼
►
to be clear and to be
01:46:32
◼
►
optimistic, if, if they
01:46:34
◼
►
make something that looks
01:46:37
◼
►
cool and attractive and
01:46:38
◼
►
new, we will be excited
01:46:41
◼
►
Customers will be excited
01:46:42
◼
►
about it, even though
01:46:43
◼
►
people will grumble that
01:46:43
◼
►
they change the way stuff
01:46:44
◼
►
looks or whatever, but
01:46:45
◼
►
like, that is a source of
01:46:46
◼
►
It is, there is upside to
01:46:48
◼
►
this, like a setting aside,
01:46:49
◼
►
like, to what end, what
01:46:50
◼
►
benefit are people getting
01:46:52
◼
►
or whatever.
01:46:53
◼
►
Merely changing the way
01:46:55
◼
►
things look and a few
01:46:56
◼
►
minor behaviors, if you do
01:46:58
◼
►
it well, it's important to
01:47:00
◼
►
do that every once in a
01:47:01
◼
►
while and can get people
01:47:03
◼
►
jazzed and excited.
01:47:04
◼
►
It can be a differentiator.
01:47:06
◼
►
It could be, like, what
01:47:07
◼
►
Apple wants a story to be
01:47:08
◼
►
when the new iPhone comes
01:47:09
◼
►
out with iOS 19 is, like,
01:47:11
◼
►
and it's got an all-new
01:47:12
◼
►
interface that looks really
01:47:13
◼
►
That's what they want the
01:47:14
◼
►
story to be, and that is
01:47:16
◼
►
a plausible story.
01:47:17
◼
►
It absolutely can happen,
01:47:18
◼
►
even if functionally they
01:47:20
◼
►
don't actually improve
01:47:21
◼
►
anything on the phone, but
01:47:22
◼
►
it just looks a little
01:47:22
◼
►
cooler, and most people
01:47:24
◼
►
think it looks cooler.
01:47:26
◼
►
Same thing with the Mac.
01:47:27
◼
►
Oh, the Mac has been kind
01:47:28
◼
►
of the same for a long
01:47:29
◼
►
Like I just said, there's
01:47:31
◼
►
things about the current
01:47:32
◼
►
interface that bother me.
01:47:34
◼
►
They have an all-new look
01:47:35
◼
►
and redesigned for the Mac,
01:47:36
◼
►
and actually a lot of those
01:47:37
◼
►
problem areas have improved,
01:47:38
◼
►
and the whole OS looks new
01:47:40
◼
►
and different, and we're
01:47:41
◼
►
excited about it.
01:47:42
◼
►
And I remember the times
01:47:44
◼
►
when Mac OS X versions
01:47:45
◼
►
would come out, and we
01:47:46
◼
►
would be excited about how
01:47:48
◼
►
That started to, you
01:47:49
◼
►
know, again, that started
01:47:50
◼
►
to veer off a little bit
01:47:51
◼
►
around the stitch leather
01:47:51
◼
►
thing, but in general, for
01:47:53
◼
►
many of the early years of
01:47:55
◼
►
Mac OS X, each new OS
01:47:56
◼
►
would come out, and we
01:47:57
◼
►
were excited to see how it
01:47:59
◼
►
looked, and if you had
01:48:00
◼
►
opinions, I like it, I
01:48:01
◼
►
don't like it, but in
01:48:02
◼
►
general, it was like, oh,
01:48:02
◼
►
this is the Mac looks all,
01:48:04
◼
►
it was part of things that
01:48:04
◼
►
drove upgrades back when
01:48:05
◼
►
Apple sold the OS for
01:48:07
◼
►
Kids, if you remember back
01:48:09
◼
►
in those days, they used
01:48:10
◼
►
to sell the upgrades to
01:48:12
◼
►
it would make you buy it, it
01:48:12
◼
►
would make you buy it, because
01:48:13
◼
►
you want the cool new look.
01:48:15
◼
►
And even if you didn't think
01:48:18
◼
►
you liked the cool new look,
01:48:19
◼
►
and when you first saw it, it
01:48:20
◼
►
would grow on you, and
01:48:21
◼
►
eventually the old look would
01:48:22
◼
►
look old, and you'd feel like
01:48:23
◼
►
you needed the new look, and
01:48:24
◼
►
like that, I think that's a
01:48:25
◼
►
healthy phenomenon, but there
01:48:28
◼
►
was a lot of getting lost in
01:48:29
◼
►
the wilderness there, and then
01:48:31
◼
►
iOS 7 happened, and then the
01:48:33
◼
►
OS has started to diverge.
01:48:34
◼
►
I do agree there's less sort of
01:48:36
◼
►
design unity between Mac OS, iOS,
01:48:39
◼
►
and iPad OS than there has
01:48:40
◼
►
been, mostly between the Mac
01:48:41
◼
►
and the other things, but I
01:48:44
◼
►
fear, I fear what they will
01:48:46
◼
►
do, and that's what I'm
01:48:46
◼
►
hearing from everybody who's
01:48:47
◼
►
sort of in the know.
01:48:48
◼
►
Regular people don't even
01:48:48
◼
►
know this is happening.
01:48:49
◼
►
They won't know until they
01:48:50
◼
►
see the first ad for the
01:48:51
◼
►
phone, or they go to the
01:48:51
◼
►
store and see the first
01:48:52
◼
►
phone with it, right, which
01:48:53
◼
►
is the way it should be,
01:48:54
◼
►
But people who are tech
01:48:55
◼
►
enthusiasts, I have not
01:48:56
◼
►
heard a single person say,
01:48:58
◼
►
I'm so jazzed about that.
01:48:59
◼
►
I haven't even heard a
01:48:59
◼
►
single person say what I
01:49:00
◼
►
just said, which is, there
01:49:01
◼
►
are parts of the current
01:49:02
◼
►
Mac OS that I don't like, and
01:49:03
◼
►
I hope this fixes them.
01:49:04
◼
►
Everybody is saying, oh my
01:49:06
◼
►
God, I'm so afraid of what
01:49:08
◼
►
they're going to do.
01:49:09
◼
►
I'm so afraid that they're
01:49:10
◼
►
just going to make
01:49:10
◼
►
everything worse, and Apple
01:49:13
◼
►
should really reflect on
01:49:14
◼
►
that, and I mean, hopefully
01:49:15
◼
►
they'll use it to motivate
01:49:16
◼
►
No one believes in us.
01:49:18
◼
►
Everyone thinks we don't
01:49:19
◼
►
know how to make things
01:49:20
◼
►
Everyone is out there just
01:49:22
◼
►
crossing their fingers that
01:49:23
◼
►
we won't break the crap
01:49:24
◼
►
that they like now.
01:49:25
◼
►
Like, a lot of people are
01:49:26
◼
►
feeling that way.
01:49:27
◼
►
Just fix the existing bugs
01:49:28
◼
►
and don't break the things
01:49:29
◼
►
that I like, right?
01:49:30
◼
►
That is a very pessimistic
01:49:33
◼
►
position for customers to
01:49:34
◼
►
be in, and Apple, I don't
01:49:36
◼
►
know if they do surveys of
01:49:38
◼
►
like their most enthusiastic
01:49:39
◼
►
customers, Apple should not
01:49:40
◼
►
have, it should not like to
01:49:42
◼
►
see that in the server
01:49:42
◼
►
responses, the sentiment that
01:49:44
◼
►
their most enthusiastic
01:49:46
◼
►
customers are saying, please
01:49:47
◼
►
just don't make anything
01:49:48
◼
►
Please just don't break the
01:49:50
◼
►
thing that I like.
01:49:50
◼
►
You know, please just fix
01:49:52
◼
►
the bugs that have been
01:49:52
◼
►
there for five years.
01:49:53
◼
►
I don't want any new
01:49:54
◼
►
Do a Snow Leopard release,
01:49:55
◼
►
blah, blah, blah.
01:49:56
◼
►
Like, the occurrence of
01:50:01
◼
►
that sentiment has only been
01:50:02
◼
►
increasing in recent years
01:50:03
◼
►
among the enthusiast
01:50:04
◼
►
community, and the non
01:50:06
◼
►
enthusiast community, the
01:50:07
◼
►
regular people who buy most
01:50:08
◼
►
of their products, they are
01:50:10
◼
►
going to be upset by any
01:50:12
◼
►
kind of change, but also if
01:50:14
◼
►
you do a change that they
01:50:15
◼
►
think looks cool, they will
01:50:16
◼
►
be motivated to get the new
01:50:17
◼
►
phone in cool colors with
01:50:19
◼
►
the new interface and so on
01:50:20
◼
►
and so forth.
01:50:20
◼
►
Now, that didn't work out
01:50:21
◼
►
for them with iOS 18 and
01:50:22
◼
►
photos, which was in the
01:50:24
◼
►
grand scheme of things, a
01:50:24
◼
►
very small change that
01:50:26
◼
►
didn't change the look
01:50:26
◼
►
and feel of the widgets
01:50:27
◼
►
everywhere, just changed
01:50:28
◼
►
one commonly used app in a
01:50:30
◼
►
way that I don't think was
01:50:31
◼
►
terrible, but certainly
01:50:32
◼
►
wasn't a clear win over the
01:50:33
◼
►
existing app.
01:50:33
◼
►
Multiply iOS 18 photos by
01:50:38
◼
►
every single app and every
01:50:39
◼
►
single iPhone, iPad, and
01:50:43
◼
►
Mac, and 2025 is looking
01:50:45
◼
►
like a pretty scary year.
01:50:45
◼
►
Yeah, because, and keep in
01:50:47
◼
►
mind, too, like, the, like,
01:50:49
◼
►
iOS 7 did not go over well
01:50:51
◼
►
with regular people.
01:50:52
◼
►
People hated it.
01:50:54
◼
►
Like, when, when, when,
01:50:55
◼
►
like, your parents' phones
01:50:57
◼
►
would update, you'd get
01:50:57
◼
►
those calls.
01:50:58
◼
►
Like, you, like, you...
01:50:59
◼
►
Yeah, what happened?
01:51:00
◼
►
Why does everything look
01:51:00
◼
►
like this now?
01:51:01
◼
►
Yeah, can I go back?
01:51:02
◼
►
Like, and, and, but also,
01:51:05
◼
►
you know, when you look at,
01:51:05
◼
►
like, iOS 7, you can say,
01:51:08
◼
►
like, oh, well, they haven't
01:51:09
◼
►
done a redesign in how many
01:51:10
◼
►
years ago that way.
01:51:11
◼
►
It's been, it's been a long
01:51:12
◼
►
But they've done a ton of
01:51:15
◼
►
incremental changes.
01:51:16
◼
►
If you look at, like, go,
01:51:17
◼
►
if, listeners, go do, right
01:51:20
◼
►
now, go do a Google image
01:51:21
◼
►
search for something like
01:51:22
◼
►
iOS 7 UI, and take a look
01:51:25
◼
►
around at screenshots of
01:51:26
◼
►
actually what iOS 7 looked
01:51:28
◼
►
It looks ancient by
01:51:30
◼
►
comparison to what we have
01:51:31
◼
►
It's not that we've kept
01:51:33
◼
►
the same design all this
01:51:35
◼
►
Apple has iterated over time,
01:51:37
◼
►
and we've iterated over time.
01:51:38
◼
►
And so, it's not like we are
01:51:40
◼
►
in desperate need for a huge
01:51:42
◼
►
We have been changing and
01:51:46
◼
►
evolving designs over the
01:51:48
◼
►
last decade or whatever it's
01:51:50
◼
►
We are nothing like iOS 7
01:51:52
◼
►
I wouldn't say nothing.
01:51:53
◼
►
We're clearly a derivative of
01:51:56
◼
►
But yes, the details, the
01:51:57
◼
►
small details have changed
01:51:58
◼
►
literally everywhere.
01:51:59
◼
►
But I think if you looked at
01:52:00
◼
►
this and said, is this more
01:52:01
◼
►
like from the iOS 7 lineage
01:52:03
◼
►
or from the iOS 1 through 6
01:52:05
◼
►
I know there wasn't an iOS 1.
01:52:06
◼
►
I would say we're clearly
01:52:08
◼
►
derived from iOS 7.
01:52:09
◼
►
I mean, yes, but like, it's
01:52:12
◼
►
like in only very broad
01:52:14
◼
►
If you look, and because
01:52:15
◼
►
every stroke is broader than
01:52:16
◼
►
every stroke in iOS 7.
01:52:17
◼
►
But like, if you look at
01:52:19
◼
►
like what iOS 7 actually
01:52:20
◼
►
looked like and shipped
01:52:22
◼
►
like, it's, you know, we
01:52:24
◼
►
have gone so far since
01:52:25
◼
►
So, there is not this big
01:52:27
◼
►
need for this.
01:52:28
◼
►
And again, like, the
01:52:30
◼
►
expense, the burden that it
01:52:32
◼
►
puts on the entire
01:52:33
◼
►
ecosystem, including users,
01:52:35
◼
►
because I cannot, if
01:52:37
◼
►
listeners, if you didn't
01:52:38
◼
►
have like parents in your
01:52:39
◼
►
life or older people in
01:52:40
◼
►
your life during the iOS 7
01:52:42
◼
►
transition, consider
01:52:43
◼
►
yourself like you missed
01:52:45
◼
►
Why does my phone's
01:52:46
◼
►
home screen look like a
01:52:48
◼
►
Or like, I don't, I can't,
01:52:49
◼
►
everything is lost.
01:52:50
◼
►
I can't find anything.
01:52:51
◼
►
Just please, how do I go
01:52:52
◼
►
People hated it.
01:52:54
◼
►
Like, regular people hated
01:52:56
◼
►
And people are always
01:52:57
◼
►
going to hate that.
01:52:57
◼
►
It's not the reason not to
01:52:58
◼
►
And I do think people
01:52:59
◼
►
eventually got on board
01:53:00
◼
►
with it and got used to it
01:53:01
◼
►
pretty quickly because I
01:53:02
◼
►
think the iOS 7 design was
01:53:04
◼
►
fundamentally a good idea if
01:53:06
◼
►
even if they overshot it a
01:53:08
◼
►
But that's going to happen.
01:53:09
◼
►
And like, it's, I think it's
01:53:11
◼
►
fine for that to happen, but
01:53:12
◼
►
you don't want to burn, you
01:53:13
◼
►
don't want to do that if
01:53:15
◼
►
there's not, if you're not
01:53:16
◼
►
going to make some people
01:53:17
◼
►
excited about it and if
01:53:18
◼
►
there's not going to be
01:53:20
◼
►
benefits on the other side
01:53:22
◼
►
So the benefits of iOS 17
01:53:23
◼
►
are, you know, lower
01:53:24
◼
►
application development
01:53:26
◼
►
costs, a fresh new look
01:53:27
◼
►
that makes you stand out in
01:53:28
◼
►
the market, a
01:53:29
◼
►
differentiator between last
01:53:30
◼
►
year's phone and this
01:53:31
◼
►
year's phone.
01:53:31
◼
►
Like there's, there were
01:53:33
◼
►
upsides to it that made the
01:53:34
◼
►
pain worth it.
01:53:36
◼
►
I think there's a couple of
01:53:38
◼
►
things that we need to
01:53:40
◼
►
First of all, while I agree
01:53:42
◼
►
with everything that you guys
01:53:43
◼
►
are saying broadly, I think
01:53:45
◼
►
I can't help but wonder
01:53:47
◼
►
hearing John particularly
01:53:48
◼
►
espouse like, oh, the Mac is
01:53:49
◼
►
so much simpler and better
01:53:50
◼
►
than iPadOS to do things like
01:53:52
◼
►
window management.
01:53:53
◼
►
And on the surface, I think
01:53:54
◼
►
that's true.
01:53:54
◼
►
But I think we're all three of
01:53:57
◼
►
us showing our age because I
01:54:00
◼
►
would say for people who grow
01:54:03
◼
►
up on touchscreen devices
01:54:05
◼
►
first, the indirection that
01:54:07
◼
►
comes from a mouse, from a
01:54:10
◼
►
keyboard in some cases, but
01:54:11
◼
►
certainly by not touching the
01:54:13
◼
►
thing that they're interacting
01:54:14
◼
►
with, that has a burden that
01:54:17
◼
►
the three of us don't have to
01:54:19
◼
►
deal with because we were
01:54:20
◼
►
brought up on that
01:54:21
◼
►
indirection.
01:54:21
◼
►
But for things like my kids,
01:54:23
◼
►
like they're using Chromebooks
01:54:25
◼
►
now and they seem fine with
01:54:26
◼
►
that, but they're not really
01:54:27
◼
►
doing window management on
01:54:28
◼
►
their Chromebooks.
01:54:29
◼
►
Like everything's full
01:54:30
◼
►
screen, right?
01:54:30
◼
►
And I think that they would
01:54:31
◼
►
find, and they're
01:54:33
◼
►
smart kids, but I think they
01:54:34
◼
►
would find the window
01:54:35
◼
►
management that I consider
01:54:36
◼
►
second nature to be
01:54:37
◼
►
burdensome and frustrating
01:54:39
◼
►
and old-timey.
01:54:41
◼
►
And even though I personally
01:54:43
◼
►
agree wholeheartedly with what
01:54:44
◼
►
you're saying, John, I don't
01:54:45
◼
►
know that that's a fair
01:54:48
◼
►
representation of everyone.
01:54:49
◼
►
And I don't know that we
01:54:52
◼
►
should assume that we are
01:54:54
◼
►
completely right about that.
01:54:55
◼
►
Well, I mean, like I said,
01:54:56
◼
►
it's in the context of doing
01:54:58
◼
►
what you do on a Mac.
01:54:59
◼
►
If you need to see multiple
01:55:01
◼
►
things at the same time, it
01:55:03
◼
►
is easier to accomplish
01:55:03
◼
►
that on the Mac.
01:55:04
◼
►
If you don't need to see
01:55:05
◼
►
multiple things at the same
01:55:06
◼
►
time, it is easier to
01:55:07
◼
►
accomplish that on an iPad.
01:55:07
◼
►
So I think it's really just a
01:55:09
◼
►
question of like, eventually
01:55:10
◼
►
your kids, if they get, you
01:55:12
◼
►
know, get older and get a
01:55:13
◼
►
job, they're going to have to
01:55:15
◼
►
do more than have a single
01:55:16
◼
►
thing full screen all the
01:55:17
◼
►
Like just inevitably your work
01:55:19
◼
►
will become more complicated
01:55:20
◼
►
So when you're faced with
01:55:21
◼
►
that challenge, how do you
01:55:23
◼
►
want to tackle it?
01:55:24
◼
►
How do you want to
01:55:24
◼
►
accomplish that goal?
01:55:26
◼
►
And the answer is not
01:55:27
◼
►
stage manager.
01:55:27
◼
►
The answer is some kind of
01:55:29
◼
►
normal windowing system.
01:55:30
◼
►
And as for the touchscreen
01:55:31
◼
►
thing, like we're all for
01:55:32
◼
►
touchscreen Macs.
01:55:32
◼
►
Like, again, if they have to
01:55:33
◼
►
change a Mac OS to make it
01:55:34
◼
►
accommodate touchscreens, fine,
01:55:35
◼
►
but then actually ship some
01:55:36
◼
►
touch Macs, right?
01:55:37
◼
►
Like this, it is frustrating
01:55:39
◼
►
that Apple has been stubbornly
01:55:41
◼
►
refusing to do touch Macs for
01:55:44
◼
►
reasons that don't make sense
01:55:45
◼
►
And if they, if the redesign
01:55:47
◼
►
accommodates that, that's all
01:55:50
◼
►
But like, like here's the
01:55:52
◼
►
When faced with a complex
01:55:54
◼
►
task, a simple set of tools
01:55:58
◼
►
is the best way to tackle
01:55:59
◼
►
it, allowing you to use
01:56:00
◼
►
those tools to solve your
01:56:01
◼
►
problem rather than taking a
01:56:04
◼
►
complex task and making a
01:56:05
◼
►
complex system that fits that
01:56:07
◼
►
complex task, like a key
01:56:09
◼
►
fits a lock, but in only one
01:56:11
◼
►
particular way, does it fit?
01:56:12
◼
►
That's, that's not a good way
01:56:14
◼
►
to solve that.
01:56:15
◼
►
So if I said you have to
01:56:17
◼
►
develop an app in Xcode, well,
01:56:18
◼
►
there's a big learning curve
01:56:20
◼
►
Now I said, now you have to do
01:56:21
◼
►
it on an iPad versus doing it
01:56:24
◼
►
It doesn't matter if you
01:56:25
◼
►
were born yesterday or born
01:56:26
◼
►
50 years ago, you will be more
01:56:29
◼
►
frustrated by trying to deal
01:56:30
◼
►
with all the different things
01:56:31
◼
►
that you have to deal with to
01:56:32
◼
►
develop an app in an Xcode or
01:56:35
◼
►
any kind of ID like interface.
01:56:36
◼
►
You'll be very frustrated
01:56:37
◼
►
trying to do that on an iPad
01:56:38
◼
►
versus trying to do it on the
01:56:40
◼
►
Once you learn all the things
01:56:42
◼
►
that you have to do.
01:56:42
◼
►
I don't know that that's true.
01:56:43
◼
►
I really don't.
01:56:44
◼
►
And I, and I mean that
01:56:45
◼
►
genuinely because I, again, I
01:56:47
◼
►
came from the same lineage that
01:56:49
◼
►
you did, even though I'm not
01:56:50
◼
►
sure you agree on that, but I
01:56:52
◼
►
came from the same lineage that
01:56:53
◼
►
And so I, one trillion
01:56:55
◼
►
percent would be, I would
01:56:57
◼
►
nope out of it instantly
01:56:58
◼
►
because it's, it's impossible,
01:57:00
◼
►
but I'm not so sure that
01:57:02
◼
►
someone from a diff cut from a
01:57:04
◼
►
different cloth would feel the
01:57:05
◼
►
But I mean, there's no way to
01:57:06
◼
►
answer this.
01:57:07
◼
►
I mean, it's a question of the
01:57:09
◼
►
complexity of the problem.
01:57:09
◼
►
How many things do you need to
01:57:11
◼
►
be doing and seeing at the same
01:57:13
◼
►
As that number decreases, you
01:57:14
◼
►
can get simpler interfaces.
01:57:16
◼
►
And by the way, I think the Mac
01:57:17
◼
►
does a pretty good job of
01:57:18
◼
►
accomplishing that.
01:57:18
◼
►
If I watch how my son uses his
01:57:21
◼
►
Mac to do things, he just
01:57:22
◼
►
full screens, everything three
01:57:23
◼
►
from his swipes between them.
01:57:24
◼
►
Like it's not as, as
01:57:25
◼
►
straightforward as, as an iPad
01:57:27
◼
►
perhaps, but it is a way of
01:57:29
◼
►
using a Mac that is foreign to
01:57:31
◼
►
me, but Mac OS does accommodate
01:57:33
◼
►
it and allows him to work more
01:57:34
◼
►
like he's used to.
01:57:35
◼
►
But there does come a point where
01:57:37
◼
►
he needs to see more than one
01:57:38
◼
►
window at the same time.
01:57:39
◼
►
And as soon as you need to do
01:57:40
◼
►
that, you need to come up with
01:57:42
◼
►
some kind of solution.
01:57:42
◼
►
And like, I, I've literally never
01:57:45
◼
►
met anybody who finds the way
01:57:48
◼
►
iPad handles multiple windows to
01:57:50
◼
►
be simpler, more understandable,
01:57:52
◼
►
and more flexible than the way
01:57:53
◼
►
It's not saying the Mac is
01:57:54
◼
►
easier because people can get
01:57:55
◼
►
frustrated by the Mac too.
01:57:56
◼
►
Oh, I lose track of windows.
01:57:58
◼
►
I can't tell when they're
01:57:58
◼
►
visible, so on and so forth.
01:57:59
◼
►
But if you're, if your thing you're
01:58:01
◼
►
trying to do is complicated, the
01:58:03
◼
►
iPad is so limiting.
01:58:05
◼
►
You can do certain things.
01:58:06
◼
►
I can do two.
01:58:07
◼
►
I can do two with the slide
01:58:08
◼
►
over four, five mil strange
01:58:11
◼
►
manager kind of, but it gets real
01:58:14
◼
►
hard, real fast.
01:58:15
◼
►
Like the curve, you hit a wall,
01:58:16
◼
►
So again, it depends on the
01:58:19
◼
►
context for simple things.
01:58:20
◼
►
You know, iPad OS makes simple
01:58:22
◼
►
things easy, but it makes many
01:58:23
◼
►
hard things literally impossible.
01:58:25
◼
►
And I, and I get you in, in I'm
01:58:27
◼
►
not, again, I'm not saying you're
01:58:28
◼
►
wrong, but I wonder if any one
01:58:30
◼
►
of the three of us would have a
01:58:31
◼
►
very different opinion about
01:58:32
◼
►
this if we were growing up now
01:58:34
◼
►
rather than 500 years ago.
01:58:35
◼
►
Uh, the other point I wanted to
01:58:37
◼
►
make is to be angels advocate
01:58:40
◼
►
rather than devil's advocate, I
01:58:41
◼
►
I don't know.
01:58:41
◼
►
Um, so I put the vision pro on a
01:58:47
◼
►
few hours ago in order to rewatch
01:58:49
◼
►
the aforementioned, um, freeze,
01:58:52
◼
►
not free solo, whatever I called
01:58:54
◼
►
Um, the, the adventure episode.
01:58:56
◼
►
And I briefly use the vision pro
01:58:58
◼
►
to do not entertainment things.
01:59:01
◼
►
I answered an email, which I think
01:59:03
◼
►
I answered with four words because
01:59:05
◼
►
it's the world's worst keyboard.
01:59:06
◼
►
But, um, but I did a handful of,
01:59:10
◼
►
of quote unquote productivity
01:59:12
◼
►
It was very little, but it was
01:59:14
◼
►
And every time I put the vision
01:59:15
◼
►
pro on, I've said this many
01:59:16
◼
►
times, every one put the, I put
01:59:17
◼
►
the vision pro on, I feel like
01:59:19
◼
►
I'm strapping the future to my
01:59:21
◼
►
And that's both in the obvious
01:59:23
◼
►
Like, oh, there's windows floating
01:59:24
◼
►
in freaking space.
01:59:26
◼
►
And the fact that when I look
01:59:28
◼
►
around, those windows are pretty
01:59:30
◼
►
solidly staying perfectly
01:59:33
◼
►
stationary, you know, they're
01:59:35
◼
►
not hovering and, and, and, and
01:59:37
◼
►
bouncing around like my drone
01:59:38
◼
►
does when I put it in the air,
01:59:39
◼
►
like they are solid.
01:59:41
◼
►
And I still am stupefied that that
01:59:43
◼
►
is something that we can
01:59:44
◼
►
accomplish in 2024, really, because
01:59:46
◼
►
this was a year ago now.
01:59:47
◼
►
Um, but the other thing that makes
01:59:49
◼
►
it feel like the future is the,
01:59:51
◼
►
just the whole vibe of the
01:59:53
◼
►
And I, I don't think I have the
01:59:54
◼
►
vocabulary to do much better than
01:59:56
◼
►
that, but the way that
01:59:58
◼
►
transparency is used and depth
02:00:00
◼
►
is used and granted those things
02:00:02
◼
►
are used because the vision pro
02:00:04
◼
►
lends itself to transparency and
02:00:07
◼
►
depth, especially, but the whole
02:00:10
◼
►
just vibe of the OS leaving aside
02:00:14
◼
►
the fact that I've got the future
02:00:15
◼
►
on my face, the vibe of the OS
02:00:17
◼
►
just feels kind of futuristic.
02:00:19
◼
►
And then I look at things like the
02:00:20
◼
►
invites app and granted the
02:00:22
◼
►
invites app was kind of not
02:00:23
◼
►
great, but visually it's a lot
02:00:27
◼
►
of transparency and, uh, in
02:00:29
◼
►
depth in a much smaller degree, but
02:00:31
◼
►
depth nevertheless.
02:00:32
◼
►
And it does, as we've talked about
02:00:34
◼
►
before, does give a kind of
02:00:36
◼
►
vision OSE vibe.
02:00:37
◼
►
And I feel like bringing that
02:00:40
◼
►
whole vibe to the OS broadly.
02:00:42
◼
►
And I'm not disagreeing, especially
02:00:44
◼
►
Marco with what you were saying
02:00:45
◼
►
earlier, it's a big lift for
02:00:47
◼
►
individual developers like us.
02:00:48
◼
►
It's asking a lot at a time where
02:00:50
◼
►
we're all feeling pretty
02:00:51
◼
►
disgruntled about Apple again.
02:00:53
◼
►
It's all of those things you
02:00:54
◼
►
said, I completely agree with, but
02:00:55
◼
►
if you take it just at the
02:00:56
◼
►
surface, I think having that
02:00:59
◼
►
vibe, the, the, the, uh, was
02:01:02
◼
►
it John Prosser?
02:01:02
◼
►
I think you said a mock-up of
02:01:04
◼
►
photos app, like visually, I
02:01:07
◼
►
think that looked pretty cool and
02:01:09
◼
►
it looked kind of like the
02:01:11
◼
►
And I would not at all be
02:01:13
◼
►
surprised if Apple tries to get
02:01:15
◼
►
if not literally that same
02:01:17
◼
►
approach, that whole vibe onto
02:01:21
◼
►
iPadOS, onto MacOS, onto iOS.
02:01:24
◼
►
And perhaps that's why it wasn't
02:01:26
◼
►
mentioned in, in German's report
02:01:27
◼
►
is because we're already there in
02:01:29
◼
►
vision OSE and we're bringing that
02:01:31
◼
►
And I know I've said the word 17
02:01:33
◼
►
I'll say it again.
02:01:34
◼
►
We're bringing that same vibe to
02:01:35
◼
►
these other platforms.
02:01:37
◼
►
And honestly, putting, taking off my
02:01:40
◼
►
developer hat and putting on my
02:01:41
◼
►
consumer hat, that actually sounds
02:01:43
◼
►
kind of good to me, to be
02:01:44
◼
►
completely honest with you.
02:01:45
◼
►
I think I might be here for that.
02:01:47
◼
►
Now, as soon as I take my, you
02:01:48
◼
►
know, user hat off and put the
02:01:49
◼
►
developer hat on, I want to crawl
02:01:51
◼
►
into a hole and die.
02:01:52
◼
►
Like I'm already too tired to deal
02:01:55
◼
►
with any of that, but it's from a
02:01:57
◼
►
user's perspective.
02:01:58
◼
►
I think that might be pretty cool.
02:01:59
◼
►
It's actually some parallels with the
02:02:01
◼
►
early days of Mac OS X here.
02:02:02
◼
►
Like one of the things that, uh, was
02:02:04
◼
►
said frequently about Aqua, probably
02:02:05
◼
►
by me, but all I don't remember,
02:02:06
◼
►
um, was that Aqua looks like the
02:02:10
◼
►
interface that people would make up
02:02:12
◼
►
for sci-fi movies back in the day.
02:02:14
◼
►
Like they make like a fake computer
02:02:16
◼
►
interface of some future computer and
02:02:17
◼
►
a sci-fi thing.
02:02:18
◼
►
And they'd make it, it would look
02:02:20
◼
►
nothing like, you know, at the time,
02:02:22
◼
►
like, you know, Windows or classic
02:02:23
◼
►
Mac OS and it would behave nothing
02:02:25
◼
►
It would have these gratuitous visual
02:02:26
◼
►
effects that people would look at
02:02:27
◼
►
and say, that's not what computers
02:02:30
◼
►
This is all, you know, fantasy sci-fi
02:02:32
◼
►
stuff or whatever.
02:02:33
◼
►
Uh, and Apple essentially said,
02:02:35
◼
►
we're going to make a movie
02:02:36
◼
►
computer interface.
02:02:37
◼
►
Like the genie effect was totally
02:02:40
◼
►
like a special effect movie thing.
02:02:41
◼
►
Everything being transparent and
02:02:43
◼
►
shiny candy colored, round 3D
02:02:46
◼
►
looking photorealistic buttons and
02:02:47
◼
►
photorealistic icons.
02:02:48
◼
►
Like that's not what computers are.
02:02:50
◼
►
Like that's some ridiculous movie
02:02:51
◼
►
person's idea, but they literally
02:02:53
◼
►
They made, they made a movie
02:02:54
◼
►
computer, right?
02:02:55
◼
►
And what you're saying about
02:02:57
◼
►
vision OS is basically the same
02:02:59
◼
►
Oh, it looks like the future
02:03:01
◼
►
because you've seen a lot of
02:03:03
◼
►
things in popular media, sci-fi
02:03:05
◼
►
stuff that looks kind of like big
02:03:08
◼
►
translucent panes.
02:03:09
◼
►
And I remember a minority report
02:03:11
◼
►
had such an effect on this that in
02:03:12
◼
►
pop culture, even non tech
02:03:14
◼
►
enthusiasts were saying it's like a
02:03:16
◼
►
minority report interface where Tom
02:03:17
◼
►
Cruz is swiping away clear panes of
02:03:20
◼
►
glass, you know, floating in front of
02:03:21
◼
►
him and like an air interface or
02:03:23
◼
►
whatever things in popular mood media
02:03:26
◼
►
influence what we think, quote unquote,
02:03:28
◼
►
looks like the future.
02:03:29
◼
►
So vision OS looks like the future
02:03:31
◼
►
because it looks like things that
02:03:33
◼
►
we've seen in sci-fi movies.
02:03:34
◼
►
And as we've all said, transparency
02:03:37
◼
►
and vision OS makes tons of sense
02:03:38
◼
►
because it's overlaying the interface
02:03:39
◼
►
on top of the world around you in a
02:03:41
◼
►
way that other things do not things
02:03:43
◼
►
with screens that are not strapped
02:03:44
◼
►
your eyeballs don't do that.
02:03:45
◼
►
And arguably early versions of Mac
02:03:49
◼
►
OS 10 and later versions of Windows
02:03:51
◼
►
thoroughly explored exactly how
02:03:53
◼
►
translucent you can make things before
02:03:55
◼
►
it becomes visually confusing.
02:03:56
◼
►
And we've learned lessons there.
02:03:58
◼
►
And we may suddenly unlearn those.
02:03:59
◼
►
But you're totally right that if
02:04:01
◼
►
they can successfully make
02:04:03
◼
►
essentially the movie interface,
02:04:04
◼
►
just like Aqua did, it will be
02:04:07
◼
►
exciting enough and cool enough
02:04:09
◼
►
that it will be a net benefit
02:04:12
◼
►
despite all the people who are
02:04:14
◼
►
going to flip out about how
02:04:15
◼
►
things look terrible, despite all
02:04:16
◼
►
the reviews that I wrote saying how
02:04:18
◼
►
this thing shouldn't be translucent
02:04:19
◼
►
and this is hard to see and the
02:04:21
◼
►
information density has gone down
02:04:22
◼
►
and yada, yada, yada.
02:04:23
◼
►
Like they refined, they tweaked,
02:04:25
◼
►
they backed off, they figured it out.
02:04:26
◼
►
But that burst of excitement is
02:04:28
◼
►
something you can't replace.
02:04:28
◼
►
And despite the fact, as Marco said,
02:04:30
◼
►
that, you know, iOS is not crying out
02:04:32
◼
►
for a massive redesign.
02:04:33
◼
►
Every n number of years, you should do
02:04:38
◼
►
this just to sort of clear the decks
02:04:40
◼
►
and freshen things up, even though
02:04:42
◼
►
it's painful.
02:04:42
◼
►
It's why you don't do it every year.
02:04:43
◼
►
It's why you don't do it every five
02:04:45
◼
►
But when was iOS 7?
02:04:46
◼
►
I can't do math in my head.
02:04:47
◼
►
But like I think every 10 or 15 years
02:04:50
◼
►
is a reasonable time scale to think
02:04:53
◼
►
about a rig redesign.
02:04:54
◼
►
The reason I'm spiraling about this
02:04:57
◼
►
is because I don't have faith
02:04:59
◼
►
that the redesign will be an improvement.
02:05:01
◼
►
Oh, it kills me to say that,
02:05:02
◼
►
but I just don't.
02:05:03
◼
►
And honestly, I've still not met a single,
02:05:06
◼
►
not met, not seen a single response
02:05:08
◼
►
from somebody granted in my little
02:05:10
◼
►
circles of people who are similar
02:05:12
◼
►
ages and have similar experiences
02:05:13
◼
►
with Apple who are like,
02:05:15
◼
►
I'm excited about this.
02:05:16
◼
►
I think they're going to do a great
02:05:17
◼
►
job because we're not excited.
02:05:20
◼
►
And I hope Apple, you know,
02:05:23
◼
►
takes that as a challenge and defies
02:05:25
◼
►
expectations and make something that
02:05:26
◼
►
we were like, oh, thank God,
02:05:27
◼
►
it's actually really cool.
02:05:29
◼
►
Thanks to our sponsors this week,
02:05:31
◼
►
Terminal and BetterHelp.
02:05:33
◼
►
And thanks to our members who
02:05:34
◼
►
support us directly.
02:05:35
◼
►
You can join us at atp.fm slash join.
02:05:37
◼
►
One of the perks of membership is
02:05:39
◼
►
ATP Overtime, our weekly bonus topic.
02:05:42
◼
►
This week on Overtime, we're going to
02:05:43
◼
►
be looking at affordable EVs and
02:05:46
◼
►
physical controls, which is an
02:05:47
◼
►
interesting combination.
02:05:48
◼
►
We're seeing there's this new
02:05:50
◼
►
Volkswagen ID everyone concept
02:05:53
◼
►
we're going to be talking about
02:05:53
◼
►
and some physical button news.
02:05:56
◼
►
So that's in this week's Overtime.
02:05:58
◼
►
If you want to hear us talk about
02:05:58
◼
►
that, you can join atp.fm slash join.
02:06:01
◼
►
Thanks, everyone.
02:06:02
◼
►
And we'll talk to you next week.
02:06:04
◼
►
Now the show is over.
02:06:09
◼
►
They didn't even mean to begin
02:06:11
◼
►
Cause it was accidental
02:06:13
◼
►
Oh, it was accidental
02:06:16
◼
►
John didn't do any research
02:06:19
◼
►
Margo and Casey wouldn't let him
02:06:22
◼
►
Cause it was accidental
02:06:24
◼
►
Oh, it was accidental
02:06:26
◼
►
And you can find the show notes
02:06:32
◼
►
And if you're into Mastodon
02:06:36
◼
►
You can follow them at C-A-S-E-Y-L-I-S-S
02:06:42
◼
►
So that's Casey Liss, M-A-R-C-O-A-R-M-E-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-E-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-E-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-E-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-E-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-E-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-E-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-E-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-E-N-T-M-A-R-
02:06:42
◼
►
That's Casey Liss, M-A-R-C-O-A-R-M-N-T-M-A-R-C-O-R-M-N-S-I-R-A-C-U-S-A-C-R-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U
02:07:12
◼
►
were dying they fully died eventually like just would not make any more noise which was bad um and
02:07:18
◼
►
so i was looking at new speakers i had some speakers in mind that i was going to get i asked
02:07:22
◼
►
the audience if anyone has these speakers how do they like them and people did write in can i jump
02:07:28
◼
►
in it just occurred i don't know why it just occurred to me what if you're only using these
02:07:33
◼
►
speakers for games why does fidelity really matter that much i mean so as i said last time i've had
02:07:40
◼
►
these speakers for like over 16 years and when i'm buying anything new electronics wise like oh
02:07:45
◼
►
can i do better than the speakers i got 16 years ago it's not that i'm against fidelity it's just
02:07:50
◼
►
that i'm not listening to them all day long so i'm not going to spend a huge amount of money on them
02:07:53
◼
►
they're not that important to me especially given my criteria which i will re-emphasize when i start
02:07:58
◼
►
talking about these new speakers this is a lot of money to spend on speakers that you're using for
02:08:02
◼
►
video games if you ask me it's not just video like anytime i need to hear audio if i'm watching a
02:08:06
◼
►
youtube video i need to hear the audio so maybe that's not a high fidelity type experience but you
02:08:10
◼
►
know and i do occasionally listen to my music collection on my mac while i'm doing stuff you
02:08:15
◼
►
know it's just i'm not i'm not i don't have music playing all the time like you do but the bottom
02:08:18
◼
►
line is i wanted to upgrade i had old speakers i wanted new speakers i wanted the new speakers to
02:08:23
◼
►
be better than the old speakers not better in a thousands of dollars way but better i mean that's
02:08:28
◼
►
all the reason you ultimately need i was just curious all right so i apologize for interrupting
02:08:32
◼
►
yeah and it's not it's not like i again i wasn't looking for like these have to be super high
02:08:36
◼
►
fidelity i just wanted them to be better right you know you buy a new thing you want to be better than
02:08:40
◼
►
the old thing especially if the old thing you have is really old so i asked for people to give me
02:08:45
◼
►
feedback on the ones i was thinking of buying and they did but also people uh suggested many
02:08:50
◼
►
alternatives to the ones that i was looking at most of the alternatives they suggested i had seen and
02:08:54
◼
►
explored and chosen the ones that i was looking at because i didn't like them but two uh suggestions
02:09:00
◼
►
stand out i want to talk about them uh one of them is the vanatoo v-a-n-a-t-o-o transparent zero plus i
02:09:07
◼
►
had actually looked at the speaker i had mostly dismissed it based on looks which was a big criteria for me
02:09:14
◼
►
uh but so many people wrote in to say they either had these or had heard these and they were impressed by
02:09:23
◼
►
the fidelity uh compared to the price and size despite the fact that they are a little weird
02:09:29
◼
►
looking uh these links to all these in the show all of these are not great looking to be honest with
02:09:35
◼
►
you i don't think any of these are good looking these speakers are wedge shaped so they're angled
02:09:40
◼
►
they're angled they're more like a trap is a trap yeah they're more like a trapezoid than a rectangle
02:09:45
◼
►
but they have this interesting feature where if you can see on the back looks like there's like a handle
02:09:49
◼
►
back there right if you turn these over if you flip them like 180 degrees
02:09:54
◼
►
then then the surface of the speakers is um perpendicular to the table right so they it's like
02:10:03
◼
►
they're trying to have it both ways these can be tilted back or these can be just straight up and down
02:10:07
◼
►
and it makes very strange arrangement uh if you have them in your desk you should probably have
02:10:11
◼
►
them tilted up towards you i don't really like the handle but i just wanted to point this out that
02:10:15
◼
►
people give lots of good reports on these speakers in particular they have good fidelity a lot of
02:10:20
◼
►
people who are looking for speakers on their desks are measuring them as what they call studio monitors
02:10:25
◼
►
or things that will try to give you an exactly accurate neutral near field listening experience for
02:10:31
◼
►
doing audio editing so you know what it really sounds like as opposed to trying to change the audio
02:10:37
◼
►
to make it pleasing to your ears like no just show me the audio that's there because i'm the one
02:10:41
◼
►
changing the audio i'm mixing the track i'm adjusting the thing or whatever so i need to hear
02:10:45
◼
►
what it really sounds like so i want you to just be completely neutral have a frequency response that
02:10:51
◼
►
doesn't change it's just totally flat uh because that is accurate uh i wasn't looking for that and so
02:10:58
◼
►
the fact that these uh vanitude transparent zero pluses have that and are fairly inexpensive and small
02:11:03
◼
►
wasn't that attractive to me but i did take a second look at them even though i had dismissed
02:11:08
◼
►
them earlier for being ugly wait before so first of all before we lose before we leave this
02:11:13
◼
►
this is actually like to have the speakers natively angled diagonally upward towards you
02:11:19
◼
►
is a great feature for desktop speakers because that is the better angle normally you have to achieve
02:11:24
◼
►
it with some kind of you know stand or like a wedge kind of mount or something like but so to have
02:11:29
◼
►
them actually just natively angled up like that is a great feature these may be tilted a little bit
02:11:34
◼
►
too much though i feel like depending on the height of your desk in their position they look a little
02:11:38
◼
►
slanty to me a little but i i think it actually that's pretty close to what you want like my i have my i
02:11:43
◼
►
have the the the kef or kef i still don't know how to pronounce it i always just like kef yeah i have
02:11:48
◼
►
the uh i think it's the lsx2 i think those have stands that like just stand them up and it's it's at
02:11:57
◼
►
almost that angle it isn't quite that angle but it's it's close um that being said i do love the
02:12:04
◼
►
name you know transparent that's what you mean like when transparent in audio terms means the speakers
02:12:10
◼
►
are not quote coloring the sound they're not like boosting the bass or boosting the treble like they're
02:12:15
◼
►
they're just giving you like the a reasonably flat frequency frequency response and that is you are
02:12:22
◼
►
correct uh what people in studios want when they have you know studio monitors uh it's almost never
02:12:30
◼
►
what you want for your own personal listening people usually would go for speakers that are quote more
02:12:34
◼
►
musical when the books usually means like a little more pleasant to listen to but you know the name
02:12:40
◼
►
transparent that means there's nothing there they add to that zero so transparent also zero still
02:12:48
◼
►
nothing there and then they say plus plus what like what that's not transparent anymore well they're
02:12:54
◼
►
better than the old transparent zero i think is actually the second version of this and by the way
02:12:57
◼
►
the other alternative that you will see and the reason some of these go in different arrangements is
02:13:01
◼
►
rather than tilting them up they you physically raise them so they're at the height of your ears and
02:13:04
◼
►
then you make them you know just 90 degrees to the the table uh that's another alternative uh you
02:13:10
◼
►
often see that's why you often see studio monitors like up on a shelf in studios so that the
02:13:14
◼
►
speakers are at the level of the ears of the person who is working on the thing um the other set of
02:13:20
◼
►
speakers that was recommended uh that i had also looked at a little bit before but again hearing lots
02:13:25
◼
►
of people who have these in real life and like them a lot were the atom audio d3v uh they look like
02:13:33
◼
►
little computer speakers they're very compact they're fairly inexpensive and again one of the things that
02:13:38
◼
►
uh people say about these is they are very neutral good for being studio monitor things these ones have
02:13:45
◼
►
going for them is they have ribbon tweeters which are uh very uh it's a different way of making the
02:13:51
◼
►
speaker mechanism that makes the highest frequencies and it uses lighter weight materials
02:13:55
◼
►
that can start and stop moving more quickly uh sometimes people don't like ribbon tweeters because
02:14:00
◼
►
they find them too shrill or too harsh but it may be they're just accurately portraying uh frequencies
02:14:06
◼
►
and transitions that they're not able to hear on other speakers that are more musical and less
02:14:11
◼
►
transparent yeah well that's on on that response by the way like people who there is nothing more
02:14:18
◼
►
divisive and harder to like nail down consensus on in the audio world than treble like treble response
02:14:27
◼
►
like this because and there's lots of good reasons for this like the amount of treble and how people
02:14:32
◼
►
people perceive it varies wildly across different speakers and headphones and like it's it's so
02:14:40
◼
►
different and there's a good reason why some people will say oh i want like i i'm i like a lot of treble
02:14:46
◼
►
i want a lot of that detail otherwise things sound muffled or dull or boring because you're missing a lot
02:14:51
◼
►
of that high-end frequency response oh to other people a lot of that high-end frequency response that kind
02:14:57
◼
►
of you know sharp trebly sound that can sound harsh or grating it can make it fatiguing to listen for
02:15:03
◼
►
long periods too bright they say yes and there's a reason the reason we have such massively different
02:15:10
◼
►
opinions across you know people in for treble response is that people have massively different
02:15:16
◼
►
hearing response to treble not only as we age we lose treble uh you know pickup response but also
02:15:24
◼
►
just different people have different like peaks and sensitivities to how how we are sensitive to
02:15:30
◼
►
different frequencies even when you're young so nothing like anything people say about treble response or
02:15:36
◼
►
harshness or sharpness or fatigue when listening to speakers or headphones you basically have to discount
02:15:42
◼
►
all of that and just kind of judge for yourself because whatever you prefer and perceive and even
02:15:48
◼
►
hear in treble is probably different from whatever that reviewer that you're reading it perceives or
02:15:54
◼
►
prefers themselves although one thing you can look at from the physical instruction is again ribbon
02:15:58
◼
►
tweeters tend to be better at the highs and and the uh the subtle transitions between the different
02:16:03
◼
►
frequencies because they can they essentially the moving parts have less momentum and mass and so
02:16:09
◼
►
than a traditional tweeter uh those those canto tucks that you got i think they had a ribbon tweeter as
02:16:14
◼
►
well like ribbon tweeters are very common like so if you like if you like the highest of high frequencies
02:16:19
◼
►
you may be drawn to a speaker that has a ribbon tweeter uh as a way to get that the other aspect of these
02:16:26
◼
►
speakers that is different than most of the other ones that i've been looking at is they're not ported
02:16:29
◼
►
which means they don't have a big hole in the back of the speaker to allow air to go in and out
02:16:33
◼
►
to make sort of a bassier noise from a smaller speaker uh instead they have a passive radiator
02:16:39
◼
►
which is like a diaphragm that the diaphragm goes in and out it's like a usually like a you know a
02:16:45
◼
►
circular region or whatever that's like a loose drum head and as the air pressure changes inside the
02:16:50
◼
►
speaker from it playing that little thing will move in and out uh it is a different it's a different
02:16:55
◼
►
sound porting can be like boomier and make sort of some sorts of uh strange noises when the volume is
02:17:01
◼
►
very high uh but it also can give a very small speaker a lot more bass and there's
02:17:06
◼
►
factors about how close you put it to the wall that affect that and so on and so forth but anyway
02:17:10
◼
►
the atom audio d3v a non-ported ribbon tweeter small form factor studio monitor type of thing with
02:17:19
◼
►
the volume control on the front not the best looking yeah i gotta say this definitely looks like someone
02:17:26
◼
►
who designed speakers in 95 was dragged to 2025 and said use modern style to do the crap you're used to
02:17:35
◼
►
doing because that's what this is it looks straight out of 95 with like the just a sprinkle of modern
02:17:39
◼
►
stuff on it i don't mind it that much i don't really like the shape i don't like like i in general i feel
02:17:46
◼
►
like i don't like speakers that that taper like footballs so many of them are like that the whole uh
02:17:53
◼
►
there's a whole bunch of very popular studio monitors that their their look of their whole
02:17:56
◼
►
product line is kind of like oblong rounded tapered type of things this at least has a little bit of
02:18:03
◼
►
sharper edges but yeah i'm not a big fan i don't really like the uh the the passive radiator on the
02:18:07
◼
►
side i do kind of like that they have an integrated tilted stand looks like a foot as opposed to you
02:18:13
◼
►
having to buy one that's the way they accomplish this i think you can use it with or without the stand
02:18:17
◼
►
i don't know if it actually tilts but they got a lot of good reviews and here's the thing there
02:18:20
◼
►
for their size and performance it is it's a good ratio if you care about transparent ish studio monitors
02:18:27
◼
►
that are small and sound really good but don't cost that much these atom audio d3vs are a good deal
02:18:33
◼
►
i would actually have probably considered them if i could have tolerated to look a little bit better
02:18:38
◼
►
which leads me to the speakers that i was actually looking at and again one of the main reasons i was
02:18:44
◼
►
looking at these speakers was because i like the way they looked and we just got done saying how
02:18:47
◼
►
silly it is what you're picking speakers based on how the speaker looks that makes no sense that makes
02:18:53
◼
►
total sense by the way i bought my car based a lot on how it looks i bought my house based a lot on how
02:18:58
◼
►
oh that's not true you bought your car because you don't know how to buy anything but a honda
02:19:01
◼
►
specifically you know no i skipped over the ugly honda core generations if you notice i'm calling i'm
02:19:07
◼
►
throwing a yellow flag on this one but we don't have time to deal with i like the way my car looks you
02:19:11
◼
►
don't have to like it i like it so anyway um the two i were looking at were the canto k-n-t-o canto
02:19:17
◼
►
aura all caps o-r-a and the canto aura four and i said please give feedback if you have these speakers
02:19:22
◼
►
tell me what you think of them tons of people wrote in pretty much no one had anything bad to say about
02:19:27
◼
►
these speakers other than the things that i already knew about them and actually just to interject again
02:19:33
◼
►
the canto aura the one that we're going to link in the show notes if you open that page on amazon do you
02:19:39
◼
►
notice that there are one two three four five six seven eight nine variations of the speaker you know
02:19:43
◼
►
why because it has in colors imagine that it has colors you can buy speakers in colors you can do
02:19:52
◼
►
black gray indigo which is i guess bluish to my eyes but that's right uh moon moss pink purple red
02:20:00
◼
►
and white imagine being able to buy colors and you can distinguish all these colors believe me yes
02:20:06
◼
►
you will not be confused about which one is the blue one it's blue and by the way they also sell
02:20:12
◼
►
it in black which is the one i got i was not offended by the existence of those colors at all
02:20:17
◼
►
i bet most people do buy i bet most people do buy the black or white ones but it's still cool that the
02:20:22
◼
►
colors exist and they can change those colors every year if they want to mix it up a little bit anyway
02:20:25
◼
►
i like how these speakers looked i also like that they got good reviews i also like the size of them i was
02:20:30
◼
►
trying to decide between the aura and the aura four they're basically the same exact speaker except for the
02:20:34
◼
►
aura four is larger because the non-tweeter driver in it is four inches instead of 2.5 inches
02:20:40
◼
►
and also there was the mostly ridiculous but still weird thing that was driving me towards the aura fours
02:20:49
◼
►
is that the auras in theory only had 16 uh 16 bit 48 kilohertz and the aura four support 24 bit 96
02:20:56
◼
►
kilohertz which makes no difference because these speakers cannot resolve anything that would let you
02:21:02
◼
►
distinguish that and i don't even have music in that resolution anyway ears but still it was driving
02:21:05
◼
►
me towards it and on that front by the way someone who has the the auras not the auras fours wrote in
02:21:10
◼
►
to say maybe they did a stealth upgrade of the guts of the auras because here is the audio midi setup in
02:21:15
◼
►
mac os with my auras attached and it lets me pick 24 bit 96 kilohertz i don't know if that is evidence
02:21:20
◼
►
that that speaker supports 24 bit 96 kilohertz or merely evidence that mac os will let you set that as the
02:21:27
◼
►
output and then when it gets to the speaker the speaker just down samples it to 1640 uh 1648 i don't
02:21:33
◼
►
know the answer to that question but just setting that aside that was one of the things driving towards
02:21:37
◼
►
it and what finally one of the final things that would drive me towards the four versus the aura
02:21:41
◼
►
was that the the mid-range driver looks nicer on the on the aura four than the aura look at the aura
02:21:51
◼
►
next to the aura four the the aura four has like i think it's metal whereas the aura has like a paper
02:21:56
◼
►
one and it just looks a little bit smoother and cleaner on the aura four i know this sounds ridiculous
02:22:01
◼
►
to you again you're you're picking one speaker over the other because the speaker cone looks nicer
02:22:07
◼
►
believe me especially if people have those keff speakers whatever speaker manufacturers spend a lot
02:22:12
◼
►
of time designing the look of the speaker drivers in their speaker even if they have great so that's why a lot
02:22:19
◼
►
of them come with magnetic like you know you know uh grills you call them grates or grills yeah they
02:22:24
◼
►
come with magnetic ones so if you don't want them on you can just take them off and there's no holes
02:22:28
◼
►
and usually it sounds better without them yeah these are visual items and i mean keff doesn't even
02:22:33
◼
►
include them but they're like look at our beautiful speakers they're so beautiful and so concentric keff
02:22:37
◼
►
speakers are okay keff speakers are awesome like i as i have tried other brands here and there
02:22:43
◼
►
including i have um uh genelec uh desktop speaker they had those briefly that's another one of those
02:22:50
◼
►
stupid uh oblong like lozenge shaped thing yeah i mean it's yeah they're fine um the the keff speakers
02:22:58
◼
►
they just sound so good and not all of them like i actually don't like the um the ls50 uh line very
02:23:06
◼
►
much like they they have a bit of a different sound profile that i don't care for um but the q line
02:23:12
◼
►
and the the lsx2 i really enjoy and they you know they have a totally different design where they they
02:23:20
◼
►
have um concentric drivers where the tweeter is on the inside of the woofer so they it's just two
02:23:27
◼
►
concentric circles it looks like one driver but you know the but the tweeter is like the middle part
02:23:32
◼
►
then that vibrates separately from the outer part which is the wolf like it's it's a crazy design but
02:23:37
◼
►
there's a bunch of benefits to that um in terms of like there it kind of widens the sweet spot of the
02:23:44
◼
►
sound and it avoids certain interference patterns like it ends up sounding really good um but what keff
02:23:49
◼
►
is really good at to my ears uh is that musicality like these are not flat frequency responses they just
02:23:57
◼
►
sound really pleasant and really really good in a way that like especially in in mid-range and in vocals
02:24:03
◼
►
i haven't found anything that sounds this good in speakers i have one pair of headphones that i like
02:24:09
◼
►
more than this that's the hi-fi man hg6 that i have from forever ago um i've never found anything else
02:24:14
◼
►
besides those headphones and keff speakers and only a few models of keff speakers uh that sound that good
02:24:21
◼
►
in the mid-range but fortunately i don't have to deal with like these being ugly because they're not
02:24:26
◼
►
ugly they're great looking in to my opinion and you know what they're offered in colors multiple colors
02:24:33
◼
►
every keff speaker is offered in multiple colors even the boring like wood finish ones are offered in like
02:24:38
◼
►
four different woods and these are like you know these have like carpet on the outside of them and like
02:24:44
◼
►
these have like four different colors too like there's they they have lots of different styles
02:24:48
◼
►
because when people use things and you know they buy them for their homes they want them to look
02:24:53
◼
►
like you know their personality it's a permanent fixture in your house it's going to be a thing that
02:24:58
◼
►
you see all the time yes you do want it to to look nice and match you want it to look good and to have
02:25:02
◼
►
some options and by the way i think the keffs if you look at them now and you're like marco thinks
02:25:06
◼
►
he looks good they're a little bit puffy looking if you're not used to what they look like and the keff
02:25:11
◼
►
does make other much much larger tower speakers that are much more complicated and have lots more
02:25:16
◼
►
large drivers that don't look like the little concentric things and yes other companies also
02:25:20
◼
►
have concentric drivers and they're great everyone should make center channel speakers with concentric
02:25:23
◼
►
drivers you hear me uh but they don't uh but still some some other companies do have in fact i believe
02:25:28
◼
►
there are a couple i was looking at some when i was looking at other like desk computer mon uh computer
02:25:33
◼
►
speakers they have computer speakers with concentric drivers too not from keff but like from other
02:25:37
◼
►
much less expensive brands uh it's a good idea because it aligns the you know the high frequencies
02:25:43
◼
►
low frequencies and it's it's very beneficial um oh my god there's a bright yellow version of the lsx2
02:25:48
◼
►
now this was not available when i purchased you should look at the really big keff tower speakers i think
02:25:53
◼
►
you might like them oh they're they look nuts so anyway the thing the downsides of these auras um
02:25:58
◼
►
what i had heard is obviously when these are all small speakers they're kind of expensive uh the
02:26:05
◼
►
they don't have a bass or treble adjustment on the speakers which everyone complained about and i knew
02:26:10
◼
►
i wouldn't like because i do like to have that basic adjustability on the speaker itself
02:26:14
◼
►
these don't have it i knew that going in everyone who owned them was happy with them
02:26:19
◼
►
some people did say that they heard the aura 4 versus the aura and they picked the aura because
02:26:24
◼
►
they felt the aura 4 had a little bit too much bass i mean it makes sense they're basically exactly the
02:26:29
◼
►
same speaker except for the uh mid-range slash quote-unquote woofer is just so much bigger on the aura 4
02:26:35
◼
►
so it can't help but sound bassier because that's the whole deal some people like the aura 4 it's better
02:26:40
◼
►
because it was bassier and could go louder because it has a more powerful amplifier and a bigger driver
02:26:45
◼
►
and all that other stuff in the end like i said i decided to get the aura 4 because i did like the way
02:26:50
◼
►
look no negative reviews from anybody really i figured i could live with the lack of bass and
02:26:55
◼
►
treble controls and i like the way i like the 24 bit 96 kilohertz even though it's pointless
02:27:00
◼
►
and i like the way the the speaker cone look the metal speaker cone versus the paper one or whatever
02:27:05
◼
►
so i did indeed get the canto aura 4s uh these are just a flat rectangle and of course i needed them to
02:27:12
◼
►
be tilted up if you are using computer speakers and you do not have them pointed at your ears you are
02:27:17
◼
►
missing out on a lot because most computer speakers if they're designed at all are designed for
02:27:22
◼
►
near quote-unquote near field listening which is your head is pretty close to the speakers like you
02:27:28
◼
►
can reach them with your hands that is not the case with you know stereo speakers or whatever uh even
02:27:33
◼
►
home theater speakers that are filling your room with sound these are going to be close to you
02:27:36
◼
►
they're often very directional which means that if you don't point in particular the tweeters
02:27:42
◼
►
at your ears you are losing a lot of the frequencies that they're putting out and it's not
02:27:48
◼
►
subtle you can just take them and twist them so they're pointed directly at the back of the room
02:27:52
◼
►
and you hear the treble disappear and then point them back at your ear so you need them to point at
02:27:56
◼
►
you and you can just twist them on your desk but you also need to point up at your ears so you have
02:28:00
◼
►
a choice of either getting some speaker stands that elevates the speaker so they are at ear level
02:28:04
◼
►
which i don't want to do because i don't like how it looks or you get something that tilts them up
02:28:09
◼
►
luckily kanto the the my first interaction with kanto as a brand was i bought their speaker stands for
02:28:15
◼
►
my home theater speakers they make lots of speaker stands surprise surprise they make tiny little
02:28:21
◼
►
angled speaker stands for their tiny speakers and so if you get the kanto aura you can get the kanto s2
02:28:28
◼
►
speaker stands which is a bent piece of metal that costs less than the one inside my mac pro
02:28:32
◼
►
and if you buy the aura 4 you should get the kanto s4 speaker stand a pro tip for kanto on your website
02:28:39
◼
►
clearly indicate which speakers the stand works with they try to do that but they don't mention
02:28:46
◼
►
the auras anywhere so i can just tell you from experimentally determining the kanto s4 speaker
02:28:50
◼
►
stands fit the kanto aura 4 perfectly they the kanto aura 4s have a little screw hole in the bottom
02:28:57
◼
►
the stands have a little screw hole and they come with a screw and it fits directly in there and they
02:29:01
◼
►
exactly fit uh and so i hooked up my speakers with a big long usb c cable to my mac plugged everything
02:29:08
◼
►
in turn everything on tried it out here's what i think of these things i wish they had a bass and
02:29:13
◼
►
treble knob i knew i would i knew it would be a problem uh part of that like marco basically covered
02:29:22
◼
►
this all this exact stuff before i'm old and i can't hear treble as well as i used to i'm 50 right that's
02:29:28
◼
►
just a fact of life uh i also happen to like treble the kanto aura 4 in their default mode
02:29:36
◼
►
sound too bassy to me they sound bassy they sound muddled they sound muffled to a young person maybe
02:29:42
◼
►
they don't but to me they do which is fine very often if you have a computer speaker that has a bass
02:29:48
◼
►
and a treble knob just turn the knobs until it sounds the way you want it to no knobs so you can't do
02:29:53
◼
►
that so i am left with uh software solutions which is fine there's lots of good software solutions this
02:29:59
◼
►
in particular sound source from rogamiba a piece of software i already own can do this for you it can
02:30:04
◼
►
provide a system-wide equalizer that applies to all audio across the entire system with customizable
02:30:11
◼
►
equalizer curves and yada yada yada if you don't want to do it system-wide itunes itself which is where i
02:30:16
◼
►
listen to my music or whatever the hell it's called now music also has its own equalizer inside the music
02:30:21
◼
►
app if you just want to equalize the music and not every system sound there are many other apps that do
02:30:27
◼
►
this that you can find i like sound source because it does 5 000 other things i've already put in like
02:30:30
◼
►
five feature requests for for a sound source um my main activity while setting these things up has been
02:30:37
◼
►
trying to figure out what equalizer curve do i want i've been trying to sort of manually reproduce the
02:30:44
◼
►
harman curve because i actually do kind of like that uh was it harman kardon the stereo manufacturer
02:30:50
◼
►
came up with a curve that they claim is what most people they just a lot of people listen to things
02:30:56
◼
►
and said do you like this better worse or the same and they came up with a curve that they thought
02:30:59
◼
►
if you apply this curve most people think it sounds better this is what marker was getting at with like
02:31:03
◼
►
it's not neutral and it sounds exactly like what you'd expect from a design by committee to average
02:31:09
◼
►
these everything designed with the harman curve because like when they released that like
02:31:14
◼
►
everything was then judged against that and so for a long time and i think even still today
02:31:20
◼
►
people imitate it yeah yeah and every like headphone and speaker is is tuned to try to match the harman
02:31:27
◼
►
curve exactly because they know they're going to be reviewed against it and as a result a lot of
02:31:30
◼
►
things end up sounding exactly the same and and for me it's a little bit less treble than i would like
02:31:35
◼
►
and so most headphones and speakers sound very boring to me as a result and so yeah there's nothing wrong
02:31:41
◼
►
with using eq to tweak the sound the way you want it i have an eq in my system it's fine
02:31:45
◼
►
yeah so i was basically trying to reproduce the harman curve with my equalizer because i found
02:31:50
◼
►
that that is actually kind of what i want and i'll try to i was trying to find a good link you would
02:31:54
◼
►
think there'd be like a good wikipedia page in the harman curve and there are a bunch of wikipedia pages
02:31:58
◼
►
about target curves and the harman itself has some pages about this but there's no like
02:32:02
◼
►
here is the one definitive url for the harman target curve i was very disappointed in not being
02:32:07
◼
►
able to find it because i wanted to find like the literal values like because i'm moving sliders i'm
02:32:10
◼
►
like i need to know where to move these sliders i don't want to just match the shape on this you
02:32:14
◼
►
know logarithmic graph where they have to carefully count the little lines to figure out what value that
02:32:18
◼
►
is i figured someone's got to have it like a excel spreadsheet with the values for like 10 band dq or
02:32:24
◼
►
something but i couldn't find it but anyway basically what it looks like is like a kind of an s
02:32:28
◼
►
shape curve where like it's high at the base then dips down low and then goes up high at the treble
02:32:32
◼
►
but then dips down at the very end of the treble anyway point is i was playing with equalizers to
02:32:38
◼
►
make these sound good and the the upshot is that when i equal these these things take very well to
02:32:44
◼
►
equalization because they have more than enough of everything if i want tons of bass they have it this
02:32:48
◼
►
is even without a subwoofer attached if they want tons of bass and that's what i want they can do it
02:32:52
◼
►
and they also have pretty good treble so it's just a question of how much of each thing do you want how
02:32:56
◼
►
do you want to dial it and i came up with a curve in sound source that i think i mostly like i'm still
02:33:02
◼
►
tweaking it a little bit uh and they just sound way better than my 16 year old speakers surprise
02:33:06
◼
►
they cost way more and they sound way better i think they look really nice too i love the stands
02:33:12
◼
►
one of the other complaints about the the canto auras in particular not the aura forest is they're so
02:33:17
◼
►
small and light and that the knob on them is so stiff and you have to press the knob in to turn
02:33:21
◼
►
them on and off that you end up moving the speaker on your desk that does not happen with the aura 4s
02:33:27
◼
►
especially on the stands because all of canto stands are very heavy metal stands and the speakers are
02:33:32
◼
►
screwed to them and they have like grippy stuff on the bottom so i can press the power button and that
02:33:37
◼
►
doesn't happen the one downside to the power button is i have to press it twice because when you first
02:33:41
◼
►
press it it always defaults to like the 3.5 inch jack and the second presses do usb which leads me to
02:33:47
◼
►
the final thing about this which is as i said before most of the time i spent with my old speakers
02:33:52
◼
►
during that 16 years the speakers were turned off like physically turned off with an off switch so
02:33:57
◼
►
every time my computer went to make a sound no sound would come out because they were sending sound to
02:34:01
◼
►
speakers that were turned off that's the way i like it right and when i want to hear music i turn my
02:34:07
◼
►
speakers on now whenever i turn my speakers on i have to press the power button twice which is a little bit
02:34:13
◼
►
annoying but the other thing that i discovered about this that i hadn't thought about at all is
02:34:17
◼
►
after i was you know i got them all set up okay let me just do some stuff turn my speakers off start
02:34:22
◼
►
working i think i clicked on something and it beeped i'm like how are they beeping i turned the speakers
02:34:26
◼
►
off and i said oh that wasn't the speakers beeping that was my mac beeping sometimes i forget that my mac
02:34:33
◼
►
has a speaker inside it but it does the mac pro does in fact have a speaker and i'm like mac why are you
02:34:38
◼
►
making noise you've never done that before you know the answer it's because these speakers are
02:34:44
◼
►
connected with a usb cable and when i turn these speakers off mac os goes well wherever the hell
02:34:49
◼
►
that usb audio interface was it's gone now so anyway falling back to the internal speaker yeah so to solve
02:34:55
◼
►
that problem i did the uh the analog the analog hole solution which is plug a stub headphone jack
02:35:02
◼
►
adapter into the headphone jack on the back of my mac and now it thinks it's connected to some
02:35:07
◼
►
analog speakers to the 3.5 millimeter jack but it's not so now my mac is blessedly silent i have
02:35:14
◼
►
system-wide eq through sound source i have speakers on my desk that i find very attractive i hope they
02:35:20
◼
►
don't collect too much dust i'll keep you updated on this situation they sound so much better than my
02:35:25
◼
►
old speakers and i actually have been to casey's delight listening to way more music at my desk although
02:35:30
◼
►
yes i absolutely i was trying to develop my app this week and at various points i said wait a second i need
02:35:36
◼
►
to turn this music off what do you think i'm not casey list i can't like my brain i can't i'm an
02:35:41
◼
►
active listener and my brain latches on to the music and stops doing the programming and so there are only
02:35:47
◼
►
limited circumstances in which i can i think we've talked to this before i can do css when i'm listening
02:35:52
◼
►
to music i can't really code and i definitely can't write so but i have listened to a lot of music when
02:35:57
◼
►
i've been working this week and i'm really happy with the the new speakers like i said there is
02:36:02
◼
►
improvement uh oh and size wise i'm glad i got the bigger ones i was afraid they would be too big
02:36:08
◼
►
they're not i think these small ones are a little bit too small and i think these big ones are a little
02:36:13
◼
►
bit too big but they're not so big that they dominate the desk in a problematic way so if you're looking for
02:36:19
◼
►
a speaker and have simpler requirements to my ridiculous requirements that you just heard
02:36:25
◼
►
and you like how these look i think they sound pretty good and i like almost everything about
02:36:30
◼
►
them and i hope they will last another 16 years uh and if you're not as picky as me definitely look at
02:36:35
◼
►
those atom audio things because they're a little bit ugly but they are uh what are they like a hundred
02:36:40
◼
►
dollars less 150 dollars less hundred dollars less uh than the ones i got and they supposedly sound
02:36:46
◼
►
better so if you don't want to be foolish like me and buy speakers based on how they look but rather
02:36:50
◼
►
how they sound go check out the atom audio d3v and if you like the way they sound they are a bargain