PodSearch

Upgrade

534: The 2024 October Event? Draft

 

00:00:00   [music]

00:00:07   -From Relay, this is Upgrade, episode 534 for October 21st, 2024.

00:00:14   Today's show is brought to you by Squarespace, Fitbot, and Vitaly,

00:00:18   and we are facing off in a draft today.

00:00:22   My name is Mike Hurley and I'm joined by my competitor and co-host, Jason Snow.

00:00:28   Hi, Jason.

00:00:29   -Hi, Mike. Let's play a clean game, leave it all out on the field.

00:00:33   Good luck, gentlemen.

00:00:36   -Yeah, this is a weird one because we're just doing a little draft later on in the episode,

00:00:39   because we'll get to it.

00:00:41   There's less to draft now than there was when we spoke last Monday.

00:00:45   -Yes, there's less to draft, it's true.

00:00:47   -Taken off the table.

00:00:48   -But we still think something is going to be announced, and so we're going to predict it.

00:00:54   -We will start off with a Snell Talk question.

00:00:56   It comes from James from the +44 who asks,

00:00:59   "I was a huge fan of Jason's TV Talk Machine podcast with the one and only Tim Goodman,

00:01:05   and it helped me discover lots of great shows.

00:01:07   I would like to know where does Jason get TV recommendations and reviews from these days?

00:01:12   I still have a TV Talk Machine shaped hole in my life. Love to your mothers."

00:01:15   -I mean, this is very nice.

00:01:17   That was a fun show.

00:01:21   When Tim stopped being forcibly required by his job to review TV shows, we stopped the podcast.

00:01:28   He went off and wrote he had a development deal with FX for a little while, and now he's back,

00:01:34   and he's got a substack that you can subscribe to, and so I do read that.

00:01:40   I read some, like Alan Sepinwall is a good source.

00:01:44   He writes at Rolling Stone and has a substack of his own that's free.

00:01:49   I read various, I don't know, I just kind of look around and I hear what people are talking about,

00:01:54   and I get recommendations from friends and stuff, but yes, I have missed.

00:01:57   It was really nice to talk every week to somebody who was forced by their job to watch as many TV

00:02:02   shows as possible, because Tim was really good at saying, "Oh, this was really good.

00:02:06   You should watch this," or even the "Don't bother with this one" thing.

00:02:10   But also, I have so many shows already that I don't feel the need quite so much,

00:02:16   but it is really nice to hear from a trusted source that this thing or this other thing is

00:02:21   worth a shot, and I will follow this up by just saying, my recommendation of the moment that we

00:02:32   just discussed last week, it is entirely there, the entire season is available on Apple TV Plus,

00:02:39   is Vince Vaughn in Bad Monkey, which is spectacularly good, it is so good.

00:02:50   It has that Florida noir vibe where it's funny, but also there's a mystery and everything is a

00:03:00   little bit shabby and shady, and there's scenery, and there's, again, jokes, and I don't know,

00:03:09   I loved it. Plus, it's a Bill Lawrence show, so it's also got that vibe that's a little bit like

00:03:16   the hangout vibe that you get on something like Shrinking, which came back, which high

00:03:21   recommendation for that too. I watched the first episode of the second season, and it's just as

00:03:26   good, so I'm very happy about that. That show's so good. This show is so well written. So well

00:03:31   written, that show. I agree completely. So anyway, I'll throw Bad Monkey on the list. If you're like,

00:03:37   I don't know, some show about a monkey, well, there's a monkey in it, but it's not about the

00:03:42   monkey at all, really, at this point. I mean, I have only seen half of it. Probably it becomes

00:03:46   very monkey-centric later. No, I'm sure it doesn't. But look, it's just part of the vibe, right?

00:03:52   There's a guy with a monkey, and there's a lady who does curses, and there's a shady land developer,

00:03:58   and there's a severed body part that is found, and, you know, it's a thing. It's great. It's

00:04:06   very fun and funny. So Bad Monkey high recommendation for me. But yeah, it's hard

00:04:11   without having... It was really nice. What I'm saying is, it's really nice to know a TV critic,

00:04:15   because then you can just say, "Hey, what are we watching?" But I don't have that anymore.

00:04:21   Well, for me, that is you, which is funny. You're my person. I will also make a couple

00:04:27   of recommendations. I think we may have spoken about it, but for me at least, I watched it all

00:04:32   ages ago, because I do have early access to it, which I'm very happy about. Slow Horses,

00:04:35   the season is superb. Superbly good. Really, really good. Do you know they just greenlit season six,

00:04:44   so that five is done, and they're doing yet another one? I'm like, yes, do it forever,

00:04:48   you know? Just keep doing it. Do it forever. Love it. So good. The characters are fantastic.

00:04:53   The guy who plays the main, like the lead, not Gary Oldman, like the second lead.

00:04:58   Yeah, River.

00:04:58   River.

00:04:59   Jack Louden is his name.

00:05:00   He's married to Shari... Oh, man. Shari's Ronan? S-A-O-I-R.

00:05:09   Saoirse.

00:05:10   Saoirse Ronan. Thank you.

00:05:11   It's Irish.

00:05:12   Anyway, she suggested, which I love, that he should be the next James Bond, which I 100% agree with.

00:05:18   I would like him to be James Bond. I think he would be a good James Bond. I don't think

00:05:21   it will be him, but I think it should be. A little mini Apple TV+ news here, by the way.

00:05:25   Shrinking got picked up for season three. Wonderful.

00:05:29   So they're going ahead with that, which is great. And this is like a little asterisk on the whole,

00:05:34   like, Apple adding TV+ as a channel on Prime Video. Like, this is why I think it's a great move,

00:05:42   is their catalog is really good now. They started with nothing and have built a catalog. And at this

00:05:48   point, like, even if you, you know, if you just never paid any attention, I mean, even for one

00:05:53   month, you could get, you could watch your fill for $10 for one month with Prime Video buying it

00:06:01   as a channel. So I hope these shows find other audiences because they're doing some great work

00:06:05   over there. And Silo's coming back, which is also great.

00:06:08   It was actually on that note, too, I saw a promotion for shrinking season two from the

00:06:15   Amazon Prime Video account on Instagram. Right, because now they get to be in the

00:06:21   marketing machine for Amazon, which is a big deal for them. So thank you, James. And I guess,

00:06:26   in addition to being the world's foremost Kindle podcast, maybe we'll occasionally recommend a TV

00:06:30   show for you here. But that's it. Sorry. Oh, I did. I want to make one final recommendation

00:06:35   for, because I think people have started to stay away from these shows, but Agatha All Along on

00:06:40   Disney+ is excellent. It's really good. It's excellent. It's really good. Because the cast is

00:06:44   brilliant and it's weird and fun and it's spooky. It is not a Marvel, it is not a Marvel show in,

00:06:50   I would say, any appreciable way, even though it is, well, yeah, I know, but it is not, it's going

00:06:56   to have tie-ins because it does have tie-ins. It is in some ways sort of a direct sequel to

00:07:00   WandaVision, which, by the way, is the first and still maybe the best of all Marvel TV shows in

00:07:07   this run that's been done by Marvel Studios. And it's the same showrunner as WandaVision,

00:07:13   which I think is super important. And it is, yeah, it's really good. It's not what you expect. It is

00:07:20   kind of a character drama with action and it's using witchcraft tropes, so magic stuff.

00:07:27   So it's a different vibe than you're going to get from your more superhero-y kind of Marvel show.

00:07:33   Yeah, I agree. High recommendation. Really, really good. Really good. Yeah, the first episode is

00:07:39   just superb. Like, it's just, like, superb. They did a great job with that show. I've enjoyed it

00:07:43   a lot. And Kathryn Hahn is just, like, incredible. Good supporting cast in that one, too. Aubrey Plaza,

00:07:49   I mean, are you kidding me? Like, it's just great. It's really, really good. Did you see what Aubrey

00:07:53   Plaza, the bit that Aubrey Plaza did the other day? She was at the finals of the WNBA in New York.

00:07:59   Not Game 5, which they just had, where the New York Liberty won. We were excited by that, because

00:08:05   one of their players is Sabrina Yanescu, who went to Oregon and is from the Bay Area. So

00:08:09   we had a rooting interest in the WNBA. And Sabrina did the three-point shootout thing

00:08:17   with Steph Curry at the NBA All-Star Game, which I watched a clip of because there was a Vision Pro

00:08:22   Immersive NBA All-Star Game thing that dropped last Friday. Spectacular, by the way. Like the

00:08:30   Super Bowl one, they took their time a little bit. I wish it had been three times as long,

00:08:35   because I would have liked to watch, like, more of it. It was more like, and this happened,

00:08:40   spectacular visuals, and now we move on to this thing that happened, spectacular visuals.

00:08:44   I wish I would have loved to watch the whole three-point contest and the whole Steph versus

00:08:49   Sabrina showdown in Immersive. It was great. Also, a little sad moment, they're showing

00:08:53   these amazing shots of the slam dunk contest and you're courtside. And I was really sad,

00:08:58   because you're courtside next to Bill Walton, the great basketball player who died about three

00:09:03   months after the NBA All-Star Game. But he was there, and he was cheering and all, and that was

00:09:09   pretty awesome. So anyway, Aubrey Plaza, they showed her on the big screen at the basketball

00:09:16   game, and what was she doing? She had a book, and she was reading a book. So she was at the finals

00:09:21   last night, because I saw a clip of her today. They went to her, she just double flipping the

00:09:26   bird to everyone. Yeah, she's incredible. Amazing, amazing. Anyway, thank you to James from The

00:09:34   Plus 4/4 for the Snell Talk question. If you'd like to send in a question of your own, just go

00:09:38   to upgradefeedback.com and send us a Snell Talk. I have a couple of follow-up items, Jason Snell.

00:09:44   First comes from Sam, who says, off of the listening to the discussion of Submerged,

00:09:49   do you think there is a future for filmmakers using the immersive recording during feature-length

00:09:54   movies, but only in certain scenes, similar to how Christopher Nolan uses IMAX for specific scenes

00:09:59   and then drops back to standard shots? The bulk of the movie could be viewed in a standard way,

00:10:03   but then for specific scenes, it could benefit from being in an immersive view and could

00:10:08   transition in and then back out again. I mean, it's possible. It would be a gimmick, but Nolan

00:10:16   flipping you into IMAX is also a gimmick. I saw one of the Batman movies that Nolan directed

00:10:21   in, I think, Dark Knight in IMAX, and suddenly it's like, "Oh, now we're in IMAX. Oh,

00:10:26   now we're not anymore." So you could do it that way. That would be interesting. I still think

00:10:33   that a standalone, an immersive view of something that happens in the movie from

00:10:41   a different vantage point in immersive might be a more fun kind of extra. Obviously, to do this,

00:10:47   Apple's going to have to spend a lot of money because the audience on Vision Pro is so small

00:10:52   that there would be no financial reason for a studio to do it. But if a director like,

00:10:57   what is it, John M. Chu is super into the Vision Pro, he loves it, and it wouldn't surprise me if

00:11:03   he's like, "Apple, what can we do with my next movie? What can we do with this?" So, I mean,

00:11:07   I think people will still experiment, whether it's an alternate scene that gets, when you watch it on

00:11:13   Vision Pro, it gets spliced in or just an alternate scene in immersive that you can watch as a

00:11:17   standalone or something. I definitely think there are going to be some filmmakers who are really

00:11:23   into this and looked at Submerged and said, like we did, like, "Huh, he had an interesting

00:11:30   approach to that." And my favorite thing about Submerged, and I liked it, but my favorite thing

00:11:34   about it is watching, really, you can watch a very intelligent, talented director trying to

00:11:40   figure out the best approach to use artistically in a different version of a medium that he knows

00:11:48   pretty well. I would love to see other people do it. And I'm sure some directors were out there

00:11:54   who were like, "Oh man, I want to do this too." So I hope we see more of this. But, you know,

00:11:59   maybe if there's a director with clout who has a good relationship with Apple and they're making

00:12:04   a movie and they say, "Look, you know, we want to do this immersive thing attached to this movie in

00:12:09   some way." I'm sure it could happen, but we'll just have to see that's a real confluence of events

00:12:15   there. And it depends on how much Apple wants to make it happen. Yeah, it feels like something that

00:12:19   they could do for one of their movies, you know, like an Apple TV movie and maybe you could do it

00:12:26   as a separate thing. They also have a really good relationship with Disney, right? So, you know,

00:12:31   if they were willing to take a Disney or Marvel or, you know, or Star Wars movie and put money

00:12:40   into a Vision Pro immersive add-on to it, but they got to put the money in it. I mean,

00:12:45   that's the bottom line is they got to put the money in if they want it to happen.

00:12:48   An anonymous listener wrote in and said, "I wanted to respond to your conversation

00:12:54   about meta showing Orion from a place of weakness and that Apple hasn't done this for a long time.

00:12:59   I think Apple Intelligence was Apple showing AI features while they're not ready yet. It's

00:13:04   a good example of how Apple is showing its panic a weakness in this area. If they were

00:13:08   doing it from strength, they would have introduced it whenever they are almost ready."

00:13:12   Yeah, 100% true. And we also talked about that last week, right? We talked about the fact that

00:13:18   Apple very much is selling the iPhone using features that don't exist yet and that you

00:13:22   shouldn't buy an iPhone because of features that don't exist yet. But, you know, the conversation

00:13:27   last week was really about pre-announcing hardware. And I would say the other difference

00:13:32   is that Apple actually, I think, intends to ship Apple Intelligence between now and next June

00:13:37   and everything they showed in June at WWDC is something that they intend to ship.

00:13:42   And the contrast there is that meta, you know, doesn't plan on shipping Orion at all.

00:13:47   They specifically said they will not ship it, right? Like this, what we have seen,

00:13:51   that will never ship.

00:13:53   They showed hardware that will never go to customers and anything like it won't ship for,

00:13:58   they said, years. They were vague, but it's years. And so for me, that seems like a very

00:14:04   different thing than, I mean, like Apple Showvision Pro and Apple Watch months before they shipped,

00:14:10   but they did ship exactly in that form and it was months. This is a product that nobody's

00:14:13   ever going to get. And I think that that is, that was my point is a lot of tech companies like to

00:14:19   show off tech demos of things that don't exist. Like they're not, you will never be able to buy

00:14:24   this thing. It happens at CES all the time, but you see it with major companies too.

00:14:26   Look at Tesla, like last week, right?

00:14:28   Oh, man. Right. So, so let's anyway, the, I don't have enough time to tell you all the things that

00:14:37   are, that are wrong with the strategic direction of that company right now. The, so the thing about

00:14:45   this is I was pointing out that like, when was the last time that Apple showed hardware that they

00:14:50   didn't intend to ship and just, and just did it to show off their technical prowess and where they

00:14:56   were going with their research lab. And that in that context, like I can't remember, like you

00:15:01   pointed out, I think the last time they really talked about hardware that didn't exist, that they

00:15:06   were promising on shipping was that Mac Pro thing, which is legendary. We talk about it to this day,

00:15:10   the round table, where they brought in a bunch of journalists and said, we love the Mac Pro. We're

00:15:15   going to make a new one eventually, no more information. And then it was years before it

00:15:20   happened. It's a meme now, but AirPower too, right? Like here's the saying.

00:15:24   Yeah. Although that, I think Apple, I don't think Apple showed that out of weakness. I think Apple

00:15:29   showed that out of confidence that it was going to ship. So I think it's a different issue. They

00:15:32   just screwed it up. That was not, that was not a, like, Oh, we feel the pressure to put out an

00:15:37   AirPower. So we get better get out there now. I'm just saying I'm coming from this, from the

00:15:41   perspective of somebody who in the nineties, the magazine I worked for published a whole feature

00:15:46   article of prototypes of Macs that never existed. Some of them sort of parts of them got into other

00:15:54   products. Like there was a bunch of things that looked sort of like the 20th anniversary Macintosh,

00:15:58   but like Apple was just like, we're spending all this money on R and D and we're not doing

00:16:03   anything with it. What do we do? And the answer is show the world that we're spending the money.

00:16:07   And that, that was the vibe I got from Metta. I don't think that is troubled. Like Apple of the

00:16:12   nineties was troubled by far. Cause no, that bad. That was bad. That was a bad era. But I, again,

00:16:21   they're trying, they're showing something that doesn't ever gonna, isn't going to ship to

00:16:24   customers because they want to send a message that they're on it. And that's because they felt like

00:16:30   they were being misjudged. So that was the point. It is absolutely true. So I stand by my point,

00:16:35   which is Apple. I can't remember the last time Apple carted out a piece of hardware

00:16:40   that was like, this will never ship, but we'll see in three years for the argument of like,

00:16:46   why don't they show their own AR project right now? And but yes, as we said last episode,

00:16:53   the Apple intelligence announcement is 100% from a position of weakness. That is Apple

00:16:58   getting out ahead and shipping and promoting features that don't even exist yet because they

00:17:04   haven't shipped like on top of the stuff that's about to come out, they're advertising features

00:17:08   that will not arrive until the end of the year or maybe early next year. And they're doing that

00:17:12   because they're behind in AI. That is a hundred percent true. And may not be good even when they

00:17:17   do ship. And may not be good in the further out they are, which is a point we made last week,

00:17:22   the further out they are, the more risk you take that the demo that you saw back in June,

00:17:26   that it does this by the time it ships, it's like, well, it doesn't quite do that cause we

00:17:30   couldn't get that to work. So it does something sort of like that, but not as good. And that is

00:17:34   always a danger. And I was, I still think some of the features that we saw will not make it

00:17:38   until 19. I don't know what, but I think this is such a long period of time, like they're

00:17:46   potentially going to be shipping this stuff. Something is not going to go exactly the way

00:17:51   they want. And they would like a little bit more time on it, sort of just put it into 19.

00:17:54   If I had to guess my, I'd say the mo more likely is that it's a, it's an aspect of it,

00:18:00   right? So they're like, Oh, well, you're going to be able to do a Siri control of apps,

00:18:05   but they're only Apple apps using app intense. And then it's going to be like, it's really only

00:18:10   these two apps, right? Like something like that where they're like, Oh, I thought it was all the

00:18:13   Apple apps. And I was like, no, it's just, it's just calendar. That's the only one we could do.

00:18:18   Right. And you're like, okay, fine. Right. Whatever. So I think that's, I think that's

00:18:22   going to happen. So it's really interesting times though. I just, and I don't want to,

00:18:26   I don't want to ding too meta too much for it because we both agreed that it was a good move

00:18:31   on their part. It's just like for Apple to get over that. I think, I think Apple, Apple doesn't

00:18:37   need to prove that it's interested in this. Although something that struck me, which I don't

00:18:42   think we're going to talk about, but, uh, there was a wall street journal. It was like a little

00:18:45   profile of Tim Cook. There's not a whole lot in it other than the tidbit. I haven't read it yet.

00:18:50   Honestly, what struck me about that article is that's the kind of venue that you use an interview

00:18:56   with Tim Cook on good morning America or in the wall street journal or something like that,

00:19:00   where obviously prompted by Apple PR to do this. But you, that is a great environment for Tim Cook

00:19:07   to do a little disclosure that I think might solve some of this, which is you asked Tim Cook about

00:19:12   medicine announcement and Tim Cook says something like we've had stuff like that in our labs for a

00:19:18   couple of years too. And we agree with meta it's not ready yet. And at Apple, we don't ship stuff

00:19:24   until it's ready to ship. So, you know, I'm glad that they believe in this. We believe in it too.

00:19:30   We're here to compete, but we're not going to talk about products that aren't ready to ship.

00:19:36   And that would be a way for the CEO's voice to basically say, we got that too, but we're not

00:19:42   going to show it to you in a way in a, in a, in a interview or something where it's just like

00:19:47   almost tossed off, but it's absolutely strategic for them to just say,

00:19:51   look, we, we know we got it too. We're working like they are, but we're not going to show it to you.

00:19:59   And I think that that it struck me that that's the kind of thing you could do

00:20:02   if you want to counter them, the meta argument is you could just acknowledge that like, great,

00:20:11   we we've got prototypes too. We'll, you know, see on the playing field in a few years. And,

00:20:17   and that would be a way that you could handle it by the way, the tidbit and the Tim Cook article

00:20:21   that was the best is the interviewer asks him what he's named some of his iMessage chat groups.

00:20:28   And he said, he said, Oh, I've never done that. Maybe I should try that. And then in a subsequent

00:20:32   chat with a writer, he said, Oh, I did what you suggested. I, uh, I, I renamed my chat with my

00:20:39   roommates from college and what's it called roommates. I love him so much. You know, like

00:20:46   that is such great energy. I saw another one, which is this is, this is, this is Tim energy

00:20:51   right there. I think I saw another where he said his favorite drink was diet Mountain Dew, but he

00:20:56   doesn't get to drink it too much because they don't stock it in Apple. And it's like, okay,

00:21:00   you're the CEO. Okay. So, so I've got a couple. So first off, yes, I like Tim Cook. My favorite soda

00:21:08   is also diet Mountain Dew. So look at that. We got that Tim, but you're the CEO. So one,

00:21:15   you could have them stock it too. You could just have a person buy diet Mountain Dew and put it in

00:21:21   the, you know, your receptionist outer office for your office and have it available to you. You

00:21:27   could do it that way. Uh, but like, I mean, surely cafe max could, unless they've got some sort of

00:21:31   weird, like, did they sign a, a distribution deal with Coke? And so their Pepsi products are not

00:21:37   allowed. I don't know what's going on there, but I'll just, here's a tip for Tim Cook. You can get

00:21:42   diet Mountain Dew, uh, soda stream bottles and just get a little soda stream and make your own

00:21:48   diet Mountain Dew. I can do that now. I actually do that now. So, uh, lots of options out there

00:21:54   for Tim to, uh, and, and my condolences to Tim on how bad the Auburn Tigers are playing this year.

00:22:00   I will just say, I just went to, and they did pick out two things that are, I guess,

00:22:05   pertinent to the conversation where, uh, in regards to the vision pro saying that at $3,500,

00:22:10   it's not a mass market product right now. It's an early adopter product. People who want to have

00:22:15   tomorrow's technology today. It's like, yep, that's a great answer. And then also talking

00:22:20   about his innovation saying we're perfectly fine with not being first. Uh, it takes a long,

00:22:25   it takes a while to do it really great. It takes a lot of iteration, you know, so like he, he's

00:22:29   winking, right? Like we'd rather come out with the kind of product and the kind of contribution

00:22:34   of people versus running to get something out first. If we can do both, that's fantastic,

00:22:38   but if we can do one, there's no doubt around here. Right, right. So that, and that, that's

00:22:43   my point is if they feel like there's some advantage to be gained from saying, yeah,

00:22:47   we've got prototype glasses too, and they aren't. And just as meta found out, they're not good

00:22:53   enough for people to buy now. And it'll probably be a few years. He could say that in an analyst

00:22:58   call. He could say that in a media interview and that's all they need to do, right? Like the people

00:23:05   are like, Oh, maybe Apple should show off. It's like all, literally all that Tim Cook needs to

00:23:09   do is say, yeah, it's great. And you know, we, we're working on it too. We'll see you in a few

00:23:14   years and that's it. So that's fine. Uh, couple more pieces of follow up. Uh, one is that,

00:23:21   according to Mark Gorman at Bloomberg, Apple's chief people officer, Carol surface is leaving

00:23:25   the company after just two years. Deidre O'Brien is taking the responsibility of people back into

00:23:31   her role. Again, this is follow up because last week when talking about Dan Riccio, you mentioned

00:23:36   about Apple's issues of hiring externally. Yeah. Yeah. That a lot of those people, not all of them.

00:23:42   And there are, there are examples of people who've stuck, but, um, actually, um, Gorman mentioned

00:23:47   this, uh, Luca Maestri was an external hire and he worked pretty well. And their legal counsel was an

00:23:51   external hire and by all accounts, she's doing great too. Their chief counsel. Um, but, but there

00:23:57   are a lot of high profile, especially in the customer facing parts where there are high profile

00:24:04   hires that don't go well. And this is essentially, you know, just like losing two retail chiefs. Now

00:24:10   we've lost the people officer was brought in to replace the person who was moving over to just

00:24:15   do retail chief. So, uh, and, and Gorman also pointed out, Deidre O'Brien is going to retire

00:24:21   here probably pretty soon. And then what are they going to do? And it's like, she's gonna,

00:24:26   she's gonna be worn down at some point. I mean, I heard from somebody, um, this week after we

00:24:32   had that conversation who basically said, yes, Apple knows this Apple makes every effort to

00:24:39   develop their own people on the inside because they know that this is the case. And of course

00:24:43   they do. That's, that's why we talked about Dan Riccio is like, that felt very much like part

00:24:48   of a concerted strategy to keep the brain trust around longer than they would otherwise be around

00:24:54   and bring on the new person and give them more of a role. Just as, uh, Greg Joswiak is now worldwide

00:25:01   marketing head, but Phil Schiller is still there, right? Because that gives Jaws his opportunity.

00:25:06   And presumably he is now having the people step up behind him. Oh, um, he mentioned the,

00:25:11   they brought in external, uh, PR person and they lasted like less than two years. And now

00:25:17   Kristen Huget, who's been there forever and who I used to work with when she was just a PR,

00:25:21   you know, person on a product basis is now running their PR. So she's been at Apple a long time. Like

00:25:26   there are so many stories of this. So Apple's not a impossible fit for an outside hire, but it's

00:25:31   very difficult for a high level outside hire to fit in there. So they're doing the right thing,

00:25:37   according to the people that I've heard from, which is they know it and they are trying very

00:25:41   hard to develop their new talent from their existing employee base, which one is great

00:25:47   because if you're an employee there, what you want to believe is that there's a ladder for you

00:25:51   to climb instead of them just bringing in a high profile person from the outside. And two, because

00:25:56   they got to do it that way. Cause there's nobody coming in from the outside. The ladder is the only

00:26:01   source of the next executive set. So, uh, yeah, really interesting to write on the follow of that

00:26:06   for this to break. Cause I was like, we just talked about that on an upgrade. Perfect timing.

00:26:10   Yep. Um, and as discovered by Sigmund Judge of the Magic Rays of Light podcast, we mentioned

00:26:15   about him. He had pointed something out about Ted Lasso season four shooting in London. Well,

00:26:22   the British Film and Television Alliance is now published at Ted Lasso season four is in production

00:26:27   with filming to occur above London and the USA. There you go. It's, it's not been announced yet.

00:26:33   Confirmed by anybody at Apple or Warner Brothers. And I would say, I would say I still,

00:26:42   one of the reports that we haven't gotten to is, is it Ted Lasso season four in terms of how they

00:26:48   market it or is it going to be like a follow on that's got a different name and maybe they

00:26:55   are spending so much money that they're just going to call it Ted Lasso season four. But I'll,

00:26:59   I was watching the last part of the last, I was trying to think of like, where did they leave it?

00:27:04   And one of the last shots, it's very telling of Ted Lasso season three is Ted's note on the

00:27:11   manuscript by Trent Crim. That's called the Lasso way. And his only note is my name. It

00:27:20   shouldn't be named after me. It's not about, it's not about me. It never was something like that.

00:27:24   And I thought at the time, this is how you hand off to a successor show is say it doesn't,

00:27:31   it shouldn't be called Ted Lasso. That said, if it's easier to market it as Ted Lasso season

00:27:37   four and they can get Jason Sudeikis to be in it a teeny tiny bit, then they'll probably do that.

00:27:42   It is the, it is Apple's only like widely known name.

00:27:46   Breakthrough hit. Yeah. Actually great. It's thought occurs to me, great time to be on Prime

00:27:52   Video when they, if they get Ted Lasso back for a season four, right? To drive subs in a new place

00:27:59   for people who are like, oh yeah, I've heard about that Ted Lasso show. And you can literally,

00:28:02   you know, sign up and watch the first three seasons and then season four is also there.

00:28:06   So interesting.

00:28:08   - This episode is brought to you by Squarespace, the all-in-one website platform for entrepreneurs

00:28:15   to stand out and succeed online. Whether you're just starting out or managing a growing brand,

00:28:20   you can stand out from the crowd of a beautiful website, engage with your audience directly

00:28:24   and sell anything, products, services, even the content that you create,

00:28:27   because Squarespace has everything you need all in one place and all on your terms.

00:28:31   Squarespace makes it so easy to get started. They've developed a new system called design

00:28:36   intelligence. It combines two decades of industry-leading design expertise of

00:28:41   cutting edge technology to unlock your strongest creative potential. Design intelligence empowers

00:28:46   anyone to build a beautiful, more personalized website tailored to your unique needs and craft

00:28:52   a bespoke digital identity to use across your entire online presence. And they make it so easy

00:28:58   to customize that as well. So one of the things I've always loved about Squarespace is how easy

00:29:03   they make it to use their tools to make an interface and make a website look the way

00:29:07   that you want. They have drag and drop tools, and you can choose from fonts and colors,

00:29:11   and you can move everything around and resize everything to your heart's content.

00:29:14   They make it so easy to get started and then super simple for you to customize too.

00:29:19   They have great layouts, great templates, and they're even more customizable than ever.

00:29:24   You also have Squarespace payments. If you want to sell physical or digital goods to Squarespace,

00:29:28   this is the easiest way to manage your payments in one place. Onboarding is fast and simple. You

00:29:34   get started in just a few clicks, and you can start receiving payments right away.

00:29:38   Plus, give your customers more ways to pay by choosing from popular payment methods like Klarna,

00:29:43   ACH Direct Debit, Apple Pay, Afterpay and Clearpay, depending on where you're located.

00:29:48   And you can also manage everything with Squarespace's analytics platform. You can

00:29:53   measure your end-to-end online performance with powerful website and seller analytics,

00:29:57   get insights on top traffic sources, understand how your reach is growing, track sales metrics,

00:30:02   and learn where to focus your engagement. It's all the data you need to scale your

00:30:06   brand or business fully integrated and clearly displayed.

00:30:09   Head to squarespace.com right now and you can sign up for a trial. When you're ready to launch,

00:30:14   go to squarespace.com/upgrade and you'll save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain.

00:30:19   That is squarespace.com/upgrade and when you sign up, you'll get that 10%

00:30:24   off your first purchase by going there. And you'll also be showing your support for the show.

00:30:28   Thanks to Squarespace for their support of this show and all of Relay.

00:30:31   So last week, in a press release in the Apple newsroom, Apple unveiled a new iPad Mini.

00:30:38   It features a bunch of small improvements, but the biggest feature and actually the way that

00:30:44   Apple is referring to this product on their website is the iPad Mini with A17 Pro. It's

00:30:50   really weird like when you go to compare them. It's like iPad Mini 6th generation and then

00:30:54   it's been replaced by iPad Mini A17 Pro. That's okay. The next one will be 8th generation and

00:31:00   we'll all just start calling it the 7th generation and no people care. Also, Mini, Mini, Mini, Mini,

00:31:06   who has all the Mini? Anyway, just get that in everybody's heads again. Thank you. That's coming

00:31:12   up, right? It is next Halloween. Halloween is Apple results, so I guess in a couple of weeks,

00:31:18   we're going to have to break out the jingle. We have to break it out. I feel like that's the

00:31:22   breakout hit. We're going to break that is the hit of the jingle episode. So we'll bring it back.

00:31:27   So yeah, this is A17 Pro. It's, you know, the chip is really anything to talk about. I think

00:31:34   there's a lot of little details. I'll put a link in the show notes to your post. You know, there's

00:31:39   a host of small things they added to this product, removed, i.e. all of the saturation from the

00:31:46   colors, but they put this chip in and this chip is weird. We've spoken about it a few times on

00:31:53   the show before because the A17 Pro was on a three nanometer processor TSMC that was a dead end,

00:32:00   but Apple kind of committed with them to produce it because they needed the chip for the iPhone,

00:32:05   so they did it. And that was also the, I think the M3 too, right? It is this, but they skipped

00:32:10   a bunch of devices on the M3 to go probably straight to M4 and it seems like... That's why

00:32:14   M4 happens so fast is that M4 is a new chip design on the new process. That is the process TSMC is

00:32:22   using going forward instead of being this dead end that is this first generation three nanometer

00:32:29   process. And so Apple has been clearing out the M3 and like, they're going to get it off of all

00:32:34   the Macs and they're going to get them all on M4. And then here's a new product that is using the

00:32:39   old process. And it seems weird, right? But what is it? Why? Well, first off, this entire product

00:32:44   exists for Apple intelligence. It feels very much... They made some other changes to it,

00:32:49   but they're so minor. As you said, they desaturated the color, but they're so minor.

00:32:56   Really what's going on here is this is not what everybody who's an iPad mini fan wanted,

00:33:02   which is a new iPad mini that's been kind of rethought and upgraded in a lot of ways.

00:33:06   It's literally the old iPad mini, but compatible with Apple intelligence because that was the

00:33:13   priority was we need to get all of our devices on Apple intelligence. Now, it is weird that

00:33:19   this is a chip that we basically figure they have stopped making or are going to stop making. I have

00:33:25   a lot of theories about it. My best guess is that they've... Because it's got one fewer GPU than the

00:33:34   one in the iPhone last year, last year's iPhone Pro. So they've been saving up binned chips that

00:33:42   didn't pass the test for the iPhone because a GPU core didn't work. And maybe they've got excess

00:33:48   that they didn't end up needing for the 15 Pro. And so they've... My question is, one,

00:33:55   is there literally a big bin of 15 Pro chips somewhere that Apple has and how many are in

00:34:02   there? And is that the total number that Apple thinks that they're going to sell of the iPad

00:34:07   mini and the product's entire life cycle? Or is it possible that they're still making them

00:34:13   because they haven't shut down that production line yet and Apple has some sort of contractual

00:34:16   deal and it's going to make some more? But my guess is Apple is going to get a certain number

00:34:22   of these chips that Apple says, "This is enough for the iPad mini's lifetime." And then they're

00:34:26   going to turn off that production line. Which means... I mean, look, the future's promised to

00:34:33   know one and nothing lasts forever. So the iPad mini that just got announced will one day be

00:34:40   replaced, as all products are. But what's interesting is the ticking clock might be like,

00:34:47   really ticking. Like, literally, we know exactly how many of these we can possibly make before we

00:34:53   have to introduce a new model that uses a different chip. So I don't know how big the bin is and I

00:34:59   don't know whether they're planning to go three more years for the next iPad mini. My gut feeling

00:35:04   is they probably won't go three years. My gut feeling is this is probably a midstream thing

00:35:08   that they did for Apple intelligence and that there's probably a better iPad mini in the works

00:35:14   a couple years down the line, maybe. But it's possible that they got three years worth of chips

00:35:19   in a bin and they're gonna just grind them out. But it is wild to think that they put this product

00:35:27   on a chip that is basically done. But they are. - Yeah, it's a very peculiar thing to do. Very

00:35:35   peculiar. Like, the A18 is just sitting right there. Which, realistically, the A18, non-pro,

00:35:46   makes more sense for this product. - So here's what I've heard. Several people pointed this out

00:35:52   after I posted my story last week, which is if they were to use the A18, they would actually

00:35:58   have to do a feature regression on the iPad mini because the sixth generation iPad mini supports

00:36:03   USB 3 and the A16 on the iPhone does not. It only supports USB 2. - Okay. - And if that is the case,

00:36:12   that is their choice, is do they want to do a feature regression. But I will also say,

00:36:17   is it possible? Because the other story that we've heard about these 3nm chips is that they're

00:36:22   expensive. They're expensive to make and they're expensive because they have a lot of failure on

00:36:26   them. So there are ones that Apple rejects. And I think their deal with TSMC, I forget whether this

00:36:30   was one where they had the ability to reject them at no cost to them and TSMC. Like, look,

00:36:36   it's bad business for Apple and TSMC to be on this line anymore. So I think it must have been

00:36:44   a little expediency thing, which is like, we're going to take all of the leftovers from this

00:36:50   failed project and use them somewhere. And this is a perfect place to use them because it allows

00:36:55   them to do it without spending the money and effort to upgrade lots of internals in order to

00:37:03   put an M chip in it, right? Because we heard from an anonymous source, a good anonymous source who

00:37:07   pointed out like, put an M chip in an iPad mini. There's a lot more that goes into it than an A chip

00:37:14   and it would have been a much more substantial upgrade. They're like, they don't want to do that.

00:37:17   So it has to be an A chip. And I don't know whether it was something that they came to and

00:37:22   they're like, aha, I've got the answer for the iPad mini and Apple intelligence or what. Or if

00:37:27   somebody was like made the vice president of A17 Pro bins, it was like, what do I do with these

00:37:34   things? And they found this, but whatever the reason, like it's very Tim Cook too, just almost

00:37:41   as Tim Cook as naming your texting thread with your roommates, roommates is taking a part that

00:37:48   you bought that isn't very good in terms of your flagship product in the future. I mean, I'm not,

00:37:55   it's not a bad chip, right? But it's like, it's, it's a, it's a broken process that you're turning

00:37:59   off, but you've got extra, extra parts and you're like, let's reuse them. It saves money. It saves

00:38:07   efficiency and it's probably better for the environment rather than just like, well, why

00:38:11   would you throw them away? They're perfectly functional. So, but you've got to find a place

00:38:15   to put them and here it is, right? You take a risk, right? Where like in theory, there is a

00:38:20   maximum amount of this product that can be sold unless they are continuing to produce for TSMC.

00:38:26   As you mentioned, you raised in your article, which would also be really weird, but I would

00:38:31   expect to at some level of degree, Apple do get to ask of TMS TSMC to do things that they would

00:38:37   otherwise not like to do, you know? Yeah, exactly. Exactly. Also, I mean, I have a list in my article,

00:38:44   you can read it. Somebody, Dave Shop mentioned in our chat that another reason is they need to

00:38:50   the ACE, the 18 for iPhone 16, right? I mean, they, I don't know how much volume they've got

00:38:56   at that, but like if you're ramping up production of iPhones, the last thing you want to do is

00:38:58   divert production of iPhones for iPad minis. I'm sorry, fans of the iPad mini, but you, even you

00:39:03   must see that if you're, if you're Apple and it's summer and you're building iPhones for your big

00:39:08   fall splash, diverting the number of iPhone 16s you can sell because of the iPad mini is a bad idea.

00:39:13   It's a really bad idea. So here we are. It is, you're right. It is. It's not that the, like I

00:39:20   said, all products will be replaced. It's the ticking clock aspect of it, which is they know

00:39:25   exactly how many they need to make. But my guess is they also know how many they're going to sell.

00:39:29   And if it's a runaway hit, well, you know, they'll move up the introduction of the,

00:39:34   the next iPad mini. But my guess is that they probably got, they're good for a couple of years.

00:39:41   That's my guess. Yep. Uh, so one of the issues of the 6th gen iPad mini was what was called

00:39:47   jelly scrolling. So I've mentioned this before in portrait, when you would scroll with the iPad mini,

00:39:53   it would sometimes look that like one half of the screen would move at a different speed

00:39:59   than the other. It was a small thing, but, but noticeable. Uh, well, well MacRumors is reporting

00:40:06   on a conversation from the 6th color secret podcast where cohost Jason Snell told Dan Morin

00:40:11   that it was his understanding that this had been addressed in the new iPad mini.

00:40:14   Yeah. Very funny to have, I mean, shout out to Julie Clover at MacRumors who either

00:40:20   listens to the podcast. Thanks. I should look up if who at MacRumors is a subscriber

00:40:26   or whether there was a tip. Was there a hot tip? Or maybe, you know, you, you go to that feed and

00:40:31   you find out there's like six people listening to it and everyone at MacRumors. Anyway, look,

00:40:34   we have briefings that are, that are on background. And so, you know, I can't say Apple says, and I

00:40:40   can't quote anybody. I mean, I can't wait for the new story about this to break this conversation

00:40:44   here, but, uh, you know, my understanding is just totally separate from that. My understanding is

00:40:49   that they did make some changes to the display circuitry. And what's unclear is whether they

00:40:54   address this problem or not. But what I would say is if Apple knew that jelly scrolling was a thing,

00:40:59   but hadn't acknowledged it, the last thing they would do is acknowledge that they had a flaw

00:41:04   in an, in, in, in, in saying that they fixed it, they would do it in this way, which is to,

00:41:09   to be asked directly about jelly scrolling and reply by saying, well, we did make some

00:41:13   changes to the display circuitry. And then you're just left hanging of like, but did it

00:41:18   solve this? Was it meant to address this? But what they won't say is we fixed that horrible jelly

00:41:25   scrolling problem that we had, that we've never talked about and never admitted to because then

00:41:29   they're going to get sued and all these things. So they just said, oh, we changed the display

00:41:32   controller is probably what they might've said. That's my understanding. Anyway, I don't know.

00:41:36   Apple says here, it's probably my understanding. Anyway. Anyway, I would imagine that later this

00:41:42   week there will be embargo drops and there will be reviews and stuff, and we'll have a better idea

00:41:47   of whether jelly scrolling is still a thing, but they changed something. So maybe jelly scrolling

00:41:52   is not a thing anymore, but that's really all we know right now. And again, thank you for Mac to

00:41:56   Macrumors for reminding me that even in my members only podcast, which is an excellent secret podcast,

00:42:04   right? Like I think technically it's just the six colors podcast. I don't think it's secret anymore.

00:42:10   We don't swear anybody to secrecy. I don't think we do it anymore. I think when we started,

00:42:14   it was internalized. We realized that if we want to sell memberships, we should not keep it a

00:42:20   secret because people do like listening to that podcast. It's a very nice podcast. People can join

00:42:24   six colors and listen to it. And if you join at the higher levels, you get more of it because we do

00:42:30   more in a big Q and A every month and all this stuff. Anyway, I'll sell my other podcast here.

00:42:35   But now I need to just remind myself that if there's something that I don't want turned into

00:42:40   a story on Macrumors, I should probably not mention it even on a members only podcast. Just a lesson

00:42:46   for me and other podcasters that just because it's behind a paywall doesn't mean somebody won't go

00:42:51   find it and report on it. Sort of like what we do with Mark Gurman's Bloomberg stories, which are

00:42:56   behind a paywall, but we just talk about them. But I pay for it. I do pay for it too. That's true.

00:43:02   I'm sure somebody paid for whatever Julie Clover reported. Maybe Julie Clover herself. I don't know.

00:43:07   There are new Kindles led by my favorite Panos Panay, who was previously at Microsoft running

00:43:16   Surface, and he left and went to Amazon and now runs hardware at Amazon. And this was the first

00:43:22   Panos kind of product unveiling. And you can see the difference in that they decided to actually

00:43:28   have an event and they unveiled an entire range of Kindles, which is not usually how they do things.

00:43:32   They usually like do one here or there, but they're like, no, here is a lot of new Kindles.

00:43:38   Put a link in the show notes to the most recent episode of the Vergecast where they had Panos on.

00:43:44   And this is a great interviewer. I actually got to interview him once and it was a great time.

00:43:48   He's a very, very thoughtful person who really cares. He's a good salesman too, but you could

00:43:56   tell that he... I don't know. I like the guy. He's got a lot of heart. Anyway, so they have a bunch of

00:44:02   products. I'm going to just talk about them real quick and then you can touch on the things that

00:44:05   you care about because you're the guy. So we've got the Kindle Color Soft, which is the first

00:44:09   color ink Kindle. The new Kindle scribes that have redesigned it a little bit visually and

00:44:16   made some changes. They've put some new software features in there. So you can take your notes with

00:44:21   your Kindle scribes, like a pen on an ink screen, and they can give you some AI summaries of your

00:44:25   handwritten notes. And they've put some new ways to put notes on books. So you can write your

00:44:31   notes on a book and it will flow the text around your notes. That's really cool. They have a new

00:44:37   Kindle Paperwhite, which has faster page turns on a larger screen, and then a new entry-level Kindle.

00:44:42   And some of these Kindles have color options on the cases too. So the big Kindles. Yay! This is

00:44:52   the foremost e-reader podcast. So first thing is they also discontinued their 2018 Kindle Oasis is

00:45:01   finally officially dead, which was the last Kindle that had page turn buttons on it. And every time

00:45:06   this comes up, people say, well, I don't need buttons to turn. I just tap the screen. It's fine.

00:45:10   I'll just say, obviously, for most people, that is the case. I hate it because it makes the ergonomics

00:45:17   of holding it for me awkward and I have to shift my finger. So if I get a good grip, it doesn't

00:45:22   matter because when I need to turn the page, I need to either use the other hand or I need to

00:45:25   shift a finger or whatever to tap or swipe in order to move to the next page. Whereas I can rest my

00:45:30   hand, holding my e-reader with my thumb on the page turn button, and then just kind of sit there

00:45:36   and go click, click, click, click without moving my hand. So I prefer page turn buttons. I think

00:45:40   that they should be an option. Amazon first thought that they should only be on the very high end.

00:45:45   And then now they think that they shouldn't exist at all. So I'm disappointed by that. If you like

00:45:50   page turn buttons, I think the answer is you should probably buy the Kobo Sage or you could

00:45:57   get the Kobo Libra color, but it's not as good a screen as the old Libra 2 was or find a Kobo

00:46:04   Libra 2 on eBay or something and just get that. That's what I still use day to day is the last

00:46:09   generation. I even bought, Mike, I bought a Kobo Libra 2 case, which I already have one, but it's

00:46:15   kind of beat up over the years. And they were putting them on clearance at Kobo.com and I just

00:46:19   went and bought another one because I have basically, I'm like, okay, this is the one,

00:46:24   this is my e-reader I'm going to keep using for the most part is the Kobo Libra 2. So I might as

00:46:32   well, because I noticed on my last trip, it was really beat up and I was like, it's a shame that

00:46:37   they don't make this anymore, but it turns out they still had some cases left in the warehouse.

00:46:40   So I bought one. Anyway, so I'm a little despondent about the state of e-readers in the

00:46:45   sense that I think page turn buttons are important, but a couple of things. I'm really encouraged that

00:46:51   Panos Panay is involved in Kindles because it felt like for the longest time, Amazon wasn't really

00:46:55   paying attention to Kindles at all and that they didn't have a strategy and they would do stuff in

00:47:00   the background. They did a big software update that I think dramatically improved the usability

00:47:04   of a Kindle. I'm generally disappointed in the trend in e-readers. I'm not offended by the idea

00:47:12   that people who are reading text on a e-reader is a niche market, that a lot of people just think

00:47:18   phones are fine or iPads are fine, which I don't, but a lot of people do. So it's a very niche

00:47:23   product already. So I'm not offended by the idea that they're trying to find other ways to push

00:47:28   this technology, but it seems to be the thing that they found is using pens and taking notes.

00:47:34   And the problem I have with it is that's not a use case for me. So it's great for others

00:47:38   and all that. I had somebody ask me, are you going to review the Kindle scribe? And my answer is what

00:47:41   it always is, which is it's too big. It has a pen. That's sort of what it's about. I'm just not

00:47:46   interested in that category. It's just not a thing. Above a certain point for people who need to mark

00:47:52   up PDFs and stuff, I think it's kind of a brilliant idea, although you could also use an iPad, but I've

00:47:56   heard positive things about marking up documents on a Kindle. So I'm not interested in the scribe

00:48:01   at all, which leaves us with the Colorsoft and the Paperwhite really. Colorsoft isn't out yet.

00:48:06   It's coming out in a week, I think. It is their first color Kindle. They resisted this for a long

00:48:14   time. E Ink has been making color screens because E Ink is a company. E Ink has been making color

00:48:21   screens for a while. And like I said, Kobo just did a turnaround into the color screens. The

00:48:25   problem is... And the remarkable color one, too. I know it's not an e-reader, but like...

00:48:31   Right. But they're out there, right? And there are issues with them where the DPI is, I think,

00:48:36   half the points per inch is half of what it is for the black and white. So your black and white text

00:48:41   is crisp, but your color is not that crisp. But still, interesting. The problem is that it also

00:48:47   puts a gray cast on the back of the screen that actually reduces readability of text because now

00:48:53   it's black on, kind of, speckly gray instead of black on very light gray to white. Amazon made

00:49:00   some sort of claim about how they've got, like, their color is different, and they've got different

00:49:05   lighting, and they... It sounds like what they're implying is that they have somehow overcome some

00:49:11   of the limitations of the color screen. I'll believe it when I see it. But I think that's

00:49:17   interesting because Kobo just came out with these color versions and discontinued some of their

00:49:23   black and white readers. Like, it doesn't matter. It's okay. And I'm not sure I believe them.

00:49:28   So we'll see if that color is better than the color on these other devices, if Amazon is

00:49:36   beaten back somehow. I assume they're still using e-ink's technology, but if they've done some

00:49:43   things to modify it, like, we'll see. I will throw out there, though, that this is a seven-inch,

00:49:48   I think, reader. It's not huge because a lot of people are like, "Oh, you read comics on it."

00:49:53   It's like, I've tried to read comics on readers this size. I mean, also, the way I read comics

00:49:58   is not available, right? Like Marvel Unlimited is not on Kindle. That's true. That's true. You've

00:50:02   got to buy comics on Kindle. If you did Kindle Unlimited, I think you'd get some comics. Anyway,

00:50:07   it's not ideal. However, here's the thing, and I don't know the answer to this question,

00:50:13   so I'm just going to put it out there, and we'll find out the answer probably in a week, which is

00:50:17   Kindle is also Comixology. They sell comics. They merged it all into the Kindle store. You can buy

00:50:23   individual issues of comics. You can buy trade paperbacks. They use the Comixology technology.

00:50:28   It's in the Kindle app on the iPad and on the iPhone. It's called Guided View. I don't read

00:50:33   comics this way because I read on a big iPad, but the idea was that Comixology built this thing

00:50:39   to make comics readable on iPhones. You double tap, and it will take you. It's built into the

00:50:44   metadata of the comic. It'll take you page by page or panel by panel through a comic, which means you

00:50:52   don't have to see the whole comic. It will lead you through the individual panels, which are then

00:50:56   much larger, which makes it more readable without you having to pan and zoom, which is really bad on

00:51:02   an e-ink screen that doesn't have a high refresh rate. As far as I can tell, they didn't say

00:51:07   anything about it. My question is, does the Kindle ColorSoft do Guided View for comics? Because if it

00:51:12   does, it could be a decent comic reader. And if it doesn't, why doesn't it, right? Because it's

00:51:19   literally their technology. So either, either it's going to be better for comics than any e-reader

00:51:28   has ever been, or I don't know what Amazon is even thinking. - Or a missed opportunity, like a

00:51:34   severe missed opportunity. They specifically call out comics and graphic novels as a thing for this,

00:51:47   and the image that they show, it looks good. They have a panel from Ms. Marvel. - Sure, but am I

00:51:54   getting there through Guided View? Because I read an issue of Saga on the Kobo, and it's just panning

00:52:01   and zooming. Oh, it's so bad. So we'll see. We'll see. Jury's still out. I ordered one. I will review

00:52:07   it, but it's not here yet. I have the Paperwhite. It's reminded me of all the reasons why I like

00:52:14   physical page turn buttons, but it's good. It looks good. It frustrates me. It also doesn't have

00:52:19   a light sensor. So when I'm reading in the daytime, I have to swipe down and crank up the

00:52:24   brightness. And when I'm reading at nighttime, I turn it on. It's super bright, and I have to swipe

00:52:28   down and crank down the brightness. How expensive is that light sensor part? It's in older Kindles

00:52:35   that are, I guess, higher end. I don't know why they left that out. It's a real degradation of the

00:52:41   quality of the product, and Paperwhite is not the entry-level Kindle, so I don't know why it does

00:52:47   that. But it looks good. The software is good. I'll write a review of it. The use cases for people

00:52:53   who -- it used to be that Kindle was way worse for people who use libraries than Kobo, especially

00:52:59   since Kobo at one point was the same company that did OverDrive, which is libraries. However,

00:53:06   if you have more than one library that you're a member of, Kindle's way better because it uses

00:53:12   Amazon's infrastructure to fulfill the books, whereas Kobo, you log into your library and it

00:53:17   only lets you log into one. So that's kind of interesting, too. So my gut feeling now is,

00:53:25   despite all my frustrations, I think the best -- e-readers last forever. You don't need to

00:53:30   upgrade them very often. However, the best general-purpose e-reader right now is probably

00:53:37   this new Paperwhite. I will, you know, write my review and see. I also want to throw out one

00:53:42   suggestion to our dear friend Panos Panay, who is obviously listening to the world's greatest

00:53:48   e-reader podcast. You heard Mike say nice things about you. If we're not going to do page-turn

00:53:54   buttons, which, again, I think they're really good, how about alternate ways of turning a page

00:54:01   that don't require you to move your fingers? How about something like, at one point, they had a

00:54:07   pressure-sensitive side, where if you gave it a squeeze over a certain area, it advanced? Or how

00:54:14   about an accelerometer? You already have one, at least an accelerometer, because you can do portrait

00:54:21   to landscape. But like, the other way I was thinking you could do it is if you get it kind

00:54:27   of like in your hand and you've got a grip, what if you use a finger to like tap the back, like do

00:54:31   a double tap or something, and it advances the page? You could do that, maybe. And that wouldn't

00:54:35   require a moving part and a button that you have to protect against water ingress and all that.

00:54:39   Just please find something that isn't moving my finger and putting it on the screen, because I

00:54:44   would really like that. But anyway, so that is, I'll have more follow-up, Mike, as we go down this

00:54:49   path with the new Kindles. Very exciting. Who knows, maybe one of these days we'll bring back

00:54:54   Scott McNulty and we'll just do an e-reader blowout. No promises. I know we did that, though.

00:55:00   In a very early episode of Upgrade, we just did a whole thing with Scott where we talked about

00:55:03   Kindles and Mike got to make a sandwich. So there we are. Hey, I was there. I had a good time. I was

00:55:08   just listening, you know? Yeah, just listening to me and Scott talking about Kindles, as you do.

00:55:13   This episode is brought to you by Fitbod. If you're looking to change your fitness level,

00:55:19   it can be hard to know where to get started, which is why I'm pleased to let you know about Fitbod.

00:55:23   They are the easy and affordable way to build a fitness plan made just for you,

00:55:28   because that's what Fitbod is all about. They take data to make sure they build the perfect

00:55:34   workout plan that meets your unique body experience, environment and goals.

00:55:39   Fitbod saves all of this information in your Fitbod gym profile because they know that

00:55:43   everybody has their own path to personal fitness. So they customize things to suit you because you

00:55:49   will see the best results with a workout program when it suits you. Fitbod will track your muscle

00:55:54   recovery so you can avoid burnout while keeping up your momentum. They've analyzed billions of

00:55:58   data points, so they've basically taken the best of workout science and machine learning.

00:56:06   They have been fine-tuned this information with their own certified personal trainers

00:56:11   to make sure that your muscles will be working together. So you won't be overworking some muscles

00:56:16   or underworking muscles. This negatively impacts your results. So Fitbod tracks your muscle

00:56:22   fatigue and your recovery to design a well-balanced workout routine that is just

00:56:27   for you. This balance as well and mixing things up makes sure that you're not going to get bored

00:56:33   because they're going to give you new exercises, new rep schemes, supersets and circuits.

00:56:37   And when you find an exercise that's new to you, you can learn it the right way thanks to their

00:56:42   great instructions and videos. I love this. There's more than a thousand demonstration videos in the

00:56:47   Fitbod app. So every time I come to a new exercise, I can see exactly how to do it and that makes me

00:56:54   feel confident and confidence for me is important in my exercise. And that is what Fitbod provides

00:56:58   me. Fitbod is easy to use. The app is fantastic. You stay informed of the progress tracking charts,

00:57:04   weekly reports and sharing cards. They say you should keep track of your achievements and your

00:57:08   personal best while sharing them with your friends and family. And Fitbod also integrates with your

00:57:13   Apple Watch, your Wear OS smartwatch and apps like Strava, Fitbit and Apple Health. Personally,

00:57:17   training at this quality, it can be expensive, but Fitbod is just $12.99 a month or $17.99 a year,

00:57:24   but you can get 25% off by going to fitbod.me/upgrades. So go now and get your

00:57:31   customized fitness plan at fitbod.me/upgrade. That is fitbod.me/upgrade for 25% off your membership.

00:57:40   If you sign up for that annual plan, that's an incredible saving. Thanks to Fitbod for their

00:57:44   support of this show and Relay. Oh, I have one last Kindle point. Okay. Thank you to ZMK in the

00:57:52   chat for pointing this out. There is a Kindle Paperweight Signature Edition. For $40 more,

00:57:57   you do get the light sensor. Why? Why? And it's got more storage that you don't really need and

00:58:03   support for wireless charging. So I guess if you want to pay $200, you can get the one with the

00:58:09   auto. Twice as much as the cheap Kindle. $40 more than the Paperweight Standard. They have the

00:58:16   Signature Edition and the Signature, apparently, is a little cheap light sensor. So there you go.

00:58:20   Anyway, review to come. Whatever. Amazon, come on. Panos, get in there. Work it out. He's doing it.

00:58:28   He's making you pay $40 more for your light. Yeah, I guess so. For a light sensor. That's what he's

00:58:32   doing. Great. Yeah. Great. It's time for a draft. All right. These are the rules and the rules are

00:58:39   slightly different. So if you don't usually pay attention to the rules, these are the rules. Yeah.

00:58:43   We don't have a whole like rules process. We just kind of talk about it and plan it and then. But

00:58:48   these are our rules. Yes. Five rounds. No, I've already said it wrong. It was originally going to

00:58:53   be five. It's more. Seven rounds. Seven rounds. We changed it today. Seven rounds, 14 overall picks.

00:58:59   The winner of the previous draft gets to pick first. That is me as I am current draft champion.

00:59:06   Our items are chosen from a predetermined list of choices, which we have agreed could be verifiable

00:59:11   and not ridiculously obvious. For an item to count, it must either be clearly announced on

00:59:17   stage or on a slide during a presentation or viewable on Apple's website if announced

00:59:23   via a press release. That is the difference for this draft because we have no idea what's going

00:59:27   to happen if they don't have a pre pre announced live stream. We switch into press release mode.

00:59:35   Yeah. Or if they don't just publish a video. Right. Which is like an event video. I guess

00:59:39   it could be either or I suppose we've seen in the past, but that's rare that they would is

00:59:43   incredibly unlikely that they would do that. But right. Nevertheless,

00:59:48   Stephen Hackett will adjudicate in case of a scoring stalemate between the two of us.

00:59:53   But he's currently on leave. So let's say Stephen Hackett will adjudicate.

00:59:58   If Stephen is away, who should be our adjudicator? Zach, let's put Zach in it. We're gonna put Zach

01:00:03   in it. I don't know if Zach wants this, but Zach Knox, who makes our scorecards will adjudicate in

01:00:08   case of Stephen's unavailability of adjudication. No partial points are awarded. The points awarded

01:00:16   on the episode are final and they are finalized during the scoring segment. In the case of a tie,

01:00:22   there is a tiebreaker question. The loser gets pick of the tiebreaker question. The winner

01:00:28   becomes draft champion and displays the champion pennant. Loser becomes draft challenger and

01:00:33   displays the challenger pennant. I am currently displaying my champion pennant as champion.

01:00:38   I am currently displaying the challenger pennant as challenger. You watch our YouTube video to see

01:00:45   me displaying it right now. I'm holding it. Indeed. There will be an interactive scorecard,

01:00:50   upgrade.cards, which are maintained and managed by Zach Knox. You can buy a t-shirt at any time

01:00:57   at the draft, upgradeyourwardrobe.com if you want that. There's always, there is some t-shirts

01:01:01   available. There's a fun room around up t-shirt there too. A couple of upgrade logo t-shirts and

01:01:05   also a draft t-shirt, which you can buy whenever you want. If you would like to celebrate the draft,

01:01:12   you can go to our cotton bureau store and do that. There have been five previous drafts held

01:01:18   in October. Jason has won three of these. I have won two of them. And so far this year,

01:01:26   I am winning at two drafts to one. So you have the opportunity to tie up for the year because

01:01:33   I doubt there will be another draft. So yeah, of course, like, so the reason we made the tweak this

01:01:38   time is we wanted to do the draft because it's fun to draft and we expect there to be some Mac stuff

01:01:43   and we thought it was going to be Mac and iPad, but then obviously Apple just released the iPad

01:01:48   mini as a press release. So we're still drafting anyway because we wanted to, and we said we would,

01:01:53   so we're doing it. But for this one instance, and maybe if we ever do this specific kind of

01:01:59   thing before where we draft without an announcement, we'll see how this goes to try and judge it by the

01:02:05   newsroom post, which I think the newsroom post on whatever's on Apple's website by the time that we

01:02:10   get there. Which I honestly, realistically, provided that we pick, and so what we've done

01:02:15   today is like we've been very particular in the picks that we are making, and we spoke about this

01:02:19   in Upgrade Plus last week, the picks that we are making, they are product. They are not stagecraft,

01:02:24   like we are specifically doing product stuff. And so yeah, it has to be on Apple's website.

01:02:30   So I'll just point out, I thought about it maybe like a day too late. I thought about us doing this

01:02:37   last week, but a little too late for us to prep for it, which would have been great because we would

01:02:43   know some of the answers, but not all of them. And we would have to wait on judging. No, you know

01:02:48   what, I think it's better this way because that would have made it really complicated, because

01:02:52   it's like do we score the whole draft now? I don't like that. That's in the rules, no partial points.

01:02:59   So we have to score the entire draft. It would have been a nightmare. So I'm happy that it's

01:03:05   actually gone this way. We dodged a bullet there. All right, so we have seven rounds. I'm gonna go

01:03:12   first. The first pick that I'm gonna make is that the new Mac Mini has a new industrial design.

01:03:24   That's gonna be my first pick. Okay, that's good. Now we had before, just to let you in on it,

01:03:32   everybody, one of the things that we debated beforehand was are these too obvious?

01:03:40   And we decided, you know what, part of the draft is actually talking about what's going to happen

01:03:46   and then what did happen. And so we just expanded our picks a couple so that we can make some picks

01:03:52   that are not guaranteed, not guaranteed. I think nothing here is a hundred percent, right? They

01:03:58   could throw us a curve ball, but we wanted to not just sort of like ignore the basic, like we're not

01:04:04   picking a new Mac Mini as announced. That's what I've decided is a hundred percent, but this is at

01:04:10   least a little detail. We've heard that it's smaller. What if it's not? What if it doesn't

01:04:14   have a new design? Then you get the pick wrong, but I'm just gonna like counter you here with my

01:04:20   pick, which is the new Mac Mini is smaller than ever. So here's why I think it's actually worthwhile.

01:04:26   So the Mac Mini has been around for, oh, how long? Let me Google this real quick. A very long time.

01:04:32   2005? Okay. So 20 years, essentially. Something like that. There have been two industrial designs

01:04:39   for the Mac Mini in its entire 20-year history. And I know this because Steven stacked them up

01:04:44   and showed me them while I was in Memphis. He was like, look, this has not changed. There's the tall

01:04:49   one and then there's the flatter one, which as Steven pointed out, I have conflated with

01:04:55   getting rid of the optical drive, but it's not true. The flatter one had an optical drive option

01:04:59   for a little while, which means that that enclosure that we've been using all of this

01:05:04   time was built to fit an optical drive, which is bananas. So it doesn't need to be that big.

01:05:11   So the way I think of it, not even just the tall one, it's the one with the plastic top and then

01:05:15   one that was all aluminum. And so I do actually think that a new industrial design for the Mac

01:05:22   Mini, while we expect it to happen, could have happened many times in the past. We have probably

01:05:29   picked it many times. I know I've written many articles about they should make a smaller Mac Mini

01:05:33   and I think the answer is they finally, you're like, why make it smaller? We've heard that from

01:05:37   people, which is like, but why make it smaller? What's the point? It's a little desktop. Why

01:05:41   does it need to be smaller? I think the answer is they decided to refresh the enclosure. First off,

01:05:45   they're going to save money on like aluminum and stuff. They don't need it to be that big.

01:05:50   It's not just we need to make it smaller. So let's engineer it to be smaller. If you look at what's

01:05:54   inside a Mac Mini, it doesn't need to be that big. It's mostly air in there. So do you know what I

01:06:01   say? Have some fun in your life. You know, if you want a big desktop, a decade more, the Mac studio

01:06:09   exists. Get that. I want the exact opposite of the Mac studio. I want the Mac Mini to be as small as

01:06:16   they can make it because why not? I want to stick it to the back of a monitor with velcro. Like,

01:06:21   let me do it. You know, make a tiny little computer. I think it'd be amazing. Let's do it.

01:06:26   I'm excited about this, by the way. I think we'll talk about it, but like this is, I have my mind on

01:06:32   this computer being my next computer and I'm excited about this Mac Mini. It's great. Cool.

01:06:37   My second round pick is that the new Mac Mini comes with both an M4 and M4 Pro configuration.

01:06:46   Yeah, it currently does, right? It currently has a standard and a Pro. So I think that's a reasonable

01:06:53   pick and I think that's, I think it's great, right? Again,

01:06:56   imagine the power in such a little tiny device. Tiny little computer and it has an M4 Pro chip

01:07:04   in it. That'd be so great. I'd be really excited about that. The risks here are it doesn't happen

01:07:10   this time because they changed the configuration. They changed the enclosure and they can't fit the

01:07:14   Pro in there. Or they just don't have an M4 version. Like they could, they could get rid of it.

01:07:19   Or the Pro version could still be in the old size. That's the other possibility. There are some,

01:07:25   there are, again, we're going from like a hundred down to like 98% to 95%, but still.

01:07:31   All right. Very excited about that, but I'm going to pick new MacBook Pros. Okay. I think

01:07:40   there will be new MacBook Pros. I think that is also up there. Again, not necessarily the case,

01:07:47   right? I think that we have all, you know, I think Mac Mini feels the most certain, MacBook Pro feels

01:07:52   the next most certain to me. And so I'm going to pick it. I'm excited about it. You know, they are,

01:07:58   this is not a prediction, but like, I don't think they're going to be very different. We,

01:08:01   I know we've got the Russian leak out there. Like they, they already redesigned these things.

01:08:07   All they're doing is bumping the processors up from M3 to M4. Nobody get too excited about it.

01:08:12   They, they, they will highlight Apple intelligence, but of course the old ones will,

01:08:16   all Apple Silicon Macs have Apple intelligence. They will talk about something that is very

01:08:21   specific to M4. That was not there in M3. That might be something we haven't heard of

01:08:25   involving the Mac that, that the iPad didn't, the iPad Pro remember because M4 already exists,

01:08:31   but iPad Pro, they didn't talk about Mac features. And also we don't know about the M4 Pro and the

01:08:37   M4 Max, which presumably will also be introduced and available in MacBook Pros. So there will be

01:08:45   some details there that will probably be little chip details that they'll be able to boast on.

01:08:49   That will be an improvement from the M3 versions of these, but otherwise they're going to be just,

01:08:55   you know, people buy MacBook Pros and we put our latest chip in it. The end.

01:09:00   But that latest chip is, you know, they did it last time too, right? Like it was an important,

01:09:04   it's an important enough thing for them that they want to talk about it.

01:09:07   Absolutely. And boast about it. Boast on their,

01:09:10   boast on their Silicon prowess. And again, the M4 came out, first off, they didn't get to talk

01:09:15   about it in the context of Macs. They only talked about it in the context of the iPads. And second,

01:09:19   they didn't get to boast about Pro and Max configurations, which presumably are coming

01:09:23   because why would you launch the MacBook Pro without them? And that's where they can boast

01:09:27   about like all the stuff they poured into that higher end model of chip. And we learned last

01:09:32   time, last October, when they did this, we expected it to be boring and just like the M2.

01:09:38   And what we saw was that the Pro and the Max were diverging from each other and from the

01:09:43   the base model. That M4 Pro was turning into like, it was, I think, continuing on to being kind of

01:09:51   like M4 or M3 in that case, but more. But the Max was like, not just like M Pro bigger. It was like,

01:10:02   no, no, no, it's like high end, much higher end than the Pro. So that may happen again.

01:10:09   We may be surprised by what they're doing there. So there's some surprise to come,

01:10:13   they'll boast on it for sure. All right, my third round pick,

01:10:17   I'm going to diverge away from hardware and assume an Apple intelligence demonstration.

01:10:23   For me, I feel like if we're thinking about the potential, what could this event be? It would

01:10:31   either be a portion of Apple intelligence demonstration in the video or part of the

01:10:36   newsroom post to specifically show features. So like, not the product pages, because that's

01:10:42   too easy, I think. But the newsroom post announcing this product to have like, here is the section

01:10:47   about Apple intelligence. Here's why I think this is risky. I think it's risky only in that

01:10:54   it is a new piece of Mac hardware and every Mac product supports Apple intelligence. However,

01:11:01   the reason I think this is a good pick is, and again, I'm not trying to tell

01:11:07   tales out of school here, but Apple gives reviewers materials to refer to about the tech

01:11:13   specs and all of that. And I will tell you that ever since Apple intelligence got announced,

01:11:18   every product that Apple has shipped has had a lengthy section in it about Apple intelligence.

01:11:23   Even if it's like, yeah, this is just in the operating system, it's like, nope,

01:11:29   we're pushing Apple intelligence, we're going to talk about it again. So I think you've got

01:11:33   a pretty good chance here. There's a huge chunk of the press release for the iPad mini that is

01:11:39   talking about Apple intelligence, including a bunch of things that aren't even in 18.1.

01:11:43   So like, I actually feel no matter what they ship, there's a part of me that I'm most confident

01:11:50   that the thing that they will do is show Apple intelligence. I think it is for them key right

01:11:56   now. Why I think this could actually be a video is just another opportunity to show these features.

01:12:06   And potentially, if it's an event, to announce when Apple intelligence is shipping.

01:12:13   Yes. Because we've heard it's shipping. That is indeed something somebody could pick in this draft.

01:12:18   The 28th. So they could potentially do that as a part of that conversation.

01:12:25   All right, I am going to bring in the other product that is rumored to be announced here

01:12:29   and say new iMac. Okay. So yes, so they went from M1 to M3. So it's like, well, why would they go to

01:12:36   M4 when they just went from M1 to M3? And the answer is they don't want to make the M3 chips

01:12:40   anymore because they're on that process, that old three nanometer process that's expensive and TSMC

01:12:44   and Apple don't want to use it anymore. So I think the rumors point to this and I think it makes

01:12:50   sense. Mark Gurman has said they want to get all the Macs onto M4. So he says the iMac is coming,

01:12:56   I'm going to take him at his word and pick new iMac. Even though I think of the three products

01:13:01   rumored to be in this event or release, it feels to me like the least essential of the three.

01:13:09   I would not have picked this this early for that reason. I think I could imagine a scenario

01:13:18   where we got MacBook Pros and Mac Minis now and like the iMac next year. I see your point,

01:13:25   but I feel like the iMac to me is a product that I don't understand anymore. I can't fully see

01:13:34   where it sits for Apple anymore. So to use draft parlance, you think this is a reach whereas I

01:13:41   actually had it second on my board and I think it's a value at three because I think it's very

01:13:47   likely to happen, but we'll see. I believe it is very likely to happen. I'm not sure it is likely

01:13:53   to happen this month, but I don't know. It's possible. I don't know. We'll see. It's possible.

01:13:58   This episode is brought to you by Vitaly. Vitaly is bringing in a new era for customer service

01:14:06   productivity with their all-in-one platform. Vitaly's collaborative workspace combines your

01:14:10   customer data with all the capabilities you expect from today's project management and work platforms.

01:14:16   With Vitaly, you can measure the effectiveness of OKRs and operational strategies

01:14:20   on customer outcomes at scale thanks to their goals feature. Goals allows you to track the

01:14:25   progress of your accounts against target metrics, meaning you can standardize goal setting across

01:14:30   the board so you know exactly how effective your processes really are. And best of all,

01:14:35   it's designed for today's customer success team. That's why Vitaly operates of unparalleled

01:14:40   efficiency, improves net revenue retention, and delivers best-in-class customer experiences.

01:14:46   Vitaly is offering a free pair of AirPods Pro for every upgrade listener who books a qualified

01:14:50   meeting. So if you're a customer success decision maker, schedule your call today by visiting

01:14:55   vitaly.io/upgrade. That's vitaly.io/upgrade for a free pair of AirPods Pro when you schedule

01:15:02   a qualified meeting. Thanks to Vitaly for their support of this show and relay.

01:15:06   All right, so we're into round four of the draft.

01:15:14   I'm at the point where I have my list and the list is ranked and I'm moving things around on

01:15:20   the list, you know, like it's that, so like earlier today I felt so confident about my ordering and

01:15:25   now I'm moving it. And we want to be behind the scenes for a moment. I have three documents open

01:15:31   here at the same time. I have our master list, which I am strikethroughing as picks get picked.

01:15:39   I copy, then strikethrough, and then I paste it in our show document, which is also open. And then

01:15:44   I have a little text document off to the right in BBEdit that has my ranked groups of priority.

01:15:51   So I have my, I have a list of, I had a list of 18 picks that I had pulled out as most

01:15:58   like him and ranked them. And I have those in an Apple note. And then as you take them away from

01:16:03   me, I remove them from my list. I'm going to go now. Ah, yeah. Okay. So my issue at the moment

01:16:12   is I have, I have significantly, uh, I have seeded the Mac mini picks more than anything else. And

01:16:20   like your concern with that kind of thing is if the product is announced, I think I feel confident

01:16:30   in getting the items correct, but what if they don't do it, you know, and then, then you're,

01:16:35   you're ruined, but I'm going to do it anyway. Okay. And I'm going to say that the new Mac

01:16:41   mini removes all USB ports. All right. I think this is a good pick. It could be weird. They're,

01:16:50   they're cheap to put back there, but I think they've run out of space for them. Yes. And I

01:16:55   just think it's over a time has to come and like they're gone from the laptops and have been for a

01:17:02   long time. Right. If they're going to, again, like they're, they're, they're redesigning the Mac mini

01:17:10   for the next 10 years or whatever, but it's time. The USB ports are not going to be there on over

01:17:16   that long, the long period of time. And I do think for the vast majority of Mac mini customers,

01:17:23   they will be perfectly fine without a USB port, I believe. Yeah. No, I think, I think you're right.

01:17:29   I think for me, first off it's cheap to put USB on because they don't take up a whole stream. Like

01:17:36   you can put like two on and it's like, it's really cheap for them to do it, but it adds complexity

01:17:41   anyway. And it adds size and you're, you're going to a tiny size. There's not room for USB A and you

01:17:49   wouldn't design it. As you said, you wouldn't design an enclosure with the size of a USB port

01:17:55   as a constraint. That would be like designing it for an optical drive, right? Like, Hmm. You don't

01:18:00   want to do that if it's going to go in the long haul. So I agree. I think it's time. I think maybe,

01:18:05   maybe, or maybe not. They stick around as a couple of extra ports on the back of a Mac studio,

01:18:10   but not on the Mac mini. It feels like it's over. I agree. I think that's a good pick. I also have

01:18:18   that same thought, which is I'm a little concerned that I've got a couple of iMac picks that I like,

01:18:25   but if I pick them and the iMac doesn't ship, that's bad for me. Right. So I'm going to pick,

01:18:36   Oh boy. Yeah. Everything's riskier. Now we're in the risky section now, basically. Yeah.

01:18:43   Um, I'm going to say, wow. Yeah. They all, they're, they're all tough. I'm going to say

01:18:56   Mac mini starting price remains unchanged. This was the pick that I decided to move

01:19:09   for this because it's like, I do believe this, but like that price was set a while ago.

01:19:19   I don't know. I don't know. I think recently Apple have shown, I mean, I notice there's a

01:19:25   lot of conversation amongst the analysts about the iPhone that there was surprise that Apple

01:19:31   did not increase the starting price because of inflation. Yes. I think Apple are in a position

01:19:38   where just like, I think they just shouldn't care about inflation in the same way, just because of

01:19:42   how much money they make and like that there is a benefit on not improving the prices. Yes.

01:19:47   This is my rationale, which is, and I went to starting price here. We were originally,

01:19:55   it said prices remain the same. I don't think that's necessarily true. Apple has shown an

01:20:00   interest in keeping their base price the same. Now upgrade prices can be big. Also, Apple has

01:20:05   big margins. The higher end models might be more expensive. It's possible or the bill to order

01:20:13   options will be more expensive, but the starting price, it's a good low starting price. I would

01:20:18   imagine that even though there's some initial cost in doing a case redesign and all of that,

01:20:23   that in the long run, this is probably going to be a cheaper product to make than the old one,

01:20:26   because it's smaller. They don't have to use as much aluminum, all those things about it. I feel

01:20:33   like in the end, they want that starting price for the low end model to be good and be the same

01:20:39   price that it is now, but maybe the other prices even go up, but that seems to be their strategy

01:20:47   is either keep them all the same or keep the base the same and raise the other ones. If you want a

01:20:52   fancy one, maybe you pay more, but the base one, you don't pay more. Also, I should say this is

01:20:57   unchanged. They could also be really aggressive and take it down, but I think they won't do that.

01:21:04   I think that in a world without as much inflation as we had in the last couple of years, maybe they

01:21:09   would consider something like that, but I think not. Cross my fingers, but I'm going to just say

01:21:15   status quo for the starting price of the Mac Mini. All right, round five. I'm going to request

01:21:23   something to the judge here. We have a pick that says release date given for iOS 18.1.

01:21:32   Could we maybe just change this for release date given for first Apple intelligence features or

01:21:38   0.1 or something? Because they might not specifically talk about 0.1 and that would be an

01:21:45   experience. And they're not going to talk about iOS, right? I have no idea. They might say along with iOS 18.1,

01:21:53   but I think that that might not be necessary. Apparently, the release candidate just came out,

01:21:59   Zach is telling us. So release date given for first Apple intelligence features, 0.1, but we know

01:22:06   what we mean here. And again, all sportsmen like release date given for first Apple intelligence

01:22:12   features. Yes, that can be your pick. You just think it's going to happen? They can't help

01:22:18   themselves. They're going to talk about Apple intelligence and they're going to talk about when

01:22:21   you're going to first be able to see that. So apparently, they have been said it's coming next

01:22:26   week, but I'm expecting a date. Like, I think that there will be like, yes, it's coming January 28th,

01:22:34   but I think they're going to say coming out tomorrow, coming out today. Okay, because I think

01:22:39   this event is happening next week. Yes. So, so if they, I think you get it. If they give a date, if

01:22:45   it's, if it's a specific date or it's tomorrow or it's Thursday or whatever, or it, it, even if they

01:22:53   say it came out today. Yeah. Like they must, they must reference a day in which Apple intelligence

01:23:00   first starts shipping in 0.1. All right. That would be interesting. Because if it's Tuesday

01:23:04   and it ships on Monday, they have to say it came out yesterday. Yeah, sure. We'll go with that.

01:23:11   Okay. Okay. Interesting. Interesting choice. All right. Um, wow. Wow. Um,

01:23:21   that may have been a bad pick from me, but I'm sticking with it anyway.

01:23:30   I'm going to pick, I wrote this wrong in the doc. Okay. Uh, so I'm slightly revising it,

01:23:38   but, uh, basically I think what I'm going to pick is that some M4 Pro or Max models,

01:23:47   and it could be the MacBook Pro, it could be the Mac Mini, but some of the Pro or Max models will

01:23:56   ship later. We'll have later ship dates than the M4 models, which is not really a rumor,

01:24:03   but it's a thing that happens sometimes. And we, we definitely have heard like the M4, they've got

01:24:07   them, but they got to have the Pro and Max chips. And sometimes they'll say these will be available

01:24:11   Friday. And the ones with that max will be available in, you know, later, later next month

01:24:16   or something like that. It builds on the Russian MacBook Pro scenario, right? Where that was what

01:24:22   we were talking about of like, oh, is the M4 just ready to go? And the other ones aren't. We don't,

01:24:30   that's the way that it could potentially be, but we don't know. We don't know.

01:24:35   All right. So what are we at, round six now? Yeah.

01:24:40   See, this is why I wanted us to do more rounds is that it puts a little more variability into

01:24:47   it than we were so certain with the first one. I'm so excited about the Mac Mini. I'm just

01:24:52   going to continue. So like I'm now, I'm now in the phase at the draft where I don't feel confident

01:24:58   anymore. So what I'm, what I'm deciding to do is to just continue talking about the computer

01:25:05   that I really want. All right. I'm going to continue talking about the Mac Mini and I'm

01:25:11   going to say a Mac Mini has some ports on the front. I love it. I love it. I hope this happens.

01:25:19   Yeah. It's phrased the way it is because it's possible that the pro Mac Mini will have ports

01:25:26   on the front and the regular Mac Mini won't. It's also possible that they'll both have ports on the

01:25:31   front. It's also possible that Apple will say, no, only the Mac studio is allowed to have ports

01:25:36   on the front. Although I hope they've gotten over it. So we'll see, like, I think where do all the

01:25:42   ports go? If you're making a tiny puck of a computer, maybe they can't all go on the back.

01:25:48   So I think I'm putting them on the side. That seems unlikely. On the front seems like a good

01:25:53   place for it. And this is like considering that potentially a difference between the M4 and the

01:25:59   M4 Pro could be the amount of ports that it has. I mean, Apple has shown that, right? That they will,

01:26:05   they will mix that stuff up. We see it with the MacBook Pro, for example, right? The MacBook Pro,

01:26:09   the, the Pro and Max models have more ports than the, than the regular M3 and same with the M2 and

01:26:16   I think the M1, so. Nice. Um, okay. So I'm, I'm going to pick, boy, it's amazing how the, uh, the

01:26:31   Russian leak has, has gotten in our heads. I think yours more, but if you're about to pick what I

01:26:38   think you're going to pick. Um, yeah, I know. This is like, this, is this, I can't believe I'm going

01:26:46   to do this right now, but I'm leaning into it. Is this like Russian interference in the draft?

01:26:50   Is that what's happening here? Oh, somebody's going to have to launch a special committee on this.

01:26:55   I know, right? No, no, no collusion. Come on. What are you talking about?

01:27:02   Um, oh boy. Yeah, then this is tough, but the, um, so currently the MacBook Pro models. Okay,

01:27:12   let's start there. Let's start there. Currently the MacBook Pro models come with a space gray

01:27:21   or a silver for the 14 inch in the M3, but the Pro or Max have space black, which always seemed

01:27:30   weird. Like we've got some extra space gray enclosures that we got to move because it's

01:27:35   just, it's literally like, it's a little darker if you get the other version, unless you get the

01:27:40   silver. So yeah, the, the Russian leak suggests that the base models will get space black instead

01:27:46   of space gray or in addition to, or who knows. So that's what I'm going to pick is space black

01:27:52   comes to the base model MacBook Pro. Yep. That's it. Oh buddy. Oh boy. Oh boy. All right. We're in

01:28:01   the final pick now. And it's rough. It's rough over here. It is. I was going to make that pick

01:28:11   by the way. Cause it's like, Oh, okay. You're, you're talking it down and you were totally

01:28:14   going to make it. All right. Yeah. Um, we'll call it the Putin pick. No, it's not. No, it's not do

01:28:25   that. Uh, there's just some that are just like, they're just not exciting or they're not good,

01:28:34   you know? And I, and I need to just choose between those.

01:28:44   I know it's hard. I'm going to go boring. I've only got a couple here that I like. So yeah. Okay,

01:28:50   go for it. Go boring. At least one Mac mini doesn't have ethernet. Whoa. I don't think that's

01:28:57   boring at all. I think that's one of the great mysteries. I think that's one of the great

01:29:02   mysteries of this is are they going to do an Apple TV thing and just leave the ethernet off of like

01:29:07   the cheap one. I think they will. Yeah. And the iMac is like that too, right? The iMac, the base model,

01:29:14   they don't even have the brick with the, with the ethernet port in it. They just have a standard

01:29:18   brick with no port. So there's, I feel like there's a lot of evidence that suggests they

01:29:24   would do this, but I don't think we know genuinely like the pick that is there that I don't want to

01:29:29   pick, but I think they will do is they will put ethernet on the power adapter. Like they have to

01:29:36   do it, right? Like they did all this engineering. It can't have just been for the iMac. Like I can't

01:29:42   bring myself to believe. No, because it's not going to have a brick. It's going to have an

01:29:44   internal power supply. Well, you know, but I don't know. Okay. I mean, I think they did this with the

01:29:52   Apple TV, right? So that's the precedent here is, and that's why I put it on the list is they did

01:29:57   this with the Apple TV. The base model doesn't have ethernet. And I go, okay, I don't, I don't

01:30:02   want that one. That's what I genuinely, I think you put ethernet on the pro model because look,

01:30:08   we need to be realistic here. All right. Now listen to me, listeners. We're all a bunch of nerds.

01:30:13   All right. And we want our ethernet, but come on now the cheapest Mac, right? Which would be the

01:30:20   Mac mini people are using wifi. Like that's what they're doing, right? Like we need to be realistic

01:30:27   here. We don't need ethernet on the base Mac mini. We don't need that. Like it doesn't need to be

01:30:34   there. Like it really doesn't today. So the way it works on the iMac is the base model and it's

01:30:43   different because it's on the power brick, right? So that's a quick swap, but the base model doesn't

01:30:47   have it. And then you can upgrade the base model to get it or the higher end models get it. So the

01:30:54   argument here is what you're saying, which is you can save some money and not offering ethernet and

01:31:01   space, but, but you know, the ones, some of them have to have it, but you're, you're saving some

01:31:05   money and differentiating your low end, save a little bit of money and you price it a little bit

01:31:10   lower. I'm not sure ethernet itself costs so much that it allows you to differentiate from like

01:31:17   nerds. It's the opposite. It's like, Hey, you want ethernet in your Mac mini, give us $100 more.

01:31:23   Yeah. Right. Right. Which is so, so the nerds, so basically you're, you're saving costs for

01:31:28   the people who are not going to care because they don't use ethernet. Yeah. And you're making all

01:31:33   the nerds pay more. Like 95% of computer users in the world. And you know what, like we're all using

01:31:38   laptops. You plug it into your non-existent ethernet port on your laptop, you know, like

01:31:43   we realistic here. I don't know who I'm arguing with. I think all the discord, I think at the

01:31:49   moment is arguing with and potentially our entire listener base. I use ethernet, ethernet plugged

01:31:56   into my Cal digit dock that my Mac book pro is plugged into. Cause I, I want the fastest internet

01:32:01   when I'm working, but at home when I'm using my Mac book air, I'm just kind of to my internet,

01:32:06   like my wifi and I'm doing a great, I'm having a great time. And so yeah, I love it. Wi-Fi is

01:32:12   amazing. All right. I am going to pick something that is another iMac pick. So I am making a risk

01:32:18   here and it's a, it's a bummer pick, but I feel like I have to, I feel like I have to because

01:32:25   one of the things that I remember from when they finally updated the iMac from M1 to M3

01:32:32   was that they changed nothing else about it. And I'm not going to pick that they changed nothing

01:32:37   about it other than the chip. Although I feel that that's probably the most likely scenario.

01:32:42   I would love for them to do a pro version. I would love for them to upgrade the webcam,

01:32:45   which is really substandard. I would love them to have an adjustable base as an option.

01:32:49   I would love for it to come in a different size as an option. There's lots of things I would like,

01:32:53   but here's what I'm going to pick Mike. I'm sorry to end this draft on a down note,

01:32:57   but here it is. The new iMac comes in the same colors as before.

01:33:01   I don't want to get my hopes up. I just don't think they're going to do it. I think they've

01:33:09   got like... Actually, no, it's not a bummer pick. I'm booing, but no, those colors are good.

01:33:15   I like those colors. You're right. I like those colors. I do. I do. I just think...

01:33:19   Because Apple released the new iPad mini. No, you're right. You're right. The risk here is

01:33:23   that they're all desaturated and boring. The iPad mini, they had a purple one. They have a new

01:33:27   purple one and it's worse. No. And it's... No. Okay. So the risk here is they're like,

01:33:32   we have all the same colors. I'm a little worried about this because especially if they change the

01:33:37   input devices, they might say, yeah, we're color matching them to the new boring colors now,

01:33:42   or they're only available in silver or whatever. So I don't know, but I'm going to just go with

01:33:46   momentum here, which is that they don't want to change the case. They make these cases. They're

01:33:51   just going to leave the case the way it was and upgrade the internals because it's the iMac. They

01:33:55   don't want to upgrade the iMac with every chip generation. They have to do it this time. They're

01:34:00   just going to kick the can down the road. Let's leave it all the same. So I'm going to say same,

01:34:04   same for the colors. I like the colors. It's true. But also it says something when they're

01:34:09   like, yeah, they're the same. It's we don't know. We're not going to bother. So yeah.

01:34:14   We're going to end today with a tiebreaker, which is not the way that we usually do things,

01:34:19   but I think makes sense for this one. So you get to pick the tiebreaker question. Would you

01:34:24   like to let me know what it is? Oh, well, we, we, we agreed to this. The tiebreaker question is,

01:34:30   is it going to be an event or not? Is it going to be an event or a newsroom post? It's that simple,

01:34:35   which is like, literally, are they going to do a thing where there's either, you know, they will

01:34:40   give you a week's warning and say, come and watch our event at 9 AM Pacific or whatever. Or do they

01:34:46   do a thing where they just put a press releases? So I think that's what I want to pick is, and,

01:34:53   and you said, you said like, if they just drop it, but it's a big video that feels like an event,

01:34:59   that would probably count too, because that's a, that's basically what you were talking about

01:35:04   earlier with the Apple intelligence demo pick. So I'm going to pick that I'm going to pick that

01:35:10   there will be an event or a substantial video presentation, and it won't just be done by

01:35:14   newsroom. Now I think this is risky because I think they could vary. You're setting the question

01:35:18   and picking it. Yeah. Okay. To pick it. I thought we agreed it was a vendor newsroom, the way it

01:35:24   usually works, which is just fine. You could do this. It's not a problem. We're, we're all off

01:35:27   the wall this time. The loser, which is you gets to pick at a tiebreaker question, which you then

01:35:31   ask me. So you should do it. And then I would say like event runtime over or under, and then I would

01:35:37   say over or under, but I'm fine with this. This is no problem for me. Okay. All right. I think it's

01:35:42   an event. Okay. Yes, I do too. So, uh, okay. So I'm going to take that one. So you get to pick first

01:35:50   and I get to pick the tiebreaker. So that's what I pick is it's going to be an event. I think it's

01:35:54   risky. I do think it's risky because I can absolutely see a scenario where on next Monday

01:36:01   or Tuesday morning, there's just a raft of press releases about the new Macs and the new chips and

01:36:07   they don't even bother. But I don't know. They bothered last year. They, they brought everybody

01:36:12   to New York for a Halloween thing. This is more of a reason this year, like I think than last year.

01:36:17   New chips. I think MacBook Pro is important. A new Mac mini design is important and boasting on the

01:36:24   new chip performance is important and flogging Apple intelligence is important. Like as a

01:36:28   marketing person on the inside, I would strongly advocate to advocate to do this because you have

01:36:35   so many points to hit and you get to hit Apple intelligence again the day or the week that it's

01:36:42   launching. So do it. Right. So that's my, that's my, my take. Yep. I completely agree. My expectation,

01:36:52   uh, is that this happens tomorrow. I almost made Will Jason be in New York next week,

01:36:57   but I changed it from that. My expectation is tomorrow. So Tuesday, uh, is when they'll send

01:37:04   out the thing and it will either be Tuesday or Wednesday of next week. I reckon as well,

01:37:07   it's what will end up happening, but we'll see. We will see. I'm excited. Yeah. Draft.

01:37:13   No last upgrade this week because we're running long. Uh, but I'll be back next week. You can

01:37:18   send us in your questions@upgradefeedback.com. You can also send us in your feedback and your

01:37:22   follow-up there too. If you want to find Jason's work, go to sixcolors.com and you can hear him

01:37:28   here on relay and at the incomparable.com. You can listen to my podcast here on relay too,

01:37:33   and check out my work@cortexbrand.com. Jason is at Jason L J S N E double L I am @imike,

01:37:39   I M Y K E. You can find video of this show on Tik TOK, Instagram, and YouTube. We are @upgraderelay.

01:37:45   Thank you to our members who support us with Upgrade Plus. We're going to talk this week

01:37:49   about some of the things we did not pick in the draft from our short lists and others.

01:37:52   You can go to getupgradeplus.com. You can sign up and get longer ad-free versions of the show

01:37:57   every week. Thank you to our sponsors this week, which was Vitaly, Fitbod, and Squarespace. Thank

01:38:03   you for listening. We'll be back next time. Until then, say goodbye, Jason Snow. Goodbye, Mike Hurley.

01:38:19   [Music]