PodSearch

Upgrade

520: Cruel Summer

 

00:00:00   [Music]

00:00:09   For Relay FM, this is Upgrade, Episode 520 for July 8, 2024. Today's show is brought

00:00:16   to you by Squarespace and Ooni Pizza Ovens. My name is Mike Hurley and I have the pleasure

00:00:21   of being joined by Jason Snow. Hi, Jason.

00:00:24   Mike, the 520 error occurs when the Origin web server initiates a connection but fails

00:00:29   to finalize the request. It's very sad. I have a Snow Talk question

00:00:33   for you. It comes from Braden, who wants to know, "Jason, on a previous episode, you discussed

00:00:38   your home weather widget and mentioned you had a home weather station. Can you tell us

00:00:43   more about your weather station? Was it a custom build or did you buy the sensors as

00:00:47   part of the bundle?" So for new listeners, this is the potentially annual breakdown of

00:00:52   Jason's weather station. Some are fun. Yes, some are fun. Thank you. Currently, only

00:00:59   58 degrees out there, Fahrenheit's chilly morning. And you know that, you know. And

00:01:03   I know that, and that's right outside. In fact, so I wrote about that this week on Mass

00:01:10   Avon. I don't think I posted anything about it, but I did post a gist of my scriptable

00:01:14   widget. So I use the excellent scriptable app, which lets you, among other things, write

00:01:19   widgets, iOS widgets in JavaScript. And I took a couple of widgets that I liked that

00:01:26   were doing slightly different things that were posted about in the Automators Forum.

00:01:31   And I updated them all a bit and got them to work with my weather station. And that

00:01:38   was great. But over the weekend, I realized I could, what I did was, it was 80 degrees

00:01:43   outside. And my weather widget on my iPhone in standby mode in the kitchen said 68 degrees.

00:01:53   And that was like really, really wrong. And it showed how the relying on non-local sources

00:02:00   for temperatures here in our weird Bay Area micro-climb was a bad idea. So I updated the

00:02:08   scriptable widget to support standby, which just, it's a small widget blown up and I had

00:02:14   to do a couple of tweaks. But now it actually shows the current, my phone in standby is

00:02:19   showing the data from my weather station as well as a forecast from Apple weather, from

00:02:25   a weather kit. So that was great. And I've done a lot of this where basically to talk

00:02:30   about the software side first, I have an app that's a very old, but continues to be updated

00:02:35   Mac app called WeatherCat that talks to the weather station and pulls down the data and

00:02:42   then generates a webpage with it. And I'm also generating a bunch of JSON and some other

00:02:48   feed stuff with it too. And then I got a bunch of scripts that run on my Mac mini server

00:02:55   that do like, I've got Python scripts that do some charting. It's a whole thing that

00:03:00   I've built up because you don't have to do that. You can just use, my weather station

00:03:05   comes with a webpage you can look at that shows current status. But like, I really like

00:03:09   that I've got a database with all the data and it generates stats all time and stuff

00:03:13   like that. And then my scripts parse the data file and do stuff with it and generate charts.

00:03:18   It's fun. It's like a little hobby on the 4th of July is when I did this thing and it

00:03:23   was like, well, it's a holiday today so I don't have to do work. Instead I'm going to

00:03:27   edit some JavaScript. Whee! Oh, so exciting. I don't like JavaScript, but I did it. It

00:03:33   worked. So that's the software side. I will put some links in the show notes of some of

00:03:37   my stories on six colors about it. The weather station, in fact, we'll put a link in the

00:03:42   show notes to the story I wrote when I decommissioned my old weather station after 17 years on

00:03:47   the job. I put it in in 2004. It lasted until 2022 where it finally sort of like, I replaced

00:03:56   a bunch of parts, but it really just kind of was like falling apart and at the end of

00:04:00   its life. And so I, and they had updated it over time, but like, cause the internet wasn't

00:04:07   really a thing and wifi was barely a thing and it was using like a serial port. So I

00:04:12   had to have an adapter and I had to connect and over the years I updated it, but it was

00:04:16   still a kind of really old tech, nineties tech essentially. So in 2022 I updated it

00:04:24   and because that original station was a Davis Vantage Pro, I decided I would buy another

00:04:30   Davis weather station. The Davis weather stations are a little bit more, they're a little bit

00:04:35   extra in terms of what they are and also in terms of what they cost. There are lots of

00:04:39   really nice, simple weather stations that you can get from like Netatmo and places like

00:04:45   that. But I got the Davis Vantage View this time, which is a little cheaper. Some of the

00:04:50   sensors that are on the Vantage Pro I never really used and didn't really care enough

00:04:54   to pay more money for. And the nice thing about the Vantage View is it's more modern.

00:05:01   They've built a modern thing on the inside. I have on my network that basically is the

00:05:06   wireless receiver cause it's completely wireless. It's solar powered. And then this little box

00:05:12   sits in my house attached to my network and receives the data from that. And then everything

00:05:18   else talks to the data. So Vantage View. And I do not have the console because I got rid

00:05:27   of the console. They sell you a very seventies, almost eighties, I guess, looking console

00:05:35   that has little LCD number readouts on it and stuff. But I have that for the old one

00:05:45   and it's unnecessary. So the new one is entirely just like if you want to look at the temperature,

00:05:50   look on the internet or many devices that I've got at my house to do this in a bunch

00:05:56   of places. But I love it. It's great. And if for nothing else that I know exactly what

00:05:59   the temperature is outside and I don't get in a situation where it's 68 degrees or 60

00:06:05   yeah, 68 degrees and then you step outside and it's actually 80 degrees. No, I don't

00:06:09   like that. Not at all.

00:06:11   No, thank you. Thank you so much to Brayden for sending in that question. If you would

00:06:15   like to send in a question to help us open a future episode of the show, remember we

00:06:19   are looking for, and thank you to everybody that is sending in summer related, you know,

00:06:25   warm related, warmth related, anything kind of questions for Snow Talk. Just go to upgrade

00:06:29   feedback.com and you can send in your Snow Talk question.

00:06:32   I just want to point out that Snow Talk was built to get me to not talk about the weather.

00:06:37   Yeah. Well, it was to stop the small talk was the idea.

00:06:42   I know. Yes. But it was mostly about, it was a lot of weather talk in the small talk.

00:06:45   Sure was. Sure was. We're going to let you get it once a year, you know?

00:06:49   Thank you. Thank you. That was my day in the sun or the fog as it turns out.

00:06:53   Indeed. How was your 4th of July, Jason Snow? Did you have a nice time?

00:06:57   Oh, have we left Snow Talk and we're just talking now?

00:07:00   We're in follow up now. Well, we're following up from last week where we spoke about the

00:07:03   fact that 4th of July was coming. 4th of July has happened. We're following up on that.

00:07:07   Thank you. It's now the 8th of July, so we can follow up on the 4th.

00:07:10   Really everything related to calendars technically is follow up.

00:07:13   Yes, correct. Correct.

00:07:15   Great. It was lovely. It was a hot day. We had a bit of a heat wave. Sorry for the weather

00:07:20   talk. A bit of a heat wave, although where we live, it doesn't get that hot. Even when

00:07:24   it gets hot, it doesn't get that hot. I fixed a weather widget just for fun recreationally.

00:07:35   We walked the dog, read the book, sat outside because it was a nice warm day. We cooked

00:07:44   on the grill because we didn't want to cook inside because it was a warm day. We had set

00:07:48   up, we got stuff the day before so that we could do a proper 4th of July. We had burgers.

00:07:54   We had grilled zucchini. We had grilled corn. You soak ears of corn for a couple hours and

00:08:04   then you can actually just put them on the grill for about 20 minutes and they steam

00:08:08   cook themselves. Then we ate it outside. Another thing I did, our outdoor table hasn't gotten

00:08:15   a lot of use this year so far and I got the power washer out and washed it down. We got

00:08:23   to eat at the table outside. It was very nice. It was lovely. That was what we were going

00:08:29   for for 4th of July. That was it. It was just pretty simple. Our son's home. The three of

00:08:36   us got to have our dinner together outside. It was great.

00:08:39   Sounds lovely. How was your 4th of July, Mike?

00:08:42   It was good actually. We effectively appointed a new government.

00:08:45   Right. Oh, that's right. It was election day.

00:08:47   Yeah, pretty busy 4th of July over here in England.

00:08:49   Great day for Keir Starmer. Bad day for Rishi Sunak.

00:08:53   Yeah, bad day for all conservatives really if you think about it. But yes, we effectively

00:08:59   installed a new government which seems like it's harder and harder to do these days but

00:09:03   we were able to manage it.

00:09:04   Good job.

00:09:05   Congratulations to everybody involved. It's been an exciting week in the UK. It's fun

00:09:11   actually. It's a lot of fun.

00:09:14   I have some follow up. Bradley and Josh wrote in regarding the Upgrade American quiz. Bradley

00:09:19   says the Upgrade American quiz started in SNL Talk. We had a few questions in SNL Talk

00:09:25   and then continued in Upgrade Plus last week. Go to getupgradeplus.com and sign up if you

00:09:29   want to. Bradley says, "I think there may have been an error. The longest river in the

00:09:34   United States is the Missouri River, not the Mississippi River. I'm a hydraulic engineer

00:09:39   who works on Mississippi River projects for both navigation and environmental purposes.

00:09:44   I do a decent amount of public outreach for my job as well and the Missouri River being

00:09:49   the longest is always a fun bit of trivia I try to work in for audience participation."

00:09:54   And Josh says, "People disagree as to whether the Missouri or the Mississippi is the longest

00:09:58   river but according to the USGS, whatever that is, the Missouri River comes out ahead

00:10:05   by 200 miles totaling an impressive 2,540 miles from source to mouth."

00:10:12   I for one cannot believe that people are doubting the accuracy of an apparently AI generated

00:10:17   quiz posted to a website as SEO spam that I found in a rudimentary Google search that

00:10:22   involved many repeated questions. Some questions that were clearly wrong that I skipped, some

00:10:28   questions that included the answer in the question and when somebody on the Discord

00:10:35   said I was disappointed because every answer was A, I had to go look because I didn't disbelieve

00:10:42   them initially. I thought, well, that would be just like that quiz to also have every

00:10:46   right answer be A. It's not true. Their right answers came from all the different letters

00:10:52   and it was, if anything, C was a little oversubscribed.

00:10:55   But they weren't all necessarily correct.

00:10:58   But they weren't. They weren't. So I think, Mike, I think emotionally the Mississippi

00:11:03   River is the heart of America and that's why that question was wrong. So there you go.

00:11:09   Well done. I think you still got it right emotionally, spiritually. So good job.

00:11:13   Well, you know, according to the quiz, I got it correct and that's kind of all that matters.

00:11:17   Well, I think that was my feedback to Bradley was I think the point is that the answer in

00:11:29   the quiz is the answer you need to give. It doesn't matter if it's wrong. That was the

00:11:33   answer. So you correctly answered the quiz, if not the correct answer.

00:11:38   My points don't change, but the provenance of those questions is maybe to be doubted.

00:11:43   You can hang on to those points.

00:11:44   I will. I did. I was very proud of myself. I think I did well. William wrote in to say,

00:11:49   Ming-Chi Kuo's suggestion that the infrared cameras in AirPods are being meant for spatial

00:11:54   audio is not entirely nonsense. Currently, AirPods use accelerometer data to determine

00:11:59   the user's head position. Slight inaccuracy in the sensor data over time accumulates,

00:12:05   leading to gradual shifts that must be corrected. It also works poorly in cars, trains, planes,

00:12:11   etc. Infrared cameras would allow them to calibrate the accelerometer readings against

00:12:15   fixed objects nearby. I have actually experienced what William is talking about, where I've

00:12:20   been using spatial audio and have turned my head for too long. Maybe I was looking at

00:12:25   something and washing something on my iPad.

00:12:27   Uh-huh. It recenters.

00:12:28   And you feel it shift. You can feel it shift. You say, "Well, that's not right." But obviously

00:12:32   the accelerometer is getting confused.

00:12:34   That's not it. What's happening is it doesn't know and it may have drifted over time. So

00:12:40   if you settle in a new sort of like standard position, at some point it infers from that

00:12:44   that that is forward and then it recenters.

00:12:47   Yeah. That was kind of what I meant, but I fully explained it. Right. So this is interesting.

00:12:53   It's like maybe they will use it for that. But again, like I think William's making a

00:12:56   great point, but I still think we can go back to what we were talking about. The idea that

00:12:59   this is to be used for the Vision Pro specifically still seems weird to me.

00:13:04   Yeah. That's, I appreciate William's phrasing here isn't entirely nonsense. It's not, and

00:13:09   I'm aware of the recentering kind of system. First off, yeah. The Mingshi quote report was,

00:13:14   "Oh, how will the Vision Pro be able to do spatial things?" And it's like, well, it's

00:13:17   got a million sensors on it. So that might be one way. But my larger point was even if

00:13:22   we take Vision Pro out of it and we say just AirPods in general, my argument is I don't

00:13:27   see how you need to add a camera just to make it slightly better. Like it's good enough.

00:13:35   It's not important enough of a feature to go to the lengths of adding an infrared camera

00:13:40   on the AirPods. It's too much. It's way too much.

00:13:42   I just don't think it's worth it just for that described case. And certainly not for

00:13:48   the case of how will the poor Vision Pro know which way is up because it does. It's got

00:13:52   lots of ways to do that. Yeah. And Richard wrote in to say, "An infrared

00:13:56   camera in the AirPods could be inward facing and could monitor temperature of the human

00:14:00   body." Which I thought was an interesting idea. That's true. I think that that's an

00:14:05   interesting thought that the infrared camera is actually the inside camera. And this came

00:14:09   up, I think you guys on Connected may have been talking about this, a podcast I listened

00:14:13   to last week, I'm not sure, was talking about AirPods and the phrase, maybe it was ATP,

00:14:20   the phrase, "There's not a microphone on the inside" came up. And I thought, well, there

00:14:24   is. There is a microphone on the inside of AirPods. That's how it does its noise canceling

00:14:31   is it's not just noise canceling the outside. It's actually listening to what happens on

00:14:35   the inside and then adjusting based on that. It's wild, but it does it. It's listening

00:14:41   to your ears. So the AirPods are reading my mind.

00:14:46   But if, you know, could this be the actually hiding in plain sight, the much suggested

00:14:52   your AirPods are going to start monitoring health data feature? Maybe possible. I don't

00:14:58   know enough about whether like about this particular part infrared camera, is it, is

00:15:03   this a cheap expedient way to measure temperature or is there a cheaper, more expedient way

00:15:09   to measure temperature given that they need to look down the air canal? Maybe this is

00:15:13   the way they do it. I don't know. I don't know.

00:15:16   Somebody knows.

00:15:17   Yeah, no, we don't know.

00:15:20   Apple's F1 movie is going to be called F1. It previously was untitled and they're using

00:15:25   the Formula One logo, which is very intriguing to me. They've also released a trailer of

00:15:29   the movie, which I thought looked also interesting. The thing that I was most drawn by is the

00:15:34   high quality imagery of like being mounted to a Formula One car. And it's answered a

00:15:40   question they've since answered a question I had. This movie was shot in IMAX and will

00:15:44   be shown in IMAX, which is what I was hoping would happen because it felt like that was

00:15:48   the right approach for this movie. It's starting to feel like to me that this may be Apple's

00:15:55   first actual attempt to truly releasing a movie. Like they've dabbled I feel like with

00:16:02   like Napoleon and Killers of the Flower Moon where they felt like somewhat limited releases.

00:16:08   But if they're really going to go and like do this on IMAX and premium format theaters

00:16:11   that this feels like more of a concerted effort to release this movie widely, which I think

00:16:16   is the right move for it. Napoleon and Killers of the Flower Moon were also sort of awards

00:16:21   bait and you were appeasing the directors in order to give them a theatrical release.

00:16:28   And what this feels like is Apple is releasing what is essentially a blockbuster and they

00:16:33   wanted to do really well in theaters. And that's yeah, that feels different than saying

00:16:38   to Ridley Scott and Martin Scorsese, yes, we will give you a theatrical release. Exactly.

00:16:42   Yeah, it's a very, very good point, right? Yeah, because this is probably isn't going

00:16:47   to win any awards. I don't know if that's if that's what this is for. Could win, you

00:16:52   know, maybe a special effects award or something like that. Who knows? We've been talking a

00:16:56   lot about Vision Pro hand controllers and a selection of this and sent this link into

00:17:00   us. There is a startup called Surreal that is making a set of hand controllers that is

00:17:05   to be is focused to work with the Vision Pro to improve gaming and experiences with the

00:17:11   headset. But to get these to work directly, the primary way would be that a developer

00:17:17   would have to integrate the Surreal SDK into their app. There's also a way to connect it

00:17:22   to a Windows PC and do like a whole thing with streaming. But the idea would be as a

00:17:26   game developer, you would integrate the Surreal SDK into your app as a controller option.

00:17:32   And then you would be able to use their hand controllers, which look pretty nice. I mean,

00:17:36   they look very, very influenced by the Oculus controllers with along with your Vision Pro.

00:17:40   Yeah, I got this from a lot of people. And it's unclear how many of them sort of thought,

00:17:45   well, here you go. But as I said to several of them, the problem is it's not from Apple.

00:17:53   So like game developers aren't going to flock to Vision Pro now with their things that require

00:17:59   that level of integration with a hand controller and build them to an API that supports a single

00:18:05   company's product, which is what this is. So this feels very PR stunty to me. And their

00:18:12   fallback is that they have an app. Yeah, that works with Steam on a PC to let you play Steam

00:18:20   games on the Vision Pro and use their controllers. And like, I don't know, I'm glad this product

00:18:28   apparently is going to exist if it doesn't already. But like the solution is there needs

00:18:34   to be an SDK for this from Apple. There needs to be support in Vision OS for hand controllers

00:18:43   so that multiple third parties can make hand controllers and app developers just have to

00:18:49   support the API and then let it work itself out. Apple doesn't have to build it even.

00:18:55   Apple just needs to build the API and then let it happen. Let the app store happen. Let

00:19:01   the controllers come out. Let anybody who's building controllers be able to say we're

00:19:06   going to support Vision Pro. That's where it needs to go. So this is interesting, but

00:19:10   it feels very much like we've got a solution. Yeah, I don't envision this changing the world.

00:19:22   This episode is brought to you by Squarespace, the all-in-one website platform for entrepreneurs

00:19:27   to stand out and succeed online. Whether you're starting out or managing a growing brand,

00:19:32   you can stand out from the crowd of a beautiful website, engage with your audience and sell

00:19:35   your products, services, or even the content you create. Squarespace has got everything

00:19:40   you need all in one place, all on your terms. I have been a huge fan of Squarespace for

00:19:46   like 15 years. I have been using them forever. And of course, as well, you know, one of the

00:19:53   things I love about Squarespace is how they support podcasting. I mean, Relay FM is in

00:19:56   its 10th year this year, and they have been a sponsor of Relay FM shows every month for

00:20:03   10 years. So we thank Squarespace for that. And we love Squarespace because they make

00:20:08   incredible tools. If you're looking to get started online, or if you have a friend or

00:20:12   an organization that you're a part of, or a family member that needs to build a website,

00:20:17   Squarespace is fantastic. It's super simple to get started with a personalized website

00:20:21   thanks to their new guided design system, Squarespace Blueprint. You choose from a professionally

00:20:25   curated layout with styling options to build a unique online presence from the ground up,

00:20:30   tailored to suit your brand or business and optimized for every device. Then you easily

00:20:35   launch your website and get discovered with fast, integrated, optimized SEO tools so you

00:20:40   show up more often to more people growing the way that you want to. Selling things on

00:20:45   Squarespace is incredibly easy. You can sell physical goods and they have all of the integrations

00:20:49   you need to make it a breeze, but you can also sell your content too. They have all

00:20:53   of the tools that you need to sell exclusive content on your site by adding a paywall to

00:20:57   sell content or courses. You can even sell files that your customers can download like

00:21:01   PDFs, music or ebooks. If you got a book you want to sell, you can do it directly on your

00:21:05   Squarespace website. You can also integrate flexible payment options to make checkout

00:21:09   super seamless for your customers. They have simple but powerful payment tools. You can

00:21:13   easily accept credit cards, PayPal and Apple Pay. And in eligible countries offer customers

00:21:18   the option to buy now and pay later with Afterpay and Clearpay. Go and check this out for free

00:21:23   for yourself today. Go to Squarespace.com, sign up for a free trial. You can build your

00:21:27   entire website and see how Squarespace is going to work for you and your business. Then

00:21:31   when you're ready to launch, go to Squarespace.com/upgrade to save 10% off your first purchase of a website

00:21:37   or domain. That's Squarespace.com/upgrade when you decide to sign up to get 10% off your

00:21:42   first purchase and show your support for the show. Our thanks to Squarespace for their

00:21:46   continued support of this show and all of Relay FM.

00:21:50   It's time to lawyer up. Oh yes. Clunk clunk.

00:21:55   Clunk clunk. There it is. Another storm is brewing between friends of the show, Epic

00:22:02   and Apple. Love a brewing storm. I love it.

00:22:05   Here we go. Here we go again. Here we go again. This time over Epic's alternative app marketplace.

00:22:12   Essentially to now, here's what's happened. Epic went public with the fact that Apple

00:22:17   has rejected the notarization of the Epic game store on two occasions because of the

00:22:23   design of the install buttons for the applications that are inside the marketplace. Apple said

00:22:29   it was too similar to the design of Apple's get button in the app store, as well as Epic's

00:22:34   labeling of in-app purchases looking too similar to Apple's. After Epic went public with this,

00:22:40   the next day Apple approved a previously rejected notarization. They say, "Oh no, this one

00:22:46   is fine," even though they previously rejected it for these reasons. But they have said to

00:22:49   Epic that this rejection is temporary and they expect the buttons to be changed. Epic have

00:22:55   said that they are sharing screenshots of their store with EC regulators. They have

00:23:01   chosen to not publicly show the screenshots. What's your take on this?

00:23:06   I, okay. Look, Epic does a lot of stuff. I think Epic is often a jerk. I think Tim Sweeney

00:23:16   is a jerk. But it doesn't mean they're wrong. It doesn't mean they're wrong.

00:23:22   Broken jerks just were right twice a day.

00:23:25   Twice a day, but only twice.

00:23:26   Let me talk to you too.

00:23:27   I think it just kind of jerks about it. So look, we don't know what those look like.

00:23:35   We don't know. I think it was Ryan Jones, developer of Flighty, who actually asked Tim

00:23:39   Sweeney, "Can you post the screenshots?" And they're like, "No, we're not going to do that.

00:23:43   We're not going to play that game." He's like, "Ah." And Ryan Jones' answer was something

00:23:46   like, "I'm just asking because Apple's complained about that stuff with my apps too." It does

00:23:51   happen.

00:23:52   I think the challenge here is they're using the notarization process for external apps

00:23:59   to do it. And I know like John Gruber wrote a post who was like, "Who are we going to

00:24:05   trust? Epic is notably untrustworthy." And then there's Apple, which is like, "Well,

00:24:09   yeah, but there have been a lot of issues with Apple's behavior, especially regarding

00:24:13   the EU, especially regarding alternative app stores."

00:24:16   I'm not sure we can particularly call Apple trustworthy when it comes to the accepting

00:24:20   and rejecting of applications.

00:24:23   And I think that Apple, it's not quite politicizing, but Apple making notarization something other

00:24:34   than a security check and making it a place where they're enforcing other policies is

00:24:43   bad. Let's just, I'll put it that way. I think you are turning something that is meant to

00:24:49   be essentially neutral, essentially just a, "Let's make sure this follows some very specific

00:24:57   rules so people aren't harmed, but we're not interceding as a gatekeeper. We're more just

00:25:03   checking things out as a platform owner." It requires Apple to think of itself as a platform

00:25:09   owner and not as a gatekeeper. That's sort of the deal there. And that's why it's allowed

00:25:16   by the EU. If the EU allows the notarization step, it's because the notarization step is

00:25:23   not being used to be a gatekeeper. Otherwise, they won't allow it. Otherwise, they'll say

00:25:27   you can't notarize apps. And that has restrictions, that has problems because it is a security

00:25:33   measure. So what makes me mad about the situation is Apple is taking a security measure that

00:25:38   is probably good and necessary and saves everybody from really bad stuff in the EU in this

00:25:46   case for iOS notarization and muddies the waters by having it be like, "Well, yeah,

00:25:51   but we have a policy against emulators, so we're gonna reject you." Or, "We're gonna

00:25:56   spend months holding up your apps like what Riley Testud says is happening with Alt Store."

00:26:02   Or in this case, "We don't like your button in your app." And what Tim Sweeney said is

00:26:08   like, "There's a big thing at the top. This is Epic Store." There's no attempt in this

00:26:12   app to, according to Epic, to pretend to be the app store.

00:26:17   Especially when Apple makes it so hard to install these things in the first place. Nobody's

00:26:21   surprised that they've installed it.

00:26:23   So suggesting that a design button, and I'll also say something so generic as an install

00:26:28   button or a get button, as a security risk that must be used via notarization, what it

00:26:37   is is it's Apple using security as an excuse to exert control that they're used to exerting.

00:26:45   And I have a hard time seeing a scenario here where Apple isn't in the wrong. Apple needs

00:26:50   to—Apple's playing a dangerous game with notarization, and I think they're gonna get

00:26:55   slapped for it because they're turning their security excuse into just that, into a thing

00:27:02   that they're using in order to do a de facto control of outside the app store.

00:27:08   And they promised not to do that. They haven't done it on the Mac, but in the EU it seems

00:27:14   like they have decided to change their story and say, "No, we're gonna use iOS notarization

00:27:19   to reject anything that displeases us and act as a gatekeeper." And again, I think notarization

00:27:26   is a good step to have in the process. I think having Apple as a platform owner look at stuff

00:27:32   that's coming in and say, "Oh, this is malware. We're not gonna sign it. We're gonna reject

00:27:37   it," is a good thing. But if you start turning it into an app store rejection and approval

00:27:43   process that has a lot to do with things that are not fundamental security, but it's like,

00:27:48   "Well, we just don't like it that way. We want you to change it," then the whole thing

00:27:53   has the potential to just get thrown out, which actually makes it worse for everybody.

00:27:56   And I don't know, maybe that's their intent, is to say, "The EU forced us to make this

00:28:01   terrible," but it's on them. They're the ones who are muddying what should be a very clear,

00:28:07   pristine, straightforward notarization process as it is and has been for years now on macOS.

00:28:14   I'm gonna read the Notarization for iOS Apps guidelines for security. "Apps cannot enable

00:28:22   distribution of malware or suspicious or unwanted software. They cannot download executable

00:28:27   code, read outside of the container or direct users to lower the security on their system

00:28:32   or device. Also, apps must provide transparency and allow user consent to enable any party

00:28:38   to access the system or device or reconfigure the system or other software." I don't know

00:28:43   within that the issue around a "Get" button. And the other things, accuracy, functionality,

00:28:49   safety, and privacy definitely doesn't apply to either of these as well, and this is from

00:28:55   the review guidelines. So I think it's very clear at this point, as you said, that Apple

00:29:01   are using notarization as essentially app review, which they said they wouldn't do,

00:29:07   but they appear to be doing, because I can't see a scenario looking at the notarization

00:29:12   guidelines how the look of a button could be argued. Because this should have nothing

00:29:20   to do with Apple now, because I would say that potentially even having notarization

00:29:27   at all could upset the European Union based on the way that the DMA is written, right?

00:29:34   The fact that Apple is still a gatekeeper, still? Yes, arguably they're using it to be

00:29:41   a gatekeeper, and the more they make it arbitrary and not like Mac OS, the more they're a gatekeeper.

00:29:48   And there's a scenario where this is fine, where everyone could be like, "Yeah, you know

00:29:53   what? If you're checking for malware on viruses, we're not going to argue with that, that makes

00:29:58   sense, but it should be an automatic process, but it isn't." And now there's just more...

00:30:05   And the thing I don't understand, Jason, right? I kind of get to a point, we were talking

00:30:10   about those a couple of weeks ago, the emulator apps, and they reject them, right? That they

00:30:14   maybe want to do that and get away with it. But this is epic, why would you do this? Do

00:30:21   you think that they weren't going to complain? Like, what was your endgame here? It's very

00:30:26   strange to me, I can't get my head around this one. Even the thing of like, "Oh, well,

00:30:32   so Epic complained, so they said it's okay, but you still got to check." It's like, what

00:30:35   is going on here? Like, what is the goal that they're trying to achieve from this? It's

00:30:42   a good question. I would also say for those who would argue, as John Gruber does, that

00:30:47   like, "Well, wait a second, but it's Epic here, do we really trust them?" This is how

00:30:50   eroded my trust is in Apple using mechanisms like Gatekeeper, or as a Gatekeeper, mechanisms

00:30:59   like notarization to do things beyond their remit as a steward of their platform and using

00:31:08   it as a crude blunt instrument to smash stuff they don't like, in violation, I think, of

00:31:14   the certainly the spirit of the DMA, and act as a Gatekeeper and erect new gates in order

00:31:20   to, because they were told they needed to, but use them as a Gatekeeper again. Like,

00:31:24   I think it's super telling that Epic, a company I do not like, run by a guy I think is a jerk,

00:31:32   I think they've got more credibility in this than Apple does. I think people at Apple should

00:31:37   consider that somebody like me, who observes this stuff, trusts Epic, who I don't like,

00:31:46   and believes them more than I believe Apple's claims at this point. And that's where Apple

00:31:51   is right now, is that I'm inclined to believe that this is Apple based on a whole track

00:31:56   record. And like, again, if Apple wants to explain itself, by all means explain yourself.

00:32:01   What they're doing is the same game plan as when they were arbitrarily rejecting things

00:32:08   in the App Store, which is, it's confusing, they obfuscate, they don't really explain

00:32:14   themselves, and then occasionally there'll just be a press report and then there'll be

00:32:18   an approval because they just don't, maybe it gets escalated to somebody who says it's

00:32:23   not worth it, just let it through, and we'll bureaucrat them later with a fix it ticket.

00:32:31   Like I just, again, if they want to make their point, I'm happy to hear it, but I don't,

00:32:38   it looks an awful lot like they are completely ruining the concept of notarization as a security

00:32:44   measure because they can't let go of the control of their platform. And I understand why they

00:32:51   want control of their platform, but you know what? The European Commission has said they

00:32:58   can't. They can't. In Europe, they don't get to have that control of their platform at

00:33:03   the level that they want, and they seem to not be able to let it go. And it's like, I

00:33:09   get why they don't like it, but I also don't like the idea that notarization is being turned

00:33:15   into a de facto app approval. Because what I don't like about it is it feels like they're

00:33:20   being disingenuous. That's what I don't like about it. Like they said it was going to be

00:33:23   used for one thing and they're using it for another, and it just feels disingenuous at

00:33:27   this point, especially when, well, if Apple, if you don't feel that way, then let's talk

00:33:33   about it, right? Talk about it. You're not. I will also just state, I will provide the

00:33:39   opposite. I get why people don't like Epic, but Epic are a very big, legitimate, very

00:33:46   powerful company who have performed some stunts against Apple, but these are stunts that I

00:33:53   ultimately agreed with where they were coming from, right? Like what people don't like Epic

00:33:58   for in a lot of instances is what they, you know, by sneaking in the in-app purchase stuff

00:34:04   into Fortnite, which, I mean, at that end, I think we go back to the argument of where

00:34:10   we are currently sitting is did Apple really have the right to own all of the in-app purchase

00:34:15   flow for something that they were ultimately uninvolved with, with the success of Fortnite?

00:34:20   Fortnite wasn't successful because of Apple, right? But yet they wanted their 30%. Like

00:34:25   that's what a lot of people don't like Epic for, but if you like any of what's happening

00:34:30   now, like anything that's happening now, Epic had the reason for it. But then I also think

00:34:35   that's why some people don't like Epic even more because they don't like what Apple's

00:34:38   currently having to do. This all goes back to that free Fortnite. That's where all of

00:34:42   this started, this free Fortnite. So that was, man, that was a great day though. That

00:34:47   was so exciting. It was so much fun. God, that was a great day. But yeah, that's where

00:34:52   we are. Who knows what we'll be next week, but I just, I'm kind of just flabbergasted

00:34:56   about the fact that they're playing this game with this particular company. Like it doesn't,

00:35:01   I just wished I could understand the logic behind that because surely I do not see it.

00:35:10   I also think, you know, one of their motivations here, I mean, I think some of this at this

00:35:14   point is, is they view him as an enemy and they're just going to, Apple views Epic as

00:35:19   an enemy and they're going to treat him that way. But I think there's a larger issue here,

00:35:23   which is Apple has often been motivated to take their cut, right? They believe that they,

00:35:27   if you, Oh great, you didn't build Fortnite on our platform, but you want to be on our

00:35:30   platform. Well, that's fine, but you got to cut us in. We want our cut. That's a classic

00:35:34   Apple maneuver. It's been like that for years. Apple wants its money and Apple believes that

00:35:38   everybody that's on its products and platforms and is making money from things that are related

00:35:43   to Apple is all built on the greatness of Apple and that Apple deserves to be paid for

00:35:48   it. That is a fundamental that Steve Jobs brought back to the company when he revived

00:35:53   it in the late nineties and they want their money. And I look at something like this and

00:35:57   think you're following this instinct so far that I don't know about European regulators

00:36:03   and politics and things like that, but I look at this and think for want of your cut, you're

00:36:10   going to get an enormous fine, an enormous fine because this is the kind of behavior

00:36:15   that will lead to an enormous fine from the EU, which is it, it's like you agreed to fix

00:36:21   this and now you've turned the fix into a, an app review. The things that they tried

00:36:29   to do in public to be legitimate, they were potentially running in the way of a fine,

00:36:34   right? Let alone now what they're doing. Post it. Very strange, very strange. Saddle up

00:36:43   for Rumor Roundup. Yeehaw. Mark Gurman is reporting that Phil Schiller will get an observer

00:36:48   board seat at Open AI as part of their arrangement with Apple. They're like Apple will get a

00:36:53   seat and that is going to be filled by Phil Schiller. This is the same arrangement that

00:36:59   Open AI have with Microsoft where they have, I believe it's Satya Nadella sits on the board

00:37:04   as an observer. This was part of the fallout of the like Sam Altman drama leaving Open

00:37:11   AI will be kicked out and then coming back and they changed the whole board. An observer

00:37:16   or an Open AI's board cannot vote or take, make any decisions about the company, but

00:37:22   because they're on the board, they are aware of the company roadmap. They, they're, they're

00:37:27   present in board meetings, et cetera. Well, I think it's great that they're giving Phil

00:37:31   Schiller stuff to do. I think he's already doing a lot of stuff. I think that whole previous

00:37:37   thing we spoke about, he might have been involved in that, but Phil Schiller being given a seat

00:37:42   on the board or as you put it, the seat that will be filled by Phil Schiller. I just want

00:37:45   to say the phrase Phil Schiller's seat filler. Oh, anyway. Um, because that's where we are.

00:37:51   Phil Schiller seat filler. There he is. He's there. I have seen people like everybody needs

00:37:56   to have a hot take on stuff, right? Like, so I've seen people like, what does it mean?

00:38:00   And what do they do and why are they getting in bed with these awful people and all this

00:38:04   stuff? And I'll just say if, if my company had a partnership with Open AI and I had as

00:38:12   a part of that, the ability to have one of my people sit in on the board meetings just

00:38:17   as Microsoft does so that this thing that might be connected to my company in some way

00:38:22   and is kind of weirdly run that I had some more understanding of what they were doing.

00:38:31   And even though I'm not controlling it at all, it gives me a better sense of whether

00:38:35   they are doing good stuff or whether they're going off the rails. I think it's obviously

00:38:39   much more important for Microsoft that is hugely invested in Open AI and it's much more

00:38:47   mission critical for Microsoft than Apple. But this idea of having some actual like real

00:38:53   tech companies watching the clown show at Open AI and making sure that they don't continue,

00:39:00   you know, return to their clownish ways that they're not doing stuff that's bizarre. Like

00:39:06   I view it as that. This is not adult supervision. It's more like adults in the room to offer

00:39:12   advice and also be able to go back to their companies and go, oh boy, uh, this is what

00:39:19   a Open AI is up to. So, oh, there's this exciting thing they're working on, right? Well, how

00:39:23   can we integrate that? When I see this, I'm like, man, what, what, what are Microsoft

00:39:30   thinking about all of this, right? Where it's Apple's coming in and getting the same, the

00:39:36   same like treatment for, and then for way less. Like I can't, I'm very intrigued to

00:39:44   see what, what Microsoft's end game is here. Like, because what it looks like is they're

00:39:48   starting to build their own stuff that they will be able to replace. And it's like, well

00:39:54   then what happens to Open AI? Because Open AI benefits significantly from the infrastructure

00:39:59   they get from Microsoft. Really interesting. I think based on such in Dell's history, I

00:40:04   actually think he doesn't care because this is not the Microsoft of old. Yeah. Microsoft

00:40:08   doesn't have a mobile operating system, right? It doesn't, it's got windows. That's great.

00:40:14   They're integrating all this stuff into copilot PCs and all that. They don't have a mobile

00:40:17   operating system and they're heavily invested in Open AI and the competition is Google.

00:40:22   And along this one particular axis, it's Apple and Microsoft and Open AI on one side and

00:40:31   Google on the other. Yeah. And so they are, there is a lot of alignment. I have heard,

00:40:35   they said, if there's something top secret that is involving the Microsoft relationship

00:40:38   with Open AI, they can, you know, they'll, they'll ask Phil Schiller to leave the room.

00:40:42   He will leave his seat that he was filling, feeling fulfilled and Phil will move outside

00:40:49   for a Phil's coffee maybe. I mean, technically any coffee that Phil Schiller has is Phil's

00:40:53   coffee. Anyway, I'm just enjoying that way too much. Phil's Phil's Phil coffee. And likewise,

00:40:59   if there's something that is super relevant to the Apple relationship and Microsoft needs

00:41:03   to not hear about it, they might ask such a Nadella to step outside as well. So I don't

00:41:08   think it's, I don't think it's that weird. And I also don't think it's that big a deal.

00:41:12   I think that there's a level of sort of courtesy involved here, which is like, since we're

00:41:16   going to be your partner, but it's my initial reaction was, you know, they're not paying

00:41:21   them. Nobody's paying anybody and it's an optional feature. And so why is it a big deal?

00:41:25   I think the reason it's a big deal is more what I said earlier, which is it's, it's Open

00:41:33   AI's best mobile platform access, right? Because their, their enemy is Google and Google controls

00:41:39   the other platform. So they need to be in a line with it, with Apple. And they want Apple

00:41:43   to get it. Even if Apple is holding them at arm's length, which I believe they really

00:41:47   are. I think Apple, right. They've got all the warning labels. It's turned off by default.

00:41:52   It warns you when it goes to chat GPT. Apple is doing a kind of as a hedge, but also at

00:41:58   arm's length, but from Open AI's perspective, like it's a big deal because you know, they're

00:42:04   not going to, I mean, Android is open and I'm sure it'll welcome them and all that,

00:42:09   but you know, Google's AI is going to be in Android phones. That's how it is. It already

00:42:13   is. It's going to continue to be that way. This is an opportunity they see to play in

00:42:18   the most important tech space, which is, which is smartphones. So I think that's what's behind

00:42:23   it.

00:42:24   Mark Gurman is also reporting on some details about the upcoming Apple watch releases for

00:42:30   this year. The series 10 will be getting a, will be getting bigger screens with the larger

00:42:38   option of the two being about the same size as the ultra. So we've heard this before.

00:42:43   This is Mark Gurman putting his kind of chip on this pile. Uh, the Apple watch will be

00:42:48   thinner but not expecting any more visual design changes. So this previously rumored

00:42:54   Apple watch X that was going to be like all new and different. It's not going to be this

00:42:58   one, not this, the series 10 and the ultra, which would be otherwise unchanged. The Apple

00:43:04   watch ultra, they're not doing anything to it other than giving it a new system on a

00:43:08   chip, which would be in both the 10 and the ultra. Uh, Gurman says this quote could lay

00:43:13   the groundwork for AI enhancements down the road. I expect we'll see about that. I'm not

00:43:20   sure what that story is going to be. Uh, eight gigabytes of Ram embedded in the watch strap.

00:43:25   Yeah, no, I wrote, I wrote that whole story. I think we talked about, I wrote that whole

00:43:29   story last week for Mac world about, um, or, uh, not emoji fragmentation, Siri fragmentation

00:43:33   and the idea of like, there are ways for them to approach this and this might be that, right?

00:43:37   This may be very much like, how do we get Apple watch to a point where it can hand off

00:43:43   Apple intelligence and seem like it's got Apple intelligence, but most of it is happening

00:43:47   in the cloud or it's happening on its paired iPhone, like something else. Like I think,

00:43:52   cause cause remember it's a two layer or multiple layer model that they're doing the way Apple

00:43:58   intelligence is working. You're doing a, you're giving a command and then it's actually the

00:44:02   model is determining whether it's going to execute that on device or whether that's the

00:44:06   kind of thing that it needs to go to the cloud to do. And so what you'd want is a device

00:44:12   capable of sort of like doing the top layer, even if it can't really do the rest of it

00:44:16   and has to hand it off. That's one way you could approach it. So beefing up the hardware,

00:44:21   but like, yeah, I, I think down the road is the key phrase there. Cause it may be like,

00:44:27   they know they need to build the hardware in now, but they know software wise, they're

00:44:30   just not going to get there for another year. So yesterday I'm sitting on the couch and

00:44:36   I saw Adina's watch had the, like your battery's about to die thing. And I was like, do you

00:44:42   want me to take that upstairs and put it on a charge for you? I was sitting upstairs.

00:44:44   She's like, yeah, sure. She has the small watch and I was holding it in my hands. It's

00:44:48   like, this watch is so small, like so small. Well, you have a, you have an ultra, right?

00:44:54   I have an ultra. Yeah. But it was just like in holding it. I was like, wow, this thing

00:44:58   is tiny. And I, I mean, I spoke to her and I said like, you know, the rumors of the watches

00:45:04   are going to get bigger and she's like, Oh, I don't know. Because the current Apple watch,

00:45:09   it's still like when she was like a sport band, there's like, you can see through the

00:45:14   sport band, right? Like it doesn't attach to her wrists because she's, she's a very

00:45:17   petite person. And I'm just not, I'm very interested. I remain open-minded, but intrigued

00:45:22   about if these watches get like the screens get physically bigger, that is an interesting

00:45:29   decision to make that people, I think this is my thing. I think people won't like it

00:45:34   or people will say they won't like it, but ultimately most people will get used to it.

00:45:39   Um, but we'll say the, this actually, I know it's one of your favorite topics. Yeah. If,

00:45:45   if there's this impulse toward doing more screen, like we need more screen on the Apple

00:45:51   watch, which I understand. I mean, it's also more battery, presumably more screen. Um,

00:45:57   I kind of get it just because if you can fit more on there and it's a little easier to

00:46:01   interact, but I wonder it is a dangerous game they're playing. They make this, they make

00:46:06   the Apple watches larger. Are they aware of what portion of their user base might really

00:46:11   be resistant to having a larger Apple watch? This is the same way, the same argument with

00:46:15   phones. Like I know people like small phones. I had an iPhone mini, but Apple's decision

00:46:22   suggests that there aren't enough of them for them to worry about it. And you know,

00:46:27   if you lose some people at the, at the bottom end, but it makes your product more popular

00:46:32   elsewhere than that's a decision you can make and people can be upset about it, but it could

00:46:36   be understandable, but there's a risk there. So, uh, what I, I just had the thought, you

00:46:44   know, what would mitigate this a little bit would be if Apple actually was working on

00:46:50   a fitness band ish kind of Apple watch design that was really small and that rely cause

00:46:58   right. Cause not all Apple watch interaction needs a screen, right? A lot of it can be

00:47:03   voice assistant and it's about syncing to the Apple watch and, or singing to the iPhone.

00:47:11   And you know, not everybody is super screen forward. Maybe there's a little tiny screen

00:47:15   on it that tells you like the time or shows you your rings, but it is not a full blown

00:47:20   Apple watch. And that would be one way you could push the Apple watch up and still have

00:47:24   people maybe like Adina and other people who don't need a full blown Apple watch with a

00:47:28   big screen to be happy. And I'm a little surprised that they haven't gone down that path of having,

00:47:34   you know, a lighter version of the Apple watch of watchOS. That's like a different product.

00:47:40   It's more like a fitness band. I'm a little surprised they haven't gone there. Yeah. And

00:47:43   while I want that product personally, I still don't, I, and I see where you're coming from

00:47:48   with that. I just think that there are a lot of people that would be upset about the watch

00:47:52   size changes. It's not that they necessarily don't want a watch, right? Like I feel like

00:47:58   it would be honestly a harder sell for my wife to get her to change to that product

00:48:03   than to just accept a bigger screen. A bigger screen. Well, yeah, I mean, this is, this

00:48:06   is the difficulty of marketing and I'm sure that they've done a lot of research of their

00:48:11   existing customers and potential customers and what their competition is doing when they

00:48:15   make these changes, just as they do with the iPhone. But yeah, this one seems really weird

00:48:20   on the outside. I, you know, the fitness band, I'm just thinking there's probably another

00:48:24   segment there that doesn't need, I'm fascinated by the impulse of let's make the screen bigger

00:48:29   because I don't feel like I need my Apple watch screen to be bigger at this point. I

00:48:35   don't, I don't need it to be bigger. I just don't. I think that it's good enough and I

00:48:42   find that a strange impulse is a little like saying we need our pro laptops to be very

00:48:46   thin. It's like, I get it on a, like a really broad scale, but in the end the product needs,

00:48:52   you know, is that your top profile? Is that your top reason here? You're like, Oh yeah,

00:48:57   thinness is the most, it's like, it's not for a pro laptop and for the Apple watch,

00:49:01   I'm like, yeah, bigger screens can be nice, but like, I don't know at what cost, but they

00:49:07   are the ones who know who buys these things and they are the ones who know, or at least

00:49:10   they think they know based on their research and that's a tough job. So maybe they're right.

00:49:17   Maybe they can keep pushing it. This is the first one of these where I've, where I've

00:49:22   gotten these reports and thought, I don't know. Like you're, you're, you're basically

00:49:27   ultra-flying more of the Apple watch line. The ultra becomes just a rugged Apple watch.

00:49:33   It's no longer the big Apple watch. It's just the rugged Apple watch. It will have the battery

00:49:38   life though, compared to, because it, because it, because the Apple watch is really thick,

00:49:43   right? And it's, remember is that this one is going to get thinner. So yeah. And I also

00:49:48   agree, this was something that came up on, um, accidental type podcast last week, which

00:49:53   is, you know, our friend Casey lists, people love it when we talk about Casey on upgrade,

00:49:58   is a, it buys a, uh, buys a small Apple watch because he says he has small wrists. And Marco

00:50:02   made the point the other day, cause he saw him at WWDC. He said, you do not need to wear

00:50:08   a small watch. You can wear the big watch and it's fine. And I wonder if part of it

00:50:12   is Apple sort of saying, lots of people think that they, that they want a smaller watch,

00:50:17   but they don't. And when we check and we test and we ask people and we try it, they don't.

00:50:23   And that we think we know what they want. And maybe that's true, but your example of

00:50:26   Adina, maybe she's a real extreme outlier. She is. She's a very, very petite person,

00:50:32   but I still think that she would actually be able to make it work. It just wouldn't

00:50:35   be as nice. But one of the things for her though, that I could imagine is if they made

00:50:39   it thinner, like significantly thinner, it would be comfortable in a different way. Cause

00:50:44   like the Apple watch sits very proudly on her wrist. Like it's, it's very chunky. And

00:50:49   so, you know, you're kind of maybe at that point trading off one for the other, right?

00:50:54   That it is thinner. And so it doesn't stick out as much, but it's a bit bigger. So you're

00:50:58   spreading it out instead of, instead of just expanding it, you're, you're kind of squishing

00:51:03   it and letting it spread out a little bit. Yeah. So we'll see. I mean, I do have faith

00:51:07   in them when it comes to this. Like on the face of it, this is one of the things where

00:51:11   I'm like, whoa, I can tell that's going to make people upset, but I am definitely of

00:51:15   the mind that a lot of people could wear a bigger watch and they'll be fine with it.

00:51:20   Um, but I think people have a hesitancy to it, but I just look at the phone thing, right?

00:51:26   That there is, what is that? The term stated and revealed preference, which by and large,

00:51:31   I don't necessarily agree with that thinking, especially when it comes to software and algorithms

00:51:36   and stuff. But I think that with, with phones that seems to have borne out that when people

00:51:42   get the choice of buying a phone, they tend to buy the bigger one, uh, or they try a bigger

00:51:48   one and they realize that they love it and could never go back. I would be intrigued

00:51:52   to see if that applies to smartwatches. I don't know. But like for me, I love the ultra

00:51:58   and I like the bigger screen. It's fine. I like being able to see more on it, but now

00:52:02   I am tied to the battery more than anything else. That's what I am tied to. So I see,

00:52:08   but I don't think these are going to get their battery life improvement cause they're going

00:52:10   to make it thinner, which I do actually think is the right way. So if you're going to make

00:52:13   it, make it bigger, maybe that's the answer. It's all very subtle, but I'm looking down

00:52:17   on my watch now and I'm remembering the original Apple watch and like so small it, it, it, it's

00:52:23   so much better. And that's, I would argue, yes, that's the dimension that I would like

00:52:28   to see change. I'm less concerned about the screen size than I am about the thickness.

00:52:33   And maybe one of the ways that you make it thinner is by expanding the footprint so that

00:52:38   the battery can, you know, take up, continue to take up a reasonable amount of volume while

00:52:43   not, you know, in the, in the, in the width while losing some of the height. I don't know.

00:52:48   And frankly, like it just comes back to the thing if Apple's making this decision, they're

00:52:52   making it for reasons that make sense for them. I, they can't try to appease everybody.

00:53:00   We seen them try to do that. Like they have that fourth phone and that fourth phone never

00:53:04   does well. Right. And that fourth phone is the, oh, don't worry. We'll make you happy

00:53:08   phone and it doesn't sell and they keep changing it. So, yeah, cause they've realized, I mean,

00:53:14   they're trying to find a market at the edges and it turns out that the, that maybe none

00:53:20   of the edges are a big enough market for them, right? Like maybe they've been searching around

00:53:25   in the dark like, well, what about this kind of phone? Well, what about this? And it may

00:53:28   be like, no, the iPhone, yes, having some other models to choose from is good, but like

00:53:33   when you start to push outside of the middle, big middle, none of them are worth it for

00:53:41   Apple again, for Apple to spend the time on it because you know, there are always going

00:53:46   to be companies making weird kind of niche shapes and sizes and stuff, but like for Apple

00:53:51   to do it, it really needs to sell incredibly well. And they've found in some cases that

00:53:55   it's, that those are not places they want to go.

00:53:58   I mean, I would say though that they should make a small phone before they should continue

00:54:02   making the Mac Pro. That's my, that's my take on that one. If you want to find some edges,

00:54:09   I think there's more edges for an iPhone meaning than there are for a Mac Pro.

00:54:13   Yeah, there's just more, but there's also more profit margin.

00:54:16   Yeah, but like 90% of for sales, you know what I mean? 30% of a couple of million, you

00:54:26   know?

00:54:27   Yeah. Going back to this report from Mark Gorman, do not expect any significant health

00:54:33   sensor changes this year. Apple continues work on their sleep apnea detection and blood

00:54:38   pressure monitoring as their next big things to go for before hopefully getting to a blood

00:54:43   glucose down the line, but they have hit development issues on these features as well as having

00:54:48   the whole problem around the blood oxygen sensor in the US, which would be used for

00:54:53   both or at least sleep apnea detection. They can't, it would be difficult for them to be

00:55:00   like, "Hey, we have this new feature," but not in America. So who knows what they're

00:55:04   going to do there.

00:55:05   Yeah, it's not great. His statement about where they are with blood pressure too is

00:55:08   that they're not going to be able to take your blood pressure. It'll be like your blood

00:55:12   pressure was higher or lower, but like it's not going to be. Yeah, it's, I, this is a

00:55:18   continued issue with the Apple watches. They've got a lot of sensor data that's feeding features

00:55:24   that it's like, it's just, it's something, but it's not exactly what you want.

00:55:32   Well, the problem with, with, with the health sensors is they started off with an excellent

00:55:38   one, right? The heart rate monitoring, which they can do incredibly well. And then everything

00:55:43   else since is like, well, we can only give you the light version of this. And I think

00:55:48   that that disparity has gotten worse and worse over time. But you know, blood pressure going

00:55:54   up or down is interesting information to have, maybe more than the blood oxygen. The risk

00:56:03   temperature stuff I know is useful for people, so that's good. But you know, it's like,

00:56:08   ah, there, there are more hit and miss than like how it started with like, bang, here's

00:56:14   your heart rate. We can, we can give you that like incredibly precise and also we can save

00:56:20   your life, right? Like that was as big as a hit you could make. And then everything

00:56:24   since is a bit like, yeah, you know, you could kind of use it to check against the baseline,

00:56:31   which is less exciting. Although, you know, I'm, I am very intrigued about their vitals

00:56:36   thing that they're bringing, where it's like pulling in a bunch of information where maybe

00:56:40   it's going to be greater than the sum of its parts of what they can provide for that.

00:56:44   So maybe, I mean, they're there, the sensors may get better. Yeah. The analysis of sensor

00:56:50   data, I think there's a lot of potential in there. There's, that's the thing where you

00:56:55   use machine learning algorithms to do analysis of data and you can pull some signal out of

00:56:58   the noise, which can be useful. So, you know, over time this may evolve, but there is also

00:57:03   just the challenge of a thing that's the size of like a big postage stamp sitting on your

00:57:07   wrist. And from there, all information about your body needs to be divined. That's hard

00:57:13   to do. It's just hard to do. Apple has also apparently discussed a new Apple Watch SE

00:57:20   featuring a hard plastic case instead of aluminium in efforts to reduce the price. I think this

00:57:26   is a very good idea. Makes sense to me. I had a plastic watch for years and years and

00:57:31   years. Perfect sense. Remember, this is what we wanted the Ultra to be. We wanted like

00:57:35   a G-Shock, right? Like that's what I was hoping for. They didn't give it to me, but I think

00:57:40   this is a great idea for, I would expect who are the majority of people that get an SE

00:57:46   that like it's for young people and it's for older people. And it's like, you know what?

00:57:51   This thing is a watch for a purpose. It is not a watch for fashion. So we'll see if they

00:57:57   do that. I hope they do, but I, I don't know. I don't know. I think Apple was so burned

00:58:04   on the 5C that going back to plastic is a problem for them, which makes me sad because

00:58:09   I think you do some fun stuff with that. Also plastic is bad for the environment and they

00:58:13   have all sorts of environmental commitments. So there's a question there too. Depends how

00:58:16   you do it. Yeah. If it's recycled plastic, it's hard to do it to their standards. Yes,

00:58:21   of course, but they can make a good, and also this is one of those sayings of like, what

00:58:26   is quote unquote plastic from this reporting? Right. What material are they actually using?

00:58:32   Yeah. And that there could be something else made of paper. It's really good pressed paper.

00:58:40   Don't get it wet. Don't get it wet. That's right. Yeah. It's from, it's from corn and

00:58:46   it's pressed and it's biodegradable. So you can, you can get it wet. You can get it wet,

00:58:52   but don't leave it soaking in water or it will dissolve. Yeah. Stand too close to the

00:58:58   grill and your Apple watch just pops. You know? Yep. Sure. Oh boy. Uh, Mac rumors have

00:59:04   found reference to a new home accessory, uh, in development from Apple. They found it in

00:59:10   some code being referred to as quote home accessory 17 comma one. This makes Mac rumors

00:59:16   believe based on the way that Apple kinds to delineate their naming schemes, that this

00:59:22   would be a device running an a 18 chip featuring a variant of TV OS. This continues the hope

00:59:29   that a home pod with a screen is a product in the future. Yeah. So a 18 is what this

00:59:35   falls iPhone chip, which is interesting because that means it's potentially Apple intelligence,

00:59:43   right? Yeah. A variant of TV OS, which makes sense. This is the home pod with a screen,

00:59:49   right? It's I, some people did a mockup that makes it look like the G4 iMac, which is really

00:59:53   great. I know Mark Gurman has reported about this a little bit. The idea that it might

00:59:56   be like a speaker with a little kind of arm and a screen above it and that kind of can

01:00:01   turn around and stuff. Mark Gurman keeps calling it a robot. He needs to stop. Um, do I have

01:00:07   to get John Syracuse at a way in a, a home accessory with a screen and a speaker that

01:00:14   might turn or tilt to keep your, your face in view? It's not a robot. It's just a thing

01:00:22   with an adjustable screen. So only you and John can, can make the ruling on this when

01:00:27   it's a reality. I wish you would stop because he, cause he's got this narrative about Apple's

01:00:32   also working on robotics and he keeps throwing this thing in and it's like, man, this is

01:00:36   just a home pod with a screen. This is not a robot. Stop making it part of Apple's robotics

01:00:41   push. Come on, come on. But I'm excited as somebody who had an echo show and now has

01:00:46   a Google home nest, whatever in my kitchen. Uh, I would love, uh, having a home pod with

01:00:54   a screen in my kitchen instead. That would be better. I would be much happier to have

01:01:00   that. So I hope that's what this is. Me too. Also, finally, uh, Mark Gurman is reporting

01:01:06   in his power on newsletter, uh, that Apple intelligence features will launch to the public

01:01:13   in the spring of next year, iOS 18.4 with beta testing beginning in January. So this

01:01:20   would be the more like actual like heavy stuff, right? The beginnings of understanding a lot

01:01:29   more about your device and that, uh, because there would still be things this year like

01:01:33   chat, GPT and the new Syria design for 2024, the things that would be considered Apple

01:01:38   intelligence would be coming all the way into spring of next year. She's wild. Not surprising,

01:01:48   but wild. Yeah. I don't think this is that, that new. I think the assumption all along

01:01:52   was that a lot of this stuff, I mean, there will be, make no mistake, there will be Apple

01:01:56   intelligence features that will ship in the fall. There will be some, but they're not

01:01:59   going to be the ones you think more what Mark has got here, which is different to what he's

01:02:05   reported before is like, you know, it was always like, Oh, there'll be next year, but

01:02:09   now it's the kind of the nailing down of 18.4 as the thing for when we can expect these.

01:02:17   And also the idea that beta testing would begin into January, uh, where there's been

01:02:21   a consideration that maybe it would be before 18 launched or, you know, at some point this

01:02:26   year, but that doesn't seem possible. Yeah. I appreciate the detail here, but it's, it's

01:02:31   not anything that it's exactly what I was expecting, which is I remember after WWDC just

01:02:36   saying, look, they're going to be shipping this stuff all the way until next WWDC and

01:02:43   beyond. Yeah. Right. They're just going to keep on rolling it out. Cause they're not,

01:02:46   a lot of this stuff is just not ready and they're moving fast and they're trying to

01:02:50   catch up and they're going to be shipping this and it's going to be an ongoing thing

01:02:54   of the evolution of Apple intelligence, but they made the announcement cause they want

01:02:58   to say, yes, we're on it, but it's going to take time and it's going to be a real challenge.

01:03:02   I mean, I know I've talked about it before. I know you talked about with Federico, like

01:03:06   it, iOS release day in the fall is not going to be like it was even as Apple's been pulling

01:03:17   features forward, you know, and, and having it be more like there's a release and then

01:03:22   more features come in the later in the fall and the more features come in the, in the

01:03:25   winter and the spring, this is going to be a lot of that. This is going to be like huge

01:03:29   headline features that are just not going to be there for awhile. And you know, that's

01:03:34   like, I think it's a good thing to have a whole cycle year long cycle instead of putting

01:03:38   everything in the one edition, but here it's going to be really, it's going to be a challenge,

01:03:43   right? Because we're really not, they're not shipping their whole OS in the fall. They're

01:03:47   shipping a first version and then adding on with the second version and the third version

01:03:52   on the fourth version. So yeah,

01:03:56   This episode is brought to you by our friends at Ooni pizza ovens. Ooni is the world's number

01:04:00   one pizza oven company letting you make restaurant quality pizza in your own home. Ooni pizza

01:04:06   ovens can reach up to 950 degrees Fahrenheit cooking pizza in as little as 60 seconds.

01:04:11   The high temperatures will separate these pieces that you're making an Ooni from those

01:04:15   that you could make in a conventional oven. They're incredibly quick to heat up and you'll

01:04:19   be ready to go in only 20 minutes, which is just enough time to get all your toppings

01:04:23   ready. Whether you love authentic wood-fired flavors, the convenience of cooking with gas

01:04:27   or whether you want to cook with wood, charcoal gas, or even electricity. There is an Ooni

01:04:32   oven that fits your needs and lifestyle. They have the wood pellet fjord, Firo 12, the multi

01:04:38   fuel Karu 12G. These are smaller ovens they have for better portability for people who

01:04:43   want cooking on the go, camping, getting out into the wilderness and the like. But if you

01:04:47   want the convenience of gas but love the flavor of wood-fired cooking, Ooni's Karu line has

01:04:53   got you covered because you can choose wood or charcoal right out of the box or get the

01:04:58   optional gas burner for cooking flexibility. And now with Ooni's electric Vault 12 pizza

01:05:03   oven, you can make pizza both indoors and outdoors. Ooni ovens are for more than just

01:05:08   pizza. You can cook juicy burgers, sizzling fajitas, buffalo wings, and so much more.

01:05:13   Their ovens start at just $299 with free shipping to the US, UK, and EU. And they also make

01:05:19   cast iron cookware, pizza peels, thermometers, and loads of other accessories to help you

01:05:24   level up your cooking. I love my Ooni pizza oven. I have had the Vault for I don't know

01:05:30   like six months or something like that, the electric one. And it's just a joy. It is a

01:05:34   treat every time we get to use it. When we know we're going to make pizza, I look forward

01:05:39   to that day and the whole day is just good fun, right? Like it's just good times. It's

01:05:44   good fun with the family. I love it. Listeners of this show can get 10% off their first purchase

01:05:50   of an Ooni pizza oven. Just go to Ooni.com that is O-O-N-I.com and use the code UPGRADE2024

01:05:57   at checkout. Ooni pizza ovens are the best way to bring restaurant quality pizza to your

01:06:01   home. So go to Ooni.com that is O-O-N-I.com use the code UPGRADE2024 and you'll get 10%

01:06:08   off. One of my other favorite things of Ooni is you can also buy groceries from there too.

01:06:12   So if you want the best cheeses, the best sauces, you can get it from them. Our thanks

01:06:16   to Ooni pizza ovens for their support of this show and Relay FM.

01:06:21   So Summer of Fun is what we're in right now. Summer of Fun! Summer of Fun! And it's where

01:06:27   during this time of the year we're trying to find stuff to have fun with, right? Yep.

01:06:32   I would say this summer so far, tough summer. Would you say it's a cruel summer? Cruel summer.

01:06:37   I would say it's a cruel summer. Alright. I think right now it's hard. Like being excited

01:06:45   about technology is a little bit tougher right now because there's so many things to drag.

01:06:50   Well at least I find this that can drag me down. Like while I enjoy talking about Epic

01:06:56   and Apple, I would prefer that not to happen. I find it interesting because it's happened,

01:07:04   but my choice would be that didn't happen. I like covering these things on the show because

01:07:10   if it's important, I want to cover it. If it's important to the landscape of Apple and

01:07:15   how it shifts, I want to cover it. This is the same of Apple intelligence, right? Where

01:07:19   we're spending so much time talking about things like image playgrounds. I wish they

01:07:23   wouldn't have done that, but if they're going to do it, I want to talk about it because

01:07:26   I want to understand it with you and I want to talk about the ramifications of it. But

01:07:30   I just think right now all of these things that are happening makes covering technology

01:07:37   just more tiring. Whether it's us having to understand things to talk about them, whether

01:07:44   we like them or not, then also having spoken about them opens the door to all kinds of

01:07:50   feedback from listeners, which understandably a lot of the time is not really directed at

01:07:56   us, but they're sharing frustrations that they have with certain things. And so as I

01:08:02   was putting the document together today and I was actually feeling a little bit of this,

01:08:06   I was feeling a bit like, "Oof, I don't know how I feel about what's going on right

01:08:10   now." I kind of wanted to understand from you if you have any thoughts about how you

01:08:14   stay excited and enthusiastic about technology at times where news is low or where it drags

01:08:21   you down. I kind of want to talk about that today a little bit.

01:08:24   - Okay. I don't know. Do I have a pep talk? I don't know.

01:08:29   - Yeah, I have to have a pep talk. But at least what do you think about this idea? Do

01:08:33   you feel like you're being dragged a little bit? Because I do.

01:08:37   - Yeah, I mean, none of us, I think, and neither of us for sure, got into this because what

01:08:46   we really wanted to do was talk about AI potentially putting people out of work, potentially being

01:08:58   trained on people's work without their permission, which is how it's basically gone, to talk

01:09:04   about government regulation. If I could encapsulate it, I would say, "As a kid, I loved computers.

01:09:16   When we got the newspaper, the last section I would ever choose to read was the business

01:09:22   section." I think that's sort of what I'm getting at, is I have an enthusiasm for technology.

01:09:31   I don't have the enthusiasm. Put it this way, the enthusiasm does not stem from a lot of

01:09:38   the places where we end up having to talk about it. That's not where my initial enthusiasm

01:09:45   came from. As a kid, I wasn't like, "Oh boy, I can't wait to grow up and think about government

01:09:49   regulation of technology companies and legislation and lawsuits and tech companies that might

01:09:56   be out of control and ripping people off and potentially leading to the loss of lots of

01:10:01   jobs and a very strange impact on the world economy." These are not why I'm interested

01:10:09   in this stuff. It's part of my job. The job is not doing just fun stuff. I make those

01:10:17   charts and we talk about it and it's fun and all that. Every time we do Apple quarterly

01:10:21   earnings, August 1st, by the way, is the date this quarter, so get ready. It'll be just

01:10:27   in time for me to be back for my trip to cover that. Every time I do that, it's money and

01:10:33   charts and stuff like that, I think. It's that business section of the newspaper that

01:10:38   I didn't even read and here I am in it. It's been part of my profession. Part of my profession

01:10:43   is to understand Apple's business and why they do what they do. Our financial results,

01:10:50   something that I have fundamental enthusiasm for, they aren't. The stuff that keeps the

01:10:56   pilot light lit, that keeps the flame burning, is that there are so many different ways that

01:11:03   technology impacts my life and other people's life in a fun way. That could be as simple

01:11:08   as I have a new nephew and the family chat iMessage thread is just full of pictures of

01:11:16   this little baby and of my niece, his big sister, who's learning to adapt to having

01:11:24   a younger sibling, which is exactly the dynamic that my kids had. Then I can just drag and

01:11:31   drop out of that to my mom who wants to see pictures of the baby, other side of the family,

01:11:36   so not related, but she wants to see because who doesn't want to see pictures of the baby?

01:11:41   I think about stuff like that. I think about having fun on the 4th of July, doing something

01:11:46   as dumb as updating my JavaScript widget so that when my phone is in the kitchen in standby,

01:11:55   it has the right temperature on it and getting excited about talking to you about that weather

01:12:00   station. There's lots of cool stuff in terms of customizing what you do and amazing that

01:12:08   we have supercomputers in our pockets and all of that. It still feels like the future.

01:12:15   It still feels like we live in an amazing time with all this amazing capability. I can't

01:12:23   pretend and ignore all of the downsides and I think they're important. I read a lot of

01:12:30   science fiction and let me tell you, science fiction is not generally PR for the tech industry.

01:12:37   Science fiction has been and continues to be often extremely critical, extremely wary,

01:12:46   extremely interested in talking about the cultural ramifications of technology in a

01:12:52   way that I think tech companies and the social and political ramifications of technology

01:12:58   in ways that tech companies are super not interested in thinking about because it gets

01:13:03   in the way. I just build it. I don't want to think about what it leads to because I

01:13:08   have stock options. That's a lot of what's going on there. It's a mix. When it's stuff

01:13:15   that is getting me down, I try to also think about the stuff that is positive because I

01:13:21   can usually find positive amidst the negative. Does that make sense to you?

01:13:26   Yeah, it's not a million miles away from where I am too. I think I care a little bit more about the business side of technology than you do, but it isn't where my love comes from.

01:13:40   It's similar where it's like the thing that excites me is technology is a toy for me.

01:13:49   It kind of always has been and even though I use the same technology to do lots of things,

01:13:54   I also like to play with the technology. Over the last five years or so, I've been finding

01:14:04   new ways of doing that too. If it comes from learning and building keyboards and learning

01:14:11   some of the electronics that go into that. Recently, I've been getting a bit more interested

01:14:17   in retro gaming handhelds and stuff and all of the ridiculous work required to try and

01:14:23   get emulators running on them and things like that and understanding what that might lead

01:14:27   to. I've been trying to find these little hobby projects for me which are just pure

01:14:32   because I love the technology, but it's always similar to like, "Oh, I want to try this new

01:14:38   app or I want to be on this beta to see what this is about." The problem I think is that

01:14:43   as we're getting further and further along, we are brushing up more and more with the

01:14:49   science fiction of it all and it just means that the toys become... There are more health

01:14:59   warning with toys, right? We have to consider that stuff more and because where we are in

01:15:06   this whole thing, we find ourselves talking about it more and then everything is just

01:15:13   more political than it used to be. You got to pick your side and it just becomes like

01:15:17   a whole thing. It can be tiring sometimes, I think, to focus on this stuff in the way

01:15:27   that we do. I just think right now, it's just particularly difficult. I'm finding it particularly

01:15:32   difficult right now, right? Where I'm wading into these huge topics about what AI is, whether

01:15:41   I like it or not, you know? And I find it interesting to talk about, but it's also just

01:15:47   very emotionally draining in a way that technology usually is exciting for me, right? My emotions

01:15:56   are being buoyed by technology rather than being drained by technology. Do you kind of

01:16:06   follow what I'm saying?

01:16:07   Yeah, it's hard when you've got a hot button issue that is an issue that you need to talk

01:16:11   about because, you know, a really hot button issue, something like AI. The problem is that

01:16:18   talking about it engenders so much feeling from people on all sides of the issue. There's

01:16:27   more than two sides with AI. And it can get really difficult really fast. And having difficult

01:16:36   conversations is not bad. In fact, for podcasting, I think it can be very good. But having difficult

01:16:44   conversations, good, healthy. Do they lead to good vibes? Maybe not. Sometimes you want

01:16:52   good vibes and that's just life, right? Sometimes, and if talking about technology is a place

01:16:58   that maybe gives you good vibes, having the other difficult kinds of talks about technology

01:17:03   are not giving you those good vibes necessarily. And it's a natural reaction. You and I have

01:17:10   had, if you go back a few years, we have had topics where we've talked on Sunday and said,

01:17:17   basically, I guess we got to talk about it. And we do. And often those are good conversations

01:17:23   and they're good episodes. And the people in the discord are like, I really appreciate

01:17:27   that. And we get feedback later saying that was a really good conversation. And it's true

01:17:33   and I can even be proud of how that conversation went. But at the same time, on Sunday, we

01:17:40   were like, we don't want to do this, but we have to, it's our responsibility. And then

01:17:44   as we're doing it, I feel unpleasant. I feel like, oh, I don't love talking about this,

01:17:52   but we need to do the work and we need to talk about it. And afterward, I feel more

01:17:56   relieved that it's over than proud of what we've done. Sometimes both, but really it's

01:18:01   just like, I'm glad we got through that and survived it. And I think that that's some

01:18:07   of this, right? Which is you could do that, but like, I don't want Mike, if everything

01:18:14   we talked about had that weight on it, I wouldn't want to do podcasts anymore. I just wouldn't

01:18:20   want to do it. Let me tell you, there was a podcast called download that we, that Stephen

01:18:26   Hackett and I did. And it was our attempt to do a more general tech podcast. And what

01:18:33   ended up happening was that it became the all because of when we were doing it, it became

01:18:39   the weekly, all of the terrible ways that Facebook is ruining humanity podcast, essentially.

01:18:47   And we couldn't dodge it. We couldn't dodge it. It was the tech story of that period.

01:18:52   And you know what happened to download is we stopped doing it because it was so unpleasant

01:18:58   to talk about those topics and they didn't bring us joy. And we created a topic that

01:19:03   people did love called the fuzzy puppy update that we did at the end of that podcast, literally

01:19:08   because we felt like the show was so dark that we needed to cheer people up and cheer

01:19:15   ourselves up when we were done. I'm like, man, I just can't, there's serious stuff that

01:19:20   we have to talk about. But like, if everything was like that, this is not what I got into

01:19:24   this to do. It would just be, I, I, I would try to find something else to do with my life.

01:19:30   Yeah. I think maybe my particular issue is I have three shows that are talking about

01:19:39   these topics right now. You do. And that might be too many for one person. Yeah. Like usually

01:19:44   it's great. Like having three places where I can talk about tangentially related stuff

01:19:50   or similar stuff, but different people in different ways. I love it. And I'm, I think

01:19:55   even now, like what we're doing right now, I'm still having these conversations in very

01:19:59   different ways on the different shows, but it's, it might be a lot for, for just one

01:20:06   man, you know, I am but one man, Jason Snow. I agree. And so, yeah, I don't know. This

01:20:12   is a, this is the cool summer that we're in, I suppose. And it's just a case of like pushing

01:20:17   through it. But then when I hear things like spring of 2025, I'm like, Jesus, please just

01:20:23   launch it. So I don't have to keep speculating about the launching of the, you know what

01:20:27   I mean? Just get it out there. Then we can understand it, deal with it and move on. Like

01:20:32   it's it, it's like the, the not knowing is the, the part that's frustrating for me right

01:20:40   now. Maybe I want to recommend to people who haven't heard it last week's episode of connected

01:20:45   episode 509. It's just you and Federico Federico has lots of thoughts about AI, but what I

01:20:50   liked about it and I don't agree. I mean, this is the challenge, right? It's also not

01:20:53   fun. Let's just say it. It's also not a fun, not fun when one of your friends is extremely

01:20:59   passionate about an issue and you don't entirely agree with them, right? I don't, I don't entirely

01:21:05   disagree with him either, but my take on it is not quite his and that can be awkward, right?

01:21:12   That can be awkward and difficult. I thought you did a good job in that episode of saying,

01:21:15   you know, I, you know, letting him say what he wanted to say and saying, I don't, you

01:21:18   know, I see where you're coming from. I don't entirely agree or disagree with it. But what

01:21:22   I, what I liked about that episode is he got to elaborate very clearly some of his concerns

01:21:28   about AI. And it's not, if you're thinking, if you sort of pegged Federico as the guy

01:21:33   who's angry that, um, models were trained on his content, that's not what most of that

01:21:42   episode is about. It's actually the, I, or at least the core of it, it's actually more

01:21:48   about a concern about how AI is used and is going to be used and how it is in Federico's

01:21:57   opinion. I think fundamentally it has the potential to be frequently misused in a way

01:22:06   that is fundamentally dehumanizing. And it's a, I mean, it's a big issue and it's complicated.

01:22:13   And what I found valuable in that is that I really liked hearing somebody who could

01:22:17   walk me through his entire perspective on it, even if there were points that I didn't

01:22:23   agree with, because it was really good to think about it. Was it summer fun, good vibes?

01:22:29   No sir, it was not, but I really liked it and I appreciated all of it while I was, this

01:22:35   is a callback to, uh, to our follow-up, uh, while I was power washing my outdoor table.

01:22:42   That was, I was thinking deep thoughts about AI with Federico Fattucci while also power

01:22:47   washing my, uh, my patio. So, people should listen.

01:22:52   You know, ostensibly what I am doing as a career, which I am thrilled that I get to

01:22:59   do is to entertain people, right? Like that is ostensibly what I do. It can be, I think

01:23:09   it is harder to entertain people with topics like this. Now, I think that that episode

01:23:15   of Connected was very entertaining in like an interesting way, but I find it harder to

01:23:22   produce something that I think is entertaining, like emotionally harder when it's about

01:23:27   such a difficult topic. I find it way easier to crack jokes, right? With my friends and

01:23:34   have a good time.

01:23:35   Sure, and it can't, and like I was saying about our difficult topics, it can't always

01:23:38   be that, right? We do have to buckle down and do those difficult topics and say, we

01:23:41   have to talk about this. And I wouldn't, I am not interested in doing a podcast that's

01:23:49   entirely unmoored from anything and is just in jokes and wackiness and all of that. Like

01:23:55   everything, and there is a spectrum, there is a scale there, there is a spectrum that

01:23:59   podcasts can run on. I also wouldn't want it to be dead serious all the time, but I

01:24:03   also wouldn't want it to be entirely weightless all the time, right? Like the world is mixed

01:24:08   and we need to be mixed, but you're right. The difficult stuff, even if it's necessary

01:24:16   and good to talk about it, is still difficult and it doesn't spark the kind of joy that

01:24:25   the fun stuff does.

01:24:26   Yeah, I don't know. I just wanted to talk about this a little bit today. This wouldn't

01:24:31   really go anywhere other than the fact of just like lifting the lid of my brain a little

01:24:35   bit and letting people look inside. Like this is kind of where I am right now. And it's

01:24:40   interesting. I am very aware of the fact that I am running on fumes at the moment because

01:24:48   we're entertaining over a thousand people in like two weeks. So like I may be running

01:24:56   a little raw at the moment, which might be why I'm feeling this way today. So thank you

01:25:01   for indulging me.

01:25:02   Sure, of course.

01:25:03   Should we do some Ask Upgrade?

01:25:07   Let's do it.

01:25:08   Let's finish out with some Ask Upgrade today. Kit writes in and says, "I have the newest

01:25:13   iPad mini and its battery life is at a point where I'm considering ordering a new one.

01:25:18   I don't recall ever replacing an Apple product within the same generation though. Have either

01:25:24   of you replaced an unbroken device with a product of the same generation?"

01:25:29   I just wanted to start off by saying that I feel for Kit and I think that Apple's doing

01:25:33   the iPad mini an injustice. That product should be given more love. It's a fantastic form

01:25:38   factor.

01:25:39   Yes. Also Kit, maybe battery replacement. Keep it alive for another year.

01:25:47   Yeah, that's the way to do it.

01:25:48   Battery replacement, then you can hand it down and then you can buy yourself a new iPad

01:25:51   mini. But like at this point in its life cycle, oh, a battery replacement is going to be cheaper

01:25:58   I think than an iPad mini. So maybe you wait and it will remain usable.

01:26:03   But for me, the only product I could think of is something like AirPods. I've replaced

01:26:10   AirPods within the same generation. And that is either because the batteries are so gone,

01:26:16   but like with that product, the battery replacement cost isn't really worth it compared to replacing

01:26:22   them. And I think Apple actually just replaces them if you need to replace the batteries

01:26:26   anyway. You usually get new ones. So I've done it with both sets of AirPods Pro because

01:26:33   also that's a product that lasts a really long time. And usually they've done it both

01:26:36   times. If you do get the quote unquote the same product, it might be slightly different.

01:26:41   Like Qi charging case or USB-C check case and Vision Pro features or whatever, but where

01:26:48   technically it's still the same thing. But I couldn't think of anything else. And I do

01:26:52   think that is partly because we try and if we're replacing something, it's usually because

01:26:59   there's something new, right? And we're replacing for the new thing way more frequently than

01:27:05   the average consumer would.

01:27:07   Yeah, I think we're unusual in that way. I do also do a lot of hand-me-downs. So again,

01:27:13   usually it's a new tech and then I'll move them down the chain. It has happened. And

01:27:18   again, they're not quite the same, but like I did get the AirPods with the Qi charging

01:27:24   case and use that as an opportunity to push my AirPods down to Jamie, I think. So yeah,

01:27:34   there's some of that, but not really because we're primarily, you know, because this is

01:27:39   what we do getting the next thing.

01:27:43   And Joao asks, how do you explain to non-tech people, especially family, that your iPhone

01:27:49   does not listen to you to show ads? I can never get them to believe me. I think cross-site

01:27:54   tracking is so hard to understand and the conspiracy theory is more attractive. I wonder

01:28:00   if there had been a conversation around the family dinner table for you, the last couple

01:28:05   of weeks. It's interesting. This is funny to me, right? Like this getting this question

01:28:12   was actually a good example of this phenomenon. Two days ago, me and Idina were having a conversation

01:28:17   about this idea and then Joao wrote to me. So it's almost like Joao was listening to

01:28:21   me too.

01:28:22   Oh no. Joao, how could you?

01:28:25   I just think these algorithms are so good. I think there's two things that are going

01:28:29   on here personally. I think the algorithms are so good that they can often show you things

01:28:33   you're interested in based on whatever it took for you to become interested in that

01:28:37   thing because they just know. Plus, human nature means we draw connections to things

01:28:42   with our environment. It might not be one, right? So I think it's the two things going

01:28:45   together where one, the system knows what you want and is giving it to you and two,

01:28:52   if you recall something, then you can jump to like, "Oh, I was just thinking about that"

01:28:57   or "I was just talking about that." But you don't, for the things that you weren't thinking

01:29:01   about go, "I was never thinking about that." You only can pay attention to the patterns.

01:29:06   What do you think about this kind of stuff?

01:29:08   I was happy to see your response because it's mine too. I don't think you can convince them

01:29:13   of anything because it is just so much. I just don't think there is because it's so

01:29:19   easy for people to make connections like that. What I will say is if you want to talk about

01:29:22   it technically, you're like, "Oh yeah, but if you say the name, then the voice assistant,

01:29:27   that means it's always listening." Apple's got markers about whether it's listening to

01:29:34   audio or not. The way those wake words work is that the microphone on the device, there's

01:29:42   an algorithm that's listening for the wake word. That's why it gets mistriggered. It's

01:29:49   not listening for conversation anyway. The only thing it's listening for is the wake

01:29:54   word. Apple actually got in a lot of trouble where it turned out that some of their activations,

01:30:01   the audio was being recorded and was available in data centers, and now you have the option

01:30:05   to say no to that. I feel like, again, it's impossible because it's a conspiracy theory

01:30:11   and you can't. You can give facts if they want to believe it, they're going to believe

01:30:14   it. But the fact is-

01:30:15   It's also like it's a harmless conspiracy theory by and large, right? For most people

01:30:19   that it's just kind of one to let go.

01:30:20   Yeah, of all the things, it's just the ads. Of all the things that you could do with that

01:30:25   information, this is actually a pretty harmless one. There are way worse things you could

01:30:29   do. That's what I would say is if they want to believe it, they can believe it. But I

01:30:33   would tell you as somebody who's watched stories about Apple over the years, that if this was

01:30:39   happening we would all know about it, right? But we don't. In fact, Apple is like a war

01:30:44   with Facebook over ad targeting. I think in the end, you can bring out all the facts,

01:30:52   but if they want to believe that their phone is listening to them, I guess you just got

01:30:56   to let them, but it's not.

01:31:01   I've never listened to the podcast Reply All, but I remember they did an episode on this

01:31:06   subject that I saw lots of people very excited about. So I'll put a link in the show notes

01:31:10   to that. Maybe this will help them. It's called "Is Facebook spying on you?" is the episode.

01:31:15   And they tried to investigate this exact phenomenon. I'm sure that they probably end up in a scenario

01:31:21   which is interesting, but still won't help you convince people in your lives that this

01:31:26   isn't happening. I mean, the other thing, if your concern is that your iPhone is listening

01:31:32   to you, even if it is, that date is never finding its way to Facebook. That's the problem

01:31:39   here, right? For us, it's what we know, we're too close to the metal. They're never giving

01:31:43   that information to Instagram. That's not why you're getting Instagram ads. It's not

01:31:49   like Apple was listening to you.

01:31:51   Exactly. They would use that for their own purposes and not for Facebook's purposes.

01:31:57   Maybe you could shift the conspiracy a little bit. Only Apple could even be listening and

01:32:05   they wouldn't share that with Facebook. So whatever you see on Facebook or on the web,

01:32:09   Apple doesn't want anybody else to have that information.

01:32:13   You can see why it's so enticing to people, right? Because you don't also then have to

01:32:17   do a lot of Googling to see that Apple and Google have this huge deal together about

01:32:22   search engines, right? Which is so easy to then just be like, "Well, maybe they're just

01:32:26   giving this data to Google." This is the problem with this stuff is there is a, I think, sometimes

01:32:34   in a lot of ways, wise mistrust about these large companies, but it then ends up sometimes

01:32:39   going a little bit too far. This one, it just doesn't make sense for these businesses to

01:32:45   do this because of the amount of information they would have to be sharing. And also there's

01:32:50   a thing of like, "Nobody cares about you that much." Right? Someone's listening to your

01:32:56   phone. I'm sorry. That's not happening.

01:32:59   And also the algorithms are still not that great. It's literally if you search for a

01:33:05   folding chair on Amazon, all your ads then suddenly are like, "Hey, folding chair enthusiast,

01:33:11   would you like to buy many more folding chairs?" It's like, "No, I bought one."

01:33:14   I see happen a lot. And I think this is one that trips people up, right? A lot say like

01:33:19   Instagram or whatever. They are aware, depending on how you have stuff set up, of devices on

01:33:27   your network and what they're searching for, right? Like based on IP addresses. So you

01:33:32   could have had a conversation with your partner and your partner went and looked something

01:33:35   up. Then you get ads for the thing you were talking about, right? Like this is one where

01:33:40   I think that's one of the things that's happening that trips people up. Where they're like,

01:33:44   "Whoa, I was just talking about this and I haven't looked for it yet and I have an ad

01:33:48   for it." It's like, yeah, because the person you were talking to, when I looked it up.

01:33:53   That's one that I do think happens. It is not a conspiracy. That's just the way the

01:33:56   technology works. But I think it's one of the ways that it could trip people up.

01:34:00   I find this to be somewhat of a fascinating thing, especially having conversations with

01:34:03   people about this stuff. But as a technology enthusiast, sometimes it can be difficult

01:34:08   because you end up being the one where people are like, "Why is my phone listening to me?"

01:34:12   And it's like, "I can't help you. I'm afraid." But yo Av, I hope that helped. If you would

01:34:18   like to send in your questions for a future episode of the show or send us any feedback

01:34:22   or follow up, just go to upgradefeedback.com. If you want to check Jason's writing out,

01:34:29   go to sixcolors.com. You can hear his podcast on the incomparable.com and here on RelayFM

01:34:34   where you can hear me too and check out my work at cortexbrown.com. You can find us online.

01:34:39   Our question is @jsnell, J-S-N-E-L-L-L. I am @imike, I-M-Y-K-E. You can watch video

01:34:45   clips of this show on TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube where we are @upgraderelay. Thank

01:34:50   you to our members who support us on Upgrade Plus. Go to getupgradeplus.com and you can

01:34:54   get longer ad-free versions of this show every week. And thank you to our sponsors, Ooni

01:34:59   and our friends over at Squarespace. Thank you for listening. We'll be back next time.

01:35:06   Until then, say goodbye Jason Snow. Goodbye Mike Hurley.

01:35:10   [Music]

01:35:20   [Music]

01:35:22   [Music]

01:35:24   [ Silence ]