44: Tap the Ellipses
00:00:00
◼
►
(upbeat music)
00:00:03
◼
►
From Relay FM, this is Upgrade, episode number 44.
00:00:12
◼
►
Today's show is brought to you by lynda.com
00:00:14
◼
►
where you can instantly stream thousands of courses
00:00:16
◼
►
that are created by industry experts,
00:00:18
◼
►
hover, simplified domain management, and fracture,
00:00:22
◼
►
photos printed in vivid color directly on glass.
00:00:25
◼
►
My name is Myke Hurley and I'm joined as always
00:00:28
◼
►
from an undisclosed Californian location by Mr. Jason Snow.
00:00:32
◼
►
- Yes, I'm in a different undisclosed California location.
00:00:35
◼
►
Hello from sunny and warm Southern California, Myke.
00:00:39
◼
►
- How is it now?
00:00:40
◼
►
- Even when it's foggy here, it's warm,
00:00:44
◼
►
which it puts it one up on the Bay Area
00:00:46
◼
►
where when it's foggy, it is not warm.
00:00:48
◼
►
Here when it's foggy, it's actually warm.
00:00:50
◼
►
So it's been nice.
00:00:51
◼
►
We were in, my wife and I went down to San Diego
00:00:54
◼
►
for a couple of days.
00:00:55
◼
►
It's sort of, it's the week before Comic-Con,
00:00:57
◼
►
So they're putting up all the Comic-Con banners and things, but I'd always dreamed all the
00:01:00
◼
►
times I'd gone to Comic-Con.
00:01:01
◼
►
I'd been to Comic-Con in San Diego like three out of the last five years, something like
00:01:09
◼
►
I always, I would walk around with just the throngs of people and trying to get from one
00:01:13
◼
►
place to another and think, "This is really nice.
00:01:15
◼
►
If there were less people here, and if my wife was with me, this would make a nice vacation."
00:01:21
◼
►
And finally I put my dream into reality and we went down for a couple of days this week
00:01:26
◼
►
and just were in San Diego without the kids and left the kids with grandma and grandpa
00:01:30
◼
►
and had a really nice time so that was like a little mini summer vacation and San Diego
00:01:35
◼
►
is beautiful and it is even more beautiful when there are not thousands of people surrounding
00:01:39
◼
►
you at Comic Con so yeah that was nice and now I'm back in greater LA area and we're
00:01:45
◼
►
headed back home after this program in fact we will be heading home.
00:01:49
◼
►
You're not going to Comic Con?
00:01:51
◼
►
No I'm not going to Comic Con this year.
00:01:53
◼
►
You know, it is huge.
00:01:55
◼
►
It is too big.
00:01:57
◼
►
And although I can glean some things from it, I decided, well first off, you have to
00:02:01
◼
►
re-qualify every couple of years for a press pass, and I'm not entirely sure I would have
00:02:05
◼
►
gotten one this year, and when you qualify it was like right in the wake of me leaving
00:02:09
◼
►
Macworld and I had this sort of like, you know, do I want to bother?
00:02:12
◼
►
And I just decided after last year that I didn't want to go this year, it was too crazy,
00:02:18
◼
►
and I didn't get enough out of it.
00:02:19
◼
►
I started going honestly because of the iPad, because comics and the iPad seemed like a
00:02:25
◼
►
natural fit, and so when Apple, the first year that Apple came out with the iPad, 2010,
00:02:31
◼
►
I went to Comic Con, talked to the Comixology people, talked to the iVerse people, talked
00:02:35
◼
►
to a bunch of publishers, went to a bunch of sessions, and it was a moment in time when
00:02:40
◼
►
the comics industry was really trying to figure out, how do you use these devices to create
00:02:44
◼
►
comics, how do you use these devices for people to read comics, can you, you know, what does
00:02:47
◼
►
do for traditional comic book sellers that people are getting these things digitally.
00:02:51
◼
►
It was a really interesting time. Last year when I went I feel like it's just part of
00:02:55
◼
►
the culture now.
00:02:56
◼
►
It's settled.
00:02:57
◼
►
Yeah, yeah. People have figured it out. They've figured out yes it is good. And you can make
00:03:02
◼
►
comics with these devices and you can read them and people buy them digitally and the
00:03:07
◼
►
comic book stores are still doing okay. The ones that have survived have survived for
00:03:10
◼
►
other reasons and it's fine.
00:03:12
◼
►
Yep, and Amazon have tied that market all up with a nice little bow.
00:03:16
◼
►
Yeah, well they have. I actually did a piece on Six Colors a couple weeks ago because they
00:03:19
◼
►
did an app update and I got to talk to their, actually I talked to their CEO David Steinberger
00:03:24
◼
►
who's the CEO of Comixology and he's basically the head of comic books for Amazon too. So
00:03:29
◼
►
I think they've got some big plans to bring some of their good comic technology over to
00:03:34
◼
►
the Kindle app at some point. They haven't announced anything and they haven't told me
00:03:37
◼
►
anything secretly either. It's just speculation but it seems like it makes sense because the
00:03:42
◼
►
the Kindle stuff isn't as good as the Comixology stuff is in terms of a reading experience.
00:03:47
◼
►
But anyway while I was talking to him about their app update he mentioned that he had
00:03:51
◼
►
been listening to our podcast at one point which was pretty fun. So if he's out there,
00:03:57
◼
►
hello David Steinberger of Comixology. But yeah it's sort of settled now. So for me I
00:04:03
◼
►
never wanted to wait in line for five hours to see people far away on a panel for forty
00:04:09
◼
►
it's... and so, I found interesting panels to go to, but it was an interesting people
00:04:15
◼
►
to talk to, but it was a lot less appealing than it was right when this was a real question
00:04:20
◼
►
about how people were going to react to it. And it was, you know, I was coming to write
00:04:24
◼
►
about things, not just to wander around, and that plus being independent, I had to make
00:04:30
◼
►
some decisions about it, and I thought, "Eh, it's not for me. Maybe I'll do it again,"
00:04:34
◼
►
Although the size, it's so unwieldy that it's actually kind of difficult to go to for that.
00:04:39
◼
►
But it does, you know, it was fun.
00:04:42
◼
►
And San Diego's beautiful.
00:04:43
◼
►
So I was happy to go to San Diego even though I did it pre-Comic-Con this year.
00:04:48
◼
►
I always thought I would like to go, but over time my desire has gone away.
00:04:54
◼
►
You know, it's fun, but it's a spectacle and it's just, I think it's oversized.
00:05:01
◼
►
That's why, because it just looks too unwieldy.
00:05:03
◼
►
Yeah, the New York, I've heard good things about the New York Comic Con, which is also
00:05:08
◼
►
It's a similar size.
00:05:10
◼
►
I think the difference is there's a little less...
00:05:12
◼
►
See, at San Diego Comic Con, it's not, they say it's celebrating the popular arts, and
00:05:17
◼
►
there's some truth to that.
00:05:18
◼
►
I mean, a lot of what's there is movies and TV shows doing promotion.
00:05:22
◼
►
It's not just comics anymore.
00:05:24
◼
►
It's movies, TV shows, video games, lots of other stuff.
00:05:26
◼
►
It's a pop culture convention, basically.
00:05:28
◼
►
And it's kind of an overstuffed bag now.
00:05:32
◼
►
So maybe something like, maybe you should go to the New York Comic Con or something.
00:05:36
◼
►
I'm sure there's a really cool equivalent of that in London somewhere.
00:05:40
◼
►
And I think the smaller scale might actually benefit that event to not have the insanity
00:05:45
◼
►
of the large scale.
00:05:46
◼
►
Yeah, there is a London Comic Con.
00:05:48
◼
►
I've just not been, I keep missing it.
00:05:50
◼
►
It's one of those things, you know, like every year I'm like, "Oh, I'll go to that."
00:05:53
◼
►
And then it just, I just miss it.
00:05:56
◼
►
Every single time I miss it.
00:05:58
◼
►
But it looks so fun.
00:05:59
◼
►
October so maybe I'll maybe I should just get tickets and actually go this time
00:06:03
◼
►
Yeah, yeah, it's it's fun. I mean I I went to a couple conventions when I was a kid and
00:06:09
◼
►
And then only in the last few years have I been to more sci-fi and comic conventions, and they're kind of fun
00:06:16
◼
►
They're not I wouldn't say they're like absolutely my bag. Actually. My favorite thing about them is meeting meeting interesting people
00:06:21
◼
►
Not waiting in lines and not big crowds. Those are not my favorite things
00:06:27
◼
►
But, I mean, the reason I go, the number one reason I go to the Doctor Who convention in
00:06:30
◼
►
LA every year now is because I know like 15 people who go to it every year and it's my
00:06:35
◼
►
chance to see them.
00:06:37
◼
►
And you know, I honestly don't even need a ticket to the event because I could just stand
00:06:42
◼
►
in the lobby and have a good time talking to the people I know, mostly podcasters actually.
00:06:47
◼
►
So anyway, it's a fun little subculture for me to sort of dip in and out of, but I'm happy
00:06:55
◼
►
to every year that I go I think why am I here and every year that I don't go now that I
00:07:00
◼
►
since I went the first time the years that I haven't gone I look at it and I'm like oh
00:07:04
◼
►
Comic Con I'm not there you know and I do feel a little bit of that like but I you know
00:07:09
◼
►
I'm not there this year but after last year I was like I gotta take a year off at least.
00:07:17
◼
►
Should we address some follow up? Yeah let's do some let's do some follow up. So interestingly
00:07:21
◼
►
in the time that we, since last episode to this episode, we were talking about antitrust
00:07:28
◼
►
and the ebook case came up and basically a couple of days ago the US Court of Appeals
00:07:36
◼
►
upheld the 2013 decision that Apple was guilty of conspiring with publishers.
00:07:41
◼
►
So basically Apple had an appeal which has now been shut down and they will have to pay
00:07:45
◼
►
the $450 million fine.
00:07:48
◼
►
So it kind of, I think, puts this to bed now.
00:07:50
◼
►
Yeah, we got, when we were talking about this earlier, last week we got some feedback from
00:07:55
◼
►
a few people who are like, very much in Apple's camp on this and said, "No, there's no proof
00:08:00
◼
►
that there was, that Apple was involved in collusion and you should report the real story
00:08:06
◼
►
and not just assume the worst of Apple and all that."
00:08:08
◼
►
And my response was, "I believe that Steve Jobs and Apple got the publishers together
00:08:15
◼
►
and banded them together to push back on Amazon."
00:08:18
◼
►
I think quite validly and rightly, but that my understanding and my belief of what went
00:08:24
◼
►
on, that's illegal collusion, and although they were, I think, doing it, not for altruistic
00:08:32
◼
►
reasons, but doing it to push back against another opponent, and it really was competition,
00:08:39
◼
►
this court ruling makes it very clear that as far as the US court system is concerned,
00:08:43
◼
►
Apple did this, it's settled.
00:08:45
◼
►
The appeal is passed.
00:08:47
◼
►
a done deal.
00:08:48
◼
►
>> So you kind of just have to lean to that and be like well that's that then.
00:08:52
◼
►
>> Yeah and I feel like Apple, I've said this before and you know it's always tricky when
00:08:57
◼
►
you're talking about Steve Jobs because you know Steve Jobs, I think you just give it
00:09:02
◼
►
as a given, it's like look Steve Jobs we all know all the great things about Steve Jobs
00:09:06
◼
►
but one of the issues with Steve Jobs is he believed that sometimes there were things
00:09:12
◼
►
he wanted to do that weren't legal, and he didn't care. That was part of his personality.
00:09:17
◼
►
And you saw it in parking and handicap spots, and you saw it in making secret deals to not
00:09:25
◼
►
hire employees from other tech companies, which is also illegal. And you saw it, I think,
00:09:31
◼
►
in the e-books case, where he thought, and again, you can see the motivation of it, you
00:09:35
◼
►
can totally understand why he would say that, which is, you know, we gotta break Amazon
00:09:39
◼
►
here because they've got a stranglehold on this market. But what he did, I would say
00:09:46
◼
►
and I think the courts have said, wasn't legal. Maybe it was the right thing to do from a
00:09:51
◼
►
moral standpoint, but it was also collusion with the leaders of the publishing industry.
00:09:57
◼
►
So I think that's a case where I would hope that we talk a lot about the new Apple. This
00:10:04
◼
►
This is one of those cases where maybe the new Apple is less inclined to do the all-out
00:10:09
◼
►
nuclear patent war with Samsung and stuff like this.
00:10:14
◼
►
I feel that's one of those areas where Steve Jobs was just so in control of that company
00:10:18
◼
►
that he would get mad about something or get his mindset on something and it didn't matter
00:10:22
◼
►
if all of his advisors and his lawyers were saying "no, no, don't" that he would just
00:10:27
◼
►
do it because that was him.
00:10:29
◼
►
I think history has shown that Steve had a very much by any means necessary kind of...
00:10:38
◼
►
Yeah, well he was a rebellious guy, right?
00:10:41
◼
►
And sometimes I think yes, he was...
00:10:45
◼
►
I was gonna say shoot first, ask questions later, but that's not entirely right.
00:10:50
◼
►
Whatever it takes.
00:10:51
◼
►
It's ask forgiveness, not permission, right?
00:10:55
◼
►
in the pirate flag, even as a huge company, I think that's where he lost some perspective.
00:11:00
◼
►
Where I believe that he really believed that the non-compete stuff, where they agreed not
00:11:06
◼
►
to hire away other people from other tech companies and the other tech companies agreed
00:11:10
◼
►
the same, which is illegal. I think he really did believe that that was doing the best thing
00:11:15
◼
►
for Apple and didn't think of the fact that he was preventing people from furthering their
00:11:21
◼
►
careers and stifling their salaries. I don't think he thought that but you know the fact
00:11:26
◼
►
is I think that's what happened. I think that he just didn't have that perspective because
00:11:31
◼
►
he was focused on what he was focused on and you know I just think that's that's who he
00:11:35
◼
►
was. He was he was focused on very particular things and didn't really care if somebody
00:11:42
◼
►
got in his way and would say that's just bureaucracy or that's just you're just worried about us
00:11:46
◼
►
getting sued but you know I don't care this is the right thing to do and you know I think
00:11:50
◼
►
That's all the Samsung patent stuff and the Android patent stuff in general I think is
00:11:55
◼
►
the same thing.
00:11:56
◼
►
It's the "let's go nuclear on them" and everybody's like "no no no no no, it's not going to be
00:12:01
◼
►
worth it, we're not going to win, what's it going to accomplish?"
00:12:03
◼
►
And I think there was just some anger there.
00:12:05
◼
►
Was it justified anger?
00:12:06
◼
►
Again, yes, I think it was justified, but not pragmatic.
00:12:13
◼
►
Or in the end, yes, or actually something, in the case of the ebook thing, or something
00:12:19
◼
►
that was legal.
00:12:20
◼
►
Even though they felt like and may have been in the right in terms of trying to increase
00:12:25
◼
►
competition in that.
00:12:27
◼
►
It was actually the rare case, right, I mean super rare case of industry collusion increasing
00:12:33
◼
►
competition but that's what it was.
00:12:38
◼
►
In regards to the Apple Music and Taylor Swift and anti-competitive antitrust stuff, Stephen
00:12:46
◼
►
Hackett, co-host of Connected and co-founder of Relay FM who just also today announced
00:12:52
◼
►
that he has gone independent. He is now going to be a full-time writer and podcaster and
00:12:58
◼
►
I'm going to include a link in the show notes to Stephen's blog post. You can go check that
00:13:01
◼
►
out. He's selling t-shirts to help give him that first kick into the independent world.
00:13:07
◼
►
Please go help him out. Stephen has joined us in the realm of fun employment, right?
00:13:11
◼
►
He has indeed. You and me and Stephen and David Sparks.
00:13:16
◼
►
in the dream. So go help Steven out. Go buy a t-shirt. It's a big thing. It's a big thing
00:13:22
◼
►
for Relay. We now both are putting, I put all my time into it, Steven's putting a majority
00:13:27
◼
►
of his time into it. It's exciting for us. It's less than a year. One year in August.
00:13:33
◼
►
So anyway, so he pointed out that one angle that we potentially missed is that by working
00:13:41
◼
►
with the record labels and that kind of thing that we may have missed that Apple
00:13:45
◼
►
Music might be pushed by the record labels to consumers and that could be
00:13:50
◼
►
part of the anti-competitive stuff that we missed. But you know which I
00:13:54
◼
►
understand but my feeling about this is while I get that idea of working with
00:13:59
◼
►
the labels would potentially you know push them on consumers. My point that
00:14:04
◼
►
Taylor Swift writing the letter means it's all okay from a legal perspective. I
00:14:09
◼
►
I think that that still stands.
00:14:10
◼
►
Like it doesn't make any sense.
00:14:11
◼
►
The Department of Justice is not gonna be,
00:14:13
◼
►
I still don't think it's gonna be like,
00:14:15
◼
►
oh, Taylor Swift wrote that letter?
00:14:16
◼
►
Well of course you can, you know,
00:14:19
◼
►
of course you can do whatever you want.
00:14:20
◼
►
It doesn't make any sense to me still.
00:14:23
◼
►
I think, I mean my take on that was,
00:14:26
◼
►
and I think I said this last week,
00:14:27
◼
►
is that the fear there is that what there was
00:14:30
◼
►
is a secret backroom deal like with the eBooks thing
00:14:32
◼
►
where Apple's like, here's our plan
00:14:35
◼
►
for how we get rid of Spotify free tier.
00:14:38
◼
►
is we, you know, colluding to get rid of the idea of a free tier because from all accounts
00:14:44
◼
►
the music industry doesn't like the free tier and Apple isn't offering a free tier but it
00:14:50
◼
►
could also be that Apple is coming as a new party here and there and the music industry
00:14:54
◼
►
is saying look we don't want a free tier and Apple's like great we'll do that you know
00:14:59
◼
►
just get on your good side and you know I think it'll be I think it'll be fine.
00:15:03
◼
►
It just funs them. It doesn't make sense to me the idea of like if they paid free trial it would make the music labels
00:15:11
◼
►
promote Apple music more
00:15:14
◼
►
Because they're doing something that a competition isn't doing
00:15:16
◼
►
So, you know therefore it's illegal but Taylor Swift said please pay and they do and then the Department of Justice is like, alright
00:15:25
◼
►
It's not legal anymore. That still stands for me. It doesn't make any sense.
00:15:28
◼
►
But your honor there was a blog post
00:15:30
◼
►
- I do, sir, have you heard the term open letter?
00:15:34
◼
►
Like it's not, it's just not gonna happen.
00:15:37
◼
►
Let's move on though.
00:15:37
◼
►
Alexander pointed out to me a potential solution
00:15:40
◼
►
for my woes of the force touch track pad.
00:15:43
◼
►
I was mentioning how the click and drag
00:15:46
◼
►
just doesn't work for me and in something like Logic,
00:15:48
◼
►
I cannot work in that scenario.
00:15:50
◼
►
And he mentioned that there is the ability
00:15:53
◼
►
to do a three finger drag motion movement.
00:15:56
◼
►
I don't know if this works in Logic.
00:16:00
◼
►
I think it works in any windowed thing.
00:16:04
◼
►
I'm not sure whether it works.
00:16:06
◼
►
I think it's to drag windows around though,
00:16:08
◼
►
not to drag objects around.
00:16:10
◼
►
- That's what I'd assume too.
00:16:12
◼
►
So I mean, basically, even if there are solutions
00:16:17
◼
►
which are like more fingers on the track pad,
00:16:19
◼
►
like I don't, my issue with the Force Touch track pad
00:16:23
◼
►
is that I just don't think that the best solution
00:16:27
◼
►
is to take the physical click away from laptops
00:16:30
◼
►
that have the space to keep it.
00:16:32
◼
►
Like so, you know, updating the 15 inch
00:16:34
◼
►
with removing the clickable trackpad,
00:16:36
◼
►
changing nothing about the body design,
00:16:39
◼
►
and putting it in there.
00:16:39
◼
►
I just don't think that it's the right option
00:16:41
◼
►
because for me, whenever I click down on my trackpad,
00:16:46
◼
►
a click is registered, right?
00:16:47
◼
►
That is a given because it is a physical switch
00:16:49
◼
►
and it works.
00:16:50
◼
►
I can't think of any time where I've ever clicked
00:16:52
◼
►
and it hasn't worked.
00:16:54
◼
►
But it was happening enough for me
00:16:55
◼
►
on the Force Touch trackpad
00:16:56
◼
►
where it makes me question if it's worth it doing.
00:16:59
◼
►
And I just wonder, is it possible,
00:17:03
◼
►
and I'm sure that they could find a way
00:17:05
◼
►
to make a hybrid version which has a real click,
00:17:08
◼
►
but also the pressure sensitivity
00:17:09
◼
►
so they can continue doing the force touch APIs
00:17:11
◼
►
that they wanna do.
00:17:12
◼
►
'Cause that can, to me, is the only reason
00:17:14
◼
►
that you would put it in something like the 15 inches
00:17:16
◼
►
because you wanna push these force touch APIs, right?
00:17:18
◼
►
So you can have bigger clicks.
00:17:20
◼
►
What if I clicked down and then kept pushing
00:17:22
◼
►
and then a force touch click happened, right?
00:17:25
◼
►
give me that. Don't take away the real click if it doesn't need to be. It just doesn't
00:17:30
◼
►
make sense to me because you are taking something that is 100% reliable and making it not so.
00:17:36
◼
►
And that is a very peculiar thing for me. It's a shame because the first time I tried
00:17:40
◼
►
to force touch I was blown away by it. And when I'm just using it, just browsing around
00:17:44
◼
►
the web, it is kind of crazy to me because it does feel like a real click. But it's not
00:17:48
◼
►
one. And at times when I really need it, like when I'm editing a podcast, I need complete
00:17:53
◼
►
precision and anything that gets in my way during that process is not something that
00:17:57
◼
►
I want to be working with and I find it, I found it very frustrating to use in those
00:18:02
◼
►
Yeah, I don't know if there can be a hybrid version or not based on, because if you're
00:18:06
◼
►
trying to do pressure sensitivity but you've got a diving board kind of thing, I think
00:18:10
◼
►
that's, I think it would be much more complicated than just taking it out.
00:18:13
◼
►
I would, I think my response would be, I wonder if they can make it better than it is in this
00:18:21
◼
►
first generation because my feeling is not I don't I haven't been bothered by
00:18:25
◼
►
it like you have but I kind of like it but the one problem I have with it is I
00:18:30
◼
►
feel like there's not enough feedback I feel like the click and I think Marco
00:18:34
◼
►
talked about this when he was complaining about the MacBook one as
00:18:38
◼
►
Marco would call it it doesn't it's not clicky enough that's my feeling about it
00:18:43
◼
►
is and when I click it I want it to be more I want more feedback and for
00:18:48
◼
►
whatever reason the maximum feedback it'll give you still doesn't quite feel
00:18:53
◼
►
it still feels like not a real click and so I wonder if they could just you know
00:18:58
◼
►
if if what we're really saying here is this is not a solved problem and the
00:19:04
◼
►
next generation of force touch trackpads needs to be better because this is not
00:19:10
◼
►
quite good enough for for you to use and you know more fee and I definitely feel
00:19:17
◼
►
the desire for some more feedback.
00:19:20
◼
►
That said, I also, I was noticing, I use a trackpad, a Magic Trackpad at my desk at home,
00:19:28
◼
►
and I have contorted my hand, I actually hurt my wrist a little bit, I contorted my hand
00:19:34
◼
►
into this weird position in order to use it because I've got my keyboard tray that I use,
00:19:38
◼
►
has got these, I don't even know what they are, they're like strips of adhesive, I think
00:19:43
◼
►
to put down like an arm rest or a wrist rest or something
00:19:47
◼
►
that I don't use.
00:19:49
◼
►
But I can't put, there's certain places
00:19:53
◼
►
I can't put the track pad,
00:19:54
◼
►
because the track pad needs to physically depress,
00:19:57
◼
►
and if the legs are up, it doesn't click right.
00:20:00
◼
►
And I had one of those moments where I thought,
00:20:02
◼
►
well, this is one of the advantages of having
00:20:05
◼
►
something like the Force Touch track pad,
00:20:07
◼
►
if you had that as a magic track pad,
00:20:09
◼
►
is it wouldn't need legs that depress.
00:20:14
◼
►
It would just sense the pressure
00:20:17
◼
►
and that would be good enough.
00:20:18
◼
►
But, so maybe a next generation,
00:20:20
◼
►
maybe Apple will listen to stories like yours
00:20:24
◼
►
and say, "Oh, so what is the issue
00:20:27
◼
►
"about how Myke uses logic
00:20:30
◼
►
"that doesn't work with the force trudge
00:20:32
◼
►
"and can we make that better?
00:20:33
◼
►
"Can we emulate that better?
00:20:34
◼
►
"Can we make the software better?
00:20:35
◼
►
"Can we make the vibration motor
00:20:38
◼
►
more, you know, I don't know, buzzier.
00:20:44
◼
►
I don't know what the solution is, but maybe that's one way to approach this is.
00:20:49
◼
►
It's not, it's a first try and it needs to be better.
00:20:54
◼
►
It definitely does.
00:20:55
◼
►
I hope that it will be and I'm sure that it will be.
00:20:57
◼
►
It's just weird to me.
00:20:58
◼
►
Looking at it now, it's really weird to me that they put it in the 15-inch without doing
00:21:01
◼
►
anything else.
00:21:02
◼
►
It wasn't needed, but they did it and it's sort of peculiar.
00:21:05
◼
►
Well, I mean, they, very clearly Apple feels that the keyboard is a compromise and, you
00:21:13
◼
►
know, every time I've talked to Apple about the keyboard on the MacBook One, they've said,
00:21:17
◼
►
"Oh God, look at me, I'm calling the MacBook One Marco!"
00:21:20
◼
►
It's easier, it is easier because it's just called the MacBook which doesn't really help.
00:21:24
◼
►
Yeah, the adjective-less MacBook. Every time I talk to somebody from Apple about it, they're
00:21:28
◼
►
like, "Look, we know that travel is a problem but we increased the, you know, keycaps and
00:21:34
◼
►
all of that and we're trying to balance it out.
00:21:37
◼
►
But I've not yet heard somebody at Apple just say, "Oh, it's better this way."
00:21:42
◼
►
They all seem to admit it's different and it's not better, which for Apple, with any
00:21:47
◼
►
new piece of technology they do, is a big admission.
00:21:50
◼
►
It's not actually better, but what they're basically saying is, "But it's not worse because
00:21:55
◼
►
of other reasons.
00:21:56
◼
►
We've balanced out the bad and the good."
00:21:59
◼
►
With the Force Touch trackpad, Apple very clearly thinks, "This is the future, this
00:22:02
◼
►
is better, it does more stuff, it's more flexible, this is better. So Apple clearly thinks it's
00:22:09
◼
►
better and that's why they put it in, the 15 and the 13, is they think this is just
00:22:13
◼
►
better. And what I hear from people who don't like it is they're wrong, or at least for
00:22:18
◼
►
some class of users they're wrong, it's not better, it needs to be better still because
00:22:23
◼
►
for a lot of uses it feels like a regression. And again, I hope Apple's listening to that
00:22:30
◼
►
not just sort of feeling like, "Well, we did that, let's move on to the next thing."
00:22:34
◼
►
Moving on, in terms of moving on to the next thing, in our upgrade last week we mentioned
00:22:42
◼
►
that Jim would like us to guess the sex of his baby girl who was, I think, was being
00:22:49
◼
►
born at that moment.
00:22:52
◼
►
In advance he wrote to us and said that on the Monday of our show, episode 43, that they
00:22:58
◼
►
would be having a baby so I assume scheduled like a c-section or something
00:23:01
◼
►
and he said what's the sex of the baby we don't know and we both declared that
00:23:06
◼
►
it was a girl and we were right and we were right upgrade wins congratulations
00:23:11
◼
►
to Jim and the whole and away family on their baby girl yeah absolutely the week
00:23:18
◼
►
can we claim Jim's baby is the first upgrade baby as I'm concerned we have
00:23:24
◼
►
just done that yes. Excellent, excellent. Baby upgrade! And the last thing I wanted
00:23:29
◼
►
to follow out of we have a new show on Relay called Material and it is an
00:23:34
◼
►
Android and Google focused show which has been created by Russell Ivanovich
00:23:39
◼
►
Andy Anarko and Yasmeen Evgen who we welcome all three to the Relay family
00:23:43
◼
►
Material has been created by the three of them in the idea that they want to
00:23:48
◼
►
create a show about Google and its related products that can be listened to
00:23:52
◼
►
by anyone. Like their idea is to try and create something that Apple fans will
00:23:57
◼
►
love, that Windows fans will love, and that Google fans will love. So if you
00:24:00
◼
►
enjoy this show I heartily recommend that you check out Material. They have a
00:24:05
◼
►
great episode one and they also have a like a little episode zero, a kind of
00:24:10
◼
►
like origin story type thing, you know, in case you want a little bit more about
00:24:13
◼
►
your hosts. You should go and check it out. I really really enjoyed it and it is
00:24:17
◼
►
a fantastic addition to our lineup at Relay FM that you should go and check
00:24:22
◼
►
out where I know. Yeah I think the idea of having it be about Google, Google is such a major part of
00:24:27
◼
►
I mean we talked about it here how we use so much of Google but also to have people who know about
00:24:31
◼
►
Android and and have that perspective is good it adds to the diversity of the network which I think
00:24:37
◼
►
is really nice. I know I was trying very hard to recruit Andy to do something at Relay and we got
00:24:45
◼
►
Andy on this. Russell really interesting it's a great trio so I'm looking forward to it.
00:24:52
◼
►
I think it's going to be a fun show.
00:25:16
◼
►
That's L Y N D A dot com slash upgrade.
00:25:19
◼
►
Lynda dot com is there to help you learn amazing things.
00:25:22
◼
►
They have real experts who are super passionate about teaching
00:25:25
◼
►
and they are there to teach you incredible stuff.
00:25:27
◼
►
Like let's say you want to learn how to use software products.
00:25:31
◼
►
You want to learn how to use Excel or Photoshop or Illustrator or Pages or Keynote or Word or PowerPoint.
00:25:36
◼
►
The list goes on and on and on.
00:25:38
◼
►
Lynda dot com have courses on all of it.
00:25:41
◼
►
And with the 10 day free trial you can go there and find out if they have courses on the exact thing
00:25:45
◼
►
the exact thing that you want to learn and I'm sure that they will because they
00:25:48
◼
►
also have some really interesting stuff which is not just software it's not just
00:25:51
◼
►
like tools but also the way that you can put things to work like so say for
00:25:55
◼
►
example you want to learn to do some photography stuff you can go there you
00:25:58
◼
►
can learn about aperture you can learn about Lightroom you can learn about
00:26:00
◼
►
iPhoto or photos you can learn all that stuff but you actually then want to
00:26:05
◼
►
learn how to take better portraits or how to light things correctly for
00:26:08
◼
►
photography and how to use your camera right they have that kind of stuff they
00:26:11
◼
►
They have practical things as well.
00:26:13
◼
►
It really is a incredible resource of stuff
00:26:16
◼
►
that you can just go and you can learn
00:26:18
◼
►
everything you need to know.
00:26:19
◼
►
You know, I've been thinking recently
00:26:20
◼
►
and looking at this stuff,
00:26:21
◼
►
like you could start a business and use learner.com
00:26:24
◼
►
to help you learn everything along the way.
00:26:26
◼
►
They have like marketing courses,
00:26:27
◼
►
papers courses, they have income tax courses,
00:26:29
◼
►
they have everything that you're gonna need.
00:26:31
◼
►
You can stream these thousands of videos on demand
00:26:33
◼
►
allowing you to learn at your own pace,
00:26:35
◼
►
at your own schedule and in your own way as well
00:26:38
◼
►
because you can jump around, you can learn this part here,
00:26:41
◼
►
you can go and grab that bite-sized piece here and you can create and save these playlists
00:26:44
◼
►
of the orders of the videos that you want to watch. You can share them as well with
00:26:48
◼
►
people in your life, maybe coworkers, friends or colleagues. You can browse along with the
00:26:52
◼
►
transcript to help you in case you're that kind of learner and you want to read along,
00:26:56
◼
►
but it also helps if you want to later on find a part you're like, "Oh, where did they
00:26:59
◼
►
mention about that thing?" And you can search the transcript, jump right to that part of
00:27:03
◼
►
the video and watch. And you can even watch and download courses to your Android and iOS
00:27:29
◼
►
so much linda.com for sponsoring this week's episode of Upgrade.
00:27:35
◼
►
So Jason please tell me, you put a little topic in here, Safari is the new Internet
00:27:40
◼
►
Explorer and I read a couple of articles about this and they've got a lot of things in here
00:27:44
◼
►
that I don't really understand about web frameworks and stuff like that.
00:27:48
◼
►
But what's going on here, I've seen a lot of people talking about this over the last
00:27:52
◼
►
Yeah it was definitely a discussion that was had, this guy named Nolan Lawson who described
00:27:58
◼
►
himself as an Android and web developer, and I think that is... he actually seems like
00:28:03
◼
►
a really bright guy, he definitely comes from a particular perspective, and his perspectives
00:28:07
◼
►
are not necessarily favorable to Apple, I would say, for a couple reasons. One, he doesn't
00:28:14
◼
►
seem to be a particularly enthusiastic user of Apple's products, he's an Android developer,
00:28:19
◼
►
and a web developer, and web developers have had an issue, you know, have had an on and
00:28:23
◼
►
off relationship with Apple. We've been talking a lot about new Apple and old Apple, and this
00:28:31
◼
►
is one of those cases where Apple's participation in standards bodies and discussion about where
00:28:37
◼
►
web development standards are going, and you know, it's hot and cold, and it's frustrated
00:28:44
◼
►
a lot of web developers. So Nolan Lawson wrote this piece where he said Safari is the new
00:28:49
◼
►
Internet Explorer and he had gone to a conference and said all the developers are frustrated
00:28:54
◼
►
because there are all these new web technologies that are standards that they've been trying
00:28:58
◼
►
to push into all the different web browsers because once they're in all the web browsers
00:29:03
◼
►
then everybody can use them and it's very difficult if something's only supported on
00:29:06
◼
►
Chrome you know you have to do a fallback or something like that because it's not really
00:29:10
◼
►
great practice to say sorry this only works on one browser. Generally they want to support
00:29:16
◼
►
more, they want to support everything, and they've been frustrated by the lack of pace
00:29:22
◼
►
in Safari development, in WebKit development really.
00:29:25
◼
►
And I think, also I would say Nolan Lawson's approach is definitely mobile-centric, a lot
00:29:31
◼
►
of his discussion, it was clear that he was referring to, when he was talking about Safari,
00:29:36
◼
►
he was really talking about Safari and WebKit on iOS, I think that was his focus, he's not
00:29:42
◼
►
so concerned about the Mac, he doesn't seem to be somebody who cares particularly about
00:29:45
◼
►
that aspect of it, he was really talking about mobile. What struck me about it, and I wrote
00:29:49
◼
►
a link on it, so I was one of the people who, and Rene Ritchie wrote a story at iMore about
00:29:53
◼
►
it, I was one of the people who I think early on was, I had seen it, it actually floated
00:29:57
◼
►
up on Nuzzle for me, because I follow a bunch of people who are on the, you know, are web
00:30:02
◼
►
developers or in the web development and web standards world, and that's how it floated
00:30:06
◼
►
up in front of me, and I thought, well that's a provocative headline, right? Safari is the
00:30:10
◼
►
the new IE, and I read the story and what struck me about it was, one, I thought, well,
00:30:16
◼
►
if Apple is really way behind on a bunch of core web technologies that other people are
00:30:20
◼
►
building, that concerns me, because Apple should be, I think, generally trying to have
00:30:28
◼
►
Safari not be this eye-rolling, weird browser.
00:30:31
◼
►
I think that on general principles, it would be nice if Safari was considered by the web
00:30:39
◼
►
development community, a modern browser, and not the next IE, right?
00:30:43
◼
►
So on that level, just generally, I was like, "Well, this is troubling.
00:30:45
◼
►
I don't know enough about this, but I sure hope that this isn't an accurate depiction."
00:30:49
◼
►
And I would love to hear from somebody who's on the WebKit team and the Safari team at
00:30:53
◼
►
Apple sort of talking about what their approach is to development, because one of his examples
00:30:58
◼
►
is like there's a database format that's been around for quite a while now as a standard
00:31:03
◼
►
Apple has sort of not implemented or implemented in a kind of partial way, and as a result,
00:31:11
◼
►
you know, the database that they have to use in Safari is not particularly robust, and
00:31:17
◼
►
it frustrates web developers that they have to do that. So on that level, you know, again,
00:31:22
◼
►
not knowing about it, it's like, okay, red flag from web developers saying that Safari
00:31:26
◼
►
is really bugging them, I wonder what Apple has to say about it. But the other thing that
00:31:30
◼
►
struck me about it in reading that article was how Nolan Lawson doesn't really understand
00:31:36
◼
►
Apple, and that just was clear to me in reading it. And that, you know, I got feedback, I
00:31:42
◼
►
got, because some of my tweets got, and my link got passed around, and I started to get
00:31:48
◼
►
feedback from people who were very clearly web developers or Android developers, people
00:31:52
◼
►
outside the kind of Apple sphere, and you know, they basically took it as, "I can't
00:31:56
◼
►
believe that you would argue that, you know, Apple shouldn't support web standards. You
00:32:02
◼
►
know, it's like, okay, well that is a really reductive version of what I wrote, because
00:32:06
◼
►
what I wrote is, it troubles me if Apple's not following web standards. But Nolan Lawson's
00:32:12
◼
►
perspective in that first piece was very much not understanding anything about Apple. So
00:32:17
◼
►
he, you know, it was hard not to look at some of the examples that he gave, which were for
00:32:21
◼
►
initiatives, there are initiatives in the web development world that it will come as
00:32:26
◼
►
no surprise to anybody are all about giving web developers access as if their apps were
00:32:34
◼
►
native apps on mobile.
00:32:37
◼
►
And essentially this is, hey we built up a lot of skills in web development and everybody's
00:32:41
◼
►
excited about mobile apps, so we really like to be able to use our skills to write those.
00:32:46
◼
►
So we've built a bunch of this, you know, we've had these standards and it comes, a
00:32:50
◼
►
lot of it is supported by Chrome because Google and the Chrome team have really been pushing
00:32:55
◼
►
this idea of websites as apps.
00:32:56
◼
►
There's the Chrome app store which has not taken the world by storm but it's something
00:33:01
◼
►
that Google has pushed in the past.
00:33:05
◼
►
And you know, I totally understand if you're a web developer and you say how do I get,
00:33:08
◼
►
you know, I want to build apps too.
00:33:10
◼
►
I want to build mobile apps that we have access to the things that mobile apps do.
00:33:16
◼
►
But my point was, what's Apple's motivation to support, and the answer that these people
00:33:25
◼
►
give is, well it's a standard, it's a web standard, why would Apple not want to support
00:33:29
◼
►
But from Apple's perspective it's like, wait a second, you're trying to create your own
00:33:34
◼
►
cross-platform app standard, and then shame us into supporting it.
00:33:41
◼
►
And just why would Apple make that a priority?
00:33:45
◼
►
And then I had some people say, "Well, what do you mean, 'Priority'?
00:33:47
◼
►
Apple's got lots of money, they could do anything!"
00:33:48
◼
►
It's like, well, okay, first off, Apple needs to choose what they want their priorities
00:33:52
◼
►
to be like anyone else, and they're not gonna run out and hire a hundred new programmers
00:33:57
◼
►
to do, so that they can, with a pile of money, so they can do anything.
00:34:01
◼
►
They still have to make their choices with their resources, and they also have to make
00:34:04
◼
►
strategic plans.
00:34:07
◼
►
And if Apple believes that creating, letting web developers create web apps that run on
00:34:15
◼
►
Android phones and run on iOS and they run the same and they look the same more or less
00:34:20
◼
►
and they're not that good but they're okay.
00:34:23
◼
►
You know if I'm somebody at Apple I think about that and I think what's going to happen
00:34:27
◼
►
is that there's going to be this whole layer of apps that are no longer developed natively
00:34:32
◼
►
because the businesses, the banks, whoever it is who don't want to spend the money on
00:34:40
◼
►
native app development will just build a web app and it'll be okay.
00:34:44
◼
►
And in the end what you're doing is sort of reducing iOS to a platform with some native
00:34:49
◼
►
games and Apple's apps and some native apps but also a lot of really boring me too web
00:34:55
◼
►
apps that are maybe not that attractive and not that fast.
00:35:01
◼
►
and maybe some of them are good but a lot of them are not good. And why would Apple
00:35:06
◼
►
do that? I was giving flashbacks to the early days of Java where people said, "Oh, Java's
00:35:12
◼
►
gonna be great because it's gonna be everywhere and you're gonna be able to write it once
00:35:15
◼
►
and run it everywhere." And you know, it didn't happen. In the end, all Java did is have terrible
00:35:20
◼
►
apps that ran everywhere sometimes and that wasn't a good experience. Apple's really kind
00:35:26
◼
►
gone in on the native app thing with great success.
00:35:31
◼
►
I would also say that being beholden to a standards body to drive innovation forward
00:35:37
◼
►
is as non-Apple as it gets.
00:35:40
◼
►
Because Apple, when Apple rolls out its new APIs to its developers, Apple can make decisions
00:35:47
◼
►
and say we're going to push the platform forward here and we're going to do this there and
00:35:50
◼
►
we're going to be innovative in these ways and we're going to catch up with the competition
00:35:53
◼
►
in these ways and go to it.
00:35:56
◼
►
I have a hard time seeing how this vision of apps being developed using web technologies,
00:36:03
◼
►
using web standards, allows Apple to differentiate their platform.
00:36:07
◼
►
It turns Apple into a meet-to-platform, which if you're an Android and web developer, sounds
00:36:12
◼
►
like the path forward, because that's obviously the right way to do it.
00:36:16
◼
►
But if you're anybody who is at Apple, or understands Apple, or understands Apple's
00:36:21
◼
►
focus on users, you look at that and say, "That sounds like a terrible idea.
00:36:25
◼
►
Why would they ever do that?
00:36:26
◼
►
And ultimately that's what struck me about the Safari is the new IE post is, one, I'm
00:36:32
◼
►
interested to hear from Apple if they really are dragging their feet on things that they
00:36:36
◼
►
probably should prioritize that will make the web better for users.
00:36:40
◼
►
And two, that there seems to be this undercurrent in at least part of the web development community
00:36:47
◼
►
that they really want to make mobile apps and are really mad at Apple because Apple's
00:36:50
◼
►
like, "I'm not so sure that's a good idea."
00:36:53
◼
►
Or that Apple's silent about it because when you look at what they're proposing, it's very
00:36:58
◼
►
hard to see why Apple would think it was a good idea.
00:37:02
◼
►
So part of what was written about here by Nolan is the way that he phrased the piece,
00:37:11
◼
►
what it was focused around is he'd just finished and just come back from a conference in London
00:37:16
◼
►
called the Edge Conference, which is about advancing the web and looking at future web
00:37:21
◼
►
technologies.
00:37:22
◼
►
And the reason it struck a chord with him is because nobody from Apple was there, but
00:37:25
◼
►
basically everybody else had someone.
00:37:29
◼
►
And so my thinking along these lines is, if you just boil it down to the most simple part,
00:37:37
◼
►
if Apple does or is ignoring this stuff, is that not just what Microsoft did?
00:37:45
◼
►
They just ignored web standards, they ignored future web technologies, and then it gave
00:37:52
◼
►
Is that not just what they did?
00:37:53
◼
►
And then the reason that he makes this comparison is
00:37:57
◼
►
it's what's installed on every Mac.
00:37:58
◼
►
Macs are becoming more popular.
00:38:00
◼
►
iOS devices have it.
00:38:03
◼
►
And I wanna talk about browser choice in iOS in a minute.
00:38:06
◼
►
And you're kind of majorly locked into that.
00:38:08
◼
►
And that's only gaining with Safari View Controller
00:38:13
◼
►
If Apple isn't advancing in certain areas,
00:38:17
◼
►
does that not just make them like Microsoft?
00:38:20
◼
►
- Yeah, well, and I think in Renee's piece,
00:38:24
◼
►
Renee Ritchie's piece, you talked about this a little bit.
00:38:26
◼
►
It depends on how you say, just like Microsoft,
00:38:28
◼
►
what does that mean?
00:38:29
◼
►
Just like Microsoft, just like IE, what does that mean?
00:38:32
◼
►
If you cast it in broad terms, you can absolutely say,
00:38:35
◼
►
look, Apple's behaving like Microsoft with IE.
00:38:38
◼
►
But what I would say is they're supporting web standards
00:38:42
◼
►
to improve the web experience so that people who are using
00:38:47
◼
►
what we think of as the web have a good experience.
00:38:53
◼
►
And I completely agree that, I mean, look, if the iOS experience with some web app is
00:38:59
◼
►
really rotten because they have to use a second tier kind of database system to store files
00:39:05
◼
►
because, and store data because the new standard that's really awesome just hasn't been implemented
00:39:11
◼
►
by Apple because Apple doesn't care, and I'm not saying that's actually the case, but if
00:39:15
◼
►
was the case, that would be a problem. And that's the first thing I said in my post about
00:39:18
◼
►
it was, "Look, I don't know enough about this to say if all of these standards are good
00:39:23
◼
►
and if they're being followed and if Apple's dragging their feet, but that is bad." And
00:39:26
◼
►
that would be—you could argue that would be what Microsoft did, because Microsoft was
00:39:31
◼
►
focused on its own things, and it was focused on, you know, use ActiveX plugins that aren't
00:39:39
◼
►
even part of web technology. They're, you know, an x86 plug-in standard, so it was completely
00:39:46
◼
►
tied to Windows and it was outside the realm of even web standards. But it seems to me
00:39:53
◼
►
that what Apple's doing, the second part of the argument is, if we agree that following
00:39:59
◼
►
open web standards and keeping modern in browsers is a good thing, and I think I do, at what
00:40:05
◼
►
point do you draw the line if what the web standards bodies and the web developers want
00:40:11
◼
►
to do is start to push into areas that you as a platform owner think are your business?
00:40:19
◼
►
And that was what made me react to the first Nolan Lawson post, is it struck me as that
00:40:30
◼
►
this stuff was crossing that line, and that they were really saying, "Look, we want to
00:40:35
◼
►
use this open standards-based platform to write apps."
00:40:41
◼
►
And there's an argument to be made that that could be great.
00:40:45
◼
►
I've seen some very interesting people, including Lauren Brikter, say basically, "Oh, you can
00:40:53
◼
►
do amazing things using the web technology.
00:40:56
◼
►
you shouldn't assume that it will just lead to crappy web apps and there are also crappy
00:41:00
◼
►
native apps. Well, okay, I'll say, yeah, I bet there could be good web apps and I know
00:41:05
◼
►
that there are crappy native apps. But if you're the platform owner, if you're Apple,
00:41:09
◼
►
especially, where you control the platform completely and your business is very different,
00:41:14
◼
►
you can't afford to be the same, run the exact same apps as everybody else because your whole
00:41:21
◼
►
business is being different than if we've signed on to "Yay, web development, web standards,
00:41:29
◼
►
we love it, it's the side of good."
00:41:31
◼
►
And then the web standards body says, "Oh, by the way, web standards now include your
00:41:34
◼
►
development platform for apps.
00:41:36
◼
►
We want equal access to that."
00:41:38
◼
►
I think it is perfectly reasonable for Apple to say, "Mm-mm, mm-mm, no.
00:41:43
◼
►
That we're not going to give you, because we don't think that's going to be a good experience."
00:41:47
◼
►
And I got a sense of that a little bit.
00:41:49
◼
►
So I feel like there's layers here and there's a bunch of different issues.
00:41:55
◼
►
And in some of them I'm in full support.
00:41:57
◼
►
I would like to hear, I would like the new Apple to come out of its shell even more and
00:42:03
◼
►
participate in these conferences and say what it likes and doesn't like and say no, we don't
00:42:08
◼
►
agree with this approach and let everybody know where Apple stands.
00:42:12
◼
►
Because I got a sense from Nolan Lawson's post that there's a feeling in a lot of the
00:42:15
◼
►
web development community that there's just a frustration that Apple doesn't participate
00:42:18
◼
►
more. And, you know, that's been Apple's way in the past, but maybe this is an opportunity
00:42:23
◼
►
for this new Apple to be a little more forceful and a little more communicative about what
00:42:28
◼
►
Apple's view of the web and web standards is. Fully support that. But I also kind of
00:42:33
◼
►
understand that some of what they're suggesting may be things that Apple looks at and goes,
00:42:38
◼
►
"No, we're not, we don't think that's the right approach for the web." And if that makes
00:42:43
◼
►
them like Microsoft in a broad sense than I guess they are, but I think that it's an
00:42:49
◼
►
unfair comparison at that point.
00:42:52
◼
►
Let's talk about iOS for a moment.
00:42:54
◼
►
So I've seen people in regards to this piece, also talking about, and I've seen this linked
00:43:00
◼
►
somewhere, an article about iOS browser choice written by Kenneth, I'm trying to find his
00:43:09
◼
►
It's like Kenneth.io is the website.
00:43:12
◼
►
Kenneth doesn't have his surname, Orkenberg I think maybe? Anyway, he wrote
00:43:17
◼
►
and he's actually started a petition to Apple. His surname is Dot IO. Yeah, Mr. Dot IO. He
00:43:24
◼
►
has written, he's actually started a petition and you know he's talking about
00:43:27
◼
►
the idea that there are technologies in iOS which make Safari better than any
00:43:34
◼
►
other browser and you obviously can't set browsers that you want like I use
00:43:39
◼
►
Chrome, I can't set Chrome's the default, and you know there is a potential for
00:43:43
◼
►
this kind of stuff to increase now that like Safari view controller is coming
00:43:48
◼
►
around and basically what that does, but I don't know my very sort of basic
00:43:51
◼
►
understanding of it, is it effectively every time you click on a link a Safari
00:43:55
◼
►
page can slide in from the outside and there'll be a new back button in the
00:43:59
◼
►
status bar which can take you back and basically it stops people from needing
00:44:02
◼
►
to create their own in-app browsers, they can just leverage Safari. So what this
00:44:09
◼
►
This further points out to me is so many developers are going to use this now and it further increases
00:44:15
◼
►
Safari's advantage over something like Chrome.
00:44:18
◼
►
It's all WebKit though.
00:44:19
◼
►
I mean it doesn't change the fact that this is all being rendered with WebKit.
00:44:22
◼
►
It just means that it's more clearly sort of in-app Safari instead of a window running
00:44:29
◼
►
the WebKit browser.
00:44:31
◼
►
But they're all running though.
00:44:33
◼
►
Every single thing is in WebKit in iOS.
00:44:36
◼
►
Apple won't allow anything else basically.
00:44:38
◼
►
But there are features of Chrome that I like and one of the things that I really like is
00:44:43
◼
►
that Chrome fully embraced the callback URL.
00:44:48
◼
►
But that's effectively all Safari View Controller is allowing you to do.
00:44:51
◼
►
You can go back to where you were.
00:44:53
◼
►
So I see a world where more and more developers may not even bother adding Chrome support
00:45:00
◼
►
Because many, I'd say, pro apps or productivity apps or very nerdy apps allow for the ability
00:45:07
◼
►
to open a link into Chrome for that reason and I use that and I'm very happy
00:45:11
◼
►
with that but I see this kind of stuff I would see a world where this is just
00:45:15
◼
►
gonna decrease because it'd be like why would you even bother because you get
00:45:18
◼
►
the full powerful Safari of all the great stuff that has that has built in
00:45:22
◼
►
that other apps can't take advantage of and it just concerns me Jason because I
00:45:28
◼
►
am a Chrome user that is the browser that I choose and I see a world where
00:45:33
◼
►
it's just gonna be less and less advantageous to be using it on iOS.
00:45:42
◼
►
So it is, this is a difficult thing to pick apart because is what we're seeing
00:45:50
◼
►
support for web standards or is it an astroturfing campaign by people who like
00:45:57
◼
►
Chrome and want Google, who is an active participant in web standards, and Chrome to have more
00:46:06
◼
►
access to iOS.
00:46:08
◼
►
And you know, I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but when I see this Kenneth post and a link
00:46:14
◼
►
to Jake from the Chrome team who says, "Hey, if Apple are throttling back their web platform
00:46:19
◼
►
work on Safari..."
00:46:20
◼
►
If, I guess, because he's just decided to cast some aspersions there.
00:46:26
◼
►
I wish they'd let other browsers on iOS so someone else could have a go.
00:46:30
◼
►
Burn from the guy at Chrome.
00:46:34
◼
►
That's part of the question here is how much of this, from Apple's perspective, is basically
00:46:39
◼
►
Google trying to get more access to iOS versus Apple keeping control.
00:46:45
◼
►
But here's what I'd say.
00:46:47
◼
►
I think it's dumb that Apple doesn't let other browsers on iOS.
00:46:52
◼
►
Bottom line.
00:46:53
◼
►
I think you could argue that there's a consistency approach that you want, and by offering these
00:47:01
◼
►
system-wide and now in iOS 9, offering this Safari service essentially to bring up Safari
00:47:08
◼
►
inside an app and then you back out.
00:47:12
◼
►
I think there's great strength in that, but the flip side of that is great strength that
00:47:17
◼
►
doesn't need to be necessarily feel to feel threatened by other rendering
00:47:21
◼
►
engines running on iOS so so yeah I think it's dumb that Chrome can't run on
00:47:28
◼
►
iOS as Chrome and not as a WebKit instance inside of a wrapper called
00:47:33
◼
►
Chrome which is what it is right now so I I agree with that I think Apple should
00:47:38
◼
►
should I mean Apple's never gonna compete with Chrome on iOS in the sense
00:47:44
◼
►
sense that all of the system calls are going to be based on WebKit and Safari.
00:47:48
◼
►
That's just how it's going to be because they're the platform vendor and we, you know, we can't
00:47:52
◼
►
open, you know, you can't open a different camera app by default.
00:47:56
◼
►
You can't open a different mail app by default.
00:47:59
◼
►
This is something Federico talks about all the time.
00:48:01
◼
►
Apple has, at this point, wants to keep all that stuff like super seamless and tied to
00:48:05
◼
►
the Apple apps.
00:48:06
◼
►
and it can be frustrating for users of other apps. But I do think that it's fine if Apple
00:48:15
◼
►
were to open it up to other rendering engines and that's always seemed to be one of the
00:48:20
◼
►
stranger limits in the app store that you know other browsers are not welcome. Everybody
00:48:29
◼
►
uses WebKit and that's it.
00:48:33
◼
►
Yeah, I wonder, I think it's just an interesting thing to keep an eye on, like where are Apple
00:48:37
◼
►
going to go in this.
00:48:39
◼
►
And you know, we've been talking a lot recently about antitrust and anti-competitive stuff,
00:48:43
◼
►
and considering this is something that Microsoft was hit so hard on, it's in the 90s right?
00:48:50
◼
►
Sure, but the difference was that Microsoft was effectively a monopoly because they had
00:48:54
◼
►
more than 90% of the computer industry.
00:48:57
◼
►
And that's the difference, is if you want to use a different browser, don't use the
00:48:59
◼
►
iPhone, use Android.
00:49:01
◼
►
And Android has a bigger market share than iOS.
00:49:04
◼
►
So there's no, you know, saying it's the same behavior as Microsoft, well, it's different
00:49:08
◼
►
in one big way.
00:49:09
◼
►
As Microsoft, we're using its monopoly power to control the web, the entire web, and say
00:49:13
◼
►
basically we have 90% of web browsing devices, because there was no mobile back then, really.
00:49:19
◼
►
So we have more than 90% of all of the web looking at our stuff, and we're going to integrate
00:49:24
◼
►
it everywhere so that we can drown out all the competition and we will control everything
00:49:29
◼
►
that everyone sees on the web.
00:49:31
◼
►
What Apple's saying is, we want to control the web on our devices, but if you don't want
00:49:36
◼
►
to use our devices, you can use any of the other devices because Apple's phone market
00:49:42
◼
►
share is not even close to half.
00:49:46
◼
►
For me, that's the big difference.
00:49:48
◼
►
Is it the same in that it's a platform vendor who wants to control the web on their platform?
00:49:52
◼
►
Yeah, but Apple's end result is control of their platform and Microsoft's end result
00:49:58
◼
►
was control of the entire internet and the shutting out of all competition anywhere.
00:50:04
◼
►
I feel like in the last couple of weeks I've been a little bit down sounding on Apple and
00:50:11
◼
►
I don't want people to think that I am, if that makes sense.
00:50:14
◼
►
There's just been a few things recently that have been frustrating me and I only talk about
00:50:20
◼
►
them in this way because I love them so much and I hate it when they annoy me.
00:50:25
◼
►
And I think this is a good subject to see both sides of it right.
00:50:32
◼
►
That for me, I think Apple could be more open, I think Apple should participate more in web
00:50:37
◼
►
standards, but I also don't think that we should all make the assumption that that means
00:50:41
◼
►
Apple should say yes to everything that everybody in web standards proposes.
00:50:45
◼
►
I mean Apple needs to be out there, but they need to be out there saying yes and no.
00:50:50
◼
►
And if people want to say "Oh I can't believe Apple's not supporting this" that's fine,
00:50:54
◼
►
But right now it's like we keep waiting for Apple, what the web developers say is we keep
00:50:59
◼
►
waiting for Apple to release updates to see if they're supporting these things because
00:51:04
◼
►
we just don't know.
00:51:06
◼
►
And that's weird.
00:51:08
◼
►
And I would like to see less of that from Apple.
00:51:12
◼
►
But I think Apple's absolutely right to be able to say, "No, we don't believe that that's
00:51:17
◼
►
the future of the web and we don't think that's good for our users and we're not going to
00:51:20
◼
►
support it."
00:51:21
◼
►
Yeah, I guess maybe they can they can choose to support what they want to support
00:51:25
◼
►
But they need to be more open about it rather than just leaving people high and dry just waiting
00:51:30
◼
►
exactly, and it's totally I think in in
00:51:33
◼
►
fit it fits with
00:51:36
◼
►
The way Tim Cook's Apple has been comporting itself lately for it to be more open about that and I hope that happens
00:51:42
◼
►
I hope that that that is one of the other ways that Apple is gonna be a little more communicative
00:51:47
◼
►
Than it was in the past that this is not you know webkit development
00:51:52
◼
►
You know Safari features and user features and things like that
00:51:55
◼
►
I totally get wanting to keep those secret until you you know you announce El Capitan or whatever
00:52:01
◼
►
but on the webkit side
00:52:03
◼
►
Being more open about where Apple thinks webkit is going and how it's going to support different initiatives
00:52:11
◼
►
Let's let's get that at me open and be as communicative as possible about it
00:52:16
◼
►
So that Nolan Lawson can write a blog post that says I can't believe Apple doesn't like my database format
00:52:21
◼
►
Instead of why won't Apple decide what it wants to do with this database format?
00:52:27
◼
►
Yeah, like basically talk about the things that I don't understand like this kind of stuff like I don't understand it
00:52:34
◼
►
So if I don't understand it, nobody already understands it unless you do this stuff
00:52:37
◼
►
there's no harm in talking about it and saying what you're gonna do it or not because you're not giving anything away because like
00:52:45
◼
►
99% of people that buy your products don't even know what you're talking about
00:52:49
◼
►
So like just just tell tell Nolan if you're gonna support the database for just just do it, you know
00:52:54
◼
►
Also to get back to that ie parallel Microsoft announced all sorts of things for ie Microsoft's issue was not
00:53:01
◼
►
questions about whether it would support web standards a lot of Microsoft's issues were Microsoft just announced its own web standards and
00:53:09
◼
►
expected people to build them and
00:53:13
◼
►
And Apple does occasionally do stuff like that, but the difference is they're just saying
00:53:19
◼
►
support this on our devices, and Microsoft was literally saying we control the entire
00:53:23
◼
►
web, you have to do what we say.
00:53:24
◼
►
So it's a little bit different.
00:53:26
◼
►
But yeah, I think there's interesting points being made on all sides, and I think I posted
00:53:31
◼
►
a follow-up because Nolan Lawson posted a follow-up where he was humble and said, you
00:53:36
◼
►
know, he thinks he probably went too far in some areas, but that this was sort of what
00:53:40
◼
►
he meant and he didn't expect it to blow up like it did, and I interacted with him a little
00:53:45
◼
►
bit on Twitter and he seems like a nice guy, and I posted a follow-up and I said, "Look,
00:53:50
◼
►
I think this is a good discussion that we're having. I don't agree with all of Nolan's
00:53:54
◼
►
points, he doesn't agree with mine, I don't agree with Lauren Bricter's points, many of
00:54:00
◼
►
them, and he doesn't agree with mine, and that's fine, I'm glad we're having the conversation.
00:54:05
◼
►
I'd like Apple to be a part of this conversation too, because it seems like there's a lot of
00:54:08
◼
►
frustration about not knowing what the heck Apple is doing in areas where Apple
00:54:13
◼
►
should probably just say look here's what we think.
00:54:16
◼
►
Right let's take a break and then we'll talk about Apple Music.
00:54:18
◼
►
Hey! No singing this time. No singing. This week's episode is also brought to you by
00:54:24
◼
►
Fracture. Fracture, you may have heard of them, they're a fantastic company who do
00:54:28
◼
►
a really really interesting thing. That Fracture is basically taking the way that
00:54:32
◼
►
people print and display their favorite types of images and doing it in a brand
00:54:35
◼
►
new way that is really, really cool.
00:54:38
◼
►
You upload a photo to fractureme.com
00:54:40
◼
►
and they don't just make a print of it and send it to your house
00:54:43
◼
►
and it may be a little frame or something, or maybe they just,
00:54:45
◼
►
you know, send you a picture in a tube.
00:54:47
◼
►
What they do is they print your photo directly onto a piece of glass.
00:54:52
◼
►
It is kind of like magic and it's really amazing.
00:54:55
◼
►
I have a few fractures here that I've bought over the years, and I have
00:54:58
◼
►
some ones that people sent to me as gifts as well, and I really love them.
00:55:02
◼
►
They look incredible.
00:55:03
◼
►
They're packaged in a really great way.
00:55:05
◼
►
So I've had them shipped from Florida.
00:55:07
◼
►
They have a little factory where they check them by hand
00:55:10
◼
►
and they're all checked for quality.
00:55:11
◼
►
It's in Gainesville, Florida.
00:55:13
◼
►
They have a small team there.
00:55:15
◼
►
They have shipped them to me in the United Kingdom.
00:55:17
◼
►
Pieces of glass, right?
00:55:18
◼
►
And they're perfect.
00:55:18
◼
►
I've had maybe eight or nine fractures sent to me here,
00:55:22
◼
►
and they have all come through perfect.
00:55:24
◼
►
I'm so impressed with how they do it.
00:55:26
◼
►
They package them in such a great way,
00:55:27
◼
►
and they all come with everything you need as well.
00:55:30
◼
►
Like, so the packaging and that all helps you.
00:55:33
◼
►
Basically, the frame that they send you,
00:55:35
◼
►
like so that the piece of glass is mounted onto like this foam board on the back, which
00:55:39
◼
►
also has in it the ability to hang it on the wall, they send you the screws and stuff that
00:55:43
◼
►
you're going to need.
00:55:44
◼
►
It's fantastic.
00:55:45
◼
►
I love fracture prints.
00:55:47
◼
►
Jason, I know that you've had a few, I know when I came to see you in your home in lovely
00:55:52
◼
►
California you had some fractures on the wall of your own.
00:55:56
◼
►
I have several.
00:55:57
◼
►
I have five on the walls out in my garage.
00:55:59
◼
►
When we talk about the frame, it's not really, it's not a frame, right?
00:56:03
◼
►
the picture, because the picture is printed on the glass, so instead of having a frame,
00:56:07
◼
►
what we think of as the frame is the picture, the picture is the frame with fracture, which
00:56:10
◼
►
is really interesting. I've got a bunch of the smaller squares, and this is following
00:56:15
◼
►
on from a recommendation that Marco Orment made, where he was printing out, or fracturing,
00:56:22
◼
►
or however you want to say it, having fracture send him icons of his apps, and so I actually
00:56:27
◼
►
ordered a bunch of icons of my podcasts and have those up on the wall and they're beautiful
00:56:33
◼
►
and the orangey color of the Clockwise logo is vibrant and the red in the upgrade logo
00:56:41
◼
►
is bright and I love the deep bluey purpley incomparable logo and I mean they all look
00:56:48
◼
►
like the red of the Total Party Kill logo, they're all very pretty.
00:56:52
◼
►
I've also got Tiffany Arment sent me a black and white photo that she shot of the ATP WWDC
00:57:02
◼
►
episode from 2014 which we did at the Macworld Podcast Studios.
00:57:06
◼
►
So it's me because I was setting them up and then the three guys from ATP and Tiff was
00:57:10
◼
►
there and took a picture of the four of us at the table and said all four of us got that
00:57:19
◼
►
And so I've got that up and that's a pretty cool little souvenir of that moment from 2014.
00:57:23
◼
►
And then I've also got a big one that also comes from Tiffany Herment of a little painting
00:57:29
◼
►
she did based on a joke that happened at dinner at the last night at Ool where you and James
00:57:34
◼
►
Thompson were looking up American words for English things or American translations of
00:57:40
◼
►
English words.
00:57:41
◼
►
A hilariously wrong website.
00:57:44
◼
►
And we ended up in this whole path down about blueberries being bilberries and a container
00:57:51
◼
►
of them being a punnet of bilberries and Tiff went home and she painted a little watercolor
00:57:58
◼
►
of a punnet of bilberries and she fractured that and I've got one of those on my wall
00:58:06
◼
►
I have one too.
00:58:07
◼
►
It's beautiful.
00:58:08
◼
►
So it works for art.
00:58:10
◼
►
You can take your kids art and scan it in and send it to them and have it be in this
00:58:14
◼
►
kind of beautiful permanent display.
00:58:19
◼
►
Works great for photos, works great for logos and things like that.
00:58:23
◼
►
I've been really happy with it.
00:58:24
◼
►
I think when we repainted our house, redid our house, we took a lot of the photos off
00:58:29
◼
►
the walls and I'm actually considering when we put stuff back on the walls like in our
00:58:35
◼
►
hallway doing those with fractures instead of getting prints and then having to buy frames
00:58:40
◼
►
and getting things matted and framed and all of those things.
00:58:44
◼
►
So they're really beautiful.
00:58:46
◼
►
They really are special looking.
00:58:47
◼
►
I love them a lot.
00:58:49
◼
►
And they're great.
00:58:50
◼
►
We mentioned that they're great for gifts as well as just getting your own stuff done.
00:58:53
◼
►
It's a really easy gift choice.
00:58:54
◼
►
For Steven's birthday I fractured him the Relay logo.
00:58:59
◼
►
And I see how it hung on his wall when I went to visit him.
00:59:02
◼
►
It's just a really nice thing.
00:59:03
◼
►
I really like them.
00:59:05
◼
►
Fractures come in five different rectangle sizes all the way up to 21 inch by 28 inch
00:59:09
◼
►
and they also have three square sizes that are perfect for Instagram photos, album covers
00:59:13
◼
►
podcast artwork, app icons, that kind of stuff for you creators out there. Their prices start
00:59:19
◼
►
at just $15 so it's not going to break the bank and you can get yourself 10% off your
00:59:23
◼
►
first order with the coupon code upgrade so just go to fractureme.com and you can get
00:59:28
◼
►
started right away. Thank you so much to Fracture for supporting this show. If you like what
00:59:32
◼
►
we do just go and buy yourself a Fracture. They're really cheap, you know, you can get
00:59:36
◼
►
10% off with the code upgrade. Buy one for yourself, buy one for a gift. That'd be a
00:59:39
◼
►
great way to help support this show because they're a new sponsor and we want to show
00:59:42
◼
►
them that it's awesome to sponsor upgrade and relay FM so thanks to those guys.
00:59:48
◼
►
So Apple Music we've had it for a week now.
00:59:50
◼
►
Do you mind if I give my overall feelings and then we can do it?
00:59:54
◼
►
I was going to say, "Hey Myke, give me your overall feelings about Apple Music."
00:59:58
◼
►
I was going to start there so let's hear it.
01:00:00
◼
►
I'm happy with it overall.
01:00:03
◼
►
There are some niggling problems that I have that I think are gonna just get ironed out
01:00:08
◼
►
because they tend to be with software more than anything.
01:00:12
◼
►
iTunes is a little bit confusing but I feel like that's just iTunes right so I
01:00:18
◼
►
didn't really expect anything else and there is this is some weird stuff like
01:00:23
◼
►
I've seen it's basically become a meme now which is like if you're listening to
01:00:26
◼
►
a song how do you get to the artist or album and it's like you press this
01:00:30
◼
►
button and this button it's possible I can't remember how you I think you tap
01:00:34
◼
►
the ellipses and then you tap the name of the current song and it takes you to
01:00:38
◼
►
which doesn't even make any sense.
01:00:39
◼
►
Like there's some weird navigation stuff.
01:00:42
◼
►
- Dan Morin posted a thing about it that was so bizarre
01:00:44
◼
►
that it's like it's a really useful how-to tip
01:00:46
◼
►
and yet at the same time it should not be like this.
01:00:50
◼
►
But it's, you know,
01:00:51
◼
►
there are things that could be a lot better with it.
01:00:55
◼
►
But I think overall I am happy with the service
01:00:59
◼
►
and I am enjoying using it.
01:01:01
◼
►
But I think that they've got some ways to go still, I think.
01:01:07
◼
►
Yeah, I wonder if they should have called the three month trial a beta.
01:01:12
◼
►
Yeah, that probably would have been a good idea.
01:01:16
◼
►
Jonathan Mann did a song about Apple Music that was mostly from the perspective of musicians
01:01:23
◼
►
and Dave Whiskus wrote a blog post about it too.
01:01:27
◼
►
But in Jonathan Mann's song, he mentions in his video that in the past Apple has released
01:01:33
◼
►
things that were sort of of this level of stability and called it a beta and
01:01:36
◼
►
you know it I'm I've really enjoyed it myself but I do have that feeling that
01:01:43
◼
►
you know this got pushed out as a work in progress and maybe they should have
01:01:51
◼
►
just said look we're gonna do a free public beta for three months you know
01:01:55
◼
►
use it tell us what you think of it and we'll keep making changes to it as we as
01:02:00
◼
►
as we go because yeah there's just weird things the UI is weird yeah there's just some strange
01:02:06
◼
►
stuff in it that I feel like needs to get ironed out but the content is just it's a
01:02:12
◼
►
lot of fun beats we got to talk about beats one so the day that it launched I was driving
01:02:16
◼
►
from we drove from San Francisco to LA the day that it launched so we listened to beats
01:02:21
◼
►
one for quite a while on the drive and then we switched over and listened to some playlists
01:02:26
◼
►
and stuff. So I'm, you know, this is your guy, Zane Lowe. Do you have more to say about
01:02:34
◼
►
Yeah, let me just mention Playlists first.
01:02:37
◼
►
Oh yeah, okay.
01:02:38
◼
►
And then we'll talk about Beats 1.
01:02:40
◼
►
Speaking of Betas.
01:02:41
◼
►
Well, no, because what I want to say is, because I have good things to say about Playlists,
01:02:45
◼
►
I'm not sure what, I'll ask you what the problem is that you have. The thing is, like, the
01:02:51
◼
►
app is frustrating in points, but it's not so much that it's an issue, and fundamentally
01:02:55
◼
►
the fact that the service works the way that I want it to
01:02:58
◼
►
and the content that I want is in there
01:02:59
◼
►
means that I am overall very, very happy with Apple Music.
01:03:03
◼
►
Like for example, the playlists that they have,
01:03:06
◼
►
I just adore.
01:03:08
◼
►
It seems like every time I open the app on my iPhone,
01:03:11
◼
►
they are suggesting a new playlist to me
01:03:13
◼
►
which I just wanna listen to instantly.
01:03:16
◼
►
And I keep pulling them up and it's perfect.
01:03:19
◼
►
'Cause I am a big fan of alternative music,
01:03:21
◼
►
alternative indie rock and stuff like that.
01:03:23
◼
►
And I follow the Apple--
01:03:25
◼
►
- It turns out that all of the music that I like
01:03:27
◼
►
is classified in Apple Music as alternative.
01:03:30
◼
►
- So like, okay, that's a really broad category
01:03:32
◼
►
and I don't really like that word, but okay.
01:03:35
◼
►
- It is, I have the same,
01:03:36
◼
►
but it doesn't really bother me too much
01:03:37
◼
►
because the music-
01:03:38
◼
►
- 'Cause rock is like Jim Dalrymple territory, right?
01:03:41
◼
►
Rock is like screaming guitars and stuff.
01:03:43
◼
►
And I consider myself a rock music fan,
01:03:45
◼
►
but they're not, you know,
01:03:47
◼
►
what they've classified as rock is very different
01:03:49
◼
►
than what I would consider alternative.
01:03:51
◼
►
I'm with you, alternative.
01:03:53
◼
►
Did you listen to A-list alternative playlist?
01:03:55
◼
►
'Cause I really loved it and it was entirely populated
01:03:57
◼
►
other than Muse and there was one other artist
01:04:01
◼
►
that I'd heard of in there, but it was entirely populated
01:04:03
◼
►
by artists I'd never heard of.
01:04:05
◼
►
And not all of it was great,
01:04:08
◼
►
but a lot of it was legitimately great.
01:04:11
◼
►
- I haven't listened to it, but I'm looking at it
01:04:12
◼
►
and there is a ton of my favorite bands in here.
01:04:16
◼
►
- Yeah, I discovered Civil Twilight, I discovered,
01:04:20
◼
►
and they're really good.
01:04:21
◼
►
I'd never heard of them.
01:04:22
◼
►
one of my favorite songs at the moment is "Bros"
01:04:25
◼
►
by Wolf Alice, which is a song that I know
01:04:27
◼
►
from like a year or two ago,
01:04:28
◼
►
'cause they've just released their first album.
01:04:31
◼
►
But it's, yeah, there's just some great stuff on here.
01:04:33
◼
►
And the thing is, I'm opening it up,
01:04:34
◼
►
and it's suggesting to me like, alternative party.
01:04:37
◼
►
And I'm looking at it, I'm like,
01:04:38
◼
►
"Oh my God, this is amazing."
01:04:39
◼
►
And there was this one playlist,
01:04:40
◼
►
which was like, alternative songs about youth.
01:04:43
◼
►
And it was basically all of the stuff
01:04:45
◼
►
that I love when I was 19.
01:04:47
◼
►
And it's like, this is just, and I'm eating it up.
01:04:50
◼
►
Like, I am in love with these playlists.
01:04:52
◼
►
and I'm subscribing to more and more and more every single day.
01:04:55
◼
►
I'll put a couple of links to some of the ones that we've mentioned in the show notes.
01:04:58
◼
►
It's incredibly hard to link to them.
01:05:00
◼
►
But I'll find a way.
01:05:01
◼
►
This is what I was going to say.
01:05:02
◼
►
My complaints about playlists are my complaints about beats in general,
01:05:05
◼
►
or sorry, Apple Music in general, which is it's hard to find things.
01:05:08
◼
►
It's hard to know where to look.
01:05:11
◼
►
If you heart something,
01:05:13
◼
►
nothing seems to happen other than filling the recommendation engine.
01:05:16
◼
►
You can't look at your hearts. They're not saved anywhere.
01:05:18
◼
►
You can add things.
01:05:19
◼
►
What you need to do is add things to your library.
01:05:22
◼
►
Then they show up in your iTunes library, which is very interesting.
01:05:25
◼
►
It makes no distinction.
01:05:27
◼
►
So I took that Civil Twilight album and I just added it to my library and it shows up
01:05:32
◼
►
on my Mac and iTunes, which is crazy.
01:05:35
◼
►
But cool, I like that, but it's crazy.
01:05:37
◼
►
And likewise if I subscribe to a playlist, that A-list alternative playlist is in my
01:05:41
◼
►
playlist on iTunes, which is actually kind of great.
01:05:44
◼
►
I really like the mixture of my iTunes library.
01:05:47
◼
►
I know some people have a problem with it, but I really like being able to add things
01:05:50
◼
►
and have my existing iTunes library and they're all just present.
01:05:54
◼
►
It's just some confusion about how do I find things?
01:05:56
◼
►
How do I find an artist?
01:05:58
◼
►
How do I find a playlist?
01:05:59
◼
►
How do I save it for later?
01:06:01
◼
►
Some of that stuff could be clearer.
01:06:03
◼
►
And then one of the things that frustrates me too is that sometimes I actually just want
01:06:08
◼
►
to do an artist shuffle.
01:06:10
◼
►
Like play everything from this artist in a shuffle.
01:06:13
◼
►
And I don't think you can do that.
01:06:15
◼
►
Oh man, I haven't tried to do that yet but that's going to drive me crazy if you can't
01:06:19
◼
►
It seems very album and track oriented and I don't think you can find an artist and just
01:06:26
◼
►
press shuffle or play with the shuffle turned on.
01:06:28
◼
►
I guess what you could do, and I've had to do this in the past, is create a playlist.
01:06:33
◼
►
Yeah, but again, it ought to be easier than that.
01:06:39
◼
►
So that's what I've been saying is I think the content is great, not just that they've
01:06:42
◼
►
got a library of tracks, but the curation that we've been talking about I think is really
01:06:48
◼
►
I liked it on Beats too. I like that it's more integrated with my music library now
01:06:52
◼
►
that it's Apple Music. So, yeah, I've been enjoying it. I just feel like some of the
01:06:58
◼
►
interface stuff, especially on the iPhone, is kind of obscure. That ellipsis button,
01:07:04
◼
►
right, is like we also put a lot of other crap in here and it's all hiding under the
01:07:08
◼
►
ellipsis. It's like I'm not quite sure. I mean, it's a hard interface problem. We can't
01:07:14
◼
►
just say, "Well, it's very obvious how Apple should have done this," because it's like,
01:07:18
◼
►
this is really hard because they've got a la carte music and they've got a
01:07:22
◼
►
streaming service and they've got radio and they've got to try to mix it all
01:07:26
◼
►
together in a way that makes sense and then it also falls back if you're not a
01:07:30
◼
►
subscriber and you don't want to see it it's a hard problem but they've got more
01:07:34
◼
►
work to do. Because fundamentally you're not gonna get it to make sense because
01:07:39
◼
►
it's too much like and over time it will but like it's not gonna make sense
01:07:44
◼
►
initially because it's a very very hard problem to fix and they will I believe
01:07:50
◼
►
that they will do it but you've really got to open it up to allow people like
01:07:54
◼
►
us to complain before you can kind of understand some of the things that
01:07:59
◼
►
people want to do because especially music everybody has their own way of
01:08:02
◼
►
wanting to categorize it play it use it the type of stuff they want to look for
01:08:06
◼
►
and you've got to get this feedback however Apple because I genuinely
01:08:10
◼
►
I genuinely believe they listen and read, right?
01:08:12
◼
►
And as well, like to us and to other people and they also look at people on Twitter, I
01:08:17
◼
►
believe that that is happening.
01:08:18
◼
►
Apple is very aware of what people are saying about Apple.
01:08:21
◼
►
I think even in the days when Apple didn't communicate, I can tell you from personal
01:08:25
◼
►
experience, Apple is paying attention.
01:08:28
◼
►
And the people who work on Apple products are paying attention to what people say about
01:08:31
◼
►
their products.
01:08:34
◼
►
It is not a black hole.
01:08:35
◼
►
So let's talk about Beats 1.
01:08:36
◼
►
I've been really impressed with it.
01:08:37
◼
►
I think it's fantastic.
01:08:39
◼
►
There's so many interesting shows, there's fantastic guest DJs, I like just tuning in
01:08:48
◼
►
and my girlfriend has just, she asked me about it, I explained it to her, I showed her it
01:08:54
◼
►
and now I keep hearing music playing, I'm like what is that?
01:08:57
◼
►
She's like it's Beats 1 and she just keeps listening to it and she seems to really like
01:09:01
◼
►
There is a great mix, I've been really really frustrated by seeing people saying "oh I don't
01:09:07
◼
►
not just rap, there is rap, you need to understand that rap and hip hop is a massive market of
01:09:13
◼
►
music and just because you don't listen to it, stop complaining about it, right? Because
01:09:18
◼
►
there is a big mix there, but you are maybe tuning into the two hours where like, Julie
01:09:24
◼
►
Adenouga is playing her set and she is predominantly hip hop and rap, because that's where she
01:09:29
◼
►
came from. But you listen to Zayn and I mean, I'm just gonna say it, I told you, right?
01:09:36
◼
►
out there that Zane Lowe is amazing.
01:09:38
◼
►
He is incredible and his sets have been fantastic
01:09:41
◼
►
and I love that they make playlists out of them
01:09:43
◼
►
and you can follow them and connect.
01:09:45
◼
►
- I am disappointed that you can't listen back to the show
01:09:49
◼
►
because the playlist, just having the playlist of the music,
01:09:52
◼
►
that's a good, what was that song they played,
01:09:55
◼
►
kind of service, but I do kind of miss the fact
01:09:58
◼
►
that I can't go back and listen to the actual
01:10:01
◼
►
Saint Vincent mixtape delivery service
01:10:03
◼
►
because that was, I only caught the end of it
01:10:06
◼
►
it was really great but I can't go back and listen to that show. I can see the playlist
01:10:10
◼
►
and play those songs which is cool but I do wish that they had like a, even if it was
01:10:16
◼
►
a seven day listen again I-player like kind of experience. We listened to Juliette and
01:10:21
◼
►
Nuka coming down and that is totally not my genre of music and yet I enjoyed it because
01:10:27
◼
►
so okay, the one at its worst is radio right and I don't love the radio and a lot of people
01:10:32
◼
►
don't like the radio, you don't have any control over it, you have to take what comes. And
01:10:37
◼
►
at its worst, that's what it is. If it's pummeling you with music that you don't like, you should
01:10:42
◼
►
change the channel or listen to something else, right? But at its best, it is kind of
01:10:48
◼
►
delightful with the surprise. It takes the fact that you aren't in control and takes
01:10:53
◼
►
you on a journey. And whether it was, for us, the Julia Inuga set that on her first
01:11:00
◼
►
day, on that first day, she was taking us on a little trip and she would say, you know,
01:11:06
◼
►
she was playing, there was hip hop and rap and it was all up tempo, well it was mostly
01:11:13
◼
►
up tempo, not entirely, but she's dropping in and is a very entertaining person and you
01:11:20
◼
►
get the feeling like you're driving around town and she's the driver and she's talking
01:11:24
◼
►
to you and she's playing music and she's telling you about the music and even though
01:11:30
◼
►
all not all the music with stuff that I liked I kind of felt like I was having a
01:11:34
◼
►
little bit of an adventure and being exposed to stuff that I wouldn't have
01:11:38
◼
►
been exposed to and some of it I really did like and then I also felt when I was
01:11:42
◼
►
done that I had taken this fun trip with with with with Julie and that you know
01:11:49
◼
►
and that was kind of fun too so I think that at its best that's what it is is
01:11:54
◼
►
is using the linear nature of radio to, with some very talented people, to take you on
01:12:01
◼
►
a journey. And the point is almost not the music. I mean, the music is the journey you're
01:12:05
◼
►
taking, but it's not like a playlist of music with people appearing in between and saying,
01:12:12
◼
►
"That was this song. Now here is another song." But it is this cur--you get the sense it's
01:12:16
◼
►
curated by these people, they care about it, and they're entertaining you along the way.
01:12:22
◼
►
That's when it hits, that's what it is.
01:12:24
◼
►
And when it doesn't work for you, you know, again, it's radio at that point and you should
01:12:29
◼
►
change the channel or listen to a playlist.
01:12:34
◼
►
Yeah, I completely agree.
01:12:36
◼
►
The main problem that I think Apple, that Beats 1 has right now is trying to understand
01:12:40
◼
►
their schedule.
01:12:43
◼
►
They are attempting to create a schedule on their Tumblr page, but they need to really
01:12:48
◼
►
lay it out better.
01:12:50
◼
►
It seems like they play music, they play the shows every 12 hours.
01:12:55
◼
►
Yeah, it looks like it's a 12 hour loop.
01:12:57
◼
►
But it's not exactly 12 hours all the time.
01:13:00
◼
►
Sometimes it's like 11.
01:13:01
◼
►
It's like for example, I just did a... because Elton John's show starts today.
01:13:06
◼
►
But it starts at 3am my time.
01:13:09
◼
►
And then it's going to be broadcast again, you would expect at 3pm tomorrow.
01:13:13
◼
►
But I just found a link on Elton John's website where they explain it.
01:13:17
◼
►
Which is really funny.
01:13:18
◼
►
They say, "It is not a podcast."
01:13:19
◼
►
I was like, "Oh, look at that."
01:13:20
◼
►
But apparently it's gonna be played at 3 a.m.
01:13:24
◼
►
and then 2 p.m.
01:13:25
◼
►
So that's not every 12 hours.
01:13:28
◼
►
- No, interesting.
01:13:29
◼
►
- If that is correct, this stuff,
01:13:31
◼
►
it needs to be explained better
01:13:33
◼
►
because their website doesn't do a good enough job
01:13:35
◼
►
of showing it.
01:13:36
◼
►
For example, if I scroll through now,
01:13:37
◼
►
it only shows the next 10 hours of stuff.
01:13:39
◼
►
So they need to get better at that.
01:13:42
◼
►
But again, that's just a thing.
01:13:43
◼
►
You just update the website.
01:13:45
◼
►
But it is, I feel like these are just growing pains.
01:13:48
◼
►
You just need to make the Tumblr a bit better to understand,
01:13:50
◼
►
show a bigger list of stuff.
01:13:53
◼
►
But like, you know, I just think that it's,
01:13:55
◼
►
Beats One is just brilliant.
01:13:58
◼
►
It's just such a great idea,
01:13:59
◼
►
and I think that there is so much stuff
01:14:02
◼
►
that they can still do with this,
01:14:04
◼
►
and so many more channels they can do,
01:14:06
◼
►
and I'm really, you know,
01:14:07
◼
►
I wanna check out more of the celebrity shows.
01:14:08
◼
►
I haven't had enough time to listen to it,
01:14:10
◼
►
but it is partly because I haven't really been able
01:14:12
◼
►
to work out when some stuff is being broadcast,
01:14:14
◼
►
and I kinda just tune in and see what's happening
01:14:16
◼
►
at the time, but that is kinda cool that they do that.
01:14:18
◼
►
and I can just tune in and see what's there.
01:14:20
◼
►
By the way, you know, talking about the playlists,
01:14:22
◼
►
like if you wanna find playlists for a certain show,
01:14:25
◼
►
just search for that person's name
01:14:27
◼
►
and you can go to the connect page and follow them
01:14:29
◼
►
and then the new playlists pop up
01:14:30
◼
►
and you'll be able to see them in your full YouTube.
01:14:32
◼
►
It's a lot of stuff and we have to learn new ways
01:14:35
◼
►
of doing things, but I think what you learn
01:14:37
◼
►
and it's probably not that difficult.
01:14:39
◼
►
- Yeah, St. Vincent's Mixtape Delivery Service,
01:14:41
◼
►
did you listen to that?
01:14:42
◼
►
- Yeah, I got the playlist.
01:14:43
◼
►
I didn't hear the show, but I got the playlist.
01:14:45
◼
►
- Well, the show is amazing because what the idea here is
01:14:47
◼
►
that she is talking to a fan and she calls them on the phone
01:14:51
◼
►
and explains what the songs are on the mixtape
01:14:54
◼
►
and why she picked them.
01:14:56
◼
►
And the fans meanwhile, the fan is just melting down
01:14:59
◼
►
because they're talking to this person they're a fan of.
01:15:01
◼
►
And it's kind of hilarious.
01:15:03
◼
►
So there was this girl that she's talking to about this,
01:15:05
◼
►
but the playlist is insane.
01:15:07
◼
►
It is an 80s playlist and it is, you know,
01:15:11
◼
►
that was, it was for day one,
01:15:13
◼
►
I thought it was a really smart move.
01:15:14
◼
►
They, you know, they had Zane Lowe on,
01:15:16
◼
►
They had "Julie" and "Nuga", they had the Beats LA stuff, which was very rap oriented,
01:15:21
◼
►
hip hop oriented.
01:15:22
◼
►
And then you get to St. Vincent and it's Depeche Mode, Stereo Lab, New Order, Devo, Chaka Khan,
01:15:29
◼
►
Erasure, Bjork, David Bowie, Pet Shop Boys, The Pointer Sisters, and Talking Heads.
01:15:34
◼
►
It's this super blast of the 80s that was, it was just a riot to listen to that.
01:15:40
◼
►
So yeah, that's the diversity of it too.
01:15:44
◼
►
I mean linear means that you may not you may tune in and find something you don't like but that you know
01:15:49
◼
►
That's gonna happen. But sometimes something listening to something you're not you haven't been exposed to you may find something you like about it
01:15:55
◼
►
That's the other thing that can happen. I'm not gonna listen to it all the time
01:15:57
◼
►
I don't know how often you're gonna you're gonna listen to it
01:16:00
◼
►
I'm not gonna listen to it all the time
01:16:01
◼
►
But I will tune it in from time to time because I'm I'm very curious about what they can provide
01:16:06
◼
►
And I anticipate that I will probably find some shows that I that I like and that I make time for
01:16:11
◼
►
Yeah, I want to just lock myself into the schedule a bit more so I can work out how to do it because a lot
01:16:16
◼
►
Of the work that I do is audio based. So, you know, yeah, that's the challenge
01:16:20
◼
►
Oh, we should also say thank you to everybody out there who's listening to this podcast and hasn't stopped listening to podcasts
01:16:24
◼
►
Because of all the things on Apple music and beats one. We thank you. It's not that good. You shouldn't go listen to it
01:16:29
◼
►
You should just listen to us
01:16:30
◼
►
Someone said it all back a couple of people said this to me on the day that it launches like aren't you worried?
01:16:35
◼
►
I'm like not really I mean
01:16:37
◼
►
There's just another thing for people to listen to I think that people enjoy our stuff enough that they will tune in
01:16:42
◼
►
Irrespective of what great radios out there that radio and music services have been there all along and this is a new one and and
01:16:49
◼
►
If it's a better one, then it provides some more competition to us, but I feel like
01:16:54
◼
►
podcasts and and music are very different and use different parts of the brain and
01:16:59
◼
►
And you know when I want to listen to music I'll listen to music and when I want to listen to podcasts or audiobooks
01:17:04
◼
►
I'll listen to those
01:17:06
◼
►
Should we do some Ask Upgrade?
01:17:08
◼
►
Let's do that.
01:17:09
◼
►
This week's episode of Ask Upgrade is brought to you by Hover. Hover is the best way to buy and manage domain names.
01:17:15
◼
►
It's been the place that I've been going to for years and that's for one simple reason.
01:17:18
◼
►
I can go there and buy a domain in 30 seconds.
01:17:21
◼
►
I don't have to traverse on a salt course of pop-ups and windows and add-ons. I just go to hover.com
01:17:27
◼
►
I search what I want. If the TLD that I want is available, I just go and buy it. Done. Easy. In and out.
01:17:33
◼
►
I don't have to like
01:17:35
◼
►
uncheck the little checkbox and read the big thing and like make sure that I'm not signing up for I don't know
01:17:42
◼
►
For a big book to be delivered to my house and I don't know what these people sell but crazy stuff
01:17:47
◼
►
Hover.com make it super easy. They have all the TLDs that you expect .com, .co, .me
01:17:51
◼
►
They have all the crazy new ones as well. Maybe when I get a .plumbing or .coffee or .academy domain
01:17:55
◼
►
You can go and get those they'll show you what's available
01:17:57
◼
►
You select the ones that you want if maybe a domain isn't available
01:18:01
◼
►
but hover.com can sometimes sit in the middle and help you with the auctioning process and
01:18:05
◼
►
that kind of stuff. They offer that service. They can help you out there as well. You know,
01:18:09
◼
►
you're going to get the great service that hover.com will provide. Their .com domains
01:18:12
◼
►
start at just $12.99. They have Whois privacy for free, which I love. If a domain supports
01:18:18
◼
►
Whois privacy, they will just enable it for you during the checkout process. You can uncheck
01:18:22
◼
►
it if you really want to. I don't know why you'd want to, but you can't. They'll just
01:18:25
◼
►
take it and then your private information stays private. I just love that they do that.
01:18:29
◼
►
It just seems like such a no brainer that it should be included but believe it or not
01:18:33
◼
►
with some other people you have to pay.
01:18:34
◼
►
I don't know why but they make you do it probably because they can charge you so they will.
01:18:38
◼
►
This is not the way that hover works.
01:18:39
◼
►
They have fantastic customer support.
01:18:41
◼
►
They have a no hold, no wait, no transfer telephone support policy.
01:18:44
◼
►
You pick up the phone to hover.com you're speaking to a person.
01:18:46
◼
►
If you don't want to speak to people they have great email communication.
01:18:50
◼
►
You can do great email support.
01:18:51
◼
►
I've used that a bunch before.
01:18:53
◼
►
It's fantastic when I've messed something up they've helped me out.
01:18:55
◼
►
They've pointed to me exactly what I need to do.
01:19:17
◼
►
I'm a fan that is co-Robot for 10% off your first purchase.
01:19:20
◼
►
Thank you so much to Hover for their support of Upgrade.
01:19:23
◼
►
Robot or not, huh?
01:19:25
◼
►
That show is like a whirlwind in the internet.
01:19:29
◼
►
- We just got a link this weekend to a podcast
01:19:34
◼
►
that had the guy who created Invader Zim on it,
01:19:37
◼
►
the animated show, and they must have spent 10 minutes
01:19:41
◼
►
basically talking about Robot or Not, not the podcast.
01:19:46
◼
►
They mentioned the podcast and then they just started
01:19:48
◼
►
debating robots or not of various things,
01:19:50
◼
►
which was pretty hilarious.
01:19:52
◼
►
So yeah, it is the dumb idea that has struck a nerve.
01:19:56
◼
►
I figured it would.
01:19:57
◼
►
I mean, it struck a nerve with us.
01:19:58
◼
►
That's why we did it, is that every time anybody
01:20:00
◼
►
would bring it up, everybody had opinions
01:20:02
◼
►
and wanted to talk about whether things were robots or not.
01:20:04
◼
►
So I saw someone on Twitter say,
01:20:06
◼
►
"It's not a podcast about robots.
01:20:08
◼
►
"It's a podcast about semantics."
01:20:09
◼
►
And I don't agree, I think it is a podcast about both.
01:20:12
◼
►
But yeah, I keep, it's crazy
01:20:15
◼
►
that people want to listen. If you haven't heard it, it's me and John
01:20:19
◼
►
Siracusa talking about whether things are robots or not and we post a couple
01:20:23
◼
►
episodes a week but each episode is only about three minutes long and it's just
01:20:26
◼
►
about one topic and then we move on. It's been fun to do it and it's been
01:20:31
◼
►
fun to see people alternately entertained and frustrated by it but
01:20:37
◼
►
that was sort of the point I think.
01:20:39
◼
►
I feel like it is completely impossible for me to
01:20:42
◼
►
to understand what John is gonna say as a robot.
01:20:46
◼
►
That's what I love about it.
01:20:47
◼
►
- That is the beauty of it is it's, is it me too, right?
01:20:50
◼
►
I ask him and I have no idea where he's going.
01:20:53
◼
►
There have been several times when I'm sure
01:20:54
◼
►
that we're gonna have a violent disagreement on it
01:20:56
◼
►
and then I'm surprised that he actually says
01:20:58
◼
►
what I agree with because I've been ready with Kit,
01:21:01
◼
►
the car from Knight Rider, I was ready to debate him
01:21:04
◼
►
vociferously about my feelings about
01:21:06
◼
►
whether Kit is a robot or not.
01:21:08
◼
►
It turns out he was on my side on that one.
01:21:11
◼
►
So that one was an easier one.
01:21:14
◼
►
I also do kind of approach it from the perspective of,
01:21:17
◼
►
I really wanna hear what Jon has to say
01:21:19
◼
►
about whether things are robots or not.
01:21:22
◼
►
I'm not sure I entirely endorse all of his judgments,
01:21:25
◼
►
but in this case, Jon is the robot master.
01:21:29
◼
►
So we see what Jon, it's all about Jon
01:21:32
◼
►
and what he thinks a robot is
01:21:34
◼
►
because his ways are strange and interesting.
01:21:37
◼
►
- Onto Ask Upgrade.
01:21:40
◼
►
Jason, I also would like to know,
01:21:41
◼
►
are you still showering with your watch on and have you had any problems with that?
01:21:46
◼
►
I took a test shower with the first Apple Watch, the one that Brad has now, Brad from
01:21:53
◼
►
the pen addict. So I wish him luck with it. No, I did that as a test just so I could write
01:22:00
◼
►
about having taken a shower with it, but I don't shower with my watch on. Also I mostly
01:22:04
◼
►
am wearing the leather band which is not appropriate for showering. So no I did, actually we go,
01:22:09
◼
►
On the 4th of July we went to the back bay here in Orange County down to Newport Beach
01:22:16
◼
►
and we did a, we paddled around on Independence Day, did I say New Year's Day?
01:22:21
◼
►
On the 4th of July we went and paddled around in outrigger canoes which was a lot of fun.
01:22:28
◼
►
Went around Balboa Island, stopped, got a frozen banana at the banana stand, there's
01:22:32
◼
►
always money in the banana stand.
01:22:35
◼
►
That's actually, I mean that is what they're talking about.
01:22:38
◼
►
place where we went is basically what they're talking about that's the reference from it's
01:22:43
◼
►
not just a banana stand but it's a reference lots of references to Balboa Island in Arrested
01:22:48
◼
►
Development and we got back and I noticed that the the digital crown was like a little
01:22:53
◼
►
sticky and it's like the salt and and maybe some sand but like the salt had gotten in
01:22:57
◼
►
there and I actually did for the first time I followed the the tech note and I took off
01:23:02
◼
►
the the watch band and I took a little you know warm water and I sort of spun the spun
01:23:08
◼
►
the digital crown under the warm water and then I dried the watch off, put the band back
01:23:11
◼
►
on, everything's fine.
01:23:13
◼
►
That terrifies me.
01:23:15
◼
►
But I'm not taking showers with the Apple Watch.
01:23:18
◼
►
I'm less careful with it like around water, like washing the dishes or whatever, I don't
01:23:22
◼
►
take it off, I wouldn't swim with it, I wouldn't shower with it.
01:23:26
◼
►
I do have some scratches on my watch now, like on the screen, and I'm just trying to
01:23:30
◼
►
forget about them.
01:23:32
◼
►
I bought the Apple Care so I figure I'm going to give it like another few months and I'm
01:23:35
◼
►
gonna take it in, pay the £50 and get them to replace it. Yeah fair enough.
01:23:41
◼
►
I wore the watch because when we went on the boat because I thought you
01:23:46
◼
►
know it doesn't matter if it gets splashed on and I had meant to bring my
01:23:50
◼
►
sport band and actually wear that but I brought the leather it was fine. I didn't
01:23:54
◼
►
go for a swim. Guy wants to know is CoverFlow truly dead in iTunes in
01:24:01
◼
►
the new music app, I think it is.
01:24:04
◼
►
Myke, we established already on the show that we are not your cover flow experts but it
01:24:09
◼
►
seems to be truly totally utterly dead.
01:24:12
◼
►
Because it's pointless for music.
01:24:16
◼
►
Jeremy wanted to just kind of, he was very confused Jeremy and I understand.
01:24:22
◼
►
He doesn't understand iCloud music.
01:24:23
◼
►
So it's the iCloud music drive thing.
01:24:26
◼
►
He says in my device I don't want to see all of my iTunes purchases access via iCloud.
01:24:31
◼
►
I had a time where I had to go in and delete from my library
01:24:35
◼
►
a bunch of stuff that I just didn't want to see in there
01:24:37
◼
►
that I bought like six years ago.
01:24:40
◼
►
- It's just a thing.
01:24:41
◼
►
It seems like basically the iCloud music library
01:24:45
◼
►
seems like a thing that snuck up on me.
01:24:46
◼
►
I don't know if I knew about this before.
01:24:48
◼
►
The first time I recall knowing about it
01:24:50
◼
►
was when Apple Music launched.
01:24:52
◼
►
I'm sure it'd been around, but I'd kind of ignored it.
01:24:54
◼
►
Seems to have to be enabled,
01:24:56
◼
►
although you get this weird error where it's like,
01:24:59
◼
►
you can't enable it!
01:25:00
◼
►
and then it's, did you get that?
01:25:03
◼
►
Like some really weird arrow popped up
01:25:04
◼
►
and I saw a bunch of people saying it
01:25:06
◼
►
when I first launched Apple Music.
01:25:08
◼
►
And it was like, you cannot sync your library,
01:25:10
◼
►
you must turn it back on again.
01:25:11
◼
►
It was very strange.
01:25:12
◼
►
But yeah, it seems like you have to have
01:25:14
◼
►
this iCloud music library.
01:25:16
◼
►
- Well there's a setting, there's a setting to turn it off.
01:25:20
◼
►
What does that do?
01:25:21
◼
►
- I don't know, I don't wanna do it, I'm scared.
01:25:25
◼
►
Well it's, yeah I think,
01:25:28
◼
►
well I mean this is add songs and playlists
01:25:30
◼
►
my music and access them from all your devices. I don't know. We're still figuring all this
01:25:34
◼
►
stuff out. But I think you can't pick and choose, so I think you can either show your
01:25:40
◼
►
library or not and access Apple Music or not.
01:25:47
◼
►
Yeah I think it's like the idea of do you want to see what you add to your music library
01:25:50
◼
►
and mirror across your devices. If you do, you have to have that turned on. I think that's
01:25:54
◼
►
my understanding of it. So, I mean you could probably try and get by without it, but I
01:25:58
◼
►
I think in the end you're just gonna have to give in
01:26:00
◼
►
and just spend the time pruning your library as I did.
01:26:03
◼
►
- Yeah, or if you don't wanna use Apple Music,
01:26:05
◼
►
you just turn all that stuff off and then you're old school.
01:26:09
◼
►
- Talking about that, John asked,
01:26:12
◼
►
"How long do you think Apple will let me continue
01:26:14
◼
►
"to keep going with my iTunes match?
01:26:15
◼
►
"Will I eventually have to switch to Apple Music?"
01:26:18
◼
►
In all of these scenarios, my advice tends to be the same,
01:26:21
◼
►
which is just try and get used to the new thing
01:26:24
◼
►
because eventually the old thing is gonna go away.
01:26:28
◼
►
Yeah, Apple has said they're going to maintain iTunes Match.
01:26:33
◼
►
I feel like as long as the iTunes store is a viable business of selling music, actually
01:26:40
◼
►
selling it, I think iTunes Match is useful for Apple to keep around in parallel because
01:26:44
◼
►
it provides a service for the people who are buying and not streaming.
01:26:49
◼
►
But it's hard to see them putting much effort into it.
01:26:51
◼
►
At the same time, Eddie Q said that he was hoping that the song limit on iTunes Match
01:26:55
◼
►
would be raised.
01:26:58
◼
►
I think that is because it also affects the song limit for Apple Music because it has
01:27:02
◼
►
all of iTunes matches functionality built into it.
01:27:05
◼
►
Yeah, that's true because you're uploading or matching and then using that on...
01:27:11
◼
►
This is actually going to change...
01:27:12
◼
►
Serenity Caldwell wrote a nice piece about like, no, it's not going to add DRM to the
01:27:17
◼
►
music you already bought.
01:27:19
◼
►
But it is going to change.
01:27:20
◼
►
This is going to change how I handle music, because I've got a Mac that I buy music on,
01:27:26
◼
►
and then I've got a Mac that I have my entire music library stored as a file.
01:27:33
◼
►
And that Mac, right now, the way I do it, since I have iTunes Match, is I just download
01:27:38
◼
►
the music on the one Mac, and then it uploads to iCloud, and then I download it on the other
01:27:42
◼
►
And if I give up iTunes Match, which I think I'm going to do, I'm going to just have to
01:27:46
◼
►
diligent about the music I buy, I actually copy it over to that Mac and add it, so I've got a
01:27:51
◼
►
non-iTunes, a non-iTunes or Apple Music version of those files, because I did buy them
01:27:59
◼
►
and I want to have the non-DRM version. But yeah, it depends on if Apple thinks this is a real--
01:28:09
◼
►
first of all, how much effort is it to do my iTunes match? It may not be a whole lot of effort
01:28:13
◼
►
to keep that going. And, you know, how big is the market for the people who are not doing Apple Music?
01:28:18
◼
►
And Apple still wants to serve them, and do they feel that this is a product that the remaining
01:28:25
◼
►
people who aren't doing Apple Music want or not? But, you know, I'd imagine it'll at least be
01:28:30
◼
►
around for another year, but I don't know. I don't believe that it's doomed, but it could go away.
01:28:37
◼
►
I'm not certain it will go away, but it could if Apple just feels like, "Look, don't do
01:28:43
◼
►
that anymore, just pay for Apple Music."
01:28:45
◼
►
Do you want to cover this last one here from Michael?
01:28:49
◼
►
Yeah, so Michael sent us a funny Ask upgrade and linked to a page that is "Brits try to
01:28:58
◼
►
label the United States on a map and hilarity ensues."
01:29:01
◼
►
A little 4th of July humor.
01:29:03
◼
►
And he suggested some great radio drama for us that you get the geography test of trying
01:29:08
◼
►
to name all the US states followed by me being quizzed about the Magna Carta.
01:29:13
◼
►
And I wrote back and told Michael that I didn't think this would be effective because I saw
01:29:19
◼
►
that Doctor Who episode where they go back in time and an android tries to stop the Magna
01:29:24
◼
►
Carta from being signed and I know all about the Magna Carta because of Doctor Who.
01:29:28
◼
►
So although it would be funny to test you about states.
01:29:31
◼
►
Because sometimes I feel like you know a great deal about America that in some areas and
01:29:39
◼
►
then in other areas you don't.
01:29:41
◼
►
And it's a funny mixture with you that you have good knowledge and more American knowledge
01:29:46
◼
►
than I think the average Brit would have.
01:29:50
◼
►
And yet in other areas I think you haven't picked up that knowledge and so those areas
01:29:55
◼
►
would be more vacant.
01:29:58
◼
►
You've been to Memphis and I haven't, and you've been to Atlanta and I haven't, so you've
01:30:02
◼
►
got me there.
01:30:03
◼
►
I think I would quite like to take that test, because I don't know how I would do it.
01:30:07
◼
►
I don't think I would do very well.
01:30:09
◼
►
You should see if you can find a printout of the US map and just fill it in and scan
01:30:15
◼
►
that and send it to me and maybe we'll talk about that next time.
01:30:18
◼
►
Okay, I can do that.
01:30:19
◼
►
And then you can invent a task for me.
01:30:22
◼
►
Just don't make it Doctor Who related because then I would win.
01:30:25
◼
►
So if anybody knows a place where I can take this online, that would be great.
01:30:31
◼
►
If I could just type it in.
01:30:32
◼
►
Send that to us.
01:30:33
◼
►
If you know a place where I can just take this test, send that to us.
01:30:37
◼
►
It's less funny than if I don't have the proof of you writing Minnesota in Wisconsin's box.
01:30:42
◼
►
I can send you a screenshot of my results or something.
01:30:46
◼
►
Because, yeah, that would be a lot easier then.
01:30:48
◼
►
Because I don't have a printer.
01:30:50
◼
►
So that's like number one.
01:30:52
◼
►
Yeah, screenshot works.
01:30:53
◼
►
I just want proof.
01:30:54
◼
►
I want proof of you labeling Oregon as Washington.
01:30:58
◼
►
- 'Cause I think it would be very entertaining
01:31:00
◼
►
for everyone, including me,
01:31:02
◼
►
to see how I do on something like that.
01:31:03
◼
►
- Yeah, that's not Colorado, that's Wyoming.
01:31:05
◼
►
- So that wraps up for this week's episode of Upgrade.
01:31:09
◼
►
If you'd like to find the show notes for today's episode,
01:31:11
◼
►
there's a bunch in there,
01:31:11
◼
►
including links to a bunch of Apple Music playlists.
01:31:13
◼
►
You might wanna go check them out.
01:31:14
◼
►
If they're not in your podcast app of choice,
01:31:16
◼
►
you can find them at relay.fm/upgrade/44.
01:31:20
◼
►
If you wanna find Jason online,
01:31:21
◼
►
he writes over at sixcolors.com,
01:31:23
◼
►
and he is @JSNEL, J S N E double L on Twitter. I am @imike, I M Y K E. Don't forget all
01:31:28
◼
►
your feedback, follow up and questions for this show can be tweeted with the hashtag
01:31:31
◼
►
#askupgrade. It's a great way for us to collect feedback and follow up as well as
01:31:35
◼
►
the questions that you have so feel free to send any and everything through to there and
01:31:39
◼
►
that would be great for us especially if you want to send me through some map tests, great
01:31:43
◼
►
place to do that. Thanks again to our sponsors for helping us out today, Lynda.com, Hover
01:31:47
◼
►
and Fracture and we'll be back next time with episode number 45. Until then, say goodbye
01:31:52
◼
►
Goodbye everybody.
01:31:54
◼
►
[MUSIC PLAYING]