100: The Least Less
00:00:23
◼
►
Jason 100 Snail. 100! Woo! We did it Mr Snail. What a thing we have done here. 100 episodes
00:00:32
◼
►
of Upgrade. Yep, the sun kept shining and the earth kept moving around it and 100 weeks
00:00:39
◼
►
passed and here we are. We made it. It's good. Very good. So to celebrate our 100th episode,
00:00:46
◼
►
today at the end of the show we are going to be discussing Star Trek II, The Wrath of
00:00:52
◼
►
Khan in the triumphant return of Myke of the Movies.
00:00:57
◼
►
ADAM But we have some follow-up to get to and some
00:00:59
◼
►
topics before that.
00:01:01
◼
►
ADAM And we start with the official announcement
00:01:05
◼
►
of Free Agents, Jason's new show with David Sparks, which premiered on Real AFM last week.
00:01:11
◼
►
Jason, would you like to explain to our listeners why they should be tuning in to Free Agents?
00:01:16
◼
►
JAY There's so many reasons to tune in. First
00:01:18
◼
►
is for the theme song as provided by Mr. Chris Breen in the style of a 60s spy movie, for
00:01:25
◼
►
the narration of said theme song by Mr. Matt Alexander, using his finest spy narration
00:01:31
◼
►
English accent. And then there's the content of the show. It's a show about being an independent
00:01:37
◼
►
worker which so many more people are becoming and I really believe is a trend that's going
00:01:42
◼
►
to just intensify as we move further into this century. So David and I recently, you
00:01:48
◼
►
know, year and a half-ish left our jobs after 20 years working for a, you know, regular
00:01:56
◼
►
paycheck and we've learned things and made mistakes and have observations and that's
00:02:03
◼
►
sort of what the show is about is topic by topic sort of like what the issues are and
00:02:07
◼
►
being an independent worker and we're going to mix those in with interviews with people
00:02:10
◼
►
who are also like us independent workers in various areas. And that's the show. And
00:02:16
◼
►
it's every other week fortnightly. And it's short. We're trying to make it more like
00:02:21
◼
►
a half hour show, not like an hour and a half show. So that's the plan. And the first
00:02:26
◼
►
episode is about scope and not taking on too much work and figuring out how much work you
00:02:33
◼
►
should take on. And that's directly because when David said, "I have an idea for a show
00:02:38
◼
►
that we should do together. And David, unlike me, David doesn't have a million podcasts.
00:02:43
◼
►
He only has the one, MacPowerUsers. But when he proposed this, I was like, "Okay, I'm intrigued,
00:02:49
◼
►
but how do we make this work that it's not going to kill both of us?" And we tried to
00:02:53
◼
►
work very hard on the concept in order to limit the scope of the podcast to something
00:02:57
◼
►
that was doable by us. So that all fed sort of into the first episode too.
00:03:01
◼
►
So what I like about Free Agents is that neither of you kind of purport to be experts, and
00:03:06
◼
►
It's like a little bit of discovery for everyone as it goes along, which I quite like, you
00:03:12
◼
►
I think that's a nice way to do it.
00:03:13
◼
►
Yeah, we'll see where it goes.
00:03:14
◼
►
And when we try to not do an intro episode, it's really just a regular episode.
00:03:19
◼
►
Which I like, that you're not getting an episode of…
00:03:22
◼
►
We may go back at some point, we probably will, and tell our stories a little more directly
00:03:26
◼
►
about what led us to make the move, but that's not the…
00:03:31
◼
►
We don't want to start there.
00:03:32
◼
►
We want to start with real stuff.
00:03:34
◼
►
And we're hoping that the listeners will also give us some feedback and tell their stories
00:03:38
◼
►
and we'll just kind of explore as we go what the show can grow into.
00:03:42
◼
►
So go check it out relay.fm/freeagents.
00:03:46
◼
►
So great little piece of artwork there from Mr. Frank Towers.
00:03:52
◼
►
Great art, great theme.
00:03:54
◼
►
I hope we can live up to the art theme and narration.
00:03:56
◼
►
I'll put it that way.
00:03:58
◼
►
Giacomo recommended Drawn Strip Reader as the best comic reader application for the
00:04:06
◼
►
Mac. I haven't used it because I don't want to but I took a look at the screenshots and
00:04:12
◼
►
it does look new and it looks modern a little bit better than the one that we were looking
00:04:19
◼
►
at last week which I can't even remember the name of but was touting universal support.
00:04:24
◼
►
This one is on the Mac App Store even.
00:04:27
◼
►
Yeah so check that out, I haven't tried it but if you're looking for a Mac comic book
00:04:30
◼
►
reader look for that one. But again, I highly recommend you read on an iPad, it's really
00:04:35
◼
►
nice. I was doing that this weekend. I was on a train going from LA to San Diego for
00:04:40
◼
►
the weekend and I read a bunch of comics on Marvel Unlimited actually sitting there on
00:04:46
◼
►
the train. It was great.
00:04:47
◼
►
Look at that, I haven't yet. I will, but not yet. Probably on my next trip I think is when
00:04:54
◼
►
I'm going to load up some stuff.
00:04:56
◼
►
And whilst we're mentioning comics, I want to provide a piece of follow-up. Strangely,
00:05:01
◼
►
we got more people tell me about this today, the day that we're recording the next episode
00:05:05
◼
►
than any other day, but the actress who plays Wonder Woman, her name is pronounced Gail
00:05:11
◼
►
Gadot, I assume. Because we were telling people that we need to, people were telling us that
00:05:16
◼
►
we need to pronounce the T. It's not Godot.
00:05:18
◼
►
It's not waiting for Godot, because she's Israeli and not French, apparently. So we
00:05:23
◼
►
would be waiting for Godot.
00:05:25
◼
►
"gudut." I thought I was being fancy, I think so did you.
00:05:28
◼
►
Yes, oh yes. Really, we should have just given in and gone
00:05:31
◼
►
with the "on the face of it" pronunciation. In general, I just try to pronounce things
00:05:37
◼
►
with a French accent because it makes it more exciting. Like, the accent in Pokémon makes
00:05:42
◼
►
me want to say "Pokemon" because it sounds better that way.
00:05:48
◼
►
I also said "gale." It's "gal." It's just getting worse and worse. Thank you,
00:05:52
◼
►
of Bay in the chat room.
00:05:53
◼
►
Tim Cynova Yeah, I was wondering if this was pronounced
00:05:56
◼
►
even weirder than I thought. Gail, really? G-A-L is Gail, but it could be, but it's
00:06:00
◼
►
not. It's Gal Gadot.
00:06:01
◼
►
David Blaney Gal Gadot.
00:06:02
◼
►
Tim Cynova Basically call her Wonder Woman is what I'm
00:06:05
◼
►
saying. She's Wonder Woman. That's who she is.
00:06:07
◼
►
David Blaney Wonder Woman through and through. Are you
00:06:10
◼
►
familiar with Carpool Karaoke?
00:06:12
◼
►
Tim Cynova Yes, absolutely. It's a late late show with
00:06:15
◼
►
James Corden CBS CBS show he's on after Stephen Colbert it's the 1230 a.m. time
00:06:23
◼
►
slot on CBS he has a talk show I'm big fan of James Corden he's a British
00:06:27
◼
►
comedy actor mm-hmm it's been a lot of great comedy series like Gavin and
00:06:31
◼
►
Stacey which is incredible which you should check out and you know that of
00:06:35
◼
►
course I know him from his two guest appearances on Doctor Who
00:06:37
◼
►
Craig yep the the guy who the doctor rents a room from him and then of course
00:06:44
◼
►
course there's aliens and things. Great in that too. And then he was on Broadway and
00:06:49
◼
►
he won a Tony Award. And then he got this job at CBS doing a talk show.
00:06:53
◼
►
So one of the regular recurring segments on James Corden's Late Late Show is Karl-Paul
00:07:00
◼
►
karaoke where he picks up a celebrity and they drive around together singing. And there's
00:07:07
◼
►
part, it tends to be part song, part music, and part comedy as well is how they tend to
00:07:12
◼
►
run. The one that kind of really broke out was the Adele Carpool Karaoke and there's
00:07:19
◼
►
been a few more since then. There was one recently with the First Lady. They're really,
00:07:23
◼
►
really entertaining. Now, there has been, it's been rumored for many months now, I
00:07:27
◼
►
think since the Adele episode, that there was going to be a spin-off TV show of Carpool
00:07:35
◼
►
There were reports, I don't even think it was a rumor, I think that CBS was shopping
00:07:41
◼
►
a Carpool Karaoke series around. I think that was definitely, the reports were out there
00:07:47
◼
►
and people were wondering like who was going to buy the Carpool Karaoke series because
00:07:51
◼
►
it would be produced by CBS and by James Corden's company but it wouldn't be hosted by James
00:07:55
◼
►
Corden because he already has a show. So that is the thing that's the sad thing to me but
00:08:00
◼
►
we'll get to that in a moment. It has now been announced that Apple have got the rights
00:08:05
◼
►
to the new show as part of Apple Music. From my content perspective, great fit, music related.
00:08:13
◼
►
Yeah, you get the sense that Apple has its eye. That's like the number one priority for Apple
00:08:18
◼
►
when it's thinking about investing in original video content is let's look at everything that's
00:08:23
◼
►
potentially music related because that allows them to just sort of stitch it into Apple Music
00:08:30
◼
►
instead of making everybody wonder if Apple's doing a whole over the top whatever. They just
00:08:35
◼
►
just say, "No, we've already got a subscription service. It's Apple Music. Find music shows."
00:08:39
◼
►
And this is a music show, so it sort of makes sense.
00:08:41
◼
►
And I feel like that there's probably likely to be some kind of update. I don't know what
00:08:45
◼
►
iOS 10 is like for video with Apple Music. I know that on iOS 9 and on previous versions,
00:08:52
◼
►
video player inside of the music app isn't as good as it is in other areas. There's like
00:08:57
◼
►
a lot of like letterboxing made by the application. So it would be nice to see some updates that
00:09:04
◼
►
updates there, especially if they're moving into video content. It just still continues
00:09:08
◼
►
to be peculiar to me that Apple are signing up these shows, but they're in Apple Music
00:09:14
◼
►
as opposed to an Apple Video service. Every time I see something like this, I just keep
00:09:22
◼
►
thinking to myself that there was supposed to be an Apple TV service that just doesn't
00:09:28
◼
►
Yeah, there was a story about that too. I don't think we even have it in our show
00:09:32
◼
►
notes here but there was a Wall Street Journal story last week about Apple and the way the
00:09:38
◼
►
story was pitched was, "Oh, Apple executives are so arrogant and nobody trusts them and
00:09:44
◼
►
all the other entertainment." I think left unsaid was, "Are the entertainment executives
00:09:51
◼
►
humble people?" I don't think that's true either. I think the arrogance is that
00:09:56
◼
►
from Apple's perspective, Apple understands the future of technology and how it intersects
00:10:01
◼
►
with entertainment and the entertainment people are dinosaurs. And from the entertainment
00:10:05
◼
►
industry's perspective, Apple is this tech company who doesn't understand anything
00:10:09
◼
►
about the entertainment industry and is acting like they are their personal industry saviors
00:10:14
◼
►
and they're not. They're super arrogant about it. I see both sides of it. The Wall
00:10:17
◼
►
Street Journal kind of not seeing both sides. Pretty much the story being told by the entertainment
00:10:23
◼
►
people. But the idea that Eddie Q walks into meetings, strangely detailed, with Hawaiian
00:10:28
◼
►
shirt and no socks, okay, and jeans. Alright, that was a detail in the story. And the entertainment
00:10:37
◼
►
industry people were wearing suits of course. Good to know, good to know the dress code.
00:10:43
◼
►
Apple comes in and says, you know, we want to do this, we don't want to do your big bundle,
00:10:47
◼
►
we want to take specific shows, here's what we want to do. They basically came in with
00:10:49
◼
►
a product. And the entertainment industry says, "Eh, that's not how we do business."
00:10:58
◼
►
And you can see the disconnect there, but it's interesting to have it spelled out
00:11:02
◼
►
And I think you can argue both sides.
00:11:03
◼
►
You can argue that Apple is coming in with their idea of a product and trying to get
00:11:08
◼
►
a whole industry to just change how they make their product in order to suit Apple and them
00:11:13
◼
►
being skeptical of that.
00:11:15
◼
►
You could also argue that Apple's coming in and saying, "You guys are chasing your
00:11:19
◼
►
You don't know whether the future lies.
00:11:20
◼
►
You're afraid to make changes.
00:11:22
◼
►
And we're just going to come in and suggest we make all these changes."
00:11:26
◼
►
that they're reluctant to change and so they reject what Apple is selling. I sort of see
00:11:31
◼
►
both sides of it. But it's interesting that this is all going on. But anyway, that's the
00:11:38
◼
►
reason why Apple doesn't have its own TV service and instead sort of has gone to "Hey, if you
00:11:45
◼
►
want to have a TV service you could make an app for Apple TV." But Apple's not doing it
00:11:50
◼
►
So all of this continues to be strange to me though.
00:11:54
◼
►
Like, I don't know, just the idea of there being TV shows,
00:11:58
◼
►
but not in a TV thing.
00:12:00
◼
►
And as you outlined, there seems to be some kind of issue
00:12:04
◼
►
with getting the deals in place.
00:12:07
◼
►
But this isn't stopping Apple from pushing ahead
00:12:09
◼
►
and they've picked up Carpool Karaoke.
00:12:12
◼
►
So the thing that upsets me about this, I guess,
00:12:14
◼
►
is that James Corden won't be a part of it.
00:12:15
◼
►
I think it's entertaining because of his ability
00:12:18
◼
►
to make it so.
00:12:20
◼
►
so I'm interested to see what they do. And it would also be very peculiar for him to
00:12:24
◼
►
drop the most popular part of his late late show.
00:12:28
◼
►
- I imagine that his segment will continue and then they'll also do these things, but
00:12:36
◼
►
I don't know how that's going to work.
00:12:38
◼
►
- And if that's the case, it makes me think it will be with somebody who's not as good
00:12:41
◼
►
as him with less popular musicians.
00:12:45
◼
►
- And it makes me wonder too, what's the format like? Is it going to be like the lip sync
00:12:50
◼
►
or whatever, is it going to be something where it's like two contestants do carpool karaoke
00:12:56
◼
►
and there's a winner or something? I don't know. I don't know how that show, what that
00:13:02
◼
►
show looks like. It'll be interesting to see what they do.
00:13:05
◼
►
But just on the face of it, it's interesting that this is happening.
00:13:08
◼
►
Not a bad fit at all for Apple Music. Something I'm not sure about is looking at how this
00:13:14
◼
►
fits into the stable. From what we know so far there is the Dr. Dre produced series,
00:13:21
◼
►
is my understanding, even though I saw some news go by that I think he was arrested over
00:13:28
◼
►
the weekend, which is a whole different thing. That's another episode for the show. Yeah,
00:13:35
◼
►
yeah, there's some kind of aggravation, some kind of violent thing I think that he was
00:13:40
◼
►
arrested over. I don't really know. That's kind of being like rumour reported on. I haven't
00:13:45
◼
►
seen any facts on it yet but it seems like he was actually arrested. Apple employee,
00:13:50
◼
►
Dr. Dre. And then we've also got this app show. Now this app show, this planet of the
00:13:59
◼
►
apps, I'm not sure whether this is going to be on Apple services or on television. I haven't
00:14:05
◼
►
seen that yet. I think that might be undecided. But this could fit into that stable.
00:14:09
◼
►
I think that was a direct Apple thing, but maybe I'm getting that wrong too. I thought
00:14:13
◼
►
that was a direct from Apple thing. I don't know.
00:14:16
◼
►
We'll see. So yeah, just another addition to Apple's media right here. Carpool karaoke.
00:14:22
◼
►
Lots of weird things happening these days.
00:14:25
◼
►
So Joe Stu in the chat room has given me a link to a Hollywood Reporter article about
00:14:28
◼
►
Dr. Dre. There was some kind of confrontation in which he was handcuffed and issued a citation,
00:14:35
◼
►
but he's not going to be charged, but it was some kind of gun-related thing. It's
00:14:39
◼
►
a bit, uh, not good no matter how you look at it really. Uh, I do wonder, I do wonder
00:14:46
◼
►
about this kind of thing. But, uh, there you go. Yep. If you want to read about it, we've
00:14:50
◼
►
got something in the notes. All right, Jason, today's episode is brought to all of, all
00:14:55
◼
►
of everybody, including you and me by Casper. Brought to me? Oh my goodness. Brought to
00:15:00
◼
►
you, it's brought to the listeners, it's brought to me by Casper. Casper, the company, the
00:15:04
◼
►
focused on sleep that has created the perfect mattress that it sells directly to you the
00:15:10
◼
►
consumer eliminating the commission driven inflated prices that you might be used to
00:15:14
◼
►
seeing. I saw an ad on TV a couple of days ago that was for a mattress company and they
00:15:22
◼
►
were trying to show off their wares and in the ad there were a couple and they were laying
00:15:28
◼
►
down on the mattress fully clothed looking at the showroom person and I couldn't help
00:15:34
◼
►
but think of Casper at this time because I had done this.
00:15:39
◼
►
I've done this in the past, gone to a mattress showroom
00:15:42
◼
►
and laid down on a bed in my clothes and my shoes
00:15:45
◼
►
and felt so awkward and kind of really didn't come out of it
00:15:49
◼
►
knowing anything more than what I went in.
00:15:51
◼
►
We just bought a really expensive mattress
00:15:53
◼
►
because that was all we could do at the time.
00:15:55
◼
►
Casper is here to stop all of that.
00:15:57
◼
►
They sell direct to you and they sell for great prices.
00:16:01
◼
►
They have an award-winning mattress
00:16:02
◼
►
that was developed in-house,
00:16:04
◼
►
has a sleek design, delivered in an impossibly small box.
00:16:07
◼
►
You don't need to sit on a mattress fully clothed
00:16:10
◼
►
talking to a showroom person to then decide
00:16:13
◼
►
that you're gonna take this mattress home
00:16:14
◼
►
and sleep on it for the next 10, 15 years.
00:16:18
◼
►
Casper allows you to buy online, they will ship it to you,
00:16:21
◼
►
and it's completely risk-free,
00:16:23
◼
►
because if you don't like it after a 100-night home trial,
00:16:27
◼
►
Casper will return it, they will take it back for free,
00:16:30
◼
►
they'll come and pick it up.
00:16:31
◼
►
They understand the importance
00:16:32
◼
►
actually sleeping on a mattress normally before you commit so that is something that Casper
00:16:38
◼
►
will get you. Their in house team of engineers spent thousands of hours developing their
00:16:42
◼
►
mattress it is obsessively engineered at a shockingly fair price. For example Casper
00:16:48
◼
►
mattresses cost $500 for a twin size, $600 for a twin excel, $750 for a full, $850 for
00:16:54
◼
►
a queen and $950 for a king and they're made in America. It combines springy latex and
00:16:59
◼
►
supportive memory foam to create a mattress that's got just the right sink and just the
00:17:03
◼
►
right bounce. BOUNCE! We all love bounce and plus it's really cool design helps you to
00:17:09
◼
►
regulate your temperature through the night. Jason I can feel you wanting to say something
00:17:13
◼
►
about Casper. Yeah I have a story which is that they this summer they did the nap tour
00:17:20
◼
►
which they actually took a truck that looks like a Casper box this blue truck around the
00:17:26
◼
►
east coast and the west coast and I say this because I saw it. I walked past it yesterday
00:17:34
◼
►
in San Diego. They had the Casper, basically you could just come and take a nap on a Casper
00:17:40
◼
►
mattress out on the street essentially, but it was really cool and Lauren and I walked
00:17:45
◼
►
by and we're like, "Yeah!" Because we have that kind of Casper loyalty now because we've
00:17:50
◼
►
been traveling for the last week and sleeping on things that are not Casper mattresses and
00:17:54
◼
►
And let me tell you, I miss my Casper mattress and I'm looking forward to sleeping in it
00:17:57
◼
►
tonight, in fact.
00:17:59
◼
►
You can get $50 towards any mattress purchase by visiting casper.com/upgrade and using the
00:18:06
◼
►
code upgrade.
00:18:07
◼
►
Check out the terms and conditions apply.
00:18:09
◼
►
Thank you so much to Casper for their support of this show.
00:18:13
◼
►
Maybe this isn't something worth sleeping on, I don't know.
00:18:15
◼
►
You can tell me.
00:18:16
◼
►
Apple's Q3 financial results were out last week as well.
00:18:20
◼
►
There was a lot of stuff happening last week, just after the show.
00:18:24
◼
►
Good time for me to go on vacation. Perfect time.
00:18:28
◼
►
So I'm going to put a couple of links in the show notes to some of your commentary and
00:18:34
◼
►
Yes, I spent my Tuesday of my vacation. I wrote 4,000 words, launched a new podcast,
00:18:43
◼
►
recorded another podcast. Happy vacation, everybody! Generated 15 charts. Yeah. Anyway,
00:18:50
◼
►
independent workers is what I'm saying here. My boss is a jerk and makes me work sometimes
00:18:54
◼
►
when I don't want to. Yeah, so Apple's results came out and, you know, it was a week ago
00:19:00
◼
►
now people have seen it. I think what's fascinating about it is, first off, this is Apple. Apple's
00:19:04
◼
►
going to take it in the shorts for its quarterly results for the next couple of quarters too.
00:19:08
◼
►
It's just going to happen because they had such a great year last year, the last fiscal
00:19:11
◼
►
year and it's going to compare when you do a year over year comparison. It's going to
00:19:16
◼
►
bad. It's just that that's just how it's going to be. The big difference is that now
00:19:23
◼
►
people expect it. So the stock market actually reacted positively this time because and people
00:19:29
◼
►
are like, "Oh, look, Apple loss went down year on year on revenue two quarters in a
00:19:34
◼
►
row and their stock went up. How ridiculous is that?" And it always shocks me how people
00:19:37
◼
►
who seem to know nothing about how the stock market works comment on the stock market.
00:19:44
◼
►
It's amazing. So the guidance was pretty good. They're still going to go down year over year
00:19:49
◼
►
in revenue next quarter, but it seems like they're optimistic. And in fact, the analysts
00:19:54
◼
►
suspect that they're being a little conservative with their guess of sales next quarter or
00:20:01
◼
►
the current quarter that we're in. And the pessimism of the cooling down of the iPhone
00:20:09
◼
►
is now built into the Apple stock price. So you're not going to have, the stock's not
00:20:14
◼
►
going to get smushed every quarter when the results came out because it kind of happened.
00:20:18
◼
►
The air came out of the balloon. Everybody like sort of got to grips with new reality
00:20:23
◼
►
that they weren't going to keep on growing like they did last year. And so on the holistic
00:20:29
◼
►
level it's basically that which is they're still struggling with their comparison to
00:20:35
◼
►
last year. They're still very profitable. This was the second best third fiscal quarter
00:20:43
◼
►
they've ever done, but last year was the best. But if you compare this to two years ago,
00:20:49
◼
►
it's better than that. So it really is this aberrant year that, you know, but it's those
00:20:55
◼
►
are real numbers. I mean, I don't want to apologize for it. It's like the aberrant year
00:20:58
◼
►
makes it tough to do year over year comparisons. That said, they had a great year and this
00:21:02
◼
►
this year is not as great as that, and that's the truth.
00:21:06
◼
►
- Yeah, I wanna come back to that in a moment,
00:21:07
◼
►
but going back to what you were saying
00:21:08
◼
►
about the fact that it hasn't hurt the stock
00:21:11
◼
►
makes a lot of sense, because the stock has already lost
00:21:14
◼
►
what it was gonna lose when it was decided
00:21:17
◼
►
that the iPhone wasn't gonna do that, what it did again.
00:21:20
◼
►
- Exactly. - So they're kind of now
00:21:21
◼
►
building on that, and also, you can correct me if I'm wrong,
00:21:24
◼
►
but it feels like Apple maybe did a better job
00:21:26
◼
►
telling the story beforehand.
00:21:28
◼
►
I think there seemed to be a lot more shock
00:21:30
◼
►
about what happened in the last quarterly results
00:21:33
◼
►
that maybe they should have been.
00:21:34
◼
►
I'm not sure, but I felt like this time,
00:21:36
◼
►
everyone was kind of expecting it.
00:21:39
◼
►
Where last time maybe people were expecting it
00:21:42
◼
►
to be not so great, but not as not so great
00:21:45
◼
►
as it ended up being.
00:21:46
◼
►
And there were a lot of things coming out,
00:21:47
◼
►
like maybe it wasn't just because they had
00:21:51
◼
►
a really great sales, but also because they over forecasted
00:21:54
◼
►
a little bit, it seemed to be a bit of a disaster
00:21:57
◼
►
where this time it felt like they were a little bit more
00:21:59
◼
►
in control of the message than they were before.
00:22:02
◼
►
Yeah, and the Chinese numbers that went down a lot last quarter, that was a bit of a surprise
00:22:08
◼
►
at how bad that was, and they went down again, but it wasn't a surprise this time. And that's
00:22:15
◼
►
how it works. Everybody's expectations are built into the stock. Oh, hello.
00:22:21
◼
►
I want to just run down some of the actual numbers, and then I'll come back to that
00:22:26
◼
►
year on year thing that you mentioned a moment ago. So this quarter was $42.4 billion in
00:22:31
◼
►
revenue with $7.8 billion in profit. And Apple met their forecast, as you said. I think they
00:22:37
◼
►
exceeded their forecast a little bit, didn't they, on this earnings?
00:22:41
◼
►
Maybe so. It was in the ballpark, yeah. But as we said, still down on 2015. Revenue was
00:22:46
◼
►
down $7.2 billion year on year. So as you said, it's the same story as last quarter
00:22:52
◼
►
and that it was all about the iPhone 6 demand, etc, etc, that led to that quarter standing
00:22:57
◼
►
out. And as I've heard you mention this, last time I've heard you mention this in other
00:23:01
◼
►
places like on 6 Colors and on the Secret Podcast, about like if you remove that year
00:23:06
◼
►
the growth curve continues, which is interesting, right, that if you look at year on year, if
00:23:13
◼
►
remove 2015 and you look at 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2016, you can kind of fill in the gaps
00:23:22
◼
►
to see that it would have just been a steady growth continuing, right? Which is an interesting
00:23:30
◼
►
fact, but the fact of the matter is it can't be removed and that's why we're in this scenario.
00:23:35
◼
►
It'd be great if we could just remove that year, but that year did happen.
00:23:40
◼
►
I think and we see it in the stock which again Apple stock price sort of doesn't interest
00:23:45
◼
►
me. I'm not an investor, I'm not going to be but where you really see it is people saw
00:23:53
◼
►
that growth and thought oh boy Apple just is going to keep on growing, this is great
00:23:59
◼
►
and now we look at it and go that was an aberration and you have to deflate all of that optimism
00:24:09
◼
►
that came out of the wild sales of last year like, "Look at Apple's growth. It continues
00:24:13
◼
►
to go. It's going to keep on going like this." And now we look at it and go, "No, that was
00:24:17
◼
►
really just pent up demand for a larger screen iPhone." And so they sold a lot of iPhone
00:24:21
◼
►
6s and that's maybe never going to happen again or it won't happen again for a few years
00:24:27
◼
►
and that's not what their business looks like. It actually looks more like it did the year
00:24:30
◼
►
before and that's where we are.
00:24:33
◼
►
I would be of the persuasion that it will never happen again.
00:24:37
◼
►
It seems unlikely that, I mean, there could be a scenario like that, but that amount of
00:24:41
◼
►
pent-up demand where all of the rest of the premium smartphone market has large-screened
00:24:45
◼
►
phones and Apple refuses and refuses and refuses and then all of a sudden it comes out with
00:24:51
◼
►
two different sizes of large-screen phones. I think that did it, right? I mean, and that
00:24:58
◼
►
was unusual and probably won't happen again. But you never know, never say never. There
00:25:02
◼
►
could be some other aberrant product that leads to a rush on that. But it's unlikely
00:25:08
◼
►
because mostly you…
00:25:10
◼
►
David: Maybe it's worth saying that it wouldn't happen again I believe with the iPhone. I
00:25:16
◼
►
feel like the iPhone as it is right now, that there isn't enough in that product market
00:25:21
◼
►
that we can see in the even relatively distant future that would differentiate so much from
00:25:28
◼
►
competing smartphones. We're kind of getting to feature completeness with smartphones.
00:25:34
◼
►
Well yeah, that's always the challenge is that then it's just about a replacement
00:25:37
◼
►
cycle and new people coming in but not the tech driving dramatic sales because the tech
00:25:43
◼
►
every year is so much better than the last year's tech. That used to be the case and
00:25:48
◼
►
it isn't any longer. That's been the source for the last like four or five years now of
00:25:52
◼
►
the stories that people write which is smartphones are boring now and there's some truth to
00:25:55
◼
►
that is that the tech doesn't advance as fast as it did in the early days when they were
00:25:59
◼
►
starting with nothing and every year was this complete dramatic reinvention. I'd also argue
00:26:04
◼
►
that it's just really hard to create a product so dramatically different that it makes everybody
00:26:11
◼
►
who's got a previous version drop everything and buy the new one immediately. That's hard
00:26:17
◼
►
and you see it and we'll get to the iPad numbers in a little bit but you know that iPad Pro
00:26:22
◼
►
9.7, that's the flagship iPad. That's a big jump in iPad. And you could argue that
00:26:30
◼
►
something like that could have really driven the iPad numbers and it didn't really happen.
00:26:34
◼
►
So I'm not sure that that product exists.
00:26:37
◼
►
And also, maybe the fact that it's different sizes wasn't even the reason. Maybe it was
00:26:42
◼
►
just China was the reason. And there isn't going to be another China. They're done
00:26:47
◼
►
now. Again, for the foreseeable future, there isn't another China. It might be India, but
00:26:54
◼
►
that's a long way away before there is an emerging middle class which the iPhone isn't
00:27:01
◼
►
available to. Then all of a sudden the floodgates are open.
00:27:05
◼
►
So I think that's kind of where we are with that, kind of the quote unquote. Let's talk
00:27:09
◼
►
about the iPad. My feeling is, positive news, not necessarily good news on the iPad.
00:27:17
◼
►
So, the positive news being, and you can correct me here because I find this difficult, iPad
00:27:23
◼
►
year on year revenue is up. So Apple made more money than they did in Q3 of 2015.
00:27:33
◼
►
But they didn't sell more of them, they still sold less. Now this is because…
00:27:37
◼
►
It was the least less though.
00:27:39
◼
►
I'm not, we're not getting into that right now. You just, I can't listen to this.
00:27:45
◼
►
the amount that their sales are going down is decreasing. I know it's madness. It's madness.
00:27:51
◼
►
Yeah, basically that. The average selling price of an iPad went up a lot.
00:27:56
◼
►
Yeah, and this is because the iPad Pros are more expensive and they may be including accessories
00:28:04
◼
►
into this. Maybe. I don't know. Maybe these ones? I mean, they're kind of like, you know.
00:28:09
◼
►
It's possible. The pencil might be in there, but not in units. I don't know. It's possible.
00:28:14
◼
►
I don't know if that's the case or if those are just going in other. But regardless, yeah.
00:28:19
◼
►
So it's good. Well, I mean, and we'll say this. I mean, I joke about how it's the year
00:28:24
◼
►
over year revenue is down less, but it is true. It is sort of like almost at even and
00:28:31
◼
►
the revenue increase or the year over year units are down less. The revenue increase,
00:28:37
◼
►
it's the first time in 10 quarters that that's happened and really it's the second time in
00:28:42
◼
►
like 13 quarters, the iPad has been falling in units year over year for a while now, for
00:28:49
◼
►
like two and a half, three years. And so it's actually kind of a big deal that this happened.
00:28:57
◼
►
Then again, you can argue that this is the, you know, they already had the 12.9 iPad Pro
00:29:04
◼
►
out there, now they've got the 9.7 iPad Pro, it's the mainstream iPad size. And it's,
00:29:11
◼
►
it's pencil support for the masses and all of that and they launch it and all they managed
00:29:18
◼
►
to do was barely eke out a revenue boost. It's probably not the ideal time for iPad
00:29:25
◼
►
purchases. I think that iPad, like so much of Apple's business, does actually do well
00:29:29
◼
►
in the fall and the holiday quarter and they are set for that now because I don't think
00:29:34
◼
►
we're going to see new iPads until the spring. I think that they're set for that. But we'll
00:29:39
◼
►
see. So it's like good, like you said, it's good iPad news. It's not great iPad news,
00:29:44
◼
►
but it's better than what we've had, which is bad iPad news.
00:29:48
◼
►
This is why, like, it's semantics, but like I'm saying, positive, not good. Because there
00:29:52
◼
►
is some, there is a trend on a chart which is going up, which hasn't happened in a long
00:29:59
◼
►
time. But I want to see how the next few quarters go, because literally all this could be is
00:30:05
◼
►
the people that replace every time, replacing again.
00:30:08
◼
►
Yeah. And Apple has made more money on it because those people now have to pay more
00:30:13
◼
►
money to do that. Yeah. Yeah, I mean more or less that's true. What I was going to say
00:30:17
◼
►
is that there's a line that keeps going up and it didn't used to go up, but that line
00:30:22
◼
►
in my charts on six colors, that line is still in the red, right? It's a negative number.
00:30:27
◼
►
It's not actually going up. It's trying to reach the surface and start going up because
00:30:34
◼
►
still a loss. It's just less of a loss and that's not a great, you know, "Woo! Yay!
00:30:39
◼
►
We lost less than we did last time!" is not really that exciting.
00:30:43
◼
►
Yeah. So if I could try and explain that a different way because this part is so confusing.
00:30:48
◼
►
I know. It seems like the analysts and Tim Cook, they're
00:30:52
◼
►
trying to paint this as a good thing but all it means is they're still selling less of
00:30:57
◼
►
them but the amount at which they're selling less is decreasing. So if they sold…
00:31:04
◼
►
10 a year, two years ago, and then, oh, but then they only sold five the next year, but
00:31:11
◼
►
now they're selling four, so you can see there's a much better loss there, right?
00:31:15
◼
►
It wasn't 50%, it was just a much smaller amount. Like, you know, so that's kind of
00:31:19
◼
►
the way that I'm very much trying to simplify it, because it has taken me a long time to
00:31:25
◼
►
get my head around this.
00:31:27
◼
►
Basically, three quarters ago, Apple said, "Hey, we sold a thousand," I'll just make
00:31:31
◼
►
of numbers, we sold a thousand fewer iPads than we did last year at the same quarter.
00:31:36
◼
►
And then last quarter they said, "Hey, we sold 500 fewer iPads than we did last quarter."
00:31:41
◼
►
And this time they're like, "Hey, we only sold 200 fewer iPads than we did last quarter."
00:31:46
◼
►
It's like, well that looks like progress on one level. On another level, they still sold
00:31:51
◼
►
200 fewer iPads than they did last year.
00:31:53
◼
►
Yeah, and also, it's fine if you look at it from the previous year, but if you zoom out,
00:31:58
◼
►
it's still losing massive amounts, right?
00:32:01
◼
►
And if you don't look at change but you look at the actual numbers, what you're seeing
00:32:03
◼
►
is a chart that just keeps going down, but it's going down slower now.
00:32:10
◼
►
So it is what it is.
00:32:11
◼
►
And then if you look at the revenue, you see a little tick up.
00:32:13
◼
►
So I think it's all of us who've been watching the iPad have been looking for a while for
00:32:17
◼
►
signs that it's hit bottom, and that because the idea here is that the iPad had an unnatural
00:32:22
◼
►
couple of quarters where everybody bought an iPad.
00:32:26
◼
►
like the iPad 2 and the iPad then especially with the iPad Air 1, they sold a lot. And
00:32:36
◼
►
those are just sitting out there, right? People are using them, they're fine, right? And so
00:32:40
◼
►
now we're in this moment of like, when does the replacement cycle really kick in where
00:32:44
◼
►
we can get some idea of in a normal period, again, not some kind of apparent quarter or
00:32:51
◼
►
to, in a normal period, what does the iPad sales figure look like? And when it's dropping
00:32:56
◼
►
every quarter for ten quarters, you can't get a handle on it. Is it going to be a 10
00:33:01
◼
►
million? You know, 5 million? What's the number per quarter that the iPad sells? And we still
00:33:07
◼
►
don't know. It may be that as we're watching it kind of hit bottom here, this is it. You
00:33:12
◼
►
know, and maybe it won't even go up very much after this, but maybe it won't go down very
00:33:16
◼
►
much and then we'll at least be able to peg. And if you're an investor, this is kind of
00:33:19
◼
►
a big deal. Peg, like what's the size of the iPad business? But you can't, when it's
00:33:24
◼
►
in free fall you can't tell.
00:33:25
◼
►
Greg is a big fan of the iPad. So we're, it looks like we're probably getting closer
00:33:28
◼
►
to that point. And I think the next year, I believe that within the next year we will
00:33:34
◼
►
know what the quarterly iPad sales look like. And it will probably be within the nine to
00:33:41
◼
►
ten million range a quarter. Now the reason I think this is important is it is then that
00:33:48
◼
►
we can understand the importance of the iPad and the product line because right now whenever
00:33:53
◼
►
we talk about the iPad we focus on the fact that things are declining. We're not necessarily
00:33:58
◼
►
focusing on too much is the actual amount of units sold because if it is within that
00:34:03
◼
►
9 to 10 million range it's more than the Mac and we don't really say that the Mac is a
00:34:09
◼
►
disaster because it sells 6 million a quarter. That's just what the Mac is but the iPad is
00:34:15
◼
►
easy to point at as a disaster because it keeps going down. But if it can stabilize…
00:34:21
◼
►
The expectations were high, right? It was, it was, it started, its trajectory at the
00:34:25
◼
►
beginning was faster than the iPhone. So it's like, oh my God, pretty soon everybody on
00:34:29
◼
►
Earth is going to own four iPads, right? And that didn't happen. And so now, now you're
00:34:34
◼
►
exactly right. I think what all of us who have been watching this have been kind of
00:34:39
◼
►
hoping would happen and thinking would probably happen. Although you don't know, I mean
00:34:44
◼
►
even Tim Cook is like, "Oh, I'm bullish on the iPad," but he doesn't know either,
00:34:48
◼
►
is that the iPad is going to settle in as a business that is comparable to the Mac business,
00:34:52
◼
►
which is a pretty darn good business, but it's not the iPhone.
00:34:55
◼
►
No, but that's… nothing's the iPhone. Exactly. Oh, I agree. I agree. I mean, nothing…
00:35:01
◼
►
I read a news story the other day about Apple's results, and it was in like a serious publication,
00:35:07
◼
►
and they said something about how, you know, Apple continues to search for a product comparable
00:35:12
◼
►
to the iPhone, it's like guys that's just never going to happen. The smartphone, I mean
00:35:18
◼
►
one of the other things that wasn't in our show notes that happened is Apple sold its
00:35:21
◼
►
billionth iPhone and that kind of thing where you have the defining product in a category
00:35:30
◼
►
that is, that everybody on earth is going to buy in the course, over the course of about
00:35:37
◼
►
ten years, it's going to go to almost everybody on the planet. Over the course of twenty years
00:35:41
◼
►
everybody will have one and will be considered standard issue for every human being on the
00:35:45
◼
►
face of the earth. It doesn't happen very often. It might not happen again in our lifetimes.
00:35:50
◼
►
It probably hasn't happened in our lifetimes other than that. And Apple had that premier
00:35:56
◼
►
brand in that category. Yeah, don't stop searching for another iPhone. It's probably
00:36:02
◼
►
not going to happen. It's probably, if it does happen, probably not going to be Apple
00:36:06
◼
►
just because what are the chances? It's a rare thing that happened.
00:36:13
◼
►
And I think to myself, we were always looking for that, right? That was what we were hoping
00:36:17
◼
►
for, to find the product that would be as big as, or like 50% the size of, or 75% the
00:36:24
◼
►
size of the iPhone. And Apple have had quarters where that was the case, right? Where the
00:36:29
◼
►
iPad sold about half of what the iPhone sold. But they are anomalies. And will always be
00:36:35
◼
►
anomalies now like the anomaly of the crazy 2015 quarters.
00:36:41
◼
►
The iPhone 6, yeah exactly right. But the iPad is a good category. If it's the size
00:36:45
◼
►
of the Mac and it continues to grow, I think that's the other thing that we would like
00:36:48
◼
►
to see is we'd like to see sales stabilize and then see what the growth curve is because
00:36:52
◼
►
you would hope that the sales would still show some growth in that category but you've
00:36:59
◼
►
got to come off of the high and then like find what's your new level and it still hasn't
00:37:03
◼
►
done that. But a Mac business is a good business. That's a good-sized business to be in. It's
00:37:09
◼
►
not bad at all.
00:37:11
◼
►
No. So if we get the iPad to that point and it continues to be larger than the Mac, as
00:37:16
◼
►
a person who cares about the iPad, I consider that a great achievement. Because then we
00:37:21
◼
►
know that this product is deserving of the time and attention and yearly software and
00:37:28
◼
►
yearly hardware on the Mac everyone, do you remember?
00:37:32
◼
►
- Yeah, good times.
00:37:34
◼
►
- So that's what I hope to see
00:37:36
◼
►
is someone who really cares about that.
00:37:38
◼
►
That's what I'm hoping for,
00:37:39
◼
►
that's what I'm hoping it ends up being.
00:37:41
◼
►
But I think anybody that does care about the iPad
00:37:44
◼
►
is gonna continue to wait for that moment
00:37:47
◼
►
and we haven't seen it yet
00:37:48
◼
►
and that's why we keep focusing on this every single time
00:37:52
◼
►
is that moment is so important to that product.
00:37:56
◼
►
Hopefully we'll get that in the next couple of quarters.
00:38:00
◼
►
It'll be interesting to see what the holiday quarter sales
00:38:02
◼
►
are for the iPad too.
00:38:04
◼
►
- I really don't think it's gonna be anything
00:38:05
◼
►
worth calling home about, unfortunately.
00:38:07
◼
►
I just don't see it.
00:38:08
◼
►
- If it, again, if it's flat, if it's flat to slightly up.
00:38:12
◼
►
- I mean, that might be the best news.
00:38:14
◼
►
- That's what I'm looking for is stop the decline.
00:38:18
◼
►
Bottom out, hit bottom, start coming back up.
00:38:22
◼
►
Still hasn't hit bottom.
00:38:24
◼
►
- Well, it may have done, we don't know, right?
00:38:26
◼
►
this might be the bottom. That's true. It may have. And the Mac did go down, but because
00:38:35
◼
►
of the volumes it's not... Yeah, the Mac quarter was bad, but anybody who knows... First off,
00:38:40
◼
►
the PC industry is bad in general, and everybody who knows the Mac knows that other than the
00:38:45
◼
►
MacBook, nothing has been updated. So you would not expect there to be anything driving
00:38:52
◼
►
sales other than the MacBook, which is one of the reasons why the average selling price
00:38:55
◼
►
of the Mac is down because I think the MacBook is the only one that's really selling and
00:39:00
◼
►
it's on the cheaper side so it pushes everything down a little bit.
00:39:03
◼
►
So some other little tidbits, services continues to grow, it's up $5.8 billion in revenue for
00:39:09
◼
►
Q3 year and year.
00:39:11
◼
►
Growing every quarter.
00:39:12
◼
►
And Apple quoted that by next year it will be the size of a Fortune 100 company.
00:39:21
◼
►
is down and this is expected to be because of a higher than expected demand for the 6SE
00:39:29
◼
►
wait 5SE? 6SE. What is it? SE. There we go. There's no number Myke. Who knows? You can't
00:39:37
◼
►
quantify the special edition it is just the SE. There you go. So it's because of the SE
00:39:42
◼
►
they reckon that it looks like that's been the case plus Apple had to kind of dump an
00:39:46
◼
►
access of the stock of the iPhone 6 line. So they did a bunch of deals, therefore driving
00:39:51
◼
►
the ASP down. I do wonder though, that even though the ASP is down, what the margins are
00:39:57
◼
►
like on the SE. I bet they're really good.
00:40:01
◼
►
I think they're pretty good, yeah.
00:40:02
◼
►
So I wonder, when you're looking at profit from that line, if that number is maybe not
00:40:08
◼
►
all it seems. I don't know. And Apple is high on new technology, Jason.
00:40:13
◼
►
Oh they are, Myke. Tim Cook in the analyst call talked about a lot of new technology
00:40:18
◼
►
that they're very excited about.
00:40:19
◼
►
He spoke about the Pokemans, didn't he? The Pokemans?
00:40:21
◼
►
He did speak about the Pokemans. He did. A couple of times.
00:40:25
◼
►
How could, like, how? How? How? How did he get that wrong? It's like, it is the most
00:40:33
◼
►
popular application on the App Store in history, right? Someone must have briefed him.
00:40:39
◼
►
It's very easy to look at Pokemon and then try to pluralize it and think it's like man
00:40:42
◼
►
and say "mans, Pokeman, Pokemans" and somebody, maybe somebody briefed him on it. I don't
00:40:48
◼
►
know. Everybody had a chuckle and then I kind of moved on. He did talk about, though, in
00:40:54
◼
►
the context of Pokemon Go, of AR and somebody asked about it because there's augmented reality
00:41:00
◼
►
as a part of Pokemon Go, although it's kind of a minor part. I actually turned it off
00:41:05
◼
►
because it's easier to play without it on. But the idea that you're interacting with
00:41:10
◼
►
things in the real world and then things that seem to be in the real world but aren't. That's
00:41:14
◼
►
the augmented reality idea. That's what Microsoft is doing with HoloLens and Apple.
00:41:19
◼
►
Tim Cook said AR is going to be big. He said AR is going to be big. We got a lot of stuff
00:41:24
◼
►
we're looking at there. So he didn't try to pretend that Apple is not interested in it.
00:41:30
◼
►
In fact, he predicted that it will be big and that Apple is very interested in it. I
00:41:35
◼
►
thought that was something to take note of. And they've talked about VR positively in
00:41:39
◼
►
the same way before. So it sounds like Apple's basically trying to send a signal that Apple's
00:41:45
◼
►
not ignoring that market because there are people who freak out when Apple's not the
00:41:50
◼
►
first company to market with an incredibly expensive, shaky technically, but just barely
00:41:55
◼
►
technically possible thing in a new category because they think that somehow that's what
00:42:00
◼
►
Apple should be doing, which is not what Apple does.
00:42:02
◼
►
But people are like, "Oh, but Microsoft has the HoloLens and then the VR headsets are
00:42:07
◼
►
coming out and where's Apple? Apple's behind here. It's like, is Apple behind?
00:42:12
◼
►
Apple hasn't come out with a product yet. It doesn't mean that they aren't working
00:42:14
◼
►
and stuff but it's unlikely that Apple would ship something and say, "Well, this is a
00:42:19
◼
►
$3,000 developer kit for VR and we think we'll have a viable product in four or five years."
00:42:25
◼
►
They tend not to do that and I think that's not in their nature. So I feel like this is
00:42:30
◼
►
signaling from Cook saying, "Yes, we are not ignoring VR and AR." Now, they may be
00:42:36
◼
►
behind, we don't know, but I think the absence of an Apple VR product or AR product today
00:42:42
◼
►
is not evidence that Apple is not working on something and that Apple is behind.
00:42:48
◼
►
Can I take the cynics view?
00:42:52
◼
►
The investors are waiting for Apple to produce the next iPhone.
00:42:56
◼
►
Aren't they always?
00:42:58
◼
►
But now they know the iPhone isn't going to grow anymore, where's the next growth
00:43:02
◼
►
has to talk about potential growth areas now is the way that I think about this.
00:43:07
◼
►
They have to talk about this because what else are they going to do?
00:43:12
◼
►
But they have to, what they have to do is send the signal, well they did that even more,
00:43:15
◼
►
what they're doing is they're sending the signal that Apple is working on new things.
00:43:18
◼
►
They did this with a watch as well.
00:43:19
◼
►
Because they have to, right, I mean but this is the, this is the, the argument is the other
00:43:23
◼
►
way to send the signal is to do what Microsoft does, which is say here's a piece of tech
00:43:28
◼
►
that doesn't really exist and is completely impractical and won't be for sale for years,
00:43:33
◼
►
but look how awesome it is. This is the sort of thing we're doing." Apple doesn't
00:43:37
◼
►
do that. Apple doesn't cart out stuff from its R&D hasn't since Jobs came back in the
00:43:41
◼
►
90s. It just doesn't do that. So how do you send that signal if you're not going
00:43:46
◼
►
to do the Microsoft thing, which is pre-announce years before the product exists? The way you
00:43:51
◼
►
do it is what they're doing, which is we're very interested.
00:43:54
◼
►
Matt: What's the better option?
00:43:57
◼
►
Reasonable people can differ.
00:43:58
◼
►
I have always felt as somebody who got to witness some of those Apple demos in the mid-90s
00:44:03
◼
►
that were for things that didn't exist, I have always felt like showing off something
00:44:08
◼
►
that's not real and that might never be real and that nobody can actually buy is kind
00:44:13
◼
►
of cheating because you're getting people really excited about a product that doesn't
00:44:18
◼
►
exist and they can't buy it.
00:44:20
◼
►
What can they do?
00:44:21
◼
►
They can't do anything.
00:44:22
◼
►
They just have to wait.
00:44:23
◼
►
always use that as a tactic to destroy its competition and turn consumers away from the
00:44:30
◼
►
competition. I'm like, "Well, I don't know. Microsoft says they're coming out with something
00:44:34
◼
►
too even if there's nothing coming soon for Microsoft." That's what they would do. They
00:44:38
◼
►
would scare off investors. Like, "I don't want to invest in somebody because Microsoft's
00:44:41
◼
►
already said they're going to take you on." And sometimes those Microsoft products wouldn't
00:44:44
◼
►
actually ever even exist. Or if they did exist, they wouldn't be anything like they were promised.
00:44:50
◼
►
So I've always believed that that's kind of a shady business tactic and I think it's bad
00:44:55
◼
►
for consumers because you're promising things you may not be able to deliver. Today's Microsoft
00:44:59
◼
►
I think is better at it, but they still use those techniques.
00:45:01
◼
►
Well, they just did it with the Xbox. So, you know, they're saying we have an Xbox project
00:45:08
◼
►
in 2017 that's going to be really super powerful, but they haven't, you know.
00:45:13
◼
►
Sure. No, they're still doing it. The HoloLens is the same. They've been talking about the
00:45:16
◼
►
HoloLens for like what a couple of years now and now they have a developer kit for the
00:45:21
◼
►
HoloLens for $3,000. And that's again when is the HoloLens a real product that people
00:45:28
◼
►
are going to use. It's going to be a while yet. So you could do that, Apple just doesn't
00:45:32
◼
►
play that game. For whatever reason and I think it comes back to Steve Jobs' focus
00:45:36
◼
►
on shipping real products and that's always been their discipline has been we ship a real
00:45:42
◼
►
product we don't promise we don't load you up with all our amazing technology and get
00:45:47
◼
►
you stars in your eyes and then three years later ship something that disappoints you
00:45:52
◼
►
because it's not everything that we promised in our mock-up because that wasn't based in
00:45:56
◼
►
reality. Apple's take is always you know we announce a product when we got a product ready
00:46:01
◼
►
to show and that's going to ship as that product even if they announce it six months in advance
00:46:06
◼
►
like the Apple watch what they showed is basically what they shipped and that's not always the
00:46:11
◼
►
case if you pre-announce technology three years in advance.
00:46:14
◼
►
So, that's Apple's earnings. Until next time. I tell you what, I have to say, at least
00:46:19
◼
►
these are more interesting to talk about. Oh yeah, yeah, that's true. That's true.
00:46:25
◼
►
I didn't even mention it. I mean, Tim Cook also dropped a line about like the R&D budget
00:46:28
◼
►
where he basically said, "Yeah, we're growing the R&D budget a whole lot and most of that
00:46:32
◼
►
growth, almost all of that growth is in entirely new product categories," which was sending
00:46:37
◼
►
that same signal. That was the car signal, by the way, right there. We're working on
00:46:42
◼
►
lots of stuff and we're not going to tell you what it is, but it's not new iPhones.
00:46:47
◼
►
We're working on new iPhones too, but this huge R&D budget increase you're seeing, it's
00:46:51
◼
►
not on new iPads and iPhones and Macs.
00:46:52
◼
►
It's Bob Manfield's salary.
00:46:54
◼
►
Yeah, that's right. We're just paying it to Bob. See what Bob does with it.
00:46:59
◼
►
Big Bob is expensive. Big Bob needs a big salary.
00:47:04
◼
►
This week's episode is also brought to you by Squarespace, the simplest way for anyone
00:47:07
◼
►
to create a beautiful landing page, website or online store. You can start building your
00:47:12
◼
►
own website today at squarespace.com and when you do, use the offer code 'upgrade' at checkout
00:47:17
◼
►
to get 10% off your first purchase. With easy to use tools and templates, Squarespace helps
00:47:23
◼
►
you capture every detail of what drives you because if it's worth the effort, it's worth
00:47:27
◼
►
sharing with the world and when you do, it's going to look amazing because Squarespace
00:47:32
◼
►
gives you tools and templates that are professionally designed and engineered. It doesn't matter
00:47:38
◼
►
what your skill level is, you don't need to understand anything about coding. You need
00:47:42
◼
►
no coding experience, no web design experience, because you'll be able to make a website that
00:47:47
◼
►
looks and feels exactly how you want whilst retaining that professional edge. Squarespace
00:47:52
◼
►
does this with their state of the art technology, which also ensures security and stability.
00:47:58
◼
►
These are the key reasons why Squarespace are trusted by millions of people around the
00:48:03
◼
►
You should be one of them.
00:48:05
◼
►
So Squarespace will give you 24/7 support with live chat and email.
00:48:09
◼
►
They have teams located in New York, Dublin and Portland who are there to help you when
00:48:12
◼
►
you need it.
00:48:13
◼
►
They have their commerce platform which allows anybody to sell things on their Squarespace
00:48:18
◼
►
We have been selling stuff at Relay FM through our Squarespace site.
00:48:21
◼
►
We have a great blog there and we have a great store there because why would we build that
00:48:24
◼
►
stuff ourselves and Squarespace can just take care of it.
00:48:27
◼
►
Rock solid fast hosting, cover page functionality, I used that recently with my new project the
00:48:32
◼
►
Ring Post to build a little cover page so people could find out some information.
00:48:36
◼
►
It's just proof that I have used Squarespace for years and continue to.
00:48:40
◼
►
If you sign up for a year you'll also nab yourself a free domain name as well so you
00:48:44
◼
►
can give your new website a great name.
00:48:47
◼
►
Squarespace plans start at just $8 a month.
00:48:49
◼
►
You can sign up today for a free trial with no credit card required and start building
00:48:54
◼
►
your own website straight away by going to squarespace.com.
00:48:57
◼
►
when you decide to sign up make sure that you use the offer code upgrade at checkout
00:49:01
◼
►
to get 10% off your first purchase and show your support for this show. Thank you to Squarespace
00:49:08
◼
►
for supporting this show and Relay FM.
00:49:11
◼
►
So before we get into Myke at the Movies this week, shall we do a quick round of Ask Upgrade?
00:49:22
◼
►
Let's do it. Do a little Ask Upgrade.
00:49:26
◼
►
Richard wanted to know if we record the show over video or audio skype. Do we see each
00:49:33
◼
►
other when we record? We don't. I don't do that of any show. I know a bunch of people
00:49:39
◼
►
that do. I understand the benefits of it. I have been on shows where there is video
00:49:44
◼
►
but no published video and I can see why some people like it. Especially if there's multiple
00:49:48
◼
►
people on a call because people can give visual cues when they want to jump in and that helps
00:49:53
◼
►
through the edit. But what I don't like is what I always do, I always find myself
00:49:57
◼
►
doing is I change the way that I talk and I talk knowing the person can see me, I show
00:50:02
◼
►
things and it doesn't come through in the audio. So that's why I don't do it because
00:50:07
◼
►
I know that when I do that, the audio listeners, because there are only audio listeners to
00:50:12
◼
►
our shows, they actually end up in a worse position. This isn't the same for everyone,
00:50:17
◼
►
not everybody is like this, but it is how I am.
00:50:20
◼
►
Well, that's how I feel when I'm on Lea LePorte's shows is that they, you know, that is a TV
00:50:24
◼
►
production. It feels like you're on television and you have to realize that some fairly large
00:50:28
◼
►
percentage of their audience just listens to the audio and even the people who watch
00:50:32
◼
►
it on video, because it's talking heads, they're probably not paying that close attention.
00:50:37
◼
►
So what will happen is people on that show will make reference to like a video that's
00:50:42
◼
►
playing or they'll hold something up and you realize, what do the audio people get
00:50:46
◼
►
out of this. So it's problematic. I'd also say there's just some purely pragmatic reasons
00:50:52
◼
►
we do this, which is video takes more bandwidth and if you're having trouble having clear
00:50:58
◼
►
audio, again, we all record our own ends of the conversation so the bandwidth doesn't
00:51:03
◼
►
– the people in the live chat room here, the live bandwidth problems, but people at
00:51:07
◼
►
home listening – everybody's at home – to the podcast, they don't hear any of that,
00:51:14
◼
►
we hear it. And so if you make that worse, it's harder to understand the other person.
00:51:17
◼
►
I'm also doing this over a mobile hotspot because of my internet connection.
00:51:23
◼
►
We're bandwidth constrained and then you put on top of that that we're streaming
00:51:26
◼
►
it live, which means that we also have another data stream going back out. There's a lot
00:51:32
◼
►
going on and so adding video unnecessarily seems like a bad idea from a bandwidth standpoint
00:51:40
◼
►
too, because some people just don't have the bandwidth for it and it makes their audio
00:51:43
◼
►
sound bad and some apps scale the video better like if the bandwidth is really bad they drop
00:51:49
◼
►
the video out or they just make it a little one frame every few seconds but I just sort
00:51:55
◼
►
of learned not to trust it. We do use video for my podcast Total Party Kill which is the
00:52:02
◼
►
Dungeons and Dragons podcast we do on the incomparable. We use Google Hangouts usually
00:52:06
◼
►
for that, although we've used other stuff too. And that is sort of an experiment, but
00:52:14
◼
►
I think people like it. There we're often referring to a map. And although the audio
00:52:20
◼
►
version I think you don't need the map to understand it, we got an unusual number of
00:52:25
◼
►
requests to see what the map was. And the fact is that people watching people play games
00:52:31
◼
►
on YouTube is a thing. People do that. So we do that now. We record that video. I put
00:52:39
◼
►
it together. I combine the video with a recording of the map because the map isn't on the Google
00:52:45
◼
►
Hangout video that gets posted to YouTube. It doesn't come through. It's just the people.
00:52:50
◼
►
So then I overlay the map video synced up and put the better quality audio on it and
00:52:56
◼
►
then release that as a video episode. It doesn't have the high quality kind of detailed audio
00:53:00
◼
►
at it because editing audio and video together is a very different thing than just editing
00:53:06
◼
►
audio. But we do it there and I like it and it works okay but with that when you've got
00:53:12
◼
►
six or seven people all talking at once and video you miss a lot. So I don't recommend
00:53:19
◼
►
it for everybody but I see why people do it.
00:53:22
◼
►
So next up we have a question from Brando and Brando asked "Is there an iOS text editor
00:53:28
◼
►
like BBEdit. You mentioned on the show last week that you use BBEdit on the Mac. I know
00:53:34
◼
►
there isn't a BBEdit iPhone app or iPad app so what do you use on iOS and is it like BBEdit?
00:53:41
◼
►
Tim: I use OneWriter and it's not really like BBEdit but it's got some markdown features
00:53:46
◼
►
which is what I use BBEdit for too really and it's got macro language in OneWriter's
00:53:52
◼
►
case I think it's JavaScript, it's got some macros that you can use. Editorial is also
00:53:56
◼
►
very good if you prefer doing writing macros in Python. And there are many, many, many
00:54:02
◼
►
others and I've tried many of them and I switch back and forth all the time, but one writer
00:54:08
◼
►
is the one that I'm using at present. It's got nice Dropbox integration, good markdown
00:54:12
◼
►
support and so that's what I'm using right now. But there are lots out there and they're
00:54:16
◼
►
all pretty cheap too. So, yeah.
00:54:18
◼
►
Cool. Good tip. One writer is really great. I've been meaning to check out Scrivener.
00:54:25
◼
►
I'll tell you what I've been thinking about doing it for.
00:54:28
◼
►
To keep kind of a good log of all of the advertising copy that I write in an application in some
00:54:34
◼
►
folders and to keep previous versions of all of it.
00:54:39
◼
►
That could work.
00:54:40
◼
►
So I'm not really doing that.
00:54:41
◼
►
I just put them into our system and I just replace them every time.
00:54:45
◼
►
But there are some times where it could be useful for me to go back and refer to something.
00:54:51
◼
►
It's only ever happened a few times but when I then don't have it it's like "Oh man, I
00:54:54
◼
►
I wish I had it. So I've been thinking about it, I've been thinking about that, or maybe
00:54:58
◼
►
I think Ulysses could do the same so I've been meaning of trying them both out. Yeah,
00:55:04
◼
►
so that might be something for later on.
00:55:06
◼
►
Rajeev asked, "Will the next iPhone storage capacities be 3264 and 128GB or 32, 128 and
00:55:15
◼
►
256GB?" My favorite thing about this question is that Rajeev seems to be completely ignoring
00:55:21
◼
►
any possibility of a 16GB phone.
00:55:25
◼
►
I'm not sold on whether they will or won't be one.
00:55:30
◼
►
If Apple put out a 16GB version of the iPhone 7, I think I will be disappointed, not surprised.
00:55:39
◼
►
Because they haven't done it yet, so why would they?
00:55:42
◼
►
But anyway, I think if the rumours are true that we've been seeing about there being three
00:55:47
◼
►
the iPhone 7, the iPhone 7 Plus and the iPhone 7 Pro.
00:55:52
◼
►
If, yeah, that's to be the leaves.
00:55:55
◼
►
It'll be regular Plus and Pro.
00:55:57
◼
►
I think there will be a 256 gigabyte.
00:56:00
◼
►
Other than that-- - Makes sense.
00:56:01
◼
►
- I'm not sure that there would be a 256.
00:56:03
◼
►
I don't think the need for a 256 is there
00:56:08
◼
►
other than as a way to charge a higher price.
00:56:13
◼
►
I don't think the 256 gigabyte iPhone is required
00:56:16
◼
►
as many people as it is for something like the iPad where there's likely to be more movies
00:56:22
◼
►
and stuff on that kind of device. We'll see. Do you agree with that thinking?
00:56:27
◼
►
Yeah, I think so. I think it's more likely that they'll do 32-64-128 and then it's what
00:56:33
◼
►
you're saying which is on some models that are considered high-end models, maybe they
00:56:39
◼
►
offer it as a 32-64-256 or 32-128-256 or 64-128-256, right? It depends. But offer on
00:56:52
◼
►
certain models like an iPhone Pro if there's something like that, something like they do
00:56:58
◼
►
on the iPad Pro where there's a big jump that you can get at the top end. That's
00:57:05
◼
►
I would see it. But I think the 3264/128 is the most likely. Just because Apple tends
00:57:10
◼
►
to be really conservative, I'll use a generous word there, with what specs it puts in those
00:57:17
◼
►
devices in terms of storage. But hey, if somebody wants to pay, I mean you could really argue
00:57:22
◼
►
like the margins on going from 128 to 256, given what Apple charges, are so huge that
00:57:27
◼
►
why wouldn't you offer it as an option other than the complexity of the SKU because…
00:57:50
◼
►
I'm not sure if anybody has a better answer than this,
00:57:52
◼
►
then please let me know.
00:57:53
◼
►
Eddie wants to know, how can I export all of the photos
00:57:56
◼
►
from my messages on iOS?
00:57:59
◼
►
I have too many to do one at a time.
00:58:01
◼
►
I mean, one thing I'll say to Eddie is,
00:58:04
◼
►
change your process now.
00:58:07
◼
►
Like from now on, if you're receiving photos
00:58:10
◼
►
that you think you might want,
00:58:11
◼
►
start saving them to the camera roll.
00:58:13
◼
►
That would be my number one recommendation there.
00:58:17
◼
►
I would suggest that you check out Phone View by Ecamm.
00:58:23
◼
►
What I know they can do is export your messages into a way that they can be read in their
00:58:31
◼
►
application or can export them as PDF documents and stuff and that includes your pictures.
00:58:38
◼
►
But I don't know if they are able to export a file for you which just extracts the photos
00:58:44
◼
►
or if the file that they give you, you can pull images from.
00:58:48
◼
►
So it might be a way that you could export them all to a folder
00:58:52
◼
►
and then could find a way to extract the images from those folders.
00:58:56
◼
►
Other than that I don't know. There are a bunch of backup utilities and stuff but
00:59:00
◼
►
I don't want to recommend, necessarily recommend them blindly. I'm recommending
00:59:04
◼
►
an app to you that I have used in the past so I believe it to be good.
00:59:08
◼
►
Plus Ecamm are responsible software developers.
00:59:11
◼
►
I use their products every single day
00:59:15
◼
►
with their core recorder.
00:59:16
◼
►
So I would suggest checking that out.
00:59:19
◼
►
They do have a free trial, so you can go and do it.
00:59:22
◼
►
Other than that, I'm not sure of what else could do it.
00:59:27
◼
►
Or at least, when I was Googling, I was finding some stuff,
00:59:33
◼
►
but I wouldn't recommend that stuff
00:59:36
◼
►
because I can't trust them.
00:59:38
◼
►
So I would say give PhoneView a go.
00:59:40
◼
►
if it doesn't i'm not sure if you're out there listening you know how eddie can get the photos
00:59:45
◼
►
from his messages
00:59:47
◼
►
then please write in and we'll provide follow up later on
00:59:52
◼
►
so that is uh... ask upgrade segment
00:59:55
◼
►
which means it is time for mike at the movies
00:59:59
◼
►
to celebrate our one hundredth episode you chose star trek 2 the wrath of khan
01:00:04
◼
►
can you sum up why this was your choice for episode one hundred why the wrath
01:00:08
◼
►
of Khan, why not something else?
01:00:11
◼
►
Well, we have a spreadsheet and it lists movies that you haven't seen and some that I haven't
01:00:19
◼
►
And we had a conversation too where we were talking about Star Trek and you mentioned
01:00:22
◼
►
that you'd seen the new Star Trek movies but not any of the old Star Trek movies.
01:00:26
◼
►
And that shocked and appalled me.
01:00:29
◼
►
And Star Trek II, The Wrath of Khan is one of my favorite movies of all time.
01:00:33
◼
►
So I thought you should watch it because then you will have seen it.
01:00:38
◼
►
And if nothing else, I would also say that like, do you watch the James Bond movies?
01:00:43
◼
►
Do you watch those?
01:00:44
◼
►
Of course I do.
01:00:45
◼
►
I love the James Bond movies.
01:00:46
◼
►
You're English.
01:00:47
◼
►
I think it's probably the law that you watch them.
01:00:48
◼
►
It's in our school's curriculum.
01:00:50
◼
►
Yes, exactly, as it should be.
01:00:53
◼
►
I would say Goldfinger, follow me here, Goldfinger is relevant not just because it's a good
01:01:06
◼
►
James Bond movie, one of the earliest, the third James Bond movie, but I think it's
01:01:10
◼
►
relevant in that I think you could probably look at every James Bond movie after Goldfinger
01:01:15
◼
►
as being an attempt to do Goldfinger in some way, to be Goldfinger. Goldfinger ended up
01:01:21
◼
►
becoming sort of the template for a James Bond movie.
01:01:25
◼
►
And I could argue, having seen all the Bond movies myself, I could argue to the detriment
01:01:30
◼
►
of the series as a whole because sometimes I feel like the Bond movies needed to try
01:01:35
◼
►
try not be Goldfinger and just do something different and instead they kept on kind of
01:01:40
◼
►
replaying aspects of Goldfinger. Not always the same aspects but replaying the aspects.
01:01:45
◼
►
I would make that same argument for Star Trek II. I feel like Star Trek II, which was coming
01:01:50
◼
►
on the heels of not very successful, very expensive and not generally well liked Star
01:01:56
◼
►
Trek the Motion Picture, although it did actually do well in the box office, it was not critically
01:01:59
◼
►
successful and everybody thought it was pretty boring. They gave them a smaller, a much smaller
01:02:05
◼
►
smaller budget to make this movie and people really liked it. It was a critical success.
01:02:10
◼
►
It did pretty well at the box office and then they made many more Star Trek movies after
01:02:14
◼
►
this. That's all great, but I also feel like the weight of Star Trek II on every other
01:02:21
◼
►
Star Trek movie that I see it. All the J.J. Abrams produced Star Trek movies have it.
01:02:27
◼
►
Star Trek Into Darkness is essentially a two hour homage to Star Trek II and but even the
01:02:34
◼
►
next generation movies feel like you can see the way the villains are constructed in Star
01:02:39
◼
►
Trek movies. It's just so much of Star Trek on film is an attempt to kind of recreate
01:02:45
◼
►
or quote Star Trek II The Wrath of Khan. So on that level, I kind of feel like it's
01:02:49
◼
►
worth watching just from as a representative of the best of the original crew movies and
01:02:55
◼
►
as the movie that sort of defined what people were going to try to do with Star Trek movies
01:03:00
◼
►
So, thank you for your opening statement.
01:03:04
◼
►
That is my opening statement.
01:03:05
◼
►
Turns out I wasn't expecting it, but there was.
01:03:07
◼
►
I have an opening statement.
01:03:10
◼
►
So my opening statement is my feelings that I wrote down before I watched the movie.
01:03:13
◼
►
This is Myke at the Movie Style here.
01:03:17
◼
►
I was not excited about this movie, Jason.
01:03:20
◼
►
I had been dreading it.
01:03:22
◼
►
I don't know why, I just thought I wasn't going to like it.
01:03:26
◼
►
I don't know why.
01:03:27
◼
►
There's a reason why I hadn't picked it up till now too, is I've been a little worried
01:03:31
◼
►
about it too.
01:03:33
◼
►
And this is, I think this ends up in why I ended up just watching it this morning. We
01:03:38
◼
►
picked this weeks ago, but I watched it today. I put it off to the very last moment. But
01:03:42
◼
►
I do actually enjoy watching them on the same day because they're fresh in my mind. One
01:03:46
◼
►
of the reasons that I wasn't looking forward to this is that I have such little knowledge
01:03:51
◼
►
about Star Trek and especially this crew. Like I know these people to be the Star Trek
01:03:57
◼
►
crew, right? Like we just know this about them. You know, Shatner and Nimoy, like they
01:04:03
◼
►
are synonymous with Star Trek, but I've never watched any of it. So I have no feeling about
01:04:09
◼
►
them, right? It's just not something that I've ever paid any attention to. So it's just
01:04:16
◼
►
been a thing that I had no absolutely no attachment to and I thought that was going to hinder
01:04:22
◼
►
my enjoyment of the movie because my instinct was that you would only really enjoy it if
01:04:27
◼
►
you were coming to them with both existing emotional attachment and knowledge of the
01:04:32
◼
►
TV show and previous movie. That was my feeling. I was coming into the sequel. So that I figured
01:04:41
◼
►
I would not enjoy this movie. I have a question for you.
01:04:44
◼
►
yes were these the TV show actors like this is the crew that were in the TV show right
01:04:50
◼
►
yes and I would actually say it's not a sequel it's funny because it's Star Trek 2
01:04:53
◼
►
because the motion picture was was completely different in terms of right production design
01:05:01
◼
►
okay then this then this movie and the producers were different the creative team was essentially
01:05:06
◼
►
different just the uh really just the actors are the same well yeah I mean you know it might
01:05:11
◼
►
it might be a sequel in name only but two suggests sequel to me.
01:05:15
◼
►
Well I mean and on Star Trek right I mean it's at the very least it's a sequel to 70 some odd
01:05:20
◼
►
episodes of a tv show that became successful and then they made a movie and now here's another
01:05:26
◼
►
movie right you're coming in you're coming in 80 hours late basically. Yep it's difficult for me
01:05:31
◼
►
to tell because of when the movie was made so when was it 82. 82 yeah so it's it's the core cast the
01:05:39
◼
►
the seven core cast members are from the original Star Trek. There are other actors in this
01:05:44
◼
►
that were not seen in the original Star Trek. Ricardo Montalban was in an episode of the
01:05:49
◼
►
original Star Trek that this is the sequel to. If it is a sequel to anything, it is to
01:05:53
◼
►
an episode called Space Seed where they find Khan floating in space and they bring him
01:05:58
◼
►
on board the Enterprise and he tries to take the Enterprise over and they beat him and
01:06:02
◼
►
put him on a planet and say, instead of arresting him and taking him into prison, they put them
01:06:08
◼
►
all down on a planet that is rough but they should be able to make a living there and
01:06:12
◼
►
they say, "Well, it'll be interesting to check back in a hundred years and see what the supermen
01:06:18
◼
►
can do with this planet." And that was, so Montalban was in that. All the other actors
01:06:23
◼
►
in this have not been in Star Trek before. Kirstie Alley wasn't in Star Trek before.
01:06:27
◼
►
Merritt Buttrick and B.B. Besch, who play Carol and David Marcus, were not in Star Trek
01:06:31
◼
►
before. Just Montalban and then the core sort of seven cast members.
01:06:36
◼
►
So, I think I'm gonna have a really weird opinion of this movie, which...
01:06:41
◼
►
You watched Star Trek Into Darkness before you watched Star Trek II The Wrath of Khan,
01:06:44
◼
►
so you've already got a very weird perspective on this movie.
01:06:46
◼
►
The thing is, though, like, yeah, but they didn't... they don't feel like anything close
01:06:53
◼
►
to each other other than the names we used, to me.
01:06:56
◼
►
It just doesn't feel like at all the same movie.
01:06:59
◼
►
The plot is so different.
01:07:01
◼
►
Oh, I agree.
01:07:02
◼
►
really the stuff at the end that is quoted directly by the other movie. Yeah.
01:07:07
◼
►
And like that one scene, like the scene where everybody, well, the scene where there's
01:07:12
◼
►
like the death, right? But they reverse the roles.
01:07:16
◼
►
Right. Exactly. And also it's not the same anyway, right?
01:07:19
◼
►
Because Kirk lives. I know there is that one little thing that,
01:07:23
◼
►
well, spoiler for movies from the 80s, they bring Spock back too.
01:07:27
◼
►
I guessed that at the end of the movie, couldn't write that more if it tried.
01:07:32
◼
►
I know. I was honestly expecting for like Spock's
01:07:35
◼
►
hand to come out of the casket at the end. Like that's, that, they, this planet generates
01:07:42
◼
►
life. It generates life, you say? Like, oh come on.
01:07:47
◼
►
I know. I know. It's true. Yes, well Star Trek 3 is called The Search for Spock, and
01:07:52
◼
►
guess what? They find Spock. But anyway, that's not about, this is not about Star Trek 3.
01:07:59
◼
►
So what I was going to ask you, and the reason it's difficult for me because of the time
01:08:04
◼
►
it was made, was this movie, did it have a big movie budget or is it like an extended
01:08:11
◼
►
episode of the TV show budget-wise?
01:08:12
◼
►
Oh, well it's more like the TV show if you see any of those old TV episodes, the budget
01:08:17
◼
►
was a lot lower for those.
01:08:19
◼
►
But it is not, so Star Trek the motion picture was made on an enormous budget and like I
01:08:24
◼
►
said it was, it's really boring.
01:08:26
◼
►
This was made on a much, much smaller budget. So it is, I wouldn't say a low budget movie,
01:08:33
◼
►
but I would say it is a modest budget for a science fiction feature film in 1982.
01:08:40
◼
►
Okay, cool. Alright, so. I feel like I'm going to hold off my feelings about this movie
01:08:47
◼
►
because they change so much throughout my notes. I don't want to spoil it because
01:08:52
◼
►
I'll have to give, it won't make sense I don't think.
01:08:55
◼
►
So, where do you want to start? Start at the start. I'm going to go chronologically
01:08:59
◼
►
through my thoughts here. Kobayashi Maru. I know what this is!
01:09:03
◼
►
Yeah, well this is one of those things that's been quoted. The J.J. Abrams movie, the first
01:09:07
◼
►
J.J. Abrams Star Trek movie, we see Captain Kirk cheat at the Kobayashi Maru and this
01:09:13
◼
►
is where that originated, is in this movie. Where we see, and it's funny, one of the
01:09:18
◼
►
funny things about this, the way this movie starts, is it's the bridge of the Enterprise
01:09:23
◼
►
and everybody we see is familiar except instead of Kirk as the captain there is this Vulcan
01:09:30
◼
►
woman played by Kirstie Alley sitting in the captain's chair and it's meant to be like
01:09:34
◼
►
what? It's a double fake out right? It is right. There's a new crew and then they all
01:09:39
◼
►
die. They all die. But it's a simulation and so like one of the moments is ruined for me
01:09:45
◼
►
in this movie because I know that Kirk cheats. Yeah. To be it. That's true. Because I've
01:09:51
◼
►
that from the other movie because that was an important plot point later. So like, and
01:09:56
◼
►
then there's they kind of had the fake out and everybody is established and we find out
01:10:01
◼
►
that Kirk is now an admiral. And it's his birthday. And there is a lot being set up
01:10:08
◼
►
here, which I think is a good way to play it because of how everybody looks that everyone's
01:10:14
◼
►
getting old. That is a big theme about this movie. Yeah, these actors. I mean, I don't
01:10:20
◼
►
know how old they are but they look TV old to me.
01:10:23
◼
►
So the, the, I think the implication and it's never set out right is that Captain Kirk is
01:10:29
◼
►
turning 50. Okay. And that, that's what's happening here. Another funny note is that
01:10:34
◼
►
Star Trek the motion picture I would argue tries to make them seem like, it, it feels
01:10:41
◼
►
much more like a continuation of the original series like well yeah it's ten years later
01:10:44
◼
►
but we're still off for some dashing adventures with your young TV crew. They're a little
01:10:48
◼
►
older but still we're off and here, which is only three years later, in this movie they're
01:10:54
◼
►
like "No, they're getting old." Like that is what this movie is about. It's about getting
01:11:00
◼
►
old and coming to terms with your mortality and all of these things. And I think to this
01:11:05
◼
►
movie's great benefit, that's what they decided to do with this movie as opposed to the movie
01:11:10
◼
►
three years before. And if you see pictures from it, they're all wearing uniforms that
01:11:14
◼
►
look like they're in pajamas and they're fighting against age and here they're embracing
01:11:22
◼
►
it or at least being aware of it from the very first scene where Kirk says gallivanting
01:11:29
◼
►
around the cosmos is a game for the young and he walks out. And they're like, "What's
01:11:34
◼
►
his problem?"
01:11:35
◼
►
Yeah, so it's like, it's his birthday, they have all these new crew and these new
01:11:38
◼
►
recruits that Spock is leading because Kirk is an admiral now and Spock is now captain.
01:11:44
◼
►
One of the ways I really like that they set up the age thing with Kirk is having him have
01:11:50
◼
►
reading glasses and they come up with like an in-universe reason that he has to have
01:11:55
◼
►
reading glasses which is like allergic to some drug that people take now which is genius.
01:12:00
◼
►
It fixes your vision, yeah, and he's like "no, yeah, I know." So the doctor, Dr. McCoy
01:12:04
◼
►
comes over and says "normally I'd give you this drug but instead have these old glasses"
01:12:09
◼
►
and also he brings illegal whiskey or Romulan ale. Romulan ale. I don't know why they call
01:12:13
◼
►
it ale but then drink it like it's whiskey. Why didn't they just call it Romulan whiskey?
01:12:18
◼
►
That's how the Romulans do it. I don't know. No, unacceptable. Unacceptable.
01:12:22
◼
►
Yeah, at the Star Trek experience in Las Vegas when that was open you could order a Romulan
01:12:27
◼
►
ale. It was blue. Was it a short drink?
01:12:31
◼
►
No, it was an ale. It was an actual beer ale. What's going on here? It's ridiculous.
01:12:35
◼
►
Yeah, I know. And then I'm gonna kind of jump around in
01:12:39
◼
►
this a little bit because I tend to write more like exhaustive notes but I didn't with
01:12:43
◼
►
this one just because sometimes these can run forever. What I'm going to jump to next
01:12:49
◼
►
is when Chekov and his captain, I believe his name is Tarel, they investigate a planet
01:12:54
◼
►
to be used for an experiment and all we kind of know at the moment is it's an experiment
01:13:00
◼
►
and they come across someone's living quarters and Chekov freaks out when he sees Botany Bay,
01:13:05
◼
►
"Oh no!" Perfect. And then he whispers "Khaaaaan" like that. And then it's established Khan
01:13:15
◼
►
appears and him and his crew capture Chekhov and Tyrell. And Chekhov refers to Khan as
01:13:23
◼
►
a product of late 20th century genetic engineering. Right, which was good because it then proved
01:13:28
◼
►
to me why he was so strong. Now this is where the story goes a bit weird for me as someone
01:13:33
◼
►
who has no prior experience. It's really interesting to me to know that people that
01:13:37
◼
►
watched the franchise would know all about Khan.
01:13:40
◼
►
Well, but the way the movie is structured, right, is they don't want just people who
01:13:43
◼
►
have an encyclopedic knowledge of Star Trek. So if you know that episode, you're like,
01:13:49
◼
►
"Oh, yes." But if you don't, like you don't, they need to explain it for you. Because
01:13:55
◼
►
I think they have to assume that most of the people going to the movie in 1982 are not
01:13:59
◼
►
going to remember that episode of Star Trek from 1968.
01:14:02
◼
►
Sure, but the reason I mentioned this is because they do explain it, but they explain it in such a way
01:14:08
◼
►
That the story makes Kirk sound like a villain to me. Yeah
01:14:12
◼
►
From well from Khan's perspective. He is for sure, but even the way that Chekhov explains it. It's like we
01:14:20
◼
►
Marooned this guy here
01:14:23
◼
►
like we sent him here and him and his crew were basically just sent to either to die or to make their own way and
01:14:30
◼
►
And Chekhov says that Khan tried to kill Kirk, which was what made me realize that there
01:14:35
◼
►
was some kind of evil doings here, but the whole time, and this actually is something
01:14:40
◼
►
that prevails throughout the whole movie to me, is like, who is good and bad? I've really
01:14:45
◼
►
struggled to work it out.
01:14:46
◼
►
Well, one of the good, a good villain has a motivation, and I think that's one of
01:14:50
◼
►
the strengths of Khan, is that we, even though yes, he's a madman out for vengeance, he
01:14:54
◼
►
has his reasons, because as Chekhov says, on "City Alpha Five" there was life and
01:14:58
◼
►
a chance. They put him on a good planet where they could make a living and not be miserable.
01:15:05
◼
►
This is an inhospitable desert that they're in. And then Khan replies with the classic
01:15:12
◼
►
line, "This is Seti Alpha 5!" Which is, "Oh, crap. This is not the planet I thought
01:15:20
◼
►
it was." Chekhov is a little confused here because Chekhov is expecting to see a fairly
01:15:25
◼
►
lush world where they're able to establish themselves instead of this complete ruined
01:15:31
◼
►
desert. But something happened and a planet exploded or whatever and it ruined the ecology
01:15:36
◼
►
of this planet. So Kirk has unwittingly sent them to basically, almost like a death sentence
01:15:43
◼
►
on this, a terrible subsistence living is all that they can manage on this desert planet.
01:15:49
◼
►
So Kirk's little plan to let them not be put in prison has backfired and made Khan
01:15:55
◼
►
furious and his wife died and he's very angry.
01:15:58
◼
►
He then, Khan plants these bugs into very realistic looking ears of Tyrell and Chekhov.
01:16:07
◼
►
That's what people remember from this movie a lot is the bugs in the ears.
01:16:12
◼
►
And it's horrifying.
01:16:13
◼
►
these bugs wrap around the cerebral cortex and make people very suggestible until they
01:16:20
◼
►
go mad. And I'm pretty sure he said "mad" and "die" even though Chekhov doesn't
01:16:26
◼
►
die. Well that's because it comes out. It's not explained why that happens. It's
01:16:32
◼
►
paid to close attention but it pops out of his ear and it's fine. Yeah, I saw that
01:16:36
◼
►
it came out but it's like "why did it come out?" That is just not explained.
01:16:40
◼
►
just like, oh, Chekhov lived.
01:16:42
◼
►
- He was very angry or upset and it ran away, I guess.
01:16:45
◼
►
Yeah, it's not explained at all.
01:16:47
◼
►
- And then we go back to Kirk.
01:16:50
◼
►
Kirk is taking, he's at the Enterprise,
01:16:54
◼
►
he's gone for an inspection with some of the old crew,
01:16:57
◼
►
including, is it Bone?
01:16:59
◼
►
He goes with Bones, Sulu, and Uhura, right?
01:17:02
◼
►
They go to make an inspection on the Enterprise.
01:17:07
◼
►
And very quickly, Kirk takes control of the Enterprise
01:17:10
◼
►
investigate a research facility after he's received a message that they can't fully understand.
01:17:19
◼
►
Yeah, there's a garbled message he gets from Carol Marcus who he knows, we are led to believe
01:17:25
◼
►
that they have a past because McCoy brings it up. We see her with her son earlier where
01:17:31
◼
►
they get the call from Chekov. But we don't know it's her son yet.
01:17:36
◼
►
- Yeah, that's true, it's just a tall blonde fellow.
01:17:40
◼
►
But they, does he not call her mother at that point?
01:17:42
◼
►
- No, he doesn't.
01:17:43
◼
►
- Anyway, they're skeptical because of,
01:17:47
◼
►
he doesn't trust the Federation,
01:17:48
◼
►
he doesn't trust Captain Kirk.
01:17:51
◼
►
All of these things are going on with these poor scientists
01:17:56
◼
►
who are being, who are, the Chekhov ship is trying to,
01:18:00
◼
►
trying to work for them and now they're worried
01:18:02
◼
►
that the military is gonna take their experiment
01:18:04
◼
►
away from them. And so Kirk has to, Kirk gets the garbled message from her and that they're
01:18:11
◼
►
taking Genesis. Why are you taking Genesis? And it breaks up jammed at the source, which
01:18:16
◼
►
is a bad sign. And so then Kirk and Spock and McCoy are like, "Genesis, anyone?" And
01:18:23
◼
►
he has to explain that it's a weapon. It's supposed to be a scientific tool, but it could
01:18:27
◼
►
be used as a weapon if you fire it at a planet.
01:18:29
◼
►
It will turn it into a new planet with life on it, but if there's life on the planet,
01:18:36
◼
►
it will just destroy the planet and replace it with new life instead.
01:18:40
◼
►
So then we get Kirk taking control of the Enterprise again after a great exchange between
01:18:48
◼
►
him and Spock where Spock's like "I know you want to do this, like just do this, like
01:18:52
◼
►
let's just stop." He's like "I have no ego to be bruised here, I'm a Vulcan, like
01:18:57
◼
►
just take control of the ship. So he does and you can see how excited he is, like he's
01:19:01
◼
►
super happy to take control again. The Genesis device is a really great MacGuffin.
01:19:07
◼
►
Yeah, it's their nuclear bomb, basically.
01:19:10
◼
►
Yeah, it's very well made and it's also, you can see why it exists. So many of these things
01:19:16
◼
►
that become weapons, like why does it exist in the first place? Like why would anybody
01:19:20
◼
►
build this? It's obvious how terrible this is going to go, but with this one it's like,
01:19:25
◼
►
yeah, it could go bad, but the good is so good it's worth doing.
01:19:28
◼
►
Well, it's made by idealistic scientists who, I mean, it's this constant push and
01:19:32
◼
►
pull between the scientists who build things and the military that deploy them. And the
01:19:37
◼
►
argument here is that they're building this because the galaxy is filled with lifeless
01:19:41
◼
►
planets and we can use this technology to instantly make them livable, to terraform
01:19:48
◼
►
them. And that is fantastic because then there are more places to grow things and for people
01:19:52
◼
►
to live. The demo reel, by the way, is one of the first substantial pieces of computer
01:19:59
◼
►
animation in any motion picture. That's an entirely computer animated demo where they
01:20:05
◼
►
shoot the missile onto the dead world and zip through on the surface and come back around
01:20:11
◼
►
on the other side and it's a living world. That's basically the first big piece of CGI
01:20:15
◼
►
in any movie.
01:20:16
◼
►
I bet that cost a lot of money.
01:20:17
◼
►
I think it did.
01:20:21
◼
►
Is Khan's chest real? You know, I want to believe. I don't think it is. It looked
01:20:29
◼
►
very fake to me. And it was just, I kept looking at it. It's like, "Have you got a real
01:20:34
◼
►
chest there, Ricardo?" I couldn't tell. I don't think it was. It looked too perfectly
01:20:39
◼
►
sculpted. It's very impressive though, isn't it? Yeah, and it's, the fact that it's
01:20:43
◼
►
on show as much as it is makes me think it's not real. I don't know, but if it was real,
01:20:50
◼
►
Bravo Ricardo, bravo. You did good work there my friend, you did good work indeed. I found
01:20:59
◼
►
it really interesting how so they have their first encounter right where it's ship versus
01:21:04
◼
►
ship because Khan's taken control and he's brought the what was the name of the ship?
01:21:09
◼
►
The Reliant. And they've kind of tricked they've tricked the enterprise into believing
01:21:17
◼
►
We're all one happy fleet. You know, where they don't have their shields up. It's a really nice exchange where they get, as Kirk says, he gets caught with his britches down.
01:21:26
◼
►
And then he has to, Kirk has to reason a way out of this, a trick to survive because Khan is just going to blow them up.
01:21:34
◼
►
So then there's like, he ends up overriding the control panel because it's a failsafe built in for this very reason. Also very believable.
01:21:45
◼
►
movie is very well written for the way they get out of things. They're all plausible.
01:21:51
◼
►
And that is very plausible. It's like, well of course you have an override, right? And
01:21:55
◼
►
of course nobody knows it, right? It's like, it's got to be kept secret. It's the point
01:21:59
◼
►
of the override. And Scott McNulty always points out that you
01:22:02
◼
►
probably shouldn't have the password to control your starship be six digits, but it was 1982.
01:22:08
◼
►
It's fine. They didn't have the computing power, I guess,
01:22:12
◼
►
maybe in the future history past. And so then there's a they end up they fight back and
01:22:19
◼
►
that kind of thing and they end up scaring them away effectively. It gets really dark
01:22:25
◼
►
here in a way that I didn't expect. The injuries are very graphic of the crew of the Enterprise
01:22:35
◼
►
and the one guy that dies…
01:22:37
◼
►
Yeah, the one crewman, the young engineering crewman, has horrible burns and dies.
01:22:44
◼
►
And leaves the literal blood of himself on Kirk.
01:22:49
◼
►
On Kirk's jacket, for as long as he wears that jacket.
01:22:53
◼
►
It's very ham-fisted, right?
01:22:55
◼
►
The blood of these people is on Kirk, but it still makes the point that for the next
01:23:01
◼
►
while you were very aware of the mistake that Kirk made.
01:23:06
◼
►
though I feel a bad point in this movie or a point that could be done differently is
01:23:10
◼
►
he feels he shows no remorse for this Kirk like they have that one moment in the in the
01:23:18
◼
►
medical bay but no other point in this movie is even referenced that a bad call from him
01:23:25
◼
►
or not reacting well enough resulted in all these young people dying on their first mission
01:23:31
◼
►
which they were never supposed to go on in the first place, which he urged to go on because
01:23:36
◼
►
he was so desperate to go on another mission. Like this is never really called up by anyone,
01:23:42
◼
►
including him. And especially when at the end of the movie, like, this one's like,
01:23:45
◼
►
"You've never faced death like this before, have you, Dad?" Like, what about all the
01:23:48
◼
►
people that died?
01:23:49
◼
►
- Yeah. No, I think it's a good point. And also there's a moment where, you know, he's
01:23:54
◼
►
really responsible. His judgment, I think it's all weighing on him throughout. But
01:23:58
◼
►
But I agree it's not as directly as dressed as maybe it could be.
01:24:03
◼
►
There's a funny quirky, you know, it's not a funny moment, but there's a moment where
01:24:11
◼
►
Terrell says to him later, "He blames you for the death of his wife."
01:24:15
◼
►
And Kirk says, "I know what he blames me for."
01:24:18
◼
►
But you know, it is a reminder that Kirk got them into this.
01:24:22
◼
►
Not only did he take the ship and then keep the shields down and allow all that damage
01:24:27
◼
►
to happen that he has to then kind of work his way out of, but he caused this problem.
01:24:32
◼
►
Like it's his problem and it's come back to haunt him.
01:24:35
◼
►
Matt: Yeah, he made a previously bad decision to exile these people.
01:24:39
◼
►
And everyone around him, yes.
01:24:41
◼
►
The kind of the brutalness of it all continues as Kirk beams to the research facility.
01:24:48
◼
►
The space station, yeah.
01:24:50
◼
►
And they are brutally murdered, all of the scientists, and like hung?
01:24:55
◼
►
It's very brutal.
01:24:56
◼
►
is not as happy-go-lucky as I was expecting an 80s Star Trek movie to be in all honesty.
01:25:02
◼
►
Yeah. I mean, I don't know if that is something I should or shouldn't have expected.
01:25:06
◼
►
Star Trek IV is the happy-go-lucky movie you want, but this is not it. Yeah.
01:25:10
◼
►
I don't know if it's what I want. I actually think I prefer this because I think part of what I was
01:25:14
◼
►
dreading was it was just going to be like bubblegum space movies. Oh yeah. Oh no, it's, it's, I like
01:25:19
◼
►
like this. In fact, in the 80s, I had the novelization of Star Trek II, and one of the
01:25:28
◼
►
things that I really like that's not in the movie, that's in the book, is you spend
01:25:31
◼
►
way more time with these scientists, and you see when Khan comes and they're trying to
01:25:38
◼
►
get away as Khan and his people are killing them, and it's horrific. And here all we
01:25:45
◼
►
get is the aftermath, which is they beam down to the station, "Where is everybody?" And
01:25:49
◼
►
there's a whole bunch of dead scientists hung upside down with their throats cut in the
01:25:55
◼
►
middle of this thing and you just get the sense like something, you know, this is a
01:25:59
◼
►
murder scene and the movie, you know, you get it but you don't see all that horrible
01:26:04
◼
►
violence but obviously this is a place of horrible violence. Somebody, Khan came here
01:26:08
◼
►
and killed the scientists who were working on Genesis and he didn't get what he wants
01:26:14
◼
►
apparently because he's still asking for it. So what's that about?
01:26:16
◼
►
It's also not completely clear. I wasn't expecting this.
01:26:18
◼
►
Like a couple of reasons, and I think the movie sets it up well.
01:26:21
◼
►
Like Chekov says it will be three days until they get there.
01:26:24
◼
►
Now obviously he was tricking them.
01:26:26
◼
►
He was lying, yeah.
01:26:28
◼
►
So that, but I didn't realize that. It didn't even cross my mind.
01:26:32
◼
►
And also when Khan comes to attack the Enterprise,
01:26:37
◼
►
there was no reference made to the fact that their mission was so far unsuccessful.
01:26:42
◼
►
So it was a surprise to see everybody dead.
01:26:45
◼
►
I was expecting them to get there and all the scientists were going to be there, you
01:26:49
◼
►
know, and then they were going to work on a plan together.
01:26:51
◼
►
Yeah, it's a, they leave that moment for the characters from the Enterprise to discover
01:26:58
◼
►
that there's nobody there. And that's an interesting, I mean, not only is it horrible
01:27:04
◼
►
and you're like, "Oh, Khan was already here. He killed everybody. Then he came and
01:27:09
◼
►
asked us about this. What's that about? Did he not get what he wants? What's going
01:27:13
◼
►
on and then it gives them a little mystery to solve on the space station of what's
01:27:17
◼
►
going on here.
01:27:18
◼
►
Ben: And then they meet Tarel and Chekov, they're like hidden away in there and it's
01:27:23
◼
►
interesting at this point because I genuinely couldn't tell who they were working for,
01:27:28
◼
►
which is again very well written because it's like all I know is they're suggestible,
01:27:37
◼
►
Like they can be kind of swayed.
01:27:40
◼
►
So like my thinking is, are they being swayed by Khan still, or is now like, are they looking
01:27:46
◼
►
at Kirk and doing whatever he wants him to do? Like it's really hard to, at this point,
01:27:52
◼
►
to place, like who are they working for? Like were they just left there, which they could
01:27:56
◼
►
have conceivably just been left there because they were useless now?
01:27:58
◼
►
Right. Chekhov says we beat them, you know, the captain was strong, and the implication
01:28:03
◼
►
is that they just left him behind. Khan left him behind because they weren't of any use
01:28:06
◼
►
to them anymore.
01:28:08
◼
►
then when they then beam down to the site where the Genesis stuff is being
01:28:13
◼
►
held underground on a planet somewhere, Tarell and Chekov turn on them but then
01:28:19
◼
►
Tarell kills himself. Right, cleansing fire, you know, kill him and he turns the
01:28:24
◼
►
he he turns the phaser on himself and then pulls the trigger. And then Chekov's
01:28:29
◼
►
bug jumps out of his ear for fun. Yeah, "Ah!" He screams and is dead because
01:28:34
◼
►
he's a regular character and we don't want him to die. So he just lays down.
01:28:39
◼
►
And Khan knew where they were because Tarell or Chekov were wearing this bracelet. It wasn't
01:28:46
◼
►
completely clear what happened previously, like how Khan knew. Like I didn't get that.
01:28:51
◼
►
I was like, how does he know? Like he went to a scene and it was like he was in the next
01:28:56
◼
►
room or something. It was very confusing. But then later I worked it out.
01:29:00
◼
►
Yeah, because Tarell says, "Your Excellency, have you been listening?"
01:29:04
◼
►
"Yes, I have been listening."
01:29:06
◼
►
- So I think they could have done this part
01:29:08
◼
►
without the scene where they show Khan listening,
01:29:10
◼
►
because that actually made it more confusing for me,
01:29:13
◼
►
because I couldn't work out how he was hearing them.
01:29:15
◼
►
And then we thought, you know, it's obvious then
01:29:17
◼
►
that there's like some kind of bracelet,
01:29:19
◼
►
which Kirk then screams Khan, twice in two, right?
01:29:23
◼
►
- Yeah, so they're doing their like back and forth
01:29:26
◼
►
with each other, which one of the things,
01:29:27
◼
►
I don't know if you realize this, if you noticed this,
01:29:29
◼
►
but you know, Kirk and Khan
01:29:31
◼
►
are never in the same physical space.
01:29:34
◼
►
the actors were never together in this movie. They're on screen with each other and they're
01:29:40
◼
►
over the bracelet but they're never in the same room together. At any point, Malteban
01:29:44
◼
►
and Shatner are never in the same room together. How interesting. Because I felt like they
01:29:47
◼
►
were all the time. I know, right? And the back and forth here is really great too because
01:29:51
◼
►
this is their, they're both trying to out bluster one another. But Khan takes, so Khan
01:30:01
◼
►
takes the Genesis device. So Khan wins this round, because that was, that basically Kirk
01:30:06
◼
►
just did Khan's job for him. Khan couldn't figure it out, but Kirk figured out where
01:30:11
◼
►
it was, led them right to it, and now they've stolen the ultimate weapon. And what's worse,
01:30:17
◼
►
they've stranded Kirk and his people in the middle of this asteroid, in this cave in the
01:30:22
◼
►
middle of this asteroid. So Khan, and Khan says, "I could kill you, but I'm not gonna
01:30:26
◼
►
bother, I'm gonna abandon you like you abandoned me." And he takes off.
01:30:30
◼
►
We then find out that Kirk has a son. Yes, the blonde guy is David Marcus, and that's
01:30:35
◼
►
the back history with Carol, is that they had a son and he stayed away, and David doesn't even
01:30:44
◼
►
know that he's his son. And they had used this planet to use Genesis Underground, and then they
01:30:50
◼
►
have this incredible looking facility where we believe that they're going to be stranded to for
01:30:55
◼
►
a while, right? They go out and they eat in this place. And it is then that Kirk realizes,
01:31:01
◼
►
kind of, he lets us know that he was bluffing about a previous communication between him
01:31:06
◼
►
and Spock, where Spock told him it would take two days before they could be re-powered.
01:31:10
◼
►
But Kirk and Spock, because they know each other so well, they knew that there was bluffing
01:31:15
◼
►
going on in case they were being listened to, which they were. And two days actually
01:31:19
◼
►
just meant two hours and they tricked Khan. So Khan thinks that they're stranded.
01:31:24
◼
►
is right after he reveals to Savik about what he did in the Kobayashi Maru test at the beginning
01:31:29
◼
►
of the movie. This came up. It's like, you know, she's like, there's no way to win.
01:31:33
◼
►
And he gives the usual line of, well, you got to deal with death. And then here they're
01:31:37
◼
►
eating like apples sitting in the cave on a cliff of this cave. And she says, I would
01:31:43
◼
►
like to know what you did. And he's, and I think it's Dr. McCoy is like, you're looking
01:31:47
◼
►
at the only kid who beat the no win scenario. And he says, yeah, I reprogrammed the test.
01:31:53
◼
►
cheated, changed the conditions of the test so that I could win. I got a commendation
01:31:57
◼
►
for original thinking and she's kind of aghast. And you see that play out in the J.J. Abrams
01:32:02
◼
►
2009 Star Trek. You get to see him reprogram the simulator and all of that, much to Spock's
01:32:09
◼
►
consternation in that movie, but with Bones' help, which is kind of a funny little bit.
01:32:14
◼
►
And he's eating an apple in Star Trek 2009 when that all goes on, which is a callback
01:32:19
◼
►
to them sitting here eating apples in the cave. And then immediately, like out of nowhere,
01:32:24
◼
►
after he said, "See how clever I am, I reprogrammed the test," and they're like, "Oh, well, I
01:32:27
◼
►
don't know if I can trust you," he just pops out the communicator and is like, "Kirk to
01:32:31
◼
►
Spock, you ready?" And as an audience member, I was like, "What?"
01:32:34
◼
►
Yeah, I couldn't work out what happened. This is Captain Kirk's magic trick. He's
01:32:39
◼
►
like, he's way ahead of you. He's figured it all out, and you're just waiting for
01:32:42
◼
►
him to figure it out. It's, yeah. I love that scene because he explains, like, "I
01:32:47
◼
►
I don't ever accept that it's a no-win situation, and I'm not going to do it now either.
01:32:53
◼
►
And let me demonstrate.
01:32:54
◼
►
Spock's waiting for me.
01:32:55
◼
►
Let's get back up to the ship."
01:32:57
◼
►
I love that scene.
01:32:58
◼
►
So they then kind of trick Khan a little bit.
01:33:01
◼
►
So they're going into this nebula, and this nebula would mean that none of the systems
01:33:07
◼
►
could be used, right?
01:33:08
◼
►
None of the tracking systems.
01:33:10
◼
►
All the shields.
01:33:11
◼
►
Yeah, the idea is that the Enterprise is really crippled more than the Verlinde is, but if
01:33:16
◼
►
they go into the nebula, the odds will be even because nobody can use their shields
01:33:21
◼
►
and nobody can see particularly well. And so it'll be a fairer battle because they
01:33:26
◼
►
can't beat them in clear combat, but they could beat them in this hazy sort of submarine
01:33:31
◼
►
warfare kind of thing. And Khan's second in command, played by Judson Scott, Joachim,
01:33:40
◼
►
knows this, right? And he's like, "I'm slowing down." And that's kind of a fun
01:33:45
◼
►
scene where Spock is like, "Well, they're slowing down," and Kirk says, "Put me on with
01:33:49
◼
►
Khan," and he gives him a little, he goes, he just goads him, it's like, "Khan, look,
01:33:53
◼
►
I'm still alive, haha, I beat you." So here's another thing, he wants to set him up to murder
01:33:58
◼
►
him. Well, but they're trying to beat him, I mean, this is the idea, is I gotta get you
01:34:03
◼
►
to chase me in here, because that's the only way we're gonna be able to escape. But here's
01:34:07
◼
►
the other, here's the thing about that, it's not just Khan, though, is it? Sure. On that
01:34:13
◼
►
Well, no, they say that they left the whole crew behind on SETI Alpha 5, so it's just
01:34:18
◼
►
Khan and his people. Khan and his other genetically engineered people, the 72 super people from
01:34:25
◼
►
1996, back in the old days of 1996 when we left on spaceships. And so anyway, they floor
01:34:35
◼
►
it at that point. Khan's like, "No, chase him. We gotta go get him," because Khan
01:34:39
◼
►
Khan is obsessed with Kirk. He has to kill Kirk. And Kirk knows this and uses it against
01:34:43
◼
►
him. No! Ooh!
01:34:47
◼
►
- Khan's downfall is his lust for revenge. - Yeah, no, this is the, I mean, that's the
01:34:54
◼
►
Moby Dick reference that gets made a couple of times too, because that's a book about
01:34:57
◼
►
a sailor who is obsessed, and his obsession is his downfall, and that's what they're going
01:35:04
◼
►
for here, is Khan is out for the wrath of Khan. It was originally called The Vengeance
01:35:07
◼
►
of Khan and he's out for revenge and the revenge is his downfall. At one point, Joachim
01:35:13
◼
►
says to him, "We can go anywhere we want. We've got a spaceship." And Khan's like,
01:35:19
◼
►
"No, I must kill Kirk."
01:35:20
◼
►
- And also they have the most powerful weapon available.
01:35:23
◼
►
- Yeah, they can go anywhere and do anything and he is not willing to do that because he
01:35:29
◼
►
is out for vengeance.
01:35:34
◼
►
And so they enter the nebula, they have a fight, and the Enterprise ends up taking out
01:35:38
◼
►
most of Khan's crew, which is again one of these other morally strange parts to me.
01:35:42
◼
►
But like, I don't know, there's just like the amount of people that we were watching
01:35:46
◼
►
being destroyed, just like, "Killed them all, man!"
01:35:49
◼
►
Yeah, well, they're Khan's people, I think that's, I think the idea is that they're,
01:35:53
◼
►
you know, you're in a space battle with another ship, that's part of the deal.
01:35:58
◼
►
And in the end, it's not Khan, I mean, it's not, Kirk kills some of the people on the
01:36:02
◼
►
the ship but they're like gonna they ask them to surrender and and and cons like
01:36:06
◼
►
no I'm blowing everything up now I mean he doesn't care either about whatever's
01:36:11
◼
►
left of his crew he's gonna blow up his his ship and take Kirk with him I mean
01:36:15
◼
►
he doesn't care about Kurt's career but Kirk's man to be the good guy yeah no
01:36:19
◼
►
they're the enemy right yeah yeah I know I know I couldn't tell here if the
01:36:27
◼
►
the Nebula scenes were tense or unnecessarily slow paced. There was lots of back and forth
01:36:34
◼
►
of like faces and it just, I didn't really feel the tension, it just felt like it was
01:36:39
◼
►
taking too long. I think that may be a difference between 1982
01:36:43
◼
►
and 2016. That's a good point, yep.
01:36:45
◼
►
I think maybe that it would be faster paced now. The idea there is they're trying to build
01:36:49
◼
►
tension, they want it to be like a submarine battle, something like Hunt for Red October,
01:36:54
◼
►
idea that they're moving very slowly. The way that they beat Khan in the battle is that
01:36:59
◼
►
Khan is thinking in terms of going left and right, and they go up and down. He's thinking
01:37:05
◼
►
two-dimensionally, which you would do in space if you were somebody who's used to being
01:37:09
◼
►
like from a planet, and the spacemen of the 23rd century are capable of flying their spaceship
01:37:15
◼
►
up and down, too. And they use that to beat him. But yeah, I think that the pacing is
01:37:21
◼
►
is not what you would do today.
01:37:27
◼
►
Because then also Khan very slowly with his last ounce of strength activates the Genesis
01:37:32
◼
►
Well he has a speech to give, Myke.
01:37:36
◼
►
Most of it he's not even talking.
01:37:38
◼
►
He's just turning a dial and then pressing a button and turning a dial and press...
01:37:41
◼
►
It's weight takes way too long.
01:37:43
◼
►
That part takes way too long.
01:37:46
◼
►
And then Spock sacrifices himself, right? Because basically they need the ship's power
01:37:54
◼
►
core or whatever to be repaired, but nobody can go and repair it because it's horrifically
01:37:59
◼
►
radioactive.
01:38:01
◼
►
And if this is done, then they can go into, what do they call it? Warp speed?
01:38:06
◼
►
Warp speed and escape. The only way they can escape, they're going full impulse. Sulu's
01:38:11
◼
►
got full impulse, but they're not going to make it. In fact, I think Sulu says in one
01:38:15
◼
►
of the lines that I like, we're not going to make it are we? And, uh,
01:38:19
◼
►
and Spock has that moment where he's sitting in the chair and he's like, okay,
01:38:23
◼
►
I gotta do this because they got to get the warp drive back on line or
01:38:26
◼
►
everybody's going to die. And so he goes into the radioactive chamber,
01:38:29
◼
►
Scotty tries to Scott stop him. Uh, uh, bones tries to stop him.
01:38:34
◼
►
He gives bones the neck pinch and then puts his fingers on his head and says,
01:38:38
◼
►
remember, Hmm, I wonder what that's setting up. And, uh,
01:38:42
◼
►
that's setting up the next movie. And he goes in, he sacrifices himself to save the ship.
01:38:48
◼
►
He bathes in the radiation, gets the warp drive back online, they zip away, yay! Thereby
01:38:54
◼
►
saving everybody, and the Genesis torpedo blows up and kills Khan and his crew and the
01:39:01
◼
►
spaceships and all of that. But not the Enterprise.
01:39:04
◼
►
Not before Khan says, "For hate's sake, I spit my last breath at thee." Bit melodramatic.
01:39:10
◼
►
I think that's Moby Dick again.
01:39:14
◼
►
That's too much.
01:39:15
◼
►
If that's a direct quote, that's too much.
01:39:18
◼
►
That's too on the nose.
01:39:19
◼
►
There's a lot of Moby Dick in this.
01:39:21
◼
►
In Star Trek 6 there's a lot of Shakespeare.
01:39:23
◼
►
I think that's a yes.
01:39:26
◼
►
Spock is in bad shape and he repeats something that he says earlier about the needs of the
01:39:31
◼
►
many and Kirk ends it by saying outweigh the needs of the few or the one or whatever it
01:39:37
◼
►
heroes that they mentioned as they kind of change it a little bit. Then they do the Vulcan
01:39:41
◼
►
salute thing through the glass, live long and prosper, Spock dies. I didn't expect him
01:39:47
◼
►
to remain dead dead, as I mentioned, like I was expecting hand out of casket or something.
01:39:52
◼
►
But then there's the father and son moment that we referenced with the, you know, you've
01:39:57
◼
►
never seen death and then it's like, I love you, dad, I love you, son, that kind of thing.
01:40:03
◼
►
then there's the whole point at the end was like I feel young and life and blah blah blah
01:40:09
◼
►
I think totally, totally questionable moment. I feel like this movie is coming. I mean the
01:40:11
◼
►
whole idea is that Kirk's taking a journey and he needs to embrace, you know, accept
01:40:16
◼
►
his mortality and embrace that he needs to do what he, what he can with his life. And
01:40:23
◼
►
because it's going to end and he's going to get old and die and he just needs to do
01:40:27
◼
►
it. It does seem awfully sunny after all these people have died and including all the scientists
01:40:33
◼
►
and all of the people on Khan's ship and a bunch of people on the Enterprise and Spock
01:40:37
◼
►
has died and then in the end Kirk's there with the mother of his son wearing his jacket
01:40:42
◼
►
next to him and he's like "Yeah, I'm feeling pretty good right now." I was like "I don't
01:40:46
◼
►
know about that." That's a little weird. That's a weird moment.
01:40:49
◼
►
So I thought this movie was going to be slow and kind of dumb and was only going to be
01:40:57
◼
►
interesting to people that liked Star Trek. What is Jason making me watch?
01:41:00
◼
►
This is how I felt, I was like this is going to be a disaster for me. But I felt like it
01:41:06
◼
►
moved super fast, like it was over in a flash. I was very surprised about that. And it had
01:41:12
◼
►
a lot more thought and moral questioning in it than I expected. And they didn't lean too
01:41:19
◼
►
heavily on the previous knowledge of the viewer. And I've got to say I enjoyed it. I did. I
01:41:29
◼
►
enjoyed it. This is not going to make my top five of Myke at the Movies. No, no, no, no,
01:41:34
◼
►
no. But I, I enjoyed it vastly more than I thought I was going to. I thought this was
01:41:41
◼
►
going to be one of the rare, I think maybe the only Myke at the Movies suggestion that
01:41:45
◼
►
I didn't like. I don't think there's been one that I didn't like before. From you anyway,
01:41:50
◼
►
I've disliked movies that Casey has shown me. Casey, yeah, sorry Casey. But of the upgrade
01:41:55
◼
►
Myke at the movies I have never disliked a movie and you have kept that crown
01:41:59
◼
►
going because I did I enjoyed it I and and I think maybe maybe of all of the
01:42:04
◼
►
movies that I've seen I enjoyed it more than I thought I would the most like the
01:42:09
◼
►
rest of them there have been elements that I thought would would work or I
01:42:15
◼
►
would like and then some of them surprised me more than than expected
01:42:18
◼
►
like say anything continues to be a massive surprise to me and will probably
01:42:22
◼
►
probably always be the most surprising, just how much I adored that movie. And some of
01:42:29
◼
►
them disappointed me a little bit, like Real Genius disappointed me a little bit in areas
01:42:32
◼
►
because there was a lot of questionable humor in that which I didn't like.
01:42:36
◼
►
Um, indeed. But this movie only surprised me positively,
01:42:40
◼
►
even if I thought some things were uncomfortable. Like, I still dislike the kind of feeling
01:42:48
◼
►
of Kirk's bad actions and that there's no consequences for him. Literally none.
01:42:54
◼
►
I guess the consequences are that he, well I mean Spock dies.
01:42:59
◼
►
Then Spock comes back to life again. So there are no consequences for Kirk's actions even
01:43:05
◼
►
when they are bad and/or questionable. And that I don't like. And I don't know why I
01:43:12
◼
►
felt this so strongly in this movie when there are so many movies like it. But I think it
01:43:17
◼
►
was purely because of the way that Khan is introduced as someone who is done wrong before
01:43:23
◼
►
you find out what he did.
01:43:24
◼
►
Yeah, he has a legitimate grievance against Kirk. I think he does.
01:43:30
◼
►
A great suggestion and a movie worthy to take the episode 100 crown, so thank you Jason.
01:43:36
◼
►
I'm glad you liked it. I think it's a good movie and there are good and bad Star Trek
01:43:43
◼
►
movies, but Star Trek II is a good movie. It has some of the best space battle scenes
01:43:49
◼
►
I think in any movie, even though the effects are obviously dated. I think they're actually
01:43:54
◼
►
pretty darn good for 1982.
01:43:56
◼
►
The effects held up surprisingly well. I thought that this was some kind of special edition
01:44:01
◼
►
or something that I was watching.
01:44:02
◼
►
No, the phaser blasts on the hull, they get the big scorch marks and people are screaming
01:44:09
◼
►
and jumping around and all of that. And it all is kind of logical and how do you resolve
01:44:13
◼
►
it. And unexpected places they go down deeper. You know, they go to the space station, nobody's
01:44:19
◼
►
there except dead bodies, and then go deeper into the planet. And then you get the back
01:44:22
◼
►
and forth between Shatner and Montalban, which is so great. And it is amazing that they never
01:44:26
◼
►
actually share space. It's just on one end of a communicator or other. But their back
01:44:32
◼
►
and forth is great and fittingly kind of, you know, they're both trying to outdo each
01:44:36
◼
►
other and go even further over the top with their back and forth. And it's great. I,
01:44:40
◼
►
I like it a lot and I like the end. The end is very sad. I, when I saw this in the movie
01:44:45
◼
►
theater as a kid, I just sobbed when Spock died. It was so sad. Um, I think looking back
01:44:50
◼
►
on it now, of course, then they just bring him back and he's in all the other movies.
01:44:54
◼
►
Um, and, and that devalues the end of this a little bit. It would have been more sad,
01:45:00
◼
►
you know, obviously if he had actually stayed dead, but that didn't happen and they were
01:45:04
◼
►
already, as you pointed out quite rightly, laying the groundwork for him to come back
01:45:07
◼
►
because the way the story goes is Leonard Nimoy said, "I'd be in Star Trek II if you
01:45:11
◼
►
killed me." And they're like, "All right, we'll do that." And then by the end of the
01:45:16
◼
►
shoot he's like, "Hey," because the Star Trek motion picture wasn't very good and I think
01:45:20
◼
►
people didn't really have a good time on it. By the end of the movie he's like, "Hey, this
01:45:23
◼
►
is pretty good. I'd do more." And they're like, "Okay." So they left themselves some
01:45:30
◼
►
outs so they could bring them back. And they did.
01:45:33
◼
►
Which is why that whole line, all those lines are there at the end.
01:45:36
◼
►
Yeah, and they'll remember putting the hand on Dr. McCoy, that's in there, and then they
01:45:44
◼
►
show the casket lovingly panning over the casket. No hand emerges, but that is the implication,
01:45:49
◼
►
right? It didn't make sense to me why the caskets
01:45:52
◼
►
remain intact on these planets. Exactly! Exactly.
01:45:56
◼
►
Why are they made to do that? Like, there'd just be dead bodies just strewn all over these
01:46:02
◼
►
I know, I think they figured, well I think they usually like fire them into the sun or
01:46:05
◼
►
something, but in this case they fired it into the Genesis planet, but of course the
01:46:09
◼
►
Genesis planet is like nothing we've seen before, so. But that's another movie.
01:46:13
◼
►
The way I write Converse is that, because maybe I didn't pay enough attention, is
01:46:16
◼
►
that they put him in an escape pod, not a coffin.
01:46:19
◼
►
Oh, it's a torpedo. It's a photon torpedo.
01:46:22
◼
►
Right, but then it makes no frickin' sense why it stayed in peace, because surely a torpedo
01:46:26
◼
►
should explode? Well, they took the explosives out and put a Vulcan in it instead. Yeah,
01:46:31
◼
►
but still! I don't know. How strong should the structures be? Yeah, yeah. Okay, it makes
01:46:37
◼
►
no sense to me why that stayed intact. It should have broken into pieces when it hit
01:46:42
◼
►
the Earth. It's magic. Whatever it is. It's the same reason, Myke, it's the same reason
01:46:45
◼
►
that Chekhov doesn't die. It would be inconvenient. I'm glad you like it. I'm glad you like it.
01:46:54
◼
►
I like it too and I'm glad you do. It's a fun movie with some great performances and
01:46:59
◼
►
a good script. And in fact, that's one of the things that I think is not a bad influence,
01:47:03
◼
►
but a good influence on future Star Trek is the writer and director of this has been involved
01:47:12
◼
►
with other Star Treks. He actually wrote Star Trek and directed Star Trek 6, Nicholas Meyer,
01:47:19
◼
►
and was involved in the Star Trek movies for quite a while. And my understanding is he
01:47:27
◼
►
is actually one of the consulting producers and writers on the new Star Trek series that's
01:47:32
◼
►
coming out in January. So they're kind of honoring him. The TV show. Yeah. For his work.
01:47:39
◼
►
But he injected, look, Star Trek as a movie franchise would not exist if this had been
01:47:43
◼
►
a bad movie. The only reason that there were more Star Trek movies is that Star Trek II
01:47:48
◼
►
was really good because it was on a 16 million dollar budget or whatever it was, small budget,
01:47:53
◼
►
and it was not really given a lot of support and it was a good movie and that's the only
01:48:00
◼
►
reason Star Trek continued after that. Only reason.
01:48:03
◼
►
If you'd like to find our show notes for this week head on over to relay.fm/upgrades/100
01:48:09
◼
►
and if you want to find Jason online he's @jasonl on twitter he's at 6colors.com I am
01:48:41
◼
►
[MUSIC PLAYING]
01:48:44
◼
►
[MUSIC PLAYING]