167: The White Room of My Mind
00:00:08
◼
►
From Relay FM, this is Upgrade, episode 167. Today's show is brought to you by Text Expander
00:00:14
◼
►
from Smile, Squarespace, and MacWaldon. My name is Myke Hurley, I'm joined by Mr. Jason
00:00:20
◼
►
Snell. Hello, Jason Snell.
00:00:22
◼
►
Hello Mr. Myke Hurley, how are you?
00:00:24
◼
►
Jason, nobody cares about that. We're going straight into #SnellTalk this week.
00:00:28
◼
►
is November right now. November is known to some, including you, as NaNoWriMo. Mark has
00:00:36
◼
►
a NaNoWriMo question for you, Jason. Mark wants to know, "Will any of the novels that
00:00:41
◼
►
Jason has written for National Novel Writing Month ever see the light of day?"
00:00:46
◼
►
Tim: This is a great question, and the answer is, when you write a draft of a novel, it's
00:00:52
◼
►
not done. Writing a novel is a little bit like making, like doing any other kind of,
00:01:01
◼
►
I don't know, like making furniture or, you know, woodworking or things like that where
00:01:07
◼
►
it's a craft and you're not done when you do your first draft. You need to edit it and
00:01:13
◼
►
you need to fix stuff that doesn't make sense or problems that you discover as you go through.
00:01:19
◼
►
the novel you finish is not the same as the one you started?" And so the answer is I have
00:01:24
◼
►
three novels basically in a drawer, in a folder, where I've written them through. None of them
00:01:31
◼
►
I consider done. None of them are publishable, in my opinion. I have tried to rewrite one
00:01:39
◼
►
of them, but going--one of the consequences of going out on my own is it's very hard to
00:01:46
◼
►
clear time and say, "I'm going to use this to rewrite my novel when I have a whole bunch
00:01:52
◼
►
of other things that I'm trying to do to pay the bills." It has definitely changed my mindset.
00:01:57
◼
►
- Yes, oh yes. I have been feeling that recently with some projects. It was like, "I would
00:02:00
◼
►
love to be able to put my time into this, but unfortunately I have a job to do." Right?
00:02:04
◼
►
- Yeah, and I tried to block out time, but even then it's hard to get out of the space
00:02:10
◼
►
of "I could use this time to do this other thing that is going to bring in money," and
00:02:16
◼
►
it's unfortunate because I really should spend the time, do the rewrite, and get it out there,
00:02:22
◼
►
whether it would be published by somebody or whether I would just self-publish it, which
00:02:25
◼
►
would be fine, I don't really care. But to get to that point, they all need work, and
00:02:32
◼
►
I haven't even gotten through working on the one, let alone the other two that are sitting
00:02:36
◼
►
there. This is also the reason why I, when people ask me, "Are you doing NaNoWriMo this
00:02:40
◼
►
year?" my answer is no, because I don't really want to put a fourth novel in the drawer that
00:02:46
◼
►
I have to rewrite since I have proven to be unable to rewrite the ones that I've already
00:02:52
◼
►
got in there. And if I'm going to spend energy on something like that, I would like to resolve
00:02:57
◼
►
the existing things one way or another. So they sit for now, and hopefully I will, I
00:03:03
◼
►
I have been gradually going through the one rewrite process
00:03:06
◼
►
and I had hoped to get back to that this month,
00:03:09
◼
►
inspired by NaNoWriMo.
00:03:11
◼
►
And I feel like, I don't know if you feel like this Myke,
00:03:15
◼
►
but I feel like since the Apple event in September,
00:03:19
◼
►
I've just been going at full max capacity.
00:03:22
◼
►
And then you throw in the travel,
00:03:24
◼
►
'cause I had a couple of trips
00:03:25
◼
►
and you had the one trip to Chicago,
00:03:28
◼
►
like you throw in the travel
00:03:29
◼
►
and all the Apple announcements
00:03:31
◼
►
and then all these Apple product releases,
00:03:32
◼
►
which have been staggered out even over a longer time
00:03:35
◼
►
because of the iPhone 10, that I have had no,
00:03:38
◼
►
like the dog is angry with me
00:03:41
◼
►
because I don't walk her as much as I should.
00:03:43
◼
►
'Cause I just, I have felt like I've been at max capacity
00:03:46
◼
►
for basically every day since mid September.
00:03:51
◼
►
So that's been, it's awfully hard to break away from that,
00:03:55
◼
►
but I need to try.
00:03:55
◼
►
This is like a mini episode of Free Agents.
00:03:57
◼
►
People should listen to Free Agents if they wanna hear me
00:03:59
◼
►
and David Sparks talk about grappling
00:04:02
◼
►
with our time management and our perceptions of getting work done versus doing personal
00:04:09
◼
►
things because it's definitely one of the issues if you're somebody who makes their
00:04:13
◼
►
own schedule and is their own boss like we are.
00:04:16
◼
►
If you would like to submit a question to start the show like Mark did, thank you Mark,
00:04:21
◼
►
just send a tweet with the hashtag Snail Talk and yours may be chosen for a future episode.
00:04:27
◼
►
So we have more Apple TV show news. Apple have signed another show. Jennifer Aniston
00:04:33
◼
►
and Reese Witherspoon will star in a morning show drama based on a book called Top of the
00:04:39
◼
►
Morning. When we spoke a few weeks ago about some Apple TV related stuff, there was the
00:04:46
◼
►
rumoured apparently that Apple was bidding for this new Jennifer Aniston project. It
00:04:51
◼
►
was really interesting to me to read the Hollywood Reporter article and realise that they threw
00:04:56
◼
►
this out there and this is wild to me that this is this will be um aniston's return to
00:05:01
◼
►
a tv series since friends this is she's not doing any tv shows since friends which is
00:05:07
◼
►
yeah wild right she's been she's been doing movies right the movies is what she has done
00:05:11
◼
►
um but it's it's yeah i was really really surprised about that because i think
00:05:15
◼
►
basically every other war every other friends actor has right all of the actors and actresses
00:05:22
◼
►
and friends have done other TV shows to my memory. Like I'm scanning it through like
00:05:27
◼
►
of all the big like the main crew.
00:05:30
◼
►
Has David Schwimmer done a TV show so far?
00:05:32
◼
►
He did Band of Brothers.
00:05:33
◼
►
Oh well I guess that's an HBO miniseries but sure.
00:05:36
◼
►
That works as a TV show I'm sure. I think I can pass on that. But anyway, so this Apple
00:05:42
◼
►
has won a multiple outlet bidding war with a straight to season two season order.
00:05:49
◼
►
Which is a, you know, that's risky. Talking to Tim Goodman last week on the podcast I
00:05:54
◼
►
do with him, he was like, "Yeah, that's risky, because it could be a bad show." They're stuck
00:05:59
◼
►
with two years of it, or paying to buy out the second year, which sometimes happens.
00:06:04
◼
►
This seems like a rare type of deal, like I imagine this isn't done very often.
00:06:11
◼
►
The story, I mean, first off, these are streaming seasons, so they're probably, you know, they
00:06:16
◼
►
they probably bought 25 episodes or 22 episodes, which used to be a season.
00:06:19
◼
►
It's 20. It's 20.
00:06:20
◼
►
It's 20, see? So it's 20 -- it's two 10-episode season. So it's not like they're buying 50
00:06:26
◼
►
episodes. They're buying 20 episodes. And the other thing is this is happening right
00:06:31
◼
►
now in the bidding wars, in this peak TV bidding war thing, because this show's been out there
00:06:36
◼
►
for a while, and people have been talking about it, and Apple has been linked to it
00:06:39
◼
►
before. But Apple was also linked to the Ryan Murphy show that Netflix signed him for.
00:06:46
◼
►
And that was a case where there was a bidding war and Netflix ended up bidding for a two-season order and
00:06:53
◼
►
raising the amount of money they were paying for
00:06:57
◼
►
streaming rights to his other shows like American Horror Story, yeah, and
00:07:03
◼
►
And so this seems to be par for the course
00:07:08
◼
►
Now if you really want to book to get one of these
00:07:10
◼
►
big-name shows that everybody's bidding on, one of the ways you do it is say, you
00:07:16
◼
►
know, "Yeah, we'll commit to 20 instead of 10. We'll commit to two seasons." And that's
00:07:21
◼
►
just more money on the table. And that is, from a creative side, I mean, it's great to
00:07:26
◼
►
go into it knowing you're making 20 episodes instead of 10, that you can have a plan. And
00:07:31
◼
►
I don't know, it's interesting, but this is the case where Amazon and Netflix have a lot
00:07:37
◼
►
of money too and so Apple is up against them in terms of getting and they want to make
00:07:43
◼
►
a splash and they want names because they want people to to watch their stuff so this
00:07:48
◼
►
is an interesting move it won't be the last again they got a lot of money that they're
00:07:53
◼
►
that they're able to spend but it's the next step there will be more.
00:07:58
◼
►
From The Hollywood Reporter this show is described as an inside look at the lives of the people
00:08:02
◼
►
who help America wake up in the morning exploring the unique challenges faced by the women and
00:08:07
◼
►
men who carry out this daily televised ritual of being a morning TV show host.
00:08:13
◼
►
Aniston and Witherspoon will be executive producers and the series is being written
00:08:16
◼
►
by another executive producer, Jay Carson, who produced House of Cards and Carson will
00:08:22
◼
►
also serve as the showrunner for top of the, well it's called Morning Show Drama is the
00:08:28
◼
►
working title at the moment I think.
00:08:30
◼
►
- Unnamed, "Untitled Morning Show Drama."
00:08:34
◼
►
Yeah, we'll see how it is.
00:08:36
◼
►
And when they can put it into production, right?
00:08:39
◼
►
I'm still kind of a believer that this is going to be a,
00:08:42
◼
►
this Apple video service thing is a fall 2018 thing.
00:08:47
◼
►
And, you know, the theory may be it's a fall 2018 thing
00:08:52
◼
►
and everybody gets a trial, you know,
00:08:55
◼
►
a three to six month trial when they sign up
00:08:57
◼
►
like they did for Apple Music,
00:08:58
◼
►
which means that basically Apple will give you
00:09:01
◼
►
all their fall shows, their launch shows,
00:09:03
◼
►
so that you will watch and try it out
00:09:07
◼
►
and presumably like it enough to stick around.
00:09:09
◼
►
Oh, I had a quick, speaking of Apple TV related things,
00:09:14
◼
►
I had an Apple TV box related update.
00:09:16
◼
►
So I finally took the plunge and downloaded the,
00:09:20
◼
►
I put the beta little profile thingy on my Apple TV 4K,
00:09:26
◼
►
which requires Xcode.
00:09:30
◼
►
It's dumb because it doesn't have a USB
00:09:32
◼
►
and it doesn't have a USB-C port on the Apple TV 4K.
00:09:35
◼
►
So you have to just kind of do it over the air
00:09:37
◼
►
which is also a little bit disturbing, but I did it.
00:09:40
◼
►
I updated to Apple TV, TV OS 11.2
00:09:44
◼
►
and found, and I used the like dynamic auto adjust
00:09:50
◼
►
frame rate thing that they added in the beta.
00:09:52
◼
►
And it's great.
00:09:54
◼
►
It seems to work really well.
00:09:55
◼
►
Many apps support it, although not all.
00:09:58
◼
►
I was able to use the TV app,
00:10:00
◼
►
but also the Netflix app and the Plex app,
00:10:05
◼
►
and it was changing frame rates.
00:10:07
◼
►
So basically if you were playing a film
00:10:09
◼
►
and the film's at 24 frames a second,
00:10:11
◼
►
the Apple TV flips over into 24 frames mode
00:10:15
◼
►
and the TV just displays the 24 frames
00:10:18
◼
►
instead of what used to happen,
00:10:19
◼
►
which is the Apple TV, we take the 24 frames from video
00:10:23
◼
►
and convert it into a 30 frame per second image
00:10:26
◼
►
by adding duplicate frames,
00:10:29
◼
►
which your TV then, depending on how it's configured,
00:10:32
◼
►
might try to dynamically remove or might not.
00:10:36
◼
►
And with this setting,
00:10:38
◼
►
this is the setting that John Saracusa
00:10:40
◼
►
is really excited about.
00:10:41
◼
►
It just switches, and my TV blinks momentarily
00:10:45
◼
►
when you start to play the video,
00:10:46
◼
►
it blinks and then comes back.
00:10:48
◼
►
But it takes the new frame rate and then just plays it
00:10:52
◼
►
because the TV has the ability to take a 24 frame,
00:10:55
◼
►
frame rate video and just play it at 24 frames a second,
00:10:59
◼
►
which is better because you lose a bunch of like hiccups
00:11:03
◼
►
in movement that are artificially put in
00:11:06
◼
►
by the conversion from 24 to 30.
00:11:08
◼
►
So it's cool.
00:11:09
◼
►
I'm a little baffled why Apple has never offered
00:11:12
◼
►
this feature before,
00:11:13
◼
►
but I'm glad that it's there in the beta
00:11:15
◼
►
because I think it's, you know, for people who care,
00:11:18
◼
►
it's a really great feature.
00:11:20
◼
►
So it's good to see that it's in there.
00:11:22
◼
►
Johnny Ive was interviewed/profiled in wallpaper magazine, the design magazine.
00:11:28
◼
►
There was an interesting quote, possibly interesting quote, that I just wanted to read and then
00:11:32
◼
►
just discuss just a little bit.
00:11:34
◼
►
So this is a quote, this is Johnny Ive speaking to wallpaper.
00:11:37
◼
►
What I think is remarkable about the iPhone X is that its functionality is so determined
00:11:42
◼
►
by software and because of the fluid nature of software this product is going to change
00:11:46
◼
►
In 12 months time this object will be able to do things that it can't now.
00:11:50
◼
►
I think that is extraordinary.
00:11:52
◼
►
I think we'll look back on it and see it as a very significant point in terms of the products
00:11:56
◼
►
we have been developing.
00:11:57
◼
►
So I want to unpack this just a touch.
00:12:00
◼
►
I love you reading the words of Jonny Ive because as an American, having a British accent
00:12:06
◼
►
read it is better.
00:12:07
◼
►
Yeah, I slowed it down.
00:12:08
◼
►
Say aluminium, Myke.
00:12:10
◼
►
Aluminium, Myke.
00:12:12
◼
►
I wanted to just slow it down just a touch so I could try and get a bit of Jonny in it.
00:12:16
◼
►
Were you in the white room momentarily?
00:12:19
◼
►
The white room of my mind.
00:12:21
◼
►
That's title fishing.
00:12:23
◼
►
Title fishing.
00:12:24
◼
►
I obviously, okay, obviously, all iPhones get new software every single year, right?
00:12:32
◼
►
This is just a given.
00:12:33
◼
►
But there are just a couple of things in this quote that are interesting to me.
00:12:37
◼
►
Like I think we'll look back on it and see it as a very significant point in terms of
00:12:40
◼
►
the products we've been developing, talking about how it's going to be very different.
00:12:45
◼
►
So I've just been thinking about this combined with my usage of the iPhone 10.
00:12:49
◼
►
So listening to a great discussion on Under the Radar last week, episode 105 where Underscore
00:12:55
◼
►
and Marco were talking about new considerations due to more prevalent larger screen sizes
00:13:01
◼
►
and OLED screens and how that may make them rethink the way that their apps work, like
00:13:05
◼
►
where things are placed and the use of dark colors, right, like to black because you get
00:13:10
◼
►
the true black of OLED and stuff like that.
00:13:12
◼
►
It's making me wonder if iOS 12 will see some significant changes to the functionality and
00:13:22
◼
►
feel of iOS from a UI perspective.
00:13:25
◼
►
You know iOS 7 was a long time ago now, it's five years right, so this could be time for
00:13:32
◼
►
a bit of a change and I think that the iPhone X could be enough of a reason for it.
00:13:38
◼
►
So like I've been playing around with the smart invert colors accessibility option which
00:13:42
◼
►
I recommend anybody who has the iPhone X should do because then when you open all of your
00:13:47
◼
►
apps that have white backgrounds, oh my word, they look unbelievable. It just looks so good
00:13:53
◼
►
to me anyway. Like the all black, like the all you're seeing is just the pixels that
00:13:59
◼
►
are illuminated. It's beautiful. So yeah, I think that this could be, there could be
00:14:05
◼
►
some stuff here and I think that they wouldn't have changed it necessarily too much before.
00:14:10
◼
►
I mean there are definitely clearly some changes to iOS 11 made for the iPhone, like the big
00:14:15
◼
►
title bars and stuff like that, I think a lot of that was changed for the 10 and some
00:14:20
◼
►
of the changes they made to the iPad operating system with the swiping gestures I think were
00:14:25
◼
►
because of the 10.
00:14:26
◼
►
But I think that we could be looking at some bigger UI changes in iOS 12 because I expect
00:14:35
◼
►
there is a possibility that we, you know, there is always a possibility we may have
00:14:40
◼
►
more phones, right, that look and operate like this one in September of next year. If
00:14:46
◼
►
not just the fact that the OLED notch screen will get its second iteration most likely,
00:14:51
◼
►
right, so there will be, even if they don't introduce any new models, that they don't
00:14:56
◼
►
introduce a plus model or whatever, that phone will, there will be more of them. And if Apple
00:15:00
◼
►
sees it as the future, maybe it's the time to do some UI redesign. So I just thought
00:15:04
◼
►
that this Johnny quote coupled with things that I've been hearing developers
00:15:09
◼
►
talk about seems to me like this could be the recipe for some some new changes
00:15:13
◼
►
come June time. Yeah I'm I'm legitimately surprised that the iPhone 10 which is
00:15:21
◼
►
the first OLED iOS device doesn't come with a dark mode. Yeah. I am legitimately
00:15:31
◼
►
surprised by that. The Apple Watch, which is OLED, was built from the ground up to
00:15:36
◼
►
prioritize black over white, and there's, you know, there's screen savings and
00:15:43
◼
►
power savings reasons to do it, plus you can really embrace the darkness,
00:15:48
◼
►
embrace the black of the OLED screen in a way that the LCD with the LED backlight
00:15:56
◼
►
doesn't let you do. And so smart invert colors is interesting. The reason that
00:16:02
◼
►
for people who don't know that it's smart invert colors is that the old
00:16:05
◼
►
invert colors literally inverted everything and smart invert colors lets
00:16:09
◼
►
you say the this is an image so it shouldn't get inverted basically and so
00:16:15
◼
►
if apps are updated to support smart invert colors the UI elements all get
00:16:21
◼
►
reversed so black turns into or white turns white, white turns black and the colors get
00:16:27
◼
►
inverted but the images stay the same so like on in Twitterific which supports smart invert
00:16:33
◼
►
colors I can invert and suddenly the white theme is black background but the images that
00:16:40
◼
►
are in line all look normal whereas overcast which doesn't support smart invert colors
00:16:47
◼
►
the white theme looks black which is nice but all the podcast artists reversed which
00:16:50
◼
►
which is less nice. So, Smart Invert Colors is an interesting attempt by Apple to create
00:16:54
◼
►
something that's kind of like a dark theme, but is really more like a hack with a hack
00:16:59
◼
►
inside it to make it look less bad.
00:17:02
◼
►
And it's an accessibility feature as well, right? Like it's not a real like dark theme.
00:17:08
◼
►
But why not a dark theme? Because you know, I use, and this is not just about an iPhone
00:17:13
◼
►
thing, this is an iPad thing too. It's like I use my iPad at night sometimes when the
00:17:16
◼
►
the lights off and I'm sitting there reading
00:17:19
◼
►
and I'll be in Safari Reader or something
00:17:22
◼
►
and I'll have it set to black background
00:17:24
◼
►
so that it, 'cause I just, it doesn't need to be that bright
00:17:26
◼
►
and then I'll open like mail or something
00:17:29
◼
►
and it's just blast of white.
00:17:32
◼
►
And I don't understand why they have not embraced this idea.
00:17:37
◼
►
I feel like this on the Mac too
00:17:42
◼
►
and at least they have the dark theme in the title bar
00:17:45
◼
►
but it doesn't like change the window chrome to be darker.
00:17:50
◼
►
And it's like, just why not?
00:17:52
◼
►
Why not do that?
00:17:53
◼
►
And iOS seems like the perfect place to do it.
00:17:55
◼
►
And the iPhone 10 seemed like the perfect time
00:17:57
◼
►
and they still haven't done it.
00:17:58
◼
►
So I hope it happens,
00:17:59
◼
►
but I have to say I've got some skepticism
00:18:02
◼
►
about whether they will do it
00:18:05
◼
►
because if they were gonna do it,
00:18:06
◼
►
why haven't they done it already?
00:18:08
◼
►
And I do think, yeah, on your larger point,
00:18:13
◼
►
iPhone X is so clearly, I mean, in some ways,
00:18:16
◼
►
it's the culmination of some changes they've been making
00:18:18
◼
►
in the background for a couple of years,
00:18:20
◼
►
but it's also so clearly the way forward for iOS,
00:18:23
◼
►
the way they view iOS going forward,
00:18:24
◼
►
which is no physical home button,
00:18:27
◼
►
lots of different gestures from the edges and all of that,
00:18:30
◼
►
that that is what all iOS devices
00:18:32
◼
►
are ultimately gonna be like.
00:18:34
◼
►
- And bigger screens than we've ever had before
00:18:36
◼
►
in all sizes, right?
00:18:37
◼
►
The screens are all gonna get bigger.
00:18:38
◼
►
And, you know, it is funny to me to hear
00:18:41
◼
►
my developer friends talk about,
00:18:42
◼
►
"Oh, we must consider big screen sizes."
00:18:45
◼
►
Like, yeah, thanks for three years ago, right?
00:18:47
◼
►
Like I've been using a bigger screen,
00:18:49
◼
►
but now finally people are understanding
00:18:52
◼
►
bigger screens can cause their own issues
00:18:54
◼
►
and keeping all the UI at the top can be a bit of a struggle
00:18:57
◼
►
at times and et cetera, et cetera.
00:18:59
◼
►
But I'm happy to see people starting to understand this
00:19:03
◼
►
and maybe embrace the bigger screens
00:19:05
◼
►
because now it's more available, right?
00:19:07
◼
►
Bigger screens are more available to people.
00:19:09
◼
►
So there you go.
00:19:10
◼
►
I was sitting on the train today, Jason,
00:19:12
◼
►
and I saw somebody using a Plus,
00:19:14
◼
►
and it looked huge to me, it was hilarious.
00:19:16
◼
►
I thought it was so funny to me
00:19:18
◼
►
that already the Plus phone looks mammoth to me.
00:19:21
◼
►
Although I will say all Plus users
00:19:24
◼
►
that I've ever spoken to agree with this,
00:19:26
◼
►
the Plus size phones always look bigger
00:19:28
◼
►
when somebody else is holding them.
00:19:31
◼
►
I don't know why that is. - Sure.
00:19:32
◼
►
It's an optical illusion.
00:19:34
◼
►
It's something that's the,
00:19:35
◼
►
why people didn't think that Myke was right.
00:19:38
◼
►
I've heard some Plus users talk about how,
00:19:41
◼
►
I've heard some skepticism from some quarters among Plus users
00:19:45
◼
►
about the iPhone X. We definitely got some feedback
00:19:47
◼
►
from somebody who said, Myke should really
00:19:49
◼
►
try the iPhone 8 Plus, which was weird because like--
00:19:52
◼
►
It doesn't make a difference.
00:19:54
◼
►
No, the iPhone 7 Plus was close enough
00:19:57
◼
►
that you know what the iPhone 8 Plus is going to be like.
00:20:01
◼
►
And I've also seen some speculation
00:20:03
◼
►
that maybe next year-- and this is not a rumor.
00:20:06
◼
►
This is pure speculation--
00:20:08
◼
►
but that next year that Apple might very well do an iPhone 10 plus.
00:20:13
◼
►
Well, just as we went on the air today, Jason, Ming-Chi Kuo reported that next year there
00:20:20
◼
►
may be a trio of iPhones, including a 5.8 inch, a 6.5 inch OLED, and for some reason
00:20:27
◼
►
a 6.1 inch LCD with a notch in it. So, Ming-Chi Kuo wasted no time. There will be three phones
00:20:36
◼
►
with Face ID, assumedly, so they have notches in them.
00:20:40
◼
►
- So basically, it's an iPhone 10,
00:20:43
◼
►
an iPhone, you know, an iPhone 10, 2018 edition,
00:20:47
◼
►
which we should talk about sometime,
00:20:48
◼
►
'cause I think maybe we've reached the point
00:20:52
◼
►
where Apple's going to just call the iPhone 10 by it,
00:20:57
◼
►
as the iPhone 10, and with a year,
00:20:59
◼
►
like they do with the iPad Pro.
00:21:01
◼
►
And then their differentiator is that
00:21:03
◼
►
they're gonna have the iPhone 9,
00:21:05
◼
►
and then they'll have the new iPhone 10
00:21:06
◼
►
and then the iPhone 10 Plus.
00:21:09
◼
►
But anyway, that's another discussion to have about naming
00:21:12
◼
►
and that'll be great in that period in like February
00:21:15
◼
►
where nothing is happening and we need to talk about names
00:21:19
◼
►
'cause we do that.
00:21:20
◼
►
But the Nchi Kuo's report is iPhone 10, iPhone 10 Plus,
00:21:25
◼
►
and basically like iPhone 9,
00:21:28
◼
►
where it's still the LCD screen,
00:21:31
◼
►
but they put face ID in it and take the home button off.
00:21:34
◼
►
So it's a plus with Face ID effectively, right?
00:21:37
◼
►
And a slightly updated design in theory,
00:21:39
◼
►
but so they can still hit another price point, I guess,
00:21:42
◼
►
would be the thing. - I guess.
00:21:44
◼
►
- Do they have something that can sit in between it all?
00:21:46
◼
►
But yes, so--
00:21:48
◼
►
- You're right, that would be a plus.
00:21:49
◼
►
That would be like the iPhone 9 Plus.
00:21:52
◼
►
- Yeah, so there you go.
00:21:53
◼
►
It's already started.
00:21:55
◼
►
- It is already happening.
00:21:57
◼
►
Well, you know, I saw my first 2018 iPhone rumor
00:22:00
◼
►
like the week after the iPhone event, right?
00:22:03
◼
►
that it's like, it's nice that they keep that level
00:22:05
◼
►
of decorum to wait until after Halloween
00:22:07
◼
►
to put up the Christmas decorations.
00:22:09
◼
►
- It's the grace period.
00:22:10
◼
►
- So, mm-hmm.
00:22:11
◼
►
But I do think that the iPhone 10,
00:22:16
◼
►
'cause I'm trying to think,
00:22:18
◼
►
I'm gonna talk about naming now, just for a moment,
00:22:21
◼
►
'cause I'm interested, you can give me a reality check
00:22:23
◼
►
if this is totally crazy, but iPhone 10,
00:22:26
◼
►
I can't think of a good name that follows it.
00:22:31
◼
►
I mean, iPhone XS, 10S, pronounce the S,
00:22:35
◼
►
don't pronounce the X, call it a 10.
00:22:38
◼
►
I don't think they're gonna go iPhone 11 or XI either way.
00:22:43
◼
►
I don't think they're gonna do that.
00:22:44
◼
►
I keep coming back to that this is their iPad Pro moment
00:22:48
◼
►
with the iPhone, where they're gonna do to iPhone 10
00:22:51
◼
►
what they did with OS X, which is just keep it for a while
00:22:56
◼
►
and just say iPhone X is iPhone X.
00:23:00
◼
►
I don't think it's a good idea because people have been too locked into the sequential numbering
00:23:05
◼
►
over the last 10 years.
00:23:08
◼
►
That if you just keep calling it iPhone 10, people will think it's old.
00:23:11
◼
►
I think rather than…
00:23:12
◼
►
I still stand by the idea of them giving them a new product name and just pulling the numbers
00:23:19
◼
►
So the next ones maybe just called iPhone.
00:23:21
◼
►
Or they call it iPhone Pro.
00:23:25
◼
►
I don't know.
00:23:27
◼
►
So I think they could do it for a little while.
00:23:29
◼
►
I think you could collapse the, like,
00:23:30
◼
►
if you think about the iPhone 6, 6S, 7, 8,
00:23:34
◼
►
that you could take three or four years and just say,
00:23:37
◼
►
this is iPhone 10 and it's better at the all new iPhone 10.
00:23:41
◼
►
But the other way to do it would be something
00:23:42
◼
►
that they did with OS X.
00:23:44
◼
►
And it's something that they're doing with the chips now,
00:23:46
◼
►
which is to call it iPhone X something,
00:23:48
◼
►
but not a number or a letter.
00:23:50
◼
►
And so if you imagine if this was,
00:23:52
◼
►
and it's not called this,
00:23:53
◼
►
but if imagine if this was iPhone X bionic
00:23:57
◼
►
and that last year's phone was iPhone Fusion or whatever.
00:24:00
◼
►
They could do something like that too.
00:24:03
◼
►
- I mean, and then eventually they just drop the 10 name
00:24:05
◼
►
and every year they come up with a new marketing name,
00:24:08
◼
►
which is not a number, but it's got, you know, like Pixel,
00:24:12
◼
►
right, like Google Pixel.
00:24:14
◼
►
- I know that they've given those numbers,
00:24:14
◼
►
but like the name, I actually think that might be a nicer
00:24:17
◼
►
way to do this going into the future is give them
00:24:20
◼
►
a cool name, stop doing numbers.
00:24:23
◼
►
Let's give these products some interesting names
00:24:25
◼
►
and sums up some of the features in them.
00:24:28
◼
►
I like that idea, Jason.
00:24:29
◼
►
And I don't want them to pick like,
00:24:31
◼
►
big trees in California.
00:24:34
◼
►
I want it to be something a little bit more abstract,
00:24:37
◼
►
which is applicable to everyone, you know?
00:24:40
◼
►
So they like bionic, 'cause it's just a cool word, right?
00:24:44
◼
►
Like give it some name like that.
00:24:45
◼
►
But yeah, I'm on board with that.
00:24:47
◼
►
So there we go, we've solved that problem.
00:24:49
◼
►
Thanks, Alan. - All right.
00:24:49
◼
►
Well, everybody check back in in February
00:24:53
◼
►
for naming corners.
00:24:55
◼
►
- Somebody write this down.
00:24:56
◼
►
- Yeah, something like that.
00:24:58
◼
►
Or Frank will come up with some segment art
00:25:01
◼
►
for naming corner and we'll just have to do it every week.
00:25:03
◼
►
That's how it works, right?
00:25:04
◼
►
- That is exactly how it works.
00:25:05
◼
►
Today's show is brought to you by Mack Weldon.
00:25:07
◼
►
They make the most comfortable underwear, socks, shirts,
00:25:10
◼
►
undershirts, hoodies, sweatpants,
00:25:12
◼
►
so much more you're ever gonna wear.
00:25:14
◼
►
Jason, I am later on this week getting on a plane.
00:25:17
◼
►
What do you think I'm gonna be wearing?
00:25:18
◼
►
- Oh, you're gonna be wearing Mack Weldon's sweatpants,
00:25:21
◼
►
of course. - I most definitely am,
00:25:22
◼
►
because they are the most comfortable pair of trousers that I own.
00:25:27
◼
►
Those sweatpants are fantastic.
00:25:29
◼
►
I feel good in them.
00:25:30
◼
►
I look good in them and I can sit on a plane for 10 hours
00:25:34
◼
►
and I am perfectly comfortable the whole way through.
00:25:37
◼
►
Mack Weldon is better than whatever you're wearing right now.
00:25:40
◼
►
If you're not wearing Mack Weldon and they're so confident of this fact.
00:25:43
◼
►
They have a no questions asked return policy.
00:25:46
◼
►
If for any reason you don't like your first pair of Mack Weldon items,
00:25:50
◼
►
just keep them, they'll refund you, no questions asked.
00:25:54
◼
►
They do this by pairing premium fabrics with meticulous attention to detail and a simple
00:25:58
◼
►
shopping experience.
00:25:59
◼
►
Macworlden believe that by having all of that stuff, they are going to make clothing that
00:26:02
◼
►
you are going to love.
00:26:03
◼
►
They have undershirts that stay tucked, socks that stay up and waistbands that don't roll.
00:26:08
◼
►
They even have a line of silver underwear and shirts that are naturally anti-microbial.
00:26:12
◼
►
This is some cool science stuff that eliminates odour.
00:26:15
◼
►
So all of Macworlden's underwear, socks and shirts look good, they perform well, they're
00:26:18
◼
►
Apple Pay for iMessage appeared in the most recent version of the 11.2 beta version.
00:26:48
◼
►
for iOS. So I want to give you some rundowns here, Jason, of some of the things that are
00:26:55
◼
►
occurring here. So as it stands right now, Apple Pay for iMessage is US only. This was
00:27:01
◼
►
expected when it was originally announced, but found by a friend of the show, Guillermo
00:27:06
◼
►
Rambo, who is @_insight on Twitter, who you should be following because he finds so much
00:27:12
◼
►
awesome stuff dug deep into iOS. Additional countries can be added with OS updates like
00:27:20
◼
►
Apple Pay. So Apple Pay could be turned on in certain countries and on devices without
00:27:28
◼
►
their requiring an iOS update. So that's a good thing. So it means that countries could
00:27:34
◼
►
be turned on for Apple Pay for iMessage as they get ready to do that.
00:27:41
◼
►
You will find inside of your wallet app on iOS your current Apple Pay cash balance along
00:27:47
◼
►
with recent transactions.
00:27:50
◼
►
And it has a little card which looks really nice and I'll put a link to a tweet from Matt
00:27:55
◼
►
Pansarino over at TechCrunch.
00:27:57
◼
►
It has like an iridescent effect so when you move your phone around there's like a glittery
00:28:03
◼
►
colour changing hologrammy effect on the card which is in the Apple Wallet app.
00:28:26
◼
►
credit card, there's a fee, if you use a debit card it's free. There are a couple of ways,
00:28:31
◼
►
actually there are a lot of ways that you can send somebody Apple Pay cash. So you can
00:28:36
◼
►
open the iMessage app and send it inside of messages. You can ask Siri to send someone
00:28:41
◼
►
money or request money from someone. There is a pay, an Apple Pay button on people's
00:28:47
◼
►
contact cards. When you send someone an iMessage that has an amount in it, like for example
00:28:52
◼
►
if I send Jason a message that says you owe me $10, Jason will see that message with the
00:28:57
◼
►
$10 underlined, which he can tap and it will open the Apple Pay app open and pre-fill the
00:29:05
◼
►
amount for him. And also the QuickType keyboard will also prompt you with an Apple Pay logo
00:29:10
◼
►
when somebody asks you for money. Basically Apple really want you to be using this a lot.
00:29:17
◼
►
So there are some limits probably for money laundering purposes. Single transactions and
00:29:21
◼
►
transfers to your bank are limited to $3,000 in total. You cannot send less than $1 a time.
00:29:39
◼
►
You can only send or receive a maximum of $10,000 in a 7 day period and you can only
00:29:44
◼
►
withdraw a maximum of $20,000 per week to your bank account. I'll just say thank you
00:29:49
◼
►
to, I think it was Ryan over at MacStories for providing me with a lot of that information
00:29:54
◼
►
in his great article.
00:29:55
◼
►
I'm curious about the international stuff though, right? Like, I imagine that you will,
00:30:01
◼
►
they will have to do some UI that explains the currency conversion?
00:30:05
◼
►
Yep. This might be one of the reasons that they haven't done it for outside of the US
00:30:09
◼
►
yet because it becomes infinitely more complicated when Jason's paying me money.
00:30:14
◼
►
Right, because do you get it in dollars? Does it go in your wallet? Does it get converted
00:30:19
◼
►
then into pounds? Can you keep it in dollars and pay American people in dollars or does
00:30:26
◼
►
it then get converted back? There's a lot of complexity there that I wonder about.
00:30:33
◼
►
Or do we just use US dollars for everything? Apple's always in US dollars and then that
00:30:40
◼
►
doesn't make sense, right? Because if you're in a foreign currency, you want to pay your
00:30:43
◼
►
friends in the foreign currency. Yeah, so I can see why it's US only.
00:30:48
◼
►
Because the idea for this is that it's in your Apple Pay, right? So in your actual Apple
00:30:53
◼
►
Pay, this is the problem that these have got the same name. When you're using Apple Pay
00:30:58
◼
►
in stores or public transport, you can have your Apple Pay cash card set as the default
00:31:03
◼
►
cards so whenever you have any money on that it can take from it.
00:31:09
◼
►
That's like PayPal balance or something right which is you you want to use your your mad
00:31:14
◼
►
money your your money that's just sitting in your wallet in cash essentially instead
00:31:19
◼
►
of using your credit card.
00:31:21
◼
►
So you know the idea of where this is very simple right in that like you are filling
00:31:26
◼
►
up the card right by making transactions so it just debits an account right the same as
00:31:32
◼
►
PayPal. It's very similar to PayPal in this way, but it's hooked right into all of iOS.
00:31:37
◼
►
I want this because it seems...
00:31:45
◼
►
Of course you do.
00:31:45
◼
►
Well, I like the... Honestly, I would want it because of the hooks into iOS and into iMessage.
00:31:56
◼
►
because it just seems like a very seamless thing. It seems like just an easy way to pay people money
00:32:04
◼
►
and a problem that I have is most of the services that provide this, stuff like Venmo,
00:32:10
◼
►
I can't get access to. So my hope is that this will go international and that there will be a
00:32:16
◼
►
way to make very simple international payments with this. For example, when me and Federico
00:32:23
◼
►
travel together, we're sending PayPal transactions constantly back and forth because one of us
00:32:28
◼
►
has booked the hotel, one of us has booked the flights, so it's all PayPal stuff. And
00:32:34
◼
►
it's like, "Ah, but I have a PayPal business account and a PayPal personal account." Honestly,
00:32:37
◼
►
I would just like to get all my business stuff in PayPal and then all my personal stuff in
00:32:42
◼
►
the iMessage payments. It just gives an easy way to deal with it. Plus as well, when we're
00:32:46
◼
►
talking about the numbers, we're texting them to each other, right? We're sending iMessages
00:32:49
◼
►
back and forth. So wouldn't it be nice to just hit a button?
00:32:53
◼
►
If Apple does this well, though, right, and it's the question of whether they're going
00:32:57
◼
►
to do it. I could also see them rolling it out and saying it's only to pay people who
00:33:00
◼
►
are using your local currency right now, and we'll do international later. But if they
00:33:04
◼
►
do it right, they're going to do those conversions. I can see lots of scenarios like you and Federico
00:33:09
◼
►
are in the US together and trying to split bills. So you're getting a bill in US dollars.
00:33:17
◼
►
would be really nice if you could say, "I want to pay Federico 20 US dollars," and have
00:33:23
◼
►
it say, "That'll be this many pounds out of your account, and that'll be this many of
00:33:28
◼
►
whatever currency he wants to use." Euro, fine. Or if he wants to use his laundered,
00:33:33
◼
►
I don't even know what, Swedish kroner, he could do that. Oh, I've said too much. But
00:33:41
◼
►
the idea that you could take, yeah, so you've got pounds and euros and dollars all in the
00:33:45
◼
►
same transaction and if they do it well, and I don't know if it's possible because this
00:33:50
◼
►
sounds like a really complicated setup, but if they do it well, that should all just happen,
00:33:54
◼
►
right? You should say, "I want to pay Federico 20 US dollars," and it'll be able to say,
00:34:01
◼
►
"Well, that's this many pounds that you have in your account, so I'll take that out, and
00:34:05
◼
►
then I'll pay it to Federico, which will turn it into Euro, and now he gets Euro." And,
00:34:11
◼
►
right? That's the dream.
00:34:12
◼
►
- I'll say the PayPal app on iOS does this kind of stuff
00:34:16
◼
►
and they have a very, very simple UI in their iOS app.
00:34:20
◼
►
The web, not so much, but on the iOS app,
00:34:22
◼
►
it's like just big numbers, you just tap on the little flag
00:34:26
◼
►
and you change the currency and then you can tap on this one
00:34:28
◼
►
change that currency, just say the amount.
00:34:31
◼
►
When you go through, it can give you a breakdown.
00:34:33
◼
►
Do you want to send this to this?
00:34:34
◼
►
It's going to cost you this, job done.
00:34:36
◼
►
Right, that's, and a lot of that stuff
00:34:38
◼
►
probably could be done quite nicely
00:34:40
◼
►
inside of an iMessage app.
00:34:43
◼
►
I think this is great and I'm not surprised that Apple is doing all of this honestly because
00:34:47
◼
►
as I said before, as I said when this was rumored when it came out, this is like, so
00:34:51
◼
►
what big companies are doing now, big companies want to be mini banks because why not as well
00:34:57
◼
►
as get people to spend money with you, just get them to literally give you their money
00:35:01
◼
►
to just look after.
00:35:05
◼
►
And then all that money that's sitting in your wallet is money that's sitting in Apple's
00:35:06
◼
►
bank account to gain interest or do whatever until it comes back out.
00:35:11
◼
►
and stuff like that, you know, and then when they've got all the reserve, they give you
00:35:15
◼
►
the money when you need it. It's not like Apple haven't got enough cash that they need
00:35:19
◼
►
to spot for themselves. They're fine. They've got that money. And then also the other part
00:35:24
◼
►
of it is just system lock-in, right? You then may be more likely to spend that inside of
00:35:28
◼
►
an Apple Pay thing somewhere, whether it's giving money to Apple or just using it inside
00:35:32
◼
►
of their system because the money is already there and it's easier than getting it out
00:35:36
◼
►
again, yeah, I'm not surprised that all of this is happening. It looks like Apple's UI
00:35:42
◼
►
and all the systems are good, and I hope that they, one, do a good international rollout,
00:35:47
◼
►
and two, that they find a way to make it work for international transfers. I'm excited for
00:35:52
◼
►
I want to take a step back here and say that I think this is an interesting trend that
00:35:57
◼
►
sort of has happened the last year or two, but is really ramped up this year, which is,
00:36:02
◼
►
Is iOS number whatever now a marketing concept? And I say that because among the features
00:36:12
◼
►
Apple has announced as being part of iOS 11 or coming in a future update, right, are iMessage
00:36:20
◼
►
in the cloud, Apple Pay, friend to friend, and I might even throw like faster inductive
00:36:28
◼
►
charging in there. That wasn't an iOS 11 announcement, it was announced when the 8 and the 10 were
00:36:34
◼
►
announced, but it was sort of like a future development. And I think it's really interesting
00:36:38
◼
►
as a trend. We've touched on this before, but I want to point it out now in the context
00:36:41
◼
►
of Apple Pay for iMessage, which is Apple seems to now be okay with the idea that when
00:36:48
◼
►
they say something is coming in iOS 11, they don't mean that it will necessarily be an
00:36:55
◼
►
11.0. Like it will be part of iOS 11 at some point. And I think I'm okay with that. I'd
00:37:05
◼
►
be okay with iOS announcements being kind of a roadmap where a lot of this stuff will
00:37:12
◼
►
hit on day one, but some of it is going to roll out over time because, even though we
00:37:17
◼
►
all want it now, right, of course, because that lets them pluck some things out that
00:37:24
◼
►
are more complicated and not happening and not ship them when they're not ready and keep
00:37:31
◼
►
working on them and then rolling them out when they need to. And I gotta be honest,
00:37:36
◼
►
it used to be that if you didn't make the iOS drop in September, that didn't show up
00:37:42
◼
►
for a year. And I kinda like the idea that Apple can be a little more confident in announcing
00:37:49
◼
►
features in June because they know that even if they don't all make it in September, they
00:37:55
◼
►
just need to make it by December or January or February. I like that, but it's different,
00:38:02
◼
►
right? And that is, but I feel like that's the game they're playing now is iOS 11 is
00:38:07
◼
►
a collection of the features across multiple software releases and that's just how it is,
00:38:12
◼
►
right? We'll get iMessages in the cloud, iMessage in the cloud at some point and we'll get the
00:38:16
◼
►
the inductive charging update at some point
00:38:18
◼
►
and we're gonna get Apple Pay for iMessage
00:38:20
◼
►
if you're on the public beta now,
00:38:22
◼
►
but that'll roll out in the next few weeks.
00:38:24
◼
►
And it's just this kind of rolling iOS 11.
00:38:26
◼
►
It's not the single release anymore.
00:38:28
◼
►
I think that's good probably,
00:38:31
◼
►
but it's definitely the way they seem to be approaching it.
00:38:34
◼
►
- So we have two Mark Gurman rumor articles
00:38:39
◼
►
to discuss this week.
00:38:40
◼
►
We'll start with the smaller of the two, I think,
00:38:44
◼
►
which is an Apple AR headset.
00:38:47
◼
►
So I wanna read some of the key points.
00:38:52
◼
►
- All right, break it down for me.
00:38:53
◼
►
- Summarize some of this stuff for you.
00:38:55
◼
►
So this will be a breakthrough product
00:38:59
◼
►
to succeed the iPhone.
00:39:00
◼
►
I'm sure I've heard that.
00:39:01
◼
►
I'm sure I've heard that somewhere before.
00:39:06
◼
►
That is not the strongest thing in this article, right?
00:39:11
◼
►
- You're gonna get to the details.
00:39:12
◼
►
And I think the, I was asked, I was on Twitter yesterday
00:39:14
◼
►
and I was asked about this
00:39:15
◼
►
and I think all these details are true,
00:39:18
◼
►
but the product to succeed the iPhone part, not that part.
00:39:24
◼
►
- No. - At least not
00:39:25
◼
►
in the short term. - I put that in
00:39:26
◼
►
because I find it so kind of ridiculous at this point.
00:39:30
◼
►
- Everybody is looking for the next iPhone.
00:39:32
◼
►
Everybody's looking for an iPhone killer.
00:39:34
◼
►
I think that, I think the smartphone is gonna survive
00:39:37
◼
►
for a long time yet. - Yes, yes.
00:39:39
◼
►
I mean like this was what the app,
00:39:41
◼
►
My joke is the Apple Watch, right?
00:39:43
◼
►
This is what-- - Yeah, right.
00:39:43
◼
►
I mean, the Apple Watch-- - Is gonna be.
00:39:45
◼
►
- Is not gonna be bigger than the iPhone,
00:39:47
◼
►
and talk like this makes it seem like
00:39:49
◼
►
if it's not bigger than the iPhone, it's a failure.
00:39:51
◼
►
And it's not.
00:39:52
◼
►
Nothing is going to be bigger than the iPhone
00:39:55
◼
►
for a very, very long time.
00:39:57
◼
►
So this is silly talk.
00:39:59
◼
►
But let's get into the details.
00:40:00
◼
►
- Could ship a product as soon as 2020.
00:40:03
◼
►
Apple's device will have its--
00:40:06
◼
►
It will have its own display.
00:40:07
◼
►
- As soon as, as soon as is great.
00:40:09
◼
►
- You gotta let me go through this, Jason.
00:40:11
◼
►
- Myke, I could go into outer space as soon as tomorrow.
00:40:15
◼
►
- Apple's device will have its own display
00:40:18
◼
►
and run on a new chip and operating system.
00:40:21
◼
►
The company began putting together a team
00:40:23
◼
►
to work on AR related projects a couple of years ago.
00:40:25
◼
►
This team's first product was ARKit.
00:40:28
◼
►
And their next step, what they're working on now,
00:40:30
◼
►
is creating a headset with a built-in display
00:40:32
◼
►
capable of streaming 3D video without draining the battery.
00:40:36
◼
►
Apple is creating their own chips again for this,
00:40:39
◼
►
that they have been doing recently
00:40:40
◼
►
with a lot of their new products.
00:40:42
◼
►
The new operating system, internally dubbed ROS,
00:40:45
◼
►
for reality operating system, that is not a good name.
00:40:51
◼
►
- AROS is better than ROS, it's R,
00:40:53
◼
►
it's the prior operating system.
00:40:56
◼
►
- ROS is based on iOS, as you could assume,
00:40:59
◼
►
again, as like TVOS and watchOS have been.
00:41:02
◼
►
The company plans to release a new version of ARKit
00:41:06
◼
►
as soon as 2018.
00:41:07
◼
►
This will include things such as shush, persistent tracking.
00:41:11
◼
►
Persistence tracking is when you can put an object
00:41:14
◼
►
in a virtual space, look away,
00:41:16
◼
►
and the object is still there, right?
00:41:18
◼
►
So you could put something down,
00:41:19
◼
►
you could turn away, do something else,
00:41:20
◼
►
turn around, then it stayed exactly where it is.
00:41:23
◼
►
The persistence tracking,
00:41:24
◼
►
I think there's very basic versions of that right now.
00:41:27
◼
►
It's not as good as it could be, like it loses its place.
00:41:29
◼
►
I assume there'll be many other things
00:41:31
◼
►
that come with ARKit.
00:41:33
◼
►
But of course, what this whole thing is framed around
00:41:36
◼
►
is like an Apple Google Glass, right? That this is what we're assuming.
00:41:42
◼
►
Or an Apple HoloLens is the other way to look at it, right?
00:41:47
◼
►
Because HoloLens actually had AR features. Google Glass didn't. Google Glass was just
00:41:50
◼
►
a screen projected in front of your face for text and stuff.
00:41:54
◼
►
It was too old, right? Like, it was too long ago. I mean, Google Glass, if it existed now,
00:42:01
◼
►
would be AR but then it was just a HUD right it was the heads-up display was
00:42:06
◼
►
what it was. Exactly that's that's right. You know there's a lot of things to say
00:42:13
◼
►
that you don't want to say when you get something like this because episode 300
00:42:21
◼
►
of Upgrade we can look back and laugh at ourselves for some of the things we say
00:42:25
◼
►
here but this is something that I'm I'm really struggling to get my head around
00:42:29
◼
►
is Apple making an AR headset? My assumption is they are not making an
00:42:38
◼
►
AR headset to be used just at home like I think the HoloLens is. My
00:42:44
◼
►
assumption would be if they made something it would be to become part
00:42:49
◼
►
of your life. It would be more like a wearable really than anything else
00:42:53
◼
►
and it would, I guess, be akin to something like Google Glass. I struggle with this, partly
00:43:04
◼
►
because Google Glass kind of ruined it, right, for everyone. And I, it just, there is an
00:43:13
◼
►
inelegance to a product like this that I'm kind of not sure about.
00:43:19
◼
►
Well, so the product doesn't exist, right? So anything we think about it is what we bring
00:43:29
◼
►
to it ourselves. But as soon as 2020. Here's the thing. I feel like this is clearly a direction
00:43:43
◼
►
and Apple wants to go in.
00:43:45
◼
►
Tim Cook talks about AR all the time.
00:43:48
◼
►
I think Apple, sometimes I think the modern strategies
00:43:52
◼
►
of all the tech companies is,
00:43:55
◼
►
at least a lot of it can be explained by fear
00:43:57
◼
►
of being left out of the next big wave of technology
00:44:02
◼
►
and being obsolete.
00:44:03
◼
►
And nobody wants that.
00:44:05
◼
►
Modern tech companies know
00:44:07
◼
►
that they can be obsoleted in a minute, right?
00:44:10
◼
►
That they could be Blackberry.
00:44:13
◼
►
to use one of many examples, that they could be just,
00:44:17
◼
►
if you poo-poo something that's new technology,
00:44:21
◼
►
it could be the thing that destroys you.
00:44:22
◼
►
And so I think Google and Apple and others,
00:44:26
◼
►
Amazon, Microsoft, are somewhat obsessed
00:44:29
◼
►
with investing in things that could potentially
00:44:32
◼
►
be a threat to their thing that they do,
00:44:35
◼
►
or could potentially be a threat to the thing
00:44:38
◼
►
that their competitor does really well.
00:44:41
◼
►
And so for Apple, you look at AR and VR is kind of a subset of AR, and you say, "Well,
00:44:49
◼
►
if anything is going to replace a smartphone, it's probably wearables and something that
00:44:55
◼
►
is a heads up kind of display where you don't need to hold a phone, hold glass in front
00:45:02
◼
►
of your face."
00:45:04
◼
►
That is a threat.
00:45:06
◼
►
And AR is interesting, and VR is interesting, and they've got the powerful processors and
00:45:13
◼
►
sensors and all those things. And so they make ARKit, and they put it in the modern
00:45:17
◼
►
phones. And they start to work on, well, what would happen if we took our OS knowledge and
00:45:22
◼
►
our sensors and our APIs and all the hardware we build, and we built a headset? And I think
00:45:32
◼
►
the answer is probably like, well, this isn't going to be a product that's any good for
00:45:36
◼
►
a few years yet that anybody's going to want. And I think that is why you say, "Could you
00:45:41
◼
►
ship a product as soon as 2020?" It's like that's somebody saying, "We're working on
00:45:45
◼
►
stuff that's on the roadmap, but what we've got now is kind of clunky, but maybe there's
00:45:50
◼
►
something there." And then the question is, "What's it for in 2020?" And the answer, there
00:45:55
◼
►
are a lot of answers, right? It could be that it is mostly for home use originally, and
00:46:01
◼
►
is a game playing thing because I would imagine that if it can do AR, you could probably flip
00:46:08
◼
►
down a thing, a covering over the eyes and basically turn it into VR if you wanted to
00:46:14
◼
►
do that. I think that they, right, so this product makes sense to me in that I think
00:46:21
◼
►
they need to work on it and that they will probably come to a point where they think,
00:46:25
◼
►
yes, there is a product here, but it's so far off now that it is more about hedging
00:46:30
◼
►
about the future and making sure you don't,
00:46:33
◼
►
'cause Apple has advantages here.
00:46:34
◼
►
In that they've been working on ARKit,
00:46:37
◼
►
in that they're building their own silicon,
00:46:39
◼
►
in that they've got, in terms of apps and games,
00:46:43
◼
►
some developers who are going to already
00:46:46
◼
►
are getting up to speed on AR stuff with the iPhone
00:46:49
◼
►
and are going to be exploitable in the good way of like,
00:46:53
◼
►
look at all of our developers are already here
00:46:55
◼
►
for this new platform.
00:46:57
◼
►
And then imagine how great James Thompson's calculator
00:47:00
◼
►
slash game will be on a set of goggles.
00:47:03
◼
►
We may never hear from James again.
00:47:05
◼
►
He may just be in the goggles from then on.
00:47:08
◼
►
So like, I like it from that level.
00:47:12
◼
►
I think the question is,
00:47:13
◼
►
how do you picture this as a product at the end?
00:47:15
◼
►
And yeah, that's a real question.
00:47:17
◼
►
I don't know if the tech even in 2020
00:47:20
◼
►
is gonna let us like wear them out of the house,
00:47:23
◼
►
but in an office setting, in a home setting,
00:47:26
◼
►
it's a little more plausible.
00:47:27
◼
►
That's certainly what Microsoft is targeting.
00:47:30
◼
►
But I don't know.
00:47:31
◼
►
I think the best way to look at this
00:47:33
◼
►
is that it is maybe a short-term product,
00:47:36
◼
►
but it is a long-term hedge
00:47:38
◼
►
against the disappearance of the iPhone glass
00:47:41
◼
►
because that's a huge threat to Apple's livelihood
00:47:44
◼
►
in the 2020s.
00:47:46
◼
►
- Yeah, this is something that I'm really struggling with
00:47:51
◼
►
because I just can't, I don't know.
00:47:56
◼
►
I really struggle to see this as a product
00:47:58
◼
►
which is mass market, I really do.
00:48:00
◼
►
- Oh, I agree with you.
00:48:03
◼
►
I think it's, and that's why I think
00:48:04
◼
►
it's not the next iPhone.
00:48:07
◼
►
- Well, let me put it this way.
00:48:09
◼
►
And yeah, we can laugh on this and upgrade 400 or 500,
00:48:13
◼
►
which is, I guess that only pushes it out two years
00:48:17
◼
►
every time we say that.
00:48:18
◼
►
But if you asked me if by the end of the 20s,
00:48:23
◼
►
which is weird to say that,
00:48:27
◼
►
But by the end of the 20s, if people are largely forgoing
00:48:32
◼
►
a slab of glass in their hand as they walk around
00:48:35
◼
►
in the world for wearables, that includes potentially
00:48:40
◼
►
something that they can see, you know,
00:48:43
◼
►
it's basically a heads up display of some kind.
00:48:45
◼
►
I would say, yeah, that sounds reasonable.
00:48:49
◼
►
Like it sounds reasonable.
00:48:50
◼
►
The question is how we get from here to there,
00:48:53
◼
►
because I don't think voice interface and talking
00:48:57
◼
►
is going to be enough on its own.
00:49:00
◼
►
I'm not sure whether having just, you know,
00:49:03
◼
►
headphones in and a cellular watch on your wrist
00:49:06
◼
►
is going to be enough to satisfy people
00:49:09
◼
►
to leave their slab of glass at home.
00:49:12
◼
►
But I'm also not sure everybody wants to walk around
00:49:16
◼
►
wearing, you know, wearing glasses,
00:49:19
◼
►
unless they are like literally as light
00:49:21
◼
►
as the pair of glasses I'm wearing right now.
00:49:24
◼
►
But I could see it, right?
00:49:26
◼
►
I think the challenge is how we get from here to there.
00:49:31
◼
►
And the problem with that is that it's very hard
00:49:34
◼
►
if you're a company, any company,
00:49:37
◼
►
to not have a product between here and there, right?
00:49:42
◼
►
The only way you get from here to there
00:49:44
◼
►
is by releasing a product and having it be not great,
00:49:49
◼
►
but exciting and people get it and then you make it better and then you make it better, right?
00:49:54
◼
►
And the challenge for Apple is unlike some of their competitors, Apple is really reluctant to
00:49:59
◼
►
release a product that they don't think that they can sell a bunch of. And that's a challenge,
00:50:04
◼
►
right? How do you make this thing good enough that people want it? Even if it's impractical
00:50:09
◼
►
and expensive and not a lot of people want it, but like the Apple Watch, it's enough to get the
00:50:14
◼
►
the category rolling and then you iterate and more people start to buy it and then it
00:50:20
◼
►
kind of becomes its own thing. That's what they need to do here. And for me that's like
00:50:24
◼
►
that's the question for whoever's building this thing at Apple. And it's probably the
00:50:29
◼
►
question for all the managers of those people in terms of when do they think that this is
00:50:33
◼
►
a real thing or do they potentially go, "Oh no, no, no, we're not, push it back. This
00:50:38
◼
►
is not going to happen." Because that's the real question is will anybody buy an Apple
00:50:43
◼
►
thing that they strap on their face that does VR and AR apps that they can use at home.
00:50:50
◼
►
Will people buy that product? What are the details of that product in 2020 that would
00:50:54
◼
►
make somebody buy it? And we don't have a lot of examples of other companies doing this
00:50:59
◼
►
successfully, right? Microsoft demos HoloLens and we've had some VR only game things like
00:51:07
◼
►
like Oculus and the PSVR, but it's super limited.
00:51:12
◼
►
So I don't know, it's something you've got to do,
00:51:15
◼
►
but you're kind of going into the woods here, right?
00:51:17
◼
►
As Apple and saying, I hope we find the right product
00:51:22
◼
►
in two or three years.
00:51:25
◼
►
- I hope so.
00:51:32
◼
►
- You see what I mean though?
00:51:33
◼
►
They got to do this, but I'm not sure-
00:51:36
◼
►
They do. I mean, because I mean, I was the one who for before ARKit, right,
00:51:42
◼
►
was was saying like Apple us being silly for not pursuing VR and AR, right?
00:51:48
◼
►
Like I was getting concerned that they were not going in this route.
00:51:52
◼
►
I personally think that something more like the HoloLens is more interesting
00:51:59
◼
►
and something that should be progressed as something than Google Glass.
00:52:03
◼
►
My concern is Apple will go down the Google Glass route, which I think is the wrong route.
00:52:08
◼
►
And that really, I believe that these AR products could be more interesting as a way to augment computers, not smartphones.
00:52:20
◼
►
And I hope that that's the route that they're going down.
00:52:24
◼
►
I really struggle by 2020 to imagine there to be a product compelling enough that is like the Apple Watch
00:52:32
◼
►
but for our faces. That's what I am concerned about because you don't...
00:52:40
◼
►
If Apple screwed this up the first time they're not going to get another shot at it for a while,
00:52:45
◼
►
right? And then they may then miss it because I think that this is a product which is fraught
00:52:51
◼
►
with social problems and it's just very tricky. It's just like a very tricky thing because you know
00:52:57
◼
►
if Apple make a headset they're going to have to put a camera on it and it's like that is there's
00:53:01
◼
►
There's like a million problems in there.
00:53:03
◼
►
And yeah, so I just think,
00:53:06
◼
►
I don't know if the world's ready for it, Jason,
00:53:08
◼
►
is the problem.
00:53:11
◼
►
And will it be ready in three or four years or not?
00:53:15
◼
►
- I can't see how, right?
00:53:17
◼
►
Like, what's gonna change, right?
00:53:20
◼
►
Our smartphones are gonna continue to be our smartphones.
00:53:23
◼
►
They're still gonna have cameras on them, right?
00:53:25
◼
►
They're the cameras we're used to.
00:53:27
◼
►
I don't know, this is just something that like,
00:53:30
◼
►
Between now and then, I'm really interested to see where technology goes because I just,
00:53:35
◼
►
I really just don't imagine it within the next couple of years that to be a
00:53:38
◼
►
product that people could walk around in the streets with and like everyone's
00:53:42
◼
►
totally cool with that. I just don't see it.
00:53:44
◼
►
Today's show is also brought to you by our friends over at Smile.
00:53:49
◼
►
And today I want to talk to you about TextExpander because with TextExpander,
00:53:53
◼
►
you can communicate smarter. When you use TextExpander,
00:53:56
◼
►
You can recall your best and most frequently used words and phrases by creating a keyboard
00:54:00
◼
►
shortcut and then letting TextExpander do the work.
00:54:03
◼
►
TextExpander is great for individuals, it's maybe even better for teams because, let me
00:54:09
◼
►
explain why.
00:54:11
◼
►
If you have a TextExpander snippet, you can put anything under it.
00:54:14
◼
►
You can have it expand a phone number or an address.
00:54:16
◼
►
But what about something like a marketing message?
00:54:19
◼
►
So let's imagine that you want to send out a marketing email and the current offers or
00:54:24
◼
►
the current products or the current thing that you're looking to sell to a potential client.
00:54:28
◼
►
This is like, it is what it is right now. Everybody wants to send it. You've got like 10 salespeople.
00:54:33
◼
►
Everyone needs to be able to send this message. So you set up a text expander, you share it with
00:54:37
◼
►
everyone. Everyone's got the message, right? With Text Expander for Teams, if you want to change
00:54:43
◼
►
that message, so now the offer has changed, you want everyone to talk about a new offer,
00:54:47
◼
►
instead of having to go around and say to everyone, this is the new offer, make sure this is what
00:54:51
◼
►
what you're sending or send out an email to everybody.
00:54:54
◼
►
All you have to do is just change what's in the snippet.
00:54:58
◼
►
It gets synced to everybody's machines.
00:55:00
◼
►
And then the next time they change,
00:55:01
◼
►
they just type in that little snippet,
00:55:03
◼
►
like maybe they type in offer with two R's
00:55:05
◼
►
or offer with two O's, it will expand for them.
00:55:08
◼
►
And they have the most up-to-date information all the time,
00:55:12
◼
►
right at their fingertips.
00:55:13
◼
►
Nobody had to do everything.
00:55:15
◼
►
Nobody had to do anything.
00:55:16
◼
►
Everyone is up to date all the time.
00:55:18
◼
►
This is the magic of shared snippets.
00:55:20
◼
►
and just one example of what your team can do to communicate smarter with TextExpander.
00:55:24
◼
►
It's mind-blowing stuff, it's so cool and it's so customizable. I love TextExpander,
00:55:32
◼
►
I've used it for years. It has handy search features so you can keep so you can find all
00:55:36
◼
►
of your snippets really easily from anywhere that you type on Mac and on PC now because TextExpander
00:55:41
◼
►
is on Windows as well. You can even create a TextExpander snippet that can add as a calculator
00:55:46
◼
►
if you want to because they have this really wild integration with JavaScript so you can create
00:55:51
◼
►
like text expander snippets that have JavaScript in them now it's wild stuff if you or any of your
00:55:56
◼
►
team spend any amount of your day typing you need text expander it's as simple as that go to text
00:56:01
◼
►
expander.com podcast for 20% off your first year and then just tell them that you heard about them
00:56:07
◼
►
on upgrade that's text expander.com podcast for 20% off your first year and when you sign up please
00:56:13
◼
►
say that you heard about them from Upgrade. We thank TextExpander for their support of
00:56:17
◼
►
this show and Relay FM.
00:56:20
◼
►
So the second report from Mark Gurman is about the 2018 iPad.
00:56:29
◼
►
So, we were talking about this last week on Ask Upgrade. Somebody asked if we think that
00:56:37
◼
►
there will be a 2018 iPad with Face ID and how that's going to work. Like where are the
00:56:41
◼
►
the camera is going to go, what's the orientation going to be, that kind of stuff.
00:56:44
◼
►
And we were wondering like maybe 2018 is too soon for Face ID on the iPad.
00:56:49
◼
►
Well Mark Gurman says that it's not.
00:56:52
◼
►
So here is the key information from this second Mark Gurman report.
00:56:56
◼
►
So the next iPad, the 2018 iPad will have a screen size similar to the current 10.5
00:57:02
◼
►
inch iPad Pro but with again smaller bezels at the top and bottom and no home button.
00:57:08
◼
►
It will have Face ID support.
00:57:10
◼
►
It will not have an OLED screen because they're super expensive and currently only Samsung
00:57:15
◼
►
can make them to Apple standards and all of their screens are going into phones.
00:57:19
◼
►
Maybe next year as we spoke about at the top of the show there will be even more phones
00:57:22
◼
►
right so they're going to need even more screens and they're already struggling to get the
00:57:25
◼
►
amount that they need.
00:57:27
◼
►
This new iPad will have a faster processor and a custom Apple GPU again.
00:57:31
◼
►
There will be a new version of the Apple Pencil with an implied release date more than a year
00:57:37
◼
►
after the recent iPad Pro update, so kind of maybe fall of 2018, where we got the most
00:57:43
◼
►
recent iPad Pro WWDC time, which was because it was super late, right? So we're kind of
00:57:49
◼
►
looking at, again, about like a kind of 15 to 18 month cycle on the iPad Pros, which
00:57:56
◼
►
seems to be becoming the norm, right? Like you're looking at a year and a half now, which
00:58:00
◼
►
is kind of cool. So I want to ask you, Jason, do you think that this report makes more or
00:58:07
◼
►
less sense than the last one? Like, does this one stack up to you?
00:58:11
◼
►
Yeah, I mean, I think this makes sense. The idea that Apple would want to bring Face ID
00:58:17
◼
►
everywhere totally makes sense to me. I think that we know that, that this is also not a
00:58:23
◼
►
wait and see. Like, Apple went all in on Face ID a while ago. They've been said so. And
00:58:29
◼
►
so how would they not have said, "Okay, we got this stack. We've got these sensors. We've
00:58:33
◼
►
got this stuff, bring it everywhere. And the next generation iPad has probably always had
00:58:39
◼
►
Face ID as part of the plan.
00:58:41
◼
►
>> And probably Macs too, right? Next generation Macs?
00:58:45
◼
►
>> Yeah, one would hope. I mean, there they have to build it into Mac OS, right? Whereas
00:58:49
◼
►
it's already in iOS. But yeah, you would think that at some point they definitely got the
00:58:53
◼
►
word like, "Put this in. This is our--we're not doing Touch ID."
00:58:57
◼
►
>> Also, here's my question for you. Could the Touch ID work be like the start of it,
00:59:02
◼
►
because for a lot of what I guess I could understand from iOS was that like
00:59:08
◼
►
they obviously had to do work to support face ID but it was it was piggybacking
00:59:12
◼
►
on the biometric stuff and all the secure enclave yeah yeah I mean the work
00:59:17
◼
►
that they've done on Mac OS already to support touch ID on MacBook Pro with
00:59:23
◼
►
touch bar means that they basically got that they still have to do all of the
00:59:28
◼
►
whatever, you know, whatever is happening in terms of the intelligence of face ID,
00:59:34
◼
►
right? That has to get built in, although that's probably fairly
00:59:37
◼
►
portable. I was gonna say, like, again, from what I understand about how it
00:59:41
◼
►
works on the MacBook Pro, a lot of the processing is happening on a specific
00:59:45
◼
►
chip, right? Which I'm assuming is very much like the chips that run on iOS, so
00:59:50
◼
►
maybe then again, right? Like, a lot of that code is usable because it's not
00:59:54
◼
►
actually happening in Mac OS itself, maybe to a point.
00:59:57
◼
►
- Right, it's happening in some ARM processor
01:00:02
◼
►
that's also running the Secure Enclave and all of that.
01:00:04
◼
►
It's possible, it's possible.
01:00:05
◼
►
It's just a little more work than like iOS,
01:00:07
◼
►
it's in there, right?
01:00:08
◼
►
So the iPad getting it is a little more straightforward
01:00:12
◼
►
than the Mac. - Yes, than the Mac,
01:00:13
◼
►
for sure, for sure.
01:00:14
◼
►
- But the OLED stuff totally makes sense to me
01:00:17
◼
►
that they wouldn't do an OLED iPad screen
01:00:19
◼
►
only because Apple's shown to be super conservative
01:00:22
◼
►
with OLED, like, it's not that there aren't OLED tablet panels out there, because I think
01:00:28
◼
►
there are, but like, Apple is not going to jump in until they get an OLED panel that,
01:00:35
◼
►
one, matches, you know, meets their standards, which are high. I think Apple is very happy
01:00:41
◼
►
with the iPad screen as it currently exists, because it is the wide color gamut screen.
01:00:46
◼
►
got the high refresh rate for ProMotion, and also there's price issues, right?
01:00:54
◼
►
Because an OLED panel for tablets is going to be super expensive, and
01:00:59
◼
►
that's going to either cut into the margins or raise the price of the iPad
01:01:01
◼
►
Pro, and I don't think they want to raise the price of the iPad Pro right now. I
01:01:04
◼
►
think they want to sell more iPad Pros at the current prices, so I buy
01:01:08
◼
►
that part of the story too, that this is not going to be an OLED iPad, it's going
01:01:12
◼
►
to be a Face ID iPad. And what the Face ID gets you is you can take the button off the
01:01:17
◼
►
screen and you can shrink the top and bottom areas. And you don't have the space constraints
01:01:24
◼
►
of a phone, so you can still leave room for the sensor bar. I don't think there's going
01:01:28
◼
►
to be a notch. I think they can leave room for the sensor bar, but have all the bezels
01:01:32
◼
►
come in a little bit more so that you can make a smaller iPad that's got the same size
01:01:36
◼
►
screen or alternately a same sized iPad that's got a bigger screen.
01:01:42
◼
►
What do you think of that one though actually? Because I was wondering right now, you know,
01:01:47
◼
►
saying the report from Girma says it has a screen size similar to the 10.5 inch iPad
01:01:52
◼
►
Pro, like I can see that that's the case, but I can also see that like that could have
01:01:56
◼
►
been misconstrued, whether like oh it's going to be the same size and you think it means
01:02:00
◼
►
screen, but like it's actually physical size. Do you think that they're more likely to bring
01:02:04
◼
►
it in or push the screen out to the edges of the current one?
01:02:08
◼
►
- I'd say I'm 50/50 on it. If I had to choose, I would say that it feels more likely that
01:02:16
◼
►
they would keep this, they would maintain the screen size and make the physical size
01:02:20
◼
►
smaller. But you know, if you keep the physical size the same, that means you've got more
01:02:24
◼
►
room for components and battery, but it means it's bigger and heavier. So what is Apple
01:02:29
◼
►
gonna solve for there. And in the 12.9, assuming they do this on the 12.9, it's the same question,
01:02:35
◼
►
which is I would take a smaller 12.9, right? Because I like the bigger screen, but I'd
01:02:41
◼
►
be happy if it was smaller and lighter. 10.5 seems like a very nice size. People like it.
01:02:47
◼
►
So that's a question is could you make it smaller or could you just stretch out the
01:02:50
◼
►
screen? On the 10.5, quite frankly, I think they could do either one and it would be a
01:02:54
◼
►
good product. It would be a better product, either a little more screen. I think the advantage
01:02:58
◼
►
of having it be the same screen size is it's not another iOS screen size. Right. They just
01:03:05
◼
►
say no no no it's the same size as the 10.5 it's fine it's fine.
01:03:09
◼
►
Do you think they'll do anything to the 12.9 or do you think it's gonna be like another
01:03:13
◼
►
two to three years for that one right so like they they rev the 10.5 and then maybe in a
01:03:18
◼
►
year and a half rev the 12.9 again?
01:03:21
◼
►
Good question. I don't know. I want them to be in lockstep, right? I'm going to fear
01:03:29
◼
►
for the 12/9 if it isn't updated at the same time as the 10/5.
01:03:33
◼
►
Right, because we had the 12/9, then the 9/7 came out with new features, nothing happened
01:03:38
◼
►
to the 12/9, then they both got updated together in June.
01:03:42
◼
►
Right. So I want them updated together again from now on.
01:03:45
◼
►
I know, but I don't know. I don't know.
01:03:49
◼
►
I don't know.
01:03:50
◼
►
I feel like that the 12 9 that like that they like it's not like it's dead but I can imagine
01:03:54
◼
►
them skipping right so like the 10 5 gets a revision and in a year later it gets another
01:04:00
◼
►
one and then the 12 9 gets a revision I doubt I doubt they I doubt it sells a lot right
01:04:06
◼
►
I mean as much as I love it I doubt it sells a lot in fact I was going to say with the
01:04:11
◼
►
10 5 like if they made that a little bit bigger screen they would pick off even more users
01:04:17
◼
►
potentially from the bigger iPad. But I do think that there's an advantage to having
01:04:24
◼
►
— I think there's an advantage to giving people choice in terms of screen size, because
01:04:29
◼
►
if you're somebody who wants extra screen space, a 10.5-inch screen is not great. I
01:04:34
◼
►
mean, on a laptop, people prefer a 13 over an 11, and yet on the iPad, definitely people
01:04:40
◼
►
seem to prefer the 11 or 10 and a half to the 13 essentially. But at the same time the
01:04:48
◼
►
12.9 is more expensive and has presumably really nice margins so they want to keep it
01:04:54
◼
►
around. Yeah, realistically the 10.5 is the priority and then the question is do they
01:05:00
◼
►
keep updating the 12.9 in lockstep. I hope they do.
01:05:05
◼
►
So if the home button goes away, then what happens to our gestures?
01:05:11
◼
►
So I can't imagine that Apple would change iOS on the iPad's gestures to match the iPhone,
01:05:20
◼
►
so that the swipe up would take you home, because I really think that the swipe up for
01:05:25
◼
►
the dock is way more powerful there, like all the dock stuff makes more sense.
01:05:30
◼
►
And honestly, I think that they would just keep what's already there.
01:05:35
◼
►
There is already a gesture on the iPad to go home and it's a four finger pinch.
01:05:39
◼
►
And you can also use four fingers to swipe left and right and you can go between apps
01:05:42
◼
►
like you can on the iPhone.
01:05:45
◼
►
I would hope and think that they'll probably go down that route rather than once again
01:05:49
◼
►
changing all of the UI gestures for iOS on the iPad because you'd end up with like, what
01:05:55
◼
►
would you do for the dock?
01:05:56
◼
►
Like do a finger swipe up and then, you know, it's...
01:05:59
◼
►
- I've got, here's my theory,
01:06:02
◼
►
I'm just gonna put it out there,
01:06:03
◼
►
which is swipe up to go home,
01:06:08
◼
►
swipe up and hold or swipe up and go high
01:06:12
◼
►
to bring up the dock and the multitasking switcher
01:06:15
◼
►
and control center, which is what it currently does.
01:06:18
◼
►
If you think about swiping up from within an app
01:06:21
◼
►
and doing the big swipe,
01:06:24
◼
►
you get to a place where the dock is there,
01:06:26
◼
►
the multitasking switcher is there
01:06:27
◼
►
and control center is there.
01:06:28
◼
►
They're all there.
01:06:29
◼
►
I wouldn't like that.
01:06:30
◼
►
- So you just get rid of the little dock swipe
01:06:32
◼
►
and the dock swipe becomes a home instead.
01:06:35
◼
►
- Because all the multitasking stuff
01:06:36
◼
►
will be so much slower, right?
01:06:38
◼
►
Like doing, 'cause you'd swipe up
01:06:40
◼
►
and then you'd want to bring a new app in
01:06:42
◼
►
and then you'd have to tap again and then bring,
01:06:44
◼
►
it all seems like it's just adding even more steps
01:06:46
◼
►
to what can be sometimes clunky UI anyway.
01:06:50
◼
►
- I find myself, the swipe up a little to get the dock
01:06:54
◼
►
is not a gesture that I have embraced on iOS 11.
01:06:58
◼
►
- Oh, wow, I use it all the time.
01:07:01
◼
►
- I rarely use it, but I can see how for multitasking
01:07:06
◼
►
and kicking off apps, that is where I use it.
01:07:08
◼
►
And so that would be more complicated.
01:07:10
◼
►
I think the four finger pinch thing
01:07:13
◼
►
is too esoteric for people.
01:07:17
◼
►
I think Apple wants something a little more specific
01:07:21
◼
►
than that, they may move some gestures around,
01:07:23
◼
►
but I feel like they will find a simple gesture
01:07:27
◼
►
to have you go home.
01:07:28
◼
►
- What about like a swipe in from,
01:07:32
◼
►
I don't know, I was gonna say from the side,
01:07:34
◼
►
but like that would just--
01:07:35
◼
►
- I was gonna say also another solution,
01:07:38
◼
►
and this is like lifting something else from the Mac,
01:07:41
◼
►
which they have done some of,
01:07:43
◼
►
which is what if home is,
01:07:48
◼
►
the home screen is already an app in the app switcher, right?
01:07:53
◼
►
When you Command + Tab,
01:07:55
◼
►
one of your options is the home screen in the app switcher.
01:07:59
◼
►
- Right, so it's in the dock maybe.
01:08:01
◼
►
- So what if it was in the dock?
01:08:03
◼
►
So if you wanna go home, you flip up and tap on home
01:08:07
◼
►
and it shows us up as an app,
01:08:09
◼
►
maybe in multitasking too as an app that you can move to.
01:08:11
◼
►
- Well, Jason, what if there just isn't home anymore
01:08:14
◼
►
on the iPad?
01:08:15
◼
►
probably not, but they could de-emphasize it, right? Because you're flipping around
01:08:20
◼
►
between apps, so maybe just putting it on the dock is the answer, is that they keep
01:08:25
◼
►
the UI the same and they just put a home, the home screen just lives on, in the little
01:08:28
◼
►
side area on the dock at all times, just like the finder is always in the dock on the Mac.
01:08:33
◼
►
Yeah, that would work. Or like, you know, Launchpad comes back, Launchpad finds its
01:08:39
◼
►
way, and then that's it, right? Like you hit it, and then the little, all your apps open
01:08:43
◼
►
up rather than you going home. That's all it is, right? Just rearrange the apps and
01:08:48
◼
►
it could just be some weird little app launcher which just sits in the dock instead. That's
01:08:53
◼
►
all home is, right? Unless they do something more there, I mean, but yeah, that could totally
01:09:00
◼
►
Goemon referenced the new app version of the Apple Pencil. I just want to run through very
01:09:05
◼
►
quickly again.
01:09:06
◼
►
What do you think of that?
01:09:07
◼
►
Yeah, I want to just say what I want to see. Well, okay.
01:09:12
◼
►
I think it will be is just that the lag is improved, right? The latency is improved.
01:09:16
◼
►
That's what I honestly I think it will be. It would probably just be that. But if I was
01:09:20
◼
►
going to ask for what I would like, it's a couple of things. Buttons. I would like there
01:09:25
◼
►
to be a button which could have some functions programmed to it. This could be great for
01:09:30
◼
►
drawing apps, right? Because you could assign shortcuts to it or whatever. But there are
01:09:33
◼
►
many different applications that could do interesting things with buttons. You could
01:09:38
◼
►
have it could be programmable inside of applications which I would really like
01:09:41
◼
►
so like say for example an app like your wonderful ferrite that you could have
01:09:47
◼
►
effectively what would be like a shortcut key attached to it so like if
01:09:51
◼
►
you press the button and tap it cuts the audio right right at that point or
01:09:56
◼
►
something like that you know like you could I'm I'm thinking of like what my
01:10:00
◼
►
Wacom tablet does right so I have like select so when I hold the button and
01:10:06
◼
►
and drag, it's like I'm pressing the select key.
01:10:09
◼
►
And you know, it's the shift, I should say,
01:10:12
◼
►
not select, shift, I'm not saying.
01:10:14
◼
►
It's like I'm holding the shift key and then dragging, right?
01:10:17
◼
►
That's what happens when I use the button on my Wacom.
01:10:19
◼
►
So I'd like to see some programmable buttons there
01:10:22
◼
►
or an eraser, right, on the top.
01:10:24
◼
►
I would also honestly like to see new material options.
01:10:28
◼
►
I've said support, I would love an aluminum Apple Pencil
01:10:30
◼
►
because that would be wonderful
01:10:34
◼
►
and it would still be super light
01:10:35
◼
►
and it would look really nice and you could get them
01:10:37
◼
►
in all the four colors or three colors,
01:10:40
◼
►
however many colors there's gonna be in the next iPads.
01:10:42
◼
►
I will quite like that too.
01:10:44
◼
►
So yeah, that's what I think the Apple Pencil could have.
01:10:46
◼
►
I would also like to see new smart keyboards
01:10:49
◼
►
with backlighting on them, please.
01:10:50
◼
►
Thank you very much, that would be great.
01:10:52
◼
►
- Let me throw out there for the Apple Pencil
01:10:57
◼
►
inductive charging and not as long.
01:11:02
◼
►
- I wish it was a little bit shorter.
01:11:05
◼
►
I feel like it's awkward.
01:11:08
◼
►
- Making it out of aluminum could make it shorter
01:11:10
◼
►
because it's all about balance, right?
01:11:13
◼
►
So like how it feels in the hand.
01:11:14
◼
►
So like having it longer is like, it's this balance thing.
01:11:17
◼
►
It's the pen thing.
01:11:18
◼
►
But having it smaller and made of aluminum,
01:11:20
◼
►
the weight and the balance would be nice.
01:11:22
◼
►
- The pens I use are not as long as the Apple Pencil
01:11:25
◼
►
and a newly sharpened pencil
01:11:28
◼
►
is not as long as the Apple Pencil, I think.
01:11:31
◼
►
It's just a little bit too long.
01:11:33
◼
►
So I'd like it to be a little bit shorter,
01:11:35
◼
►
but it's just a little ergonomic thing.
01:11:37
◼
►
It just seems like it's too, there's too much there.
01:11:40
◼
►
And yeah, maybe there's a balance and a waiting thing
01:11:42
◼
►
that is a part of this too.
01:11:44
◼
►
And then inductive charging, I think is one where
01:11:46
◼
►
I think the charging issues with it are dumb, right?
01:11:49
◼
►
With the thing and you can do it and it's fine,
01:11:52
◼
►
but it's not its best feature that it's got a little nubbin
01:11:55
◼
►
under the cap that you have to use to charge.
01:11:58
◼
►
And then you have to find, you have to use an adapter
01:12:01
◼
►
or stick it into the bottom of your iPad
01:12:02
◼
►
and have it stick out kind of weirdly.
01:12:03
◼
►
- What would it inductively charge against though?
01:12:06
◼
►
- Well, I mean, they would allow it to inductively charge
01:12:10
◼
►
against air power.
01:12:13
◼
►
- But like then if the battery dies, what do you do
01:12:17
◼
►
if you're out at a coffee shop?
01:12:19
◼
►
- I think it would still need a lightning plug.
01:12:21
◼
►
I would also be fine if it had a,
01:12:23
◼
►
my feeling is if it had a female lightning
01:12:27
◼
►
so that you could just plug it into
01:12:29
◼
►
any of your many lightning plugs.
01:12:30
◼
►
I get that there's the emergency of you're at a coffee shop and you can just siphon off
01:12:35
◼
►
some of your iPad's battery power, but it still seems like a very weird.
01:12:39
◼
►
So I will say like I will go to, I will fight in war over this statement that whilst it
01:12:48
◼
►
looks silly, it was the best, smartest way to deal with this product was to have the
01:12:53
◼
►
male lightning plug on there because when you need to charge it, you just want to be
01:12:58
◼
►
be able to stick it into the iPad and charge it.
01:13:01
◼
►
And anything which is not, I am charging it via the device
01:13:05
◼
►
I'm using is a step backwards.
01:13:07
◼
►
If I have to have a cable, because like my iPad,
01:13:11
◼
►
I don't need to take charges with it
01:13:13
◼
►
when I'm leaving for the day,
01:13:14
◼
►
because it's got all their battery life, right?
01:13:17
◼
►
The Apple Pencil doesn't and it drains quicker,
01:13:21
◼
►
especially if you keep it near it,
01:13:22
◼
►
I hope that they can do something around that as well,
01:13:24
◼
►
because if you keep them near each other,
01:13:26
◼
►
they're connected to each other and the battery drains.
01:13:28
◼
►
to have any kind of case or anything that keeps it attached to the battery drains.
01:13:31
◼
►
I don't want to then have to take a full connector with me somewhere because I might have to
01:13:37
◼
►
charge my Apple Pencil because it has a female connector. Whilst it is dumb and it's fun
01:13:42
◼
►
to make jokes about it because it looks ridiculous to stick the Apple Pencil in the bottom, it
01:13:47
◼
►
makes so much sense during usage. It's like having an inkwell. You would stick the pen
01:13:52
◼
►
into the inkwell to refill it and then use it. It just kind of makes sense to me that
01:13:57
◼
►
have this thing you stick it in there you wait 30 seconds and you're good for
01:14:01
◼
►
15 minutes like whilst it is not necessarily like this is definitely a
01:14:06
◼
►
function of a form decision that they made and if they decide to go in another
01:14:11
◼
►
route of it in my opinion if it doesn't charge from the device they've made
01:14:15
◼
►
they've made a bad decision. Okay take it from someone that uses it. Yep I buy I
01:14:24
◼
►
I'll take that.
01:14:26
◼
►
It is frustrating in all other contexts, I would say,
01:14:31
◼
►
but you are right.
01:14:32
◼
►
If you're just out somewhere with your iPad
01:14:34
◼
►
and your pencil's running out of battery,
01:14:36
◼
►
it would be terrible to be like, oh no,
01:14:38
◼
►
I need to get an adapter out and plug it in
01:14:42
◼
►
that I brought just in case the pencil ran out
01:14:44
◼
►
when you can just sort of stick it in the iPad
01:14:46
◼
►
and it charges.
01:14:48
◼
►
It's just, again, all the other scenarios, it's weird.
01:14:53
◼
►
And I really, it makes me uncomfortable to plug that thing
01:14:56
◼
►
into the bottom of my iPad and have this big pencil,
01:14:59
◼
►
big long pencil thing sticking out the bottom.
01:15:01
◼
►
Like I'm afraid I'm gonna snap it off every single time.
01:15:05
◼
►
It terrifies me, but you use it more than I do.
01:15:07
◼
►
So I get why it's there.
01:15:09
◼
►
- Push and wrench that thing in and out.
01:15:10
◼
►
Like there is no problem, it's not breaking.
01:15:12
◼
►
You're all good.
01:15:13
◼
►
I wouldn't worry about it.
01:15:14
◼
►
But also, so you don't ever need to leave it in
01:15:16
◼
►
for that long.
01:15:18
◼
►
You kind of just, I will plug it in.
01:15:19
◼
►
I'll open up a couple of apps,
01:15:20
◼
►
kind of get all my ducks in a row
01:15:22
◼
►
and then I'm good to go,
01:15:23
◼
►
'cause it only takes like 30 seconds or whatever.
01:15:25
◼
►
It's totally fine, totally fine.
01:15:29
◼
►
- All right.
01:15:30
◼
►
- Anything else on this iPad?
01:15:31
◼
►
I mean, I know I want it.
01:15:33
◼
►
And also, yay for increased sales means we get more iPads.
01:15:37
◼
►
- Yeah, that's what I was gonna say is,
01:15:40
◼
►
yes, please an iPad update in 2018.
01:15:44
◼
►
I know we had one in 2017, I'm greedy.
01:15:46
◼
►
I want another iPad update.
01:15:47
◼
►
I want the iPad to get the whizzy new iPhone features.
01:15:50
◼
►
They don't have to get them the same month,
01:15:52
◼
►
but maybe like the next iPad has the whizzy features
01:15:55
◼
►
that came to the iPhone.
01:15:57
◼
►
And the iPad is, you know,
01:15:58
◼
►
iPad's doing the iPhone a solid,
01:16:00
◼
►
the iPad did the True Tone
01:16:02
◼
►
and then it moved back to the iPhone.
01:16:04
◼
►
Well, I want it the other way.
01:16:06
◼
►
I would love Face ID on my iPad
01:16:09
◼
►
and all the latest, you know,
01:16:11
◼
►
latest processor tech upgrades and all of that stuff.
01:16:14
◼
►
And getting rid of the home button I think is fine
01:16:17
◼
►
because I am over the physical home buttons now.
01:16:21
◼
►
Yeah, me too, unfortunately. It's like when I use touch ID on my iPad, I'm like, "Oh,
01:16:28
◼
►
yeah, look at you!" I mean, I have--it has been kind of weird to keep using the physical
01:16:31
◼
►
home button for this amount of time anyway, right? Because we've had the 3D touch home
01:16:38
◼
►
Yeah, oh, I don't use the home button very much other than unlocking it via touch ID,
01:16:43
◼
►
because I have gestures to move around.
01:16:45
◼
►
Mm-hmm. I understand.
01:16:46
◼
►
is why I believe that it's not necessary on the iPad.
01:17:10
◼
►
Today's show is brought to you by Squarespace. Use the offer code "upgrade" at checkout
01:17:13
◼
►
and you'll get 10% off your first purchase.
01:17:15
◼
►
Make your next move with Squarespace
01:17:17
◼
►
with the ability to grab a unique domain name,
01:17:19
◼
►
access to award winning templates and 24/7 customer support.
01:17:23
◼
►
They will let you easily create the website
01:17:26
◼
►
that you have for your next idea
01:17:27
◼
►
and you're going to feel great when you're doing it.
01:17:29
◼
►
Squarespace is an all in one platform
01:17:31
◼
►
that will let you put just about anything you want online.
01:17:34
◼
►
There is nothing to install, no patches to worry about,
01:17:37
◼
►
no upgrades needed.
01:17:39
◼
►
Squarespace have got you covered.
01:17:40
◼
►
Whether you want to create a blog, a portfolio,
01:17:42
◼
►
an online store, a site for your business, a site for your band, a restaurant, no matter
01:17:51
◼
►
what it is they have templates to help you, they are so customisable and they have that
01:17:55
◼
►
customer support if you need anything.
01:17:57
◼
►
Squarespace plans start at just $12 a month, you can sign up for a free trial with no credit
01:18:02
◼
►
card required, just go to squarespace.com and use the offer code UPGRADE to get 10%
01:18:09
◼
►
your first purchase and show your support for this show, that is the offer code UPGRADE
01:18:13
◼
►
for 10% off your first purchase. Our thanks to Squarespace for their support of this show,
01:18:18
◼
►
Squarespace. Make your next move, make your next website.
01:18:22
◼
►
It is time for #ASKUPGRADE. Dave wants to know, I've noticed a trend this week which
01:18:32
◼
►
Dave is making fun of but I've noticed it, given that Twitter now allows 280 characters
01:18:38
◼
►
is in their tweets. Do you think that the upgradians will be more loquacious in their
01:18:47
◼
►
hashtag #askupgradequestions? And what impact do you think this will have on the segment?
01:18:52
◼
►
Will it be better or worse? Now this word loquacious means tending to talk a great deal
01:19:00
◼
►
or talkative. I like – everyone's making fun, I'm sure, with the word choice, right?
01:19:04
◼
►
But I did notice when I was looking through the Ask Upgrade questions that boy were they
01:19:11
◼
►
280 character tweets, people are using them.
01:19:14
◼
►
So I'm going to say that whilst the questions in some cases are longer, quite a lot of the
01:19:21
◼
►
time people would send multiple tweets.
01:19:24
◼
►
This is fine.
01:19:25
◼
►
I mean if it helps our listeners get their questions out to us in a more detailed way
01:19:32
◼
►
to try and help with some stuff, great, because a lot of the time as well, I was noticing
01:19:36
◼
►
people just like wrenching to fit the 140 in, like really kind of, yeah.
01:19:41
◼
►
Also sometimes you paste in a tweet and it's not the whole question and then you're like,
01:19:45
◼
►
"Oh God, what was the rest of the question?" You have to go back and find the next tweet.
01:19:49
◼
►
I think there are a lot of good debates that people are having about whether 280 instead
01:19:52
◼
►
of 140 hurts Twitter or helps Twitter about like regular conversation and people, the
01:19:58
◼
►
kind of challenge of fitting a thought in 140.
01:20:02
◼
►
And I think those, I have some opinions on them,
01:20:04
◼
►
but I think it's a good, great, debatable subject.
01:20:09
◼
►
I will say, as somebody who does podcasts
01:20:11
◼
►
where I'm posting a new episode
01:20:13
◼
►
and I'm trying to mention everybody who's on the panel
01:20:15
◼
►
and I can't fit it in 140,
01:20:17
◼
►
I'm very happy to have 280
01:20:19
◼
►
so I can mention everybody in the same tweet
01:20:21
◼
►
and keep it in one tweet and say,
01:20:23
◼
►
"Here's our new episode with these five people
01:20:25
◼
►
and here's the link."
01:20:26
◼
►
And as somebody who does podcasts with this hashtag
01:20:30
◼
►
where people are asking questions,
01:20:31
◼
►
and I do that with TV Talk Machine too,
01:20:33
◼
►
where people tweet at TVTM with their questions,
01:20:35
◼
►
and it's a super easy way to get podcast feedback
01:20:38
◼
►
and questions, I'm very happy with 280,
01:20:41
◼
►
because I want them to be able to fit their question in
01:20:44
◼
►
and not give up or send an email
01:20:46
◼
►
that then we forget to read on the air,
01:20:48
◼
►
'cause like people send emails to upgrade every now and then.
01:20:51
◼
►
And I feel really bad because I usually forget
01:20:54
◼
►
that we've got them by the time the show happens. And so I'm happy. I think this is a great
01:20:59
◼
►
change for some of these uses that we have for it. So I'm glad to have longer, clearer
01:21:07
◼
►
#AskUpgrade tweets. I think that's great.
01:21:11
◼
►
Ryan wants to know, "How do you clean the inside of your AirPods case?" Jason, please
01:21:16
◼
►
tell me you have good options for this. I'm assuming compressed air would do it. But there's
01:21:23
◼
►
just like there is some lint in my AirPods case which feels like it's now just a part
01:21:27
◼
►
of the AirPods case like it's impossible to get out.
01:21:30
◼
►
I don't have a good answer here. My in-ear headphones came with a little tiny tool that's
01:21:38
◼
►
like a little kind of scraper thing that's super small that I will use sometimes. I was
01:21:46
◼
►
This is not, okay, I'll just say it.
01:21:49
◼
►
I have a SIM removal tool that I use
01:21:52
◼
►
to like pop out the SIM card on my old iPhone
01:21:54
◼
►
and put it in the iPhone 10 and all of that.
01:21:56
◼
►
And it was out.
01:21:57
◼
►
And it's basically like a little tiny pin.
01:22:02
◼
►
And so I actually kind of used it to scrape off the like,
01:22:05
◼
►
the lint and the junk around the corner
01:22:08
◼
►
of the AirPods case.
01:22:11
◼
►
- You did it, Jason.
01:22:13
◼
►
I'm now using a sim removal tool right now.
01:22:16
◼
►
There you go, see, you did have an answer for me.
01:22:19
◼
►
- That's fantastic.
01:22:21
◼
►
- It's not like a push pin where it's gonna kinda scrape
01:22:25
◼
►
and not, 'cause it's too pointy.
01:22:26
◼
►
It's kind of a blunt pin and that worked pretty well
01:22:30
◼
►
to scrape the stuff out.
01:22:32
◼
►
So yeah, there you go, there's my,
01:22:34
◼
►
if you've got a sim removal tool, that might be your answer.
01:22:37
◼
►
- That is an upgrade top tip.
01:22:39
◼
►
Chris has a question for me.
01:22:42
◼
►
Chris wants to know, is there a reason to get AppleCare+ for the iPhone 10 and not just
01:22:47
◼
►
have it on something like home contents insurance with accidental damage cover?
01:22:51
◼
►
Now I'm assuming Chris asked me this question because Chris is also in the UK and is like
01:22:55
◼
►
me unaware of what home contents insurance is like or if it even exists in the US, who
01:23:02
◼
►
But here is my question about this, right?
01:23:03
◼
►
And I've also had people say to me like, oh, what about European Union warranty laws and
01:23:08
◼
►
all that sort of stuff?
01:23:09
◼
►
I'm sure that there are ways in which you can argue a case, um, or you can put it on
01:23:16
◼
►
home contents insurance with accidental damage cover and you might be able to get stuff fixed.
01:23:21
◼
►
I have a laptop fixed that way once where I spilt an entire, uh, like half pint of soda
01:23:28
◼
►
into a laptop keyboard and with the accidental damage cover, they replaced it here.
01:23:33
◼
►
That's what we call the PEPC syndrome.
01:23:35
◼
►
That's what we always used to call that when I was a kid.
01:23:37
◼
►
It's like the China syndrome except instead of a nuclear meltdown it's Pepsi on your computer
01:23:43
◼
►
Which is it feels very similar at that moment in time.
01:23:46
◼
►
I actually I dumped that I did that to that computer during the month in which we were
01:23:53
◼
►
launching Relay like building up to it.
01:23:56
◼
►
It was the month prior.
01:23:58
◼
►
In the US generally this is called renters insurance.
01:24:02
◼
►
Okay yeah see this is something that people that own homes also get I don't know if that's
01:24:06
◼
►
'cause rent as insurance sounds like something you do
01:24:09
◼
►
when you're renting, but like there's like a-
01:24:11
◼
►
- Here it's for homeowners, it's generally just,
01:24:15
◼
►
it's your homeowner's insurance and you can have it cover
01:24:19
◼
►
and it covers your house and the contents.
01:24:21
◼
►
And then it depends on your policy, but there's for just
01:24:25
◼
►
a policy for just the contents, I think generally,
01:24:27
◼
►
you know, the difference there is then you're a renter.
01:24:30
◼
►
- You're a renter.
01:24:31
◼
►
- Because a homeowner's insurance,
01:24:32
◼
►
you also have to be insured against somebody tripping
01:24:34
◼
►
on the shrub outside your house and breaking their neck
01:24:37
◼
►
and stuff like that.
01:24:38
◼
►
And I'm with you, which is what's your insurance like?
01:24:43
◼
►
What's the deductible?
01:24:44
◼
►
What's, you know, there's a whole list of things
01:24:47
◼
►
that like you sure maybe your insurance is awesome
01:24:49
◼
►
and it totally covers it,
01:24:50
◼
►
but I'm not sure how confident people are
01:24:54
◼
►
about their insurance coverage covering something
01:24:56
◼
►
like dropping your iPhone. - They may say they cover it,
01:24:59
◼
►
but like, will they actually agree to fix it?
01:25:01
◼
►
How long is it gonna take them?
01:25:03
◼
►
who is going to perform the repair? Right? Like all of these questions, like for example,
01:25:08
◼
►
I got my laptop replaced, but it took like four weeks, three or four weeks. Now, the Apple store,
01:25:14
◼
►
in theory, is not going to take that long, especially for an iPhone. Now, I know like
01:25:17
◼
►
the iPhone stuff is done relatively fast when you actually can get an appointment.
01:25:20
◼
►
And I know that it's the Apple store that's fixing it. Like who fixes these things for
01:25:28
◼
►
contents insurance companies. Who does that? Like do they have some third party that they send them
01:25:33
◼
►
out to? Right? So yes, in theory you can do this. I went with AppleCare+ because if I have a problem,
01:25:40
◼
►
I want to take it to an Apple store and the Apple store fixes it. With their warranty
01:25:47
◼
►
extensions on those repairs, right? And all that sort of stuff. And then it doesn't put up my
01:25:52
◼
►
entire home insurance premium and plan and you know and all that sort of stuff.
01:25:57
◼
►
So yeah, I just I didn't want to go through all of that.
01:25:59
◼
►
Dean has an interesting question. Dean wants to know if you could swap time zones with me,
01:26:05
◼
►
would you? The pro is Apple product pre-orders are at 3 p.m. The con is keynotes are at 1 a.m.
01:26:12
◼
►
and Dean is in Perth. So Western Australia, yeah.
01:26:16
◼
►
Yes. What would you do? Would you swap? Would you swap?
01:26:21
◼
►
I certainly would not. No, you're in the prime time zone for it, right?
01:26:27
◼
►
I'm in, as Apple will continue to explain to you, Cupertino time zone. So, product pre-order
01:26:34
◼
►
at midnight is not a big deal. It's like a party. And then the keynotes are at a proper
01:26:38
◼
►
time at 10am. So, I am going to stay here. But what about you, Myke?
01:26:43
◼
►
I mean, I am in the one true time zone, which is GMT or GMT offset by one. But right now,
01:26:49
◼
►
I'm in the ultimate prime time because it's the time. I'm in time. I'm at zero right now,
01:26:56
◼
►
which is in GMT. No, I wouldn't either because our pre-order is 8 a.m., which is not terrible,
01:27:02
◼
►
right? Like, it's pretty good. And we watch the keynotes at like 6 o'clock at night. Like,
01:27:08
◼
►
that's fine too. So I'm sure there are some people in the world that would want to make
01:27:11
◼
►
that switch. Maybe people in Eastern time would be more inclined to do it, right? So
01:27:16
◼
►
they'd have to wake up at 3 a.m. for their product pre-orders.
01:27:18
◼
►
But they're used to the world revolving around them and their time zones.
01:27:21
◼
►
This is why I want to point out that the one true time zone is my time zone, Casey, not
01:27:27
◼
►
yours. It makes no sense that Eastern Time would be... Anyway, moving on, Rob wants to
01:27:32
◼
►
know, "What are your thoughts on if Apple will or should or could break out apps like
01:27:39
◼
►
Safari into releases that are not tied to the OS?" What do you think about this, Jason?
01:27:44
◼
►
talking about this recently, like iOS seems to be the same with like a
01:27:47
◼
►
staggered release of products now but like should stuff like Safari still be
01:27:52
◼
►
tied into big OS updates?
01:27:56
◼
►
So I'm sure Apple would like to unhitch apps and have them go through
01:28:05
◼
►
software update like iWork does, like you know, there's just a
01:28:08
◼
►
pages update and you go okay that's fine on iOS and Mac. I think the problem with
01:28:13
◼
►
with Safari is that it's not just Safari, it's WebKit,
01:28:17
◼
►
and it's underlying the entire web experience
01:28:19
◼
►
of the operating system.
01:28:21
◼
►
And that's why it's tied to the OS,
01:28:23
◼
►
is that, you know, the apps, theoretically,
01:28:25
◼
►
the apps that are tied to the OS are the ones
01:28:28
◼
►
that can't be updated outside the OS update structure.
01:28:32
◼
►
So yeah, Apple could pull Safari app
01:28:36
◼
►
and make that updatable separate
01:28:38
◼
►
from like all the WebKit frameworks, I suppose,
01:28:42
◼
►
but I'm not quite sure what you get by doing that
01:28:45
◼
►
because how often are they gonna update the Safari app
01:28:49
◼
►
versus doing, you know,
01:28:51
◼
►
pushing an update that also updates the rest of it.
01:28:53
◼
►
So I get the frustration if you're an avid user,
01:28:57
◼
►
like for me, it's with photos where I write about photos,
01:28:59
◼
►
I'm working on the update to my book about photos
01:29:03
◼
►
'cause I'm gonna do that in the next couple of weeks
01:29:05
◼
►
and photos only gets updates when the OS updates.
01:29:09
◼
►
And why is that?
01:29:09
◼
►
It's like, well, I guess it's so tied into iCloud stuff that they just have made it a part of the OS stuff.
01:29:20
◼
►
But it's frustrating.
01:29:21
◼
►
I think, though, that's the theory.
01:29:23
◼
►
And Safari is a great example.
01:29:26
◼
►
It's actually the best example.
01:29:27
◼
►
Like, all web rendering on iOS, for example, is happening in Safari, essentially.
01:29:35
◼
►
and it is web rendering in the Mac,
01:29:38
◼
►
wherever it's needed is being supplied
01:29:40
◼
►
by the web kit under Safari.
01:29:43
◼
►
So I think that's the theory is they don't want to do that.
01:29:46
◼
►
The good news is on the Mac,
01:29:49
◼
►
you can just get the Safari developer preview
01:29:53
◼
►
if you want a peek at the next generation Safari stuff,
01:29:57
◼
►
Safari technology preview,
01:30:00
◼
►
and that gets updated all the time, which is cool,
01:30:03
◼
►
but they want to keep the, you know, the updates that affect web rendering across the entire
01:30:08
◼
►
platform constraint. So that's why.
01:30:11
◼
►
I want to just have, before we finish today, a quick tangent which is coming off this,
01:30:15
◼
►
which is tied to machine learning. There's been this weird bug going around on iOS, which
01:30:22
◼
►
seems like some kind of weird virus, spreading from machine to machine, where it's been replacing
01:30:28
◼
►
the capital I with an A and a question mark and a box, like this is like a weird Unicode
01:30:34
◼
►
bug effectively was what was going on. And it seems like, now there have been, I am interested
01:30:41
◼
►
to see Apple publish a potential paper on this in the future, but what it seems like
01:30:47
◼
►
is that there has been some kind of bug in CoreML or in differential privacy or something
01:30:52
◼
►
like that in which somebody put this into autocorrect and then somehow that spread to
01:30:58
◼
►
everyone to a lot of people and it seems like there's this theory which I subscribe to but
01:31:05
◼
►
hasn't been proven of like if it was sent to you it maybe got into your autocorrect like if somebody
01:31:10
◼
►
sent you a message and it had those characters in it that then maybe you would start doing it but
01:31:15
◼
►
you didn't even know it was happening it's a very strange thing like people would see it but you
01:31:19
◼
►
didn't know you were doing it it didn't happen to me but it's there's been this bug which apple was
01:31:24
◼
►
fixed via a software update. So my kind of question mark about this is how good is your
01:31:32
◼
►
machine learning system when the only way you can fix it is via a software update. Now
01:31:38
◼
►
if this happened to Google, Google would just fix it on their back end, right, because their
01:31:43
◼
►
machine learning algorithms, they control them.
01:31:46
◼
►
But here it's running on the device.
01:31:49
◼
►
But when it's running on device, if there is a problem in your, in something in your
01:31:53
◼
►
machine learning in this differential privacy stuff, you have to push an operating system
01:32:00
◼
►
update as your way to fix this. Which means it's still happening and people are still
01:32:05
◼
►
seeing it because not everybody updates their phones. Like, I have a big question mark about
01:32:13
◼
►
this because it's like, well, many actually. Like, does this mean that maybe this isn't
01:32:19
◼
►
the best way to do this at grand scale. And then also, this is a bug we've seen. Are there others?
01:32:26
◼
►
What other bugs could exist in the machine learning? Like, are all of the locations in
01:32:33
◼
►
my photos being tagged incorrectly? Like, are all of the subjects? Like, am I no longer seeing
01:32:39
◼
►
mountains and horses because they've been miscategorized somewhere but I can't see it?
01:32:43
◼
►
Like, this is one we can see because it's happening to our keyboards. But like, could
01:32:47
◼
►
there be other errant information like other like weird stuff that's happening
01:32:50
◼
►
somewhere in these machine learning databases but we don't necessarily see it and can they then only
01:32:57
◼
►
be fixed via operating system updates? It's curious to me like this this is this we're seeing one of
01:33:03
◼
►
the trade-offs this is one of the trade-offs when you go for privacy it would seem. Yeah I think so
01:33:08
◼
►
and and it's one of those things where they could probably uh change the architecture so that they
01:33:15
◼
►
they could make this something that was correctable
01:33:18
◼
►
without a software update.
01:33:20
◼
►
But first off, there are lots of security implications there.
01:33:25
◼
►
And secondly, they won't hit this one again.
01:33:30
◼
►
It'll be somewhere else, right?
01:33:32
◼
►
And they're all constantly changing,
01:33:33
◼
►
"Oh, well, maybe we should make that something
01:33:35
◼
►
we've been remote control."
01:33:36
◼
►
And maybe there's something that it's, but so you're right.
01:33:38
◼
►
This is live by the sword, die by the sword here,
01:33:40
◼
►
where if this was a cloud database,
01:33:43
◼
►
Apple could just delete this from it
01:33:44
◼
►
and everything would be okay.
01:33:46
◼
►
But since it's learning and then on device,
01:33:49
◼
►
I had that same thought, which was, wow,
01:33:53
◼
►
wouldn't this be the kind of thing
01:33:56
◼
►
that Apple could like just kind of pop in and take away?
01:34:01
◼
►
And instead they're like, nope,
01:34:02
◼
►
we gotta release a software update for it.
01:34:04
◼
►
Everybody's gonna have to reboot their phone
01:34:05
◼
►
in order to fix this problem.
01:34:07
◼
►
- I don't understand enough of this stuff, right?
01:34:09
◼
►
But my assumption would be that
01:34:11
◼
►
this is the way you fix this,
01:34:12
◼
►
because if they could fix it remotely,
01:34:15
◼
►
then there's a back door, right?
01:34:16
◼
►
Which is exactly what they don't want.
01:34:19
◼
►
Like, the only way to fix this
01:34:20
◼
►
is to go to my device and fix it.
01:34:23
◼
►
And if it's not done by software update, how do you do it?
01:34:26
◼
►
Yeah, I don't know.
01:34:27
◼
►
I see it's a very, it's a curious problem.
01:34:29
◼
►
This is why I would like to see and hope that like,
01:34:31
◼
►
on their machine learning blog,
01:34:33
◼
►
they publish a paper about this.
01:34:34
◼
►
Like, what happened?
01:34:36
◼
►
How can you prevent it?
01:34:37
◼
►
And is there a way to stop it going,
01:34:40
◼
►
putting it in the future?
01:34:41
◼
►
or like what changes are they gonna make
01:34:43
◼
►
to stop this type of thing happening in the future?
01:34:45
◼
►
Because I think a lot of the reason
01:34:46
◼
►
that Apple made this machine learning blog
01:34:48
◼
►
is they want to, I think, encourage other companies
01:34:51
◼
►
to take their approach,
01:34:53
◼
►
which is a privacy first look at machine learning.
01:34:57
◼
►
Well, I think we've seen one of the problems with that.
01:34:59
◼
►
And like why some companies are like, "No, no,
01:35:02
◼
►
we'll control the data set."
01:35:05
◼
►
And then we could just change it if we need to.
01:35:06
◼
►
So yeah, very, very interesting.
01:35:09
◼
►
I've been racking my brain on this one a little bit.
01:35:13
◼
►
And again, I have no doubt that there are many things
01:35:16
◼
►
that I don't understand, but it's been an interesting,
01:35:19
◼
►
it has been a very interesting thing to watch
01:35:23
◼
►
kind of happen to the internet.
01:35:25
◼
►
- Yeah, what a weird thing too.
01:35:29
◼
►
I hope that there's some lesson they can learn from this
01:35:32
◼
►
about, so that something like this doesn't happen again.
01:35:36
◼
►
But again, probably this won't recur
01:35:38
◼
►
and it will be some other weird thing that happens the next time.
01:35:42
◼
►
Now I'm just terrified that it's all wrong and I can't see it. It's all wrong and nobody
01:35:47
◼
►
knows. Today's episode was brought to you by our friends Squarespace, Matt Gauldin,
01:35:53
◼
►
and Texas Spanto from Smile. Thank you to them for supporting this week's show. You
01:35:56
◼
►
can find our show notes at relay.fm/upgrades/167. Jason is at sixcolors.com and he is @jasonel
01:36:05
◼
►
on Twitter. I am @imikeyke. If you'd like to send in questions to open the show, use
01:36:10
◼
►
the hashtag #snelltalk if you want to send in questions for us at the end of the show,
01:36:14
◼
►
hashtag #askupgrade. Thank you so much for your continued participation in these segments.
01:36:19
◼
►
We quite literally could not do them without you. As always, thank you for listening. We'll
01:36:23
◼
►
be back next time. Until then, say goodbye Jason Snell.
01:36:27
◼
►
Goodbye everybody.
01:36:28
◼
►
[MUSIC PLAYING]
01:36:31
◼
►
[MUSIC PLAYING]