175: $4,999, Cheap!
00:00:11
◼
►
From Relay FM, this is Upgrade, episode 175. Today's show is brought to you by Squarespace,
00:00:17
◼
►
Freshbooks and Mission U. My name is Myke Hurley and it is a pleasure to be joined again by Mr.
00:00:23
◼
►
Jason Snell. Jason Snell, we are back to the regularly expected programming after a great
00:00:28
◼
►
holiday season. It's good to be back and happy new year. Happy new year everybody.
00:00:35
◼
►
I think we've had some great shows over the last few weeks. We've been very happy with
00:00:39
◼
►
how the holidays panned out for the upgrade podcast. We were talking before the show.
00:00:44
◼
►
We're already thinking about summer of fun. We have like a whole thing. But Myke,
00:00:48
◼
►
nobody cares about that right now because it's time for #SnellTalk. See what I did there?
00:00:55
◼
►
interesting today's Snail Talk question comes from Iann and I am asks Jason do
00:01:01
◼
►
you use the dark menu bar and dock on your Mac no I figured you wouldn't but
00:01:08
◼
►
if anything was gonna convince you it would be the space gray I make pro
00:01:12
◼
►
because there's like a match there no no the reason is the reason is the same
00:01:18
◼
►
reason that I don't use it anyway which is I actually kind of would like to use
00:01:21
◼
►
I usually keep my office kind of dark. I would love a dark theme for Mac OS. The dark menu bar is not a dark theme.
00:01:31
◼
►
It's not enough. It looks out of place.
00:01:35
◼
►
Yeah, like, hey, we colored the menu bar! But what about all the windows? And do other apps have the ability?
00:01:43
◼
►
Some apps have a dark mode. Most do not.
00:01:47
◼
►
You see, I just turned it on and every other thing on my desktop uses the same coloring as the regular menu bar.
00:01:55
◼
►
Right? Like all of the Chrome and all of the apps, right?
00:01:58
◼
►
So like my C app, Skype, Chrome, it's all the same.
00:02:04
◼
►
Like Finder, even Finder doesn't change, right?
00:02:07
◼
►
Like nothing changes.
00:02:09
◼
►
It just now looks weird.
00:02:12
◼
►
It would be nice, I think, to use to have a darker theme, but they just...
00:02:16
◼
►
it doesn't extend past those two things which is kind of strange.
00:02:20
◼
►
I want a real, I want a real dark theme. I want a an empty safari window in dark mode
00:02:25
◼
►
to come up black instead of white. I want the finder windows to be to be dark, right?
00:02:32
◼
►
I want I want a real dark mode if they want to do a dark mode. One that is minimizing
00:02:36
◼
►
the amount of really bright white stuff that happens everywhere. But the menu bar and the
00:02:40
◼
►
dock, it's just it's not enough. I don't like how it looks. It seems out of place. And so
00:02:46
◼
►
yeah that's that's my reasoning is not that I wouldn't consider doing something
00:02:49
◼
►
like that it's like I don't like the partial measures of the what's currently
00:02:54
◼
►
in Mac OS and they introduced that a few years ago and they just done nothing
00:02:57
◼
►
with it I was really hoping they would just say okay developers here's how you
00:03:00
◼
►
sense whether you're in dark mode or not and here's how we implemented it in the
00:03:04
◼
►
finder and all that and they just didn't bother you know logic logic's got a
00:03:08
◼
►
great dark mode like logic pro 10 is dark mode and it's fine and final cut
00:03:12
◼
►
Yeah, exactly right there there how much blacker could they be none more black?
00:03:16
◼
►
but the rest of the system just doesn't do that and I don't like I don't like
00:03:22
◼
►
The piecemeal aspect of it. So that's that's why no you're right. It would be I guess extra nice on the darker
00:03:29
◼
►
Darker silver of the iMac Pro versus the lighter silver of the iMac
00:03:34
◼
►
But alas we are gonna be talking about the iMac Pro today before we do that
00:03:38
◼
►
We do have some follow up, but I will say if you have a question to open the show
00:03:42
◼
►
Just send a tweet with the hashtag Snell talk and we will pick for pick them for later episodes
00:03:47
◼
►
Thank you so much to I am for their suggestion. I just wanted to thank everybody
00:03:54
◼
►
Great comments about the upgrade ease. I had a great time putting the upgrade ease together as we do every year
00:03:59
◼
►
And I'm already thinking about what big and wonderful things we're gonna do for the upgrade ease next year
00:04:07
◼
►
And I feel vindicated, I feel satisfied if you go to Macintosh.fm/about, which is the
00:04:16
◼
►
about page for Welcome to Macintosh.
00:04:20
◼
►
Marc has put a winner of the 2017 Best Tech Podcast Upgrading Award right there on the
00:04:26
◼
►
I'd love to see that.
00:04:27
◼
►
I want to see more of that over the internet, the acknowledgement of the upgradees.
00:04:33
◼
►
I think Canis did that with Fairite.
00:04:37
◼
►
I think at the bottom of the Fairite product page is the 2015 upgrade symbol.
00:04:43
◼
►
So yeah, that's right.
00:04:44
◼
►
Market this thing, people.
00:04:48
◼
►
So then people will care more and more about it.
00:04:50
◼
►
We know you care.
00:04:51
◼
►
We need the whole world to care.
00:04:53
◼
►
Because that's the path to real trophies.
00:04:57
◼
►
I want to do real trophies, but we need to see that people actually want to receive them
00:05:02
◼
►
first so there you go. Yeah that is true. A lot of stuff has happened in what is usually the
00:05:08
◼
►
quietest time of the year hence why we create episodes like the upgrade is in the holiday
00:05:13
◼
►
Christmas special. We had some huge news in regards to iPhone batteries and Intel CPUs.
00:05:21
◼
►
Most of this stuff is taken care of now. They're really long-winded topics and there are better
00:05:28
◼
►
places that have been discussed even by Jason. So if you want to hear more about
00:05:32
◼
►
Jason's thoughts on the iPhone battery scandal situation, I don't know any other
00:05:39
◼
►
type of word to describe it. I was on this kind of obscure podcast, most people
00:05:46
◼
►
haven't heard of it. Lesser known, very good but lesser known. Well it's hosted
00:05:49
◼
►
by kind of a blogger who... An enthusiast. That's it. It's an enthusiast blogger, John
00:06:02
◼
►
Gruber, and his strangely named podcast, The Talk Show. Anyway, I was on there on the penultimate
00:06:12
◼
►
episode of 2018/17 because they had the Star Wars Holiday Special basically on New Year's
00:06:18
◼
►
So on the December 30th episode, episode 210 of the talk show, Jon and I talked about the
00:06:26
◼
►
battery stuff in great detail.
00:06:29
◼
►
Yeah, you know, I'm very happy.
00:06:32
◼
►
Sometimes you say things on the talk show and then like a week later somebody very angry
00:06:38
◼
►
who only listens to the talk show and doesn't know who you are or what else you do appears
00:06:44
◼
►
and says, "You made a misstatement here that shows that you know nothing about Apple.
00:06:47
◼
►
you should learn about Apple." I'm like, "Okay, thanks." This time, though, I'm
00:06:52
◼
►
actually extra happy with what we did because I feel like we broke it down into all of its
00:06:58
◼
►
component parts, all of the issues, the places where Apple is complicit, the places where
00:07:03
◼
►
Apple was trying to do the right thing. You know, I think it's a good one. So people
00:07:07
◼
►
should check that out if they have not heard the talk show number 210.
00:07:13
◼
►
The episodes that you two are on together tend to be my favorites. It was a very good
00:07:17
◼
►
one. So there's a lot there, a lot of information there.
00:07:20
◼
►
We didn't talk about baseball or keyboards almost at all, which is shocking.
00:07:23
◼
►
Which is a surprise.
00:07:24
◼
►
After we got to about two and a half hours, I almost mentioned baseball. And I thought,
00:07:29
◼
►
I'm not going to do that, because we'll be here another hour and a half. So I waited
00:07:34
◼
►
until we were done recording, and then I mentioned baseball. And we did talk for another half
00:07:38
◼
►
hour, but it wasn't part of the show. So you're welcome, people who don't want to hear us
00:07:42
◼
►
talk about baseball.
00:07:43
◼
►
then there is this whole Intel CPU thing, the Meltdown and the Spectre. ATP episode
00:07:48
◼
►
255 and download episode 36 for further information about that. I am really pleased that we did
00:07:57
◼
►
not have to speak about this thing specifically because I listened to the episode of ATP and
00:08:02
◼
►
I think my brain leaked out of my ears. I do not understand it.
00:08:07
◼
►
I go to learn about processor architectures from John Siracusa, because he's a fan. Like
00:08:14
◼
►
John doesn't drive a sports car, but he reads all the car magazines, he's also a fan of
00:08:21
◼
►
But doesn't get them.
00:08:22
◼
►
And bless him. So I like to, that was a good episode. And we did talk about it on the tablet.
00:08:29
◼
►
This is just one of those things that's pretty low level that I just, it just doesn't compute
00:08:33
◼
►
with me. Like, the CPUs aren't computing anymore, so you can go find out about that information
00:08:39
◼
►
too if you want to. So I think we should now get into regular programming and I want to
00:08:44
◼
►
discuss some media news. I like this ongoing segment that we have now. I have yet to brand
00:08:51
◼
►
this segment, so I'll work on that. We'll come up with something.
00:08:55
◼
►
I can do a little tiny bit of follow-out here too, just to plug, if people like us talking
00:09:00
◼
►
about the future of streaming media and things like that. We did a really nice episode, I'm
00:09:06
◼
►
very happy with it, December 21st on download called "Let Deadpool Be Deadpool," but it
00:09:12
◼
►
is Julia Alexander from Polygon and Natalie Jarvey from The Hollywood Reporter, and we
00:09:18
◼
►
basically talked the whole hour about what the Disney/Fox merger would mean for streaming,
00:09:26
◼
►
and I'm really happy with how that turned out. So if people like us talking about this,
00:09:29
◼
►
should check out that episode and I'm hoping to have them on again to talk about it in
00:09:33
◼
►
the future because I think it's a very interesting topic, whatever we call it here.
00:09:37
◼
►
So, David Letterman on Netflix. The show is called My Next Guest Needs No Introduction.
00:09:44
◼
►
There was a couple of reasons I wanted to bring this up. One is that I know that you
00:09:48
◼
►
love David Letterman.
00:09:50
◼
►
And the other is the fact that this is really interesting from the way that this show is
00:09:55
◼
►
going to be distributed. It's monthly, one episode at a time, which is very strange for
00:10:02
◼
►
Netflix. Yeah, they made this announcement that they were doing a deal with Letterman
00:10:11
◼
►
to do these specials. And the way they described it is that he was going to do a series of
00:10:18
◼
►
specials and the way it was going to drop was not described and I kind of figured that
00:10:26
◼
►
they might do a, you know, here are three episodes or here are six episodes kind of
00:10:31
◼
►
thing because it's very Netflix. But what they're doing is, there is a precedent for
00:10:35
◼
►
this, they're doing what they did with Chelsea Handler's talk show which dropped, it was
00:10:41
◼
►
a, you know, their foray into like we're going to do a talk show and they dropped those or
00:10:46
◼
►
kind of a talk show sort of, but they drop those regularly, not in a binge.
00:10:53
◼
►
All at once.
00:10:55
◼
►
And I think Netflix likes experimenting with this. For originals, they prefer not to do
00:11:02
◼
►
this. They really prefer binging, although in the UK and the rest of the world, you see
00:11:06
◼
►
weekly Netflix releases a lot from mostly American television shows that get picked
00:11:11
◼
►
up like a show like The Good Place is on in a bunch of countries on Netflix even though
00:11:17
◼
►
it's on NBC here. We get Jane the Virgin that way too. Right, and Star Trek Discovery actually
00:11:22
◼
►
works that way too although that's being released weekly in the US and Netflix is not waiting
00:11:27
◼
►
until the seasons are over to drop those. They're dropping them weekly. But in the US
00:11:32
◼
►
I will tell you if Netflix has any control over it they vastly prefer to drop in a binge
00:11:38
◼
►
And they do with, like even, there's a sci-fi show I really like called Travelers, which
00:11:43
◼
►
is from a network called Showcase in Canada.
00:11:46
◼
►
And Netflix, I believe, runs it everywhere else in the world.
00:11:50
◼
►
And they wait for the season to end, like all the episodes run in Canada, or almost
00:11:55
◼
►
all the episodes run in Canada.
00:11:57
◼
►
My understanding is that the first season they dropped it with two episodes to go, and
00:12:01
◼
►
everybody in Canada freaked out because they were being spoiled on the ending by everybody
00:12:04
◼
►
who was binging it in the US.
00:12:06
◼
►
They didn't do that this year.
00:12:07
◼
►
I think they learned their lesson this year. But this is an example where Netflix would
00:12:11
◼
►
rather drop it as a bingeable set, even when in another country it's doing weekly, but
00:12:19
◼
►
it's really only in the US that they're doing that. So anyway, Letterman, it sounds
00:12:23
◼
►
like what they thought was best, he thought was best, was to deliver these things monthly.
00:12:30
◼
►
And when you think that Letterman used to do four or five shows a week to do a monthly
00:12:35
◼
►
I don't know, that sounds like a much more reasonable approach in terms of production,
00:12:41
◼
►
in terms of recording, to sort of say, "We got a pace going, we're going to release these
00:12:46
◼
►
things monthly." They become kind of more events that way, but there's still a pace
00:12:51
◼
►
to them. So I like that idea, but it is kind of unusual for Netflix, that it's rather than
00:12:56
◼
►
having a season of David Letterman specials drop in July, they're going to run one a month,
00:13:03
◼
►
And the thing that really surprised me was they announced this last week, and the first
00:13:09
◼
►
episode drops Friday.
00:13:12
◼
►
So this is also not a "David Letterman, here's the name of his show, he'll be here in March."
00:13:17
◼
►
He will be here January 12th.
00:13:19
◼
►
So that was surprising too.
00:13:21
◼
►
So I guess off we go.
00:13:23
◼
►
And I'm looking forward to seeing what, you know, a guy who doesn't need to work essentially,
00:13:27
◼
►
other than I think emotionally he needs to work, but monetarily he doesn't need to work
00:13:32
◼
►
doing something that uses his skills and strikes his fancy without needing the grind and then
00:13:41
◼
►
using 30 years of knowledge of doing interviews and doing a TV show and like what do you do
00:13:46
◼
►
the same and what do you do differently. So I'm kind of fascinated to see what he does.
00:13:50
◼
►
He did sort of half of a National Geographic special last year where he went to India and
00:13:55
◼
►
I thought it was pretty great. I thought it was a nice mixture of kind of documentary
00:14:00
◼
►
and also his dumb jokes. So yeah, I'm looking forward to the first episode is January 12th.
00:14:06
◼
►
With Barack Obama. Yeah, first extended post-presidential interview
00:14:11
◼
►
with Barack Obama. And then the way it works is it's not just an interview, like there
00:14:16
◼
►
are supposedly related, like there's some man on the street stuff, because Letterman
00:14:20
◼
►
always used to like doing that, and there's some related bits. So that'll be kind of interesting
00:14:23
◼
►
too to see how it comes together, that it's not just like a Barbara Walters special where
00:14:27
◼
►
it's a sit-down with famous people, but it's also got some other stuff. So I'm kind of
00:14:32
◼
►
fascinated by how they're doing that. And I noticed that Jerry Seinfeld's show is now,
00:14:36
◼
►
they made a deal with him, Netflix did, to move from Crackle to Netflix. So that's happening
00:14:44
◼
►
too. So Netflix is definitely experimenting with more of this stuff too.
00:14:47
◼
►
So I love, love comedians in Cars Getting Coffee. It's fantastic. It's one of my favorite
00:14:53
◼
►
things I found in years that I watched the whole thing relatively recently like
00:14:57
◼
►
I'd seen episodes here and there but I watched all of it but on Netflix there
00:15:02
◼
►
are like there are like 12 seasons of the show they've broken them down into
00:15:05
◼
►
collections yeah and the cups of coffee strange yeah it's weird the way that
00:15:10
◼
►
they're doing it because they've mixed them all up yeah that it's like all over
00:15:15
◼
►
the place so it's a bit weird remix them it looks like they had to had to re-edit
00:15:20
◼
►
them and stuff because they had like they were all presented by Acura before but now in Netflix
00:15:25
◼
►
they're not so they had to drop them as sort of like they're like re-edited or at least somewhat
00:15:30
◼
►
modified versions. I did laugh because they are not seasons they're like cups of coffee.
00:15:36
◼
►
Yeah, Late Night Espresso just made a fresh pot light and sweet.
00:15:40
◼
►
And here's the wacky thing I was thinking about this from a programming standpoint you know how
00:15:45
◼
►
normally in their interface it'll show like S2E3 season 2 episode 3. For comedians and
00:15:51
◼
►
cars getting coffee it says C1E4 for cup 1. Because they're calling them collections.
00:15:57
◼
►
It's four collections. They're coffee cups. It's bizarre. It's like, yeah, I don't know
00:16:03
◼
►
what they're doing there. Because they're doing another season, so what do they do with
00:16:06
◼
►
that one? Where do those episodes go? That'll be collection 5, coffee cup 5, season 5, I
00:16:12
◼
►
I don't know.
00:16:12
◼
►
But anyway, Netflix continues to do interesting things
00:16:15
◼
►
as they spend a whole lot of money on content.
00:16:19
◼
►
Whole lot of money.
00:16:21
◼
►
- Amazon are planning to bid
00:16:23
◼
►
for Premier League football games.
00:16:25
◼
►
So this is a pretty big deal for the UK market.
00:16:29
◼
►
So they're looking to buy up a portion of them,
00:16:33
◼
►
which costs billions, right?
00:16:36
◼
►
But like they will just be buying a selection of games.
00:16:41
◼
►
potentially 20, 32, something like that. It is unknown right now, but this would be a
00:16:48
◼
►
big thing for them. I believe that Amazon bought some NFL games. Yeah, it's weird
00:16:53
◼
►
because they're like rebroadcast, so if you... they're games that are on
00:16:57
◼
►
television, they're not exclusive, but they got these streaming rights
00:17:04
◼
►
basically, which I think it was an experiment. This is interesting, in
00:17:10
◼
►
In the US, if you get NPC Sports Network, you basically get all of the Premier League
00:17:16
◼
►
games. You can stream the ones that aren't aired. But in the UK, my understanding is,
00:17:21
◼
►
it's much, if you've got a team that you watch, it's harder to get their games, because you
00:17:29
◼
►
may need to sign up for a bunch of different services.
00:17:31
◼
►
Yes. It started to change in the last few years. It used to be just Sky, mostly had
00:17:36
◼
►
them all the terrestrial channels so you either had you had some of them for free
00:17:39
◼
►
if you wanted all of them you got Sky then BT the the telecommunications
00:17:44
◼
►
company they started buying some of it as they created their own TV and sports
00:17:49
◼
►
channels now in the last couple I think maybe last year BT and Sky actually
00:17:56
◼
►
shared their channels with their subscribers after being at war for
00:17:59
◼
►
multiple years and the belief is because companies like Amazon are moving in yeah
00:18:03
◼
►
Yeah. So now, because what will happen if Amazon buy these games, the only places you
00:18:08
◼
►
will see those specific games are on Amazon Prime. There will be nowhere else.
00:18:13
◼
►
Yep. So this is a pretty big move from Amazon into
00:18:16
◼
►
the UK sports market. Premier League football is worth a lot, a lot of money.
00:18:21
◼
►
It is. It's very, very lucrative and therefore very,
00:18:25
◼
►
very expensive, right? Like if the, from Bloomberg, like if it's right, you know what they're
00:18:29
◼
►
saying that you could be looking at like multiple millions if not billions just for a small
00:18:36
◼
►
subset of the matches, it's worth a lot of money.
00:18:39
◼
►
Right, the net rights sale in 2015 with all of the different rights purchasers rolled
00:18:46
◼
►
together was more than £5 billion which is almost $7 billion.
00:18:51
◼
►
It's huge and this is every year, right? That is yearly. So it is a huge market for sports
00:18:59
◼
►
three years worth that they bought for that. It's billions a year. And Amazon, it sounds
00:19:06
◼
►
like since they're likely to bid for a smaller package, it sounds interesting. That seems
00:19:10
◼
►
like their NFL strategy here, which is, let's try it out.
00:19:14
◼
►
Yeah, they want to see if it actually does anything. Like, do people just miss the games
00:19:19
◼
►
or do they sign up?
00:19:20
◼
►
Right, but they might do that down the road. And I thought about this with the NFL too,
00:19:25
◼
►
it. They're trying this now to see how it goes, but, you know, because otherwise if
00:19:31
◼
►
they want to buy an exclusive package of NFL games, there aren't that many of those and
00:19:36
◼
►
it will cost them a huge amount of money. So, try it out with something cheaper, basically.
00:19:43
◼
►
But it is interesting, and we're going to see more of this. I have a whole tangent I'm
00:19:48
◼
►
actually going to write at some point. We had the college football national championship
00:19:51
◼
►
game last night and a bunch of the bowl games earlier on New Year's Day put out by ESPN
00:19:58
◼
►
here in the US and they tried this multicast format where they had a bunch of different
00:20:03
◼
►
versions of the same game live on a bunch of their channels and then more versions like
00:20:08
◼
►
you could get one with the home radio announcers overlaid over the ESPN telecast or you could
00:20:13
◼
►
get coaches analyzing what was going on on the field the whole or just one where it was
00:20:18
◼
►
Don't they do some of that like top down stuff as well?
00:20:20
◼
►
They do the All 22 where you can see the whole field like you're a coach watching the game
00:20:26
◼
►
film. They have the one from the little SkyCam that's on a cable. There's a whole channel
00:20:30
◼
►
of just you're floating over the field. You know, a lot of it's not watchable, but it's
00:20:34
◼
►
interesting.
00:20:36
◼
►
My point here is live sports, this is a computer nerd thing, believe it or not, even though
00:20:40
◼
►
I'm talking about live sports. Live sports is way harder to do than streaming video.
00:20:45
◼
►
Netflix does, Netflix has a CDN, a content delivery network, and they put the files all
00:20:53
◼
►
over the internet so that you can get them quickly. When HBO comes out with Game of Thrones,
00:21:00
◼
►
it's got that file on its CDN all over the place. And so, it is prepped for streaming.
00:21:09
◼
►
And that's one of the ways you avoid crashing your service when you have an episode, a new
00:21:13
◼
►
new episode of Game of Thrones is that you've got it prepped. And I was talking to somebody
00:21:16
◼
►
about, we talk about how BamTech, which was previously Major League Baseball's streaming
00:21:20
◼
►
service and now, or streaming tech spinoff and was majority owned by Disney now, and
00:21:27
◼
►
how good they were. And then somebody said, well, BamTech does ESPN and the ESPN live
00:21:31
◼
►
streams were a mess. And they were, that was on New Year's Day and they were a mess last
00:21:35
◼
►
night as well, apparently. And here's the thing, live sports is hard because you can't
00:21:40
◼
►
take a pre-encoded file and distribute it to your CDN. It's a totally different infrastructure
00:21:46
◼
►
if the content is being created and encoded and distributed on the fly, and it's harder
00:21:52
◼
►
to do that. So that's also part of the test, I think, of Amazon doing some live sports,
00:21:58
◼
►
is that they have to change their infrastructure to do live TV. Amazon actually did a live
00:22:03
◼
►
event on New Year's Day here in the US. They had Will Ferrell and Molly Shannon in character
00:22:10
◼
►
the Pasadena Rose Parade as a kind of a parody yet also a real live coverage of the Tournament
00:22:19
◼
►
of Roses parade. And again, where did that deal come from? That's totally bizarre. But
00:22:27
◼
►
the live thing, I think the short version of this is live is different and Amazon is
00:22:32
◼
►
really interested in experimenting with live and it could potentially change the game because
00:22:37
◼
►
there's a lot of stuff on traditional TV, especially sports, that happens live, but
00:22:41
◼
►
also like award shows and other events like that. And streaming, that's been one of
00:22:46
◼
►
the traditional kind of like bulwarks against erosion of television by cable companies and
00:22:53
◼
►
by TV channels is, well, live stuff is harder. It's like, "Oh, you can't do that. They
00:22:58
◼
►
can't do that." So this is, yeah, wouldn't it be something? And it might, the truth is,
00:23:02
◼
►
it might be more convenient for the, depending on what the package is, it might be more
00:23:06
◼
►
convenient for UK people who like soccer to get streaming Amazon stuff than to have to
00:23:14
◼
►
navigate all the other stuff. But I don't know, it depends. Breaking up the rights makes
00:23:18
◼
►
it a lot harder. We have it way easier. Premier League is way easier to watch in the US than
00:23:21
◼
►
it is in the UK. Yeah, because you just get it all. Because fewer people care about it
00:23:25
◼
►
here, so NBC was able to just buy it, lock, stock and barrel. YouTube is off of the Fire
00:23:31
◼
►
TV now so Amazon is promoting that people watch it via web browsers they
00:23:38
◼
►
just shipped their own web browser silk onto the fire TV probably for this
00:23:42
◼
►
purpose and they're also promoting Firefox as how you can watch YouTube and
00:23:47
◼
►
then within the last couple of days another shoe is dropping in this dropped
00:23:52
◼
►
in this fight which is that Google have announced partnerships with a bunch of
00:23:57
◼
►
companies including JBL, Lenovo, LG, and Sony for their assistant screen smart display.
00:24:05
◼
►
So they have a bunch of products that have a screen on them and they have created a new
00:24:09
◼
►
interface for Google Assistant which includes YouTube.
00:24:14
◼
►
So of course there's another part of it.
00:24:16
◼
►
They had a thing that they were working on so the fact that their agreement wasn't that
00:24:20
◼
►
great of Amazon, they don't care because it's going to help sell some products that they're
00:24:24
◼
►
affiliated with.
00:24:25
◼
►
is a similar story I mean I mentioned something like this which is where does
00:24:29
◼
►
this arms race go next because YouTube works in web browsers and if Amazon just
00:24:34
◼
►
puts YouTube in a web browser and says hey we're a web browser does YouTube
00:24:38
◼
►
start selectively blocking web browsers of companies they don't like that seems
00:24:42
◼
►
like it's a it's a bridge too far to me yep so maybe this is it or maybe the
00:24:49
◼
►
arms race will continue yeah it's a I think it would be especially difficult
00:24:52
◼
►
for them to just be like, "No, Firefox." Right? Like, I feel like they end up as
00:24:58
◼
►
collateral damage in this. Yeah. It continues to move on and I think it's
00:25:02
◼
►
just kicked up a gear now that Google are making their own products.
00:25:07
◼
►
It's really wild. Alright, today's show is brought to you in part by a new sponsor
00:25:12
◼
►
and that is Mission You. Mission You is a one-year program that gives you the
00:25:16
◼
►
skills and experience needed to launch a successful career in data analytics and
00:25:20
◼
►
and just about every other 21st century career.
00:25:23
◼
►
They have a student centered approach.
00:25:26
◼
►
MissionU proved this with no upfront tuition costs
00:25:28
◼
►
or high risk loans.
00:25:30
◼
►
They partner with companies like Spotify, Lyft,
00:25:32
◼
►
and Warby Parker to provide students like you
00:25:35
◼
►
with invaluable work experience.
00:25:37
◼
►
The MissionU program is perfect for go-getters
00:25:40
◼
►
who are determined to make their career a success.
00:25:42
◼
►
If you think that that could be for you,
00:25:44
◼
►
your new career focused schedule
00:25:45
◼
►
will look a little something like this.
00:25:47
◼
►
In the first trimester, you focus on developing skills
00:25:50
◼
►
like collaboration, critical thinking, and communication.
00:25:53
◼
►
In Trimester 2, you work on technical skills,
00:25:56
◼
►
and then to wrap things up,
00:25:57
◼
►
you'll get valuable internship experience.
00:26:00
◼
►
Overall with Mission U,
00:26:01
◼
►
you're looking at about 80% live virtual classroom sessions
00:26:04
◼
►
and 20% biweekly meetups
00:26:06
◼
►
with networking and skill development.
00:26:09
◼
►
Here's how application works.
00:26:10
◼
►
There are no standardized test scores, no GPAs.
00:26:12
◼
►
They just want to know about you.
00:26:14
◼
►
You take a short quiz
00:26:15
◼
►
to show your problem solving abilities,
00:26:17
◼
►
complete a 45 minute team-based challenge,
00:26:19
◼
►
and then meet with a member of the MissionU team for an individual interview.
00:26:22
◼
►
This is the first step towards a resume of relevant experience and a debt-free future.
00:26:27
◼
►
To learn more about MissionU and to earn $500 upon completion of the full year program,
00:26:32
◼
►
go to missionu.com/upgrade. That is $500 upon the completion of the full year program.
00:26:39
◼
►
Head there to learn more and see what your next career could be. That is missionu.com/upgrade.
00:26:48
◼
►
Thank you to MissionU for their support of this show and Relay FM.
00:26:52
◼
►
So we spoke about the fact that you were ordering it. It has arrived. We spent time of it.
00:26:58
◼
►
The iMac Pro.
00:26:59
◼
►
Yeah, it arrived on Boxing Day, Myke.
00:27:01
◼
►
What a great day to unbox a computer on Boxing Day. You have an extra box.
00:27:06
◼
►
It's the best day.
00:27:06
◼
►
Not quite a Christmas present, but close. And then the...
00:27:09
◼
►
Believe it or not, the understood...
00:27:11
◼
►
The history of Boxing Day is when we take our new computers out of their boxes.
00:27:17
◼
►
That's what it means.
00:27:17
◼
►
Since that's been that way since like the 17th century.
00:27:20
◼
►
It's funny really when you think about it, but yeah, that is the understood meaning.
00:27:25
◼
►
Back when computers met a person who did math, they would get in the box, they would take
00:27:29
◼
►
it to the university, they'd open the box and surprise somebody with "A computer's inside!"
00:27:33
◼
►
and the computer would jump out of the box and say "Boo!"
00:27:36
◼
►
You know, Jason, I just learned about this.
00:27:39
◼
►
Because for Analog, we are now watching, we finished Firefly, and we are watching Crash
00:27:46
◼
►
course computer science right and we just did the first episode which is
00:27:50
◼
►
about early computers and I found out that the first computers were people
00:27:55
◼
►
that's hilarious that's where the word came from it was a person who computed
00:27:59
◼
►
things no computer turns out and the computer would say hey what's going on
00:28:04
◼
►
how can I help you need some math alright so before we get into talking
00:28:08
◼
►
about this thing I want to do a specs recap of your model just so we can frame
00:28:12
◼
►
So you got the $4,999 base model.
00:28:17
◼
►
Yep, I went cheap, Myke. I went cheap. I cheaped out.
00:28:20
◼
►
You went to the Frift store with this one.
00:28:22
◼
►
I did. That's it. It was a little tag on the side that said "Cheap $49.99."
00:28:28
◼
►
Only. You got the 8 core Xeon, 32 gigabytes of RAM, and a 1 terabyte SSD.
00:28:36
◼
►
Yeah, I did.
00:28:38
◼
►
I will ask you. You've been using it for a couple of weeks.
00:28:41
◼
►
Are there any, would you change any of those specs would be my first question to you. Is
00:28:47
◼
►
there anything in there that you're like, little bit of buyer's remorse, like I wish
00:28:51
◼
►
I would have got this instead?
00:28:52
◼
►
No. No, I mean, I've heard people say that the 10 core, Marco will tell you, the 10 core
00:28:58
◼
►
is maybe the sweet spot because it's got a little bit better of the turbo boost, which
00:29:03
◼
►
is the sort of single core performance. This in, in my tests, the single core, if you're
00:29:10
◼
►
working on something that is not multi-threaded at all, it's essentially the same speed as
00:29:15
◼
►
my old i7 from 2014. Like single core, and the 10 core is a little bit faster, so, I
00:29:23
◼
►
mean, spoiler alert for my review, which might come out this week in Macworld, is if all
00:29:29
◼
►
you do is single core stuff, why would you buy one of these? That's the whole point is
00:29:34
◼
►
these are good at multi-core. As a single core processor, it's fine, it's like a 5K
00:29:38
◼
►
it's fast, but the point is that it's got so many of these cores. So I thought about
00:29:44
◼
►
the 10 core, but I was on Leo Laporte's screensaver show over the weekend, and he has the 10 core
00:29:49
◼
►
because Rene Ritchie talked him into it. And he ended up spending like an extra two grand
00:29:55
◼
►
putting features in it, and for me, I could only barely justify the $49.99. In fact, what
00:30:03
◼
►
I would say is I probably don't need 32 gigs of RAM. If they would have let me take 16
00:30:09
◼
►
and knock some money off the price, maybe that would have been my preference, but I
00:30:13
◼
►
am very happy about having lots of RAM and I am very happy about having more storage
00:30:18
◼
►
because I have the 512 SSD in my 5K iMac and having a little bit more elbow room with the
00:30:25
◼
►
1 terabyte is really nice. So I'm pretty happy with it as is. I guess my only other regret
00:30:31
◼
►
would be that I probably should have bought the mouse too because everybody wants space
00:30:35
◼
►
grey peripherals and if I had bought the mouse I could have sold that to somebody.
00:30:41
◼
►
Get some money back.
00:30:42
◼
►
For the record I sold my keyboard to John Syracuse for the cost of that keyboard in
00:30:46
◼
►
normal silver.
00:30:49
◼
►
And shipping.
00:30:51
◼
►
Because he is a friend.
00:30:52
◼
►
You could have sold it on eBay for a billion dollars.
00:30:56
◼
►
I had to just look up. I have 16 gigabytes of RAM in my iMac and I don't think I need
00:31:04
◼
►
more than that. Like I don't know if I ever feel it. I don't even know why I would need
00:31:08
◼
►
32 gigabytes of RAM.
00:31:09
◼
►
The story so far in the chatroom says, "LOL, first time I've heard someone want less RAM."
00:31:13
◼
►
I guess my point is that I can look in Activity Monitor. I see when we're hitting, when we're
00:31:19
◼
►
swapping RAM to disk and it never happens. And it basically never happened in my old
00:31:23
◼
►
computer. I am not doing things that are super heavy consumers of RAM. I mean the
00:31:30
◼
►
the GPU in here is totally overkill for me too. I ran a GPU benchmark last night
00:31:38
◼
►
that is one of these tests that we used in Macworld for years and it runs on my
00:31:42
◼
►
5k iMac at in the highest resolution highest quality it runs at like 12
00:31:47
◼
►
frames a second and it's at like a hundred degrees C when it's doing it and
00:31:53
◼
►
the fan is blowing loudly and I ran that on this iMac Pro with that the Vega card
00:31:58
◼
►
in it and it was doing like 35 frames a second easy and it was not even running
00:32:05
◼
►
that hot so again probably overkill for what I am using this thing for but
00:32:10
◼
►
that's that's the deal with this computer is they've decided to not
00:32:14
◼
►
really skimp on the base specs and I think the reason is like if if you start
00:32:21
◼
►
to look at it and say well I do I need eight cores do I need 32 gigs of RAM do
00:32:24
◼
►
I need a terabyte SSD that's when somebody comes to you and says let me
00:32:28
◼
►
show you the 5k iMac like we have a very powerful computer that you can spec up
00:32:33
◼
►
to $4,000 and have all of this stuff in it and it won't be quite what this is
00:32:38
◼
►
but you don't need this right like I do feel like Apple is drawing a divider
00:32:43
◼
►
here because they do have a very powerful iMac that is not the iMac Pro. So if you want
00:32:49
◼
►
less than this, there is a computer for you, it is not this with fewer specs in it. So
00:32:53
◼
►
the base model for me is really nice because it's like, would I have splurged for 32? Would
00:32:59
◼
►
I have splurged for a terabyte SSD? Probably not, maybe, but I had no choice. So, oh well,
00:33:07
◼
►
I'll have to live with 32 gigs of RAM. Alright, so you didn't buy this computer because it
00:33:12
◼
►
was space gray. I did not. You didn't buy this computer. That would be a terrible reason to buy this computer. Some people will. Some people will. You didn't buy this
00:33:20
◼
►
computer for another reason which is this is the best Mac you can buy right
00:33:23
◼
►
now right like there are you know there are many reasons that people buy a
00:33:27
◼
►
computer. You bought yours for speed and for efficiency and for processing. I did.
00:33:33
◼
►
So proofs in the pudding. Yes. What are the actual speed differences like? So I
00:33:40
◼
►
- I, most of my tests are versus my 2014 iMac 5K,
00:33:45
◼
►
which they have revved several times.
00:33:51
◼
►
There is a 2017 model.
00:33:52
◼
►
Steven Hackett had the, and I had the i7,
00:33:55
◼
►
so the faster processor and actually the faster GPU.
00:33:59
◼
►
Steven Hackett bought the new i7 of the 5K iMac,
00:34:04
◼
►
and then he returned it and bought an iMac Pro.
00:34:06
◼
►
But while he had it, I had him run some of the same tests
00:34:09
◼
►
I ran, so I could compare it to a current iMac, because I don't have to wear with all
00:34:15
◼
►
of Macworld anymore where I have every Mac that I can survey before me and I can compare
00:34:19
◼
►
them all. I am now on my own and I bought an iMac when I started out and have kept it,
00:34:26
◼
►
and so that's my reference system. So I did a bunch of tests using real things I do. That
00:34:32
◼
►
was important to me. In the end, I did run a couple of other kind of benchmark stuff
00:34:37
◼
►
like Geekbench and one of these 3D tests.
00:34:40
◼
►
But I tried to--
00:34:40
◼
►
- That's pointless.
00:34:41
◼
►
- Yeah, but--
00:34:42
◼
►
- Like, you know.
00:34:43
◼
►
- Yeah, I mean, I can sign off and say,
00:34:44
◼
►
yes, it's faster, which we already knew.
00:34:46
◼
►
But I tried a bunch of stuff.
00:34:48
◼
►
So I tried a bunch of podcast stuff
00:34:49
◼
►
and a little bit of video stuff.
00:34:50
◼
►
'Cause the reason I bought this is for podcast stuff.
00:34:52
◼
►
That a huge part of my podcast workflow,
00:34:55
◼
►
prep workflow, because I do so many podcasts
00:34:58
◼
►
with people who do not have pristine audio environments,
00:35:01
◼
►
because they're just people--
00:35:02
◼
►
- Recording a podcast.
00:35:03
◼
►
- I have a pristine environment.
00:35:04
◼
►
The mega office environment is entirely pristine. There are a few people I know I don't need
00:35:10
◼
►
to denoise their audio file. I'm in like a podcast clean room here. Yes you are. You
00:35:15
◼
►
are wearing a, it's not a clean suit, it's a silent suit. Silent suit. You zip it up
00:35:23
◼
►
silently. With the microphone inside and then that's it. There's nothing, yeah, exactly.
00:35:28
◼
►
But most people instead have their computer fan blowing and a heater going and somebody's
00:35:34
◼
►
jackhammering outside. Well, the jackhammer, it's hard to take out. But like, I get these
00:35:38
◼
►
files and I can look at them in the program I use to denoise them, which is Isotope RX
00:35:43
◼
►
6. And it actually shows you like a big orange stripe that is like, "Oh, that's the heater,"
00:35:50
◼
►
or "That's where the air conditioning came on," or whatever. And these are the environments
00:35:54
◼
►
people are in. And I want everybody to sound as good as they can because what ends up happening
00:36:00
◼
►
is you're listening to a podcast and one person talks and suddenly there's a hum
00:36:03
◼
►
and then when they stop talking the hum goes away
00:36:06
◼
►
it's really and there's you know hissing in the background and so it's really
00:36:09
◼
►
disconcerting so I de-noise these files and that is a there's an amazing plug-in
00:36:15
◼
►
in iZotope that does this and it is multi-core multi-threaded it will use as
00:36:22
◼
►
many processor cores as you can give it so I use that I did some encoding a
00:36:27
◼
►
video which tends to pick the processor. I used a couple of tools by Marco Arment
00:36:32
◼
►
because Marco is obsessed with filling the processor cores to their fullest too,
00:36:35
◼
►
so I use Sidetrack and Forecast. I did a bunch of stuff and the reality is that
00:36:44
◼
►
the iMac Pro can do all that stuff in half the time as my old iMac and I would
00:36:53
◼
►
say in 60% of the time as the 2017 iMac that Stephen Hackett had.
00:37:02
◼
►
So it's 40% faster than that one?
00:37:05
◼
►
Somewhere, but yeah.
00:37:07
◼
►
Well, I mean, okay.
00:37:09
◼
►
You could say that.
00:37:10
◼
►
I would say it does it in 60% of the time because there's a great debate about it.
00:37:15
◼
►
But yes, you would say that.
00:37:16
◼
►
could say that it's twice as fast as my old iMac for these tasks and a little less than
00:37:24
◼
►
twice as fast.
00:37:25
◼
►
Like a third? You know, at least you could say it's a third faster.
00:37:29
◼
►
This is the problem, there's "as fast as" and there's "faster than" and I get angry
00:37:33
◼
►
letters when I phrase it a certain way. But the bottom line is...
00:37:37
◼
►
But suffice to say, there is a significant speed increase no matter what you're coming
00:37:44
◼
►
- In the ways of a three hour long file,
00:37:46
◼
►
took a minute 34 on my old iMac.
00:37:50
◼
►
It took 86 seconds, so a little bit less
00:37:53
◼
►
on Steven Hackett's iMac,
00:37:55
◼
►
and 49 seconds on the iMac Pro.
00:37:58
◼
►
And that's consistent across all of the other things I did.
00:38:01
◼
►
You know, a handbrake decode that took 1,270 seconds
00:38:06
◼
►
to encode a 1080p on my old iMac,
00:38:13
◼
►
1276 and 674 on the iMac Pro, and in between 1095 on Stephen Hackett's iMac, so it's faster
00:38:22
◼
►
but not nearly as fast as the iMac Pro. And this is consistent. For stuff that's really
00:38:28
◼
►
multi-threaded, the iMac Pro is, even the base model, is incredibly fast. This is not
00:38:33
◼
►
one of those like, "Well, you can see it in these numbers." Between 2014, when I bought
00:38:39
◼
►
my iMac and 2017, Steven Hackett's iMac that he bought before he returned it. There was
00:38:46
◼
►
definitely a speed boost. The iMac got a better screen, it got faster SSD, and it got faster
00:38:52
◼
►
processors. That all said, the speed difference there was, you know, an improvement of, what,
00:39:02
◼
►
30 seconds in my spectral denoise test and the difference between that iMac and
00:39:11
◼
►
my iMac Pro is another like 40 plus seconds on that one test so this is a
00:39:19
◼
►
much larger jump in performance than a normal like iMac update would be so
00:39:24
◼
►
that's four years four years of iMac improvements do not match the difference
00:39:29
◼
►
between the current iMac and the iMac Pro.
00:39:32
◼
►
It is, you know, and that's what you're going for here,
00:39:34
◼
►
is you want a leap in performance
00:39:36
◼
►
to pay a leap in price tag, and it's there, it's real.
00:39:41
◼
►
- All right, so look, I'm just asking you questions here.
00:39:43
◼
►
I'm not trying to like, purchase shame you, but--
00:39:47
◼
►
- Oh no, I have no, if you had gotten me
00:39:50
◼
►
before I'd gotten this, I would have been very vulnerable,
00:39:54
◼
►
but now I've used it for two weeks.
00:39:54
◼
►
- But now you're good.
00:39:56
◼
►
- Yeah, I'm okay. (laughs)
00:39:58
◼
►
But let me ask you then, right? So like, you know, because I just want to dig into that a little bit more.
00:40:01
◼
►
So some of this stuff, it's twice as fast as your previous Mac, right? Like it's doing it in half time.
00:40:07
◼
►
It basically, by spending $5,000, it is twice as fast.
00:40:11
◼
►
But it's saving 40 seconds, right? So, my question to you is like, on a daily basis,
00:40:21
◼
►
how and if are you feeling that and how is that worth it?
00:40:25
◼
►
Well, what I would say is that when I'm prepping, see, I don't do one of these when I'm prepping
00:40:29
◼
►
files. Sometimes I'm literally doing seven and they're all three or four hour long audio files.
00:40:36
◼
►
And it's not something that I can automate because you actually have to, there is an auto setting,
00:40:44
◼
►
but it's just not as good. You need to find the noise and learn it and then apply it and it
00:40:53
◼
►
it removes the noise so it's a manual process with multiple steps and this is
00:40:57
◼
►
the problem is if you're doing that with a lot of this and the steps were all
00:41:00
◼
►
require you to wait two three four five minutes to get through it and I didn't
00:41:05
◼
►
even mention like also going on here is that the SSD performance is way faster
00:41:09
◼
►
which means I can and honestly all that RAM I can open more files at once I can
00:41:14
◼
►
have multiple files processing or saving at once and what it means is that this
00:41:18
◼
►
this long, slow process to prep a set of files for me or for an outside editor to use used
00:41:26
◼
►
to take like an hour and now it takes like 15 minutes. And that's so it's cumulative.
00:41:36
◼
►
Or video encoding is a similar thing where I'm sitting down and I need to convert this
00:41:40
◼
►
Final Cut that came out, Final Cut export that came out of 1080 but it's enormous and
00:41:44
◼
►
I need to do a podcast version which I know I want to be small and 720p and I
00:41:48
◼
►
want to a 1080 version I can upload to YouTube and I don't want to upload the
00:41:51
◼
►
10 gigabyte version to YouTube because I'll be there forever
00:41:54
◼
►
I want to do that that's that's a common thing for me
00:41:57
◼
►
I can run that through handbrake and have it be done quickly and then move on
00:42:06
◼
►
and post them as opposed to what I used to do which is start them in handbrake
00:42:10
◼
►
and leave and go do other things, maybe go to bed, come back in the morning and upload
00:42:18
◼
►
them. That happened a lot and that was fine. I mean the overnight task is a thing that
00:42:23
◼
►
can be useful but it's nicer to have that task be so short that I can just do some other
00:42:28
◼
►
stuff and then come back and it's done instead of like completely breaking because I know
00:42:34
◼
►
this task is going to take hours.
00:42:36
◼
►
So there are two things that are interesting to me.
00:42:39
◼
►
One of them, a lot of this stuff, it's the quality of life for you and your work, right?
00:42:45
◼
►
So you're getting less frustrated.
00:42:47
◼
►
And then the other thing that I find really interesting is that it's not just the raw
00:42:52
◼
►
power of what this machine can do, it also has a lot more headroom, right?
00:42:56
◼
►
So like you're saying, okay, so I save half the time on an individual process, but I can
00:43:02
◼
►
do two times more of those processes than I could do before. So it's all of that time
00:43:09
◼
►
savings is adding up. So whilst it's doing it like in half the time, you're actually
00:43:14
◼
►
saving three quarters of an hour, right? Like because you're doing more at once, right?
00:43:20
◼
►
That's really interesting to me and I hadn't necessarily considered that.
00:43:24
◼
►
Where the storage comes in is the big one for me with isotope where I'm opening multiple
00:43:28
◼
►
files and the memory, I think. I think the RAM is a part of that too. I'm opening multiple
00:43:32
◼
►
files and getting them to process and saving them out and the my iMac would
00:43:39
◼
►
just I gave up I would just do one at a time but on this I can do that and then
00:43:44
◼
►
what that means also is that it's now processing yes it's processing three
00:43:48
◼
►
files at once four files at once and it can't really go any faster because it's
00:43:53
◼
►
filling up the processor cores but what it means is my menial task of starting
00:44:01
◼
►
those processes going is all done in a block, and then my attention can move elsewhere.
00:44:08
◼
►
And this is one of those things that even if you're only saving a little bit of time,
00:44:12
◼
►
if you can go from a task that is "do something and wait, then do something and wait, and
00:44:17
◼
►
then do something and wait," and replace it with "do those three things all at once
00:44:21
◼
►
and then do something else while the waiting happens," that's way better. That's way
00:44:26
◼
►
better because I can turn my attention elsewhere instead of having to just basically sit there
00:44:31
◼
►
and wait it out because I know there's going to be another step along the way in two minutes.
00:44:38
◼
►
And the added storage, the SSD speed, and I think the memory too is feeding into that
00:44:46
◼
►
as well. So that was a moment of realization for me because I was like, "Oh, great, it's
00:44:50
◼
►
faster." And then I was like, "I wonder if I could just open more files." And the answer
00:44:54
◼
►
is, "Yep, I can do that. It's fine. It totally works." Then again, to get back to the single
00:45:00
◼
►
processor thing, iZotope's D-Reverb plugin, which is amazing if you've got somebody in
00:45:05
◼
►
an echoey room, runs on a single processor core. And it takes me, I tested it against
00:45:13
◼
►
my old iMac, within a second of one another doing a D-Echo, a D-Reverb effect. And what
00:45:20
◼
►
makes me want to do is send a friendly but somewhat sternly worded email to iZotope saying
00:45:27
◼
►
why are all your plugins not better optimized for multiple processor cores, please. But
00:45:34
◼
►
the one I use the most is and that's one of the big reasons why I bought the iMac Pro.
00:45:41
◼
►
So that's the important part of the way in my opinion, right, which is like the performance
00:45:45
◼
►
of it. Let's talk about the looks. So, I mean, from a visual perspective, the biggest change
00:45:51
◼
►
is the color, and then maybe secondary to that is the holes in the back, right? The
00:45:56
◼
►
vents. Yeah. How do you feel about those two things? I mean, everything else is like, if
00:46:00
◼
►
you like the iMac, you're going to like this one because it's the same. It is so much the
00:46:04
◼
►
same that I just, you know, it's not like my... I'm using a 27-inch 5K iMac suspended
00:46:13
◼
►
on an arm above my desk it's literally not any different from what I've been using for
00:46:18
◼
►
the last four years. The only difference is that the aluminum is darker and it's way faster
00:46:24
◼
►
but like just in terms of the visual of it. A lot of people are very excited about the
00:46:30
◼
►
darker aluminum. My issue is what my issue always is with this stuff which is space gray
00:46:38
◼
►
like an amazing cool idea and it is nice to have some variation but you know when
00:46:43
◼
►
you've got a space gray something next to a regular something it really is just
00:46:48
◼
►
a darker shade of silver like I mean it's not and out of context you get used
00:46:55
◼
►
to it really fast so I actually think that's one of the reasons why they do
00:46:58
◼
►
the dark peripherals and everything is like it extends that makes you feel like
00:47:05
◼
►
like everything's a little bit something a little bit more like my my macbook pro
00:47:09
◼
►
is space gray and I could swear to you that every macbook pro I've ever had was
00:47:14
◼
►
that color exactly no I think I think there's truth in that I think the old
00:47:19
◼
►
one now my gold macbook 12 inch right now that's that's right that's different
00:47:24
◼
►
yeah exactly I'm not saying they should make a gold iMac but you know
00:47:29
◼
►
The iMac Pro was gold.
00:47:33
◼
►
The hot takes.
00:47:34
◼
►
I would so get it, though.
00:47:35
◼
►
The hot takes.
00:47:36
◼
►
I would so get it.
00:47:37
◼
►
Just because.
00:47:38
◼
►
Get a gold trackpad, my word.
00:47:42
◼
►
And you have yours mounted on the VESA?
00:47:46
◼
►
So there's an extra, unlike the 5K iMacs, and the modern iMacs, but exactly like the previous
00:47:53
◼
►
generation model where you could pop off the stand and put on a little extra purchase mounting
00:48:01
◼
►
bracket that turned it into a VESA mountable thing. iMac Pro has that. It's literally they
00:48:07
◼
►
just brought it back. And I don't know why they took it off of the last generation iMac
00:48:11
◼
►
and I'm not entirely sure. I think they brought it back because they know that for a lot of
00:48:15
◼
►
professional applications, people do want to put these things on walls or on arms. And
00:48:21
◼
►
I do too. So I was able to do that. So now I have... You have yours mounted to your desk,
00:48:26
◼
►
right? Yes. Anybody want a space gray IMAX stand? No, I have to keep it in case I want
00:48:31
◼
►
to convert it later. But yeah, it's just on an arm floating on my, the arms clamped to
00:48:36
◼
►
my desk. Yeah. I might do that next time. Next time I get a machine. Although I was
00:48:43
◼
►
just saying I'm connected today, so I'm just repeating myself now. I've been thinking about
00:48:48
◼
►
this Jason especially when I was preparing for this episode and I think
00:48:51
◼
►
that then my next computer will probably be a Mac Pro like a new Mac Pro because
00:48:57
◼
►
for what I want out of a computer the idea the perceived idea of what that
00:49:02
◼
►
machine will be as like parts upgradeable over time is more appealing
00:49:06
◼
►
to me as I am less interested in cool Mac hardware but want the thing that I
00:49:11
◼
►
can use the best it is the best workhorse for me and over time in that
00:49:17
◼
►
might make sense if it is truly upgradeable. So that's what I've been thinking about.
00:49:22
◼
►
I wanted to ask, because I don't know, what is the I/O like on the iMac Pro? Do you get
00:49:28
◼
►
more ports? There are more ports. You have four USB-A and four Thunderbolt/USB-C. And
00:49:42
◼
►
that's two controllers on the Thunderbolt. So you've got potentially a lot of really
00:49:46
◼
►
high-speed external stuff on there and lots and lots of ports. It does mean
00:49:53
◼
►
though that if you have Thunderbolt peripherals or displays that are external
00:49:59
◼
►
on your existing setup, if you get an iMac Pro you're gonna have to buy some
00:50:02
◼
►
dongles because there's no, you know, there's no Thunderbolt that matches
00:50:09
◼
►
Mini DisplayPort or if you've got a Mini DisplayPort or Thunderbolt 2 to VGA
00:50:15
◼
►
or DVI or whatever else you've got like those adapters don't work anymore really
00:50:20
◼
►
I mean you may be able to adapt to them I don't know don't do it you're gonna
00:50:24
◼
►
have to buy some some Thunderbolt 3 adapters USB-C adapters so but they are
00:50:30
◼
►
there's a lot of a lot of I/O a lot of ports on the back plus that what is it
00:50:38
◼
►
10 gigabit Ethernet which is my understanding is it's sort of like how
00:50:44
◼
►
Gigabit Ethernet was back in the day, which is esoteric and only for like really high-end
00:50:48
◼
►
applications. But if you want basically network storage that feels like local storage, and
00:50:53
◼
►
if you're in something like video or anything that's crunching through huge amounts of data,
00:50:58
◼
►
they want that and that Ethernet will let them have it. But, you know, I just have Gigabit
00:51:02
◼
►
in my garage, so alas.
00:51:08
◼
►
The stickers, you know it in your kind of first impressions, the stickers were black.
00:51:15
◼
►
Yes, just like on the Mac Pro.
00:51:17
◼
►
As one of the poor fools who bought the Mac Pro, I just wanted to mention that they are,
00:51:21
◼
►
I have still have one, I kept one.
00:51:24
◼
►
I used one, kept one.
00:51:26
◼
►
They were black there too.
00:51:27
◼
►
I had the trash can Mac, it was a tale of woe.
00:51:31
◼
►
iFixit gave the iMac Pro a 3 out of 10 on repairability.
00:51:37
◼
►
always just a beautiful thing to just look through right like what just
00:51:42
◼
►
wonderful images I wanted to break down a couple of those things though Jason so
00:51:46
◼
►
from looking at the teardown the RAM and CPU are modular and upgradeable you can
00:51:52
◼
►
do it the SSD is modular but it is custom so you kind of stuck there but
00:51:59
◼
►
take well you know like it's it's not as not stuck but it's not you can't put
00:52:03
◼
►
anything in it. You have to get something that fits it. You can't just get anything.
00:52:09
◼
►
What Apple did with the SSD is they did these NAND modules. They don't have a disk controller
00:52:14
◼
►
on them. The T2 processor, which is the ARM, Apple built ARM processor that's inside this
00:52:19
◼
►
thing, it's the disk controller along with the system controller and a lot of other things.
00:52:25
◼
►
I wrote a whole article at Macworld about it. But the, so they're NAND chips. So I don't
00:52:34
◼
►
want to say never because history shows us that there are companies out there that will
00:52:43
◼
►
make a great effort to build Apple compatible parts that were were Apple only when they
00:52:52
◼
►
came out and I you know there are a bunch of companies that do that sort of
00:52:57
◼
►
thing and so in two years if you wanted a much larger SSD and an iMac Pro could
00:53:05
◼
►
somebody pop off the glass on the front and take those chips out and put new
00:53:10
◼
►
chips in maybe I wouldn't recommend that people under spec this thing and then
00:53:17
◼
►
plan on immediately specing it up because it's not, it is that like complete disassembly
00:53:25
◼
►
So you should spec this thing if you're going to buy one with all the RAM you want and all
00:53:28
◼
►
the disk you want.
00:53:30
◼
►
But I'm kind of optimistic that in two or three years if you decide, "Well, I really
00:53:35
◼
►
need to refresh this thing and give it more RAM, more SSD," that there will be opportunities
00:53:39
◼
►
to potentially do that.
00:53:42
◼
►
Do note that taking a thing apart is incredibly difficult and requires a lot of very careful
00:53:46
◼
►
disassembly. So, you know, bear that in mind. It's for a repair shop or an Apple store to
00:53:54
◼
►
take apart, not for you to do. It's not user upgradable, but upgradable, but just not,
00:54:01
◼
►
you know, you got to leave it to the professionals. And they did note that there is no GPU upgrade
00:54:06
◼
►
possible because of the way that it's like sort of to the board or something like that.
00:54:09
◼
►
You just can't take it out. So when they talk about it being modular, like with a RAM and
00:54:14
◼
►
CPU it means you can take those things out but yeah the GPU you cannot remove
00:54:19
◼
►
so yeah and the CPU is is removable but it by all accounts is a custom part
00:54:26
◼
►
being made for Intel for Apple by Intel so I think that's one of those same
00:54:32
◼
►
thoughts of like okay well maybe in two years or three years when you want a
00:54:35
◼
►
faster processor maybe you could find one but probably not like don't again
00:54:40
◼
►
don't count on it but but you never know like it's possible but I wouldn't bank
00:54:48
◼
►
on it so I guess one other thing this machine is so powerful and it has a
00:54:54
◼
►
bunch of holes in the back how often do you hear the fans so I don't hear the
00:55:00
◼
►
fan at all unless I stick my ear right up to it in which case the fan is
00:55:05
◼
►
running. Even when you're doing six simultaneous processes of isotope? Here's one of the interesting
00:55:12
◼
►
things. This computer seems to have been designed to run the fan all the time. Okay. And really
00:55:23
◼
►
quietly. Two, I think, enormous kind of blowers suck air in up by the, where the stand connects
00:55:31
◼
►
and then, or blow it out there and suck it in down below. And they've got this whole,
00:55:37
◼
►
like, all of this space is devoted to that. But it's quiet. It was designed to be quiet.
00:55:43
◼
►
It seems to be designed to basically run all the time. And so when I tested this thing
00:55:48
◼
►
out and when I stress it out, the volume doesn't change. If you, it's not to say that there
00:55:56
◼
►
might not be scenarios where it cranks up, but I've not heard them. Like I said, if you
00:56:02
◼
►
listen carefully in a quiet room and you put your ear close to the computer, you can tell
00:56:06
◼
►
that there is a fan, sort of "Syracusa" style if you're that sensitive, but in a normal
00:56:11
◼
►
room environment in my office, I can't tell. I have to go looking for it in order to hear
00:56:17
◼
►
it. But it's the same sound all the time, so it's consistent. You're not sitting there
00:56:21
◼
►
doing work and suddenly the fans blow blow like um like the iMac 5k where that
00:56:27
◼
►
absolutely happens and if I put my hand back there in normal operation I feel
00:56:33
◼
►
air blowing out and it's cool air and then when heavy work is going on the air
00:56:39
◼
►
is warmer but that's about it like what's changing is not the sound of the
00:56:44
◼
►
fans showing that this thing is laboring what's changing is the temperature of
00:56:48
◼
►
the air being blown out the back. Now on a 14 core system where the all the cores
00:56:54
◼
►
are hitting and the GPU is maxed out, does it crank up the fan? I don't know.
00:56:59
◼
►
How hot is the air coming out of it? I don't know. But on the base model I tried
00:57:05
◼
►
to max out the GPU. I certainly maxed out the CPUs. It sounds like the GPU is a
00:57:10
◼
►
bigger issue in terms of power and heat than the CPU by the way. Like that GPU is
00:57:15
◼
►
a, you know, it's throwing off a lot of heat. I think the thermal stuff in the iMac Pro
00:57:21
◼
►
is basically more concerned about the GPU than the CPU, but regardless, I just found
00:57:26
◼
►
the fan a non-issue. It's quiet and constant and, you know, it's built to just keep blowing
00:57:35
◼
►
air through the system whether you're taxing it or not and as quietly as possible. So,
00:57:42
◼
►
For people who need absolute silence, it's, I guess, not going to work for them, but I
00:57:47
◼
►
don't think that most people will notice or care.
00:57:50
◼
►
And the beauty of it is that when it's really working hard, I still can't hear it.
00:57:57
◼
►
It's just keeping on doing what it was doing.
00:58:01
◼
►
So I think, overall, it sounds like you really like this machine.
00:58:04
◼
►
Yeah, it is.
00:58:07
◼
►
I just keep coming back to the disclaimer, which is if you don't know, if you want one,
00:58:10
◼
►
you don't want one.
00:58:11
◼
►
like the 5K iMac is a very powerful computer and you can spec it up pretty far. And in
00:58:22
◼
►
terms of single core performance, you're not going to get much of a benefit out of this
00:58:26
◼
►
thing. You're not going to get any benefit out of it versus a new iMac Pro, basically,
00:58:31
◼
►
or a new iMac, 5K iMac. So, in talking to Leo about this last weekend, I mean, he said
00:58:38
◼
►
that, and I immediately agreed with him, which is, you know if this computer's for you, and
00:58:47
◼
►
if you don't know, it's not for you. And it really is that simple. Like, you need to know
00:58:52
◼
►
So when you hear people talk about it, if you're going, "Oh my god, I need one now,"
00:58:57
◼
►
it's for you. Otherwise, you're probably good.
00:59:00
◼
►
Because I suspect that the people who know that they're using high-performance stuff
00:59:06
◼
►
taxes the GPU and taxes the processors across multiple cores. Like, I feel like
00:59:11
◼
►
those people know who they are. That if you're somebody who is just working in a
00:59:16
◼
►
word processor, you really don't need this, right? But if you're somebody... so for
00:59:21
◼
►
me it was like, "Oh my god, I have those isotope plugins and the video encoding
00:59:27
◼
►
and they could really benefit from all those cores and the faster SSD and the
00:59:31
◼
►
extra RAM, like, "All right, let's do it." But that was what did it for me. If I was
00:59:37
◼
►
just thinking, "You know, I've had my iMac for three years, and maybe I should get a
00:59:41
◼
►
new iMac," then I would just get a new iMac, new 5K iMac. But I, you know, instead I was
00:59:50
◼
►
thinking about all of this stuff that I've started to do for audio and video, and that
00:59:54
◼
►
was the difference. So it is a really fast Mac. I like it a lot. It's got some quirks
01:00:03
◼
►
because it's got that T2 processor, so like the startup is different and rebooting onto
01:00:09
◼
►
other volumes is a little bit different. But it's all carefully thought out on Apple's
01:00:14
◼
►
part. It's just different from the previous Mac experience. I suspect that all future
01:00:18
◼
►
Macs will probably have something like the T2 in them and that this will be a new way
01:00:22
◼
►
for Apple to build Macs with this ARM chip doing most of the controller stuff and security
01:00:28
◼
►
stuff. But yeah, I like it a lot. And strangely, I'm now running the 10.13.3 beta, and it feels
01:00:41
◼
►
to me like everything on this iMac got a little bit faster and a little bit better when I
01:00:47
◼
►
went to the 10.13.3 beta, so I feel like it is, this is in Apple dialect, iMac Pro 1,1.
01:00:58
◼
►
So this is the first of its name, and I suspect that the OS is still, I mean, there are going
01:01:07
◼
►
to be some quirks too, because it's brand new and it's got a bunch of stuff that's kind
01:01:11
◼
►
of new like the T2. So the beta seems to have moved things along. The logic and Final Cut
01:01:18
◼
►
Pro updates that came out are kind of directly addressing this system and have made improvements
01:01:24
◼
►
there and I think there'll be some more of those along the way too. But yeah, I'm loving
01:01:28
◼
►
it. It's great. It is like my old iMac except for a lot of the hardest processor-intense
01:01:35
◼
►
stuff I do twice as fast. So that's not bad.
01:01:38
◼
►
All right, let's take a break and thank our friends over at Squarespace for their support of this week's show.
01:01:44
◼
►
Use the offer code upgrade at checkout and you'll get 10% off your first purchase. Make your next move with Squarespace.
01:01:50
◼
►
They let you easily create a website for your next idea by giving you all of the tools that you need in their all-in-one platform.
01:01:58
◼
►
You can grab a unique and awesome domain name.
01:02:00
◼
►
You can take advantage of and customize award-winning beautiful templates that look good across all types of devices.
01:02:06
◼
►
You can take advantage of 24/7 customer support if you need it. They have it right there whenever you need
01:02:12
◼
►
You can ask some questions. They have great support documents and everything. They've got tons of stuff there
01:02:16
◼
►
If you need any help, they're there to give you it. If you want to create a blog or a portfolio
01:02:20
◼
►
It's very simple to do. If you want to create a site for your business, maybe a site for your restaurant, super simple to go
01:02:26
◼
►
They have templates that are built just for that if you want to take advantage of them
01:02:29
◼
►
But you can tweak any template to your heart's content
01:02:31
◼
►
They even have the ability to add an online store to a Squarespace site and that is how we sell some merch at relay FM
01:02:38
◼
►
We have a store on our Squarespace website, which we also have our blog on as well. It's super simple
01:02:43
◼
►
We wouldn't want to go and find anyone else want to buy or build something like that Squarespace is super simple
01:02:48
◼
►
It's easy to use and it's fairly priced as well
01:02:50
◼
►
Their plans start at just $12 a month, but you can try it out for free with no credit card required
01:02:55
◼
►
Just by going to squarespace.com you can play around make sure it's right for you before you sign up
01:03:00
◼
►
up then when you do use the offer code upgrade to get 10% of your first purchase and show
01:03:04
◼
►
your support for this show we thank Squarespace for the continued support of upgrade and relay
01:03:08
◼
►
FM Squarespace make your next move make your next website.
01:03:12
◼
►
So with all of the Apple battery stuff there was a Goermann report from our friend Mark
01:03:20
◼
►
Goermann over at Bloomberg that kind of got lost in the shuffle because it basically happened
01:03:25
◼
►
on the same day. And of course it got covered, but I don't think maybe to the extent that
01:03:30
◼
►
it would have otherwise, because the whole battery thing was bigger news. I think it
01:03:36
◼
►
was actually something that was definitely happening and was affecting people. But there's
01:03:41
◼
►
nothing to speculate about on the battery problem anymore. There is stuff to speculate
01:03:45
◼
►
on a unified app platform between iOS and Mac OS. According to people familiar with
01:03:52
◼
►
the matter in 2018 developers will be able to design an app that works on both
01:03:57
◼
►
iOS and Mac OS and this may be announced at WWDC this year so Apple would in
01:04:03
◼
►
theory be joining Microsoft and Google as platform vendors that are trying to
01:04:07
◼
►
get their developers to bring mobile apps to the desktop or do write once run
01:04:12
◼
►
anywhere or some variant of that right like Microsoft have tried it Google have
01:04:16
◼
►
tried it because they're like you can put Android apps on Chrome OS computers
01:04:21
◼
►
So what's going on here? What are the ramifications of this? Are we gonna have
01:04:25
◼
►
a truly universal app now? Do we just buy one app and it's everywhere?
01:04:32
◼
►
So I'm gonna do a little follow-up people if they don't listen to ATP all
01:04:37
◼
►
the time, listen to episode 254. They did a really great job of covering this
01:04:40
◼
►
story so I want to throw that in there because I kept nodding as I was cooking
01:04:47
◼
►
dinner listening to them. I don't know, this is an interesting report, right? Because on
01:04:52
◼
►
one level, it's obviously something that is in the works, and people give Gherman a lot
01:04:58
◼
►
of guff for some of this stuff where he says, "It could happen this year," or "It could
01:05:04
◼
►
never happen," and they're like, "Wow, that's really hedging your bets here," but the problem
01:05:09
◼
►
is he's not a prognosticator, right? He knows that people are working on this at Apple now.
01:05:15
◼
►
people at Apple don't know if it's going to be approved, if it's going to ship, or
01:05:19
◼
►
if they're just trying it out. His leak is telling them that Apple is working on
01:05:23
◼
►
it, and so when people are like, "Oh, he reported this thing and it didn't happen,
01:05:26
◼
►
he's wrong," it doesn't mean he's wrong, because he didn't say it would happen. He
01:05:29
◼
►
said people at Apple are working on this thing and it might happen, but it also
01:05:33
◼
►
might get shut down. They might work on this, and then some executive at Apple
01:05:37
◼
►
looks at it in March and goes, "No, we're not going to do this. This was a bad idea."
01:05:41
◼
►
idea, and then that'll be the last we hear about it. So, up front, I wanted to say that.
01:05:47
◼
►
He was very good in this report at disclosing, like, "This may not happen. They're working
01:05:53
◼
►
on it, but it's unknown whether this will actually happen or when." And good for him
01:05:59
◼
►
for doing that, because the irresponsible way to do this story is to say, "I had somebody
01:06:03
◼
►
tell me they're working on this project. This is what Apple's doing." Because you don't
01:06:07
◼
►
know that. You don't know. This is not far enough along that you know that Apple's going
01:06:11
◼
►
commit to this line of thinking. You only know that people are working on it. Maybe
01:06:17
◼
►
they'll commit, maybe they won't. Is this good or bad for developers? So let's assume
01:06:21
◼
►
that this is going to happen in some way, right? Like that there is going to be some
01:06:26
◼
►
kind of new platform, maybe it's some extension of what they use to make photos with, you
01:06:32
◼
►
know. Let's break down why you do this if you're Apple. Number one reason that you do
01:06:37
◼
►
this if you're Apple is because, well, there's there's some possibilities here.
01:06:41
◼
►
One of them is you're frustrated that there's so much iOS software and there
01:06:48
◼
►
is so little Mac software. That would be one reason. And the idea there is we have
01:06:53
◼
►
a thriving platform for apps on iOS and it's not... and then we've got this other
01:07:00
◼
►
platform and we have no way for those people to write for that platform. They
01:07:04
◼
►
have to work very hard and do something very different to get to the Mac because
01:07:08
◼
►
the Mac is using a completely different approach than iOS is. So what if we made
01:07:14
◼
►
it that writing apps for the Mac was a lot more like writing apps for iOS?
01:07:20
◼
►
Would that... and there's a real open question there, which is like, would that
01:07:24
◼
►
make any difference? Are the people who are writing iOS apps going to then say,
01:07:27
◼
►
"Oh, well, now let's invest some time in bringing those over to the Mac," because
01:07:34
◼
►
it presumably wouldn't be compile once run everywhere it would presumably be
01:07:39
◼
►
like you'll still need to do a Mac version but it will be you know you can
01:07:44
◼
►
base it more on the code that you wrote for iOS so there's some skepticism there
01:07:49
◼
►
about it but I could see that like I mean if anybody who has listened to ATP
01:07:53
◼
►
knows like Marco as a as an iOS developer looks at developing a Mac app
01:07:58
◼
►
and is like, "Maybe I'll do a command line app instead," right? Finally, he's done a
01:08:04
◼
►
couple, you know, Forecast actually has a UI, although it's a very stock UI, but like,
01:08:09
◼
►
there's not a lot of comfort in being a long-time iOS developer and looking at the Mac, even
01:08:16
◼
►
as all developers on iOS are, a Mac user. Like, the Mac is just disconnected from--people
01:08:25
◼
►
the Mac to develop on iOS, but developing on the Mac it's like totally a different world.
01:08:30
◼
►
So I get that that might be Apple's motivation. I also kind of think that Apple, if you look
01:08:38
◼
►
at the big picture, Apple, it doesn't make a lot of sense for Apple to have many platforms
01:08:46
◼
►
with many completely different ways of writing software. Like, you'd like the Apple platform
01:08:52
◼
►
to feel like a platform to feel like a family where there's a bunch of stuff that is shared
01:08:58
◼
►
well especially when there already is except for one right like writing for the watch writing
01:09:04
◼
►
for the TV iPad iPhone they're all similar they're all similar but not the same you have
01:09:10
◼
►
the similar and then Mac because Mac because of the legacy there so so this is the question
01:09:16
◼
►
is would they do that do they think people would take advantage of it and what does that
01:09:22
◼
►
look like? Do they want it to be... like, because one level would be like, I feel this
01:09:27
◼
►
way, I have apps on... this is my frustration, I have like great video apps on iOS that'll
01:09:34
◼
►
do picture-in-picture, and they have access to all this content, and on my Mac I have
01:09:39
◼
►
to use Chrome with Flash in it, and then there's no picture-in-picture support to watch videos
01:09:45
◼
►
on my Mac, because they didn't write a... they didn't bother to write a Mac app, they're
01:09:49
◼
►
just use our website but on iOS they wrote a great iOS app. So I understand the appeal
01:09:56
◼
►
of just saying, "Look, the Mac can run iOS apps now." Like, you want to be in the Mac
01:10:01
◼
►
App Store? Guess what? Check the box, say Mac, it runs, we've done the work, we, you
01:10:06
◼
►
know, I don't think that's realistic because like a mouse and a keyboard is not a finger
01:10:12
◼
►
unless they're going to start making touchscreen Macs that all the touchscreen is for is for
01:10:16
◼
►
for iOS mode, but I don't think that's a good idea. That's a really weird mix metaphor that
01:10:23
◼
►
would be a very different way for Apple to go. So more likely Apple's going to say, "Here
01:10:28
◼
►
are the tools, here's a new development environment for, let's say, the Mac that is much more
01:10:33
◼
►
like the tools you're used to using on iOS." So you've got all the stuff that you would
01:10:43
◼
►
on iOS is like it's basically the same like with photos like you mentioned with
01:10:47
◼
►
you that's UX kit right instead of UI kit the okay you know maybe but you're
01:10:56
◼
►
still requiring those developers to do that extra work and it's like is slack
01:10:59
◼
►
gonna do extra work so that they can take their iOS app and move it to the
01:11:03
◼
►
Mac when they've got a Mac app that's just a web instance and it's fine is
01:11:07
◼
►
Comcast gonna take their video tool and you know the video app with all of those
01:11:12
◼
►
streams or they just gonna be like "why would we do extra work? We've got this
01:11:15
◼
►
stupid website that works fine in Flash and we're just gonna leave it there
01:11:17
◼
►
until Flash dies in two years." I think it's a real question. Like, if you
01:11:23
◼
►
have to do extra work, do they want to do that to get on the Mac? Maybe some do, and
01:11:27
◼
►
maybe that's good enough. So that's possibility one. Possibility two is that
01:11:33
◼
►
this is not about that. That this is about starting a process of doing the
01:11:38
◼
►
next-generation app development environment that's got stuff that is
01:11:42
◼
►
neither Mac nor iOS as we know it today but it's like a new set of frameworks a
01:11:48
◼
►
new way of developing apps that you can then deploy across all of Apple's
01:11:52
◼
►
platforms and I feel like when we start talking about this we come back to the
01:11:57
◼
►
question of what's the future of Apple's OS strategy because I feel like it's the
01:12:01
◼
►
same thing which is what does Apple do they've got iOS and Mac they're very
01:12:05
◼
►
different. They try to bring them together when they can, but they're very different
01:12:08
◼
►
things. And are they just going to—is Apple going to invest in these two different platforms
01:12:14
◼
►
for the long run? Or are they going to let the Mac kind of fade away and focus on iOS?
01:12:20
◼
►
Or are they going to do something that's new, that is going to be unifying, that's a little
01:12:24
◼
►
like—you know, capable of doing desktop Mac-y things and phone-in-your-pocket iPhone-y
01:12:30
◼
►
but is a new platform. And in the end I'm not sure whether there's a huge
01:12:38
◼
►
difference between evolving iOS to be more capable and replacing iOS and Mac
01:12:46
◼
►
with new OS. You could do either. Apple's going to be strongly motivated
01:12:54
◼
►
to keep all of its app developers who have been working on iOS for a long time
01:12:59
◼
►
and have all the developers who develop for iOS and are familiar with it. So, from a pragmatic
01:13:04
◼
►
standpoint, it seems more likely that they would want to kind of keep evolving iOS and
01:13:08
◼
►
evolving the app development tools. So maybe that's what this is. It's not about getting
01:13:14
◼
►
iOS stuff to run on the Mac, but to kind of like create a new set of frameworks that are
01:13:21
◼
►
a little more independent and say, "This is our new app. This is our new app. This is
01:13:26
◼
►
a little more independent and say, "This is our next gen," just like with Swift being a new
01:13:31
◼
►
language, like, "This is our next thing that we're doing." And it's not a new OS yet, but it is a way
01:13:37
◼
►
for you to write for these different platforms. I don't know. I think what's fascinating about
01:13:41
◼
►
this story is I don't think there's one clear right answer. There's whatever Apple may be doing,
01:13:50
◼
►
but I just when I try to put myself in Apple's shoes, this is hard. Like, I don't think there's
01:13:56
◼
►
an obvious solution because if there was, Apple would be doing that and we would know
01:14:01
◼
►
it, right? I think it's a set of hard decisions about how do you evolve, how do you keep the
01:14:06
◼
►
Mac going, do you keep the Mac going, how do you evolve iOS, do you do that, where are
01:14:11
◼
►
your platforms in five or ten years, how are apps being developed for them? Because the
01:14:17
◼
►
The fact is there's a huge swath of Apple platform developers now, but almost all of
01:14:23
◼
►
them are iOS developers.
01:14:25
◼
►
And then there's this other platform.
01:14:26
◼
►
Because I see there's like a couple of other reasons to do this.
01:14:29
◼
►
You know, so you started this discussion was like, what, what are the reasons?
01:14:32
◼
►
You know, like one I see is you have an app store, which is mostly a laughing stock in
01:14:37
◼
►
the community, which is the Mac app store.
01:14:40
◼
►
But yet you have another app store, which is, I know it's the only game in town, but
01:14:45
◼
►
is considered to be pretty good.
01:14:47
◼
►
Right. Like I think people tend to like the
01:14:49
◼
►
iOS app store and
01:14:51
◼
►
maybe it would be good if you could try and get
01:14:53
◼
►
some of those people that like that app store to
01:14:55
◼
►
make applications for your overall one as well.
01:14:57
◼
►
And the other thing that I see is if
01:15:00
◼
►
you are developing the tools
01:15:02
◼
►
to the point that they could run on the Mac as
01:15:05
◼
►
well as iOS, right, you're kind of like bridging
01:15:08
◼
►
the gap between them.
01:15:09
◼
►
It could be an interesting way to allow for
01:15:12
◼
►
more powerful iOS apps to exist.
01:15:15
◼
►
You know, like, people may push iOS further because this tool also runs on the Mac.
01:15:21
◼
►
So here, I mean, I've talked about and written about the idea of doing an iOS laptop or one day doing an iOS desktop.
01:15:28
◼
►
And like, part of the stumbling block there is you're really going to do that?
01:15:33
◼
►
Like, there's no pointing device.
01:15:37
◼
►
You're going to be, are you just going to be keyboard in touch?
01:15:39
◼
►
Are you going to add a pointing device to iOS?
01:15:41
◼
►
That's really weird.
01:15:43
◼
►
if if Apple starts down a version of this path what they're telling developers is
01:15:49
◼
►
look think about your app in different contexts think about in small screen
01:15:53
◼
►
contacts and large screen contacts think about it in
01:15:58
◼
►
contacts where there's a keyboard like iOS developers can do some of that now
01:16:01
◼
►
there's a there's the the big iPad and there's the iPhone SE right like
01:16:06
◼
►
there's a huge gap between them different sizes different use cases if
01:16:10
◼
►
if you're on iPhone X, it's different. All of those things are happening, right?
01:16:14
◼
►
Then there's things that also iOS developers have to deal with, like, is
01:16:18
◼
►
there a keyboard? Like, iOS developers can now say, "Oh, there's a keyboard. I've got
01:16:21
◼
►
keyboard shortcuts, the keyboard on the screen slides away, I've got
01:16:26
◼
►
more room to put other stuff." That's a thing that they could do. Well, you go
01:16:29
◼
►
down this path further and you say, "What if there's a pointing device? What if
01:16:34
◼
►
you're on an iMac size screen?" And the answer for now would be, guess what? You
01:16:39
◼
►
can make an iMac app now. You can make a Mac app. What is it on a laptop? What is it on
01:16:44
◼
►
an iMac? What is it with a mouse and a keyboard versus touch? And you're building one app-ish
01:16:52
◼
►
that you're thinking about all these different scenarios where it might run across Apple's
01:16:58
◼
►
platforms. That opens the door not just for that app to run on the Mac, but for that app
01:17:06
◼
►
to run on iOS in a context that doesn't exist right now, like a laptop with a trackpad or
01:17:14
◼
►
an iMac-shaped iOS device with a keyboard and a mouse or a trackpad. I'm not saying
01:17:21
◼
►
they will do that, but that's one of the ramifications of something like this. And that may be the
01:17:26
◼
►
long game for Apple, is rather than ripping off the Band-Aid and saying, "In two years
01:17:31
◼
►
we have a new OS, everybody go to it," say, "We're adding these tools, and then we're
01:17:34
◼
►
gonna add these tools, we're just gonna incrementally push toward the point where it won't matter
01:17:39
◼
►
whether it's a Mac or it's running iOS because it's capable of doing either. And the apps
01:17:46
◼
►
that you write can run on either in the proper context. That's kind of the dream. I just
01:17:53
◼
►
keep coming back to the fact that I'm not sure if I'm a random iOS developer. Maybe
01:17:58
◼
►
they don't need the random iOS developers, but part of the goal is like, if I've got
01:18:01
◼
►
a game on iOS?" And Apple says, "Here's some things you can do to make it run on the Mac."
01:18:05
◼
►
And I look and I'm like, "Well, what's the size of the Mac audience, and does my game
01:18:09
◼
►
really match, and it's touch-based, and do I really want to change it to be something
01:18:13
◼
►
different?" Eh. And they just all kind of don't bother. But for people committed to
01:18:18
◼
►
Apple's platforms, I think that is, um, I think, in the end, it may be just a sneaky
01:18:25
◼
►
way of getting Mac developers to move to a new, more modern framework that allows a transition
01:18:37
◼
►
to happen down the road where the Mac is something very different or goes away and is replaced
01:18:42
◼
►
by iOS doing everything the Mac needs to do, which could happen.
01:18:49
◼
►
I kind of see it slightly differently, but similarly.
01:18:53
◼
►
This seems like a logical step to me
01:18:57
◼
►
as the first towards Apple OS, the unified OS.
01:19:02
◼
►
So it's not iOS, but it's not macOS either.
01:19:09
◼
►
- Right, and that's what I meant by saying
01:19:10
◼
►
that I'm not sure there's much of a difference
01:19:13
◼
►
between saying, "Will Apple do a new OS
01:19:15
◼
►
"that's neither iOS or macOS?"
01:19:17
◼
►
or will Apple just keep evolving iOS until it can do all the things the Mac can do? The
01:19:22
◼
►
answer may be yes, right? The answer may be that Apple is not going to, like I said, rip
01:19:27
◼
►
the band-aid off and say, "New OS is here," but just, "Here's a new framework. Here's
01:19:31
◼
►
some changes we made to iOS," and just keep pushing everything up to the point where the
01:19:34
◼
►
distinctions don't matter anymore.
01:19:36
◼
►
- Yeah. I don't know if we're going to see this this year, but this certainly feels like
01:19:41
◼
►
a sure thing to me eventually. I really think that.
01:19:45
◼
►
And in terms of what it would mean for users, because we've been talking a lot about it
01:19:49
◼
►
from the developer side, my gut feeling is that if this happens at WWDC this year, what
01:19:55
◼
►
it's going to be is we've got a bunch of great new frameworks. We've got a whole new framework
01:19:59
◼
►
that lets you apply your knowledge of writing on iOS and apply it to the Mac. And for Mac
01:20:04
◼
►
developers who are also working on iOS apps, this is a great way for you to make your apps
01:20:10
◼
►
more understandable across platform as a developer like you can you know they'll
01:20:15
◼
►
be a spiel like that there'll be a sales job of we made a new thing for
01:20:19
◼
►
developers from a user perspective it may be invisible like I think people
01:20:23
◼
►
jumping to assumptions like oh this means iOS emulation is happening in the
01:20:27
◼
►
Mac or the apples giving up on Mac app the Mac app environment at all and in
01:20:34
◼
►
the future the Mac is going to be 15 pro apps and then otherwise it's just going
01:20:39
◼
►
run iOS apps. Maybe, I doubt it, but maybe, I think it's more likely that it's going to
01:20:44
◼
►
be a developer announcement about tools that'll be a first version that you'll be able to
01:20:52
◼
►
use experimentally in the fall, but that full support won't really be there for another
01:20:58
◼
►
year, and it'll be a long, slow rollout creeping toward a new thing. I think that's more likely.
01:21:09
◼
►
from Apple. They surprise us, but that feels the most likely to me,
01:21:13
◼
►
is that they'll just say, "Good news everyone, we're finally gonna make it
01:21:16
◼
►
so that either Mac people can use a lot of the same concepts as iOS people
01:21:22
◼
►
or that we have a new thing that you can use for both."
01:21:26
◼
►
Which, again, may be pretty much the same thing.
01:21:29
◼
►
And it's better in ABC-wise.
01:21:31
◼
►
Yeah, and the big selling point will probably be iOS developers who want to bring their apps to the Mac
01:21:37
◼
►
that it's very confusing because there's a whole different paradigm over there.
01:21:39
◼
►
Guess what? There isn't now. Yay! That may be the sales pitch,
01:21:43
◼
►
regardless of how many people actually pick up that sales pitch. It may end up
01:21:48
◼
►
being that it's a lot of people who just the people who care about the Mac who
01:21:52
◼
►
look at that and say, "Okay, well, this is where they're going, so I'm
01:21:55
◼
►
going to go there." But we'll see. But I think that's the most likely thing is
01:22:00
◼
►
it'll be a developer message and it's not going to be that Apple is suddenly
01:22:03
◼
►
injecting iOS apps into 10.14. Yeah and I think the key thing now is to see
01:22:14
◼
►
which one of us will pick this in the draft. In our WWDC keynote draft, sure.
01:22:19
◼
►
Yeah, that'll be... There's many options to choose from too, so that'll be good.
01:22:24
◼
►
Alright, today's show is also brought to you by FreshBooks. Freelancers, you know
01:22:28
◼
►
how important it is to make smart decisions for your business and in my
01:22:31
◼
►
opinion there is no smarter decision than signing up for FreshBooks. They can
01:22:34
◼
►
save you real time with their cloud accounting software. They say they save
01:22:38
◼
►
you up to 192 hours. It's a very specific number. They've done a lot of testing
01:22:42
◼
►
because by simplifying tasks like invoicing, tracking your expenses and
01:22:47
◼
►
then actually getting paid online, which can be tricky at times, FreshBooks has
01:22:50
◼
►
drastically reduced the time it takes for over 10 million people to deal with
01:22:54
◼
►
their paperwork. We are just starting a new year which means we just had the end
01:22:59
◼
►
of a year and the end of the year comes with it lots and lots of invoicing and
01:23:04
◼
►
financing questions I had lots of them for people people had lots of them for
01:23:09
◼
►
me and with FreshBooks everything was so easy for me to go in when I had
01:23:13
◼
►
somebody say oh please send us all of the invoices that we have outstanding
01:23:17
◼
►
it's so easy for me to go in go to the person download all their invoices or I
01:23:21
◼
►
can send them to them via email again super simple or if I present some you
01:23:26
◼
►
know if I was wondering if somebody's looked at an invoice I was like oh nearly
01:23:29
◼
►
the end of the year they looked at this invoice I don't have to write them one
01:23:32
◼
►
of those hey have you seen the info I'd have to write that email I just go to
01:23:36
◼
►
the invoice that I sent them and it tells me if they've opened it it is as
01:23:40
◼
►
simple as that and then if I don't want to have to send those chasing reminder
01:23:44
◼
►
emails FreshBooks will do it for me if you're listening to this and you ever
01:23:48
◼
►
send invoices or track expenses and you've not yet tried FreshBooks please
01:23:53
◼
►
Please give it a try.
01:23:55
◼
►
They are offering an unrestricted 30 day free trial to the listeners of this show.
01:23:58
◼
►
There's no credit card required to go and try it out.
01:24:01
◼
►
You just have to go to freshbooks.com/upgrade and then to upgrade in the "How did you hear
01:24:06
◼
►
about us" section.
01:24:07
◼
►
It is that simple.
01:24:08
◼
►
We thank FreshBooks for their continued support of this show.
01:24:11
◼
►
Trust me on this one.
01:24:13
◼
►
Try them out.
01:24:14
◼
►
It is awesome.
01:24:15
◼
►
Thank you FreshBooks.
01:24:18
◼
►
Alright, so it is time for us to return to #AskUpgrade.
01:24:25
◼
►
Hooray, we're back.
01:24:26
◼
►
Rajeev asks, "Is there a shortcut of any kind on the Apple TV remote to mute the television
01:24:34
◼
►
This is like the only thing that an Apple TV user needs a regular remote for, right?
01:24:43
◼
►
I could watch all of my television just using the Apple TV remote except for
01:24:50
◼
►
something like muting. Yeah I don't think there is I think it's mashing the down
01:24:55
◼
►
button until it's quiet or pausing. Pressing and holding and eventually it will go down. If there is
01:25:01
◼
►
some magical command I've yet to come across it I don't think they exist. It's
01:25:06
◼
►
just a shame.
01:25:09
◼
►
Mark asks, "Can you recommend a charging station that can handle three or four USB devices or cables at a time?"
01:25:17
◼
►
So, I'm not completely sure what Mark means by charging station, but I have a product that I think will probably suffice, which is something that Anker makes.
01:25:30
◼
►
And they make a couple of different versions of this, some that have USB-C and some that don't.
01:25:34
◼
►
don't, but I use it is the Anker 6 port USB wall charger. You just plug one of these into
01:25:40
◼
►
a power outlet and you get six USB cables to like well USB ports that you can plug cables
01:25:47
◼
►
into this is part of my permanent travel kit. Whenever I'm traveling, I typically need at
01:25:53
◼
►
least three USB cables, right? Like I need one for my iPhone, one for my Apple watch
01:25:58
◼
►
and one for my iPad and to carry around three different adapters all with different like
01:26:04
◼
►
country adapters and all of the cables is too much. I just have one little kit that has one
01:26:12
◼
►
of these anchor things and the three cables and a US or Europe power adapter and I'm good to go.
01:26:17
◼
►
Big fan of this product. Yeah, I did for a while until actually we got iPhone 8 and iPhone 10 and
01:26:23
◼
►
switch to wireless charging, the inductive charging pads. Before that we actually had a...
01:26:30
◼
►
I replaced one of the outlets in our wall with one that is a 4 USB outlet instead.
01:26:41
◼
►
Instead of plugs, it just was 4 USB, and we used that for a while. But I'm not using that anymore
01:26:48
◼
►
because we're back to that. But I have that anchor thing, and it is part of my travel kit when I
01:26:53
◼
►
travel and it otherwise it's actually by my bedside so that I can charge my iPad
01:26:58
◼
►
and Kindle and Apple watch overnight that I use that rather than having three
01:27:04
◼
►
separate plugs they're all plugged into the anchor Scott asks Jason what
01:27:09
◼
►
standing desk do you use and what arm do you have your iMac on I am looking
01:27:18
◼
►
excuse me while I search my own site because the answer is there's an article called "What's
01:27:25
◼
►
on my desk on six colors" that I wrote in 2014 and it details everything that's on my desk including
01:27:34
◼
►
I bought a desk from it's a vert desk from beyond the office door the wire cutter raved noticeably
01:27:43
◼
►
cheap. But Lex Friedman had one and it's a convertible standing sitting desk, and so
01:27:51
◼
►
he recommended it to me. If I were buying it today, I would not buy this desk because
01:27:55
◼
►
there are nicer desks, and I was buying it thinking it might be a home office or it might
01:28:00
◼
►
be my workspace, and here I am three years later and I'm still using it. I wish it was
01:28:07
◼
►
a little bit bigger. I do wish it was a little bit nicer, but it's fine. And it came with
01:28:13
◼
►
an arm which is the hover series 2 from a company called Right Angle. It was
01:28:18
◼
►
just sort of bundled with a desk and it supports weight up to like 24 pounds or
01:28:23
◼
►
something like that so it supports an iMac just fine. So that's what I use but
01:28:27
◼
►
I also recommend the wire cutter. They have some nicer choices than this one.
01:28:32
◼
►
This one's okay but I would probably buy. I've actually thought about now that I'm
01:28:36
◼
►
in here all the time I've thought about replacing this with another desk and
01:28:40
◼
►
about to go visit my father-in-law down in LA and he has a adjustable sit-stand desk.
01:28:46
◼
►
He bought the wire cutters selection and it's really nice. So I'm going to spend a few days
01:28:52
◼
►
down there looking at that and that may tempt me. But I do like the adjustable desk and I really
01:28:58
◼
►
like having my monitor or in this case iMac on an arm because it gives me the entire desk space to
01:29:06
◼
►
to put stuff on instead of working around and the other with that stand on
01:29:10
◼
►
the iMac account blocks it's low it blocks what's behind it and I use this
01:29:15
◼
►
iMac Pro for a week ish with just with the normal stand and I hated it it
01:29:21
◼
►
reminded me once again why I prefer the arm plus you can like just make the
01:29:25
◼
►
screen higher or lower tilted or whatever and that's actually kind of
01:29:29
◼
►
nice so those my answers but just check out the what's on my desk story it's
01:29:33
◼
►
more or less accurate even now right down to the right down to the iPod
01:29:38
◼
►
HiFi that I know any orange and the orange brain the microphone is not is
01:29:42
◼
►
the same that's true it's it's back it's my old setup look at that with the Yeti
01:29:46
◼
►
and the little pop filter no good times all right Todd asks any guess as to why
01:29:52
◼
►
Apple doesn't offer free trial versions of logic Pro a final cut how do they
01:29:58
◼
►
expect to bring in new users my answer to this Jason is I think that the free
01:30:03
◼
►
versions of logic pro and final cut a garage band and iMovie yeah i guess you could look at it that
01:30:10
◼
►
way i think this is i have heard in the last month or two from a couple people who said i read your
01:30:16
◼
►
stuff about logic and then i found out that the only way for me to try logic is to buy it and i'm
01:30:21
◼
►
just gonna buy it i'm just gonna go try this other thing and use it instead and i think they make a
01:30:27
◼
►
good point. I think it's stupid that Apple doesn't offer a trial.
01:30:31
◼
►
Well, but they can't now because they're App Store apps.
01:30:34
◼
►
Well, that's right.
01:30:36
◼
►
That's why, I mean, that's the technical reason for why it doesn't happen.
01:30:40
◼
►
In my response to one of those people, I literally used the phrase "hoist" on their own
01:30:45
◼
►
petard because that is what's happened here is Apple made the rules and now they have to
01:30:49
◼
►
live by the rules and that means no free trials. Now, what I would argue is maybe Logic and
01:30:55
◼
►
Final Cut should be free with in-app purchase or they should be a subscription
01:31:00
◼
►
app it wouldn't surprise me can they can you do subscription apps on the Mac yet
01:31:04
◼
►
if you if they if they introduce that so if they introduce that that'll be the
01:31:08
◼
►
first thing that they do right but I think they like that it's a
01:31:11
◼
►
differentiator and that they're competing against products that have
01:31:14
◼
►
subscriptions and they don't but I will know like just just as a point I mean
01:31:18
◼
►
this doesn't make it better but they brought the price down significantly and
01:31:21
◼
►
they put those in the App Store. They were like three or four times at least
01:31:25
◼
►
more expensive than they are now. No, they're way cheaper than they were.
01:31:30
◼
►
Logic used to be like $700 or something. Yeah, but still I think this is a good
01:31:35
◼
►
point which is it's very hard to commit to a brand new piece of professional
01:31:39
◼
►
software sight unseen. It is. It took me a while to be at this like you know I
01:31:45
◼
►
think... You're right though GarageBand is essentially a cut-down version of Logic.
01:31:50
◼
►
It's just so cut down.
01:31:52
◼
►
And it's the way you learn and then you can make the jump.
01:31:57
◼
►
But like the, the real, like, you know, non tongue in cheek version, the real
01:32:02
◼
►
reason is because Apple cannot give you a free version if they want to put it in
01:32:06
◼
►
the app store, because I would also expect that those applications are so
01:32:10
◼
►
complex, especially logic.
01:32:12
◼
►
They're trying to break stuff out into an app purchase is it will probably be
01:32:15
◼
►
impossible at this point without a significant underwriting like a rewrite
01:32:20
◼
►
of the underpinnings of the application so you must use layers and layers of old
01:32:24
◼
►
code now surely a final cut maybe a bit newer they maybe could have done it
01:32:29
◼
►
there but they decided not to Jordan asked final question today how do you
01:32:33
◼
►
guys wake up your iPhone 10 do you raise to wake it you tap on the screen or do
01:32:37
◼
►
you use the side button Jason I generally raised to wake raise it sees
01:32:44
◼
►
me flip I'm in generally that's what happens sometimes I will tap to wake if
01:32:50
◼
►
it's already in my hand I don't lower it and then raise it again I will tap it
01:32:54
◼
►
but generally that's what I use is raised awake I use raised awake and I
01:33:00
◼
►
use tapping a lot more than I expected like my phone is kind of just on the
01:33:05
◼
►
desk or it's like on the sofa next to me yeah I'm like playing a video game and
01:33:08
◼
►
I just tap it and you know what I've realized I've started doing in the last
01:33:11
◼
►
few days can you guess what I'm doing tapping on your iPad tapping on my iPad
01:33:15
◼
►
it's really annoying me too hey buddy what you doing oh I don't know where
01:33:22
◼
►
Myke I don't know where to slide to get control center anymore I'm I can't tell
01:33:26
◼
►
you how many times I pull down notifications that are on my iPad and
01:33:30
◼
►
I'm like why is this oh yeah that doesn't happen to me as much as other
01:33:35
◼
►
people it does happen I do do it but like most of the time I know where I'm
01:33:40
◼
►
going. Alright if you want to submit a question for Ask Upgrade just send a
01:33:44
◼
►
tweet with the hashtag #AskUpgrade and we will provide hopefully a good answer
01:33:47
◼
►
for you at the end of the show or an answer good maybe an answer probably. If
01:33:53
◼
►
you want to find us online as a few places you can do that you can go to
01:33:56
◼
►
@JACE now on Twitter you can go to sixcolors.com the incomparable.com or
01:34:01
◼
►
relay.fm/shows. Jason hosts a great selection of shows here at Relay FM
01:34:06
◼
►
including liftoff and free agents and download as well as upgrade so you can
01:34:11
◼
►
go and check those out I am @imike and I host a lot of shows at Relay.fm
01:34:19
◼
►
to go to Relay.fm/shows find something new I bet there's gonna be
01:34:23
◼
►
something in there that you will enjoy thanks to Squarespace and FreshBooks and
01:34:27
◼
►
MissionU for their support of this show and we'll be back next week until
01:34:32
◼
►
Until then, say goodbye, Jason Snow.
01:34:33
◼
►
Happy New Year, everybody.
01:34:35
◼
►
[MUSIC PLAYING]