192: People Like Colors and Fun
00:00:09
◼
►
From Relay FM, this is Upgrade, Episode 192, and today's show is brought to you by Eero,
00:00:16
◼
►
StoryWorth, and Simple Contacts.
00:00:18
◼
►
My name is Myke Hurley and I am joined by Mr. Jason Snell.
00:00:22
◼
►
Hello, Jason.
00:00:23
◼
►
Hello, Myke Hurley.
00:00:24
◼
►
How are you?
00:00:25
◼
►
I'm very well, Jason Snell.
00:00:26
◼
►
How are you?
00:00:27
◼
►
I'm doing great.
00:00:28
◼
►
Do anything interesting this last week?
00:00:29
◼
►
Sure did, my friend.
00:00:31
◼
►
I have my bachelor party in Austin, Texas.
00:00:34
◼
►
With a bunch of my favorite people.
00:00:37
◼
►
But nobody wants to hear about that, Myke.
00:00:39
◼
►
Oh, look at that.
00:00:40
◼
►
We're going to go into our hashtag Snell Talk question.
00:00:42
◼
►
I like that. Very clever. Very clever indeed.
00:00:45
◼
►
You stuck with me right in.
00:00:46
◼
►
You took advantage of my jet lag.
00:00:47
◼
►
Joel wants to know, Jason, if a movie is released in IMAX 3D
00:00:53
◼
►
and as well as regular 2D,
00:00:55
◼
►
do you have a preference of which version you would like to see?
00:00:59
◼
►
Great question, Joel. And my answer is, I don't like 3D movies. I have seen some 3D
00:01:06
◼
►
movies that I thought were fine, that did a good job, but in general, I don't like
00:01:12
◼
►
them. I don't like the fact that because of the way the 3D process works, you generally
00:01:16
◼
►
get a darker picture. I wear glasses, so I don't really like the fact that I spend
00:01:20
◼
►
an entire movie with two pairs of glasses stuck on my face.
00:01:25
◼
►
I hate that so much.
00:01:26
◼
►
It is the worst. So I will always pick a regular 2D movie. IMAX, I've seen some IMAX movies
00:01:33
◼
►
and if it's an IMAX movie, I like them. But a lot of times there's a film that's in IMAX
00:01:39
◼
►
often times, like The Dark Knight I saw and it was at an IMAX theater. And it was, most
00:01:44
◼
►
of the movie was just the movie projected on the giant IMAX screen and then there were
00:01:49
◼
►
some parts of it that were shot in IMAX that were at the IMAX ratio and then they went
00:01:53
◼
►
back to the other aspect ratio. My only IMAX movie was Blade Runner 2048 and that had some
00:02:00
◼
►
IMAX stuff in it and it was glorious, right? Like it looked wonderful. Yeah, it looks great.
00:02:06
◼
►
It's a little bit weird but I don't have an IMAX theater near me, honestly. Well, I mean
00:02:11
◼
►
near me. In my county I don't have any. I would have to go to kind of the far side of
00:02:15
◼
►
San Francisco or out into the East Bay which means I never go to IMAX movies and I try
00:02:20
◼
►
to avoid the 3D movies. In fact, and we'll put a link in the show notes, I own what are
00:02:26
◼
►
called 2D glasses. I've never seen these and this is maybe one of the best things I've
00:02:31
◼
►
ever come across. So if you go to a 3D movie and you don't want to see 3D, you wear these.
00:02:38
◼
►
That's hilarious. And what it does is, you know, the way 3D movies work is that the two
00:02:43
◼
►
lenses are polarized differently so that you see two different images and that's how 3D
00:02:49
◼
►
works is that they give you that depth sensation. 2D glasses are only one side, and so it flattens
00:02:59
◼
►
the image. I will say, for people who are maybe thinking sort of like, "What about the
00:03:04
◼
►
purity of the 3D image?" I'll just point out, almost every movie made now that's in 3D is
00:03:09
◼
►
faked. They have a -- if you look in the credits, like, Infinity War is a good example of this.
00:03:14
◼
►
If you sit through the credits of any movie, and a Marvel movie is a good one to sit through
00:03:17
◼
►
the credits through because you want to see what happens in the post-credits sequence,
00:03:21
◼
►
you will see an entire section of names that are the people who did the 3D conversion because
00:03:28
◼
►
3D cameras are really heavy and hard to use and most people don't bother. They just shoot
00:03:33
◼
►
it in 2D and let some company sit there and apply fake depth in order to give that 3D
00:03:39
◼
►
effect. And if you like 3D movies, that's great, but I don't care for it. I don't think
00:03:43
◼
►
it's really necessary. I try to avoid them and I have 2D glasses for when I actually
00:03:48
◼
►
want to avoid them. I also did, in order to cure one of the other issues we've got, I
00:03:54
◼
►
have bought but haven't used yet, some 3D clip-ons. The idea there is, well, what if
00:04:00
◼
►
I go to a 3D movie and I can clip some little 3D lenses onto my glasses and don't have that
00:04:06
◼
►
second set of plastic over my face? And it's compatible with most of the 3D theaters. So
00:04:12
◼
►
So I've got those, and the next time I end up at a 3D showing, I'm going to try those.
00:04:19
◼
►
I've used the 2D glasses before, and they worked just fine. But the 3D clip-ons I'm
00:04:25
◼
►
going to give a try. We'll put links into the show notes. I haven't used it yet, but
00:04:29
◼
►
if you're curious about that. But Joel, my standard answer here is 2D works for me. In
00:04:35
◼
►
fact, when they started doing MoviePass and the MoviePass service, where you pay a certain
00:04:39
◼
►
amount of money and you can see a certain amount of movies that keeps changing. One
00:04:44
◼
►
of their restrictions is no 3D because of course 3D movies cost more. That's why they
00:04:48
◼
►
do them so they can charge you more for them and create an experience that you can't get
00:04:52
◼
►
at home. And I was okay with movie pass being like, "Oh no no, 2D only." Like, "Oh, what
00:04:58
◼
►
a shame. I can only see a 2D movie." That's what I want to see.
00:05:01
◼
►
I just said while we're talking about movies, absolutely no spoilers, but I enjoyed Infinity
00:05:06
◼
►
you wore more the second time. Me too. Sorry for a second time this past week and I enjoyed
00:05:10
◼
►
it more. Me too and I will also say as an aside it was my first time in an Alamo draft
00:05:14
◼
►
house and I loved it. Which is a wild experience. I have to say I looked at that and I thought
00:05:20
◼
►
this is how the movies stay in business. This is how people keep going to movies is stuff
00:05:25
◼
►
like this because I loved it. I loved it all. I loved the reserved seats which I know a
00:05:28
◼
►
lot of movie theaters have reserved seats now but none in my area do. I love the reserved
00:05:32
◼
►
seats. I love the fact that we, you know, order food and it's delivered and if I
00:05:38
◼
►
want another beer during the show I just write it on a piece of paper and stick
00:05:41
◼
►
it on on the little thing in front of me and somebody comes by and brings me a
00:05:44
◼
►
beer and then at the end I sign my credit card slip and it's done. It's
00:05:48
◼
►
amazing. That's so funny like when the person's like crawling down and they
00:05:53
◼
►
like hand the beer up to you it's a it's a very weird experience but a good one
00:05:57
◼
►
at the same time. Yeah, yeah, so thumbs up to a second viewing of Infinity War
00:06:02
◼
►
thumbs up to the Alamo Drafthouse, thumbs down to 3D.
00:06:06
◼
►
I think I agree with basically everything you just said. I stopped going to 3D movies
00:06:12
◼
►
a while ago, I just wasn't interested in it anymore. It just wasn't necessary for me because
00:06:18
◼
►
it felt like more and more of it was being hamfisted.
00:06:21
◼
►
And it's more expensive, right? They charge you more for it. That's the other part of
00:06:24
◼
►
it. If somebody is wondering, by the way, why is it that I am sometimes forced to go
00:06:27
◼
►
to a 3D movie. It's mostly about logistics. Whether it is I need to see something quickly
00:06:36
◼
►
for a podcast, which does happen, or whether it's my family can only go at a certain time.
00:06:43
◼
►
And we don't live, the closest theater to us does not have a lot of screens. In fact,
00:06:47
◼
►
the closest theater to us has one screen, which is great. But, and it's a great experience,
00:06:52
◼
►
except if the timing is that the only time we can take the kids is on a Saturday at this
00:06:56
◼
►
time and it's a 3D showing, well, we're going to go to the 3D showing. If we can avoid it,
00:07:01
◼
►
we do, but we can't always avoid it. And likewise, if the timing, if I need to go see a movie,
00:07:05
◼
►
now that I have movie pass, this is probably less so where like I'm really going to try
00:07:09
◼
►
to use that and not do a 3D showing, but it does happen sometimes where you just end up
00:07:14
◼
►
at a 3D showing. So it's not as if a big burly man comes and says, "You will go to the 3D
00:07:19
◼
►
movie now." Like it's not quite like that, but it's just expediency. But if I can avoid
00:07:23
◼
►
yeah it's cheaper and I don't need to see it and I kind of don't want to see
00:07:26
◼
►
it which is why I bought the 2d glasses. Do you know if the new Avatar movies are
00:07:30
◼
►
being shot in 3d again? Oh of course of course. Because I would see that right
00:07:35
◼
►
because I saw the original Avatar 3d and it was incredible in 3d. I agree I mean
00:07:39
◼
►
the list I can make a list of 3d movies that I really liked I liked Avatar I
00:07:43
◼
►
liked Tron Legacy in 3d I thought it looked really cool and Hugo is the one I
00:07:50
◼
►
keep mentioning. Because yes, Martin Scorsese made a 3D movie that's a family movie and
00:07:56
◼
►
it's called Hugo. And not only is it a good movie, but it is beautiful in 3D because you
00:08:01
◼
►
were seeing a master working with the best cinematographers and they were like, "Okay,
00:08:09
◼
►
we're going to make this in 3D. We're going to make it really good." And it was really
00:08:13
◼
►
good. But then I've seen all sorts of summer blockbusters in 3D and it just kind of leaves
00:08:18
◼
►
me cold, it doesn't really do anything for me. There are occasional moments where you
00:08:22
◼
►
think "oh well that looks pretty cool in 3D" but most of the time I find it distracting
00:08:27
◼
►
and unnecessary. And plus it does make the movie darker.
00:08:30
◼
►
I'm really happy about the fact that it feels like the trend of a thing happens in a movie
00:08:36
◼
►
just because it's going to be in 3D seems to have died away. There's a scene where like
00:08:42
◼
►
"oh and it's all coming to the screen!" you know, there's been a big crash and there's
00:08:47
◼
►
debris flying directly at you like it feels like some of that's died off which is good because
00:08:51
◼
►
you watch a 2d movie and you're like oh that was the big 3d effect that i didn't get to see because
00:08:57
◼
►
i didn't want to see that i think in star trek is it maybe star trek or star trek into darkness that
00:09:02
◼
►
there's a uh the warp drive is in 3d and i was like oh that was cute but it's like literally
00:09:06
◼
►
the only thing that made me excited about the 3d in that movie so you know it's just uh it's i
00:09:12
◼
►
I don't think it's necessary. It's fine if you like it. Obviously it works enough, although
00:09:19
◼
►
I've read stories that say that audiences are lukewarm about 3D and that it is more
00:09:24
◼
►
like they go because it's the time that's convenient for them and that some people are
00:09:29
◼
►
unhappy when they have to put the glasses on. But as long as it is something that can
00:09:33
◼
►
boost the--the bottom line, we talked about the Alamo Drafthouse--bottom line is the movie
00:09:38
◼
►
movie theaters are trying to find ways to get people to come to the movie theater because
00:09:43
◼
►
it's a good experience instead of staying home. And having movies that are exclusive
00:09:48
◼
►
is part of it, and that's always been the case since home video happened. There's a
00:09:52
◼
►
period where you need to see the movie in the theater and that's fine. But it is now
00:09:56
◼
►
about nice seats, they bring you food, they let you reserve your seats, and 3D is one
00:10:02
◼
►
of those things that's kind of on that list of, especially since 3D TV didn't take off,
00:10:07
◼
►
if you want to see the 3D version of anything, you gotta see it in the movie theater because
00:10:11
◼
►
after that you're basically never going to see it again until some other 3D tech comes
00:10:14
◼
►
along. Maybe with higher quality VR goggles, maybe 3D will come back in that format because
00:10:22
◼
►
you need to have the special glasses basically to do 3D. Or they'll invent some amazing 3D
00:10:27
◼
►
TV that requires no glasses. But the industry's attempt to make 3D TV happen failed and it's
00:10:33
◼
►
going to be a while before they try again. So it's on the list of things. Good Sound,
00:10:38
◼
►
theoretically, is on that list too. And anything else they can do to make it a more pleasant
00:10:43
◼
►
experience. And I believe they can do it. Going to the Alamo Drafthouse convinced me
00:10:48
◼
►
of that. There are ways to make the movie theater experience a nice one that people
00:10:52
◼
►
actually are excited about doing. I'm not convinced 3D is a big part of that strategy,
00:10:57
◼
►
but I get why it's a part of the strategy. Plus, it lets them raise the ticket price
00:11:00
◼
►
for a lot of showings because they charge extra for 3D.
00:11:04
◼
►
It's an extra fee they get to charge.
00:11:06
◼
►
If you would like to send in a Snail Talk question, just send out a tweet with the hashtag
00:11:10
◼
►
SnailTalk and it goes into a document for us to pull later on.
00:11:13
◼
►
Thank you to Joel for his excellent question this week.
00:11:16
◼
►
I wanted to just give a piece of follow up, Jason, in regards to Yoav's #AskUpgrade question
00:11:22
◼
►
last week where Yoav asked about finding a way to get rid of duplicates basically from
00:11:30
◼
►
photos app. So when you have a shared file, a shared album of photos and you want to download
00:11:37
◼
►
them or you end up with a bunch of duplicates. And whilst we don't have a great way to solve
00:11:41
◼
►
that problem, Nash has a great way to get rid of the duplicates once you've got them
00:11:46
◼
►
as an app that he uses called Best Photos, which will allow you to detect and remove
00:11:52
◼
►
duplicate photos from your iOS photo library. So this isn't a complete solution to your
00:11:57
◼
►
problem, but it can fix it on the other end.
00:11:59
◼
►
and I'll mention I kind of steered away from the post import scenario because
00:12:06
◼
►
there are a bunch of options there and that wasn't quite what what he asked but
00:12:10
◼
►
I'll mention power photos from fat cats off where they are an occasional six
00:12:14
◼
►
color sponsor so they just sponsored the site a couple weeks ago so there's my
00:12:18
◼
►
disclaimer but I've used it I mentioned it in the book that I wrote about photos
00:12:22
◼
►
and it is the successor to their iPhoto library manager product and basically it
00:12:27
◼
►
does all sorts of stuff including deduping, letting you merge libraries,
00:12:30
◼
►
letting you separate libraries. So if you're trying to do like
00:12:33
◼
►
stuff that Photos doesn't do, it's worth looking. I think they've got a demo
00:12:37
◼
►
version that you can try with PowerPhotos from Fat Cat. So I'll put
00:12:42
◼
►
that in the show notes too. Because I guess if there isn't a way to fix it on the front end,
00:12:47
◼
►
yeah, you can detect the duplicates later and that is not ideal, right?
00:12:53
◼
►
you'd prefer it to be smart about detecting duplicates, but a lot of stuff, writing about
00:12:58
◼
►
photos for the last few years, I get a lot of emails are like, why doesn't it do this?
00:13:03
◼
►
And my response is always like, because it doesn't because I mean, like, literally, my
00:13:07
◼
►
goal is to show you what you can do and how you can work around it. You almost have to
00:13:12
◼
►
have to view the app as a force of nature, almost like, look, it just doesn't do it.
00:13:17
◼
►
So it's like, we could complain. That's fine about the fact that it doesn't strip out the
00:13:21
◼
►
duplicates in some scenarios, but it doesn't. So what are you going to do? And the answer
00:13:27
◼
►
is find a way to fix that because Apple hasn't fixed it yet. So there are some options there.
00:13:33
◼
►
Jason, I believe you have some upstream news for me this week.
00:13:37
◼
►
I do. I have some "doo doo doo doo" upstream news. That's not the theme song for upstream.
00:13:43
◼
►
I just was trying it out, but it didn't work. Little horn. Well, so last week was something
00:13:49
◼
►
called Newfronts, which is this totally weird thing. To back it up, there's a thing called
00:13:54
◼
►
Upfronts, which is when TV networks go to New York and they do a bunch of, it's like
00:13:58
◼
►
a dog and pony show for advertisers, for the biggest advertisers. And what they're trying
00:14:02
◼
►
to do is say, "Here are all these great things that we're doing and you should give us advertising
00:14:08
◼
►
because aren't we awesome?" And that means that Upfronts has become also a media dog
00:14:13
◼
►
and pony show for the networks to talk about their new fall seasons and what their strategies
00:14:18
◼
►
are. And the New Fronts are an attempt by new media companies that are also wanting
00:14:26
◼
►
to reach with advertisers. So it's basically like, "Well, we want to do Upfronts too, so
00:14:29
◼
►
we're going to do this thing called New Fronts." There's also a thing, I think, called Podfronts
00:14:32
◼
►
that is by podcast networks. You remember that? Where we saw Lex Friedman got up on
00:14:39
◼
►
stage and talked about how great Midroll was and the people from Panoply and all that.
00:14:46
◼
►
Anyway, everybody wants to do a dog and pony show in New York City is basically the story
00:14:50
◼
►
because you wouldn't want to be in New York City. It's a great city. So, New Fronts was
00:14:54
◼
►
Hulu, YouTube, Netflix, I think. Well, maybe Netflix wasn't there because they don't have
00:14:58
◼
►
any ads. Anyway, Hulu was there, YouTube was there, some other streaming services were
00:15:02
◼
►
there, and they made some news. So, Hulu was at the New Fronts and they announced they
00:15:07
◼
►
have 20 million subscribers. They're US only. They grew four million in, I think, four or
00:15:12
◼
►
months. So Hulu showing a lot of growth. One of the challenges with Hulu is it's a US only
00:15:18
◼
►
service right now. It's not just that their 20 million subs are US only, which is actually
00:15:21
◼
►
a pretty good number in the US, but what's the rest of their strategy? We've talked about
00:15:26
◼
►
how Hulu is going to be, if the Disney/Fox merger goes through, majority owned by Disney,
00:15:33
◼
►
and there's a question of sort of like what happens to it? What's its fate? Does it keep
00:15:36
◼
►
its other owners or does Disney buy them out? Does Disney use Hulu as the place where its
00:15:42
◼
►
content that's more adult-oriented, the stuff from Fox and FX goes to, and maybe even some
00:15:47
◼
►
of the stuff from ABC, instead of going to the other Disney streaming services. The Ham
00:15:54
◼
►
Maid's Tale is like their number one show. It's a success across the board among viewers
00:15:58
◼
►
and critics and it's won a lot of awards, so they crowed about that a little bit. And
00:16:03
◼
►
they pointed out, again, that their catalogue is all about TV, which I think is interesting.
00:16:07
◼
►
Like, it's a TV brand. They have more TV content than any of their competitors. If you think
00:16:11
◼
►
about it that's kind of interesting because they've been as I think Netflix
00:16:14
◼
►
and Amazon have been less interested in having a massive library of old TV shows
00:16:19
◼
►
and things like that they kind of want some hits and they want originals and
00:16:22
◼
►
they want movies who is all about TV and then they also have a live TV service
00:16:27
◼
►
that they introduced that's the over-the-top you know cable replacement
00:16:31
◼
►
that will show you like shows and channels as they're running live so
00:16:35
◼
►
that's that's what's going on with Hulu and then YouTube was also there and they
00:16:41
◼
►
made some news. So they premiered their new original series on YouTube Red, Cobra Kai,
00:16:45
◼
►
which is the sequel to the Karate Kid movies, which has gotten pretty good reviews actually,
00:16:50
◼
►
as far as I've seen, which is kind of surprising and funny. And they also gave kind of a weird
00:16:56
◼
►
presentation where I think the money line from the CEO of YouTube who's Susan Wojcicki,
00:17:03
◼
►
I don't know how to pronounce that name.
00:17:06
◼
►
I think it's Wojcicki.
00:17:07
◼
►
Wojcicki? All right, it's a Polish name. Anyway, she said there is not a playbook for how open
00:17:12
◼
►
platforms operate at our scale. So it's an admission of weakness. Why is that important?
00:17:17
◼
►
Well, open platforms at scale is all about, remember, she's talking to advertisers. One
00:17:22
◼
►
of the challenges about having ads in an open platform like YouTube is, you guessed it,
00:17:29
◼
►
your ads as these very carefully planned and maybe uptight advertisers are working on their
00:17:36
◼
►
ad campaigns and then their ad gets put next to something violent, something sexual, something
00:17:42
◼
►
racist and that totally happens with YouTube.
00:17:47
◼
►
Or just something that becomes controversial for whatever reason.
00:17:51
◼
►
And most advertisers don't want to be attached to anything controversial.
00:17:53
◼
►
They want to be just blend in and be in the background.
00:17:57
◼
►
YouTube also has its own YouTube TV, live TV over the top streaming service.
00:18:01
◼
►
So there's another aspect where YouTube is doing that, Hulu is doing that.
00:18:05
◼
►
Anyway, I thought both of those stories were interesting just as a way of YouTube doing
00:18:11
◼
►
some original content that is also interesting because we think of YouTube as a brand that
00:18:15
◼
►
is very much focused on young people and their original content is a show that will appeal
00:18:22
◼
►
to Gen Xers in terms of nostalgia, which I think is a funny thing, but I think they're
00:18:28
◼
►
trying to broaden.
00:18:29
◼
►
I think between this and the YouTube TV over the top service, they're trying to like...
00:18:34
◼
►
YouTube Red isn't just for my son, it's for me too is what they're trying to say there.
00:18:38
◼
►
Right, that's interesting.
00:18:39
◼
►
The person who's probably actually going to be paying the bill in the first place.
00:18:43
◼
►
It's true, it's true.
00:18:44
◼
►
I am the one who pays that bill, so that's exactly right.
00:18:47
◼
►
And then Hulu I think is interesting because there's a lot of questions like, I think Hulu's
00:18:50
◼
►
actually a pretty good service, but there are so many different questions about like,
00:18:54
◼
►
how do they build subscribers?
00:18:55
◼
►
Are they going to go outside the US?
00:18:57
◼
►
What's Disney going to do?
00:18:58
◼
►
Because it's potential that in a year or two what we're going to realize is that Hulu is
00:19:02
◼
►
Disney's worldwide content strategy for streaming stuff that appeals to adults.
00:19:11
◼
►
That's not their sports strategy or their Disney-branded, Disney-Marvel-Star Wars-branded
00:19:17
◼
►
thing that's going to skew a little bit younger, but that it's their strategy for
00:19:21
◼
►
everything else. And that would be an interesting competitor. Also, if they are all about TV,
00:19:28
◼
►
that gives them another little talking point, right? Like that they pick up all the TV,
00:19:34
◼
►
whereas Netflix and Amazon maybe are more concerned with their own programming rather
00:19:39
◼
►
than like picking up programming from other places and putting it in their service. So
00:19:43
◼
►
that I'm fascinated by where Hulu's going to go in the next couple of years because
00:19:50
◼
►
there's a lot of potential there. Or it could just go nowhere. That's also possible. But
00:19:53
◼
►
they do seem to be growing and they seem to have some sort of a plan, but we'll see.
00:19:58
◼
►
Netflix has released a remixed version of the fourth season of Arrested Development.
00:20:05
◼
►
This is super weird.
00:20:06
◼
►
Yeah, okay, it's weird and there's even a weirder backstory here.
00:20:11
◼
►
Because Mitch Hurwitz, who is the creator of Arrested Development, he actually did this
00:20:15
◼
►
a long time ago.
00:20:16
◼
►
We talked about this on the podcast I do with Tim Goodman in July of 2016.
00:20:23
◼
►
So a year and a half ago, we talked about this.
00:20:27
◼
►
up two years ago we talked about this and Tim wrote a story we can put in the
00:20:30
◼
►
show notes in July of 2016 Mitch Hurwitz said he and told him he'd recut the
00:20:37
◼
►
original fourth season so this was the Netflix original season of Arrested
00:20:41
◼
►
Development it got kind of mixed reviews it was weirdly shot because they got the
00:20:46
◼
►
different actors at different points and so what he they ended up releasing this
00:20:50
◼
►
thing that was almost like Rashomon style it was like different perspectives
00:20:53
◼
►
It was 15 episodes long. The episodes were, keeping in mind the standard sitcom and the
00:20:59
◼
►
first three seasons of Arrested Development were about 22 minutes each. These episodes
00:21:03
◼
►
were 30 minutes all the way up to like 42 minutes long. They were longer, there were
00:21:07
◼
►
fewer of them, there were 15, and they were in these kind of blocks of like this character's
00:21:12
◼
►
story and you'd see them cross over with other characters and then the next episode you'd
00:21:16
◼
►
see a different character's story and you'd see them cross over. It was a very different
00:21:19
◼
►
format for the show. And my daughter, who's been watching Arrested Development, had that
00:21:25
◼
►
same comment and she doesn't know the history. She was just like, "Yeah, that four seasons
00:21:28
◼
►
were really strange. Like, it's not like the first three seasons." Well, what Mitch Hurwitz
00:21:33
◼
►
told Tim in July 16 is he actually went back and edited a new version of season four that
00:21:41
◼
►
works like the traditional first three seasons. He got Ron Howard to do new narration. They
00:21:45
◼
►
used some shots that are not the same shots. It's a different thing. It's got some different
00:21:49
◼
►
material in it, and it's 22 minute episodes. Like it's just the old show the way it was
00:21:57
◼
►
done instead of this new format. And that he had done that, and Netflix didn't want
00:22:03
◼
►
it basically. And he said it was just sitting on a shelf, or probably more accurately sitting
00:22:07
◼
►
on a hard drive somewhere. But he had gone back and made a new version of the show. And
00:22:12
◼
►
at the time, Tim wrote about it, people were tweeting about it, everybody who's an Arrested
00:22:16
◼
►
development fan went bananas about this and I was baffled by why Netflix
00:22:22
◼
►
wouldn't do anything with it because it's like the same content and you know
00:22:26
◼
►
other than a contractual thing it's possible that like they would need to
00:22:30
◼
►
pay 20th television I think is the is the producer of it more money for an
00:22:35
◼
►
alternate version but I kept thinking to myself streaming shows and services like
00:22:41
◼
►
this is the perfect way like yeah put out an alternate version that's cool
00:22:45
◼
►
"Why don't you do that? And why wouldn't you do that if you're Netflix?" Well, almost two
00:22:51
◼
►
years later, and with a fifth season apparently in production, now Netflix apparently -- my
00:22:57
◼
►
guess is Netflix thought, "Well, now we can start warming up people for the new season
00:23:01
◼
►
of Arrested Development and get them excited about it by doing this recut version of season
00:23:06
◼
►
four. Perhaps this is why they would pay the money and do the promotion to do it." But
00:23:10
◼
►
they finally did it. After sitting on a -- probably sitting in a hard drive of Mitch Hurwitz for
00:23:14
◼
►
a couple of years. Last Friday they released this remixed Arrested Development season 4.
00:23:22
◼
►
So people who are fans of that show and maybe who didn't like season 4 or didn't watch it
00:23:26
◼
►
might want to give it a go because it's apparently a more standard take consistent with the first
00:23:32
◼
►
three seasons. And I just love this story because this is a creator taking advantage
00:23:39
◼
►
of the fact that they've got all this content to do an alternate version of the show that
00:23:43
◼
►
they made and the the streaming service can just post it and then you've got an
00:23:48
◼
►
alternate version it's a little bit like how a lot of the sitcoms especially the
00:23:52
◼
►
Michael Schur sitcom so like The Office and Parks and Recreation and The Good
00:23:57
◼
►
Place and Brooklyn Nine-Nine a lot of those shows they would drop the the
00:24:02
◼
►
episode would air at 22 minutes and then on iTunes the next day they would drop
00:24:06
◼
►
like a 38 minute version that was the one that they wanted to release but it
00:24:10
◼
►
didn't fit in the time slot. And in most cases, those are the versions that are on Netflix,
00:24:15
◼
►
which I think is great because that means in the long run, that's the real version of
00:24:19
◼
►
the show, not the one that ran on a network with commercials. And I think, again, that's
00:24:25
◼
►
the brilliance of the world we live in now that you can do that, that there's not just
00:24:29
◼
►
sort of like, we do it once and then we walk away forever. And how could we even offer
00:24:33
◼
►
another version of it? And here, Mitch Hurwitz has done an entire different season of his
00:24:39
◼
►
same season. It's really cool. So I haven't watched them yet, but I'm really excited to
00:24:43
◼
►
watch them because I think it's a great idea. It's just strange that it took two years.
00:24:46
◼
►
So the new season's coming out at the end of May, and they released a new trailer.
00:24:49
◼
►
Oh good! That goes alongside it.
00:24:51
◼
►
So there you go. So it's part of the promotion of the new season.
00:24:54
◼
►
Yeah. And something that I find interesting though, the original season four has been
00:24:59
◼
►
replaced with this new one. Oh interesting. So it's not alongside, they
00:25:03
◼
►
just put it in there. I can't find the original season four.
00:25:07
◼
►
It just says "Season 1, 2, 3" and then "Season 4 remix, fateful consequences."
00:25:12
◼
►
Interesting.
00:25:13
◼
►
Interesting.
00:25:14
◼
►
That's the list you get now.
00:25:15
◼
►
Yeah, well, it's also possible that Netflix and Hurwitz talked about it and they're like,
00:25:17
◼
►
"Yeah, this is better.
00:25:19
◼
►
Nobody liked it the way we did it.
00:25:20
◼
►
Let's just replace it and never..."
00:25:22
◼
►
Because at this point, your viewers of that are people who are binging, which means they
00:25:28
◼
►
are not seeing the context of the show going off the air for a few years and then coming
00:25:33
◼
►
Instead all they're seeing is that this thing happened and we move from season three
00:25:40
◼
►
last episode to season four first episode and like, "Whoa, what happened?"
00:25:43
◼
►
So you just remove it and it's not a problem anymore.
00:25:45
◼
►
All right, should we take a break, Jason?
00:25:46
◼
►
Yeah, it's a great idea.
00:25:47
◼
►
Today's show is brought to you by StoryWorth, the easiest way to share your family's
00:25:53
◼
►
StoryWorth makes it easy and enjoyable for your loved ones to share their life stories
00:25:57
◼
►
with weekly emailed story prompts and questions that you might not think to ask.
00:26:02
◼
►
at the end of the year, they're going to get all their stories bound in a beautiful hard
00:26:06
◼
►
cover book. It's sleek with a black and white interior colour cover of up to 480 pages in
00:26:11
◼
►
length. This means that you and your loved ones can preserve the memories that you want
00:26:16
◼
►
to share and even pass them on to future generations. Here's how StoryWorth works. You buy a subscription
00:26:22
◼
►
for someone important to you and each week StoryWorth will send them an email of a question
00:26:26
◼
►
about their life. They can email an answer back or they can even record it over the phone
00:26:30
◼
►
as well and after a year these stories will be printed and bound into that beautiful book
00:26:35
◼
►
so they can be kept maybe even put on the shelf and built up over time. StoryWorth is a great way
00:26:40
◼
►
to learn more about someone important to you. The questions are designed to evoke entertaining,
00:26:45
◼
►
surprising and moving responses and StoryWorth is also a great way of staying in touch with family
00:26:50
◼
►
members who maybe live a little further away than you'd like. You can write the stories and upload
00:26:55
◼
►
photos by email but you can also do this on the web or in their app. You can share the stories of
00:27:00
◼
►
of as many people as you want, you just can invite them to see them and
00:27:03
◼
►
everything can be saved and edited on storyworth.com and all of your data is
00:27:07
◼
►
secure and everything is private by default so you get to control who sees
00:27:11
◼
►
your stories or the stories of your loved ones. For my family, Storyworth is
00:27:16
◼
►
a great thing because we're not, it's not that we're spread out. Like I
00:27:19
◼
►
totally understand that, right? That like, oh, if we're, if you're spread
00:27:22
◼
►
out, it's difficult, but we're just, we just don't get to see, spend a lot of
00:27:26
◼
►
time together as a group. Like it's just not really, everyone's busy. It's
00:27:29
◼
►
It's just not really a thing that we get to do.
00:27:31
◼
►
And being able to share this sort of stuff digitally
00:27:34
◼
►
is a great way to stay connected.
00:27:36
◼
►
So one of the questions I saw in StoryWorth
00:27:38
◼
►
was about who inspires you?
00:27:40
◼
►
And this is something that I never would have thought
00:27:43
◼
►
about asking a member of my family.
00:27:46
◼
►
It's just a really interesting question
00:27:48
◼
►
that will bring some fascinating answers,
00:27:50
◼
►
but I just never would have thought to ask it myself.
00:27:52
◼
►
And that's the value of something like this.
00:27:54
◼
►
I'm keen to see how the answer to these types of questions
00:27:57
◼
►
relate to the way that my life is gone. Like what parallels do I have to people that I care about?
00:28:03
◼
►
It's really cool. So if you're looking for a meaningful, maybe even a last minute Mother's Day
00:28:07
◼
►
gift, StoryWorth is perfect for someone you care about. So now is the time to place your order.
00:28:12
◼
►
Listeners of this show can get $20 off their subscription by going to storyworth.com/upgrade.
00:28:18
◼
►
That is $20 off when you go to storyworth.com/upgrade and sign up today. StoryWorth,
00:28:24
◼
►
a new way to bring the family together. Thank you to StoryWarp for their support of this show
00:28:28
◼
►
and Relay FM. So over the weekend there was an anniversary, a very important anniversary,
00:28:35
◼
►
it was the 20th anniversary of the introduction of the iMac. This is the computer we know,
00:28:42
◼
►
the iMac G3 as it became kind of colloquially known later on because there were multiple
00:28:48
◼
►
versions of it but this is the Bondi blue and white case that you'll be very familiar with.
00:28:54
◼
►
So this was this happened over the weekend it's been 20 years since it was introduced on stage
00:29:00
◼
►
by Steve Jobs in 1998 and I want to talk about a few things about this JSON but what I don't
00:29:06
◼
►
necessarily want to go through is the introduction itself because we've done that already. We did.
00:29:12
◼
►
In May 2016, we had Stephen Hackett on the show because at this time, I think he was coming towards
00:29:18
◼
►
the end of his project of collecting all of the IMAX. And we spoke about kind of the announcement
00:29:24
◼
►
and you told some stories about what it was like when you were working at Macworld then, right?
00:29:29
◼
►
Uh, yeah, I was in Macworld then, right. Yeah, no, Stephen told his stories, I told my stories,
00:29:33
◼
►
and you sat patiently while we talked and perhaps doodled or colored or went away.
00:29:39
◼
►
I cannot and I will not answer that question. I wanted to look at kind of in context 20 years ago
00:29:48
◼
►
this product and then kind of looking at how it relates to products of today. So I think first I
00:29:55
◼
►
wanted to kind of get from you a feeling of this iMac what mark did it leave on Apple? Like do we
00:30:02
◼
►
see anything else that is a parallel today, good or bad, with this product that maybe
00:30:09
◼
►
because of its success kind of became ingrained in the company?
00:30:13
◼
►
I mean, it's always hard to point at one thing or one moment and say that's when it all changed,
00:30:19
◼
►
right? Because the truth is that what they said later is they started this project the
00:30:25
◼
►
day Steve Jobs came back in July of the previous year, like that that was when they kicked
00:30:29
◼
►
it off. And that there were, this is the Columbus project and they ended up shipping these things
00:30:36
◼
►
and there was, internally there was a lot of turmoil. In fact, you and I were fortunate
00:30:41
◼
►
to spend some time with a friend of ours who was actually, who was on the iMac software
00:30:46
◼
►
team, the original iMac software team. Like, they were working on this for a long time
00:30:50
◼
►
and there was a lot of there. So, we can point to the moment that it surfaced publicly and
00:30:55
◼
►
say there's the moment but obviously huge amounts of work went in before then
00:30:59
◼
►
and after that announcement to get that product to ship right I mean it was it
00:31:04
◼
►
was a huge amount of work but it is on another level I could you point to it
00:31:09
◼
►
and say what what do they have here like they took the old ports away the it's
00:31:16
◼
►
actually funny Stephen Hackett and I were talking about this yesterday it's
00:31:20
◼
►
fun the Macworld story on this actually mentioned something called chirp which
00:31:23
◼
►
which not a lot of people remember, and I may actually dig through my old magazines
00:31:28
◼
►
and write something about this, or Stephen will, that there was this idea to create this
00:31:32
◼
►
common hardware reference platform, which is, I think, what Chirp stood for, and it
00:31:38
◼
►
was the idea of, like, could you make a PowerPC-based computer that was like a standard PC, just
00:31:44
◼
►
like an Intel PC was a standard PC, something that everybody who made a PowerPC-based computer,
00:31:49
◼
►
and at that point there were, like, different companies making them, not just Mac clones
00:31:53
◼
►
but like for different operating systems and all, and IBM really wanted people to use,
00:31:57
◼
►
and Motorola to use the PowerPC, and they thought maybe it would be a viable alternative
00:32:02
◼
►
to an Intel standard PC, would be this chirp standard PC.
00:32:06
◼
►
So was the idea that by doing this, other people would make Macs? Is that the idea?
00:32:12
◼
►
Well, I mean, I think that the clones was part of that story, but it was also the idea
00:32:16
◼
►
that like if you were Motorola or IBM or somebody else and you wanted to do, or be actually
00:32:22
◼
►
is another example with the BOS, which was considered at one point a possibility as a
00:32:26
◼
►
replacement for the Mac OS, that if you, or quite honestly, if it had been successful,
00:32:32
◼
►
Microsoft could have done a PowerPC version of Windows and written to the common platform.
00:32:38
◼
►
The idea was they wanted to create this common platform that basically any computer that
00:32:44
◼
►
was running a PowerPC processor would look like. And it didn't happen, basically. There
00:32:49
◼
►
There were some chirp devices shipped, including I think the Motorola Mac clone was a chirp
00:32:55
◼
►
computer, although I'm not 100% on that because Motorola did actually ship its own Mac clone
00:32:59
◼
►
at one point.
00:33:01
◼
►
But it all fell apart and of course Steve Jobs killed the clones and that was the end
00:33:06
◼
►
But why I bring up chirp now...
00:33:07
◼
►
And the clone wars, right?
00:33:08
◼
►
And the clone wars, yeah, that was right.
00:33:10
◼
►
They fought, Darth Vader and Steve Jobs fought together in the clone wars.
00:33:13
◼
►
That's right.
00:33:14
◼
►
Tell your kids.
00:33:16
◼
►
That's the story.
00:33:17
◼
►
So, I bring it up because in the Macworld article, it actually quotes an Apple product
00:33:24
◼
►
manager as saying that the iMac project picked up a lot of the stuff from Chirp.
00:33:29
◼
►
So even though Apple didn't make a Chirp Mac, it used that stuff in order to, you know,
00:33:35
◼
►
simplify and modernize and it still used that as a jumping off point in terms of building
00:33:40
◼
►
And what that got them was a modern Mac and a break from the past.
00:33:44
◼
►
And I think what's interesting about that is not Apple participating in kind of an industry
00:33:49
◼
►
consortium to build something, which is not a thing that they do a lot today, but the
00:33:54
◼
►
idea that Apple used that tech to do what it wanted to do, which is make a clean break.
00:33:59
◼
►
And you see echoes of that in all sorts of other times that they have dropped features.
00:34:04
◼
►
We joke about all the features that get dropped from Apple's devices.
00:34:07
◼
►
The optical drives went away at some point, and USB-A went away.
00:34:11
◼
►
The MacBook only has the one thing.
00:34:12
◼
►
headphone jack went away on the iPhone when they went from dock
00:34:17
◼
►
connector to lightning. People complained about that, like, that Apple is fearless
00:34:20
◼
►
about doing that. So that's part of it. And the design forward is part of it
00:34:27
◼
►
too. Like, there were a couple of Macs—I read a story today that said this was
00:34:31
◼
►
the one where Apple's design language came forward. And it's like, well, again,
00:34:36
◼
►
the story's a little more complicated than that. The Power Mac G3, the beige one,
00:34:41
◼
►
had this weird plastic like green translucent plastic thing on it that was
00:34:47
◼
►
like it was like Johnny Ive trying to let me out let me out I want to do
00:34:51
◼
►
something interesting I put a green plastic thing somewhere. And then
00:34:55
◼
►
they did I don't think the Wall Street PowerBook G3 gets enough credit those
00:34:58
◼
►
were crazy looking at the time they had these black laptops with kind of a rubberized
00:35:04
◼
►
surface and the white Apple logo on the back like they were so different from
00:35:11
◼
►
the previous PowerBook G3 that preceded them, that you could tell that Apple was doing some
00:35:19
◼
►
really different things from design standpoint, even though that was probably a product that
00:35:23
◼
►
was in the works, and at most they sort of agreed to pump up the design stuff a little
00:35:28
◼
►
bit and make it look a little more interesting in the time that they had. And that came out
00:35:32
◼
►
a couple months before the iMac was announced, right? So you could get the sense that things
00:35:36
◼
►
were starting to happen design-wise, but then you look at the iMac, and like, the iMac design
00:35:41
◼
►
design is unlike anything that was out there. It was incredibly influential in the computer
00:35:46
◼
►
industry and outside the computer industry. Basically, I would say in the plastics industry,
00:35:51
◼
►
everybody who made plastic things suddenly said, "Oh, we can finally, somebody is allowing
00:35:56
◼
►
us," because I think they could always do it, right? The question was like nobody wanted
00:36:00
◼
►
translucent plastic and colored plastic, brightly colored plastic. And once Apple did the iMac,
00:36:06
◼
►
like every kitchen appliance and clock radio and everything else was available
00:36:11
◼
►
in a translucent, bright plastic version.
00:36:15
◼
►
It became premium, right? In the same way that making everything white became premium after the iPod.
00:36:20
◼
►
It's like everybody agreed that nothing could be anything but black, white, or beige,
00:36:23
◼
►
and then Apple was like, "Yeah, we're making a bright blue computer, and good luck.
00:36:27
◼
►
Just deal with it." And everybody was like, "Oh, people like colors and fun.
00:36:33
◼
►
Maybe we should do that." And that was a big part of it, too.
00:36:36
◼
►
So I think you see that today.
00:36:38
◼
►
I will use this as my monthly request for more color
00:36:41
◼
►
in Apple devices.
00:36:42
◼
►
Yeah, well, I think you see it, but it comes and goes, right?
00:36:45
◼
►
And right now, Apple stuff is like, well, everybody
00:36:48
◼
►
get excited, because not only is there silver,
00:36:50
◼
►
now there's a slightly darker silver that we call space gray.
00:36:54
◼
►
And it's not like, more shades of gray, it's very exciting.
00:36:57
◼
►
And occasionally, some product will get gold,
00:37:00
◼
►
and then there will be the product red.
00:37:01
◼
►
Is that one red one?
00:37:02
◼
►
Yeah, that's six months later.
00:37:04
◼
►
Did you wait for the red one?
00:37:05
◼
►
So yes, I agree there should be more color in Apple products.
00:37:08
◼
►
That would be something that I would like them to come back to.
00:37:11
◼
►
But if you remember like the iPod Nanos and all of that,
00:37:13
◼
►
like they, that was the same kind of approach too.
00:37:17
◼
►
So I think that those are some of the places where you see this culture that
00:37:22
◼
►
Steve Jobs was basically building at that point that continues on to this day that
00:37:27
◼
►
is in the DNA of Apple and the iMac was the first like full representation of all
00:37:33
◼
►
of that and it evolved and changed as everything does but I think that it was a clear first
00:37:40
◼
►
100% step in that direction.
00:37:42
◼
►
So whilst if you look at any kind of successful company, person, entity, you can kind of draw
00:37:48
◼
►
a line between all of the dots to see if they're, you know, to go to the success. You know,
00:37:54
◼
►
you could be like, "Oh, they had that teacher and then they went to that class," or that
00:37:57
◼
►
kind of thing.
00:37:58
◼
►
I wonder if we have a special case here when it comes to the iMac G3 when I ask this question,
00:38:04
◼
►
which is, would we have the iPhone today if the iMac never existed?
00:38:08
◼
►
So going back to my previous point about like pointing to a moment, in my article that I
00:38:13
◼
►
wrote on Six Colors about this, I said, and again, I hesitate because there's no such
00:38:19
◼
►
thing as a moment. That is all stagecraft. Like it's months and years of work that lead
00:38:26
◼
►
to that moment. But in terms of the outside world, if you watch that keynote from the
00:38:31
◼
►
Flint Center, and I wasn't there, because at that point, I suspect Apple was calling
00:38:37
◼
►
us in for briefings, thinking they had something to show us, and in the chaos of the early
00:38:42
◼
►
days of Steve Jobs, then they ended up not. Because we had a couple briefings where nothing
00:38:46
◼
►
happened and we're like, "Why did we come down here? You've got nothing to say." And
00:38:49
◼
►
so for this one, it was a little like the boy who cried wolf. We're like, "Yeah, sure,
00:38:53
◼
►
got something else and so only our editor-in-chief went. But if you watch that video, the first
00:38:59
◼
►
half hour of it, or 20 minutes of it, it's amazing. It's like Steve Jobs is sort of like
00:39:05
◼
►
saying, "We're not gonna die." He puts up a chart about employee retention and says,
00:39:12
◼
►
"People aren't quitting at Apple as fast as they used to. That's really good. So we're
00:39:16
◼
►
doing better. This is no longer a place that people are trying to escape."
00:39:20
◼
►
i'm really pleased reports you that apples back on track when you have great
00:39:24
◼
►
people the most important thing is to not lose them when i came back to apple
00:39:29
◼
►
last summer apples was a lot of them nutrition rate analyzed was thirty three
00:39:34
◼
►
percent and i'm very pleased to say the ten months later nutrition rate is
00:39:38
◼
►
fifteen percent and part of that is because people now see how apple can win
00:39:43
◼
►
again another part of that is 'cause we've made apple much more
00:39:46
◼
►
entrepreneurial place all the key employees have lots of stock options
00:39:49
◼
►
boy those presentations are different then. Right? And it was like, you know, and the
00:39:54
◼
►
Mac sales are going pretty well and, you know, we had the PowerBook G3, that Wall Street
00:39:58
◼
►
G, and it's really good and we're gonna, I think they made like some adjustments to it,
00:40:02
◼
►
but it basically had been out for a couple of months. There was a lot of Phil Schiller
00:40:06
◼
►
coming out on stage to demo like various PCs from Compaq and Dell against Macs so that
00:40:15
◼
►
they could show the megahertz myth because in those days what they were trying to do
00:40:18
◼
►
do is say that even though the PowerPC G3 processor had a lower clock speed than a bunch
00:40:22
◼
►
of the Pentium IIs, that they were actually faster. You couldn't just compare the megahertz
00:40:28
◼
►
that you had to say like this 333 G3 was actually faster than a 400 Pentium II. But they had
00:40:35
◼
►
to do like bake-offs where they like start Photoshop results and then Steve and Phil
00:40:39
◼
►
would stand there and watch as the computers like worked in split screen. It was super
00:40:46
◼
►
Tell us about your computer here.
00:40:47
◼
►
here to come out and try to take you on head-to-head because you asked me to go
00:40:51
◼
►
out and get the biggest and the best and I did. This is the brand new Compaq
00:40:54
◼
►
Armada 7800. It's got a Pentium II, the new mobile Pentium II 266. That's the
00:41:00
◼
►
fastest speed it runs at. It's just been announced. You can't get much better than
00:41:03
◼
►
this. I'm scared. So we're just gonna have to find out. Now up on this screen on
00:41:10
◼
►
your left we have the Compaq Armada Pentium II 266. In the middle we have our
00:41:16
◼
►
new PowerBook G3 running at 233 megahertz and on the far right we have
00:41:21
◼
►
the G3 running at 292 megahertz. Of course both of these machines are less
00:41:25
◼
►
money than the Compaq. So let's go ahead. What we're gonna do now is we're gonna
00:41:28
◼
►
run Photoshop. What a lot of our customers like to do and have been dying
00:41:32
◼
►
to do on a fast portable. So we've got Photoshop here and we've got exactly the
00:41:36
◼
►
same file on all of these computers. But it's all about like I need to justify
00:41:42
◼
►
that Apple still exists because you all remember last year and figured we were
00:41:45
◼
►
going out of business and now I need to completely change the narrative. It's amazing how hard
00:41:51
◼
►
he's working to get people to believe that Apple is not about to die.
00:41:55
◼
►
-Cause you have to do that before you unveil a new product.
00:41:57
◼
►
-Right, right. Well, and he knows what's coming, right? He knows what's coming. But what's
00:42:01
◼
►
amazing about it, and he at one point he's like, and especially when you see what we
00:42:04
◼
►
have today, right? Like, "Ha ha, I'm gonna tease what I've got coming." All of that said,
00:42:09
◼
►
the moment that he takes the little drape off of the iMac and reveals it.
00:42:14
◼
►
This is what they look like today. And I would like to take the privilege of showing you
00:42:20
◼
►
what they're going to look like from today on. This is IMAQ. This is IMAQ. The whole
00:42:34
◼
►
thing is translucent. You can see into it. It's so cool.
00:42:38
◼
►
That is literally the moment that Apple went from dead to alive. Like literally that is
00:42:42
◼
►
the moment and from that moment to 20 years later it has been up up up for
00:42:48
◼
►
Apple like that was the moment without that moment they probably wouldn't be
00:42:53
◼
►
around I know because the Mac although the Mac was kind of turning around I
00:42:56
◼
►
think if Apple had just continued doing beige products and all of that like
00:42:59
◼
►
would they have gotten to the iPod would they have been able to sell the iPod
00:43:04
◼
►
would the popularity of the iPod have given them more gas because they weren't
00:43:09
◼
►
just getting the gas from sales of the iPod, but they got way boosted, the Mac sales got
00:43:14
◼
►
boosted because of the halo effect where people finally were having positive experiences with
00:43:19
◼
►
Apple as a brand that they had never had before. Again, we've gone long enough now that people
00:43:25
◼
►
forget the iPod halo effect. The iPod was, for most people, the first Apple product they
00:43:30
◼
►
ever bought. And they were like, "Oh, this is great." Or they went into an Apple store
00:43:36
◼
►
then they saw the Mac and they're like "Oh, Apple makes a computer! This is way
00:43:39
◼
►
better than that PC that I have! I'm going to get one of these too!" And that
00:43:43
◼
►
was the infusion of energy and cash that Apple needed in the 2000s in
00:43:49
◼
►
order to keep going. And I don't think they would have gotten there
00:43:51
◼
►
without the iMac, which was a hit because it was different, but also because it was
00:43:56
◼
►
priced pretty well, and because it was the right time. Because up to that point,
00:44:00
◼
►
so many computers, the idea was "Well, I need a computer at home so I can do some
00:44:04
◼
►
of my work when I'm at home, and so it needs to be a PC, and it needs to do everything
00:44:08
◼
►
that my office PC does. But by like the late 90s, really what you needed was you wanted
00:44:14
◼
►
to get on the internet and maybe check your email. And you could do that on a Mac, so
00:44:18
◼
►
like there was a real opportunity for the Mac to no longer be seen as this weird incompatible
00:44:22
◼
►
computer, but to be seen as an appliance that lets you get internet and email at home. And
00:44:30
◼
►
Jeff Goldblum narrated ad where it's like step one plug it in step two get connected and they plug in the phone cable
00:44:36
◼
►
There's no step three right like that was the whole appeal of the iMac
00:44:40
◼
►
You should just plop one of these things down in your living room
00:44:42
◼
►
It looks kind of neat and weird and fun and you're on the internet
00:44:46
◼
►
And it's all just you know you don't have to hook up a monitor and do anything like that
00:44:51
◼
►
it's like super simple all in one and
00:44:53
◼
►
That was powerful and they sold a lot of them very quickly it became the
00:45:00
◼
►
the Mac product, the definitive Mac for a very long time afterward, and set Apple on
00:45:05
◼
►
its way to the iPod and ultimately to the iPhone. But they would never have gotten there
00:45:12
◼
►
without a product like this because Mac sales were kind of ebbing and everybody—there
00:45:17
◼
►
was nothing to be excited about. There had been so much press about Apple dying that
00:45:22
◼
►
there needed to be a turnaround. And you know, in the background, they're working on OS X
00:45:25
◼
►
because they came—when Jobs came back, he came back with Next Step and they knew they
00:45:29
◼
►
were going to do a new operating system, but they didn't have it ready yet. So this is
00:45:33
◼
►
not an OS X device when it ships. It's an OS 8, 6 device, I think. And, you know, so
00:45:40
◼
►
there's a lot of stuff bubbling in the background, but the hardware alone got people excited
00:45:44
◼
►
about this computer. And that was how Apple changed its fate.
00:45:49
◼
►
Is the iMac G3 a product that can only come from a struggling company? Like, could Apple
00:45:56
◼
►
be that kind of daring again? Or is this always like a Hail Mary to do something so far out
00:46:04
◼
►
of left field?
00:46:05
◼
►
I think on your average company, this is not the kind of product that they could do. But
00:46:11
◼
►
I think that's what Apple is trying to do all the time. I think Apple at its best and
00:46:17
◼
►
what, again, they don't succeed a lot of the time and they do have to maintain existing
00:46:22
◼
►
products and iterate them and all of that. But they also have those moments where they
00:46:26
◼
►
take a leap. And I think Steve Jobs wanted that in Apple's corporate culture. I think
00:46:33
◼
►
that's the thing that he always wanted Apple to strive for, is what's the next big thing?
00:46:36
◼
►
We're going to take another crack at this. And we're not going to be afraid of upsetting
00:46:40
◼
►
the install base. Like, you know, we laugh about it now, about how Mac users were kind
00:46:46
◼
►
of all up in arms about the iMac because it broke compatibility with literally everything.
00:46:49
◼
►
You think the headphone jack thing is bad when they took the headphone jack off?
00:46:53
◼
►
You had every Mac for the previous like 10 years had shipped with SCSI ports and ADB
00:47:01
◼
►
ports and serial ports and they are all gone in one system.
00:47:06
◼
►
They're gone.
00:47:07
◼
►
Gone never to return.
00:47:09
◼
►
You can buy at Dongle's, you can go to Dongle Town.
00:47:11
◼
►
Dongle Town was smaller then, Myke, but it was still there out on the frontier on the
00:47:16
◼
►
Dongle Hamlet.
00:47:17
◼
►
Yeah, it was more of a Dongle Village at that point.
00:47:19
◼
►
- It was definitely there, it wasn't incorporated yet,
00:47:21
◼
►
didn't have a lot of tall buildings,
00:47:22
◼
►
but boy, it was there because I had,
00:47:25
◼
►
I still have some USB serial adapters and USB ADB adapters,
00:47:28
◼
►
but they did, they made that break.
00:47:33
◼
►
It was a big deal, but part of what Jobs wanted Apple
00:47:37
◼
►
to think collectively in its culture was
00:47:40
◼
►
the users will come along if there's a benefit.
00:47:43
◼
►
Now there are positives and negatives to that approach
00:47:45
◼
►
and all the conversation about the Mac laptops
00:47:48
◼
►
the last couple of years is definitely it cuts both ways but there is something
00:47:52
◼
►
to be said like that iMac was the point was that it wasn't for those existing
00:47:56
◼
►
Mac users like it was for new users who wanted to come to the Mac. The Mac wasn't
00:48:01
◼
►
selling enough to just the faithful to just the install base they needed to
00:48:05
◼
►
sell to new people and the new people didn't care and in the end the new
00:48:08
◼
►
people would benefit from having USB where you could literally like this was
00:48:12
◼
►
the era where if you wanted to detach your hard drive or attach a hard drive
00:48:16
◼
►
You had to shut down the computer and then unplug everything and then or replug it and
00:48:21
◼
►
then turn it back on.
00:48:23
◼
►
And USB is hot pluggable basically so you can just unplug or unplug and it's fine.
00:48:27
◼
►
Like that was huge.
00:48:29
◼
►
And how long did Apple just kind of putter around with this old stuff?
00:48:34
◼
►
So I think Steve Jobs wanted to instill in Apple the feeling that if they felt that there
00:48:38
◼
►
was a benefit to ditching something like the lightning port or not the lightning port like
00:48:43
◼
►
the dock connector for the lightning port or like the headphone jack and we
00:48:46
◼
►
can argue about like the headphone jack was that a good idea and USB-C for USB-A
00:48:51
◼
►
but you can see why they do it. They do it because Steve Jobs wanted them to have
00:48:56
◼
►
that culture of like break the rules throw the old thing away. The iPod nano
00:49:00
◼
►
is a great example of that where they follow that on whatever five six seven
00:49:04
◼
►
years later where they had the iPod mini and it was incredibly successful and it
00:49:08
◼
►
was more successful than the iPod and they killed it because the nano was
00:49:11
◼
►
better and it was a totally different product and that was super weird but
00:49:15
◼
►
that was the culture was throw the old thing away we want to be our own
00:49:18
◼
►
replacement flash storage is the future let's let's just kill the old product
00:49:23
◼
►
and that worked for them so that is I would even say that's the thing when we
00:49:29
◼
►
criticize Apple and they often do deserve criticize criticism about it
00:49:33
◼
►
what I like about them is they are always trying this stuff and it doesn't
00:49:39
◼
►
always work and they deserve criticism when it doesn't work, but I do like that they try
00:49:44
◼
►
and that comes from Steve Jobs instilling that in their culture. Like, look at the iMac,
00:49:50
◼
►
it's a great example. Like, they just made a break and it worked for them and there's
00:49:54
◼
►
something to be said for that because the argument is, if you don't make a break because
00:49:59
◼
►
you're super comfortable, someone else will do it and they will eat your lunch. So you
00:50:03
◼
►
better be your own replacement. Build your own replacement, be your best competition.
00:50:08
◼
►
And I do think that Apple, at its best, when it's working at its best, is doing that.
00:50:13
◼
►
Happy Birthday, iMac.
00:50:14
◼
►
Yeah, yeah, it's funny.
00:50:16
◼
►
I have on my wall a 20th anniversary of the Macintosh cover from Macworld.
00:50:23
◼
►
And we've come all the way, I guess it's 14 years later, because we've come all the way
00:50:28
◼
►
to the 20th anniversary of the iMac.
00:50:32
◼
►
I mean, the iMac now is older than the original Mac was when the iMac was introduced.
00:50:37
◼
►
That's the thing that blows me away a lot older, but that's how time works.
00:50:41
◼
►
This episode is brought to you by Simple Contacts.
00:50:44
◼
►
It's amazing when an app takes a task that you don't want to have to do over and over
00:50:48
◼
►
again and just makes it so fuss-free.
00:50:50
◼
►
When it can take time away from you having to go somewhere and wait in a waiting room.
00:50:54
◼
►
This is the sort of stuff that Simple Contacts can take away from you because it is the easy
00:50:58
◼
►
way to renew your contact lens prescription.
00:51:01
◼
►
You'll be able to reorder your contacts from anywhere you want in just minutes.
00:51:05
◼
►
So like if you're in the grocery store and you're like, oh, I need new contacts, you
00:51:08
◼
►
don't have to like call someone to make an appointment.
00:51:10
◼
►
You just grab your phone and you order them.
00:51:12
◼
►
Super simple.
00:51:13
◼
►
All you need to do first is complete their online self-guided vision test.
00:51:17
◼
►
It takes less than five minutes.
00:51:18
◼
►
You can do it from wherever you are right now.
00:51:20
◼
►
And what that will do is make sure that the prescription that you're telling them you
00:51:25
◼
►
need is still an accurate prescription for you.
00:51:28
◼
►
This vision test costs just $20, which for comparison, an appointment without insurance
00:51:32
◼
►
could cost over $200. Simple contacts also save you money and time. Now I need to let
00:51:38
◼
►
you know that this test, whilst amazing, is not a replacement for your periodic fall eye
00:51:43
◼
►
health exam. Simple contacts is just checking that you've got the prescription correct so
00:51:48
◼
►
they can renew your lenses based on that prescription. They're not writing completely new prescriptions
00:51:52
◼
►
or examining your eye health. You still have to go and get that done, but once you've got
00:51:55
◼
►
that prescription, you'll be able to order those contacts from wherever you want, whenever
00:52:00
◼
►
you want. You'll be able to order exactly what you need right from the palm of your
00:52:03
◼
►
hand because they have all the brands that you love with options for astigmatism, multifocal
00:52:08
◼
►
lenses, colored lenses and more. Now Mr. Jason Snow I know that you uh your I think that
00:52:13
◼
►
your contact brand is tricky I think I heard you mentioning before.
00:52:17
◼
►
Yeah I've got astigmatism and it took us quite a while to find one that would actually be
00:52:22
◼
►
big enough that it would not I would like look to the side and I could see the edge
00:52:26
◼
►
of my contact lens floating around, it was not good. And we finally found one that worked
00:52:30
◼
►
for me, but it was a long process. And so I thought when I started using simple contacts,
00:52:34
◼
►
I was like, "They're not going to have it." Well, I put it in there like, "Yep, we got
00:52:37
◼
►
it. Where do you want us to ship it?" It was like, it was pretty amazing. So they've got
00:52:41
◼
►
you, if you're thinking that you have something special about you and therefore it's going
00:52:46
◼
►
to be too complicated for simple contacts, that's not necessarily the case, although
00:52:50
◼
►
they will, you know, they're also very serious about the fact that they're not a replacement
00:52:54
◼
►
for your eye doctor and for eye exams. So they will ask you a bunch of questions and
00:52:57
◼
►
if there's something that's weird about your eye health specifically, you don't have to
00:53:03
◼
►
worry because they will tell you if they don't want you to order with them, which is, I think,
00:53:08
◼
►
a good policy. Like, if you've got something wrong, go ahead and try because if it's not
00:53:14
◼
►
a problem, they'll let you order the contacts. And if it is a problem, they'll be like, "You
00:53:18
◼
►
know what? You need to go back to your doctor. We're not going to touch that because you
00:53:21
◼
►
need to see that professional in order to order more contacts, which I think is a good
00:53:25
◼
►
way of balancing it.
00:53:27
◼
►
I agree. As a listener to this show, you can get $30 off your contact lenses. Just go to
00:53:31
◼
►
simplecontacts.com/ahoy and you can enter ahoy at checkout as well. That's simplecontacts.com/ahoy.
00:53:38
◼
►
That's A-H-O-Y. Or just use the code ahoy for $30 off. Our thanks to Simple Contacts
00:53:46
◼
►
for their support of this show.
00:53:48
◼
►
So Apple results were last week and it was mostly good, right?
00:53:57
◼
►
I don't think there were any blockbusters in either direction really.
00:54:02
◼
►
No, I think they slightly beat their estimates.
00:54:05
◼
►
They increased their revenue year over year.
00:54:08
◼
►
They had good results in China, even though people were worried about that.
00:54:13
◼
►
The iPad did okay.
00:54:14
◼
►
Mac went down a smidge, right?
00:54:17
◼
►
went down in units but was flattened revenue or flattened units and up in
00:54:21
◼
►
revenue it was one of those things where basically what you were seeing is that
00:54:24
◼
►
the even though it seemed flat revenue was better and that was probably at
00:54:30
◼
►
least in part because of the iMac Pro just because the iMac Pro boost is
00:54:35
◼
►
expensive and they they introduced it so they sold a lot of them
00:54:38
◼
►
relatively speaking you know maybe not a huge amount but enough to boost revenue
00:54:43
◼
►
revenue, the ratio, right, we figured out average selling price by looking at the ratio
00:54:47
◼
►
of the sales units to the sales revenue and the revenue went up so the average selling
00:54:53
◼
►
price went up, which I point at and say, "Well, the iMac Pro was there and that's a much more
00:54:59
◼
►
expensive computer than they usually sell and therefore it dragged it up a little bit."
00:55:04
◼
►
But yeah, it was, I mean, the get routine, it was a huge quarter, Apple makes so much
00:55:08
◼
►
money but in the end most of it was pretty much what you'd expect it was the
00:55:14
◼
►
continuing story not anything kind of revelatory but there was one little
00:55:19
◼
►
thing which is kind of interest it was because it was about a very big thing so
00:55:24
◼
►
since the release of the iPhone 10 there have been many analysts reports and this
00:55:30
◼
►
we saw this last quarter we saw it this quarter as well last quarter is just
00:55:34
◼
►
proven by numbers, this quarter it was just proven by numbers, that people have been saying
00:55:39
◼
►
that iPhone X sales have been struggling. This has been a thing that has been, like
00:55:44
◼
►
even like the day before I think Bloomberg published this big thing, you know, "Oh, the
00:55:49
◼
►
iPhone X's are going to be down. It's been a big disappointment and they're going to
00:55:52
◼
►
forecast it down again and they're going to miss their forecast." None of this happened.
00:55:58
◼
►
And Apple is saying that it's their top selling phone and has been their top selling phone
00:56:03
◼
►
since the day it was introduced every week to not just per quarter but every
00:56:08
◼
►
single week it's the number one selling more iPhone tens than any other phone
00:56:12
◼
►
it's difficult to know what the exact mix is but it's like they're selling
00:56:15
◼
►
more iPhone tens than like they are pluses you know I don't know if maybe
00:56:19
◼
►
when you add both eights together like but you know single handset exactly and
00:56:25
◼
►
again right like they in their forecasts they forecast an increase in profit and
00:56:31
◼
►
sorry, increasing revenue year over year, and the literal only way Apple can do that
00:56:36
◼
►
is by selling more iPhones, right?
00:56:38
◼
►
There's nothing else that will drive the revenue so significantly for them currently.
00:56:43
◼
►
It has to be selling more iPhones.
00:56:45
◼
►
So what is going on?
00:56:49
◼
►
Why are analysts consistently having this thought that iPhone X is tanking?
00:56:57
◼
►
I have a theory about the iPhone X one.
00:57:00
◼
►
There is an overarching theory which is that, which I don't know enough about the investing
00:57:06
◼
►
world to talk about other than to say that there is one theory that says that the Apple
00:57:12
◼
►
bears are manipulating the stock, right? That they literally are contrarian because they
00:57:18
◼
►
are suppressing the Apple stock so that they can make money on the Apple stock, which again,
00:57:24
◼
►
it's a conspiracy theory and I don't know enough about that world.
00:57:27
◼
►
You can see that though, right? Like, I mean, it doesn't seem like a wild, like it doesn't
00:57:32
◼
►
seem like something from fiction. Like, of course I can understand that.
00:57:35
◼
►
It's either that or there's something about Apple that brings out people who are, um,
00:57:40
◼
►
who don't understand reality. Um, and maybe that's true too, because that's been true
00:57:45
◼
►
for years. But the thing is, correct me if I'm wrong,
00:57:49
◼
►
but in recent times, this, this feels a little bit out of place.
00:57:52
◼
►
Well, the iPhone X thing has been going on for a while now, and I think I've got my theory,
00:57:59
◼
►
so here it is. First off, if we go back to before the iPhone X was announced, when you
00:58:04
◼
►
and I were talking about it and it was this theoretical high-end phone and all of that,
00:58:08
◼
►
there was a lot of consternation about like, how are they going to do it? How are they
00:58:12
◼
►
going to make it so that they sell this one? Are people going to want the other one? Are
00:58:15
◼
►
people going to just defer purchases because they don't want to buy what we now know is
00:58:20
◼
►
the iPhone 8 when the iPhone X exists, that seems to not have happened, but that was the
00:58:24
◼
►
beginning of a narrative that you could pick up. And I think some people picked it up,
00:58:27
◼
►
a negative narrative, like Apple's changing their strategy, fear, fear, right? So we get
00:58:33
◼
►
into the release and there's some skepticism and it continues to build and there was like
00:58:38
◼
►
a supply chain report at some point that said that a couple of Apple suppliers were cutting,
00:58:45
◼
►
had their orders cut, including, I think, for the OLED screens from Samsung.
00:58:50
◼
►
And you can see how people start to make those assumptions based upon that, right?
00:58:54
◼
►
Yeah, although there were some just totally weird assumptions, like the one that said
00:58:57
◼
►
the iPhone X is "end of life," which I can't tell whether that was somebody who
00:59:03
◼
►
doesn't know what they're talking about or whether there was a mistranslation or
00:59:06
◼
►
misunderstanding because they're going to stop making the current iPhone X and do a
00:59:11
◼
►
a new iPhone 10 for the fall, which is probably closer to the truth, right? That it's not
00:59:16
◼
►
like they're killing the iPhone 10, but that they're going to end the, they're going to
00:59:19
◼
►
stop making that one and make the new one, which who knows whether they'll do that or
00:59:23
◼
►
not. I think it's, I think it's possible. I think it's likely in fact, but, um, so what
00:59:27
◼
►
ended up happening also, let's back up and say, what do we say when there are sources
00:59:33
◼
►
that are anonymous sources or that are insider sources, you always have to ask, what do they
00:59:38
◼
►
have to gain by sharing this information. And in the case of suppliers, what they have
00:59:44
◼
►
to gain is blaming someone else for their bad results because they didn't sell as many
00:59:50
◼
►
of these things that they usually supply. So they say, "Oh, well, our results are going
00:59:55
◼
►
to be bad because Apple didn't buy as many. It's Apple's fault. Apple's having trouble.
00:59:59
◼
►
It's not us. It's not us. We're great. Apple's having trouble." So that's all going on in
01:00:04
◼
►
the background. And then the results come out and it's like, "No, the iPhone X is still
01:00:07
◼
►
the best-selling iPhone, iPhone sales are good, where is this disaster?" And I think
01:00:14
◼
►
Apple made those statements about the iPhone X specifically to bat down those rumors and
01:00:19
◼
►
say, "Nope, you're wrong." Here's my theory. If you look at the average selling price of
01:00:23
◼
►
the iPhone, the holiday quarter, and when the iPhone X had just come out, and you look
01:00:29
◼
►
at the average selling price of the iPhone for this most recent quarter, January for
01:00:34
◼
►
for Burry March. It's lower, sequentially. It's higher year over year because the iPhone
01:00:40
◼
►
10 is more expensive and the iPhone 8 and 8 Plus are more expensive than the 7 and 7
01:00:44
◼
►
Plus were. Let's not forget that, that Apple raised the price on their other phones too.
01:00:48
◼
►
So year over year, the average selling price is up, but sequentially it's down a little
01:00:53
◼
►
bit. What does that mean? And my guess is, what that means is that the iPhone 10 sold
01:01:01
◼
►
an awful lot at the very beginning and the gap between it and the other iPhone models
01:01:07
◼
►
was greater and since it's a more expensive product, the ASP was higher and that after
01:01:13
◼
►
that initial burst of iPhone X sales over the next three months in this new quarter,
01:01:18
◼
►
they came down a little bit. They're still number one, but they're not as far ahead of
01:01:23
◼
►
the 8 and 8 Plus as they were. Yeah, they haven't done a lap around the course, right?
01:01:28
◼
►
you know, number two is catching up.
01:01:30
◼
►
- Which is maybe not shocking,
01:01:32
◼
►
given that there was the pent up demand for the iPhone X
01:01:35
◼
►
and so that there were an awful lot of those sold.
01:01:38
◼
►
I think it's impressive that the iPhone X did
01:01:39
◼
►
as well as it did in that quarter,
01:01:42
◼
►
'cause it was only available for a third of it.
01:01:44
◼
►
- Exactly, and also you'd think that like a $1,000 phone
01:01:48
◼
►
will probably do its best numbers at two points
01:01:51
◼
►
when it's released and the holiday quarter.
01:01:53
◼
►
- And it was simultaneous. - When it goes to.
01:01:55
◼
►
- Yeah, and so like, you know,
01:01:56
◼
►
that's when that's gonna happen,
01:01:58
◼
►
And you say it happens at the same time.
01:01:59
◼
►
- So here's my theory.
01:02:00
◼
►
My theory is that Apple looked at how well it did
01:02:03
◼
►
in December and said, "Whoa, it's gonna do this gap
01:02:06
◼
►
away from the eight for its life.
01:02:08
◼
►
This is what it's gonna be.
01:02:10
◼
►
So this is how many we need to make."
01:02:12
◼
►
And then as it got into that first calendar quarter
01:02:14
◼
►
of this year, beginning of this year,
01:02:16
◼
►
they started to see that that's not really
01:02:18
◼
►
where it was gonna be.
01:02:19
◼
►
It was gonna still be above the other phones,
01:02:21
◼
►
but not quite as high up.
01:02:23
◼
►
And that means that they bought too many components
01:02:26
◼
►
for what the actual selling rate was. And that means they have more inventory. And Luca,
01:02:32
◼
►
the CFO of Apple, said on the analyst call last week, basically that, he said, "Yeah,
01:02:37
◼
►
we ended up with a little more inventory and it'll work itself out." And that was a very
01:02:41
◼
►
pointed response to a pointed question about essentially the rumors that they had cut production
01:02:47
◼
►
of the iPhone X. And I think the truth is somewhere in the middle, right? He kind of
01:02:52
◼
►
shrugged it off as like, "Look, it happens. We had a little more inventory and it'll work
01:02:56
◼
►
itself out soon and it's not a big deal. And the question was like, "Oh, Breathless. Oh,
01:03:01
◼
►
iPhone X was doomed. What happened?" The truth is, I think, they looked at December and thought
01:03:07
◼
►
the iPhone X was going to sell a bit more than it actually is selling.
01:03:10
◼
►
Yeah, they may have gotten a little bit over excited.
01:03:12
◼
►
Right. Or as Tim Cook said, "We won the Super Bowl, but not by as many points as we would
01:03:16
◼
►
have liked to." Which is a weird metaphor, but you can sort of see it like we're very
01:03:21
◼
►
proud of the product and it's great and it is our number one product even if you know
01:03:28
◼
►
it didn't win by 30 points or whatever it still won the Super Bowl and it still gets
01:03:33
◼
►
the ring that's what he was trying to say and I think that's I think that's the source
01:03:37
◼
►
of this entire rumor I think the source of this rumor is that Apple in the natural course
01:03:41
◼
►
of things and again you might not even notice this if this weren't Apple and everybody wants
01:03:45
◼
►
to know everything about Apple I think Apple made a judgment in December and then they
01:03:49
◼
►
looked in January and they're like, "Oh, it's a little less than we thought." But we already
01:03:54
◼
►
have them in the process of we bought the screens and we bought the components and we're
01:03:57
◼
►
going to start producing them, which means we're going to end up with a little more inventory
01:04:01
◼
►
of iPhone Xs that we want, but we know the demand is still there, and so we will dial
01:04:06
◼
►
back on our orders and that'll get us back in balance and we'll be able to continue to
01:04:11
◼
►
make as many iPhone Xs as we can sell, but we have a little hump. It's like a snake eating
01:04:18
◼
►
a pig or something and there's the bulbs and the bulbs moves through. Okay, a cartoon snake
01:04:23
◼
►
eating a cartoon pig probably. I don't know about actual snakes and pigs. You know, and
01:04:28
◼
►
it'll work its way through and then out the other side and then that's it, right? Like
01:04:32
◼
►
they made an estimate. It was a little high. They put it into balance, but meanwhile they
01:04:37
◼
►
had cranked up the machine a little bit, so they got to crank the machine back down to
01:04:41
◼
►
get it in balance. I suspect that's it. That's the entire story of, "Oh, the iPhone 10 is
01:04:46
◼
►
terrible and doomed and they're going to stop making it all is sourced from the
01:04:49
◼
►
fact that Apple made a judgment in December and then in January or February
01:04:53
◼
►
made a slightly different judgment to back off a little bit and that's it
01:04:57
◼
►
that's your whole story but I guess that's a window into how supply chain
01:05:02
◼
►
details and people who want to break stories about Apple and make big
01:05:06
◼
►
speculation about like that moment when Apple finally takes a big stumble will
01:05:10
◼
►
will lead you to places that maybe aren't actual places. And in this case, I think that's
01:05:18
◼
►
It seems like the expectation, and I understand it, is that it's got to happen eventually.
01:05:23
◼
►
So maybe it's next quarter, right? Like, and I think that's where a lot of this is coming
01:05:28
◼
►
from that, like, any indication that this might be the quarter will set people into
01:05:35
◼
►
What is the greatest enemy of attention? I was going to say of journalism, of being an
01:05:39
◼
►
analyst, but really, what's the greatest enemy of attention? It's attention's arch-enemy,
01:05:44
◼
►
boredom. The usual is boring and nobody clicks through on stories and listens to analysts
01:05:51
◼
►
about boring, usual, business as usual, right? No one wants to read that story of like, "Oh,
01:05:57
◼
►
it's going to be alright." So if I tell you I have insider information that Apple is going
01:06:01
◼
►
to kind of continue on its upward trajectory, the phone sales are going to be pretty solid,
01:06:06
◼
►
services are going to continue to go up, they're going to introduce new products, and in the
01:06:10
◼
►
end, Apple is not one of these companies that's going to burn out and fade away. It's just
01:06:14
◼
►
going to kind of be boring and grow slowly and make huge amounts of money. Then, if I
01:06:21
◼
►
could come back from the future and tell you that, like, it's not going to stop analysts
01:06:25
◼
►
and writers from hoping that something happens, because that's boring. It's like, "Come on,
01:06:31
◼
►
do something, do something!" It's the same thing when we talked about the Apple Watch
01:06:34
◼
►
and people are like, "This is why Apple must release a watch and why it must be the next
01:06:38
◼
►
iPhone and why it must be a game changer." It's like, must? As long as the iPhone is
01:06:43
◼
►
growing and doing well, Apple must not do anything. They don't must anything at all.
01:06:50
◼
►
All Apple must do is keep making good iPhones. That's all Apple must do.
01:06:54
◼
►
Essentially true. If Apple keeps making good iPhones and the iPhone keeps selling, for
01:06:59
◼
►
a very long time that's all Apple must do. Now they must find the next thing for when
01:07:05
◼
►
the iPhone is no longer, when smartphones are no longer the product category that everybody
01:07:09
◼
►
cares about. That may be a very long time and that's part of the problem here. It's
01:07:12
◼
►
like, come on, I'm just in my career as an analyst, writer, whatever. Right now, I don't
01:07:18
◼
►
want to wait 15 years for the next big transition. I want something big to happen right now.
01:07:23
◼
►
Change the world again. I need that. Right now. And it's not because Apple needs to,
01:07:27
◼
►
because we want to see it collectively and that's a more interesting story. And so that's
01:07:33
◼
►
why I think these things are going to continue even if Apple, in fact even more so if Apple
01:07:37
◼
►
is just a boring, incredibly popular successful company because boring doesn't sell. Boring
01:07:43
◼
►
is the enemy of attention and I think that that leads to things getting hyped up that
01:07:50
◼
►
are nothing. Which is not to say that Apple couldn't do something that is really deserving
01:07:53
◼
►
of attention, that they couldn't have a flop, that they couldn't make a terrible decision
01:07:56
◼
►
that leads to harming their business totally could happen but in the absence
01:08:00
◼
►
of that people will still write stuff like this because they're desperate for
01:08:04
◼
►
something to say and modern Apple is in many ways as we we pick through like
01:08:10
◼
►
where they're going with the Mac and stuff and iOS and how it's interesting
01:08:13
◼
►
and it's very interesting to speculate about that stuff but especially as a
01:08:17
◼
►
business modern Apple is super boring above the waterline where we can see it
01:08:22
◼
►
where it's just not about future products it's just about the stuff they
01:08:24
◼
►
release and how much they sell, they're boring. They're a money machine. They make
01:08:28
◼
►
a huge profit. They sell a lot of phones. They sell other stuff too. What more can
01:08:32
◼
►
you say? And every time I turn on CNBC, which I only turn on on the day of the
01:08:36
◼
►
results, there is always somebody there is like, "Oh, Apple's done for," and
01:08:39
◼
►
somebody else. And then the results come out and everybody's like, "Money, money,
01:08:42
◼
►
money, money, money! Amazing! It's an amazing thing!" And it's like, yeah, sure,
01:08:47
◼
►
being a huge company that makes a lot of money and sells a lot of products, it is
01:08:51
◼
►
boring but it's also you know it's pretty good if you're that company and that you know that's
01:08:56
◼
►
apple right now today's show is also brought to you by aero with aero you never need to think
01:09:02
◼
►
about wi-fi again because they have created the dream setup for you it's a fast reliable connection
01:09:08
◼
►
that you can get throughout your house even out to the backyard and now is a great time to get
01:09:12
◼
►
on board with aero because you can get one of their beautiful second generation devices
01:09:16
◼
►
they have a tri-band second generation model that they couple along with the aero beacon
01:09:21
◼
►
which allows you to build a Wi-Fi system that is perfectly tailored to your home.
01:09:25
◼
►
The second generation Eero includes a third 5GHz radio. This makes it twice as fast as ever before
01:09:31
◼
►
and also lets you do more than ever because Eero is even more powerful now to help blanket your
01:09:36
◼
►
home in fast reliable Wi-Fi. It also includes a new Thread radio which allows you to connect
01:09:42
◼
►
to low power home devices such as locks and doorbells and stuff like that so you can
01:09:47
◼
►
beef up your smart home game. And also the new devices are really great. So the Eero itself sits
01:09:53
◼
►
flat on any surface, you can just plug it into the wall with the included power adapter. You can
01:09:57
◼
►
connect your Eero either with Ethernet or wirelessly if you want to. And also the Eero
01:10:03
◼
►
beacon, which is the little extenders, they just plug straight into the wall so that you just you
01:10:08
◼
►
plug the main thing in and then the little Eero beacons and that's what helps you expand your
01:10:14
◼
►
wonderful Wi-Fi coverage out throughout your home.
01:10:17
◼
►
And also those little beacons, they have a built in LED nightlight with an ambient
01:10:22
◼
►
light sensor in them. So it just adds another little bit of use to the home.
01:10:25
◼
►
And you can add as many Eero beacons as you want, as long as you have a standard
01:10:30
◼
►
Eero device. So you can put as many in no matter how big your home is, you can
01:10:34
◼
►
stretch out that Wi-Fi coverage throughout the house.
01:10:37
◼
►
Jason, I know that you have an Eero at home, right?
01:10:41
◼
►
And I guess we were talking about this.
01:10:43
◼
►
Aero is a great thing right now, especially if you've been a customer of previous companies
01:10:49
◼
►
who made previous white products.
01:10:54
◼
►
If you're coming from an airport, it definitely has the same kind of design, since these are
01:10:57
◼
►
little white bricks that you plug into a wall, or that it's a little white block, and they've
01:11:02
◼
►
got an app to let you configure it, and it's pretty simple to configure it.
01:11:06
◼
►
And for me, one of the things I liked about it is that in the early days of Wi-Fi, if
01:11:10
◼
►
If you tried to have multiple base stations, they would kind of fight.
01:11:13
◼
►
An Eero is made to be a multi-station system and they talk to each other, but what you
01:11:18
◼
►
see is kind of continuous Wi-Fi everywhere.
01:11:20
◼
►
So you can put them in a couple places.
01:11:22
◼
►
Depending on the size of your house, you might need many of them.
01:11:25
◼
►
Congratulations that you have a house that large.
01:11:27
◼
►
I don't, but I still have three, I think, in different places in my house.
01:11:31
◼
►
And what it means is my smart bulbs that are over my driveway in the very front of my house
01:11:35
◼
►
and me sitting in a chair in the backyard in the very back of my house.
01:11:40
◼
►
it's all covered, the whole, you know, our whole footprint of our house and the areas
01:11:45
◼
►
outside of it where we stand or we have devices, it's all covered because, you know, you just
01:11:51
◼
►
plug it all in and say, "Okay, Eero, I want to hook it all together," and then it's done.
01:11:55
◼
►
You don't have to fuss with, like, connecting them individually to each other. They're all
01:12:00
◼
►
built to work that way from the start.
01:12:02
◼
►
The new Eero system starts at $399 for a second-generation Eero and two Beacons, and that's everything
01:12:08
◼
►
that you need to get started.
01:12:10
◼
►
Listeners of this show can get free overnight shipping to the US or Canada when you go to
01:12:14
◼
►
Eero.com that's E-E-R-O.com and use the promo code upgrade that is Eero.com with the promo
01:12:21
◼
►
code upgrade for free overnight shipping.
01:12:24
◼
►
Our thanks to Eero for their support of this show and Relay FM.
01:12:28
◼
►
So we'll do some #AskUpgrade questions today comes from our first one is from Gustavo.
01:12:33
◼
►
Gustavo wants to know, "What do you guys think about Apple's leather iPhone cases?"
01:12:38
◼
►
What do you think Jason?
01:12:40
◼
►
Do you like those?
01:12:41
◼
►
Do you use those?
01:12:42
◼
►
I do like them.
01:12:43
◼
►
I would prefer not to use a case on my iPhone, but for the 6 and for the 10, it's just slippery
01:12:52
◼
►
enough that I wanted a little more grip.
01:12:55
◼
►
And I do like the Apple leather iPhone cases.
01:12:57
◼
►
I think they're really nice.
01:12:58
◼
►
You've got to like leather.
01:12:59
◼
►
I did talk to somebody this week who uses a silicone one because they didn't like how
01:13:03
◼
►
leather can discolor and it can get, you know, I like that leather is gonna age and change
01:13:10
◼
►
and look, I like the look of that, but there are, you know, silicone doesn't, so you could
01:13:15
◼
►
do that if you want, but I really like the leather cases and I'll remind you that Apple's
01:13:18
◼
►
secret weapon here is that Apple is the only company that can make a case with an Apple
01:13:21
◼
►
logo on it, which is, you know, if you want the Apple logo on your case, that's how you
01:13:26
◼
►
do it. But I wish, the iPhone X is so beautiful that I wish I didn't have to use a case on
01:13:30
◼
►
it because I love how it looks, but I just don't feel like I can have that. I had a dream
01:13:35
◼
►
last night, Myke, that I was on a roller coaster, or it might have been a go-kart, I'm not sure.
01:13:45
◼
►
And I got crashed or bumped or something, and I thought, "Wow, that was a really bad
01:13:51
◼
►
bump." And then I got out at the bottom and looked at my phone and my iPhone had been
01:13:55
◼
►
smashed in my pocket by the force of it.
01:13:59
◼
►
And what I'm saying is I'm afraid my iPhone X
01:14:00
◼
►
is going to get broken, which is why I put a case on it.
01:14:02
◼
►
- That's a very good reason.
01:14:03
◼
►
I agree with you for all of the reasons
01:14:05
◼
►
of why you have a case, and also all of the reasons
01:14:09
◼
►
you wish you didn't have to have a case.
01:14:10
◼
►
Like, I agree with all of that.
01:14:12
◼
►
I tried to run my iPhone X without a case
01:14:15
◼
►
because I loved the look of it so much,
01:14:17
◼
►
and it was still just a little bit too slippery for me.
01:14:19
◼
►
And do you know what?
01:14:20
◼
►
This thing costs too much money.
01:14:21
◼
►
Like, it was too expensive.
01:14:23
◼
►
And yes, I have AppleCare on it,
01:14:24
◼
►
but I would still prefer not to have to go through that, right?
01:14:27
◼
►
Like I just don't want, I don't want to break my phone and I'm happy to have a case on it
01:14:32
◼
►
because my desire to not have a broken phone outweighs my desire to have a phone without a case.
01:14:38
◼
►
I'm, I'm not such a fan of the leather cases.
01:14:42
◼
►
I like the silicone cases, um, for two reasons.
01:14:45
◼
►
I like the color range of the silicone cases more and I personally find the silicone to be more grippy,
01:14:51
◼
►
which is what I'm looking for.
01:14:52
◼
►
And honestly, I think this is a personal preference thing because I spoke to many people who say
01:14:57
◼
►
the exact opposite, who find the leather to be more grippy.
01:15:00
◼
►
I have no idea if that's anything to do with the oils in your skin.
01:15:03
◼
►
I don't know.
01:15:04
◼
►
I think the silicone is more grippy.
01:15:05
◼
►
I actually think it's too grippy, which is why I don't like the silicone.
01:15:08
◼
►
The silicone case, I have a hard time getting it in my pocket.
01:15:11
◼
►
And the leather leather case, I don't.
01:15:13
◼
►
So for me, it's the that's the right one for me.
01:15:15
◼
►
Wayne wants some advice, Jason.
01:15:17
◼
►
Wayne's first generation stainless steel Apple watch has broken.
01:15:21
◼
►
Is it worth buying the Series 3 now or wait?
01:15:26
◼
►
I don't have a good answer for this.
01:15:28
◼
►
I'm pretty sure there will be a new Apple Watch this fall.
01:15:31
◼
►
How badly do you want an Apple Watch?
01:15:32
◼
►
Maybe you could get a used first or second or third generation watch or a refurb and
01:15:38
◼
►
you could get a deal on something like that and then use that for a year.
01:15:42
◼
►
Yeah, I would really try that.
01:15:44
◼
►
You can find first gen Apple Watches being sold pretty cheap.
01:15:50
◼
►
a series one or series two used or refurbed maybe the sport and not the stainless and
01:15:57
◼
►
just figure you're going to use that for a year or two and then the new Apple Watch style
01:16:02
◼
►
if there is one and generations will have arrived and then you can make a good decision
01:16:06
◼
►
about buying one that's more or less brand new with the material that you want. This
01:16:13
◼
►
is good advice I think because if the Apple Watch is something you must have every day
01:16:19
◼
►
day, and considering you were coming from first gen anyway, if you can find a good deal
01:16:25
◼
►
on something that is lower than a series 3, do it, because you don't know what you're
01:16:30
◼
►
missing out on with the benefits of it, because you don't own it.
01:16:33
◼
►
Right, and I was going to say my wife's battery on her series 0 is dying, and it's a tough
01:16:41
◼
►
time to buy a new Apple Watch right now, and we're going to pay the $75 and get a new battery
01:16:46
◼
►
put in it and wait and maybe she'll get a new Apple watch next year but for this
01:16:50
◼
►
year I think we're just gonna we're just gonna wait and and spend $75 and get her
01:16:55
◼
►
back up to speed with her Series Zero which she still likes just fine and it's
01:16:59
◼
►
stainless so again buying a new stainless is that much more expensive and
01:17:02
◼
►
it's a nice watch it looks great so we're gonna do that instead and I think
01:17:07
◼
►
that that because it's a weird time right now if there was a brand new
01:17:10
◼
►
Apple watch out right now I would consider just buying that for her but
01:17:15
◼
►
But there isn't, so we're gonna defer too.
01:17:19
◼
►
So yeah, maybe finding somebody's used old watch
01:17:22
◼
►
that they've replaced with a Series 3
01:17:23
◼
►
might get you through for, let's say,
01:17:26
◼
►
year, year and a half until maybe
01:17:28
◼
►
the 2019 Apple Watch models in the fall.
01:17:30
◼
►
- And you never know, in three or four weeks,
01:17:32
◼
►
there may be some big indications of some changes, right?
01:17:35
◼
►
If they start doing stuff like,
01:17:36
◼
►
hey, your app should be adaptable
01:17:38
◼
►
for different screen shapes, right?
01:17:41
◼
►
Then you'll know, then you'll know.
01:17:44
◼
►
Jason, not Jason, different Jason, Jason too wrote in to say,
01:17:49
◼
►
almost every online service I use has emailed me
01:17:52
◼
►
over the last week updating their terms and privacy,
01:17:55
◼
►
Twitter, eBay, Amazon, Fitbit, the list goes on and on.
01:17:59
◼
►
Did something happen across the internet
01:18:01
◼
►
that has necessitated this or is there another reason?
01:18:04
◼
►
Jason, let me say four letters to you.
01:18:07
◼
►
Those four letters are GDPR.
01:18:10
◼
►
Basically in the EU there are a bunch
01:18:12
◼
►
your privacy regulations. And it's all about one of the key things while you're seeing
01:18:17
◼
►
this so much is companies have to update their terms and their privacy policies to account
01:18:22
◼
►
for how they keep in your data and how it's used and how you can get to it.
01:18:26
◼
►
But also if you're on an email mailing list, you have to basically now reconfirm in a lot
01:18:31
◼
►
of businesses that you want to be on that mailing list. So a lot of companies I think
01:18:36
◼
►
are using the privacy and policy updates as an excuse to email you and be like, "Hey,
01:18:43
◼
►
you love these emails, right? You should click this button." So that's why you're seeing
01:18:46
◼
►
so many of those.
01:18:47
◼
►
Yeah, that's exactly it. And even if you're not in the EU, you need to do... Basically,
01:18:55
◼
►
if you've got EU customers, you're covered by GDPR. You need to do it and you're subject
01:19:00
◼
►
to their sanction if you break the rules. So, you know, anybody, any business that's
01:19:05
◼
►
got people who are users in the in the EU. They have two choices. They can either do
01:19:09
◼
►
the GDPR stuff, which you're seeing, or like some companies, they can say, "Sorry, we're
01:19:15
◼
►
not going to have people in Europe anymore," which is usually a sign that their business
01:19:21
◼
►
is built on shady uses of user data. There are examples of small businesses that maybe
01:19:32
◼
►
the issues with the cost of doing business. They've got to hire a lawyer to look at their
01:19:38
◼
►
statements. They worry about the fines. They don't have very many customers in Europe.
01:19:43
◼
►
There are going to be some outlier cases, but mostly if you're using a service like
01:19:46
◼
►
there's that service that unsubscribes you for messages that Slice Intelligence owns,
01:19:51
◼
►
and what that means is that they're actually reading through all of your emails to find
01:19:54
◼
►
out what you bought so that they can use that in their estimates of market share. And they
01:19:58
◼
►
this service that I think they bought, they have it to datamine you. And that service
01:20:03
◼
►
is no longer going to be available to people in the EU. Because in the end, that's the
01:20:07
◼
►
only reason it's there, is to datamine you. And if they can't datamine you in the EU,
01:20:11
◼
►
they're not going to bother. So that's a sign, I'll tell you, if you get one of those things
01:20:16
◼
►
that says, "We're not going to be able to use this service anymore because Europe is
01:20:20
◼
►
out." That's maybe a bad sign most of the time.
01:20:24
◼
►
Joe wants to know what do we use for mousing surfaces if not a mouse pad what is your desk made of?
01:20:30
◼
►
Do you use a mouse? Yeah we don't use I mean I don't think either of us use mice right? Oh Joe
01:20:35
◼
►
is this was this sent in in I'm not gonna make jokes about people who use mice if you use a mouse
01:20:41
◼
►
great I have not used a mouse with my computer since the 1990s folks I don't I used a trackball
01:20:49
◼
►
for many many years and I use a trackpad now. So surfaces that I use where my
01:20:55
◼
►
trackpad is set as my surface and that's the keyboard tray on my desk and yeah
01:21:01
◼
►
that's it. I have a wooden desk I very occasionally maybe like once or twice a
01:21:06
◼
►
year will use a mouse which is usually just because of some kind of injury
01:21:11
◼
►
thing I don't know nope but then I just use it directly on the desk I don't have
01:21:15
◼
►
a mousepad. My desk is made of wood but you know it's wood in quotes because it's really
01:21:19
◼
►
like particle board with a wood fake kind of cover on it I think. Mine's like IKEA I
01:21:24
◼
►
mean I have no idea I mean they could be a small family living in there. It's pressed
01:21:28
◼
►
it's sawdust pressed into the shape of wood and so technically wood but it's wood like
01:21:34
◼
►
a pringle is a potato chip it's sort of that kind of wood but most furniture is like that
01:21:39
◼
►
these days and I think my keyboard tray is that stuff too although it might be plastic
01:21:44
◼
►
I'm not sure, but my desk is that, you know, IKEA-like wood surface.
01:21:49
◼
►
It's got a nice fake wood grain on it, though.
01:21:51
◼
►
It's very pretty, but I don't think it's real.
01:21:52
◼
►
- Here's James's question.
01:21:54
◼
►
"I have mixed feelings about the idea of AR glasses.
01:21:58
◼
►
It would make things like turn-by-turn directions better
01:22:00
◼
►
and could potentially, in some instances, make our lives better overall.
01:22:06
◼
►
But how could people wearing AR glasses affect face-to-face interactions?
01:22:12
◼
►
I think significantly, and this is my reservation with this stuff.
01:22:16
◼
►
Yeah, I think significantly is true. I think change will change things that will happen.
01:22:23
◼
►
I think all new technology changes aspects, right? Our aspects of our interaction now
01:22:28
◼
►
when we have smartphones is different and you see people using their smartphones and
01:22:31
◼
►
all of that, and that changes things. Having cars change things and having public transit
01:22:36
◼
►
change things. But it is true. This is a heretofore not intervened by technology, not imposed
01:22:44
◼
►
over our human experience, but now imposed through technology, where you are getting
01:22:51
◼
►
jokes to tell to make you seem more interesting, facts that you're looking up, data about this
01:22:56
◼
►
person, even if it's as simple as like, "Oh, that's your name. I forgot who you are, but
01:23:00
◼
►
now I know." All of that stuff can be in there. And it does mean, as we knew with the Google
01:23:06
◼
►
glass stuff like the distraction issue where now we know you're distracted if you're looking down
01:23:11
◼
►
at your phone or your watch but with a heads up display are we going to know are they going to
01:23:16
◼
►
people looking at you blankly but they're actually doing something else it makes that part that much
01:23:20
◼
►
harder too yeah my concern is just like the apple watch was a step right and i know that there are
01:23:28
◼
►
times where like and i still get this every now and then where like i'm you know things are coming
01:23:33
◼
►
in and I'm just glancing and stuff and people are like it's not the it's moved away from
01:23:38
◼
►
uh oh are you checking the time if you've got to be somewhere which is what we all initially
01:23:43
◼
►
thought it was going to be but now it's just like what's going on like they know it's notifications
01:23:48
◼
►
like why are you checking this stuff right so that that's the thing that I see and I've been
01:23:53
◼
►
privy to and it's something that I have to pay attention to if I've got something literally
01:23:58
◼
►
beaming into my eyeballs, like that is very different, right? Like how is that not going
01:24:03
◼
►
to distract me? Like I don't, I just don't, this is my reservation with this. Like I do genuinely
01:24:09
◼
►
believe that this could be a cool product. Like whilst it was wonky in a lot of areas,
01:24:14
◼
►
I always thought Google Glass was kind of cool. Like some of the stuff that it could do
01:24:18
◼
►
is kind of cool, right? As somebody who primarily navigates by foot, you know,
01:24:26
◼
►
having turn-by-turn directions in front of my face for walking is fantastic, right?
01:24:32
◼
►
So, because like, you know, it's not like when you're in a car and you can just mount the system
01:24:35
◼
►
somewhere, right? Like you're kind of walking around staring at your phone. It's, it's, it's
01:24:40
◼
►
like kind of awkward, but having it like right in front of your face is great, right? Like all that
01:24:44
◼
►
stuff is great. But I think one of the reasons that Google Glass ended up not working out is
01:24:49
◼
►
this exact thing because you can't hide it. You're wearing those, you're wearing those and everybody
01:24:55
◼
►
knows and they're gonna react to you differently. Yeah, but imagine a world where everybody's
01:24:58
◼
►
got them though, right? When everybody's got them, what does that mean? But that's it though.
01:25:03
◼
►
I don't know. Because this is the, my feeling Jason is this awkwardness that people feel
01:25:09
◼
►
I think could be the reason that we won't all have them. So I don't know. I wonder,
01:25:15
◼
►
I was thinking about things like there's somebody you don't like and so you have them, you put
01:25:19
◼
►
a Snapchat filter on them where they always look like a clown or their eyes bug out or
01:25:23
◼
►
or something like that.
01:25:24
◼
►
I mean, where you're mocking them in your visual field,
01:25:28
◼
►
even though they don't know it.
01:25:29
◼
►
Like there's all sorts of bad usage of this,
01:25:32
◼
►
or maybe that's good if it's a really bad person
01:25:34
◼
►
and you don't want to deal with them, but you have to.
01:25:37
◼
►
But it's a complete change in human interaction.
01:25:41
◼
►
- Maybe if you could actually help me remember
01:25:42
◼
►
people's names, 'cause I forget names at the time,
01:25:43
◼
►
so that'd be nice.
01:25:44
◼
►
- Yeah, but completely.
01:25:45
◼
►
I think in the end, everybody will use it differently
01:25:49
◼
►
because of course people are people,
01:25:50
◼
►
that there will be like, people will, we will understand that there's a certain lightness
01:25:55
◼
►
of an AR interface overlaid on the world when you're talking to somebody that may be, and
01:26:02
◼
►
of course these things are going to be able to detect when you're talking to somebody.
01:26:05
◼
►
So it may go into a mode when you're talking to somebody that you've set that reduces everything.
01:26:11
◼
►
Maybe even just saying it, that everything else around them darkens so that you're focused
01:26:19
◼
►
just on them, right? Like, they could do that too. There's lots of things you could do,
01:26:24
◼
►
but other people will want to be like checking their email or whatever is the future email
01:26:28
◼
►
that comes in AR while they're talking to somebody and just be alerted when they say
01:26:33
◼
►
something interesting or have a transcript of what they've said up to then so that if
01:26:37
◼
►
you didn't hear what they said you can quickly read the transcript and then respond to it.
01:26:40
◼
►
I mean, all that stuff is going to be to play for and I think in the end I think we'll all
01:26:45
◼
►
figure it out and it'll be okay but that doesn't necessarily mean that human interaction won't be
01:26:51
◼
►
completely changed by something like that in a world where everybody's got AR in their vision
01:26:55
◼
►
all the time. That's going to be a while. Like there's going to be this really ugly transition
01:26:59
◼
►
phase but ultimately if that's the world then it'll yeah it'll be a really different world and
01:27:03
◼
►
the way we interact with people face to face will be totally different. I mean we did all get used
01:27:08
◼
►
to smartphones, right? That was a huge change because we had the entire internet available
01:27:17
◼
►
to reach us. This wasn't a thing that existed before. The idea of the push notification,
01:27:23
◼
►
right? When that became a thing, the push notification, someone being able to reach you
01:27:28
◼
►
via any method, either personal or application from wherever you are, that was a huge change,
01:27:35
◼
►
I think, in social interactions and just smartphones in general.
01:27:39
◼
►
And by and large, I think we've adapted to that.
01:27:43
◼
►
People have understood certain etiquettes around that.
01:27:46
◼
►
And my hope would be that if these things exist, maybe there is a thing where if you're
01:27:51
◼
►
sitting down to somebody with dinner, you take them off.
01:27:55
◼
►
And that's just how you live your life.
01:27:57
◼
►
But I don't know.
01:28:00
◼
►
Then there's the other awkward problem with people like me and you who wear eyeglasses.
01:28:03
◼
►
would be integrated into our eyeglasses and then what do we do? So we have a lot to work
01:28:09
◼
►
out before this can become a thing. But I think if any company has the track record
01:28:17
◼
►
to show that they can try and get some of this way, it's Apple, right? I believe that
01:28:22
◼
►
if anyone's going to get close to doing this in a way that is conscious of the people that
01:28:27
◼
►
are around you, it's probably them.
01:28:31
◼
►
If you have any questions you would like to hear us answer at the end of the show, you
01:28:34
◼
►
can just send out a tweet with the hashtag #AskUpgrade and we collect some out to read
01:28:38
◼
►
every episode.
01:28:39
◼
►
Thank you to everybody who has submitted one for this week.
01:28:42
◼
►
If you want to hear us talk about literally anything at all, there's a wide range of topics
01:28:46
◼
►
going to Ask Upgrade.
01:28:47
◼
►
Just send out a tweet with the hashtag #AskUpgrade and we will talk about it on a future episode.
01:28:52
◼
►
Yeah, and if you've got any podcasting questions, we're collecting them now because we're going
01:28:57
◼
►
to pre-record a whole podcasting episode as a special episode. So in the next couple of
01:29:03
◼
►
weeks, it's a great time for you to do that at #AskUpgrade.
01:29:06
◼
►
If you want to find our show notes for this week, go to relay.fm/upgrades/192. That's
01:29:11
◼
►
where they live on the web. But I'm hoping that the podcast app that you use should display
01:29:15
◼
►
them in all of their glory to you. So you can go and read along and pull in some extra
01:29:20
◼
►
information based upon the stuff that we've spoken about. There's a lot of great stuff
01:29:23
◼
►
in there today, including all of Jason's weird Amazon links for 3D accessories.
01:29:29
◼
►
They're all in there.
01:29:30
◼
►
3D, 2D, 4D maybe even.
01:29:32
◼
►
But it is a secret one.
01:29:34
◼
►
If you want to find Jason online, he is over at sixcolors.com and the
01:29:38
◼
►
incomparable.com.
01:29:39
◼
►
He is @jasonel on Twitter, J S N E double L.
01:29:42
◼
►
I am @imike, I M Y K E.
01:29:44
◼
►
This show is a part of Relay FM.
01:29:46
◼
►
Both me and Jason host many wonderful shows at Relay FM.
01:29:49
◼
►
Just go to relay.fm/shows to find more there.
01:29:53
◼
►
I want to thank StoryWorth, Simple Contacts and Eero for their support of this show.
01:29:58
◼
►
And we'll be back next week. Until then, say goodbye, Jason Snow.
01:30:02
◼
►
Y'all come back now, you hear?
01:30:03
◼
►
[MUSIC PLAYING]
01:30:07
◼
►
[MUSIC PLAYING]