428: (2)
00:00:08
◼
►
From Relay FM, this is Upgrade, episode 428.
00:00:13
◼
►
Today's show is brought to you by Fitbud, Hover, and CleanMyMac X.
00:00:17
◼
►
My name is Myke Hurley and I'm joined by Jason Snell.
00:00:20
◼
►
Hi, Jason Snell.
00:00:21
◼
►
Hi, Myke Hurley. It's good to be here.
00:00:23
◼
►
I have a #SnellTalk question for you, if you could imagine such things.
00:00:26
◼
►
Oh great. That's how we do it here.
00:00:28
◼
►
- That is how we start them all.
00:00:29
◼
►
This one comes from Mark and Mark wants to know,
00:00:32
◼
►
Jason, when you read a hardcover book,
00:00:35
◼
►
or used to, I guess, says Mark,
00:00:38
◼
►
there's Mark added that in there,
00:00:39
◼
►
you can suggest if Mark is right or wrong about that.
00:00:41
◼
►
Anyway, do you remove the slipcover?
00:00:44
◼
►
- All right, so the answer is yes.
00:00:46
◼
►
I remember the last hardcover book
00:00:49
◼
►
that I bought for myself and took on a trip,
00:00:52
◼
►
which was I think the last hardcover book
00:00:54
◼
►
I bought for myself with,
00:00:56
◼
►
I guess there are a couple exceptions
00:00:57
◼
►
where I bought like an autographed copy
00:00:59
◼
►
from an author I like, that sort of thing.
00:01:02
◼
►
It was "Cryptonomicon" by Neal Stephenson.
00:01:06
◼
►
It was a very, very, very large, heavy Neal Stephenson
00:01:08
◼
►
thousand page novel.
00:01:10
◼
►
And I got a Kindle and was like, I'm never doing this again.
00:01:15
◼
►
So I don't, I very rarely read a hardcover book.
00:01:17
◼
►
But if I do, like Joe Posnanski's "Baseball 100"
00:01:22
◼
►
or whatever, I leave the slip cover on.
00:01:24
◼
►
And in fact, I have been known to tuck
00:01:26
◼
►
one of the flaps of this cover into the book as a bookmark
00:01:31
◼
►
if I don't have another bookmark.
00:01:33
◼
►
So that's a little bonus for you there.
00:01:35
◼
►
But basically every book I read now is on a Kobo actually,
00:01:40
◼
►
but you know, an e-reader.
00:01:41
◼
►
I don't do paper books anymore
00:01:43
◼
►
and I have very little nostalgia for it.
00:01:47
◼
►
And I have very little tolerance
00:01:48
◼
►
for other people's nostalgia for it.
00:01:50
◼
►
Like read what you like.
00:01:51
◼
►
It's the think pieces that are like,
00:01:53
◼
►
"Oh, is something lost when you can't smell the paper?"
00:01:57
◼
►
And my answer is no.
00:01:59
◼
►
- Yeah, I mean, I could also have
00:02:01
◼
►
like a reel-to-reel projector if I wanted to
00:02:04
◼
►
rather than a television.
00:02:05
◼
►
Cassette tapes are cool again.
00:02:07
◼
►
- Cassette tapes, sure.
00:02:09
◼
►
They auto-reverse.
00:02:10
◼
►
You get, theoretically, they could play forever, right?
00:02:12
◼
►
They just play one side, flip over, go the other way,
00:02:15
◼
►
flip over, go back the other way.
00:02:16
◼
►
You can just listen to one thing
00:02:18
◼
►
for all time on a cassette tape.
00:02:20
◼
►
- It's the only way to do it.
00:02:22
◼
►
- I have a secondary question for you.
00:02:24
◼
►
This comes from me and me says.
00:02:26
◼
►
- Oh, hi me.
00:02:28
◼
►
Are Kobo's like, are they like the hipster Kindle,
00:02:31
◼
►
do you think?
00:02:32
◼
►
- I mean, are Mac books like the hipster laptop?
00:02:38
◼
►
- Okay, 'cause in the sense that there's a dominant
00:02:41
◼
►
market leader and then there's the one that sort of people
00:02:43
◼
►
in the know think is better, I think is probably yes.
00:02:48
◼
►
Although I'll also say it's no,
00:02:50
◼
►
because Kobo has a deal with like Walmart,
00:02:53
◼
►
where Walmart's ebook store is also,
00:02:57
◼
►
you can log in with your Walmart ID to a Kobo
00:03:00
◼
►
and buy books that way.
00:03:01
◼
►
So that's very unhip.
00:03:03
◼
►
- So actually Kobo is the hipster e-reader that sold out.
00:03:07
◼
►
- Yeah, sure.
00:03:09
◼
►
- That sold out to Walmart.
00:03:12
◼
►
I just, Scott McNulty, a friend of the show,
00:03:14
◼
►
wrote a piece about how he finally gave a Kobo a try
00:03:16
◼
►
and he did not like it,
00:03:18
◼
►
which is because he's been taken over by Big Kindle.
00:03:22
◼
►
- Isn't that just Amazon?
00:03:23
◼
►
Like, isn't that Big Kindle?
00:03:25
◼
►
- No, Amazon's so big that Big Kindle
00:03:28
◼
►
is just a small subsidiary of Amazon, unfortunately.
00:03:32
◼
►
Anyway, Scott made a point that I actually linked to
00:03:36
◼
►
from Six Colors, which is the software gap
00:03:39
◼
►
between Kindle and Kobo used to be much larger
00:03:41
◼
►
than it is now.
00:03:42
◼
►
There was a Kindle software update last year
00:03:43
◼
►
that actually really improved the Kindle software.
00:03:47
◼
►
It's way better than it used to be.
00:03:48
◼
►
It's still, I would say not as good as the Kobo software.
00:03:51
◼
►
And there's lots of reasons to prefer Kobo,
00:03:53
◼
►
but there are fewer of them than there were last time.
00:03:57
◼
►
And I still think the best, if you're like me
00:03:59
◼
►
and you think that physical page turn buttons
00:04:01
◼
►
on your e-reader are a thing that is a priority,
00:04:04
◼
►
the best e-reader with physical page turn buttons
00:04:09
◼
►
is the Kobo Libra 2, because it's like more than 100 bucks
00:04:13
◼
►
less than the cheapest Kindle with physical page turn buttons,
00:04:18
◼
►
because that's the Oasis and it's not cheap at all.
00:04:20
◼
►
So there are lots of reasons that you
00:04:22
◼
►
might want to get a Kobo.
00:04:23
◼
►
And I felt--
00:04:24
◼
►
I was like, let's not go all in on the Amazon ebook monopoly.
00:04:31
◼
►
And I've been fine with it.
00:04:32
◼
►
I've enjoyed it.
00:04:32
◼
►
I have a Kindle Oasis.
00:04:34
◼
►
I could use it.
00:04:35
◼
►
It is nicer hardware, but the software
00:04:38
◼
►
is still nicer enough on the Kobo
00:04:40
◼
►
that I keep using the Kobo instead.
00:04:43
◼
►
- Kobo Libra 2.
00:04:45
◼
►
- Libra 2, yeah, yeah.
00:04:47
◼
►
And we'll see, I mean, Amazon could make this moot
00:04:49
◼
►
if it came up out with a new round of Kindles,
00:04:53
◼
►
but I feel like Amazon thinks that buttons to turn the page
00:04:56
◼
►
are a premium feature that should only be
00:04:58
◼
►
on the most high end of products.
00:05:00
◼
►
And as long as that's the case,
00:05:02
◼
►
I'm gonna prefer the Kobo because the Kobo,
00:05:07
◼
►
Kobo doesn't seem to think that.
00:05:10
◼
►
I mean, they do have a cheaper one that doesn't have buttons
00:05:12
◼
►
but that you can get for 100 to 120 less
00:05:17
◼
►
to get what is essentially the same e-reader
00:05:20
◼
►
and slightly not as nice hardware.
00:05:23
◼
►
That's a pretty big gap.
00:05:26
◼
►
- The Kindle Scribe is a very interesting
00:05:31
◼
►
looking product to me.
00:05:32
◼
►
- It is, so this is, somebody asked me,
00:05:34
◼
►
they're like, "Oh, Jason, you review e-readers,
00:05:37
◼
►
"are you gonna review the Kindle Scribe?"
00:05:38
◼
►
And the problem I have with it is there is this weird,
00:05:40
◼
►
Like e-readers are a weird sub category to begin with,
00:05:43
◼
►
but there is a weird sub sub category of e-readers,
00:05:47
◼
►
which is the e-reader note takers,
00:05:50
◼
►
where you've got a bigger screen
00:05:53
◼
►
and support for a pen basically,
00:05:56
◼
►
so that you can read documents, usually PDFs,
00:05:59
◼
►
although it can be other books and things,
00:06:01
◼
►
and use your pen to mark them up or take notes.
00:06:05
◼
►
And there are a bunch of those that are like,
00:06:08
◼
►
There's some Android things where they put e-paper
00:06:11
◼
►
on an Android tablet.
00:06:13
◼
►
There is, I think Kobo has one in Kindle now,
00:06:17
◼
►
the Amazon Kindle, big Kindle.
00:06:18
◼
►
- Remarkable is like,
00:06:20
◼
►
- And yes, the one that you see on the Instagram ads.
00:06:24
◼
►
- Constantly, yeah, forever.
00:06:27
◼
►
- Yeah, along with that little device that lets you type
00:06:30
◼
►
without being on a computer, whatever that thing is called.
00:06:32
◼
►
Those are my, every Instagram ad I get
00:06:34
◼
►
is those two things. - Wait, what?
00:06:35
◼
►
- Oh, it's got like a little e-paper or e-ink screen
00:06:40
◼
►
and it's like a typewriter, basically.
00:06:44
◼
►
- Interesting, I've never seen that one.
00:06:45
◼
►
That one's a you one, right?
00:06:47
◼
►
They're not gonna get that one to me.
00:06:48
◼
►
I don't write anything.
00:06:49
◼
►
- Yeah, I guess that's true.
00:06:51
◼
►
But for other people, so I am utterly uninterested
00:06:55
◼
►
in the e-ink note-taking.
00:06:59
◼
►
It's not part of my life, it's not a thing I do.
00:07:01
◼
►
I also don't particularly like handwriting anything,
00:07:05
◼
►
But it is an interesting, so I'm not gonna read about it
00:07:08
◼
►
'cause I do not care about it, but it is interesting
00:07:11
◼
►
that Amazon is now going in that direction too,
00:07:14
◼
►
especially since they had the Kindle DX back in the day,
00:07:16
◼
►
which sort of was trying to do this and was kind of a flop
00:07:19
◼
►
and they killed it after a while.
00:07:21
◼
►
- The DX was like a magazine thing though, right?
00:07:23
◼
►
- Yeah, it was big, but it also had,
00:07:25
◼
►
it was also for notes, theoretically,
00:07:27
◼
►
note-taking and all that.
00:07:28
◼
►
But I guess the tech has gotten a lot better
00:07:30
◼
►
where they think this is basically like a virtual notepad
00:07:34
◼
►
There are no buttons on it though. No page turn buttons even though it starts at $339.
00:07:42
◼
►
I mean I can see for a product that's got a lot of pen input that the buttons don't
00:07:46
◼
►
even need to be there as opposed to a dedicated reader.
00:07:49
◼
►
This one is interesting to me, I'll say that, just because for what the product is it's
00:07:54
◼
►
a little bit different and it's more of a note taking device which is something that
00:07:58
◼
►
I would care more about. I think this is super interesting and I feel bad for Remarkable
00:08:02
◼
►
Because I don't think, because you know, I mean, the thing about the
00:08:06
◼
►
Remarkable tablet for me, I think me and Ray will talk about this in
00:08:09
◼
►
Cortex because we spoke about the Remarkable a little while ago, but the
00:08:14
◼
►
thing about the Remarkable was like, it would be great if I could write on
00:08:17
◼
►
my Kindle books, but you can't.
00:08:20
◼
►
Well, do you know what can?
00:08:22
◼
►
The Kindle one.
00:08:24
◼
►
And I think they're doing a thing that this isn't interesting to me, but I
00:08:27
◼
►
think it will be interesting to people.
00:08:29
◼
►
They're working with Microsoft, so you can,
00:08:32
◼
►
there'll be a button in Word,
00:08:34
◼
►
and you can send your Word documents to your Kindle scribe.
00:08:39
◼
►
Now, I don't care about that,
00:08:42
◼
►
but that seems like a really good feature.
00:08:45
◼
►
You know what I mean? - Yeah, if you're an attorney
00:08:46
◼
►
or any business type person, Microsoft business type,
00:08:50
◼
►
I mean, that's a use case here, right?
00:08:54
◼
►
It's somebody who wants to mark documents up on paper,
00:08:57
◼
►
but have them be accessible electronically,
00:09:00
◼
►
this is how you do something like that.
00:09:02
◼
►
It's part of that whole, you know,
00:09:03
◼
►
it's another stab at the whole paperless office concept
00:09:06
◼
►
to use an ink reader and a pencil,
00:09:09
◼
►
you know, pen stylist thingy instead.
00:09:11
◼
►
By the way, it's the Freerite Traveler
00:09:13
◼
►
is the other one that I get endlessly recommended to me
00:09:16
◼
►
on Instagram, which is like a keyboard.
00:09:19
◼
►
It's got a little flip up thing.
00:09:22
◼
►
- Genuinely, I'm surprised you haven't bought this.
00:09:24
◼
►
This feels like a Jason Snell product through and through
00:09:27
◼
►
of like, here's this little fun little thing.
00:09:29
◼
►
- But that's the thing is it's sort of a fun little thing,
00:09:33
◼
►
but there are like so many,
00:09:34
◼
►
like I would just use an iPad, right?
00:09:38
◼
►
I feel like if this had more tinkerability,
00:09:42
◼
►
it doesn't look very tinkerable, this thing.
00:09:44
◼
►
- No, 'cause I just think the experience
00:09:46
◼
►
is probably not very good.
00:09:47
◼
►
And I've got so many options for very, very small,
00:09:52
◼
►
very light writing environments now, right?
00:09:54
◼
►
That this is not, no.
00:09:57
◼
►
I don't think so.
00:09:58
◼
►
But it is, I mean, I'm fascinated by it.
00:10:00
◼
►
I love the idea, but I wouldn't buy it
00:10:03
◼
►
'cause I wouldn't use it.
00:10:04
◼
►
- If you would like to send in a Snell Talk question
00:10:08
◼
►
of your own to help us start off the show,
00:10:10
◼
►
then maybe I'll ask a supplementary question too,
00:10:12
◼
►
if I want to.
00:10:14
◼
►
You can send them in with the hashtag Snell Talk
00:10:16
◼
►
or use question mark Snell Talk
00:10:18
◼
►
in the Relay FM members discord.
00:10:21
◼
►
I have some items of follow up, Jason Snell.
00:10:25
◼
►
- So we've been talking a bit recently
00:10:27
◼
►
about potential sales figures of the new iPhones,
00:10:31
◼
►
you know, like wondering like,
00:10:32
◼
►
are these gonna-- - Right, how's it going?
00:10:33
◼
►
- How are they gonna do?
00:10:35
◼
►
Well, Foxconn, Apple's primary supplier,
00:10:39
◼
►
I think maybe only supplier,
00:10:42
◼
►
like manufacturer I meant to say, of iPhones,
00:10:45
◼
►
has set new monthly revenue records.
00:10:49
◼
►
They haven't said, they've said they've had storming demand,
00:10:54
◼
►
right? Like it's been like they're 40% year over year up.
00:10:58
◼
►
Foxconn don't explicitly name Apple as the reason
00:11:02
◼
►
for this 40% year over year increase in their earnings,
00:11:07
◼
►
but it's considered by analysts
00:11:08
◼
►
that the only new product launch
00:11:10
◼
►
that could drive the increase they are seeing
00:11:13
◼
►
is the iPhone.
00:11:14
◼
►
- Okay, I mean, it's,
00:11:16
◼
►
maybe we'll get a better hint at the end of the month
00:11:18
◼
►
with the financials, but this suggests that whatever,
00:11:22
◼
►
Either that or they had a bad year last year or something,
00:11:26
◼
►
but this is an interesting positive sign for iPhone sales.
00:11:29
◼
►
- And I think this is maybe my favorite thing
00:11:34
◼
►
I've ever written in the document.
00:11:35
◼
►
So I write these little headings
00:11:37
◼
►
and then I put links and notes in for individual things.
00:11:40
◼
►
This is rollercoaster car crashes.
00:11:44
◼
►
- The "Wall Street Journal."
00:11:45
◼
►
- This is your super karate monkey death car moment.
00:11:48
◼
►
- The "Wall Street Journal" is reporting
00:11:49
◼
►
that Apple's new car crash detection features
00:11:52
◼
►
are being triggered by roller coasters.
00:11:54
◼
►
Joanna Stern reported and wrote the article
00:11:57
◼
►
and spoke with a theme park in Cincinnati
00:12:00
◼
►
that has already received
00:12:01
◼
►
six accidentally triggered emergency responses.
00:12:04
◼
►
I just find this to be quite funny
00:12:08
◼
►
and what you're gonna do.
00:12:10
◼
►
You know what I mean?
00:12:11
◼
►
Like what are you gonna do?
00:12:11
◼
►
There's nothing you can do about it.
00:12:13
◼
►
- I guess Apple might be interested in looking at that data
00:12:16
◼
►
to see if there's a way for them to do a software update
00:12:18
◼
►
where they lock out certain sorts of signals
00:12:21
◼
►
as rollercoaster signals, that would be interesting, right?
00:12:25
◼
►
To say, is there a way for Apple to improve the algorithm
00:12:27
◼
►
so that this stuff gets locked out?
00:12:31
◼
►
And also, I think in the meantime, what's gonna happen is
00:12:33
◼
►
the dispatchers are gonna be like,
00:12:36
◼
►
that's a rollercoaster thing, right?
00:12:38
◼
►
Like they're gonna realize that,
00:12:41
◼
►
of what's going on and work around it.
00:12:43
◼
►
But that's a very funny thing that obviously
00:12:45
◼
►
Apple's algorithm didn't test
00:12:48
◼
►
at least some rollercoaster profiles that set it off.
00:12:53
◼
►
- I don't know if someone would naturally draw that link
00:12:58
◼
►
before it happens.
00:13:00
◼
►
- I don't know.
00:13:01
◼
►
I mean, it is somebody's job to think about
00:13:02
◼
►
what other ways could we trigger a false positive here.
00:13:05
◼
►
And maybe they did, but there's a certain aspect of,
00:13:09
◼
►
for example, the theme park in Cincinnati
00:13:12
◼
►
that their coaster sets it off.
00:13:17
◼
►
- Yeah, the other thought I had was
00:13:18
◼
►
could also set it up where literally you know where the roller coasters are and if it goes
00:13:23
◼
►
off on the roller coaster, the Apple Watch knows or the phone knows, "Oh, not here."
00:13:30
◼
►
Right? Like you could literally just block out…
00:13:31
◼
►
Because it knows where you are, that's part of the whole process is identifying the location.
00:13:36
◼
►
So maybe this is what they need, you know, this is what they need to do. Did you see
00:13:42
◼
►
the… there was a…
00:13:44
◼
►
It won't save the person who gets in a high-speed car crash underneath the roller coaster, but
00:13:48
◼
►
that's probably not gonna happen, right? Did you see that there was a an actual
00:13:52
◼
►
fatal car accident that, did you see about this? There was, I think it was in
00:13:58
◼
►
Nebraska, it was very sad, there were six young people in the car, they all
00:14:03
◼
►
died, but it was the first time that this feature had been reported on as
00:14:09
◼
►
actually doing the job, so like the emergency services only knew about this
00:14:17
◼
►
because the an iPhone triggered it. Wow. So it's you know it's horrible absolutely
00:14:23
◼
►
horrible thing to have happened but this is it in action like this is what this
00:14:29
◼
►
feature is supposed to do this was an incredibly unfortunate incident but you
00:14:36
◼
►
can like at least someone was taken to hospital because of it like they one of
00:14:41
◼
►
the because a young woman she died in hospital but she probably never would
00:14:45
◼
►
have made it to the hospital I would assume without this feature so you know in theory
00:14:51
◼
►
it will do its thing but they have to deal with the roller coaster problem first and
00:14:57
◼
►
this isn't going to be the only thing there's going to be lots of things like this I'm sure
00:15:02
◼
►
that over time will they'll have to weed out this is part of it right but this is that
00:15:07
◼
►
thing of if you if you work at Apple when you deploy a feature you're deploying it to
00:15:14
◼
►
millions of people at once and then you have to work out very fast how to tweak it. I can't
00:15:20
◼
►
even imagine what that is like, what that kind of scale is like. It's really a wild
00:15:26
◼
►
kind of thing to think about.
00:15:28
◼
►
It's the, and it's got multiple inputs, right? So it's trying to make a really good judgment.
00:15:32
◼
►
I found a story about that Nebraska thing and it is, again, tragic and the fact that
00:15:38
◼
►
nobody survived is awful, but it is interesting that the, there's like what happened with
00:15:44
◼
►
or without the iPhone.
00:15:45
◼
►
And the fact is they called 911 when somebody heard it
00:15:49
◼
►
and went out and saw that there was a car crash.
00:15:51
◼
►
And then they went back inside and they called 911.
00:15:54
◼
►
And the 911 operator said, basically we already know
00:15:59
◼
►
because they got the call from the iPhone 14.
00:16:02
◼
►
Now at some point that's gonna save somebody's life,
00:16:07
◼
►
but in this case it didn't.
00:16:09
◼
►
Although I also there's cases where there's like,
00:16:12
◼
►
even in a fatal accident in a remote location
00:16:16
◼
►
where people don't hear it, right?
00:16:19
◼
►
To get that warning, whether you can save them or not,
00:16:21
◼
►
to know that, to send somebody out there
00:16:23
◼
►
and find the car and all that is also a thing,
00:16:25
◼
►
but it's not, the purpose of it is not retrieval, right?
00:16:30
◼
►
It's rescue.
00:16:31
◼
►
- Yeah, but it's interesting technology.
00:16:36
◼
►
It feels like one of those things that like,
00:16:37
◼
►
I understand it might cause issues with roller coasters
00:16:40
◼
►
and the dispatchers at roller coasters.
00:16:42
◼
►
But when you weigh these two things against each other,
00:16:44
◼
►
there's a minor inconvenience compared to the fact
00:16:48
◼
►
that this could save someone's life.
00:16:49
◼
►
And will, if it hasn't already.
00:16:51
◼
►
It probably hasn't, 'cause there would have been
00:16:53
◼
►
an article about it like there was about this one.
00:16:56
◼
►
But it's only a matter of time, right?
00:16:59
◼
►
So, kind of fascinating stuff.
00:17:02
◼
►
This episode is brought to you by FitBond.
00:17:06
◼
►
Between balancing work and family
00:17:08
◼
►
in everything else you have going on in your life
00:17:10
◼
►
is it can sometimes be hard to make fitness
00:17:12
◼
►
a priority for you.
00:17:14
◼
►
What you need is a program that will work with you
00:17:16
◼
►
and not against you, and that's why you need Fitbud.
00:17:19
◼
►
They have an algorithm that will learn about you
00:17:21
◼
►
and your goals and your training ability
00:17:23
◼
►
to craft a personalized exercise plan that is unique to you.
00:17:27
◼
►
And that is super important because personal fitness
00:17:30
◼
►
isn't just about doing what other people do.
00:17:33
◼
►
You have to find the thing that works for you
00:17:34
◼
►
because then you'll find the thing that works for your body
00:17:37
◼
►
and you'll also find the thing that works for your motivation.
00:17:40
◼
►
That's the big thing for me.
00:17:41
◼
►
And what I like about Fitbud is it's not the same thing all the time.
00:17:44
◼
►
And I'm not doing the same workouts all the time.
00:17:47
◼
►
And you know, because I get bored of that,
00:17:49
◼
►
or you can become more injury prone that way.
00:17:52
◼
►
What I like is that Fitbud will analyze what I'm doing,
00:17:55
◼
►
no matter how much I work out, and craft an exercise plan that fits me
00:18:00
◼
►
and also fits my muscle recovery with a real balance of exercises.
00:18:04
◼
►
and you think to yourself, oh new exercises all the time,
00:18:07
◼
►
isn't that daunting?
00:18:08
◼
►
No, because Fitbot has these really awesome video tutorials.
00:18:12
◼
►
They're shot from multiple angles,
00:18:13
◼
►
so every time you find a new exercise,
00:18:15
◼
►
it shows you when you haven't done before
00:18:16
◼
►
or when you want a reminder of,
00:18:18
◼
►
you could just watch a simple video for how to do it
00:18:20
◼
►
to make sure that you can learn everything really easily.
00:18:24
◼
►
I love that Fitbot integrates with my Apple Watch
00:18:26
◼
►
so I can see what I'm doing and I can make adjustments
00:18:28
◼
►
maybe to the reps and sets if I want to.
00:18:30
◼
►
It also integrates with Wear OS
00:18:32
◼
►
and apps like Strava, Fitbit and into the Apple Health app as well.
00:18:40
◼
►
Personalised training of this quality can be expensive. Fitbod is just $12.99 a month
00:18:44
◼
►
or $79.99 a year. You can get 25% off your membership by signing up at fitbod.me/upgrade.
00:18:53
◼
►
Everybody's fitness path is different and this is why Fitbod does so much work to make
00:18:57
◼
►
sure that they customise everything to suit you. They learn from your last workouts, your
00:19:01
◼
►
next will be even better. So go now and get your customized fitness plan at fitbod.me/upgrade
00:19:07
◼
►
and you will get 25% off your membership. For 25% off your membership that is fitbod.me/upgrade.
00:19:14
◼
►
Our thanks to fitbod for their support of this show and Relay FM.
00:19:19
◼
►
Saddle up partner. It's a big day in Rumour Roundup town. We have finally, many people
00:19:27
◼
►
have asked at the time that we were doing Rumour Roundup to have some chapter
00:19:31
◼
►
artwork and I wasn't sure what to do and then over time it's like I want to do
00:19:37
◼
►
something and as we did it more and more I kept thinking about Woody's Roundup
00:19:40
◼
►
like that's where a lot of this comes from it's from Toy Story 2 and what I
00:19:45
◼
►
like about Woody's Roundup and I've always liked is that it says Woody's
00:19:48
◼
►
Roundup in like a lasso like it's written out and so I thought in my mind
00:19:52
◼
►
what would it be like to have Rumour Roundup written out like this then I
00:19:56
◼
►
I popped into my head, I've commissioned an artist
00:19:59
◼
►
that I've been lucky to work with a bunch of times.
00:20:01
◼
►
He's named Siege Roland.
00:20:02
◼
►
He's done a bunch of poster work for me in the past
00:20:05
◼
►
and some other projects.
00:20:07
◼
►
He's an incredibly talented illustrator.
00:20:09
◼
►
So I spoke to Siege and I told him the kind of thing
00:20:11
◼
►
that I was thinking about.
00:20:12
◼
►
And he created the brand new Rumor Roundup artwork
00:20:16
◼
►
and I adore it.
00:20:18
◼
►
- Yeah, it's pretty great.
00:20:20
◼
►
We're like cowboys.
00:20:21
◼
►
- We're cowboys and we're on the plains.
00:20:23
◼
►
- You're scouting the distance
00:20:25
◼
►
and I'm looking at a map.
00:20:27
◼
►
- Yep, you're giving it, you're finding the way.
00:20:29
◼
►
Map, it's, you're looking at Map World magazine.
00:20:32
◼
►
- It is Map World.
00:20:34
◼
►
There's a 16 camera iPhone room around the back
00:20:37
◼
►
and there's a cactus in the background.
00:20:38
◼
►
So I don't know if we're on the plains,
00:20:39
◼
►
we may be out in the desert.
00:20:41
◼
►
- Oh yeah, that makes more sense.
00:20:44
◼
►
We're in the desert, I guess.
00:20:46
◼
►
- And our horse is looking at us like,
00:20:48
◼
►
I can't believe I have to work with these guys.
00:20:50
◼
►
- These chocolate heads.
00:20:52
◼
►
They don't even know where they're going.
00:20:54
◼
►
Also, we made a Room Around Up t-shirt.
00:20:58
◼
►
So if you want to get the Room Around Up just like written out, I was looking at this, it
00:21:02
◼
►
was too much to make that a full t-shirt that will cost about $1,000 a shirt with the colors
00:21:09
◼
►
But the beautiful Room Around Up text is also available on our permanent merch store where
00:21:14
◼
►
there are a selection of wonderful upgrade t-shirts available all the time, printed by
00:21:19
◼
►
our friends over at Cotton Bureau.
00:21:21
◼
►
So you can go and get that too.
00:21:23
◼
►
If you want a Roomba Roundup t-shirt of your own, I can't wait to get one because I love
00:21:28
◼
►
this so much.
00:21:29
◼
►
And so, yeah, thank you to Siege for doing such fantastic work on this.
00:21:33
◼
►
I'll put a link to their kind of portfolio in the chat too, in the show notes too, if
00:21:40
◼
►
you want to check out their work.
00:21:42
◼
►
But I do actually have some rumors for the Roundup.
00:21:45
◼
►
Thank goodness.
00:21:46
◼
►
It's not just devolved into just custom art.
00:21:48
◼
►
We're just talking about the artwork.
00:21:51
◼
►
every week. That's what we do. We just review our own artwork. No. According to display analyst Ross
00:21:57
◼
►
Young, Apple is expecting to release their 27-inch mini LED display now in Q1 of 2023.
00:22:05
◼
►
As a reminder, this display would feature ProMotion support. The expectation is it does not
00:22:12
◼
►
replace the current Pro Display XDR, but would make for a nicer and less expensive upgrade for
00:22:18
◼
►
for people who want something more
00:22:19
◼
►
than the current studio display.
00:22:21
◼
►
So they would have, this is the whole thing.
00:22:24
◼
►
I want to set it up, start you with a question, right?
00:22:25
◼
►
So you've got Pro Display, XDR,
00:22:28
◼
►
which is the full-on big thing
00:22:31
◼
►
with the stand that costs the money it costs,
00:22:34
◼
►
and it's all like reference grade, right?
00:22:36
◼
►
Then you've got the Studio Display,
00:22:39
◼
►
which is the 27, is it 27 inches Studio Display?
00:22:43
◼
►
I think so, right? - Yes.
00:22:44
◼
►
- 27 inch display that, you know,
00:22:47
◼
►
It's just a nice display.
00:22:49
◼
►
But then you've got this third display,
00:22:51
◼
►
which is 27 inches, so the same size,
00:22:54
◼
►
but it's mini LED, so very high performance on the HDR level
00:22:58
◼
►
and it's Pro Display, which the, so it's got, you know,
00:23:01
◼
►
like the one can go up to 120 hertz.
00:23:04
◼
►
- ProMotion, you mean?
00:23:05
◼
►
- That's what I meant to say, ProMotion display,
00:23:07
◼
►
which the Pro Display cannot do.
00:23:09
◼
►
It does not have that feature.
00:23:10
◼
►
So what I want to ask Jason is what on earth
00:23:12
◼
►
do they call this product?
00:23:14
◼
►
- All right, I have two suggestions.
00:23:18
◼
►
- That I'm gonna put down.
00:23:19
◼
►
One of them is to call it the ProMotion display.
00:23:25
◼
►
So there's the Pro Display, Studio Display,
00:23:28
◼
►
ProMotion Display, and Pro Display XDR.
00:23:31
◼
►
Or ProMotion Display XDR if you really wanted to do it,
00:23:34
◼
►
but like ProMotion Display.
00:23:35
◼
►
And the other suggestion I have is
00:23:37
◼
►
the 27 inch Pro Display XDR.
00:23:41
◼
►
- I see where you're going with that.
00:23:42
◼
►
You can understand why that's weird though, right?
00:23:44
◼
►
'Cause it's like,
00:23:45
◼
►
it doesn't have the same feature set.
00:23:47
◼
►
However-- - It does not have
00:23:48
◼
►
the same feature set.
00:23:49
◼
►
- I see where you're going.
00:23:51
◼
►
- And it's much newer and there's a question,
00:23:52
◼
►
will the Pro Display XDR continue to be sold
00:23:54
◼
►
or updated or discontinued down the road?
00:24:00
◼
►
I don't know.
00:24:01
◼
►
But so those are my two options is one,
00:24:04
◼
►
you could literally put ProMotion in the name, right?
00:24:06
◼
►
'Cause you've got a studio display,
00:24:07
◼
►
that's the lower cost one.
00:24:09
◼
►
So you could call it the ProMotion display.
00:24:11
◼
►
You give it a new name, but like I think ProMotion display
00:24:15
◼
►
or just call it Pro Display, you know,
00:24:18
◼
►
27 inch Pro Display XDR or 27 inch Pro Display.
00:24:22
◼
►
You could do that.
00:24:23
◼
►
You don't have to come up with a brand new name for it.
00:24:26
◼
►
I do, so to throw a spanner in the works,
00:24:29
◼
►
this display type exists, right?
00:24:33
◼
►
So mini LED and ProMotion on both the iPad Pro
00:24:38
◼
►
and the MacBook Pro and Apple calls them both
00:24:41
◼
►
Liquid Retina XDR.
00:24:45
◼
►
- Could you imagine,
00:24:46
◼
►
do you imagine they could call it
00:24:48
◼
►
the liquid retina XDR display?
00:24:50
◼
►
- Yeah, I mean, they don't.
00:24:53
◼
►
- I don't like that as a name to be honest.
00:24:54
◼
►
- That is a display technology and they generally,
00:24:59
◼
►
I mean, that's also an argument against promotion
00:25:01
◼
►
'cause that's just a feature.
00:25:03
◼
►
So they could, they could do that.
00:25:06
◼
►
It is also true,
00:25:07
◼
►
and Zach in our member Discord pointed this out,
00:25:11
◼
►
The iPad Pro 11 and 12.9 are called the same thing,
00:25:14
◼
►
and 12.9 has ProMotion, Liquid Retina, blah, blah, blah,
00:25:19
◼
►
and the 11 doesn't, and they're still just differentiated
00:25:21
◼
►
by their size, right?
00:25:23
◼
►
So you could get away with it, I think,
00:25:24
◼
►
saying 27-inch Pro Display XDR,
00:25:27
◼
►
and it's got different features.
00:25:29
◼
►
But yeah, they could invent a third title.
00:25:34
◼
►
I don't know, those are my guesses.
00:25:37
◼
►
It's like, if you need to differentiate in some way,
00:25:40
◼
►
ProMotion is a great way to do it
00:25:41
◼
►
'cause it's the only external display with ProMotion.
00:25:45
◼
►
Or I would say just roll it into the Pro Display XDR line.
00:25:50
◼
►
Those are my two suggestions.
00:25:51
◼
►
- The 11 inch, it isn't called like
00:25:53
◼
►
we're driving a display XDR on the 11 inch.
00:25:56
◼
►
- I know, but the 11 inch iPad Pro is the 11 inch iPad Pro
00:25:58
◼
►
and the 12.9 inch iPad Pro is just the 12.9 inch iPad Pro.
00:26:02
◼
►
And the displays are very different,
00:26:04
◼
►
but all they differentiate by is size.
00:26:06
◼
►
- Yeah, but they are different product.
00:26:08
◼
►
They're not just the display, you know what I mean?
00:26:10
◼
►
I get the argument, I get the argument.
00:26:12
◼
►
But the 30-inch Pro Display XDR and the 27-inch Pro Display XDR having different display technologies
00:26:18
◼
►
is not necessarily a deal breaker.
00:26:20
◼
►
I have two more name suggestions from the Discord.
00:26:24
◼
►
Studio Display XDR and Studio Display Ultra.
00:26:32
◼
►
Studio Display Ultra Pro Max.
00:26:34
◼
►
Studio Display XDR is interesting, but I feel like it puts it too close to the Studio Display
00:26:38
◼
►
Right? Like that it's much more impressive than that.
00:26:41
◼
►
I guess that depends where it sits price-wise, right?
00:26:44
◼
►
Also, the dynamic range isn't the only differentiator.
00:26:46
◼
►
The problem with XDR as a title is that it is a dynamic range differentiator,
00:26:51
◼
►
not a screen refresh differentiator, right? It's not.
00:26:57
◼
►
And so, if you just put XDR in the name, it is matching up with the existing product.
00:27:04
◼
►
but like if you tag XDR onto the end of the studio display, I don't know, you're
00:27:08
◼
►
you are missing Promotion if you if you don't mention Promotion, I guess is what
00:27:13
◼
►
I'm saying. Yes, but they don't call it Promotion. Promotion is not in the name
00:27:19
◼
►
for the laptops either, it's just Liquid Retina XDR display. Yeah, I get it.
00:27:24
◼
►
It's a it's an interesting marketing challenge for them. I would I would if
00:27:31
◼
►
If I'm the marketing person,
00:27:33
◼
►
I wanna place this in the category of the Pro Display XDR.
00:27:37
◼
►
It's a Pro Display.
00:27:38
◼
►
I don't wanna place it in the Studio Display category
00:27:41
◼
►
'cause we already have a Studio Display.
00:27:43
◼
►
It's the same size.
00:27:46
◼
►
Let's not, let's differentiate in the name
00:27:49
◼
►
that this is the more expensive, higher quality display.
00:27:53
◼
►
- What about Studio Display Pro XDR?
00:27:57
◼
►
I'm only slightly joking.
00:27:59
◼
►
I mean, sure, they could do that, sure.
00:28:03
◼
►
- 'Cause I think it's complicated.
00:28:05
◼
►
- Then you've got a Studio Pro and a Studio and a Pro?
00:28:08
◼
►
I don't know.
00:28:09
◼
►
Yeah, I don't know.
00:28:12
◼
►
- It's just very complicated because
00:28:14
◼
►
they've already used XDR when they maybe shouldn't have.
00:28:19
◼
►
- The Mac Studio, Mac Pro.
00:28:22
◼
►
- Yep. - Studio Display, Pro Display.
00:28:24
◼
►
I think that's the answer,
00:28:25
◼
►
which is why it's probably Pro Display XDR.
00:28:29
◼
►
or ProMotion Display, or ProMotion Display XDR,
00:28:32
◼
►
something like that.
00:28:34
◼
►
- It's very frustrating that they use Pro Display
00:28:36
◼
►
as a name already.
00:28:38
◼
►
- I wonder about the Pro Display XDR, right?
00:28:40
◼
►
Like it doesn't, it's not gonna be as good
00:28:43
◼
►
as this monitor, right?
00:28:44
◼
►
Like, because we've seen from the, it's big,
00:28:48
◼
►
and it's good, right?
00:28:49
◼
►
But like it's using older tech to do its dynamic range.
00:28:52
◼
►
It's got the like illumination zones
00:28:54
◼
►
that are basically like a monitor behind the monitor
00:28:56
◼
►
to do illumination.
00:28:58
◼
►
And the mini LED is a much finer level of illumination.
00:29:03
◼
►
And so you got that and then you've got ProMotion
00:29:07
◼
►
and the Pro Display XDR doesn't do that.
00:29:10
◼
►
So other than its size-
00:29:11
◼
►
- 6K, it's 6K as well as the physical size difference,
00:29:15
◼
►
it is a higher resolution.
00:29:16
◼
►
- Yeah, I mean, that's, yeah,
00:29:18
◼
►
they go hand in hand, I think.
00:29:19
◼
►
But it's in a weird position where like, okay,
00:29:23
◼
►
Apple made this like unnecessary high-end monitor.
00:29:27
◼
►
That was a choice, but now they've made the studio display
00:29:31
◼
►
and they're apparently making this display.
00:29:33
◼
►
So why does that high-end monitor exist anymore
00:29:36
◼
►
other than to be aspirational?
00:29:38
◼
►
And that I think is the key question is like,
00:29:40
◼
►
is that monitor long for this world?
00:29:42
◼
►
And if it is, I kind of think like they're gonna need
00:29:44
◼
►
to update it at some point, right?
00:29:46
◼
►
Because it is, you already hear talking nerd circles
00:29:50
◼
►
about how like the features that it lacks,
00:29:53
◼
►
and it's a ridiculously expensive, in context,
00:29:56
◼
►
Display, again, not if you're trying to sort of do
00:30:00
◼
►
a cheap reference monitor for professional work,
00:30:03
◼
►
but like if you're thinking of it as just a computer display
00:30:06
◼
►
so like where does it go?
00:30:09
◼
►
At some point it's irrelevant and do they intend for it
00:30:12
◼
►
to remain relevant or do they intend to pull it out
00:30:16
◼
►
of the product line because this new monitor
00:30:18
◼
►
is gonna be great?
00:30:18
◼
►
And I think that's one of the questions
00:30:20
◼
►
that probably factors into the naming too
00:30:22
◼
►
is like in the long run, is the Pro Display XDR
00:30:26
◼
►
going away, and if so, what does that mean?
00:30:30
◼
►
Are you free to just call this
00:30:32
◼
►
the new 27-inch Pro Display XDR,
00:30:33
◼
►
knowing that eventually it will be the standard bearer?
00:30:36
◼
►
I don't know.
00:30:37
◼
►
- 'Cause what I was just looking there is like,
00:30:39
◼
►
I couldn't, what I couldn't remember is like,
00:30:41
◼
►
are the Mac, does the MacBook Pro have a similar like,
00:30:45
◼
►
'cause obviously one of the big things
00:30:46
◼
►
about the original Pro Display XDR
00:30:48
◼
►
is the fact that it's a reference monitor, right?
00:30:51
◼
►
And you can do that.
00:30:52
◼
►
And they've referenced in the MacBook Pro
00:30:55
◼
►
about color grading and reference modes
00:30:58
◼
►
and all that kind of stuff.
00:31:00
◼
►
So like, 'cause what I was wondering is like,
00:31:02
◼
►
will this new display also be like,
00:31:05
◼
►
could it be considered a reference monitor?
00:31:07
◼
►
And if it could, if it could,
00:31:09
◼
►
then I actually think you might be right
00:31:11
◼
►
that they just call it the 27 inch Pro Display XDR
00:31:14
◼
►
with the idea that eventually they will have
00:31:17
◼
►
a 30 inch Pro Display XDR or whatever, right?
00:31:22
◼
►
- Well, they'll either update the one that's there
00:31:24
◼
►
they'll remove it, right?
00:31:25
◼
►
Like those are the choices, I think.
00:31:27
◼
►
- Intriguing.
00:31:29
◼
►
I am intrigued about that.
00:31:32
◼
►
- This is why they pay those marketing people
00:31:33
◼
►
the big money, right?
00:31:34
◼
►
It's like, this is not an easy decision.
00:31:36
◼
►
- Ross Young is also reporting that the next iPhone SE
00:31:42
◼
►
will feature a 6.1 inch display with a notch.
00:31:46
◼
►
Even though there is still suggestion
00:31:47
◼
►
that there would not actually be any face ID technology
00:31:50
◼
►
in that notch, the iPhone SE would continue with touch ID.
00:31:53
◼
►
So a 6.1 inch display would significantly change
00:31:58
◼
►
the physical dimensions of the iPhone SE product.
00:32:02
◼
►
So a 6.1 inch display with a notch
00:32:05
◼
►
is what the iPhone XR had.
00:32:08
◼
►
So I wanna give some breakdowns here.
00:32:11
◼
►
You'll have to excuse the fact that I mix up the units,
00:32:16
◼
►
but I think it's actually easier to understand.
00:32:18
◼
►
So the screen would be going from the iPhone SE,
00:32:21
◼
►
which has a 4.7 inch screen to a 6.1 inch screen.
00:32:25
◼
►
And then I took a look at iPhone 10R versus,
00:32:28
◼
►
well, iPhone SE versus iPhone XR
00:32:30
◼
►
in dimensions as they are currently.
00:32:33
◼
►
The height, it would go from 138 to 150 millimeters,
00:32:38
◼
►
and the width from 67 millimeters to 75 millimeters.
00:32:42
◼
►
Now, of course, there could be some differences
00:32:46
◼
►
in physical size between iPhone SE4 in this dimension
00:32:51
◼
►
and the iPhone XR, but I expect it will be close enough.
00:32:54
◼
►
Now, the thing that you must remember now
00:32:56
◼
►
is when I give you these numbers,
00:32:57
◼
►
is that the iPhone XR is physically larger
00:33:01
◼
►
than the iPhone 14.
00:33:04
◼
►
- So this would be, if this is true,
00:33:08
◼
►
the age of the small iPhone is definitely over
00:33:12
◼
►
at that point.
00:33:13
◼
►
- Yeah, I mean, arguable, but yeah,
00:33:15
◼
►
I think that's the idea.
00:33:16
◼
►
I'll get to the arguable in a minute,
00:33:19
◼
►
but the part that makes me do a double take
00:33:23
◼
►
is still touch ID.
00:33:25
◼
►
'Cause it's like, all right, well,
00:33:27
◼
►
so you're gonna put a notch up there,
00:33:29
◼
►
but there's not gonna be most of the stuff in there.
00:33:31
◼
►
It's gonna be mostly empty.
00:33:33
◼
►
- Then I'm in Ireland.
00:33:35
◼
►
- Well, and they're not gonna do that, right?
00:33:38
◼
►
So why is that notch there?
00:33:41
◼
►
I mean, I get it that you still need to have a place
00:33:44
◼
►
for the camera and the proximity sensor and all that.
00:33:47
◼
►
It's just, are you saving enough money
00:33:50
◼
►
and is it necessary enough to differentiate
00:33:53
◼
►
that you are going to, or have you gotten the feedback
00:33:58
◼
►
that some people really, really, really, really want Touch ID
00:34:02
◼
►
and are opposed to Face ID?
00:34:07
◼
►
Because, you know, so you take Face ID out
00:34:10
◼
►
and you put Touch ID on the button on the side, I'm assuming,
00:34:13
◼
►
'cause there's not gonna be any room
00:34:14
◼
►
on the home screen for a button if it's the 10R design.
00:34:17
◼
►
So that's weird, that's weird.
00:34:20
◼
►
They could do it, they totally could do it.
00:34:22
◼
►
I just am a little surprised that they wouldn't just say
00:34:24
◼
►
like the XR that they're essentially upgrading the XR
00:34:27
◼
►
and that it's got face ID and all that.
00:34:29
◼
►
So if they pull face ID out and say, no, no, no, face ID,
00:34:32
◼
►
it's far too expensive a feature for you,
00:34:34
◼
►
little SE phone, big SE phone,
00:34:36
◼
►
you get a touch ID sensor on the button.
00:34:38
◼
►
That's just how you have to do it now.
00:34:40
◼
►
That's, I don't know.
00:34:43
◼
►
That part is disappointing, but you're right.
00:34:46
◼
►
This is also the ultimate uncoupling of the concept
00:34:49
◼
►
of an SE phone as a smaller iPhone versus cheaper iPhone.
00:34:54
◼
►
I think it was always intended to be a cheaper iPhone,
00:34:57
◼
►
but it was also the smaller iPhone,
00:34:59
◼
►
and this is the end of that if this happens.
00:35:01
◼
►
- I have my own theory about why they would
00:35:03
◼
►
put the notch there, irrespective of what's inside,
00:35:07
◼
►
is that then the iPhone SE won't look
00:35:09
◼
►
like an old phone anymore.
00:35:11
◼
►
- Oh, absolutely true.
00:35:12
◼
►
It's so frustrating that they would have a notched phone
00:35:14
◼
►
and not put the face ID sensors in it.
00:35:17
◼
►
- It's like a fake notch.
00:35:18
◼
►
They actually, it's all software.
00:35:21
◼
►
- I mean, I had that thought too,
00:35:23
◼
►
which is like, there's actually just a little cutout
00:35:25
◼
►
for the one thing, but they draw the whole notch.
00:35:28
◼
►
- Maybe though, you know, maybe.
00:35:30
◼
►
Maybe, you know what, like it says it's a notch,
00:35:32
◼
►
maybe it is a really small notch.
00:35:34
◼
►
Maybe it is just for the camera.
00:35:38
◼
►
- They haven't said what the dimensions of a notch would be.
00:35:40
◼
►
It could just be just for a camera.
00:35:42
◼
►
Like it would be much smaller.
00:35:43
◼
►
- It could be.
00:35:44
◼
►
I think that they'll also have the,
00:35:46
◼
►
they'll have the proximity sensor up there
00:35:48
◼
►
and they'll have, there's other sensors,
00:35:49
◼
►
but not the infrared beam illuminator
00:35:53
◼
►
and face ID sensor and all that stuff.
00:35:55
◼
►
So here is, so for people who like me, like small phones,
00:36:00
◼
►
here's my don't despair quite yet theory,
00:36:06
◼
►
which is there is nothing stopping Apple
00:36:11
◼
►
from releasing an iPhone mini every so often,
00:36:16
◼
►
maybe even just in the spring, right?
00:36:19
◼
►
Like they could, and I know it sounds weird,
00:36:21
◼
►
but like there are lots of iPhones out there.
00:36:24
◼
►
If Apple thinks that there is a small
00:36:26
◼
►
but existing audience for the iPhone mini
00:36:29
◼
►
and they're getting ready to clear,
00:36:31
◼
►
let's say the iPhone 14 mini off the price list
00:36:34
◼
►
in a year or two,
00:36:35
◼
►
would Apple consider doing what they do with the SE
00:36:40
◼
►
with the iPhone mini and just on every two or three years,
00:36:45
◼
►
just do a spring release where there's a new mini phone.
00:36:48
◼
►
Like if it's extra money and they've got an existing design,
00:36:51
◼
►
'cause we've seen repeatedly,
00:36:53
◼
►
we're talking about the XR again now, right?
00:36:56
◼
►
That Apple likes reusing designs.
00:36:58
◼
►
So I would hold out at least a little bit of hope still.
00:37:01
◼
►
I wouldn't have the hope dashed completely.
00:37:03
◼
►
There is nothing stopping Apple
00:37:06
◼
►
from occasionally releasing an iPhone mini.
00:37:08
◼
►
I think what's stopping Apple from doing it every year
00:37:11
◼
►
is that it doesn't make sense to do it every year.
00:37:13
◼
►
But that doesn't mean they stop doing it all together
00:37:16
◼
►
'cause Apple really likes recycling old phone designs.
00:37:19
◼
►
And if they can slap a new chip in that mini design
00:37:24
◼
►
in the spring when the volumes are low,
00:37:27
◼
►
they might yet do that someday.
00:37:30
◼
►
That's my little thread of hope I'll put out there
00:37:32
◼
►
for many, many fans.
00:37:37
◼
►
I think the kind of canary in the coal mine for this will be what do they do with the
00:37:46
◼
►
Because I love my iPad mini.
00:37:48
◼
►
It's the iPad I use the most.
00:37:50
◼
►
My main computer at home, I use it more than my iPhone when I'm at home.
00:37:56
◼
►
And I often think to myself, please let them make more than just one of these.
00:38:02
◼
►
And like, please let them do something to it at least every two years, you know?
00:38:07
◼
►
and I'll be happy.
00:38:08
◼
►
- I think this is where Apple is right now,
00:38:11
◼
►
and that's why I mentioned the mini phone
00:38:14
◼
►
as a possibility is Apple is optimizing, right?
00:38:18
◼
►
This is a Tim Cook's Apple.
00:38:20
◼
►
It's huge now, by the way.
00:38:23
◼
►
And so while you've got your flagship phones
00:38:25
◼
►
that you wanna sell lots of,
00:38:27
◼
►
they have a lot of money, they got a lot of audience.
00:38:30
◼
►
Even some sub audiences are pretty decent sizes.
00:38:34
◼
►
And while they clearly have shown
00:38:36
◼
►
that while they have products
00:38:38
◼
►
that they're not gonna update every year
00:38:39
◼
►
or even every 18 months,
00:38:40
◼
►
that they're worth keeping them around
00:38:43
◼
►
to fulfill certain audience needs.
00:38:46
◼
►
And the iPad mini is a good example of that.
00:38:49
◼
►
And I would say, I think the iPhone mini might be too.
00:38:53
◼
►
And it's the same kind of idea, which is,
00:38:55
◼
►
look, we can't make a new one of these every year.
00:38:57
◼
►
Like it doesn't make any sense,
00:38:59
◼
►
but maybe every two or three years we'll do it.
00:39:02
◼
►
And I think that that's obviously,
00:39:06
◼
►
if it's your favorite product,
00:39:07
◼
►
you want it to be there every year, obviously.
00:39:10
◼
►
But not everybody, you know,
00:39:13
◼
►
not everybody has that luxury.
00:39:16
◼
►
Lots of people do, most people do,
00:39:17
◼
►
because that's what makes it be your annual product release
00:39:21
◼
►
is that it's very popular.
00:39:22
◼
►
- Yeah, if most people didn't,
00:39:24
◼
►
Apple are doing a very bad job, right?
00:39:26
◼
►
Like if most people's favorite products is not refreshed.
00:39:30
◼
►
- Low priority, refresh, that would be a really serious,
00:39:34
◼
►
You gotta call the judgment into question of that executive
00:39:36
◼
►
if they just are on some sort of vendetta.
00:39:39
◼
►
Like, "I hate that, it sells so well, I hate it so much."
00:39:42
◼
►
- They did do that with a Mac for a while, I think,
00:39:44
◼
►
but we don't think about those times.
00:39:47
◼
►
- Yeah, well, I mean, they tried to do it
00:39:50
◼
►
with the MacBook Air, right?
00:39:51
◼
►
They're like, "Oh, this MacBook Air,
00:39:53
◼
►
it's really unappealing, nobody will buy it."
00:39:54
◼
►
And they're like, "Sir, they're still buying it."
00:39:56
◼
►
It's like, "Oh, okay, I guess we have to update it."
00:40:00
◼
►
So we'll see about it.
00:40:03
◼
►
but I think they are in the same boat,
00:40:05
◼
►
in a similar kind of circumstance
00:40:07
◼
►
where they are edge products and how the SE is,
00:40:11
◼
►
the Mini is at this point, I would say,
00:40:13
◼
►
and the iPhone and the iPad, like these are all,
00:40:17
◼
►
okay, let's throw in like maybe even ultimately
00:40:20
◼
►
the Mac Mini, right?
00:40:22
◼
►
These are maybe even the Mac Studio, who knows?
00:40:25
◼
►
Kind of not necessarily the flagships,
00:40:28
◼
►
but we'll get an update every so often
00:40:30
◼
►
because there's enough reason to do so
00:40:31
◼
►
when they already put in the work, right?
00:40:33
◼
►
Like, they already designed these things.
00:40:35
◼
►
So just kind of keep revising them enough to be modern
00:40:39
◼
►
and so you can keep selling.
00:40:41
◼
►
- And now that the EU has approved its new directive
00:40:44
◼
►
to legally require device manufacturers to adopt USB-C,
00:40:48
◼
►
Mark Gurman is reporting that as well as changes
00:40:50
◼
►
to the iPhone line by about 2024,
00:40:53
◼
►
which is when it comes into effect,
00:40:55
◼
►
Apple will also transition AirPods and Mac accessories
00:40:59
◼
►
away from Lightning to USB-C.
00:41:01
◼
►
Mark says that Apple has previously been preparing
00:41:04
◼
►
for these changes as they expected that this would be passed.
00:41:07
◼
►
The iPhone 15, due in 2023,
00:41:10
◼
►
will adopt USB-C across the line.
00:41:12
◼
►
The base iPad will change to USB-C this year.
00:41:16
◼
►
And Mark expects the Magic Mouse and Magic Keyboard
00:41:20
◼
►
to switch over from Lightning to USB-C
00:41:23
◼
►
when Apple announces its new Mac model for sale next year.
00:41:28
◼
►
like for its new, its next Mac model,
00:41:31
◼
►
which would be on sale next year sometime,
00:41:33
◼
►
whether that be an iMac or a Mac Pro.
00:41:36
◼
►
And then all three AirPods products, as I mentioned,
00:41:39
◼
►
would go to USB-C as well.
00:41:40
◼
►
But Mark goes on to say that he expects
00:41:44
◼
►
the USB-C connector will be short lived.
00:41:47
◼
►
Quote, "Apple's future is wireless
00:41:49
◼
►
and that some version of the canceled AirPower Dream
00:41:52
◼
►
from 2017 will still eventually come to fruition
00:41:56
◼
►
well before a decade from now."
00:41:58
◼
►
At some point in the next few years,
00:42:00
◼
►
Apple will probably begin transitioning entirely
00:42:02
◼
►
to inductive charging on the iPhone and iPad,
00:42:05
◼
►
matching the Apple Watch.
00:42:07
◼
►
I really hope they don't do that part, but that's just me.
00:42:11
◼
►
- I mean, the difficulty here again is
00:42:13
◼
►
what is Mark Gurman's take
00:42:17
◼
►
and what is Mark Gurman's reporting,
00:42:19
◼
►
and how current is he with his take versus his reporting?
00:42:23
◼
►
- I feel like the reporting part is that first part, right?
00:42:26
◼
►
Like these products will change, you know.
00:42:29
◼
►
- Yeah, even then though, I think he's,
00:42:31
◼
►
I'm not sure he knows for a fact
00:42:33
◼
►
that the Magic Mouse and the keyboard will switch over.
00:42:35
◼
►
He just sort of expects that it'll happen
00:42:37
◼
►
and that the iMac is a good time.
00:42:39
◼
►
And he's not wrong.
00:42:41
◼
►
Like the iMac comes with them and that would be right.
00:42:46
◼
►
Like his laptops don't come with them.
00:42:47
◼
►
The Mac Mini doesn't come with them.
00:42:49
◼
►
iMac comes with them.
00:42:50
◼
►
So that would be the logical time
00:42:53
◼
►
to update the Magic Mouse and keyboard
00:42:54
◼
►
is as part of an iMac announcement.
00:42:56
◼
►
- Makes sense. - Yeah, yeah.
00:42:57
◼
►
- Not sure that that's his sources versus his intuition.
00:43:02
◼
►
And I'll also point out, this is gonna happen,
00:43:05
◼
►
like let's all be emotionally prepared for this.
00:43:07
◼
►
Next year, the iPhone's gonna switch to USB-C
00:43:12
◼
►
and we're gonna know that the lightning lasted
00:43:15
◼
►
about as long as the docked connector lasted on the iPhone
00:43:18
◼
►
and that this has been a good, or lasted in general,
00:43:21
◼
►
and that this has been a good run
00:43:23
◼
►
and that switching to USB-C is good
00:43:26
◼
►
because everybody's already got USB-C,
00:43:28
◼
►
but I am telling you get ready for all of the hot takes
00:43:32
◼
►
about how dare Apple change their connector again.
00:43:34
◼
►
And I say this because Mark Gurman's newsletter this week
00:43:37
◼
►
was headlined Apple to Change Charger Again,
00:43:41
◼
►
which by the way, charger, it's not really the charger,
00:43:44
◼
►
it's the cable plug, right?
00:43:46
◼
►
It's not the same, but that just,
00:43:48
◼
►
and it's just like that's such a lazy
00:43:50
◼
►
Apple to Change Charger Again.
00:43:51
◼
►
That's the story here again,
00:43:53
◼
►
'cause they did it 11 years ago.
00:43:55
◼
►
Again, it's happening, stupid Apple.
00:43:57
◼
►
Anyway, of all the things to complain about,
00:44:00
◼
►
this is, but people will do it.
00:44:02
◼
►
So be ready is what I'm saying, be ready.
00:44:04
◼
►
About the wireless stuff,
00:44:06
◼
►
this is like one level down from the,
00:44:09
◼
►
Apple will release a car that has no steering wheel
00:44:12
◼
►
kind of statement, which is like,
00:44:14
◼
►
I appreciate that there's somebody with a vision
00:44:17
◼
►
who's like, everything will be wireless.
00:44:20
◼
►
And on an infinite timescale,
00:44:22
◼
►
Again, that's probably true, but as Apple scales up
00:44:25
◼
►
its sensors and stuff, so that it ends up with these,
00:44:28
◼
►
you know, 8K, 120 frames a second HDR video cameras
00:44:33
◼
►
on iPhones and stuff in the future, the data is huge.
00:44:37
◼
►
Is transferring that via wireless gonna be the way
00:44:42
◼
►
you need to do it?
00:44:43
◼
►
And is wireless gonna be fast enough to outpace
00:44:47
◼
►
the increased voraciousness of our devices for data?
00:44:52
◼
►
I am skeptical.
00:44:54
◼
►
Also his statement that-
00:45:00
◼
►
- His statement that Apple will be transitioning
00:45:05
◼
►
entirely to inductive charging on the iPhone and the iPad.
00:45:11
◼
►
Entirely is fascinating, right?
00:45:14
◼
►
Because there are lots of ergonomic situations
00:45:17
◼
►
where, you know, bringing it,
00:45:19
◼
►
you can, yeah, you can bring a charging puck
00:45:21
◼
►
like you do with the Apple Watch.
00:45:22
◼
►
I mean, I can see it, but it seems like,
00:45:25
◼
►
at least today, that seems like they're really pushing it.
00:45:29
◼
►
And I think about the iPad,
00:45:30
◼
►
and I remember that question we had
00:45:31
◼
►
about how would they do MagSafe on the iPad.
00:45:34
◼
►
And I think like the iPad thing kind of only works
00:45:37
◼
►
if you do MagSafe.
00:45:40
◼
►
And I'm not sure based on the EU regulations,
00:45:43
◼
►
if that's allowed, if you don't have a USB-C port, honestly.
00:45:49
◼
►
'Cause I think about my iPad and like,
00:45:50
◼
►
Do I have to snap on a little magnetic puck somewhere
00:45:54
◼
►
to charge my iPad?
00:45:55
◼
►
And like, I don't know, it seems really weird.
00:45:57
◼
►
- I don't think that the EU regulations
00:46:00
◼
►
would allow them to do this.
00:46:02
◼
►
- I don't think so. - At all.
00:46:03
◼
►
Because the regulation that I've seen,
00:46:05
◼
►
it seems very clear of like,
00:46:07
◼
►
smartphones get USB-C connectors.
00:46:09
◼
►
And the only devices that don't, right,
00:46:13
◼
►
that like won't are devices where it's too small.
00:46:15
◼
►
It's like smartwatches they're not gonna require it on.
00:46:18
◼
►
- Right, so if it's like, well now what we have
00:46:20
◼
►
we have a proprietary charging puck that you charge your phone with, instead of USB-C,
00:46:28
◼
►
that everybody has to buy separately and only works with ours or whatever, or doesn't, it
00:46:33
◼
►
works with other Qi charges, but still, I think it does cut against the exact premise
00:46:37
◼
►
of the EU regulation, right? But I'm also just, I'm skeptical on a high level. Like,
00:46:41
◼
►
this feels to me very much like the, you know, like the car without a steering wheel or the
00:46:48
◼
►
iPod shuffle without any buttons, where there is an ideal here which is picture no ports.
00:46:54
◼
►
And then I look at the state of affairs in terms of the technology for wireless charging
00:46:59
◼
►
and data transfer and how people use these things and the fact that everything gets more
00:47:05
◼
►
complicated if you can't connect to a device if it gets in distress, right?
00:47:11
◼
►
Like it's the idea that you can't reset, you can't do a DFU currently on an iPhone without
00:47:16
◼
►
plugging it into a computer.
00:47:17
◼
►
It's like, well, I know that they could address that,
00:47:20
◼
►
but it's way more complicated.
00:47:22
◼
►
And are there magnetic pins that actually do transfer data,
00:47:25
◼
►
but it's not a port?
00:47:26
◼
►
Like there's a lot going on here.
00:47:29
◼
►
And I just wanna, I'm expressing some skepticism
00:47:32
◼
►
because this feels to me more like a pie in the sky
00:47:35
◼
►
Apple dream than something that's real.
00:47:38
◼
►
And the reason I say that is because I think if Apple
00:47:41
◼
►
did this on its products, maybe not today,
00:47:43
◼
►
but in the next couple of years,
00:47:44
◼
►
it feels like a regression, right?
00:47:47
◼
►
It makes their products worse.
00:47:49
◼
►
And Apple's not above doing that.
00:47:52
◼
►
Removing the headphone jack is arguably a regression.
00:47:54
◼
►
They did it.
00:47:55
◼
►
It turned out to not be that big a deal,
00:47:56
◼
►
although it still was somewhat of a regression.
00:47:59
◼
►
I'm just skeptical that the entirely inductive,
00:48:04
◼
►
charged universe for all Apple products
00:48:07
◼
►
is something that's realistic.
00:48:12
◼
►
I'm like scanning over these documents.
00:48:14
◼
►
is obviously too hard for me to try and get an idea
00:48:17
◼
►
of right now, but I would be super surprised
00:48:21
◼
►
if like, even if they could get away with Qi charging
00:48:24
◼
►
as the common connector that's required.
00:48:29
◼
►
- I don't think that's possible.
00:48:31
◼
►
- I don't know.
00:48:32
◼
►
I mean, I love, look, having a vision like this is great.
00:48:35
◼
►
And knowing where the technology is going in the future,
00:48:41
◼
►
in terms of wireless and in terms of inductive
00:48:44
◼
►
and having a vision, like that's all great.
00:48:50
◼
►
You should do that if you're Apple.
00:48:51
◼
►
You should be thinking many moves ahead.
00:48:55
◼
►
However, and I don't know all the insidery stuff
00:49:00
◼
►
that they probably know, but I look at this
00:49:02
◼
►
and I think this seems unrealistic
00:49:06
◼
►
and more like an ideal than something
00:49:11
◼
►
that everybody is asking for.
00:49:13
◼
►
And the flip side of the,
00:49:15
◼
►
oh, people just want a faster horse
00:49:16
◼
►
and we gave them a car kind of argument is
00:49:19
◼
►
when you give people something they don't want,
00:49:21
◼
►
or you ask them to take a hit in terms of usability
00:49:24
◼
►
for a benefit they don't see.
00:49:27
◼
►
And Apple has done that in the last decade, a few times.
00:49:32
◼
►
- I mean, honestly, see the headphone jack, right?
00:49:34
◼
►
Like people are still upset about that, you know,
00:49:37
◼
►
but I think it ended up turning out mostly okay
00:49:40
◼
►
because AirPods are so good, but.
00:49:42
◼
►
- Sure, but that's the, I mean, the challenge is
00:49:45
◼
►
that charging infrastructure and the ergonomics of it
00:49:47
◼
►
are a harder problem to solve, not insoluble,
00:49:50
◼
►
but a harder problem to solve than something like,
00:49:53
◼
►
like we made AirPods, so this problem is solved.
00:49:57
◼
►
And then, you know, they did that with the,
00:50:00
◼
►
with the butterfly keyboard and with USB-C
00:50:03
◼
►
and in that whole era, that was very much an era of,
00:50:08
◼
►
we're taking you to the future because we have a vision.
00:50:10
◼
►
And everybody else was like, but I was fine
00:50:13
◼
►
and this is really a regression and I don't like it.
00:50:17
◼
►
And that is, again, we sort of are there now
00:50:22
◼
►
with all of that, but they jumped in way too early
00:50:28
◼
►
and users suffered.
00:50:29
◼
►
So when I look at this, that's the kind of like
00:50:31
◼
►
alarm signal that goes off in my head is
00:50:34
◼
►
this feels like a mission statement.
00:50:37
◼
►
And the danger with the mission statement is it's allowed to become real without a reality
00:50:44
◼
►
check happening.
00:50:45
◼
►
So we'll watch it.
00:50:46
◼
►
Like I don't doubt Mark's thought that Apple really doesn't like ports and thinks that
00:50:51
◼
►
they're not necessary.
00:50:53
◼
►
But I think it's far more likely that magnetic connection, induction, all of those sorts
00:50:58
◼
►
of things become preferred.
00:51:02
◼
►
that's not the same as eventually there'll just be no ports. Right? That's not the same
00:51:12
◼
►
This episode is brought to you by Hover. Have you ever thought about starting your own business,
00:51:17
◼
►
creating a brand, or sharing your wealth of knowledge with the world? What about using
00:51:21
◼
►
your years of experience to create something for yourself online? Hover wants to help you
00:51:26
◼
►
take the first step in getting your ideas off the ground. If you have a brand that you've
00:51:31
◼
►
always dreamt of building or a business you want to take online, the first step is finding
00:51:36
◼
►
your domain name. Hover makes this incredibly easy, super simple in fact, of a clear and
00:51:41
◼
►
straight forward user experience, easy to use tools and truly amazing support from friendly
00:51:46
◼
►
humans. It's never too late to step up to the plate and share what you have to offer.
00:51:51
◼
►
Getting online has helped thousands of people around the world reach new heights of their
00:51:55
◼
►
says I am one of these kinds of people that has lots of ideas and I like to
00:52:01
◼
►
pursue those ideas as well as I can and that always for me includes making a
00:52:06
◼
►
website for it and if I want to make a website for it I have to get a domain
00:52:10
◼
►
name sometimes I buy domain names just to forward to other places right so we're
00:52:14
◼
►
talking about merch earlier in the show I have upgradeyourwardrobe.com because I
00:52:18
◼
►
think it's a great domain that are registered on hover that I'm able to
00:52:21
◼
►
send people to and it gets them to what I need them to see very easily.
00:52:25
◼
►
In addition to the classics like .com you can get extensions like .shop, .tech and .art
00:52:31
◼
►
and with over 400 more to choose from you'll be able to find the perfect domain name for
00:52:35
◼
►
your business, one that's memorable, relevant and boosts your brand.
00:52:40
◼
►
You can buy a domain, set up custom email boxes and point it to your website in just
00:52:44
◼
►
a few clicks.
00:52:45
◼
►
If you ever run into trouble help is just a phone call or chat away.
00:52:49
◼
►
Secure, simple and reliable, Hover is a trusted and popular choice amongst millions of people
00:52:54
◼
►
launching any kind of brand or business.
00:52:57
◼
►
If you're ready to get your idea off the ground with the perfect domain name, go to
00:53:01
◼
►
hover.com/upgrade to get 10% off your first Hover purchase.
00:53:05
◼
►
That's hover.com/upgrade for 10% off.
00:53:08
◼
►
Our thanks to Hover for their support of this show and Relay FM.
00:53:13
◼
►
Goodbye notebooks.
00:53:14
◼
►
Oh no, what happened to them?
00:53:16
◼
►
Where'd they go?
00:53:17
◼
►
Hello laptops.
00:53:18
◼
►
Oh, hello laptops!
00:53:20
◼
►
We love to talk about namings and branding on this show.
00:53:24
◼
►
I mean, witness earlier.
00:53:26
◼
►
Witness most of this episode, actually.
00:53:29
◼
►
9to5Mac discovered over the weekend, or late last week it was,
00:53:34
◼
►
that Apple appears to be removing reference to the word "notebook"
00:53:40
◼
►
across their product lines and pages and marketing information,
00:53:45
◼
►
support documents and replacing it with the word "laptop."
00:53:49
◼
►
So I wanted to ask you, Jason, kind of roughly how long have Apple been calling their products "notebooks"?
00:53:56
◼
►
I've forever, right? Because the PowerBook had it embedded in the...
00:54:05
◼
►
I mean, Macintosh Portable was a portable computer, right?
00:54:09
◼
►
Was not a laptop.
00:54:11
◼
►
It's more like you drag it to another desk, right?
00:54:16
◼
►
It was not to go in your lap.
00:54:17
◼
►
But the Power Book in 1991 was a notebook,
00:54:22
◼
►
hence Power Book.
00:54:25
◼
►
That was the whole metaphor being used there.
00:54:27
◼
►
The idea that this was a computer
00:54:30
◼
►
in the shape of a paper notebook, right?
00:54:33
◼
►
That it was the size roughly of a notebook.
00:54:37
◼
►
In the early days, it was very thick notebook.
00:54:40
◼
►
but when you open it up, oh, look, it's a computer
00:54:42
◼
►
and you can do all sorts of things with it.
00:54:45
◼
►
And what came into prevalence, of course,
00:54:47
◼
►
is this idea of a laptop,
00:54:50
◼
►
that it's a computer that's so small
00:54:51
◼
►
you can set it in your lap.
00:54:53
◼
►
And that metaphor seems to have won the day
00:54:55
◼
►
almost everywhere.
00:54:56
◼
►
We used to have arguments about this
00:54:58
◼
►
and use them pretty interchangeably, I think,
00:55:00
◼
►
at Macworld back in the day.
00:55:02
◼
►
But clearly when you think about it for more than a minute
00:55:05
◼
►
and you say the words out loud to yourself,
00:55:08
◼
►
notebook, it's like, why is that?
00:55:12
◼
►
What is, right?
00:55:14
◼
►
It's just like, no, it's wrong.
00:55:16
◼
►
Like it's not notebook, a notebook computer?
00:55:21
◼
►
That actually, you know, Myke,
00:55:23
◼
►
that thing we talked about earlier,
00:55:25
◼
►
the Kindle whatever with a pen on it, that's a notebook.
00:55:29
◼
►
- I mean, an iPad is closer to be, especially, right?
00:55:33
◼
►
'Cause they, if you think of the iPad Pro
00:55:35
◼
►
or the iPad Air now, they're like part built
00:55:39
◼
►
for this pencil to go on the side of the thing.
00:55:41
◼
►
It's all flat and it's got a charging thing.
00:55:43
◼
►
That's a notebook computer.
00:55:46
◼
►
- Not laptops.
00:55:47
◼
►
- Yeah, so, and I think, I mean, it actually,
00:55:51
◼
►
it's funny that they're doing this
00:55:52
◼
►
'cause this is one of those words that really has,
00:55:55
◼
►
I know it doesn't come from his era,
00:55:57
◼
►
but like it gives me like Steve Jobs vibes, right?
00:56:02
◼
►
Like that that was, 'cause he would do that, right?
00:56:04
◼
►
he would occasionally like embrace certain terms
00:56:07
◼
►
and you'd be like, well, that's a weird way to put it, Steve,
00:56:09
◼
►
but that's how Steve does it.
00:56:10
◼
►
So we're all gonna call them apps now
00:56:12
◼
►
and that's just how it's gonna be.
00:56:14
◼
►
And this feels a little like that too.
00:56:17
◼
►
And I wonder who it was who finally inside Apple
00:56:20
◼
►
was like, everybody, we have to stop calling these things
00:56:23
◼
►
notebooks, nobody does.
00:56:25
◼
►
And it probably, you know what probably won the day?
00:56:28
◼
►
Probably it was like a search engine optimization expert
00:56:32
◼
►
who said, "People don't search for notebook!"
00:56:36
◼
►
And they're like, "They search for laptop,
00:56:38
◼
►
we're losing sales, we're losing search hits
00:56:40
◼
►
because we're using the wrong term."
00:56:42
◼
►
And finally somebody at Apple said,
00:56:45
◼
►
"All right, okay, it's fine."
00:56:49
◼
►
You know, that's my guess.
00:56:52
◼
►
- Laptop is just, I mean, about,
00:56:56
◼
►
even then it's like laptop.
00:56:59
◼
►
You know what I mean?
00:57:00
◼
►
Like, the people, laptop,
00:57:04
◼
►
do you think people use their laptops
00:57:06
◼
►
mostly on their laps anymore?
00:57:08
◼
►
- No, I mean, no, I mean, the name is dumb.
00:57:11
◼
►
And I should say MacBook is still the name, right?
00:57:13
◼
►
So notebook, MacBook, it's still book there.
00:57:17
◼
►
Although you could argue the MacBook notebook is dumb, right?
00:57:20
◼
►
It's using MacBook laptop.
00:57:21
◼
►
We have a, we're not doubling up on the metaphor.
00:57:26
◼
►
Laptop, I mean, it's, okay.
00:57:30
◼
►
for a very long time now,
00:57:32
◼
►
most Macs have been laptops.
00:57:36
◼
►
- Yes. - So,
00:57:38
◼
►
there is a larger issue here, which is,
00:57:42
◼
►
I refer sometimes to desktop computers, right?
00:57:46
◼
►
Desktop computers.
00:57:48
◼
►
And sometimes they're, you know, under your desktop
00:57:50
◼
►
or on your floor or whatever.
00:57:52
◼
►
But the desktop laptop parallel
00:57:56
◼
►
is sort of what we're getting at here,
00:57:58
◼
►
that there are two kinds of computers,
00:58:00
◼
►
the kinds that are portable
00:58:02
◼
►
and the kinds that are not portable.
00:58:04
◼
►
But the truth is the majority of Macs,
00:58:06
◼
►
the definitive Mac for the last decade
00:58:08
◼
►
has been the MacBook Air, I would say.
00:58:10
◼
►
It's probably the most best-selling laptop
00:58:12
◼
►
and best-selling computer
00:58:13
◼
►
that they've sold over the last decade.
00:58:16
◼
►
So isn't it just a computer?
00:58:18
◼
►
But we need some other word to,
00:58:22
◼
►
at least sometimes, to signify the difference
00:58:24
◼
►
between a computer that comes with its own display
00:58:26
◼
►
and a battery and is small enough that you can fold it up
00:58:29
◼
►
and take it somewhere.
00:58:30
◼
►
And the ones like my Mac studio, which you can't.
00:58:34
◼
►
I mean, you can't fold it up.
00:58:37
◼
►
You could take it somewhere else.
00:58:39
◼
►
It doesn't have a screen though.
00:58:40
◼
►
It doesn't have any of those other things.
00:58:41
◼
►
It doesn't have its own keyboard, doesn't have a battery.
00:58:43
◼
►
So we're left with desktop laptop.
00:58:47
◼
►
That's just sort of where we are is that over there
00:58:50
◼
►
is a desktop over here is the laptop.
00:58:51
◼
►
But yeah, in terms of meaning, all it really means is
00:58:54
◼
►
you could put it on your lap.
00:58:56
◼
►
- If you wanted to. - And use it.
00:58:58
◼
►
If you wanted to, and people do,
00:59:00
◼
►
but that's not the only place they use them, but you could.
00:59:03
◼
►
- Also with macOS Ventura, this is from a 95 Mac article,
00:59:07
◼
►
a newly set up MacBook Air or MacBook Pro
00:59:11
◼
►
will now be called blank laptop by default.
00:59:15
◼
►
It used to be blank MacBook Air or blank MacBook Pro.
00:59:19
◼
►
Now that's weirder.
00:59:20
◼
►
- Right, right. - Right?
00:59:22
◼
►
- So you get a brand new MacBook Air and set it up
00:59:25
◼
►
and it's gonna be called Myke's laptop.
00:59:27
◼
►
- Rather than Myke's MacBook Air.
00:59:29
◼
►
- Myke's MacBook Air.
00:59:30
◼
►
What's next?
00:59:32
◼
►
Are they gonna change the mail signature
00:59:33
◼
►
to be sent from my smartphone?
00:59:35
◼
►
- Sent from my, but like that I would have,
00:59:38
◼
►
that is like, if you would have said to me,
00:59:40
◼
►
they're gonna change the default thing in Macos Ventura,
00:59:43
◼
►
that is the least likely one that I would have picked.
00:59:46
◼
►
I would naturally have assumed
00:59:48
◼
►
they would just call it Myke's MacBook.
00:59:50
◼
►
Like they're all just called MacBooks, right?
00:59:53
◼
►
- Instead of laptop.
00:59:54
◼
►
It's like, why would you do that?
00:59:56
◼
►
That is a very strange decision to make.
00:59:59
◼
►
I feel like it doesn't match up
01:00:01
◼
►
with these other things in a way.
01:00:03
◼
►
I find that very odd.
01:00:08
◼
►
- Now I wanna know, what happens if you set up an iMac?
01:00:11
◼
►
Is it like Myke's computer?
01:00:13
◼
►
Like what is that called?
01:00:15
◼
►
Myke's personal computation device?
01:00:19
◼
►
So here's my guess.
01:00:22
◼
►
I'm just gonna throw out a guess here.
01:00:23
◼
►
not knowing the real answer, but why not?
01:00:25
◼
►
It's a podcast.
01:00:26
◼
►
I wonder if there was a complaint
01:00:31
◼
►
from somebody who administers a lot of devices
01:00:34
◼
►
about the MacBook Air, MacBook Pro thing,
01:00:37
◼
►
especially since when you migrate, it keeps the name.
01:00:40
◼
►
So you migrate from a MacBook Air to a MacBook Pro,
01:00:44
◼
►
and it keeps the name MacBook Air,
01:00:46
◼
►
even though it's not a MacBook Air anymore.
01:00:49
◼
►
This is like how my iPhone 13 mini,
01:00:53
◼
►
when I migrated to the iPhone 14 Pro, it said, you know,
01:00:56
◼
►
13 mini, like that's not your name,
01:00:59
◼
►
but it doesn't know that.
01:01:00
◼
►
By the way, that would be smart
01:01:01
◼
►
if they were smart enough to rename.
01:01:03
◼
►
- Why don't they do that? - If you did use a product name
01:01:05
◼
►
to rename it and they don't do that.
01:01:07
◼
►
- So I set up my new AirPods Pro and it just said,
01:01:11
◼
►
Myke's AirPods Pro, parentheses two,
01:01:14
◼
►
well, not just actually two, which is what it is.
01:01:17
◼
►
Why could you not work that out?
01:01:19
◼
►
You know, like I do find that annoying.
01:01:21
◼
►
or like you say, set up a new iPhone,
01:01:23
◼
►
and now it's called Myke's iPhone 13 Pro Max 2.
01:01:28
◼
►
- You know what you are.
01:01:30
◼
►
Nobody wants to keep the name, right?
01:01:32
◼
►
If I've not changed the name,
01:01:34
◼
►
you should change it for me, right?
01:01:37
◼
►
- Especially if you can use, you know,
01:01:39
◼
►
some of your fancy on-device intelligence
01:01:41
◼
►
to recognize that this is literally the name
01:01:43
◼
►
of the product that I was on before,
01:01:45
◼
►
and therefore, when I come to a new product,
01:01:47
◼
►
I should change it to the name of the new product.
01:01:49
◼
►
This isn't hard.
01:01:50
◼
►
Considering that you do change it, right?
01:01:52
◼
►
Like you do change it by adding the number at the end.
01:01:55
◼
►
So you do feel like it needs to be changed, right?
01:01:58
◼
►
So you're changing it.
01:02:00
◼
►
If you feel like it needs to be changed
01:02:01
◼
►
and are therefore changing it,
01:02:03
◼
►
why not actually make it correct?
01:02:05
◼
►
That's a very strange one.
01:02:07
◼
►
But yeah, so there you go.
01:02:08
◼
►
The laptops now, no more notebooks.
01:02:11
◼
►
- No more notebooks except the MacBook itself.
01:02:14
◼
►
- Maybe it's gonna be called MacTop.
01:02:16
◼
►
MacTop, MacLap.
01:02:18
◼
►
- Laptop Pro Max.
01:02:20
◼
►
- Lap Mac Pro Max.
01:02:23
◼
►
- Lap Book Pro Max.
01:02:27
◼
►
Yeah, the Lap Book Air.
01:02:28
◼
►
- Oh, they call it Laptop Pro Max
01:02:30
◼
►
and it's M-A-C-S at the end.
01:02:32
◼
►
It's Laptop Pro Max.
01:02:34
◼
►
- Oh, I like it.
01:02:35
◼
►
So they're all Macs.
01:02:36
◼
►
So it would be like Laptop Air Max, M-A-C-S.
01:02:40
◼
►
- Air Max 95.
01:02:44
◼
►
Well, I feel like somebody at Apple was listening,
01:02:48
◼
►
a recruiter at Apple was listening to this episode
01:02:49
◼
►
for some reason, and we're like saying,
01:02:51
◼
►
these two gents really know what they're doing.
01:02:53
◼
►
We should hire them to work on our product naming team.
01:02:56
◼
►
And they just got to that last one minute
01:02:58
◼
►
and they're like, stop and throw away trash.
01:03:01
◼
►
- We were so close. - These guys are dummies.
01:03:03
◼
►
- We were so close. - We were almost in,
01:03:05
◼
►
but we are back out.
01:03:06
◼
►
- So close, but yes, so far.
01:03:08
◼
►
I have some more good news.
01:03:12
◼
►
- The Matter 1.0 standard has finally been finalized.
01:03:17
◼
►
So it's really taken its time.
01:03:21
◼
►
- It takes a lot of effort to get these tech giants to agree
01:03:24
◼
►
on home automation standards, I guess.
01:03:29
◼
►
- Sure, I mean--
01:03:30
◼
►
- But we did it.
01:03:30
◼
►
We did it everybody.
01:03:32
◼
►
- And also this is one of those things
01:03:34
◼
►
where very complicated and you only get a first shot
01:03:38
◼
►
at first impression, so make it right.
01:03:41
◼
►
I wanted to give everyone a bit of a refresh
01:03:43
◼
►
'cause I did some reading today about Matter,
01:03:45
◼
►
about kind of what it's gonna be doing
01:03:47
◼
►
and what we can expect, because it was one of those things
01:03:50
◼
►
where I was personally kind of waiting until this point
01:03:53
◼
►
to really spend a lot of time reading about it,
01:03:55
◼
►
because it felt like it could change or just never happen.
01:03:59
◼
►
I was wondering, is matter ever actually going to happen?
01:04:02
◼
►
Well, it is.
01:04:03
◼
►
So it is officially launching on November 3rd,
01:04:05
◼
►
and there's gonna be this event of some description.
01:04:08
◼
►
I don't think anything particularly exciting will be there,
01:04:11
◼
►
but it's like the matter organization
01:04:14
◼
►
is inviting people of the media to go to an event.
01:04:17
◼
►
New devices can be sold as of now.
01:04:32
◼
►
Existing devices can now be upgraded to support MATA.
01:04:35
◼
►
Many will be upgraded.
01:04:45
◼
►
iOS 16.1 is where matter support will happen
01:04:48
◼
►
in the home app, including the,
01:04:51
◼
►
now do you remember Jason, Apple said that the home app
01:04:55
◼
►
will have underlying changes to support matter?
01:05:00
◼
►
- This is because of what is called a matter controller.
01:05:04
◼
►
These are-- - I tried something
01:05:06
◼
►
out of Star Trek. - Yes.
01:05:07
◼
►
These are effectively hubs, bridges, that kind of thing.
01:05:12
◼
►
You know like how you need like a hub to be able to get some things to talk to each other
01:05:16
◼
►
or whatever.
01:05:18
◼
►
Some devices can become matter controllers.
01:05:21
◼
►
Google, Amazon, their smarts, some of their smart speakers will be updated to be controllers.
01:05:26
◼
►
The HomePod mini can be a matter controller.
01:05:29
◼
►
A HomeKit hub is the best analog here.
01:05:34
◼
►
Because this is the separate part.
01:05:37
◼
►
Apps can be matter controllers.
01:05:40
◼
►
It doesn't have to be tied to a physical piece of hardware that stays in your home.
01:05:48
◼
►
Because the matter controller is designed to create the links between the devices and
01:05:55
◼
►
also set any automations.
01:05:58
◼
►
So when Apple were talking about the underlying changes to the home app, what they're talking
01:06:05
◼
►
about is making the home app a matter controller.
01:06:08
◼
►
So you actually don't necessarily need to buy any hardware that stays in your home specifically
01:06:17
◼
►
- The dream here is you connect everything on Matter and you set up an automation that
01:06:24
◼
►
says when device A fires, device B does something else.
01:06:28
◼
►
And device A and device B can see each other and talk to each other.
01:06:33
◼
►
So you don't need to have another device watching device A and then telling device B what to
01:06:38
◼
►
do. Device A says to device B directly "I did this" and device B says "oh well then
01:06:44
◼
►
I do this" right?
01:06:46
◼
►
Yeah this is a great summary of that which I enjoyed from the Verge. With Matter instead
01:06:51
◼
►
of using two or three separate apps and connecting their cloud service backends to get your smart
01:06:56
◼
►
plug to turn on your lamp when you unlock your front door, that plug and lock can now
01:07:00
◼
►
talk directly to each other and you can set up automation using one Matter controller
01:07:06
◼
►
So you set up the links, but then the devices talk to each other.
01:07:11
◼
►
And it's actually all of this is done without the requirement of the internet at all.
01:07:16
◼
►
Matter all works locally by design.
01:07:19
◼
►
It does not require a connection to the internet.
01:07:22
◼
►
It is possible for devices to be internet controllable if desired by the user, but it
01:07:27
◼
►
is not a necessary part of the specification.
01:07:29
◼
►
- Right, so like Apple is undoubtedly adding
01:07:32
◼
►
this whole home app layer with other Apple devices
01:07:37
◼
►
where you can continue to do what you can do now,
01:07:39
◼
►
which is control them outside of your home.
01:07:42
◼
►
But you don't have to do that.
01:07:44
◼
►
- No, you don't have to do that.
01:07:45
◼
►
And this is really, it is kind of like networking based.
01:07:50
◼
►
So if you have Thread devices,
01:07:53
◼
►
you will need a Matter Thread hub to get that all to work.
01:07:57
◼
►
'cause Thread is all just like direct control,
01:07:59
◼
►
but it's networking, but not internet,
01:08:02
◼
►
if that makes sense, right?
01:08:03
◼
►
So like it's using networking like equipment,
01:08:06
◼
►
where Thread is just this local radio system.
01:08:10
◼
►
Now Thread devices don't work naturally with--
01:08:13
◼
►
- The HomePod Mini has a Thread radio, right?
01:08:15
◼
►
- So I would imagine that the HomePod Mini
01:08:16
◼
►
would be an example of a device that could do that,
01:08:18
◼
►
that could talk to Thread devices
01:08:20
◼
►
and act as the matter controller.
01:08:21
◼
►
- I will say in theory.
01:08:23
◼
►
- In theory.
01:08:24
◼
►
- I think Apple need to say that it will do that first.
01:08:26
◼
►
But yes, it may be a device like a HomePod Mini
01:08:31
◼
►
or some kind of Google device will work
01:08:34
◼
►
and or the company that you use
01:08:37
◼
►
that are all thread related might make a hub
01:08:39
◼
►
and then that will work.
01:08:41
◼
►
Or the company will just be able to update the software on it
01:08:44
◼
►
and they can make it work
01:08:45
◼
►
if it has some kind of radio in it.
01:08:47
◼
►
But thread is maybe one of the ones
01:08:49
◼
►
which is a little bit left out here
01:08:52
◼
►
of the idea of not needing new hardware.
01:08:54
◼
►
you may need something to get those things to connect.
01:08:57
◼
►
Which is a shame because up until this point,
01:08:59
◼
►
Thread was considered the easiest way to do all this stuff.
01:09:03
◼
►
Because it was so low level.
01:09:04
◼
►
But, you know, you may need it, but you may not,
01:09:07
◼
►
depending on the other devices that you have in your home
01:09:10
◼
►
that could work as a controller.
01:09:12
◼
►
Like in theory, that might be where you want something
01:09:15
◼
►
like a HomePod mini or one of the Google Nest Hub things.
01:09:20
◼
►
Where it's like that is a physical thing
01:09:22
◼
►
which is acting as that bridge, right?
01:09:25
◼
►
So when your phone isn't there, it might still work.
01:09:28
◼
►
That's conjecture on my part.
01:09:29
◼
►
I don't know the answer to that, but.
01:09:31
◼
►
This launch spec only will cover a limited set
01:09:35
◼
►
of device types in Matter 1.0.
01:09:38
◼
►
These are light bulbs and light switches,
01:09:41
◼
►
HVAC controls, smart shades, thermostats, smart sensors,
01:09:47
◼
►
I assume that's like presence sensors and stuff,
01:09:50
◼
►
locks and media devices including TVs. Support for devices like vacuums and cameras
01:09:58
◼
►
is being developed for later versions of the specification.
01:10:02
◼
►
My understanding, but I don't know this for sure, is that updates to the spec are not going to be
01:10:11
◼
►
like a huge deal, right? But it's going to be a thing that just over time will add more and more
01:10:17
◼
►
stuff. So that's kind of where we are with matter right now. I'm pretty excited
01:10:23
◼
►
about it. A lot of companies are talking about the devices that are going to be
01:10:27
◼
►
updated. Some devices that you already own will be able to be
01:10:32
◼
►
updated to matter. Some you may need to get a newer model. Like for example I
01:10:36
◼
►
think Nest are adding support, a matter support to their thermostats, but I think
01:10:40
◼
►
only on the newest model. But what that would mean though if you have that
01:10:46
◼
►
model is in theory you would be able to ask your HomePod to change your temperature and
01:10:53
◼
►
it will change the temperature of your Nest thermostat, which is exactly what people want.
01:10:59
◼
►
That is why this exists.
01:11:01
◼
►
I run Homebridge mostly so I can do this one thing, which is connect Nest to the Home app.
01:11:07
◼
►
So that may be enough actually for me to buy another Nest.
01:11:11
◼
►
Now, there are other thermostats out there.
01:11:14
◼
►
I like the Nest.
01:11:15
◼
►
I really do.
01:11:16
◼
►
I prefer it to the Ecobee,
01:11:18
◼
►
mostly because I like how it looks, honestly.
01:11:23
◼
►
And that might be enough to do it.
01:11:24
◼
►
But that's the dream, right?
01:11:25
◼
►
Is that all these things that have been like,
01:11:27
◼
►
well, you can't do Amazon things
01:11:31
◼
►
and Google things and Apple things in the home.
01:11:33
◼
►
And guess what?
01:11:34
◼
►
I have all three of those things in my home.
01:11:37
◼
►
And theoretically, this will allow you to do that.
01:11:40
◼
►
- Or you have a device manufacturer
01:11:42
◼
►
that's gone all in on one thing.
01:11:44
◼
►
Well, now they can talk to each other.
01:11:45
◼
►
So like, you know, I use Eve products in the studio here
01:11:50
◼
►
and they are like basically all in on HomeKit.
01:11:52
◼
►
But now Eve are going to be integrating Matter.
01:11:55
◼
►
So I would be able to get my Eve radiator,
01:11:59
◼
►
like controller devices to maybe talk to some kind of sensor
01:12:03
◼
►
I buy from another company,
01:12:05
◼
►
rather than it necessarily needing to all be HomeKit.
01:12:09
◼
►
And one of the things that's worth noting is,
01:12:12
◼
►
what the Matter spec will allow
01:12:14
◼
►
for some kind of communication automation stuff between these devices.
01:12:18
◼
►
It does not remove entirely the need for apps.
01:12:25
◼
►
There might be some features of a Nest thermostat that you still need to use the Nest app to
01:12:30
◼
►
configure, but once it's configured or updated or whatever, the day-to-day control can be
01:12:38
◼
►
more automated and you can use whatever you want to control it.
01:12:41
◼
►
it doesn't completely remove the requirement to use this app, use that app.
01:12:48
◼
►
My ancient Philips Hue bridge will apparently get a software update to support Matter.
01:12:53
◼
►
Yep, Philips are all in. And this is the benefit where some, if you do have a product which
01:13:00
◼
►
uses bridges, like in Philips have always had bridges, it's in fact the only way that
01:13:04
◼
►
Hue devices work is with a bridge, they are able to just update the bridge and then all
01:13:09
◼
►
the light bulbs will be able to, because they will just talk to the bridge and so that's
01:13:13
◼
►
great but not all bridge based products will support this but Philips are all in on this
01:13:18
◼
►
which I'm very happy about and I actually think is not a surprise to Philips because
01:13:21
◼
►
they've they've always been pretty good with this kind of stuff. So yeah, Joe in the discord
01:13:27
◼
►
is asking this is kind of what I was talking about, has anyone seen if Matter has something
01:13:31
◼
►
for how it handles firmware updates for devices? That's the kind of thing you will need third
01:13:36
◼
►
party apps for. You still need the app for those devices to do things like updates. To
01:13:41
◼
►
my knowledge, Matter has no support for any of that. It's not an OS. It's not like this
01:13:49
◼
►
replaces Google Nest or whatever. By and large, you as the user will never see Matter other
01:13:55
◼
►
than knowing when you buy a product, you want to see the Matter logo on it. I don't even
01:14:00
◼
►
think there's like a matter app like it's it's just a technology but it's not
01:14:04
◼
►
about replacing anything specifically it's more about just providing this
01:14:10
◼
►
open source framework that all of these devices can talk to each other for I'm
01:14:15
◼
►
super excited about the future of home automation because of this like this is
01:14:21
◼
►
exactly what we need this is the I this the market has one out here which is a
01:14:26
◼
►
a bananas thing because this never happens.
01:14:28
◼
►
The reason this has happened is that
01:14:31
◼
►
all of these companies came to,
01:14:34
◼
►
like basically at the same time, right?
01:14:36
◼
►
Like Google and Amazon, Philips, you know, like Apple,
01:14:40
◼
►
they all came at the same time with this idea.
01:14:43
◼
►
And no one could decide on one of them
01:14:44
◼
►
because really none of them are any better than any other.
01:14:48
◼
►
And so it's forced all of these companies to work together
01:14:50
◼
►
to make it better for the consumer.
01:14:53
◼
►
And that's awesome.
01:14:54
◼
►
And it sounds like Apple donated its home kit code
01:14:58
◼
►
to make this happen, which is also kind of cool.
01:15:01
◼
►
- But Apple said, we wrote this
01:15:03
◼
►
and it sounds like everybody else was like,
01:15:05
◼
►
it's pretty good, we could use this as the base.
01:15:07
◼
►
And it's this detente that we've been talking about
01:15:09
◼
►
for a long time.
01:15:10
◼
►
This idea that it is the single biggest thing
01:15:14
◼
►
keeping smart home, holding smart home technology back
01:15:17
◼
►
is that everybody, it was a gold rush.
01:15:20
◼
►
Everybody wanted to win.
01:15:22
◼
►
They threw up walls everywhere
01:15:24
◼
►
so that things were incompatible.
01:15:26
◼
►
It was bad for the manufacturers.
01:15:27
◼
►
It increased their expense to make products
01:15:30
◼
►
'cause they had to either make different SKUs
01:15:31
◼
►
for different tech,
01:15:32
◼
►
or they had to write the same support three times
01:15:35
◼
►
in order for it to work on Google and Amazon and Apple.
01:15:38
◼
►
And it meant that some products would just never come
01:15:41
◼
►
to certain platforms.
01:15:42
◼
►
And they finally realized that the land rush era was over
01:15:46
◼
►
and that they were just defeating themselves by doing this.
01:15:50
◼
►
And that was what, two plus years ago with Chip,
01:15:53
◼
►
whatever it was, that they finally announced
01:15:57
◼
►
they were doing this, but November 3rd, right?
01:16:00
◼
►
So less than a month from now, we enter the Matter era.
01:16:04
◼
►
I'm sure there are gonna be complaints.
01:16:05
◼
►
I'm sure there's gonna be things that work weirdly.
01:16:08
◼
►
People are gonna be frustrated by stuff
01:16:09
◼
►
that doesn't get upgraded to it.
01:16:10
◼
►
I'm also kind of curious about whether
01:16:12
◼
►
those homebridge type products of the world shift gears
01:16:16
◼
►
to be like more just trying to get
01:16:20
◼
►
non-matter compatible stuff into matter,
01:16:23
◼
►
or if there'll be a new,
01:16:24
◼
►
I know nothing about what they're planning,
01:16:26
◼
►
but like I can still see a place
01:16:28
◼
►
for something like Homebridge or Home Control,
01:16:32
◼
►
but in a different context of like,
01:16:35
◼
►
really our goal now is to just get anything that's old
01:16:38
◼
►
to show up in matter.
01:16:41
◼
►
- I mean, in my mind,
01:16:44
◼
►
like I feel like they have to do something
01:16:46
◼
►
because over time the need for something like a home bridge
01:16:50
◼
►
will decrease.
01:16:53
◼
►
- Yeah, because of matter.
01:16:54
◼
►
- In theory every device that you should be buying
01:16:57
◼
►
should be matter.
01:16:58
◼
►
- And maybe in the end what it really is
01:16:59
◼
►
is it's a software matter controller, right?
01:17:03
◼
►
Something like that.
01:17:04
◼
►
I don't know, I don't know what they're planning,
01:17:06
◼
►
but I do think that there's still gonna be a place
01:17:08
◼
►
for some of that stuff just to be a bridge
01:17:10
◼
►
from old tech to new tech.
01:17:12
◼
►
- Yeah, I agree with that.
01:17:14
◼
►
But that feels like not a great over, I mean, not that Homebridge is a business,
01:17:18
◼
►
but it's not really like a long term product at that point, right?
01:17:21
◼
►
Like, because then within a matter of years, people would upgrade or a matter of
01:17:25
◼
►
time, maybe, maybe a decade, people would change their devices and hopefully
01:17:29
◼
►
they'll be matter supported.
01:17:30
◼
►
Because this is one of those things now where I feel like if you're buying
01:17:34
◼
►
smart home technology, you really want to make sure that that company will be
01:17:38
◼
►
updating the thing that you're buying to support matter.
01:17:41
◼
►
Like really, I would say that you shouldn't buy something unless it's going to have the support
01:17:47
◼
►
because it harms you not all and it future proofs you, I think. So I think this is the clear way to
01:17:56
◼
►
go when it comes to home automation technology. This episode is brought to you by CleanMyMac X.
01:18:04
◼
►
You want to make sure that you can trust and rely on your Macintosh. It is a crucial tool for work,
01:18:10
◼
►
education and life. MacPaw are on a mission to help machines help you. That's why they
01:18:25
◼
►
developed ClearMyMac X, an ideal decluttering app for the Mac that can keep it in tip top
01:18:30
◼
►
shape. So what does ClearMyMac X do exactly? Well, it includes 49 tools to help you find
01:18:36
◼
►
and delete invisible computer junk to help you tune your Mac so it runs at its maximum
01:18:41
◼
►
speed with no hold ups, it organises your disk space, it shows you your large hidden
01:18:46
◼
►
folders so you can very easily see what's taking up space on your Mac and free up that
01:18:51
◼
►
space so you don't run into storage issues, it will fight Mac specific malware and adware
01:18:56
◼
►
and protect your computer if you want that and it also prevents your Mac from cluttering,
01:19:01
◼
►
lagging and slowing down.
01:19:02
◼
►
CleanMyMac also has an all new menu app to help you take care of your Mac's health, with
01:19:09
◼
►
six detailed monitors to provide useful information for you about your storage, your state of
01:19:15
◼
►
protection, your CPU performance, RAM, battery and network speeds.
01:19:19
◼
►
So at a glance you can see how your computer is performing right now.
01:19:23
◼
►
CleanMyMac X is notarized by Apple and is available in the Mac App Store and it really
01:19:28
◼
►
stands out in its design.
01:19:30
◼
►
In 2021, CleanMyMac was honored with the Red Dot Award, UX Design Award and has become
01:19:36
◼
►
a Webby Award nominee this year.
01:19:38
◼
►
I use CleanMyMac X, it's a great tool to have in my toolkit.
01:19:42
◼
►
Every now and then I want to see how much space is in a certain folder or if sometimes
01:19:46
◼
►
I say "hey your disk space is filling up" and I'm like "why?"
01:19:50
◼
►
CleanMyMac X is really a great way for me to find the answer to that question.
01:19:55
◼
►
CleanMyMac X, go and get it today and you will get 5% off by going to macpoor.app/updates
01:20:00
◼
►
upgrade. This discount is only valid for 2 weeks so go now to makpaw.app/upgrade and
01:20:07
◼
►
you will get 5% off.
01:20:09
◼
►
Despite the war in Makpaw's home country of Ukraine, the team have worked hard to make
01:20:13
◼
►
sure there are no disruptions in the support and development of CleanMyMakX. The product
01:20:17
◼
►
is stable, safe and secure and I think we should be supporting Makpaw because they are
01:20:22
◼
►
a fantastic company doing wonderful work.
01:20:25
◼
►
Our thanks to CleanMyMakX for their support of Upgrade and all of Relay FM.
01:20:29
◼
►
Let's do some #AskUpgradeQuestions to finish out today's episode.
01:20:36
◼
►
First question comes from Terminal 3, which I like to think is the Heathrow Terminal 3,
01:20:42
◼
►
like Heathrow Airport Terminal 3, just wants to know.
01:20:44
◼
►
Jason, how did you spend your birthday?
01:20:47
◼
►
It was Jason's birthday this past week.
01:20:50
◼
►
Happy birthday, Jason!
01:20:51
◼
►
Yes, it was.
01:20:53
◼
►
Uh, pretty normal day, honestly, because Lauren was working all day, so, and it's the busy
01:20:59
◼
►
season for us, so, and there were no baseball games on, which is sad, because I always like
01:21:03
◼
►
to do that. So I wrote some of my macOS Ventura review, I got yelled at by you and Steven,
01:21:10
◼
►
who said I should be curling or something instead. That's how curling works.
01:21:12
◼
►
Just doing anything else other than writing, because you were angry too, you were just
01:21:16
◼
►
having like a bad time with it.
01:21:18
◼
►
Little preview of my macOS Ventura review, some of the features aren't very good. You
01:21:23
◼
►
can guess which ones.
01:21:24
◼
►
That was more of it for me, you know, if you want to work on your birthday, work on your
01:21:27
◼
►
birthday but work on something fun at least. Yeah well I mean it was I mean I
01:21:31
◼
►
did get it out honestly clearing things out of the to-do list is a little bit
01:21:36
◼
►
fun when it's so overwhelming like it is in September but we had a nice dinner
01:21:42
◼
►
and went to a couple of concerts last week too so that was kind of fun so we
01:21:47
◼
►
had some we did some nice stuff but it was not entirely concentrated on my
01:21:51
◼
►
birthday and that's okay. David wants to know seems like a long time since
01:21:56
◼
►
"Eddie Q presented at an Apple event.
01:21:58
◼
►
"He used to be a regular.
01:21:59
◼
►
"When do you think we'll see Eddie again?"
01:22:01
◼
►
I wanted to pick this question out
01:22:02
◼
►
'cause we spent so much time talking about Eddie Q last week.
01:22:06
◼
►
What do you think about the lack of Eddie Q?
01:22:10
◼
►
- It's not, he's not great at it,
01:22:12
◼
►
at the presenting on, you know, on stage or in an event.
01:22:15
◼
►
And it's not, there are other people who like,
01:22:19
◼
►
for Apple TV stuff,
01:22:21
◼
►
there should be other people to present it.
01:22:25
◼
►
Like, I don't know, it's just,
01:22:26
◼
►
he's not necessary for that sort of thing.
01:22:28
◼
►
He, and it is not, here's what I will say.
01:22:31
◼
►
You don't wanna be at a company
01:22:34
◼
►
where people insist on screen time
01:22:37
◼
►
in order to prove how important they are.
01:22:40
◼
►
- I think Google has this problem.
01:22:42
◼
►
- Google, I mean, I don't know about the last couple
01:22:45
◼
►
of years, I haven't watched a full Google thing live
01:22:50
◼
►
- Well, I/O is where you see this issue the most, I think.
01:22:52
◼
►
- But definitely you see it where it's like every
01:22:55
◼
►
vice president has to have their five minutes even if they don't have anything to announce,
01:23:00
◼
►
just to exert their power. And like Eddie, you know, Eddie's living his best life and
01:23:07
◼
►
services are a very important part of Apple's business. His presence in the photo on the
01:23:12
◼
►
May Day Parade at the top of the Kremlin is not, you know, is not required for him to
01:23:18
◼
►
be still there and powerful. And I think it's interesting that he was in all those photos
01:23:22
◼
►
or many of those photos last week from the big European trip, shows you he's still a
01:23:27
◼
►
mover and a shaker and a schmoozer and he doesn't have to be, you know, doing his dad
01:23:34
◼
►
dance out there like he did that one time. He doesn't have to do that. He doesn't have
01:23:40
◼
►
to be present for that sort of thing.
01:23:42
◼
►
So my kind of read on this is somewhat similar, which is like, I think there was a time when
01:23:48
◼
►
Apple presentations, every kind of like head of each division would be the person to deliver
01:23:55
◼
►
the presentation about that portion of whatever was spoken about, right? So they would have,
01:24:01
◼
►
you know, you want a software, right? Well, now we're going to get forced all up. We're
01:24:05
◼
►
going to talk about hardware. Well, now Sheila's going to, you know, it was like a kind of
01:24:09
◼
►
a person who had the fiefdom and they would bring out each person to talk about each area.
01:24:15
◼
►
- And that started to then change over time
01:24:17
◼
►
where they ended up just relying on the best presenters.
01:24:20
◼
►
So like Craig Federighi had an increased role.
01:24:22
◼
►
And then I think they've done an even better thing
01:24:24
◼
►
where now they bring in people from the teams
01:24:29
◼
►
that aren't the same people every time.
01:24:32
◼
►
And I think in doing this,
01:24:33
◼
►
they're able to showcase the diversity of employee
01:24:37
◼
►
that they actually have at the company.
01:24:38
◼
►
And it's not all just middle-aged white men
01:24:41
◼
►
which is the majority of the leadership team, right?
01:24:43
◼
►
They're able to mix it up more.
01:24:44
◼
►
Ironically, EdiQ is Cuban, but yes, the point is that they--
01:24:48
◼
►
- I'm not talking about Edi specifically here.
01:24:50
◼
►
I'm talking about-- - Yeah, they changed
01:24:51
◼
►
their way of presenting and who presents
01:24:53
◼
►
to be a very different sort of thing
01:24:55
◼
►
where you're not gonna have the same five people
01:24:58
◼
►
out there every time.
01:24:59
◼
►
- My point here is not to talk about Edi specifically.
01:25:02
◼
►
It's more just a change in the process,
01:25:04
◼
►
to which I will say Edi has been lost
01:25:06
◼
►
in the shuffle of the new process,
01:25:08
◼
►
which is to have people in each division
01:25:11
◼
►
come out and talk about it,
01:25:13
◼
►
which is not necessarily the person in charge of each division.
01:25:17
◼
►
I will say, Greg Joss-Wieck seems like a really nice guy.
01:25:22
◼
►
I don't think he is necessarily the best person
01:25:24
◼
►
to be talking about the iPhone Pro anymore,
01:25:27
◼
►
but, you know, you can have your own differing opinions on that.
01:25:29
◼
►
-I mean, he's at the top level, right?
01:25:31
◼
►
I mean, he's at the top level, like Jeff Williams or something,
01:25:34
◼
►
where it sort of, like, then introduces all the people beneath.
01:25:37
◼
►
That's the -- he's in the part that Steve would have been in.
01:25:40
◼
►
-Joss does the whole thing about the Pro iPhone.
01:25:42
◼
►
- Does he do the whole thing?
01:25:43
◼
►
- Well, he's probably not doing that.
01:25:44
◼
►
- And I don't think that he's the best person for that.
01:25:46
◼
►
Like, Karen Jants is like a way better presenter,
01:25:49
◼
►
I think, Karen does the iPhone, right?
01:25:52
◼
►
Is that right?
01:25:53
◼
►
Is that, yeah, I think so.
01:25:55
◼
►
And she does a much better--
01:25:58
◼
►
- Kayan, not Karen.
01:25:59
◼
►
- Kayan, thank you.
01:26:01
◼
►
I was, I, Y and an R, I got them mixed up.
01:26:05
◼
►
Kayan Jants does a better job, right, of that, I think.
01:26:09
◼
►
- It's an I.
01:26:10
◼
►
- Oh my God.
01:26:11
◼
►
You're killing me here, alright?
01:26:13
◼
►
Well, you know, I want to get the name right.
01:26:16
◼
►
Well, you googled it, right? To confirm?
01:26:19
◼
►
I'm just speaking here.
01:26:21
◼
►
I googled it because I knew it wasn't Karen, but it's Kian with an I.
01:26:25
◼
►
I was mixing up the R from Drance.
01:26:27
◼
►
That's what I'm going to say, alright? I'm trying.
01:26:29
◼
►
We know her husband.
01:26:31
◼
►
Shh, we know her husband.
01:26:33
◼
►
Oh my god, I didn't know that.
01:26:35
◼
►
It's Matt's.
01:26:37
◼
►
Okay. Anyway, all of this to say, I think Eddie has been lost in the shuffle for this
01:26:42
◼
►
because I think in Eddie's division, he's just not the right person anymore because
01:26:46
◼
►
like the majority of Eddie's division now is probably TV Plus. And if you're gonna have
01:26:52
◼
►
someone come out now to talk about that, you want the content people, not the deals guy.
01:26:58
◼
►
Because no one wants to hear about the deals that are made. You want to hear about the
01:27:01
◼
►
content that's made.
01:27:02
◼
►
He's a mover and a shaker and a schmoozer and he's living his best life and he's at
01:27:06
◼
►
Oktoberfest and he doesn't need to be more than that.
01:27:09
◼
►
I have a question from David who asks, "Do you think Apple will ever allow third-party
01:27:14
◼
►
watch faces?"
01:27:15
◼
►
Is this an underscore David Smith?
01:27:19
◼
►
This is actually David Dooley, our artwork designer.
01:27:24
◼
►
But then I put in a link to a David Smith tweet.
01:27:28
◼
►
Of David Smith making new watch faces.
01:27:31
◼
►
It's a conspiracy of David's.
01:27:32
◼
►
It's the David's conspiracy.
01:27:35
◼
►
The, do I think Apple will ever allow third-party watch faces?
01:27:40
◼
►
I'm gonna say yes, ever,
01:27:44
◼
►
because Apple does a lot of things that we say
01:27:47
◼
►
they'll never ever do eventually as a platform matures
01:27:50
◼
►
and they're looking for other ways for it to be interesting.
01:27:52
◼
►
And I think that they will, there will come a point
01:27:56
◼
►
where they will allow a certain level.
01:27:58
◼
►
Obviously it's gonna be like face kit or something,
01:28:01
◼
►
and there's gonna be limitations on what you can do
01:28:03
◼
►
and you have to use Apple's pieces,
01:28:05
◼
►
and there's gonna be, you know,
01:28:07
◼
►
you can't use anybody else's intellectual property,
01:28:09
◼
►
and there'll have to be apps in the app store
01:28:10
◼
►
that'll be approved, and like,
01:28:12
◼
►
there'll be lots of restrictions on it,
01:28:16
◼
►
but I do think it will happen at some point,
01:28:18
◼
►
because it will be a way for Apple to extol the virtues
01:28:23
◼
►
of the watch in a new way.
01:28:26
◼
►
And at some point, you get in the life cycle of a product
01:28:29
◼
►
where you're like, okay, we have the ability to do it,
01:28:32
◼
►
and it'll make us look good,
01:28:34
◼
►
and it'll bring in all these other faces,
01:28:36
◼
►
and we'll have approval over everything,
01:28:39
◼
►
and developers will be happy,
01:28:41
◼
►
and like, why not do it at this point?
01:28:43
◼
►
Because we've reached year 10 or whatever,
01:28:46
◼
►
the Apple Watch, we might as well go ahead with it.
01:28:48
◼
►
I think it's inevitable at some point.
01:28:51
◼
►
And most of the arguments against it
01:28:54
◼
►
that I hear from people
01:28:55
◼
►
are that the intellectual property arguments,
01:28:58
◼
►
and the App Store approval process kinda clears that up.
01:29:02
◼
►
Like, first off, as a developer, you have to say,
01:29:05
◼
►
"No, this is not somebody,
01:29:07
◼
►
doesn't violate anybody's intellectual property."
01:29:09
◼
►
And if somebody raises their hand and says,
01:29:10
◼
►
"Actually, it does.
01:29:11
◼
►
It violates our patent or whatever
01:29:13
◼
►
on our trade dress of our watch or whatever,"
01:29:16
◼
►
then Apple says, "Show us some proof,"
01:29:18
◼
►
and they pull the face down.
01:29:20
◼
►
And I know, you know,
01:29:21
◼
►
that can lead to some controversies and all that,
01:29:23
◼
►
but like, this is the process for this stuff.
01:29:25
◼
►
It's not really any different
01:29:26
◼
►
from any other App Store submission thing.
01:29:29
◼
►
- I'm not convinced, you know.
01:29:31
◼
►
- That they'll do it?
01:29:34
◼
►
- I mean within a reasonable timeframe, right?
01:29:36
◼
►
'Cause like ever is like whatever.
01:29:38
◼
►
- That wasn't the question.
01:29:39
◼
►
- Yeah, I know, but like I'm honestly, I don't know.
01:29:41
◼
►
- In the next two years, I'd say, I don't know.
01:29:43
◼
►
- But I could say in the next 10 years, I don't think so.
01:29:46
◼
►
- Yeah, all right.
01:29:47
◼
►
- Because it's essentially, would they allow anybody else
01:29:52
◼
►
to redesign the UI of the iPhone home screen?
01:29:56
◼
►
Like you can have your own home screen layout
01:29:58
◼
►
that's completely designed by a third-party developer.
01:30:02
◼
►
- You mean like widgets and custom icons?
01:30:04
◼
►
- No, I mean like not that,
01:30:06
◼
►
because that's complications, right?
01:30:08
◼
►
A new watch face design is like,
01:30:10
◼
►
oh, we're gonna allow a third party
01:30:12
◼
►
to design how icons are arranged on the screen
01:30:16
◼
►
and where the clock goes on the lock screen
01:30:18
◼
►
and where the battery indicator goes.
01:30:20
◼
►
Like, it feels way more,
01:30:22
◼
►
'cause we already have that, right?
01:30:24
◼
►
Like widgets, it already exists, they're complications,
01:30:26
◼
►
and you can put them in a bunch of different formats
01:30:29
◼
►
and you can have them already on there.
01:30:31
◼
►
Like, I think it's too much.
01:30:32
◼
►
- I don't agree because I think that in fact,
01:30:36
◼
►
the existence of the complications
01:30:38
◼
►
is the thing that makes it still be kind of
01:30:41
◼
►
under Apple's control,
01:30:42
◼
►
that you've got to design a watch face that we approve
01:30:46
◼
►
and that these are the complication slots.
01:30:48
◼
►
And you do that and you're exerting a level of control
01:30:52
◼
►
over it that sort of limits what a watch face can be.
01:30:55
◼
►
And that's sort of how I'm picturing it.
01:30:56
◼
►
is not, "Oh, people will just write an app
01:30:58
◼
►
that's the Carrot Weather watch face.
01:31:01
◼
►
And all the data on it is from Carrot Weather,
01:31:03
◼
►
and they're using it, and it's literally just an app
01:31:07
◼
►
that runs all the time."
01:31:08
◼
►
Well, that's not what I'm saying.
01:31:09
◼
►
I'm saying, well, no, Carrot Weather.
01:31:11
◼
►
If you wanna display, if you wanna write a watch face app,
01:31:14
◼
►
I guess you can, but the only way
01:31:15
◼
►
you're gonna be displaying data
01:31:17
◼
►
is through our complications API.
01:31:19
◼
►
That's how you do it.
01:31:21
◼
►
And all you're really doing as a custom watch face
01:31:24
◼
►
is adding the design of all the stuff
01:31:27
◼
►
that goes around the complications
01:31:28
◼
►
and choosing which complications you use.
01:31:30
◼
►
That's sort of how I'm envisioning it, right?
01:31:31
◼
►
It's not freedom, it's very limited,
01:31:35
◼
►
'cause we'll, and if they ever do it,
01:31:37
◼
►
it'll be like, "Oh yay, custom watch faces!"
01:31:39
◼
►
And then everybody will look at the rules
01:31:40
◼
►
and they're like, "Oh, oh, it only lets you do this."
01:31:44
◼
►
And that sounds very much like something
01:31:46
◼
►
Apple will do eventually.
01:31:47
◼
►
- And Nougatmachine asks,
01:31:50
◼
►
Next year we have we expect a periscope lens system to debut on the iPhone
01:31:55
◼
►
Should we expect it to follow a similar pattern to the initial rollout of wide and telephoto lenses?
01:32:01
◼
►
Where it's initially impressive to have all of it on an expensive phone
01:32:05
◼
►
But with future versions quickly making the first iteration of that seem crude. So I'm thinking of say something like
01:32:16
◼
►
maybe a portrait mode or something like that?
01:32:19
◼
►
Like, do we expect that it will start one way,
01:32:22
◼
►
and probably be on the most expensive phone,
01:32:23
◼
►
and then move forward in a way
01:32:25
◼
►
that makes the initial one seem kind of basic?
01:32:29
◼
►
- I mean, that's always the way it is, right?
01:32:30
◼
►
It's gonna start out amazing,
01:32:32
◼
►
and then future versions will leave it in the dust.
01:32:34
◼
►
That's just how it is.
01:32:35
◼
►
But I feel like my question about how periscope lenses work
01:32:40
◼
►
and how they work on the other smartphones now
01:32:44
◼
►
and how Apple will choose to implement it is,
01:32:46
◼
►
are you, is there one thing with a periscope?
01:32:50
◼
►
I was kind of assuming that there was one periscope path
01:32:54
◼
►
and that all the sensors are on the other side of it,
01:32:56
◼
►
if that makes sense, that you could actually simplify it,
01:33:00
◼
►
because you're using so much space for the periscope
01:33:02
◼
►
that wouldn't you have like,
01:33:05
◼
►
but I guess you gotta have,
01:33:05
◼
►
I guess the optics have to be different.
01:33:08
◼
►
I'm curious about how this is constructed, right?
01:33:10
◼
►
I assume that the periscope lens is gonna be the,
01:33:13
◼
►
main camera, but I don't know.
01:33:18
◼
►
And I don't know enough about optics,
01:33:19
◼
►
but that's what I'm curious about is like,
01:33:20
◼
►
how do you redefine what an iPhone camera is
01:33:23
◼
►
if you've got actually more focal length, essentially?
01:33:28
◼
►
How does that look and how does that work?
01:33:30
◼
►
- Will it be the main camera?
01:33:33
◼
►
I don't know.
01:33:36
◼
►
'Cause the idea-- - Or is it a zoom?
01:33:37
◼
►
- Well, the idea of the periscope is zooming.
01:33:40
◼
►
Like that's its like function is to allow for a stronger optical zoom.
01:33:47
◼
►
So it's the normal boring, haha, 48 megapixel camera that we have today, but the 3x becomes a
01:33:53
◼
►
super periscope mega zoom like on the Samsung phones, like 100x or whatever they are.
01:33:59
◼
►
It could be part of the reason that the 2x came back because then it's going to be like a 5x.
01:34:04
◼
►
So it'd be like one, two, five.
01:34:07
◼
►
- And then it goes up to 10 maybe.
01:34:11
◼
►
But like it would start and be much more.
01:34:14
◼
►
I expect that this will be a,
01:34:16
◼
►
I mean all Jason it's a fourth camera, I don't know.
01:34:20
◼
►
Like genuinely like maybe, right?
01:34:22
◼
►
Like it's already a square and you've got three in there.
01:34:25
◼
►
Put a fourth in there, you know?
01:34:26
◼
►
Maybe, I don't know.
01:34:28
◼
►
- I think that the Samsung Ultra is four cameras
01:34:31
◼
►
or like what looks like four cameras at the moment.
01:34:35
◼
►
My expectation is this will probably just be
01:34:40
◼
►
the biggest phone that gets this to start with
01:34:44
◼
►
just because it will be easier.
01:34:46
◼
►
- Yeah, there's that rumor that,
01:34:48
◼
►
or the report that Mark Gurman has talked about
01:34:51
◼
►
that it's the Pro Ultra, right?
01:34:53
◼
►
Or the Ultra, Phone Ultra, just straight up Ultra.
01:34:56
◼
►
And that might be exactly where it goes.
01:34:58
◼
►
Somebody in the chat room just pointed out
01:35:00
◼
►
to the Huawei, a little cutaway that they did
01:35:02
◼
►
where it's sort of like camera, camera,
01:35:04
◼
►
and then lens to periscope that turns at 90 degrees
01:35:08
◼
►
and then the sensors on the inside.
01:35:10
◼
►
So there you go, that's the idea.
01:35:12
◼
►
So there'll be one that's got the super mega powerful,
01:35:15
◼
►
awesome periscoping, which the value in the periscope again,
01:35:19
◼
►
is just the more focal length, more optical,
01:35:23
◼
►
like having a very, very, very thin camera
01:35:27
◼
►
eliminates a lot of possibilities.
01:35:29
◼
►
you need to have more length for the light to travel.
01:35:33
◼
►
So it's an interesting idea,
01:35:37
◼
►
but to answer a Nougat machine's question,
01:35:39
◼
►
yeah, I think of course it's gonna seem crude
01:35:44
◼
►
five years afterward, right?
01:35:46
◼
►
But I have hope that these periscope lenses
01:35:50
◼
►
lead to optics that we haven't seen before in smartphones
01:35:53
◼
►
until the advent of periscope lenses.
01:35:55
◼
►
And that if Apple does this,
01:35:57
◼
►
that they're gonna do it right
01:35:58
◼
►
and they're gonna have a good story to tell
01:36:00
◼
►
and great image samples and that'll make it worth it.
01:36:03
◼
►
'Cause keep in mind, they're gonna have to pay
01:36:05
◼
►
on the inside of the phone by leaving space for this.
01:36:08
◼
►
This is gonna be even more space devoted to the camera.
01:36:11
◼
►
- It's gotta be good if they're gonna take up that space,
01:36:14
◼
►
right, the space that could be given
01:36:15
◼
►
to a bunch of different types of things.
01:36:17
◼
►
I mean, I think we said it,
01:36:18
◼
►
but this might be part of the reason
01:36:20
◼
►
why they removed the SIM card.
01:36:22
◼
►
- Sure, I mean, every little bit helps
01:36:25
◼
►
and why they might introduce it
01:36:27
◼
►
in something like an ultra phone that's the biggest one.
01:36:29
◼
►
I like to think that in the future,
01:36:31
◼
►
every smartphone will be almost entirely
01:36:33
◼
►
just bouncing around light inside for camera purposes
01:36:36
◼
►
and just a little tiny bit.
01:36:38
◼
►
- The batteries are in zigzag shapes
01:36:40
◼
►
so they can pass the light between the middle.
01:36:42
◼
►
- Yeah, they're the walls of the little filter bouncing
01:36:47
◼
►
light thingy that is going on there.
01:36:49
◼
►
But I can't wait to see it.
01:36:50
◼
►
Like, I know our excitement about the 48 megapixel camera
01:36:54
◼
►
in the iPhone 14 Pro was very much like,
01:36:57
◼
►
let's see what Apple does with this.
01:36:59
◼
►
Cause Apple has, you know, cares about photography
01:37:01
◼
►
and has its takes on like what it should be.
01:37:04
◼
►
And for something like this, again,
01:37:05
◼
►
what's that story going to be?
01:37:07
◼
►
And what design decisions did they make
01:37:09
◼
►
that finally led to them saying,
01:37:11
◼
►
now is the time we're going to do this with this camera.
01:37:13
◼
►
That's going to be really interesting.
01:37:15
◼
►
If that happens next year, that'll be fun to watch.
01:37:19
◼
►
- Yeah. Follow up on camera, by the way,
01:37:21
◼
►
like I went out this weekend, I took some pictures
01:37:24
◼
►
and I used Halide to take some of the raw
01:37:26
◼
►
and do some editing with them.
01:37:27
◼
►
And again, like just to confirm
01:37:29
◼
►
kind of what we were talking about before,
01:37:31
◼
►
like I'd say again that under the right circumstances
01:37:34
◼
►
this camera is unbelievable.
01:37:37
◼
►
- Yep, it really is. - Unbelievably good.
01:37:39
◼
►
But it's gotta be under the right circumstances.
01:37:40
◼
►
And the fact that that is the case,
01:37:43
◼
►
I do understand why they make it somewhat tricky
01:37:47
◼
►
to get the full 48 megapixel,
01:37:50
◼
►
'cause you know, it needs certain things,
01:37:53
◼
►
but really you can get some fantastic shots out of it.
01:37:58
◼
►
- It's absolutely true.
01:38:00
◼
►
- If you would like to send in a question for us to answer
01:38:02
◼
►
on a future episode of Upgrade,
01:38:04
◼
►
just send out a tweet with the hashtag #AskUpgrade
01:38:06
◼
►
or use question mark #AskUpgrade
01:38:08
◼
►
in the Relay FM members Discord.
01:38:11
◼
►
You can get access to that if you sign up for Upgrade Plus.
01:38:13
◼
►
Go to getupgradeplus.com and you can sign up
01:38:15
◼
►
and you'll get longer ad-free versions of the show
01:38:18
◼
►
along with access to tons of benefits
01:38:21
◼
►
of being a Relay FM member.
01:38:23
◼
►
Thank you to Hover, Fitbod, and CleanMyMacX for their support of this week's episode,
01:38:28
◼
►
and thank you for listening.
01:38:29
◼
►
If you want to find us in the meantime, you can find Jason over at SixColors.com, and
01:38:34
◼
►
he is @JasonL on Twitter.
01:38:35
◼
►
I am @imike, I am YKE, Jason and I both host many shows here at Real AFM, and Jason also
01:38:41
◼
►
hosts a bunch of shows over at The Incomparable as well, if you want more of us in your life
01:38:46
◼
►
in between your weekly doses of the upgrade program.
01:38:50
◼
►
We'll be back next time.
01:38:52
◼
►
Until then, say goodbye, Jsusno.
01:38:55
◼
►
Goodbye, my Curly.
01:38:56
◼
►
[MUSIC PLAYING]
01:38:59
◼
►
[MUSIC PLAYING]
01:39:02
◼
►
[BLANK_AUDIO]