00:00:00 ◼ ► Are we doing an aftershow? Should we talk about? - We gotta talk about Margo's 10-year computer.
00:00:04 ◼ ► - Oh, that, oh. Okay, I didn't know if that was the MacPro thing in disguise. - You're getting sleepy, KZ.
00:00:10 ◼ ► - I am frickin' dying, but I'm trying to put on the big boy pants, so... - You can do it. - Let's rock it.
00:00:18 ◼ ► I do not know where this piece of follow-up came from, but I am in love with this piece of follow-up. So, we discussed last week, I forget what the context was, but we were discussing ASCII art and code comments.
00:00:29 ◼ ► This is when you're making, you know, like, pictures as best you can out of text, with pipes and hyphens and plus signs and things of that nature.
00:00:36 ◼ ► And we were talking about it for some reason or another, I don't remember why. But someone has sent us, and maybe John, you can fill me in where this is from, but a link called "Explaining Code Using ASCII Art," and oh, mama, this is delightful.
00:00:56 ◼ ► Yeah, this is an Ask ATP question asking us to weigh in on the value of comments, and that led us to the ASCII art thing.
00:01:05 ◼ ► I also don't remember where this came from, sorry, I just grabbed the link, but didn't grab whoever sent it to us, but yeah, it's an entire blog, and it's filled with awesome diagrams showing exactly what I was talking about.
00:01:15 ◼ ► Things that are easier to explain visually than in words, whether they be data structures or memory layout with a bunch of different blocks, someone even tried to do an entity relationship diagram, that one's maybe a little bit less successful.
00:01:29 ◼ ► But yeah, I love this type of thing, and I think we also got some feedback from sort of the horror stories of not understanding how the comment terminators work in your language and accidentally throwing in like an asterisk and then a forward slash.
00:01:48 ◼ ► And you've just ended the comment when really you thought you were just drawing ASCII art and various techniques to defend against that. Anyway, we'll put the link in the show notes. If you had no idea what we're talking about, check this site out, and if you're a programmer, check out this site and feel bad about your own comments.
00:02:05 ◼ ► Nice. Where in the timeline was the MacBook Pro refresh? Was that before we recorded last? Is that right?
00:02:14 ◼ ► Okay, right. So we've talked about the refresh. So we didn't know the details about what the material differences were. We didn't know if that meant literally materials. We didn't know if that was a measure of the difference.
00:02:25 ◼ ► So iFixit has done what they do best, and they've torn this thing apart. So tell me, tell me, one of you, maybe Marco, since you love these keyboards so much, tell me what the differences are here.
00:02:35 ◼ ► The main thing so far is that they did clearly change two of the materials. One of them is part of the main plastic dome that flexes for each key press. And then also the big metal cap that actually flexes again to make the contact for each key press.
00:02:52 ◼ ► That seems to be revised well. They weren't able to tell quite in what way that was revised, but it was visually obviously different from before. So what's interesting about this is that we've seen as the keyboard drama has played out that all the protections they've put in place so far seem to be about keeping dust out, keeping particles out.
00:03:13 ◼ ► Because they can jam the actual, like the big plastic butterfly wings that act as the hinge to the switch. But what we keep seeing though, and I think the reason why the past fixes haven't entirely worked, is because the keys that are used the most are the ones that tend to fail.
00:03:32 ◼ ► You have like the vowel keys, like E, you have the space bar. Like those are the ones that tend to fail much more frequently than other ones. And so if you have a random selection of keys that fail, that would lend more credence towards the dust theory.
00:03:45 ◼ ► But because the keys that keep getting used the most tend to be the ones that fail the most, it seems like it might be like a wearing out of something. Like a physical, like a part is wearing or deforming or bending or something. Somehow wearing out from just repeated use.
00:04:03 ◼ ► So I'm guessing these material changes were made to actually address that. We still, it's still too early to know whether it will actually work or not. I do know that it does feel different. I was able to feel one in the store the other day.
00:04:25 ◼ ► Almost. No, like he, I was on the way to run some errands at a place that includes an Apple store and when he told me it feels different. So naturally I like walked across the street immediately to go to the Apple store to see how it feels.
00:04:41 ◼ ► Yeah, exactly. Exactly. Um, the, the, yeah, so I did type on one unfortunately because they're still very new. The store still had some of the old models literally right next to it on the table. So I was able to do a side by side comparison with old, with the 2018 keyboard and the 2019 keyboard.
00:04:58 ◼ ► And the, they definitely do feel different. The 2019 feels a little bit softer, a little bit squishier. Fortunately, I still have a lot of hope that this is the last of these butterfly keyboards that we're likely to see. And so I'm just keeping my eye on the future and ignoring all this crap.
00:05:16 ◼ ► And when they mentioned it was a materials fix, there was that slight confusion about the exact meaning of the word material, but either meaning that you would have taken from their statement, it was clear that they hadn't actually like redesigned the keyboard that the essential mechanism was the same.
00:05:31 ◼ ► And although there are surely parts of the functioning of that mechanism that can fail due to materials getting old or tired or whatever, I still feel like there's definitely part of that mechanism that fails due to the inherent design of the mechanism itself because of the way the butterfly hinge is arranged because of the low clearances.
00:05:51 ◼ ► If you get a big enough crumb in there and you depress the key, the little crumb can wedge itself such that the mechanism can't bring the key back up. Right. You end up with like a stuck key.
00:06:02 ◼ ► And it's not stuck because the dome has collapsed. Although dome fatigue may be an issue, right? As you already talked about the frequency use keys, but the debris going into a relatively new keyboard and getting wedged under the butterfly thing points to just a basic design flaw.
00:06:19 ◼ ► That debris can go in there, it can get wedged in a particular place, it doesn't have a good way to get out. It's why blowing air might fix something. If the dome was fatigued, blowing air on it is not going to help.
00:06:28 ◼ ► But if you have a little tiny crumb that's wedged in this 0.25 millimeter space between the upper part of the butterfly wing and the key and it's causing it not to be able to bounce back up, like you can't fix that by changing materials.
00:06:43 ◼ ► You'd have to change parts, you'd have to make something thinner, you'd have to change the mechanism and they're just continuing to not do that.
00:06:50 ◼ ► So I'm glad they're making some material changes. I hope they fix some kinds of issues, but I still feel like the fundamental design of the combination of both this keyboard and the frame that the keys poke through, like that whole combination of the keyboard unit, is no good.
00:07:06 ◼ ► Is that the opposite of the Vittucci seal of approval? Yeah. It's worse, I hate you. Oh, my word.
00:07:15 ◼ ► Alright, moving on. The App Store is coming to the Apple Watch, possibly. This is from a friend of the show, Guillermo Rambo.
00:07:23 ◼ ► He was saying that it is possible that, and I think Germin reported on this as well, he was saying that it's possible that there will be an App Store on the Apple Watch.
00:07:33 ◼ ► And Guillermo specifically noted that keywords had been added to one of the watchOS labs, and those keywords were independence and independent. Hmm. Interesting.
00:07:45 ◼ ► Yeah, but I'm surprised we didn't touch on that in the last time we talked about this. I threw out that if you have an App Store that was only usable on your watch, what could you sell?
00:07:55 ◼ ► We could sell watch faces, and we all want that, but we'll probably all be sad. But we didn't even mention this. The idea that any kind of App Store on the watch would have to be part of what I feel like is the inevitable, eventual independence of the watch.
00:08:10 ◼ ► In the same way that both the iPod and the iPhone, I think I got that right, yeah, the iPod and the iPhone were both tied to the Mac originally. You couldn't really buy either one unless you had a Mac, and eventually both became independent of the Mac.
00:08:25 ◼ ► The watch right now, if you buy it, you need to have an iPhone, otherwise it's really no good to you, at least to set it up initially. I suppose you could divorce it from the phone at some point. But anyway, the watch needs to go independent. And it's not just because, oh, it should be a standalone device and it shouldn't be tailored or whatever.
00:08:40 ◼ ► It's the same reason that the iPod and the iPhone became independent, because then you can sell it to people who don't have some other expensive Apple product. And that's important. From all accounts, what we're able to tell from Apple's earnings and everything, the watch has actually been selling pretty well.
00:08:56 ◼ ► I think Underscore just posted a chart recently that his stats showed that the Series 4 watch is soon to be the most popular watch, which means the newer watches are selling even better than the old ones, so everything's looking up. But if you can't sell the Apple Watch to anybody unless they have an iPhone, that's very limiting.
00:09:12 ◼ ► So the watch has to become independent, and if it does become independent, you need some way to get software onto the thing. One way would be to have the watch be able to download apps directly. Another way is some support on Android or a PC version of something. There's all sorts of ways you can do this, but the fact that these keywords are added, I don't know what that means. I'm not really good at spelunking this thing.
00:09:34 ◼ ► I don't have any track record of looking at keywords associated with things, but I am 100% willing to believe that if the Apple Watch has an app store on it, it will be part of the story about how the watch can now be sold to people without an iPhone.
00:09:47 ◼ ► A couple other caveats, too. Number one, the titles of things in the WVDC schedule before the keynote are basically meaningless. People always try to derive any kind of predictions they can of them, and the reality is Apple's very good at not telling more than they want to tell in those titles.
00:10:08 ◼ ► I would not read too much into any of the titles that exist in the app now. Secondly, you also have to remember that sometimes there will be labs or sessions or web pages or whatever from Apple that tell you not really news, but are trying to convince you to do something the way they want you to do it.
00:10:28 ◼ ► They might intend for us to use the Apple Watch more independently. They might intend for us to develop more apps and have more independence in our apps, but that doesn't necessarily imply by itself that they are going to actually be meaningfully changing things on that front for us on the watch or in the APIs or the deep technical stuff.
00:11:01 ◼ ► I think the watch going independent is as inevitable as the watch getting cellular, which I think when the day the watch came out, we were all like, "This is going to have to be independent of the phone with a cell connection," and they can't do it yet because technology is really hard, but eventually they will.
00:11:25 ◼ ► I think I read something recently. It was from a product designer for the Apple Watch. Did you both read that story?
00:11:32 ◼ ► It was an ex-Apple industrial designer, I think, talking about her time working on the watch. She was very candid, but she's no longer at Apple and saying how they had all these different challenges.
00:11:44 ◼ ► They wanted the watch from day one to be independent of the phone, but they couldn't do it because it's really hard. I think she described it as, "Look, we have 70 problems to solve here. Let's take one off the table and save it for later," because they had all sorts of issues with just trying to get the radio to work and where do you put the antenna when the whole thing is metal and they had to stick the antenna in the screen that sticks out above the metal body.
00:12:07 ◼ ► I'll see if I can find the story for the channel. Anyway, making it have its own cell connection was deemed a bridge too far for version one. They didn't do that, but eventually they did. In the same way, I feel like it's inevitable that the watch is going to become independent, even if it doesn't happen this year.
00:12:25 ◼ ► I can't say I've met or spoken to anyone that has said, "I'd love to have an Apple Watch, even though I have an Android phone." That just seems an odd combination, but why wouldn't you try to do this? I agree that it is an inevitability.
00:12:38 ◼ ► Speaking of things that have happened this week, like news things that have happened this week, and also speaking of Mark Gurman, there's apparently a Bloomberg podcast called Decrypted, which I was not previously aware of, but this week they had an interview with the former chief of AppReview, whose name escapes me.
00:12:59 ◼ ► Yeah, something like that. I listened to this. I don't know if you guys did. I think you have to take everything said here with a little bit of salt, because the information's old. It's typically unlike someone to talk about the inside, unless they have a little bit of an axe to grind.
00:13:13 ◼ ► But, that being said, I thought it was fascinating. It's about 40 minutes, and I thought it was well worth my time. I thought it was really, really interesting hearing some of the stuff they talked about. I wish I had been able to take notes. I forget what I was doing at the time, but there were a handful of things that they said, and I was like, "Oh, interesting. I didn't know that." I do recommend it if you happen to have the time to listen to it.
00:13:36 ◼ ► He actually gave a conference talk a few months back somewhere. There's a video of it on YouTube somewhere, if you look for it. That also flew under the radar. Nobody realized, "Oh, that's the guy who ran AppReview."
00:13:46 ◼ ► But, I will say again, to extend your grain of salt a little bit further into one of those big crystals of salt that you get in the expensive salt box, I would say, keep in mind that he did leave Apple.
00:14:00 ◼ ► I think I heard that it maybe might not have been his decision, and the timing of his departure correlated exactly with the App Store all of a sudden getting a lot better.
00:14:16 ◼ ► I agree. But it was good. I still think, even with all of that copious amount of salt, I do think it is worth your time. All right. John, tell me about Mac OS 1015, if you please.
00:14:38 ◼ ► Mac OS 1015, whatever the heck it's going to be called, one of the features that it supposedly has, whether optional or mandatory, is a read-only system partition.
00:14:49 ◼ ► Which is interesting for a couple of reasons. Now, a couple years back, they introduced system integrity protection, which is basically meant to prevent you from either accidentally or on purpose messing with the essential files that are part of the operating system.
00:15:02 ◼ ► It's malware protection, so even if you accidentally run some unknown executable or intentionally run it and don't realize it's infested with malware, it can't modify some driver or kernel resource or whatever in your operating system to add some sort of spyware to it.
00:15:17 ◼ ► Because even you, as a user, and even you as root, can't modify files that are part of the operating system thanks to system integrity protection.
00:15:27 ◼ ► But that relies on some code that Apple added for security and can have its own set of flaws or whatever.
00:15:34 ◼ ► A step up from that would be to put the operating system on a separate partition, a separate volume as far as the operating system is concerned, and to mount that volume read-only, which itself relies on protections inherent in the operating system that enforce the read-only nature of mounted volumes and so on and so forth.
00:15:49 ◼ ► But presumably that code is simpler than system integrity protection, older and more reliable than system integrity protection, and just sort of more straightforward, right?
00:15:58 ◼ ► Because if you mount a volume read-only, you would expect only to be able to read from it, and that is easier to secure than a weird system where we have this special case for certain files that are flagged in a particular way or on some list that you're not allowed to modify even when you're root or whatever.
00:16:15 ◼ ► Thanks to the magic of APFS, adding additional volumes to your existing volume is easier now because you don't have to carve out a bunch of space and move stuff around like you used to have in the old days.
00:16:26 ◼ ► As we know, or should recall from the times when we discussed APFS, you can put multiple volumes on the same disk.
00:16:32 ◼ ► You can put, if you have a one terabyte disk, you can put five one terabyte volumes on the disk, which doesn't make any sense because you don't have five terabytes of space.
00:16:44 ◼ ► So it should be fairly straightforward for Apple to non-optionally, when upgrading to whatever this new operating system is called, make a new volume and then put the new operating system on that volume and do it in such a way that you don't have weird errors about repartitioning.
00:17:04 ◼ ► We'll see if they make it mandatory or whatever, but reportedly this is a feature of the new OS, and I think it's pretty neat.
00:17:09 ◼ ► There is the potential issues though that are brought up by what common third party app uses is this going to mess with or prevent?
00:17:27 ◼ ► There's already lots of protections for kernel extensions, there's already lots of restrictions and everything, there's various code signing restrictions, there's now Apple events prevention,
00:17:37 ◼ ► there's system integrity protection. Every time they lock down Mac OS a little bit further, it tends to break things.
00:17:45 ◼ ► And some of those things can never be fixed, or the updated version of them has fewer capabilities than the old one did, or is harder to use, or is cumbersome, or whatever else.
00:17:55 ◼ ► And so I do like the idea of them making Mac OS more secure and continuing to make it less susceptible to malware and limit what malware can do.
00:18:11 ◼ ► Yeah, I mean the main thing that I imagine it has broken and continues to break is all of Apple's internal stuff, because especially when you're trying to run diagnostics or test things or run the OS through automated tests,
00:18:25 ◼ ► the expectation that you can just write some temporary files to a particular location inside a particular extension bundle or stuff, that's just convenient to do. The bundle structure lends itself to,
00:18:35 ◼ ► you need a place to put things for debugging or dumping a log or doing some diagnostics, all internal Apple stuff when they're testing their own software.
00:18:43 ◼ ► You can't do that anymore if all system library is read-only. And so they are the first people who have to come up with solutions to that.
00:18:51 ◼ ► Same thing with any sort of applications. If you can look into system library core services, there's a bunch of basically just plain old applications buried in "the operating system" or the system folder as we knew it back in the day.
00:19:04 ◼ ► Like the screen sharing app is down there, there's all sorts of little helper applications that are down there, just plain old application bundles.
00:19:11 ◼ ► And as most people know who have been developing for Mac OS X for a long time when it was called Mac OS X, you used to be able to write stuff to application bundles.
00:19:21 ◼ ► And that is generally frowned upon now and I think perhaps banned by code signing in the Mac App Store. I haven't kept track of what those requirements are.
00:19:31 ◼ ► You used to be able to basically modify the contents of your applications any way you wanted and with the advent of code signing, that is much more difficult because really the application wants to know that it is running in an unmodified state.
00:19:42 ◼ ► You can do exceptions and all sorts of stuff like that. But all those applications that are buried inside the operating system folders, they can't write anything to themselves anymore because they're part of a real-life system partition.
00:19:54 ◼ ► And on and on all the way up to, like Mark was saying, third-party applications that expect to be able to write things there. The good news is that from day one, thanks to its heritage as the next-step operating system, the structure, the seemingly confusing sort of hall-of-mirrors structure, actually serves a purpose.
00:20:12 ◼ ► Why is there tilde/library, system library, slash library, and the old days network library? Why are there so many directories called library? It's a hierarchy of machine-wide, network-wide, operating system, home directory.
00:20:26 ◼ ► The reason all those directory structures are mirrored is because they're different domains. So in theory, there should be a writable place for you to correctly put the stuff that you care about.
00:20:34 ◼ ► You shouldn't be messing with the operating system. And system integrity protection probably took a lot of the heat for this change because already most of the things having to do with the operating system are write-only.
00:20:44 ◼ ► And when you're running as a regular user, you can't write into those directories anyway because they're not owned by you. So I'm hoping it won't be that painful. But inevitably, some things will break. I mean, presumably everything Adobe makes will break. But what else is new?
00:20:56 ◼ ► We are sponsored this week by Mobileux. Mobileux is a full-service digital agency that designs, builds, and brands award-winning mobile apps and web platforms.
00:21:08 ◼ ► And I gotta say, I have worked with Mobileux. They are top-notch. Since 2008, they've worked with a diverse set of partners ranging from startups to Fortune 500s, such as Ford, Stripe, Walmart, Capital One, Western Digital, Tumblr, that's where I know them from,
00:21:24 ◼ ► Colonial Williamsburg, The Infatuation, Neighborhood Goods, and more. There's a good chance that you've used something that they've made and you don't even know it.
00:21:33 ◼ ► What separates Mobileux from others is that their belief is that the best software is made when strategy, brand, design, and development all work hand-in-hand.
00:21:43 ◼ ► So Mobileux's team is all under one roof. It's a one-stop shop for high-quality digital product development. I actually hired them when I wanted to make an Android version of Instapaper.
00:21:55 ◼ ► I wanted somebody to just take care of it for me, do everything. I didn't even give them any source code for the iOS version or the website or anything. And they did the entire thing start to finish.
00:22:04 ◼ ► It was a pleasure to work with Mobileux. I would do it again in a heartbeat if I needed their services. So I gotta say, if you need their services, check out Mobileux.
00:22:13 ◼ ► They are just top-notch and the best to work with. So if you're wondering if your current mobile strategy is the right one for your company, or if you're concerned that your website UX is costing you customers,
00:22:25 ◼ ► or if you need a quality digital product built for scale from the ground up, give Mobileux a call. You can call them on the phone at 804-767-7104, or learn more at mobileux.com.
00:22:40 ◼ ► Once again, thank you so much to Mobileux for just making awesome products and for sponsoring our show.
00:23:20 ◼ ► It was very old. It was previously running, I believe, an A8 processor, right? And so it was very old, it was very slow, and it was running a processor that the next version of iOS probably won't support.
00:23:36 ◼ ► So they had to either update it or kill it, and so they, I think, did the minimum update they could, which is they gave it the A10 CPU, they updated the capacities a little bit, and that's about it.
00:23:53 ◼ ► I'm still a fan of this product. I mean, obviously, they let it go, was it four years without an update? It's kind of ridiculous. But I like the fact that it exists. So iPods are gone now entirely, right? There's nothing left there even in it.
00:24:08 ◼ ► Yeah. And this, first of all, this is still, this is like the world's most amazing iPod because it does run iOS. It presumably will run the latest version of it, and that's got lots of cool features, and it does all the things that you would expect it to do, just slightly slower.
00:24:24 ◼ ► It's not burdened by the cell phone stuff. It can hold a lot of songs if you get the 256 gig model. They're incredibly small and light because there's like, just, you know, it's very old stuff, and there's nothing big and bulky in them. The cameras certainly aren't fancy or big and bulky.
00:24:41 ◼ ► And, you know, people talk about what, who might want to buy this. You know, obviously, kids come up as a potential use for it, but also, you know, enterprise applications for point of sale type things where they don't need to have a cell connection because they're in a store with Wi-Fi and something.
00:24:56 ◼ ► I just, I think this is still a good product. I mean, it's certainly a lot of bang for your buck. $199 for a 32 gigabyte iOS device that runs the latest OS, you know, presumably runs it pretty well.
00:25:09 ◼ ► It's a pretty good deal. It was not a good deal, like, you know, five days ago when it was an A8 with an A10. It's a little bit better deal. It's not like they're, they didn't, you know, update it to an A12. That would be something else, like, but that's not, that's not the role of this product.
00:25:22 ◼ ► So I'm glad it still exists. All my kids had iPod touches until they graduated to iPhone. So I still think that's definitely a valid use case. Lots of people saying, oh, they're just going to get hand-me-down phones sometimes, but sometimes the grownups want to trade those phones in because they're valuable.
00:25:38 ◼ ► And they get money off their next iPhone rather than giving their kids, you know, their hand-me-down $1,000 iPhone. It feels much better to get your kid a $200 iPod touch, and then if they drop it in the ocean, it's not as big a deal.
00:25:51 ◼ ► Yeah, I mean, I do, I think this is good. I'm not entirely sure that there's a huge market for it. You know, I think kids are obvious. I think test devices is obvious. But I still think it should exist. I don't begrudge this existing. And even though I'm not amped about it, I certainly, if I was still at my jobby job, would be amped about it. So, yeah, I mean, I think, I think this is good. I'm okay with this.
00:26:23 ◼ ► Because you don't want to cram your UI into a screen that small anymore. This just extends the timeline even further.
00:26:26 ◼ ► Well, that's true. And so, yeah, I would love to not need to support the 4-inch screen size, because it just, it makes it so hard to design a modern layout that looks good and scales well to the larger phones that also works on the 4-inch phones. But as a number of people pointed out to me on Twitter over the last day, I would still have to support it for a while anyway, because remember when the iPhone 7, or when the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus came out, they introduced display zoom mode, where you can actually run the entire OS, and it's not going to be able to do that.
00:26:55 ◼ ► You can run the entire OS at like a resolution lower than what the screen will natively do to make everything a little bit bigger. This is separate from dynamic text, separate from everything else.
00:27:04 ◼ ► This is, like when you set it up, it asks you whether you want to run it in display zoom or not. And so for people who want everything to be bigger, that's actually a pretty good option.
00:27:12 ◼ ► And the display zoom screen size for the iPhone 6, 7 and 8 size phones is this screen size. So even if they stopped selling 4-inch screen devices and just killed the iPod touch or made it bigger, and they already stopped selling the SE, even if they totally stopped selling them, we still have to support that screen size for as long as the iPhone 6, 7 and 8 are supported, because they have that display zoom mode that is that size.
00:27:37 ◼ ► But anyway, I think the iPod touch sucks for lots of other reasons though. For me, again, I'm glad they did it. If they're going to have the iPod touch remaining a product in their lineup, they might as well keep it updated at least once every four years.
00:27:50 ◼ ► They couldn't possibly show this product less love without totally killing it, but they're doing literally the bare minimum to keep this product going, and that's fine. I think that's all it deserves.
00:28:01 ◼ ► My analytics show it gets very, very low usage. And granted, I'm not representative maybe of its market, but for whatever it's worth, almost no one on Overcast uses iPod touch, and that's fine.
00:28:13 ◼ ► I think the kids market is much better served much of the time by iPads. And by the time they are ready to have something in their pocket that they can bring everywhere that is smaller than an iPad, they usually either get their own iPhone, which I know sounds ridiculous to a lot of older people, but that's what happens, or they get hand-me-down iPhones, whether they're activated or not.
00:28:37 ◼ ► And so, honestly, I don't see a huge place for this for kids. What I do see is this is used in a lot of special roles, like a lot of point-of-sale systems, like the kind of like roaming credit card terminal things.
00:28:52 ◼ ► Even in Apple stores, we'll often use iPod touches. There's various like industrial applications where you have people walking around with the iPod touch as a terminal for some random thing.
00:29:03 ◼ ► There are a lot of specialty applications like that, so when you combine that with like the some kids market, I guess there's enough use for this thing.
00:29:12 ◼ ► But I think there's a reason why Apple shows it so little love that really it is the right product for almost nobody.
00:29:35 ◼ ► Like it's not worth that because they probably don't sell enough of them, but it is worth continuing to update this because if they didn't, they're like I just feel like having a non-phone device that can run iOS and do Wi-Fi things that is not the size of an iPad is important.
00:29:54 ◼ ► Maybe the mini fills this role to some degree, but financially, it doesn't make much sense to give your kids your hand-me-down $1,400 plus size phone when you could trade it in for $400 off your next phone and use the difference to buy them one of these things.
00:30:14 ◼ ► I know kids want iPads, but iPads are more expensive than this little dinky thing, so I still feel like there's an important role. If Apple is not going to bring the prices down on any of their products, having something that runs iOS for $200 is still kind of like their cheapest laptop.
00:30:31 ◼ ► At various times, their cheapest laptop has been a good product. At various times, it has just been their cheapest laptop. This is just their cheapest iOS device, and it is fulfilling that role by continuing to exist.
00:30:41 ◼ ► All right, we have another leak from Guillermo Rambo, a couple of leaks actually. We have screenshots, actual screenshots of iOS 13, including dark mode, and Mac OS 10.15, including the new music app.
00:31:12 ◼ ► It didn't go into too much detail, but he was basically just starting off by fighting off the ideas of people saying, "If this is supposed to be iOS 13, then why don't I see this, that, and the other thing? Then why aren't the icons changed?"
00:31:25 ◼ ► He's talking about this and the Mac OS screenshots. If you install iOS 13 on your own personal phone, it doesn't replace your wallpaper. It just leaves whatever you had there before, because that's how iOS updates go.
00:31:43 ◼ ► So these are not marketing images of Apple showing off, "Here's what iOS 13 looks like." It's some person's phone that installed a build of iOS 13 on it and took a screenshot and sent it or whatever. That's the story behind it anyway, which is why it doesn't look like Apple's marketing images and why you see stuff that just looks like some person's phone.
00:32:04 ◼ ► Obviously, any of this stuff can change before release and yada, yada, yada. But yeah, actual screenshots. It's about that time. We were less than a week to go. It's time to start getting the real leaks here.
00:32:14 ◼ ► It's true. These iOS screenshots, the dark mode looked good. I don't have a strong opinion about it, but I do tend to like dark mode. I run Tweetbot in dark mode. I run Overcast in dark mode. I like the dark mode. We can come back to that in a second. But I don't remember who it was I saw point this out, and now I cannot unsee it, and I think I really like it.
00:32:35 ◼ ► The tools for the screen shot thing actually have a little bit of depth and texture to them. It's not overblown like it was circa iOS 6, but it's enough that it's nice. I really, really like the look of it.
00:33:01 ◼ ► I'm really curious to see it looks like the pendulum is swinging back slightly in the direction of skeuomorphism again, and I think I'm okay with that.
00:33:09 ◼ ► It's like a children's story where at the beginning of the story, everybody lives in Johnny Ives's white world, and all the characters in the story are completely white.
00:33:18 ◼ ► About a quarter into the book, someone comes out of his house and their nose is a little bit pink. Not really pink, but just a little bit pink. Everyone looks at them and says, "But your nose! What is that on your nose?"
00:33:28 ◼ ► Because they've never seen color before, right? And so these little things, these tools at the bottom...
00:33:36 ◼ ► These little tools at the bottom are like halfway through the book, where it's mostly a bunch of Johnny Ives's white world tools, but they have a little touch of color.
00:33:44 ◼ ► The highlighter is a little bit yellow, the eraser is a little bit pink. It's very soft. It's not super photorealistic. It's still stylized. It looks like characters from the white world with just a little bit of color.
00:33:55 ◼ ► And I like it, and I like the pendulum swinging back in the other direction. It's hard to tell how much of a trend this is, given just the very limited screenshots that we have, because for all we know, this is the only instance of this type of thing.
00:34:06 ◼ ► But there's one thing we can say about it. It's not like line art like the current things are. I'm not even sure... We're just talking about the aesthetics, right?
00:34:13 ◼ ► I'm not even sure these read better, like in terms of if you were to ask somebody who knows nothing about Apple, "What does this tool do? What does that tool do?" They're a little bit faint and low contrast, especially since they lack the outlines.
00:34:28 ◼ ► Like, can you distinguish between the pen on the left and the pen on the right that are surrounding the highlighter? One of those is a pencil and one of them is a pen.
00:34:36 ◼ ► That's a good point. Some interesting choices of the eraser having a little X on it, because maybe without the X it doesn't read as an eraser, but with the X you might be confused a little bit.
00:34:46 ◼ ► The little smudger tool, the little pencil cone smudger thing, do non-artists even know what the hell that is? Do I know what it is?
00:34:53 ◼ ► Is that what that is? I think that's what it is. If it's not that, then I'm failing to identify it at all.
00:34:59 ◼ ► By the way, I totally could not tell that the two different pencil-shaped things were a pen and a pencil. I thought they were just two pens.
00:35:05 ◼ ► Now that you say that, now I can see the little hexagonal shape of the shaft of the second one.
00:35:14 ◼ ► I hope you have a very accurate screen calibrated correctly with the right brightness levels.
00:35:18 ◼ ► You're not seeing that on the phone. Maybe on the iPad you might see it on the phone. You're not seeing that.
00:35:23 ◼ ► It doesn't matter that much for these tools, because it's not a daily use thing and eventually you'll learn what they are because the positions don't change and it's fine.
00:35:31 ◼ ► If anything, the fact that they made a pencil that looks like no pencil in the world because they had to make it white.
00:35:40 ◼ ► No! It looks like no pencil in the world. I don't know. That I think might say they're not ready for this yet.
00:35:47 ◼ ► They're not ready to give up Johnny Has a White World yet because they couldn't even make that non-white.
00:35:55 ◼ ► At first I thought that might be the size of the brush tip, but I don't know why they would be displaying that on the icons for the non-selected tools.
00:36:04 ◼ ► That's a clever use of just showing what they are. Because each tool does have its own separate brush size and that might be what it's for.
00:36:10 ◼ ► If you roll backwards six feet and grab one of these things off Tiff's desk, I bet she has one of these little paper smudging tools.
00:36:18 ◼ ► I'm assuming that's what that is, but I could be totally wrong. They could be trying to draw an X-Acto knife and doing a bad job at it.
00:36:25 ◼ ► Next time you do a Pokemon thing, I'll find an image of it online and you'll recognize it.
00:36:31 ◼ ► So is the idea to possibly be like a blur tool? Like to blur out sensitive information? Hopefully better than the current tools do, which don't really work.
00:36:41 ◼ ► Yeah, I'm wondering. That could be. There's a paper stump. That's the phrase I couldn't grab.
00:37:15 ◼ ► Like if you're doing a pencil drawing and you want to blend some of the shading of the pencil and you don't want to rub your finger on it and get graphite all over your finger, you rub this thing.
00:37:32 ◼ ► Well, now that you're sending me this picture of these things, I do think there's a non-trivial chance that this is what they're trying to represent with this tool icon.
00:37:46 ◼ ► But again, judging these not aesthetically but as UI elements where someone is supposed to look at them, recognize the function, and remember it, if you've never seen one of these things in real life, despite the fact that being an actual tool that artists will recognize and understand, the regular person is going to be like, "What is that supposed to be?"
00:38:06 ◼ ► And this will be fun. If they ship with anything like this, because again, these could be non-final graphics.
00:38:10 ◼ ► If they ship with anything like this, it's one of those instances where regular people are going to have to communicate with each other to spread the knowledge that if you want to blur sensitive information in a screenshot, you use the whatever tool.
00:38:24 ◼ ► And I wonder what name they're going to come up with, like the cone head tool or the barber pole tool or the pointy tool next to the eraser. Like surely someone will come up with a name.
00:38:36 ◼ ► But they'd have to know it's a blending stump then. They'll come up with some kind of way to describe it to each other. Or Apple will talk about it in the keynote and we'll all just latch onto whatever name they use, which will probably be blending stump.
00:38:48 ◼ ► Well, let me give you one better. Steve Chodden Smith just pointed out to me that that is taking the place of the lasso in today's iOS. So can you imagine if that's actually the lasso?
00:39:00 ◼ ► It can't be X-Acto. That's the worst-drawn X-Acto ever. It is definitely a blending stump.
00:39:07 ◼ ► I mean, I can tell it's a thing that puts marks on paper. Like this is you're saying is it a knife or is it a thing that smudges? Those are pretty different.
00:39:15 ◼ ► Actually, you know what? The reason why I think it might be an X-Acto is that it doesn't look, I haven't measured this yet, but it doesn't look like it's straight.
00:39:26 ◼ ► Well, blending stumps, first of all, that could be an optical illusion because of diagonal lines because our brains are broken.
00:39:34 ◼ ► Anyway, I'm sure there will be an entire section of the keynote just about these tools. So I'm sure we'll learn everything we want to know.
00:39:41 ◼ ► All right, anything else on these iOS 13 screenshots? Do you want to talk about dark mode? Is there anything there that you'd like to discuss?
00:39:47 ◼ ► Yeah, as the article points out, the one screenshot that shows, I guess this is the music app, shows them using, as far as we can tell, 100% black in the backgrounds, which is the most energy you can save by not lighting up pixels at all.
00:39:59 ◼ ► Interestingly, you don't have to go 100% black to save energy. If you do a dimmer color, it also takes less power than bright white.
00:40:06 ◼ ► But it's an interesting aesthetic choice, and it makes sense in a world where many iPhones have OLED displays.
00:40:14 ◼ ► It is interesting, though, as somebody who has designed a couple of these themes now, pure black does look best on OLED displays because you lose the seams.
00:40:25 ◼ ► You totally lose the margins between the screen and the bezel, which is great. However, it brings a number of challenges.
00:40:32 ◼ ► Number one is that pure black does have that weird ripple effect when you scroll on an OLED real fast.
00:40:37 ◼ ► Things kind of lag behind, and there's this weird optical effect because the pixels have been turned all the way back off, all the way back on. It's kind of odd.
00:40:50 ◼ ► The biggest problem with an all-black screen is that you lose the ability to use shadows behind things to show depth and layering.
00:40:59 ◼ ► You don't realize how much you depend on a little modal sheet that has a shadow behind it to show that it's floating above the thing behind it.
00:41:09 ◼ ► You don't realize that you need that so much until the color behind it is already pure black so it can't be any darker, so you can't see a shadow on it.
00:41:18 ◼ ► And that's such a commonly used element in iOS that it's going to require some really tricky design tweaks to everyone's apps doing this if they actually want to use pure black.
00:41:27 ◼ ► So I'm curious to see how Apple has solved a lot of these problems, or if they've solved them.
00:41:31 ◼ ► Yeah, I mean, it's not like it's going to be a requirement of dark mode. I assume that you'll actually have to be 100% black.
00:41:36 ◼ ► Like, you'll have control. You'll know when you're in dark mode, and you can control what your application looks like, and that, you know, I'm assuming it's just dark mode on the Mac, right?
00:41:44 ◼ ► Yeah, yeah, it's probably just like you, like probably all the standard system controls update themselves, and you as the app maker can respond to changes of the slice of theme, and you can then theme it however you want.
00:41:57 ◼ ► And speaking of the Mac, the next thing was the screenshots, the very bare screenshots of the music and TV applications, which basically just show the layout of the main window and the sidebar.
00:42:08 ◼ ► If there was any content in the main portion of the window, it has been blanked out. I don't know if it was missing entirely, or they just removed it, or whatever.
00:42:17 ◼ ► But there's things to note here. First of all, the music application doesn't look like iTunes. They rearranged all the controls. It looks like sort of a modern Apple Mac application, where they get rid of the title bar and make a semi-vibrant sidebar, and with a bunch of icons on it.
00:42:35 ◼ ► And they shove the search fields up above the sidebar, and it's still got that iTunes play button and progress bar, and a bunch of weird stuff. Like it's kind of homely and not particularly standard, but in that, I mean, maybe in that way it is like iTunes.
00:42:49 ◼ ► It's like a modern reimagining of iTunes. Very non-standard and weird, but, you know, it'll be recognizable as the place where you play music.
00:42:57 ◼ ► The most interesting thing about it is that in the sidebar, there's actual color. There's these little icons for the various things in the sidebar have gradients on them and are bright pink, and in an otherwise very drab gray window.
00:43:11 ◼ ► So it's nice to have a touch of color here, but it's hard to judge this application without actually seeing anything other than the sidebar.
00:43:16 ◼ ► I think if anything, like if you look at the pictures, so they have the TV app and the new music app, which is, you know, slash iTunes, and the TV app looks like a marzipan app.
00:43:28 ◼ ► It looks very similar to what we've seen from the capabilities of other marzipan apps and from Steve Tiest's hacking of like it has the selector on the top and kind of the title bar tool area.
00:43:38 ◼ ► Like it looks like a marzipan app. The music app looks different. It looks very, like if you just look at it for a split second, you might think it looks similar, but if you look for more than that, you see there's actually, it actually looks very different.
00:43:51 ◼ ► The title bar is a totally different structure, a totally different visual look and hierarchy and theming and shading and everything else.
00:43:58 ◼ ► So I think this does lend credence to the rumor that it is not only not a marzipan app, but that it is a lot more based on iTunes than you would have maybe guessed.
00:44:08 ◼ ► iTunes has been re-themed many times over its very long life. So this just being the latest theme of it would not be that big of a surprise.
00:44:22 ◼ ► Apple, like, I mean, they have sessions on this all the time about what to do with all the various names for these like title bars that don't have titles in them and where to position things.
00:44:30 ◼ ► And then Apple ships their own applications for like the stoplight widgets move all over the place.
00:44:35 ◼ ► And sometimes there's not like in the iTunes one, there isn't really a title bar. The window widgets are basically in the sidebar and there's nothing on top.
00:44:42 ◼ ► And then more recently, in recent couple of years, they've always been trying to find a place to hide the less than sign button, which is the back navigation button.
00:44:52 ◼ ► But if you've ever taken a regular person and put them in front of photos on the Mac and navigated them into a place and watched them struggle to figure out how the hell to get out of it, they will never see.
00:45:05 ◼ ► There's just a giant grid of pictures and they see the sidebar because it has text. They will never find that button.
00:45:10 ◼ ► Half the time I can't find it. Half the time I hit like escape or whatever and try to get it. It's like, oh yeah, I have to hit back.
00:45:16 ◼ ► It's not like a web browser where you're accustomed to forward, back, stop, reload, address, like it's a paradigm that's been hammered into our brains.
00:45:24 ◼ ► These Mac applications that fancy themselves weird single window browser things that have this lone back button that they chuck somewhere into the upper left and hope people find it.
00:45:33 ◼ ► I feel like a lot of these Mac applications, Apple's included, are kind of out in the wilderness trying to figure out what happens at the top of the window exactly.
00:45:41 ◼ ► Like what's going on up there? And Apple's answer is, I don't know, just try some stuff, throw some things up there. How are things supposed to be aligned?
00:45:53 ◼ ► It's one of the lessons from the Apple human interface guidelines back from the classic Mac OS days that I referenced several times.
00:45:59 ◼ ► And in fact, I think quoted in its entirety in one of my Mac OS X reviews that things don't have to look exactly the same.
00:46:07 ◼ ► Those three window widgets, as long as they are basically the same distance from each other and in the same arrangement and in the upper left somewhere, you don't always have to have them the exact number of pixels off the left and top edge.
00:46:18 ◼ ► They don't always have to be aligned exactly the same way. Like if they're up there, people will see them, recognize them and understand what they do.
00:46:25 ◼ ► It's mostly the same for the back button. Its main problem isn't the fact that it moves around. It's the fact that it's so far out of the flow of the otherwise, you know, the paradigm, the application, the navigation paradigm is otherwise very different than that button indicates.
00:46:37 ◼ ► So I don't begrudge Apple moving things around and having things in weird positions, but I feel like there should still be some best practices and some standard widgets to let you achieve the best practices.
00:46:49 ◼ ► And it seems like instead that every application is an opportunity to find new homes for all this stuff and that the navigational paradigm, unlike, for example, original iOS, which was so clear of like you can come up from the bottom, you can go to the sides.
00:47:01 ◼ ► They have the, you know, whatever that nav bar controller thing like there were certain paradigms that were like, if you use this paradigm, your application, this is how it works.
00:47:09 ◼ ► And people understand it. And it's always the same in applications that behave like this. And even as they've expanded it to have things coming up from different directions and card interfaces and stuff like that.
00:47:18 ◼ ► They've always had sessions to say, if you do this, like, make sure you're essentially spatially consistent. Don't have things like appear from the bottom and then disappear to the left because it makes no sense.
00:47:28 ◼ ► Like, you know, don't have things zoom in and then fade out instead of, you know, regressing or whatever.
00:47:34 ◼ ► And I think Mac applications are like they could use them as the don't do examples in Apple's own applications could be used as the negative example.
00:47:42 ◼ ► So don't make an application that behaves one way. But if you get caught into this little navigational alley, you have to find the back button that you otherwise never need because you can navigate with the sidebar that switches in one dimension and then the tab bar that switches in the top dimension.
00:47:55 ◼ ► And then in the main pane, there's a separate set of navigation. But then also occasionally you need to go to the thing that's in the title bar and hit that back button to get out of.
00:48:02 ◼ ► It's just if you tried to map these out, they make no sense spatially and they don't they don't present a coherent paradigm. Sorry, I'm bagging on these applications that we have these empty screenshots of.
00:48:12 ◼ ► But I'm just I'm a little bit frustrated with the state of Mac OS application design independent of the Mars band thing, because that doesn't really make it really worse or better.
00:48:20 ◼ ► And if anything, it could make it better if what we get on the Mac are applications that don't behave like Mac applications in terms of navigation, but behave like iOS for applications.
00:48:33 ◼ ► We are sponsored this week by Jamf Now. Start securing your business today at jamf.com/atp.
00:48:45 ◼ ► As a business grows, so does its digital inventory, making it harder to manage everyone's Apple devices.
00:48:51 ◼ ► This is especially true if employees are remote. With Jamf Now, you can check your digital inventory, you can distribute Wi Fi and email settings to everyone,
00:49:00 ◼ ► deploy apps, enforce passcode requirements, protect company data, even lock or wipe a device as needed remotely from anywhere.
00:49:18 ◼ ► So our listeners can start securing your business today by managing your first three devices for free.
00:49:38 ◼ ► Thank you so much to Jamf Now for keeping our devices secure and for sponsoring our show.
00:49:42 ◼ ► We should probably give Jon his moment. Jon, there are rumors about Apple's Pro Display. Be still your heart. What do you think?
00:50:04 ◼ ► Occasionally I hear people talking about this on podcasts and they forget that it's not rumored that Apple is making a display.
00:50:09 ◼ ► Apple said they're making a display. Like the rumors are like, what about what is that display exactly like?
00:50:14 ◼ ► But this is not speculation. Apple said they're making a display. So they're making display until we hear otherwise.
00:50:18 ◼ ► Anyway, latest rumor about it I thought was interesting. We talked about this before about 6K display versus 8K and what the weird dimensions are in 31.6K.
00:50:26 ◼ ► And you know, all these other things about it. There's a little bit more information here about it being P3 and supporting HDR and night shift and true tone and all the other stuff.
00:50:35 ◼ ► But the most interesting part of this rumor and the new piece of information as far as I'm concerned is what size and shape would this monitor be.
00:50:42 ◼ ► 31.6 inch diagonal doesn't tell you that much because there's lots of different shaped screens that can be like that.
00:50:49 ◼ ► This article says that it is basically the 5K display that's on all the 5K iMacs and the iMac Pro with wings.
00:51:02 ◼ ► So exactly the same height and exactly the same pixel dimensions as the 5K but just more on the left than the right.
00:51:07 ◼ ► So it's sort of an ultra wide format display which are very popular with people these days.
00:51:11 ◼ ► And I think that is clever and fairly perfect because those wide displays are popular despite the fact that I would prefer it to be taller but I understand that's not the trend these days.
00:51:22 ◼ ► And it potentially allows this monitor to be placed alongside either a current or a future iMac and have exactly the same height screen.
00:51:34 ◼ ► So you could line them up alongside each other and you could buy two of these displays plus your big 5 or 6K iMac display and they would all look nice together.
00:51:43 ◼ ► That's probably not going to be true when this is introduced because I can't imagine this thing being offered with a stand that allows it to be aligned with the current iMacs.
00:51:51 ◼ ► But as I've said before I hope that the current iMacs are close to the last generation of this specific hardware design and they can revise it slightly and have new iMacs come out that match the display.
00:52:05 ◼ ► But anyway, I would prefer something with the proportions of the old 30 inch Apple Cinema display but taking the 5K display and just making it wider has a certain sort of logical progression and appeal to me.
00:52:31 ◼ ► There's a lot of options out there that are very very different from what we're looking for.
00:52:37 ◼ ► First of all there just aren't really any 5K monitors. There isn't really anything above that.
00:52:44 ◼ ► In the PC world what we would call non-retina screens still dominate a lot of the screens that are out there and that are in use.
00:52:52 ◼ ► And Windows still doesn't really have great retina support and Windows customers still largely don't demand retina screens or they are happy with the more intermediary resolutions that are like 1.5X what we would consider compared to the 2X that retina is for certain densities.
00:53:09 ◼ ► So the world of non-Apple options out there, while PC people seem okay with them, for Apple people it's not okay.
00:53:18 ◼ ► If anything the non-retina ones are an advantage because some of the most demanding customers in the PC space are gamers and they do not want retina because games can barely drive the 1X resolution on these very wide monitors.
00:53:32 ◼ ► If you gave them retina they would never use that resolution. No game wants to run that many pixels.
00:53:38 ◼ ► So the highest end consumer oriented purchasers, not pro people who are working on 8K video editing but consumers and they want a really big wide monitor that they can play games at at 1X in Apple parlance.
00:53:55 ◼ ► Oh totally. And I'm also just very excited to see Apple basically grow past the resolution or at least the point resolution that we have been at and not exceeding since the release of the 30 inch cinema display.
00:54:12 ◼ ► Like we have had 2560 points across since then and in fact the cinema display was taller. The cinema display was 1600 points tall and the new ones, the current 5Ks are only 1440 so the 30 inch displays that we had of yesteryear while they were non-retina actually had a little bit more screen real estate than what the 27 inch retina ones offer us now.
00:54:35 ◼ ► And so I'm just very excited to see this potentially break out of that and just give us a little bit more space. Because I do think that the limit of your field of view is probably not that much bigger than where we are now with these monitors.
00:54:49 ◼ ► But I don't think we're at that limit yet. I think we can go a little bit bigger and we can make use of that space without turning our necks.
00:54:56 ◼ ► And so to have Apple push that boundary for the first time in a long time, I'm very excited about that.
00:55:02 ◼ ► Plus you're going to need all this extra space on the left and the right to park all your little marzipan iPhone apps next year.
00:55:17 ◼ ► If you ever wanted to make your side dock maximum icon size, which I think is 512 now, can you make the dock big enough to get a 512 pixel icon? I'm not sure.
00:55:34 ◼ ► And the reality is like it's going to cost what it's going to cost. We know Modern Apple. We know their game.
00:55:40 ◼ ► When we get them to finally make what we want, it always costs about 40% more than we want it to.
00:55:47 ◼ ► And that's what's going to happen here. It's going to be 40% more than we think it should be.
00:56:14 ◼ ► I assume both of you are insta-buying it, or Jon, are you going to find some reason to figure out why it's not good enough for you?
00:56:26 ◼ ► I'm not going to make an impulse purchase after 10 years. I'm going to look at it and be excited by it.
00:56:31 ◼ ► And then I'm going to decide, is this a thing that I want to buy, or do I just want to get an iMac Pro?
00:56:42 ◼ ► Basically, this is probably going to be the last episode that we record where we don't know anything about the Mac Pro.
00:56:48 ◼ ► And so I kind of wanted to go through final predictions of our guesses on some points here about the new Mac Pro.
00:57:23 ◼ ► So I would say it's not going to be as small as the trash can, probably not going to be as big as the cheese grater.
00:57:29 ◼ ► But if I had to pick a position in that spectrum, I'm willing to believe that it might be closer to the cheese grater than the trash can.
00:57:39 ◼ ► The thing that I'm really wondering about is, you know, we've heard reports that it's going to be like a bunch of pizza boxes that you can stack up, right?
00:57:55 ◼ ► But what I'm driving at is, I feel, I don't know enough about the hardware to know, is it really feasible, unless Apple does something truly custom,
00:58:05 ◼ ► is it feasible to have, to split a motherboard, so to speak, across several physical boxes?
00:58:15 ◼ ► Is it really feasible to have, I don't know, like a box full of hard drives or SSDs or what have you?
00:58:33 ◼ ► If this is, if it's the sort of thing where we don't have the technology to split this out physically into several boxes,
00:58:40 ◼ ► then yeah, I think it's something that's going to be like a mini-tower of, you know, the late 90s,
00:58:47 ◼ ► But if it is modular in the physical sense of the word, then I mean, all bets are off at that point.
00:58:55 ◼ ► Yeah, that honestly, so I will say my size prediction is on the assumption that it's not going to be modular,
00:59:03 ◼ ► like with separate boxes, because I think the separate boxes thing is still a fantasy and may always be a fantasy,
00:59:10 ◼ ► because the practical realities of such a setup are just so complex and so compromised in so many ways
00:59:22 ◼ ► It presents severe challenges for things like cooling, noise, power distribution, you know,
00:59:27 ◼ ► the thermals that result from that, compatibility, forwards and backwards compatibility with various modules,
00:59:35 ◼ ► It just presents so many problems and it's so incredibly ungraceful in a way that I don't think Apple would do,
00:59:42 ◼ ► that I just don't think we ever have to worry about the separate box thing becoming the reality.
00:59:55 ◼ ► see, I don't think it's going to be as big as John, like John, you were kind of leaning more towards like
01:00:05 ◼ ► So I'm kind of thinking like if you put like two trash cans next to each other and draw an enclosing box around them,
01:00:28 ◼ ► But yeah, because that is a question and I don't think anybody uses full length cards anymore
01:00:34 ◼ ► because that required like the old '90s towers to do a full length card that would go past the speaker.
01:00:43 ◼ ► So I'm leaning towards two trash cans worth of volume and the enclosing box around them.
01:00:58 ◼ ► There's one question to consider before that that none of us have been even thinking of,
01:01:02 ◼ ► but I mean I don't think this is a high possibility, but I do occasionally entertain it.
01:01:17 ◼ ► many of them were -- they would lay flat and you'd put your gigantic monitor on top of them.
01:01:22 ◼ ► You had the next slab, you had all the traditional desktop Macs that came, the desktop PCs.
01:01:33 ◼ ► And you put your monitor on top of it, and that seems very unlikely just because of the primacy of towers
01:01:58 ◼ ► And Marco's thing of, like, two-trashcan volume, I'd be thinking more like three-trashcan volume, slightly redistributed.
01:02:10 ◼ ► If you actually look at the volumes and pick -- you know, find the midpoint, it doesn't take much to be bigger than that.
01:02:20 ◼ ► Well, so actually -- and one small comment, because we're never going to get through this topic --
01:02:26 ◼ ► The Mac Pro also has to fulfill the role for certain uses of having a bunch of them put together in compute farms or data centers or whatever else.
01:02:49 ◼ ► Oh, yeah. Didn't Mac Mini Cola or Mac Stadium, didn't they actually build custom rack mounts for these?
01:03:12 ◼ ► and I can't imagine that they're going to bring back the Xserve or have any other kind of alternate shape.
01:03:16 ◼ ► So if we assume that one computer here is also going to attempt to be better for putting in racks,
01:04:05 ◼ ► It's got handles for flair, but it's like cool air goes in the front, hot air goes out the back.
01:04:10 ◼ ► It is rectangular because most of the things that have to go inside it are rectangular,
01:04:34 ◼ ► But the cheese grater was just more modern Apple design of, like, not hiding from what they are.
01:04:39 ◼ ► So, I keep picturing something in my head that is not shy about its rectilinear nature.
01:05:11 ◼ ► It's just like a sphere or a cylinder, especially a cylinder that doesn't even go the full, like, depth of the rack.
01:08:04 ◼ ► So typically the workstation CPUs might be in the range of like 160-watt power output max.
01:09:21 ◼ ► And the gap between like the clock speeds that you get from the low-core and the high-core models
01:09:31 ◼ ► And also, I think a dual CPU enclosure has to accommodate such radically different things.
01:09:39 ◼ ► Like, a second CPU socket, and I think, I don't know if the current chips are like this,
01:09:48 ◼ ► Having that be accommodated by one case design that Apple probably wants to keep kind of small,
01:10:19 ◼ ► I don't know. First of all, porque no los dos, like why couldn't they have lower grade builds
01:10:38 ◼ ► Like you could, if you got the single socket model, there wasn't a second empty socket there.
01:10:52 ◼ ► even have two different power supplies or whatever else, you know, have very different things.
01:11:00 ◼ ► It reminds me, I should have been lording this over to you every time you make fun of my computer.
01:11:19 ◼ ► I think you're onto something with the differentiation between the iMac Pro and the Mac Pro.
01:11:32 ◼ ► "Oh, you want something professional? Well, f*** you, here it is. And that'll be $20,000, please."
01:11:38 ◼ ► You know, I kind of feel like this might be Apple thumbing their nose at us and saying,
01:11:43 ◼ ► "Okay, you whined, you complained, John Syracuse, for a decade you complained, John Syracuse.
01:12:02 ◼ ► Like, they've retreated so far into the consumer land that they're just trying to get back in the game.
01:12:07 ◼ ► And I don't think you can come back in at the top. Like, you can't be charging people that,
01:12:16 ◼ ► And I don't think they even want that. Like, Apple's been, whatever, that pro lab where they talk to the people
01:12:24 ◼ ► And the needs are going to be more than the iMac Pro, you know, reliability, upgradability, all the other things, or whatever,
01:12:30 ◼ ► but they're not going to say, "What I need is like, you know, 75 of the biggest CPUs in a giant box that goes in a closet."
01:12:41 ◼ ► So I don't think they're going to do that. It's not the reason I think they're not going to do dual core.
01:12:44 ◼ ► I think it's just not the right trade-off in terms of, like Margo said, like, what do you get for that extra,
01:12:53 ◼ ► You don't get that much. I don't think people are going to be asking for it, like, and I don't think Apple's going to go that way.
01:12:58 ◼ ► Like, if they did do a dual CPU option, if they're successful and they return to the pro market after a few years,
01:13:05 ◼ ► if it still makes sense to make that trade-off at all, I can imagine them introducing a dual core one.
01:13:10 ◼ ► But A, I don't think it'll make sense, and B, I think they have a long way to go before they're even in the position to give the big FU model.
01:13:20 ◼ ► Well, honestly, and if they don't do it in this generation of Mac Pro, they're probably not going to do it before an ARM transition.
01:13:27 ◼ ► And that would probably change everything. Like, you know, who knows what their needs would be.
01:13:35 ◼ ► You got one in your keyboard, one runs a touch bar, there's one that runs your computer, there's one on the display.
01:13:45 ◼ ► Yeah, and I don't, for the record, I don't think this will be an ARM computer. I don't think they're ready to do that yet.
01:13:50 ◼ ► It would be really cool if it was. Like, that would be a really interesting, awesome story, but I don't think it's quite that time yet.
01:14:04 ◼ ► Like, whatever this is, maybe they'll update it in 18 months for the next Xeon CPUs or whatever,
01:14:09 ◼ ► but I don't think there's going to be another generation of Intel Mac Pro after this one.
01:14:18 ◼ ► Wait, are we really doing this? Are we really going to push the WWDC stuff to like the after show? This is really where this is going?
01:14:27 ◼ ► GPUs, single or dual, are they upgradeable, and are they standard PCI Express GPU cards that you could just buy off of Newegg or Amazon and stick in?
01:14:38 ◼ ► Maybe from a white list of whatever is supported, or are they like special Apple modules that only Apple can make and sell you or whatever?
01:15:02 ◼ ► Single or dual Macs and then upgradeable or not and upgradeable with standard cards or special Apple things?
01:15:17 ◼ ► I think that's like what most people are asking for besides the Nvidia question, which I guess might be separate,
01:15:22 ◼ ► but I think that would satisfy the most people is replaceable standard PCI Express GPUs supporting up to two of them.
01:15:54 ◼ ► Or would Apple want to do something a little nicer and more integrated and quieter and more powerful
01:16:00 ◼ ► where Apple has their own custom cooling integration with maybe the whole rest of the system or something like that?
01:16:06 ◼ ► So some kind of more advanced cooling setup than just using the big-ass fan that comes on the side of the graphics card.
01:16:12 ◼ ► That I think is a big question, and that's why I think maybe they wouldn't support standard PCI Express cards
01:16:22 ◼ ► when you have a sideways fan hanging off of a giant PCI Express card wedged between itself
01:16:31 ◼ ► It's a very difficult cooling situation in there, and to try to do it without having just a loud fan
01:16:48 ◼ ► They use very large fans, like very large diameter fans that just look like giant water wheels,
01:16:53 ◼ ► and there is enough room to get a fairly quiet one in there to eject the air out sideways.
01:16:59 ◼ ► That said, I really wished for the entire life of Apple's Pro computers up to the trash can
01:17:11 ◼ ► They relied on these 17 fans in the cheese grater to just shove all that air out the back anyway,
01:17:20 ◼ ► they didn't do a very good job cooling, the trash can was actually theoretically an upgrade in that area
01:17:25 ◼ ► because it had one big fan that was supposed to handle everything and no separate weird GPU coolers.
01:17:30 ◼ ► It turns out that one fan wasn't enough to do the job and the GPUs would overheat, so oops, Apple's bad.
01:17:36 ◼ ► But I like the thought, but I think you can have standard replaceable cards that just happen to come with coolers
01:17:44 ◼ ► Apple-designed coolers that come with Apple's cards, whether you buy one or two of them,
01:17:49 ◼ ► that are quiet and efficient and integrate with the cooling, not because they're part of the whole system,
01:17:58 ◼ ► And then when you buy a third-party one, they'll have to find a way to integrate, but I think that's the only reasonable path.
01:18:16 ◼ ► See, I think no, because the T2-based Macs, they all have this custom pairing for encryption and everything
01:18:23 ◼ ► between the modules and the T2, and they're like, so that's why I think they're probably going to continue down that same path.
01:18:42 ◼ ► And that I think is unlikely. I think they're going to leave the disk expansion up to external only.
01:18:49 ◼ ► And I hope they don't, but I bet it's going to be like two modules inside the case, just like the iMac Pro uses two modules in parallel.
01:18:56 ◼ ► I'm guessing it's two modules inside, and you're on your own for anything else after that, and they're not upgradable.
01:19:05 ◼ ► So I think what you just said about externally upgradable makes the most sense, without doubt.
01:19:11 ◼ ► But what if it's a kind of in the middle, where it is upgradable, but you have to bring it in.
01:19:18 ◼ ► What just went through that? There was like, you could upgrade the RAM in something, but it wasn't user serviceable or something like that.
01:19:27 ◼ ► The Mac Mini, I believe the RAM is upgradable without, you know, destroying the machine, but you have to bring it to Apple to do it, or so they say.
01:19:33 ◼ ► What if it's one of those scenarios with the SSDs, where yes, they will sell you a heinously overpriced SSD,
01:19:38 ◼ ► and you have to give your computer to Apple to do it, but they should be able to do so without utterly destroying your entire machine.
01:19:45 ◼ ► I think the best case scenario for the internal storage is that Apple sells you the computer and lets you pick how much storage is in it,
01:19:52 ◼ ► and as far as Apple's concerned, it's not upgradable, but if you actually look inside the machine, physically speaking, you can take it out and put a different module there.
01:20:00 ◼ ► And other world computing or whoever finds a way to sell you a thing that will fit in that slot and give you some kind of procedure to sync it up with the encryption,
01:20:09 ◼ ► and you know, kind of unofficially upgradable, but honestly, I feel like the regular internal storage is not, you know, again, thinking of what pro users might want,
01:20:20 ◼ ► I don't think they're big about upgrading that in terms of like, "Oh, when the computer gets old, we'll just upgrade the internal storage."
01:20:25 ◼ ► I think their question is, "What are my storage options for the computer?" And those are mostly external.
01:20:30 ◼ ► I don't rule out the ability to add internal storage, but I feel like the sort of built-in boot disk storage that you get is going to look a lot like the storage on the iMac does today.
01:20:41 ◼ ► And that's not soldered in either, right? It's two little modules, but it's just because the iMac is not particularly friendly to open up,
01:20:47 ◼ ► there hasn't been a big market for aftermarket SSDs for the iMac Pro, if that would even be possible.
01:20:53 ◼ ► But assuming this thing is easy to open up, and assuming the storage does look like the iMac Pro, it's potential for a third party for it to have to upgrade that.
01:21:01 ◼ ► And the only remaining question is, is there any place inside this case, besides that place, where you can put storage, and I'm not entirely willing to rule that out.
01:21:08 ◼ ► I mean, especially if you just get it with one GPU, you've got a PCI slot, so you know, you could buy a PCI card with SSDs on it, for sure.
01:21:16 ◼ ► Oh, yeah, that's true. If we do have standard PCI slots, which I sure hope we do, that would actually be really nice. Yeah, you're right.
01:21:23 ◼ ► Do we think just two disk modules to start, or four? Like, maybe one way they can differentiate from the iMac Pro is by upping the disk bandwidth even more.
01:21:33 ◼ ► And so you could run four M.2 SSDs in parallel. I mean, you've got to figure, like, all this stuff, we're going to be very limited by PCI Express liens and stuff like that,
01:21:44 ◼ ► so I don't even know if they can offer all this and support dual GPUs and everything else, but maybe they have more modules.
01:21:56 ◼ ► Alright, so, speaking of price, my final question for the Mac Pro predictions. Starting price. What is the cheapest one you can get?
01:22:05 ◼ ► Keeping in mind that the iMac Pro starts at $5,000 for a pretty decent configuration. That's one terabyte, eight core, 32 gigs of RAM.
01:22:14 ◼ ► So, iMac Pro starts at $5,000 but includes a screen built in. So, what do you think for starting price?
01:22:21 ◼ ► I will be stunned if it's less than $7,500. What? No, that's too high. I think. I'm telling you, it's going to be a fortune.
01:22:30 ◼ ► You've got two rules. You've gone over. One dollar. Yeah, uh-huh. No, I really think this is going to be a frickin' fortune.
01:22:36 ◼ ► I take your point about it not including a screen. I really believe that this thing, it will be amazing. I'm not doubting that, but I think it will be just prohibitively expensive.
01:22:46 ◼ ► And this is coming from someone who buys a lot of expensive Apple stuff. Like, I think it's just going to be insanely expensive.
01:22:52 ◼ ► If they had a stripper model, they could offer a machine for $3,999. Hold on, hold on, sorry. A what?
01:23:00 ◼ ► A stripper. It's a car terminology. Like, it's the model with the cloth seats and the manual windows and no AC and no radio.
01:23:09 ◼ ► That's not how I buy cars at all. But they're not going to have a stripper model for this, so I think the starting price will be $4,999.
01:23:19 ◼ ► I actually agree. I think the iMac Pro, they spec'd it up to one terabyte and 32 giga ram minimum so that they could price it at $5,000.
01:23:30 ◼ ► Because the upgrades, they cost Apple a lot less than they cost us. I think they did that for a reason.
01:23:42 ◼ ► You'll be able to configure it up to some crazy amounts. You might be able to configure it up to $20,000 for all we know.
01:23:49 ◼ ► If you spec up everything to the craziest amounts. But I think the base price, keep in mind the current Mac Pro, the base price is $3,000.
01:23:57 ◼ ► So it's still a price increase, a substantial one at that. But I think it'll probably come spec'd similarly to the iMac Pro if not more, higher spec'd.
01:24:09 ◼ ► You know, I think you guys, you probably convinced me. I still think it's going to be just hilariously expensive.
01:24:14 ◼ ► But you're probably right. I do like the, God help me, I do like the synergy of having this start at about the same cost without the screen.
01:24:24 ◼ ► So it's actually quite a bit more expensive. I see your point and I think that makes sense.
01:24:29 ◼ ► They're probably going to Apple Arcade us though, you know. Even if they have a teaser for this thing, there's no reason they need to tell us the price.
01:24:35 ◼ ► Oh no, well they might tell us the starting price. I think they did with the iMac Pro, didn't they? Didn't they tell us the starting?
01:24:42 ◼ ► Yeah, I mean if it's shipping in December there can be more details later. Like, you know, we'll see.
01:24:47 ◼ ► Depends on how much of a teaser it is versus a very long pre-announcement. Six months from now you'll be able to buy this.
01:24:53 ◼ ► Or they'll blow right by it. Remember when the Apple Watch was announced way earlier than its launch and they blew right by the edition pricing?
01:25:06 ◼ ► We respond to this week by ExpressVPN. Protect your online activity today and find out how you can get three months free at expressvpn.com/atp.
01:25:17 ◼ ► Now you might think cybercrime is something that happens to other people, not you. Nobody wants your data.
01:25:27 ◼ ► But the reality is stealing data from unsuspecting people on public wifi is one of the simplest and cheapest ways for hackers to make money.
01:25:35 ◼ ► So when you leave your connection unencrypted and you use public wifi, you are exposing your data for the world to see.
01:25:42 ◼ ► ExpressVPN secures and anonymizes your internet browsing by encrypting your data and hiding your public IP address.
01:25:49 ◼ ► It has easy to use apps that run seamlessly in the background of your computer, phone, and/or tablet.
01:25:58 ◼ ► So ExpressVPN lets you safely surf on public wifi without being snooped on or having your personal data stolen.
01:26:04 ◼ ► I gotta say personally, I think it's really weird that we've ever thought it was okay to just use public wifi.
01:26:11 ◼ ► Just connect to anybody's wifi network where they can control everything about it, they can snoop on our traffic, and just have our computer just start sending all of our data over that network.
01:26:19 ◼ ► It seems crazy, I don't know why we still do it, but the reality is the world we live in sometimes needs us to do that.
01:26:27 ◼ ► ExpressVPN is rated the number one VPN service by TechRadar and comes with a 30-day money-back guarantee.
01:26:38 ◼ ► So protect your online activity today and find out how you can get three months free at expressvpn.com/atp.
01:27:11 ◼ ► There's a million other podcasts giving more accurate predictions about software changes and all this stuff.
01:27:17 ◼ ► I don't actually think we're going to see any more hardware besides the display in the Mac Pro.
01:27:24 ◼ ► One question is, do you think we're going to see, say, the 16-inch MacBook Pro previewed?
01:27:30 ◼ ► Yeah, I've been thinking no ever since they preannounced things, but I keep going back and forth.
01:27:35 ◼ ► The whole reason that they did the speed bump before the thing is just basically to tell you the 16-inch isn't ready.
01:27:43 ◼ ► But if they're already preannouncing a computer that's going to ship in December, maybe,
01:27:53 ◼ ► In theory, it wouldn't kill sales of the 15-inch because it's a different, newer thing,
01:27:57 ◼ ► and it would be potentially more expensive because Apple loves introducing new models that are more expensive than the existing ones.
01:28:10 ◼ ► Imagine if they had a Mac Pro teaser and the 16-inch and it's got a new keyboard, and none of them are available to buy, but you'd just be jazzed about them.
01:28:17 ◼ ► It seems highly unlikely, but I'm not willing to entirely rule it out because I think Mike brought this up on the recent upgrade.
01:28:23 ◼ ► There's nothing about what Apple has released that would make it awkward for them to introduce a 16-inch, a totally new form factor 16-inch.
01:28:36 ◼ ► It's differentiated enough that it's not shipping now, it's a totally different computer, and it's a different-sized screen, even if it's just the screen and not the overall size.
01:28:45 ◼ ► They could survive that and say, "Well, why did you just introduce this 15-inch? I feel bad."
01:28:52 ◼ ► Again, it seems highly unlikely, but I'm unable to banish it from my mind as the amazing fantasy of how great this WWDC could go.
01:29:03 ◼ ► Yeah, me too. I can't say it definitely won't happen. I can't say, "Oh, they would never do that," because they might do that.
01:29:13 ◼ ► Because of all the reasons you said, they might actually still tell us about it, even though it doesn't seem like it's shipping anytime soon, and even though they just updated the MacBook Pro.
01:29:25 ◼ ► Anyway, I actually had another idea for how we could structure this part, if you guys are up for it.
01:29:29 ◼ ► Wait, hold on, hold on. I just had an epiphany. I think I would like to steal a connected term, and I will do my risky pick.
01:29:38 ◼ ► I'm going to do it right up front. I know we're not scoring or whatever, but I would like to put on record a risky pick that I will regret later.
01:29:54 ◼ ► No, no, no. Well, first of all, you started it, sir, but secondly, the reason I say that is I want there to be a Mac Pro teaser.
01:30:03 ◼ ► Despite the fact that I will not be able to get a word in edgewise on this podcast for six months, I do want there to be a Mac Pro teaser, or hell, maybe even a release.
01:30:13 ◼ ► I mean, if we're going crazy, let's get crazy, but I wonder if there's so much software stuff, all of the leftovers from 2018 that got pushed to '19, all of the stuff that was originally slated for '19 that hopefully most of which made it, that's a big, long, busy keynote.
01:30:34 ◼ ► Additionally, it is impossible to please nerds. I can assure you that. I have lived it for years. It is impossible to please nerds.
01:30:46 ◼ ► And the only way I think Apple gets away with a Mac Pro announcement of any sort, probably a teaser, is by not announcing a price, because I really think the price is going to put off a lot of people, which it shouldn't, because this is obviously going to be the crazy, you know, "we spared no expense," that's a reference, John, "we spared no expense" computer.
01:31:13 ◼ ► But I think it'll still be an off-putting price. So if they don't put the price in, everyone's going to complain and say, "Oh, it's surely too expensive because Apple, and nobody's going to want to buy this, nobody will be able to buy this because it'll be too expensive."
01:31:26 ◼ ► They put the price in, "Oh, it is too expensive, you know, nobody's going to buy this." And in so many ways, it's, okay, it's not modular like we thought it was, or, "Oh, it's modular but not the way we want."
01:31:35 ◼ ► "Oh, there's only one GPU." You know, it's going to be nit-picked to death. And if the rest of the conference feels like such a home run to Apple, which I think it does, why would you throw this risky teaser in?
01:31:50 ◼ ► And I can answer that question, right? And the three of us have answered that question. And I still think they should do it. But I can see, I can work, I can balance this math equation in such a way that them teasing it just doesn't make sense.
01:32:06 ◼ ► One thing we know about modern Apple, though, is that regardless of what their internal monologue might be, personified as a company, when they introduce a product, what they project is that they think this product is great.
01:32:21 ◼ ► Whether it is or not. So the doubts about, "Oh, but what if they don't like the Mac Pro?" They think everyone's going to like the Mac Pro. They think whatever the issues were, they fixed them, it's the whole point. They may be nervous about how it's received, yada, yada, yada, but I feel like when they do an intro, they would never hold off on introducing the thing because they're afraid people might not like it.
01:32:46 ◼ ► It's always like, "Well, this is great." I mean, hell, they thought everyone would love the touch bar. That's what they put out. Whether that's internally what they're thinking, the presentation is, "We think these are the best laptops ever. Look at this amazing touch bar," so on and so forth. And they will give the exact same message to the Mac Pro.
01:33:01 ◼ ► But I also told Tim Cook through our friend Jason Snell that he can make it one more thing. I'm okay with that.
01:33:07 ◼ ► So you do the whole thing, you do all the Marzipan stuff. Everyone's super excited. All the new OS features, everything we've talked about is just all amazing. You can mix AppKit and UIKit in a single application. Look at all these things we've ported and it's just amazing. And all the iOS developers are going crazy. And there's one more thing and it's my Mac Pro.
01:33:25 ◼ ► It specifically says John Saratusa on the front. I've already planned the keynote. That's how it's going to go. The only question was the 16-inch laptop. Is there any more hardware stuff that is a blip on anyone's radar? Anyone?
01:33:39 ◼ ► I mean the MacBook 12-inch is due for an update. The Escape is due for an update. But I don't think we're getting those. There's no time for that. Sorry, Jason. They're probably going to be unimportant. So actually, I had a quick idea. I have a list of things here that I think are at risk for not being mentioned at all from most likely to not be mentioned at all to more risky.
01:34:04 ◼ ► I'm curious to get your read. What do you think out of this list will not be mentioned at all during the keynote? Is keynote only not State of the Union? Keynote only? Number one, I think the most likely, easiest pick, messages apps. Like the apps that you can make for iMessage.
01:34:19 ◼ ► Oh, that's punching down. Yeah, we're going to hear nothing about those, right? It's an interesting question because one of the possible announcements is cross-platform iMessage, which is probably low probability, but it's always out there every year. If they did cross-platform iMessage and if third-party iMessage applications are still a thing, they would have to mention them as part of that segment.
01:34:42 ◼ ► I think they may show iMessage applications, but that's different than reminding people that this is a place where you can make applications.
01:34:52 ◼ ► So it's separate from like, let's remind you that we have a platform where you can message applications versus we have some new applications to show you or whatever.
01:34:59 ◼ ► So I think they will probably not remind us that messages applications is a thing unless they're significantly enhanced, but I think there's even odds that we will see one or more messages applications being used in the keynote.
01:35:13 ◼ ► But see, that won't count. I'm talking about actually mentioning, and not even a tiny word on one of the word cloud slides. That doesn't count.
01:35:21 ◼ ► Oh, the word cloud slides, if it's enhanced, like, if they've enhanced it, now message applications can do this thing that they couldn't do before. That goes on a word slide for sure, if they did that at all.
01:35:32 ◼ ► Right, but this is what I'm saying, like I don't think we'll even see that. But anyway, all right. So moving on, a little bit riskier now, tvOS. You think tvOS is getting mentioned in the keynote?
01:35:49 ◼ ► Hmm. I mean, it depends on how much of a services recap they have time for, because surely there will be some form of services recap of talking about their various plus.
01:35:58 ◼ ► This is why this is tricky, right? Because, like, they're going to want to mention the tv app, and they're going to want to mention, you know, Apple Arcade, that games run on all the platforms, right? So that's, it's tricky, right?
01:36:10 ◼ ► See, I'm saying no to iMessage apps. I think I'm also saying no to tvOS, but it's a riskier pick, for sure. All right, getting a little bit harder now. The HomePod.
01:36:23 ◼ ► I think it'll get mentioned, like, as this works with the HomePod. I don't think it'll get mentioned in the sense of, look at the new things the HomePod can do.
01:36:31 ◼ ► I don't think anyone will say the word HomePod. No, I'm going to go, like, verbal versus slide. I'm willing to believe there will be a picture of a HomePod on a slide and the word HomePod on a slide. I give it a 50/50 chance of a human being saying HomePod.
01:36:45 ◼ ► Yeah, I'm going to say the HomePod is not mentioned in the keynote. All right, getting more risky now. Siri.
01:36:58 ◼ ► They're always mentioning Siri, whether it's better or not. It's going to be mentioned.
01:37:01 ◼ ► Yeah, I guess they use the word Siri to describe any kind of, like, on-device learning thing also. Like, Siri found these photos for you. Yeah, I guess you're right. All right. More specifically, shortcuts.
01:37:12 ◼ ► Oh, yeah, they're super proud of shortcuts and everybody likes them. Why wouldn't they mention it? Even if they haven't done anything, they're going to mention it.
01:37:34 ◼ ► It has been their catnip for a few years now, but I think at this event there's going to be so much else that they might want to save AR stuff for the fall event where they introduce new hardware.
01:37:47 ◼ ► Like, AR goes better with, like, here's the new iPhone or whatever that does new AR crap. I actually think there's a solid chance they won't mention AR at all during this keynote.
01:37:59 ◼ ► No, they did the ARKit enhancements. That's going to get a one-word mention and it will get expanded in the State of the Union.
01:38:05 ◼ ► Because until and unless they can the glasses project, like, either they release the glasses or can the project, they're going to keep mentioning AR.
01:38:11 ◼ ► Because they keep enhancing ARKit. ARKit will be enhanced. There will be sessions on it. It will be mentioned in the State of the Union.
01:38:16 ◼ ► I think it will get a single mention in the keynote. And if they have an AR table, like, well, no, when we sit down and we see a giant table, it's like, all right, well, get ready for another AR demo.
01:38:24 ◼ ► Yep, lost that bet. I'm actually voting no on AR. I bet it doesn't get mentioned at all.
01:38:30 ◼ ► I think it will at least get mentioned. It wouldn't surprise me if there was a demo. I mean, I'm being a little hypocritical, right?
01:38:38 ◼ ► Because I just made this big passionate speech about how there's not going to be any time for anything during this keynote and they're going to have to cut the Mac Pro.
01:38:50 ◼ ► There's always time to mention it. Like, you know, you can, yeah. ARKit enhancements exist and will be mentioned.
01:38:57 ◼ ► All right, and last one, which I think is the riskiest to evaluate, WatchOS. You don't think that there would be a mention?
01:39:06 ◼ ► How do you get out of this keynote without mentioning it, without talking about WatchOS? I don't know how you, that's...
01:39:11 ◼ ► Yeah. I mean, I know you're pessimistic about WatchOS, you're pessimistic about WatchKit, but there is a new WatchOS.
01:39:21 ◼ ► Maybe. But what if, you know, like, new watch faces, there's not much for developers to do there.
01:39:32 ◼ ► If the focus of the OS, like, if it's a pretty quiet year on that front, and it's a really packed keynote, maybe that might slip to the State of the Union.
01:39:42 ◼ ► I mean, there's going to be W2C sessions on WatchOS. Like, you're assuming this is not the year that we get basically UIKit for the watch?
01:39:50 ◼ ► I don't think, I mean, there aren't that many rumors about the watch in general, but I'm pretty sure that's not happening this year.
01:39:54 ◼ ► So, I'm talking about just being mentioned in the keynote. Like, my rationale here, I think WatchOS probably will be mentioned in the keynote,
01:40:02 ◼ ► but I think it's definitely worth considering because it is going to be such a jam-packed keynote with everything else,
01:40:09 ◼ ► and it doesn't seem like there's that much this year for WatchOS that would be relevant to developers, you know, enough to make it into a very packed keynote.
01:40:16 ◼ ► Yeah, I don't think you can get out of the keynote without mentioning WatchOS. I think that's a pretty sure thing.
01:40:21 ◼ ► Yeah, I think you're right, but it's definitely worth thinking about. All right, I'm done. I also have the MacBook Pro on here, but we already answered that.
01:40:28 ◼ ► Yeah, and so there's no other hardware on the software. Like, we don't have to cover all the things, you know, new versions of iOS, macOS.
01:40:34 ◼ ► We don't have to go into details on the individual features. Like, there's been so many rumors and leaks about it.
01:40:40 ◼ ► I don't think we have time to speculate about what the new iPad situation will be like. They've kept that stuff under wraps.
01:40:48 ◼ ► Yeah, I mean, I think this is a solid keynote. Like, just for the three or four pillars of just the iPad enhancements,
01:41:06 ◼ ► And the thing about Marzipan is it spans iOS and the Mac, so it lets you talk more about the Mac and it lets you talk more about iOS, like, kind of at the same time.
01:41:19 ◼ ► Obviously, that's more of state of the union stuff, showing how you can mix AppKit and UIKit and if you can do that and all that stuff.
01:41:24 ◼ ► But just that stuff. Basic touching on the new features of our platforms, the Marzipan story and the iPad story,
01:41:31 ◼ ► and then one more thing, hardware tees for a product that most people aren't going to buy, but that I think most people are excited about, even if they're not going to buy it.
01:41:39 ◼ ► That's a good WWDC keynote right there. And, you know, there's always room for some weird thing that hasn't even been rumored, right?
01:41:46 ◼ ► Like those location tile things that's been rumored. But, like, there's something like that. Say we hadn't heard of it.
01:41:50 ◼ ► There's always room for a little wild card like that. I mean, heck, sometimes they have people bringing up, like, remote control cars on stage.
01:42:03 ◼ ► So what do you think that my final question to you guys is, how do you think Marzipan will be approached?
01:42:14 ◼ ► You know, since they introduced it last year, they're going to want to have a touchpoint to use business crap lingo.
01:42:21 ◼ ► But they're going to want to talk about it again. And what do you think the presentation will be?
01:42:36 ◼ ► Or it could be as much as, like, "Look at all the things that this is already doing for the Mac.
01:42:45 ◼ ► Because in order to get UIKit to support thing, that made it easier for us to support that same thing on iOS.
01:43:12 ◼ ► They're going to... it's going to take up a lot of the time of, like, a lot of the substantive talking time.
01:43:20 ◼ ► Like, I think it's going to be a major focus of the keynote and of the conference and of the next year.
01:43:29 ◼ ► You know, Marzipan is not some... it's not like one API that some people might get used from.
01:43:39 ◼ ► It's so much more... like, it is such a huge undertaking that involves tons of changes to both the Mac and to iOS.
01:44:05 ◼ ► Look at how much progress we have made and how much progress you all can make with your apps.
01:44:17 ◼ ► So little faith in Apple's ability to come up with new names. Like, well, just go with the code name.
01:44:22 ◼ ► You're not going to come up with anything better. You'll probably just embarrass yourself.
01:44:31 ◼ ► I think, you know, if all goes well, I feel like they're pitching it as this is the future of developing for Apple's platforms.
01:44:43 ◼ ► But imagine a presentation where that's what Apple is thinking the entire time they're presenting it.
01:44:47 ◼ ► It will probably mostly be presented about, you know, the story that I think, you know, my original discussion and take on Marzipan on the very first show where we talked about it is that there is an untapped resource of tons of really skilled developers who know UIKit.
01:45:08 ◼ ► And the developer's perspective, now I can target a new platform with skills that I already have.
01:45:16 ◼ ► And Apple's apps, instead of them telling us what they've ported, will be, as they always are, demonstrations of what you can do, right?
01:45:24 ◼ ► Apple tends not to lean heavily on the things that benefit it or, you know, like Apple being able to put all the wood behind the arrow and not have a split strategy internally is an incredibly important aspect of Marzipan.
01:45:40 ◼ ► But they maybe will touch on that briefly, allude to it, you know, like in a subtle way.
01:46:04 ◼ ► Marzipan is the story of WWDC, unless, you know, secondarily, unless you're Paticci, the iOS stuff for the iPad.
01:46:11 ◼ ► But the biggest developer story is, it's like the biggest developer story, it's the biggest developer story since Swift, basically.
01:46:24 ◼ ► I think it's about even. Because, like, Swift was written in the same way, as in, like, they didn't present it as, "Here's this cool experiment we're thinking about."
01:46:32 ◼ ► They presented it from day one as, like, "This is the new language for Apple's platforms."
01:46:36 ◼ ► And we forced all of our presenters to have Swift on all their slides, and people were like, "What?"
01:46:44 ◼ ► And, like, they were faking it until they were making it. Like, it was clear what they wanted to happen with Swift.
01:46:50 ◼ ► But even, you know, on day zero, they were like, "Swift! The future of development on Apple's platforms!"
01:46:57 ◼ ► Whether you are ready for it or not, and whether we're ready for it or not, and they have been executing on that strategy ever since.
01:47:04 ◼ ► I think it is pretty big, because not only is it a complete language change across all their platforms, but it was an entirely new language.
01:47:14 ◼ ► And Marzipan, I mean, depending on, like, the three-year pan may be bigger than Swift, but what they start out with now is, I think it's an even footing.
01:47:24 ◼ ► You know, Marzipan, Swift is something that, like, Swift is a developer tool. It's a fancy, large-scale developer tool, but it's a developer tool.
01:47:31 ◼ ► It can result in apps being built better or more efficiently or, you know, whatever, but it ultimately really only benefits developers.
01:47:39 ◼ ► Marzipan is huge for developers in different ways than Swift. Like, Marzipan changes, like, major business realities for developers.
01:47:49 ◼ ► That's, I think, a way larger type of change. Like, you know, it's not going to be like an everyday kind of change, but it's like it's merging markets together.
01:47:59 ◼ ► Like, that's a huge business shift for developers. But more importantly, Marzipan will have massive value to users.
01:48:08 ◼ ► Like, your users don't give a crap what language your app is written, and they don't even usually know, and they certainly don't care.
01:48:15 ◼ ► And, like, if I converted my entire app to Swift over the next year, nobody would care, nobody would notice, nothing meaningful would be significantly better for my users.
01:48:29 ◼ ► Whereas, Marzipan is both a huge change for developers, and I think for the better, and also provides massive value, hopefully, to users.
01:48:39 ◼ ► Because it'll bring all this amazing software from iOS much more easily to the Mac, and so the Mac will just have a lot more software than it's had before.
01:48:47 ◼ ► That's huge for users. That's why I think this is way, way bigger than changing a language that is something that really only affects developers, and honestly, frankly, not even that much.
01:48:59 ◼ ► I was judging them from the perspective of developers, this is a developer conference. There's lots of changes that have affected users in unexpected ways, but I think there's a disconnection between how much it affects users and how much it affects developers.
01:49:11 ◼ ► Like, you should think about the population of applications available for the Mac with the Mac OS X transition, and with the introduction of Cocoa, and with the sort of, you know, the deprecation of Carbon.
01:49:25 ◼ ► A lot of those changes have really affected the Mac ecosystem. Just to give one example, having AppKit available, and bringing over those next developers, and the few people who got into the Cocoa world, seems like technologically it's not that big of a deal.
01:49:42 ◼ ► And developer-wise, it's like, well, I'm not sure how this is going to go, but it was one of the sort of mini Mac OS X renaissance, where all of a sudden we had a bunch of new applications that, you know, we knew them as like the new Cocoa applications, or the applications made by next developers, or the Omni stuff, or NetNewswire, like just a certain crop of applications made possible by an API that already existed, and a language that already existed.
01:50:09 ◼ ► But if you were a Mac user during that time, if we had like a race to Cocoa, and you were a Mac user during that time, and you were forced to only use Carbon applications, you would have been sad, and it would have been a very different era.
01:50:18 ◼ ► But technologically speaking, like, it's not like they introduced a major new thing. It wasn't like they invented a new language, an entire new API, or whatever.
01:50:29 ◼ ► Whereas, Marzipan is bringing in an API that is entirely new to the Mac. This UI kit had nothing to do with the Mac for the longest time. So I feel like it's a big technological change. How that affects users remains to be seen.
01:50:43 ◼ ► They will get shovelware, there will be applications that don't behave like Mac applications.
01:50:51 ◼ ► Electron and stuff like that, right. But I feel like there's a disconnect. So when I'm judging the significance of events in terms of things that have been announced at WWDC, I'm judging it entirely from the perspective of developers and the technical underpinnings of the application.
01:51:04 ◼ ► So Mac OS X was a big change, but the slow dominance of Cocoa was not a thing they even announced at WWDC, it's just a thing that slowly happened. But that had a huge effect on users.
01:51:14 ◼ ► So similarly, I feel like yes, of course Marzipan is going to have a huge effect on users, but that's not why it's a big deal. It's a big deal because it's the first step towards the unification of all of Apple's platforms under a, not a single top-level framework, but much closer to a single top-level framework than we have ever been before.
01:51:33 ◼ ► Because we got rid of Carbon and Cocoa can be subsumed, absorbed by UIKit and then it just becomes variants of UIKits across all of their platforms. Like that's the end state and I feel like Swift is as big an announcement as that from the perspective of the developer.
01:51:48 ◼ ► From the perspective of users, it's hard to tell. Obviously Swift didn't affect them at all, Marzipan is going to affect them a lot, but lots of things have affected users a lot that have just not been that significant. So I don't know. If you wanted to sum up user and developer, give it to Marzipan, but I still feel like Swift is a very big deal.
01:52:07 ◼ ► Let me stop while I'm ahead. Thank you for our sponsors this week, ExpressVPN, Jamf Now and MobileLux. And we will talk to you next week live at WBC.
01:52:20 ◼ ► Now the show is over, they didn't even mean to begin, cause it was accidental. Oh it was accidental.
01:52:30 ◼ ► John didn't do any research, Marco and Casey wouldn't let him, cause it was accidental. Oh it was accidental.
01:52:41 ◼ ► And you can find the show notes at ATP.FM. And if you're into Twitter, you can follow them at C-A-S-E-Y-L-I-S-S. So that's Casey, Liszt, M-A-R-C-O-A-R-M.
01:52:59 ◼ ► Anti Marco Armin, S-I-R-A-C-U-S-A-C-R-A-Q-S-A. It's accidental. They didn't mean to. Accidental. Tech podcast so long.
01:53:19 ◼ ► We've heard a few of our friends, in particular Mike Hurley and Steven Hackett over at the Relay Area. We have heard them mention a few times on recent podcasts that they are interested in buying the new Mac Pro and keeping it for ten years.
01:53:36 ◼ ► And being able to upgrade it and everything and basically have the same computer upgraded slowly for ten years.
01:53:44 ◼ ► Right. And so I wanted to both mention this to provide my skepticism for the reality of this and also to ask John as the owner and user of a ten year old computer to describe to them what this experience is like.
01:54:07 ◼ ► When you're holding onto an old computer, even if it's as upgradeable as the old cheese graters were, which I don't think it will be.
01:54:14 ◼ ► We mentioned earlier, we think the GPUs will probably be upgradeable, the RAM will probably be upgradeable, but the SSDs probably won't, CPUs probably won't.
01:54:25 ◼ ► Or at least only within the little narrow family of whatever CPUs were available at the time.
01:54:30 ◼ ► You could put in another member of the same family, same generation, but not the next year's model.
01:54:39 ◼ ► Discs maybe. But also other stuff about it, like the speed of its ports, the type of its ports, not really, either not upgradeable at all or only minimally upgradeable maybe later via PCI cards.
01:54:57 ◼ ► So the reality is if you use a ten year old computer, you have not only ten year old performance, but you also have ten year old limitations on what kind of things you can even plug into that computer.
01:55:13 ◼ ► Like for instance, even if you have the 2013 Mac Pro, those are Thunderbolt 2 or 1 ports on that.
01:55:24 ◼ ► It is USB 3, but it can't drive a display over a certain resolution and everything else.
01:55:29 ◼ ► If you have a cheese grater Mac Pro, which is the actual ten year old ones these days, you have USB 2 ports, not USB 3 unless you've added them via a PCI card.
01:55:48 ◼ ► Yeah, yeah, you have FireWire 800 and USB 2 is what you have for a ten year old computer.
01:55:53 ◼ ► So, you know, I don't think the idea of somebody like us who's really into this kind of thing, buying a Mac Pro, justifying it's probably very high priced by saying it'll last us ten years, I don't think that's realistic at all.
01:56:14 ◼ ► Well, first of all, this is silly because this is going to be an armed transition probably.
01:56:17 ◼ ► There's no way to hell their tape between a computer with the old CPU. That's a degree of difficulty that I could get up to.
01:56:27 ◼ ► But here's the thing, especially for the Mac, it's not just about a computer for ten years, it's about a top of the line Pro computer for ten years.
01:56:34 ◼ ► Top of the line Pro computers have compromises that make sense when you first get them. They're big, they're hot, they have all sorts of ports and wires poking out of them and everything.
01:56:48 ◼ ► That you can convince yourself are the right compromises for you or that you're willing to live with because it's the biggest and baddest computer.
01:56:55 ◼ ► But as it stops being the biggest and baddest computer, the desire to replace it with a Mac Mini or a 12-inch MacBook, all of which end up being faster than it, would be irresistible.
01:57:07 ◼ ► Let alone replacing it by what you really should have got anyway, which is an iMac Pro, which these people already have.
01:57:12 ◼ ► So I don't think they would have the will to keep it, I don't think they should keep it, and there will be so many much more tempting options as the thing ages.
01:57:21 ◼ ► Even I wouldn't have kept this computer that long if I didn't have lots of mitigating factors like my specific needs, but also the fact that my wife has a 5k iMac and I've had access to modern Macs.
01:57:32 ◼ ► You won't be able to run the most recent OS, forget about it, you can plug into it, you won't even be able to run the most recent OS.
01:57:38 ◼ ► I can't sync my notes to this computer anymore if the notes use features that aren't available in this version of Notes.
01:57:45 ◼ ► It stops being functional. Even if you stop upgrading the software on it, it stops working with all the rest of your stuff.
01:57:57 ◼ ► So if anyone is thinking of buying a computer and saying "I can justify the price because I'll use this for 10 years", you won't.
01:58:03 ◼ ► The time to use a computer for 10 years was starting in 2008 like I did. This is the wrong time to use a Mac for 10 years, you're not going to make it.
01:58:10 ◼ ► You barely made it. And you had to do a lot of upgrades. I think one thing that held you over significantly was that during your 10 years, the SSD revolution happened.
01:58:20 ◼ ► And that made a huge performance jump. A 10 year old computer had hard drives in it, so adding SSDs, that helped a lot.
01:58:28 ◼ ► You've also upgraded the GPU in that time, you've upgraded the RAM of course, the disks.
01:58:32 ◼ ► You've done a lot of upgrades over time, some of which are factors that I don't think will be upgradeable on the new Mac Pro.
01:58:40 ◼ ► Yeah, and the thing is, the performance, setting aside the SSD thing, we're on SSD now.
01:58:46 ◼ ► Your 10 year old computer performance wise, that won't be your problem. Especially if parts of it are upgradeable.
01:58:52 ◼ ► Even if it never gets any faster, things are fast enough at the baseline that your 10 year old Mac Pro, performance is not the reason you want to abandon it.
01:59:01 ◼ ► It will be because you can get better performance in a way smaller, lighter, cheaper, simpler, better, able to support modern.
01:59:08 ◼ ► You'll be able to get a better computer for less money. So there will be no reason to keep dealing with this behemoth when you know you could just...
01:59:18 ◼ ► It may even be the case, and in marketer user experience, it may even be the case that you'll be able to sell it to somebody if you sell it at the right time.
01:59:24 ◼ ► And buy a better computer with the money that you sold it for. Better for your needs. That it will actually be faster, it won't have any of the expansion or weird esoteric features that you never used anyway.
01:59:37 ◼ ► So I don't think it's going to happen. I like the idea that they're trying to convince themselves to buy a fancy computer. A fancy Mac. I like the idea that they're thinking about how quickly they'll be able to denoise podcasts or work in Final Cut Pro and all. That is probably true.
01:59:59 ◼ ► See, if it wasn't for the ARM transition, I would keep the computer, not for 10 years, but for a pretty long time if, if and only if, it was one of those computers that's a good one.
02:00:09 ◼ ► So to give an example, my current Mac Pro, every time I come up to my Mac Pro that is over 10 years old and I hit the spacebar, it wakes up. It always wakes up.
02:00:18 ◼ ► And I don't reboot it. It just runs forever. It always works. It does exactly what it's going to do. That's a good one, right?
02:00:25 ◼ ► If your computer occasionally, like my wife's 5k iMac, freaks out and has some kind of dialogue telling me to reenter my keychain password and nothing works and I have to reboot the thing to get it to work and I have no idea why it's causing it, no way in hell I'm keeping that computer for 10 years.
02:00:38 ◼ ► If it's flaky, if all the laptops have ever owned and you lift the lid and sometimes they don't wake up, or a kernel panics 3.5 times per month for inexplicable reasons, I'm not keeping that computer for 10 years.
02:00:50 ◼ ► But if you find a good one, like this is my philosophy, you find a computer that, you know, it was really awesome when you bought it and it was super fast and you really loved it, but now it's getting kind of long on the tooth, but it continues to just work reliably.
02:01:03 ◼ ► Like I frequently look at the 5k iMac and I'm like, I'm glad it's not my computer because my computer never does that stuff. It just works.
02:01:09 ◼ ► And I don't know if it's a software problem. I don't know if it's a hardware problem. I've had computers that are like this and computers that are not like this.
02:01:14 ◼ ► My Power Mac G5 was a little finicky, right? You know, and I had a Quadra that was very solid, even though it was a garbage computer.
02:01:23 ◼ ► I had an SE30 that was amazing, my previous champion computer, you know, so if I find a good one, I will keep it for a long time, but the ARM transition is going to stop even me from doing that because there's no way I'm going to be running like an Intel Mac 60 years into the ARM transition.