182: ‘AAA Podcast’ With Marco Arment
00:00:00
◼
►
It does kind of feel like like I just discovered Phil's in San Francisco once last year and
00:00:07
◼
►
I'm probably never gonna go there again. Uh
00:00:10
◼
►
guess what though I looked on the map and there is a Phil Z within a few blocks of
00:00:15
◼
►
The San Jose Convention Center. Oh, yeah. All right
00:00:19
◼
►
It's like not right across the street but it's probably about as close as the one
00:00:27
◼
►
Just a couple blocks. That was a good place. That's I I do wonder how different the culture of Santa
00:00:34
◼
►
I've never been to San Jose. Like I've been only only a handful of times in Silicon Valley at all and
00:00:40
◼
►
and so San Jose is even less familiar to me than the rest of it and
00:00:45
◼
►
But you've gone to a couple events here and there right? Yeah, including the only time I ever set foot in
00:00:51
◼
►
In San Jose was the 2012
00:00:56
◼
►
October event so it was a the one a month after the big iPhone event they did
00:01:00
◼
►
iPads and I think that was when the current form factor of the iMac debuted with the thin side not yet retina
00:01:09
◼
►
Of course, yeah and was the last public
00:01:12
◼
►
Event Apple held while Scott for stall was was an executive
00:01:17
◼
►
Yeah, that was that was I remember so I still remember like the day that that he was officially announced as being out
00:01:25
◼
►
We were actually Tiff and I were in vacation in Seattle. I was like in this weird clothing store with her like killing time my phone
00:01:31
◼
►
I'm trying to catch up on what the heck just happened. Everyone was exploding about it. It's pretty cool. Yeah
00:01:35
◼
►
No, so speaking of our of our IMAX though
00:01:39
◼
►
I have a bone to pick with you about because I believe that that you and I have the same
00:01:44
◼
►
2014 first gen 5k iMac, correct
00:01:47
◼
►
Does yours have problems with image retention? No
00:01:53
◼
►
You're lucky either that or apparently I don't see it
00:01:57
◼
►
It's possible that maybe I you know, maybe if my eyes were what they used to be
00:02:01
◼
►
I would see it, but it doesn't seem here's here's why here's why you would see it in particular
00:02:05
◼
►
because the the most common place I see it this this just started happening over the last few months and
00:02:12
◼
►
And it's I know exactly what you're gonna say
00:02:14
◼
►
Yeah, exactly. It just started happening over the last few months and it's getting worse quickly
00:02:19
◼
►
And so what happens is, I'm not talking about burn-in,
00:02:22
◼
►
like on Plasma TV, you have something burned in forever.
00:02:25
◼
►
I'm talking about LCD image retention,
00:02:26
◼
►
where basically you kind of see the ghost image
00:02:30
◼
►
of what was there before for a few minutes,
00:02:33
◼
►
and it fades over a minute or two.
00:02:36
◼
►
So if you have something high contrast up
00:02:39
◼
►
for five or 10 minutes, say.
00:02:41
◼
►
So for instance, when you're podcasting,
00:02:42
◼
►
and you have a couple windows up that might have
00:02:44
◼
►
text notes or the Skype window or whatever else,
00:02:47
◼
►
and then you go to your web browser
00:02:48
◼
►
and you load a dark gray website,
00:02:52
◼
►
then you will see the shadows of your formerly in those spots
00:02:57
◼
►
black and white windows.
00:02:59
◼
►
You will see those very clearly against the gray background
00:03:02
◼
►
of the website you're looking at.
00:03:04
◼
►
Yeah, it's like 4a5--
00:03:05
◼
►
So this almost always gets me.
00:03:10
◼
►
On my previous display-- and it was ancient.
00:03:14
◼
►
I used to talk about it on a podcast.
00:03:16
◼
►
But before getting this 5K iMac, what was that,
00:03:21
◼
►
like two and a half years ago now, I guess?
00:03:23
◼
►
- Yeah, something like that. - Yeah.
00:03:24
◼
►
- I was using a 20 inch Apple Cinema Display,
00:03:28
◼
►
not 24 inch, 20 inch from, oh geez,
00:03:32
◼
►
must be like 2000 or 2002 or something.
00:03:35
◼
►
I mean, I don't know, it was really,
00:03:37
◼
►
maybe it wasn't quite that old,
00:03:38
◼
►
but it was really pretty old.
00:03:39
◼
►
And I was sort of in a Syracuse's situation
00:03:44
◼
►
where I-- it was long past the point where I could have easily
00:03:49
◼
►
afforded to replace it.
00:03:51
◼
►
And there were all sorts of good options I could have bought.
00:03:53
◼
►
But I was sort of hoping for something retina forever
00:03:57
◼
►
and ever and ever.
00:03:58
◼
►
And so I just kept putting it off.
00:03:59
◼
►
It's like, there's no way I'm spending $1,000 on an apple.
00:04:02
◼
►
Even no matter how--
00:04:03
◼
►
I guess they were 30 inch for a while,
00:04:05
◼
►
and then they went to 27 inch.
00:04:06
◼
►
But I just didn't feel like buying it not to have retina,
00:04:10
◼
►
knowing that retina would come out any year now.
00:04:12
◼
►
For years and years and years.
00:04:13
◼
►
So my, I was using, and that display, after,
00:04:17
◼
►
it must have been, it had to be at least 10 years old,
00:04:19
◼
►
and I'd used it every day, had terrible image retention,
00:04:22
◼
►
and I knew exactly where you were going
00:04:23
◼
►
because my website was the number one culprit.
00:04:26
◼
►
- Yeah, 'cause like most, if you're dealing
00:04:28
◼
►
with other black and white windows,
00:04:30
◼
►
you don't really see it as often,
00:04:31
◼
►
but when you've had something black and white
00:04:33
◼
►
up for a while, and then you switch to a large expanse
00:04:36
◼
►
of gray, you see it very clearly,
00:04:38
◼
►
and my initial thought is always,
00:04:41
◼
►
I didn't realize that Safari was translucent.
00:04:43
◼
►
- That's exactly what I thought.
00:04:44
◼
►
- I always think it's like window translucency,
00:04:47
◼
►
and I'm like, oh, that's a weird design decision.
00:04:49
◼
►
Oh wait, that isn't a design decision.
00:04:50
◼
►
- Right, when I first encountered it,
00:04:52
◼
►
that's exactly what I thought,
00:04:53
◼
►
is I thought that maybe at some point
00:04:54
◼
►
I'd hit some kind of weird,
00:04:56
◼
►
I'd diddled something in the terminal
00:04:58
◼
►
with defaults right,
00:05:00
◼
►
translucent, you know,
00:05:01
◼
►
com.apples.safari/translucency=91,
00:05:06
◼
►
or something like that.
00:05:08
◼
►
- Right, exactly.
00:05:09
◼
►
- 'Cause that's exactly what it looks like.
00:05:11
◼
►
Sorry about that.
00:05:11
◼
►
Now that now it's an iMac, and it's my main computer,
00:05:14
◼
►
and so it's like, I don't want to send this thing
00:05:17
◼
►
in for repair and not be with my main computer
00:05:19
◼
►
for like two weeks or however long it takes
00:05:21
◼
►
to get it actually fixed.
00:05:22
◼
►
- Two and a half years under even daily use
00:05:24
◼
►
seems like too soon, honestly.
00:05:26
◼
►
- Yeah, and I don't know, and then it's like,
00:05:30
◼
►
am I gonna get one that has just the same problem?
00:05:32
◼
►
I'm always worried that they're not even gonna believe me
00:05:34
◼
►
or that they're not gonna replace it
00:05:35
◼
►
'cause they don't think it's bad enough.
00:05:38
◼
►
Even though I don't have a lot of basis
00:05:41
◼
►
for those feelings, it's just like,
00:05:42
◼
►
it's such a hassle to send away my main computer
00:05:46
◼
►
for repair, especially 'cause it's large.
00:05:49
◼
►
Like if it's a laptop, I could bring 'em to a Genius Bar
00:05:50
◼
►
and maybe have something faster, maybe,
00:05:53
◼
►
but like, because it's such an ordeal
00:05:55
◼
►
to haul this thing anywhere and ship it anywhere,
00:05:58
◼
►
I don't know.
00:05:59
◼
►
My current plan is to just hope that they do something
00:06:03
◼
►
with like an iMac Pro or a Mac Pro sometime this year
00:06:08
◼
►
before my AppleCare runs out in October.
00:06:11
◼
►
And then I can just buy the new one,
00:06:14
◼
►
send this in for repair,
00:06:16
◼
►
and then when I get it back from repair, sell it.
00:06:18
◼
►
- Oh, if you've got AppleCare,
00:06:19
◼
►
you should definitely do it,
00:06:20
◼
►
although you have to be without it.
00:06:21
◼
►
- But it's a pain, yeah.
00:06:22
◼
►
It's like, I don't wanna switch
00:06:23
◼
►
to my new crappy keyboard touch bar.
00:06:26
◼
►
- You know I haven't bought it.
00:06:27
◼
►
I haven't bought AppleCare since 1991.
00:06:29
◼
►
- The only reason I bought it on this,
00:06:32
◼
►
and I'm with you most of the time,
00:06:33
◼
►
the only reason I bought it on this
00:06:34
◼
►
is that AppleCare, the pricing is based
00:06:36
◼
►
on these tiers of the product they apply to.
00:06:40
◼
►
A $1,400 iMac has the same AppleCare cost
00:06:44
◼
►
as a $4,500 fully loaded one.
00:06:48
◼
►
- And so, and I was buying the very first generation
00:06:51
◼
►
of a new thing, of the 5K.
00:06:53
◼
►
And so I thought, you know what,
00:06:54
◼
►
it was only like 200 bucks or something.
00:06:56
◼
►
It was not a lot of money for what was something
00:06:59
◼
►
like a $4,400 configuration, 'cause I got really maxed out,
00:07:02
◼
►
'cause my main computer.
00:07:04
◼
►
And I figure, you know what, the ratio there pays off.
00:07:06
◼
►
I don't really get it for anything else,
00:07:08
◼
►
but in cases where you're buying a really maxed out
00:07:10
◼
►
config of something, it often does pay off
00:07:13
◼
►
because it's such a low relative cost.
00:07:15
◼
►
- I think we might have literally the same machine.
00:07:17
◼
►
I know I maxed out the RAM, 32 gigs.
00:07:21
◼
►
And I would have--
00:07:21
◼
►
- If you have a terabyte.
00:07:23
◼
►
I think I have a terabyte drive,
00:07:26
◼
►
'cause I don't know why I wouldn't have bought it,
00:07:27
◼
►
'cause it's the only drive I keep attached most of the time.
00:07:30
◼
►
I actually don't even know.
00:07:33
◼
►
That's something.
00:07:36
◼
►
- It's gotta be a terabyte.
00:07:37
◼
►
I don't see how I would be able to function
00:07:39
◼
►
if it wasn't a terabyte.
00:07:41
◼
►
And then what I get, the four gigahertz Intel Core i7.
00:07:44
◼
►
- Yep, yeah, same thing.
00:07:46
◼
►
Enjoy your wonderful screen.
00:07:49
◼
►
You will know quickly if it ever becomes a problem.
00:07:51
◼
►
- Yes, it is a terabyte drive.
00:07:53
◼
►
999.38 gigabytes, which is bullshit.
00:07:56
◼
►
- Oh, you got ripped off.
00:07:57
◼
►
You didn't get the full terabyte.
00:07:59
◼
►
Yeah, oh boy.
00:08:01
◼
►
I just hope I can fix this easily.
00:08:04
◼
►
I don't know, ATP Tifster said that this was a problem
00:08:07
◼
►
with the one that we have, the 2014,
00:08:09
◼
►
but that they fixed it for the 2015 model,
00:08:12
◼
►
which is still the current model.
00:08:14
◼
►
But he also says they're gonna have new ones
00:08:15
◼
►
like in March or whatever, who knows.
00:08:18
◼
►
- Yeah, we can get to March soon.
00:08:19
◼
►
We'll have to get to that.
00:08:22
◼
►
Did you see-- - It kinda sounds like
00:08:23
◼
►
Apple's gonna release like 15 things in March.
00:08:25
◼
►
That's kind of what, like all the rumors are pointing to,
00:08:28
◼
►
Like four iPads, new iMacs, new 12-inch MacBook One,
00:08:33
◼
►
and new watch bands and who knows what on the software side,
00:08:38
◼
►
new iPad stuff maybe.
00:08:40
◼
►
I mean, there is such a giant list of things
00:08:43
◼
►
that rumor people expect to be launched and marked.
00:08:45
◼
►
It's kind of ridiculous.
00:08:47
◼
►
- Did you see this?
00:08:48
◼
►
I've been meaning to link to it,
00:08:49
◼
►
and I haven't 'cause I forget why.
00:08:52
◼
►
I think it might be because I can't find the guy's name.
00:08:54
◼
►
You and I ran into the same thing
00:08:57
◼
►
with somebody on Twitter recently,
00:08:58
◼
►
that guy OMD or something like that, or?
00:09:02
◼
►
- Yeah, yeah, he didn't have his name anywhere
00:09:04
◼
►
on any of his stuff, and we both wanted to link to him
00:09:06
◼
►
and name him, you know, like he's nice.
00:09:09
◼
►
- Right, like I always--
00:09:11
◼
►
- I think he didn't, he responded,
00:09:12
◼
►
and it's not like he didn't want to be named,
00:09:14
◼
►
like at least he gave only a first name
00:09:15
◼
►
or something like that.
00:09:16
◼
►
- I heard, and he said something like he's building
00:09:17
◼
►
his brand on OMD or something like that,
00:09:19
◼
►
and it's harder for me to link to somebody who's anonymous.
00:09:22
◼
►
And the other thing that really gets me,
00:09:24
◼
►
And I hate to say it to you, but it's true.
00:09:28
◼
►
It seems like I link a lot less frequently anymore
00:09:31
◼
►
to people who have Tumblr blogs, just anecdotally.
00:09:34
◼
►
But back when Tumblr was sort of at its peak
00:09:36
◼
►
as a blogging platform-- I'm not saying that Tumblr is
00:09:40
◼
►
in decline, but I think it's in decline for the sort of blogging
00:09:44
◼
►
that I tend to link to it during Fireball.
00:09:46
◼
►
An awful lot of Tumblr sites don't
00:09:48
◼
►
have the person's real name on.
00:09:51
◼
►
It's just their Tumblr handle.
00:09:53
◼
►
And that was always a big hassle for me,
00:09:55
◼
►
and I'd have to figure out what their Twitter name was
00:09:57
◼
►
and go to their Twitter page
00:09:59
◼
►
and find their real name from there.
00:10:00
◼
►
It didn't even seem like it was people
00:10:02
◼
►
who were trying to hide their name.
00:10:03
◼
►
It's just sort of idiomatic for Tumblr.
00:10:06
◼
►
But anyway, there's this site here.
00:10:07
◼
►
- No, and that was actually designed that way.
00:10:09
◼
►
We meant it to be,
00:10:11
◼
►
like it's the same way that one account
00:10:14
◼
►
could have multiple blogs,
00:10:16
◼
►
and that there would be no way to tell,
00:10:18
◼
►
unless you put it there,
00:10:20
◼
►
which blogs belong to which account.
00:10:22
◼
►
- Right, right.
00:10:23
◼
►
it was very easy to create anonymous things
00:10:26
◼
►
that weren't tied to your main identity,
00:10:28
◼
►
and that was very much intentional.
00:10:30
◼
►
Because like everything else at the time,
00:10:32
◼
►
keep in mind we made Tumblr as kind of a response
00:10:35
◼
►
to Myspace and Facebook and the big social networks
00:10:39
◼
►
that were big when we started it in 2006.
00:10:42
◼
►
And so Twitter wasn't really,
00:10:43
◼
►
Twitter existed but it wasn't big.
00:10:45
◼
►
So it was really a response to those
00:10:46
◼
►
that were all about getting your real name
00:10:48
◼
►
and putting all your stuff out in public
00:10:50
◼
►
under your real name.
00:10:51
◼
►
And a lot of people can't or won't give their real name
00:10:56
◼
►
for a lot of the stuff they want to do online.
00:10:57
◼
►
And so you enable a lot more creativity
00:11:02
◼
►
and different types of uses if you allow people
00:11:05
◼
►
to be anonymous.
00:11:06
◼
►
So that was kind of like the ethos from the beginning
00:11:08
◼
►
of you can make a different blog, it's no risk,
00:11:11
◼
►
it's not gonna look bad upon you.
00:11:14
◼
►
This was before all the hate crap that we have today.
00:11:17
◼
►
Today it might be a little bit different calculation there.
00:11:19
◼
►
But back then, most of the hate was confined to these fringe forms and stuff, and they weren't really on Tumblr.
00:11:24
◼
►
I don't even know what they are now. I don't think they are. But regardless, the idea of getting an anonymous identity out there very, very easily was quite a positive thing in 2006.
00:11:36
◼
►
Anyway, I just sent you the link. It's to a guy named Thomas Verschorin at Verschorin.com.
00:11:42
◼
►
He has a Twitter link, so I got his name from there. But anyway, he has an interesting speculation here that
00:11:47
◼
►
it's purely his guess. He's not claiming any sort of sources.
00:11:52
◼
►
But what he's saying is that when Apple made standalone displays, they tend to sell them for a long time.
00:11:57
◼
►
The 27-inch LED display was on sale for three years. The 27-inch Thunderbolt display was on sale for five years.
00:12:03
◼
►
for five years, I guess they're still selling it?
00:12:05
◼
►
Or do they still sell that, right?
00:12:07
◼
►
I don't even know.
00:12:08
◼
►
- No, no, no, they just continued
00:12:10
◼
►
like a year and a half ago or something.
00:12:11
◼
►
- So you can't even buy an outdated Apple Display
00:12:14
◼
►
at this point?
00:12:14
◼
►
- No, I mean, you might be able to find somebody
00:12:16
◼
►
who has one in stock, but they haven't sold them new
00:12:18
◼
►
for a while. - Cancel.
00:12:19
◼
►
So here's his guess, is his guess is that Apple
00:12:25
◼
►
didn't wanna release a 5K standalone cinema display
00:12:28
◼
►
back in October when they did all the new MacBooks
00:12:31
◼
►
that could use them because they weren't yet ready
00:12:34
◼
►
to sell one with True Tone,
00:12:36
◼
►
because they don't have True Tone in the iMac either.
00:12:38
◼
►
None of the desktop Macs do.
00:12:40
◼
►
And so, as he says here, his conclusion,
00:12:42
◼
►
if you were Apple, what would you choose to do?
00:12:44
◼
►
Release an Apple 5K Cinema Display in 2016
00:12:48
◼
►
and then sell it for a few years unchanged without True Tone
00:12:52
◼
►
or push the LG display in 2016 as a stopgap
00:12:56
◼
►
and release an Apple 5K True Tone display sometime in 2017.
00:13:01
◼
►
So is anybody who's still holding onto a thread of hope
00:13:05
◼
►
that Apple hasn't abandoned the standalone display game, which
00:13:08
◼
►
I would not bet on.
00:13:09
◼
►
I kind of suspect that they are done.
00:13:12
◼
►
But there's a wee bit of sense here, in my opinion.
00:13:17
◼
►
I mean, so the thing about they tend
00:13:19
◼
►
to have these displays that last for a certain amount of time.
00:13:22
◼
►
Throw that right out, doesn't matter.
00:13:23
◼
►
It doesn't matter how long things have been out,
00:13:25
◼
►
like five years.
00:13:26
◼
►
This is a very small sample size.
00:13:28
◼
►
Apple does not artificially hold things back
00:13:30
◼
►
simply because the last one is only three years old
00:13:32
◼
►
instead of four years old or whatever.
00:13:34
◼
►
Like that's, this is too small of a correlation to matter
00:13:38
◼
►
and that's not how they really work.
00:13:39
◼
►
I think the only question here is
00:13:42
◼
►
whether we believe that they would hold back this display
00:13:45
◼
►
and go through the kind of,
00:13:48
◼
►
and assume the LG display was perfect, which it isn't,
00:13:51
◼
►
but assume the LG display was perfect,
00:13:52
◼
►
they still took a big PR hit
00:13:55
◼
►
in order to push that as the solution
00:13:57
◼
►
and to have the idea out there
00:13:59
◼
►
unchallenged for months and still so far that they are out of this display
00:14:03
◼
►
business. Yeah but what if they had no choice? Is that more like is that
00:14:07
◼
►
is that more likely than them wanting to save True Tone for the iMac? They don't
00:14:12
◼
►
sell them any iMacs, they sell a lot more laptops. It would not surprise me if when
00:14:17
◼
►
the Thunderbolt display that they just when they discontinued recently, that one
00:14:22
◼
►
when it was new, it wouldn't surprise me if that outsold the iMac when it was new.
00:14:27
◼
►
It might not, but they sell a lot of laptops.
00:14:31
◼
►
And they sell a lot of these displays for laptops,
00:14:33
◼
►
for their laptops.
00:14:35
◼
►
And so I don't see them holding back something
00:14:39
◼
►
that their customers very clearly want,
00:14:42
◼
►
replacing a product that was incredibly out of date,
00:14:45
◼
►
only for the purpose of one of its really minor features,
00:14:50
◼
►
like jumping ahead of the iMac getting that same feature.
00:14:53
◼
►
It doesn't seem like that would be important enough to them
00:14:55
◼
►
to justify all the downsides of that strategy.
00:14:57
◼
►
What if the original plan though was like a year in advance or well over a year ago
00:15:01
◼
►
if they had hoped to also have 5k IMAX at the end of 2016 too with True Tone and the
00:15:08
◼
►
whole thing just fell apart?
00:15:10
◼
►
That's plausible but it just seems—
00:15:12
◼
►
I'm not saying how likely it is but the whole thing seems plausible to me that it's
00:15:16
◼
►
some sort of engineering/supply chain screw up or you know maybe screw up is too harsh
00:15:23
◼
►
of a word but something didn't go according to plan and that's where they are.
00:15:26
◼
►
I don't know.
00:15:27
◼
►
I still love it.
00:15:28
◼
►
I brought it up the other week on this show.
00:15:29
◼
►
And there must be an awful lot of people
00:15:31
◼
►
who listen to my show who don't listen to ATP,
00:15:33
◼
►
because I got so much--
00:15:35
◼
►
the best feedback I got was that the observation--
00:15:39
◼
►
I got so much email about ripping off
00:15:41
◼
►
Syracuse's observation from ATP, which I did credit him with,
00:15:45
◼
►
that what does Apple plan to do in their beautiful new campus?
00:15:48
◼
►
Stuff all of these--
00:15:49
◼
►
which supposedly has a more open floor plan, where you'll see
00:15:53
◼
►
more of your colleagues' desks.
00:15:55
◼
►
Are they going to put one of these ugly LG monitors
00:15:59
◼
►
on every single one of these Johnny Ive designed desks?
00:16:02
◼
►
Like Johnny Ive is bought these off in the woods,
00:16:05
◼
►
nailing desks together out of wood
00:16:08
◼
►
that comes from one special brand of tree
00:16:10
◼
►
that grows in northern Italy or something.
00:16:13
◼
►
And they're going to put ugly LG monitors on all these desks?
00:16:18
◼
►
And that's also a good counterargument.
00:16:20
◼
►
But I think it's just as likely that you could just say,
00:16:23
◼
►
well, their solution is just they're
00:16:24
◼
►
you're gonna give most of their engineers and stuff,
00:16:27
◼
►
It really does seem like,
00:16:30
◼
►
and again, this could be blown under the water
00:16:33
◼
►
when Apple releases a brand new Mac Pro, iMac Pro,
00:16:35
◼
►
whatever it is in July, but I think that's very unlikely.
00:16:38
◼
►
I think if that was gonna happen,
00:16:40
◼
►
we would have a lot more than casual speculation
00:16:42
◼
►
about it by now.
00:16:43
◼
►
The fact that there's nothing in the pipeline
00:16:46
◼
►
to suggest that's happening makes me believe
00:16:48
◼
►
it's definitely not happening this year, if ever.
00:16:51
◼
►
And so I really do think it's very clear
00:16:53
◼
►
that we all have wishful thinking
00:16:56
◼
►
that goes in a different direction,
00:16:57
◼
►
but the reality is it's most likely
00:17:00
◼
►
that Apple really is out of the display business
00:17:02
◼
►
and the Pro Desktop business and the Mac Mini business
00:17:06
◼
►
and is really just gonna make the iMac and the MacBook Pro
00:17:09
◼
►
their only computers going forward.
00:17:11
◼
►
- I've heard that, I think I figured
00:17:13
◼
►
if I've talked about this,
00:17:14
◼
►
I've heard that there is a new Mac Pro in the pipeline,
00:17:17
◼
►
but that it is, it sounds ridiculous,
00:17:21
◼
►
but that it's effectively in a slot
00:17:24
◼
►
where there's so many other machines,
00:17:26
◼
►
whether they're Macs or other things,
00:17:27
◼
►
that are getting testing and validation engineering
00:17:31
◼
►
resources ahead of it,
00:17:33
◼
►
that there's no way it's gonna ship by WWDC.
00:17:36
◼
►
Which seems ridiculous, but.
00:17:38
◼
►
- Well, yeah.
00:17:38
◼
►
Even if they, I mean, here's the thing.
00:17:42
◼
►
Most people who feel bad about Apple
00:17:47
◼
►
because of the lack of Mac Pro updates at all,
00:17:50
◼
►
they don't necessarily need it to ship at WDC.
00:17:53
◼
►
I think what would calm a lot of fears, my own included,
00:17:56
◼
►
would just be an acknowledgement and confirmation
00:17:59
◼
►
that something else is coming.
00:18:01
◼
►
Just confirmation, even if it's one of their BSE replies
00:18:04
◼
►
to the press, keep an eye out, this space,
00:18:07
◼
►
you know, whatever else, something.
00:18:10
◼
►
And Tim Cook's little Q&A response
00:18:12
◼
►
to that internal bulletin board thing a few months back,
00:18:14
◼
►
that wasn't enough.
00:18:15
◼
►
That was actually, in fact, making things worse, I think,
00:18:17
◼
►
by kind of implying that the iMac was gonna be it,
00:18:20
◼
►
going forward. That's all we really want here. But again, I just, it's what I want to be
00:18:27
◼
►
true. I want there to be a new Mac Pro of some sort. And if it's shaped like an iMac,
00:18:34
◼
►
and it has a built-in 5K screen, and it just has a Xeon processor in it with like a thicker
00:18:38
◼
►
back for a bigger heatsink, that's fine. I'll take that. That actually sounds kind of nice
00:18:42
◼
►
to me. It wouldn't be as ideal as standalone, because then I'd have the same problem I have
00:18:45
◼
►
now when it gets image retention, and I have to send the whole thing in. But I'd take it.
00:18:49
◼
►
It's better than nothing, that'd be great.
00:18:51
◼
►
- Yeah, and it leads to weird situations.
00:18:54
◼
►
I mean, again, better than nothing if they made an iMac Pro
00:18:57
◼
►
and somehow put a Xeon in there and solved the heat problems
00:19:01
◼
►
that that would, you know,
00:19:02
◼
►
I say that's technically possible.
00:19:04
◼
►
The biggest-- - Well, and I think
00:19:07
◼
►
it's possible, although, talking to ATB Tipster
00:19:10
◼
►
about this a little bit in our chat a few weeks ago,
00:19:12
◼
►
he pointed out that the logic board in the iMac
00:19:15
◼
►
faces the wrong way to really make that happen.
00:19:18
◼
►
I think the CPU faces towards you when you're sitting at it.
00:19:21
◼
►
And to drastically improve the heat capacity
00:19:25
◼
►
to be able to cool a high-powered Xeon chip
00:19:27
◼
►
to make it more Mac Pro class processing power,
00:19:30
◼
►
you need to flip the whole logic board around,
00:19:31
◼
►
which is kind of be like a redesign
00:19:33
◼
►
on the level of a whole new iMac generation.
00:19:36
◼
►
So the question is, would Apple really do that
00:19:39
◼
►
for this relatively low volume,
00:19:42
◼
►
I mean, I guess they designed a whole case before,
00:19:44
◼
►
but it sure does seem like they couldn't possibly care less
00:19:49
◼
►
about keeping the Mac Pro updated in any reasonable fashion.
00:19:52
◼
►
And so it really, it's a pretty big question
00:19:55
◼
►
whether they would basically redesign
00:19:57
◼
►
the entire iMac enclosure and a whole new computer
00:20:01
◼
►
just for this line that they haven't given two craps about
00:20:04
◼
►
for three years.
00:20:05
◼
►
- It's a real mystery.
00:20:07
◼
►
I think it's possible, I think the iMac Pro is possible
00:20:11
◼
►
or that they'll sell it as a Pro somehow.
00:20:14
◼
►
I don't know.
00:20:16
◼
►
I hope-- I wish for it to be true, but I just don't see it.
00:20:19
◼
►
But there's got to be a reason why they don't just
00:20:22
◼
►
stop selling the Mac Pros.
00:20:23
◼
►
There's some contingent within the company that's clearly
00:20:26
◼
►
hoping for new Mac Pros.
00:20:28
◼
►
Otherwise, it would be easier.
00:20:30
◼
►
It would be easier, and they'd look less foolish
00:20:33
◼
►
if they had canceled the Mac Pro like it last WWDC,
00:20:36
◼
►
if they had just said, hey, these new iMacs are so great,
00:20:38
◼
►
that it's all that-- the time for the standalone is gone,
00:20:43
◼
►
whatever, people would disagree, obviously,
00:20:45
◼
►
and there'd be people who'd be heartbroken,
00:20:47
◼
►
and there'd be people who were furious,
00:20:48
◼
►
but at least Apple wouldn't look foolish, right?
00:20:51
◼
►
- Yeah, 'cause it really looks bad now.
00:20:53
◼
►
Like, it really, the situation now is
00:20:55
◼
►
egregiously bad.
00:20:58
◼
►
It's kind of embarrassing.
00:21:00
◼
►
- It's hard to believe.
00:21:01
◼
►
It's really kind of hard to believe how old it is.
00:21:03
◼
►
It really is.
00:21:04
◼
►
And still my biggest regret is that I didn't ask Schiller
00:21:08
◼
►
about it on stage last year, and I had the card.
00:21:10
◼
►
I had it on a card, and I did not.
00:21:14
◼
►
Some people understand, but it's so hard
00:21:16
◼
►
to keep that thing going live.
00:21:18
◼
►
And it's my one and only regret from that whole show.
00:21:22
◼
►
The year before, when Schiller was on the first time,
00:21:25
◼
►
I had way more regrets afterwards.
00:21:26
◼
►
And I felt like my self-criticism really helped,
00:21:30
◼
►
and I did a better job last year.
00:21:31
◼
►
But my one-- oh, I can't believe it.
00:21:35
◼
►
And now look at this.
00:21:36
◼
►
We're already at the point where WWDC has been announced again,
00:21:39
◼
►
and it still hasn't been answered.
00:21:41
◼
►
And the one reason why I put it at a lower priority at first,
00:21:45
◼
►
and then towards the end when I was wrapping up,
00:21:47
◼
►
I was flipping through the cards I had left,
00:21:50
◼
►
and I didn't see that one, which I might have,
00:21:53
◼
►
is like a last question.
00:21:54
◼
►
But the reason I originally had it lower in the stack
00:21:57
◼
►
was I thought, well, they've got to do something in September,
00:22:04
◼
►
I can get them on the record now,
00:22:06
◼
►
It's only for the next two, three months.
00:22:09
◼
►
So anyway, I don't know.
00:22:10
◼
►
- Well, and it's hard.
00:22:12
◼
►
When you're in a situation like what you're doing
00:22:15
◼
►
with these executive interviews, it's hard.
00:22:18
◼
►
And we got a little bit of this from when ATP interviewed
00:22:22
◼
►
Chris Lattner a few weeks ago.
00:22:23
◼
►
- Which was great, by the way.
00:22:25
◼
►
- And we had a couple people ask us afterwards
00:22:28
◼
►
on Twitter and email and stuff,
00:22:29
◼
►
why didn't you ask me about the Mac Pro?
00:22:31
◼
►
- Oh, you can't.
00:22:34
◼
►
Yeah, it's like, A, even if he knew about Mac Pro stuff,
00:22:39
◼
►
you know, you're not gonna answer that.
00:22:41
◼
►
And B, the guy who writes the compiler
00:22:44
◼
►
probably has no clue about what the Mac Pro hardware team
00:22:47
◼
►
is doing and what might or might not be released
00:22:49
◼
►
in that department.
00:22:50
◼
►
Like, it's a big company.
00:22:51
◼
►
And so like, anyway, your context,
00:22:54
◼
►
like interviewing Schiller on stage,
00:22:55
◼
►
like, it's tough to know whether you should bust out
00:23:00
◼
►
a question like that which is slightly antagonizing
00:23:03
◼
►
and really puts them on the spot.
00:23:06
◼
►
'Cause like, there's a very good chance
00:23:09
◼
►
that you would just get like a non-answer,
00:23:12
◼
►
you know, just like a nice PR-friendly non-answer,
00:23:14
◼
►
kind of like Tim Cook's post,
00:23:15
◼
►
like we really love desktops,
00:23:17
◼
►
we have great desktops coming in the future,
00:23:18
◼
►
you know, like stuff like that.
00:23:19
◼
►
And that's not very helpful,
00:23:21
◼
►
and then you've just like shifted the tone of the interview
00:23:24
◼
►
in a way that now they are on edge
00:23:27
◼
►
or are less likely to go to you in the future.
00:23:29
◼
►
So it's a tricky balance.
00:23:32
◼
►
So I don't blame you for not asking that last year.
00:23:34
◼
►
- No, but it wasn't because I thought it was--
00:23:35
◼
►
- I wouldn't blame you for not asking it this year.
00:23:36
◼
►
- Yeah, this year it would have to happen.
00:23:38
◼
►
- This year's gonna be the first question you ask.
00:23:40
◼
►
- Yeah, but watch, I'll end up getting,
00:23:43
◼
►
I don't know, somebody that has nothing to do
00:23:46
◼
►
with Mac hardware or something like that.
00:23:50
◼
►
- You can get Chris Ladder.
00:23:51
◼
►
- Right, like all of a sudden
00:23:52
◼
►
Schiller doesn't return my calls.
00:23:53
◼
►
No, I would have, 'cause there's ways to ask it,
00:23:58
◼
►
and I feel like that's something that I,
00:24:01
◼
►
maybe why I've gotten to this position where I can do this,
00:24:04
◼
►
is where I can ask the question, but do it in a way that's not
00:24:07
◼
►
confrontational.
00:24:09
◼
►
I mean, the framing I would have used is, look,
00:24:11
◼
►
this audience in particular is largely
00:24:15
◼
►
comprised of people who use Xcode, which
00:24:16
◼
►
is one of the apps where every bit of CPU power
00:24:21
◼
►
can really help at times.
00:24:24
◼
►
And we're in this transition moving towards from Objective-C
00:24:29
◼
►
Swift, I think it's fair to say, is more taxing on the CPU than Objective-C. It seems like
00:24:35
◼
►
the Swift compiler is, you know, you can write Swift code that takes a lot longer to compile,
00:24:40
◼
►
but whatever, it certainly isn't easy to compile. And there's just a general sentiment that
00:24:47
◼
►
Apple's priorities for pro hardware in general are lower than they used to be. The Mac Pro
00:24:56
◼
►
is I don't know, whatever it was, 900 days old at this time,
00:24:59
◼
►
after an incredibly splashy debut.
00:25:02
◼
►
What the heck is going on here?
00:25:03
◼
►
I don't think that is making-- it's not
00:25:06
◼
►
like I'm putting him on the spot.
00:25:07
◼
►
And he can easily say-- and maybe that's all he would have
00:25:10
◼
►
said is, hey, we love you guys.
00:25:14
◼
►
But you know I can't talk about future stuff.
00:25:17
◼
►
I don't have anything to say about it.
00:25:18
◼
►
And then that's the end of it.
00:25:22
◼
►
So it's possible, but at least I would have asked.
00:25:26
◼
►
Anyway, there's always there's always future executive podcast interviews live at everybody. I loved the latner interview, by the way
00:25:32
◼
►
I don't I it was really and especially for a show that
00:25:35
◼
►
Almost never does interviews. I mean you guys never
00:25:41
◼
►
I thought there was one a long time ago or no, I guess you guys swapped you guys swapped with another show
00:25:47
◼
►
Yeah, we had John trade spots with Christina Warren right for one episode
00:25:50
◼
►
Which actually turned out really nice, but it wasn't really an interview show
00:25:52
◼
►
It's just like she just was another host on our show for that episode, right?
00:25:55
◼
►
You know, I thought that for a show that has an established rhythm between the three of you
00:26:00
◼
►
in which really none of it is really interview style and there's an incredible comfort level between your
00:26:06
◼
►
personalities to have somebody new on and
00:26:09
◼
►
Do a three-way interview where it eats all three of you asked good questions
00:26:14
◼
►
I thought it was really impressive because that's hard to do because it was a really different show. Yeah
00:26:20
◼
►
It's like all of a sudden instead of driving a car you're you're riding bicycles or something
00:26:23
◼
►
Yeah, it was a lot of fun though and Chris was you know
00:26:28
◼
►
He made it easy on us like he wasn't like a prima donna about anything and you know
00:26:32
◼
►
Just really easy to work with and a super nice guy. That was a lot of fun. Yeah, he is it's you know, it's
00:26:38
◼
►
You know, it's obviously not true from top to bottom
00:26:40
◼
►
But it is generally true that Apple tends to attract very nice people. There are yeah
00:26:48
◼
►
You know, I mean Federighi is a great example where you know, I don't know what he's like in real personal life
00:26:52
◼
►
But you know like backstage and stuff like that and when you see him at WWDC and and people come up and and you know
00:26:59
◼
►
Just random attendees are like, hey, can I get a selfie or whatever?
00:27:02
◼
►
He stops and talks for you know, five minutes with them and asks what they're doing
00:27:05
◼
►
He he comes across like talking to a group of five
00:27:09
◼
►
You know first time in WWDC at WWDC attendees wearing the WWDC jacket
00:27:16
◼
►
He comes across exactly with the same demeanor that he has on stage. So like that affection that people seem to have for him
00:27:21
◼
►
It's true. That seems to be his personality and Latiners exactly that type of personalities
00:27:26
◼
►
He's you know, just just a nice guy
00:27:28
◼
►
Yeah, did I ever did I tell you about last year WC when I visited apples and Facebook's campuses in the same day? Yeah
00:27:36
◼
►
It all sort of blurs together
00:27:39
◼
►
I remember you doing it, but I don't remember what the details were really interesting like so
00:27:43
◼
►
- Yeah, in both cases, me and Casey
00:27:47
◼
►
and a couple other friends, we had a friend
00:27:50
◼
►
at each company that wanted to just give us
00:27:53
◼
►
a quick tour, let us in, and show us around,
00:27:55
◼
►
and stuff like that, and Apple, I only saw
00:27:57
◼
►
the center courtyard and Cafe Max,
00:28:01
◼
►
'cause you can't bring people into the buildings,
00:28:03
◼
►
really, there.
00:28:04
◼
►
- Frowned upon.
00:28:06
◼
►
- Yeah, exactly, so I didn't see any actual offices,
00:28:09
◼
►
but I was able to see the courtyard and hang out
00:28:11
◼
►
and have lunch with everybody there,
00:28:13
◼
►
and we had lunch with something like 15 people
00:28:15
◼
►
at this giant table.
00:28:16
◼
►
So I got to meet a lot of people there
00:28:18
◼
►
and hang out for a good amount of time
00:28:20
◼
►
and they have pretty good coffee at Apple,
00:28:21
◼
►
even at Cafe Max, I gotta say.
00:28:23
◼
►
And kind of get a feel for the vibe of the campus,
00:28:27
◼
►
even though I didn't see any offices.
00:28:28
◼
►
And then a couple hours later we went to Facebook
00:28:31
◼
►
and I had never been to either of these campuses before.
00:28:34
◼
►
I had been to the Apple retail store,
00:28:36
◼
►
but I'd never gone through the doors into the courtyard.
00:28:40
◼
►
And I'm actually not sure I was allowed to.
00:28:42
◼
►
They have some kind of weird rules about bloggers,
00:28:44
◼
►
but I think I'm just under--
00:28:46
◼
►
like, I'm not really officially Apple Press in any capacity.
00:28:49
◼
►
I never have been.
00:28:50
◼
►
And so I think that's why it wasn't a problem
00:28:52
◼
►
that I was there.
00:28:53
◼
►
Because I had a friend who tried to go--
00:28:56
◼
►
who was Apple Press and was not allowed in.
00:28:58
◼
►
So that was interesting.
00:29:00
◼
►
But anyway, so seeing Apple and then seeing Facebook
00:29:07
◼
►
could not have been two more different company culture
00:29:11
◼
►
environments, at least visibly from these brief visits I did. And Facebook, I just
00:29:18
◼
►
felt horrible the whole time I was there. Like, I felt kind of creeped out and
00:29:23
◼
►
intimidated by just how bizarre and kind of intense, high energy but not high
00:29:30
◼
►
positive energy it seemed to be. Like, just really like, I don't know, it's hard to
00:29:36
◼
►
explain. I really did, I really got a very bad feeling from Facebook. A
00:29:39
◼
►
combination of like how does anybody get any work done here
00:29:43
◼
►
and where are the adults and and it just didn't feel good. It
00:29:48
◼
►
felt like a dysfunctional workaholic culture that was
00:29:51
◼
►
hard to get any real work done in an in an environment. That's
00:29:54
◼
►
kind of weirdly like like trapped in youth forever
00:29:58
◼
►
bizarro college fantasy world and then Apple was so like calm
00:30:05
◼
►
and adult and just like nicely like low key.
00:30:08
◼
►
The people there were just like nice and calm.
00:30:11
◼
►
And it kind of felt like, oh, this is where the adults work.
00:30:14
◼
►
Like this is like where people come
00:30:17
◼
►
to actually do serious work.
00:30:19
◼
►
And it was a much, it just,
00:30:21
◼
►
whatever the environment actually is,
00:30:24
◼
►
again, because I've never worked at these companies
00:30:26
◼
►
and didn't even go inside the offices at Apple,
00:30:28
◼
►
it's hard for me to really say this,
00:30:30
◼
►
but it just felt like the little tiny windows
00:30:34
◼
►
into these cultures I saw really just seemed like
00:30:37
◼
►
Apple was the place where the nice, mature adults
00:30:42
◼
►
- Mm, I could see that.
00:30:43
◼
►
I don't know.
00:30:45
◼
►
It definitely seems like people who go to Apple,
00:30:48
◼
►
company cultures attract like-minded people,
00:30:53
◼
►
but it does seem to me, in general,
00:30:54
◼
►
like when I've been there,
00:30:56
◼
►
people know how to turn it off,
00:30:58
◼
►
that when you're going to lunch
00:31:00
◼
►
and they're gonna have lunch with a friend,
00:31:01
◼
►
they're just having lunch with a friend.
00:31:04
◼
►
- Right, yeah.
00:31:05
◼
►
- Get back up to speed when they get back to work
00:31:07
◼
►
or whatever.
00:31:08
◼
►
- I mean, I'll tell you one thing.
00:31:10
◼
►
I don't hear a lot of stories about Facebook and Apple
00:31:13
◼
►
stealing talent from each other,
00:31:15
◼
►
and maybe that's 'cause I don't really pay attention,
00:31:16
◼
►
but I'll tell you one thing, seeing them both those places,
00:31:19
◼
►
I cannot imagine that anybody who works for one
00:31:22
◼
►
would want to work for the other in either direction.
00:31:25
◼
►
Like, I don't think they're competing
00:31:26
◼
►
for the same people at all.
00:31:28
◼
►
- Yeah, I've never really heard that either.
00:31:30
◼
►
I mean, and obviously at a certain level,
00:31:32
◼
►
There's probably some like maybe like sysadmins
00:31:35
◼
►
or something like that.
00:31:36
◼
►
But, and you know what, there was that one team at Facebook
00:31:39
◼
►
that was largely poached from Apple,
00:31:40
◼
►
but now they're all dispersed, right?
00:31:42
◼
►
They're gone.
00:31:43
◼
►
The mic man is--
00:31:44
◼
►
- All the designers, yeah, they bought a bunch of designers
00:31:45
◼
►
for a while and then just slowly eroded their sanity
00:31:48
◼
►
until they all quit.
00:31:49
◼
►
- Right, and they built a very Apple-like beautiful system
00:31:53
◼
►
and custom tools to support it with Facebook paper
00:31:55
◼
►
or whatever they call, whether it was just paper
00:31:58
◼
►
or Facebook paper or whatever.
00:31:59
◼
►
- One of the names they stole, yeah, it's fine.
00:32:02
◼
►
- Well, but you know what I mean.
00:32:04
◼
►
It's a tough call because the paper app,
00:32:08
◼
►
the other paper app, the one that you draw on,
00:32:10
◼
►
was there first.
00:32:11
◼
►
But it's the risk you take when you
00:32:13
◼
►
pick a regular, a plain word is your app name.
00:32:17
◼
►
- It seemed like for a while there,
00:32:19
◼
►
Facebook was just gobbling up as much design talent
00:32:22
◼
►
as they could at about the same time
00:32:23
◼
►
that Google was gobbling up as much email talent
00:32:25
◼
►
as they could.
00:32:26
◼
►
And it seems like both of those have just kind of fizzled
00:32:28
◼
►
and faded over the last year or so.
00:32:30
◼
►
I haven't heard anything about them recently.
00:32:32
◼
►
- I think in broad terms what happened
00:32:34
◼
►
was that there was a period where Zuckerberg,
00:32:36
◼
►
I think it coincides with,
00:32:38
◼
►
'cause if there's one, I don't get Facebook,
00:32:43
◼
►
I've never signed up for it.
00:32:44
◼
►
And so I'm not, it does feel foreign to me.
00:32:48
◼
►
It feels like studying a foreign country.
00:32:51
◼
►
But from my observations, it is clear,
00:32:54
◼
►
I don't think there could be any question
00:32:55
◼
►
that Zuckerberg has a tremendous gift for changing his mind.
00:32:59
◼
►
People often said that about Steve Jobs.
00:33:02
◼
►
Tim Cook has often, when he talks about working
00:33:05
◼
►
with Steve Jobs, usually just talks about him
00:33:08
◼
►
on a personal level, but if you can get him talking
00:33:10
◼
►
about working, Tim Cook tells stories about his
00:33:14
◼
►
absolutely amazing ability to change his mind.
00:33:16
◼
►
But the Steve Jobs style is that when he comes in
00:33:19
◼
►
with his mind change, he acts as though it was
00:33:21
◼
►
his opinion all along.
00:33:22
◼
►
And I think Bill Gates had some of that too, right?
00:33:26
◼
►
Like when Bill Gates famously, like Microsoft
00:33:29
◼
►
building this early '90s strategy to sort of do their own custom stuff for connecting
00:33:34
◼
►
computers to each other. And then all of a sudden, Gates writes like a 10-page manifesto
00:33:39
◼
►
that we've got to get on this internet thing. And all of a sudden, I mean, how long did
00:33:43
◼
►
it take for Explorer to decimate Netscape? Didn't take long.
00:33:49
◼
►
Yeah, but at the same time, they made an active desktop. So I don't know if that was a net
00:33:54
◼
►
I'm not saying that it was seamlessly executed. I'm just saying that we did change his mind.
00:33:59
◼
►
And the broad strokes Facebook was a website.
00:34:04
◼
►
It was a website you went to and you did all these things.
00:34:06
◼
►
And the iPhone came out.
00:34:08
◼
►
And an awful lot of products that
00:34:10
◼
►
were popular websites in 2007 in the iPhone era
00:34:17
◼
►
just weren't getting the engagement that things that
00:34:20
◼
►
could be done as a native app got.
00:34:25
◼
►
Not to go too far off into the weeds, but one reason
00:34:27
◼
►
is that an awful lot of websites were built.
00:34:30
◼
►
I don't think this is true anymore because mobile is--
00:34:32
◼
►
I don't think anybody overlooks it.
00:34:34
◼
►
But the back end of the website was inextricably tied
00:34:37
◼
►
to the front end of the website.
00:34:39
◼
►
And instead of having everything go through nice APIs,
00:34:42
◼
►
even the front end of the website,
00:34:43
◼
►
so that you could make clients for other devices,
00:34:47
◼
►
like a native Mac client, or-- and people would say,
00:34:52
◼
►
well, I forget.
00:34:52
◼
►
You don't need a native Mac or Windows client.
00:34:54
◼
►
We'll just go through the web browser.
00:34:55
◼
►
And for a lot of things, for a lot of years, that was fine.
00:34:57
◼
►
But then with the phone, that wasn't good enough.
00:34:59
◼
►
And Facebook had an app that was largely just
00:35:02
◼
►
a front end for HTML and JavaScript.
00:35:05
◼
►
And then they seemed to get it.
00:35:06
◼
►
And it's from Zuckerberg on down that, no, we
00:35:09
◼
►
should do this with as much native stuff as we can.
00:35:12
◼
►
This app is important.
00:35:13
◼
►
This is more important than our website.
00:35:16
◼
►
And that's around when he hired all those designers.
00:35:18
◼
►
And I think there was sort of a look.
00:35:21
◼
►
Apple's a company to look at.
00:35:23
◼
►
they value A+ design talent, maybe we should too.
00:35:28
◼
►
And then I think in the intervening years,
00:35:30
◼
►
Facebook realized that that wasn't really
00:35:32
◼
►
that important to them.
00:35:34
◼
►
That the native part was, but the design caliber wasn't.
00:35:38
◼
►
- Or rather, I think it seemed like there was
00:35:41
◼
►
a lot of trouble, you know, like they were able
00:35:43
◼
►
to get the talent, but just, you know,
00:35:45
◼
►
by applying sheer force of will and lots of money,
00:35:48
◼
►
they were able to get the talent.
00:35:49
◼
►
But then the question is, well, what do you have,
00:35:50
◼
►
all these incredibly talented people do at Facebook.
00:35:54
◼
►
And that was, it seemed like they had a harder time
00:35:57
◼
►
having a good answer to that question
00:35:59
◼
►
and maintaining that over time.
00:36:01
◼
►
But who knows, it's hard to keep good people interested
00:36:05
◼
►
in working for a giant established product.
00:36:08
◼
►
You know, like Apple has this problem too.
00:36:10
◼
►
Like once you have something that's big and successful
00:36:12
◼
►
and boring like Facebook or the iPhone,
00:36:14
◼
►
it's hard to get people interested in working on that,
00:36:18
◼
►
the same kind of people who would make something like that
00:36:19
◼
►
'cause they wanna go make something else.
00:36:21
◼
►
- Yeah, I know Mike Mattis a little bit,
00:36:23
◼
►
and I haven't spoken to him much since he left Facebook,
00:36:28
◼
►
so I'm just sort of speculating here,
00:36:31
◼
►
but I know from a couple of the people on the team
00:36:33
◼
►
that they were used to being the A team at the company.
00:36:36
◼
►
Mattis was, I think, I know he designed a whole bunch
00:36:40
◼
►
of stuff in the original iPhone,
00:36:41
◼
►
but I think he literally did the actual pixels
00:36:44
◼
►
for the slide to unlock.
00:36:49
◼
►
And if you're the person who designs both the visuals
00:36:53
◼
►
and the interaction for a thing, doing Slide to Unlock
00:36:56
◼
►
is pretty big.
00:36:57
◼
►
Because I remember Steve Jobs actually demoed it
00:36:59
◼
►
like three times.
00:37:00
◼
►
He was like, that's so cool.
00:37:01
◼
►
I'm going to do it again.
00:37:01
◼
►
He locked the phone and did it again.
00:37:04
◼
►
So when you're designing the feature that Steve Jobs
00:37:08
◼
►
decides, I'm just going to do this three or four times
00:37:10
◼
►
on stage because I just love it so much,
00:37:13
◼
►
and then to go to Facebook, and you're not designing the app
00:37:18
◼
►
that's in front of a billion users,
00:37:20
◼
►
you're designing the app that's in front of like
00:37:22
◼
►
one tenth of one percent of the users
00:37:24
◼
►
who care more about how things look
00:37:26
◼
►
than the regular Facebook experience.
00:37:29
◼
►
I just think it's hard to get excited about that.
00:37:33
◼
►
- I'll take a break, let's take a break.
00:37:36
◼
►
I'm gonna thank our first sponsor,
00:37:37
◼
►
it's our good friends at Audible.
00:37:40
◼
►
You guys know Audible, Audible is where you go to get
00:37:42
◼
►
just about anything and everything audio related.
00:37:47
◼
►
I used to think of it as a place you go to get audio books.
00:37:49
◼
►
And it's true.
00:37:50
◼
►
They have more audio books than anybody.
00:37:54
◼
►
But they have so much more than audio books now.
00:37:57
◼
►
You go there, you sign up for an account,
00:37:59
◼
►
and you can get all sorts of stuff.
00:38:01
◼
►
They have news, daily news shows.
00:38:03
◼
►
They have comedy shows.
00:38:04
◼
►
All of this stuff, and a lot of this stuff, is original to Audible.
00:38:08
◼
►
If you want to listen to it, Audible has it.
00:38:11
◼
►
Listen to audio books from virtually every genre,
00:38:13
◼
►
anytime, anywhere.
00:38:14
◼
►
They have a great listen guarantee.
00:38:16
◼
►
So if you get an audio book and you start listening to it
00:38:19
◼
►
and it's putting you to sleep, you
00:38:21
◼
►
could just give it back to them and get a different book.
00:38:24
◼
►
That's how confident they are.
00:38:28
◼
►
You're not going to get bored.
00:38:30
◼
►
Every minute where you need to listen to something to not be
00:38:32
◼
►
bored, you can fill it up with stuff from Audible.
00:38:34
◼
►
And I've always said, I think this
00:38:36
◼
►
is one of the greatest advertising opportunities ever.
00:38:40
◼
►
Why do they sponsor podcasts?
00:38:41
◼
►
Because they know that everybody who's
00:38:43
◼
►
listening to me tell you about Audible
00:38:45
◼
►
is somebody who listens to spoken word content,
00:38:48
◼
►
by definition.
00:38:49
◼
►
So if you're listening to this and you
00:38:51
◼
►
feel like you've got gaps in your life
00:38:54
◼
►
where you need more podcasts or things like podcasts,
00:38:57
◼
►
go to Audible.
00:38:59
◼
►
Go to audible.com/talkshow.
00:39:02
◼
►
No "the," just "talk show."
00:39:04
◼
►
And no, no, you came here and you get a free 30-day trial.
00:39:07
◼
►
30 days, we can just listen to whatever you want.
00:39:09
◼
►
Audible.com/talkshow.
00:39:13
◼
►
I think I wrote that script.
00:39:15
◼
►
Yeah, maybe.
00:39:19
◼
►
I was telling her--
00:39:24
◼
►
I forget if it was on air or not.
00:39:26
◼
►
But Bill Simmons--
00:39:28
◼
►
I've been listening to him.
00:39:29
◼
►
I read the football season I was listening.
00:39:31
◼
►
He does a sports thing.
00:39:32
◼
►
He does a thing called the ringer.
00:39:36
◼
►
Very popular.
00:39:36
◼
►
You probably see it.
00:39:37
◼
►
It's probably pretty high up in overcast.
00:39:39
◼
►
So that'd be interesting to see if it was actually
00:39:40
◼
►
all that high up in overcast.
00:39:41
◼
►
maybe Overcast skews towards non-sports stuff. Maybe like sports stuff is a little bit more,
00:39:48
◼
►
I don't know, they'd be in our syndicate. It does pretty well in Overcast. It is not as high as tech
00:39:53
◼
►
shows and like the really popular, you know, NPR-style storytelling shows like This American
00:39:58
◼
►
Life, though. I think it was Ben Thompson and I who were talking about it. I forget if it was on
00:40:01
◼
►
the show or off. But the gist of it is that when Bill Simmons first started doing sponsors reads
00:40:06
◼
►
on his show. He was awful at it, as was I when I first split off and started doing this
00:40:12
◼
►
show on my own. Just brutal. Maybe the shows were okay, but the sponsor reads were just
00:40:18
◼
►
brutal. I don't know why. It's a hard thing to do.
00:40:22
◼
►
You got the hang of it eventually. It took you maybe a couple of months, and you were
00:40:25
◼
►
pretty good at it.
00:40:26
◼
►
Yeah, but Simmons has actually taken it to a new level. I would venture to say he was
00:40:31
◼
►
worse than me at the beginning, and now he's better than anybody I've ever seen.
00:40:35
◼
►
He's like in Howard Stern territory at being able to do it. Because sometimes
00:40:41
◼
►
when I listen to Stern anymore, it almost seems like when Stern does one, where
00:40:44
◼
►
he does the read, he's phoning it. You could tell he's phoning it in.
00:40:47
◼
►
Whereas Simmons does it, and he's got a real tight script, and it seems like
00:40:51
◼
►
he's trying to literally stick it to 30 seconds, get in and out, and he really
00:40:57
◼
►
starts talking faster.
00:40:59
◼
►
And it just alleviates-- it just completely alleviates
00:41:03
◼
►
any urge I have to skip ahead.
00:41:05
◼
►
I tend not to--
00:41:06
◼
►
Interesting.
00:41:07
◼
►
I tend not to skip ahead on sponsor reads, on podcasts,
00:41:10
◼
►
simply because I-- you know, I know some people do.
00:41:14
◼
►
And if you do, you know, that's why the feature's there.
00:41:17
◼
►
It's my job to try to make it as interesting.
00:41:19
◼
►
You and I have talked about this before.
00:41:20
◼
►
It's my job to try to make it so interesting
00:41:21
◼
►
that you don't want to skip.
00:41:22
◼
►
But when I'm listening to podcasts,
00:41:24
◼
►
I tend not to skip because I want to listen.
00:41:26
◼
►
I'm curious at a professional level,
00:41:29
◼
►
how is this person going to keep me interested?
00:41:31
◼
►
- Yeah, I often will listen to other people
00:41:34
◼
►
who are doing reads for the same sponsors that I have
00:41:36
◼
►
just to hear, like, you know, how are you doing this read?
00:41:39
◼
►
And like, maybe there's something I can learn
00:41:41
◼
►
and do better in my reads for the same people
00:41:43
◼
►
from the way you're doing this read.
00:41:45
◼
►
So what else we got?
00:41:48
◼
►
We got a lot to talk about, we gotta hurry up.
00:41:51
◼
►
- We're really good at that, yeah.
00:41:52
◼
►
- So we got the, what about WWDC moving?
00:41:55
◼
►
- Yeah, it's cool.
00:41:56
◼
►
I mean, I don't know anything about San Jose,
00:41:58
◼
►
so it's gonna be interesting.
00:41:59
◼
►
- We talked a little bit about that.
00:42:00
◼
►
I was completely surprised by this.
00:42:03
◼
►
This just wasn't even on my radar.
00:42:05
◼
►
But I kind of, once it happened, it was an initial shock,
00:42:09
◼
►
and then I thought, oh shit,
00:42:10
◼
►
what am I gonna do about my live show?
00:42:11
◼
►
Of course, my thoughts turned to myself immediately.
00:42:17
◼
►
- Everyone else's did too.
00:42:18
◼
►
Everyone else is like, oh, how can I fly there?
00:42:20
◼
►
Is Arno hotels expensive?
00:42:21
◼
►
I mean, everyone's thinking the same general stuff.
00:42:25
◼
►
Most of the people aren't thinking,
00:42:25
◼
►
where can I host my live podcast?
00:42:27
◼
►
- It just never occurred to me
00:42:28
◼
►
that they would do this though.
00:42:30
◼
►
I guess the rough thinking was,
00:42:34
◼
►
and we've all had this, people who go regularly,
00:42:36
◼
►
that San Francisco's not great.
00:42:39
◼
►
I mean, there are parts of San Francisco
00:42:42
◼
►
that are absolutely gorgeous,
00:42:44
◼
►
but south of Market where Moscone is, it's not great.
00:42:47
◼
►
I don't hate it, some people really hate it.
00:42:49
◼
►
Some people, it is what it is,
00:42:51
◼
►
but it is sort of the touristy, hotel-y,
00:42:55
◼
►
maybe touristy's the wrong, but it's--
00:42:59
◼
►
- It's kind of like the worst of San Francisco.
00:43:01
◼
►
The area that we see when we go to WBC
00:43:04
◼
►
is a terrible image of the city as a whole.
00:43:08
◼
►
- Well, and it's not too far from Union Square, though,
00:43:11
◼
►
and Union Square is nicer,
00:43:12
◼
►
but Union Square is just high-end retail.
00:43:15
◼
►
It's not, you know what I mean?
00:43:16
◼
►
Like, what are you supposed to do,
00:43:18
◼
►
go shopping for jewelry and stuff like that?
00:43:22
◼
►
But it is what it is.
00:43:24
◼
►
But the fact is that Apple, we'd say, well,
00:43:26
◼
►
what could they do different?
00:43:28
◼
►
Well, there's no other facility with 5,000 people.
00:43:31
◼
►
And then we would just say, well, it used to be in San Jose,
00:43:33
◼
►
but they moved out of San Jose for a reason.
00:43:35
◼
►
And there's nothing else.
00:43:38
◼
►
And they're not going to go further away,
00:43:39
◼
►
because it's already a major stress on Apple
00:43:42
◼
►
to get 1,000 engineers from the South Bay area
00:43:45
◼
►
to San Francisco for labs and to just hang out and do stuff
00:43:48
◼
►
and still get work done.
00:43:50
◼
►
I, for one, had just completely overlooked the,
00:43:57
◼
►
well, they could move back to San Jose angle for years.
00:44:00
◼
►
It just never really,
00:44:01
◼
►
I never even really gave it serious thought,
00:44:03
◼
►
but then once they said, yeah, here's what we're doing,
00:44:05
◼
►
I could totally see the logic of it,
00:44:06
◼
►
and it seems like a very Apple-like move.
00:44:09
◼
►
- I mean, really, it makes a ton of sense logistically too.
00:44:12
◼
►
I mean, not only is it closer to them,
00:44:13
◼
►
but like San Francisco is a dense, competitive,
00:44:18
◼
►
very expensive city, there's a reason why
00:44:21
◼
►
you don't see a lot of tech conferences in Manhattan.
00:44:24
◼
►
It's because if you put on a tech conference in Manhattan,
00:44:28
◼
►
the space that you hold it in is going to be
00:44:30
◼
►
extraordinarily expensive.
00:44:32
◼
►
All the logistics, getting the food in there,
00:44:35
◼
►
getting all the equipment, that's all gonna be
00:44:37
◼
►
extraordinarily expensive.
00:44:38
◼
►
And then for the attendees, they're gonna have to pay
00:44:41
◼
►
ridiculous hotel prices because they're going
00:44:44
◼
►
to this major city that is itself
00:44:46
◼
►
a massive tourist destination.
00:44:48
◼
►
And so it's very unappealing to hold a major conference
00:44:52
◼
►
in New York City unless it really needs to be
00:44:56
◼
►
specifically in New York City for some reason.
00:44:59
◼
►
WBC could be anywhere.
00:45:00
◼
►
As far as the attendees are concerned,
00:45:03
◼
►
it doesn't matter where it is.
00:45:05
◼
►
You're going to see talks and labs and stuff
00:45:07
◼
►
and that could be in any conference center
00:45:09
◼
►
in any city in America.
00:45:11
◼
►
You don't have to be paying the extreme premium
00:45:16
◼
►
and dealing with all the logistical challenges
00:45:18
◼
►
and downsides of being in a massive tourist
00:45:21
◼
►
expensive dense city just to go watch some talks and go to lab.
00:45:26
◼
►
And either you already have friends and colleagues
00:45:29
◼
►
who will also be there, and you'll see them,
00:45:32
◼
►
and it doesn't matter where you are.
00:45:33
◼
►
Or even if you don't, even if you're like a first timer,
00:45:36
◼
►
if you're new, you're going to be surrounded
00:45:38
◼
►
by like-minded individuals.
00:45:41
◼
►
And it's not hard to make friends, or even just
00:45:44
◼
►
temporary friends while sitting at a bar
00:45:46
◼
►
or something like that.
00:45:47
◼
►
You're very, you know, you can start talking about Xcode
00:45:50
◼
►
and all of a sudden, you know, you're not bored.
00:45:52
◼
►
- Right, I mean like, if anything,
00:45:53
◼
►
the city's kind of wasted on you
00:45:55
◼
►
because if you're attending the conference,
00:45:58
◼
►
you don't really have time to go out
00:46:00
◼
►
and explore much of the city.
00:46:01
◼
►
Like for the most part, you're waking up,
00:46:04
◼
►
you're trying to get to that 9 a.m. session in the morning,
00:46:06
◼
►
you're in sessions and stuff all day,
00:46:08
◼
►
you might have a little hour for lunch
00:46:09
◼
►
but you can't go that far, and then you're back
00:46:11
◼
►
and then like five o'clock rolls around
00:46:12
◼
►
and you just wanna go to the hotel bar with your friends,
00:46:15
◼
►
have a couple of drinks, and go to dinner,
00:46:18
◼
►
and that's the night.
00:46:19
◼
►
You can do that anywhere.
00:46:20
◼
►
You're not seeing the whole city.
00:46:23
◼
►
It doesn't really make sense.
00:46:25
◼
►
One of my favorite conference venues I've ever been to
00:46:28
◼
►
is where Ool has been held the last couple years,
00:46:31
◼
►
in Killarney, Ireland, in this hotel called The Europe.
00:46:34
◼
►
And it's this very, very remote location.
00:46:38
◼
►
And the hotel itself, you've been there.
00:46:40
◼
►
Have you been there, actually?
00:46:41
◼
►
- I don't think so.
00:46:42
◼
►
I don't, uh.
00:46:43
◼
►
- Yeah, 'cause you missed the, yeah, anyway, it's awesome.
00:46:47
◼
►
It's the third remote. - It depends how many years
00:46:48
◼
►
in a row they've been at the same one.
00:46:50
◼
►
I was at one that was at a remote location,
00:46:52
◼
►
but I think they've switched to a different remote location.
00:46:55
◼
►
- Yeah, this is, I believe this is their third one
00:46:58
◼
►
that they're about to do next month.
00:46:59
◼
►
I'm going, I recommend it.
00:47:01
◼
►
Anyway, so it's just like this one giant hotel venue
00:47:06
◼
►
kind of in the middle of nowhere, it's beautiful,
00:47:09
◼
►
but like you're all kind of self-enclosed there.
00:47:11
◼
►
There is a nearby city of Killarney,
00:47:14
◼
►
but you don't really,
00:47:16
◼
►
the attendees don't really have to go there.
00:47:17
◼
►
You're all on premises, and you're surrounded
00:47:20
◼
►
by all the people that are there for your event,
00:47:23
◼
►
and so there is no time to go out and enjoy some other city.
00:47:28
◼
►
That's what you're there for.
00:47:29
◼
►
You're there to hang out with those people
00:47:31
◼
►
and see those talks and do those events.
00:47:32
◼
►
So to have a conference in a massive city
00:47:35
◼
►
that you're paying a big premium to be in
00:47:38
◼
►
doesn't actually make a lot of sense.
00:47:40
◼
►
I love Ireland. I remember the last time I was there and there was a band, remember,
00:47:46
◼
►
and their lead singer, were you there this year? And there was a lead singer named Paddy,
00:47:51
◼
►
I've never been there on the same time that you were there.
00:47:54
◼
►
I don't think so either. So Paddy was there and he was the lead singer of this band and
00:47:58
◼
►
he had nothing interesting. He had no connection to Apple-related stuff. But he came up to
00:48:04
◼
►
the pub without leaving the building.
00:48:08
◼
►
It's sort of like a compound.
00:48:09
◼
►
He came up and was gonna have a drink or two,
00:48:12
◼
►
and he just, you know, he's a gregarious showbiz performer,
00:48:15
◼
►
but very nice.
00:48:17
◼
►
And it quickly struck up conversations
00:48:19
◼
►
with all sorts of people, and he was having a good time,
00:48:22
◼
►
and never left. (laughs)
00:48:25
◼
►
And then at like midnight, they were doing Last Call,
00:48:28
◼
►
and everybody was like, "Oh, man, what are we gonna do?
00:48:30
◼
►
"Everybody wanted to stay up a little bit later."
00:48:32
◼
►
And Patty went up to the bartender and just off--
00:48:36
◼
►
it wasn't like whispering in his ear,
00:48:37
◼
►
but he just spent about two minutes talking to him.
00:48:39
◼
►
And the next thing you know, the bartender's
00:48:41
◼
►
like slapping on the back.
00:48:42
◼
►
And the bartender says, all right,
00:48:43
◼
►
we'll stay open two more hours.
00:48:45
◼
►
That's awesome.
00:48:46
◼
►
I've never heard of anything like that in my life,
00:48:48
◼
►
like we're the staff of a place.
00:48:50
◼
►
And he got-- he called over--
00:48:52
◼
►
he didn't make it unilaterally.
00:48:53
◼
►
He called over another bartender and was just like,
00:48:55
◼
►
hey, what do you-- these guys want to keep going.
00:48:57
◼
►
How about we do two more hours?
00:49:01
◼
►
It was a good conference.
00:49:04
◼
►
Why do you think WWDC moved from San Jose to San Francisco
00:49:08
◼
►
when it did?
00:49:08
◼
►
I think it was 2003 or 2004.
00:49:11
◼
►
- I don't know, that was before my time.
00:49:12
◼
►
I think some of the other things I've heard,
00:49:15
◼
►
I think Jason was talking about it on Upgrade,
00:49:18
◼
►
about how back then Apple really wanted to be
00:49:23
◼
►
in more of the media spotlight with this stuff.
00:49:25
◼
►
It's more prestigious to go there.
00:49:27
◼
►
It's really owning, yeah, we're big, we're awesome,
00:49:30
◼
►
It kind of attracts more media attention being there.
00:49:32
◼
►
But now the attention comes to them,
00:49:33
◼
►
so they don't need to do that as much.
00:49:35
◼
►
- Yeah, I think that's it exactly.
00:49:36
◼
►
I think it was Steve Jobs.
00:49:38
◼
►
And I think Steve Jobs, you know,
00:49:39
◼
►
Apple was firing on all cylinders.
00:49:41
◼
►
The iPod was slowly turning into a massive hit.
00:49:46
◼
►
The retail stores were slowly turning into a success story.
00:49:50
◼
►
They were, it was the, you know, the last, famously,
00:49:55
◼
►
I know that, I think Jason and Mike even went over this,
00:49:58
◼
►
And the last one at San Jose was the one
00:50:01
◼
►
where they had a funeral for Mac OS 9, which was actually
00:50:05
◼
►
kind of forced.
00:50:07
◼
►
Like, the only reason they had to--
00:50:09
◼
►
you think that's a weird thing to do
00:50:11
◼
►
is have a funeral on stage for your product.
00:50:13
◼
►
But it was actually because it wasn't dead.
00:50:16
◼
►
It was because so many people were still using Mac OS 9.
00:50:20
◼
►
But it was at the point where they
00:50:21
◼
►
felt like they were in the clear.
00:50:24
◼
►
It was three or four years into the--
00:50:25
◼
►
I guess at least three years into the Mac OS 10 era.
00:50:28
◼
►
But they were at the point where I think they could see the light at the end of the tunnel that yes
00:50:31
◼
►
We're we're going to make this transition all max will be running Mac OS X
00:50:38
◼
►
This isn't going to sink us the first two years of Mac OS X was kind of iffy really in terms of how big the uptake
00:50:44
◼
►
Was so I think that after that one, you know, the Mac was clearly had a bright future. The iPod was great retail was great
00:50:50
◼
►
I think Steve Jobs wanted a bigger spotlight
00:50:53
◼
►
And I think doing I hope that you have having like a hopeful funeral
00:50:57
◼
►
Like, we really hope this is it, guys. Please, Richard, we're begging you, please make this
00:51:04
◼
►
I remember they had it, and it was before my time of attending WWDCs, but I still had
00:51:08
◼
►
two Macs at my desk. I had a Power Mac 9600 that was still running Mac OS 9 as my main
00:51:17
◼
►
machine, and then I had an iBook running OS 10.
00:51:21
◼
►
Oh, see, now I have one with a keyboard I can use and one with another one.
00:51:26
◼
►
So that's what I think.
00:51:27
◼
►
I think they moved to San Francisco for the publicity.
00:51:30
◼
►
I think that's exactly right,
00:51:31
◼
►
that they wanted more attention.
00:51:33
◼
►
They felt like they could use it.
00:51:35
◼
►
They had stuff to say.
00:51:36
◼
►
They had stuff that deserved more attention,
00:51:38
◼
►
and now they don't.
00:51:39
◼
►
And I don't think San Francisco
00:51:40
◼
►
was ever a good fit for Apple, culturally.
00:51:43
◼
►
They're not a San Francisco city.
00:51:44
◼
►
- Yeah, they have a very different vibe about them
00:51:50
◼
►
than what I've, I mean, again, I've never worked for Apple,
00:51:53
◼
►
and I've never lived in San Francisco,
00:51:55
◼
►
so it's hard for me to say this,
00:51:56
◼
►
But just my kind of bird's eye view of it,
00:51:59
◼
►
it does seem like they didn't really fit in there.
00:52:01
◼
►
- Like there's no, put travel aside.
00:52:04
◼
►
Like 'cause when they move to the new Apple,
00:52:06
◼
►
when they open a new Apple, I shouldn't say move,
00:52:08
◼
►
'cause that's exactly my point,
00:52:09
◼
►
but when they open the new Apple Campus too,
00:52:11
◼
►
they're not leaving the Apple Campus,
00:52:15
◼
►
the original Infinite Loop Campus.
00:52:17
◼
►
They need all the space they can get.
00:52:19
◼
►
And so, I mean there might be some empty offices for a while
00:52:22
◼
►
but there's gonna be back and forth
00:52:24
◼
►
between the original Apple Campus and Apple Campus 2
00:52:27
◼
►
on a daily basis.
00:52:28
◼
►
So having them both in Cupertino is a big deal.
00:52:32
◼
►
And they have new office space in San Jose.
00:52:34
◼
►
They have space in a few other places in the South Bay area.
00:52:37
◼
►
But the fact that getting between anywhere in the South
00:52:40
◼
►
Bay is easier than getting from anywhere in the South Bay
00:52:42
◼
►
to San Francisco is a big deal.
00:52:44
◼
►
There's no universe where Apple Campus 2 is a skyscraper
00:52:50
◼
►
with the same square footage in San Francisco.
00:52:52
◼
►
It's just culturally--
00:52:53
◼
►
And travel aside, even if part of it
00:52:56
◼
►
was like a tunnel dug by Elon Musk
00:52:58
◼
►
that could get you between them in 10 minutes,
00:53:01
◼
►
even if you could get between them in 10 minutes,
00:53:03
◼
►
there's just no way they would do it.
00:53:04
◼
►
It's just San Francisco is not an Apple town
00:53:06
◼
►
in a way that San Jose, I think, is.
00:53:10
◼
►
- I'm looking forward to it,
00:53:12
◼
►
'cause it really is like going
00:53:14
◼
►
to a whole new conference now.
00:53:15
◼
►
And at WBC, I've gone now for something like seven years,
00:53:20
◼
►
something like that, and I've enjoyed it,
00:53:23
◼
►
but I'm looking forward to something new,
00:53:26
◼
►
something fresh and it's kind of more exciting now
00:53:29
◼
►
'cause it's gonna be something a little bit different.
00:53:31
◼
►
- I forget if I went in 2006,
00:53:33
◼
►
so I either went 10 years in a row or nine years in a row.
00:53:37
◼
►
Yeah, it's one of my favorite things about covering Apple
00:53:39
◼
►
is that they're very predictable,
00:53:42
◼
►
so if you try to approach them
00:53:43
◼
►
and analyze them in a logical standpoint,
00:53:45
◼
►
you can have success,
00:53:47
◼
►
but they're also resistant to complacency, right?
00:53:50
◼
►
So they're not gonna like ping pong around
00:53:53
◼
►
and move WWDC to random cities every year.
00:53:56
◼
►
But they're not going to keep it in San Francisco
00:53:59
◼
►
just because that's where it's been for 10 years,
00:54:03
◼
►
which we'll get to when we talk about iPhone and iPad form
00:54:10
◼
►
The other thing, too, is you've heard it.
00:54:12
◼
►
I've heard it.
00:54:12
◼
►
Everybody who's gone in recent years
00:54:13
◼
►
has heard that from the longtime attendees who
00:54:15
◼
►
remember the San Jose era, there's
00:54:17
◼
►
a reputation that downtown San Jose was kind of sleepy,
00:54:20
◼
►
that restaurants and bars close early.
00:54:23
◼
►
There's quote unquote nothing to do.
00:54:26
◼
►
Two things on that is one, back then WWDC
00:54:29
◼
►
didn't even sell out.
00:54:31
◼
►
I forget when the first sell out was,
00:54:33
◼
►
but I don't think it was in San Jose.
00:54:35
◼
►
And the second thing is that talking to a couple people,
00:54:41
◼
►
downtown San Jose has improved a lot in the last 10 years,
00:54:45
◼
►
that there's been a lot of-- I just looked it up.
00:54:51
◼
►
first WWDC to sell out was 2008.
00:54:53
◼
►
Gee, I wonder what happened 2008
00:54:55
◼
►
that would cause the first sale.
00:54:57
◼
►
So up until 2008, even the first few years at Moscone,
00:55:00
◼
►
you could buy a ticket the day before WWDC.
00:55:02
◼
►
I think the fact that this is obviously going to sell out
00:55:05
◼
►
and that there are going to be people in San Jose
00:55:08
◼
►
who don't even have tickets,
00:55:10
◼
►
it's gonna be a different vibe.
00:55:12
◼
►
And a couple people have said that downtown San Jose
00:55:15
◼
►
has really improved a lot.
00:55:17
◼
►
I was just talking to a friend of the show, Jim Dalrymple.
00:55:19
◼
►
- I was saying on Twitter,
00:55:20
◼
►
you don't really need much.
00:55:21
◼
►
Like, when you're there for a conference,
00:55:24
◼
►
like, you need a handful of, you know,
00:55:25
◼
►
you need good hotels that you can hopefully get
00:55:28
◼
►
for a reasonable price.
00:55:29
◼
►
You need a bunch of restaurants
00:55:32
◼
►
to be able to get food at.
00:55:33
◼
►
And you need, you know, a handful of decent bars
00:55:36
◼
►
and bars in the hotels.
00:55:38
◼
►
And that's about it.
00:55:39
◼
►
Like, you don't need tons and tons of nightlife
00:55:42
◼
►
for a tech conference for five days.
00:55:44
◼
►
- Right, it's actually better
00:55:45
◼
►
if the bars are generally empty,
00:55:47
◼
►
but are willing to stay open late,
00:55:48
◼
►
so you can take over.
00:55:49
◼
►
Dow Rumple, I was talking to about it,
00:55:52
◼
►
now he's familiar with the area now,
00:55:54
◼
►
and he goes to hockey games at the San Jose,
00:55:58
◼
►
I forget, I don't know what the name of it is,
00:56:00
◼
►
but wherever the Sharks play,
00:56:01
◼
►
which is only one mile away from the convention center,
00:56:04
◼
►
so it's, by city standards, not a far walk.
00:56:07
◼
►
That's the thing about San Jose,
00:56:09
◼
►
is that downtown San Jose is all in one area.
00:56:12
◼
►
It's not spread out.
00:56:13
◼
►
And he said after hockey games, 10, 30, 11,
00:56:17
◼
►
and there's all sorts of stuff to do,
00:56:18
◼
►
bars to get beers at and places to eat late
00:56:20
◼
►
and stuff like that.
00:56:21
◼
►
So I'm looking forward to it.
00:56:25
◼
►
- Are you gonna go no matter what?
00:56:28
◼
►
- I'm going, yeah.
00:56:29
◼
►
I actually, last year I told myself,
00:56:32
◼
►
you know what, I'm not gonna get tickets anymore.
00:56:34
◼
►
'Cause I'm going to fewer sessions.
00:56:37
◼
►
I'm like, you know what, I feel now
00:56:39
◼
►
that I'm wasting a ticket
00:56:41
◼
►
because I keep trying to do more and more other things.
00:56:44
◼
►
I keep getting double booked for time slots
00:56:46
◼
►
with meetings and social events and podcast events
00:56:48
◼
►
and everything else, like you know what,
00:56:49
◼
►
I'm just not gonna take it.
00:56:51
◼
►
Now actually I'm questioning that
00:56:53
◼
►
because now it's gonna be different.
00:56:54
◼
►
Well, maybe I should get a ticket this year, I don't know.
00:56:57
◼
►
I'm definitely going out there.
00:56:59
◼
►
- Yeah, I mean I'll go just to cover the keynote
00:57:02
◼
►
and I have nothing to announce
00:57:04
◼
►
but hopefully to do my live show again.
00:57:08
◼
►
But I always do that and try to always do it
00:57:10
◼
►
on Tuesday evenings.
00:57:12
◼
►
My question is how long to stay?
00:57:13
◼
►
Like I don't know if I'm gonna stay all week.
00:57:16
◼
►
- Yeah, I don't know.
00:57:17
◼
►
'Cause the thing is, we don't know.
00:57:20
◼
►
It is a whole new conference, effectively.
00:57:22
◼
►
So we don't know if you plan to go in Sunday
00:57:27
◼
►
and leave Wednesday or something like that,
00:57:29
◼
►
are you gonna regret that you didn't stay
00:57:31
◼
►
until the cool things that were gonna happen
00:57:32
◼
►
on Thursday night?
00:57:33
◼
►
You don't know.
00:57:34
◼
►
And that's why I'm kinda thinking,
00:57:36
◼
►
I might just do my usual Sunday
00:57:39
◼
►
through Friday afternoon thing.
00:57:41
◼
►
The worst that can happen is I have a couple bonus days
00:57:45
◼
►
California. Oh no, you know, there are worse things in the world than that.
00:57:51
◼
►
Yeah, I don't know what I'm gonna do, but anyway, what a surprise. So that came out
00:57:55
◼
►
like what, the day after ATP last week, so you guys didn't get to talk about it yet.
00:57:58
◼
►
Yeah, haven't talked about it yet. I think the gist of it, and I think everybody's sort of
00:58:02
◼
►
wrapping their heads around it, is I think Apple can spend the money on
00:58:06
◼
►
surrounding stuff around the Convention Center, and the number of people that
00:58:11
◼
►
will be there, you know, attendance is not going up, but even if it's just
00:58:14
◼
►
5,000 plus a couple thousand people who you know come in we're out of a couple
00:58:20
◼
►
thousand come but if a thousand people come just to be there and simultaneous
00:58:24
◼
►
with it and then cut the other factor is combined with all the South Bay companies
00:58:29
◼
►
whose employees might come after work when they couldn't if it was all the way
00:58:32
◼
►
up in San Francisco I think it's I think it's gonna feel like apples taken over
00:58:37
◼
►
for San Jose.
00:58:39
◼
►
- Yeah, my main concern is if I don't get
00:58:43
◼
►
a conference ticket, will I not be able to get
00:58:46
◼
►
into major events that I will then want to get into?
00:58:49
◼
►
- Yeah, I know.
00:58:50
◼
►
- You know, that's been my one concern of like,
00:58:53
◼
►
should I go anyway or not?
00:58:55
◼
►
And because in San Francisco, there was so much
00:58:59
◼
►
to do everywhere that whether you had a WDC badge
00:59:03
◼
►
didn't really matter for anything except for the beer bash.
00:59:07
◼
►
That was the only thing where it really mattered
00:59:10
◼
►
whether you had it or not, but all the other events
00:59:11
◼
►
that happened around the conference were for anybody.
00:59:14
◼
►
And I hope that's gonna keep being the case,
00:59:16
◼
►
but I don't know yet.
00:59:18
◼
►
- Yeah, I think it'll be the same, I do.
00:59:20
◼
►
I do think, here's my theory, one of my theories
00:59:23
◼
►
is that they'll have the Bash on campus at Apple Campus too.
00:59:26
◼
►
'Cause I think they used-- - That would be awesome,
00:59:29
◼
►
but I don't think it's ready.
00:59:31
◼
►
- Maybe by June it will be, I don't know.
00:59:32
◼
►
- I mean, it's certainly cutting it close.
00:59:34
◼
►
- Yeah, I don't know.
00:59:35
◼
►
Or maybe they'll have it back at Infinite Loop,
00:59:36
◼
►
I don't know, that's what they used to do.
00:59:39
◼
►
- Is it big enough?
00:59:39
◼
►
Like is the courtyard there big enough
00:59:41
◼
►
to hold today's WDC crowd?
00:59:43
◼
►
I don't know.
00:59:44
◼
►
- Yeah, I don't know.
00:59:45
◼
►
I mean, the new courtyard certainly is.
00:59:47
◼
►
- Like Yerba Buena felt crowded.
00:59:49
◼
►
And that's a big yard, you know?
00:59:51
◼
►
- Yeah, but it got crowded by the stage,
00:59:54
◼
►
but yeah, I don't know.
00:59:57
◼
►
- No, no, it was empty by the stage.
01:00:00
◼
►
- I guess you're right, you know what I mean.
01:00:01
◼
►
- It was very crowded.
01:00:03
◼
►
The further back you got from the stage,
01:00:05
◼
►
the crowd more crowded at God because none of the nerds at the conference ever
01:00:09
◼
►
wanted to be near the band we all wanted to talk to each other right you can't
01:00:11
◼
►
hear I can't hear you let's go to the back it's the worst gig for a band to
01:00:15
◼
►
ever play some of them had success it's I felt bad for them every year because
01:00:20
◼
►
it's like oh god like you you're playing to a bunch of nerds backs who are like
01:00:24
◼
►
plugging their ears because they don't want to hear you right oh it's terrible
01:00:28
◼
►
all right let's uh it's shift gears to there's supposedly a March Apple event
01:00:34
◼
►
and they're gonna do iPads, new iPads,
01:00:38
◼
►
possibly a 128 gigabyte upgrade to the iPhone SE
01:00:44
◼
►
and then what else, a new red color for the iPhone SE.
01:00:49
◼
►
Or maybe a new red color for all iPhones.
01:00:53
◼
►
- No, I think the rumor was a new red color
01:00:55
◼
►
for the main iPhone 7 line.
01:00:56
◼
►
- Oh, maybe.
01:00:57
◼
►
- Which is kind of odd to do halfway through Recycle,
01:00:59
◼
►
but I mean, who knows?
01:01:01
◼
►
You know, again, like this is the kind of thing
01:01:02
◼
►
where if we look back and say, well, Apple never does that.
01:01:06
◼
►
The iPhone makes a lot of money,
01:01:08
◼
►
Apple's an evolving company.
01:01:10
◼
►
They can do whatever they want, and they will.
01:01:12
◼
►
If they think there's a good reason to do something like this,
01:01:14
◼
►
they would do it.
01:01:15
◼
►
- So I think one of the interesting things
01:01:17
◼
►
is that just about everything we know about,
01:01:19
◼
►
or have heard, I shouldn't say we know,
01:01:21
◼
►
but just about all the rumors we have
01:01:23
◼
►
about upcoming Apple products all come from Ming-Chi Kuo,
01:01:27
◼
►
the analyst at KGI Securities.
01:01:29
◼
►
- He certainly seems like he has the best info the earliest.
01:01:34
◼
►
- Right, like, Gurman has had some stories at Bloomberg,
01:01:38
◼
►
but it hasn't really been a lot.
01:01:40
◼
►
He had like an Apple TV thing recently,
01:01:41
◼
►
but it's just 4K coming to Apple TV.
01:01:45
◼
►
In terms of like iPads and iPhones,
01:01:46
◼
►
he hasn't had a lot recently.
01:01:48
◼
►
It seems like it's all coming from Ming-Chi Kuo.
01:01:51
◼
►
- It seems like Gurman's sources
01:01:53
◼
►
are maybe more in the Mac area.
01:01:55
◼
►
- Yeah, maybe.
01:01:56
◼
►
- Because he seems to have more Mac info,
01:01:58
◼
►
and Ming-Chi Kuo seems to have more iOS supply chain info.
01:02:02
◼
►
- It's all supply chain info.
01:02:03
◼
►
I don't think Ming-Chi Kuo has any sources at Cupertino.
01:02:06
◼
►
I really don't.
01:02:07
◼
►
And a lot of what he gets wrong
01:02:08
◼
►
is from not having those sources,
01:02:11
◼
►
but that he has seemingly drinking buddy status
01:02:14
◼
►
with some Foxconn executives.
01:02:17
◼
►
But it was interesting 'cause just yesterday,
01:02:23
◼
►
I'm looking at the date, Mac Otakara,
01:02:26
◼
►
Japanese rumor site who has a pretty good track record too.
01:02:30
◼
►
Yeah, they're pretty good.
01:02:31
◼
►
I mean, I'll put a link in the show notes to the one, but I'll put it the Mac Rumors
01:02:34
◼
►
version because it's in English.
01:02:37
◼
►
What they're saying is, much like KGI or Ming Chi Kuo, the new 9.7 and 12.9 inch iPad Pros,
01:02:48
◼
►
so take the iPad Pros, we already have new ones.
01:02:52
◼
►
bizarre to me rumor of a 10.5 inch iPad which basically has the same footprint
01:02:59
◼
►
as the 9.7 inch as we know it but with an edge to edge display so get rid of
01:03:04
◼
►
the bezels at the top and bottom so it has a 10.5 inch diagonal display because
01:03:09
◼
►
it gets rid of the bezels now the reason I call that bizarre getting rid of bezels
01:03:13
◼
►
sounds like something Apple would do but the reason it sounds bizarre to me is
01:03:16
◼
►
that all these rumors say that it's going to come alongside a new 9.7 inch
01:03:22
◼
►
To me, what would make the--
01:03:25
◼
►
what both makes sense and fits the historical pattern is,
01:03:30
◼
►
if they're going to do that, introduce that
01:03:32
◼
►
as the new high-end model at this footprint
01:03:34
◼
►
and put the iPad, the 9.7-inch iPad
01:03:37
◼
►
Pro at a minus $100 or minus $200 price point
01:03:42
◼
►
lower down the chain.
01:03:44
◼
►
But there's an awful lot--
01:03:46
◼
►
all these rumors say that they're going to do both.
01:03:48
◼
►
And now, Mac Atacara yesterday says
01:03:51
◼
►
there's also going to be a 7.9-inch iPad Pro.
01:03:56
◼
►
So in other words, an iPad Pro Mini.
01:04:00
◼
►
Which should be the first update to the Mini in quite some time.
01:04:03
◼
►
Yeah, but I think that they've done that before.
01:04:05
◼
►
I think if you look at the updates to the Mini
01:04:07
◼
►
that they've skipped years before.
01:04:09
◼
►
Yeah, I mean, so let's--
01:04:12
◼
►
easy things first.
01:04:13
◼
►
The 7.9-inch iPad Pro Mini, that makes a lot of sense.
01:04:17
◼
►
And it's probably got last year's specs, right?
01:04:18
◼
►
That's what I would think.
01:04:19
◼
►
It's going to have--
01:04:20
◼
►
It probably has the specs of the current 9.7 Pro, which
01:04:23
◼
►
is now a year old.
01:04:24
◼
►
So that makes sense, right?
01:04:26
◼
►
Apple doesn't need to save the Pro name only
01:04:29
◼
►
for the higher end products, because Pro
01:04:31
◼
►
means they can sell $100 pencil and $150 keyboard
01:04:35
◼
►
with these things.
01:04:35
◼
►
So they love spreading Pro all over the whole line.
01:04:38
◼
►
I wonder what a--
01:04:40
◼
►
I mean, a keyboard that would fit--
01:04:41
◼
►
I have an iPad Mini in front of me right now.
01:04:43
◼
►
That's a cramped keyboard.
01:04:45
◼
►
- Yeah, I used like a Logitech one once a long time ago
01:04:48
◼
►
and it was nearly impossible to use, it was tough.
01:04:51
◼
►
Like the 9.7 size allows for a just barely usable
01:04:55
◼
►
keyboard case on it, but the 7.9, that's tough.
01:04:59
◼
►
I mean, they do exist and I guess somebody's buying them,
01:05:01
◼
►
but that's certainly not a good keyboard.
01:05:04
◼
►
But anyway, so that makes sense.
01:05:07
◼
►
So between 9.7 and 10.5, you know,
01:05:11
◼
►
there are these kind of similar rumors
01:05:15
◼
►
that we'll probably get to also with the whole
01:05:17
◼
►
iPhone 7S and 8 being also simultaneously released
01:05:22
◼
►
in the fall and they're basically being like,
01:05:24
◼
►
the iPhone quote eight would be this similar
01:05:27
◼
►
bezel-less, larger screen, smaller case,
01:05:29
◼
►
higher priced model.
01:05:31
◼
►
So that's, if they're gonna do that for the iPhone line,
01:05:36
◼
►
whatever their reasons are for doing it there,
01:05:38
◼
►
they had, maybe they finally got their
01:05:40
◼
►
edge to edge design and technology lined up
01:05:42
◼
►
so they can finally do this,
01:05:43
◼
►
so they're very excited to do this,
01:05:44
◼
►
but it costs more to do it for various reasons
01:05:46
◼
►
or whatever else, or they just wanted,
01:05:48
◼
►
you know, they wanted to have a premium product
01:05:50
◼
►
'cause they wanna start, you know,
01:05:51
◼
►
if people are really treating their phones
01:05:54
◼
►
and their iPads as computers,
01:05:57
◼
►
both in what they're doing with them
01:05:59
◼
►
and in their replacement cycles,
01:06:02
◼
►
then Apple probably wants them
01:06:03
◼
►
to boost those prices up a little bit.
01:06:04
◼
►
It's like, well, if you're only gonna buy
01:06:06
◼
►
a new phone every three years or an iPad every five,
01:06:08
◼
►
and you're gonna treat it like
01:06:10
◼
►
you used to treat your $2,000 laptop,
01:06:11
◼
►
well, if we can get you to pay 1,100 bucks for it,
01:06:14
◼
►
that's better for us and we can give you higher end specs
01:06:17
◼
►
and higher end, you know, more storage
01:06:19
◼
►
and fancier screen technology and all this other stuff.
01:06:22
◼
►
So it makes lots of sense why they would have
01:06:25
◼
►
higher priced ones at all.
01:06:27
◼
►
And it's totally plausible with modern Apple
01:06:31
◼
►
that they would also keep making lower end ones
01:06:34
◼
►
that, you know, rather, 'cause, you know,
01:06:36
◼
►
when Apple releases new things like this,
01:06:39
◼
►
you know, new iOS devices, new form factors,
01:06:41
◼
►
One of the ways that they can release these things
01:06:44
◼
►
that they have in the past is you release the new thing
01:06:47
◼
►
at the old price point and push everything down 100 bucks.
01:06:50
◼
►
The other way you do it is you leave everything
01:06:52
◼
►
at the same price point and you bring the new one in
01:06:55
◼
►
that's 100 bucks more than the old one was
01:06:57
◼
►
because the new one's higher end.
01:06:58
◼
►
So that's what I see them probably doing here.
01:07:00
◼
►
That's probably what the 10.5 inch iPad
01:07:03
◼
►
and the quote iPhone 8 with this weird edge to edge display,
01:07:05
◼
►
both of those are probably that latter kind of product
01:07:08
◼
►
where they both probably come into an existing lineup
01:07:10
◼
►
itself doesn't really change or changes only in minor ways and they come in at
01:07:14
◼
►
higher price points with more premium stuff. Yeah, so I think it's almost
01:07:18
◼
►
like you have to because the pattern is the same that there's going to be new
01:07:21
◼
►
models in the old form factor and there's amazing edge-to-edge, you know,
01:07:28
◼
►
blow away design without the bezels. It's the same story for the iPad and the
01:07:32
◼
►
iPhone so we might as well talk about the iPhone. Did you just forestall the blow away thing as a verb? I might have.
01:07:37
◼
►
Oh jeez or it wasn't an adjective it was an adjective. Yeah, I
01:07:45
◼
►
It's big league. That's a big league design
01:07:48
◼
►
I thought it was big Lee. No, it's not every time
01:07:52
◼
►
Everybody who says that they were talking about Trump here Trump uses big league as an adjective and he's it doesn't make any sense to
01:07:59
◼
►
Say bigly it wouldn't he says big league and but it comes out
01:08:03
◼
►
I don't think not making sense is necessarily a per a yeah, but big league big league
01:08:08
◼
►
Yeah, but big league is what he's saying. Trust me. All right, and Dave's you're gonna have these blowaway designs for install
01:08:14
◼
►
All right. Keep going. You can even see it when the White House transcribes his remarks. It's it's big league
01:08:19
◼
►
It's gonna be a big league design
01:08:21
◼
►
You sure I'm just auto-crafting for
01:08:23
◼
►
You know, I mean what I bet on it now, but I
01:08:29
◼
►
No, I-- it's the same story.
01:08:36
◼
►
But to me, it makes more sense with the iPhone than the iPad.
01:08:39
◼
►
And so the story with the iPhone is
01:08:41
◼
►
that there would be what would presumably be called,
01:08:44
◼
►
or at least described-- I mean, again,
01:08:46
◼
►
marketing names are the hardest thing to know for sure,
01:08:48
◼
►
because they're the tightest held secrets.
01:08:50
◼
►
But it sounds like they're going to do the 7S and 7S+ exactly
01:08:56
◼
►
like you would think, where it's the same form factor,
01:09:00
◼
►
close enough down to the tenth of a millimeter,
01:09:03
◼
►
where you can probably use the same case with presumably
01:09:09
◼
►
a better camera and maybe a next generation A series CPU.
01:09:16
◼
►
Everything-- exactly what you think a 7S would be.
01:09:19
◼
►
And then also this new iPhone.
01:09:24
◼
►
I don't, if this is any, if there's any truth to this,
01:09:27
◼
►
I don't think there's any chance that they call
01:09:29
◼
►
this new iPhone the iPhone 8.
01:09:31
◼
►
There's just no way.
01:09:32
◼
►
I think that they would call it the iPhone Pro.
01:09:34
◼
►
Because I think that's the only way that you can have
01:09:38
◼
►
a reasonable amount of excitement for the new 7S and 7S+
01:09:42
◼
►
and have this new phone.
01:09:46
◼
►
Like it doesn't make sense to me to have an iPhone 8
01:09:49
◼
►
and a 7S in the same year.
01:09:51
◼
►
Like why not just, 'cause who wouldn't just buy the 8?
01:09:54
◼
►
Well, it's going to be expensive though, right?
01:09:57
◼
►
Like it's the part of the room where it's going to be like a
01:09:59
◼
►
thousand dollars, which is like, if you actually look at like
01:10:01
◼
►
the, the full price of iPhones, that is not that ridiculous.
01:10:04
◼
►
It's like 150 bucks more than a, than a similar respect.
01:10:08
◼
►
Plus model would be right.
01:10:09
◼
►
My assume if you assume that it probably starts at 128 or 256,
01:10:14
◼
►
Like which it probably does the 256.
01:10:16
◼
►
No rumor came out today that it's going to have to two models
01:10:24
◼
►
So I would guess it might be like 1049 for 64 and 1149 for 256.
01:10:30
◼
►
At least it's only two.
01:10:33
◼
►
But the idea would be that this would get slotted
01:10:36
◼
►
in at a new higher price point.
01:10:38
◼
►
That the 7S and 7S+ would take the existing price points,
01:10:42
◼
►
and that they're actually-- instead of going lower,
01:10:44
◼
►
they're actually going more upscale.
01:10:47
◼
►
And that is a very Apple-like thing to do.
01:10:50
◼
►
Yeah, it makes sense on a lot of levels.
01:10:52
◼
►
I mean, the cynical take is of course,
01:10:54
◼
►
they're going to make a lot more money
01:10:55
◼
►
because the ASP is going to go up
01:10:56
◼
►
on their most profitable product and all that.
01:10:58
◼
►
That's a big deal for them financially,
01:11:01
◼
►
for their performance on Wall Street, et cetera.
01:11:02
◼
►
Okay, but also, there's good reasons for it also.
01:11:05
◼
►
Like, one of them is they can afford
01:11:08
◼
►
to put higher priced parts in this one.
01:11:11
◼
►
So you could have something that maybe
01:11:14
◼
►
they couldn't afford parts price-wise
01:11:17
◼
►
to put in all the iPhones for a year,
01:11:19
◼
►
'cause that's a lot of phones,
01:11:20
◼
►
then they can have it in this model for people who are willing to pay another couple hundred
01:11:23
◼
►
bucks. And then also, you know, if the rumors are true that they're doing this crazy edge-to-edge
01:11:28
◼
►
screen thing, I think it's pretty clearly going to be OLED. OLEDs are at this scale,
01:11:34
◼
►
like possibly they're having production yield problems with the type and quality and whatever
01:11:39
◼
►
that they're making. And so maybe they can't make like 80 million of them a quarter, whatever
01:11:43
◼
►
the number is. So they have to have like a mainstream iPhone for this coming year that
01:11:49
◼
►
isn't this crazy new screen, but they also
01:11:52
◼
►
want to have this crazy new screen in whatever quantity
01:11:54
◼
►
they can make for people who are willing to pay for it.
01:11:57
◼
►
And it lets them keep the kind of innovation crown going.
01:12:03
◼
►
Because it's like this wonderful showpiece
01:12:06
◼
►
at the top of the line, even if like 60% of the buyers
01:12:09
◼
►
aren't buying it.
01:12:12
◼
►
I think, though, if they do this,
01:12:14
◼
►
it has to be in sufficient quantity
01:12:17
◼
►
that they can meet demand as well as they've met it
01:12:19
◼
►
in recent years with whatever the new top of the line is.
01:12:23
◼
►
Because I think a ton of people are going to want this,
01:12:26
◼
►
if this exact rumor comes true.
01:12:29
◼
►
I don't know if it's 40%, but it's going to be,
01:12:32
◼
►
it's not going to be like just a sliver.
01:12:34
◼
►
There's going to be an awful lot of people who,
01:12:37
◼
►
for an extra 100 or $200 or even $300,
01:12:40
◼
►
are going to say, I want the new hotness.
01:12:42
◼
►
And if it's like, I could see this,
01:12:46
◼
►
I think it's a risk if they're really going to do this.
01:12:49
◼
►
And I think the idea-- if your complaint about Apple
01:12:51
◼
►
is they don't take risks anymore, here's your story.
01:12:54
◼
►
Because the risk I see happening is
01:12:56
◼
►
if they make this announcement and 40% of everybody who
01:13:02
◼
►
wants to buy a new iPhone in September wants this one,
01:13:05
◼
►
and it's instantly backordered three months or something,
01:13:09
◼
►
and nobody can get it instantly--
01:13:12
◼
►
--none of those people are then going to say, oh, cancel
01:13:15
◼
►
my order, I'll get the 7S.
01:13:17
◼
►
Nobody's going to do that.
01:13:18
◼
►
They're all going to say, I'll wait.
01:13:20
◼
►
So what I could see happening, if they can't meet demand,
01:13:24
◼
►
at least as well as they've done in recent years,
01:13:26
◼
►
with just to say, like in the quarter they just reported,
01:13:31
◼
►
if they can't meet demand for this iPhone Pro
01:13:33
◼
►
as well as they did for the 7 and 7 Plus three months ago,
01:13:38
◼
►
in what turned out to be the best selling iPhone quarter
01:13:42
◼
►
ever, then I think they're in real trouble,
01:13:46
◼
►
because everybody who's waiting for it
01:13:48
◼
►
is not going to settle on the 7S and 7S Plus.
01:13:50
◼
►
And then year over year, it's going
01:13:51
◼
►
to look bad, because they're going to take a big hit.
01:13:55
◼
►
It'll even out eventually, because eventually-- it's
01:13:57
◼
►
not like these people waiting for the iPhone Pro
01:13:59
◼
►
are going to switch to Android.
01:14:01
◼
►
They'll wait till January or February or March
01:14:03
◼
►
or however long it takes to get it.
01:14:06
◼
►
But it's going to look bad at that year over year,
01:14:09
◼
►
quarter over quarter demand.
01:14:11
◼
►
So I think that the idea, I've seen people say, oh, they'll do this, and it's sort of just like
01:14:17
◼
►
a, like the 20th anniversary Mac, you know, it's like a little thing at the fringe for just a
01:14:23
◼
►
handful of people who are willing to spend a little bit more. I don't think that's the case
01:14:29
◼
►
at all. I think this might be the best-selling phone they come out with next year. And I happen
01:14:34
◼
►
to know, I just, anecdotally, I see lots of people on Twitter, the people who really care. I mean,
01:14:38
◼
►
I mean, I've gone on then this along with the iPhone 7
01:14:43
◼
►
looking so much like an iPhone 6 and 6s.
01:14:47
◼
►
I can't see why people are so obsessed
01:14:49
◼
►
with the exterior of the phone.
01:14:51
◼
►
But it's true that an awful lot of people
01:14:53
◼
►
are, that they're not even getting
01:14:55
◼
►
into what the camera does, how good the screen looks,
01:14:58
◼
►
how good the touch sensor is, how good the new virtual home
01:15:01
◼
►
button is, and all the other things
01:15:03
◼
►
that there are to like about it.
01:15:04
◼
►
There's an awful lot of people.
01:15:06
◼
►
And you see it in all the tech reviews.
01:15:07
◼
►
you certainly see it in most of the gadget reviews
01:15:09
◼
►
that it's like, ah, it looks like the old iPhone, meh.
01:15:11
◼
►
There's an awful lot of people who think like that
01:15:13
◼
►
who've been waiting for years for, you know, screw it,
01:15:17
◼
►
I'll hold onto my old phone for another year
01:15:19
◼
►
because I know Apple's gonna come out
01:15:20
◼
►
with a new thing eventually.
01:15:22
◼
►
- Yeah, I mean, it matters, it matters a lot.
01:15:24
◼
►
And I think you're right, like I think a lot of people
01:15:27
◼
►
are going to want this new thing.
01:15:29
◼
►
I mean, I think we've shown that as customers
01:15:32
◼
►
that no matter what the new iPhone is,
01:15:35
◼
►
matter how happy we are or aren't with it, you know, in
01:15:39
◼
►
our social media posts and tech reviews and everything, we all
01:15:42
◼
►
want it and we're all gonna buy it and we're all gonna pay
01:15:45
◼
►
whatever it costs. So, yeah, they're gonna if this thing is
01:15:49
◼
►
real, unless it unless it has some obscene downside which it
01:15:53
◼
►
probably won't and and an extra 150 bucks is probably not
01:15:57
◼
►
enough of a downside for enough people. Then they're gonna sell
01:16:01
◼
►
this thing like literally just they're gonna sell as many as
01:16:04
◼
►
as many as they can possibly make.
01:16:06
◼
►
- I really wonder why people would buy the 7S and 7S Plus.
01:16:11
◼
►
I can totally see why they would keep selling the 7
01:16:15
◼
►
and 7 Plus at lower prices, but I just can't see
01:16:18
◼
►
why people would sign up.
01:16:21
◼
►
I guess it's people who have more sense, you know,
01:16:24
◼
►
than I do financially and who are like,
01:16:25
◼
►
"Well, it is $200, I'll just get the 7S."
01:16:29
◼
►
- Yeah, and that's a lot of people.
01:16:32
◼
►
Like, it's everybody who doesn't buy the top-of-the-line model in any other year.
01:16:38
◼
►
Right. Right. People who don't, you know, don't buy the 256, even though they only
01:16:45
◼
►
use 128 of their storage, just in case they—
01:16:48
◼
►
I don't even buy the 256.
01:16:50
◼
►
I can't stand the thought of not having the best one. I just can't. And I often think,
01:16:56
◼
►
like—and then I talk—I say to myself, like, "What happens if you're, like, out and about,
01:16:59
◼
►
and like breaking news happens and you start shooting video like of this like major event like I don't want to run out of
01:17:06
◼
►
Space to shoot video because by I cheaped out on my phone by $100
01:17:10
◼
►
You'd have to be shooting a lot of video. Well, I don't know just thought that occurs to me
01:17:16
◼
►
I think the battery would die before you fill it up
01:17:18
◼
►
We'll come back to this
01:17:20
◼
►
I'm gonna take another break here for a sponsor
01:17:22
◼
►
But we I'm not done with this because I want to take this back to the iPad because I don't think I don't think the iPhone
01:17:28
◼
►
and story works with the iPad.
01:17:31
◼
►
But I'm going to take a break here, and thanks
01:17:32
◼
►
to our next sponsor, our good friends at Eero.
01:17:35
◼
►
You guys know who Eero is.
01:17:36
◼
►
We talk about them a lot lately.
01:17:38
◼
►
They're new Wi-Fi base stations.
01:17:41
◼
►
The old model of Wi-Fi is that you get a router,
01:17:44
◼
►
you hook it up to your cable modem,
01:17:45
◼
►
put it somewhere, probably wherever your cable box is
01:17:48
◼
►
in your house, and then hope that that one router
01:17:50
◼
►
would give you good Wi-Fi throughout your whole house.
01:17:54
◼
►
We've been doing that for like 15 years.
01:17:56
◼
►
Guess what? That model stinks.
01:17:58
◼
►
And the old way, if you did that,
01:17:59
◼
►
you could also maybe get like an extender or something,
01:18:02
◼
►
but then all of a sudden you're playing like
01:18:03
◼
►
junior sysadmin trying to get this to work
01:18:06
◼
►
to have like a second device
01:18:08
◼
►
that connects to the first device
01:18:09
◼
►
and somehow extends the same network
01:18:11
◼
►
so that when you're just open your device,
01:18:14
◼
►
it looks like the same network,
01:18:16
◼
►
whether you're upstairs or downstairs or whatever.
01:18:19
◼
►
Eero is a system designed from the ground up
01:18:23
◼
►
to have multiple devices spread throughout your house.
01:18:26
◼
►
And it just coordinates all the nerdy stuff
01:18:28
◼
►
to make that happen seamlessly all by itself.
01:18:33
◼
►
You don't even have to separate which device is the main one
01:18:36
◼
►
and which one are the satellites.
01:18:37
◼
►
They're all actually the same little Apple TV style size
01:18:42
◼
►
hockey puck type things.
01:18:45
◼
►
Really nice design.
01:18:46
◼
►
You can put them anywhere in your house.
01:18:48
◼
►
If you have a Wi-Fi router anywhere in your house,
01:18:51
◼
►
the Eero is almost certainly better
01:18:53
◼
►
looking than smaller device.
01:18:55
◼
►
They recommend three for most houses.
01:18:57
◼
►
You could just go to their website,
01:18:58
◼
►
and they'll tell you, put like how many floors
01:18:59
◼
►
your house in, how many square feet,
01:19:01
◼
►
and they'll give you a recommendation on that.
01:19:02
◼
►
If you buy four and you really only need three,
01:19:04
◼
►
you can send one back.
01:19:06
◼
►
You configure the whole thing through a nice,
01:19:09
◼
►
really nice app.
01:19:10
◼
►
Like you don't have to go to like some weird website
01:19:13
◼
►
on the router at 192.168, whatever, none of that stuff.
01:19:18
◼
►
It's a really nice app.
01:19:19
◼
►
And you don't have to worry, you're not playing sysadmin,
01:19:23
◼
►
you're just setting it up the way you want it to be.
01:19:26
◼
►
You want to have a guest network,
01:19:27
◼
►
you'd say, give me a guest network.
01:19:28
◼
►
Then your network has a guest network.
01:19:30
◼
►
That's it, you're done.
01:19:31
◼
►
Really, really great.
01:19:32
◼
►
I've got one here, I've set it up,
01:19:34
◼
►
I've replaced an Apple base station setup in our house
01:19:39
◼
►
with Eero, and the speeds are way better.
01:19:41
◼
►
They even tell you in the app what your speeds are,
01:19:43
◼
►
so you can check, and it'll even tell you
01:19:45
◼
►
what kind of speeds you're getting from your cable company
01:19:48
◼
►
or FiOS or whatever you've got.
01:19:50
◼
►
They even have great customer support.
01:19:51
◼
►
It's something that the company is really invested in.
01:19:53
◼
►
You can call and you get a hold of a real wifi expert
01:19:56
◼
►
within 30 seconds just in case you need it.
01:19:59
◼
►
Because look, this stuff's tough.
01:20:00
◼
►
So maybe something happens.
01:20:01
◼
►
30 seconds, you're talking to an expert.
01:20:04
◼
►
Where do you go to find out more?
01:20:05
◼
►
Easy, go to ero.com/thetalkshow.
01:20:10
◼
►
Go to the talk show, use that code,
01:20:12
◼
►
and you'll get something nice.
01:20:15
◼
►
I think you get expedited shipping.
01:20:18
◼
►
Yeah, that's pretty-- - I'm pretty sure
01:20:19
◼
►
that's it, yeah.
01:20:19
◼
►
Expedited shipping at eero.com.
01:20:22
◼
►
So use that code, the talk show.
01:20:24
◼
►
What's your code?
01:20:25
◼
►
Probably ATP?
01:20:26
◼
►
- I think so.
01:20:27
◼
►
- You can use ATP too, and then Marco
01:20:29
◼
►
will get credit for it.
01:20:30
◼
►
Either way, it's fine with me.
01:20:31
◼
►
Good company, eero.
01:20:34
◼
►
So anyway, I don't think that this middle iPad
01:20:40
◼
►
that doesn't have a bezel, I don't think that it has
01:20:43
◼
►
that same cache that this rumored iPhone does.
01:20:47
◼
►
Like, would I pay an extra $200
01:20:50
◼
►
to get a way cooler looking iPhone?
01:20:53
◼
►
Would I pay an extra $200 to get a cooler looking iPad?
01:20:56
◼
►
I don't think so.
01:20:58
◼
►
- Well, I think it's, you know,
01:21:00
◼
►
the iPad approach that Apple has taken in recent years
01:21:04
◼
►
has been pretty much scattershot.
01:21:06
◼
►
Just like, we have this product category,
01:21:09
◼
►
it's not performing as well as we want it to or need it to.
01:21:13
◼
►
So, let's try a bunch of stuff.
01:21:16
◼
►
And that has resulted in a lot of weird attempts for things
01:21:19
◼
►
and a lot of things that are really good.
01:21:21
◼
►
And the whole iPad Pro branch of the product line,
01:21:25
◼
►
the whole thing with making a pencil
01:21:28
◼
►
after everyone assumed Apple never would
01:21:30
◼
►
'cause Steve Jobs made one comment 20 years ago.
01:21:33
◼
►
They've been just trying a bunch of stuff.
01:21:38
◼
►
And the fact is, what most people need out of their iPads
01:21:44
◼
►
to get more work done or more of their work done
01:21:47
◼
►
is really tricky, difficult, long-term software stuff
01:21:52
◼
►
that's much harder to do.
01:21:53
◼
►
It's much easier to just,
01:21:55
◼
►
let's try some new screen sizes
01:21:56
◼
►
and some new hardware abilities.
01:21:58
◼
►
That's actually easier to do than,
01:22:00
◼
►
let's figure out file management on iOS or windowing.
01:22:04
◼
►
Those are way harder.
01:22:06
◼
►
Or let's fix the App Store pricing ecosystem.
01:22:10
◼
►
That's way harder than Apple,
01:22:13
◼
►
who's already an excellent hardware company,
01:22:15
◼
►
making one more screen size,
01:22:16
◼
►
or making one more hardware configuration.
01:22:18
◼
►
- The iPad has never been, to my mind,
01:22:21
◼
►
an ooh and aah industrial design product,
01:22:25
◼
►
except for maybe the first one.
01:22:28
◼
►
The first one was like,
01:22:30
◼
►
'cause it was just like a quote unquote,
01:22:32
◼
►
they're making a tablet,
01:22:33
◼
►
nobody knows it's gonna be thick,
01:22:35
◼
►
is what, how big is it, nobody knew, you know,
01:22:38
◼
►
what it was gonna be like.
01:22:41
◼
►
And then we saw it and it was like,
01:22:42
◼
►
this is really nice and it's wow this is really kind of cool to have something with the touch
01:22:46
◼
►
latency of an iPhone on a big screen. It was impressive but then every iteration since then
01:22:53
◼
►
has been very iterative to my mind. Like there's never been one generation where you're like
01:22:58
◼
►
whoa with the possible exception of the move from non-retina to retina but even then it's not really
01:23:06
◼
►
the way it looks without turning it on,
01:23:11
◼
►
you know, like the rumors about this iPhone Pro or iPhone 8
01:23:15
◼
►
or whatever you want to call it, are that it's going to look
01:23:17
◼
►
like, wow, what is that before you even turn it on?
01:23:22
◼
►
It doesn't seem-- you know, that was never really the case
01:23:25
◼
►
I mean, the current iPads look an awful lot
01:23:28
◼
►
like the original one.
01:23:29
◼
►
I mean, the backs are flat now, and the bezel on the side
01:23:33
◼
►
is narrower.
01:23:34
◼
►
But like the top and bottom bezel
01:23:35
◼
►
is almost exactly the same.
01:23:38
◼
►
- I think what it is, it's a combination of them
01:23:41
◼
►
trying to figure out what else can we try here
01:23:44
◼
►
to turn around the sales curve and to let this product
01:23:47
◼
►
really come into its own.
01:23:49
◼
►
And then also just like the iPad,
01:23:52
◼
►
I don't think it's about flashiness.
01:23:54
◼
►
I think this is actually just about utility.
01:23:56
◼
►
The iPad really struggles between how much screen size
01:24:01
◼
►
you get versus how nice it is to use.
01:24:03
◼
►
It's really this incredibly polar opposite relationship
01:24:07
◼
►
where if you want to get anything more done on it
01:24:11
◼
►
than browsing the web and watching video,
01:24:14
◼
►
you really want more screen space.
01:24:16
◼
►
If you try multitasking at all, the 9.7 can do it,
01:24:21
◼
►
but it's pretty tight.
01:24:23
◼
►
And the people we know in the community
01:24:26
◼
►
who are big pro iPad users who get a lot of their work done
01:24:30
◼
►
on iPads almost always prefer the 12.9 now
01:24:34
◼
►
for getting like quote work done,
01:24:36
◼
►
because it has more screen space.
01:24:38
◼
►
But anyone who's ever used a 12.9 can tell you
01:24:42
◼
►
like it's pretty big for an iPad.
01:24:45
◼
►
Like for a laptop it's still nice and small,
01:24:47
◼
►
but for an iPad the way you use and hold an iPad,
01:24:52
◼
►
it really is quite large.
01:24:55
◼
►
And so adding that screen space to get the 12.9
01:25:00
◼
►
and its ability to have multitasking be better
01:25:02
◼
►
and to get more work done and more effectively
01:25:05
◼
►
has come at a great cost of this kind of unwieldy size
01:25:09
◼
►
for hand-holded iPad use.
01:25:11
◼
►
That's why I think a lot of 12.9 users use keyboards
01:25:15
◼
►
and stuff where it's kind of more like a laptop
01:25:17
◼
►
propped up on a table more of the time
01:25:19
◼
►
'cause if you're actually using it one-handed,
01:25:21
◼
►
one hand to hold it and the other hand to tuck shit
01:25:23
◼
►
or use the pencil, that's a pretty big iPad to do that with.
01:25:26
◼
►
It's kind of awkward, it's kind of unwieldy.
01:25:28
◼
►
So this 10 point whatever I think is an attempt to cram
01:25:33
◼
►
that screen resolution into the smaller body,
01:25:37
◼
►
which for iPad power users,
01:25:40
◼
►
and I guess we don't know how many of those there are,
01:25:43
◼
►
but for iPad power users, that sounds incredible.
01:25:46
◼
►
That sounds like exactly what so many people would want
01:25:49
◼
►
in I want an iPad that is still small enough
01:25:54
◼
►
to feel and handle like an iPad.
01:25:57
◼
►
and that means 9.7 roughly physical dimensions.
01:26:01
◼
►
But that would have more screen space
01:26:03
◼
►
so I could better multitask
01:26:04
◼
►
and get more of my work done on this device
01:26:06
◼
►
or get my work done more efficiently on this device.
01:26:08
◼
►
- And the speculation I think is that the pixel resolution,
01:26:11
◼
►
instead of being at 266 pixels print,
01:26:15
◼
►
it's gonna be 326,
01:26:17
◼
►
which is the pixel resolution of the Retina Mini.
01:26:21
◼
►
- And the iPhone. - And the iPhone.
01:26:23
◼
►
That seems really small to me
01:26:26
◼
►
for a device that you would hold at a further away distance,
01:26:29
◼
►
but maybe that's just my aging vision speaking.
01:26:32
◼
►
I don't know.
01:26:33
◼
►
- It's just like the iPad Mini.
01:26:34
◼
►
You know, it's like if the iPad, you know,
01:26:35
◼
►
the iPad Mini just has like the 9.7 resolution shrunk down,
01:26:39
◼
►
it's gonna be that same relationship.
01:26:40
◼
►
So like if the iPad Mini looks acceptable to you
01:26:43
◼
►
and you can use it without eye strain,
01:26:44
◼
►
then this would probably work for you too.
01:26:46
◼
►
- It just seems like a confusing decision though,
01:26:50
◼
►
which one you would buy, doesn't it?
01:26:52
◼
►
You don't think so.
01:26:53
◼
►
- Well, it's probably gonna be more expensive
01:26:54
◼
►
than the equivalent 9.7.
01:26:56
◼
►
So it's probably gonna be like 100 bucks more at least,
01:26:58
◼
►
so you know, and it may be slightly cheaper
01:27:01
◼
►
than the 12.9 version of it.
01:27:03
◼
►
So who knows?
01:27:04
◼
►
I mean, we'll see what they do.
01:27:07
◼
►
I think at this point, it's very clear
01:27:09
◼
►
that Apple's strategy with the iPad,
01:27:10
◼
►
again, it's scattershot, it's like,
01:27:12
◼
►
let's just try a bunch of stuff and see what works,
01:27:15
◼
►
and just give people tons and tons of options.
01:27:17
◼
►
You know, they will now sell you an iPad
01:27:21
◼
►
at pretty much every $100 price point from $250
01:27:24
◼
►
on up to like $1100.
01:27:27
◼
►
And it's like any of these price points,
01:27:28
◼
►
pick your price, whatever you're willing to pay for an iPad,
01:27:31
◼
►
we got one to sell you at exactly that price point,
01:27:33
◼
►
but a little bit more after accessories.
01:27:35
◼
►
And I think for what they're trying to do with the iPad,
01:27:40
◼
►
like I think it's very clear that again,
01:27:41
◼
►
I think they maybe don't really know what will work
01:27:46
◼
►
and what won't to boost sales
01:27:49
◼
►
or to carry this platform forward.
01:27:51
◼
►
So they are just trying a bunch of random stuff
01:27:53
◼
►
at this point.
01:27:54
◼
►
And I'm sure there's more thought that goes into it
01:27:55
◼
►
than that, but it certainly seems like they're taking
01:27:58
◼
►
a lot of hardware risks here in order to just cover
01:28:01
◼
►
more of the market in hopes that people will want
01:28:05
◼
►
what they're now making without having to really
01:28:07
◼
►
dramatically change iOS to be more PC-like.
01:28:10
◼
►
- I don't know, it just seems really,
01:28:11
◼
►
it just seems really curious to me that it would,
01:28:13
◼
►
that this new bezel design would debut alongside
01:28:17
◼
►
the iPad Pro 2, you know?
01:28:20
◼
►
I don't know.
01:28:21
◼
►
I believe, I'm not saying I don't--
01:28:23
◼
►
- You probably wouldn't under Steve,
01:28:24
◼
►
but I think this is kind of a hallmark of Tim Cook's Apple,
01:28:26
◼
►
is like, you know, just, is not an aversion
01:28:31
◼
►
to throwing a bunch of different options out there
01:28:33
◼
►
for people to choose from. - I don't think
01:28:34
◼
►
that's Tim Cook, I really don't.
01:28:36
◼
►
I don't know.
01:28:37
◼
►
I don't know what to think.
01:28:39
◼
►
I think there's something we're missing if this is true.
01:28:41
◼
►
I just don't get it.
01:28:42
◼
►
I don't know.
01:28:46
◼
►
I do think-- have you played around with the math?
01:28:49
◼
►
MacRumors had a report from Ming-Chi Kuo on this new--
01:28:52
◼
►
the iPhone, as I'm calling it, the iPhone Pro,
01:28:54
◼
►
as others are saying, the iPhone 8, which supposedly
01:28:57
◼
►
has a 5.8-inch OLED display.
01:29:00
◼
►
But that's the whole device.
01:29:03
◼
►
And only 5.15 inches of it are really
01:29:07
◼
►
what we think of as the iPhone display now.
01:29:09
◼
►
And the rest is the chin.
01:29:11
◼
►
And presumably, there'll be new features in the OS that
01:29:14
◼
►
can light stuff up down there.
01:29:15
◼
►
But basically, if you do the math,
01:29:22
◼
►
and he's exactly right, it's a device
01:29:25
◼
►
that's a very different aspect ratio than the iPhone
01:29:28
◼
►
as we know it.
01:29:29
◼
►
Yeah, like it's too tall and skinny.
01:29:30
◼
►
Yeah, it's basically a device that the hardware
01:29:35
◼
►
is as narrow as an iPhone SE, because it's
01:29:38
◼
►
an edge-to-edge display.
01:29:40
◼
►
And if you actually put an iPhone SE or an iPhone 5
01:29:44
◼
►
on top of a 4.7-inch iPhone and turn the screen on,
01:29:48
◼
►
and then put this, like an iPhone SE on top of it,
01:29:51
◼
►
it's pretty much exactly the same width.
01:29:53
◼
►
- Hang on, I'm doing this now.
01:29:56
◼
►
- I got this right here, all right.
01:29:57
◼
►
- So it's a device-- - Yeah, you're right.
01:29:59
◼
►
- It's a device that's actually narrower in hand
01:30:02
◼
►
than an iPhone 7, you know, than a 4.7-inch.
01:30:05
◼
►
It's more like an SE in hand,
01:30:07
◼
►
but it's as tall as an iPhone 7.
01:30:09
◼
►
In other words, it's as tall, almost exactly the height,
01:30:12
◼
►
and it's a device of the iPhone with a 4.7 inch screen.
01:30:17
◼
►
So as a piece of hardware in your hand,
01:30:18
◼
►
not even turning it on, it would be smaller than an iPhone 7,
01:30:21
◼
►
about the same height and a little narrower.
01:30:23
◼
►
But the aspect ratio that KGI is saying,
01:30:31
◼
►
instead of being 16 to 9, it's more like 2.15 to 1.
01:30:37
◼
►
It's more like a widescreen movie,
01:30:39
◼
►
like a anamorphic movie.
01:30:41
◼
►
It's a lot wider.
01:30:43
◼
►
It's not just a little bit wider than 16 to nine.
01:30:45
◼
►
It's a lot wider.
01:30:47
◼
►
- Yeah, I mean, that's why I think
01:30:50
◼
►
the most likely explanation for this is just like,
01:30:55
◼
►
there's some other key piece of information
01:30:56
◼
►
that we don't know about how the screen is used,
01:31:00
◼
►
how it's shaped around the device.
01:31:02
◼
►
Maybe there's this function area at the bottom
01:31:06
◼
►
where presumably some kind of like home button area will go.
01:31:10
◼
►
Maybe there's one at the top also,
01:31:11
◼
►
which we could slice off that other part of the aspect ratio
01:31:14
◼
►
and therefore make it look right, who knows.
01:31:17
◼
►
But this is getting into really nitty-gritty specifics
01:31:21
◼
►
that I think we probably don't have enough information
01:31:25
◼
►
to really gauge what's real here and what's not.
01:31:29
◼
►
I mean, it's so early and there's no other information
01:31:33
◼
►
backing this up besides KGI stuff
01:31:36
◼
►
which again, KGI stuff has been good
01:31:38
◼
►
about a lot of details about stuff.
01:31:40
◼
►
- Especially on component type stuff, right.
01:31:43
◼
►
- Right, but all this is saying is the panel resolution.
01:31:48
◼
►
And there's lots of things that could affect
01:31:53
◼
►
that being correct or not, and that being like
01:31:56
◼
►
how we think of the screen shape on the phone or not.
01:31:59
◼
►
OLED allows lots of flexibility.
01:32:01
◼
►
It allows not only different shape things,
01:32:03
◼
►
but it allows holes to be cut in panels,
01:32:05
◼
►
and stuff like that, you can do all sorts of crazy stuff
01:32:09
◼
►
So it could be something weird that we don't,
01:32:11
◼
►
that we can't explain this yet with what we know,
01:32:14
◼
►
but it could be a much less interesting story
01:32:16
◼
►
than, oh, it's gonna be a new shaped phone.
01:32:20
◼
►
Like, well, it might just be, it might look like
01:32:22
◼
►
what we have now in general proportions and aspect ratios
01:32:26
◼
►
and just have this weird implementation detail
01:32:28
◼
►
about why the screen happens to be this certain resolution.
01:32:31
◼
►
- Would you want it to be that tall, do you think?
01:32:33
◼
►
Like what if it really is just, it's as wide as iPhone 7,
01:32:38
◼
►
but tall, you know, way taller.
01:32:41
◼
►
So like you'd see more messages in a list in mail.
01:32:45
◼
►
If you're reading an article,
01:32:46
◼
►
you'd see more of the article on screen at once,
01:32:49
◼
►
but at the exact same width.
01:32:51
◼
►
- Hmm, as the designer of an app
01:32:56
◼
►
that has to lay out a giant square
01:32:57
◼
►
in the middle of its now playing screen,
01:32:59
◼
►
that would be awesome.
01:33:00
◼
►
But as a user of the phone,
01:33:02
◼
►
I don't think I need that really.
01:33:03
◼
►
I mean, I think there's a lot of advantages
01:33:06
◼
►
to the phone display being 16 by nine.
01:33:08
◼
►
One of them is when you turn it sideways and shoot video,
01:33:11
◼
►
you have the whole screen and it looks right.
01:33:13
◼
►
So there's a lot of advantages to that.
01:33:16
◼
►
16 by nine allows you to lay out a lot of different shapes
01:33:19
◼
►
fairly nicely within it.
01:33:21
◼
►
Squares, four by three, so it's,
01:33:25
◼
►
I don't think I really want the screen
01:33:28
◼
►
to be taller and skinnier, but who knows?
01:33:30
◼
►
I mean, I'd have to actually see it and use it.
01:33:32
◼
►
Well, the screen wouldn't be any skinnier.
01:33:34
◼
►
And the numbers add up.
01:33:35
◼
►
So he's saying that this is-- his number's
01:33:37
◼
►
for the pixel resolution.
01:33:40
◼
►
This is for the display area, not the whole panel,
01:33:43
◼
►
but the part that would be used as a display area by 1,125
01:33:48
◼
►
Now 1,125 wide is really interesting
01:33:50
◼
►
because an iPhone 7 and the iPhone 6S and the 6,
01:33:54
◼
►
the ones that were 4.7 inches, have 375 point
01:34:01
◼
►
and at 2x and it's in pixels, it's what is 375 times two.
01:34:10
◼
►
- And so if you take 375 times three, guess what?
01:34:13
◼
►
You get 1125.
01:34:15
◼
►
- So basically it's saying we're gonna have 3x.
01:34:17
◼
►
- It's exactly 3x.
01:34:19
◼
►
So it would be the exact same point for point size
01:34:22
◼
►
as the iPhone 4.7 inch screens that we know,
01:34:26
◼
►
except instead of being at 2x resolution, it would be 3x.
01:34:29
◼
►
And unlike the Plus phones, it would be a real 3X
01:34:32
◼
►
with no downsampling.
01:34:34
◼
►
- I mean, that would look great,
01:34:36
◼
►
'cause the Plus phones with their like,
01:34:38
◼
►
rendered 3X scaled down to 1080p,
01:34:41
◼
►
that already looks really nice.
01:34:44
◼
►
- It isn't a massive difference over 2X,
01:34:47
◼
►
but it is a difference.
01:34:48
◼
►
It does just kinda look nicer. - It does look better.
01:34:50
◼
►
- And I can't explain why.
01:34:52
◼
►
I don't think I can really see the pixels for making it,
01:34:55
◼
►
but it just does look nicer.
01:34:57
◼
►
So to have it be true 3X and not even have to do
01:35:01
◼
►
the downsampling compared to what we have now
01:35:04
◼
►
in the 4.7 inch line I think would look really great.
01:35:06
◼
►
- Yeah, I think that like 10 years ago or prior,
01:35:10
◼
►
the downsampling technique, even if it was technically
01:35:13
◼
►
a higher resolution screen, but if you downsampled,
01:35:16
◼
►
it might look bad.
01:35:17
◼
►
I think it probably would have.
01:35:18
◼
►
But I think at this point the pixels are so small
01:35:20
◼
►
that downsampling actually makes it look better
01:35:22
◼
►
so long as the actual pixels are smaller.
01:35:24
◼
►
But anyway, this rumored phone would actually be true
01:35:27
◼
►
to 3x resolution, which, and the fact that the numbers
01:35:30
◼
►
really add up makes, gives me, makes me think
01:35:33
◼
►
that he's onto something.
01:35:34
◼
►
- Yeah, I think, 'cause like, these are weird numbers
01:35:39
◼
►
to just make up or to like, to misinterpret, you know?
01:35:43
◼
►
Like, so there is probably something here,
01:35:46
◼
►
I think again, the only question comes down to like,
01:35:49
◼
►
how are these pixels actually allocated
01:35:51
◼
►
to the various screen elements?
01:35:53
◼
►
- Right, and what does the app get
01:35:54
◼
►
and what does the system get?
01:35:56
◼
►
So anyway, the other last aspect of this
01:35:59
◼
►
is that it seems like nobody knows what the hell is
01:36:01
◼
►
going on with Touch ID.
01:36:03
◼
►
It seems like some of this stuff is like, well,
01:36:05
◼
►
Touch ID must go away because the display goes all the way
01:36:08
◼
►
to the bottom, so there's nowhere
01:36:09
◼
►
to put the little Sapphire button.
01:36:11
◼
►
Which is wrong.
01:36:12
◼
►
I think so, too.
01:36:13
◼
►
I don't think-- I think that there's a way
01:36:16
◼
►
to integrate it into the screen.
01:36:19
◼
►
Just put it in the middle.
01:36:21
◼
►
And clearly, the move away from the physical button
01:36:25
◼
►
last year to a virtual button that has haptic feedback would play right into this.
01:36:32
◼
►
But then there's all these rumors, also rumors that they're going to use a new fancy new
01:36:35
◼
►
camera to do face recognition or something like that.
01:36:39
◼
►
I wouldn't be surprised if they do that, but I would be a little surprised if they did
01:36:42
◼
►
it in place of Touch ID because I feel like Touch ID, it seems like it's a habit people
01:36:47
◼
►
already have.
01:36:48
◼
►
I don't feel like they could take that away.
01:36:50
◼
►
Well, I mean, they again, they could they could try whatever they want, especially if
01:36:55
◼
►
it's only this weird high end one that is already kind of like selecting for fewer buyers.
01:36:59
◼
►
But but I think it's unlikely. I'm with you on that. I mean, again, we'll see what happens.
01:37:04
◼
►
I mean, I think we all thought the headphone jack was unlikely to but no, I didn't. Okay,
01:37:08
◼
►
yeah, that's right. You didn't I couldn't wait for him to get rid of my headphone jack.
01:37:14
◼
►
Anyway, so that's, I don't have the energy for that today.
01:37:18
◼
►
But yeah, the whole face recognition thing,
01:37:22
◼
►
I'm sure they wouldn't do it
01:37:26
◼
►
if they couldn't do it really well.
01:37:27
◼
►
- Right, the same thing with the fingerprint,
01:37:29
◼
►
where the first fingerprint sensor was pretty darn good.
01:37:32
◼
►
- Yeah, and like when you compared
01:37:33
◼
►
to previous fingerprint sensors at the time,
01:37:36
◼
►
they were all really awkward and garbagey,
01:37:39
◼
►
and Apple came out with a really good one,
01:37:40
◼
►
and now they're all pretty, you know,
01:37:42
◼
►
they're all a lot better than they used to be.
01:37:44
◼
►
People saying now that they're like face recognition
01:37:47
◼
►
on their Samsung whatever whatever was crappy,
01:37:51
◼
►
I think again like I don't see Apple doing this
01:37:54
◼
►
unless they could do it really well.
01:37:56
◼
►
So I wouldn't worry too much about what these things
01:37:58
◼
►
have been like in the past from other people.
01:38:00
◼
►
But I still, despite saying that,
01:38:02
◼
►
I still think it's unlikely that this is what they have
01:38:06
◼
►
in mind just 'cause it doesn't sound like it would be better
01:38:09
◼
►
it sounds like it would be worse.
01:38:11
◼
►
I guess the other thing, too, is that when I first
01:38:14
◼
►
heard these rumors a few months ago,
01:38:16
◼
►
I was really, really skeptical.
01:38:17
◼
►
Because again, same thing with the iPads.
01:38:19
◼
►
It's so atypical for Apple to introduce
01:38:24
◼
►
two generations of new stuff at the same time.
01:38:28
◼
►
If they do this, the 7S and 7S Plus
01:38:30
◼
►
are totally going to get lost because they're
01:38:32
◼
►
debuting as mid-range phones.
01:38:34
◼
►
And that just hasn't happened before.
01:38:38
◼
►
And the other aspect is that Apple
01:38:39
◼
►
has had so much success since the iPhone 6
01:38:42
◼
►
by selling two-size phones.
01:38:44
◼
►
And really, three-size, if you count the SE,
01:38:46
◼
►
which is obviously a surprise hit.
01:38:48
◼
►
I mean, they've admitted that they underestimated demand
01:38:54
◼
►
So multiple sizes have proven so popular.
01:38:56
◼
►
Why in the world would they come out with a brand new design
01:38:58
◼
►
at only one size?
01:39:00
◼
►
But when you do all the math and think about this,
01:39:03
◼
►
it's actually a pretty good size to be a one-size-fits-all,
01:39:07
◼
►
because the usable display area is 0.45 inches more
01:39:17
◼
►
than the 4.7 inch phone diagonally.
01:39:20
◼
►
It's 0.35 inches less than the 5.5 inch phone.
01:39:24
◼
►
Yeah, so it's right in the middle.
01:39:25
◼
►
Right in the middle, and air is a little bit on the bigger side.
01:39:29
◼
►
But physically in hand, it's narrower than the 4.7 inch
01:39:33
◼
►
phone, which is, to me, the biggest
01:39:34
◼
►
factor of what makes the iPhone SE so nice to hold, is that it's so narrow.
01:39:40
◼
►
So in terms of like, well, you like something that fits in your hand really securely and
01:39:45
◼
►
that you can go from side to side with your thumb, and you like the fit more information
01:39:50
◼
►
on screen at once, like an iPhone 7 Plus.
01:39:53
◼
►
And the last aspect to all these rumors is that it's supposedly going to have an iPhone
01:40:00
◼
►
7+ caliber, at least in the general range, battery, as opposed to the 4.7, because that's
01:40:06
◼
►
the other factor. I mean, I know it. I mean, there's some people who just love the big
01:40:09
◼
►
phone. And you and I both know people who have the 7+, and they don't even like the
01:40:14
◼
►
size, but they do. I mean, I think you were even talking about it where the battery life
01:40:18
◼
►
alone is sometimes a reason enough to get it. Like, "Ah, it doesn't fit my pocket.
01:40:23
◼
►
It's too big to hold." But I could use it all day and still have battery life at the
01:40:28
◼
►
end of the day.
01:40:29
◼
►
Although to be fair, that was a lot more true
01:40:31
◼
►
of the 6 versus 6 Plus than it has been
01:40:34
◼
►
of the 6S or 7 generations.
01:40:36
◼
►
The gap is now smaller, and to the point where now,
01:40:40
◼
►
the battery life on the 7 is actually pretty decent.
01:40:43
◼
►
And on the 7 Plus, it is better,
01:40:45
◼
►
but it's not better by as much as it used to be
01:40:47
◼
►
in the previous ones.
01:40:48
◼
►
- Yeah, it's gotta say, the 7 has the best battery life
01:40:52
◼
►
for me, I think, of any iPhone I've ever had.
01:40:54
◼
►
- Yeah, me too.
01:40:55
◼
►
- The only time I ever get down into red
01:40:57
◼
►
is on days when I somehow in a circumstance
01:41:01
◼
►
where I didn't even start the day with 100%,
01:41:03
◼
►
which is rare 'cause usually I sleep with it charging.
01:41:07
◼
►
All right, let me take another break here
01:41:11
◼
►
and thank our third and final sponsor of the day.
01:41:14
◼
►
Who do you think it is?
01:41:16
◼
►
Do you have a guess?
01:41:17
◼
►
- Hmm, Casper, Squarespace, Hover.
01:41:21
◼
►
- Well, you can only guess one.
01:41:23
◼
►
- Hmm, I'm gonna go Squarespace.
01:41:25
◼
►
- Ah, Casper.
01:41:26
◼
►
Ah, Casper, you guys know Casper,
01:41:29
◼
►
they're the obsessively engineered mattress
01:41:31
◼
►
and they sell it at a shockingly fair price.
01:41:34
◼
►
Go to casper.com/thetalkshow and use that code,
01:41:37
◼
►
the talk show, and you will save 50 bucks
01:41:39
◼
►
towards any mattress, insert X asterisk right there.
01:41:43
◼
►
There's a footnote, you have to wait for it.
01:41:45
◼
►
Here's the deal.
01:41:46
◼
►
- From your condition to apply.
01:41:47
◼
►
- Casper to me is, it's like an Apple-like company
01:41:51
◼
►
where to me design is making decisions
01:41:55
◼
►
And they've designed one perfect mattress.
01:41:58
◼
►
You don't go to Casper and select
01:42:00
◼
►
from like six different types of mattress
01:42:03
◼
►
and then get the size you want.
01:42:05
◼
►
No, you just pick the size you want.
01:42:06
◼
►
And then they send it to you.
01:42:07
◼
►
And it's one perfect mattress.
01:42:09
◼
►
They've engineered-- they have mattress engineers.
01:42:10
◼
►
That's a real thing.
01:42:11
◼
►
They spent a lot of money and time
01:42:13
◼
►
to get one mattress that's just--
01:42:16
◼
►
is the right mattress for most people.
01:42:18
◼
►
A combination of supportive memory foam and all sorts
01:42:24
◼
►
of other technology, ships to you in a little box.
01:42:27
◼
►
It's the size of a little dorm room refrigerator,
01:42:31
◼
►
or maybe a little bigger than that, but remarkably small
01:42:34
◼
►
for a big mattress.
01:42:35
◼
►
You put it in your bedroom.
01:42:36
◼
►
You open the box, following their instructions.
01:42:38
◼
►
It sucks all the air out of the room to fill the mattress.
01:42:41
◼
►
So you get lightheaded when you do it, and you kind of get dizzy.
01:42:47
◼
►
But it's fun to be in a room when it happens.
01:42:49
◼
►
It makes a very cool sound.
01:42:50
◼
►
And then, boom, you've got a great mattress.
01:42:53
◼
►
I say it all the time.
01:42:55
◼
►
Going to a mattress store is gross.
01:42:56
◼
►
Because what do you want to do?
01:42:57
◼
►
You want to sit on a bed that all sorts of other people
01:42:59
◼
►
have come in and sat on and laid on and whatever?
01:43:02
◼
►
And laying on a mattress with bright fluorescent lights
01:43:05
◼
►
in a mattress store doesn't simulate sleep.
01:43:09
◼
►
So the fact that you can actually sit
01:43:10
◼
►
on a mattress in a retail store doesn't really
01:43:12
◼
►
give you any better hint of whether you're
01:43:13
◼
►
going to light the mattress you buy anyway.
01:43:15
◼
►
So why don't you just trust Casper?
01:43:18
◼
►
Next time you need a mattress, they give you
01:43:19
◼
►
a 100-night home trial.
01:43:21
◼
►
If you don't love it, they'll just give them a ring
01:43:23
◼
►
or go to the website, they'll pick it up at your house
01:43:26
◼
►
and give you a full refund.
01:43:27
◼
►
No questions asked, no hard sell.
01:43:29
◼
►
This is not like, it's not like sending your cable box back
01:43:32
◼
►
and cord cutting where they send like a Gestapo after you
01:43:36
◼
►
to try to keep you.
01:43:37
◼
►
No, they'll just say, okay, sure, sorry.
01:43:39
◼
►
Here's your money back, we'll come pick up the mattress.
01:43:42
◼
►
Here's the asterisk.
01:43:43
◼
►
They also sell a dog mattress.
01:43:45
◼
►
And I keep hearing from people who've bought it
01:43:46
◼
►
for their dogs that their dogs love.
01:43:49
◼
►
Yeah, they have a dog mattress, and it's very, very popular.
01:43:51
◼
►
People who've got it-- listeners of the show
01:43:54
◼
►
who've gotten it love it.
01:43:55
◼
►
But here's the deal.
01:43:56
◼
►
You don't save the $50 on it, because it's
01:43:58
◼
►
like a lower cost mattress.
01:44:00
◼
►
And this is the gist of it, is I got a whole bunch of email
01:44:02
◼
►
from people who bought the dog mattress.
01:44:04
◼
►
And then they said, hey, I just wanted to say,
01:44:05
◼
►
I love the mattress.
01:44:06
◼
►
My dog loves it, but the $50 code didn't work.
01:44:08
◼
►
I botched it the first time they had the dog mattress.
01:44:11
◼
►
So anyway, go to casper.com/thetalkshow.
01:44:13
◼
►
Remember that code, thetalkshow.
01:44:14
◼
►
Save $50 towards your mattress, unless it's a dog mattress.
01:44:17
◼
►
But you'll get $50 of love from your dog
01:44:20
◼
►
that'll make up for it.
01:44:24
◼
►
Why don't we talk about Overcast?
01:44:26
◼
►
Overcast 3.0 just shipped yesterday.
01:44:30
◼
►
Yeah, big update.
01:44:31
◼
►
I knew you were working on this.
01:44:32
◼
►
But I somehow had no idea that it was that close to shipping.
01:44:36
◼
►
I think I was even on the beta.
01:44:38
◼
►
Was I on the beta?
01:44:39
◼
►
You were definitely on the list.
01:44:41
◼
►
I don't know if you actually ever installed it,
01:44:42
◼
►
but you were on the list.
01:44:43
◼
►
I think I did.
01:44:44
◼
►
I think I remember my Overcast having the orange dot next
01:44:47
◼
►
to it, but I don't--
01:44:48
◼
►
I never remembered any--
01:44:51
◼
►
I remember the switch to cards and talking to you about it.
01:44:54
◼
►
And I remember playing with the slide on the card.
01:44:56
◼
►
This was months ago, though, and you had it really--
01:44:59
◼
►
Yeah, well, when I was in Philly,
01:45:00
◼
►
I showed you a prototype.
01:45:02
◼
►
And I had you play with it on my phone
01:45:03
◼
►
and tell me what you thought.
01:45:04
◼
►
I had Hop Sing, right.
01:45:05
◼
►
We were at Hop Sing, and I was playing with it.
01:45:07
◼
►
And it was already--
01:45:08
◼
►
the prototype was very, very good.
01:45:10
◼
►
I had very minor feedback, but I couldn't even
01:45:13
◼
►
find anything to complain about.
01:45:16
◼
►
I forget what I wrote today.
01:45:17
◼
►
Did I write this today?
01:45:18
◼
►
I know I wrote a bit about the business model,
01:45:20
◼
►
but did I write about how if you-- casual user not paying
01:45:23
◼
►
attention isn't going to be-- even though there's a yet.
01:45:26
◼
►
So that's my two points is that it's a great update,
01:45:29
◼
►
because all these things-- every single thing you documented
01:45:32
◼
►
on your blog about the changes, I think every single one
01:45:35
◼
►
of them is like, yes, I totally agree.
01:45:36
◼
►
This is better.
01:45:37
◼
►
This is better.
01:45:37
◼
►
This is better.
01:45:38
◼
►
But I think a casual person who just
01:45:40
◼
►
wants to listen to podcasts, and if they have auto updates on,
01:45:43
◼
►
and they may not even notice that it's a new version.
01:45:47
◼
►
- Yeah, it's odd because here I was like,
01:45:51
◼
►
you know, really busting my butt and just changing,
01:45:54
◼
►
it was a lot of work going into these changes
01:45:57
◼
►
in Overcast 3.
01:45:59
◼
►
And then at the end, when it comes time to like,
01:46:01
◼
►
you know, write the release notes
01:46:02
◼
►
and start like promoting it to people,
01:46:05
◼
►
and it's all right, well what's the list
01:46:06
◼
►
of new features in 3.0?
01:46:09
◼
►
And it's like, uh,
01:46:12
◼
►
I redesigned a lot of the UI.
01:46:14
◼
►
That's about it.
01:46:16
◼
►
There's like a couple of like Q features here and there,
01:46:18
◼
►
but it's, and there's a new watch app.
01:46:20
◼
►
That's, which actually does less than the old one,
01:46:23
◼
►
but is way faster.
01:46:25
◼
►
And that's about it.
01:46:27
◼
►
Like the bullet point list of what is new in this update
01:46:30
◼
►
is incredibly short.
01:46:32
◼
►
Unless you wanna go through and like itemize
01:46:34
◼
►
all the little UI changes,
01:46:35
◼
►
but nobody wants to read that 'cause nobody cares.
01:46:37
◼
►
What you care about is the whole thing,
01:46:38
◼
►
like how the whole thing feels and works for you
01:46:41
◼
►
and everything else.
01:46:41
◼
►
And there were tons of changes and tons of time
01:46:46
◼
►
that went into this, that most of which is fairly subtle
01:46:51
◼
►
or hidden or is the kind of change that you notice
01:46:54
◼
►
the very first day you use it and then it just becomes
01:46:57
◼
►
normal and you immediately stop noticing.
01:47:00
◼
►
That's how this app is now.
01:47:02
◼
►
And things like the whole, the card UI,
01:47:07
◼
►
that took forever to get working.
01:47:10
◼
►
That took so long.
01:47:11
◼
►
and so much work and there are still so many
01:47:15
◼
►
weird little considerations with it.
01:47:17
◼
►
Like one of the things, I had to issue a quick 3.0.1 update
01:47:22
◼
►
because I moved all of the secondary screens in the app
01:47:27
◼
►
into these cards 'cause I have a reusable controller
01:47:30
◼
►
that I can use for anything now
01:47:32
◼
►
to put it in one of these cards.
01:47:33
◼
►
And the problem is that when an iOS standard table view
01:47:39
◼
►
is in one of these cards in certain modes,
01:47:42
◼
►
the reorder controls, like the drag handles
01:47:45
◼
►
when a table's in reordering mode just don't work.
01:47:48
◼
►
Like it moves like two pixels and then stops.
01:47:52
◼
►
And it's only because it's in this card environment
01:47:54
◼
►
and a few of the implementation details of that.
01:47:58
◼
►
And so I had an update today that just moved
01:48:01
◼
►
the playlist editor out of the cards
01:48:04
◼
►
'cause otherwise you can't reorder
01:48:06
◼
►
the priority podcast setting.
01:48:08
◼
►
And it's like, when I was in development,
01:48:10
◼
►
there were so many weird cases like this
01:48:11
◼
►
where like some part of the UI would fail in a weird way
01:48:16
◼
►
if it was moved to this card thing.
01:48:19
◼
►
And so I had to either try to figure out why
01:48:22
◼
►
and see if I could work around it
01:48:23
◼
►
or re-implement it in a different way so it wouldn't fail.
01:48:26
◼
►
And that's just, that card thing is just one of the changes.
01:48:31
◼
►
And there were just so, like,
01:48:34
◼
►
I mean, just so much time going into
01:48:37
◼
►
seemingly minor things like that.
01:48:40
◼
►
Even other things like the full-time drag handles
01:48:42
◼
►
now on the playlist.
01:48:44
◼
►
That is not easy to do in UI table view.
01:48:48
◼
►
- No, I know that.
01:48:50
◼
►
I do. - I did it.
01:48:50
◼
►
It's not a collection view.
01:48:51
◼
►
It is still a table view.
01:48:53
◼
►
And the way I did it is such an incredible hack.
01:48:57
◼
►
And that took a long time too.
01:48:59
◼
►
Similarly, having the Tweetbot style
01:49:03
◼
►
where you tap on the episode and a little row of buttons
01:49:06
◼
►
expands out from the bottom of it
01:49:07
◼
►
that you can then select actions from.
01:49:10
◼
►
Again, a seemingly small thing in the UI,
01:49:13
◼
►
but that takes a long time to implement
01:49:15
◼
►
and to figure out how you have to abuse
01:49:18
◼
►
the system frameworks to let them let you do this.
01:49:21
◼
►
Like, it's all like, and you know from Vesper stuff,
01:49:24
◼
►
like a lot of times it's these little tiny
01:49:27
◼
►
implementation details or these little tiny interactions
01:49:30
◼
►
or UI affordances that they make all the difference
01:49:33
◼
►
in the world when you're using the app
01:49:34
◼
►
and like how nice it is to use or how easy it is to use.
01:49:37
◼
►
But like one of those little behaviors
01:49:41
◼
►
or little animations or implementations
01:49:43
◼
►
might take you weeks to just develop that one little thing.
01:49:47
◼
►
- It is my opinion that the modern touchscreen UI
01:49:53
◼
►
that started with the iPhone
01:50:00
◼
►
is a trickier and inherently more limited interaction model
01:50:07
◼
►
than the mouse pointer interface that we've had since the Mac
01:50:14
◼
►
and go back to the Xerox thing that was before the Mac
01:50:20
◼
►
in a lot of ways.
01:50:21
◼
►
And I think that most people don't think about it.
01:50:24
◼
►
You don't have to.
01:50:24
◼
►
You shouldn't have to if you're not a designer.
01:50:26
◼
►
But when you are a designer, you suddenly
01:50:28
◼
►
that you're limited in a certain way.
01:50:30
◼
►
So for example, let's just say a list of things.
01:50:33
◼
►
You have a list of rows, and you can drag them to reorder.
01:50:37
◼
►
There's all sorts of apps that do stuff like this.
01:50:40
◼
►
On a Mac, you would think, well, I could just click
01:50:44
◼
►
on the row I want to move up, and hold the mouse button down
01:50:47
◼
►
and drag up, and that's exactly how you do it.
01:50:50
◼
►
You click on it and drag, and you don't have to click
01:50:52
◼
►
and wait, you could click and wait and then drag,
01:50:56
◼
►
or you could just click and drag immediately,
01:50:57
◼
►
and it just works.
01:50:59
◼
►
Well, you can't do that on a touch screen
01:51:01
◼
►
because if you're in a list and you just touch
01:51:04
◼
►
and immediately move down or move up,
01:51:06
◼
►
you're scrolling the list because touching on the list
01:51:09
◼
►
and moving your finger is how you do it.
01:51:11
◼
►
So how do you take an item and move it up
01:51:15
◼
►
if you can't just touch on it and move up?
01:51:19
◼
►
- Yeah, you can't have like a modifier key.
01:51:20
◼
►
Oh, just hold down Command.
01:51:21
◼
►
- There is, and the truth is there's no perfect solution.
01:51:23
◼
►
There's a perfect solution with a mouse pointer,
01:51:25
◼
►
which is just allow the user to click and drag up.
01:51:29
◼
►
On touch screens, I could think of-- there's three ways
01:51:32
◼
►
I can think to do it.
01:51:33
◼
►
Apple's usual way is to have an Edit button in the top right
01:51:37
◼
►
that you tap this Edit button, and then it switches it
01:51:42
◼
►
to a mode where there's like a little grippy strip over there.
01:51:45
◼
►
And you can use that grippy strip
01:51:46
◼
►
to drag things up and down.
01:51:48
◼
►
And if you touch on the grippy strip and drag,
01:51:50
◼
►
it won't scroll the list, it'll drag the thing up.
01:51:53
◼
►
The way Vesper did it, and a lot of other apps do,
01:51:55
◼
►
is you tap and hold.
01:51:56
◼
►
And after a brief-- and again, this
01:51:58
◼
►
is the sort of thing where you sit there
01:52:00
◼
►
and you play with little fractions of a second
01:52:02
◼
►
to see how long is too short and how long is too long.
01:52:05
◼
►
But you know you're drag-- you know
01:52:07
◼
►
you're moving it because it visually pops up off the screen.
01:52:10
◼
►
And you can see that it's sort of like raised,
01:52:12
◼
►
and then you're moving the item up and down.
01:52:16
◼
►
I like the solution you came with,
01:52:18
◼
►
where you just put the grip strips there all the time.
01:52:20
◼
►
And so you can't scroll the list from over
01:52:22
◼
►
at the edge of the screen.
01:52:23
◼
►
but most of it you can.
01:52:27
◼
►
- Yeah, and most people don't scroll
01:52:28
◼
►
that far of the edge anyway, so it's fine.
01:52:30
◼
►
Because what I found, I made this whole blog post about,
01:52:34
◼
►
and actually this blog post was the release of Overcast 3
01:52:39
◼
►
and kind of the announcement of Overcast 3,
01:52:41
◼
►
but I titled it Design Walkthrough
01:52:43
◼
►
because this release really was effectively a redesign.
01:52:48
◼
►
Not like 100% redesign, a lot of things look
01:52:50
◼
►
kind of similar or the same, but.
01:52:53
◼
►
There's a lot more redesigning than anything else
01:52:55
◼
►
in this release.
01:52:56
◼
►
And that's because over the last couple years,
01:53:00
◼
►
since I made 1.0, I've gotten literally thousands
01:53:04
◼
►
of emails and tweets from people with feedback
01:53:07
◼
►
and some support questions and things like that.
01:53:11
◼
►
I basically had a lot of feedback to show me
01:53:13
◼
►
all the ways in which the old design failed.
01:53:16
◼
►
And by that I mean people weren't able to find features
01:53:20
◼
►
that they wanted to find or they couldn't understand
01:53:22
◼
►
way something worked or something caused errors to people to
01:53:26
◼
►
erroneously invoke it or things like that. And so
01:53:30
◼
►
there were, one of the major themes I learned
01:53:34
◼
►
over the last couple years is these built-in
01:53:38
◼
►
iOS standards. Things like tapping edit in the top right corner
01:53:42
◼
►
and then having a table view switch to this mode where you can delete or
01:53:46
◼
►
reorder or batch operate on things in a list.
01:53:50
◼
►
or even just swiping a table cell to delete it,
01:53:55
◼
►
these things that we, like power users,
01:53:58
◼
►
have known literally since iOS 1.0 introduced most of them,
01:54:03
◼
►
most people who use iPhones these days
01:54:06
◼
►
don't know those things, they never find it.
01:54:08
◼
►
They don't know you can swipe on a table view
01:54:09
◼
►
to reveal a delete button.
01:54:11
◼
►
They never tap the edit button in the corner,
01:54:14
◼
►
and if they do, they quickly undo it
01:54:16
◼
►
'cause they don't really understand what it does
01:54:17
◼
►
and don't care.
01:54:18
◼
►
So there's lots of assumed knowledge of platform standards
01:54:23
◼
►
that I went into with this,
01:54:27
◼
►
that I think a lot of iOS developers still do,
01:54:29
◼
►
that the reality is the customers don't have
01:54:33
◼
►
that vocabulary in enough quantity.
01:54:35
◼
►
- Yeah, I think that you can only really count
01:54:38
◼
►
on them finding what they can see.
01:54:41
◼
►
- Right, and if you can't, if the only way to do it
01:54:43
◼
►
is a way that you don't see, you have to do something
01:54:47
◼
►
to see it, like slide the row, they all won't find it.
01:54:50
◼
►
That's why, you know, if you look at an app,
01:54:52
◼
►
like I think it's a super successful app,
01:54:53
◼
►
is an app like Apple's Mail for iPhone.
01:54:57
◼
►
That's why there's a trash can when you're in a message view
01:55:00
◼
►
but also why you could swipe on the message
01:55:02
◼
►
in the list of messages and delete it from there.
01:55:06
◼
►
- But that trash can has to be there.
01:55:09
◼
►
- Exactly. - Because some people
01:55:10
◼
►
would be shocked to find out
01:55:11
◼
►
that you can delete a message any other way.
01:55:13
◼
►
- Yeah, 'cause like even, you know,
01:55:14
◼
►
even like the edit button in the corner,
01:55:16
◼
►
that is visible, but it's not even obvious enough.
01:55:19
◼
►
Like what it does or why, like if you're in a list,
01:55:22
◼
►
like what does that even mean to edit
01:55:25
◼
►
in the corner of this entire list of episodes?
01:55:27
◼
►
Like a lot of people just don't think that way.
01:55:30
◼
►
They don't try to poke everything and see,
01:55:33
◼
►
well what does this weird word do
01:55:35
◼
►
that doesn't seem to specify anything in particular?
01:55:39
◼
►
- I hate to spring this on you, but all right,
01:55:41
◼
►
I'm in all episodes and there is an edit button up there.
01:55:46
◼
►
- Still there. - I don't understand
01:55:48
◼
►
what it does.
01:55:49
◼
►
I hit edit and then it says done
01:55:51
◼
►
and it just toggles between edit and done,
01:55:53
◼
►
but what's different?
01:55:54
◼
►
- Do you actually have the latest version?
01:55:57
◼
►
- I think so.
01:55:59
◼
►
- 'Cause normal, what's supposed to happen
01:56:00
◼
►
is if you hit edit, you're supposed to get
01:56:02
◼
►
a little header on top that says,
01:56:03
◼
►
edit playlist on one half and delete playlist
01:56:05
◼
►
on the other half, and then all of the rows
01:56:07
◼
►
turn into the multi-select toggle dots on the right.
01:56:10
◼
►
- Oh, maybe I don't have the latest version.
01:56:14
◼
►
I don't know, I thought I updated to the App Store version.
01:56:16
◼
►
Let me see if I make a new playlist.
01:56:19
◼
►
I mean, you might have found a bug, but--
01:56:20
◼
►
You might have.
01:56:21
◼
►
I don't know.
01:56:22
◼
►
Not how it's supposed to work.
01:56:23
◼
►
Anyway, I agree with you, though.
01:56:31
◼
►
What about the-- so the other factor, and we talked about it.
01:56:36
◼
►
And one of the things that lets you do this-- and you
01:56:38
◼
►
and I have had discussions about this over the years,
01:56:40
◼
►
going back to Vesper and Overcast and that-- OK,
01:56:46
◼
►
But let's just give-- the old model for indie software
01:56:49
◼
►
developers is you pre-app store.
01:56:51
◼
►
You sell a version.
01:56:52
◼
►
Let's say it's $30.
01:56:53
◼
►
And then you do version 2.0.
01:56:56
◼
►
And you still sell it for $30.
01:56:57
◼
►
But you give your existing users an upgrade price.
01:57:00
◼
►
Maybe they get it for half off.
01:57:01
◼
►
Maybe they get the new version for $14.99.
01:57:04
◼
►
Maybe you sell the upgrade for just $9.99.
01:57:06
◼
►
But then the idea is you keep building users.
01:57:09
◼
►
And the ones who keep using the app will, every year
01:57:13
◼
►
or however often you come out with a major upgrade,
01:57:15
◼
►
keep giving you upgrade money.
01:57:18
◼
►
And that's what funds the continued development
01:57:24
◼
►
Because eventually, you stop getting--
01:57:27
◼
►
you max out on new users, and you
01:57:30
◼
►
need to monetize your existing user base.
01:57:32
◼
►
Well, there's no upgrades in the App Store.
01:57:35
◼
►
And so new models are called for if you want to sustain an app.
01:57:39
◼
►
I think you've come across an interesting one.
01:57:44
◼
►
Because the downside to the old model, and as much as everybody--
01:57:48
◼
►
I still kind of wish the App Store supported it
01:57:50
◼
►
and allowed developers the option of doing it.
01:57:53
◼
►
The downside to it is that everybody
01:57:55
◼
►
seems to agree that the way-- most cases, people
01:57:59
◼
►
would decide whether to buy the upgrade to the new app
01:58:02
◼
►
or not based on what are the new features.
01:58:05
◼
►
And so like Overcast 3, where you say it's hard to say,
01:58:09
◼
►
here's all the new features.
01:58:10
◼
►
It may not sell as a paid upgrade, because it's just a modernized version of the same
01:58:22
◼
►
But to me, this is the sort of thing I'm glad to pay for, because it's exactly what I want
01:58:28
◼
►
Well, yeah, because if you do it the other way, where you're dependent on that upgrade
01:58:33
◼
►
revenue for new features every release, then you get Microsoft Office, where you have all
01:58:39
◼
►
all this pressure to just add more and more and more
01:58:42
◼
►
features even if it kind of makes the app worse
01:58:45
◼
►
to have more features added to it.
01:58:47
◼
►
But that's what the incentive structure
01:58:50
◼
►
kind of forces you to do.
01:58:51
◼
►
And that's one of the reasons why you see
01:58:54
◼
►
these major apps like Office and Adobe Creative Suite
01:58:57
◼
►
trying to get away from that model
01:58:59
◼
►
and moving towards subscriptions so aggressively
01:59:00
◼
►
over the last few years.
01:59:01
◼
►
And I think they've both pretty much completed that move.
01:59:04
◼
►
Where like, now they're kind of free to do things better.
01:59:09
◼
►
as opposed to the old model of having to try
01:59:13
◼
►
to justify your revenue every single year
01:59:15
◼
►
with a bullet list of features that you added.
01:59:19
◼
►
Eventually, even the, however much it was ever in dispute
01:59:24
◼
►
within those companies, it becomes obvious to everybody
01:59:26
◼
►
that it's not sustainable forever.
01:59:28
◼
►
You can't just keep adding more
01:59:30
◼
►
and assume that that means better.
01:59:33
◼
►
- Well, and you can for a while.
01:59:37
◼
►
it's generally like when things are young.
01:59:39
◼
►
So when the applications are young,
01:59:42
◼
►
or like in the case of Adobe and Microsoft,
01:59:46
◼
►
a lot of their revenue came from people,
01:59:49
◼
►
like OSes were still young.
01:59:52
◼
►
And as OSes would change,
01:59:53
◼
►
you'd have to get the new versions of the apps
01:59:55
◼
►
to just work on the new OS.
01:59:57
◼
►
Computers were still young.
01:59:58
◼
►
You'd be buying a new computer every three to five years
02:00:01
◼
►
or whatever it was that would be so different
02:00:04
◼
►
from your old one and so much better
02:00:06
◼
►
that you would buy new software to take advantage of it
02:00:08
◼
►
or whatever and like now everything's a lot more
02:00:10
◼
►
settled down in these industries.
02:00:12
◼
►
And it's true of mobile as well.
02:00:13
◼
►
Like the upgrade cycles are getting longer for these things
02:00:15
◼
►
and all the OSs are kind of settling down and maturing.
02:00:20
◼
►
And so, and all these, and if you've had any kind of
02:00:25
◼
►
long-standing product, I mean hell, my podcast app
02:00:28
◼
►
is only like two and a half years old
02:00:31
◼
►
and I'm already running out of features
02:00:34
◼
►
that I think I want to add to it.
02:00:35
◼
►
Like, at a certain point, you add pretty much everything
02:00:39
◼
►
that you think it needs, and it's kind of done feature-wise.
02:00:44
◼
►
But that doesn't mean it can't be improved.
02:00:46
◼
►
- Right, so what you've arrived at after like,
02:00:50
◼
►
and again, you've changed it subtly
02:00:53
◼
►
with each major release, but where you are now is,
02:00:56
◼
►
it's a free download, so anybody can get it,
02:01:00
◼
►
try the Overcast for free, which I think is essential
02:01:03
◼
►
in today's world.
02:01:04
◼
►
It's been free since day one.
02:01:05
◼
►
I don't regret that for a minute.
02:01:07
◼
►
And I think it's proven right.
02:01:09
◼
►
It's just-- I've said this before,
02:01:15
◼
►
but I really do think it's true that when people-- there's
02:01:17
◼
►
just too many people who, if they're
02:01:22
◼
►
looking for a podcast app, or they're
02:01:23
◼
►
looking for a notes app, or whatever the app is,
02:01:26
◼
►
they'll start looking.
02:01:28
◼
►
And they will start trying free ones.
02:01:31
◼
►
And eventually, one of the free ones--
02:01:33
◼
►
I guess this is good enough.
02:01:35
◼
►
And they never get past that.
02:01:37
◼
►
They never get past it, even if your app is 99 cents.
02:01:40
◼
►
There's just too many people who never ever say,
02:01:42
◼
►
I'm gonna try, I'm gonna cough up a dollar
02:01:44
◼
►
before I even try it, just because the screenshots
02:01:48
◼
►
I mean, some people will, but it's not enough.
02:01:50
◼
►
And there's too many free ones, and there's too many
02:01:53
◼
►
free ones that really are good enough.
02:01:55
◼
►
- Yeah, well, and you know, there's that saying,
02:01:57
◼
►
like you always fight in the last war.
02:01:58
◼
►
Like, I apologize to John Syracuse for butchering that,
02:02:02
◼
►
but when I was running Instapaper,
02:02:05
◼
►
it was never free during the time I ran it.
02:02:07
◼
►
It was paid up front the whole time
02:02:09
◼
►
and I was really adamant about that.
02:02:11
◼
►
It had to be paid up front
02:02:12
◼
►
'cause that's how you have to make revenue.
02:02:13
◼
►
And that was okay for the first couple years
02:02:16
◼
►
at the App Store, but then every competitor I got
02:02:21
◼
►
from that point forward, they were all free.
02:02:24
◼
►
Like every major competitor was free
02:02:27
◼
►
and then Apple made Reading List,
02:02:29
◼
►
which was free of course because it's built in.
02:02:31
◼
►
And it's just like, I really was marginalized
02:02:35
◼
►
to a large degree by all of my competitors being free
02:02:40
◼
►
and by the platform having this thing for free
02:02:44
◼
►
and by my app having a big paywall in front of it
02:02:47
◼
►
before anybody could even try it.
02:02:48
◼
►
And so that's one of the reasons why,
02:02:51
◼
►
and I was always afraid that a new competitor
02:02:55
◼
►
would come out that would be awesome and free.
02:02:59
◼
►
'Cause I didn't have that for a long time.
02:03:01
◼
►
And so, it was like every morning I would wake up afraid
02:03:06
◼
►
to look at the news on my phone,
02:03:08
◼
►
'cause what if today was the day my business was crushed
02:03:11
◼
►
by a new awesome free competitor?
02:03:13
◼
►
And so with Overcast, I launched it free,
02:03:15
◼
►
in part out of that, because I was just like,
02:03:17
◼
►
you know what, I don't wanna leave,
02:03:19
◼
►
I don't wanna leave that gap for anybody.
02:03:21
◼
►
Like, I don't wanna wake up every morning with that fear.
02:03:23
◼
►
- Well, you also had the advantage though,
02:03:26
◼
►
and I mean it that it's an advantage,
02:03:28
◼
►
that Apple already had its podcast app.
02:03:31
◼
►
- Exactly, I was pretty Sherlocked.
02:03:33
◼
►
- Right. - And so, yeah,
02:03:34
◼
►
so it was, and that was a big reason why I was free,
02:03:37
◼
►
because A, I didn't wanna leave what Apple calls
02:03:40
◼
►
a price umbrella for competitors to beat me only on price.
02:03:45
◼
►
If you wanna beat me on quality, fine, I'll play that game,
02:03:48
◼
►
I will happily fight on that battlefront,
02:03:52
◼
►
but I didn't want price to be the only thing
02:03:55
◼
►
people could compete with me, or I'd rather,
02:03:57
◼
►
I didn't want to be losing a lot of customers
02:04:00
◼
►
to someone else because of price.
02:04:02
◼
►
- I think you had--
02:04:02
◼
►
- Because I always was with Instapaper,
02:04:04
◼
►
and it killed me, and so, and I was,
02:04:07
◼
►
at the time I was not a good enough business person
02:04:10
◼
►
in this regard to recognize at the time
02:04:12
◼
►
that I should have gone free
02:04:13
◼
►
and figured out something else back then,
02:04:15
◼
►
but in the meantime I kind of figured that out,
02:04:17
◼
►
and so that's why I launched with this.
02:04:18
◼
►
- I think you had an advantage that podcasts,
02:04:20
◼
►
Apple's podcast app isn't always,
02:04:22
◼
►
it always has been pretty good,
02:04:24
◼
►
and it's free and it's there,
02:04:26
◼
►
and it's got the iTunes store backing it,
02:04:27
◼
►
and the fact that it's Apple's app.
02:04:30
◼
►
Does it come with the phones,
02:04:31
◼
►
or do you have to get it from the app store?
02:04:32
◼
►
I forget if it's--
02:04:33
◼
►
- They go back and forth from that,
02:04:34
◼
►
like every few releases.
02:04:36
◼
►
I forget what it is now.
02:04:37
◼
►
I think it's separate.
02:04:38
◼
►
- The fact that it's pretty good and very popular
02:04:40
◼
►
is a much better situation.
02:04:42
◼
►
I feel like we, at Vesper, it was a disservice to us
02:04:47
◼
►
that at that time Apple Notes was garbage.
02:04:50
◼
►
It was a really bad app with really bad sync.
02:04:53
◼
►
The only way to get sync was through IMAP.
02:04:56
◼
►
- That was a mess.
02:04:58
◼
►
- God bless him for having made it work,
02:05:00
◼
►
but it just didn't work well.
02:05:03
◼
►
And it worked terrible if your email was Gmail
02:05:05
◼
►
because you'd get copies of messages over and over again.
02:05:08
◼
►
It was terrible.
02:05:08
◼
►
I think it was starting with iOS 9.
02:05:12
◼
►
I think it was two years ago where they redid notes
02:05:14
◼
►
and they built it on CloudKit, and it's super good.
02:05:17
◼
►
It's a really great, it's a great notes app,
02:05:19
◼
►
and it's really great sync.
02:05:20
◼
►
The sync is terrific.
02:05:22
◼
►
would have been better if that was already out because it would have calibrated our expectations.
02:05:27
◼
►
It wasn't like we assumed Apple would never improve notes, but we didn't know what it
02:05:31
◼
►
Yeah, exactly.
02:05:32
◼
►
So right now, what you do, you get it for free.
02:05:38
◼
►
And for free, you show ads.
02:05:40
◼
►
And you started this...
02:05:41
◼
►
When did you start?
02:05:44
◼
►
So just in September.
02:05:45
◼
►
And you were using Google's mobile ad services.
02:05:48
◼
►
And if you want to, if you want to get rid of the ads and you want to support the app,
02:05:52
◼
►
you can subscribe for 10 bucks a year.
02:05:55
◼
►
And it's auto-recurring or no,
02:05:57
◼
►
it just reminds you in a year?
02:05:58
◼
►
- Now it's recurring, 'cause now we get a raise
02:06:00
◼
►
after year one if we do recurring.
02:06:02
◼
►
- Right, 'cause you get, yeah, right.
02:06:04
◼
►
So anybody who's with you for more than a year,
02:06:05
◼
►
if it's recurring, you get an 85/15 split.
02:06:09
◼
►
- Right, which is a big deal.
02:06:10
◼
►
- Yeah, 'cause like 30% is a lot.
02:06:14
◼
►
And having that cut from 30 to 15 after a year,
02:06:17
◼
►
that adds up a lot as well.
02:06:19
◼
►
- Well, it means you make more--
02:06:20
◼
►
- You make a 15-- - It's getting a raise.
02:06:21
◼
►
You get a 15% raise from your existing users.
02:06:24
◼
►
It's actually kind of putting the old upgrade model
02:06:27
◼
►
the other way around, where you would get less money
02:06:30
◼
►
from your longtime users because they're only
02:06:31
◼
►
paying the upgrade price.
02:06:32
◼
►
Now you're getting more, even though they don't pay more.
02:06:35
◼
►
This is actually--
02:06:36
◼
►
I have a strong incentive now to keep
02:06:38
◼
►
people subscribed long term.
02:06:40
◼
►
This is one of those areas where it really is Apple--
02:06:43
◼
►
everybody's interests aligned.
02:06:47
◼
►
It's not necessarily that Apple is putting developers ahead
02:06:49
◼
►
Apple itself because Apple still makes money. But the motivation is they're putting motivation
02:06:55
◼
►
out there to build apps and services that are worth keeping a multi-year subscription
02:07:01
◼
►
to. And that's in their interests in terms of not maximizing their revenue from the app
02:07:09
◼
►
store at any given transaction or any given renewal, but in terms of making the platform
02:07:14
◼
►
more popular and getting, you know, which leads to people doing things like buying crazy
02:07:19
◼
►
new $1100 iPhones. And it's great for users because the user doesn't pay more. I pay the
02:07:27
◼
►
same 10 bucks on my renewal for overcast and you just get more of the money you get $8
02:07:31
◼
►
and 50 cents instead of $7.
02:07:33
◼
►
Yeah, and a long time ago, like when I when I launched the magazine, it was it was a new
02:07:38
◼
►
stand app. And new Stan was the first thing to have these auto renewing subscriptions.
02:07:42
◼
►
and this was back in iOS 5 and 6.
02:07:47
◼
►
And at the time, this big blog post basically was saying
02:07:50
◼
►
like auto-renewing subscriptions are terrible
02:07:54
◼
►
and I would never do them again.
02:07:55
◼
►
And I wouldn't if they were the same,
02:07:58
◼
►
but they're a lot better now.
02:07:59
◼
►
Like everything about them now,
02:08:00
◼
►
they still have a lot of shortcomings,
02:08:02
◼
►
but everything about them now is a lot easier to implement
02:08:04
◼
►
and easier for both developers and customers to deal with
02:08:07
◼
►
than it was in iOS 5.
02:08:07
◼
►
And so now it is, again, there are still limits.
02:08:12
◼
►
In particular, it's like you still can't tell
02:08:15
◼
►
if somebody has told their subscription not to renew,
02:08:20
◼
►
so effectively if they've canceled.
02:08:21
◼
►
You don't know until it expires.
02:08:24
◼
►
Like you know the date that it's supposed to renew,
02:08:26
◼
►
but until that date comes and it doesn't renew,
02:08:29
◼
►
you don't know they've canceled it.
02:08:30
◼
►
And so there's weird things with like,
02:08:33
◼
►
if you want to also sell subscriptions
02:08:36
◼
►
through your website maybe,
02:08:38
◼
►
and it like offer both payment options,
02:08:40
◼
►
it's really hard to reconcile these things,
02:08:43
◼
►
'cause like you don't know if the person
02:08:45
◼
►
has canceled on their phone, if they are extending,
02:08:47
◼
►
so there's a whole bunch of weird cases.
02:08:49
◼
►
But the way I'm doing it now, which is very simple,
02:08:51
◼
►
and there is no web payment option,
02:08:53
◼
►
along with the improvements they've done
02:08:56
◼
►
to the system since iOS 5, make it a much easier sell now,
02:09:00
◼
►
and then add the raise to it, and it's a no-brainer.
02:09:04
◼
►
- And it was starting now with version 3.0.
02:09:07
◼
►
You've switched the, you seem to have narrowed in
02:09:11
◼
►
on the $10 a year recurring subscription for the Pro,
02:09:14
◼
►
you know, what do you call it, iPhone or Overcast Pro?
02:09:17
◼
►
- I call it Premium.
02:09:19
◼
►
- Well, all right, you can call it that.
02:09:22
◼
►
- I was kind of like going off of like, you know,
02:09:23
◼
►
like what streaming music services call their ad-free tiers.
02:09:27
◼
►
- Which are almost all premium.
02:09:28
◼
►
- I guess it semantically it makes sense.
02:09:30
◼
►
Pro's shorter.
02:09:32
◼
►
- And pro is kind of, it's kind of weird
02:09:34
◼
►
to call something pro that adds almost no features.
02:09:38
◼
►
- Like it's like what, like so premium,
02:09:39
◼
►
like there was basically like, you know,
02:09:41
◼
►
I'm kind of going off of like what people
02:09:43
◼
►
are accustomed to here.
02:09:44
◼
►
And streaming music services are way more popular
02:09:47
◼
►
than Overcast, so like if they're all saying
02:09:50
◼
►
their ad free tiers are called premium,
02:09:52
◼
►
and if I call mine that, I think people basically get it.
02:09:55
◼
►
- But the big change is on the ad side,
02:09:58
◼
►
where instead of using Google's mobile ad services,
02:10:01
◼
►
you've dropped it for your own homegrown system
02:10:04
◼
►
where you're going to sell, or you are selling ads that--
02:10:08
◼
►
you sell the ads and they get shown with the novel idea,
02:10:13
◼
►
but which is very obvious.
02:10:14
◼
►
And it kind of gets into my thing
02:10:16
◼
►
when I was talking about Audible before that, hey,
02:10:18
◼
►
guess why Audible advertises on a podcast?
02:10:21
◼
►
Because they know everybody who listens to it
02:10:23
◼
►
is listening to spoken word content.
02:10:26
◼
►
And so one of your ideas is that podcasts
02:10:28
◼
►
can buy these ads to promote their podcast.
02:10:32
◼
►
So I could buy ads for the talk show,
02:10:34
◼
►
and people would be listening to other shows.
02:10:36
◼
►
And if they're free users of Overcast,
02:10:38
◼
►
I get a little ad at the bottom, and I can try
02:10:39
◼
►
to pitch them on listening.
02:10:41
◼
►
And if they tap it, it doesn't take them
02:10:44
◼
►
to my website or something.
02:10:46
◼
►
It does something far smarter than that.
02:10:48
◼
►
It takes you to the page-- not the page,
02:10:50
◼
►
but the card in Overcast, where you
02:10:53
◼
►
would be able to either subscribe to my show
02:10:56
◼
►
or listen to the latest episode to see what it's like.
02:11:00
◼
►
- Yeah, you browse the whole episode list,
02:11:01
◼
►
the whole history of the show and everything.
02:11:03
◼
►
Exactly what you get from the ad podcast screen.
02:11:06
◼
►
It's the same thing.
02:11:07
◼
►
Yeah, I mean, it's,
02:11:08
◼
►
this was kind of, I mean,
02:11:11
◼
►
I've kind of like fallen into all my business models
02:11:14
◼
►
for Overcast here. (laughs)
02:11:16
◼
►
- I don't know if it's gonna work.
02:11:18
◼
►
I mean, you never know.
02:11:18
◼
►
You have to try them. - Neither do I.
02:11:19
◼
►
- And you know, like my RSS feed sponsorships
02:11:22
◼
►
have worked way better than I thought they would,
02:11:24
◼
►
or than I even hoped they would.
02:11:25
◼
►
But I'm sure glad I tried it because it worked a lot better than I thought it would.
02:11:31
◼
►
Who knows? Maybe it will, maybe it won't.
02:11:34
◼
►
But it at least fits the basic description of
02:11:37
◼
►
advertising that is sustainable and works in my experience.
02:11:41
◼
►
It isn't just a flash in the pan,
02:11:43
◼
►
which is that it's got to be that win-win-win scenario,
02:11:47
◼
►
where it's a good value for the advertiser.
02:11:49
◼
►
It's not super annoying to the user and it makes money for the person selling the ad.
02:11:55
◼
►
And it kind of has that.
02:11:56
◼
►
And part of the way that you get that to work
02:11:58
◼
►
is to not try to make ads that are exactly
02:12:03
◼
►
like the ads for a previous medium,
02:12:05
◼
►
or to reuse the analogy, fighting the previous war.
02:12:09
◼
►
But what is native for this?
02:12:12
◼
►
And I've given talks about it, but in the early days
02:12:16
◼
►
when people would try to monetize RSS,
02:12:18
◼
►
they would have two ad strategies.
02:12:19
◼
►
The big one that was super common for a long time
02:12:22
◼
►
was that you wouldn't put the full article in the RSS feed.
02:12:25
◼
►
So you didn't have to put ads in.
02:12:27
◼
►
You'd get a list of articles.
02:12:28
◼
►
And if you wanted to read one, you'd
02:12:30
◼
►
get a two-sentence summary.
02:12:31
◼
►
And then you'd double-click it and go to the website.
02:12:33
◼
►
And then you'd see the website ads.
02:12:36
◼
►
Well, it works in terms of not giving away
02:12:39
◼
►
your content for free.
02:12:40
◼
►
But it wasn't what people who used RSS readers want to do.
02:12:44
◼
►
They were using RSS readers because they wanted to read
02:12:46
◼
►
your stuff in the RSS reader.
02:12:48
◼
►
Yeah, basically ruin the feed.
02:12:50
◼
►
So the next thing people would try to do
02:12:52
◼
►
put banner ads in each article, which made them
02:12:55
◼
►
like little web pages.
02:12:57
◼
►
And they paid pennies, and everybody just
02:12:59
◼
►
skipped over them.
02:13:01
◼
►
And so my idea was, well, why not just have a paid entry
02:13:04
◼
►
in the feed once a week?
02:13:05
◼
►
Give them the whole entry.
02:13:07
◼
►
Don't put something in the entries.
02:13:09
◼
►
Just sell an entry.
02:13:11
◼
►
And it has worked out very, very well.
02:13:14
◼
►
And I think selling a podcast--
02:13:15
◼
►
I think if your idea works, I think actually having
02:13:18
◼
►
and the podcasts sell by other podcasts buying the ads
02:13:24
◼
►
is going to work.
02:13:25
◼
►
And one of the things that occurred to me
02:13:27
◼
►
is, what do you see a lot-- when you watch regular commercial
02:13:29
◼
►
TV, what do you see a lot of commercials for?
02:13:35
◼
►
And it's not because the network couldn't sell the spot.
02:13:39
◼
►
And oh, well, we'll put an ad for Modern Family
02:13:42
◼
►
during the football game because we didn't sell the spot.
02:13:48
◼
►
They do it because they know it's super valuable to get people to watch the show
02:13:53
◼
►
Like I can't even tell you how many times during the Super Bowl. They told you how many
02:13:56
◼
►
forget what the show was but
02:13:59
◼
►
It shows how well the ads work, but but they kept telling you what should what show is gonna be on right after the Super Bowl
02:14:05
◼
►
Yeah, it was like the new 24 reboot or something like that
02:14:08
◼
►
Over and over and over again because it works because you're already watching TV
02:14:13
◼
►
Right exactly and listening to a podcast
02:14:17
◼
►
Yeah, and so like that's like I think this the only question in my mind basically is like
02:14:23
◼
►
Do enough podcasters have enough money to want to pay for ads right that and that's a big question mark
02:14:31
◼
►
And that's what I'm like. This isn't just podcasters
02:14:34
◼
►
Like I also have like a hover ad and a Squarespace ad and a Linode added my like I can advertise for I put the
02:14:40
◼
►
Whole thing to be fairly generic so I can advertise for podcasts or just any website or apps in the App Store
02:14:46
◼
►
So any of those things can be advertised with these with these ad units and I can control all server sides
02:14:53
◼
►
I can you know, I'm a mentally insert them as necessary. I
02:14:56
◼
►
Just it remains to be seen like whether podcasters actually will buy these at
02:15:03
◼
►
The prices that they end up being worth or not
02:15:06
◼
►
What I don't that's I don't know what percentage I mean right now your your revenue is overwhelmingly from the premium subscribers, correct?
02:15:14
◼
►
- Yeah, and basically what allowed me the freedom
02:15:17
◼
►
to even try this at all is that what I found
02:15:19
◼
►
since September, since using the Google Ads,
02:15:22
◼
►
the Google Ads in apps, and I mean this is true
02:15:26
◼
►
of any in app advertising basically,
02:15:28
◼
►
how much it works for you is extremely dependent
02:15:33
◼
►
on your click through rate.
02:15:36
◼
►
Basically how many clicks do you get
02:15:37
◼
►
per 1,000 impressions of the ad as it's shown?
02:15:41
◼
►
And my click-through rate in the Google Ads was awful.
02:15:46
◼
►
It was so far below industry averages and everything.
02:15:49
◼
►
It was terrible.
02:15:50
◼
►
Because who wants to jump out to a web browser?
02:15:53
◼
►
That's certainly part of it.
02:15:54
◼
►
I mean, another part of it is just like--
02:15:55
◼
►
And how many people think if they tap it
02:15:57
◼
►
and it goes to a web browser that the podcast is
02:15:59
◼
►
going to stop playing?
02:15:59
◼
►
It didn't, because it's overcast.
02:16:01
◼
►
It can run in the background.
02:16:02
◼
►
But how many people wouldn't even--
02:16:05
◼
►
it may even be vaguely interested,
02:16:06
◼
►
but wouldn't tap it out of fear that the podcast would
02:16:08
◼
►
stop playing, which would be like the worst thing ever?
02:16:10
◼
►
- Yeah, I never thought about that.
02:16:12
◼
►
So basically, there was that big problem of
02:16:14
◼
►
my tap-through rate was terrible.
02:16:18
◼
►
And also, just things that advertise
02:16:22
◼
►
in these kind of bulk ad networks on mobile,
02:16:26
◼
►
they weren't often very high-quality ads.
02:16:28
◼
►
So the result of this was both that they look kind of junky
02:16:34
◼
►
and also they made very little money.
02:16:38
◼
►
And the only reason that this has succeeded
02:16:42
◼
►
as a business model at all is because
02:16:45
◼
►
having the ads there made a lot more people
02:16:48
◼
►
subscribe as premium members than the previous system,
02:16:52
◼
►
which is basically like subscribe if you like me.
02:16:54
◼
►
It was kind of like a voluntary patronage thing.
02:16:56
◼
►
That got very few people to subscribe.
02:16:59
◼
►
And so having the ads there,
02:17:02
◼
►
I thought it would be a nice balance of like,
02:17:03
◼
►
all right, I'll make a lot of money from ads
02:17:04
◼
►
and some money from subscriptions.
02:17:06
◼
►
and it ends up I made more money from subscriptions
02:17:09
◼
►
than I thought and way less money from ads than I expected.
02:17:12
◼
►
So the advantage there though, the silver lining there
02:17:15
◼
►
is that I could replace the ads
02:17:17
◼
►
with basically any other ads.
02:17:20
◼
►
It doesn't really matter, whatever I replace them with,
02:17:24
◼
►
as long as it brings in some money,
02:17:28
◼
►
I can come out basically the same or ahead
02:17:32
◼
►
from the little bit I was making from Google
02:17:34
◼
►
just because as I said, my tap rate was terrible
02:17:37
◼
►
from those ads.
02:17:37
◼
►
- And it doesn't make you hang your head in shame
02:17:40
◼
►
about the quality of the ads.
02:17:41
◼
►
As long as it's-- - Exactly.
02:17:42
◼
►
- You had a good point.
02:17:43
◼
►
- And I only have about 24 hours worth of numbers so far,
02:17:48
◼
►
but my tap rate on the new ads is something like,
02:17:52
◼
►
I think it's like 100 times better than it was.
02:17:55
◼
►
It's some obscene multiplier.
02:17:58
◼
►
Again, I only have 24 hours of data
02:18:00
◼
►
and everyone's trying them out to see what they are,
02:18:01
◼
►
So this is not representative of long-term trends,
02:18:05
◼
►
but I'm confident so far that I think
02:18:08
◼
►
I hit something better this time.
02:18:09
◼
►
- I think it's gonna work.
02:18:16
◼
►
I think it's a good idea,
02:18:17
◼
►
but it's definitely better than the old ads.
02:18:20
◼
►
No question. - I mean, my only question
02:18:21
◼
►
really is like, in six months,
02:18:24
◼
►
are most of the ads that you see in Overcast
02:18:26
◼
►
going to be for websites like Hover and Squarespace,
02:18:29
◼
►
or are they gonna be for podcasts?
02:18:31
◼
►
And I have no idea.
02:18:32
◼
►
- Yeah, but it's good to keep an open mind
02:18:34
◼
►
and let it sort out.
02:18:35
◼
►
- Exactly. - As it falls.
02:18:37
◼
►
Water seeks its own level.
02:18:38
◼
►
I think this is one of those things too
02:18:39
◼
►
where you underestimate your personal skillset
02:18:42
◼
►
in terms of your,
02:18:44
◼
►
I mean, the main part of Overcast is,
02:18:48
◼
►
you know, it's an iOS app and it's programming,
02:18:51
◼
►
you know, and you've done,
02:18:52
◼
►
we talked extensively already about all the UI stuff
02:18:55
◼
►
that you've done and changed and customized
02:18:57
◼
►
and customizing the table view and all this stuff that's just pure, this is what iOS developers
02:19:04
◼
►
of good apps do.
02:19:06
◼
►
But your background as a CMS developer gives you such a leg up in terms of, "Oh, I'll just
02:19:12
◼
►
build my own ad network."
02:19:17
◼
►
Because you did this before where you built the system that we use, I use it, ATP uses
02:19:23
◼
►
is it to just set up the schedule of podcast ads,
02:19:28
◼
►
which ads are in which episode and what do you say?
02:19:32
◼
►
It's just something you build out of the frustration
02:19:36
◼
►
of whatever jury-rigged system.
02:19:39
◼
►
I don't even remember what we did before, but--
02:19:41
◼
►
- I used a terrible Excel spreadsheet before.
02:19:43
◼
►
I think that most people have some kind of
02:19:45
◼
►
awful combination of spreadsheets and stuff.
02:19:47
◼
►
- Yeah, it was a numbers spreadsheet.
02:19:50
◼
►
And it was just awful.
02:19:53
◼
►
So your ability to have this second skill set
02:19:58
◼
►
where you can build the backend of a dynamic,
02:20:03
◼
►
on the fly, up to the minute ad thing
02:20:06
◼
►
is a huge advantage of being able to think
02:20:08
◼
►
of something like this.
02:20:09
◼
►
'Cause I can see a lot of people might come up
02:20:10
◼
►
with this idea, but then they will wait.
02:20:12
◼
►
How would I actually manage the ads on the backend
02:20:16
◼
►
so that they get served?
02:20:18
◼
►
And maybe it would never percolate up to the level
02:20:21
◼
►
where they do it because they don't have that skill set.
02:20:23
◼
►
- Well, I mean, I wouldn't necessarily say
02:20:27
◼
►
that it's much of a skill set, honestly.
02:20:29
◼
►
It's more of like a willing,
02:20:33
◼
►
or it's more of a confidence to do it
02:20:35
◼
►
because so many app developers don't have
02:20:38
◼
►
a lot of server-side experience.
02:20:40
◼
►
And so they have experience developing
02:20:42
◼
►
the local native app, but maybe not necessarily
02:20:44
◼
►
the server-side chops, or they don't want
02:20:46
◼
►
to run the server themselves or have to depend on a server.
02:20:49
◼
►
And I just, whatever it is that intimidates people
02:20:54
◼
►
or turns people off about running servers,
02:20:56
◼
►
I don't have that.
02:20:57
◼
►
Because my job, before making apps,
02:21:00
◼
►
my job was all about running servers
02:21:01
◼
►
and running applications on servers.
02:21:03
◼
►
And so I just became comfortable with that.
02:21:05
◼
►
Running servers and running apps on servers
02:21:07
◼
►
and writing backend code is actually way easier
02:21:10
◼
►
than writing app code in so many ways.
02:21:12
◼
►
It's, sorry backend developers,
02:21:15
◼
►
I know I'm one of you sometimes,
02:21:16
◼
►
but I'm telling you, it's so much easier most of the time
02:21:20
◼
►
than writing most app code that you have to do
02:21:23
◼
►
to make a reasonable quality app.
02:21:25
◼
►
And so it isn't that most developers can't do this,
02:21:28
◼
►
it's that most of them think they can't do this,
02:21:30
◼
►
and so they don't even try.
02:21:31
◼
►
The main challenge for me, trying to do all this ad stuff,
02:21:36
◼
►
is that I just find it incredibly uninteresting.
02:21:39
◼
►
Like, the idea, like, I actually really got
02:21:42
◼
►
a lot of enjoyment out of designing the ad format,
02:21:45
◼
►
and integrating them into the app
02:21:46
◼
►
and making that work really nicely.
02:21:48
◼
►
But doing the back end of putting in the ads
02:21:51
◼
►
and tracking how many clicks they get,
02:21:53
◼
►
that I could not be less interested in doing that.
02:21:57
◼
►
I put it off forever.
02:22:03
◼
►
- Well, you did it.
02:22:04
◼
►
I don't know, we'll see how it goes.
02:22:05
◼
►
- I literally did it three days ago.
02:22:09
◼
►
- The other little details I have are some of the changes.
02:22:13
◼
►
you call it a DIOS 7-ification.
02:22:15
◼
►
So one of the good things about the timing of Overcast
02:22:19
◼
►
is it debuted with iOS 7, so it never
02:22:21
◼
►
had to go through that shift from the old world of iOS 6
02:22:25
◼
►
to iOS 7 visually, in terms of the way that you code an app
02:22:31
◼
►
and assume stuff.
02:22:32
◼
►
It went through the shift, just no one saw it except me.
02:22:38
◼
►
And it is interesting.
02:22:42
◼
►
I was never an iOS 7 hater, but iOS 7 definitely
02:22:45
◼
►
debuted at the extreme end of the direction that it went,
02:22:50
◼
►
which I think is the way that you go.
02:22:52
◼
►
I think it's the right way to--
02:22:53
◼
►
I think it was right for Apple to go push it
02:22:55
◼
►
as far as they could with the thin fonts
02:22:58
◼
►
and the translucency everywhere.
02:23:02
◼
►
But they've dialed it back a lot of ways each step iOS 8 to 9
02:23:10
◼
►
And a lot of the changes you made in Overcast 3
02:23:13
◼
►
really bring them to the forefront,
02:23:15
◼
►
'cause there were some things that have been there
02:23:17
◼
►
in Overcast since 1.0 that are now gone,
02:23:20
◼
►
but that didn't disappear until now,
02:23:22
◼
►
like the popover that you would get
02:23:24
◼
►
for the info on a podcast,
02:23:26
◼
►
which you said you hated from the beginning.
02:23:28
◼
►
- I did, I hated those popovers.
02:23:30
◼
►
- Included in the use of popovers was translucency.
02:23:36
◼
►
Like, iOS 7 introduced an awful lot of things
02:23:38
◼
►
that were like a semi-translucent piece of glass,
02:23:42
◼
►
or like it's, like the popover that I'm talking about
02:23:45
◼
►
looked like it was printed on like frosted glass.
02:23:48
◼
►
So you could like see that, like in a shower,
02:23:50
◼
►
you can see that there's somebody in the shower,
02:23:52
◼
►
but you can't see what they look like.
02:23:54
◼
►
- Yeah, a lot of use of blur.
02:23:56
◼
►
But because what happened was like,
02:23:57
◼
►
at the time that iOS 7 came out,
02:24:00
◼
►
whatever combination of hardware and software tricks,
02:24:03
◼
►
blur is computationally intensive.
02:24:06
◼
►
And so they basically couldn't do it before,
02:24:08
◼
►
And on that year, I think it was 2013 that came out,
02:24:13
◼
►
on that year of iPhones, they were finally powerful enough
02:24:17
◼
►
to really do it and they came up with a couple
02:24:19
◼
►
of neat software tricks to do it a little bit faster.
02:24:22
◼
►
And so it was like they had this new technical ability
02:24:25
◼
►
that was pretty rare before, especially,
02:24:27
◼
►
and was not seen at all on mobile
02:24:29
◼
►
'cause it was too complex to do on mobile hardware.
02:24:32
◼
►
And so they went nuts with it.
02:24:33
◼
►
It was like, you know, typical,
02:24:34
◼
►
when you get a new tech ability,
02:24:36
◼
►
you first go nuts with it and then you dial it back.
02:24:38
◼
►
and they certainly did.
02:24:40
◼
►
- But I think what this update really focuses is
02:24:43
◼
►
where we still use Blur, Apple still uses Blur extensively
02:24:47
◼
►
in iOS 10, but instead of being like this foreground panel
02:24:51
◼
►
that's in the front and that you see through,
02:24:54
◼
►
it's the background that gets blurred.
02:24:56
◼
►
So for example, when you do the force touch on an episode
02:25:00
◼
►
to peak at it, the panel is not translucent,
02:25:05
◼
►
but the background around it is,
02:25:07
◼
►
which is, it's a subtle difference,
02:25:10
◼
►
but I think it works much better.
02:25:13
◼
►
Because it doesn't make the thing
02:25:14
◼
►
you're looking at hard to read,
02:25:16
◼
►
but it gives you this immediate context
02:25:19
◼
►
of oh, this is temporary, this is just a little,
02:25:22
◼
►
'cause it's all blurry in the background,
02:25:23
◼
►
I've popped this thing up.
02:25:24
◼
►
- Yeah, 'cause the other thing about blur is like,
02:25:29
◼
►
besides being computationally difficult,
02:25:31
◼
►
it's also very hard to design around.
02:25:35
◼
►
When you have these blurry foreground panes
02:25:38
◼
►
and these large blurry expanses,
02:25:41
◼
►
and then you have like, behind them you have
02:25:43
◼
►
some bright pink icon shining through
02:25:45
◼
►
and you have this pink blob in the blur area,
02:25:48
◼
►
it's very hard to design around that
02:25:51
◼
►
and to make that both legible and attractive
02:25:55
◼
►
in all situations.
02:25:56
◼
►
It's nearly impossible.
02:25:57
◼
►
- And then the other difference that's definitely
02:26:02
◼
►
moving directly away from iOS 7 is slightly thicker lines,
02:26:06
◼
►
like icons and stuff like that,
02:26:08
◼
►
like the sharing icon and stuff.
02:26:11
◼
►
Everything isn't so wispy anymore.
02:26:13
◼
►
It's a little, I wouldn't say it's thick lines,
02:26:16
◼
►
but they're much more like regular lines.
02:26:19
◼
►
- Oh, you should have seen the conversation
02:26:21
◼
►
between me and Louis Mantia.
02:26:23
◼
►
I designed the entire rest of the app myself,
02:26:26
◼
►
and then I went to him, 'cause he made the original icon,
02:26:29
◼
►
so I went to him to refresh the icon,
02:26:32
◼
►
and I showed him the screenshot of the toolbar
02:26:37
◼
►
on the main screen that has those four icons across the top
02:26:39
◼
►
and he's like, what are you doing with the stroke width?
02:26:42
◼
►
Because the lines on all the icons and everything
02:26:47
◼
►
in all previous versions were one point wide,
02:26:51
◼
►
which is two pixels on the 2X phones
02:26:54
◼
►
and then three pixels or six, yeah, three pixels on,
02:26:58
◼
►
anyway, so one point was what we had before.
02:27:02
◼
►
I wanted to make everything a little bit thicker.
02:27:04
◼
►
Two points in most things look too thick.
02:27:07
◼
►
So the actual stroke width of most of the icons
02:27:12
◼
►
in Overcast is 1.5 points.
02:27:15
◼
►
And this makes everything suck.
02:27:18
◼
►
This makes everything about icon design harder
02:27:22
◼
►
because you can either have it blurry on all devices
02:27:26
◼
►
or you can align things to quarter point boundaries
02:27:30
◼
►
and have it work.
02:27:32
◼
►
So that's what I did.
02:27:33
◼
►
And when I tried to make another designer do that,
02:27:37
◼
►
I got some pushback.
02:27:40
◼
►
Eventually we worked it out.
02:27:42
◼
►
But the result is that almost all the icons
02:27:47
◼
►
in Overcast 3 have a 1.5 point stroke width
02:27:50
◼
►
and it works and it looks sharp.
02:27:53
◼
►
- So is that gonna work out well on the 3X iPhone X?
02:27:57
◼
►
- So that's a question.
02:27:59
◼
►
So basically, the way it works, the way I've aligned them
02:28:02
◼
►
on these quarter pixel boundaries,
02:28:03
◼
►
it is sharp on 2x.
02:28:06
◼
►
On 3x, it is a little bit less sharp.
02:28:09
◼
►
But there are so many pixels,
02:28:11
◼
►
I'm kind of thinking you might not notice.
02:28:12
◼
►
- Yeah, but on-- - 'Cause I don't,
02:28:13
◼
►
I don't notice on the plus phones, now.
02:28:16
◼
►
We'll have to see.
02:28:20
◼
►
Anyway, I think it's good work.
02:28:22
◼
►
- Anything else you wanted to talk about?
02:28:24
◼
►
- I don't think so.
02:28:26
◼
►
I mean, we've only been going for two and a half hours.
02:28:28
◼
►
I mean, we still have three more to go, right?
02:28:30
◼
►
- That's short for us, we gotta wrap it up.
02:28:32
◼
►
- It really is short for us.
02:28:34
◼
►
- How'd the release go?
02:28:36
◼
►
You had that one bug you had to fix,
02:28:37
◼
►
so you had to have one emergency bug in it,
02:28:39
◼
►
but it seems like that got through.
02:28:40
◼
►
Did you have to do an expedited review?
02:28:43
◼
►
- No, it was just fast.
02:28:45
◼
►
It was just that fast.
02:28:48
◼
►
So yeah, I actually fixed, here, let me pull it up,
02:28:50
◼
►
I fixed 13 kind of important day one bugs.
02:28:55
◼
►
One of the things, I had a couple people on Twitter saying,
02:28:58
◼
►
Why didn't you beta test this more with a bigger group?
02:29:00
◼
►
Your beta group sucked.
02:29:01
◼
►
And the reason why, literally, is secrecy.
02:29:06
◼
►
Like, that's it.
02:29:07
◼
►
It's a boring reason, but that's true.
02:29:09
◼
►
I have done bigger betas before.
02:29:10
◼
►
I've done betas where I've tried to fill
02:29:12
◼
►
all 1,000 of my test flight slots,
02:29:15
◼
►
and I came pretty close,
02:29:16
◼
►
and I had like 800 people on one of them.
02:29:18
◼
►
And I've done like kind of mediums,
02:29:19
◼
►
where it's like 150 people,
02:29:22
◼
►
and this one was something like 40 or 50 people.
02:29:24
◼
►
And the reason why I kept it small
02:29:27
◼
►
is because every previous beta I've done,
02:29:29
◼
►
I've said in the instructions,
02:29:31
◼
►
please don't share screenshots of this with anybody.
02:29:33
◼
►
Please don't show this to people who aren't on the beta.
02:29:35
◼
►
Like, please try to keep this under wraps.
02:29:37
◼
►
And every single time it's been bigger
02:29:39
◼
►
than my group of friends that I did this beta with,
02:29:42
◼
►
people leak it.
02:29:43
◼
►
Because, and it's not that they're trying to be devious,
02:29:45
◼
►
they just don't read the directions.
02:29:47
◼
►
And they think it's okay,
02:29:48
◼
►
or they want to show it off or whatever else.
02:29:49
◼
►
So I just didn't want that.
02:29:51
◼
►
Like there was enough new stuff in this visually
02:29:55
◼
►
that I did not want anybody sharing a screenshot
02:29:57
◼
►
before I emailed it to the world.
02:29:59
◼
►
And whether you think it's a valid excuse or not,
02:30:03
◼
►
that was the reason.
02:30:04
◼
►
And I knew I could trust this group of people
02:30:07
◼
►
to be attentive to that and to be trustworthy of that,
02:30:10
◼
►
so I tested it just with trusted friends.
02:30:12
◼
►
And I found the number of bugs that you find
02:30:16
◼
►
with larger groups of people actually isn't that much more.
02:30:19
◼
►
- I don't think so either.
02:30:20
◼
►
That's my experience. - It really isn't.
02:30:22
◼
►
- I think the only way you could do it is do a public beta,
02:30:24
◼
►
and then you will shake out more bugs in the aggregate,
02:30:28
◼
►
but then you're completely blowing any kind of secrecy
02:30:31
◼
►
'cause it's a public beta.
02:30:32
◼
►
- Yeah, exactly, and you kinda can't do that on iOS.
02:30:35
◼
►
Like, that is kinda what I simulated
02:30:36
◼
►
with my test flight invitation form
02:30:39
◼
►
and with those previous tests, but it's, yeah.
02:30:42
◼
►
It basically is, like, now I would do it
02:30:46
◼
►
for a bug fix update because now, like,
02:30:48
◼
►
there's nothing secret for the next few releases.
02:30:50
◼
►
The next few releases are gonna be bug fixes
02:30:52
◼
►
and minor feature additions.
02:30:53
◼
►
So, like, I would consider doing it now,
02:30:54
◼
►
but now it's not necessary anymore.
02:30:56
◼
►
I really have found that keeping the beta small
02:30:58
◼
►
is the way to go.
02:30:59
◼
►
So anyway, fixed a couple of bugs.
02:31:01
◼
►
- We had about 60 with Vesper, and our rule was,
02:31:03
◼
►
I'm looking at the list right now,
02:31:04
◼
►
'cause we put them in the credits.
02:31:06
◼
►
I would say out of the 60, at least 40 of them
02:31:08
◼
►
are people who I would give my wallet to.
02:31:10
◼
►
And our general, but that was like our general rule.
02:31:12
◼
►
And the other 20 are ones that either Brent or Dave
02:31:16
◼
►
would vouch for, you know, but the rule was
02:31:18
◼
►
if you wanted somebody on the beta,
02:31:19
◼
►
you'd have to be someone that you would verify
02:31:21
◼
►
you'd trust with your wallet.
02:31:23
◼
►
- Yeah, exactly.
02:31:24
◼
►
And again, the benefit of having a lot more people on that
02:31:28
◼
►
than that on a beta is fairly small.
02:31:31
◼
►
It's severely diminishing returns.
02:31:33
◼
►
So yeah, it was fine.
02:31:34
◼
►
So anyway, I fixed all those bugs in a release
02:31:37
◼
►
that went through today.
02:31:38
◼
►
I created one also major bug during that release,
02:31:41
◼
►
which is that now you can't create new playlists anymore.
02:31:45
◼
►
So I have to fix that.
02:31:46
◼
►
But otherwise, besides those things,
02:31:51
◼
►
it's actually been great.
02:31:52
◼
►
The servers haven't collapsed or anything.
02:31:55
◼
►
Everything's pretty stable there.
02:31:56
◼
►
So yeah, so far so good.
02:31:58
◼
►
- I uncovered that bug while we were talking
02:32:00
◼
►
about this earlier and I didn't want to tell you.
02:32:02
◼
►
I didn't want to-- - The create playlist bug?
02:32:04
◼
►
- Yeah, there's no save button.
02:32:07
◼
►
- Yeah, that's a tough one.
02:32:09
◼
►
- That's all right.
02:32:10
◼
►
- That's all right.
02:32:11
◼
►
Probably by the time that you actually publish this episode,
02:32:14
◼
►
it might even be fixed.
02:32:15
◼
►
- That's probably a good one. - 'Cause I'm probably gonna
02:32:16
◼
►
have to issue an update tomorrow to fix that one
02:32:18
◼
►
and hope it gets through App Review somewhat quickly.
02:32:20
◼
►
I feel kind of I feel kind of guilty putting through like something in app review two days in a row
02:32:25
◼
►
But I feel like they've got the wheels to turn it over there where that's not you shouldn't feel guilty
02:32:31
◼
►
It seems like they've just got you know, they've really upped up the capacity
02:32:35
◼
►
I mean, I've heard because like I'm not requesting fast reviews like they just happen to be going through quickly
02:32:40
◼
►
Yeah, yeah, I think especially if you don't request an expedited review just just fix it however often you want
02:32:47
◼
►
Yeah, I feel like I'd be like put on some like bad list, you know, I don't like every day for a while
02:32:53
◼
►
I don't know maybe if it kept up for a very long time
02:32:55
◼
►
But even then it might be more like let's make sure this guy isn't do anything suspicious. Yeah, that's true
02:33:01
◼
►
Well Marco, thank you for your time
02:33:04
◼
►
Thank you. Everybody can listen to your the dulcet tones of your voice on a very regular weekly basis at
02:33:11
◼
►
ATP FM which is literally my favorite podcast
02:33:18
◼
►
I do notice, though, you cheat, and it
02:33:20
◼
►
sorts to the top of the list in Overcast.
02:33:25
◼
►
You would not believe how many people think that--
02:33:30
◼
►
well, I mean, it's not a lot of people.
02:33:31
◼
►
You think that ATP is first because it's the shares?
02:33:35
◼
►
I do get the occasional angry email or one-star App Store
02:33:40
◼
►
review from people who think that the entire reason I made
02:33:45
◼
►
overcast was to promote my own podcast and that that's why it shows up in the most recommended
02:33:51
◼
►
list sometimes that I've hard coded it to appear there.
02:33:55
◼
►
Oh, did I tell you I'm changing the name of my show?
02:33:59
◼
►
AAA talk show.
02:34:02
◼
►
Like the yellow pages.
02:34:03
◼
►
AAA talk show.
02:34:04
◼
►
AAA talk show.
02:34:06
◼
►
Oh, I wanted that.
02:34:07
◼
►
That reminds me.
02:34:08
◼
►
That's amazing that you said that.
02:34:09
◼
►
I want I have I have some follow up from like an episode 10 weeks ago on ATP.
02:34:15
◼
►
You were confused about minor league baseball and why single A and double A. Yes. Triple A.
02:34:22
◼
►
It's just more A's are better. So why aren't the major leagues quadruple A?
02:34:28
◼
►
They are in concept. You could think of them as...
02:34:34
◼
►
My whole question was like why is triple A like the top tier in video game budget terms?
02:34:41
◼
►
Right. But like this kind of minor league thing in baseball?
02:34:44
◼
►
Yeah, I think that it's a different I think that I don't know that's actually a good question on the video games
02:34:49
◼
►
I suspect that the triple-a for video games has absolutely nothing to do with baseball that it doesn't come from baseball that it's some other
02:34:56
◼
►
Some other route so are there single-a and double-a teams? Yes, they're single-a
02:35:02
◼
►
Which is really regional and then double-a is a little bit bigger triple-a is is elite
02:35:08
◼
►
it's people most of the people on a triple-a team are the
02:35:14
◼
►
or at least have the potential to play Major League Baseball.
02:35:17
◼
►
And then you can think of Major League Baseball
02:35:19
◼
►
as Quadruple-A baseball, but nobody calls it that.
02:35:23
◼
►
Nobody ever would, 'cause it's not minor league.
02:35:25
◼
►
- What are the Columbus Clippers?
02:35:27
◼
►
- I have no idea.
02:35:28
◼
►
And there's also-- - Oh, it says Triple-A.
02:35:30
◼
►
- There's also-- - They're all Triple-A
02:35:31
◼
►
affiliated with the Cleveland Indians.
02:35:32
◼
►
- There's also independent leagues, which are,
02:35:37
◼
►
so I believe it's the case, I could be wrong,
02:35:39
◼
►
but I believe it's the case that every single A,
02:35:41
◼
►
AA and AAA team is affiliated with a major league team.
02:35:46
◼
►
So like the Yankees own a AAA team and a AA team
02:35:50
◼
►
and an A team.
02:35:51
◼
►
But then there's independent leagues
02:35:52
◼
►
which aren't affiliated with a major league team.
02:35:56
◼
►
I think right over the river here in Philly,
02:35:58
◼
►
the Trenton, whatever they're called,
02:36:01
◼
►
Land Sharks or Rat Sharks or whatever the hell
02:36:03
◼
►
they're called are unaffiliated.
02:36:05
◼
►
- The Rat Sharks, that's it, yeah.
02:36:06
◼
►
- Yeah, they're an independent team.
02:36:09
◼
►
And so they're not affiliated with a major league team.
02:36:11
◼
►
So, but they, they, they, some of them are like single A and some of them are even like
02:36:18
◼
►
double A they say, but for the most part, they're, they're just players who are having
02:36:22
◼
►
trouble getting picked up by a major league team.
02:36:24
◼
►
Anyway, I figured I'd explain that to you.
02:36:28
◼
►
I actually, I didn't realize that, that like they weren't just all triple A. No, like I'm
02:36:31
◼
►
seeing now like, like the only two teams I know of are the Columbus Clippers.
02:36:34
◼
►
Cause that's, that was my team growing up in Columbus.
02:36:36
◼
►
Like we'd go there like on school field trips cause it costs nothing and they actually are
02:36:41
◼
►
AAA apparently associated with the Indians and then now that I'm in New York the nearest team
02:36:47
◼
►
I think of this of this caliber is the Long Island Ducks
02:36:50
◼
►
which are apparently independent there in the
02:36:53
◼
►
The Liberty division of the Atlantic League of Professional Baseball, which is not affiliated with the MLB
02:36:59
◼
►
Here to have no A's
02:37:02
◼
►
They don't have any days. No a baseball team. It's not Trenton. It's Camden. It's the Camden River Sharks
02:37:09
◼
►
You were close. Yeah. Yeah the Trenton rat sharks close enough. Yeah
02:37:12
◼
►
What I love about these games like cuz I don't you know, I I wish I cared about sports
02:37:17
◼
►
I really do and because I like I know the rules of all the games
02:37:20
◼
►
I just don't care about the teams and so I don't get into it. But like I I like the
02:37:25
◼
►
Experience of seeing a game in person with friends who care about it
02:37:29
◼
►
Like that's a that's a nice thing to do
02:37:31
◼
►
And so I love triple-a baseball because you can go to these stadiums with basically no advanced notice whatsoever
02:37:37
◼
►
You can get amazing seats for almost no money
02:37:39
◼
►
And you can go have a really good time and you can watch a game
02:37:43
◼
►
With great seats and everything and you know, the food is not exorbitant
02:37:47
◼
►
or relatively speaking and you know
02:37:50
◼
►
You just have a really nice time and it's much less of an ordeal and much less expensive and much better quality of
02:37:55
◼
►
Like, you know your seats and everything compared to a major league game as long as you don't care about teams
02:38:01
◼
►
Which I don't so it's perfect
02:38:04
◼
►
Yeah, the Camden River Sharks. I've gone to see them a couple times with Jonas and you can go in for like three bucks and
02:38:09
◼
►
front row and then you get and it's even cooler if the kids are you know, like a younger age
02:38:16
◼
►
like when Jonas was playing Little League when he was a little younger because then it's like after the game you can get autographs from
02:38:20
◼
►
The players and stuff like that and you know, it seems super cool. It's like holy cow
02:38:24
◼
►
This guy was out there playing professional baseball 15 minutes ago. Now he's signing my hat. You can't get that in a major
02:38:30
◼
►
Here's it. Here's a Quora answer. Why are big-budget games called triple-a?
02:38:33
◼
►
This seems this seems pretty credible. I mean although is always the best
02:38:37
◼
►
Way back in the old days games in old days studios had a B and C titles in the catalog a games were made in-house
02:38:45
◼
►
with your developers and they were your main products the B titles were either add-on content for your a titles or
02:38:51
◼
►
new but slightly more humble games created by third-party developers that you
02:38:56
◼
►
Would specify and then C titles were the older classic SK use now reduced to a value price or small games people brought in and?
02:39:03
◼
►
a nearly finished state to be published, even non-game add-ons like Screensavers and stuff
02:39:11
◼
►
And of course, the industry is full of hyperbole and bluster, so everything was new, was bigger
02:39:15
◼
►
and better, and so the biggest A titles eventually began to be described as AA, or A+ to emphasize
02:39:23
◼
►
that they were even better than A games.
02:39:26
◼
►
And it wasn't long until the AAA moniker arrived.
02:39:29
◼
►
like the number of blades in disposable razors. Watch for 5A games coming soon.
02:39:34
◼
►
That's a pretty good answer. Yeah, I find that to be a very good answer. A, B, and C,
02:39:40
◼
►
and then it went to double A just to plus it up a little bit. That's probably how minor
02:39:46
◼
►
league baseball got it too. Probably used to be the same thing, and then they have a
02:39:50
◼
►
better team and they say that. I will leave that as your homework this week to research
02:39:54
◼
►
that. All right, thank you, Marco. Thank you.