PodSearch

The Talk Show

182: ‘AAA Podcast’ With Marco Arment

 

00:00:00 ◼   ► It does kind of feel like like I just discovered Phil's in San Francisco once last year and

00:00:07 ◼   ► I'm probably never gonna go there again. Uh

00:00:10 ◼   ► guess what though I looked on the map and there is a Phil Z within a few blocks of

00:00:15 ◼   ► The San Jose Convention Center. Oh, yeah. All right

00:00:19 ◼   ► It's like not right across the street but it's probably about as close as the one

00:00:27 ◼   ► Just a couple blocks. That was a good place. That's I I do wonder how different the culture of Santa

00:00:34 ◼   ► I've never been to San Jose. Like I've been only only a handful of times in Silicon Valley at all and

00:00:40 ◼   ► and so San Jose is even less familiar to me than the rest of it and

00:00:45 ◼   ► But you've gone to a couple events here and there right? Yeah, including the only time I ever set foot in

00:00:51 ◼   ► In San Jose was the 2012

00:00:56 ◼   ► October event so it was a the one a month after the big iPhone event they did

00:01:00 ◼   ► iPads and I think that was when the current form factor of the iMac debuted with the thin side not yet retina

00:01:09 ◼   ► Of course, yeah and was the last public

00:01:12 ◼   ► Event Apple held while Scott for stall was was an executive

00:01:17 ◼   ► Yeah, that was that was I remember so I still remember like the day that that he was officially announced as being out

00:01:25 ◼   ► We were actually Tiff and I were in vacation in Seattle. I was like in this weird clothing store with her like killing time my phone

00:01:31 ◼   ► I'm trying to catch up on what the heck just happened. Everyone was exploding about it. It's pretty cool. Yeah

00:01:35 ◼   ► No, so speaking of our of our IMAX though

00:01:39 ◼   ► I have a bone to pick with you about because I believe that that you and I have the same

00:01:44 ◼   ► 2014 first gen 5k iMac, correct

00:01:47 ◼   ► Does yours have problems with image retention? No

00:01:53 ◼   ► You're lucky either that or apparently I don't see it

00:01:57 ◼   ► It's possible that maybe I you know, maybe if my eyes were what they used to be

00:02:01 ◼   ► I would see it, but it doesn't seem here's here's why here's why you would see it in particular

00:02:05 ◼   ► because the the most common place I see it this this just started happening over the last few months and

00:02:12 ◼   ► And it's I know exactly what you're gonna say

00:02:14 ◼   ► Yeah, exactly. It just started happening over the last few months and it's getting worse quickly

00:02:19 ◼   ► And so what happens is, I'm not talking about burn-in,

00:02:22 ◼   ► like on Plasma TV, you have something burned in forever.

00:02:25 ◼   ► I'm talking about LCD image retention,

00:02:26 ◼   ► where basically you kind of see the ghost image

00:02:30 ◼   ► of what was there before for a few minutes,

00:02:33 ◼   ► and it fades over a minute or two.

00:02:36 ◼   ► So if you have something high contrast up

00:02:39 ◼   ► for five or 10 minutes, say.

00:02:41 ◼   ► So for instance, when you're podcasting,

00:02:42 ◼   ► and you have a couple windows up that might have

00:02:44 ◼   ► text notes or the Skype window or whatever else,

00:02:47 ◼   ► and then you go to your web browser

00:02:48 ◼   ► and you load a dark gray website,

00:02:52 ◼   ► then you will see the shadows of your formerly in those spots

00:02:57 ◼   ► black and white windows.

00:02:59 ◼   ► You will see those very clearly against the gray background

00:03:02 ◼   ► of the website you're looking at.

00:03:04 ◼   ► Yeah, it's like 4a5--

00:03:05 ◼   ► So this almost always gets me.

00:03:07 ◼   ► 4a5, 2, 5a.

00:03:09 ◼   ► Exactly.

00:03:10 ◼   ► On my previous display-- and it was ancient.

00:03:14 ◼   ► I used to talk about it on a podcast.

00:03:16 ◼   ► But before getting this 5K iMac, what was that,

00:03:21 ◼   ► like two and a half years ago now, I guess?

00:03:23 ◼   ► - Yeah, something like that. - Yeah.

00:03:24 ◼   ► - I was using a 20 inch Apple Cinema Display,

00:03:28 ◼   ► not 24 inch, 20 inch from, oh geez,

00:03:32 ◼   ► must be like 2000 or 2002 or something.

00:03:35 ◼   ► I mean, I don't know, it was really,

00:03:37 ◼   ► maybe it wasn't quite that old,

00:03:38 ◼   ► but it was really pretty old.

00:03:39 ◼   ► And I was sort of in a Syracuse's situation

00:03:44 ◼   ► where I-- it was long past the point where I could have easily

00:03:49 ◼   ► afforded to replace it.

00:03:51 ◼   ► And there were all sorts of good options I could have bought.

00:03:53 ◼   ► But I was sort of hoping for something retina forever

00:03:57 ◼   ► and ever and ever.

00:03:58 ◼   ► And so I just kept putting it off.

00:03:59 ◼   ► It's like, there's no way I'm spending $1,000 on an apple.

00:04:02 ◼   ► Even no matter how--

00:04:03 ◼   ► I guess they were 30 inch for a while,

00:04:05 ◼   ► and then they went to 27 inch.

00:04:06 ◼   ► But I just didn't feel like buying it not to have retina,

00:04:10 ◼   ► knowing that retina would come out any year now.

00:04:12 ◼   ► For years and years and years.

00:04:13 ◼   ► So my, I was using, and that display, after,

00:04:17 ◼   ► it must have been, it had to be at least 10 years old,

00:04:19 ◼   ► and I'd used it every day, had terrible image retention,

00:04:22 ◼   ► and I knew exactly where you were going

00:04:23 ◼   ► because my website was the number one culprit.

00:04:26 ◼   ► - Yeah, 'cause like most, if you're dealing

00:04:28 ◼   ► with other black and white windows,

00:04:30 ◼   ► you don't really see it as often,

00:04:31 ◼   ► but when you've had something black and white

00:04:33 ◼   ► up for a while, and then you switch to a large expanse

00:04:36 ◼   ► of gray, you see it very clearly,

00:04:38 ◼   ► and my initial thought is always,

00:04:41 ◼   ► I didn't realize that Safari was translucent.

00:04:43 ◼   ► - That's exactly what I thought.

00:04:44 ◼   ► - I always think it's like window translucency,

00:04:47 ◼   ► and I'm like, oh, that's a weird design decision.

00:04:49 ◼   ► Oh wait, that isn't a design decision.

00:04:50 ◼   ► - Right, when I first encountered it,

00:04:52 ◼   ► that's exactly what I thought,

00:04:53 ◼   ► is I thought that maybe at some point

00:04:54 ◼   ► I'd hit some kind of weird,

00:04:56 ◼   ► I'd diddled something in the terminal

00:04:58 ◼   ► with defaults right,

00:05:00 ◼   ► translucent, you know,

00:05:01 ◼   ► com.apples.safari/translucency=91,

00:05:06 ◼   ► or something like that.

00:05:08 ◼   ► - Right, exactly.

00:05:09 ◼   ► - 'Cause that's exactly what it looks like.

00:05:11 ◼   ► Sorry about that.

00:05:11 ◼   ► Now that now it's an iMac, and it's my main computer,

00:05:14 ◼   ► and so it's like, I don't want to send this thing

00:05:17 ◼   ► in for repair and not be with my main computer

00:05:19 ◼   ► for like two weeks or however long it takes

00:05:21 ◼   ► to get it actually fixed.

00:05:22 ◼   ► - Two and a half years under even daily use

00:05:24 ◼   ► seems like too soon, honestly.

00:05:26 ◼   ► - Yeah, and I don't know, and then it's like,

00:05:30 ◼   ► am I gonna get one that has just the same problem?

00:05:32 ◼   ► I'm always worried that they're not even gonna believe me

00:05:34 ◼   ► or that they're not gonna replace it

00:05:35 ◼   ► 'cause they don't think it's bad enough.

00:05:38 ◼   ► Even though I don't have a lot of basis

00:05:41 ◼   ► for those feelings, it's just like,

00:05:42 ◼   ► it's such a hassle to send away my main computer

00:05:46 ◼   ► for repair, especially 'cause it's large.

00:05:49 ◼   ► Like if it's a laptop, I could bring 'em to a Genius Bar

00:05:50 ◼   ► and maybe have something faster, maybe,

00:05:53 ◼   ► but like, because it's such an ordeal

00:05:55 ◼   ► to haul this thing anywhere and ship it anywhere,

00:05:58 ◼   ► I don't know.

00:05:59 ◼   ► My current plan is to just hope that they do something

00:06:03 ◼   ► with like an iMac Pro or a Mac Pro sometime this year

00:06:08 ◼   ► before my AppleCare runs out in October.

00:06:11 ◼   ► And then I can just buy the new one,

00:06:14 ◼   ► send this in for repair,

00:06:16 ◼   ► and then when I get it back from repair, sell it.

00:06:18 ◼   ► - Oh, if you've got AppleCare,

00:06:19 ◼   ► you should definitely do it,

00:06:20 ◼   ► although you have to be without it.

00:06:21 ◼   ► - But it's a pain, yeah.

00:06:22 ◼   ► It's like, I don't wanna switch

00:06:23 ◼   ► to my new crappy keyboard touch bar.

00:06:26 ◼   ► - You know I haven't bought it.

00:06:27 ◼   ► I haven't bought AppleCare since 1991.

00:06:29 ◼   ► - The only reason I bought it on this,

00:06:32 ◼   ► and I'm with you most of the time,

00:06:33 ◼   ► the only reason I bought it on this

00:06:34 ◼   ► is that AppleCare, the pricing is based

00:06:36 ◼   ► on these tiers of the product they apply to.

00:06:40 ◼   ► A $1,400 iMac has the same AppleCare cost

00:06:44 ◼   ► as a $4,500 fully loaded one.

00:06:47 ◼   ► - Right.

00:06:48 ◼   ► - And so, and I was buying the very first generation

00:06:51 ◼   ► of a new thing, of the 5K.

00:06:53 ◼   ► And so I thought, you know what,

00:06:54 ◼   ► it was only like 200 bucks or something.

00:06:56 ◼   ► It was not a lot of money for what was something

00:06:59 ◼   ► like a $4,400 configuration, 'cause I got really maxed out,

00:07:02 ◼   ► 'cause my main computer.

00:07:04 ◼   ► And I figure, you know what, the ratio there pays off.

00:07:06 ◼   ► I don't really get it for anything else,

00:07:08 ◼   ► but in cases where you're buying a really maxed out

00:07:10 ◼   ► config of something, it often does pay off

00:07:13 ◼   ► because it's such a low relative cost.

00:07:15 ◼   ► - I think we might have literally the same machine.

00:07:17 ◼   ► I know I maxed out the RAM, 32 gigs.

00:07:21 ◼   ► And I would have--

00:07:21 ◼   ► - If you have a terabyte.

00:07:22 ◼   ► - Right.

00:07:23 ◼   ► I think I have a terabyte drive,

00:07:26 ◼   ► 'cause I don't know why I wouldn't have bought it,

00:07:27 ◼   ► 'cause it's the only drive I keep attached most of the time.

00:07:30 ◼   ► I actually don't even know.

00:07:33 ◼   ► That's something.

00:07:34 ◼   ► (laughing)

00:07:35 ◼   ► Wow.

00:07:36 ◼   ► - It's gotta be a terabyte.

00:07:37 ◼   ► I don't see how I would be able to function

00:07:39 ◼   ► if it wasn't a terabyte.

00:07:41 ◼   ► And then what I get, the four gigahertz Intel Core i7.

00:07:44 ◼   ► - Yep, yeah, same thing.

00:07:46 ◼   ► Enjoy your wonderful screen.

00:07:49 ◼   ► You will know quickly if it ever becomes a problem.

00:07:51 ◼   ► - Yes, it is a terabyte drive.

00:07:53 ◼   ► 999.38 gigabytes, which is bullshit.

00:07:56 ◼   ► - Oh, you got ripped off.

00:07:57 ◼   ► You didn't get the full terabyte.

00:07:58 ◼   ► (laughing)

00:07:59 ◼   ► Yeah, oh boy.

00:08:01 ◼   ► I just hope I can fix this easily.

00:08:04 ◼   ► I don't know, ATP Tifster said that this was a problem

00:08:07 ◼   ► with the one that we have, the 2014,

00:08:09 ◼   ► but that they fixed it for the 2015 model,

00:08:12 ◼   ► which is still the current model.

00:08:14 ◼   ► But he also says they're gonna have new ones

00:08:15 ◼   ► like in March or whatever, who knows.

00:08:18 ◼   ► - Yeah, we can get to March soon.

00:08:19 ◼   ► We'll have to get to that.

00:08:22 ◼   ► Did you see-- - It kinda sounds like

00:08:23 ◼   ► Apple's gonna release like 15 things in March.

00:08:25 ◼   ► That's kind of what, like all the rumors are pointing to,

00:08:28 ◼   ► Like four iPads, new iMacs, new 12-inch MacBook One,

00:08:33 ◼   ► and new watch bands and who knows what on the software side,

00:08:38 ◼   ► new iPad stuff maybe.

00:08:40 ◼   ► I mean, there is such a giant list of things

00:08:43 ◼   ► that rumor people expect to be launched and marked.

00:08:45 ◼   ► It's kind of ridiculous.

00:08:47 ◼   ► - Did you see this?

00:08:48 ◼   ► I've been meaning to link to it,

00:08:49 ◼   ► and I haven't 'cause I forget why.

00:08:52 ◼   ► I think it might be because I can't find the guy's name.

00:08:54 ◼   ► You and I ran into the same thing

00:08:57 ◼   ► with somebody on Twitter recently,

00:08:58 ◼   ► that guy OMD or something like that, or?

00:09:02 ◼   ► - Yeah, yeah, he didn't have his name anywhere

00:09:04 ◼   ► on any of his stuff, and we both wanted to link to him

00:09:06 ◼   ► and name him, you know, like he's nice.

00:09:09 ◼   ► - Right, like I always--

00:09:11 ◼   ► - I think he didn't, he responded,

00:09:12 ◼   ► and it's not like he didn't want to be named,

00:09:14 ◼   ► like at least he gave only a first name

00:09:15 ◼   ► or something like that.

00:09:16 ◼   ► - I heard, and he said something like he's building

00:09:17 ◼   ► his brand on OMD or something like that,

00:09:19 ◼   ► and it's harder for me to link to somebody who's anonymous.

00:09:22 ◼   ► And the other thing that really gets me,

00:09:24 ◼   ► And I hate to say it to you, but it's true.

00:09:28 ◼   ► It seems like I link a lot less frequently anymore

00:09:31 ◼   ► to people who have Tumblr blogs, just anecdotally.

00:09:34 ◼   ► But back when Tumblr was sort of at its peak

00:09:36 ◼   ► as a blogging platform-- I'm not saying that Tumblr is

00:09:40 ◼   ► in decline, but I think it's in decline for the sort of blogging

00:09:44 ◼   ► that I tend to link to it during Fireball.

00:09:46 ◼   ► An awful lot of Tumblr sites don't

00:09:48 ◼   ► have the person's real name on.

00:09:51 ◼   ► It's just their Tumblr handle.

00:09:53 ◼   ► And that was always a big hassle for me,

00:09:55 ◼   ► and I'd have to figure out what their Twitter name was

00:09:57 ◼   ► and go to their Twitter page

00:09:59 ◼   ► and find their real name from there.

00:10:00 ◼   ► It didn't even seem like it was people

00:10:02 ◼   ► who were trying to hide their name.

00:10:03 ◼   ► It's just sort of idiomatic for Tumblr.

00:10:06 ◼   ► But anyway, there's this site here.

00:10:07 ◼   ► - No, and that was actually designed that way.

00:10:09 ◼   ► We meant it to be,

00:10:11 ◼   ► like it's the same way that one account

00:10:14 ◼   ► could have multiple blogs,

00:10:16 ◼   ► and that there would be no way to tell,

00:10:18 ◼   ► unless you put it there,

00:10:20 ◼   ► which blogs belong to which account.

00:10:22 ◼   ► - Right, right.

00:10:23 ◼   ► it was very easy to create anonymous things

00:10:26 ◼   ► that weren't tied to your main identity,

00:10:28 ◼   ► and that was very much intentional.

00:10:30 ◼   ► Because like everything else at the time,

00:10:32 ◼   ► keep in mind we made Tumblr as kind of a response

00:10:35 ◼   ► to Myspace and Facebook and the big social networks

00:10:39 ◼   ► that were big when we started it in 2006.

00:10:42 ◼   ► And so Twitter wasn't really,

00:10:43 ◼   ► Twitter existed but it wasn't big.

00:10:45 ◼   ► So it was really a response to those

00:10:46 ◼   ► that were all about getting your real name

00:10:48 ◼   ► and putting all your stuff out in public

00:10:50 ◼   ► under your real name.

00:10:51 ◼   ► And a lot of people can't or won't give their real name

00:10:56 ◼   ► for a lot of the stuff they want to do online.

00:10:57 ◼   ► And so you enable a lot more creativity

00:11:02 ◼   ► and different types of uses if you allow people

00:11:05 ◼   ► to be anonymous.

00:11:06 ◼   ► So that was kind of like the ethos from the beginning

00:11:08 ◼   ► of you can make a different blog, it's no risk,

00:11:11 ◼   ► it's not gonna look bad upon you.

00:11:14 ◼   ► This was before all the hate crap that we have today.

00:11:17 ◼   ► Today it might be a little bit different calculation there.

00:11:19 ◼   ► But back then, most of the hate was confined to these fringe forms and stuff, and they weren't really on Tumblr.

00:11:24 ◼   ► I don't even know what they are now. I don't think they are. But regardless, the idea of getting an anonymous identity out there very, very easily was quite a positive thing in 2006.

00:11:36 ◼   ► Anyway, I just sent you the link. It's to a guy named Thomas Verschorin at Verschorin.com.

00:11:42 ◼   ► He has a Twitter link, so I got his name from there. But anyway, he has an interesting speculation here that

00:11:47 ◼   ► it's purely his guess. He's not claiming any sort of sources.

00:11:52 ◼   ► But what he's saying is that when Apple made standalone displays, they tend to sell them for a long time.

00:11:57 ◼   ► The 27-inch LED display was on sale for three years. The 27-inch Thunderbolt display was on sale for five years.

00:12:03 ◼   ► for five years, I guess they're still selling it?

00:12:05 ◼   ► Or do they still sell that, right?

00:12:07 ◼   ► I don't even know.

00:12:08 ◼   ► - No, no, no, they just continued

00:12:10 ◼   ► like a year and a half ago or something.

00:12:11 ◼   ► - So you can't even buy an outdated Apple Display

00:12:14 ◼   ► at this point?

00:12:14 ◼   ► - No, I mean, you might be able to find somebody

00:12:16 ◼   ► who has one in stock, but they haven't sold them new

00:12:18 ◼   ► for a while. - Cancel.

00:12:19 ◼   ► So here's his guess, is his guess is that Apple

00:12:25 ◼   ► didn't wanna release a 5K standalone cinema display

00:12:28 ◼   ► back in October when they did all the new MacBooks

00:12:31 ◼   ► that could use them because they weren't yet ready

00:12:34 ◼   ► to sell one with True Tone,

00:12:36 ◼   ► because they don't have True Tone in the iMac either.

00:12:38 ◼   ► None of the desktop Macs do.

00:12:40 ◼   ► And so, as he says here, his conclusion,

00:12:42 ◼   ► if you were Apple, what would you choose to do?

00:12:44 ◼   ► Release an Apple 5K Cinema Display in 2016

00:12:48 ◼   ► and then sell it for a few years unchanged without True Tone

00:12:52 ◼   ► or push the LG display in 2016 as a stopgap

00:12:56 ◼   ► and release an Apple 5K True Tone display sometime in 2017.

00:13:01 ◼   ► So is anybody who's still holding onto a thread of hope

00:13:05 ◼   ► that Apple hasn't abandoned the standalone display game, which

00:13:08 ◼   ► I would not bet on.

00:13:09 ◼   ► I kind of suspect that they are done.

00:13:12 ◼   ► But there's a wee bit of sense here, in my opinion.

00:13:17 ◼   ► I mean, so the thing about they tend

00:13:19 ◼   ► to have these displays that last for a certain amount of time.

00:13:22 ◼   ► Throw that right out, doesn't matter.

00:13:23 ◼   ► It doesn't matter how long things have been out,

00:13:25 ◼   ► like five years.

00:13:26 ◼   ► This is a very small sample size.

00:13:28 ◼   ► Apple does not artificially hold things back

00:13:30 ◼   ► simply because the last one is only three years old

00:13:32 ◼   ► instead of four years old or whatever.

00:13:34 ◼   ► Like that's, this is too small of a correlation to matter

00:13:38 ◼   ► and that's not how they really work.

00:13:39 ◼   ► I think the only question here is

00:13:42 ◼   ► whether we believe that they would hold back this display

00:13:45 ◼   ► and go through the kind of,

00:13:48 ◼   ► and assume the LG display was perfect, which it isn't,

00:13:51 ◼   ► but assume the LG display was perfect,

00:13:52 ◼   ► they still took a big PR hit

00:13:55 ◼   ► in order to push that as the solution

00:13:57 ◼   ► and to have the idea out there

00:13:59 ◼   ► unchallenged for months and still so far that they are out of this display

00:14:03 ◼   ► business. Yeah but what if they had no choice? Is that more like is that

00:14:07 ◼   ► is that more likely than them wanting to save True Tone for the iMac? They don't

00:14:12 ◼   ► sell them any iMacs, they sell a lot more laptops. It would not surprise me if when

00:14:17 ◼   ► the Thunderbolt display that they just when they discontinued recently, that one

00:14:22 ◼   ► when it was new, it wouldn't surprise me if that outsold the iMac when it was new.

00:14:27 ◼   ► It might not, but they sell a lot of laptops.

00:14:31 ◼   ► And they sell a lot of these displays for laptops,

00:14:33 ◼   ► for their laptops.

00:14:35 ◼   ► And so I don't see them holding back something

00:14:39 ◼   ► that their customers very clearly want,

00:14:42 ◼   ► replacing a product that was incredibly out of date,

00:14:45 ◼   ► only for the purpose of one of its really minor features,

00:14:50 ◼   ► like jumping ahead of the iMac getting that same feature.

00:14:53 ◼   ► It doesn't seem like that would be important enough to them

00:14:55 ◼   ► to justify all the downsides of that strategy.

00:14:57 ◼   ► What if the original plan though was like a year in advance or well over a year ago

00:15:01 ◼   ► if they had hoped to also have 5k IMAX at the end of 2016 too with True Tone and the

00:15:08 ◼   ► whole thing just fell apart?

00:15:09 ◼   ► Maybe.

00:15:10 ◼   ► That's plausible but it just seems—

00:15:12 ◼   ► I'm not saying how likely it is but the whole thing seems plausible to me that it's

00:15:16 ◼   ► some sort of engineering/supply chain screw up or you know maybe screw up is too harsh

00:15:23 ◼   ► of a word but something didn't go according to plan and that's where they are.

00:15:26 ◼   ► I don't know.

00:15:27 ◼   ► I still love it.

00:15:28 ◼   ► I brought it up the other week on this show.

00:15:29 ◼   ► And there must be an awful lot of people

00:15:31 ◼   ► who listen to my show who don't listen to ATP,

00:15:33 ◼   ► because I got so much--

00:15:35 ◼   ► the best feedback I got was that the observation--

00:15:39 ◼   ► I got so much email about ripping off

00:15:41 ◼   ► Syracuse's observation from ATP, which I did credit him with,

00:15:45 ◼   ► that what does Apple plan to do in their beautiful new campus?

00:15:48 ◼   ► Stuff all of these--

00:15:49 ◼   ► which supposedly has a more open floor plan, where you'll see

00:15:53 ◼   ► more of your colleagues' desks.

00:15:55 ◼   ► Are they going to put one of these ugly LG monitors

00:15:59 ◼   ► on every single one of these Johnny Ive designed desks?

00:16:02 ◼   ► Like Johnny Ive is bought these off in the woods,

00:16:05 ◼   ► nailing desks together out of wood

00:16:08 ◼   ► that comes from one special brand of tree

00:16:10 ◼   ► that grows in northern Italy or something.

00:16:13 ◼   ► And they're going to put ugly LG monitors on all these desks?

00:16:18 ◼   ► And that's also a good counterargument.

00:16:20 ◼   ► But I think it's just as likely that you could just say,

00:16:23 ◼   ► well, their solution is just they're

00:16:24 ◼   ► you're gonna give most of their engineers and stuff,

00:16:26 ◼   ► like iMacs.

00:16:27 ◼   ► It really does seem like,

00:16:30 ◼   ► and again, this could be blown under the water

00:16:33 ◼   ► when Apple releases a brand new Mac Pro, iMac Pro,

00:16:35 ◼   ► whatever it is in July, but I think that's very unlikely.

00:16:38 ◼   ► I think if that was gonna happen,

00:16:40 ◼   ► we would have a lot more than casual speculation

00:16:42 ◼   ► about it by now.

00:16:43 ◼   ► The fact that there's nothing in the pipeline

00:16:46 ◼   ► to suggest that's happening makes me believe

00:16:48 ◼   ► it's definitely not happening this year, if ever.

00:16:51 ◼   ► And so I really do think it's very clear

00:16:53 ◼   ► that we all have wishful thinking

00:16:56 ◼   ► that goes in a different direction,

00:16:57 ◼   ► but the reality is it's most likely

00:17:00 ◼   ► that Apple really is out of the display business

00:17:02 ◼   ► and the Pro Desktop business and the Mac Mini business

00:17:06 ◼   ► and is really just gonna make the iMac and the MacBook Pro

00:17:09 ◼   ► their only computers going forward.

00:17:11 ◼   ► - I've heard that, I think I figured

00:17:13 ◼   ► if I've talked about this,

00:17:14 ◼   ► I've heard that there is a new Mac Pro in the pipeline,

00:17:17 ◼   ► but that it is, it sounds ridiculous,

00:17:21 ◼   ► but that it's effectively in a slot

00:17:24 ◼   ► where there's so many other machines,

00:17:26 ◼   ► whether they're Macs or other things,

00:17:27 ◼   ► that are getting testing and validation engineering

00:17:31 ◼   ► resources ahead of it,

00:17:33 ◼   ► that there's no way it's gonna ship by WWDC.

00:17:36 ◼   ► Which seems ridiculous, but.

00:17:38 ◼   ► - Well, yeah.

00:17:38 ◼   ► Even if they, I mean, here's the thing.

00:17:42 ◼   ► Most people who feel bad about Apple

00:17:47 ◼   ► because of the lack of Mac Pro updates at all,

00:17:50 ◼   ► they don't necessarily need it to ship at WDC.

00:17:53 ◼   ► I think what would calm a lot of fears, my own included,

00:17:56 ◼   ► would just be an acknowledgement and confirmation

00:17:59 ◼   ► that something else is coming.

00:18:01 ◼   ► Just confirmation, even if it's one of their BSE replies

00:18:04 ◼   ► to the press, keep an eye out, this space,

00:18:07 ◼   ► you know, whatever else, something.

00:18:10 ◼   ► And Tim Cook's little Q&A response

00:18:12 ◼   ► to that internal bulletin board thing a few months back,

00:18:14 ◼   ► that wasn't enough.

00:18:15 ◼   ► That was actually, in fact, making things worse, I think,

00:18:17 ◼   ► by kind of implying that the iMac was gonna be it,

00:18:20 ◼   ► going forward. That's all we really want here. But again, I just, it's what I want to be

00:18:27 ◼   ► true. I want there to be a new Mac Pro of some sort. And if it's shaped like an iMac,

00:18:34 ◼   ► and it has a built-in 5K screen, and it just has a Xeon processor in it with like a thicker

00:18:38 ◼   ► back for a bigger heatsink, that's fine. I'll take that. That actually sounds kind of nice

00:18:42 ◼   ► to me. It wouldn't be as ideal as standalone, because then I'd have the same problem I have

00:18:45 ◼   ► now when it gets image retention, and I have to send the whole thing in. But I'd take it.

00:18:49 ◼   ► It's better than nothing, that'd be great.

00:18:51 ◼   ► - Yeah, and it leads to weird situations.

00:18:54 ◼   ► I mean, again, better than nothing if they made an iMac Pro

00:18:57 ◼   ► and somehow put a Xeon in there and solved the heat problems

00:19:01 ◼   ► that that would, you know,

00:19:02 ◼   ► I say that's technically possible.

00:19:04 ◼   ► The biggest-- - Well, and I think

00:19:07 ◼   ► it's possible, although, talking to ATB Tipster

00:19:10 ◼   ► about this a little bit in our chat a few weeks ago,

00:19:12 ◼   ► he pointed out that the logic board in the iMac

00:19:15 ◼   ► faces the wrong way to really make that happen.

00:19:18 ◼   ► I think the CPU faces towards you when you're sitting at it.

00:19:21 ◼   ► And to drastically improve the heat capacity

00:19:25 ◼   ► to be able to cool a high-powered Xeon chip

00:19:27 ◼   ► to make it more Mac Pro class processing power,

00:19:30 ◼   ► you need to flip the whole logic board around,

00:19:31 ◼   ► which is kind of be like a redesign

00:19:33 ◼   ► on the level of a whole new iMac generation.

00:19:36 ◼   ► So the question is, would Apple really do that

00:19:39 ◼   ► for this relatively low volume,

00:19:42 ◼   ► I mean, I guess they designed a whole case before,

00:19:44 ◼   ► but it sure does seem like they couldn't possibly care less

00:19:49 ◼   ► about keeping the Mac Pro updated in any reasonable fashion.

00:19:52 ◼   ► And so it really, it's a pretty big question

00:19:55 ◼   ► whether they would basically redesign

00:19:57 ◼   ► the entire iMac enclosure and a whole new computer

00:20:01 ◼   ► just for this line that they haven't given two craps about

00:20:04 ◼   ► for three years.

00:20:05 ◼   ► - It's a real mystery.

00:20:07 ◼   ► I think it's possible, I think the iMac Pro is possible

00:20:11 ◼   ► or that they'll sell it as a Pro somehow.

00:20:14 ◼   ► I don't know.

00:20:15 ◼   ► But--

00:20:16 ◼   ► I hope-- I wish for it to be true, but I just don't see it.

00:20:19 ◼   ► But there's got to be a reason why they don't just

00:20:22 ◼   ► stop selling the Mac Pros.

00:20:23 ◼   ► There's some contingent within the company that's clearly

00:20:26 ◼   ► hoping for new Mac Pros.

00:20:28 ◼   ► Otherwise, it would be easier.

00:20:30 ◼   ► It would be easier, and they'd look less foolish

00:20:33 ◼   ► if they had canceled the Mac Pro like it last WWDC,

00:20:36 ◼   ► if they had just said, hey, these new iMacs are so great,

00:20:38 ◼   ► that it's all that-- the time for the standalone is gone,

00:20:43 ◼   ► whatever, people would disagree, obviously,

00:20:45 ◼   ► and there'd be people who'd be heartbroken,

00:20:47 ◼   ► and there'd be people who were furious,

00:20:48 ◼   ► but at least Apple wouldn't look foolish, right?

00:20:51 ◼   ► - Yeah, 'cause it really looks bad now.

00:20:53 ◼   ► Like, it really, the situation now is

00:20:55 ◼   ► egregiously bad.

00:20:58 ◼   ► It's kind of embarrassing.

00:21:00 ◼   ► - It's hard to believe.

00:21:01 ◼   ► It's really kind of hard to believe how old it is.

00:21:03 ◼   ► It really is.

00:21:04 ◼   ► And still my biggest regret is that I didn't ask Schiller

00:21:08 ◼   ► about it on stage last year, and I had the card.

00:21:10 ◼   ► I had it on a card, and I did not.

00:21:14 ◼   ► Some people understand, but it's so hard

00:21:16 ◼   ► to keep that thing going live.

00:21:18 ◼   ► And it's my one and only regret from that whole show.

00:21:22 ◼   ► The year before, when Schiller was on the first time,

00:21:25 ◼   ► I had way more regrets afterwards.

00:21:26 ◼   ► And I felt like my self-criticism really helped,

00:21:30 ◼   ► and I did a better job last year.

00:21:31 ◼   ► But my one-- oh, I can't believe it.

00:21:35 ◼   ► And now look at this.

00:21:36 ◼   ► We're already at the point where WWDC has been announced again,

00:21:39 ◼   ► and it still hasn't been answered.

00:21:41 ◼   ► And the one reason why I put it at a lower priority at first,

00:21:45 ◼   ► and then towards the end when I was wrapping up,

00:21:47 ◼   ► I was flipping through the cards I had left,

00:21:50 ◼   ► and I didn't see that one, which I might have,

00:21:53 ◼   ► is like a last question.

00:21:54 ◼   ► But the reason I originally had it lower in the stack

00:21:57 ◼   ► was I thought, well, they've got to do something in September,

00:21:59 ◼   ► right?

00:22:00 ◼   ► [LAUGHTER]

00:22:04 ◼   ► Yeah.

00:22:04 ◼   ► I can get them on the record now,

00:22:06 ◼   ► It's only for the next two, three months.

00:22:09 ◼   ► So anyway, I don't know.

00:22:10 ◼   ► - Well, and it's hard.

00:22:12 ◼   ► When you're in a situation like what you're doing

00:22:15 ◼   ► with these executive interviews, it's hard.

00:22:18 ◼   ► And we got a little bit of this from when ATP interviewed

00:22:22 ◼   ► Chris Lattner a few weeks ago.

00:22:23 ◼   ► - Which was great, by the way.

00:22:25 ◼   ► - And we had a couple people ask us afterwards

00:22:28 ◼   ► on Twitter and email and stuff,

00:22:29 ◼   ► why didn't you ask me about the Mac Pro?

00:22:31 ◼   ► - Oh, you can't.

00:22:34 ◼   ► Yeah, it's like, A, even if he knew about Mac Pro stuff,

00:22:39 ◼   ► you know, you're not gonna answer that.

00:22:41 ◼   ► And B, the guy who writes the compiler

00:22:44 ◼   ► probably has no clue about what the Mac Pro hardware team

00:22:47 ◼   ► is doing and what might or might not be released

00:22:49 ◼   ► in that department.

00:22:50 ◼   ► Like, it's a big company.

00:22:51 ◼   ► And so like, anyway, your context,

00:22:54 ◼   ► like interviewing Schiller on stage,

00:22:55 ◼   ► like, it's tough to know whether you should bust out

00:23:00 ◼   ► a question like that which is slightly antagonizing

00:23:03 ◼   ► and really puts them on the spot.

00:23:06 ◼   ► 'Cause like, there's a very good chance

00:23:09 ◼   ► that you would just get like a non-answer,

00:23:12 ◼   ► you know, just like a nice PR-friendly non-answer,

00:23:14 ◼   ► kind of like Tim Cook's post,

00:23:15 ◼   ► like we really love desktops,

00:23:17 ◼   ► we have great desktops coming in the future,

00:23:18 ◼   ► you know, like stuff like that.

00:23:19 ◼   ► And that's not very helpful,

00:23:21 ◼   ► and then you've just like shifted the tone of the interview

00:23:24 ◼   ► in a way that now they are on edge

00:23:27 ◼   ► or are less likely to go to you in the future.

00:23:29 ◼   ► So it's a tricky balance.

00:23:32 ◼   ► So I don't blame you for not asking that last year.

00:23:34 ◼   ► - No, but it wasn't because I thought it was--

00:23:35 ◼   ► - I wouldn't blame you for not asking it this year.

00:23:36 ◼   ► - Yeah, this year it would have to happen.

00:23:38 ◼   ► - This year's gonna be the first question you ask.

00:23:40 ◼   ► - Yeah, but watch, I'll end up getting,

00:23:43 ◼   ► I don't know, somebody that has nothing to do

00:23:46 ◼   ► with Mac hardware or something like that.

00:23:48 ◼   ► (laughing)

00:23:50 ◼   ► - You can get Chris Ladder.

00:23:51 ◼   ► - Right, like all of a sudden

00:23:52 ◼   ► Schiller doesn't return my calls.

00:23:53 ◼   ► No, I would have, 'cause there's ways to ask it,

00:23:58 ◼   ► and I feel like that's something that I,

00:24:01 ◼   ► maybe why I've gotten to this position where I can do this,

00:24:04 ◼   ► is where I can ask the question, but do it in a way that's not

00:24:07 ◼   ► confrontational.

00:24:09 ◼   ► I mean, the framing I would have used is, look,

00:24:11 ◼   ► this audience in particular is largely

00:24:15 ◼   ► comprised of people who use Xcode, which

00:24:16 ◼   ► is one of the apps where every bit of CPU power

00:24:21 ◼   ► can really help at times.

00:24:24 ◼   ► And we're in this transition moving towards from Objective-C

00:24:29 ◼   ► to Swift.

00:24:29 ◼   ► Swift, I think it's fair to say, is more taxing on the CPU than Objective-C. It seems like

00:24:35 ◼   ► the Swift compiler is, you know, you can write Swift code that takes a lot longer to compile,

00:24:40 ◼   ► but whatever, it certainly isn't easy to compile. And there's just a general sentiment that

00:24:47 ◼   ► Apple's priorities for pro hardware in general are lower than they used to be. The Mac Pro

00:24:56 ◼   ► is I don't know, whatever it was, 900 days old at this time,

00:24:59 ◼   ► after an incredibly splashy debut.

00:25:02 ◼   ► What the heck is going on here?

00:25:03 ◼   ► I don't think that is making-- it's not

00:25:06 ◼   ► like I'm putting him on the spot.

00:25:07 ◼   ► And he can easily say-- and maybe that's all he would have

00:25:10 ◼   ► said is, hey, we love you guys.

00:25:13 ◼   ► We got you.

00:25:14 ◼   ► But you know I can't talk about future stuff.

00:25:17 ◼   ► I don't have anything to say about it.

00:25:18 ◼   ► And then that's the end of it.

00:25:22 ◼   ► So it's possible, but at least I would have asked.

00:25:24 ◼   ► Yeah.

00:25:26 ◼   ► Anyway, there's always there's always future executive podcast interviews live at everybody. I loved the latner interview, by the way

00:25:32 ◼   ► I don't I it was really and especially for a show that

00:25:35 ◼   ► Almost never does interviews. I mean you guys never

00:25:41 ◼   ► I thought there was one a long time ago or no, I guess you guys swapped you guys swapped with another show

00:25:47 ◼   ► Yeah, we had John trade spots with Christina Warren right for one episode

00:25:50 ◼   ► Which actually turned out really nice, but it wasn't really an interview show

00:25:52 ◼   ► It's just like she just was another host on our show for that episode, right?

00:25:55 ◼   ► You know, I thought that for a show that has an established rhythm between the three of you

00:26:00 ◼   ► in which really none of it is really interview style and there's an incredible comfort level between your

00:26:06 ◼   ► personalities to have somebody new on and

00:26:09 ◼   ► Do a three-way interview where it eats all three of you asked good questions

00:26:14 ◼   ► I thought it was really impressive because that's hard to do because it was a really different show. Yeah

00:26:20 ◼   ► It's like all of a sudden instead of driving a car you're you're riding bicycles or something

00:26:23 ◼   ► Yeah, it was a lot of fun though and Chris was you know

00:26:28 ◼   ► He made it easy on us like he wasn't like a prima donna about anything and you know

00:26:32 ◼   ► Just really easy to work with and a super nice guy. That was a lot of fun. Yeah, he is it's you know, it's

00:26:38 ◼   ► You know, it's obviously not true from top to bottom

00:26:40 ◼   ► But it is generally true that Apple tends to attract very nice people. There are yeah

00:26:48 ◼   ► You know, I mean Federighi is a great example where you know, I don't know what he's like in real personal life

00:26:52 ◼   ► But you know like backstage and stuff like that and when you see him at WWDC and and people come up and and you know

00:26:59 ◼   ► Just random attendees are like, hey, can I get a selfie or whatever?

00:27:02 ◼   ► He stops and talks for you know, five minutes with them and asks what they're doing

00:27:05 ◼   ► He he comes across like talking to a group of five

00:27:09 ◼   ► You know first time in WWDC at WWDC attendees wearing the WWDC jacket

00:27:16 ◼   ► He comes across exactly with the same demeanor that he has on stage. So like that affection that people seem to have for him

00:27:21 ◼   ► It's true. That seems to be his personality and Latiners exactly that type of personalities

00:27:26 ◼   ► He's you know, just just a nice guy

00:27:28 ◼   ► Yeah, did I ever did I tell you about last year WC when I visited apples and Facebook's campuses in the same day? Yeah

00:27:36 ◼   ► It all sort of blurs together

00:27:39 ◼   ► I remember you doing it, but I don't remember what the details were really interesting like so

00:27:43 ◼   ► - Yeah, in both cases, me and Casey

00:27:47 ◼   ► and a couple other friends, we had a friend

00:27:50 ◼   ► at each company that wanted to just give us

00:27:53 ◼   ► a quick tour, let us in, and show us around,

00:27:55 ◼   ► and stuff like that, and Apple, I only saw

00:27:57 ◼   ► the center courtyard and Cafe Max,

00:28:01 ◼   ► 'cause you can't bring people into the buildings,

00:28:03 ◼   ► really, there.

00:28:04 ◼   ► - Frowned upon.

00:28:06 ◼   ► - Yeah, exactly, so I didn't see any actual offices,

00:28:09 ◼   ► but I was able to see the courtyard and hang out

00:28:11 ◼   ► and have lunch with everybody there,

00:28:13 ◼   ► and we had lunch with something like 15 people

00:28:15 ◼   ► at this giant table.

00:28:16 ◼   ► So I got to meet a lot of people there

00:28:18 ◼   ► and hang out for a good amount of time

00:28:20 ◼   ► and they have pretty good coffee at Apple,

00:28:21 ◼   ► even at Cafe Max, I gotta say.

00:28:23 ◼   ► And kind of get a feel for the vibe of the campus,

00:28:27 ◼   ► even though I didn't see any offices.

00:28:28 ◼   ► And then a couple hours later we went to Facebook

00:28:31 ◼   ► and I had never been to either of these campuses before.

00:28:34 ◼   ► I had been to the Apple retail store,

00:28:36 ◼   ► but I'd never gone through the doors into the courtyard.

00:28:40 ◼   ► And I'm actually not sure I was allowed to.

00:28:42 ◼   ► They have some kind of weird rules about bloggers,

00:28:44 ◼   ► but I think I'm just under--

00:28:46 ◼   ► like, I'm not really officially Apple Press in any capacity.

00:28:49 ◼   ► I never have been.

00:28:50 ◼   ► And so I think that's why it wasn't a problem

00:28:52 ◼   ► that I was there.

00:28:53 ◼   ► Because I had a friend who tried to go--

00:28:56 ◼   ► who was Apple Press and was not allowed in.

00:28:58 ◼   ► So that was interesting.

00:29:00 ◼   ► But anyway, so seeing Apple and then seeing Facebook

00:29:07 ◼   ► could not have been two more different company culture

00:29:11 ◼   ► environments, at least visibly from these brief visits I did. And Facebook, I just

00:29:18 ◼   ► felt horrible the whole time I was there. Like, I felt kind of creeped out and

00:29:23 ◼   ► intimidated by just how bizarre and kind of intense, high energy but not high

00:29:30 ◼   ► positive energy it seemed to be. Like, just really like, I don't know, it's hard to

00:29:36 ◼   ► explain. I really did, I really got a very bad feeling from Facebook. A

00:29:39 ◼   ► combination of like how does anybody get any work done here

00:29:43 ◼   ► and where are the adults and and it just didn't feel good. It

00:29:48 ◼   ► felt like a dysfunctional workaholic culture that was

00:29:51 ◼   ► hard to get any real work done in an in an environment. That's

00:29:54 ◼   ► kind of weirdly like like trapped in youth forever

00:29:58 ◼   ► bizarro college fantasy world and then Apple was so like calm

00:30:05 ◼   ► and adult and just like nicely like low key.

00:30:08 ◼   ► The people there were just like nice and calm.

00:30:11 ◼   ► And it kind of felt like, oh, this is where the adults work.

00:30:14 ◼   ► Like this is like where people come

00:30:17 ◼   ► to actually do serious work.

00:30:19 ◼   ► And it was a much, it just,

00:30:21 ◼   ► whatever the environment actually is,

00:30:24 ◼   ► again, because I've never worked at these companies

00:30:26 ◼   ► and didn't even go inside the offices at Apple,

00:30:28 ◼   ► it's hard for me to really say this,

00:30:30 ◼   ► but it just felt like the little tiny windows

00:30:34 ◼   ► into these cultures I saw really just seemed like

00:30:37 ◼   ► Apple was the place where the nice, mature adults

00:30:41 ◼   ► go to work.

00:30:42 ◼   ► - Mm, I could see that.

00:30:43 ◼   ► I don't know.

00:30:45 ◼   ► It definitely seems like people who go to Apple,

00:30:48 ◼   ► company cultures attract like-minded people,

00:30:53 ◼   ► but it does seem to me, in general,

00:30:54 ◼   ► like when I've been there,

00:30:56 ◼   ► people know how to turn it off,

00:30:58 ◼   ► that when you're going to lunch

00:31:00 ◼   ► and they're gonna have lunch with a friend,

00:31:01 ◼   ► they're just having lunch with a friend.

00:31:04 ◼   ► - Right, yeah.

00:31:05 ◼   ► - Get back up to speed when they get back to work

00:31:07 ◼   ► or whatever.

00:31:08 ◼   ► - I mean, I'll tell you one thing.

00:31:10 ◼   ► I don't hear a lot of stories about Facebook and Apple

00:31:13 ◼   ► stealing talent from each other,

00:31:15 ◼   ► and maybe that's 'cause I don't really pay attention,

00:31:16 ◼   ► but I'll tell you one thing, seeing them both those places,

00:31:19 ◼   ► I cannot imagine that anybody who works for one

00:31:22 ◼   ► would want to work for the other in either direction.

00:31:25 ◼   ► Like, I don't think they're competing

00:31:26 ◼   ► for the same people at all.

00:31:28 ◼   ► - Yeah, I've never really heard that either.

00:31:30 ◼   ► I mean, and obviously at a certain level,

00:31:32 ◼   ► There's probably some like maybe like sysadmins

00:31:35 ◼   ► or something like that.

00:31:36 ◼   ► But, and you know what, there was that one team at Facebook

00:31:39 ◼   ► that was largely poached from Apple,

00:31:40 ◼   ► but now they're all dispersed, right?

00:31:42 ◼   ► They're gone.

00:31:43 ◼   ► The mic man is--

00:31:44 ◼   ► - All the designers, yeah, they bought a bunch of designers

00:31:45 ◼   ► for a while and then just slowly eroded their sanity

00:31:48 ◼   ► until they all quit.

00:31:49 ◼   ► - Right, and they built a very Apple-like beautiful system

00:31:53 ◼   ► and custom tools to support it with Facebook paper

00:31:55 ◼   ► or whatever they call, whether it was just paper

00:31:58 ◼   ► or Facebook paper or whatever.

00:31:59 ◼   ► - One of the names they stole, yeah, it's fine.

00:32:02 ◼   ► - Well, but you know what I mean.

00:32:04 ◼   ► It's a tough call because the paper app,

00:32:08 ◼   ► the other paper app, the one that you draw on,

00:32:10 ◼   ► was there first.

00:32:11 ◼   ► But it's the risk you take when you

00:32:13 ◼   ► pick a regular, a plain word is your app name.

00:32:17 ◼   ► - It seemed like for a while there,

00:32:19 ◼   ► Facebook was just gobbling up as much design talent

00:32:22 ◼   ► as they could at about the same time

00:32:23 ◼   ► that Google was gobbling up as much email talent

00:32:25 ◼   ► as they could.

00:32:26 ◼   ► And it seems like both of those have just kind of fizzled

00:32:28 ◼   ► and faded over the last year or so.

00:32:30 ◼   ► I haven't heard anything about them recently.

00:32:32 ◼   ► - I think in broad terms what happened

00:32:34 ◼   ► was that there was a period where Zuckerberg,

00:32:36 ◼   ► I think it coincides with,

00:32:38 ◼   ► 'cause if there's one, I don't get Facebook,

00:32:43 ◼   ► I've never signed up for it.

00:32:44 ◼   ► And so I'm not, it does feel foreign to me.

00:32:48 ◼   ► It feels like studying a foreign country.

00:32:51 ◼   ► But from my observations, it is clear,

00:32:54 ◼   ► I don't think there could be any question

00:32:55 ◼   ► that Zuckerberg has a tremendous gift for changing his mind.

00:32:59 ◼   ► People often said that about Steve Jobs.

00:33:02 ◼   ► Tim Cook has often, when he talks about working

00:33:05 ◼   ► with Steve Jobs, usually just talks about him

00:33:08 ◼   ► on a personal level, but if you can get him talking

00:33:10 ◼   ► about working, Tim Cook tells stories about his

00:33:14 ◼   ► absolutely amazing ability to change his mind.

00:33:16 ◼   ► But the Steve Jobs style is that when he comes in

00:33:19 ◼   ► with his mind change, he acts as though it was

00:33:21 ◼   ► his opinion all along.

00:33:22 ◼   ► And I think Bill Gates had some of that too, right?

00:33:26 ◼   ► Like when Bill Gates famously, like Microsoft

00:33:29 ◼   ► building this early '90s strategy to sort of do their own custom stuff for connecting

00:33:34 ◼   ► computers to each other. And then all of a sudden, Gates writes like a 10-page manifesto

00:33:39 ◼   ► that we've got to get on this internet thing. And all of a sudden, I mean, how long did

00:33:43 ◼   ► it take for Explorer to decimate Netscape? Didn't take long.

00:33:49 ◼   ► Yeah, but at the same time, they made an active desktop. So I don't know if that was a net

00:33:53 ◼   ► win.

00:33:54 ◼   ► I'm not saying that it was seamlessly executed. I'm just saying that we did change his mind.

00:33:59 ◼   ► And the broad strokes Facebook was a website.

00:34:04 ◼   ► It was a website you went to and you did all these things.

00:34:06 ◼   ► And the iPhone came out.

00:34:08 ◼   ► And an awful lot of products that

00:34:10 ◼   ► were popular websites in 2007 in the iPhone era

00:34:17 ◼   ► just weren't getting the engagement that things that

00:34:20 ◼   ► could be done as a native app got.

00:34:23 ◼   ► And--

00:34:23 ◼   ► Oh, yeah.

00:34:25 ◼   ► Not to go too far off into the weeds, but one reason

00:34:27 ◼   ► is that an awful lot of websites were built.

00:34:30 ◼   ► I don't think this is true anymore because mobile is--

00:34:32 ◼   ► I don't think anybody overlooks it.

00:34:34 ◼   ► But the back end of the website was inextricably tied

00:34:37 ◼   ► to the front end of the website.

00:34:39 ◼   ► And instead of having everything go through nice APIs,

00:34:42 ◼   ► even the front end of the website,

00:34:43 ◼   ► so that you could make clients for other devices,

00:34:47 ◼   ► like a native Mac client, or-- and people would say,

00:34:52 ◼   ► well, I forget.

00:34:52 ◼   ► You don't need a native Mac or Windows client.

00:34:54 ◼   ► We'll just go through the web browser.

00:34:55 ◼   ► And for a lot of things, for a lot of years, that was fine.

00:34:57 ◼   ► But then with the phone, that wasn't good enough.

00:34:59 ◼   ► And Facebook had an app that was largely just

00:35:02 ◼   ► a front end for HTML and JavaScript.

00:35:05 ◼   ► And then they seemed to get it.

00:35:06 ◼   ► And it's from Zuckerberg on down that, no, we

00:35:09 ◼   ► should do this with as much native stuff as we can.

00:35:12 ◼   ► This app is important.

00:35:13 ◼   ► This is more important than our website.

00:35:16 ◼   ► And that's around when he hired all those designers.

00:35:18 ◼   ► And I think there was sort of a look.

00:35:21 ◼   ► Apple's a company to look at.

00:35:23 ◼   ► they value A+ design talent, maybe we should too.

00:35:28 ◼   ► And then I think in the intervening years,

00:35:30 ◼   ► Facebook realized that that wasn't really

00:35:32 ◼   ► that important to them.

00:35:34 ◼   ► That the native part was, but the design caliber wasn't.

00:35:38 ◼   ► - Or rather, I think it seemed like there was

00:35:41 ◼   ► a lot of trouble, you know, like they were able

00:35:43 ◼   ► to get the talent, but just, you know,

00:35:45 ◼   ► by applying sheer force of will and lots of money,

00:35:48 ◼   ► they were able to get the talent.

00:35:49 ◼   ► But then the question is, well, what do you have,

00:35:50 ◼   ► all these incredibly talented people do at Facebook.

00:35:54 ◼   ► And that was, it seemed like they had a harder time

00:35:57 ◼   ► having a good answer to that question

00:35:59 ◼   ► and maintaining that over time.

00:36:01 ◼   ► But who knows, it's hard to keep good people interested

00:36:05 ◼   ► in working for a giant established product.

00:36:08 ◼   ► You know, like Apple has this problem too.

00:36:10 ◼   ► Like once you have something that's big and successful

00:36:12 ◼   ► and boring like Facebook or the iPhone,

00:36:14 ◼   ► it's hard to get people interested in working on that,

00:36:18 ◼   ► the same kind of people who would make something like that

00:36:19 ◼   ► 'cause they wanna go make something else.

00:36:21 ◼   ► - Yeah, I know Mike Mattis a little bit,

00:36:23 ◼   ► and I haven't spoken to him much since he left Facebook,

00:36:28 ◼   ► so I'm just sort of speculating here,

00:36:31 ◼   ► but I know from a couple of the people on the team

00:36:33 ◼   ► that they were used to being the A team at the company.

00:36:36 ◼   ► Mattis was, I think, I know he designed a whole bunch

00:36:40 ◼   ► of stuff in the original iPhone,

00:36:41 ◼   ► but I think he literally did the actual pixels

00:36:44 ◼   ► for the slide to unlock.

00:36:49 ◼   ► And if you're the person who designs both the visuals

00:36:53 ◼   ► and the interaction for a thing, doing Slide to Unlock

00:36:56 ◼   ► is pretty big.

00:36:57 ◼   ► Because I remember Steve Jobs actually demoed it

00:36:59 ◼   ► like three times.

00:37:00 ◼   ► He was like, that's so cool.

00:37:01 ◼   ► I'm going to do it again.

00:37:01 ◼   ► He locked the phone and did it again.

00:37:04 ◼   ► So when you're designing the feature that Steve Jobs

00:37:08 ◼   ► decides, I'm just going to do this three or four times

00:37:10 ◼   ► on stage because I just love it so much,

00:37:13 ◼   ► and then to go to Facebook, and you're not designing the app

00:37:18 ◼   ► that's in front of a billion users,

00:37:20 ◼   ► you're designing the app that's in front of like

00:37:22 ◼   ► one tenth of one percent of the users

00:37:24 ◼   ► who care more about how things look

00:37:26 ◼   ► than the regular Facebook experience.

00:37:29 ◼   ► I just think it's hard to get excited about that.

00:37:33 ◼   ► - Yeah.

00:37:33 ◼   ► - I'll take a break, let's take a break.

00:37:36 ◼   ► I'm gonna thank our first sponsor,

00:37:37 ◼   ► it's our good friends at Audible.

00:37:40 ◼   ► You guys know Audible, Audible is where you go to get

00:37:42 ◼   ► just about anything and everything audio related.

00:37:47 ◼   ► I used to think of it as a place you go to get audio books.

00:37:49 ◼   ► And it's true.

00:37:50 ◼   ► They have more audio books than anybody.

00:37:54 ◼   ► But they have so much more than audio books now.

00:37:57 ◼   ► You go there, you sign up for an account,

00:37:59 ◼   ► and you can get all sorts of stuff.

00:38:01 ◼   ► They have news, daily news shows.

00:38:03 ◼   ► They have comedy shows.

00:38:04 ◼   ► All of this stuff, and a lot of this stuff, is original to Audible.

00:38:08 ◼   ► If you want to listen to it, Audible has it.

00:38:11 ◼   ► Listen to audio books from virtually every genre,

00:38:13 ◼   ► anytime, anywhere.

00:38:14 ◼   ► They have a great listen guarantee.

00:38:16 ◼   ► So if you get an audio book and you start listening to it

00:38:19 ◼   ► and it's putting you to sleep, you

00:38:21 ◼   ► could just give it back to them and get a different book.

00:38:24 ◼   ► That's how confident they are.

00:38:28 ◼   ► You're not going to get bored.

00:38:30 ◼   ► Every minute where you need to listen to something to not be

00:38:32 ◼   ► bored, you can fill it up with stuff from Audible.

00:38:34 ◼   ► And I've always said, I think this

00:38:36 ◼   ► is one of the greatest advertising opportunities ever.

00:38:40 ◼   ► Why do they sponsor podcasts?

00:38:41 ◼   ► Because they know that everybody who's

00:38:43 ◼   ► listening to me tell you about Audible

00:38:45 ◼   ► is somebody who listens to spoken word content,

00:38:48 ◼   ► by definition.

00:38:49 ◼   ► So if you're listening to this and you

00:38:51 ◼   ► feel like you've got gaps in your life

00:38:54 ◼   ► where you need more podcasts or things like podcasts,

00:38:57 ◼   ► go to Audible.

00:38:58 ◼   ► Sign up.

00:38:59 ◼   ► Go to audible.com/talkshow.

00:39:02 ◼   ► No "the," just "talk show."

00:39:04 ◼   ► And no, no, you came here and you get a free 30-day trial.

00:39:07 ◼   ► 30 days, we can just listen to whatever you want.

00:39:09 ◼   ► Audible.com/talkshow.

00:39:13 ◼   ► I think I wrote that script.

00:39:15 ◼   ► Yeah, maybe.

00:39:16 ◼   ► [LAUGHTER]

00:39:19 ◼   ► I was telling her--

00:39:24 ◼   ► I forget if it was on air or not.

00:39:26 ◼   ► But Bill Simmons--

00:39:28 ◼   ► I've been listening to him.

00:39:29 ◼   ► I read the football season I was listening.

00:39:31 ◼   ► He does a sports thing.

00:39:32 ◼   ► He does a thing called the ringer.

00:39:33 ◼   ► Thank you.

00:39:36 ◼   ► Very popular.

00:39:36 ◼   ► You probably see it.

00:39:37 ◼   ► It's probably pretty high up in overcast.

00:39:39 ◼   ► So that'd be interesting to see if it was actually

00:39:40 ◼   ► all that high up in overcast.

00:39:41 ◼   ► maybe Overcast skews towards non-sports stuff. Maybe like sports stuff is a little bit more,

00:39:48 ◼   ► I don't know, they'd be in our syndicate. It does pretty well in Overcast. It is not as high as tech

00:39:53 ◼   ► shows and like the really popular, you know, NPR-style storytelling shows like This American

00:39:58 ◼   ► Life, though. I think it was Ben Thompson and I who were talking about it. I forget if it was on

00:40:01 ◼   ► the show or off. But the gist of it is that when Bill Simmons first started doing sponsors reads

00:40:06 ◼   ► on his show. He was awful at it, as was I when I first split off and started doing this

00:40:12 ◼   ► show on my own. Just brutal. Maybe the shows were okay, but the sponsor reads were just

00:40:18 ◼   ► brutal. I don't know why. It's a hard thing to do.

00:40:22 ◼   ► You got the hang of it eventually. It took you maybe a couple of months, and you were

00:40:25 ◼   ► pretty good at it.

00:40:26 ◼   ► Yeah, but Simmons has actually taken it to a new level. I would venture to say he was

00:40:31 ◼   ► worse than me at the beginning, and now he's better than anybody I've ever seen.

00:40:35 ◼   ► He's like in Howard Stern territory at being able to do it. Because sometimes

00:40:41 ◼   ► when I listen to Stern anymore, it almost seems like when Stern does one, where

00:40:44 ◼   ► he does the read, he's phoning it. You could tell he's phoning it in.

00:40:47 ◼   ► Whereas Simmons does it, and he's got a real tight script, and it seems like

00:40:51 ◼   ► he's trying to literally stick it to 30 seconds, get in and out, and he really

00:40:57 ◼   ► starts talking faster.

00:40:59 ◼   ► And it just alleviates-- it just completely alleviates

00:41:03 ◼   ► any urge I have to skip ahead.

00:41:05 ◼   ► I tend not to--

00:41:06 ◼   ► Interesting.

00:41:07 ◼   ► I tend not to skip ahead on sponsor reads, on podcasts,

00:41:10 ◼   ► simply because I-- you know, I know some people do.

00:41:14 ◼   ► And if you do, you know, that's why the feature's there.

00:41:16 ◼   ► It's OK.

00:41:17 ◼   ► It's my job to try to make it as interesting.

00:41:19 ◼   ► You and I have talked about this before.

00:41:20 ◼   ► It's my job to try to make it so interesting

00:41:21 ◼   ► that you don't want to skip.

00:41:22 ◼   ► But when I'm listening to podcasts,

00:41:24 ◼   ► I tend not to skip because I want to listen.

00:41:26 ◼   ► I'm curious at a professional level,

00:41:29 ◼   ► how is this person going to keep me interested?

00:41:31 ◼   ► - Yeah, I often will listen to other people

00:41:34 ◼   ► who are doing reads for the same sponsors that I have

00:41:36 ◼   ► just to hear, like, you know, how are you doing this read?

00:41:39 ◼   ► And like, maybe there's something I can learn

00:41:41 ◼   ► and do better in my reads for the same people

00:41:43 ◼   ► from the way you're doing this read.

00:41:45 ◼   ► - Yeah.

00:41:45 ◼   ► So what else we got?

00:41:48 ◼   ► We got a lot to talk about, we gotta hurry up.

00:41:50 ◼   ► (laughing)

00:41:51 ◼   ► - We're really good at that, yeah.

00:41:52 ◼   ► - So we got the, what about WWDC moving?

00:41:55 ◼   ► - Yeah, it's cool.

00:41:56 ◼   ► I mean, I don't know anything about San Jose,

00:41:58 ◼   ► so it's gonna be interesting.

00:41:59 ◼   ► - We talked a little bit about that.

00:42:00 ◼   ► I was completely surprised by this.

00:42:03 ◼   ► This just wasn't even on my radar.

00:42:05 ◼   ► But I kind of, once it happened, it was an initial shock,

00:42:09 ◼   ► and then I thought, oh shit,

00:42:10 ◼   ► what am I gonna do about my live show?

00:42:11 ◼   ► Of course, my thoughts turned to myself immediately.

00:42:15 ◼   ► (laughing)

00:42:17 ◼   ► - Everyone else's did too.

00:42:18 ◼   ► Everyone else is like, oh, how can I fly there?

00:42:20 ◼   ► Is Arno hotels expensive?

00:42:21 ◼   ► I mean, everyone's thinking the same general stuff.

00:42:25 ◼   ► Most of the people aren't thinking,

00:42:25 ◼   ► where can I host my live podcast?

00:42:27 ◼   ► - It just never occurred to me

00:42:28 ◼   ► that they would do this though.

00:42:30 ◼   ► I guess the rough thinking was,

00:42:34 ◼   ► and we've all had this, people who go regularly,

00:42:36 ◼   ► that San Francisco's not great.

00:42:39 ◼   ► I mean, there are parts of San Francisco

00:42:42 ◼   ► that are absolutely gorgeous,

00:42:44 ◼   ► but south of Market where Moscone is, it's not great.

00:42:47 ◼   ► I don't hate it, some people really hate it.

00:42:49 ◼   ► Some people, it is what it is,

00:42:51 ◼   ► but it is sort of the touristy, hotel-y,

00:42:55 ◼   ► maybe touristy's the wrong, but it's--

00:42:59 ◼   ► - It's kind of like the worst of San Francisco.

00:43:01 ◼   ► The area that we see when we go to WBC

00:43:04 ◼   ► is a terrible image of the city as a whole.

00:43:08 ◼   ► - Well, and it's not too far from Union Square, though,

00:43:11 ◼   ► and Union Square is nicer,

00:43:12 ◼   ► but Union Square is just high-end retail.

00:43:15 ◼   ► It's not, you know what I mean?

00:43:16 ◼   ► Like, what are you supposed to do,

00:43:18 ◼   ► go shopping for jewelry and stuff like that?

00:43:20 ◼   ► It's OK.

00:43:22 ◼   ► But it is what it is.

00:43:24 ◼   ► But the fact is that Apple, we'd say, well,

00:43:26 ◼   ► what could they do different?

00:43:28 ◼   ► Well, there's no other facility with 5,000 people.

00:43:31 ◼   ► And then we would just say, well, it used to be in San Jose,

00:43:33 ◼   ► but they moved out of San Jose for a reason.

00:43:35 ◼   ► And there's nothing else.

00:43:38 ◼   ► And they're not going to go further away,

00:43:39 ◼   ► because it's already a major stress on Apple

00:43:42 ◼   ► to get 1,000 engineers from the South Bay area

00:43:45 ◼   ► to San Francisco for labs and to just hang out and do stuff

00:43:48 ◼   ► and still get work done.

00:43:50 ◼   ► I, for one, had just completely overlooked the,

00:43:57 ◼   ► well, they could move back to San Jose angle for years.

00:44:00 ◼   ► It just never really,

00:44:01 ◼   ► I never even really gave it serious thought,

00:44:03 ◼   ► but then once they said, yeah, here's what we're doing,

00:44:05 ◼   ► I could totally see the logic of it,

00:44:06 ◼   ► and it seems like a very Apple-like move.

00:44:09 ◼   ► - I mean, really, it makes a ton of sense logistically too.

00:44:12 ◼   ► I mean, not only is it closer to them,

00:44:13 ◼   ► but like San Francisco is a dense, competitive,

00:44:18 ◼   ► very expensive city, there's a reason why

00:44:21 ◼   ► you don't see a lot of tech conferences in Manhattan.

00:44:24 ◼   ► It's because if you put on a tech conference in Manhattan,

00:44:28 ◼   ► the space that you hold it in is going to be

00:44:30 ◼   ► extraordinarily expensive.

00:44:32 ◼   ► All the logistics, getting the food in there,

00:44:35 ◼   ► getting all the equipment, that's all gonna be

00:44:37 ◼   ► extraordinarily expensive.

00:44:38 ◼   ► And then for the attendees, they're gonna have to pay

00:44:41 ◼   ► ridiculous hotel prices because they're going

00:44:44 ◼   ► to this major city that is itself

00:44:46 ◼   ► a massive tourist destination.

00:44:48 ◼   ► And so it's very unappealing to hold a major conference

00:44:52 ◼   ► in New York City unless it really needs to be

00:44:56 ◼   ► specifically in New York City for some reason.

00:44:59 ◼   ► WBC could be anywhere.

00:45:00 ◼   ► As far as the attendees are concerned,

00:45:03 ◼   ► it doesn't matter where it is.

00:45:05 ◼   ► You're going to see talks and labs and stuff

00:45:07 ◼   ► and that could be in any conference center

00:45:09 ◼   ► in any city in America.

00:45:11 ◼   ► You don't have to be paying the extreme premium

00:45:16 ◼   ► and dealing with all the logistical challenges

00:45:18 ◼   ► and downsides of being in a massive tourist

00:45:21 ◼   ► expensive dense city just to go watch some talks and go to lab.

00:45:26 ◼   ► And either you already have friends and colleagues

00:45:29 ◼   ► who will also be there, and you'll see them,

00:45:32 ◼   ► and it doesn't matter where you are.

00:45:33 ◼   ► Or even if you don't, even if you're like a first timer,

00:45:36 ◼   ► if you're new, you're going to be surrounded

00:45:38 ◼   ► by like-minded individuals.

00:45:41 ◼   ► And it's not hard to make friends, or even just

00:45:44 ◼   ► temporary friends while sitting at a bar

00:45:46 ◼   ► or something like that.

00:45:47 ◼   ► You're very, you know, you can start talking about Xcode

00:45:50 ◼   ► and all of a sudden, you know, you're not bored.

00:45:52 ◼   ► - Right, I mean like, if anything,

00:45:53 ◼   ► the city's kind of wasted on you

00:45:55 ◼   ► because if you're attending the conference,

00:45:58 ◼   ► you don't really have time to go out

00:46:00 ◼   ► and explore much of the city.

00:46:01 ◼   ► Like for the most part, you're waking up,

00:46:04 ◼   ► you're trying to get to that 9 a.m. session in the morning,

00:46:06 ◼   ► you're in sessions and stuff all day,

00:46:08 ◼   ► you might have a little hour for lunch

00:46:09 ◼   ► but you can't go that far, and then you're back

00:46:11 ◼   ► and then like five o'clock rolls around

00:46:12 ◼   ► and you just wanna go to the hotel bar with your friends,

00:46:15 ◼   ► have a couple of drinks, and go to dinner,

00:46:18 ◼   ► and that's the night.

00:46:19 ◼   ► You can do that anywhere.

00:46:20 ◼   ► You're not seeing the whole city.

00:46:23 ◼   ► It doesn't really make sense.

00:46:25 ◼   ► One of my favorite conference venues I've ever been to

00:46:28 ◼   ► is where Ool has been held the last couple years,

00:46:31 ◼   ► in Killarney, Ireland, in this hotel called The Europe.

00:46:34 ◼   ► And it's this very, very remote location.

00:46:38 ◼   ► And the hotel itself, you've been there.

00:46:40 ◼   ► Have you been there, actually?

00:46:41 ◼   ► - I don't think so.

00:46:42 ◼   ► I don't, uh.

00:46:43 ◼   ► - Yeah, 'cause you missed the, yeah, anyway, it's awesome.

00:46:47 ◼   ► It's the third remote. - It depends how many years

00:46:48 ◼   ► in a row they've been at the same one.

00:46:50 ◼   ► I was at one that was at a remote location,

00:46:52 ◼   ► but I think they've switched to a different remote location.

00:46:55 ◼   ► - Yeah, this is, I believe this is their third one

00:46:58 ◼   ► that they're about to do next month.

00:46:59 ◼   ► I'm going, I recommend it.

00:47:01 ◼   ► Anyway, so it's just like this one giant hotel venue

00:47:06 ◼   ► kind of in the middle of nowhere, it's beautiful,

00:47:09 ◼   ► but like you're all kind of self-enclosed there.

00:47:11 ◼   ► There is a nearby city of Killarney,

00:47:14 ◼   ► but you don't really,

00:47:16 ◼   ► the attendees don't really have to go there.

00:47:17 ◼   ► You're all on premises, and you're surrounded

00:47:20 ◼   ► by all the people that are there for your event,

00:47:23 ◼   ► and so there is no time to go out and enjoy some other city.

00:47:28 ◼   ► That's what you're there for.

00:47:29 ◼   ► You're there to hang out with those people

00:47:31 ◼   ► and see those talks and do those events.

00:47:32 ◼   ► So to have a conference in a massive city

00:47:35 ◼   ► that you're paying a big premium to be in

00:47:38 ◼   ► doesn't actually make a lot of sense.

00:47:39 ◼   ► (laughing)

00:47:40 ◼   ► I love Ireland. I remember the last time I was there and there was a band, remember,

00:47:46 ◼   ► and their lead singer, were you there this year? And there was a lead singer named Paddy,

00:47:50 ◼   ► P-A-D-D-Y.

00:47:51 ◼   ► I've never been there on the same time that you were there.

00:47:54 ◼   ► I don't think so either. So Paddy was there and he was the lead singer of this band and

00:47:58 ◼   ► he had nothing interesting. He had no connection to Apple-related stuff. But he came up to

00:48:04 ◼   ► the pub without leaving the building.

00:48:08 ◼   ► It's sort of like a compound.

00:48:09 ◼   ► He came up and was gonna have a drink or two,

00:48:12 ◼   ► and he just, you know, he's a gregarious showbiz performer,

00:48:15 ◼   ► but very nice.

00:48:17 ◼   ► And it quickly struck up conversations

00:48:19 ◼   ► with all sorts of people, and he was having a good time,

00:48:22 ◼   ► and never left. (laughs)

00:48:25 ◼   ► And then at like midnight, they were doing Last Call,

00:48:28 ◼   ► and everybody was like, "Oh, man, what are we gonna do?

00:48:30 ◼   ► "Everybody wanted to stay up a little bit later."

00:48:32 ◼   ► And Patty went up to the bartender and just off--

00:48:36 ◼   ► it wasn't like whispering in his ear,

00:48:37 ◼   ► but he just spent about two minutes talking to him.

00:48:39 ◼   ► And the next thing you know, the bartender's

00:48:41 ◼   ► like slapping on the back.

00:48:42 ◼   ► And the bartender says, all right,

00:48:43 ◼   ► we'll stay open two more hours.

00:48:44 ◼   ► [LAUGHTER]

00:48:45 ◼   ► That's awesome.

00:48:46 ◼   ► I've never heard of anything like that in my life,

00:48:48 ◼   ► like we're the staff of a place.

00:48:50 ◼   ► And he got-- he called over--

00:48:52 ◼   ► he didn't make it unilaterally.

00:48:53 ◼   ► He called over another bartender and was just like,

00:48:55 ◼   ► hey, what do you-- these guys want to keep going.

00:48:57 ◼   ► How about we do two more hours?

00:48:59 ◼   ► [LAUGHTER]

00:49:01 ◼   ► It was a good conference.

00:49:04 ◼   ► Why do you think WWDC moved from San Jose to San Francisco

00:49:08 ◼   ► when it did?

00:49:08 ◼   ► I think it was 2003 or 2004.

00:49:11 ◼   ► - I don't know, that was before my time.

00:49:12 ◼   ► I think some of the other things I've heard,

00:49:15 ◼   ► I think Jason was talking about it on Upgrade,

00:49:18 ◼   ► about how back then Apple really wanted to be

00:49:23 ◼   ► in more of the media spotlight with this stuff.

00:49:25 ◼   ► It's more prestigious to go there.

00:49:27 ◼   ► It's really owning, yeah, we're big, we're awesome,

00:49:30 ◼   ► It kind of attracts more media attention being there.

00:49:32 ◼   ► But now the attention comes to them,

00:49:33 ◼   ► so they don't need to do that as much.

00:49:35 ◼   ► - Yeah, I think that's it exactly.

00:49:36 ◼   ► I think it was Steve Jobs.

00:49:38 ◼   ► And I think Steve Jobs, you know,

00:49:39 ◼   ► Apple was firing on all cylinders.

00:49:41 ◼   ► The iPod was slowly turning into a massive hit.

00:49:46 ◼   ► The retail stores were slowly turning into a success story.

00:49:50 ◼   ► They were, it was the, you know, the last, famously,

00:49:55 ◼   ► I know that, I think Jason and Mike even went over this,

00:49:58 ◼   ► And the last one at San Jose was the one

00:50:01 ◼   ► where they had a funeral for Mac OS 9, which was actually

00:50:05 ◼   ► kind of forced.

00:50:07 ◼   ► Like, the only reason they had to--

00:50:09 ◼   ► you think that's a weird thing to do

00:50:11 ◼   ► is have a funeral on stage for your product.

00:50:13 ◼   ► But it was actually because it wasn't dead.

00:50:16 ◼   ► It was because so many people were still using Mac OS 9.

00:50:20 ◼   ► But it was at the point where they

00:50:21 ◼   ► felt like they were in the clear.

00:50:24 ◼   ► It was three or four years into the--

00:50:25 ◼   ► I guess at least three years into the Mac OS 10 era.

00:50:28 ◼   ► But they were at the point where I think they could see the light at the end of the tunnel that yes

00:50:31 ◼   ► We're we're going to make this transition all max will be running Mac OS X

00:50:37 ◼   ► You know

00:50:38 ◼   ► This isn't going to sink us the first two years of Mac OS X was kind of iffy really in terms of how big the uptake

00:50:44 ◼   ► Was so I think that after that one, you know, the Mac was clearly had a bright future. The iPod was great retail was great

00:50:50 ◼   ► I think Steve Jobs wanted a bigger spotlight

00:50:53 ◼   ► And I think doing I hope that you have having like a hopeful funeral

00:50:57 ◼   ► Like, we really hope this is it, guys. Please, Richard, we're begging you, please make this

00:51:03 ◼   ► dead.

00:51:04 ◼   ► I remember they had it, and it was before my time of attending WWDCs, but I still had

00:51:08 ◼   ► two Macs at my desk. I had a Power Mac 9600 that was still running Mac OS 9 as my main

00:51:17 ◼   ► machine, and then I had an iBook running OS 10.

00:51:21 ◼   ► Oh, see, now I have one with a keyboard I can use and one with another one.

00:51:26 ◼   ► So that's what I think.

00:51:27 ◼   ► I think they moved to San Francisco for the publicity.

00:51:30 ◼   ► I think that's exactly right,

00:51:31 ◼   ► that they wanted more attention.

00:51:33 ◼   ► They felt like they could use it.

00:51:35 ◼   ► They had stuff to say.

00:51:36 ◼   ► They had stuff that deserved more attention,

00:51:38 ◼   ► and now they don't.

00:51:39 ◼   ► And I don't think San Francisco

00:51:40 ◼   ► was ever a good fit for Apple, culturally.

00:51:43 ◼   ► They're not a San Francisco city.

00:51:44 ◼   ► - Yeah, they have a very different vibe about them

00:51:50 ◼   ► than what I've, I mean, again, I've never worked for Apple,

00:51:53 ◼   ► and I've never lived in San Francisco,

00:51:55 ◼   ► so it's hard for me to say this,

00:51:56 ◼   ► But just my kind of bird's eye view of it,

00:51:59 ◼   ► it does seem like they didn't really fit in there.

00:52:01 ◼   ► - Like there's no, put travel aside.

00:52:04 ◼   ► Like 'cause when they move to the new Apple,

00:52:06 ◼   ► when they open a new Apple, I shouldn't say move,

00:52:08 ◼   ► 'cause that's exactly my point,

00:52:09 ◼   ► but when they open the new Apple Campus too,

00:52:11 ◼   ► they're not leaving the Apple Campus,

00:52:15 ◼   ► the original Infinite Loop Campus.

00:52:17 ◼   ► They need all the space they can get.

00:52:19 ◼   ► And so, I mean there might be some empty offices for a while

00:52:22 ◼   ► but there's gonna be back and forth

00:52:24 ◼   ► between the original Apple Campus and Apple Campus 2

00:52:27 ◼   ► on a daily basis.

00:52:28 ◼   ► So having them both in Cupertino is a big deal.

00:52:32 ◼   ► And they have new office space in San Jose.

00:52:34 ◼   ► They have space in a few other places in the South Bay area.

00:52:37 ◼   ► But the fact that getting between anywhere in the South

00:52:40 ◼   ► Bay is easier than getting from anywhere in the South Bay

00:52:42 ◼   ► to San Francisco is a big deal.

00:52:44 ◼   ► There's no universe where Apple Campus 2 is a skyscraper

00:52:50 ◼   ► with the same square footage in San Francisco.

00:52:52 ◼   ► It's just culturally--

00:52:53 ◼   ► And travel aside, even if part of it

00:52:56 ◼   ► was like a tunnel dug by Elon Musk

00:52:58 ◼   ► that could get you between them in 10 minutes,

00:53:01 ◼   ► even if you could get between them in 10 minutes,

00:53:03 ◼   ► there's just no way they would do it.

00:53:04 ◼   ► It's just San Francisco is not an Apple town

00:53:06 ◼   ► in a way that San Jose, I think, is.

00:53:10 ◼   ► - I'm looking forward to it,

00:53:12 ◼   ► 'cause it really is like going

00:53:14 ◼   ► to a whole new conference now.

00:53:15 ◼   ► And at WBC, I've gone now for something like seven years,

00:53:20 ◼   ► something like that, and I've enjoyed it,

00:53:23 ◼   ► but I'm looking forward to something new,

00:53:26 ◼   ► something fresh and it's kind of more exciting now

00:53:29 ◼   ► 'cause it's gonna be something a little bit different.

00:53:31 ◼   ► - I forget if I went in 2006,

00:53:33 ◼   ► so I either went 10 years in a row or nine years in a row.

00:53:37 ◼   ► Yeah, it's one of my favorite things about covering Apple

00:53:39 ◼   ► is that they're very predictable,

00:53:42 ◼   ► so if you try to approach them

00:53:43 ◼   ► and analyze them in a logical standpoint,

00:53:45 ◼   ► you can have success,

00:53:47 ◼   ► but they're also resistant to complacency, right?

00:53:50 ◼   ► So they're not gonna like ping pong around

00:53:53 ◼   ► and move WWDC to random cities every year.

00:53:56 ◼   ► But they're not going to keep it in San Francisco

00:53:59 ◼   ► just because that's where it's been for 10 years,

00:54:03 ◼   ► which we'll get to when we talk about iPhone and iPad form

00:54:08 ◼   ► factors.

00:54:10 ◼   ► The other thing, too, is you've heard it.

00:54:12 ◼   ► I've heard it.

00:54:12 ◼   ► Everybody who's gone in recent years

00:54:13 ◼   ► has heard that from the longtime attendees who

00:54:15 ◼   ► remember the San Jose era, there's

00:54:17 ◼   ► a reputation that downtown San Jose was kind of sleepy,

00:54:20 ◼   ► that restaurants and bars close early.

00:54:23 ◼   ► There's quote unquote nothing to do.

00:54:26 ◼   ► Two things on that is one, back then WWDC

00:54:29 ◼   ► didn't even sell out.

00:54:31 ◼   ► I forget when the first sell out was,

00:54:33 ◼   ► but I don't think it was in San Jose.

00:54:35 ◼   ► And the second thing is that talking to a couple people,

00:54:41 ◼   ► downtown San Jose has improved a lot in the last 10 years,

00:54:45 ◼   ► that there's been a lot of-- I just looked it up.

00:54:51 ◼   ► first WWDC to sell out was 2008.

00:54:53 ◼   ► Gee, I wonder what happened 2008

00:54:55 ◼   ► that would cause the first sale.

00:54:57 ◼   ► So up until 2008, even the first few years at Moscone,

00:55:00 ◼   ► you could buy a ticket the day before WWDC.

00:55:02 ◼   ► I think the fact that this is obviously going to sell out

00:55:05 ◼   ► and that there are going to be people in San Jose

00:55:08 ◼   ► who don't even have tickets,

00:55:10 ◼   ► it's gonna be a different vibe.

00:55:12 ◼   ► And a couple people have said that downtown San Jose

00:55:15 ◼   ► has really improved a lot.

00:55:17 ◼   ► I was just talking to a friend of the show, Jim Dalrymple.

00:55:19 ◼   ► - I was saying on Twitter,

00:55:20 ◼   ► you don't really need much.

00:55:21 ◼   ► Like, when you're there for a conference,

00:55:24 ◼   ► like, you need a handful of, you know,

00:55:25 ◼   ► you need good hotels that you can hopefully get

00:55:28 ◼   ► for a reasonable price.

00:55:29 ◼   ► You need a bunch of restaurants

00:55:32 ◼   ► to be able to get food at.

00:55:33 ◼   ► And you need, you know, a handful of decent bars

00:55:36 ◼   ► and bars in the hotels.

00:55:38 ◼   ► And that's about it.

00:55:39 ◼   ► Like, you don't need tons and tons of nightlife

00:55:42 ◼   ► for a tech conference for five days.

00:55:44 ◼   ► - Right, it's actually better

00:55:45 ◼   ► if the bars are generally empty,

00:55:47 ◼   ► but are willing to stay open late,

00:55:48 ◼   ► so you can take over.

00:55:49 ◼   ► Dow Rumple, I was talking to about it,

00:55:52 ◼   ► now he's familiar with the area now,

00:55:54 ◼   ► and he goes to hockey games at the San Jose,

00:55:58 ◼   ► I forget, I don't know what the name of it is,

00:56:00 ◼   ► but wherever the Sharks play,

00:56:01 ◼   ► which is only one mile away from the convention center,

00:56:04 ◼   ► so it's, by city standards, not a far walk.

00:56:07 ◼   ► That's the thing about San Jose,

00:56:09 ◼   ► is that downtown San Jose is all in one area.

00:56:12 ◼   ► It's not spread out.

00:56:13 ◼   ► And he said after hockey games, 10, 30, 11,

00:56:17 ◼   ► and there's all sorts of stuff to do,

00:56:18 ◼   ► bars to get beers at and places to eat late

00:56:20 ◼   ► and stuff like that.

00:56:21 ◼   ► So I'm looking forward to it.

00:56:24 ◼   ► - Yeah.

00:56:25 ◼   ► - Are you gonna go no matter what?

00:56:28 ◼   ► - I'm going, yeah.

00:56:29 ◼   ► I actually, last year I told myself,

00:56:32 ◼   ► you know what, I'm not gonna get tickets anymore.

00:56:34 ◼   ► 'Cause I'm going to fewer sessions.

00:56:37 ◼   ► I'm like, you know what, I feel now

00:56:39 ◼   ► that I'm wasting a ticket

00:56:41 ◼   ► because I keep trying to do more and more other things.

00:56:44 ◼   ► I keep getting double booked for time slots

00:56:46 ◼   ► with meetings and social events and podcast events

00:56:48 ◼   ► and everything else, like you know what,

00:56:49 ◼   ► I'm just not gonna take it.

00:56:51 ◼   ► Now actually I'm questioning that

00:56:53 ◼   ► because now it's gonna be different.

00:56:54 ◼   ► Well, maybe I should get a ticket this year, I don't know.

00:56:57 ◼   ► I'm definitely going out there.

00:56:59 ◼   ► - Yeah, I mean I'll go just to cover the keynote

00:57:02 ◼   ► and I have nothing to announce

00:57:04 ◼   ► but hopefully to do my live show again.

00:57:08 ◼   ► But I always do that and try to always do it

00:57:10 ◼   ► on Tuesday evenings.

00:57:12 ◼   ► My question is how long to stay?

00:57:13 ◼   ► Like I don't know if I'm gonna stay all week.

00:57:16 ◼   ► - Yeah, I don't know.

00:57:17 ◼   ► 'Cause the thing is, we don't know.

00:57:20 ◼   ► It is a whole new conference, effectively.

00:57:22 ◼   ► So we don't know if you plan to go in Sunday

00:57:27 ◼   ► and leave Wednesday or something like that,

00:57:29 ◼   ► are you gonna regret that you didn't stay

00:57:31 ◼   ► until the cool things that were gonna happen

00:57:32 ◼   ► on Thursday night?

00:57:33 ◼   ► You don't know.

00:57:34 ◼   ► And that's why I'm kinda thinking,

00:57:36 ◼   ► I might just do my usual Sunday

00:57:39 ◼   ► through Friday afternoon thing.

00:57:41 ◼   ► The worst that can happen is I have a couple bonus days

00:57:45 ◼   ► California. Oh no, you know, there are worse things in the world than that.

00:57:51 ◼   ► Yeah, I don't know what I'm gonna do, but anyway, what a surprise. So that came out

00:57:55 ◼   ► like what, the day after ATP last week, so you guys didn't get to talk about it yet.

00:57:58 ◼   ► Yeah, haven't talked about it yet. I think the gist of it, and I think everybody's sort of

00:58:02 ◼   ► wrapping their heads around it, is I think Apple can spend the money on

00:58:06 ◼   ► surrounding stuff around the Convention Center, and the number of people that

00:58:11 ◼   ► will be there, you know, attendance is not going up, but even if it's just

00:58:14 ◼   ► 5,000 plus a couple thousand people who you know come in we're out of a couple

00:58:20 ◼   ► thousand come but if a thousand people come just to be there and simultaneous

00:58:24 ◼   ► with it and then cut the other factor is combined with all the South Bay companies

00:58:29 ◼   ► whose employees might come after work when they couldn't if it was all the way

00:58:32 ◼   ► up in San Francisco I think it's I think it's gonna feel like apples taken over

00:58:37 ◼   ► for San Jose.

00:58:39 ◼   ► - Yeah, my main concern is if I don't get

00:58:43 ◼   ► a conference ticket, will I not be able to get

00:58:46 ◼   ► into major events that I will then want to get into?

00:58:49 ◼   ► - Yeah, I know.

00:58:50 ◼   ► - You know, that's been my one concern of like,

00:58:53 ◼   ► should I go anyway or not?

00:58:55 ◼   ► And because in San Francisco, there was so much

00:58:59 ◼   ► to do everywhere that whether you had a WDC badge

00:59:03 ◼   ► didn't really matter for anything except for the beer bash.

00:59:07 ◼   ► That was the only thing where it really mattered

00:59:10 ◼   ► whether you had it or not, but all the other events

00:59:11 ◼   ► that happened around the conference were for anybody.

00:59:14 ◼   ► And I hope that's gonna keep being the case,

00:59:16 ◼   ► but I don't know yet.

00:59:18 ◼   ► - Yeah, I think it'll be the same, I do.

00:59:20 ◼   ► I do think, here's my theory, one of my theories

00:59:23 ◼   ► is that they'll have the Bash on campus at Apple Campus too.

00:59:26 ◼   ► 'Cause I think they used-- - That would be awesome,

00:59:29 ◼   ► but I don't think it's ready.

00:59:31 ◼   ► - Maybe by June it will be, I don't know.

00:59:32 ◼   ► - I mean, it's certainly cutting it close.

00:59:34 ◼   ► - Yeah, I don't know.

00:59:35 ◼   ► Or maybe they'll have it back at Infinite Loop,

00:59:36 ◼   ► I don't know, that's what they used to do.

00:59:39 ◼   ► - Is it big enough?

00:59:39 ◼   ► Like is the courtyard there big enough

00:59:41 ◼   ► to hold today's WDC crowd?

00:59:43 ◼   ► I don't know.

00:59:44 ◼   ► - Yeah, I don't know.

00:59:45 ◼   ► I mean, the new courtyard certainly is.

00:59:47 ◼   ► - Like Yerba Buena felt crowded.

00:59:49 ◼   ► And that's a big yard, you know?

00:59:51 ◼   ► - Yeah, but it got crowded by the stage,

00:59:54 ◼   ► but yeah, I don't know.

00:59:57 ◼   ► - No, no, it was empty by the stage.

01:00:00 ◼   ► - I guess you're right, you know what I mean.

01:00:01 ◼   ► - It was very crowded.

01:00:03 ◼   ► The further back you got from the stage,

01:00:05 ◼   ► the crowd more crowded at God because none of the nerds at the conference ever

01:00:09 ◼   ► wanted to be near the band we all wanted to talk to each other right you can't

01:00:11 ◼   ► hear I can't hear you let's go to the back it's the worst gig for a band to

01:00:15 ◼   ► ever play some of them had success it's I felt bad for them every year because

01:00:20 ◼   ► it's like oh god like you you're playing to a bunch of nerds backs who are like

01:00:24 ◼   ► plugging their ears because they don't want to hear you right oh it's terrible

01:00:28 ◼   ► all right let's uh it's shift gears to there's supposedly a March Apple event

01:00:34 ◼   ► and they're gonna do iPads, new iPads,

01:00:38 ◼   ► possibly a 128 gigabyte upgrade to the iPhone SE

01:00:44 ◼   ► and then what else, a new red color for the iPhone SE.

01:00:49 ◼   ► Or maybe a new red color for all iPhones.

01:00:53 ◼   ► - No, I think the rumor was a new red color

01:00:55 ◼   ► for the main iPhone 7 line.

01:00:56 ◼   ► - Oh, maybe.

01:00:57 ◼   ► - Which is kind of odd to do halfway through Recycle,

01:00:59 ◼   ► but I mean, who knows?

01:01:01 ◼   ► You know, again, like this is the kind of thing

01:01:02 ◼   ► where if we look back and say, well, Apple never does that.

01:01:06 ◼   ► The iPhone makes a lot of money,

01:01:08 ◼   ► Apple's an evolving company.

01:01:10 ◼   ► They can do whatever they want, and they will.

01:01:12 ◼   ► If they think there's a good reason to do something like this,

01:01:14 ◼   ► they would do it.

01:01:15 ◼   ► - So I think one of the interesting things

01:01:17 ◼   ► is that just about everything we know about,

01:01:19 ◼   ► or have heard, I shouldn't say we know,

01:01:21 ◼   ► but just about all the rumors we have

01:01:23 ◼   ► about upcoming Apple products all come from Ming-Chi Kuo,

01:01:27 ◼   ► the analyst at KGI Securities.

01:01:29 ◼   ► - He certainly seems like he has the best info the earliest.

01:01:34 ◼   ► - Right, like, Gurman has had some stories at Bloomberg,

01:01:38 ◼   ► but it hasn't really been a lot.

01:01:40 ◼   ► He had like an Apple TV thing recently,

01:01:41 ◼   ► but it's just 4K coming to Apple TV.

01:01:45 ◼   ► In terms of like iPads and iPhones,

01:01:46 ◼   ► he hasn't had a lot recently.

01:01:48 ◼   ► It seems like it's all coming from Ming-Chi Kuo.

01:01:51 ◼   ► - It seems like Gurman's sources

01:01:53 ◼   ► are maybe more in the Mac area.

01:01:55 ◼   ► - Yeah, maybe.

01:01:56 ◼   ► - Because he seems to have more Mac info,

01:01:58 ◼   ► and Ming-Chi Kuo seems to have more iOS supply chain info.

01:02:02 ◼   ► - It's all supply chain info.

01:02:03 ◼   ► I don't think Ming-Chi Kuo has any sources at Cupertino.

01:02:06 ◼   ► I really don't.

01:02:07 ◼   ► And a lot of what he gets wrong

01:02:08 ◼   ► is from not having those sources,

01:02:11 ◼   ► but that he has seemingly drinking buddy status

01:02:14 ◼   ► with some Foxconn executives.

01:02:17 ◼   ► But it was interesting 'cause just yesterday,

01:02:23 ◼   ► I'm looking at the date, Mac Otakara,

01:02:26 ◼   ► Japanese rumor site who has a pretty good track record too.

01:02:30 ◼   ► Yeah, they're pretty good.

01:02:31 ◼   ► I mean, I'll put a link in the show notes to the one, but I'll put it the Mac Rumors

01:02:34 ◼   ► version because it's in English.

01:02:37 ◼   ► What they're saying is, much like KGI or Ming Chi Kuo, the new 9.7 and 12.9 inch iPad Pros,

01:02:48 ◼   ► so take the iPad Pros, we already have new ones.

01:02:52 ◼   ► bizarre to me rumor of a 10.5 inch iPad which basically has the same footprint

01:02:59 ◼   ► as the 9.7 inch as we know it but with an edge to edge display so get rid of

01:03:04 ◼   ► the bezels at the top and bottom so it has a 10.5 inch diagonal display because

01:03:09 ◼   ► it gets rid of the bezels now the reason I call that bizarre getting rid of bezels

01:03:13 ◼   ► sounds like something Apple would do but the reason it sounds bizarre to me is

01:03:16 ◼   ► that all these rumors say that it's going to come alongside a new 9.7 inch

01:03:21 ◼   ► iPad Pro.

01:03:22 ◼   ► To me, what would make the--

01:03:25 ◼   ► what both makes sense and fits the historical pattern is,

01:03:30 ◼   ► if they're going to do that, introduce that

01:03:32 ◼   ► as the new high-end model at this footprint

01:03:34 ◼   ► and put the iPad, the 9.7-inch iPad

01:03:37 ◼   ► Pro at a minus $100 or minus $200 price point

01:03:42 ◼   ► lower down the chain.

01:03:44 ◼   ► But there's an awful lot--

01:03:46 ◼   ► all these rumors say that they're going to do both.

01:03:48 ◼   ► And now, Mac Atacara yesterday says

01:03:51 ◼   ► there's also going to be a 7.9-inch iPad Pro.

01:03:56 ◼   ► So in other words, an iPad Pro Mini.

01:03:59 ◼   ► Yeah.

01:04:00 ◼   ► Which should be the first update to the Mini in quite some time.

01:04:03 ◼   ► Yeah, but I think that they've done that before.

01:04:05 ◼   ► I think if you look at the updates to the Mini

01:04:07 ◼   ► that they've skipped years before.

01:04:09 ◼   ► Yeah, I mean, so let's--

01:04:12 ◼   ► easy things first.

01:04:13 ◼   ► The 7.9-inch iPad Pro Mini, that makes a lot of sense.

01:04:17 ◼   ► And it's probably got last year's specs, right?

01:04:18 ◼   ► That's what I would think.

01:04:19 ◼   ► Yeah.

01:04:19 ◼   ► It's going to have--

01:04:20 ◼   ► It probably has the specs of the current 9.7 Pro, which

01:04:23 ◼   ► is now a year old.

01:04:24 ◼   ► So that makes sense, right?

01:04:26 ◼   ► Apple doesn't need to save the Pro name only

01:04:29 ◼   ► for the higher end products, because Pro

01:04:31 ◼   ► means they can sell $100 pencil and $150 keyboard

01:04:35 ◼   ► with these things.

01:04:35 ◼   ► So they love spreading Pro all over the whole line.

01:04:38 ◼   ► I wonder what a--

01:04:40 ◼   ► I mean, a keyboard that would fit--

01:04:41 ◼   ► I have an iPad Mini in front of me right now.

01:04:43 ◼   ► That's a cramped keyboard.

01:04:45 ◼   ► - Yeah, I used like a Logitech one once a long time ago

01:04:48 ◼   ► and it was nearly impossible to use, it was tough.

01:04:51 ◼   ► Like the 9.7 size allows for a just barely usable

01:04:55 ◼   ► keyboard case on it, but the 7.9, that's tough.

01:04:59 ◼   ► I mean, they do exist and I guess somebody's buying them,

01:05:01 ◼   ► but that's certainly not a good keyboard.

01:05:04 ◼   ► But anyway, so that makes sense.

01:05:07 ◼   ► So between 9.7 and 10.5, you know,

01:05:11 ◼   ► there are these kind of similar rumors

01:05:15 ◼   ► that we'll probably get to also with the whole

01:05:17 ◼   ► iPhone 7S and 8 being also simultaneously released

01:05:22 ◼   ► in the fall and they're basically being like,

01:05:24 ◼   ► the iPhone quote eight would be this similar

01:05:27 ◼   ► bezel-less, larger screen, smaller case,

01:05:29 ◼   ► higher priced model.

01:05:31 ◼   ► So that's, if they're gonna do that for the iPhone line,

01:05:36 ◼   ► whatever their reasons are for doing it there,

01:05:38 ◼   ► they had, maybe they finally got their

01:05:40 ◼   ► edge to edge design and technology lined up

01:05:42 ◼   ► so they can finally do this,

01:05:43 ◼   ► so they're very excited to do this,

01:05:44 ◼   ► but it costs more to do it for various reasons

01:05:46 ◼   ► or whatever else, or they just wanted,

01:05:48 ◼   ► you know, they wanted to have a premium product

01:05:50 ◼   ► 'cause they wanna start, you know,

01:05:51 ◼   ► if people are really treating their phones

01:05:54 ◼   ► and their iPads as computers,

01:05:57 ◼   ► both in what they're doing with them

01:05:59 ◼   ► and in their replacement cycles,

01:06:02 ◼   ► then Apple probably wants them

01:06:03 ◼   ► to boost those prices up a little bit.

01:06:04 ◼   ► It's like, well, if you're only gonna buy

01:06:06 ◼   ► a new phone every three years or an iPad every five,

01:06:08 ◼   ► and you're gonna treat it like

01:06:10 ◼   ► you used to treat your $2,000 laptop,

01:06:11 ◼   ► well, if we can get you to pay 1,100 bucks for it,

01:06:14 ◼   ► that's better for us and we can give you higher end specs

01:06:17 ◼   ► and higher end, you know, more storage

01:06:19 ◼   ► and fancier screen technology and all this other stuff.

01:06:22 ◼   ► So it makes lots of sense why they would have

01:06:25 ◼   ► higher priced ones at all.

01:06:27 ◼   ► And it's totally plausible with modern Apple

01:06:31 ◼   ► that they would also keep making lower end ones

01:06:34 ◼   ► that, you know, rather, 'cause, you know,

01:06:36 ◼   ► when Apple releases new things like this,

01:06:39 ◼   ► you know, new iOS devices, new form factors,

01:06:41 ◼   ► One of the ways that they can release these things

01:06:44 ◼   ► that they have in the past is you release the new thing

01:06:47 ◼   ► at the old price point and push everything down 100 bucks.

01:06:50 ◼   ► The other way you do it is you leave everything

01:06:52 ◼   ► at the same price point and you bring the new one in

01:06:55 ◼   ► that's 100 bucks more than the old one was

01:06:57 ◼   ► because the new one's higher end.

01:06:58 ◼   ► So that's what I see them probably doing here.

01:07:00 ◼   ► That's probably what the 10.5 inch iPad

01:07:03 ◼   ► and the quote iPhone 8 with this weird edge to edge display,

01:07:05 ◼   ► both of those are probably that latter kind of product

01:07:08 ◼   ► where they both probably come into an existing lineup

01:07:10 ◼   ► itself doesn't really change or changes only in minor ways and they come in at

01:07:14 ◼   ► higher price points with more premium stuff. Yeah, so I think it's almost

01:07:18 ◼   ► like you have to because the pattern is the same that there's going to be new

01:07:21 ◼   ► models in the old form factor and there's amazing edge-to-edge, you know,

01:07:28 ◼   ► blow away design without the bezels. It's the same story for the iPad and the

01:07:32 ◼   ► iPhone so we might as well talk about the iPhone. Did you just forestall the blow away thing as a verb? I might have.

01:07:37 ◼   ► Oh jeez or it wasn't an adjective it was an adjective. Yeah, I

01:07:41 ◼   ► Might have

01:07:45 ◼   ► It's big league. That's a big league design

01:07:48 ◼   ► I thought it was big Lee. No, it's not every time

01:07:52 ◼   ► No

01:07:52 ◼   ► Everybody who says that they were talking about Trump here Trump uses big league as an adjective and he's it doesn't make any sense to

01:07:59 ◼   ► Say bigly it wouldn't he says big league and but it comes out

01:08:03 ◼   ► I don't think not making sense is necessarily a per a yeah, but big league big league

01:08:08 ◼   ► Yeah, but big league is what he's saying. Trust me. All right, and Dave's you're gonna have these blowaway designs for install

01:08:14 ◼   ► All right. Keep going. You can even see it when the White House transcribes his remarks. It's it's big league

01:08:19 ◼   ► It's gonna be a big league design

01:08:21 ◼   ► You sure I'm just auto-crafting for

01:08:23 ◼   ► You know, I mean what I bet on it now, but I

01:08:29 ◼   ► No, I-- it's the same story.

01:08:36 ◼   ► But to me, it makes more sense with the iPhone than the iPad.

01:08:39 ◼   ► And so the story with the iPhone is

01:08:41 ◼   ► that there would be what would presumably be called,

01:08:44 ◼   ► or at least described-- I mean, again,

01:08:46 ◼   ► marketing names are the hardest thing to know for sure,

01:08:48 ◼   ► because they're the tightest held secrets.

01:08:50 ◼   ► But it sounds like they're going to do the 7S and 7S+ exactly

01:08:56 ◼   ► like you would think, where it's the same form factor,

01:09:00 ◼   ► close enough down to the tenth of a millimeter,

01:09:03 ◼   ► where you can probably use the same case with presumably

01:09:09 ◼   ► a better camera and maybe a next generation A series CPU.

01:09:16 ◼   ► Everything-- exactly what you think a 7S would be.

01:09:19 ◼   ► And then also this new iPhone.

01:09:24 ◼   ► I don't, if this is any, if there's any truth to this,

01:09:27 ◼   ► I don't think there's any chance that they call

01:09:29 ◼   ► this new iPhone the iPhone 8.

01:09:31 ◼   ► There's just no way.

01:09:32 ◼   ► I think that they would call it the iPhone Pro.

01:09:34 ◼   ► Because I think that's the only way that you can have

01:09:38 ◼   ► a reasonable amount of excitement for the new 7S and 7S+

01:09:42 ◼   ► and have this new phone.

01:09:46 ◼   ► Like it doesn't make sense to me to have an iPhone 8

01:09:49 ◼   ► and a 7S in the same year.

01:09:51 ◼   ► Like why not just, 'cause who wouldn't just buy the 8?

01:09:54 ◼   ► Well, it's going to be expensive though, right?

01:09:57 ◼   ► Like it's the part of the room where it's going to be like a

01:09:59 ◼   ► thousand dollars, which is like, if you actually look at like

01:10:01 ◼   ► the, the full price of iPhones, that is not that ridiculous.

01:10:04 ◼   ► It's like 150 bucks more than a, than a similar respect.

01:10:08 ◼   ► Plus model would be right.

01:10:09 ◼   ► My assume if you assume that it probably starts at 128 or 256,

01:10:14 ◼   ► right?

01:10:14 ◼   ► Like which it probably does the 256.

01:10:16 ◼   ► No rumor came out today that it's going to have to two models

01:10:20 ◼   ► 64 and 256.

01:10:21 ◼   ► Really?

01:10:24 ◼   ► So I would guess it might be like 1049 for 64 and 1149 for 256.

01:10:30 ◼   ► At least it's only two.

01:10:33 ◼   ► But the idea would be that this would get slotted

01:10:36 ◼   ► in at a new higher price point.

01:10:38 ◼   ► That the 7S and 7S+ would take the existing price points,

01:10:42 ◼   ► and that they're actually-- instead of going lower,

01:10:44 ◼   ► they're actually going more upscale.

01:10:47 ◼   ► And that is a very Apple-like thing to do.

01:10:50 ◼   ► Yeah, it makes sense on a lot of levels.

01:10:52 ◼   ► I mean, the cynical take is of course,

01:10:54 ◼   ► they're going to make a lot more money

01:10:55 ◼   ► because the ASP is going to go up

01:10:56 ◼   ► on their most profitable product and all that.

01:10:58 ◼   ► That's a big deal for them financially,

01:11:01 ◼   ► for their performance on Wall Street, et cetera.

01:11:02 ◼   ► Okay, but also, there's good reasons for it also.

01:11:05 ◼   ► Like, one of them is they can afford

01:11:08 ◼   ► to put higher priced parts in this one.

01:11:11 ◼   ► So you could have something that maybe

01:11:14 ◼   ► they couldn't afford parts price-wise

01:11:17 ◼   ► to put in all the iPhones for a year,

01:11:19 ◼   ► 'cause that's a lot of phones,

01:11:20 ◼   ► then they can have it in this model for people who are willing to pay another couple hundred

01:11:23 ◼   ► bucks. And then also, you know, if the rumors are true that they're doing this crazy edge-to-edge

01:11:28 ◼   ► screen thing, I think it's pretty clearly going to be OLED. OLEDs are at this scale,

01:11:34 ◼   ► like possibly they're having production yield problems with the type and quality and whatever

01:11:39 ◼   ► that they're making. And so maybe they can't make like 80 million of them a quarter, whatever

01:11:43 ◼   ► the number is. So they have to have like a mainstream iPhone for this coming year that

01:11:49 ◼   ► isn't this crazy new screen, but they also

01:11:52 ◼   ► want to have this crazy new screen in whatever quantity

01:11:54 ◼   ► they can make for people who are willing to pay for it.

01:11:57 ◼   ► And it lets them keep the kind of innovation crown going.

01:12:03 ◼   ► Because it's like this wonderful showpiece

01:12:06 ◼   ► at the top of the line, even if like 60% of the buyers

01:12:09 ◼   ► aren't buying it.

01:12:12 ◼   ► I think, though, if they do this,

01:12:14 ◼   ► it has to be in sufficient quantity

01:12:17 ◼   ► that they can meet demand as well as they've met it

01:12:19 ◼   ► in recent years with whatever the new top of the line is.

01:12:23 ◼   ► Because I think a ton of people are going to want this,

01:12:26 ◼   ► if this exact rumor comes true.

01:12:29 ◼   ► I don't know if it's 40%, but it's going to be,

01:12:32 ◼   ► it's not going to be like just a sliver.

01:12:34 ◼   ► There's going to be an awful lot of people who,

01:12:37 ◼   ► for an extra 100 or $200 or even $300,

01:12:40 ◼   ► are going to say, I want the new hotness.

01:12:42 ◼   ► And if it's like, I could see this,

01:12:46 ◼   ► I think it's a risk if they're really going to do this.

01:12:49 ◼   ► And I think the idea-- if your complaint about Apple

01:12:51 ◼   ► is they don't take risks anymore, here's your story.

01:12:54 ◼   ► Because the risk I see happening is

01:12:56 ◼   ► if they make this announcement and 40% of everybody who

01:13:02 ◼   ► wants to buy a new iPhone in September wants this one,

01:13:05 ◼   ► and it's instantly backordered three months or something,

01:13:09 ◼   ► and nobody can get it instantly--

01:13:11 ◼   ► It will be.

01:13:12 ◼   ► --none of those people are then going to say, oh, cancel

01:13:15 ◼   ► my order, I'll get the 7S.

01:13:17 ◼   ► Nobody's going to do that.

01:13:18 ◼   ► They're all going to say, I'll wait.

01:13:20 ◼   ► So what I could see happening, if they can't meet demand,

01:13:24 ◼   ► at least as well as they've done in recent years,

01:13:26 ◼   ► with just to say, like in the quarter they just reported,

01:13:31 ◼   ► if they can't meet demand for this iPhone Pro

01:13:33 ◼   ► as well as they did for the 7 and 7 Plus three months ago,

01:13:38 ◼   ► in what turned out to be the best selling iPhone quarter

01:13:42 ◼   ► ever, then I think they're in real trouble,

01:13:46 ◼   ► because everybody who's waiting for it

01:13:48 ◼   ► is not going to settle on the 7S and 7S Plus.

01:13:50 ◼   ► And then year over year, it's going

01:13:51 ◼   ► to look bad, because they're going to take a big hit.

01:13:55 ◼   ► It'll even out eventually, because eventually-- it's

01:13:57 ◼   ► not like these people waiting for the iPhone Pro

01:13:59 ◼   ► are going to switch to Android.

01:14:01 ◼   ► They'll wait till January or February or March

01:14:03 ◼   ► or however long it takes to get it.

01:14:06 ◼   ► But it's going to look bad at that year over year,

01:14:09 ◼   ► quarter over quarter demand.

01:14:11 ◼   ► So I think that the idea, I've seen people say, oh, they'll do this, and it's sort of just like

01:14:17 ◼   ► a, like the 20th anniversary Mac, you know, it's like a little thing at the fringe for just a

01:14:23 ◼   ► handful of people who are willing to spend a little bit more. I don't think that's the case

01:14:29 ◼   ► at all. I think this might be the best-selling phone they come out with next year. And I happen

01:14:34 ◼   ► to know, I just, anecdotally, I see lots of people on Twitter, the people who really care. I mean,

01:14:38 ◼   ► I mean, I've gone on then this along with the iPhone 7

01:14:43 ◼   ► looking so much like an iPhone 6 and 6s.

01:14:47 ◼   ► I can't see why people are so obsessed

01:14:49 ◼   ► with the exterior of the phone.

01:14:51 ◼   ► But it's true that an awful lot of people

01:14:53 ◼   ► are, that they're not even getting

01:14:55 ◼   ► into what the camera does, how good the screen looks,

01:14:58 ◼   ► how good the touch sensor is, how good the new virtual home

01:15:01 ◼   ► button is, and all the other things

01:15:03 ◼   ► that there are to like about it.

01:15:04 ◼   ► There's an awful lot of people.

01:15:06 ◼   ► And you see it in all the tech reviews.

01:15:07 ◼   ► you certainly see it in most of the gadget reviews

01:15:09 ◼   ► that it's like, ah, it looks like the old iPhone, meh.

01:15:11 ◼   ► There's an awful lot of people who think like that

01:15:13 ◼   ► who've been waiting for years for, you know, screw it,

01:15:17 ◼   ► I'll hold onto my old phone for another year

01:15:19 ◼   ► because I know Apple's gonna come out

01:15:20 ◼   ► with a new thing eventually.

01:15:22 ◼   ► - Yeah, I mean, it matters, it matters a lot.

01:15:24 ◼   ► And I think you're right, like I think a lot of people

01:15:27 ◼   ► are going to want this new thing.

01:15:29 ◼   ► I mean, I think we've shown that as customers

01:15:32 ◼   ► that no matter what the new iPhone is,

01:15:35 ◼   ► matter how happy we are or aren't with it, you know, in

01:15:39 ◼   ► our social media posts and tech reviews and everything, we all

01:15:42 ◼   ► want it and we're all gonna buy it and we're all gonna pay

01:15:45 ◼   ► whatever it costs. So, yeah, they're gonna if this thing is

01:15:49 ◼   ► real, unless it unless it has some obscene downside which it

01:15:53 ◼   ► probably won't and and an extra 150 bucks is probably not

01:15:57 ◼   ► enough of a downside for enough people. Then they're gonna sell

01:16:01 ◼   ► this thing like literally just they're gonna sell as many as

01:16:04 ◼   ► as many as they can possibly make.

01:16:06 ◼   ► - I really wonder why people would buy the 7S and 7S Plus.

01:16:11 ◼   ► I can totally see why they would keep selling the 7

01:16:15 ◼   ► and 7 Plus at lower prices, but I just can't see

01:16:18 ◼   ► why people would sign up.

01:16:21 ◼   ► I guess it's people who have more sense, you know,

01:16:24 ◼   ► than I do financially and who are like,

01:16:25 ◼   ► "Well, it is $200, I'll just get the 7S."

01:16:29 ◼   ► - Yeah, and that's a lot of people.

01:16:32 ◼   ► Like, it's everybody who doesn't buy the top-of-the-line model in any other year.

01:16:38 ◼   ► Right. Right. People who don't, you know, don't buy the 256, even though they only

01:16:45 ◼   ► use 128 of their storage, just in case they—

01:16:48 ◼   ► I don't even buy the 256.

01:16:49 ◼   ► I do.

01:16:50 ◼   ► I know.

01:16:50 ◼   ► I can't stand the thought of not having the best one. I just can't. And I often think,

01:16:56 ◼   ► like—and then I talk—I say to myself, like, "What happens if you're, like, out and about,

01:16:59 ◼   ► and like breaking news happens and you start shooting video like of this like major event like I don't want to run out of

01:17:06 ◼   ► Space to shoot video because by I cheaped out on my phone by $100

01:17:10 ◼   ► You'd have to be shooting a lot of video. Well, I don't know just thought that occurs to me

01:17:16 ◼   ► I think the battery would die before you fill it up

01:17:18 ◼   ► We'll come back to this

01:17:20 ◼   ► I'm gonna take another break here for a sponsor

01:17:22 ◼   ► But we I'm not done with this because I want to take this back to the iPad because I don't think I don't think the iPhone

01:17:28 ◼   ► and story works with the iPad.

01:17:31 ◼   ► But I'm going to take a break here, and thanks

01:17:32 ◼   ► to our next sponsor, our good friends at Eero.

01:17:35 ◼   ► You guys know who Eero is.

01:17:36 ◼   ► We talk about them a lot lately.

01:17:38 ◼   ► They're new Wi-Fi base stations.

01:17:41 ◼   ► The old model of Wi-Fi is that you get a router,

01:17:44 ◼   ► you hook it up to your cable modem,

01:17:45 ◼   ► put it somewhere, probably wherever your cable box is

01:17:48 ◼   ► in your house, and then hope that that one router

01:17:50 ◼   ► would give you good Wi-Fi throughout your whole house.

01:17:54 ◼   ► We've been doing that for like 15 years.

01:17:56 ◼   ► Guess what? That model stinks.

01:17:58 ◼   ► And the old way, if you did that,

01:17:59 ◼   ► you could also maybe get like an extender or something,

01:18:02 ◼   ► but then all of a sudden you're playing like

01:18:03 ◼   ► junior sysadmin trying to get this to work

01:18:06 ◼   ► to have like a second device

01:18:08 ◼   ► that connects to the first device

01:18:09 ◼   ► and somehow extends the same network

01:18:11 ◼   ► so that when you're just open your device,

01:18:14 ◼   ► it looks like the same network,

01:18:16 ◼   ► whether you're upstairs or downstairs or whatever.

01:18:19 ◼   ► Eero is a system designed from the ground up

01:18:23 ◼   ► to have multiple devices spread throughout your house.

01:18:26 ◼   ► And it just coordinates all the nerdy stuff

01:18:28 ◼   ► to make that happen seamlessly all by itself.

01:18:33 ◼   ► You don't even have to separate which device is the main one

01:18:36 ◼   ► and which one are the satellites.

01:18:37 ◼   ► They're all actually the same little Apple TV style size

01:18:42 ◼   ► hockey puck type things.

01:18:45 ◼   ► Really nice design.

01:18:46 ◼   ► You can put them anywhere in your house.

01:18:48 ◼   ► If you have a Wi-Fi router anywhere in your house,

01:18:51 ◼   ► the Eero is almost certainly better

01:18:53 ◼   ► looking than smaller device.

01:18:55 ◼   ► They recommend three for most houses.

01:18:57 ◼   ► You could just go to their website,

01:18:58 ◼   ► and they'll tell you, put like how many floors

01:18:59 ◼   ► your house in, how many square feet,

01:19:01 ◼   ► and they'll give you a recommendation on that.

01:19:02 ◼   ► If you buy four and you really only need three,

01:19:04 ◼   ► you can send one back.

01:19:06 ◼   ► You configure the whole thing through a nice,

01:19:09 ◼   ► really nice app.

01:19:10 ◼   ► Like you don't have to go to like some weird website

01:19:13 ◼   ► on the router at 192.168, whatever, none of that stuff.

01:19:18 ◼   ► It's a really nice app.

01:19:19 ◼   ► And you don't have to worry, you're not playing sysadmin,

01:19:23 ◼   ► you're just setting it up the way you want it to be.

01:19:26 ◼   ► You want to have a guest network,

01:19:27 ◼   ► you'd say, give me a guest network.

01:19:28 ◼   ► Then your network has a guest network.

01:19:30 ◼   ► That's it, you're done.

01:19:31 ◼   ► Really, really great.

01:19:32 ◼   ► I've got one here, I've set it up,

01:19:34 ◼   ► I've replaced an Apple base station setup in our house

01:19:39 ◼   ► with Eero, and the speeds are way better.

01:19:41 ◼   ► They even tell you in the app what your speeds are,

01:19:43 ◼   ► so you can check, and it'll even tell you

01:19:45 ◼   ► what kind of speeds you're getting from your cable company

01:19:48 ◼   ► or FiOS or whatever you've got.

01:19:50 ◼   ► They even have great customer support.

01:19:51 ◼   ► It's something that the company is really invested in.

01:19:53 ◼   ► You can call and you get a hold of a real wifi expert

01:19:56 ◼   ► within 30 seconds just in case you need it.

01:19:59 ◼   ► Because look, this stuff's tough.

01:20:00 ◼   ► So maybe something happens.

01:20:01 ◼   ► 30 seconds, you're talking to an expert.

01:20:04 ◼   ► Where do you go to find out more?

01:20:05 ◼   ► Easy, go to ero.com/thetalkshow.

01:20:10 ◼   ► Go to the talk show, use that code,

01:20:12 ◼   ► and you'll get something nice.

01:20:15 ◼   ► I think you get expedited shipping.

01:20:18 ◼   ► Yeah, that's pretty-- - I'm pretty sure

01:20:19 ◼   ► that's it, yeah.

01:20:19 ◼   ► Expedited shipping at eero.com.

01:20:22 ◼   ► So use that code, the talk show.

01:20:24 ◼   ► What's your code?

01:20:25 ◼   ► Probably ATP?

01:20:26 ◼   ► - I think so.

01:20:27 ◼   ► - You can use ATP too, and then Marco

01:20:29 ◼   ► will get credit for it.

01:20:30 ◼   ► Either way, it's fine with me.

01:20:31 ◼   ► Good company, eero.

01:20:34 ◼   ► So anyway, I don't think that this middle iPad

01:20:40 ◼   ► that doesn't have a bezel, I don't think that it has

01:20:43 ◼   ► that same cache that this rumored iPhone does.

01:20:47 ◼   ► Like, would I pay an extra $200

01:20:50 ◼   ► to get a way cooler looking iPhone?

01:20:52 ◼   ► Yes.

01:20:53 ◼   ► Would I pay an extra $200 to get a cooler looking iPad?

01:20:55 ◼   ► No.

01:20:56 ◼   ► I don't think so.

01:20:58 ◼   ► - Well, I think it's, you know,

01:21:00 ◼   ► the iPad approach that Apple has taken in recent years

01:21:04 ◼   ► has been pretty much scattershot.

01:21:06 ◼   ► Just like, we have this product category,

01:21:09 ◼   ► it's not performing as well as we want it to or need it to.

01:21:13 ◼   ► So, let's try a bunch of stuff.

01:21:16 ◼   ► And that has resulted in a lot of weird attempts for things

01:21:19 ◼   ► and a lot of things that are really good.

01:21:21 ◼   ► And the whole iPad Pro branch of the product line,

01:21:25 ◼   ► the whole thing with making a pencil

01:21:28 ◼   ► after everyone assumed Apple never would

01:21:30 ◼   ► 'cause Steve Jobs made one comment 20 years ago.

01:21:33 ◼   ► They've been just trying a bunch of stuff.

01:21:38 ◼   ► And the fact is, what most people need out of their iPads

01:21:44 ◼   ► to get more work done or more of their work done

01:21:47 ◼   ► is really tricky, difficult, long-term software stuff

01:21:52 ◼   ► that's much harder to do.

01:21:53 ◼   ► It's much easier to just,

01:21:55 ◼   ► let's try some new screen sizes

01:21:56 ◼   ► and some new hardware abilities.

01:21:58 ◼   ► That's actually easier to do than,

01:22:00 ◼   ► let's figure out file management on iOS or windowing.

01:22:04 ◼   ► Those are way harder.

01:22:06 ◼   ► Or let's fix the App Store pricing ecosystem.

01:22:10 ◼   ► That's way harder than Apple,

01:22:13 ◼   ► who's already an excellent hardware company,

01:22:15 ◼   ► making one more screen size,

01:22:16 ◼   ► or making one more hardware configuration.

01:22:18 ◼   ► - The iPad has never been, to my mind,

01:22:21 ◼   ► an ooh and aah industrial design product,

01:22:25 ◼   ► except for maybe the first one.

01:22:28 ◼   ► The first one was like,

01:22:30 ◼   ► 'cause it was just like a quote unquote,

01:22:32 ◼   ► they're making a tablet,

01:22:33 ◼   ► nobody knows it's gonna be thick,

01:22:35 ◼   ► is what, how big is it, nobody knew, you know,

01:22:38 ◼   ► what it was gonna be like.

01:22:41 ◼   ► And then we saw it and it was like,

01:22:42 ◼   ► this is really nice and it's wow this is really kind of cool to have something with the touch

01:22:46 ◼   ► latency of an iPhone on a big screen. It was impressive but then every iteration since then

01:22:53 ◼   ► has been very iterative to my mind. Like there's never been one generation where you're like

01:22:58 ◼   ► whoa with the possible exception of the move from non-retina to retina but even then it's not really

01:23:06 ◼   ► the way it looks without turning it on,

01:23:11 ◼   ► you know, like the rumors about this iPhone Pro or iPhone 8

01:23:15 ◼   ► or whatever you want to call it, are that it's going to look

01:23:17 ◼   ► like, wow, what is that before you even turn it on?

01:23:22 ◼   ► It doesn't seem-- you know, that was never really the case

01:23:24 ◼   ► with iPads.

01:23:25 ◼   ► I mean, the current iPads look an awful lot

01:23:28 ◼   ► like the original one.

01:23:29 ◼   ► I mean, the backs are flat now, and the bezel on the side

01:23:33 ◼   ► is narrower.

01:23:34 ◼   ► But like the top and bottom bezel

01:23:35 ◼   ► is almost exactly the same.

01:23:38 ◼   ► - I think what it is, it's a combination of them

01:23:41 ◼   ► trying to figure out what else can we try here

01:23:44 ◼   ► to turn around the sales curve and to let this product

01:23:47 ◼   ► really come into its own.

01:23:49 ◼   ► And then also just like the iPad,

01:23:52 ◼   ► I don't think it's about flashiness.

01:23:54 ◼   ► I think this is actually just about utility.

01:23:56 ◼   ► The iPad really struggles between how much screen size

01:24:01 ◼   ► you get versus how nice it is to use.

01:24:03 ◼   ► It's really this incredibly polar opposite relationship

01:24:07 ◼   ► where if you want to get anything more done on it

01:24:11 ◼   ► than browsing the web and watching video,

01:24:14 ◼   ► you really want more screen space.

01:24:16 ◼   ► If you try multitasking at all, the 9.7 can do it,

01:24:21 ◼   ► but it's pretty tight.

01:24:23 ◼   ► And the people we know in the community

01:24:26 ◼   ► who are big pro iPad users who get a lot of their work done

01:24:30 ◼   ► on iPads almost always prefer the 12.9 now

01:24:34 ◼   ► for getting like quote work done,

01:24:36 ◼   ► because it has more screen space.

01:24:38 ◼   ► But anyone who's ever used a 12.9 can tell you

01:24:42 ◼   ► like it's pretty big for an iPad.

01:24:45 ◼   ► Like for a laptop it's still nice and small,

01:24:47 ◼   ► but for an iPad the way you use and hold an iPad,

01:24:52 ◼   ► it really is quite large.

01:24:55 ◼   ► And so adding that screen space to get the 12.9

01:25:00 ◼   ► and its ability to have multitasking be better

01:25:02 ◼   ► and to get more work done and more effectively

01:25:05 ◼   ► has come at a great cost of this kind of unwieldy size

01:25:09 ◼   ► for hand-holded iPad use.

01:25:11 ◼   ► That's why I think a lot of 12.9 users use keyboards

01:25:15 ◼   ► and stuff where it's kind of more like a laptop

01:25:17 ◼   ► propped up on a table more of the time

01:25:19 ◼   ► 'cause if you're actually using it one-handed,

01:25:21 ◼   ► one hand to hold it and the other hand to tuck shit

01:25:23 ◼   ► or use the pencil, that's a pretty big iPad to do that with.

01:25:26 ◼   ► It's kind of awkward, it's kind of unwieldy.

01:25:28 ◼   ► So this 10 point whatever I think is an attempt to cram

01:25:33 ◼   ► that screen resolution into the smaller body,

01:25:37 ◼   ► which for iPad power users,

01:25:40 ◼   ► and I guess we don't know how many of those there are,

01:25:43 ◼   ► but for iPad power users, that sounds incredible.

01:25:46 ◼   ► That sounds like exactly what so many people would want

01:25:49 ◼   ► in I want an iPad that is still small enough

01:25:54 ◼   ► to feel and handle like an iPad.

01:25:57 ◼   ► and that means 9.7 roughly physical dimensions.

01:26:01 ◼   ► But that would have more screen space

01:26:03 ◼   ► so I could better multitask

01:26:04 ◼   ► and get more of my work done on this device

01:26:06 ◼   ► or get my work done more efficiently on this device.

01:26:08 ◼   ► - And the speculation I think is that the pixel resolution,

01:26:11 ◼   ► instead of being at 266 pixels print,

01:26:15 ◼   ► it's gonna be 326,

01:26:17 ◼   ► which is the pixel resolution of the Retina Mini.

01:26:21 ◼   ► - And the iPhone. - And the iPhone.

01:26:23 ◼   ► That seems really small to me

01:26:26 ◼   ► for a device that you would hold at a further away distance,

01:26:29 ◼   ► but maybe that's just my aging vision speaking.

01:26:32 ◼   ► I don't know.

01:26:33 ◼   ► - It's just like the iPad Mini.

01:26:34 ◼   ► You know, it's like if the iPad, you know,

01:26:35 ◼   ► the iPad Mini just has like the 9.7 resolution shrunk down,

01:26:39 ◼   ► it's gonna be that same relationship.

01:26:40 ◼   ► So like if the iPad Mini looks acceptable to you

01:26:43 ◼   ► and you can use it without eye strain,

01:26:44 ◼   ► then this would probably work for you too.

01:26:46 ◼   ► - It just seems like a confusing decision though,

01:26:50 ◼   ► which one you would buy, doesn't it?

01:26:52 ◼   ► You don't think so.

01:26:53 ◼   ► - Well, it's probably gonna be more expensive

01:26:54 ◼   ► than the equivalent 9.7.

01:26:56 ◼   ► So it's probably gonna be like 100 bucks more at least,

01:26:58 ◼   ► so you know, and it may be slightly cheaper

01:27:01 ◼   ► than the 12.9 version of it.

01:27:03 ◼   ► So who knows?

01:27:04 ◼   ► I mean, we'll see what they do.

01:27:07 ◼   ► I think at this point, it's very clear

01:27:09 ◼   ► that Apple's strategy with the iPad,

01:27:10 ◼   ► again, it's scattershot, it's like,

01:27:12 ◼   ► let's just try a bunch of stuff and see what works,

01:27:15 ◼   ► and just give people tons and tons of options.

01:27:17 ◼   ► You know, they will now sell you an iPad

01:27:21 ◼   ► at pretty much every $100 price point from $250

01:27:24 ◼   ► on up to like $1100.

01:27:27 ◼   ► And it's like any of these price points,

01:27:28 ◼   ► pick your price, whatever you're willing to pay for an iPad,

01:27:31 ◼   ► we got one to sell you at exactly that price point,

01:27:33 ◼   ► but a little bit more after accessories.

01:27:35 ◼   ► And I think for what they're trying to do with the iPad,

01:27:40 ◼   ► like I think it's very clear that again,

01:27:41 ◼   ► I think they maybe don't really know what will work

01:27:46 ◼   ► and what won't to boost sales

01:27:49 ◼   ► or to carry this platform forward.

01:27:51 ◼   ► So they are just trying a bunch of random stuff

01:27:53 ◼   ► at this point.

01:27:54 ◼   ► And I'm sure there's more thought that goes into it

01:27:55 ◼   ► than that, but it certainly seems like they're taking

01:27:58 ◼   ► a lot of hardware risks here in order to just cover

01:28:01 ◼   ► more of the market in hopes that people will want

01:28:05 ◼   ► what they're now making without having to really

01:28:07 ◼   ► dramatically change iOS to be more PC-like.

01:28:10 ◼   ► - I don't know, it just seems really,

01:28:11 ◼   ► it just seems really curious to me that it would,

01:28:13 ◼   ► that this new bezel design would debut alongside

01:28:17 ◼   ► the iPad Pro 2, you know?

01:28:20 ◼   ► I don't know.

01:28:21 ◼   ► I believe, I'm not saying I don't--

01:28:23 ◼   ► - You probably wouldn't under Steve,

01:28:24 ◼   ► but I think this is kind of a hallmark of Tim Cook's Apple,

01:28:26 ◼   ► is like, you know, just, is not an aversion

01:28:31 ◼   ► to throwing a bunch of different options out there

01:28:33 ◼   ► for people to choose from. - I don't think

01:28:34 ◼   ► that's Tim Cook, I really don't.

01:28:36 ◼   ► I don't know.

01:28:37 ◼   ► I don't know what to think.

01:28:39 ◼   ► I think there's something we're missing if this is true.

01:28:41 ◼   ► I just don't get it.

01:28:42 ◼   ► I don't know.

01:28:46 ◼   ► I do think-- have you played around with the math?

01:28:49 ◼   ► MacRumors had a report from Ming-Chi Kuo on this new--

01:28:52 ◼   ► the iPhone, as I'm calling it, the iPhone Pro,

01:28:54 ◼   ► as others are saying, the iPhone 8, which supposedly

01:28:57 ◼   ► has a 5.8-inch OLED display.

01:29:00 ◼   ► But that's the whole device.

01:29:03 ◼   ► And only 5.15 inches of it are really

01:29:07 ◼   ► what we think of as the iPhone display now.

01:29:09 ◼   ► And the rest is the chin.

01:29:11 ◼   ► And presumably, there'll be new features in the OS that

01:29:14 ◼   ► can light stuff up down there.

01:29:15 ◼   ► But basically, if you do the math,

01:29:22 ◼   ► and he's exactly right, it's a device

01:29:25 ◼   ► that's a very different aspect ratio than the iPhone

01:29:28 ◼   ► as we know it.

01:29:29 ◼   ► Yeah, like it's too tall and skinny.

01:29:30 ◼   ► Yeah, it's basically a device that the hardware

01:29:35 ◼   ► is as narrow as an iPhone SE, because it's

01:29:38 ◼   ► an edge-to-edge display.

01:29:40 ◼   ► And if you actually put an iPhone SE or an iPhone 5

01:29:44 ◼   ► on top of a 4.7-inch iPhone and turn the screen on,

01:29:48 ◼   ► and then put this, like an iPhone SE on top of it,

01:29:51 ◼   ► it's pretty much exactly the same width.

01:29:53 ◼   ► - Hang on, I'm doing this now.

01:29:55 ◼   ► - Yeah.

01:29:56 ◼   ► - I got this right here, all right.

01:29:57 ◼   ► - So it's a device-- - Yeah, you're right.

01:29:59 ◼   ► - It's a device that's actually narrower in hand

01:30:02 ◼   ► than an iPhone 7, you know, than a 4.7-inch.

01:30:05 ◼   ► It's more like an SE in hand,

01:30:07 ◼   ► but it's as tall as an iPhone 7.

01:30:09 ◼   ► In other words, it's as tall, almost exactly the height,

01:30:12 ◼   ► and it's a device of the iPhone with a 4.7 inch screen.

01:30:17 ◼   ► So as a piece of hardware in your hand,

01:30:18 ◼   ► not even turning it on, it would be smaller than an iPhone 7,

01:30:21 ◼   ► about the same height and a little narrower.

01:30:23 ◼   ► But the aspect ratio that KGI is saying,

01:30:31 ◼   ► instead of being 16 to 9, it's more like 2.15 to 1.

01:30:37 ◼   ► It's more like a widescreen movie,

01:30:39 ◼   ► like a anamorphic movie.

01:30:41 ◼   ► It's a lot wider.

01:30:43 ◼   ► It's not just a little bit wider than 16 to nine.

01:30:45 ◼   ► It's a lot wider.

01:30:47 ◼   ► - Yeah, I mean, that's why I think

01:30:50 ◼   ► the most likely explanation for this is just like,

01:30:55 ◼   ► there's some other key piece of information

01:30:56 ◼   ► that we don't know about how the screen is used,

01:31:00 ◼   ► how it's shaped around the device.

01:31:02 ◼   ► Maybe there's this function area at the bottom

01:31:06 ◼   ► where presumably some kind of like home button area will go.

01:31:10 ◼   ► Maybe there's one at the top also,

01:31:11 ◼   ► which we could slice off that other part of the aspect ratio

01:31:14 ◼   ► and therefore make it look right, who knows.

01:31:17 ◼   ► But this is getting into really nitty-gritty specifics

01:31:21 ◼   ► that I think we probably don't have enough information

01:31:25 ◼   ► to really gauge what's real here and what's not.

01:31:29 ◼   ► I mean, it's so early and there's no other information

01:31:33 ◼   ► backing this up besides KGI stuff

01:31:36 ◼   ► which again, KGI stuff has been good

01:31:38 ◼   ► about a lot of details about stuff.

01:31:40 ◼   ► - Especially on component type stuff, right.

01:31:43 ◼   ► - Right, but all this is saying is the panel resolution.

01:31:48 ◼   ► And there's lots of things that could affect

01:31:53 ◼   ► that being correct or not, and that being like

01:31:56 ◼   ► how we think of the screen shape on the phone or not.

01:31:59 ◼   ► OLED allows lots of flexibility.

01:32:01 ◼   ► It allows not only different shape things,

01:32:03 ◼   ► but it allows holes to be cut in panels,

01:32:05 ◼   ► and stuff like that, you can do all sorts of crazy stuff

01:32:08 ◼   ► with OLED.

01:32:09 ◼   ► So it could be something weird that we don't,

01:32:11 ◼   ► that we can't explain this yet with what we know,

01:32:14 ◼   ► but it could be a much less interesting story

01:32:16 ◼   ► than, oh, it's gonna be a new shaped phone.

01:32:20 ◼   ► Like, well, it might just be, it might look like

01:32:22 ◼   ► what we have now in general proportions and aspect ratios

01:32:26 ◼   ► and just have this weird implementation detail

01:32:28 ◼   ► about why the screen happens to be this certain resolution.

01:32:31 ◼   ► - Would you want it to be that tall, do you think?

01:32:33 ◼   ► Like what if it really is just, it's as wide as iPhone 7,

01:32:38 ◼   ► but tall, you know, way taller.

01:32:41 ◼   ► So like you'd see more messages in a list in mail.

01:32:45 ◼   ► If you're reading an article,

01:32:46 ◼   ► you'd see more of the article on screen at once,

01:32:49 ◼   ► but at the exact same width.

01:32:51 ◼   ► - Hmm, as the designer of an app

01:32:56 ◼   ► that has to lay out a giant square

01:32:57 ◼   ► in the middle of its now playing screen,

01:32:59 ◼   ► that would be awesome.

01:33:00 ◼   ► But as a user of the phone,

01:33:02 ◼   ► I don't think I need that really.

01:33:03 ◼   ► I mean, I think there's a lot of advantages

01:33:06 ◼   ► to the phone display being 16 by nine.

01:33:08 ◼   ► One of them is when you turn it sideways and shoot video,

01:33:11 ◼   ► you have the whole screen and it looks right.

01:33:13 ◼   ► So there's a lot of advantages to that.

01:33:16 ◼   ► 16 by nine allows you to lay out a lot of different shapes

01:33:19 ◼   ► fairly nicely within it.

01:33:21 ◼   ► Squares, four by three, so it's,

01:33:25 ◼   ► I don't think I really want the screen

01:33:28 ◼   ► to be taller and skinnier, but who knows?

01:33:30 ◼   ► I mean, I'd have to actually see it and use it.

01:33:32 ◼   ► Well, the screen wouldn't be any skinnier.

01:33:34 ◼   ► And the numbers add up.

01:33:35 ◼   ► So he's saying that this is-- his number's

01:33:37 ◼   ► for the pixel resolution.

01:33:39 ◼   ► 2,436 high.

01:33:40 ◼   ► This is for the display area, not the whole panel,

01:33:43 ◼   ► but the part that would be used as a display area by 1,125

01:33:47 ◼   ► wide.

01:33:48 ◼   ► Now 1,125 wide is really interesting

01:33:50 ◼   ► because an iPhone 7 and the iPhone 6S and the 6,

01:33:54 ◼   ► the ones that were 4.7 inches, have 375 point

01:34:01 ◼   ► and at 2x and it's in pixels, it's what is 375 times two.

01:34:06 ◼   ► It's 750.

01:34:09 ◼   ► - Yeah.

01:34:10 ◼   ► - And so if you take 375 times three, guess what?

01:34:13 ◼   ► You get 1125.

01:34:15 ◼   ► - So basically it's saying we're gonna have 3x.

01:34:17 ◼   ► - It's exactly 3x.

01:34:19 ◼   ► So it would be the exact same point for point size

01:34:22 ◼   ► as the iPhone 4.7 inch screens that we know,

01:34:26 ◼   ► except instead of being at 2x resolution, it would be 3x.

01:34:29 ◼   ► And unlike the Plus phones, it would be a real 3X

01:34:32 ◼   ► with no downsampling.

01:34:34 ◼   ► - I mean, that would look great,

01:34:36 ◼   ► 'cause the Plus phones with their like,

01:34:38 ◼   ► rendered 3X scaled down to 1080p,

01:34:41 ◼   ► that already looks really nice.

01:34:43 ◼   ► - It does.

01:34:44 ◼   ► - It isn't a massive difference over 2X,

01:34:47 ◼   ► but it is a difference.

01:34:48 ◼   ► It does just kinda look nicer. - It does look better.

01:34:50 ◼   ► - And I can't explain why.

01:34:52 ◼   ► I don't think I can really see the pixels for making it,

01:34:55 ◼   ► but it just does look nicer.

01:34:57 ◼   ► So to have it be true 3X and not even have to do

01:35:01 ◼   ► the downsampling compared to what we have now

01:35:04 ◼   ► in the 4.7 inch line I think would look really great.

01:35:06 ◼   ► - Yeah, I think that like 10 years ago or prior,

01:35:10 ◼   ► the downsampling technique, even if it was technically

01:35:13 ◼   ► a higher resolution screen, but if you downsampled,

01:35:16 ◼   ► it might look bad.

01:35:17 ◼   ► I think it probably would have.

01:35:18 ◼   ► But I think at this point the pixels are so small

01:35:20 ◼   ► that downsampling actually makes it look better

01:35:22 ◼   ► so long as the actual pixels are smaller.

01:35:24 ◼   ► But anyway, this rumored phone would actually be true

01:35:27 ◼   ► to 3x resolution, which, and the fact that the numbers

01:35:30 ◼   ► really add up makes, gives me, makes me think

01:35:33 ◼   ► that he's onto something.

01:35:34 ◼   ► - Yeah, I think, 'cause like, these are weird numbers

01:35:39 ◼   ► to just make up or to like, to misinterpret, you know?

01:35:43 ◼   ► Like, so there is probably something here,

01:35:46 ◼   ► I think again, the only question comes down to like,

01:35:49 ◼   ► how are these pixels actually allocated

01:35:51 ◼   ► to the various screen elements?

01:35:53 ◼   ► - Right, and what does the app get

01:35:54 ◼   ► and what does the system get?

01:35:56 ◼   ► So anyway, the other last aspect of this

01:35:59 ◼   ► is that it seems like nobody knows what the hell is

01:36:01 ◼   ► going on with Touch ID.

01:36:03 ◼   ► It seems like some of this stuff is like, well,

01:36:05 ◼   ► Touch ID must go away because the display goes all the way

01:36:08 ◼   ► to the bottom, so there's nowhere

01:36:09 ◼   ► to put the little Sapphire button.

01:36:11 ◼   ► Which is wrong.

01:36:12 ◼   ► I think so, too.

01:36:13 ◼   ► I don't think-- I think that there's a way

01:36:16 ◼   ► to integrate it into the screen.

01:36:19 ◼   ► Just put it in the middle.

01:36:21 ◼   ► And clearly, the move away from the physical button

01:36:25 ◼   ► last year to a virtual button that has haptic feedback would play right into this.

01:36:32 ◼   ► But then there's all these rumors, also rumors that they're going to use a new fancy new

01:36:35 ◼   ► camera to do face recognition or something like that.

01:36:39 ◼   ► I wouldn't be surprised if they do that, but I would be a little surprised if they did

01:36:42 ◼   ► it in place of Touch ID because I feel like Touch ID, it seems like it's a habit people

01:36:47 ◼   ► already have.

01:36:48 ◼   ► I don't feel like they could take that away.

01:36:50 ◼   ► Well, I mean, they again, they could they could try whatever they want, especially if

01:36:55 ◼   ► it's only this weird high end one that is already kind of like selecting for fewer buyers.

01:36:59 ◼   ► But but I think it's unlikely. I'm with you on that. I mean, again, we'll see what happens.

01:37:04 ◼   ► I mean, I think we all thought the headphone jack was unlikely to but no, I didn't. Okay,

01:37:08 ◼   ► yeah, that's right. You didn't I couldn't wait for him to get rid of my headphone jack.

01:37:13 ◼   ► (sighs)

01:37:14 ◼   ► Anyway, so that's, I don't have the energy for that today.

01:37:18 ◼   ► But yeah, the whole face recognition thing,

01:37:22 ◼   ► I'm sure they wouldn't do it

01:37:26 ◼   ► if they couldn't do it really well.

01:37:27 ◼   ► - Right, the same thing with the fingerprint,

01:37:29 ◼   ► where the first fingerprint sensor was pretty darn good.

01:37:32 ◼   ► - Yeah, and like when you compared

01:37:33 ◼   ► to previous fingerprint sensors at the time,

01:37:36 ◼   ► they were all really awkward and garbagey,

01:37:39 ◼   ► and Apple came out with a really good one,

01:37:40 ◼   ► and now they're all pretty, you know,

01:37:42 ◼   ► they're all a lot better than they used to be.

01:37:44 ◼   ► People saying now that they're like face recognition

01:37:47 ◼   ► on their Samsung whatever whatever was crappy,

01:37:51 ◼   ► I think again like I don't see Apple doing this

01:37:54 ◼   ► unless they could do it really well.

01:37:56 ◼   ► So I wouldn't worry too much about what these things

01:37:58 ◼   ► have been like in the past from other people.

01:38:00 ◼   ► But I still, despite saying that,

01:38:02 ◼   ► I still think it's unlikely that this is what they have

01:38:06 ◼   ► in mind just 'cause it doesn't sound like it would be better

01:38:09 ◼   ► it sounds like it would be worse.

01:38:11 ◼   ► I guess the other thing, too, is that when I first

01:38:14 ◼   ► heard these rumors a few months ago,

01:38:16 ◼   ► I was really, really skeptical.

01:38:17 ◼   ► Because again, same thing with the iPads.

01:38:19 ◼   ► It's so atypical for Apple to introduce

01:38:24 ◼   ► two generations of new stuff at the same time.

01:38:28 ◼   ► If they do this, the 7S and 7S Plus

01:38:30 ◼   ► are totally going to get lost because they're

01:38:32 ◼   ► debuting as mid-range phones.

01:38:34 ◼   ► And that just hasn't happened before.

01:38:38 ◼   ► And the other aspect is that Apple

01:38:39 ◼   ► has had so much success since the iPhone 6

01:38:42 ◼   ► by selling two-size phones.

01:38:44 ◼   ► And really, three-size, if you count the SE,

01:38:46 ◼   ► which is obviously a surprise hit.

01:38:48 ◼   ► I mean, they've admitted that they underestimated demand

01:38:51 ◼   ► for that.

01:38:54 ◼   ► So multiple sizes have proven so popular.

01:38:56 ◼   ► Why in the world would they come out with a brand new design

01:38:58 ◼   ► at only one size?

01:39:00 ◼   ► But when you do all the math and think about this,

01:39:03 ◼   ► it's actually a pretty good size to be a one-size-fits-all,

01:39:07 ◼   ► because the usable display area is 0.45 inches more

01:39:17 ◼   ► than the 4.7 inch phone diagonally.

01:39:20 ◼   ► It's 0.35 inches less than the 5.5 inch phone.

01:39:24 ◼   ► Yeah, so it's right in the middle.

01:39:25 ◼   ► Right in the middle, and air is a little bit on the bigger side.

01:39:29 ◼   ► But physically in hand, it's narrower than the 4.7 inch

01:39:33 ◼   ► phone, which is, to me, the biggest

01:39:34 ◼   ► factor of what makes the iPhone SE so nice to hold, is that it's so narrow.

01:39:40 ◼   ► So in terms of like, well, you like something that fits in your hand really securely and

01:39:45 ◼   ► that you can go from side to side with your thumb, and you like the fit more information

01:39:50 ◼   ► on screen at once, like an iPhone 7 Plus.

01:39:53 ◼   ► And the last aspect to all these rumors is that it's supposedly going to have an iPhone

01:40:00 ◼   ► 7+ caliber, at least in the general range, battery, as opposed to the 4.7, because that's

01:40:06 ◼   ► the other factor. I mean, I know it. I mean, there's some people who just love the big

01:40:09 ◼   ► phone. And you and I both know people who have the 7+, and they don't even like the

01:40:14 ◼   ► size, but they do. I mean, I think you were even talking about it where the battery life

01:40:18 ◼   ► alone is sometimes a reason enough to get it. Like, "Ah, it doesn't fit my pocket.

01:40:23 ◼   ► It's too big to hold." But I could use it all day and still have battery life at the

01:40:28 ◼   ► end of the day.

01:40:29 ◼   ► Although to be fair, that was a lot more true

01:40:31 ◼   ► of the 6 versus 6 Plus than it has been

01:40:34 ◼   ► of the 6S or 7 generations.

01:40:36 ◼   ► The gap is now smaller, and to the point where now,

01:40:40 ◼   ► the battery life on the 7 is actually pretty decent.

01:40:43 ◼   ► And on the 7 Plus, it is better,

01:40:45 ◼   ► but it's not better by as much as it used to be

01:40:47 ◼   ► in the previous ones.

01:40:48 ◼   ► - Yeah, it's gotta say, the 7 has the best battery life

01:40:52 ◼   ► for me, I think, of any iPhone I've ever had.

01:40:54 ◼   ► - Yeah, me too.

01:40:55 ◼   ► - The only time I ever get down into red

01:40:57 ◼   ► is on days when I somehow in a circumstance

01:41:01 ◼   ► where I didn't even start the day with 100%,

01:41:03 ◼   ► which is rare 'cause usually I sleep with it charging.

01:41:06 ◼   ► But anyway.

01:41:07 ◼   ► All right, let me take another break here

01:41:11 ◼   ► and thank our third and final sponsor of the day.

01:41:14 ◼   ► Who do you think it is?

01:41:16 ◼   ► Do you have a guess?

01:41:17 ◼   ► - Hmm, Casper, Squarespace, Hover.

01:41:21 ◼   ► - Well, you can only guess one.

01:41:23 ◼   ► - Hmm, I'm gonna go Squarespace.

01:41:25 ◼   ► - Ah, Casper.

01:41:26 ◼   ► Ah, Casper, you guys know Casper,

01:41:29 ◼   ► they're the obsessively engineered mattress

01:41:31 ◼   ► and they sell it at a shockingly fair price.

01:41:34 ◼   ► Go to casper.com/thetalkshow and use that code,

01:41:37 ◼   ► the talk show, and you will save 50 bucks

01:41:39 ◼   ► towards any mattress, insert X asterisk right there.

01:41:43 ◼   ► There's a footnote, you have to wait for it.

01:41:45 ◼   ► Here's the deal.

01:41:46 ◼   ► - From your condition to apply.

01:41:47 ◼   ► - Casper to me is, it's like an Apple-like company

01:41:51 ◼   ► where to me design is making decisions

01:41:55 ◼   ► And they've designed one perfect mattress.

01:41:58 ◼   ► You don't go to Casper and select

01:42:00 ◼   ► from like six different types of mattress

01:42:03 ◼   ► and then get the size you want.

01:42:05 ◼   ► No, you just pick the size you want.

01:42:06 ◼   ► That's it.

01:42:06 ◼   ► And then they send it to you.

01:42:07 ◼   ► And it's one perfect mattress.

01:42:09 ◼   ► They've engineered-- they have mattress engineers.

01:42:10 ◼   ► That's a real thing.

01:42:11 ◼   ► They spent a lot of money and time

01:42:13 ◼   ► to get one mattress that's just--

01:42:16 ◼   ► is the right mattress for most people.

01:42:18 ◼   ► A combination of supportive memory foam and all sorts

01:42:24 ◼   ► of other technology, ships to you in a little box.

01:42:27 ◼   ► It's the size of a little dorm room refrigerator,

01:42:31 ◼   ► or maybe a little bigger than that, but remarkably small

01:42:34 ◼   ► for a big mattress.

01:42:35 ◼   ► You put it in your bedroom.

01:42:36 ◼   ► You open the box, following their instructions.

01:42:38 ◼   ► It sucks all the air out of the room to fill the mattress.

01:42:41 ◼   ► So you get lightheaded when you do it, and you kind of get dizzy.

01:42:47 ◼   ► But it's fun to be in a room when it happens.

01:42:49 ◼   ► It makes a very cool sound.

01:42:50 ◼   ► And then, boom, you've got a great mattress.

01:42:53 ◼   ► I say it all the time.

01:42:55 ◼   ► Going to a mattress store is gross.

01:42:56 ◼   ► Because what do you want to do?

01:42:57 ◼   ► You want to sit on a bed that all sorts of other people

01:42:59 ◼   ► have come in and sat on and laid on and whatever?

01:43:02 ◼   ► And laying on a mattress with bright fluorescent lights

01:43:05 ◼   ► in a mattress store doesn't simulate sleep.

01:43:09 ◼   ► So the fact that you can actually sit

01:43:10 ◼   ► on a mattress in a retail store doesn't really

01:43:12 ◼   ► give you any better hint of whether you're

01:43:13 ◼   ► going to light the mattress you buy anyway.

01:43:15 ◼   ► So why don't you just trust Casper?

01:43:17 ◼   ► Buy it.

01:43:18 ◼   ► Next time you need a mattress, they give you

01:43:19 ◼   ► a 100-night home trial.

01:43:21 ◼   ► If you don't love it, they'll just give them a ring

01:43:23 ◼   ► or go to the website, they'll pick it up at your house

01:43:26 ◼   ► and give you a full refund.

01:43:27 ◼   ► No questions asked, no hard sell.

01:43:29 ◼   ► This is not like, it's not like sending your cable box back

01:43:32 ◼   ► and cord cutting where they send like a Gestapo after you

01:43:36 ◼   ► to try to keep you.

01:43:37 ◼   ► No, they'll just say, okay, sure, sorry.

01:43:39 ◼   ► Here's your money back, we'll come pick up the mattress.

01:43:42 ◼   ► Here's the asterisk.

01:43:43 ◼   ► They also sell a dog mattress.

01:43:45 ◼   ► And I keep hearing from people who've bought it

01:43:46 ◼   ► for their dogs that their dogs love.

01:43:49 ◼   ► Yeah, they have a dog mattress, and it's very, very popular.

01:43:51 ◼   ► People who've got it-- listeners of the show

01:43:54 ◼   ► who've gotten it love it.

01:43:55 ◼   ► But here's the deal.

01:43:56 ◼   ► You don't save the $50 on it, because it's

01:43:58 ◼   ► like a lower cost mattress.

01:44:00 ◼   ► And this is the gist of it, is I got a whole bunch of email

01:44:02 ◼   ► from people who bought the dog mattress.

01:44:04 ◼   ► And then they said, hey, I just wanted to say,

01:44:05 ◼   ► I love the mattress.

01:44:06 ◼   ► My dog loves it, but the $50 code didn't work.

01:44:08 ◼   ► I botched it the first time they had the dog mattress.

01:44:11 ◼   ► So anyway, go to casper.com/thetalkshow.

01:44:13 ◼   ► Remember that code, thetalkshow.

01:44:14 ◼   ► Save $50 towards your mattress, unless it's a dog mattress.

01:44:17 ◼   ► But you'll get $50 of love from your dog

01:44:20 ◼   ► that'll make up for it.

01:44:22 ◼   ► Oh, yeah.

01:44:23 ◼   ► All right.

01:44:24 ◼   ► Why don't we talk about Overcast?

01:44:26 ◼   ► Overcast 3.0 just shipped yesterday.

01:44:30 ◼   ► Yeah, big update.

01:44:31 ◼   ► I knew you were working on this.

01:44:32 ◼   ► But I somehow had no idea that it was that close to shipping.

01:44:36 ◼   ► I think I was even on the beta.

01:44:38 ◼   ► Was I on the beta?

01:44:39 ◼   ► You were definitely on the list.

01:44:41 ◼   ► I don't know if you actually ever installed it,

01:44:42 ◼   ► but you were on the list.

01:44:43 ◼   ► I think I did.

01:44:44 ◼   ► I think I remember my Overcast having the orange dot next

01:44:47 ◼   ► to it, but I don't--

01:44:48 ◼   ► I never remembered any--

01:44:51 ◼   ► I remember the switch to cards and talking to you about it.

01:44:54 ◼   ► And I remember playing with the slide on the card.

01:44:56 ◼   ► This was months ago, though, and you had it really--

01:44:59 ◼   ► Yeah, well, when I was in Philly,

01:45:00 ◼   ► I showed you a prototype.

01:45:02 ◼   ► And I had you play with it on my phone

01:45:03 ◼   ► and tell me what you thought.

01:45:04 ◼   ► I had Hop Sing, right.

01:45:05 ◼   ► We were at Hop Sing, and I was playing with it.

01:45:07 ◼   ► And it was already--

01:45:08 ◼   ► the prototype was very, very good.

01:45:10 ◼   ► I had very minor feedback, but I couldn't even

01:45:13 ◼   ► find anything to complain about.

01:45:16 ◼   ► I forget what I wrote today.

01:45:17 ◼   ► Did I write this today?

01:45:18 ◼   ► I know I wrote a bit about the business model,

01:45:20 ◼   ► but did I write about how if you-- casual user not paying

01:45:23 ◼   ► attention isn't going to be-- even though there's a yet.

01:45:26 ◼   ► So that's my two points is that it's a great update,

01:45:29 ◼   ► because all these things-- every single thing you documented

01:45:32 ◼   ► on your blog about the changes, I think every single one

01:45:35 ◼   ► of them is like, yes, I totally agree.

01:45:36 ◼   ► This is better.

01:45:37 ◼   ► This is better.

01:45:37 ◼   ► This is better.

01:45:38 ◼   ► But I think a casual person who just

01:45:40 ◼   ► wants to listen to podcasts, and if they have auto updates on,

01:45:43 ◼   ► and they may not even notice that it's a new version.

01:45:47 ◼   ► - Yeah, it's odd because here I was like,

01:45:51 ◼   ► you know, really busting my butt and just changing,

01:45:54 ◼   ► it was a lot of work going into these changes

01:45:57 ◼   ► in Overcast 3.

01:45:59 ◼   ► And then at the end, when it comes time to like,

01:46:01 ◼   ► you know, write the release notes

01:46:02 ◼   ► and start like promoting it to people,

01:46:05 ◼   ► and it's all right, well what's the list

01:46:06 ◼   ► of new features in 3.0?

01:46:09 ◼   ► And it's like, uh,

01:46:12 ◼   ► I redesigned a lot of the UI.

01:46:14 ◼   ► That's about it.

01:46:16 ◼   ► There's like a couple of like Q features here and there,

01:46:18 ◼   ► but it's, and there's a new watch app.

01:46:20 ◼   ► That's, which actually does less than the old one,

01:46:23 ◼   ► but is way faster.

01:46:25 ◼   ► And that's about it.

01:46:27 ◼   ► Like the bullet point list of what is new in this update

01:46:30 ◼   ► is incredibly short.

01:46:32 ◼   ► Unless you wanna go through and like itemize

01:46:34 ◼   ► all the little UI changes,

01:46:35 ◼   ► but nobody wants to read that 'cause nobody cares.

01:46:37 ◼   ► What you care about is the whole thing,

01:46:38 ◼   ► like how the whole thing feels and works for you

01:46:41 ◼   ► and everything else.

01:46:41 ◼   ► And there were tons of changes and tons of time

01:46:46 ◼   ► that went into this, that most of which is fairly subtle

01:46:51 ◼   ► or hidden or is the kind of change that you notice

01:46:54 ◼   ► the very first day you use it and then it just becomes

01:46:57 ◼   ► normal and you immediately stop noticing.

01:47:00 ◼   ► That's how this app is now.

01:47:02 ◼   ► And things like the whole, the card UI,

01:47:07 ◼   ► that took forever to get working.

01:47:08 ◼   ► (laughing)

01:47:10 ◼   ► That took so long.

01:47:11 ◼   ► and so much work and there are still so many

01:47:15 ◼   ► weird little considerations with it.

01:47:17 ◼   ► Like one of the things, I had to issue a quick 3.0.1 update

01:47:22 ◼   ► because I moved all of the secondary screens in the app

01:47:27 ◼   ► into these cards 'cause I have a reusable controller

01:47:30 ◼   ► that I can use for anything now

01:47:32 ◼   ► to put it in one of these cards.

01:47:33 ◼   ► And the problem is that when an iOS standard table view

01:47:39 ◼   ► is in one of these cards in certain modes,

01:47:42 ◼   ► the reorder controls, like the drag handles

01:47:45 ◼   ► when a table's in reordering mode just don't work.

01:47:48 ◼   ► Like it moves like two pixels and then stops.

01:47:52 ◼   ► And it's only because it's in this card environment

01:47:54 ◼   ► and a few of the implementation details of that.

01:47:58 ◼   ► And so I had an update today that just moved

01:48:01 ◼   ► the playlist editor out of the cards

01:48:04 ◼   ► 'cause otherwise you can't reorder

01:48:06 ◼   ► the priority podcast setting.

01:48:08 ◼   ► And it's like, when I was in development,

01:48:10 ◼   ► there were so many weird cases like this

01:48:11 ◼   ► where like some part of the UI would fail in a weird way

01:48:16 ◼   ► if it was moved to this card thing.

01:48:19 ◼   ► And so I had to either try to figure out why

01:48:22 ◼   ► and see if I could work around it

01:48:23 ◼   ► or re-implement it in a different way so it wouldn't fail.

01:48:26 ◼   ► And that's just, that card thing is just one of the changes.

01:48:31 ◼   ► And there were just so, like,

01:48:34 ◼   ► I mean, just so much time going into

01:48:37 ◼   ► seemingly minor things like that.

01:48:40 ◼   ► Even other things like the full-time drag handles

01:48:42 ◼   ► now on the playlist.

01:48:44 ◼   ► That is not easy to do in UI table view.

01:48:48 ◼   ► - No, I know that.

01:48:50 ◼   ► I do. - I did it.

01:48:50 ◼   ► It's not a collection view.

01:48:51 ◼   ► It is still a table view.

01:48:53 ◼   ► And the way I did it is such an incredible hack.

01:48:57 ◼   ► And that took a long time too.

01:48:59 ◼   ► Similarly, having the Tweetbot style

01:49:03 ◼   ► where you tap on the episode and a little row of buttons

01:49:06 ◼   ► expands out from the bottom of it

01:49:07 ◼   ► that you can then select actions from.

01:49:10 ◼   ► Again, a seemingly small thing in the UI,

01:49:13 ◼   ► but that takes a long time to implement

01:49:15 ◼   ► and to figure out how you have to abuse

01:49:18 ◼   ► the system frameworks to let them let you do this.

01:49:21 ◼   ► Like, it's all like, and you know from Vesper stuff,

01:49:24 ◼   ► like a lot of times it's these little tiny

01:49:27 ◼   ► implementation details or these little tiny interactions

01:49:30 ◼   ► or UI affordances that they make all the difference

01:49:33 ◼   ► in the world when you're using the app

01:49:34 ◼   ► and like how nice it is to use or how easy it is to use.

01:49:37 ◼   ► But like one of those little behaviors

01:49:41 ◼   ► or little animations or implementations

01:49:43 ◼   ► might take you weeks to just develop that one little thing.

01:49:47 ◼   ► - It is my opinion that the modern touchscreen UI

01:49:53 ◼   ► that started with the iPhone

01:50:00 ◼   ► is a trickier and inherently more limited interaction model

01:50:07 ◼   ► than the mouse pointer interface that we've had since the Mac

01:50:14 ◼   ► and go back to the Xerox thing that was before the Mac

01:50:20 ◼   ► in a lot of ways.

01:50:21 ◼   ► And I think that most people don't think about it.

01:50:24 ◼   ► You don't have to.

01:50:24 ◼   ► You shouldn't have to if you're not a designer.

01:50:26 ◼   ► But when you are a designer, you suddenly

01:50:28 ◼   ► that you're limited in a certain way.

01:50:30 ◼   ► So for example, let's just say a list of things.

01:50:33 ◼   ► You have a list of rows, and you can drag them to reorder.

01:50:37 ◼   ► There's all sorts of apps that do stuff like this.

01:50:40 ◼   ► On a Mac, you would think, well, I could just click

01:50:44 ◼   ► on the row I want to move up, and hold the mouse button down

01:50:47 ◼   ► and drag up, and that's exactly how you do it.

01:50:50 ◼   ► You click on it and drag, and you don't have to click

01:50:52 ◼   ► and wait, you could click and wait and then drag,

01:50:56 ◼   ► or you could just click and drag immediately,

01:50:57 ◼   ► and it just works.

01:50:59 ◼   ► Well, you can't do that on a touch screen

01:51:01 ◼   ► because if you're in a list and you just touch

01:51:04 ◼   ► and immediately move down or move up,

01:51:06 ◼   ► you're scrolling the list because touching on the list

01:51:09 ◼   ► and moving your finger is how you do it.

01:51:11 ◼   ► So how do you take an item and move it up

01:51:15 ◼   ► if you can't just touch on it and move up?

01:51:17 ◼   ► So it's--

01:51:19 ◼   ► - Yeah, you can't have like a modifier key.

01:51:20 ◼   ► Oh, just hold down Command.

01:51:21 ◼   ► - There is, and the truth is there's no perfect solution.

01:51:23 ◼   ► There's a perfect solution with a mouse pointer,

01:51:25 ◼   ► which is just allow the user to click and drag up.

01:51:29 ◼   ► On touch screens, I could think of-- there's three ways

01:51:32 ◼   ► I can think to do it.

01:51:33 ◼   ► Apple's usual way is to have an Edit button in the top right

01:51:37 ◼   ► that you tap this Edit button, and then it switches it

01:51:42 ◼   ► to a mode where there's like a little grippy strip over there.

01:51:45 ◼   ► And you can use that grippy strip

01:51:46 ◼   ► to drag things up and down.

01:51:48 ◼   ► And if you touch on the grippy strip and drag,

01:51:50 ◼   ► it won't scroll the list, it'll drag the thing up.

01:51:53 ◼   ► The way Vesper did it, and a lot of other apps do,

01:51:55 ◼   ► is you tap and hold.

01:51:56 ◼   ► And after a brief-- and again, this

01:51:58 ◼   ► is the sort of thing where you sit there

01:52:00 ◼   ► and you play with little fractions of a second

01:52:02 ◼   ► to see how long is too short and how long is too long.

01:52:05 ◼   ► But you know you're drag-- you know

01:52:07 ◼   ► you're moving it because it visually pops up off the screen.

01:52:10 ◼   ► And you can see that it's sort of like raised,

01:52:12 ◼   ► and then you're moving the item up and down.

01:52:16 ◼   ► I like the solution you came with,

01:52:18 ◼   ► where you just put the grip strips there all the time.

01:52:20 ◼   ► And so you can't scroll the list from over

01:52:22 ◼   ► at the edge of the screen.

01:52:23 ◼   ► but most of it you can.

01:52:27 ◼   ► - Yeah, and most people don't scroll

01:52:28 ◼   ► that far of the edge anyway, so it's fine.

01:52:30 ◼   ► Because what I found, I made this whole blog post about,

01:52:34 ◼   ► and actually this blog post was the release of Overcast 3

01:52:39 ◼   ► and kind of the announcement of Overcast 3,

01:52:41 ◼   ► but I titled it Design Walkthrough

01:52:43 ◼   ► because this release really was effectively a redesign.

01:52:48 ◼   ► Not like 100% redesign, a lot of things look

01:52:50 ◼   ► kind of similar or the same, but.

01:52:53 ◼   ► There's a lot more redesigning than anything else

01:52:55 ◼   ► in this release.

01:52:56 ◼   ► And that's because over the last couple years,

01:53:00 ◼   ► since I made 1.0, I've gotten literally thousands

01:53:04 ◼   ► of emails and tweets from people with feedback

01:53:07 ◼   ► and some support questions and things like that.

01:53:11 ◼   ► I basically had a lot of feedback to show me

01:53:13 ◼   ► all the ways in which the old design failed.

01:53:16 ◼   ► And by that I mean people weren't able to find features

01:53:20 ◼   ► that they wanted to find or they couldn't understand

01:53:22 ◼   ► way something worked or something caused errors to people to

01:53:26 ◼   ► erroneously invoke it or things like that. And so

01:53:30 ◼   ► there were, one of the major themes I learned

01:53:34 ◼   ► over the last couple years is these built-in

01:53:38 ◼   ► iOS standards. Things like tapping edit in the top right corner

01:53:42 ◼   ► and then having a table view switch to this mode where you can delete or

01:53:46 ◼   ► reorder or batch operate on things in a list.

01:53:50 ◼   ► or even just swiping a table cell to delete it,

01:53:55 ◼   ► these things that we, like power users,

01:53:58 ◼   ► have known literally since iOS 1.0 introduced most of them,

01:54:03 ◼   ► most people who use iPhones these days

01:54:06 ◼   ► don't know those things, they never find it.

01:54:08 ◼   ► They don't know you can swipe on a table view

01:54:09 ◼   ► to reveal a delete button.

01:54:11 ◼   ► They never tap the edit button in the corner,

01:54:14 ◼   ► and if they do, they quickly undo it

01:54:16 ◼   ► 'cause they don't really understand what it does

01:54:17 ◼   ► and don't care.

01:54:18 ◼   ► So there's lots of assumed knowledge of platform standards

01:54:23 ◼   ► that I went into with this,

01:54:27 ◼   ► that I think a lot of iOS developers still do,

01:54:29 ◼   ► that the reality is the customers don't have

01:54:33 ◼   ► that vocabulary in enough quantity.

01:54:35 ◼   ► - Yeah, I think that you can only really count

01:54:38 ◼   ► on them finding what they can see.

01:54:41 ◼   ► - Exactly.

01:54:41 ◼   ► - Right, and if you can't, if the only way to do it

01:54:43 ◼   ► is a way that you don't see, you have to do something

01:54:47 ◼   ► to see it, like slide the row, they all won't find it.

01:54:50 ◼   ► That's why, you know, if you look at an app,

01:54:52 ◼   ► like I think it's a super successful app,

01:54:53 ◼   ► is an app like Apple's Mail for iPhone.

01:54:57 ◼   ► That's why there's a trash can when you're in a message view

01:55:00 ◼   ► but also why you could swipe on the message

01:55:02 ◼   ► in the list of messages and delete it from there.

01:55:05 ◼   ► - Yeah.

01:55:06 ◼   ► - But that trash can has to be there.

01:55:09 ◼   ► - Exactly. - Because some people

01:55:10 ◼   ► would be shocked to find out

01:55:11 ◼   ► that you can delete a message any other way.

01:55:13 ◼   ► - Yeah, 'cause like even, you know,

01:55:14 ◼   ► even like the edit button in the corner,

01:55:16 ◼   ► that is visible, but it's not even obvious enough.

01:55:19 ◼   ► Like what it does or why, like if you're in a list,

01:55:22 ◼   ► like what does that even mean to edit

01:55:25 ◼   ► in the corner of this entire list of episodes?

01:55:27 ◼   ► Like a lot of people just don't think that way.

01:55:30 ◼   ► They don't try to poke everything and see,

01:55:33 ◼   ► well what does this weird word do

01:55:35 ◼   ► that doesn't seem to specify anything in particular?

01:55:39 ◼   ► - I hate to spring this on you, but all right,

01:55:41 ◼   ► I'm in all episodes and there is an edit button up there.

01:55:46 ◼   ► - Still there. - I don't understand

01:55:48 ◼   ► what it does.

01:55:49 ◼   ► I hit edit and then it says done

01:55:51 ◼   ► and it just toggles between edit and done,

01:55:53 ◼   ► but what's different?

01:55:54 ◼   ► - Do you actually have the latest version?

01:55:57 ◼   ► - I think so.

01:55:58 ◼   ► (laughing)

01:55:59 ◼   ► - 'Cause normal, what's supposed to happen

01:56:00 ◼   ► is if you hit edit, you're supposed to get

01:56:02 ◼   ► a little header on top that says,

01:56:03 ◼   ► edit playlist on one half and delete playlist

01:56:05 ◼   ► on the other half, and then all of the rows

01:56:07 ◼   ► turn into the multi-select toggle dots on the right.

01:56:10 ◼   ► - Oh, maybe I don't have the latest version.

01:56:12 ◼   ► (laughing)

01:56:14 ◼   ► I don't know, I thought I updated to the App Store version.

01:56:16 ◼   ► Let me see if I make a new playlist.

01:56:19 ◼   ► I mean, you might have found a bug, but--

01:56:20 ◼   ► You might have.

01:56:21 ◼   ► I don't know.

01:56:22 ◼   ► Not how it's supposed to work.

01:56:23 ◼   ► Anyway, I agree with you, though.

01:56:31 ◼   ► What about the-- so the other factor, and we talked about it.

01:56:36 ◼   ► And one of the things that lets you do this-- and you

01:56:38 ◼   ► and I have had discussions about this over the years,

01:56:40 ◼   ► going back to Vesper and Overcast and that-- OK,

01:56:46 ◼   ► But let's just give-- the old model for indie software

01:56:49 ◼   ► developers is you pre-app store.

01:56:51 ◼   ► You sell a version.

01:56:52 ◼   ► Let's say it's $30.

01:56:53 ◼   ► And then you do version 2.0.

01:56:56 ◼   ► And you still sell it for $30.

01:56:57 ◼   ► But you give your existing users an upgrade price.

01:57:00 ◼   ► Maybe they get it for half off.

01:57:01 ◼   ► Maybe they get the new version for $14.99.

01:57:04 ◼   ► Maybe you sell the upgrade for just $9.99.

01:57:06 ◼   ► But then the idea is you keep building users.

01:57:09 ◼   ► And the ones who keep using the app will, every year

01:57:13 ◼   ► or however often you come out with a major upgrade,

01:57:15 ◼   ► keep giving you upgrade money.

01:57:18 ◼   ► And that's what funds the continued development

01:57:23 ◼   ► of the app.

01:57:24 ◼   ► Because eventually, you stop getting--

01:57:27 ◼   ► you max out on new users, and you

01:57:30 ◼   ► need to monetize your existing user base.

01:57:32 ◼   ► Well, there's no upgrades in the App Store.

01:57:35 ◼   ► And so new models are called for if you want to sustain an app.

01:57:39 ◼   ► I think you've come across an interesting one.

01:57:44 ◼   ► Because the downside to the old model, and as much as everybody--

01:57:48 ◼   ► I still kind of wish the App Store supported it

01:57:50 ◼   ► and allowed developers the option of doing it.

01:57:53 ◼   ► The downside to it is that everybody

01:57:55 ◼   ► seems to agree that the way-- most cases, people

01:57:59 ◼   ► would decide whether to buy the upgrade to the new app

01:58:02 ◼   ► or not based on what are the new features.

01:58:05 ◼   ► And so like Overcast 3, where you say it's hard to say,

01:58:09 ◼   ► here's all the new features.

01:58:10 ◼   ► It may not sell as a paid upgrade, because it's just a modernized version of the same

01:58:20 ◼   ► UI.

01:58:22 ◼   ► But to me, this is the sort of thing I'm glad to pay for, because it's exactly what I want

01:58:27 ◼   ► in an app.

01:58:28 ◼   ► Well, yeah, because if you do it the other way, where you're dependent on that upgrade

01:58:33 ◼   ► revenue for new features every release, then you get Microsoft Office, where you have all

01:58:39 ◼   ► all this pressure to just add more and more and more

01:58:42 ◼   ► features even if it kind of makes the app worse

01:58:45 ◼   ► to have more features added to it.

01:58:47 ◼   ► But that's what the incentive structure

01:58:50 ◼   ► kind of forces you to do.

01:58:51 ◼   ► And that's one of the reasons why you see

01:58:54 ◼   ► these major apps like Office and Adobe Creative Suite

01:58:57 ◼   ► trying to get away from that model

01:58:59 ◼   ► and moving towards subscriptions so aggressively

01:59:00 ◼   ► over the last few years.

01:59:01 ◼   ► And I think they've both pretty much completed that move.

01:59:04 ◼   ► Where like, now they're kind of free to do things better.

01:59:09 ◼   ► as opposed to the old model of having to try

01:59:13 ◼   ► to justify your revenue every single year

01:59:15 ◼   ► with a bullet list of features that you added.

01:59:18 ◼   ► - Right.

01:59:19 ◼   ► Eventually, even the, however much it was ever in dispute

01:59:24 ◼   ► within those companies, it becomes obvious to everybody

01:59:26 ◼   ► that it's not sustainable forever.

01:59:28 ◼   ► You can't just keep adding more

01:59:30 ◼   ► and assume that that means better.

01:59:33 ◼   ► - Well, and you can for a while.

01:59:37 ◼   ► it's generally like when things are young.

01:59:39 ◼   ► So when the applications are young,

01:59:42 ◼   ► or like in the case of Adobe and Microsoft,

01:59:46 ◼   ► a lot of their revenue came from people,

01:59:49 ◼   ► like OSes were still young.

01:59:52 ◼   ► And as OSes would change,

01:59:53 ◼   ► you'd have to get the new versions of the apps

01:59:55 ◼   ► to just work on the new OS.

01:59:57 ◼   ► Computers were still young.

01:59:58 ◼   ► You'd be buying a new computer every three to five years

02:00:01 ◼   ► or whatever it was that would be so different

02:00:04 ◼   ► from your old one and so much better

02:00:06 ◼   ► that you would buy new software to take advantage of it

02:00:08 ◼   ► or whatever and like now everything's a lot more

02:00:10 ◼   ► settled down in these industries.

02:00:12 ◼   ► And it's true of mobile as well.

02:00:13 ◼   ► Like the upgrade cycles are getting longer for these things

02:00:15 ◼   ► and all the OSs are kind of settling down and maturing.

02:00:20 ◼   ► And so, and all these, and if you've had any kind of

02:00:25 ◼   ► long-standing product, I mean hell, my podcast app

02:00:28 ◼   ► is only like two and a half years old

02:00:31 ◼   ► and I'm already running out of features

02:00:34 ◼   ► that I think I want to add to it.

02:00:35 ◼   ► Like, at a certain point, you add pretty much everything

02:00:39 ◼   ► that you think it needs, and it's kind of done feature-wise.

02:00:44 ◼   ► But that doesn't mean it can't be improved.

02:00:46 ◼   ► - Right, so what you've arrived at after like,

02:00:50 ◼   ► and again, you've changed it subtly

02:00:53 ◼   ► with each major release, but where you are now is,

02:00:56 ◼   ► it's a free download, so anybody can get it,

02:01:00 ◼   ► try the Overcast for free, which I think is essential

02:01:03 ◼   ► in today's world.

02:01:04 ◼   ► It's been free since day one.

02:01:05 ◼   ► I don't regret that for a minute.

02:01:06 ◼   ► Right.

02:01:07 ◼   ► And I think it's proven right.

02:01:09 ◼   ► It's just-- I've said this before,

02:01:15 ◼   ► but I really do think it's true that when people-- there's

02:01:17 ◼   ► just too many people who, if they're

02:01:22 ◼   ► looking for a podcast app, or they're

02:01:23 ◼   ► looking for a notes app, or whatever the app is,

02:01:26 ◼   ► they'll start looking.

02:01:28 ◼   ► And they will start trying free ones.

02:01:31 ◼   ► And eventually, one of the free ones--

02:01:33 ◼   ► I guess this is good enough.

02:01:35 ◼   ► And they never get past that.

02:01:37 ◼   ► They never get past it, even if your app is 99 cents.

02:01:40 ◼   ► There's just too many people who never ever say,

02:01:42 ◼   ► I'm gonna try, I'm gonna cough up a dollar

02:01:44 ◼   ► before I even try it, just because the screenshots

02:01:47 ◼   ► look good.

02:01:48 ◼   ► I mean, some people will, but it's not enough.

02:01:50 ◼   ► And there's too many free ones, and there's too many

02:01:53 ◼   ► free ones that really are good enough.

02:01:55 ◼   ► - Yeah, well, and you know, there's that saying,

02:01:57 ◼   ► like you always fight in the last war.

02:01:58 ◼   ► Like, I apologize to John Syracuse for butchering that,

02:02:02 ◼   ► but when I was running Instapaper,

02:02:05 ◼   ► it was never free during the time I ran it.

02:02:07 ◼   ► It was paid up front the whole time

02:02:09 ◼   ► and I was really adamant about that.

02:02:11 ◼   ► It had to be paid up front

02:02:12 ◼   ► 'cause that's how you have to make revenue.

02:02:13 ◼   ► And that was okay for the first couple years

02:02:16 ◼   ► at the App Store, but then every competitor I got

02:02:21 ◼   ► from that point forward, they were all free.

02:02:24 ◼   ► Like every major competitor was free

02:02:27 ◼   ► and then Apple made Reading List,

02:02:29 ◼   ► which was free of course because it's built in.

02:02:31 ◼   ► And it's just like, I really was marginalized

02:02:35 ◼   ► to a large degree by all of my competitors being free

02:02:40 ◼   ► and by the platform having this thing for free

02:02:44 ◼   ► and by my app having a big paywall in front of it

02:02:47 ◼   ► before anybody could even try it.

02:02:48 ◼   ► And so that's one of the reasons why,

02:02:51 ◼   ► and I was always afraid that a new competitor

02:02:55 ◼   ► would come out that would be awesome and free.

02:02:59 ◼   ► 'Cause I didn't have that for a long time.

02:03:01 ◼   ► And so, it was like every morning I would wake up afraid

02:03:06 ◼   ► to look at the news on my phone,

02:03:08 ◼   ► 'cause what if today was the day my business was crushed

02:03:11 ◼   ► by a new awesome free competitor?

02:03:13 ◼   ► And so with Overcast, I launched it free,

02:03:15 ◼   ► in part out of that, because I was just like,

02:03:17 ◼   ► you know what, I don't wanna leave,

02:03:19 ◼   ► I don't wanna leave that gap for anybody.

02:03:21 ◼   ► Like, I don't wanna wake up every morning with that fear.

02:03:23 ◼   ► - Well, you also had the advantage though,

02:03:26 ◼   ► and I mean it that it's an advantage,

02:03:28 ◼   ► that Apple already had its podcast app.

02:03:31 ◼   ► - Exactly, I was pretty Sherlocked.

02:03:33 ◼   ► - Right. - And so, yeah,

02:03:34 ◼   ► so it was, and that was a big reason why I was free,

02:03:37 ◼   ► because A, I didn't wanna leave what Apple calls

02:03:40 ◼   ► a price umbrella for competitors to beat me only on price.

02:03:45 ◼   ► If you wanna beat me on quality, fine, I'll play that game,

02:03:48 ◼   ► I will happily fight on that battlefront,

02:03:52 ◼   ► but I didn't want price to be the only thing

02:03:55 ◼   ► people could compete with me, or I'd rather,

02:03:57 ◼   ► I didn't want to be losing a lot of customers

02:04:00 ◼   ► to someone else because of price.

02:04:02 ◼   ► - I think you had--

02:04:02 ◼   ► - Because I always was with Instapaper,

02:04:04 ◼   ► and it killed me, and so, and I was,

02:04:07 ◼   ► at the time I was not a good enough business person

02:04:10 ◼   ► in this regard to recognize at the time

02:04:12 ◼   ► that I should have gone free

02:04:13 ◼   ► and figured out something else back then,

02:04:15 ◼   ► but in the meantime I kind of figured that out,

02:04:17 ◼   ► and so that's why I launched with this.

02:04:18 ◼   ► - I think you had an advantage that podcasts,

02:04:20 ◼   ► Apple's podcast app isn't always,

02:04:22 ◼   ► it always has been pretty good,

02:04:24 ◼   ► and it's free and it's there,

02:04:26 ◼   ► and it's got the iTunes store backing it,

02:04:27 ◼   ► and the fact that it's Apple's app.

02:04:30 ◼   ► Does it come with the phones,

02:04:31 ◼   ► or do you have to get it from the app store?

02:04:32 ◼   ► I forget if it's--

02:04:33 ◼   ► - They go back and forth from that,

02:04:34 ◼   ► like every few releases.

02:04:36 ◼   ► I forget what it is now.

02:04:37 ◼   ► I think it's separate.

02:04:38 ◼   ► - The fact that it's pretty good and very popular

02:04:40 ◼   ► is a much better situation.

02:04:42 ◼   ► I feel like we, at Vesper, it was a disservice to us

02:04:47 ◼   ► that at that time Apple Notes was garbage.

02:04:50 ◼   ► It was a really bad app with really bad sync.

02:04:53 ◼   ► The only way to get sync was through IMAP.

02:04:56 ◼   ► - That was a mess.

02:04:58 ◼   ► - God bless him for having made it work,

02:05:00 ◼   ► but it just didn't work well.

02:05:03 ◼   ► And it worked terrible if your email was Gmail

02:05:05 ◼   ► because you'd get copies of messages over and over again.

02:05:08 ◼   ► It was terrible.

02:05:08 ◼   ► I think it was starting with iOS 9.

02:05:12 ◼   ► I think it was two years ago where they redid notes

02:05:14 ◼   ► and they built it on CloudKit, and it's super good.

02:05:17 ◼   ► It's a really great, it's a great notes app,

02:05:19 ◼   ► and it's really great sync.

02:05:20 ◼   ► The sync is terrific.

02:05:22 ◼   ► would have been better if that was already out because it would have calibrated our expectations.

02:05:27 ◼   ► It wasn't like we assumed Apple would never improve notes, but we didn't know what it

02:05:30 ◼   ► would be.

02:05:31 ◼   ► Yeah, exactly.

02:05:32 ◼   ► So right now, what you do, you get it for free.

02:05:38 ◼   ► And for free, you show ads.

02:05:40 ◼   ► And you started this...

02:05:41 ◼   ► When did you start?

02:05:43 ◼   ► September.

02:05:44 ◼   ► So just in September.

02:05:45 ◼   ► And you were using Google's mobile ad services.

02:05:48 ◼   ► And if you want to, if you want to get rid of the ads and you want to support the app,

02:05:52 ◼   ► you can subscribe for 10 bucks a year.

02:05:55 ◼   ► And it's auto-recurring or no,

02:05:57 ◼   ► it just reminds you in a year?

02:05:58 ◼   ► - Now it's recurring, 'cause now we get a raise

02:06:00 ◼   ► after year one if we do recurring.

02:06:02 ◼   ► - Right, 'cause you get, yeah, right.

02:06:04 ◼   ► So anybody who's with you for more than a year,

02:06:05 ◼   ► if it's recurring, you get an 85/15 split.

02:06:08 ◼   ► - Exactly.

02:06:09 ◼   ► - Right, which is a big deal.

02:06:10 ◼   ► - Yeah, 'cause like 30% is a lot.

02:06:14 ◼   ► And having that cut from 30 to 15 after a year,

02:06:17 ◼   ► that adds up a lot as well.

02:06:19 ◼   ► - Well, it means you make more--

02:06:20 ◼   ► - You make a 15-- - It's getting a raise.

02:06:21 ◼   ► You get a 15% raise from your existing users.

02:06:24 ◼   ► It's actually kind of putting the old upgrade model

02:06:27 ◼   ► the other way around, where you would get less money

02:06:30 ◼   ► from your longtime users because they're only

02:06:31 ◼   ► paying the upgrade price.

02:06:32 ◼   ► Now you're getting more, even though they don't pay more.

02:06:35 ◼   ► This is actually--

02:06:36 ◼   ► I have a strong incentive now to keep

02:06:38 ◼   ► people subscribed long term.

02:06:40 ◼   ► This is one of those areas where it really is Apple--

02:06:43 ◼   ► everybody's interests aligned.

02:06:47 ◼   ► It's not necessarily that Apple is putting developers ahead

02:06:49 ◼   ► Apple itself because Apple still makes money. But the motivation is they're putting motivation

02:06:55 ◼   ► out there to build apps and services that are worth keeping a multi-year subscription

02:07:01 ◼   ► to. And that's in their interests in terms of not maximizing their revenue from the app

02:07:09 ◼   ► store at any given transaction or any given renewal, but in terms of making the platform

02:07:14 ◼   ► more popular and getting, you know, which leads to people doing things like buying crazy

02:07:19 ◼   ► new $1100 iPhones. And it's great for users because the user doesn't pay more. I pay the

02:07:27 ◼   ► same 10 bucks on my renewal for overcast and you just get more of the money you get $8

02:07:31 ◼   ► and 50 cents instead of $7.

02:07:33 ◼   ► Yeah, and a long time ago, like when I when I launched the magazine, it was it was a new

02:07:38 ◼   ► stand app. And new Stan was the first thing to have these auto renewing subscriptions.

02:07:42 ◼   ► and this was back in iOS 5 and 6.

02:07:47 ◼   ► And at the time, this big blog post basically was saying

02:07:50 ◼   ► like auto-renewing subscriptions are terrible

02:07:54 ◼   ► and I would never do them again.

02:07:55 ◼   ► And I wouldn't if they were the same,

02:07:58 ◼   ► but they're a lot better now.

02:07:59 ◼   ► Like everything about them now,

02:08:00 ◼   ► they still have a lot of shortcomings,

02:08:02 ◼   ► but everything about them now is a lot easier to implement

02:08:04 ◼   ► and easier for both developers and customers to deal with

02:08:07 ◼   ► than it was in iOS 5.

02:08:07 ◼   ► And so now it is, again, there are still limits.

02:08:12 ◼   ► In particular, it's like you still can't tell

02:08:15 ◼   ► if somebody has told their subscription not to renew,

02:08:20 ◼   ► so effectively if they've canceled.

02:08:21 ◼   ► You don't know until it expires.

02:08:24 ◼   ► Like you know the date that it's supposed to renew,

02:08:26 ◼   ► but until that date comes and it doesn't renew,

02:08:29 ◼   ► you don't know they've canceled it.

02:08:30 ◼   ► And so there's weird things with like,

02:08:33 ◼   ► if you want to also sell subscriptions

02:08:36 ◼   ► through your website maybe,

02:08:38 ◼   ► and it like offer both payment options,

02:08:40 ◼   ► it's really hard to reconcile these things,

02:08:43 ◼   ► 'cause like you don't know if the person

02:08:45 ◼   ► has canceled on their phone, if they are extending,

02:08:47 ◼   ► so there's a whole bunch of weird cases.

02:08:49 ◼   ► But the way I'm doing it now, which is very simple,

02:08:51 ◼   ► and there is no web payment option,

02:08:53 ◼   ► along with the improvements they've done

02:08:56 ◼   ► to the system since iOS 5, make it a much easier sell now,

02:09:00 ◼   ► and then add the raise to it, and it's a no-brainer.

02:09:02 ◼   ► - Yeah.

02:09:04 ◼   ► - And it was starting now with version 3.0.

02:09:07 ◼   ► You've switched the, you seem to have narrowed in

02:09:11 ◼   ► on the $10 a year recurring subscription for the Pro,

02:09:14 ◼   ► you know, what do you call it, iPhone or Overcast Pro?

02:09:17 ◼   ► - I call it Premium.

02:09:18 ◼   ► - Premium.

02:09:18 ◼   ► - Yeah.

02:09:19 ◼   ► - Well, all right, you can call it that.

02:09:22 ◼   ► - I was kind of like going off of like, you know,

02:09:23 ◼   ► like what streaming music services call their ad-free tiers.

02:09:27 ◼   ► - Yeah.

02:09:27 ◼   ► - Which are almost all premium.

02:09:28 ◼   ► - I guess it semantically it makes sense.

02:09:30 ◼   ► Pro's shorter.

02:09:32 ◼   ► - And pro is kind of, it's kind of weird

02:09:34 ◼   ► to call something pro that adds almost no features.

02:09:37 ◼   ► - Right.

02:09:38 ◼   ► - Like it's like what, like so premium,

02:09:39 ◼   ► like there was basically like, you know,

02:09:41 ◼   ► I'm kind of going off of like what people

02:09:43 ◼   ► are accustomed to here.

02:09:44 ◼   ► And streaming music services are way more popular

02:09:47 ◼   ► than Overcast, so like if they're all saying

02:09:50 ◼   ► their ad free tiers are called premium,

02:09:52 ◼   ► and if I call mine that, I think people basically get it.

02:09:55 ◼   ► - But the big change is on the ad side,

02:09:58 ◼   ► where instead of using Google's mobile ad services,

02:10:01 ◼   ► you've dropped it for your own homegrown system

02:10:04 ◼   ► where you're going to sell, or you are selling ads that--

02:10:08 ◼   ► you sell the ads and they get shown with the novel idea,

02:10:13 ◼   ► but which is very obvious.

02:10:14 ◼   ► And it kind of gets into my thing

02:10:16 ◼   ► when I was talking about Audible before that, hey,

02:10:18 ◼   ► guess why Audible advertises on a podcast?

02:10:21 ◼   ► Because they know everybody who listens to it

02:10:23 ◼   ► is listening to spoken word content.

02:10:26 ◼   ► And so one of your ideas is that podcasts

02:10:28 ◼   ► can buy these ads to promote their podcast.

02:10:32 ◼   ► So I could buy ads for the talk show,

02:10:34 ◼   ► and people would be listening to other shows.

02:10:36 ◼   ► And if they're free users of Overcast,

02:10:38 ◼   ► I get a little ad at the bottom, and I can try

02:10:39 ◼   ► to pitch them on listening.

02:10:41 ◼   ► And if they tap it, it doesn't take them

02:10:44 ◼   ► to my website or something.

02:10:46 ◼   ► It does something far smarter than that.

02:10:48 ◼   ► It takes you to the page-- not the page,

02:10:50 ◼   ► but the card in Overcast, where you

02:10:53 ◼   ► would be able to either subscribe to my show

02:10:56 ◼   ► or listen to the latest episode to see what it's like.

02:11:00 ◼   ► - Yeah, you browse the whole episode list,

02:11:01 ◼   ► the whole history of the show and everything.

02:11:03 ◼   ► Exactly what you get from the ad podcast screen.

02:11:06 ◼   ► It's the same thing.

02:11:07 ◼   ► Yeah, I mean, it's,

02:11:08 ◼   ► this was kind of, I mean,

02:11:11 ◼   ► I've kind of like fallen into all my business models

02:11:14 ◼   ► for Overcast here. (laughs)

02:11:16 ◼   ► - I don't know if it's gonna work.

02:11:18 ◼   ► I mean, you never know.

02:11:18 ◼   ► You have to try them. - Neither do I.

02:11:19 ◼   ► - And you know, like my RSS feed sponsorships

02:11:22 ◼   ► have worked way better than I thought they would,

02:11:24 ◼   ► or than I even hoped they would.

02:11:25 ◼   ► But I'm sure glad I tried it because it worked a lot better than I thought it would.

02:11:31 ◼   ► Who knows? Maybe it will, maybe it won't.

02:11:34 ◼   ► But it at least fits the basic description of

02:11:37 ◼   ► advertising that is sustainable and works in my experience.

02:11:41 ◼   ► It isn't just a flash in the pan,

02:11:43 ◼   ► which is that it's got to be that win-win-win scenario,

02:11:47 ◼   ► where it's a good value for the advertiser.

02:11:49 ◼   ► It's not super annoying to the user and it makes money for the person selling the ad.

02:11:55 ◼   ► And it kind of has that.

02:11:56 ◼   ► And part of the way that you get that to work

02:11:58 ◼   ► is to not try to make ads that are exactly

02:12:03 ◼   ► like the ads for a previous medium,

02:12:05 ◼   ► or to reuse the analogy, fighting the previous war.

02:12:09 ◼   ► But what is native for this?

02:12:12 ◼   ► And I've given talks about it, but in the early days

02:12:16 ◼   ► when people would try to monetize RSS,

02:12:18 ◼   ► they would have two ad strategies.

02:12:19 ◼   ► The big one that was super common for a long time

02:12:22 ◼   ► was that you wouldn't put the full article in the RSS feed.

02:12:25 ◼   ► So you didn't have to put ads in.

02:12:27 ◼   ► You'd get a list of articles.

02:12:28 ◼   ► And if you wanted to read one, you'd

02:12:30 ◼   ► get a two-sentence summary.

02:12:31 ◼   ► And then you'd double-click it and go to the website.

02:12:33 ◼   ► And then you'd see the website ads.

02:12:36 ◼   ► Well, it works in terms of not giving away

02:12:39 ◼   ► your content for free.

02:12:40 ◼   ► But it wasn't what people who used RSS readers want to do.

02:12:44 ◼   ► They were using RSS readers because they wanted to read

02:12:46 ◼   ► your stuff in the RSS reader.

02:12:48 ◼   ► Yeah, basically ruin the feed.

02:12:49 ◼   ► Right.

02:12:50 ◼   ► So the next thing people would try to do

02:12:52 ◼   ► put banner ads in each article, which made them

02:12:55 ◼   ► like little web pages.

02:12:57 ◼   ► And they paid pennies, and everybody just

02:12:59 ◼   ► skipped over them.

02:13:01 ◼   ► And so my idea was, well, why not just have a paid entry

02:13:04 ◼   ► in the feed once a week?

02:13:05 ◼   ► Give them the whole entry.

02:13:07 ◼   ► Don't put something in the entries.

02:13:09 ◼   ► Just sell an entry.

02:13:11 ◼   ► And it has worked out very, very well.

02:13:14 ◼   ► And I think selling a podcast--

02:13:15 ◼   ► I think if your idea works, I think actually having

02:13:18 ◼   ► and the podcasts sell by other podcasts buying the ads

02:13:24 ◼   ► is going to work.

02:13:25 ◼   ► And one of the things that occurred to me

02:13:27 ◼   ► is, what do you see a lot-- when you watch regular commercial

02:13:29 ◼   ► TV, what do you see a lot of commercials for?

02:13:31 ◼   ► TV shows.

02:13:32 ◼   ► TV shows.

02:13:35 ◼   ► And it's not because the network couldn't sell the spot.

02:13:39 ◼   ► And oh, well, we'll put an ad for Modern Family

02:13:42 ◼   ► during the football game because we didn't sell the spot.

02:13:48 ◼   ► They do it because they know it's super valuable to get people to watch the show

02:13:53 ◼   ► Like I can't even tell you how many times during the Super Bowl. They told you how many

02:13:56 ◼   ► forget what the show was but

02:13:59 ◼   ► It shows how well the ads work, but but they kept telling you what should what show is gonna be on right after the Super Bowl

02:14:05 ◼   ► Yeah, it was like the new 24 reboot or something like that

02:14:08 ◼   ► Over and over and over again because it works because you're already watching TV

02:14:13 ◼   ► Right exactly and listening to a podcast

02:14:17 ◼   ► Yeah, and so like that's like I think this the only question in my mind basically is like

02:14:23 ◼   ► Do enough podcasters have enough money to want to pay for ads right that and that's a big question mark

02:14:31 ◼   ► And that's what I'm like. This isn't just podcasters

02:14:34 ◼   ► Like I also have like a hover ad and a Squarespace ad and a Linode added my like I can advertise for I put the

02:14:40 ◼   ► Whole thing to be fairly generic so I can advertise for podcasts or just any website or apps in the App Store

02:14:46 ◼   ► So any of those things can be advertised with these with these ad units and I can control all server sides

02:14:53 ◼   ► I can you know, I'm a mentally insert them as necessary. I

02:14:56 ◼   ► Just it remains to be seen like whether podcasters actually will buy these at

02:15:03 ◼   ► The prices that they end up being worth or not

02:15:06 ◼   ► What I don't that's I don't know what percentage I mean right now your your revenue is overwhelmingly from the premium subscribers, correct?

02:15:14 ◼   ► - Yeah, and basically what allowed me the freedom

02:15:17 ◼   ► to even try this at all is that what I found

02:15:19 ◼   ► since September, since using the Google Ads,

02:15:22 ◼   ► the Google Ads in apps, and I mean this is true

02:15:26 ◼   ► of any in app advertising basically,

02:15:28 ◼   ► how much it works for you is extremely dependent

02:15:33 ◼   ► on your click through rate.

02:15:36 ◼   ► Basically how many clicks do you get

02:15:37 ◼   ► per 1,000 impressions of the ad as it's shown?

02:15:41 ◼   ► And my click-through rate in the Google Ads was awful.

02:15:46 ◼   ► It was so far below industry averages and everything.

02:15:49 ◼   ► It was terrible.

02:15:50 ◼   ► Because who wants to jump out to a web browser?

02:15:53 ◼   ► That's certainly part of it.

02:15:54 ◼   ► I mean, another part of it is just like--

02:15:55 ◼   ► And how many people think if they tap it

02:15:57 ◼   ► and it goes to a web browser that the podcast is

02:15:59 ◼   ► going to stop playing?

02:15:59 ◼   ► It didn't, because it's overcast.

02:16:01 ◼   ► It can run in the background.

02:16:02 ◼   ► But how many people wouldn't even--

02:16:05 ◼   ► it may even be vaguely interested,

02:16:06 ◼   ► but wouldn't tap it out of fear that the podcast would

02:16:08 ◼   ► stop playing, which would be like the worst thing ever?

02:16:10 ◼   ► - Yeah, I never thought about that.

02:16:12 ◼   ► So basically, there was that big problem of

02:16:14 ◼   ► my tap-through rate was terrible.

02:16:18 ◼   ► And also, just things that advertise

02:16:22 ◼   ► in these kind of bulk ad networks on mobile,

02:16:26 ◼   ► they weren't often very high-quality ads.

02:16:28 ◼   ► So the result of this was both that they look kind of junky

02:16:34 ◼   ► and also they made very little money.

02:16:38 ◼   ► And the only reason that this has succeeded

02:16:42 ◼   ► as a business model at all is because

02:16:45 ◼   ► having the ads there made a lot more people

02:16:48 ◼   ► subscribe as premium members than the previous system,

02:16:52 ◼   ► which is basically like subscribe if you like me.

02:16:54 ◼   ► It was kind of like a voluntary patronage thing.

02:16:56 ◼   ► That got very few people to subscribe.

02:16:59 ◼   ► And so having the ads there,

02:17:02 ◼   ► I thought it would be a nice balance of like,

02:17:03 ◼   ► all right, I'll make a lot of money from ads

02:17:04 ◼   ► and some money from subscriptions.

02:17:06 ◼   ► and it ends up I made more money from subscriptions

02:17:09 ◼   ► than I thought and way less money from ads than I expected.

02:17:12 ◼   ► So the advantage there though, the silver lining there

02:17:15 ◼   ► is that I could replace the ads

02:17:17 ◼   ► with basically any other ads.

02:17:20 ◼   ► It doesn't really matter, whatever I replace them with,

02:17:24 ◼   ► as long as it brings in some money,

02:17:28 ◼   ► I can come out basically the same or ahead

02:17:32 ◼   ► from the little bit I was making from Google

02:17:34 ◼   ► just because as I said, my tap rate was terrible

02:17:37 ◼   ► from those ads.

02:17:37 ◼   ► - And it doesn't make you hang your head in shame

02:17:40 ◼   ► about the quality of the ads.

02:17:41 ◼   ► As long as it's-- - Exactly.

02:17:42 ◼   ► - You had a good point.

02:17:43 ◼   ► - And I only have about 24 hours worth of numbers so far,

02:17:48 ◼   ► but my tap rate on the new ads is something like,

02:17:52 ◼   ► I think it's like 100 times better than it was.

02:17:55 ◼   ► It's some obscene multiplier.

02:17:58 ◼   ► Again, I only have 24 hours of data

02:18:00 ◼   ► and everyone's trying them out to see what they are,

02:18:01 ◼   ► So this is not representative of long-term trends,

02:18:05 ◼   ► but I'm confident so far that I think

02:18:08 ◼   ► I hit something better this time.

02:18:09 ◼   ► - I think it's gonna work.

02:18:16 ◼   ► I think it's a good idea,

02:18:17 ◼   ► but it's definitely better than the old ads.

02:18:20 ◼   ► No question. - I mean, my only question

02:18:21 ◼   ► really is like, in six months,

02:18:24 ◼   ► are most of the ads that you see in Overcast

02:18:26 ◼   ► going to be for websites like Hover and Squarespace,

02:18:29 ◼   ► or are they gonna be for podcasts?

02:18:31 ◼   ► And I have no idea.

02:18:32 ◼   ► - Yeah, but it's good to keep an open mind

02:18:34 ◼   ► and let it sort out.

02:18:35 ◼   ► - Exactly. - As it falls.

02:18:37 ◼   ► Water seeks its own level.

02:18:38 ◼   ► I think this is one of those things too

02:18:39 ◼   ► where you underestimate your personal skillset

02:18:42 ◼   ► in terms of your,

02:18:44 ◼   ► I mean, the main part of Overcast is,

02:18:48 ◼   ► you know, it's an iOS app and it's programming,

02:18:51 ◼   ► you know, and you've done,

02:18:52 ◼   ► we talked extensively already about all the UI stuff

02:18:55 ◼   ► that you've done and changed and customized

02:18:57 ◼   ► and customizing the table view and all this stuff that's just pure, this is what iOS developers

02:19:04 ◼   ► of good apps do.

02:19:06 ◼   ► But your background as a CMS developer gives you such a leg up in terms of, "Oh, I'll just

02:19:12 ◼   ► build my own ad network."

02:19:17 ◼   ► Because you did this before where you built the system that we use, I use it, ATP uses

02:19:23 ◼   ► is it to just set up the schedule of podcast ads,

02:19:28 ◼   ► which ads are in which episode and what do you say?

02:19:32 ◼   ► It's just something you build out of the frustration

02:19:36 ◼   ► of whatever jury-rigged system.

02:19:39 ◼   ► I don't even remember what we did before, but--

02:19:41 ◼   ► - I used a terrible Excel spreadsheet before.

02:19:43 ◼   ► I think that most people have some kind of

02:19:45 ◼   ► awful combination of spreadsheets and stuff.

02:19:47 ◼   ► - Yeah, it was a numbers spreadsheet.

02:19:50 ◼   ► And it was just awful.

02:19:53 ◼   ► So your ability to have this second skill set

02:19:58 ◼   ► where you can build the backend of a dynamic,

02:20:03 ◼   ► on the fly, up to the minute ad thing

02:20:06 ◼   ► is a huge advantage of being able to think

02:20:08 ◼   ► of something like this.

02:20:09 ◼   ► 'Cause I can see a lot of people might come up

02:20:10 ◼   ► with this idea, but then they will wait.

02:20:12 ◼   ► How would I actually manage the ads on the backend

02:20:16 ◼   ► so that they get served?

02:20:18 ◼   ► And maybe it would never percolate up to the level

02:20:21 ◼   ► where they do it because they don't have that skill set.

02:20:23 ◼   ► - Well, I mean, I wouldn't necessarily say

02:20:27 ◼   ► that it's much of a skill set, honestly.

02:20:29 ◼   ► It's more of like a willing,

02:20:33 ◼   ► or it's more of a confidence to do it

02:20:35 ◼   ► because so many app developers don't have

02:20:38 ◼   ► a lot of server-side experience.

02:20:40 ◼   ► And so they have experience developing

02:20:42 ◼   ► the local native app, but maybe not necessarily

02:20:44 ◼   ► the server-side chops, or they don't want

02:20:46 ◼   ► to run the server themselves or have to depend on a server.

02:20:49 ◼   ► And I just, whatever it is that intimidates people

02:20:54 ◼   ► or turns people off about running servers,

02:20:56 ◼   ► I don't have that.

02:20:57 ◼   ► Because my job, before making apps,

02:21:00 ◼   ► my job was all about running servers

02:21:01 ◼   ► and running applications on servers.

02:21:03 ◼   ► And so I just became comfortable with that.

02:21:05 ◼   ► Running servers and running apps on servers

02:21:07 ◼   ► and writing backend code is actually way easier

02:21:10 ◼   ► than writing app code in so many ways.

02:21:12 ◼   ► It's, sorry backend developers,

02:21:15 ◼   ► I know I'm one of you sometimes,

02:21:16 ◼   ► but I'm telling you, it's so much easier most of the time

02:21:20 ◼   ► than writing most app code that you have to do

02:21:23 ◼   ► to make a reasonable quality app.

02:21:25 ◼   ► And so it isn't that most developers can't do this,

02:21:28 ◼   ► it's that most of them think they can't do this,

02:21:30 ◼   ► and so they don't even try.

02:21:31 ◼   ► The main challenge for me, trying to do all this ad stuff,

02:21:36 ◼   ► is that I just find it incredibly uninteresting.

02:21:39 ◼   ► Like, the idea, like, I actually really got

02:21:42 ◼   ► a lot of enjoyment out of designing the ad format,

02:21:45 ◼   ► and integrating them into the app

02:21:46 ◼   ► and making that work really nicely.

02:21:48 ◼   ► But doing the back end of putting in the ads

02:21:51 ◼   ► and tracking how many clicks they get,

02:21:53 ◼   ► that I could not be less interested in doing that.

02:21:57 ◼   ► I put it off forever.

02:21:59 ◼   ► (laughing)

02:22:03 ◼   ► - Well, you did it.

02:22:04 ◼   ► I don't know, we'll see how it goes.

02:22:05 ◼   ► - I literally did it three days ago.

02:22:07 ◼   ► (laughing)

02:22:09 ◼   ► - The other little details I have are some of the changes.

02:22:13 ◼   ► you call it a DIOS 7-ification.

02:22:15 ◼   ► So one of the good things about the timing of Overcast

02:22:19 ◼   ► is it debuted with iOS 7, so it never

02:22:21 ◼   ► had to go through that shift from the old world of iOS 6

02:22:25 ◼   ► to iOS 7 visually, in terms of the way that you code an app

02:22:31 ◼   ► and assume stuff.

02:22:32 ◼   ► It went through the shift, just no one saw it except me.

02:22:35 ◼   ► Right.

02:22:38 ◼   ► And it is interesting.

02:22:42 ◼   ► I was never an iOS 7 hater, but iOS 7 definitely

02:22:45 ◼   ► debuted at the extreme end of the direction that it went,

02:22:50 ◼   ► which I think is the way that you go.

02:22:52 ◼   ► I think it's the right way to--

02:22:53 ◼   ► I think it was right for Apple to go push it

02:22:55 ◼   ► as far as they could with the thin fonts

02:22:58 ◼   ► and the translucency everywhere.

02:23:02 ◼   ► But they've dialed it back a lot of ways each step iOS 8 to 9

02:23:07 ◼   ► to 10.

02:23:10 ◼   ► And a lot of the changes you made in Overcast 3

02:23:13 ◼   ► really bring them to the forefront,

02:23:15 ◼   ► 'cause there were some things that have been there

02:23:17 ◼   ► in Overcast since 1.0 that are now gone,

02:23:20 ◼   ► but that didn't disappear until now,

02:23:22 ◼   ► like the popover that you would get

02:23:24 ◼   ► for the info on a podcast,

02:23:26 ◼   ► which you said you hated from the beginning.

02:23:28 ◼   ► - I did, I hated those popovers.

02:23:30 ◼   ► - Included in the use of popovers was translucency.

02:23:36 ◼   ► Like, iOS 7 introduced an awful lot of things

02:23:38 ◼   ► that were like a semi-translucent piece of glass,

02:23:42 ◼   ► or like it's, like the popover that I'm talking about

02:23:45 ◼   ► looked like it was printed on like frosted glass.

02:23:48 ◼   ► So you could like see that, like in a shower,

02:23:50 ◼   ► you can see that there's somebody in the shower,

02:23:52 ◼   ► but you can't see what they look like.

02:23:54 ◼   ► - Yeah, a lot of use of blur.

02:23:56 ◼   ► But because what happened was like,

02:23:57 ◼   ► at the time that iOS 7 came out,

02:24:00 ◼   ► whatever combination of hardware and software tricks,

02:24:03 ◼   ► blur is computationally intensive.

02:24:06 ◼   ► And so they basically couldn't do it before,

02:24:08 ◼   ► And on that year, I think it was 2013 that came out,

02:24:13 ◼   ► on that year of iPhones, they were finally powerful enough

02:24:17 ◼   ► to really do it and they came up with a couple

02:24:19 ◼   ► of neat software tricks to do it a little bit faster.

02:24:22 ◼   ► And so it was like they had this new technical ability

02:24:25 ◼   ► that was pretty rare before, especially,

02:24:27 ◼   ► and was not seen at all on mobile

02:24:29 ◼   ► 'cause it was too complex to do on mobile hardware.

02:24:32 ◼   ► And so they went nuts with it.

02:24:33 ◼   ► It was like, you know, typical,

02:24:34 ◼   ► when you get a new tech ability,

02:24:36 ◼   ► you first go nuts with it and then you dial it back.

02:24:38 ◼   ► and they certainly did.

02:24:40 ◼   ► - But I think what this update really focuses is

02:24:43 ◼   ► where we still use Blur, Apple still uses Blur extensively

02:24:47 ◼   ► in iOS 10, but instead of being like this foreground panel

02:24:51 ◼   ► that's in the front and that you see through,

02:24:54 ◼   ► it's the background that gets blurred.

02:24:56 ◼   ► So for example, when you do the force touch on an episode

02:25:00 ◼   ► to peak at it, the panel is not translucent,

02:25:05 ◼   ► but the background around it is,

02:25:07 ◼   ► which is, it's a subtle difference,

02:25:10 ◼   ► but I think it works much better.

02:25:13 ◼   ► Because it doesn't make the thing

02:25:14 ◼   ► you're looking at hard to read,

02:25:16 ◼   ► but it gives you this immediate context

02:25:19 ◼   ► of oh, this is temporary, this is just a little,

02:25:22 ◼   ► 'cause it's all blurry in the background,

02:25:23 ◼   ► I've popped this thing up.

02:25:24 ◼   ► - Yeah, 'cause the other thing about blur is like,

02:25:29 ◼   ► besides being computationally difficult,

02:25:31 ◼   ► it's also very hard to design around.

02:25:34 ◼   ► - Yes.

02:25:35 ◼   ► When you have these blurry foreground panes

02:25:38 ◼   ► and these large blurry expanses,

02:25:41 ◼   ► and then you have like, behind them you have

02:25:43 ◼   ► some bright pink icon shining through

02:25:45 ◼   ► and you have this pink blob in the blur area,

02:25:48 ◼   ► it's very hard to design around that

02:25:51 ◼   ► and to make that both legible and attractive

02:25:55 ◼   ► in all situations.

02:25:56 ◼   ► It's nearly impossible.

02:25:57 ◼   ► - And then the other difference that's definitely

02:26:02 ◼   ► moving directly away from iOS 7 is slightly thicker lines,

02:26:06 ◼   ► like icons and stuff like that,

02:26:08 ◼   ► like the sharing icon and stuff.

02:26:11 ◼   ► Everything isn't so wispy anymore.

02:26:13 ◼   ► It's a little, I wouldn't say it's thick lines,

02:26:16 ◼   ► but they're much more like regular lines.

02:26:19 ◼   ► - Oh, you should have seen the conversation

02:26:21 ◼   ► between me and Louis Mantia.

02:26:23 ◼   ► I designed the entire rest of the app myself,

02:26:26 ◼   ► and then I went to him, 'cause he made the original icon,

02:26:29 ◼   ► so I went to him to refresh the icon,

02:26:32 ◼   ► and I showed him the screenshot of the toolbar

02:26:37 ◼   ► on the main screen that has those four icons across the top

02:26:39 ◼   ► and he's like, what are you doing with the stroke width?

02:26:42 ◼   ► Because the lines on all the icons and everything

02:26:47 ◼   ► in all previous versions were one point wide,

02:26:51 ◼   ► which is two pixels on the 2X phones

02:26:54 ◼   ► and then three pixels or six, yeah, three pixels on,

02:26:58 ◼   ► anyway, so one point was what we had before.

02:27:02 ◼   ► I wanted to make everything a little bit thicker.

02:27:04 ◼   ► Two points in most things look too thick.

02:27:07 ◼   ► So the actual stroke width of most of the icons

02:27:12 ◼   ► in Overcast is 1.5 points.

02:27:15 ◼   ► And this makes everything suck.

02:27:18 ◼   ► This makes everything about icon design harder

02:27:22 ◼   ► because you can either have it blurry on all devices

02:27:26 ◼   ► or you can align things to quarter point boundaries

02:27:30 ◼   ► and have it work.

02:27:32 ◼   ► So that's what I did.

02:27:33 ◼   ► And when I tried to make another designer do that,

02:27:37 ◼   ► I got some pushback.

02:27:38 ◼   ► (laughing)

02:27:40 ◼   ► Eventually we worked it out.

02:27:42 ◼   ► But the result is that almost all the icons

02:27:47 ◼   ► in Overcast 3 have a 1.5 point stroke width

02:27:50 ◼   ► and it works and it looks sharp.

02:27:53 ◼   ► - So is that gonna work out well on the 3X iPhone X?

02:27:57 ◼   ► - So that's a question.

02:27:59 ◼   ► So basically, the way it works, the way I've aligned them

02:28:02 ◼   ► on these quarter pixel boundaries,

02:28:03 ◼   ► it is sharp on 2x.

02:28:06 ◼   ► On 3x, it is a little bit less sharp.

02:28:09 ◼   ► But there are so many pixels,

02:28:11 ◼   ► I'm kind of thinking you might not notice.

02:28:12 ◼   ► - Yeah, but on-- - 'Cause I don't,

02:28:13 ◼   ► I don't notice on the plus phones, now.

02:28:15 ◼   ► - Right.

02:28:16 ◼   ► We'll have to see.

02:28:20 ◼   ► Anyway, I think it's good work.

02:28:22 ◼   ► - Thanks.

02:28:22 ◼   ► - Anything else you wanted to talk about?

02:28:24 ◼   ► - I don't think so.

02:28:26 ◼   ► I mean, we've only been going for two and a half hours.

02:28:28 ◼   ► I mean, we still have three more to go, right?

02:28:30 ◼   ► - That's short for us, we gotta wrap it up.

02:28:32 ◼   ► - It really is short for us.

02:28:34 ◼   ► - How'd the release go?

02:28:36 ◼   ► You had that one bug you had to fix,

02:28:37 ◼   ► so you had to have one emergency bug in it,

02:28:39 ◼   ► but it seems like that got through.

02:28:40 ◼   ► Did you have to do an expedited review?

02:28:43 ◼   ► - No, it was just fast.

02:28:45 ◼   ► It was just that fast.

02:28:48 ◼   ► So yeah, I actually fixed, here, let me pull it up,

02:28:50 ◼   ► I fixed 13 kind of important day one bugs.

02:28:55 ◼   ► One of the things, I had a couple people on Twitter saying,

02:28:58 ◼   ► Why didn't you beta test this more with a bigger group?

02:29:00 ◼   ► Your beta group sucked.

02:29:01 ◼   ► And the reason why, literally, is secrecy.

02:29:06 ◼   ► Like, that's it.

02:29:07 ◼   ► It's a boring reason, but that's true.

02:29:09 ◼   ► I have done bigger betas before.

02:29:10 ◼   ► I've done betas where I've tried to fill

02:29:12 ◼   ► all 1,000 of my test flight slots,

02:29:15 ◼   ► and I came pretty close,

02:29:16 ◼   ► and I had like 800 people on one of them.

02:29:18 ◼   ► And I've done like kind of mediums,

02:29:19 ◼   ► where it's like 150 people,

02:29:22 ◼   ► and this one was something like 40 or 50 people.

02:29:24 ◼   ► And the reason why I kept it small

02:29:27 ◼   ► is because every previous beta I've done,

02:29:29 ◼   ► I've said in the instructions,

02:29:31 ◼   ► please don't share screenshots of this with anybody.

02:29:33 ◼   ► Please don't show this to people who aren't on the beta.

02:29:35 ◼   ► Like, please try to keep this under wraps.

02:29:37 ◼   ► And every single time it's been bigger

02:29:39 ◼   ► than my group of friends that I did this beta with,

02:29:42 ◼   ► people leak it.

02:29:43 ◼   ► Because, and it's not that they're trying to be devious,

02:29:45 ◼   ► they just don't read the directions.

02:29:47 ◼   ► And they think it's okay,

02:29:48 ◼   ► or they want to show it off or whatever else.

02:29:49 ◼   ► So I just didn't want that.

02:29:51 ◼   ► Like there was enough new stuff in this visually

02:29:55 ◼   ► that I did not want anybody sharing a screenshot

02:29:57 ◼   ► before I emailed it to the world.

02:29:59 ◼   ► And whether you think it's a valid excuse or not,

02:30:03 ◼   ► that was the reason.

02:30:04 ◼   ► And I knew I could trust this group of people

02:30:07 ◼   ► to be attentive to that and to be trustworthy of that,

02:30:10 ◼   ► so I tested it just with trusted friends.

02:30:12 ◼   ► And I found the number of bugs that you find

02:30:16 ◼   ► with larger groups of people actually isn't that much more.

02:30:19 ◼   ► - I don't think so either.

02:30:20 ◼   ► That's my experience. - It really isn't.

02:30:22 ◼   ► - I think the only way you could do it is do a public beta,

02:30:24 ◼   ► and then you will shake out more bugs in the aggregate,

02:30:28 ◼   ► but then you're completely blowing any kind of secrecy

02:30:31 ◼   ► 'cause it's a public beta.

02:30:32 ◼   ► - Yeah, exactly, and you kinda can't do that on iOS.

02:30:35 ◼   ► Like, that is kinda what I simulated

02:30:36 ◼   ► with my test flight invitation form

02:30:39 ◼   ► and with those previous tests, but it's, yeah.

02:30:42 ◼   ► It basically is, like, now I would do it

02:30:46 ◼   ► for a bug fix update because now, like,

02:30:48 ◼   ► there's nothing secret for the next few releases.

02:30:50 ◼   ► The next few releases are gonna be bug fixes

02:30:52 ◼   ► and minor feature additions.

02:30:53 ◼   ► So, like, I would consider doing it now,

02:30:54 ◼   ► but now it's not necessary anymore.

02:30:56 ◼   ► I really have found that keeping the beta small

02:30:58 ◼   ► is the way to go.

02:30:59 ◼   ► So anyway, fixed a couple of bugs.

02:31:01 ◼   ► - We had about 60 with Vesper, and our rule was,

02:31:03 ◼   ► I'm looking at the list right now,

02:31:04 ◼   ► 'cause we put them in the credits.

02:31:06 ◼   ► I would say out of the 60, at least 40 of them

02:31:08 ◼   ► are people who I would give my wallet to.

02:31:10 ◼   ► And our general, but that was like our general rule.

02:31:12 ◼   ► And the other 20 are ones that either Brent or Dave

02:31:16 ◼   ► would vouch for, you know, but the rule was

02:31:18 ◼   ► if you wanted somebody on the beta,

02:31:19 ◼   ► you'd have to be someone that you would verify

02:31:21 ◼   ► you'd trust with your wallet.

02:31:23 ◼   ► - Yeah, exactly.

02:31:24 ◼   ► And again, the benefit of having a lot more people on that

02:31:28 ◼   ► than that on a beta is fairly small.

02:31:31 ◼   ► It's severely diminishing returns.

02:31:33 ◼   ► So yeah, it was fine.

02:31:34 ◼   ► So anyway, I fixed all those bugs in a release

02:31:37 ◼   ► that went through today.

02:31:38 ◼   ► I created one also major bug during that release,

02:31:41 ◼   ► which is that now you can't create new playlists anymore.

02:31:45 ◼   ► So I have to fix that.

02:31:46 ◼   ► But otherwise, besides those things,

02:31:51 ◼   ► it's actually been great.

02:31:52 ◼   ► The servers haven't collapsed or anything.

02:31:55 ◼   ► Everything's pretty stable there.

02:31:56 ◼   ► So yeah, so far so good.

02:31:58 ◼   ► - I uncovered that bug while we were talking

02:32:00 ◼   ► about this earlier and I didn't want to tell you.

02:32:02 ◼   ► I didn't want to-- - The create playlist bug?

02:32:04 ◼   ► - Yeah, there's no save button.

02:32:07 ◼   ► - Yeah, that's a tough one.

02:32:09 ◼   ► - That's all right.

02:32:10 ◼   ► - That's all right.

02:32:11 ◼   ► Probably by the time that you actually publish this episode,

02:32:14 ◼   ► it might even be fixed.

02:32:15 ◼   ► - That's probably a good one. - 'Cause I'm probably gonna

02:32:16 ◼   ► have to issue an update tomorrow to fix that one

02:32:18 ◼   ► and hope it gets through App Review somewhat quickly.

02:32:20 ◼   ► I feel kind of I feel kind of guilty putting through like something in app review two days in a row

02:32:25 ◼   ► But I feel like they've got the wheels to turn it over there where that's not you shouldn't feel guilty

02:32:31 ◼   ► It seems like they've just got you know, they've really upped up the capacity

02:32:35 ◼   ► I mean, I've heard because like I'm not requesting fast reviews like they just happen to be going through quickly

02:32:40 ◼   ► Yeah, yeah, I think especially if you don't request an expedited review just just fix it however often you want

02:32:47 ◼   ► Yeah, I feel like I'd be like put on some like bad list, you know, I don't like every day for a while

02:32:53 ◼   ► I don't know maybe if it kept up for a very long time

02:32:55 ◼   ► But even then it might be more like let's make sure this guy isn't do anything suspicious. Yeah, that's true

02:33:01 ◼   ► Well Marco, thank you for your time

02:33:04 ◼   ► Thank you. Everybody can listen to your the dulcet tones of your voice on a very regular weekly basis at

02:33:11 ◼   ► ATP FM which is literally my favorite podcast

02:33:16 ◼   ► Thank you.

02:33:18 ◼   ► I do notice, though, you cheat, and it

02:33:20 ◼   ► sorts to the top of the list in Overcast.

02:33:25 ◼   ► You would not believe how many people think that--

02:33:30 ◼   ► well, I mean, it's not a lot of people.

02:33:31 ◼   ► You think that ATP is first because it's the shares?

02:33:35 ◼   ► I do get the occasional angry email or one-star App Store

02:33:40 ◼   ► review from people who think that the entire reason I made

02:33:45 ◼   ► overcast was to promote my own podcast and that that's why it shows up in the most recommended

02:33:51 ◼   ► list sometimes that I've hard coded it to appear there.

02:33:55 ◼   ► Oh, did I tell you I'm changing the name of my show?

02:33:59 ◼   ► AAA talk show.

02:34:02 ◼   ► Like the yellow pages.

02:34:03 ◼   ► AAA talk show.

02:34:04 ◼   ► AAA talk show.

02:34:05 ◼   ► Exactly.

02:34:06 ◼   ► Oh, I wanted that.

02:34:07 ◼   ► That reminds me.

02:34:08 ◼   ► That's amazing that you said that.

02:34:09 ◼   ► I want I have I have some follow up from like an episode 10 weeks ago on ATP.

02:34:13 ◼   ► You were.

02:34:14 ◼   ► Of course.

02:34:15 ◼   ► You were confused about minor league baseball and why single A and double A. Yes. Triple A.

02:34:22 ◼   ► It's just more A's are better. So why aren't the major leagues quadruple A?

02:34:28 ◼   ► They are in concept. You could think of them as...

02:34:34 ◼   ► My whole question was like why is triple A like the top tier in video game budget terms?

02:34:41 ◼   ► Right. But like this kind of minor league thing in baseball?

02:34:44 ◼   ► Yeah, I think that it's a different I think that I don't know that's actually a good question on the video games

02:34:49 ◼   ► I suspect that the triple-a for video games has absolutely nothing to do with baseball that it doesn't come from baseball that it's some other

02:34:56 ◼   ► Some other route so are there single-a and double-a teams? Yes, they're single-a

02:35:02 ◼   ► Which is really regional and then double-a is a little bit bigger triple-a is is elite

02:35:08 ◼   ► it's people most of the people on a triple-a team are the

02:35:14 ◼   ► or at least have the potential to play Major League Baseball.

02:35:17 ◼   ► And then you can think of Major League Baseball

02:35:19 ◼   ► as Quadruple-A baseball, but nobody calls it that.

02:35:23 ◼   ► Nobody ever would, 'cause it's not minor league.

02:35:25 ◼   ► - What are the Columbus Clippers?

02:35:27 ◼   ► - I have no idea.

02:35:28 ◼   ► And there's also-- - Oh, it says Triple-A.

02:35:30 ◼   ► - There's also-- - They're all Triple-A

02:35:31 ◼   ► affiliated with the Cleveland Indians.

02:35:32 ◼   ► - There's also independent leagues, which are,

02:35:37 ◼   ► so I believe it's the case, I could be wrong,

02:35:39 ◼   ► but I believe it's the case that every single A,

02:35:41 ◼   ► AA and AAA team is affiliated with a major league team.

02:35:46 ◼   ► So like the Yankees own a AAA team and a AA team

02:35:50 ◼   ► and an A team.

02:35:51 ◼   ► But then there's independent leagues

02:35:52 ◼   ► which aren't affiliated with a major league team.

02:35:56 ◼   ► I think right over the river here in Philly,

02:35:58 ◼   ► the Trenton, whatever they're called,

02:36:01 ◼   ► Land Sharks or Rat Sharks or whatever the hell

02:36:03 ◼   ► they're called are unaffiliated.

02:36:05 ◼   ► - The Rat Sharks, that's it, yeah.

02:36:06 ◼   ► - Yeah, they're an independent team.

02:36:09 ◼   ► And so they're not affiliated with a major league team.

02:36:11 ◼   ► So, but they, they, they, some of them are like single A and some of them are even like

02:36:18 ◼   ► double A they say, but for the most part, they're, they're just players who are having

02:36:22 ◼   ► trouble getting picked up by a major league team.

02:36:24 ◼   ► Anyway, I figured I'd explain that to you.

02:36:26 ◼   ► Thanks.

02:36:27 ◼   ► Yeah.

02:36:28 ◼   ► I actually, I didn't realize that, that like they weren't just all triple A. No, like I'm

02:36:31 ◼   ► seeing now like, like the only two teams I know of are the Columbus Clippers.

02:36:34 ◼   ► Cause that's, that was my team growing up in Columbus.

02:36:36 ◼   ► Like we'd go there like on school field trips cause it costs nothing and they actually are

02:36:41 ◼   ► AAA apparently associated with the Indians and then now that I'm in New York the nearest team

02:36:47 ◼   ► I think of this of this caliber is the Long Island Ducks

02:36:50 ◼   ► which are apparently independent there in the

02:36:53 ◼   ► The Liberty division of the Atlantic League of Professional Baseball, which is not affiliated with the MLB

02:36:59 ◼   ► Here to have no A's

02:37:02 ◼   ► They don't have any days. No a baseball team. It's not Trenton. It's Camden. It's the Camden River Sharks

02:37:09 ◼   ► You were close. Yeah. Yeah the Trenton rat sharks close enough. Yeah

02:37:12 ◼   ► What I love about these games like cuz I don't you know, I I wish I cared about sports

02:37:17 ◼   ► I really do and because I like I know the rules of all the games

02:37:20 ◼   ► I just don't care about the teams and so I don't get into it. But like I I like the

02:37:25 ◼   ► Experience of seeing a game in person with friends who care about it

02:37:29 ◼   ► Like that's a that's a nice thing to do

02:37:31 ◼   ► And so I love triple-a baseball because you can go to these stadiums with basically no advanced notice whatsoever

02:37:37 ◼   ► You can get amazing seats for almost no money

02:37:39 ◼   ► And you can go have a really good time and you can watch a game

02:37:43 ◼   ► With great seats and everything and you know, the food is not exorbitant

02:37:47 ◼   ► or relatively speaking and you know

02:37:50 ◼   ► You just have a really nice time and it's much less of an ordeal and much less expensive and much better quality of

02:37:55 ◼   ► Like, you know your seats and everything compared to a major league game as long as you don't care about teams

02:38:01 ◼   ► Which I don't so it's perfect

02:38:04 ◼   ► Yeah, the Camden River Sharks. I've gone to see them a couple times with Jonas and you can go in for like three bucks and

02:38:09 ◼   ► front row and then you get and it's even cooler if the kids are you know, like a younger age

02:38:14 ◼   ► You know

02:38:16 ◼   ► like when Jonas was playing Little League when he was a little younger because then it's like after the game you can get autographs from

02:38:20 ◼   ► The players and stuff like that and you know, it seems super cool. It's like holy cow

02:38:24 ◼   ► This guy was out there playing professional baseball 15 minutes ago. Now he's signing my hat. You can't get that in a major

02:38:30 ◼   ► Here's it. Here's a Quora answer. Why are big-budget games called triple-a?

02:38:33 ◼   ► This seems this seems pretty credible. I mean although is always the best

02:38:37 ◼   ► Way back in the old days games in old days studios had a B and C titles in the catalog a games were made in-house

02:38:45 ◼   ► with your developers and they were your main products the B titles were either add-on content for your a titles or

02:38:51 ◼   ► new but slightly more humble games created by third-party developers that you

02:38:56 ◼   ► Would specify and then C titles were the older classic SK use now reduced to a value price or small games people brought in and?

02:39:03 ◼   ► a nearly finished state to be published, even non-game add-ons like Screensavers and stuff

02:39:10 ◼   ► like that.

02:39:11 ◼   ► And of course, the industry is full of hyperbole and bluster, so everything was new, was bigger

02:39:15 ◼   ► and better, and so the biggest A titles eventually began to be described as AA, or A+ to emphasize

02:39:23 ◼   ► that they were even better than A games.

02:39:26 ◼   ► And it wasn't long until the AAA moniker arrived.

02:39:29 ◼   ► like the number of blades in disposable razors. Watch for 5A games coming soon.

02:39:34 ◼   ► That's a pretty good answer. Yeah, I find that to be a very good answer. A, B, and C,

02:39:40 ◼   ► and then it went to double A just to plus it up a little bit. That's probably how minor

02:39:46 ◼   ► league baseball got it too. Probably used to be the same thing, and then they have a

02:39:50 ◼   ► better team and they say that. I will leave that as your homework this week to research

02:39:54 ◼   ► that. All right, thank you, Marco. Thank you.